Speaker 1: Good morning, peeps, and welcome to ook F Daily with
Speaker 1: Me your Girl Danielle Moody pre recording from the home Bunker, Folks,
Speaker 1: I am very, very excited for one of the last
Speaker 1: conversations to happen on wok F Daily to be with
Speaker 1: the producer extraordinaire Andrew Marcello, who has been with wok
Speaker 1: F Daily since the very first episode.
Speaker 2: I think if I am not.
Speaker 1: Correct, and has just been an extraordinary partner for the
Speaker 1: last seven years in making this show possible. And yeah,
Speaker 1: I just wanted Andrew for us to be able to
Speaker 1: close it out together. So it's been a journey. It's
Speaker 1: been this, It has been a journey. I started this
Speaker 1: show in response to Donald Trump's first election, thinking that
Speaker 1: it was going to be a blip on America's radar.
Speaker 1: And we're ending the show and he's starting a second
Speaker 1: term in a couple of weeks, which is just wild.
Speaker 1: But tell me first, like, seven years it's a long time.
Speaker 2: How do you feel.
Speaker 3: I feel like a different person than I was seven
Speaker 3: years ago in a lot of ways. I feel like
Speaker 3: the show itself has grown so much from where it started.
Speaker 3: I'm very proud of where you and where we got
Speaker 3: with this show. I wish I could say the same
Speaker 3: for the country.
Speaker 2: Sam.
Speaker 3: You know, the show started out, even in the space
Speaker 3: that it was in, as a more left wing oriented
Speaker 3: or more progressive oriented voice, and I'm fearful that I
Speaker 3: feel a lot of things. I have a lot of
Speaker 3: feelings about how progressive politics have been treated over the
Speaker 3: last four years. I think they were starting to become normalized,
Speaker 3: and even during the first Trump administration, I felt like,
Speaker 3: at least as a form of resistance, they were still
Speaker 3: somewhat prominent and being heard. And I think the last
Speaker 3: four years in particular have been really disheartening in terms
Speaker 3: of the regression that has happened. In some ways, I
Speaker 3: wasn't really actually surprised by Trump's reelection because I felt
Speaker 3: the forces in society shifting more and more towards the right,
Speaker 3: and I'm certain fearful for what's going to come next.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think that that is right. I wanted to
Speaker 1: be surprised, I think by his reelection. I wanted to
Speaker 1: really believe that the country had progressed and had learned
Speaker 1: write some really hard lessons in his first term, but
Speaker 1: also over the last seven years. And you know, I
Speaker 1: think that one of the villains, if I will say,
Speaker 1: of the wok F daily story, have been the Democrats
Speaker 1: and their messaging or lack thereof, and their desire to
Speaker 1: really appeal to a center that doesn't exist anymore. I've
Speaker 1: been referring to Democrats these days, those the Pelosis and
Speaker 1: the Schumers, as they're basically moderate Republicans. They're what moderate
Speaker 1: Republicans used to be before they all gave their soul
Speaker 1: to the devil and became a of a cult.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: But I saw so much possibility right in progressivism, and
Speaker 1: I thought that for certain, seeing Donald Trump's first term unfold,
Speaker 1: that folks would gather and Democrats would gather people in
Speaker 1: a way to say, like, no, you're deserving of all
Speaker 1: of these things that other industrialized countries have, like universal
Speaker 1: health care right, like childcare taken care of, like you know,
Speaker 1: children outside of the womb, actually having their needs met.
Speaker 1: And it seems as if they have gone in the
Speaker 1: complete opposite direction. What do you make of what you've
Speaker 1: seen of Democrats over the last over these last seventy years,
Speaker 1: and like you know, where you saw possibility and where
Speaker 1: you have seen disappointment.
Speaker 3: I'm going to point to two moments that that really
Speaker 3: resonate with me years and years later, and I think
Speaker 3: may resonate with some other people who feel similar to
Speaker 3: me years and years later. In June of twenty nineteen,
Speaker 3: Joe Biden was speaking to donors at an event at
Speaker 3: the Carlisle Hotel in Manhattan, rich wealthy donors, and he
Speaker 3: said four words that I will never forget nothing would
Speaker 3: fundamentally change if he is elected. Nothing would fundamentally change.
Speaker 3: And then I think about I think it was Nevada.
Speaker 3: There was some weekend in twenty twenty where Bernie Sanders
Speaker 3: had won some Nevada or like multiple states, and I
Speaker 3: was so excited. I saw a picture of myself. To
Speaker 3: go back a little bit more from I saw a
Speaker 3: picture of myself from a Bernie Sanders rally in twenty sixteen,
Speaker 3: and the light in my eyes, the hope in my face,
Speaker 3: I was like, who is that? So when there was
Speaker 3: a what felt like a second chance that weekend, it
Speaker 3: was really invigorating and exciting. And then there were a
Speaker 3: bunch of backroom deals and I think it was Jim
Speaker 3: Clyburn from South Carolina mm YEP said that he would
Speaker 3: help Biden and a bunch of people in the primary
Speaker 3: dropped out and put their force behind Biden, and all
Speaker 3: of a sudden, it was Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 3: And what I don't know is that a democratic process.
Speaker 2: I no, it's it's it's not.
Speaker 1: But it has been backroom dealings. I feel like have
Speaker 1: been the way right for so so many decades. This
Speaker 1: is this is how, this is how they have told
Speaker 1: us that politics works and how politics should have worked,
Speaker 1: right was. I mean, we were covering this every single
Speaker 1: day on Woke a Up. Joe Biden was not my
Speaker 1: first through fifth choice right to be the nominee.
Speaker 3: It wasn't winning a lot of states at the time.
Speaker 1: It wasn't winning any states until Clyburn said, no, I'm
Speaker 1: putting South Carolina in his column, which is what he did,
Speaker 1: and then from then on Biden had a clear runway.
Speaker 1: And I think that when the democratic establishment decides to
Speaker 1: create these clear runways for the candidate of their choosing
Speaker 1: rather than the candidate of our choosing, that's how people
Speaker 1: lose faith in the process.
Speaker 3: Right. I definitely feel like there was a lot of
Speaker 3: disengagement over the last four years for a variety of factors.
Speaker 3: I think the suppression that occurred in I mean, there
Speaker 3: was a lot that happened in twenty twenty. What a year.
Speaker 3: But I think the suppression that occurred in twenty twenty
Speaker 3: and the response to that by you have me about
Speaker 3: how I feel about Democrats, and there was very much
Speaker 3: a like, we're going to put more money into police,
Speaker 3: and then Republicans had this narrative of like, Democrats are
Speaker 3: defunding the police when the opposite was happening, and then Democrats'
Speaker 3: response to their defunding the police was to just throw
Speaker 3: more money at the police, and which leaves the progressive
Speaker 3: position out in the rain.
Speaker 1: It never made sense to me that for seven plus
Speaker 1: years that Democrats couldn't figure out how to message around
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, couldn't figure out how to redirect the conversation
Speaker 1: into a narrative that they want. And I think that
Speaker 1: you know, I've had a lot of time to reflect
Speaker 1: on Donald Trump's win, his second win, and you know,
Speaker 1: hate to say it, trust me hate to say it,
Speaker 1: but Donald Trump and MAGA for better or for Worse
Speaker 1: created a sense of belonging for a whole group of
Speaker 1: people who we may not have wanted in our tent,
Speaker 1: but by virtue of them not feeling like they had
Speaker 1: a place or a voice anymore. Donald Trump and Maga said, oh,
Speaker 1: come over here, right, the water's great. And at that
Speaker 1: same time, you were watching Democrats, right, Oh, we're four
Speaker 1: trans writes, Ooh, people don't seem to like that, so
Speaker 1: we're going.
Speaker 2: To back away. Oh we're with black people.
Speaker 1: Ooh, but white people don't seem to like that, so
Speaker 1: we're going to fund the police more. Oh we're So
Speaker 1: there was always this two steps forward twelve steps back
Speaker 1: that was happening, where Maga has already has always been
Speaker 1: full steam ahead.
Speaker 2: How do you see it?
Speaker 3: There's two issues actually in twenty twenty four and this
Speaker 3: whole cycle that I have thought about that I felt
Speaker 3: that way about, which is the uki spooky specter of crime,
Speaker 3: what a nebulous word? And immigration, And I think on crime,
Speaker 3: it's so frustrating because crime is like a factual argument.
Speaker 3: Like this idea that all of a sudden America's cities
Speaker 3: have become criminal wastelands is just not true. And all
Speaker 3: you have to do is say that's not true and
Speaker 3: like have some sort of I don't know, because I'm
Speaker 3: not a strategist, but like, you know what I mean,
Speaker 3: it just felt like there was this capitulation to this
Speaker 3: idea that criminals and criminality is ravaging American cities when
Speaker 3: it's not. That's just not the truth. And unfortunately this
Speaker 3: narrative was aided by people who were running certain American cities,
Speaker 3: like Eric Adams and others. I'll you know you're in
Speaker 3: New York, so I'll say he's certainly a prominent one.
Speaker 3: By the way, I wanted to talk about him, So
Speaker 3: I really just want to inject this what a goofy
Speaker 3: little purp walk that camera obsessed man just did and
Speaker 3: ended up making the man an orange who is innocent
Speaker 3: until proven guilty. He did such a good job making
Speaker 3: that man look like the people's hero because he, like
Speaker 3: Eric Adams, is a villain. He's a bad person. He
Speaker 3: wants a pardon from Donald Trump. He thinks that he's
Speaker 3: gonna go out there and show this man who terrorized
Speaker 3: my city. He didn't terrorize anyone but allegedly one.
Speaker 1: Man, but one person. But they've and and that that
Speaker 1: to me, right him sitting down Eric Adams, And also
Speaker 1: what is he now the defender of the CEO, right
Speaker 1: like he's he's the sheriff of the of the of
Speaker 1: the CEOs because this city wasn't terrorized, right, this man
Speaker 1: and I will say that I believe that New York
Speaker 1: completely overcharged him when because me because New York has
Speaker 1: that that the ability to wage a terrorist accusation against somebody,
Speaker 1: This was not terrorism. Right. We can say acts that
Speaker 1: are terrorizing, but this was not one of them. This
Speaker 1: was a targeted attack against one individual in the city.
Speaker 1: This was not somebody opening up and a mass shooting
Speaker 1: that took place.
Speaker 2: It was not.
Speaker 3: If you were scared now, because you are a CEO
Speaker 3: of a company that has unethical business practices, all you
Speaker 3: have to do is take off your suit and walk
Speaker 3: out of the c suite. You are not a persecuted minority.
Speaker 2: Are you sure?
Speaker 1: Because Eric Adams said that they were, and so did
Speaker 1: and so did Kathy Hockel. Oh right, like, and so
Speaker 1: they're both Democrats in your in your state of Pennsylvania.
Speaker 2: You know what I'm saying. Like, but that's that's.
Speaker 3: And Cheryl Parker wants to evict a bunch of people
Speaker 3: from Chinatown to build a basketball stadium, that's a democrat.
Speaker 3: It's so like, who are there are there politicians of
Speaker 3: the people that's what's scary, to go back to the
Speaker 3: original thing.
Speaker 1: And no, there aren't. And I was going to ask you.
Speaker 1: Millions of people sat home on November fifth did not vote.
Speaker 1: And I know right that I talk about voting and
Speaker 1: have talked about voting.
Speaker 2: Throughout the years. It is your responsibility.
Speaker 1: It is a right that was hard fought and one
Speaker 1: over decades, and you not voting is in fact casting
Speaker 1: a vote, right, So you might as well put some opinion, gusto,
Speaker 1: and thought behind who you're pulling the levers for. However,
Speaker 1: when folks looked at this, they said, they're all taken
Speaker 1: pharma money, they're all taken oil money and coal money.
Speaker 1: What do you think led to so many millions of people,
Speaker 1: and particularly young people thirty and under, who didn't vote.
Speaker 3: I'm not at risk for saying this because you said
Speaker 3: oil money, you said all these other kinds of money.
Speaker 3: I'm gonna be real for a lot of people that
Speaker 3: I know. We're talking about apac money, baby, we're talking
Speaker 3: about is real. We're talking about the atrocities being committed overseas.
Speaker 3: We're talking about the genocide being committed overseas. We are
Speaker 3: talking about the full throated not only defense, but full
Speaker 3: throated endorsement of a genocide by the United States government
Speaker 3: and the Biden Harris administration. That Kamala Harris did not
Speaker 3: do nearly enough. I mean, did she do anything to
Speaker 3: distance herself from she did when she went on to
Speaker 3: if you talk about nothing would fundamentally change when she
Speaker 3: went on the view or wherever and was like, I'll
Speaker 3: be the same as Joe Biden. We didn't. He's not
Speaker 3: in the race anymore for a reason.
Speaker 2: Mm hm.
Speaker 3: They had an opportunity to forge a different path forward.
Speaker 3: And the people who pull the strings, the people who
Speaker 3: run the campaigns, the campaign managers, the people who are
Speaker 3: obsessed with polls and all this and perception rather than
Speaker 3: talking to actual human beings. They ran a campaign that
Speaker 3: was just like Biden in a different body. Yes, and
Speaker 3: I don't get why they did that, and the result
Speaker 3: was exactly what I expected.
Speaker 2: I was just going to.
Speaker 1: Say, I think a part of why they did it,
Speaker 1: And this is not to make excuses at all, because
Speaker 1: it was the wrong move. There's always just to the
Speaker 1: point that you said earlier, I think that Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: by saying is said what you said. Joe Biden said
Speaker 1: at the Carlisle. Nothing will fundamentally change, right. I may
Speaker 1: be this black and Asian woman m hm, who is
Speaker 1: going to be a potentially the leader of the free world,
Speaker 1: but don't worry, nothing is going to fundamentally change.
Speaker 2: And I think that.
Speaker 1: That was her and are handlers trying to assure the
Speaker 1: American public that, oh, this person from who sits at
Speaker 1: the intersection of multiple identities isn't going to change anything.
Speaker 1: She's really a part of the status quo. And they
Speaker 1: thought that that was a selling point, where as many
Speaker 1: of us saw it as a sellout point.
Speaker 3: What are the two words you most associate with the
Speaker 3: two thousand and eight Barack Obama campaign? What, Oh, I'm
Speaker 3: asking you?
Speaker 2: Yes we can? You said three years old.
Speaker 3: Oh, okay, no, see, but that's that's the say I
Speaker 3: was going to say, hope and change.
Speaker 2: Oh, hope and change.
Speaker 3: Yes, but yes we can also a positive message, an
Speaker 3: energizing message, something that distinguishes you from what came before.
Speaker 3: I understand it's tricky when your predecessor is an incumbent Democrat,
Speaker 3: but this, this idea that she was going to be
Speaker 3: the same as what came before, that is not to me.
Speaker 3: That is not exciting to a lot of voters.
Speaker 2: I don't think that it was exciting to young voters
Speaker 2: at all.
Speaker 1: And I think that, you know, again, before right Thesella Beltway,
Speaker 1: you know, folks came in and interjected themselves into her campaign.
Speaker 1: The messaging that was coming out was largely around hope
Speaker 1: and joy and bringing that back to our politics. And
Speaker 1: then by the end, we're arm in arm with Liz Cheney,
Speaker 1: so you know what I'm saying. So at the beginning
Speaker 1: I felt like, this is a breath of fresh air.
Speaker 1: This is exactly what the kind of energy and attitude
Speaker 1: that we need. And by the end it was like, oh,
Speaker 1: I'm doing a tour de force with one of the
Speaker 1: biggest legacy political families right who have done so much
Speaker 1: harm to this country. We only agree on one thing,
Speaker 1: which is the Constitution. But this is where I'm gonna
Speaker 1: put all my energy.
Speaker 2: How big?
Speaker 1: Like, what could that time Andrew in your mind have
Speaker 1: been better spent doing?
Speaker 3: I don't know, is anything else an answer? It's just
Speaker 3: like so many things like that, this idea, and some
Speaker 3: of it felt like felt like scolding the base, felt
Speaker 3: like browbeating the base, like we're gonna ally with moderate Republicans,
Speaker 3: which I don't believe in. But like, we're gonna ally
Speaker 3: with Republicans and you're gonna like it. We're gonna in
Speaker 3: a week before the election, We're gonna send Bill Clinton
Speaker 3: to Michigan to say, actually, you're wrong for being passionate
Speaker 3: about the genocide and Gaza, Like I don't know if
Speaker 3: they could have spent their time, I don't know. I
Speaker 3: feel like there's just there's flaws in the system that
Speaker 3: I'm not in this in the democratic system of doing
Speaker 3: elections that I'm not well versed enough to speak to.
Speaker 3: I've heard people criticize the whole inherent model of phone
Speaker 3: banking and canvassing as something that's impersonal and outdated. Can
Speaker 3: I offer something that can be done in exchange, not
Speaker 3: on a broad scale I said before, just like listening
Speaker 3: to people.
Speaker 2: I feel like.
Speaker 3: Democrats have this obsession with data and data driven campaigning,
Speaker 3: which data can be useful, but hearing what actual human
Speaker 3: beings have to say and our feeling and thinking is
Speaker 3: a lot different than sending someone a poll and having
Speaker 3: them fill out some bubbles or talk to some person
Speaker 3: on the phone.
Speaker 1: It's so utterly disappointing, right, Like I think the win
Speaker 1: that Donald Trump had was not a landslide. It was
Speaker 1: not a mandate, regardless of what it is that he
Speaker 1: is saying now on his broke down social media platform
Speaker 1: or what the real president elect, Elon Musk is saying.
Speaker 1: And I want to get to that and your opinions
Speaker 1: on him right now and where JD vances on a
Speaker 1: mill cart in someplace. But it wasn't a landslide. So
Speaker 1: that means that there were people that could have been persuaded,
Speaker 1: right that could have been brought over. And I wonder
Speaker 1: in your mind, do you see any which way that
Speaker 1: Democrats are moving right now that would lead you to
Speaker 1: believe that a change is going to come.
Speaker 3: You were just talking the other day about a leadership
Speaker 3: election and or you know, I don't know if election
Speaker 3: is the right word, but like democratic leadership and Alexandria
Speaker 3: Ocasio Cortes being passed over, and I think in a bubble,
Speaker 3: like whether or not that's the right or wrong choice
Speaker 3: in a bubble, to me, that's emblematic of just how
Speaker 3: the last eight years of democratic leadership has been. Like
Speaker 3: they don't even give crumbs when Corey Bush gets elected.
Speaker 3: Their reaction isn't to embrace Corey Bush. It's to spend
Speaker 3: ten million dollars or whatever obscene amount of money was
Speaker 3: put into that election to unseat her. And that was
Speaker 3: this year. So my unfortunately no, because they are not
Speaker 3: even willing to have what used to be called the
Speaker 3: squad as like they're token four or five representatives anymore.
Speaker 3: They they really don't care about us. They don't care
Speaker 3: about the left. They've decided that people on the left
Speaker 3: in America, progressives, leftists, whatever you call yourself, socialist, communist, anarchist,
Speaker 3: whatever you call yourself, they don't care about you. They
Speaker 3: don't care about us. They care about themselves. They care
Speaker 3: about the wealth, they care about the powerful, they care
Speaker 3: about the CEOs. They care more about shaking hands with
Speaker 3: Republicans than helping you. M M so no, like so no.
Speaker 3: I used to be bright eyed and optimistic. I think
Speaker 3: when we met seven years ago, I was more bright
Speaker 3: eyed and optimistic than I am on this day.
Speaker 1: I mean, hell, I was more bright eyed and optimistic
Speaker 1: as well. I mean, you know, I was coming off
Speaker 1: of the Obama years right, thinking that that was the
Speaker 1: trajectory was only going to go up, that it hadn't
Speaker 1: occurred to me, and that was my naivete that there
Speaker 1: was going to be a backslide, a white lash, as
Speaker 1: there always has been any time that there's been any
Speaker 1: notable progress in this country. And you know, and I
Speaker 1: wasn't prepared. And I wonder this time around, Andrew, as
Speaker 1: we wind down and we see who's really running the show,
Speaker 1: which seems to be Elon Musk, the head of the
Speaker 1: brolagarc I guess like, where are you looking for opportunities
Speaker 1: in these obstacles ahead? Where do you see possibility, if any,
Speaker 1: right in how we're going to be moving forward.
Speaker 3: I am going to lead by saying I don't think
Speaker 3: this is healthy for a left wing movement, but I
Speaker 3: feel that there's others my age and who have my
Speaker 3: inclinations who are taking the same persuasion of divesting. Honestly,
Speaker 3: I voted, I will say that, especially living in Pennsylvania.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, I voted. But I think I used to
Speaker 3: be a lot more politically active in a lot of
Speaker 3: different ways. I used to care about the political maneuverings
Speaker 3: within Washington, within state government. I used to literally be
Speaker 3: in the streets. I feel like I'm going to be
Speaker 3: divesting from capital pee politics and focusing on the people
Speaker 3: around me, the people who are in my community, keeping
Speaker 3: my community and my loved ones and myself safe because
Speaker 3: like I just like, if they don't care about us,
Speaker 3: you can't make someone who doesn't care about you care. Yeah,
Speaker 3: if we've spent the last eight years, whoever this wei is,
Speaker 3: if we spent the last eight years mouths a gape,
Speaker 3: throats raw, screaming at them, pay attention to us, care
Speaker 3: about us, protect us, fight for us, and their responses
Speaker 3: to stick their fingers in their ears, and you're nean
Speaker 3: er nein or neiner Okay, heard, got it?
Speaker 1: All right?
Speaker 3: What's next? Yeah, I'm going to take care of those
Speaker 3: in my immediate vicinity because that's really all that's in
Speaker 3: my power to do. And the people who who have
Speaker 3: more power than me aren't interested in representing me and
Speaker 3: the people I love and care about, and that makes
Speaker 3: me very sad.
Speaker 1: But yeah, but some you know, sometimes we need to
Speaker 1: go back to the fundamentals, which is what we can control,
Speaker 1: which is strengthening and supporting our own communities and what
Speaker 1: that looks like for us, and you know, and let
Speaker 1: these people are going to do what they're going to do.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: And I there was a time I remember on WOKF
Speaker 1: where I would say, and this is back in Donald
Speaker 1: Trump's first term, that things are going to get bloodier
Speaker 1: before they get better, and I would say it all
Speaker 1: the time. And the fact is is that there is
Speaker 1: a lot of pain that is about to happen. There
Speaker 1: is a lot of cruelty that we are going to
Speaker 1: see wield it.
Speaker 2: The good guys or the good people did not win, right.
Speaker 1: But I think that sometimes America needs to be revealed
Speaker 1: the good and the awful, and we are we need
Speaker 1: to see the awful because by just talking about it
Speaker 1: and telling people what could possibly come, it wasn't enough.
Speaker 1: And sometimes people need to see it to believe it.
Speaker 1: But I think that if we can control what we
Speaker 1: can control, which is you know, saving our public libraries
Speaker 1: in our communities, supporting our teachers, hosting gatherings just so
Speaker 1: that people feel safe and are reminded of joy, you know,
Speaker 1: of holding on to those things that make us feel
Speaker 1: human and connected, then we will find a way to
Speaker 1: weather through.
Speaker 3: I think one thing I definitely do want to add
Speaker 3: on to what you're saying is not just community protection
Speaker 3: like I said, but also you know, community education, because
Speaker 3: a lot of people are still like people are waking up,
Speaker 3: but you can help. You can help people wake up,
Speaker 3: You can help people learn what's going on. You can
Speaker 3: help people have the tools to think more critically about
Speaker 3: what's around them and take action for themselves. So I
Speaker 3: do think that's something important as well, holding gatherings, talking
Speaker 3: to the people around you, finding out what they believe,
Speaker 3: and if gently, guiding them in the right direction.
Speaker 2: Yeah, one hundred percent.
Speaker 1: Well with our final moments here, Andrew, I just want
Speaker 1: to thank you so incredibly much, Thank you publicly, so
Speaker 1: incredibly much for the hours upon hours and hours of
Speaker 1: work that you have put into making WEKF as successful
Speaker 1: as it has been for nearly a decade.
Speaker 3: Wow.
Speaker 1: It is an extraordinary feet to produce a daily show
Speaker 1: that is as that tried to be informative uh and
Speaker 1: hopeful but honest uh and I really could not have
Speaker 1: done it without you. And I just I want to
Speaker 1: thank you for for every bit of passion uh that
Speaker 1: you put into into this and into me over the
Speaker 1: last seven years.
Speaker 3: Thank you very much. I'm honored and I'm excited for
Speaker 3: what's next for you. I'm apprehensive about what's next for me,
Speaker 3: but I'll be you know, I'll be good.
Speaker 2: You will you will be great.
Speaker 1: Thank you because of the talents that that you have,
Speaker 1: So thank you for making the time to join wok
Speaker 1: f Daily. Thank you for all of the work that
Speaker 1: you've put into wok f Daily and.
Speaker 2: I appreciate you.
Speaker 3: Thank you very much.
Speaker 2: That is it for me today.
Speaker 1: Dear friends on Woke af as always, Power to the
Speaker 1: people and to all the people.
Speaker 2: Power, get woke and stay woke as fuck.