WEBVTT - DOJ Sues Georgia Over Voter Law 

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Well, the Justice Department

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>just today this morning is filing a lawsuit against a

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>sweeping new Republican back voting law in Georgia, saying it

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:34.520
<v Speaker 1>represents intentional discrimination against black voters and is unconstitutional. Let's

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>check in with the reporter on that, Storry Chris Strom.

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:41.160
<v Speaker 1>He's a national security reporter for Bloomberg News. Chris Big

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 1>News Today. What do we know right now? So this

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>is the first major action that the Justice Department under

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:51.959
<v Speaker 1>under Biden and Merrick Garland taking in regard to voting. Right,

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>There's been a lot of criticism against the Department as

0:00:55.400 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Republican controlled state moved the past voting laws that critics

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>they are really restrictive and discriminate, and um, you know,

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the Department has been facing a lot of pressure and

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>today they came out with their first action, and um,

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you know it's against the law that uh that Georgia

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Governor Brian Kemp had signed in March that restricts voting

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>access in ballot drop boxes and other things. So, Um,

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that we all have heard about

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>this um Georgia law is that it makes it illegal

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to approach a person and give him or her food

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and water understanding in line to vote. Is that considered

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>somehow racist in itself or is it more of is

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>it more of secondary issue here? I'm having trouble understanding

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>why you why why the Department of Justice would consider

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>this racist. So the issue that you mentioned there is

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the secondary issue. So the stuff this is a complaint

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>is really about the the other sections of the voting law.

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Um that that imposes new voter identification requirements. Um that Um,

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>it's limits. What are the voter What are the voter

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:17.839
<v Speaker 1>identification requirements? Do you have to prove who you are? Somehow? Yes?

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>You can no longer use like photo copies of of

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:24.080
<v Speaker 1>of documents. You have to original You have to use

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the original documents. Those could be easily doctored, right, I mean,

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't it make sense to have to prove your identity. Sure,

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, the thing is is that you know,

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>as as uh you know, Garland has said voting identification

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 1>laws in and of themselves are not um, you know,

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:44.519
<v Speaker 1>are not are not bad. The question becomes how they're

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>applied and what the consequences are going to be and

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>if if they begin to um cause you know, hardships,

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 1>especially targeted against you know, minorities, then there's the potential

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>for violations of federal law. And that's what the Justice

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:07.399
<v Speaker 1>Department is alleging here. Um. You know what what Garland

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:09.519
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, the d o j Is saying

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:13.959
<v Speaker 1>is that this law just goes too far in terms

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of in terms of what it's, what it is requiring,

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:22.799
<v Speaker 1>and and how it's going to have a negative impact,

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 1>especially on minorities. And that's where the kind of you know,

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>rubber meets the road. The the issue of you know,

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the you know, making making it impossible or making it

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>illegal for people to approach voters with water and food,

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's a much secondary issue. And um and

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you know critics, you know, i mean, supporters of that

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>restriction say that voters were being harassed in line, and

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>so it's justified to you know, put that kind of

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>restriction out there, all right, Chris. So the Justice Department

0:03:55.280 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>files here today the lawsuit. What are next steps? Well,

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the next steps are going to be that there's several

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits that are that have already been filed against this law,

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and those will probably most likely to go first into

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>into court um, and the Justice Department will evaluate whether

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>it's going to join in any of those lawsuits, which

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>would be kind of a quicker avenue for the Justice

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Department to become involved, or if the Justice Department will

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>sue its own track. Um. Right now, the Justice Department

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>is pursuing its own track, and so you know, they

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>will go into court and begin to you know, make

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>their make their argument. And it's also possible that you know,

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 1>they reached some kind of a settlement with the with

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Georgia UM where the you know, the governor agrees to

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>make certain you know changes through you know, executive authority

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:55.599
<v Speaker 1>that then satisfies the Justice Department. So it's a long

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 1>way to go before we know how this will play out.

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>At the same time time, the Justice Department is saying

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>that they're looking at other laws and other states, and

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 1>they said clearly today that this was the first of

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>many anticipated actions, and so we can probably expect that,

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Department will move against other laws and

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 1>other states in the coming months. Chris, I wonder on

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:22.359
<v Speaker 1>a on a broader level, on a federal level, is

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>there any um move towards taking away all of this, um,

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:33.359
<v Speaker 1>all of these misunderstandings and and putting into place of

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:35.600
<v Speaker 1>policy the likes of which we see, for example, here

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 1>in Germany, when you register to vote, which you're required

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to do at the age of eighteen, you're issued a

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 1>federal identification card and everyone has one, and there's no

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:51.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, question about, um, whether certain groups are held

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>back for lack of these identification cards. Um, there's I mean,

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>so you know, in the United States, the voting, the

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:04.359
<v Speaker 1>voting is voting is ran by this by the states,

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and there there there is no federal authority that kind

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of dictates. There's no you know, I mean, if you

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 1>want to say, if there's a federal identification then you

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:16.840
<v Speaker 1>can say it's a driver's license, although you know passport,

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:20.360
<v Speaker 1>passport can be another one. But there you know, there's

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>there's cutouts where um, you know, people just get state

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>identification cards rather than like you know, an actual driver's license. Um.

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 1>You know, there is talk about passing a federal legislation

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>then that's been that's been uh, you know, installed in Congress.

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 1>It's very divisive right now and it doesn't look like

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it's going to have the support to move forward. There

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>is a push for UM that the Justice Department wants

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Congress to pass legislation that would give it the ability

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to UM oversee when states make changes to their election laws,

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>that the Justice Department will kind of have to sign

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:55.720
<v Speaker 1>off on that. But I gotta say, like, you know,

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>are you know, Congress in the United States is very

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>deadlock right now, and it doesn't seem like any legislation

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>is canna get through anytime soon. You know, it's clearly

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:05.919
<v Speaker 1>it's very polarized. I was just and you make a

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>good point that it's a the fact that it's on

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>a state basis makes it more difficult for a federal

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>republic uh to do something like that a federal republic

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>like Germany does. It's just that, um, you know, there's

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>there's been so much UM strife around this issue in

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the United States. To me, it would make sense that

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you have to identify yourself, but it should also be

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, everyone should get the same kind of identification.

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's just a little bit more difficult in um,

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>a United States kind of federal situation, right. And it's

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's not just the identification cards either, that's an

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>issue in some of these states, like Georgia. It's also

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple of other factors too. There's also just

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>access to to uh to to voting uh, you know,

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>like using ballot drop boxes and and the hours of

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>which you can vote. And what the o J is

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>saying with the with the Georgia law is that the

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Georgia law live, it's uh ballot drop boxes and specifically

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>limits them in in minority and minority uh community and

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>off the limits the ability for people to vote during hours.

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, it's a fascinating development. Will definitely follow

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>your reporting, Chris, Thanks so much for joining us. Chris

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Strom is our national security reporter for Bloomberg News covering

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Justice suing Georgia over the new voter law.

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. It is Pride Month and here in

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>New York City, NYC Pride Parade will take place this Sunday.

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>We want to check in with Alison Witherspoon. She's the

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>chief marketing officer fort Nissan. Allison, thanks so much for

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:48.199
<v Speaker 1>joining us. I love to get a sense of how

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you guys at Nissan are you know, kind of aligning

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>yourself or interacting with this community here as we celebrate

0:08:56.320 --> 0:09:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Pride Month. Yeah. Absolutely, I think we are very be

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:03.319
<v Speaker 1>proud to be a part of NYC Pride. We're actually

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>supporters of and part of the celebrations for Pride events

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 1>around the country, not just for Pride Month in the

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 1>month of June, but also throughout the year. Um so

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 1>our support continues actually through April with various Pride celebrations

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:23.239
<v Speaker 1>around the country. So for us from a price standpoint

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:25.679
<v Speaker 1>and how we support the l g B t Q

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>plus community, it actually starts with our own employees and

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>it starts internally. So we want to make sure we

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 1>have a commitment to UH. We're committed to diversity, equity

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and inclusion, and we strive to make sure that our

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 1>internal policies, our benefit packages are support for employees is

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 1>inclusive of everyone. So it starts first internally and then

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>we get into how do we support externally with the

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:56.079
<v Speaker 1>l g B t Q community. I I don't want

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 1>to put it on the spot here, but I wonder

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>about UM, this kind of position at Nissan, just in

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:08.839
<v Speaker 1>regards to Japan. UM not famously an inclusive culture. What's

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the lgbt Q plus situation there? Yeah, Actually I worked

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 1>in Japan for a couple of years, so I was

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 1>there for two thousand seventeen through two thousand nineteen, so

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I have direct experience in this. I think. UM. You know,

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:28.559
<v Speaker 1>obviously Asian markets are very different culturally from a support

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of LGBTQ communities. Actually, Nissan is a supporter of the

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:36.839
<v Speaker 1>celebration of the Tokyo Rainbow Pride Parade. UM, we also

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of inclusivity policies and program and training

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>for all of our employees, and that includes in our

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>head in our home market in Japan. Alison, give us

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a sense, as chief marketing officer for Nissan, how Nissan

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>markets and promotes its products to this community, anything, anything

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>unique that you guys are doing. I think for us

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>at Nissan, it's not just one month. To us, it's

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>not just the month of June. We want to be

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>supporting and engaging with the LGBTQ community throughout the year.

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>So this is why we have a full schedule of

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Pride events which we support. UM. We work with all

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of our regions around the country to make sure that

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:19.719
<v Speaker 1>we're supporting at a local level, so it's not just

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>in the month of June. This is a year round

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>support that is part of not just our our business strategy,

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 1>but also our marketing strategy. And I mean, obviously it's

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>just the right thing to do. You want to show

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you know more than tolerance, acceptance and and love. I

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>don't want to sound corny, but you know that's what

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:42.439
<v Speaker 1>makes life worth living, right UM. On the on the

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>business side of things, though, Allison does it, does it

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>pay dividends? I mean, do you see broader acceptance from

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:53.559
<v Speaker 1>that community of your products. I think yes, we do.

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 1>And obviously we know that the LGBTQ community has a

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>very large amount of spending, so I think there's that

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:03.319
<v Speaker 1>piece of it, but we also see that when you

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>show up and you show up authentically and not just

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>in the month of June, we have seen very strong

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>acceptance of our brand as well as our products from

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:17.559
<v Speaker 1>this community. That's a great message. Authenticity is important and

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:22.679
<v Speaker 1>I think consumers definitely recognize that. Alison Witherspoon talking to

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>us as a chief marketing officer at Nissan. Really interesting,

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>UM and cool. We focus obviously on this issue in

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the month and Pride Month, but certainly should be paying

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>attention to it all year round. So Alison, thank you

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:43.559
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Now, let's bring in Andrew

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>chain in right now, chief executive officer at procure a

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 1>m UM. Procure has the e t F UFO. It's

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>not an e t F for unidentified flying objects, but

0:12:57.080 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>rather one that it is a pure play investment in

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>UM space and things surrounding space exploration. Andrew, thanks so

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Uh, what is UM the interest

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>right now in uh? Pure play space e t F

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>as we start to see you know, almost on a

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 1>feel like a weekly basis, UM elon Musk putting rockets

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 1>up there, and new satellite technologies coming out that even

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the average person can afford. You know, the the appetite

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>force based investing is unlike any I've seen UM in

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 1>my career. And there's been so many transformational technological advancement

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that have helped allow us to reduce the cost of

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>sending things down into outer space. We're also even seeing

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>it from the military and defense side of government spending,

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>UM really ramping up space efforts as well. So we're

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 1>at a really unprecedented, unprecedented time for the space industry.

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:57.079
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know, there's a lot of companies that

0:13:57.120 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you can get through play exposure to these days. All right, Andrew,

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:03.839
<v Speaker 1>So looking at UFO, what are some of the big

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>holdings in UFO? Certainly so we have companies like Virgin

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Galactic max are we just recently in the most recent

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>UH rebalanced added company m d A to the fund. Um.

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>You also have a lot of satellite operators and providers,

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>launch companies, and even some of your diversified aerospace and

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>defense names that are major players in the space industry,

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 1>like your Blowings and your Lockey. So, um, if I

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>look at the e t F over the last year,

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>it's just shot up from twenty to h thirty almost

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty two. So you're looking at the game the last

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 1>twelve months, what's your expectation going out a year or two?

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, I can't really make I'm not allowed to

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>make projections. But what we what we can look at

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 1>is there's various investment banks and research houses that have

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 1>all started building focused space analyst team and companies like

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley are predicting that the space industry could be

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>over a trillion dollars by Think of America even pointing

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that the space economy could be roughly two point seven

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars and as of the most recent Space Report,

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>numbers in industry is currently at about four four billion.

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>So um, you know, a lot of a lot of

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>these analysts are pointing to broadband internet and communications really

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>driving that growth over the next several years. Andrew, what

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>we have you? I have to ask you about UFOs.

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I've generally not been a believer in UFOs, but there's

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of military footage, you know, I'm not

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>sure if it's Air Force or Navy pilots, a lot

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of documentaries lately. Yeah, and I understand there's some Pentagon

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>report out there. Give us what you know about that. Yes,

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>we're we're waiting for the public release. There have been

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>several um, you know, individuals and entities that I've been

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>um given copies of the report already. But this was

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>something that was passed in a coronavirus relief plan that

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>this report would need to come out. And essentially, um,

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>from what we're hearing that's been leaked already. Um, you know,

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>it discusses hundreds of confirmed reports of having identified um,

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 1>these UFOs or as they're now calling them, U A

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>p s, And we don't know what they are. And

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>so although we might not have an answer saying that, okay,

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>these crafts that we can't identify or understand our foreign

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>adversaries or other worldly Um, it's terrifying from from both

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 1>your standpoints. One that you know, our adversaries could be

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>a hundred years ahead of us technologically, or on the

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>other end that um, you know, these are other worldly

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>craft that we can't even understand. Oh I see, So

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>you're saying it's possible that rather than aliens, these are

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 1>earthly foreign adversaries. Yes, because I you know, any logical

0:16:56.640 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 1>person who thinks about it rationally has to assume there

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 1>are many other life forms in the universe, right, I

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>mean it's very large and and it's very unlikely that

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>we happen to be on the leading edge of life intelligence,

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:19.680
<v Speaker 1>right Yeah. And it's it's amazing to think that, you know,

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>if there were other countries that were advanced enough to

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>come up with these technologies that defy you our understanding

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of physics. Um, you know that they've just been sitting

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 1>on these technologies and not using them for other purposes.

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 1>So you know, to to think that there could be

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>other technologies that maybe you were you're not far away

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:39.200
<v Speaker 1>from being able to understand or potentially harness and thinking

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>about how that could advance. Uh, you know human you

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>know space, Uh, you know desires as well as just

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, what we can learn from potentially others out

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 1>there that might be a lot smarter than we are.

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>So the fact that our government can't rule that out,

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I think is, you know, potentially, what could be the

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>big takeaway from this? Yeah, if if, if there's that

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:01.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of techno ology coming from other countries on Earth

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>that is slightly terrifying and we don't know about it.

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 1>But Paul Sweeney, don't you have to assume in you know,

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:13.359
<v Speaker 1>a galaxy, that a universe that goes out thirteen billion

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>light years that one of the I don't know how

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>many millions of other planets there are, how many millions

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>of their solar systems there are on on at least

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:26.880
<v Speaker 1>one of those, most likely thousands of them, life forms

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 1>have developed. You know, I'm as big a Star Trek fan.

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I go way back to the original Star trek Um.

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>So yes is my answer. But you know, it just

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>it just haven't really seen any evidence. But this is

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>this new stuff that we're seeing just recently from some

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of these military aircraft are are very interesting to be

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:46.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see what kind of conclusion the Pentagon comes

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:49.719
<v Speaker 1>up with. But Andrew, I mean, when you have all

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:52.920
<v Speaker 1>this talk about potential UFOs, is that good for the

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:57.119
<v Speaker 1>space business? I certainly think so. You know, if you

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:00.040
<v Speaker 1>look at it, you know, our ability to learn and

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 1>whatever these technologies are to you know, advance us, you know,

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 1>extremely quickly if we're able to figure out, you know,

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>how to reverse engineer some of this. And from your

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 1>a defense standpoint, um, you've got to think that there's

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>a there's a good chance that we could see more

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 1>government and military expenditures towards space, whether it's trying to

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to create these technologies ourselves, whether it's

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 1>just tracking, identifying, cataloging, and trying to understand where these

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:27.879
<v Speaker 1>crafts that are moving within our own airspace. So this

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 1>is a national defense issue as well as you know,

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 1>one that could provide opportunities is the Space Force Andrew,

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 1>is still a thing. I know you spent a lot

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>of time thinking about. This is still a thing, absolutely,

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and we're spending going towards space force and that's a

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>growing branch of our military. Sweet is. At first I

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 1>thought it was just like, what is this? You can't

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the Air Force just continue doing it? But maybe, uh,

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe they're onto something. When when are we going to

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>see this report? Officially they were it was supposed to

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>be released actually too day, um, and now they're saying

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>that it could be released by the end of the month.

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 1>So you know, keep keep your eyes killed. This is

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>something that we're we're certainly looking forward to its release.

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 1>And maybe he added a risk disclosure to the UFO

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:14.880
<v Speaker 1>perspectives because of potential U A T and USO risks.

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, it's some cool stuff. We'll have you

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>back on Andrew Shannon. He's a chief executive officer for

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 1>procure a m talking to us about UFOs, the E

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:27.879
<v Speaker 1>T F and also actually the real thing, Matt. I

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>mean again, um, big fan of Star Trek. I'll go there,

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, Um, we'll see. But anyway, it's attracting money,

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 1>so that's important to us. A Bloomberg we'll have more

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 1>coming up. This is Bloomberg. Now let's get over to

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Ben's lavin right now, Global head of E T S

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 1>n Asset Servicing at b n Y Melon, because we've

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:56.959
<v Speaker 1>seen um an interesting trend here mutual funds converting into

0:20:57.119 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>e T s. Ben, Why are we? Why are we

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 1>seeing this? What's the ben fit to investors? Well, an

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>industry milestone occurred in March with the first ever conversion,

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 1>and then a few weeks ago we saw dimensional funds

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:13.159
<v Speaker 1>convert around thirty billion in mutual fund assets the e

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>T S, which is notable for the scale. But why

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 1>is this happening? I mean really because investors are demanding

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>it um. The market is preferring investment content delivered in

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the et F wrapper, and the data shows that mutual

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>fund flows have been persistently negative and E t F

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 1>flows have been persistently positive over the last several years.

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 1>And the recent SEC ruling UM and regulatory developments that

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:41.400
<v Speaker 1>were adopted last year really set the stage to make

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 1>this easier or asset managers to convert products and bring

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>some of these strategies to market inside an et F rapper.

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:53.920
<v Speaker 1>But some mutual funds can transition easily to the EHF structure,

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 1>but some are not well suited due to the underlying

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 1>investment strategies. But this is a trend I expect to

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:02.439
<v Speaker 1>continue and it will attract a lot of attention going forward.

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 1>So Ben, I'm just unclear what is the advantage to

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the investor for you know, going from the mutual fund

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>structure to et F structure. Well, there are several advantages

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 1>that e t F s bring UM. One certainly is

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>around tax station and certainly UM the e t F

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>rapper offers in many ways a better mouse trap compared

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>to mutual funds when it comes to managing the underlying

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 1>taxes UM. So the e t F structure does allow

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the portfolio managers to to eliminate or avoid distributing capital

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>gains to investors compared to mutual funds. But other features

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that e t F s have such as daily liquidity,

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 1>daily transparency UM and certainly lower fees on average in

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>many cases is another big driver behind the trend towards

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 1>e t F adoption and managers thinking about converting funds

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>into the e t F rapper. What are the drawbacks

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 1>of an e of an e t F rapper A

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>mutual fund. Well, I think UM, you know, the drawbacks

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:18.199
<v Speaker 1>are few, but the process is UM, you know, somewhat complicated. UM.

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>And for investors who have bought their mutual fund shares

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>directly with the company UM, they would need a brokerage

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:31.639
<v Speaker 1>account UM, where many mutual fund transfer agencies have not

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>are not able UH to easily UM have an equity

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>security or an equity like security on their platform UM

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 1>and so that's a big piece of conversion. But but

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>more recently, many investors are buying their mutual funds through

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>brokerage platforms UM and so it's a quite easy conversion UM,

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you have those accounts in place. UM.

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 1>And also many of the fund companies are offering you know,

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>other options for asters who don't want to convert. But

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking, in the conversions we've seen, most investors have

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>opted to transition their shares from a mutual fund to

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 1>an et S. So UM just a good headline come

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 1>across the bloomber terminal Justice Department to sue Georgia over

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:19.880
<v Speaker 1>voting restrictions. That's according to the Washington Post and we'll

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 1>have more reporting on that up. Shows you where this

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Justice Department is yeah, exactly, new sheriff in town. I

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>guess Ben Slaven joining us here talk to us about

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>um the record flows we're seen the e t F.

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>It just seems like there's NonStop money coming into the

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>e F et F space. What have you seen so

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 1>far this year? Well, the e t F industry continues

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to set records. We saw the global et F flow

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:49.120
<v Speaker 1>top over five hundred billion years of date and over

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a trillion in the trailing twelve month period. UM. So

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:55.159
<v Speaker 1>the industry globally sits at nine trillion, which is now

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 1>around four of all funds. But here in the US

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>we've seen about four hundred and fifty billion in inflow

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>year to date, which would put us on pace to

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 1>shatter the record that we saw last year. But what's

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 1>remarkable is the breath. Um It's not just a few

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 1>products or a few issuers. We are seeing that inflow

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 1>spread across the industry up and down the lead table,

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 1>but also across investment type as well, So it's not

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>just equities, it's fixed income and and other multi asset products.

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:31.680
<v Speaker 1>The other interesting thing we are seeing here at being

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 1>why is really the record pace of new fund launches.

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:39.439
<v Speaker 1>So with that inflow. UM. You know, issuers are also

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:42.879
<v Speaker 1>launching product at a record pace. We've seen over a

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:47.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty new EPs launched this year alone, UM

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and again after a record year last year. UM, so

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:55.639
<v Speaker 1>we expect this trend to continue. UM. Also, trading volume

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:58.679
<v Speaker 1>is also up significantly as well with all the new

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:01.160
<v Speaker 1>products in the flow, which would just not surprising, Yeah,

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 1>just extraordinary development and financial services really over the last

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 1>several years is the growth of e t F. Ben Slaven,

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Global head of E t F S and Asset Servicing

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>at b n Y Melan giving us the latest on

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 1>e t F s again, continued record inflos into the

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>e t F space, just amazing. Thanks for listening to

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller three

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>pt On Fall Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio