WEBVTT - Valuations Are Just About Average, Herro Says

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Brought you by Bank of America Mary Lynch. Investing in

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 1>local communities, economies and a sustainable future. That's the power

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of global connections, Mary Lynch, Pierce Fenner and Smith Incorporated

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Member s I p C. Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast.

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Keene with David Gura. Daily we bring you

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Find Bloomberg Surveillance on iTunes, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot Com, and

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 1>of course on the Bloomberg. John Gollub joins us now

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 1>in our Bloomberg eleven three studios here in New York.

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>John and Gollo the chief US market strate that RBC

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Capital Markets. We're just reminiscing about the evening of number

0:00:57.320 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>November eight. You are here as we went through the results.

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Even what's your sense of what's happened since market wise?

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>There was this swoon, there was this great enthusiasm in

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the markets afterwards. Help us understand what's been through the

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>going through the dulations here leading up to today. Well,

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 1>you mean, I think there's two stories. The first thing

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 1>is there was this natural knee jerk reaction to to Trump.

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:20.039
<v Speaker 1>But then I think the market realized that these pro

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>growth policies may actually um not you know, maybe maybe

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>much more important or positive than people think. But what

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 1>really has happened over the last four months is that

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the economy has been really good. Expectations for corporate profits

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>have been good. UM. If you look at um market returns,

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the day before the election, when people thought Hillary was

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>going to win, the market was up, and then after

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the market was still up. So it appears the real

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:45.959
<v Speaker 1>story here is this is way less about Donald Trump

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and really more about an approving global economy and US

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>economy and the reflation trade. You've helped us with the

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>definition of that, and your most recent note you you

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>note that you know there are so many definitions spinning right,

0:01:55.920 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>how do you define those reflationary pressures? We we've been in, uh,

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>this ultra low inflation, ultra low interest rate environment, and

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>it's been really damaging. And it's been damaging, for example,

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>to people who are in retirement or planning for retirement,

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and it causes them to do something really interesting, was

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to save even more money because they can't get any

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of return on their assets. UM. While you would

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:22.920
<v Speaker 1>think that corporations would take advantage of these low interest

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>rates they look at as a sign of the world

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>being broken, and they do the opposite. They actually refused

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:31.639
<v Speaker 1>to invest and so so there's actually a fair bit

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>of damage done by this this kind of environment. So

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>reflating and getting back to something which looks more normal,

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>where you can actually get a return on your bank

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:42.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, on on a savings account, that's actually a

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>really positive thing and maybe the big surprise over the

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>next year or two if rates can get back towards

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>something that feels a bit more normal. Was there a

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Trump trade, as as you look back at it now,

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>was there a Trump trade? If there was, when one

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 1>did lose its luster for you, I think that there

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>was probably Trump trade for about a week, you know,

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>if you look. Market had this vicious sell off and

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>stopped out really overnight, and then it bounced really hard.

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>But for the last three and a half months, most

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>of this has just been economics, and we can see

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that by the kinds of companies that are are driving

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the market. John's great to have David gur back. He

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>took his family to Antarctica and I've got an email

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>he was like a tour Tara del Fuego and he

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>got at the Buenos Areas for the fight back, and

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>it's long with that. Help us here with the idea

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>of foreign investment right now, if I want to invest seriously,

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>not in Antarctica, but in Argentina, is how do I

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>express it? Now? Do I do it through US multinationals

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>or do I buy abroad? You know, there's there's a

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>ton is a big difference between the companies that you

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>would invest in in the US compared to overseas. Um

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>non US portfolios tend to have a ton of banks

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and old economy, and in the US, you you know,

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>if you think about innovative tech companies and biotech companies,

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>so the US kind of feels more like the Nasdaq

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>is a bit fresher. The interesting thing though, is if

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the economy is bouncing, old economy, these old banks in

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:19.679
<v Speaker 1>old industry tends to actually bounce harder, which could surprisingly

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>be good for some of these non US investments. What's

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>been going on with emerging markets surprising results since the

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 1>election you've versus Yeah, if you look at kind of

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the orthodoxy or and the data proves us to be

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the cases. When the dollar is strengthening, you don't want

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>to be in emerging markets, and emerging markets have been

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>on fire. Um, it's really about a re risking. I mean,

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>what do you have right now is small caps are

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 1>beating the markets. Riskier assets are beating the markets. Companies

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that are more volatile and less stable and less have

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>less dependable earnings are beating the markets. And that environment

0:04:55.600 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>has just been great for emerging market companies. And and

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>it's it really has been the whole the big surprise

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>over last three or four months. I was talking with

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:06.679
<v Speaker 1>our colleague Oliver Rennick, and he said that small caps

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>is really where it's at at this point. How do

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you what's your advice on how to approach that space

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>right now? If we're seeing that looked upon so favorably well,

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:16.239
<v Speaker 1>if you if you said, what are the real big wins,

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 1>and all of them I think are going to continue.

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>First of all, just betting on the banks as a

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:23.840
<v Speaker 1>win has been If you did that, nothing else you've got,

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:28.799
<v Speaker 1>you've done unbelievably well. I think that continues to ride. Um.

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Value stocks, cheap companies have you know, have outperformed the market.

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>And then smaller companies. But the smaller company thing is

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>really about risk. It's the fact that they are risky

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 1>or more volatile, and that's what's really been driving it,

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>not the fact that they're small. How do I catch?

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:50.159
<v Speaker 1>And I mean I heard this, it didn't buy the bank.

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I didn't hear this eighteen times this weekend, but I'm sorry, folks,

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I heard it like six times. The percentage of the

0:05:57.160 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>institutional and retail public that hasn't made the bogey is

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen it. It's off the chart. Do you

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 1>catch up with you so leverage? Do you catch up

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>with going sexier, fancier higher? Beata to use a Greek letter, folks.

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 1>We have to use a Greek letter every day. Last night,

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean they needed beta last night at

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:20.239
<v Speaker 1>the end of the oscars. Help me, Actually they needed

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a stiff drink. Help me here with how I catch up?

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, Tom, I don't think you want to invest

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>thinking about how you catch. There's what you haven't done.

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 1>So what you want to do is just you know,

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>if you think that this thing has lags, I think

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>that you want to get in it in the kind

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>of in the and really what's been working the last

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>few months. It's value companies. It's companies are a little

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:46.039
<v Speaker 1>bit riskier, it's banks, it's cyclical. The arch idea here,

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:50.559
<v Speaker 1>and please you're the pro I'm not. You jump into

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 1>the market knowing you could enjoy a bear market of

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>x percent down and you still got to get in

0:06:56.760 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 1>the market psychologically ready to take that hit if it comes.

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>We've all gotten spoiled. I forget about whether you you

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you have a pullback of two percent or five percent

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, which is which is normal and that.

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>But but if you're talking about really big you know, pullbacks,

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:20.239
<v Speaker 1>they almost only occur when you have recessions, and there's

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>just none of the indications that a recession is around

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the corner are in place. So the likelihood of having

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that walloping pull back's just extremely alone that you lower

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>right now. You have to have something really go badly

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>um and and right now from an economic and markets perspective,

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't appear to be there. Could we be missing

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>something We talked about orthodoxy and how emerging markets should

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>be performing with the dollar ware it's at Could we

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>be missing something when it comes to forecasting for a

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>recession at this point if there can clearly be policy issues,

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and you know, if you have these border just a

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>tax issues, or if we end up in a trade war,

0:07:58.000 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>or if to some type of a geopolitical event, they

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>could be really disruptive and in the market struggling with

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>a hand handicap that but if you look even at

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the volatility in the market, the market's telling you that

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>that it thinks the likelihood of those things is reasonably low. So, yeah,

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>we could be missing We could always be missing something.

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>But the yield curve that you know, the difference between

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a long dated bond and something that's near you know,

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a short dated UM, it's steep. That's a sign that

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>you're not likely to have a recession. Um. You know,

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the employment market, we're creating lots of jobs. That's not

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:37.119
<v Speaker 1>something you have as you're moving towards a recession. Wages

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>arising steadily, that's not something that has housing activity. You know,

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>if you've made a list of the dozen things you

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>want to see to tell you that recessions aren't around

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the corner, you know ten of the twelve or telling

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:49.679
<v Speaker 1>you or twelve or the twelve we're telling you that

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>everything's gone. You and I mentioned the banks earlier. You

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>said me, in the banks, if you believe in higher rates,

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:57.679
<v Speaker 1>what about the industrials. The President likes to trot these

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>people out a photo fest at the White House. Are

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>they happy? I mean Emerson Electric the CEO shows up.

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Is the Emerson Electrics of the world happy. I think

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a much murkier picture. The g D P ain't there. Well.

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>But if you think about if you're a company, one

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of the things you want to know is where you're

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:19.959
<v Speaker 1>gonna get your supplies from. And if you don't know

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>what the border adjusted taxes or trade agu is gonna be.

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>If you're a Ford and you don't know whether you're

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 1>making cars in Mexico or the United States, it affects decisions.

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to me. I'm glad you mentioned this. We're

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna come back with John Gallup. Here's gonna do, folks,

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 1>because you know my theme this week. And besides, I

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>missed David Girl so much like Antarcticle with the kids.

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Are you kidding me? A sheet of ice is gonna

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>fall into the ocean anyways, I said, besides missing David Girl,

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I said, I gotta read about the border tax I'm

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna put out on Twitter two killer articles on the

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>border tacks that I looked at. Uh, this uh weekend,

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna rip up the script big time right now.

0:09:56.320 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Greg Villier just wrote a blistering note on Republican reality,

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>speaking about an epic war to come in the budget battle.

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>He takes it back John Gallop to the Budget Control

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Act of two thousand eleven, which sets the question your

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>caps and you know all the rest of it. What

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>happens to your world And forget about the politics of this, folks,

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 1>pro Trump, anti Trump. If we just get delay, if

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the X axis extends out where what we thought would

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>happen in April happens in November, where we thought what

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>would happen in November is pushed into the next year.

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>If two thousand eighteen is pushed to two thousand twenty,

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>how does your world respond to that? Well, first of all,

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that's exactly what's going to happen. I mean,

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you saw this with Minuchin who talked about hoping to

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>get something on taxes by August, which probably means that

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 1>getting something on taxes is a two thousand and eighteen events. Um,

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:02.679
<v Speaker 1>as long as we are confident that there's something which

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>looks like pro growth somewhere in the attainable future. Six

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 1>months nine months twelve months out. I think the market

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>stays perfectly engaged. What we don't want to see is

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the process breakdown in front of us to believe that

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>it can't happen as long as we have that promise

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>a year from now, six months from now. All the

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>same time, I look at the Bloomberg, I pick up

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the FT, I see a lot of articles about how

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>investors are very hungry for detail in the speech tomorrow night.

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>And you look back at history State of Union addresses,

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>joint UH addresses to joint Sessions of Congress are usually

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>short on details. They're full of sweeping statements, and seems

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>like from Gregvlier's note, the tom I just mentioned, we're

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>going to get a big, sweeping rhetorical speech tomorrow night.

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:41.839
<v Speaker 1>How important are the details to you? How important is

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>it that there be details in that speech tomorrow night? Okay,

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>so the details are really important, and I have zero expectations.

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean, you're talking about, David that on

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>a president other than Donald Trump has been short on

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:58.559
<v Speaker 1>giving details. What's the what's the incentive for Donald Trump

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to give details at this very moment of time. David,

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>continue here, but I just had an incredible insight went

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>through my Monday morning brain. Forget about fake news. What

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>if he started going on fake strategy guys like John

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>fake strategy from John gollub, I mean, that could be

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that that could be the next frontier for Bloomberg surveillance.

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>We can debate the fakeness of it. But listening to

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the Sunday shows yesterday on on Bloombergradi yesterday afternoon, there

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>were a lot of conversations about here we are a

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:28.199
<v Speaker 1>few weeks into the first hundred days, so there's still

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>time to go. But we haven't seen great movement in

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:33.959
<v Speaker 1>the House or Senate when it comes to repealing the

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Affordable Care Act. We haven't seen a lot when it

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>comes to tax reform. How worried about that? Are you?

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>That the that the great strategic promise there was a

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of this stuff would happen early. You know, from

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 1>a market's perspective, what's most important is that he give

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>priority to the things that the market cares about most.

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>And so the market doesn't care about um immigration issues.

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>The market care is really about two things that care about.

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:58.599
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't care about the New York Times. Yeah, and

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the market doesn't care about but but the latest tweet

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:02.679
<v Speaker 1>or whether he shows up to you know, to a

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:05.679
<v Speaker 1>press event. What the market cares about is, um, are

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>we going to see something on taxes? And and frankly,

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>if it happens at the beginning of eighteen instead of

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the middle of seventeen, as long as we believe that

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:14.679
<v Speaker 1>in directly it's moving, so I think the market is

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be comfortable with that. And the market wants

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>to see, you know, a pullback in regulation and all

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 1>these things. Taxes is really hard, but on the regulatory front,

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot that it can do through executive order. UM.

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 1>There there is areas such as financial regulation. We're both

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Democrats and Republicans believe that there are areas within Dodd

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Prank Frank that can be improved upon. So even a

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 1>modest softening of things like that, UM would would really

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 1>be quite appealing. What the market doesn't want to see

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 1>is an obsession on things that don't matter to the economy.

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>As an investor, am I happy that executive from big

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>companies are now interfacing with the president in a new way,

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 1>that they're being called to the portico, that they're being

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>called to the cabinet room to meet with the president

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>to have these listening sessions. Is that a good thing,

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that new kind of dynamic. You know, as as I'm

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:00.839
<v Speaker 1>talking to institutional investors, they're frankly not spending as much

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:03.719
<v Speaker 1>time worrying about the latest photo up with what they

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 1>what they're obsessing on which they're not getting to your

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>point is they want to see the actual details around

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 1>this tax plan more than anything else. In the extent

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 1>that they can get that on some regulatory issues as well. Great, Um,

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 1>but it appears as if this stuff is going to

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>be um, take a little time. And I think Manuchin

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>did a brilliant job of putting August out there by

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>basically saying, is I'm promising if something's on the come,

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>just be patient with me. And I think that that

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 1>was a really smart move. You must be happy now

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to see Steven Manuchan in that job, to see Rex

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>de Lerson confirming in that job. It must provide some

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>stability for the market to have the heads of those

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>agencies in place. Yeah, And I think that there's a

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>wide belief that whether you agree with their politics or

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>this or that, that they're grown ups in the seats

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>their reasonable guys. Um. If you look at the when

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>when Tillerson was speaking to foreign leaders or when the

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Vice president speaking to foreign leaders, they're speaking with with

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the tone which is I think pretty comfortable for people. Lincoln,

0:14:57.960 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna run out of time here, Lincoln, here in

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>thir seconds your view with Tom Purcelli's view, there are

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>we going to get the g d P the president

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>needs to make America great again. Let's call it three

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>point zero. Yeah, we have a shot at something between

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>two and a half and three percent this year. But

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 1>but the real I think that what you're gonna get

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>is nominal GDP will be substantially hired. That's GDP plus inflation.

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>What's that We can't talk real wages. You gotta come

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>back and we got to talk about real wages will

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>be out. That's that's what people will focus on. Okay,

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>John Golif RBC Capital Markets, thank you for the time commitment.

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>This Monday morning, David Gura and Tom Keen worldwide, coast

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to coast. This is Bloomberg. David, I want you to

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>bring in the next guest here as we tell talk

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 1>about policy in the abstract issues of medicine. But I

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>just want to say, David that every parent has tattooed

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to their brain the once a year, the once every

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>three years. Where you you go, where you go where

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I live is five. He's that's where you go when

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you need there's that moment where you need to go

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>with said child, and it's He's sixty Street, New York,

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>New York. A man very familiar with that addresses Dr

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Steve core and he's the President and c of New

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 1>York Presbyterian Hospital. Joining us here in our studios in

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>New York as the President prepares to meet with health

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>insurance company CEOs. He's calling it a listening session. Today

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 1>he's had he's had a few of these. Were you

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>around the table or what would you say to him

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>about what needs to happen to Affordable Care Act, whether

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>it's repeal, replaced, repair? What does the government need to

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>do here to write the ship? Well, I think repeal

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>is UH an overreach. I think that the Medicaid expansion

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:58.520
<v Speaker 1>has worked. I think a number of Republican governors have

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>told the President that I think the Medicaid expansion should

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>continue and not be rolled back. UH. The individual insurance

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>market needs to be repaired. We have many areas in

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the country where there's only a single insurer. People are

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:16.919
<v Speaker 1>concerned about deductibles and premiums, but that individual insurance market

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>cannot work in the absence, in my opinion, of an

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:23.199
<v Speaker 1>individual mandate and subsidies for the insurance companies. And I

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>think the health insurance executives will tell the President that

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>today you've got a company like pulling out of a

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>number of these markets saying they're not eager to get

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>back into them at this point in time. What's it

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:34.200
<v Speaker 1>going to take these insurers to get back into markets

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that they well, I think first there needs to be stability.

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 1>You need to tell people this is where we're going.

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it would be very unfortunate if with the

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>House Republican Reconciliation Bill, the individual mandate and the subsidies

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>were removed, because that that will just precipitate this happening. Doctor,

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you're out of Northwestern and then Columbia p ands and

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:58.400
<v Speaker 1>you've got this blending of being a practicing cardiologist with

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the actual running of hospital. What do doctors and nurses

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>want or think of this silly debate in Washington. Basically,

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>we have non experts experting on the fact that if

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:16.199
<v Speaker 1>David Gura's kids or my kids are sick. We need

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>them fixed by the best talent we can find. How

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 1>do you people respond to this debate? In Washington, we

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>have over thirty thousand employees, and I would tell you

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>that their response to this is, when somebody's sick, you've

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.920
<v Speaker 1>got to take care of them. One out of every

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:34.719
<v Speaker 1>four people in New York State is on Medicaid. One

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>out of every three New York City residence is on Medicaid,

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and this is replicated throughout the country. UM. I think

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:45.640
<v Speaker 1>it's important to recognize that Medicaid insures over seventy five

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 1>million Americans, and you have to have insurance in this country.

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Access to care is not insurance. One of the great

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 1>things is that Logan in Boston are there's many other cities.

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 1>Here at JFK, foreign people come here when they're really sick.

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.199
<v Speaker 1>I've seen it. They come through our airports, whether it's

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland Clinic or Mgture You're wonderful hospital. How do we

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>repair and move forward away from six of gdp HE

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:16.920
<v Speaker 1>or whatever we're spending to the proper balance of medicine.

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I think in order to bend the cost curve, you've

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:23.679
<v Speaker 1>got to deal more with preventive health, mental health. I

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 1>know this is unpopular in many areas, but UM, I

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>am in favor of attacks on sugary drinks. You've seen

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>in Mexico, the the reduction in soda consumption. Uh, if

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you can't prevent illness, you're going to have UM six

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>substantial expenses associated with caring for people, and I think

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that that is one of the things that should be

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.399
<v Speaker 1>kept with the Affordable Care Act. Just about thirty seconds

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 1>left too short. I'm sorry to say it. Are you?

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Are you convinced this is going to be a more

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:52.919
<v Speaker 1>participatory process going forward. A lot of people have complained

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that when the Portal CARECT came about, all the parties

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:57.679
<v Speaker 1>were involved in crafting it. That needed to be when

0:19:57.760 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>it comes to changing the law. Do you think more

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>voy say we're going to be here, They're gonna be

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 1>more voices at the time. I would hope that we

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:05.120
<v Speaker 1>can get bipartisan support on that. Right now, it looks

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>like it is just going to be one party doing it,

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:10.119
<v Speaker 1>and I think that would be unfortunate. Do I have

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:13.439
<v Speaker 1>to walk ten thousand steps today? I'd like for you

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:19.879
<v Speaker 1>to go away the tall ten thousand step things you

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>think is A is A is an adequate measure of

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>good health. A path to good health. Exercise is great

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 1>for the brain, great for the heart, and I would

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:31.439
<v Speaker 1>urge everybody to exercise. You are you are so done.

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Dr Corwin, Thank you so much. Presbyterian. Please come by

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>in a weekly. Oh I just got in a message

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 1>here from Mrs Keane. Have Dr Carwin daily. Okay, thank you,

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 1>David Garrow Toime Keen. This is Bloomberg, brought you by

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America. Mary Lynch. Dedicated to bringing our clients

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>in sites and solutions to meet the challenges of a

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>transforming world. That's the power of global connections, Marylynch, Pierce

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>Federin Smith Incorporated, Member s I p C. David Gura,

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:21.879
<v Speaker 1>this is very, very smart work on our foreign policy

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and the choices in the debates the new administration has

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to do. I like Trump's team of rivals. It's very lincolness.

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Wright is online director of the Project on International

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:36.639
<v Speaker 1>Order and Strategy at the Brookings Institution, co author of

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>a new report Building Situations of Strength and National Security

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Strategy for the United States and Thomas right, let me

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 1>ask you first of all about this president's national security strategy.

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>How different is it now that Michael Flynn. Lieutenant Michael

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Flynn is out office, he's no longer the National Security Advisor.

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Did we see Donald Trump's foreign policy change? I think

0:21:56.560 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>it's highly significant, actually is it's one of the most

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>significant developments or in his first month in office, and

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:07.120
<v Speaker 1>not typically in the way people think, though, I think,

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:09.640
<v Speaker 1>what what what? What? What's striking to me is that

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>this basically denies President Trump and Steve Bannon sort of

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:19.200
<v Speaker 1>access in control of the bureaucracy to forward the America

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:22.120
<v Speaker 1>First agenda. So you know, to the extent that they

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>have very radical ideas about American farm policy, it is

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:29.919
<v Speaker 1>much harder now for them to use the interagency process

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 1>and sort of the flight as infrastructure to push that

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>throughout the different departments in a way they might have

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:37.919
<v Speaker 1>been able to do so with Flynn. So you know,

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>President Trump still has its views, Bannon still has this views.

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 1>They'll do their thing, but there's a bit more of

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 1>a constraint there from the NSC than there was a

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>few weeks ago. What's your sense of who is crafting

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and guiding foreign policy in this White House? Is it

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:56.919
<v Speaker 1>hr McMaster, Michael Flynn's successor. Is it James Maddis the

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Defense, Rex tillers in the Secretary of State, or

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 1>is it the as in himself. I think there's no

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>easy answer to that, because there is a structural incoherence

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of built into this administration, like there's no um,

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 1>there's no sort of unified position, and there will not

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>be one because there the views of the President and

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 1>of Bannon and maybe two others around him are so

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally different than those of the cabinets. So what we're

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>likely to see is a continuing sort of struggle and

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 1>wrestling maps to see who comes out on top on

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 1>different issues. But those looking for sort of the you know,

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the voice of of coherence or who can sort of

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>sum it all up, I think they'll be looking for

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.360
<v Speaker 1>a long time because that's that's not going to happen. Um.

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I think in a Trump administration. We're talking to Jonathan

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Galub with the OURBC Capital Markets and he spoke about

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 1>how he's listening to what the Vice president has to

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 1>say when he's traveling abroad, He's listening to the Secretary

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of State when he goes to Europe and talks to

0:23:56.640 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 1>our our allies there. How much discord or distance, says

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 1>there between the message we're hearing from those underneath Donald

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump and those the messages that we're hearing from the

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>president himself, Well, there's enormous difference, you know. But the

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Vice president's comments and Munich are a great example, like

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:14.919
<v Speaker 1>he went there and gave a speech as that that

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>George W. Bush could have given. Um, So that that

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 1>is reassuring to a lot of people who want to

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 1>see a strong story of US alliance in Europe. But

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the fact of the matter is that if there's a crisis,

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>say there's a crisis of Russia in the politics or

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:32.160
<v Speaker 1>somewhere else, the person who gets to make the decision

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>about what to do is the president, right. So, um,

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I certainly understand those who point to Tillerson and Pence

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and Madison say, oh, you should just listen to them,

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:44.640
<v Speaker 1>that's really what's important. But at the end of the day,

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, Trump is going to have a major say

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and his personal views could determine whether or not the

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>US polled some of these commitments or not. So I'm

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:56.679
<v Speaker 1>not bully reassured. I think it's a positive thing that

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>they're saying, that things are saying and I'm glad they're

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:02.160
<v Speaker 1>doing it when they go tom when when matters Tillerson

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 1>offense goes to these places. But it's not as sufficient. Okay,

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 1>enough of the brookings feet stuff, doctor Wright. Tomorrow night.

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:17.120
<v Speaker 1>If the president possibly goes off speech script and let's

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:19.640
<v Speaker 1>say he goes after fake news, etcetera, all the other

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 1>themes of the moment, if he starts bashing name the

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>nation or you know, the Sweden idiocy of two weeks ago,

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:31.120
<v Speaker 1>how do you respond to that? How how do our

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:35.160
<v Speaker 1>allies what a quaint word, how do our allies respond

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to that? Yeah, No, it's a great question. I mean

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 1>I think what they have two reactions. One is that

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>it will it will really um, it will really underscore

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>their concerned that they will be really worried basically that

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 1>they can't trust the president. Um. They'll essentially, you know,

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:55.360
<v Speaker 1>think that if push comes to shove and there's a problem,

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, this guy doesn't understand them and it's a

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>wild card. And the other thing is they look for

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 1>assurance from everyone else. Just as we were talking about

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a second ago. The next day, all the other members

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of the cabinet will come out and say that's not

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>what he really meant and you know, our alliance is strong,

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:14.679
<v Speaker 1>as there will be some sort of assurance there. But

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:19.160
<v Speaker 1>these episodes like Sweden or Australia or any one of

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 1>a number of examples over the last you know, month

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 1>or so, you know, they point to the fact that

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the commander in chief is not exactly um, you know,

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:34.119
<v Speaker 1>it's not exactly uh, you know, upholding the alliances and

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 1>commitments from your international relations per view. Why is trade down?

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Why is world trade down down? Down down over like

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:47.920
<v Speaker 1>over the last few years or less ten years last,

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:51.719
<v Speaker 1>the growth of trade is down. I mean, we're not

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>getting it like we used to get it. Yeah, I

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:58.199
<v Speaker 1>think it's you know, I think there are I do

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:00.879
<v Speaker 1>think that they're you know, we're the important time we

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>say this in the report you mentioned to look at

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 1>free trade agreements and look at economic diplomacy and say,

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:10.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's not just about market access anymore. It's

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 1>also about distortions in the market, whether it's Chinese use

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of state owned enterprises or currency or many other issues,

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and then to work with like minded countries to try

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to address those, you know, problems. So I think there

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:26.920
<v Speaker 1>are problems in you know, the global economy. Trump is

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:30.199
<v Speaker 1>not sort of wrong about that, but it's really you know,

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 1>how he's responding and whether or not the appropriate way

0:27:32.840 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 1>to respond is by launching a trade war or general

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 1>economic war with China or Mexico, which could be catastrophic

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and kind of productive, you know, or is it to

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:46.680
<v Speaker 1>work you know, diplomatically and multilaterally with with other sort

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:52.440
<v Speaker 1>of large industrialized democracy to try to address these these issues.

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:54.440
<v Speaker 1>So I do think, you know, I do think there's

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not that the concerns about the training system are unfounded.

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I think there there is, um there is some reason

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>for concern, but it's not it's not in the sense

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:05.399
<v Speaker 1>that he's saying that the US has lost out in

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>these deals and it's just been negotiating badly. I think

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Thomas right. You have a book coming out All Measures

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 1>short of We're the Contest for the twenty Century in

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the Future of American Power, due to be published in May,

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and I can just picture you pouring over the galleys

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>in early November and the election was how much did

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:24.920
<v Speaker 1>you have to revise in light of this election, in

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 1>light of what we're seeing with this new administration. Yeah,

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 1>and it's a great question. You know, the draft was

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:32.880
<v Speaker 1>done before November eight, but I had you know, they

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:34.720
<v Speaker 1>said that if the if Trump won, I'd have a

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:37.879
<v Speaker 1>chance to make some revisions. Um, well, you know, the

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 1>book read is arguing that the you know, this age

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 1>is sort of great power cooperation and convergence towards the

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>liberal international order is is over and unraveling, and that

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing the advent of a more nationalists and geopolitically

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>competitive world. And so prior to the election, I thought

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the US to be pushing back against that, you know,

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that the US to be trying to op that from

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>happening and trying to uphold the liberal order. And I

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>guess that what I sort of corrected for was that

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>actually the US is more caught up in it than

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I might have, you know, than I had anticipated. But

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the basic sort of gist of the of the argument

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I think was was, I mean, in some ways Trump

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 1>just confirmed it, right, because it's just really underscored that

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>this was this force is even stronger than I pought,

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and I thought it was sort of the driving force.

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 1>That's right. One more question if we can squeeze it

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 1>in here. You have the luxury of experience in Dublin,

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Cambridge and over UH at Georgetown as well. Is there

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:40.719
<v Speaker 1>a risk of the city in the financial part of

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 1>London could move part or all to Dublin. Do you

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 1>buy that idea? Well, I think that. I mean, I

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 1>think that they will definitely lose. The City of London

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 1>will definitely be diminished. I think there's very little dabt

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 1>about that, and the folks I speak to over there

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>when I when I go over to UH for events

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 1>in the City of London very much acknowledge it upfront.

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 1>If the question is the destination, I think it's not.

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not at all clear will be Dublin, although Dublin

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>is picking up some business, but Frankfurt and Amsterdam I

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>think are strong competitors as well. But you know, the

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:19.480
<v Speaker 1>folks in London hope that they will only lose business

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 1>that is specific to you know, the passporting issue, but

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 1>it could be more broad than that. I think we've

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 1>got to leave it there time right, Thank you so much.

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Dr Wright is with Brookings Institution. What we're gonna do

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 1>years investment talk and we'll do the political talk in

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 1>our next section with one of our most popular guests,

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 1>one d Herrow David Harrold of Harris associates and the

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 1>oak Mark International Fund joins us. Now, David, you've had

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 1>mense repair to your track record, and this is typical

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>with international where you get a ginormous year and then

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you get a bad year, and maybe you get two

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>good years and two off the marketers. What's the year

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 1>ahead or the two year ahead view? David Harrow on

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>international stocks versus US multinationals. Well, good morning, Tom, And

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 1>this view for me, anyways, always predicated on where we

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 1>sit in terms of the valuation spectrum, where stocks are trading,

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 1>in terms of you know, conventional conventional valuation uh in

0:31:38.160 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 1>dissees that I like to use, like cash flow yields

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>EV two EVA. I mean just looking at how businesses

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 1>are priced and given what business conditions are like and

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 1>what we see today's there about average price. We don't

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 1>see panic fire sales like we saw during certain periods

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 1>in the last year or two. Recalling the beginning of

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 1>we had a very very weak start, a bottomed in

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 1>February and then an international market's got really hit hard

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 1>right after Brexit. And to me, these were really really

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 1>good panic buying panic There was panic selling given a

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 1>good buying opportunity. UM, we don't see you four in

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the markets because they're still there's still people scared of

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 1>what might happen in Europe with the elections, and we

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 1>always have this with the elections, um. But so what

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>we see is valuations are just about average. They're they're

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 1>not super attractive, and they're not over the humble. One

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 1>forgets to mention that thirty two days ago you were

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 1>named morning Stars International Stock Fund Manager of the Year.

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>And the issue here, David Girl, it's like the Oscars.

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 1>You just expect that Meryl Street will come up on

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the stage, same thing with David Harrow. But David, to

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the boom bust of your world and you've won every

0:32:58.800 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 1>award there is within is you just assume last year

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 1>was a great year, this year is a bad year. No,

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily. What you do assume is that you can't

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>look in the past, and you have to keep looking

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 1>forward and you have to keep the portfolio forward positioned.

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 1>And you know, if I look at my history at

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Harris Associates, it's almost twenty five years, there's been about

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 1>three or four big bust years and about twelve or

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>thirteen big boom years. And to me, that's that's livable,

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:31.720
<v Speaker 1>because what we're ultimately trying to deliver is performance over

0:33:31.760 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 1>three fifteen years as opposed to just trying to match

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the index over week to week, month to month, quarter

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to quarter, half year and a half year. And I

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:43.160
<v Speaker 1>think there is a trade off. There is a trade

0:33:43.160 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 1>off between, you know, trying to achieve short term performance

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and trying to achieve medium and long term And we'll

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 1>take the medium and long term any day. So if

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 1>it means some short term under performance, I'll take that,

0:33:54.760 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 1>if it means we're going to get greater medium and

0:33:57.080 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 1>long term out performance. Ask you a bit about the

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Italian banking sector. We've talked about that a bunch here

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 1>over these last last few months, and let me just

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 1>get a sense of where you see opportunity there. There

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:10.799
<v Speaker 1>were reports here of Antessa generally merger happening, and we've

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 1>talked about the need perhaps for for more consolidation in

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the banking sector in Italy and Europe more generally. Where

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:19.800
<v Speaker 1>do you see things headed there? Yeah, there definitely needs

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to be more consolidation in the Italian banking market, probably

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 1>even in the German the Lindest bunk in which the

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 1>setup there makes it very difficult for any bank to

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:33.000
<v Speaker 1>make money doing local banking in Germany. But back to Italy. Yeah,

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 1>we're big shareholders of Intessa and we were watching this

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:41.719
<v Speaker 1>quite closely because this generally, in our view, it made

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:45.279
<v Speaker 1>limited sense. And management assured us they're going to stick

0:34:45.320 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to the plan. They're going to stick to their capital

0:34:48.239 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 1>allocation policies Etter and so we trusted and we trusted

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:55.280
<v Speaker 1>him as they have a very good track record. The

0:34:55.320 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Antessa is very sound. Uh. They continue to form,

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 1>they're starting to grow their loan book, Loan losses are

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:07.000
<v Speaker 1>going down, costs are going down, and they're distributing most

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of their excess capital, which they have a bit of

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 1>and Testa sel Paul actually has excessive capital and they're

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:15.759
<v Speaker 1>distributing it most of it back to owners. So this

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:19.319
<v Speaker 1>is what we liked, and we were raise some doubts

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 1>on this generally, but they looked at it, they looked

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 1>at it closely, and they decided to pull back, which

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:28.279
<v Speaker 1>um us was was a good sign unless you could

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 1>really really make a strong case for business combination because

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:36.239
<v Speaker 1>these things are littered, littered with the laws of unintended

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 1>consequences when you merge to big entasis. There's so much

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 1>work that needs to be done in combining businesses, and

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 1>you just have to make sure you're really paying the

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 1>right price and you have the ability to integrate and

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:52.879
<v Speaker 1>to manage. So that's it's fraught with risks, or we're

0:35:52.920 --> 0:35:55.799
<v Speaker 1>pretty happy that they backed away from that. Jonathan Donald

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:58.279
<v Speaker 1>was here just a few minutes ago talking about how

0:35:58.320 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 1>well you would have done if you've gotten into America

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and financials shortly before the election. Is there still room

0:36:03.960 --> 0:36:06.799
<v Speaker 1>to get into financials here in the US and indeed overseas.

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Overseas in particular, there's been a little bounce, but if

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you just look at the valuation spreads where they're trading

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:17.759
<v Speaker 1>at versus historic on an absolute basis, for other sectors,

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:21.359
<v Speaker 1>there's still a lot of room, and especially since we're

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:25.120
<v Speaker 1>starting to finally see in Europe finally starting to see

0:36:25.239 --> 0:36:28.800
<v Speaker 1>lending growth, you know, three four or five six percent,

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:31.839
<v Speaker 1>and that's better than not. And in the meantime, these

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:35.839
<v Speaker 1>banks have been very proactive at cutting costs. The regulatory

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:40.759
<v Speaker 1>burdens seems to have been the strictest regulatory burdens that

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:43.320
<v Speaker 1>we saw in Bossil three seemed to kind of be

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:45.719
<v Speaker 1>in the rear view mirror. Most of these big European

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:49.719
<v Speaker 1>firms are at or above their desired capital positions. So

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I think valuation is still saying for at least for

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:55.719
<v Speaker 1>European banks like B and P and Tessa Lloyd's. It's

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 1>it's yes, you should be looking at these seriously. How

0:36:58.640 --> 0:37:05.760
<v Speaker 1>did you respond to the Craft Heinz Buffett private equity

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:09.800
<v Speaker 1>tons of money going after Uni Leaver? Here? Did you

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:13.239
<v Speaker 1>wan Unilever? We don't own Uni Leaver, but I and

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:15.759
<v Speaker 1>I've looked at it, we've owned in the past, and

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:19.240
<v Speaker 1>you know this, this company does not have a good pedigree.

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean we recall it was an Anglo Dutch monstrosity.

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:25.879
<v Speaker 1>Two chairman to ce CFOs do everything and I don't

0:37:25.920 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 1>even know if they've ever quite recovered from that. Um.

0:37:29.719 --> 0:37:32.799
<v Speaker 1>You know, these big companies with all these brands, they

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:37.960
<v Speaker 1>just sometimes lack focus and they become huge bureaucracies. And

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, to be honest, I think maybe you know

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the three gene Heinscraft people would have had had good

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:47.920
<v Speaker 1>run at would have had a good run at Unilevers.

0:37:48.120 --> 0:37:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I would guess there's a lot of fact that cut there. Um,

0:37:52.000 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and they have some good brands and some good businesses,

0:37:54.520 --> 0:37:58.360
<v Speaker 1>especially in health and personal care and ice cream. We

0:37:58.440 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 1>all like ice cream. Um, But you know, I'm I'm

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:05.560
<v Speaker 1>surprised that backed away so quickly. Maybe they're reloading or

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:09.840
<v Speaker 1>because I think there's an opportunity there for someone. When

0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you look at the VIX hovering around twelve on the

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:15.239
<v Speaker 1>issue of where does David Harris down the issue of complacency?

0:38:15.320 --> 0:38:16.840
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of the VIX being where it

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:18.719
<v Speaker 1>is and and indeed where it's been here for these

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:22.239
<v Speaker 1>last few months. Yeah, that's not something I give a

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:24.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of thought about. But just looking at how quiet

0:38:24.920 --> 0:38:29.680
<v Speaker 1>things are and knowing that you know, for every period

0:38:29.680 --> 0:38:34.400
<v Speaker 1>of quiet, there's a period of disquiet. I would assume that, um,

0:38:35.000 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not sustainable, but you know, you never know. If

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:39.600
<v Speaker 1>you look at charts of the VIX, there's been periods

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:41.440
<v Speaker 1>of time where it's been law for quite some time,

0:38:42.280 --> 0:38:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think, you know, the market's kind of in

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a good place because you know, what they think is

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:49.919
<v Speaker 1>going to be better more pro capitalist policy coming down

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the road, David, let's talk about the politics. You've been

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 1>moderately active in Republican politics and in Wisconsin. How's a

0:38:56.719 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 1>state that the president uh, I took right now. How

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:04.160
<v Speaker 1>intrusive is the Washington debate? What we're going to observe

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:08.360
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow night, the present budget debate and with that any

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:12.719
<v Speaker 1>delay in the hopes of Republicans. How intrusive is that

0:39:13.480 --> 0:39:16.400
<v Speaker 1>on our g d P and particularly on our investments.

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:22.239
<v Speaker 1>I think market participants have grown used to this political

0:39:22.360 --> 0:39:26.960
<v Speaker 1>discourse for better or worse, and as a result, um

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:31.920
<v Speaker 1>especially as as a result of various events happening and

0:39:32.200 --> 0:39:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the impacts of markets becoming less and less and less,

0:39:35.560 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and so you're going to continue to see more noise

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:41.719
<v Speaker 1>out of Washington. It is a constant flow. This is

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:44.799
<v Speaker 1>an altunate, but it does seem to be amped up

0:39:44.800 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. How I had to do is watch

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:50.759
<v Speaker 1>the last night's programming on the OSCARS, and I mean,

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:56.440
<v Speaker 1>people are just extremely excited about this whole presidency in

0:39:56.520 --> 0:39:58.920
<v Speaker 1>one direction or the next. But I think the markets

0:39:58.920 --> 0:40:03.080
<v Speaker 1>have grown, um what less responsive. I wouldn't say immune,

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:06.000
<v Speaker 1>but less responsive to all this noise and chatter. And

0:40:06.040 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that what really market participants need to do

0:40:09.520 --> 0:40:13.000
<v Speaker 1>is listen to the policy UH and look for things

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that make it better for corporates to grow their profits

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and cash flow. Streams. You know, if that happens, they

0:40:19.760 --> 0:40:22.400
<v Speaker 1>hire more workers. If that happens, they invest more. If

0:40:22.440 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that happens, you know, it leads to better business conditions

0:40:26.200 --> 0:40:29.239
<v Speaker 1>and economic growth. It's the bottom up value investor. What

0:40:29.360 --> 0:40:33.319
<v Speaker 1>we really want is for our companies to be able to,

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, grow, grow their cash flow streams in a

0:40:37.000 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 1>in a safetound environment. And I think that's what this

0:40:40.120 --> 0:40:43.240
<v Speaker 1>whole rally has kind of been about, is the belief

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:47.880
<v Speaker 1>that the policies of the previous eight years been very

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:53.160
<v Speaker 1>anti capitalist, very anti free market. And I think the policies,

0:40:53.280 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 1>even though they there's a little hair surrounding them, I

0:40:56.680 --> 0:41:00.319
<v Speaker 1>think there's an anticipation that the policies will be lot

0:41:00.320 --> 0:41:05.640
<v Speaker 1>more pro growth, pro free market capitalism. When you are

0:41:05.640 --> 0:41:08.319
<v Speaker 1>you listening now more to those I was chatting about

0:41:08.320 --> 0:41:10.439
<v Speaker 1>this a little bit earlier today. Do you listen less

0:41:10.440 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to Donald Trump and more to say Steven Manuch and

0:41:12.200 --> 0:41:13.600
<v Speaker 1>he has been on the job now for for just

0:41:13.719 --> 0:41:16.480
<v Speaker 1>over a week. Are you when you're when you're trying

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:18.840
<v Speaker 1>to understand what this administration is trying to do? Is

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:21.239
<v Speaker 1>it more useful, last investor, to listen to those heading

0:41:21.280 --> 0:41:23.759
<v Speaker 1>the agencies and those beneath them. You know, it's a

0:41:23.800 --> 0:41:25.799
<v Speaker 1>really good question, is you know, where does the puck

0:41:25.880 --> 0:41:29.720
<v Speaker 1>really stop? Because you know, Trump was all his roaring.

0:41:29.800 --> 0:41:31.840
<v Speaker 1>He does listen to the people around him, and I

0:41:31.880 --> 0:41:34.400
<v Speaker 1>think that was evidence during the whole Remember the first

0:41:34.440 --> 0:41:40.640
<v Speaker 1>executive order, UM, the immigration restrictions, and you heard the

0:41:40.680 --> 0:41:43.080
<v Speaker 1>story of Madison whatever said well what about the green

0:41:43.080 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 1>card holders? And they very quickly got to Trump and

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:48.560
<v Speaker 1>he wanted, you know, wanted that clarified. So he does

0:41:48.719 --> 0:41:51.640
<v Speaker 1>listen to people, um, and he does have very strong

0:41:51.719 --> 0:41:53.520
<v Speaker 1>people around him. That was one of the things that

0:41:53.600 --> 0:41:56.880
<v Speaker 1>surprised me. I thought someone was such a big ego

0:41:57.040 --> 0:41:59.320
<v Speaker 1>would put a bunch of weeklings around him. In fact,

0:41:59.400 --> 0:42:03.719
<v Speaker 1>he put some very very strong, highly opinionated people. And

0:42:03.760 --> 0:42:05.440
<v Speaker 1>so I think you have to really listen to both

0:42:05.440 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and you have to see how to interact. And I

0:42:07.040 --> 0:42:09.960
<v Speaker 1>think really what one has to do is look to

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 1>see if Trump is listening, learning and reacting to his

0:42:13.800 --> 0:42:16.799
<v Speaker 1>skilled advisors. And I think it would be a very

0:42:16.800 --> 0:42:19.759
<v Speaker 1>good sign if he does, because he is new, he

0:42:19.840 --> 0:42:22.120
<v Speaker 1>is new to politics, and he has some very good

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:25.680
<v Speaker 1>people around David Harrow, Thank you so much. Congratulations David

0:42:25.719 --> 0:42:29.279
<v Speaker 1>Harrow in your morning star acclaim it will be. It

0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:35.279
<v Speaker 1>goes on the Harrow mantle of the fireplace, crowd fireplace

0:42:35.360 --> 0:42:38.400
<v Speaker 1>in the west wing. That's where it goes. David Harrow

0:42:38.440 --> 0:42:43.160
<v Speaker 1>with the Market Harris Associates International Manager of the Year.

0:42:43.200 --> 0:42:46.040
<v Speaker 1>But that's how it is, David, I mean, David garraw Um,

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I find it in the international you know, you wait,

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you wait, you go. It's not working. It's not working

0:42:52.960 --> 0:42:56.480
<v Speaker 1>in a boom you get one year or two years too.

0:42:57.760 --> 0:43:00.759
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a different cadence than domestic. Yeah no.

0:43:00.880 --> 0:43:02.440
<v Speaker 1>And I was again struck by what he had to

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:04.880
<v Speaker 1>say there about the European banks. We talked about European

0:43:04.880 --> 0:43:06.960
<v Speaker 1>banks in terms of how they are structurally and in

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the context of financial regulations. But interesting to hear that,

0:43:09.719 --> 0:43:12.680
<v Speaker 1>David Hare, they're talking about opportunity in the European banking

0:43:12.680 --> 0:43:24.000
<v Speaker 1>system right now. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast.

0:43:24.360 --> 0:43:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe and listen to interviews on iTunes, SoundCloud, or whichever

0:43:29.600 --> 0:43:34.040
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm out on Twitter at Tom Keene.

0:43:34.120 --> 0:43:37.920
<v Speaker 1>David Gura is at David Gura. Before the podcast, you

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:54.239
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio brought you

0:43:54.280 --> 0:43:57.880
<v Speaker 1>by Bank of America. Mary Lynch dedicated to bringing our

0:43:58.000 --> 0:44:01.560
<v Speaker 1>clients insights and solutions to meet the challenges of a

0:44:01.600 --> 0:44:06.480
<v Speaker 1>transforming world. That's the power of global connections. Mary Lynch, Pierce,

0:44:06.600 --> 0:44:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Fenner and Smith Incorporated, Member s I p C