WEBVTT - The Burning Mountains of Io, Part 2

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:12.720 --> 0:00:15.160
<v Speaker 2>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 2>is Robert Lamb and.

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:18.919
<v Speaker 3>I am Joe McCormick, and we're back with part two

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:23.279
<v Speaker 3>in our series on Jupiter's innermost moon, Io, the most

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 3>volcanic body in our Solar system, and, as I argued

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 3>in the last episode, one of the most fascinating and

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 3>dramatic places we know of beyond Earth. So if you

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 3>haven't heard part one, we would recommend going back to

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 3>listen to that one first. But for a brief recap

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 3>of what we talked about last time. We started off

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:44.840
<v Speaker 3>talking about how I got interested in revisiting Io because

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 3>we did do a series of episodes on Jupiter's moons

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:50.480
<v Speaker 3>at large several years back, but I wanted to come

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 3>back and do a closer pass on Io, in particular

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 3>because I got visually obsessed with some images produced by

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 3>the NASA Juno mission in the past year or so.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 3>Guess it's actually little bit over a year because some

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 3>of the data that we were looking at was collected

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 3>in late twenty twenty three. But we talked about several

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 3>of these images in detail, about the strangely polychrome surface

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 3>of the Moon and its truly fascinating surface features, including

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 3>gigantic blade like mountains, vast sulfurous plains, hundreds of erupting volcanoes,

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 3>enormous hellish lava lakes rippling with lava waves, and lava

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 3>flows stretching hundreds of kilometers, all situated within a land

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 3>that is at once burning hot and freezing cold. So

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 3>it is, as Bart Simpson might say, a land of contrasts,

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:46.119
<v Speaker 3>but also just a place of enormous physical and sort

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 3>of geological drama. We also talked a little bit about

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 3>the history of the exploration of Io, at least going

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 3>back to Carl Sagan's account of the discoveries made by

0:01:55.680 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 3>the Voyager Probe in nineteen seventy nine. Around then talked

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 3>about the extremely thin sulfur dioxide atmosphere of Io, which

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 3>is generated initially by venting from the Moon's volcanoes and

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 3>subsequently by the cyclical freezing and sublimation of sulfur dioxide

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 3>frost on the surface, freezing when the Moon passes into

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 3>Jupiter's shadow, then transitioning into gas again once back in

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 3>the sunlight. We also talked a good bit about the

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 3>Greek myth of the Moon's namesake, sort of the themes of

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 3>the Io story, especially in Ovid's telling and other versions

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 3>of the story, and the way the tale was said

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 3>in ancient times to interlock with Egyptian religious figures such

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 3>as the goddess Isis, Shepherd of the dead, and the

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 3>Sacred Mother of Pharaoh's And we are back today to

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 3>talk once again about Io.

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:53.079
<v Speaker 3>So there's something we didn't really talk about at all

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 3>last time, and that was the use of IO as

0:02:56.919 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 3>a setting or plot device in science fiction, which, you know,

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 3>despite all of its, at least to me, really apparent

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 3>aesthetic virtues as a setting for a story, it doesn't

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 3>really seem to be a favorite place within our solar

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 3>system for sci fi writers. Or maybe I'm wrong about that.

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 3>Maybe it's just not in a lot of stories I've read.

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 3>But I was having trouble thinking of many examples in

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 3>which it featured in stories I knew. I think it

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 3>showed up at some point briefly in the Expanse, and

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:29.679
<v Speaker 3>I can't really think of many other examples.

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, even in the Expanse. And I'm a little foggy

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 2>on where it shows up or doesn't show up if

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 2>it's in the novels by James S. A. Corey, or

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 2>if it's in the TV adaptation. I've only read the

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 2>first book in the series, Leviathan Wiggs, but I watched

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 2>the entire run of the show. But even then, I

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 2>think maybe it only partially factored in there. And I

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 2>think one of the possibilities here is that i Owe

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 2>is a moon that we know to be rather extreme

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 2>and hostile, for even our sci fi visions and fantasies

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 2>tend to give it a little safe distance.

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 3>You know, it doesn't seem like a top candidate for colonization.

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, in well, I don't want to spoil too

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 4>much of the plot if people aren't familiar with the expanse,

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 4>but I do remember it pops up as the location

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 4>of a quite cursed laboratory.

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Yes, they're working on a particular molecule. Yes, yes. Now.

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 2>One place you do see Io pop up as a

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 2>setting is the nineteen eighty one gritty sci fi western Outland.

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 2>This one starred Sean Connery and Peter Boyle, has some

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 2>other fairly big names sprinkled throughout the cast as well.

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Directed by Peter Hyam's and I guess they chose Io

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 2>as a setting here because it would be such a

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 2>horrible place to work. It's the horrible working conditions and

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:55.479
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of like labor dispute in this particular

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 2>sci fi vision, you know, eighty one, that's not too

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 2>long after Ridley Scott's a and it's a film that

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 2>you could almost assume to be in the same universe,

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 2>you know. It's that sort of very gritty, essentially near

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 2>future vision of science fiction that is very much focused

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 2>on like the working man in space.

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 3>I have meant to see this for years and never

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 3>have it. It's intrigued me ever since my days of

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:26.359
<v Speaker 3>like in high school flipping through you know, stacks of

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 3>DVDs at the used bookstore in town because it really

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:34.160
<v Speaker 3>pops because it's Sean Connery holding a shotgun, dressed like

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 3>a cop, except he's in space. So strange vibes from

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 3>the get go. But I've read that if you didn't

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:43.359
<v Speaker 3>already say this, I've read that this one is supposed

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 3>to be like a Western but in space.

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 2>Correct. Yeah, And I saw it many many years ago,

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 2>but I'm a little foggy on the details. But it

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 2>is gritty, it is very much a Western in space.

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 2>A lot of it concerns explosive decompression, people's heads exploding

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 2>inside a set of suits, and yeah, terrible labor conditions. Now,

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 2>one thing about it that I wasn't familiar with until

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 2>very recently is there was a comic book adaptation of

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 2>it for heavy metal, I believe, by comics legend Jim Staranco,

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 2>and I include a few stills from it here for you, Joe.

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 2>I've seen people talk about this online almost in terms

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 2>of like a lost classic, Like it's apparently hard to

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 2>get your hands on, but it's got some very impressive

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 2>line work and just some really beautiful imagery. I mean,

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 2>like I say that the film itself has a very

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 2>gritty air to it, and that flavor is still present

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 2>in the comic book apparently, but it also has this

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 2>like extra like wilder vibe going on.

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:48.039
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, it's one of those comic book art styles

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 3>where even apparently static objects seem to radiate with energy.

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:56.239
<v Speaker 3>It's just I don't know what you call that style,

0:06:56.240 --> 0:07:00.479
<v Speaker 3>but it's where everything looks dynamic, like the style of

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 3>drawing is of a reality in which everything is about

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 3>to explode.

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:07.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'd be very interested to hear from anyone who's

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:09.280
<v Speaker 2>read the comic book. There was also an Alan Deine

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 2>Foster novelization, so it has that in common with Alien

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 2>and Aliens and Alien three as well. But as far

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 2>as the treatment of Io in the motion picture and

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 2>in the comic book, basically it's a hell world where

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 2>they just decided to put a mining colony of some

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 2>sort and then prioritize profits over human safety. Yeah, so

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 2>it's the perfect setting for that. Now I had to

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 2>hunt around a little bit more defined examples of Io

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 2>being used as a setting in other sci fi visions.

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 2>There's a nineteen ninety four mini series titled Escape from

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Jupiter that concerns an escape from Io. Apparently it's an

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Australian kids adventure and it's also has Steve Bisley in it,

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 2>who's in a number of I think it was in

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 2>at least one of the Mad Max films.

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 3>Oh, okay, I don't reckon him by name. Yeah, well

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 3>maybe what if I saw him? Is this a screenshot

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 3>you've got from it with the bright colors?

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's one of the most nineteen nineties TV images

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 2>you could possibly look up online.

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, what what was the name of it? Wasn't there

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 3>like a Canadian kids sci fi show, sort of a

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 3>Star Trek for kids that was on Nickelodeon in the nineties.

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 3>It was like Space Cases or something.

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Maybe that's ringing a bell only.

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 3>The foggiest memory, but this is reminding me of that,

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 3>except I recall that had a darker look and this

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 3>is very pastel.

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Now. There's also a twenty nineteen film titled Io. This

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 2>was apparently one that was put out on Netflix and

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 2>I haven't seen it, but it concerns refugees of a

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 2>destroyed Earth living on a space station near Io. It

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 2>stars Margaret Qualley of the Substance fame, Anthony Mackie, and

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 2>Danny Houston. Again, I haven't seen this one, but apparently

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:58.559
<v Speaker 2>it's one. It was released on Netflix. I have to say,

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 2>in the one still I found from or a production

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 2>image promotionary image, doesn't look very pizza in the background.

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 3>No looks this is very gray. One of those shows

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 3>where all the colors washed out. To be fair, this

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 3>is just a still. I don't know the show, but

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 3>marketing department is not selling me on it with this

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 3>color here.

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 2>All right. Now, In terms of written sci fi, there

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 2>are at least there at least two examples to call out.

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 2>There's The Mad Moon by Stanley Jen g Weinbaum. This

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 2>is from nineteen thirty five, same individual who wrote a

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Martian Odyssey, and it features two different alien species that

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 2>are supposed to be native to Io and there's a

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 2>human colony. I haven't read that one, but I did

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 2>read a story he wrote titled The Planet of Doubt,

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:48.959
<v Speaker 2>which I did a Monster Fact episode back in twenty

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:51.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty three, So I'm going to make sure that I

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 2>re air that one either this week or the following

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 2>week so you don't have to go look it up again.

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 2>But it's a pretty fun one. This guy had a real,

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 2>real creative mind for dreaming up alien creatures that you know,

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 2>often reflected some of the stranger biological examples we have

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 2>on our own planet, but with you know, a nineteen

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.840
<v Speaker 2>thirties or slightly later sci fi spin.

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 3>But now nineteen thirties, so that's long before Voyager. I'm

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 3>wondering what did we actually know about Io at that

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 3>point to inform a vision of the biology that would

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 3>arise there.

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, that may maybe not enough to know that two

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 2>indigenous species of any human colony were not maybe that likely.

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 2>We have some caveats on the whole life on IO thing. Well,

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 2>we'll come back to it though. Another one that came

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:44.079
<v Speaker 2>out though is The Very Pulse of the Machine by

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Michael Swanwick. This is from nineteen ninety eight and it

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 2>concerns a possibly sentient IO. It was adapted into an

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 2>episode of Love, Death and Robots on Netflix again, Netflix

0:10:56.760 --> 0:11:00.679
<v Speaker 2>loves Io with the main character voice by McKinsey Davis,

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:03.319
<v Speaker 2>who's been in things like Halden Catch Fire and I

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 2>believe the more recent Blade Runner of film.

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:08.319
<v Speaker 3>So when you say sentient io, you're talking about the

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 3>moon itself, the planetary body being a sentient organism or

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 3>sentient in some way.

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I believe so, And I haven't read the story,

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 2>but I have seen this episode of Love, Death and Robots,

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 2>and I just the only thing I remember about it

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 2>is that it looked beautiful and it concerned bad things

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 2>happening in space on the Moon.

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 3>That sounds kind of like silarious, But having not seen it,

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to be overly broad about that.

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 2>But there's a fair amount of variety in Love, Death

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 2>and Robots. It's a really fun series, but there are

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 2>a number of episodes I think that you can describe

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 2>as bad things happen to people in space. So maybe

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 2>some of those bleed together in my memory.

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to write some sci fi where only good

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 3>things happen to people in space.

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 2>There you go, That's what we need, you know, we

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 2>need a dash of the more of the Star Trek

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 2>optimism these days.

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 3>Like page three hundred, people just wake up, Oh splendid

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 3>day once again, smooth sailing.

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 2>So that's what I've got. Now, there may be some

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 2>other fantastic examples or just even marginally interesting examples of

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 2>IO in science fiction. So if you have any of those,

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 2>do write in. We'd love to share them with everyone

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 2>else on a future listener mail episode.

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, especially if it's something that takes the real physical

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 3>characteristics of IO seriously as either a source of creating

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 3>alien biology or something people on the planet would have

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 3>on the moon would have to live with. Yeah, right

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 3>in contact at stuff to Blow your mind dot com.

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah again. One of the challenges though, is we've been

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 2>discussing it and will continue to discuss It's just it's

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 2>a very extreme place. There are there are I'm not

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 2>going to say there are more interesting Jovian moons, But

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 2>there are other Jovian moons that are better candidates for

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 2>things like some sort of life form being present there potentially,

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 2>or there being some possibility for human colonization or outpost efforts,

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 2>and so.

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 3>Forth, bridging to the next thing I wanted to talk about.

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 3>Even though Io, and as you said, we'll get into

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 3>this a bit more later, might not be the best

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 3>place to search for alien life, might not be the

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 3>best place for humans to colonize, that doesn't mean it

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 3>is a place without mysteries of its own. There can

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 3>be mysteries of a quite inorganic nature that I still

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 3>think are pretty compelling, and I wanted to bring up

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 3>one of those, the mystery dunes of Io. So Rob

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 3>to start off with, I'm gonna have you look at

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 3>two images side by side in our outline here, and

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 3>folks at home, we will describe them for you so

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 3>you understand what we're looking at. On the right, we

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:58.839
<v Speaker 3>have a satellite image. This is taken from above the

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 3>Namib Desert, which is on the west facing Atlantic coast

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:06.679
<v Speaker 3>of Southern Africa, and that desert covers parts of the

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 3>coastal region of Angola, South Africa, and primarily Namibia. Now,

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 3>looking down at this desert from an orbital perspective, we

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 3>can see a beautiful, almost hypnotic pattern repeating across the

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 3>sandy expanse. Those are dunes, and sand dunes are characteristic

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 3>of many, but certainly not all, desert environments on Earth.

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Some desert environments are very rocky, others are very cold,

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 3>places you might find ice fields, and then other desert

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 3>environments are the places you would find vast expanses of

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 3>sand dunes. Sand Dunes on Earth are formed primarily by

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 3>what are called Eolian forces, meaning they're created by the

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 3>action of wind, and actually the influence of wind comes

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 3>in at multiple stages because if you go way back

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 3>to the point of of the sand, wind along with water,

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 3>plays a role in the weathering and the transportation of rocks.

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 3>So you start off with rocks. You might have rocks

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 3>in the mountains or something, and they are broken up

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 3>by weathering, they get rained on, or they get the

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 3>wind blows on them, and various forces break those rocks

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 3>up into smaller pieces which can then be transported by

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 3>water and by wind downhill into places where they collect,

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 3>and over time those pieces of rock are continually broken

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 3>down into smaller and smaller pieces by further weathering and

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 3>erosion and transport, and the smallest sizes of mineral grains.

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 3>You might remember this if you listen to our series

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 3>on dust, are known as from larger to smaller are

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 3>known as sand, silt, and then clay. Sand Dunes are

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 3>created in areas where sand collects, So after the rocks

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 3>are weathered and eroded and then the sand is broken

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 3>down in transport, it'll sort of end up in some

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 3>kind of catching place, a depression, usually a lower lying area,

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 3>And when the wind blows it can move sand particles

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 3>along with it, And this is something yet again we

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 3>talked about in our series on dust. The term for

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 3>the process by which sand is moved around by the

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 3>wind is known as saltation. So you can get different

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 3>ways that the wind interacts with sediments and rock pieces

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 3>of different sizes. So you know, a larger rock, the

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 3>wind blows against it, it's not going anywhere. Maybe a

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 3>pebble the wind blows against it, it might kind of

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 3>move it a little bit, or a pebble might get

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 3>blown off another a pile of other pebbles and kind

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 3>of tumble a little bit, but it doesn't really go

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 3>much of anywhere unless you get really high winds. And

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 3>then meanwhile, if you go all the way down to

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 3>the sort of the dust size of grains of sediment,

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 3>the wind can pick it up and carry it up

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 3>into the atmosphere and then the dust just you know,

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 3>it is borne a lot for a long long time.

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 3>It can travel anywhere. It can travel across the land,

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 3>across the ocean, end up in different places. But sand

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 3>is in this middle zone where it's subject primarily to

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 3>the forces known as saltation. When wind blows on sand,

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:17.679
<v Speaker 3>the sand will be blown along the surface of the ground,

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 3>or will follow the surface of whatever sort of the

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 3>base layer of the earth is, and it will will

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.680
<v Speaker 3>be kicked up, and it'll kind of jump and bounce

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:30.640
<v Speaker 3>and then come back down and hit the sand, and

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 3>that will cause other pieces of sand to kind of

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 3>get knocked out of place when the initial piece of

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 3>sand lands, So it creates this kind of bouncing, jumping,

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 3>hopping motion as sand is blown along by the wind,

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:48.440
<v Speaker 3>As sand gets blown along by the wind, as saltation

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:52.119
<v Speaker 3>is going on. At some point the flow of wind

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 3>driven sand can become obstructed. Maybe it gets caught on

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 3>an obstacle like there's a bush, or maybe it falls

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 3>behind an obstacle like a bush or piece of vegetation,

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:07.439
<v Speaker 3>and then the wind cannot exert as much of a

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 3>force on it anymore, so it just kind of like

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 3>sits there and grains can pile up, or maybe it

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 3>gets blown against the side of a slightly elevated pile

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 3>of other grains of sand and it gets stuck there

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 3>instead of moving on and from here, these places where

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 3>sand starts to collect can be a self reinforcing process,

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 3>where a mound of sand just gets bigger and bigger

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 3>as the wind forces blowing sand particles against it cause

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:41.120
<v Speaker 3>the particles to collect around this mound in one way

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 3>or another. So a common format of sand dune that

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 3>you will get in places, especially where the dominant winds

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 3>are blowing primarily in one direction, is that the side

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:58.120
<v Speaker 3>of the sand dune facing the wind will be a smoother, slower,

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:00.880
<v Speaker 3>more gradual slope, and then the side of the sand

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 3>dune facing away from the dominant winds will be a

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:07.119
<v Speaker 3>much steeper, sharper slope. And what's usually happening is the

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:11.400
<v Speaker 3>wind is blowing sand along and it's eroding sand from

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 3>the middle of the rising slope on the windward side,

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 3>and then trying to deposit it right at the crest,

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 3>right at the peak of the dune. And in this way,

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 3>over years and years, more and more sand accumulates. But

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 3>sand dunes don't just grow higher and higher forever. Eventually

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 3>a sand dune will collapse, not totally disappearing, but losing height.

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:39.160
<v Speaker 3>And this happens when one side of the dune becomes

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:45.440
<v Speaker 3>too steep, exceeding what is called the angle of repose. Now,

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 3>this is a kind of cool physics principle. I think

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 3>we may have talked about this on the show before,

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 3>but the angle of repose is the steepest angle that

0:19:54.800 --> 0:20:00.199
<v Speaker 3>a pile of sediment or whatever other granular substance can

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:04.120
<v Speaker 3>attain before it collapses under its own weight. In fact,

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:06.359
<v Speaker 3>I wonder if we talked about the angle of repose

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 3>in when we were talking about the ant lion, because

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 3>I believe that is a factor in the construction of

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:16.159
<v Speaker 3>their conical traps. That you know, they make them so

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:19.920
<v Speaker 3>just so that they're sort of right on the edge,

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:22.679
<v Speaker 3>and it's easy for the sides to start collapsing and

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:24.640
<v Speaker 3>pull an ant down if they fall in.

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 2>That may be a place where it's come up before. Yeah.

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:31.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Now, the angle of repose is not a universal constant.

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:35.479
<v Speaker 3>It instead depends on a number of variables about the

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 3>material you're piling up. So you know, different types of sand,

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:43.959
<v Speaker 3>different grain sizes of sand, like the amount of friction

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:47.439
<v Speaker 3>between the particles, how big the particles are on average,

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 3>stuff like that will all affect what the angle of

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 3>repose is for a pile of this stuff. But I

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:56.439
<v Speaker 3>was reading that. I was reading on an information page

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 3>by the USGS. This was a page about Sand Dune's

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 3>National Park in Colorado. The angle of repose for sand

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:06.879
<v Speaker 3>is usually between thirty and thirty four degrees, so once

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 3>it gets steeper than that, the dune will collapse. And this,

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 3>in part explains why when you're looking at pictures of

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 3>sand dunes in the desert, you will, as I said,

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 3>often see them with this one smooth side, kind of

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:23.479
<v Speaker 3>a gentler slope on one side ascending at a shallower angle,

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:25.919
<v Speaker 3>and then the other side will fall off at a

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:29.120
<v Speaker 3>steeper angle with an almost kind of sheared off texture.

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:32.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, looking like someone is sliced into it to get

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:36.160
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of the dessert. That's sort of a look.

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 3>Yes, exactly. So generally the smoother side is facing the

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 3>dominant winds, where the sediment continues to be eroded from

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 3>the slope going up and then tries, and then the

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 3>wind deposits more and more of it at the crest,

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:53.399
<v Speaker 3>and then it gets steeper and steeper on the downwind

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 3>side until it collapses. And of course there's also going

0:21:56.600 --> 0:22:00.040
<v Speaker 3>to be some sand grains falling over the top of

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 3>the dune and then ending up down sort of in

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 3>the shelter from the wind on the leeward side. And

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 3>sand dunes are really interesting, you know, you can if

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:13.120
<v Speaker 3>you watch them over long periods of time, they can

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 3>start to seem less like the geological formations we're used to.

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we know that mountains move over time, but

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's really hard to imagine how mountains move.

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 3>You really have to just sort of think outside of

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 3>the human timescale. Dunes are kind of somewhere in between

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:34.239
<v Speaker 3>mountains and the waves in the ocean. Over periods of

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:37.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, months or years, dunes will will creep across

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 3>the surface of the Earth. So that's dunes on Earth. However,

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Rob I want to come back and have you look

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 3>at the photos we started with, So the one we

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:48.719
<v Speaker 3>were looking at first is sand dunes on Earth. But

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 3>then the photo I've got for you here on the

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:55.399
<v Speaker 3>left is a photo of Io. So what we see

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 3>on the lower left hand side of the image is

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 3>a kind of dark spreading expanse that has a sort

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 3>of creepy organic outline, kind of like if you zoom

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 3>way out, like a flood pouring through topography. And researchers

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:12.119
<v Speaker 3>think that this area in the photo of Io is

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:15.879
<v Speaker 3>probably one of those relatively fresh lava flows that we

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:18.119
<v Speaker 3>talked about last time. You know, a lot of the

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 3>surface of Io is affected by lava flows, and that

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 3>they can be huge, enormous, hundreds of kilometers of just

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:30.679
<v Speaker 3>lava flows. And this helps contribute, of course to what

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.199
<v Speaker 3>Carl Sagan said about the moon right. He said that

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 3>Io is a place of relatively rapid change by planetary standards.

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Major changes to the surface of Io can occur on

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:43.479
<v Speaker 3>a timescale of months. But if you look at the

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 3>other side of this image from Galileo, not the dark side,

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:50.880
<v Speaker 3>but the lighter colored side, we see not lava flows,

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 3>but these pale reflective ripples thousands of them arrayed in

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 3>a repeating pattern, kind of like what you would see

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 3>in like when you can see a standing wave of

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:04.879
<v Speaker 3>emerging in a fluid, or you know, if you like

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:08.439
<v Speaker 3>a rattle, you like rattle a speaker, and then on

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:10.920
<v Speaker 3>top of it there's some sand. You get these emerging things.

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 3>One thing I wanted to compare it to was like

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 3>a silver reptile skin. It has almost kind of a

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 3>pebbly lizard texture.

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 2>It does.

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 3>But actually when you see him side by side here

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 3>this looks quite a lot like satellite photos of desert

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:28.640
<v Speaker 3>dunes on Earth. But could that really be what they are?

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 3>Because remember what we talked about in the previous episode.

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 3>Io only has the most tenuous, ghost like suggestion of

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 3>an atmosphere. It's composed primarily of sulfur dioxide with a

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 3>few other trace constituents. And for a comparison of how

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:50.359
<v Speaker 3>thin Io's atmosphere is, I was looking for, you know,

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 3>what's the difference between Earth's atmosphere and iOS And I

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 3>actually found a twenty twenty press release from the National

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 3>Science Foundation that addressed this. They crunch the numbers and

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 3>they say that i Io's atmosphere is roughly a billion

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 3>times thinner than Earth's It is barely an atmosphere at all,

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 3>thicker than the even more tenuous exosphere of Earth's moon,

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 3>which I was looking that up. Also, apparently Earth's moon

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 3>has such a thin layer of gas that there are

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 3>only about one hundred molecules of gas per cubic centimeter

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:25.199
<v Speaker 3>near its surface. So iOS is thicker than that, but

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 3>still not thick enough to cause irrosive wind patterns like

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:31.439
<v Speaker 3>we have on Earth. So if there's not enough of

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:36.120
<v Speaker 3>an atmosphere to sustain significant winds on Io, and if

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 3>dunes are generally created by Eolien forces by wind, what's

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:45.360
<v Speaker 3>making the dunes or are they actually dunes at all?

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:47.679
<v Speaker 3>So just a couple of years ago, there was a

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 3>paper that actually addressed this question. It was published in

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Nature Communications by MacDonald at All and the title is

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 3>this will answer some of the questions Eolian sediment transport

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 3>on IO from lava frost interactions and for context. I

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:07.159
<v Speaker 3>was also reading about this in a Rutgers University press

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 3>release by Kiddy Macpheerson from April twenty twenty two that

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 3>had some quotes from the authors. So, first of all,

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:19.639
<v Speaker 3>to answer the question, are these dunes previous researchers had

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:23.360
<v Speaker 3>noted that the features which are generally turned termed ridges

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 3>in the astronomy context or the planetary science context. These

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 3>features that they had been noticed for their similarity to

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 3>eli and sand dunes on planets like Earth and Mars.

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Mars has dunes as well, But these previous investigations usually argued, no,

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 3>these are probably not dunes formed by wind. For the

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 3>reasons that we've already raised. The atmosphere of Io is

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 3>not thick enough to really have wind. It's not thick

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:57.920
<v Speaker 3>enough to lift sediment and move it around. And again,

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 3>this moving around of sediment by s particles by wind

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 3>would be saltation. So remember that when it comes up

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 3>in these quotes. The authors of the paperwright quote choosing

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 3>zero point one nanobars as a representative atmospheric pressure. One

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:17.439
<v Speaker 3>study estimated a twenty kilometer per second threshold friction speed

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 3>to move grains on Io, two orders of magnitude greater

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 3>than Io's roughly three hundred meters per second wins, concluding

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:30.120
<v Speaker 3>that an Eolian origin for these features was impossible. Formation

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 3>by tidal forces was favored. Now, tidal forces means the

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 3>interaction of different gravitational forces on matter exerting a pulling

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 3>or a stretching force. So this alternate explanation previously favored

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:49.879
<v Speaker 3>because Io can't sustain wins, is that there's something about

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 3>the gravity that is causing these ridge features to emerge. However,

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 3>despite agreeing that saltation is not possible under the ambient

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 3>atmospheric conditions of Io, the authors note that there really

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 3>are a number of similarities between the features seen in

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 3>these images and Eolian dunes. They mentioned quote the ridges,

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 3>regular spacing, slightly meandering forms, and possession of crestline defects.

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:22.679
<v Speaker 3>So these are all features that are very similar, so

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 3>similar to wind formed dunes on Earth and Mars that

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:28.679
<v Speaker 3>it would be kind of strange if that's not what

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 3>they were. So is there any way that these features

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:36.120
<v Speaker 3>could have been formed by something like wind, even though

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, even given the limitations we know of Io's atmosphere. Well,

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 3>the authors of the paper note that the thickness of

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 3>Io's atmosphere is not consistent across its surface, so the

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 3>density of surface gas could actually be much higher at

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 3>certain times and in certain areas, specifically in the vicinity

0:28:57.520 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 3>of volcanic vents, which are rapidly viewing so two gas

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 3>as they erupt. The authors ask, what if there is

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 3>a sort of you could say, quote unquote wind that

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 3>is present locally, not globally, on the surface of Io,

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 3>consisting of some kind of rush of gases from subsurface

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 3>interactions from volcanism or from downstream effects of volcanic eruptions,

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 3>And what if this is responsible for crafting the dunes?

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 3>And this is in fact what they find support for

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 3>in their paper and the author's write quote here we

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 3>demonstrate that interactions between lava from volcanic eruptions and the

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 3>sulfur dioxide frost blanketing Io's surface can produce localized sublimation

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 3>vapor flows with sufficient gas densities to enable saltation. So

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 3>I thought that was really interesting. So what would these

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 3>interactions be. To be clear, they're not talking about their

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:04.080
<v Speaker 3>quote unquote wind being the gases that burst directly from

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 3>volcanic eruptions. You know, it's not like the gas comes

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 3>out of the volcano and that is the wind. They're

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 3>talking instead about a secondary mechanism that they find probable,

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 3>which is that you have hot lava flowing just underneath

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 3>the surface of the frost layer here, and it's creating

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 3>this interaction with the sulfur dioxide frost on the surface,

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 3>causing the sulfur dioxide to sublimate. Essentially, it heats it

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 3>up and it causes an outgasing process. So suddenly a

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 3>bunch of this SO two turns into gas and then

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 3>they find that that would be capable of driving saltation.

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 3>So lead author George MacDonald, quoted in the press release, says,

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 3>our studies point to the possibility of Io as a

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 3>new dune world. We have proposed and quantitatively tested a

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 3>mechanism by which sand grains can move and in turn

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 3>dunes could be forming there. And I really they actually

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 3>come through in the in the press release there the

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 3>authors are like referencing the book Dune and talking about

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 3>how it could be like a racket. So I like

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 3>the dedication to like we have we have determined how

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 3>it can be a dune world.

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 2>We have captured a sand worm and will soon begin

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 2>the spice spice production on another planet.

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Yes, now, if this is in fact the mechanism, it

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 3>would explain a number of things. It would explain the

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 3>similarity to dunes created by wind on the other planets

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 3>of course, it would also explain, sort of going against

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 3>the tidal forces argument, why you see dunes in different orientations,

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 3>because the authors say, you know, if it was tidal forces,

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:43.959
<v Speaker 3>it seems like you'd be more likely to see all

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 3>the dunes kind of aligned along with certain gravitational axes,

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 3>but instead you see dunes facing different directions. But another

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 3>thing is that if this really is the mechanism, you

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 3>might expect to see more dunes forming, like around the

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:02.479
<v Speaker 3>edges offs like we see in this image we started with,

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 3>where you've got this black glassy area on one part

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 3>of the image. You know, that's where the lava is flowing,

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 3>and then at the edge of that it's probably interacting

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:14.720
<v Speaker 3>with these these planes of so two frost, and that

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:17.560
<v Speaker 3>could be creating the winds that blow that blow over

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 3>the surface and help form the dunes. Interesting, So I

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 3>feel like sci fi writers, we're just feeding you, We're

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 3>just you know, like you can you can do a

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 3>dune type thing on io that'll work here.

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, absolutely. I mean it's a again, this is

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 2>it's an exciting world and perhaps a little too exciting,

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:39.240
<v Speaker 2>and I think that's what maybe scares away even some

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 2>sci fi visions.

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, once again. I mean, I agree, that's fair. Like

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:45.960
<v Speaker 3>I understand, especially if you're trying to write hard or

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:48.479
<v Speaker 3>semi hard sci fi, like dealing with the real uh

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 3>what we actually know and how that would inform the

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 3>story creates problems. But I think this is really enticing

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 3>because Okay, so we've seen Arakis, We've seen Dune as

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 3>a hot world, but imagine a freezing cold Dune world

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 3>but also super hot in certain areas.

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 2>I guess one of the things to keep in mind,

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 2>kind of going back to our full episodes on the

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Jovian moons, is like they're all kind of terrible, you know,

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 2>compared to what we have here on Earth. I mean

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 2>the same can be said for pretty much everywhere else

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 2>in our Solar system and the known universe, you know,

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:22.959
<v Speaker 2>like this this is the world we can live on,

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 2>this is the world we have to make work, and

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 2>the rest of them. It's kind of like looking at

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 2>the I don't know Batman's rogue gallery and saying, well,

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 2>which one is the like the least awful, And you

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:35.719
<v Speaker 2>might be like, well, mister Freeze has some you know,

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 2>some virtues to him, yes, but he's still a murderous madman. Killer.

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 3>That's a very good comparison. Weirdly, and I've sort of

0:33:43.160 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 3>had this on my mind lately. I mean, this is

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:47.680
<v Speaker 3>something I think of every now and then, ever since

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 3>I read Kim Stanley Robinson's Aurora, which is a book

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 3>very much about It's a space exploration book that I

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 3>don't want to spoil too much for people who haven't

0:33:57.360 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 3>read it, but it ends up being very much about

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 3>the virtues of Earth.

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 2>Earth.

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and you know, the preciousness of the planet we

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:08.320
<v Speaker 3>already have. Uh, and so that's a wonderful theme. It's

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:12.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, some people I love space, space exploration and

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 3>space colonization as a setting for a science fiction story.

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I love that as much as anybody. But

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 3>but also sometimes in people who are real advocates of

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:25.759
<v Speaker 3>space exploration, you almost get a sense of that they're

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 3>just kind of done with Earth. It's like, yeah, okay,

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 3>we've used that up, we can kick that out. We

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 3>just got to move on to the next thing. I

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 3>don't I don't think that's a good basket to put

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 3>your chickens in.

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 2>No. No, I mean, you know this has come up

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 2>in various conversations in the show before, but you know,

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:45.319
<v Speaker 2>you pretty much any model for near to medium term

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 2>colonization efforts, you know elsewhere in the Solar System, those

0:34:50.120 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 2>are all going to be completely dependent upon Earth. You know,

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 2>There's there's no deshackling from that planet. You know, even

0:34:57.640 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 2>in your you know, sci fi visions. You know, it's

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 2>like you have to really look at far future scenarios

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:06.560
<v Speaker 2>where it would even become possibly feasible for there to

0:35:06.600 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 2>be truly independent colonies, independent systems that are not depending

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:15.959
<v Speaker 2>on this place where we evolve to thrive. Yeah.

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:19.320
<v Speaker 3>I couldn't agree more. And to be clear, once again,

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:23.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm not against space exploration or even necessarily space colonization.

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:27.400
<v Speaker 3>See the beauty and the excitement in those kind of

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:31.320
<v Speaker 3>grand projects. But I don't know, I find it revolting

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 3>when that kind of grand ambition brings along with it

0:35:36.000 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 3>contempt for the planet that we need right now and

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 3>will need for the foreseeable future. You gotta love Earth now.

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 2>This is a commentary that has existed in the zeitgeist

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 2>for a while. I always come back to a particular

0:35:49.560 --> 0:35:53.959
<v Speaker 2>nineteen ninety four talk given by Terrence McKenna in which

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 2>he refers to the Earth as quote, an incredible pearl,

0:35:57.120 --> 0:36:01.759
<v Speaker 2>flung out in a universe of ashes and darkness. And

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:04.800
<v Speaker 2>and he's making a larger point in referencing this about

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 2>a decision to be made regarding human nature and how

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 2>we view ourselves and our place in the universe. But

0:36:10.480 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 2>I keep coming back to that idea. Our earth is

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:16.520
<v Speaker 2>this incredible pearl, and because it is the place where

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:19.080
<v Speaker 2>there is life, it is the place where we are

0:36:19.160 --> 0:36:22.360
<v Speaker 2>meant to be. And you know, we may expand out

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 2>and explore these other places, we may expand out and

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:28.759
<v Speaker 2>make new homes on these other places, but this, this

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 2>is the place from which we arose. This is our

0:36:32.040 --> 0:36:34.400
<v Speaker 2>true home. This is the only place we can count

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 2>on to sustain us as long as we cherish it.

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:40.880
<v Speaker 3>Everywhere else is a gamble, And you don't bet the

0:36:40.920 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 3>home world on a gamble, you know, that's right. Nothing

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 3>else is a sure thing.

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 2>And you certainly don't bet on Io. Yeah no, because

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:51.799
<v Speaker 2>I don't think anybody's realistically betting on Io. They may,

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:55.880
<v Speaker 2>they may be placing moderate bets on other destinations in

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:59.799
<v Speaker 2>our solar system, but Io is the odds are great.

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:02.880
<v Speaker 2>You're a gambler, but it's not likely going to be

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:03.680
<v Speaker 2>a win.

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:08.280
<v Speaker 3>However, greatly worth studying, if not the number one candidate

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:12.319
<v Speaker 3>for a little for a base out there. One thing

0:37:12.360 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 3>I did observe about that quote before we move on, though,

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 3>I actually think the pearl is a wonderful metaphor for Earth,

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:21.239
<v Speaker 3>not just because it's a ball, you know, like Earth

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:25.359
<v Speaker 3>is roughly spherical and pearl is usually somewhat spherical, Not

0:37:25.440 --> 0:37:27.879
<v Speaker 3>just because it is precious. I mean, pearl, of course

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 3>is a type of jewel, so it's precious just like

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:34.480
<v Speaker 3>the Earth is. But it is also essentially a mineral

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:38.359
<v Speaker 3>product at its material base, which most of the Earth is,

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 3>but also a biofact. You know, a pearl is created

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 3>by life, and the way the Earth is now it

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:47.719
<v Speaker 3>was also in a way created by life. Life is

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:51.480
<v Speaker 3>defined what the planet is down to its very physical substance.

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:52.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely.

0:38:02.920 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 3>Oh now, Rob, I remembered something we said we were

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:07.880
<v Speaker 3>going to come back to, was the question of the

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:10.960
<v Speaker 3>possibility of io sustaining life. We've already said that it's

0:38:11.239 --> 0:38:14.840
<v Speaker 3>probably not, you know, just from from what we already know.

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:18.480
<v Speaker 3>Probably not the first candidate to look for life elsewhere

0:38:18.480 --> 0:38:22.200
<v Speaker 3>in our solar system. But you know, with with most

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:24.920
<v Speaker 3>planetary bodies out there, people have kind of done the

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:27.600
<v Speaker 3>work to say, like what sort of thing would be

0:38:27.640 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 3>most plausible here? And I know you'd been reading a

0:38:29.960 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 3>bit about io and life, so once you turn up.

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, again, it is an extreme environment and it's

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:39.920
<v Speaker 2>by no means the best option for life in amid

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 2>the Jovian Moons. The best options I think are arguably

0:38:43.719 --> 0:38:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Europa and Ganymede. But you know, we know, based on

0:38:47.160 --> 0:38:49.440
<v Speaker 2>our own model of life here on Earth, that life

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:52.080
<v Speaker 2>can thrive in extreme environments. And you know, over the

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:54.839
<v Speaker 2>past several decades, I think that's become you know, more

0:38:54.840 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 2>and more crystallized in our understanding that you know, life

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:02.920
<v Speaker 2>here on Earth is pretty rugged and certain models of

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:06.960
<v Speaker 2>it can survive in very hostile conditions. So it's not

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:09.879
<v Speaker 2>completely out of the question that something could evolve, either

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 2>evolve within those hostile conditions on another world, or survive

0:39:17.640 --> 0:39:20.200
<v Speaker 2>in such conditions, you know, after the loss of a

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:25.200
<v Speaker 2>previous habitat. And so I was looking around in one

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:29.440
<v Speaker 2>individual in particular that has speculated a fair amount concerning

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:35.600
<v Speaker 2>IO is German astrobiologist Dirk Schultz Makouch speculated in twenty

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:39.840
<v Speaker 2>twenty three on Big Think about the possibility. The title

0:39:39.880 --> 0:39:43.239
<v Speaker 2>of the Big Think article that he crafted is there

0:39:43.280 --> 0:39:47.640
<v Speaker 2>could be life on hot volcanic Io. Jupiter's quote pizza met.

0:39:48.880 --> 0:39:51.080
<v Speaker 3>We talked about the pizza surface in the last episode.

0:39:51.120 --> 0:39:52.839
<v Speaker 3>It looks like it's got I don't know, what would

0:39:52.840 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 3>you say? The topping selection is definitely pepperoni and olives.

0:39:56.600 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, and cheese of course, the fair amount of cheese,

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:05.000
<v Speaker 2>mozzarella and or parmesan on top. And of course Schultz

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 2>macouch has has also a third and co authored a

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 2>number of peer reviewed articles that the Big Think article

0:40:12.239 --> 0:40:15.719
<v Speaker 2>is more is more general audience. But but he goes through,

0:40:15.840 --> 0:40:18.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, all the major points that he hits in

0:40:18.680 --> 0:40:22.320
<v Speaker 2>some of these other articles, and he drives home that

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:26.120
<v Speaker 2>the Juno mission revealed much more about Io than we

0:40:26.200 --> 0:40:30.879
<v Speaker 2>previously knew, and that based on these more recent discoveries,

0:40:31.200 --> 0:40:34.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's reasonable to hypothesize that while Io is

0:40:34.800 --> 0:40:39.600
<v Speaker 2>now this volcanic world of extreme cold and extreme hot temperatures,

0:40:40.040 --> 0:40:43.040
<v Speaker 2>it may have once had as much liquid water as

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Europa and Ganny meat and during those early days, the

0:40:46.440 --> 0:40:50.840
<v Speaker 2>combination combination of liquid water and geothermal heat again you know,

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:55.440
<v Speaker 2>highly volcanic world could have led to the development of life. However,

0:40:55.520 --> 0:40:58.279
<v Speaker 2>of course, this wouldn't be the case today. Io would

0:40:58.320 --> 0:41:01.040
<v Speaker 2>have gone on to lose most of the water due

0:41:01.040 --> 0:41:05.400
<v Speaker 2>to Jupiter's radiation and tidal forces, and this is pretty

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 2>much left the surface of Io quite uninhabitable. But what

0:41:09.719 --> 0:41:14.400
<v Speaker 2>about the underground, Well, Schulzmakouch stresses that it might still

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:17.879
<v Speaker 2>prove too violent beneath Io's surface for life, Like it's

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:21.960
<v Speaker 2>still it's still you know, not the best bat, but

0:41:22.520 --> 0:41:24.800
<v Speaker 2>you know. He says that there's a chance it could

0:41:25.360 --> 0:41:29.200
<v Speaker 2>survive there due to the possibibility of remaining abundant water

0:41:30.239 --> 0:41:36.160
<v Speaker 2>carbon and reduce sulfur compounds. So a dynamic, though possibly

0:41:36.239 --> 0:41:40.120
<v Speaker 2>too dynamic environment for life. Maybe not on the surface

0:41:40.160 --> 0:41:44.920
<v Speaker 2>of Io, but perhaps maybe underneath the surface of the planet,

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:47.239
<v Speaker 2>beneath the planet of the pizza if you will.

0:41:47.880 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's where the remnants of their civilization worship a

0:41:51.120 --> 0:41:51.919
<v Speaker 3>giant pizza oven.

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:56.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, So where would we look for them, if

0:41:56.960 --> 0:41:59.480
<v Speaker 2>we could at all look look for them on this world,

0:41:59.680 --> 0:42:03.560
<v Speaker 2>We suggests lava tubes, which should be common on such

0:42:03.600 --> 0:42:06.720
<v Speaker 2>a volcanically active world. These would of course be beneath

0:42:06.760 --> 0:42:09.759
<v Speaker 2>the surface of Io, where they would possibly serve as

0:42:09.760 --> 0:42:13.319
<v Speaker 2>a safe haven for life, protected to some degree from

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:19.120
<v Speaker 2>radiation and subject to warm at least semi constant temperatures.

0:42:19.800 --> 0:42:22.360
<v Speaker 2>And he stresses that lava tubes here on Earth, you know,

0:42:22.400 --> 0:42:24.600
<v Speaker 2>they provide a great example because they are often home

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:28.719
<v Speaker 2>to extremophile and microbial life, regardless of the region in

0:42:28.760 --> 0:42:31.200
<v Speaker 2>which you find them. You know, this is true of

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:33.920
<v Speaker 2>lava tubes in the desert as well as in Iceland,

0:42:33.920 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 2>in places like that. And on top of that, lava

0:42:37.239 --> 0:42:43.839
<v Speaker 2>tubes on Mars, according to schulsmaccooch the most plausible place

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:47.080
<v Speaker 2>to find life on the Red planet. So lava tubes

0:42:47.120 --> 0:42:49.800
<v Speaker 2>in general great place to look for. It seems like

0:42:49.960 --> 0:42:52.680
<v Speaker 2>lava tubes should be present beneath the surface of Io

0:42:52.760 --> 0:42:55.319
<v Speaker 2>as well. Now, he also discusses that if there's not

0:42:55.480 --> 0:42:58.400
<v Speaker 2>enough water for life on Io, it's also feasible that

0:42:58.520 --> 0:43:02.320
<v Speaker 2>hydrogen sulfide might and in for water, though he stresses

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:05.920
<v Speaker 2>that quote suggesting an alternative alternative solvent for life is

0:43:06.000 --> 0:43:09.480
<v Speaker 2>always very very speculative. Yeah, So I do want to

0:43:09.480 --> 0:43:12.360
<v Speaker 2>make sure I'm doing justice to what he has written

0:43:12.960 --> 0:43:16.200
<v Speaker 2>and said about this, because he's not saying there's definitely

0:43:16.239 --> 0:43:18.239
<v Speaker 2>life on ioh. He's saying, you know, we have to

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:22.800
<v Speaker 2>keep an open mind about these things and discuss how

0:43:22.880 --> 0:43:26.120
<v Speaker 2>it could exist there based on what we know of

0:43:26.239 --> 0:43:27.160
<v Speaker 2>life here on Earth.

0:43:27.440 --> 0:43:29.240
<v Speaker 3>Right. Well, as you said that this is a common

0:43:29.320 --> 0:43:32.600
<v Speaker 3>experiment a lot of you know, people who are interested

0:43:32.640 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 3>in astrobiology go through. Is not to say there is

0:43:36.719 --> 0:43:40.120
<v Speaker 3>definitely life on Titan or whatever it is, but to say, Okay,

0:43:40.160 --> 0:43:43.719
<v Speaker 3>given the conditions we know about here, what could you

0:43:43.800 --> 0:43:46.759
<v Speaker 3>imagine working there? If we were to discover life in

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:49.640
<v Speaker 3>this kind of place, where would we expect to find it,

0:43:49.680 --> 0:43:51.560
<v Speaker 3>What form would we expect it to take?

0:43:52.239 --> 0:43:54.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it sounds like the possibility here would be

0:43:54.960 --> 0:43:59.279
<v Speaker 2>some sort of you know, microbial extremeophile life form that

0:43:59.320 --> 0:44:02.680
<v Speaker 2>again is living in certain lava tubes where they're protected

0:44:02.680 --> 0:44:07.399
<v Speaker 2>from the radiation, where there's something like consistent warmth going

0:44:07.440 --> 0:44:10.279
<v Speaker 2>on and it's not subject to like massive freezes and

0:44:10.320 --> 0:44:15.400
<v Speaker 2>then massive you know, boiling temperatures. So but again it

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:17.640
<v Speaker 2>would be down in these lava tubes. And one of

0:44:17.640 --> 0:44:19.799
<v Speaker 2>the things that he points out is that, yeah, these

0:44:20.239 --> 0:44:22.160
<v Speaker 2>we just have to speculate like this, This would be

0:44:22.239 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 2>very hard to just to explore one hundred percent for

0:44:26.719 --> 0:44:29.600
<v Speaker 2>a number of reasons. It's very difficult to figure out

0:44:29.600 --> 0:44:31.520
<v Speaker 2>how you would like land a craft or a rover

0:44:31.680 --> 0:44:35.080
<v Speaker 2>on IO and then dig down underneath the surface. It's

0:44:35.120 --> 0:44:38.719
<v Speaker 2>a very hostile world. However, there's still plenty of room

0:44:38.840 --> 0:44:42.879
<v Speaker 2>to explore it from an orbital standpoint, and we can

0:44:42.920 --> 0:44:45.880
<v Speaker 2>continue to learn more about the surface of Io and

0:44:45.960 --> 0:44:49.120
<v Speaker 2>the composition of IO, and in doing so we might

0:44:49.160 --> 0:44:52.200
<v Speaker 2>be able to make even better guesses about what might

0:44:52.239 --> 0:44:55.520
<v Speaker 2>be beneath the surface. All right, Well, on that note,

0:44:55.640 --> 0:44:58.439
<v Speaker 2>we're going to close out this episode, but we'll come

0:44:58.480 --> 0:45:02.239
<v Speaker 2>back with one more episode on Io this Thursday. In

0:45:02.280 --> 0:45:04.759
<v Speaker 2>the meantime, definitely feel free to write into us. We'd

0:45:04.760 --> 0:45:07.440
<v Speaker 2>love to hear from you your thoughts about anything we

0:45:07.520 --> 0:45:11.840
<v Speaker 2>discussed here. Examples of IO from science fiction. All of

0:45:11.840 --> 0:45:14.600
<v Speaker 2>that is fair Game will remind you the stuff to

0:45:14.640 --> 0:45:16.800
<v Speaker 2>blow your mind. Is primarily a science and culture podcast,

0:45:16.800 --> 0:45:19.320
<v Speaker 2>with core episodes on Tuesdays and Thursdays, short form episodes

0:45:19.320 --> 0:45:22.120
<v Speaker 2>on Wednesdays and on Fridays. We set aside most serious

0:45:22.120 --> 0:45:24.400
<v Speaker 2>concerns to just talk about a weird film on Weird

0:45:24.400 --> 0:45:27.160
<v Speaker 2>House Cinema. Maybe we'll get to Outland someday. It's been

0:45:27.160 --> 0:45:28.799
<v Speaker 2>on kind of like the shortlist for a little bit,

0:45:29.840 --> 0:45:34.040
<v Speaker 2>but maybe maybe someday soon If you would like us

0:45:34.040 --> 0:45:38.360
<v Speaker 2>to cover Outland on Weird House Cinema, write in and encourage.

0:45:38.040 --> 0:45:41.040
<v Speaker 3>Us, Sir, Sean just looks so serious.

0:45:41.400 --> 0:45:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, he's very serious in this one. I think

0:45:45.000 --> 0:45:46.680
<v Speaker 2>maybe that's why I've held off on this one, like

0:45:46.800 --> 0:45:49.239
<v Speaker 2>this is a gritty film, or at least that's my

0:45:49.360 --> 0:45:52.840
<v Speaker 2>memory of it. Very gritty, not a lot of fun

0:45:54.440 --> 0:45:58.200
<v Speaker 2>to be had, you know, it's it's a dirty future.

0:45:58.440 --> 0:46:00.279
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I've got a note. Does he just use his

0:46:00.360 --> 0:46:03.000
<v Speaker 3>normal accent or does he pretend to have a different accent?

0:46:04.040 --> 0:46:06.399
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't remember, but if added that, I would say,

0:46:06.480 --> 0:46:10.720
<v Speaker 2>just normal accent. Okay, that's normally how it shakes out.

0:46:10.840 --> 0:46:15.399
<v Speaker 3>I would want to hear Sean Connery doing cowboy voice. Well,

0:46:15.440 --> 0:46:21.400
<v Speaker 3>howdy partner, all right, huge, Thanks as always to our

0:46:21.480 --> 0:46:25.040
<v Speaker 3>excellent audio producer JJ Posway. If you would like to

0:46:25.040 --> 0:46:27.360
<v Speaker 3>get in touch with us with feedback on this episode

0:46:27.440 --> 0:46:29.600
<v Speaker 3>or any other, to suggest a topic for the future,

0:46:29.680 --> 0:46:31.879
<v Speaker 3>or just to say hi, you can email us at

0:46:31.960 --> 0:46:42.240
<v Speaker 3>contact at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

0:46:42.440 --> 0:46:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:46:45.440 --> 0:46:48.240
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:46:48.400 --> 0:46:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you're listening to your favorite shows

0:47:00.040 --> 0:47:02.640
<v Speaker 2>The same priest with rapt