1 00:00:00,800 --> 00:00:04,040 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney. Alongside 2 00:00:04,040 --> 00:00:06,920 Speaker 1: my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring 3 00:00:06,960 --> 00:00:11,520 Speaker 1: you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along 4 00:00:11,560 --> 00:00:15,560 Speaker 1: with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast 5 00:00:15,600 --> 00:00:18,479 Speaker 1: on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and 6 00:00:18,480 --> 00:00:23,239 Speaker 1: at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. The labor market continues 7 00:00:23,360 --> 00:00:27,120 Speaker 1: to improve. The job's claims numbers today continues to show 8 00:00:27,200 --> 00:00:30,880 Speaker 1: a week over week improvement. How about those teens. It's 9 00:00:30,920 --> 00:00:33,280 Speaker 1: you know, at the end of the school year, kids 10 00:00:33,680 --> 00:00:37,360 Speaker 1: entering the summer workforce. What's the marketplace like for them? 11 00:00:37,400 --> 00:00:40,680 Speaker 1: Barry rid Holds, Bloomberg Opinion columnists and host of Masters 12 00:00:40,720 --> 00:00:43,440 Speaker 1: in Business on Bloomberg Radio is also founder, chairman and 13 00:00:43,520 --> 00:00:46,040 Speaker 1: chief investment officer rid Holds Wealth Management. He's got some 14 00:00:46,080 --> 00:00:49,520 Speaker 1: thoughts on that. So for all those teenagers, Barry, there's 15 00:00:49,600 --> 00:00:51,279 Speaker 1: got to be lots of jobs out there, right, It's 16 00:00:51,280 --> 00:00:54,600 Speaker 1: just a question of what am I gonna get paid? Yeah, 17 00:00:54,680 --> 00:00:57,000 Speaker 1: there there are a ton of jobs there. And and 18 00:00:57,160 --> 00:01:02,680 Speaker 1: when you look at teenage employment, especially the labor participation rate, 19 00:01:03,040 --> 00:01:07,480 Speaker 1: this is at a thirteen year high. Um. But it's 20 00:01:07,480 --> 00:01:12,240 Speaker 1: way down. There's this really interesting generational story that's taken 21 00:01:12,240 --> 00:01:16,160 Speaker 1: place pretty much over the past thirty years. The labor 22 00:01:16,319 --> 00:01:21,679 Speaker 1: teen participation rate has fallen, and and I argue that 23 00:01:22,360 --> 00:01:29,000 Speaker 1: it's fallen as minimum wage lagged behind things like inflation 24 00:01:29,120 --> 00:01:33,440 Speaker 1: or productivity, or corporate profits or executive comp and at 25 00:01:33,440 --> 00:01:38,400 Speaker 1: a certain point, teenagers say, wait, in pre crisis, pre 26 00:01:38,520 --> 00:01:41,039 Speaker 1: in two thousand seven, you want to pay me five 27 00:01:41,120 --> 00:01:46,160 Speaker 1: dollars in fifteen cents an hour before you know FICA 28 00:01:46,400 --> 00:01:50,600 Speaker 1: and and taxes. Most kids just turned around and say 29 00:01:50,600 --> 00:01:53,200 Speaker 1: it's not worth it to do that. And you could 30 00:01:53,240 --> 00:01:56,160 Speaker 1: see that reflected in the participation right now. Funny thing, 31 00:01:56,680 --> 00:01:59,000 Speaker 1: the minimum wage went up in O eight oh nine 32 00:01:59,440 --> 00:02:03,440 Speaker 1: and twenty ten, and not coincidentally, from at seven and 33 00:02:03,480 --> 00:02:06,560 Speaker 1: a quarter and up, which is a bump from where 34 00:02:06,560 --> 00:02:11,280 Speaker 1: it was. The labor participation rate of teenagers started to 35 00:02:11,320 --> 00:02:15,919 Speaker 1: tick up. And here's the craziest thing. Unlike most other 36 00:02:16,840 --> 00:02:21,320 Speaker 1: participation rates, it's now higher than it was pre pandemic. 37 00:02:21,440 --> 00:02:23,840 Speaker 1: So maybe the kids are bored, they want to get 38 00:02:23,840 --> 00:02:26,760 Speaker 1: out of the house, They're tired of looking at mom, dad, brother, sister, 39 00:02:27,280 --> 00:02:29,239 Speaker 1: and say, let me, let me just see a change 40 00:02:29,240 --> 00:02:32,440 Speaker 1: of pace. But all of this just keeps coming back 41 00:02:32,520 --> 00:02:37,000 Speaker 1: to wages. Wages are table stakes. If you can't offer 42 00:02:37,040 --> 00:02:41,079 Speaker 1: a competitive wage, your your potential pool of applicants are 43 00:02:41,080 --> 00:02:45,560 Speaker 1: going to be tiny. And I mentioned the Pittsburgh Gazette 44 00:02:45,680 --> 00:02:49,359 Speaker 1: article about an ice cream parlor that doubled their wages 45 00:02:49,400 --> 00:02:52,200 Speaker 1: from seven to fifteen dollars. Usually they put on an 46 00:02:52,240 --> 00:02:56,120 Speaker 1: air they get two or three applicants. At fifteen an hour, 47 00:02:56,360 --> 00:03:00,240 Speaker 1: they got a thousand applicants. So wages are every thing 48 00:03:01,200 --> 00:03:04,120 Speaker 1: the kids, no, right, I actually, to be honest, Barry, 49 00:03:04,120 --> 00:03:05,600 Speaker 1: when I was a kid, my parents were just like, 50 00:03:05,639 --> 00:03:08,920 Speaker 1: you're getting a job. It wasn't really my choice. You know. 51 00:03:09,120 --> 00:03:11,600 Speaker 1: It was like I had to do something I wasn't 52 00:03:11,600 --> 00:03:15,639 Speaker 1: allowed to not you could see that in that participation, right, Listen, 53 00:03:15,680 --> 00:03:17,840 Speaker 1: I had a paper out when I was twelve. I 54 00:03:17,880 --> 00:03:22,040 Speaker 1: was mowing lawns and shoveling snow at fourteen, fifteen, sixteen, 55 00:03:22,120 --> 00:03:24,880 Speaker 1: And by the time I got to college, you know, 56 00:03:24,960 --> 00:03:27,760 Speaker 1: I was waiting tables and and tending bar or short 57 00:03:27,840 --> 00:03:32,359 Speaker 1: order chefs way back when. But that's a generational thing, 58 00:03:32,560 --> 00:03:36,200 Speaker 1: and five ten fifteen, let's say, ten fifteen years ago, 59 00:03:36,840 --> 00:03:42,280 Speaker 1: that wasn't what the standard was it's get an internship, 60 00:03:42,800 --> 00:03:47,040 Speaker 1: work on your extracurricular activities, get into a better college, 61 00:03:47,120 --> 00:03:51,880 Speaker 1: get get into a better um internship program, and first job. 62 00:03:52,360 --> 00:03:56,240 Speaker 1: The focus shifted away from earning a living then to 63 00:03:56,520 --> 00:03:59,080 Speaker 1: what are you going to do over the lifetime earnings? 64 00:03:59,120 --> 00:04:03,320 Speaker 1: You can see, Barry, what do you think I mean? 65 00:04:03,360 --> 00:04:07,480 Speaker 1: We're seeing anecdotal evidence of wages on the lower end 66 00:04:07,480 --> 00:04:11,080 Speaker 1: of the hiring pool, whether it's McDonald's going to thirteen 67 00:04:11,160 --> 00:04:15,200 Speaker 1: bucks or you know, Amazon, you know, going to fifteen 68 00:04:15,240 --> 00:04:18,919 Speaker 1: dollars here is that just anecdotal or does that really 69 00:04:18,960 --> 00:04:22,840 Speaker 1: signify this, you know, pulling up the bottom of the 70 00:04:22,839 --> 00:04:26,880 Speaker 1: wage scale. It's a good question because very I gotta 71 00:04:26,960 --> 00:04:29,600 Speaker 1: I gotta point out, you know, we haven't really seen 72 00:04:29,640 --> 00:04:33,080 Speaker 1: wage inflation at all. If you look over the last decades, right, everything, 73 00:04:33,240 --> 00:04:36,760 Speaker 1: the price of everything rises butt wages. So so here's 74 00:04:36,800 --> 00:04:40,760 Speaker 1: the here's the issue you're referring to, and it plays 75 00:04:40,800 --> 00:04:47,080 Speaker 1: into both wages and inflation. We have a tendency for 76 00:04:47,279 --> 00:04:51,719 Speaker 1: wage prices to be sticky, and then at a certain 77 00:04:52,200 --> 00:04:57,080 Speaker 1: point it becomes clear that wages are insufficient and you 78 00:04:57,120 --> 00:05:00,560 Speaker 1: get this reset higher. So instead of seeing like an 79 00:05:00,600 --> 00:05:04,640 Speaker 1: annualized increase in wage inflation. You sort of get this 80 00:05:04,720 --> 00:05:07,560 Speaker 1: reset up and then it goes plateaus for a while, 81 00:05:07,920 --> 00:05:12,240 Speaker 1: and you could tell that wages are moving higher, not 82 00:05:12,839 --> 00:05:16,239 Speaker 1: because of the BLS or Census data, but my favorite 83 00:05:16,320 --> 00:05:20,200 Speaker 1: data point is the quits rate. The people with full 84 00:05:20,200 --> 00:05:24,320 Speaker 1: time jobs who are saying to their bosses audio smoas 85 00:05:24,560 --> 00:05:30,039 Speaker 1: and moving on because there are better opportunities at higher wages. 86 00:05:30,080 --> 00:05:33,000 Speaker 1: And if your boss won't give you a raise, someone 87 00:05:33,040 --> 00:05:36,640 Speaker 1: else will. And so the flip side of why can't 88 00:05:36,640 --> 00:05:41,039 Speaker 1: I hire people becomes why can't I retain people? For 89 00:05:41,200 --> 00:05:45,760 Speaker 1: the hiring. I keep saying wages are table stakes, but 90 00:05:45,800 --> 00:05:49,280 Speaker 1: if you want to keep people, it's more than just wages. 91 00:05:49,440 --> 00:05:54,760 Speaker 1: It's some sort of path to equity, profit participation, benefits 92 00:05:55,200 --> 00:05:58,200 Speaker 1: for oh one k things like that. And as we've 93 00:05:58,320 --> 00:06:00,880 Speaker 1: seen over the past year, are you have to give 94 00:06:00,920 --> 00:06:05,479 Speaker 1: people some freedom and control over their working circumstances. Ours 95 00:06:05,600 --> 00:06:08,840 Speaker 1: we got and we got down to the we got 96 00:06:08,839 --> 00:06:10,640 Speaker 1: down to the two minute mark, which means I gotta 97 00:06:10,720 --> 00:06:15,000 Speaker 1: ask you about Ferrari. I speak. It's a new job, right. 98 00:06:15,040 --> 00:06:18,680 Speaker 1: They got a new guy as CEO. He comes from 99 00:06:18,800 --> 00:06:23,960 Speaker 1: wait for it, st micro Electronics. Ferrari, the new guy 100 00:06:24,120 --> 00:06:28,359 Speaker 1: they hired run Ferrari deals with like touch screen interactivity. 101 00:06:28,400 --> 00:06:32,159 Speaker 1: What the heck? Let me let me break this down really, 102 00:06:32,279 --> 00:06:37,960 Speaker 1: really easily, so that even you can understand it. Tesla 103 00:06:38,080 --> 00:06:43,000 Speaker 1: doesn't make cars, they make computers that move, and Ferrari 104 00:06:43,640 --> 00:06:47,920 Speaker 1: has recognized that and said, we have been building so 105 00:06:48,040 --> 00:06:53,280 Speaker 1: much electronics into our all, all of the traction, control, 106 00:06:53,400 --> 00:06:56,760 Speaker 1: over the management, management, all of the which tire is 107 00:06:56,800 --> 00:07:00,920 Speaker 1: going to get, how much power it for vector and 108 00:07:00,960 --> 00:07:02,920 Speaker 1: how much time, how many times a second, how many 109 00:07:02,960 --> 00:07:05,840 Speaker 1: hundreds of times a second? Are we gonna adjust that 110 00:07:06,400 --> 00:07:12,600 Speaker 1: that the electronics become even more important than your favorite 111 00:07:12,680 --> 00:07:16,600 Speaker 1: V twelve and ps. If you think Ferrari is going 112 00:07:16,680 --> 00:07:19,800 Speaker 1: to be internal combustion engine forever, I got some bad 113 00:07:19,840 --> 00:07:24,280 Speaker 1: news for you, Matt. They will eventually go to the faster, 114 00:07:25,720 --> 00:07:29,160 Speaker 1: greener e V and the only thing they're gonna miss 115 00:07:29,200 --> 00:07:31,880 Speaker 1: is the wonderful sound that comes out of those four 116 00:07:32,120 --> 00:07:38,880 Speaker 1: chrome pipes at the back. I don't either, Paul. We're 117 00:07:38,880 --> 00:07:41,520 Speaker 1: gonna buy old Ferrari's. Me and Barry are gonna be 118 00:07:41,600 --> 00:07:44,400 Speaker 1: on bring a Trailer dot com while the rest of 119 00:07:44,440 --> 00:07:48,520 Speaker 1: you are driving brand new electronic whiz kid cars and uh, 120 00:07:48,560 --> 00:07:50,600 Speaker 1: while we still probably won't be able to afford them. 121 00:07:50,600 --> 00:07:55,320 Speaker 1: Great talking to Barry ittt Holtz. As always, this is Bloomberg. 122 00:07:58,960 --> 00:08:04,640 Speaker 1: Now President has revoked the Trump era bands on TikTok 123 00:08:05,160 --> 00:08:08,960 Speaker 1: and we chat we chat in the United States of America. 124 00:08:09,040 --> 00:08:12,320 Speaker 1: Jim Anderson, CEO of Social Flow, is here UM to 125 00:08:12,400 --> 00:08:14,440 Speaker 1: talk with us a little bit about this. And we 126 00:08:14,480 --> 00:08:17,360 Speaker 1: also want to point out here at Bloomberg we use 127 00:08:17,480 --> 00:08:20,920 Speaker 1: social Flow. It's a platform used by Bloomberg for social 128 00:08:20,920 --> 00:08:24,120 Speaker 1: media purposes. So just full disclosure there, we have another 129 00:08:24,160 --> 00:08:27,640 Speaker 1: relationship with Jim. Um, let's get to the TikTok and 130 00:08:27,920 --> 00:08:31,320 Speaker 1: we chat what what were the bands like and what 131 00:08:31,400 --> 00:08:37,240 Speaker 1: does this um revocation mean? I mean kids were still 132 00:08:37,320 --> 00:08:41,199 Speaker 1: using TikTok and we chat in the United States, right, oh, 133 00:08:41,240 --> 00:08:43,400 Speaker 1: without a doubt. And to be clear, this was never 134 00:08:43,480 --> 00:08:46,400 Speaker 1: about TikTok or or we chat chat. It was about 135 00:08:46,400 --> 00:08:49,560 Speaker 1: the US and China relationship. And you know, President Trump 136 00:08:49,600 --> 00:08:52,240 Speaker 1: issues his executive order he said that Bike Dance had 137 00:08:52,280 --> 00:08:55,280 Speaker 1: to sell TikTok and there were various suitors. If you 138 00:08:55,320 --> 00:08:57,600 Speaker 1: remember Microsoft, the Oracle, We're going to buy it. But 139 00:08:57,760 --> 00:09:01,200 Speaker 1: remember the Chinese government ultimately had to approve that sale. 140 00:09:01,559 --> 00:09:04,959 Speaker 1: And that always seemed wildly unlikely. You know, so really 141 00:09:04,960 --> 00:09:07,400 Speaker 1: this is less about regulation of big tech and more 142 00:09:07,440 --> 00:09:10,400 Speaker 1: about the U. S. Relationship with China expressed through big 143 00:09:10,480 --> 00:09:14,560 Speaker 1: tech A Jim. It's the expectation not in Silicon Valley, 144 00:09:14,800 --> 00:09:20,079 Speaker 1: that Biden administration will in fact dial down the rhetoric 145 00:09:20,160 --> 00:09:23,280 Speaker 1: in terms of maybe some of the regulatory concerns about 146 00:09:23,880 --> 00:09:27,160 Speaker 1: big tech that we're really starting to ramp up during 147 00:09:27,679 --> 00:09:30,800 Speaker 1: towards the end of the Trump presidency. Yeah, for sure, 148 00:09:30,960 --> 00:09:33,440 Speaker 1: dialing down the rhetoric. I mean, it doesn't take too 149 00:09:33,520 --> 00:09:35,720 Speaker 1: much of an expert a server to to look and 150 00:09:35,760 --> 00:09:38,240 Speaker 1: see that. You know, President Biden governs in a very 151 00:09:38,280 --> 00:09:41,800 Speaker 1: different fashion than President Trump did. But I wouldn't, you know, confuse, 152 00:09:42,040 --> 00:09:44,880 Speaker 1: you know, dial down rhetoric with a lack of substance. 153 00:09:44,960 --> 00:09:48,000 Speaker 1: I think there's really something still quite substantive here, and 154 00:09:48,040 --> 00:09:52,840 Speaker 1: that's because the U. S. China relationship and competitive nature 155 00:09:52,880 --> 00:09:55,240 Speaker 1: of that relationship is still very very much in place. 156 00:09:55,360 --> 00:09:57,520 Speaker 1: So the fact that he revoked the executive order in 157 00:09:57,559 --> 00:10:00,960 Speaker 1: some ways was inevitable because it was a fairly dubious 158 00:10:01,040 --> 00:10:04,160 Speaker 1: executive order. I think the subsequent court filings and all 159 00:10:04,240 --> 00:10:06,760 Speaker 1: suggested that there was a long battle to be had 160 00:10:06,800 --> 00:10:10,520 Speaker 1: with that executive order. So rather than fight a losing battle, 161 00:10:10,600 --> 00:10:14,000 Speaker 1: I think he just decided quite quite understandably to just 162 00:10:14,040 --> 00:10:16,800 Speaker 1: revoke it. But you know that that doesn't mean this 163 00:10:16,880 --> 00:10:19,480 Speaker 1: is over. I think there's still a substantial and legitimate 164 00:10:19,480 --> 00:10:23,560 Speaker 1: concern about a Chinese company owning data about U. S 165 00:10:23,600 --> 00:10:27,199 Speaker 1: citizens and that's not gone away. Yeah. That, well, that 166 00:10:27,440 --> 00:10:30,880 Speaker 1: definitely hasn't gone away. And we see other concerns around. 167 00:10:30,880 --> 00:10:33,920 Speaker 1: For example, the peace cable UM I think, is just 168 00:10:34,000 --> 00:10:38,680 Speaker 1: reaching the southern coast of France and Google isn't going 169 00:10:38,760 --> 00:10:40,640 Speaker 1: to use it, Amazon is not going to use it. 170 00:10:41,880 --> 00:10:44,360 Speaker 1: How is this all gonna work out? Because no doubt 171 00:10:45,160 --> 00:10:49,160 Speaker 1: Huawei shares data with the Chinese government if they have 172 00:10:49,320 --> 00:10:52,960 Speaker 1: to write, I would assume some US big US tech 173 00:10:53,000 --> 00:10:56,680 Speaker 1: companies probably do the same with US. Yeah. Well, and 174 00:10:56,960 --> 00:10:59,240 Speaker 1: that's a great point too, because we were seeing you know, 175 00:10:59,320 --> 00:11:02,440 Speaker 1: situations where people are you know, being compelled under court 176 00:11:02,520 --> 00:11:05,000 Speaker 1: order to provide data and the companies will fight it, etcetera. 177 00:11:05,080 --> 00:11:08,120 Speaker 1: So you know, two different you know ideologies that work there. 178 00:11:08,160 --> 00:11:11,520 Speaker 1: One is very you know, authoritarians and the other is 179 00:11:11,720 --> 00:11:14,480 Speaker 1: is more of a democracy or a public So I 180 00:11:14,679 --> 00:11:16,480 Speaker 1: don't know that I can give you an answer to that, 181 00:11:16,559 --> 00:11:18,760 Speaker 1: But I will say that this is just one of 182 00:11:18,960 --> 00:11:20,880 Speaker 1: many battles we're going to see. And the thing that 183 00:11:21,000 --> 00:11:23,679 Speaker 1: my mind makes it so unique is just how wildly 184 00:11:24,080 --> 00:11:27,160 Speaker 1: popular TikTok continues to be. I mean it it is 185 00:11:27,240 --> 00:11:30,400 Speaker 1: red hot. It's got the attention of young people. Um, 186 00:11:30,440 --> 00:11:33,520 Speaker 1: it's proven quite difficult for competitors to harness the same 187 00:11:33,640 --> 00:11:36,400 Speaker 1: level of creativity. So you might think that, oh, TikTok 188 00:11:36,520 --> 00:11:38,640 Speaker 1: is is doomed. You know, it's a bit of a 189 00:11:38,640 --> 00:11:41,640 Speaker 1: strong statement, but you know, with all of this regulatory 190 00:11:41,720 --> 00:11:45,679 Speaker 1: overhang and concern about presidential executive orders, you might think 191 00:11:45,720 --> 00:11:48,160 Speaker 1: that it's not relevant. But in many ways, TikTok is 192 00:11:48,200 --> 00:11:50,360 Speaker 1: more relevant than ever too young people who who quite 193 00:11:50,400 --> 00:11:53,680 Speaker 1: honestly don't really care about the geopolitical political implications. They 194 00:11:53,760 --> 00:11:55,600 Speaker 1: just like a fun app. So what do you think 195 00:11:55,640 --> 00:11:59,440 Speaker 1: the future is for TikTok. It's still owned by Byte Dance, right, 196 00:11:59,440 --> 00:12:01,320 Speaker 1: I mean, is this think they could spun out or 197 00:12:01,400 --> 00:12:04,800 Speaker 1: I p O somewhere or again, as you mentioned, it's 198 00:12:04,840 --> 00:12:07,680 Speaker 1: just become so popular. Yeah, I think it depends on 199 00:12:07,760 --> 00:12:11,120 Speaker 1: whether the Chinese government ultimately would like to harvest the 200 00:12:11,160 --> 00:12:14,920 Speaker 1: economic value or use it to make a political point, 201 00:12:15,000 --> 00:12:18,320 Speaker 1: and my guess is um that they're not, you know, 202 00:12:18,400 --> 00:12:20,320 Speaker 1: sort of eager to just harness a couple of billion 203 00:12:20,400 --> 00:12:22,360 Speaker 1: dollars of economic excited. Maybe more than a couple of 204 00:12:22,400 --> 00:12:24,680 Speaker 1: billion if the I POD or spun it out to 205 00:12:24,760 --> 00:12:27,199 Speaker 1: another owner. I mean, it could be worth tens of 206 00:12:27,240 --> 00:12:30,120 Speaker 1: billions of dollars. But the Chinese government's got lots of money. 207 00:12:30,120 --> 00:12:32,760 Speaker 1: I'm not sure they say necessarily want to say, hey, 208 00:12:32,840 --> 00:12:35,160 Speaker 1: let's let's just get tens of billions. I think they 209 00:12:35,200 --> 00:12:38,640 Speaker 1: want to continue to use their position and the stay 210 00:12:38,800 --> 00:12:41,959 Speaker 1: their their effective control over an asset's so popular in 211 00:12:42,000 --> 00:12:44,199 Speaker 1: the U. S as as more of a geopolitical chip. 212 00:12:44,280 --> 00:12:46,559 Speaker 1: So I would expect this to continue. And ultimately there 213 00:12:46,559 --> 00:12:48,839 Speaker 1: may very well be something that comes out of the 214 00:12:48,840 --> 00:12:51,959 Speaker 1: Biden administration that actually forces the same thing that President 215 00:12:52,000 --> 00:12:53,640 Speaker 1: Trump was trying to do at the time, which is 216 00:12:53,640 --> 00:12:56,520 Speaker 1: to force a divestiture. That wouldn't surprise me at all. Well, 217 00:12:56,559 --> 00:12:59,520 Speaker 1: and the Biden administration could put some pressure itself on 218 00:12:59,559 --> 00:13:02,839 Speaker 1: our own big social media platforms. Right, just got about 219 00:13:02,840 --> 00:13:06,160 Speaker 1: ten seconds here, Jim, Oh, yeah, and that will continue, right. 220 00:13:06,320 --> 00:13:09,480 Speaker 1: Antitrust and privacy are the two big dimensions there, and 221 00:13:09,520 --> 00:13:12,080 Speaker 1: those are not going away Facebook, Punch and center on 222 00:13:12,120 --> 00:13:14,760 Speaker 1: those all right. Jim, thanks so much for joining us. 223 00:13:14,800 --> 00:13:18,240 Speaker 1: We always appreciate chatting with you. Getting the latest from 224 00:13:18,280 --> 00:13:20,480 Speaker 1: some of the big tech platforms out there, and again 225 00:13:21,000 --> 00:13:24,880 Speaker 1: good news for TikTok for sure. Jim Anderson, CEO of 226 00:13:24,920 --> 00:13:27,800 Speaker 1: Social Flow, joining us here and again looking at the 227 00:13:27,840 --> 00:13:31,720 Speaker 1: markets again. Still you know Hire today and led by 228 00:13:31,760 --> 00:13:34,160 Speaker 1: the NASTAC one hundred. That's up seven tenths of one percent, 229 00:13:34,240 --> 00:13:36,200 Speaker 1: So a little bit of a move into those tech 230 00:13:36,360 --> 00:13:41,840 Speaker 1: names we are seeing again. Lots of economic data. This 231 00:13:41,880 --> 00:13:44,319 Speaker 1: morning's CPI came in a little bit higher than expected, 232 00:13:44,760 --> 00:13:49,800 Speaker 1: stoking some concerns about inflation into this market place. Let's 233 00:13:49,880 --> 00:13:52,400 Speaker 1: check in with Chris Zacarelli. He's the chief investment officer 234 00:13:52,480 --> 00:13:56,640 Speaker 1: for Independent Advisers Alliance Today about seven billion dollars in 235 00:13:56,760 --> 00:14:00,120 Speaker 1: assets under management. Chris, thanks so much for joining us here. 236 00:14:00,240 --> 00:14:03,240 Speaker 1: You've got the economic data this morning. Did that make 237 00:14:03,320 --> 00:14:06,920 Speaker 1: you think that this FED is likely to begin tapering 238 00:14:07,240 --> 00:14:12,079 Speaker 1: sooner rather than later. Well, the FET is definitely considering 239 00:14:12,160 --> 00:14:14,920 Speaker 1: tapering at some point, and with the FED meeting next 240 00:14:15,040 --> 00:14:17,800 Speaker 1: next week, we're we're thinking now is the time to 241 00:14:17,800 --> 00:14:20,720 Speaker 1: start positioning for that. So whether they start the communication 242 00:14:20,760 --> 00:14:23,880 Speaker 1: process for tapering next week or potentially more likely in 243 00:14:23,920 --> 00:14:26,840 Speaker 1: August during the Jackson Whole symposium, we know they're going 244 00:14:26,920 --> 00:14:30,080 Speaker 1: to be talking about tapering very shortly, and so I 245 00:14:30,080 --> 00:14:32,600 Speaker 1: think looking at these inflation numbers, clearly the FAT has 246 00:14:32,640 --> 00:14:34,880 Speaker 1: to be watching what's happened the last couple of months. 247 00:14:35,160 --> 00:14:38,040 Speaker 1: They've been communicating pretty effectively that they're going to look 248 00:14:38,120 --> 00:14:40,320 Speaker 1: through a lot of these inflation numbers. So I don't 249 00:14:40,360 --> 00:14:42,520 Speaker 1: know that this morning's print is necessarily going to change 250 00:14:42,520 --> 00:14:45,200 Speaker 1: their game plan. But for all those people who think 251 00:14:45,240 --> 00:14:48,520 Speaker 1: inflation is going to be transitory and not sticky, as 252 00:14:48,560 --> 00:14:51,200 Speaker 1: we continue to see these prints every single month, it's 253 00:14:51,200 --> 00:14:53,520 Speaker 1: got at least put some doubt in your mind and 254 00:14:53,560 --> 00:14:55,560 Speaker 1: take away a little bit of that conviction. So I think, 255 00:14:55,600 --> 00:14:57,680 Speaker 1: if anything, that would be the one change at the 256 00:14:57,680 --> 00:15:00,200 Speaker 1: margin that that I would expect out of today's now words, 257 00:15:00,280 --> 00:15:04,760 Speaker 1: Let's say, what does transitory look like? It's transitory like um, 258 00:15:04,800 --> 00:15:07,200 Speaker 1: three to six months, or is transitory like a year 259 00:15:07,280 --> 00:15:11,000 Speaker 1: or two? You know in our in our minds, transitory 260 00:15:11,160 --> 00:15:13,560 Speaker 1: would be less than a year. I think you asked 261 00:15:13,560 --> 00:15:15,800 Speaker 1: that question of of a hundred people, and you'll get 262 00:15:15,800 --> 00:15:17,920 Speaker 1: close to a hundred answers. I think everyone has has 263 00:15:17,960 --> 00:15:20,280 Speaker 1: their own range of what transitory is. I think a 264 00:15:20,360 --> 00:15:23,120 Speaker 1: FED is deliberately been vague about what transitory means in 265 00:15:23,240 --> 00:15:25,240 Speaker 1: order to give themselves a little bit more room to 266 00:15:25,320 --> 00:15:28,640 Speaker 1: work with. But if anything, they've said time and again 267 00:15:28,760 --> 00:15:31,640 Speaker 1: that they're willing to allow inflation to run a little 268 00:15:31,640 --> 00:15:34,440 Speaker 1: bit hotter hotter than they normally would. They're much more 269 00:15:34,440 --> 00:15:36,680 Speaker 1: focused on the labor part of their dual mandate than 270 00:15:36,680 --> 00:15:38,440 Speaker 1: they are in the price stability part of their two 271 00:15:38,600 --> 00:15:41,160 Speaker 1: dual mandate. So for our mind, if we see these 272 00:15:41,200 --> 00:15:43,640 Speaker 1: types of prints going over the course of more than 273 00:15:43,680 --> 00:15:46,160 Speaker 1: six months, that would definitely be a concern to us. 274 00:15:46,240 --> 00:15:48,200 Speaker 1: It's possible to FED would let that run a little 275 00:15:48,240 --> 00:15:51,640 Speaker 1: bit longer. But the longer the definition of transitory, the 276 00:15:51,720 --> 00:15:53,960 Speaker 1: longer we're going to be in this this state of flux. 277 00:15:54,000 --> 00:15:57,080 Speaker 1: And I think the more volatility that that um brings 278 00:15:57,120 --> 00:15:59,120 Speaker 1: to the situation, which is which is why they need 279 00:15:59,160 --> 00:16:01,400 Speaker 1: to really kind of button that up. All right, Chris, 280 00:16:01,480 --> 00:16:04,360 Speaker 1: giving that background, where are you guys doing some work today? 281 00:16:04,360 --> 00:16:08,200 Speaker 1: Where do you see some opportunities? So for us, an 282 00:16:08,200 --> 00:16:11,080 Speaker 1: interesting area is still the financials. So whether that's the 283 00:16:11,160 --> 00:16:15,160 Speaker 1: regional banks or the larger money sending money money center banks. 284 00:16:15,680 --> 00:16:18,240 Speaker 1: The financials are really showing some weakness from a technical 285 00:16:18,280 --> 00:16:20,880 Speaker 1: point of view, but from evaluation point of view, there's 286 00:16:20,920 --> 00:16:23,920 Speaker 1: they're still cheap to where they've been historically. So we 287 00:16:23,960 --> 00:16:26,720 Speaker 1: think within the financials, if the economy continues to do 288 00:16:26,800 --> 00:16:30,520 Speaker 1: well and interest rates they anchored, financials should do okay. 289 00:16:30,600 --> 00:16:32,520 Speaker 1: And I think we're going to see some buying opportunities 290 00:16:32,560 --> 00:16:36,119 Speaker 1: in the next few months within financials as people continue 291 00:16:36,160 --> 00:16:40,520 Speaker 1: to see interest rates being very staying stuck very low. However, 292 00:16:40,560 --> 00:16:43,800 Speaker 1: if interest rates start going higher again, that's great for financials. 293 00:16:43,840 --> 00:16:46,200 Speaker 1: So we think financials are are well priced. We think 294 00:16:46,200 --> 00:16:48,479 Speaker 1: there's some weakness at least in terms of the technicals. 295 00:16:48,480 --> 00:16:50,720 Speaker 1: So I pick your spots, and I think you're gonna 296 00:16:50,720 --> 00:16:53,160 Speaker 1: see some financials go on sale. But we see that 297 00:16:53,280 --> 00:16:56,560 Speaker 1: as heads you do okay, tales you do very well, 298 00:16:56,600 --> 00:16:58,560 Speaker 1: and so we like the risk rewards set up at 299 00:16:58,640 --> 00:17:04,000 Speaker 1: least within within that end street. So again thinking about 300 00:17:04,080 --> 00:17:07,879 Speaker 1: some opportunities here, you know, again the concern is that 301 00:17:07,920 --> 00:17:11,840 Speaker 1: the FED is going to need to raise rates here. Um, 302 00:17:12,000 --> 00:17:16,639 Speaker 1: given that scenario, are there parts of the market that 303 00:17:16,680 --> 00:17:18,960 Speaker 1: you just think you're gonna be really rocked when and 304 00:17:19,040 --> 00:17:23,160 Speaker 1: if that happens, well, if interest rates start going higher, 305 00:17:23,280 --> 00:17:25,920 Speaker 1: and again that's more likely to be at the ten 306 00:17:26,000 --> 00:17:28,560 Speaker 1: year or third year range, we're gonna see longer term 307 00:17:28,600 --> 00:17:31,560 Speaker 1: insestrates move higher through through the market. Tapering is one 308 00:17:31,600 --> 00:17:33,960 Speaker 1: way that could happen, and and a shift and sentiment 309 00:17:34,040 --> 00:17:36,119 Speaker 1: is another way. As far as short term rates, with 310 00:17:36,160 --> 00:17:38,440 Speaker 1: the when the Fed will begin raising, I think most 311 00:17:38,480 --> 00:17:41,000 Speaker 1: people believe that's a year or two out at the earliest, 312 00:17:41,040 --> 00:17:43,600 Speaker 1: even as inflation starts to heat up. So we think 313 00:17:43,640 --> 00:17:46,520 Speaker 1: if longer term interest rates go higher again through either 314 00:17:46,600 --> 00:17:49,080 Speaker 1: taper discussions or just because the bond market changes the 315 00:17:49,200 --> 00:17:52,440 Speaker 1: narrative for how how high they think rates will will 316 00:17:52,480 --> 00:17:54,359 Speaker 1: go in the future and how much economic growth and 317 00:17:54,400 --> 00:17:59,240 Speaker 1: inflation rates higher. We think technology shares and high price 318 00:17:59,400 --> 00:18:01,800 Speaker 1: price to earn shares are are the parts of the 319 00:18:01,800 --> 00:18:04,280 Speaker 1: market that are are most vulnerable in that case, and 320 00:18:04,320 --> 00:18:06,040 Speaker 1: so those those are areas of the market i'd be 321 00:18:06,119 --> 00:18:08,119 Speaker 1: careful on. You want to right size your positions in 322 00:18:08,160 --> 00:18:12,960 Speaker 1: those longer duration stocks, so to speak. You know that, um, 323 00:18:13,000 --> 00:18:16,600 Speaker 1: the narrative that this is a very dangerous moment for 324 00:18:16,640 --> 00:18:19,680 Speaker 1: central banks has really gained a lot of pace. Um. 325 00:18:19,720 --> 00:18:23,119 Speaker 1: We heard that from Andy Haldane, chief economists at the 326 00:18:23,160 --> 00:18:26,280 Speaker 1: Bank of England. We have heard Martin folkirts Land down, 327 00:18:26,280 --> 00:18:29,080 Speaker 1: Peter Hooper at Deutsche Bank saying, you know, inflation could 328 00:18:29,119 --> 00:18:32,440 Speaker 1: be more than just transitory and uh. Bill Dudley wrote 329 00:18:32,440 --> 00:18:35,359 Speaker 1: for Bloomberg Opinion that the problem with this is this 330 00:18:35,560 --> 00:18:39,679 Speaker 1: overheating is that when it's time to turn around, the 331 00:18:39,680 --> 00:18:43,800 Speaker 1: Fed's gonna have to raise rates quickly, more quickly than 332 00:18:44,200 --> 00:18:47,920 Speaker 1: people are ready for, and faster and uh and higher 333 00:18:47,960 --> 00:18:49,479 Speaker 1: than people may be ready for, and that could bring 334 00:18:49,520 --> 00:18:52,199 Speaker 1: about a full blown recession. It's like a turn on 335 00:18:52,240 --> 00:18:55,480 Speaker 1: a dime kind of situation. Is that a concern you 336 00:18:55,520 --> 00:18:59,159 Speaker 1: think that's gaining a lot more traction. I don't know 337 00:18:59,240 --> 00:19:01,359 Speaker 1: that has gained as extraction as it should. It's a 338 00:19:01,359 --> 00:19:04,600 Speaker 1: concern that we share. We are also in that camp that, um. 339 00:19:04,800 --> 00:19:06,440 Speaker 1: The idea that the FED is going to play this 340 00:19:06,520 --> 00:19:10,720 Speaker 1: perfectly keep inflation in check while the economy reopens, I 341 00:19:10,760 --> 00:19:13,359 Speaker 1: think is a is a stretch. And I think for 342 00:19:13,440 --> 00:19:15,840 Speaker 1: all those people who are keeping interest rates as low 343 00:19:15,880 --> 00:19:18,280 Speaker 1: as they are buying that tenure today and keep knocking 344 00:19:18,280 --> 00:19:21,080 Speaker 1: down those rates, that's a big article of faith from 345 00:19:21,080 --> 00:19:22,880 Speaker 1: from our point of view, and one that we don't 346 00:19:22,920 --> 00:19:25,119 Speaker 1: have as much conviction and as clearly a lot of 347 00:19:25,280 --> 00:19:28,000 Speaker 1: bond market investors have. We think there's a really big 348 00:19:28,040 --> 00:19:32,040 Speaker 1: difference between uh an extraordinary amount of quantitative easing, which 349 00:19:32,080 --> 00:19:35,200 Speaker 1: was done after the global financial crisis. Sure M two 350 00:19:35,240 --> 00:19:38,200 Speaker 1: can jump up astronomically, but as long as the velocity 351 00:19:38,200 --> 00:19:41,040 Speaker 1: of money collapses, you can get away with so much 352 00:19:41,119 --> 00:19:43,960 Speaker 1: quantitative easing without seeing a lot of inflation. But what's 353 00:19:44,040 --> 00:19:46,240 Speaker 1: different this time around is we've got so much fiscal 354 00:19:46,280 --> 00:19:49,520 Speaker 1: stimulus in addition to the monetary stimulus, and that's something 355 00:19:49,760 --> 00:19:52,679 Speaker 1: we're surprised that the market is not seemed to not 356 00:19:52,760 --> 00:19:55,480 Speaker 1: be taking into consideration the idea of putting trillions of 357 00:19:55,520 --> 00:19:59,960 Speaker 1: dollars into the hands of consumers, especially those lower income consumers, 358 00:20:00,000 --> 00:20:02,560 Speaker 1: we're much more likely to spend it. We think that's 359 00:20:02,560 --> 00:20:04,520 Speaker 1: where the risk lies. It's not that we have so 360 00:20:04,600 --> 00:20:06,960 Speaker 1: much quantitative easing. It is that we have quantitative easing 361 00:20:06,960 --> 00:20:09,679 Speaker 1: on top of trillions of dollars a fiscal stimulus. And 362 00:20:09,720 --> 00:20:12,480 Speaker 1: I'm not the only person who's who's making this point. 363 00:20:12,520 --> 00:20:14,040 Speaker 1: I think there are others who are starting to talk 364 00:20:14,040 --> 00:20:16,359 Speaker 1: about it. But if I think that narrative is the 365 00:20:16,359 --> 00:20:18,360 Speaker 1: one that I haven't seen really take off, and I'm 366 00:20:18,400 --> 00:20:21,560 Speaker 1: surprised about it, I would think, And that much fiscal 367 00:20:21,560 --> 00:20:25,760 Speaker 1: stimulus on top of monetary stimulus is why inflation is 368 00:20:25,880 --> 00:20:29,080 Speaker 1: much more of a risk than it ever was in 369 00:20:29,080 --> 00:20:31,840 Speaker 1: two thousand nine, two thousand ten, and even into the 370 00:20:31,840 --> 00:20:37,320 Speaker 1: Taper chance. Chris, have a valuation here again setting new 371 00:20:37,400 --> 00:20:41,400 Speaker 1: highs in this marketplace. Yes, earnings have been very good 372 00:20:41,440 --> 00:20:44,040 Speaker 1: for the past couple of quarters. How do you view evaluation? 373 00:20:44,119 --> 00:20:46,199 Speaker 1: Is that a concern for you and for this market? 374 00:20:47,840 --> 00:20:50,560 Speaker 1: I think where the market's price right now, at least 375 00:20:50,640 --> 00:20:53,919 Speaker 1: using the SMPI as a proxy, you have to be 376 00:20:54,000 --> 00:20:58,040 Speaker 1: aware that that valuations are elevated now. I think within 377 00:20:58,080 --> 00:21:00,679 Speaker 1: the SMP five you have to look at kind of 378 00:21:00,680 --> 00:21:03,600 Speaker 1: the the index composition, and because so much of the 379 00:21:03,640 --> 00:21:07,960 Speaker 1: index is heavily weighted towards technology and communication shares, a 380 00:21:08,000 --> 00:21:12,119 Speaker 1: lot of those companies are businesses that are that deserve 381 00:21:12,240 --> 00:21:15,439 Speaker 1: those valuations. So I think evaluation in and of itself 382 00:21:15,520 --> 00:21:17,200 Speaker 1: is not a concern for us, but it's something that 383 00:21:17,240 --> 00:21:20,920 Speaker 1: we're keeping in mind. It's definitely a necessary condition, all right, Chris, 384 00:21:20,920 --> 00:21:23,080 Speaker 1: thanks so much for joining us. Chris Scarelly, chief investment 385 00:21:23,080 --> 00:21:29,359 Speaker 1: officer for Independent Advisor Alliance. Let's get over now to 386 00:21:29,560 --> 00:21:33,200 Speaker 1: Ted Swimmer, head of Corporate Finance and Capital Market at 387 00:21:33,560 --> 00:21:37,840 Speaker 1: Citizens speak Capital Markets at Citizens, because we had um 388 00:21:37,840 --> 00:21:43,800 Speaker 1: first off, Ted, really interesting no doubt from the SEC 389 00:21:44,080 --> 00:21:47,720 Speaker 1: yesterday that Gary Gensler has instructed his staff to well 390 00:21:47,800 --> 00:21:52,639 Speaker 1: make markets work better is the broad order, But UM 391 00:21:52,680 --> 00:21:59,000 Speaker 1: talking really to to his staff about market makers and um, 392 00:21:59,040 --> 00:22:01,400 Speaker 1: you know, buying fund thos. What do you think about 393 00:22:01,400 --> 00:22:05,040 Speaker 1: the changes we should see? Well, thank first of all, 394 00:22:05,040 --> 00:22:07,920 Speaker 1: thanks for having me this morning. We're seeing some very 395 00:22:08,040 --> 00:22:11,119 Speaker 1: positive fund flows in the businesses that we're working on. 396 00:22:12,400 --> 00:22:15,040 Speaker 1: We're seeing a lot of investor demand. Loan and bond 397 00:22:15,080 --> 00:22:18,960 Speaker 1: side of the businesses seem to be taking off. We 398 00:22:19,040 --> 00:22:23,040 Speaker 1: feel like the markets are incredibly accommodative now for future 399 00:22:23,440 --> 00:22:26,480 Speaker 1: for transactions in the second half of the year. First 400 00:22:26,480 --> 00:22:29,240 Speaker 1: half of the year has been very aggressive already, but 401 00:22:29,400 --> 00:22:32,199 Speaker 1: not a ton of new business coming in, not a 402 00:22:32,200 --> 00:22:35,320 Speaker 1: ton of new l B O s or acquisition related deals. 403 00:22:35,320 --> 00:22:38,720 Speaker 1: But we're feeling like the pipelines are building rapidly in 404 00:22:38,760 --> 00:22:40,800 Speaker 1: the second half of the year and we think the 405 00:22:40,800 --> 00:22:44,040 Speaker 1: markets will be very accommodated for it. So what are 406 00:22:44,080 --> 00:22:46,680 Speaker 1: some sectors ted that you're seeing some of the activity. 407 00:22:46,720 --> 00:22:49,320 Speaker 1: And again I think just from the public equity markets, 408 00:22:49,640 --> 00:22:51,520 Speaker 1: a lot of investors have been piling into some of 409 00:22:51,560 --> 00:22:55,280 Speaker 1: the cyclical areas of the market that will benefit from reopening. 410 00:22:55,280 --> 00:22:58,200 Speaker 1: What are you seeing from the corporate finance, the capital markets, 411 00:22:58,240 --> 00:23:00,800 Speaker 1: the UH specialized loan market. What are you seeing there 412 00:23:00,840 --> 00:23:03,760 Speaker 1: in terms of sector demand so so far in the 413 00:23:03,800 --> 00:23:06,400 Speaker 1: first half of year. That UH, the debt markets, which 414 00:23:06,400 --> 00:23:09,800 Speaker 1: tend to be more backwards looking and forwards looking. UH, 415 00:23:10,040 --> 00:23:11,840 Speaker 1: we saw a lot of deals in the healthcare and 416 00:23:11,880 --> 00:23:14,800 Speaker 1: tech markets, given that those markets were not as much 417 00:23:14,800 --> 00:23:18,639 Speaker 1: affected by the COVID environment last year, So revenues and 418 00:23:18,680 --> 00:23:23,280 Speaker 1: EPO DOC continue to improve, making a very very easy 419 00:23:23,320 --> 00:23:25,960 Speaker 1: to do debt transactions in those markets. As we see 420 00:23:25,960 --> 00:23:28,480 Speaker 1: the second a half year picking up and earnings picking 421 00:23:28,560 --> 00:23:31,120 Speaker 1: up in more of the cyclicals, I will see more 422 00:23:31,160 --> 00:23:33,280 Speaker 1: cyclical deals done in the second half of the year, 423 00:23:33,320 --> 00:23:34,679 Speaker 1: but the first half of the year has really been 424 00:23:34,680 --> 00:23:40,280 Speaker 1: dominated more by technology and healthcaretil related transactions. Do you 425 00:23:40,320 --> 00:23:43,119 Speaker 1: have any concerns about inflation. I mean, we're starting to 426 00:23:43,200 --> 00:23:47,760 Speaker 1: hear some big names in economics voice concerns about the 427 00:23:47,800 --> 00:23:52,000 Speaker 1: possibility that it may not be transitory. We we do 428 00:23:52,119 --> 00:23:54,960 Speaker 1: have some I mean it's it's not an overwhelming concern, 429 00:23:55,080 --> 00:23:57,800 Speaker 1: but we're in the companies that we bank, we're starting 430 00:23:57,840 --> 00:24:00,160 Speaker 1: to see inflation take off. We're started a few all 431 00:24:00,800 --> 00:24:03,639 Speaker 1: the consumer pinch a little bit on the inflation side 432 00:24:03,640 --> 00:24:07,240 Speaker 1: of the business. From an inflation perspective. Uh you know, 433 00:24:08,080 --> 00:24:11,000 Speaker 1: the bond market has seen some gets seems to get 434 00:24:11,000 --> 00:24:13,960 Speaker 1: concerned about inflation and then papers off, and because there's 435 00:24:13,960 --> 00:24:15,959 Speaker 1: still so much demand on that side of the market. 436 00:24:16,520 --> 00:24:18,680 Speaker 1: I think it's out there. I think, well, I think 437 00:24:18,840 --> 00:24:21,000 Speaker 1: our bank thinks it's going to hit at some point. 438 00:24:21,560 --> 00:24:23,960 Speaker 1: It's not an immediate concern, but looking out tools to 439 00:24:24,000 --> 00:24:26,200 Speaker 1: eighteen months, I certainly think it's going to be part 440 00:24:26,240 --> 00:24:29,639 Speaker 1: of the discussion on everything we're doing. Talk to us 441 00:24:29,720 --> 00:24:32,480 Speaker 1: just real quickly about private equity ted kind of are 442 00:24:32,520 --> 00:24:35,119 Speaker 1: they driving deal flow out there and kind of the 443 00:24:35,160 --> 00:24:41,720 Speaker 1: small mid market part of the market. Absolutely, private equity 444 00:24:41,800 --> 00:24:45,320 Speaker 1: is becoming, not becoming, is the dominant force in the 445 00:24:45,400 --> 00:24:49,640 Speaker 1: upper middle markets uh D fifty million dollar eve dot 446 00:24:49,680 --> 00:24:53,320 Speaker 1: type transactions. We're seeing a lot of private equities obviously 447 00:24:53,359 --> 00:24:56,720 Speaker 1: stay on the sidelines from a new business perspective last year, 448 00:24:57,119 --> 00:25:01,320 Speaker 1: and that market is hot right now. From from both 449 00:25:01,320 --> 00:25:03,760 Speaker 1: the selling perspective, we're seeing a number of p sell 450 00:25:03,880 --> 00:25:07,520 Speaker 1: some firms, but the main buyer out there is the 451 00:25:07,600 --> 00:25:11,119 Speaker 1: PE market. A number of middle market companies we're seeing 452 00:25:11,359 --> 00:25:13,480 Speaker 1: wanting to sell. Given I think they looked over the 453 00:25:13,520 --> 00:25:17,360 Speaker 1: precipice last year during COVID, got nervous see the potential 454 00:25:17,440 --> 00:25:20,320 Speaker 1: change in the capital gains tax next year, and I 455 00:25:20,359 --> 00:25:22,920 Speaker 1: think they want to They want to have a liquidity event, 456 00:25:22,960 --> 00:25:26,080 Speaker 1: and private equities the dominant buyer. The debt markets are 457 00:25:26,119 --> 00:25:28,760 Speaker 1: certainly whether it's private BED or public BET is certainly 458 00:25:28,760 --> 00:25:32,520 Speaker 1: accommodated or those transactions to occur. And I think we'll 459 00:25:32,520 --> 00:25:35,560 Speaker 1: see the second half of the year dominated by by 460 00:25:35,640 --> 00:25:39,720 Speaker 1: eminent by private equity snatching up opportunities. Obviously, we saw 461 00:25:39,720 --> 00:25:43,240 Speaker 1: a couple of those deals announced last week, and uh, 462 00:25:43,280 --> 00:25:45,360 Speaker 1: I think we'll see that as a continuing trend through 463 00:25:45,400 --> 00:25:48,480 Speaker 1: the third and fourth quarter of this year. Hey, Ted, 464 00:25:48,480 --> 00:25:50,240 Speaker 1: thanks so much for joining us. We really appreciate you 465 00:25:50,320 --> 00:25:52,320 Speaker 1: taking the time. They're giving us some thoughts on the 466 00:25:52,359 --> 00:25:56,240 Speaker 1: capital markets there, uh remain hot, likely to get even 467 00:25:56,280 --> 00:25:58,320 Speaker 1: hotter in the second half of the year, says Mr 468 00:25:58,359 --> 00:26:01,280 Speaker 1: Swimmer Ted Swimmer, head of Corporate Finance and Capital Markets 469 00:26:01,320 --> 00:26:03,720 Speaker 1: at Citizens. Good to get a sense of kind of 470 00:26:03,720 --> 00:26:06,240 Speaker 1: how things are going out there in the deal flow. 471 00:26:06,359 --> 00:26:09,440 Speaker 1: We've seen some big, big deals, obviously strategic M and 472 00:26:09,480 --> 00:26:12,920 Speaker 1: A transactions, but small and mid market also doing well 473 00:26:12,960 --> 00:26:16,520 Speaker 1: and very active. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. 474 00:26:16,920 --> 00:26:20,119 Speaker 1: You can subscribe and listen to interviews of Apple Podcasts 475 00:26:20,240 --> 00:26:24,160 Speaker 1: or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm 476 00:26:24,200 --> 00:26:28,240 Speaker 1: on Twitter at Matt Miller, three pt on Fall Sweeney. 477 00:26:28,240 --> 00:26:30,879 Speaker 1: I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney Before the podcast. You 478 00:26:30,880 --> 00:26:33,560 Speaker 1: can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio