WEBVTT - I'm Feeling Pretty Thrivey

0:00:01.950 --> 0:00:05.780
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio at the

0:00:05.820 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>George Washington Broadcast Center.

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:12.140
<v Speaker 2>Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty. Armstrong and Getty. And now,

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:17.329
<v Speaker 2>here's Armstrong and Getty.

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:28.420
<v Speaker 3>So in light of the Shane Gillis controversial Saturday Night

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:32.339
<v Speaker 3>Live monologue in which he hatefully attacked women and did

0:00:32.510 --> 0:00:35.550
<v Speaker 3>so much damage across the country to the fairer sex,

0:00:35.990 --> 0:00:39.790
<v Speaker 3>here's Jimmy Kimmel commenting on Trump's new White House press secretary.

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:42.729
<v Speaker 4>I want to introduce you to the new kid in

0:00:42.780 --> 0:00:45.530
<v Speaker 4>Trump land. It was the first day of kindergarten for

0:00:45.550 --> 0:00:49.830
<v Speaker 4>the new White House press secretary, Katie Zachariah. In order

0:00:49.870 --> 0:00:52.170
<v Speaker 4>to keep him awake and interested, every six months they

0:00:52.190 --> 0:00:55.150
<v Speaker 4>bring in a new fawning blonde adult to.

0:00:55.190 --> 0:00:56.230
<v Speaker 2>Add to the rotation.

0:00:57.160 --> 0:00:59.300
<v Speaker 4>Things did not get off to a great start for

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 4>Malibu Katie today. Her first briefing was brief. It was

0:01:03.140 --> 0:01:05.500
<v Speaker 4>only 14 minutes long. But even in that short time,

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:08.140
<v Speaker 4>she accomplished exactly what she was brought in to do,

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:11.180
<v Speaker 4>which is slobber a whole tube of lip gloss all

0:01:11.250 --> 0:01:13.010
<v Speaker 4>over the president's behind.

0:01:13.550 --> 0:01:15.370
<v Speaker 2>And really, that's all it takes nowadays.

0:01:16.090 --> 0:01:18.309
<v Speaker 4>All it takes is that and dressing like you're about

0:01:18.370 --> 0:01:21.430
<v Speaker 4>to announce pre-boarding on a Delta Airlines flight.

0:01:22.590 --> 0:01:23.910
<v Speaker 2>Commenting on a woman's appearance?

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Making assumptions about your intelligence over and over again.

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:27.820
<v Speaker 4>Yes.

0:01:28.020 --> 0:01:31.310
<v Speaker 2>Oh my God. Calling her a prostitute for the president.

0:01:31.410 --> 0:01:36.010
<v Speaker 3>Yes, man. I, um, so since Saturday, which I watched

0:01:36.110 --> 0:01:39.990
<v Speaker 3>the Shane Gillis thing live and then played it for

0:01:40.030 --> 0:01:43.870
<v Speaker 3>my kids. And I didn't even consider that this would

0:01:43.890 --> 0:01:44.990
<v Speaker 3>turn into a controversy.

0:01:46.510 --> 0:01:48.930
<v Speaker 2>Has it really? That's how it landed with me.

0:01:48.950 --> 0:01:55.290
<v Speaker 3>Um, But since it has become a controversy and the hateful, misogynistic, well,

0:01:55.330 --> 0:01:56.290
<v Speaker 3>they talked about it on.

0:01:56.250 --> 0:01:57.870
<v Speaker 2>The View for an hour yesterday. It's the number one

0:01:57.910 --> 0:01:59.810
<v Speaker 2>daytime TV show. Oh, my God.

0:02:00.690 --> 0:02:02.330
<v Speaker 3>But how awful it was and how hurtful it was.

0:02:03.540 --> 0:02:06.180
<v Speaker 3>So many people have brought up the various Saturday Night

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 3>Live bits where they insult every white male in America

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:14.460
<v Speaker 3>or every Republican voter or everyone in the South or

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:16.490
<v Speaker 3>whatever and are perfectly comfortable calling you a.

0:02:16.889 --> 0:02:21.070
<v Speaker 2>Nazi, a racist, whatever. Mm-hmm.

0:02:22.060 --> 0:02:23.910
<v Speaker 3>And that's just funny because the crowd laughs like crazy.

0:02:25.130 --> 0:02:27.490
<v Speaker 3>But the saying women dress like whores at the gym,

0:02:27.590 --> 0:02:31.209
<v Speaker 3>which many women do, is somehow out of bounds, which,

0:02:31.389 --> 0:02:31.570
<v Speaker 3>you know.

0:02:32.570 --> 0:02:36.870
<v Speaker 5>Well, look, it's the permanently aggrieved set. It's the always

0:02:36.970 --> 0:02:37.850
<v Speaker 5>offended set.

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:38.900
<v Speaker 2>Shut up. I don't care.

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:41.260
<v Speaker 5>That's the only proper response to these people.

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 2>Please, it's a power grab. I'd like to.

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 5>You're a bad person. You have to be quiet now.

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:49.860
<v Speaker 5>That's what every single message is. Shane Gillis is on

0:02:49.900 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 5>podcasts all the time. I don't know if he's done

0:02:51.820 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 5>one since Saturday. I'd like to know what he thinks

0:02:54.220 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 5>of this.

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:57.660
<v Speaker 3>I would guess he's not digging it, really, just because

0:02:58.020 --> 0:03:01.019
<v Speaker 3>he tries to be not really political. He doesn't want

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:05.060
<v Speaker 3>to be... And why would you want to be coded

0:03:05.660 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 3>one way or the other? But he certainly doesn't want

0:03:07.310 --> 0:03:10.170
<v Speaker 3>to get coded Republican. And then all of a sudden, oh,

0:03:10.190 --> 0:03:11.870
<v Speaker 3>you're going to see the Trump comic, you know, that

0:03:11.910 --> 0:03:14.330
<v Speaker 3>sort of thing, how everybody puts you in a camp.

0:03:14.490 --> 0:03:16.230
<v Speaker 2>And then that's where you are for the rest of

0:03:16.250 --> 0:03:16.609
<v Speaker 2>your life.

0:03:17.270 --> 0:03:19.530
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, I would counsel Mr. Gillis as if he

0:03:19.630 --> 0:03:23.079
<v Speaker 5>needs my counsel. You can't win with these people, so

0:03:23.139 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 5>don't adjust what you're doing one iota. They're going to

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:28.940
<v Speaker 5>label you no matter what you do. Again, it's an

0:03:29.060 --> 0:03:30.260
<v Speaker 5>effort to silence.

0:03:30.340 --> 0:03:32.739
<v Speaker 3>That's what all of it is. I like one of

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:34.740
<v Speaker 3>his jokes where he says, I know what I look like.

0:03:35.030 --> 0:03:36.410
<v Speaker 3>I know what I look like. I know my body

0:03:36.530 --> 0:03:39.690
<v Speaker 3>type screams. Let's wait until the body cam video comes out.

0:03:42.940 --> 0:03:43.580
<v Speaker 2>See, that's the thing.

0:03:43.620 --> 0:03:45.180
<v Speaker 5>That's the brilliant part of a lot of those jokes

0:03:45.220 --> 0:03:47.570
<v Speaker 5>was he always ended up being the butt of the joke.

0:03:47.730 --> 0:03:47.850
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:03:48.850 --> 0:03:51.780
<v Speaker 5>You know, I'm a fool, I'm flabby, I am actually

0:03:52.060 --> 0:03:54.900
<v Speaker 5>gaping at the women at the gym, whatever. He was always,

0:03:55.020 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 5>but see, that proves that you can't win with these people.

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:02.650
<v Speaker 5>They're professional scolds. They're 24-7 scolds.

0:04:02.810 --> 0:04:05.270
<v Speaker 2>Screw them. Just because you're offended doesn't mean you're right.

0:04:05.290 --> 0:04:07.300
<v Speaker 2>And in this case, they're not. They're idiots. Shut up.

0:04:07.490 --> 0:04:10.970
<v Speaker 2>I don't care. Shut up. I don't care. That's the response.

0:04:11.210 --> 0:04:13.590
<v Speaker 3>I wonder if a lot of the podcasts who have

0:04:13.610 --> 0:04:15.730
<v Speaker 3>them on all the time are all of a sudden going.

0:04:15.660 --> 0:04:17.419
<v Speaker 2>To think, ah, we better not have Shane Gillis on.

0:04:20.339 --> 0:04:25.810
<v Speaker 2>A lot of our crowd thinks he's a right-winger misogynist. Yeah,

0:04:25.900 --> 0:04:27.169
<v Speaker 2>I wonder. I wonder.

0:04:27.460 --> 0:04:32.430
<v Speaker 5>I'm so not in that world that the so-called controversy

0:04:32.470 --> 0:04:34.860
<v Speaker 5>to me sounds like, please, where is it?

0:04:35.850 --> 0:04:40.110
<v Speaker 2>Stop it. I don't know. I'm just tired of these people.

0:04:40.210 --> 0:04:43.020
<v Speaker 2>I know their game. As I've said multiple times.

0:04:43.060 --> 0:04:45.339
<v Speaker 3>But you know how these things get coded, like masks

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:47.700
<v Speaker 3>or vaccines or people or sports or whatever.

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:48.300
<v Speaker 2>Sure, but there's.

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:52.940
<v Speaker 5>Nothing you can do about it. Because the scolds will scold.

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 5>Scold is going to scold.

0:04:54.020 --> 0:04:55.740
<v Speaker 2>That's what I say. Oh, speaking of scolding.

0:04:56.520 --> 0:05:01.230
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Katie Zachariah's debut was a little rough. She sounded

0:05:01.250 --> 0:05:04.270
<v Speaker 5>really nervous. She misspoke a couple of times. But number one,

0:05:04.550 --> 0:05:07.390
<v Speaker 5>it's her first day in an incredibly high pressure.

0:05:07.410 --> 0:05:08.230
<v Speaker 2>Where's her law degree?

0:05:09.100 --> 0:05:11.659
<v Speaker 5>Well, and yeah, that's the other thing. She graduated from

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:14.150
<v Speaker 5>Pepperdine Law but did not pass the bar. She only

0:05:14.170 --> 0:05:16.450
<v Speaker 5>took one hack at it. Then she and her husband

0:05:16.490 --> 0:05:19.100
<v Speaker 5>got married and moved to China and decided not to

0:05:19.130 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 5>come back. And she's called herself a lawyer at times.

0:05:24.940 --> 0:05:26.039
<v Speaker 5>I don't really care.

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:31.500
<v Speaker 3>Well, Trump thought she was a lawyer because he was asked.

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 2>So the press got on this fast. We should have

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:34.779
<v Speaker 2>gotten the clip.

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 3>We got on this fast, like moments after her first

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 3>appearance the other day.

0:05:39.020 --> 0:05:42.099
<v Speaker 2>Trump was asked on the rope line, hey, where did.

0:05:42.020 --> 0:05:43.720
<v Speaker 3>She get her? Where did she pass the bar? What

0:05:43.740 --> 0:05:45.100
<v Speaker 3>state she passed the bar? And Trump turns to her

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:46.180
<v Speaker 3>and said, where did you pass the bar?

0:05:46.220 --> 0:05:49.810
<v Speaker 2>They want to know. And she said something about China

0:05:49.830 --> 0:05:52.950
<v Speaker 2>that made no sense. After I went to China, yeah.

0:05:53.050 --> 0:05:54.190
<v Speaker 2>Which is not an answer.

0:05:54.750 --> 0:05:56.890
<v Speaker 3>To where did you pass the bar and trump just

0:05:56.930 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 3>said after she went to china so but then i'll

0:05:59.690 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 3>bet he was thinking because he knows how these things

0:06:01.810 --> 0:06:04.900
<v Speaker 3>work i bet he thought uh-oh what's going on here

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:07.500
<v Speaker 3>it's not a good look absolutely not a good you

0:06:07.540 --> 0:06:08.900
<v Speaker 3>don't have to be a lawyer to be a white

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:12.540
<v Speaker 3>house press secretary i'm thinking probably most of them not

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 3>hardly any of them ever have been i don't know

0:06:14.620 --> 0:06:16.580
<v Speaker 3>if any of them have ever been a lawyer you

0:06:16.620 --> 0:06:17.620
<v Speaker 3>don't need to be a lawyer you.

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.020
<v Speaker 2>Usually come out of the media Has nothing to do

0:06:20.060 --> 0:06:20.479
<v Speaker 2>with the job.

0:06:20.540 --> 0:06:22.340
<v Speaker 5>It's just, again, it's not a great look if you're

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 5>calling yourself a lawyer for years and years and you

0:06:24.140 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 5>never pass the bar.

0:06:25.230 --> 0:06:27.290
<v Speaker 3>And one of her old professors, just to stand up

0:06:27.370 --> 0:06:29.510
<v Speaker 3>for the lovely, what's her name?

0:06:29.570 --> 0:06:30.830
<v Speaker 2>I haven't even memorized her name yet.

0:06:33.029 --> 0:06:35.210
<v Speaker 3>One of her old professors at Pepperdine said, all I

0:06:35.230 --> 0:06:36.810
<v Speaker 3>remember about her is she was a good student. And

0:06:36.850 --> 0:06:39.330
<v Speaker 3>by the way, many great legal minds never.

0:06:39.430 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 2>Took the bar. Right, including judges, yeah.

0:06:42.540 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 3>You don't have to be a great legal mind to

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:45.900
<v Speaker 3>be the White House press secretary, by the way.

0:06:45.940 --> 0:06:50.300
<v Speaker 2>We're like jumping to some sort of thing that doesn't exist. Right, exactly, yeah.

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 5>And the other thing was she was juggling her family's

0:06:53.540 --> 0:06:56.460
<v Speaker 5>move to Washington, had less than 24 hours to prepare.

0:06:56.760 --> 0:07:00.090
<v Speaker 5>She got her briefing materials that morning, according to a

0:07:00.150 --> 0:07:05.010
<v Speaker 5>senior administration official, and several former press secretaries have come

0:07:05.089 --> 0:07:07.850
<v Speaker 5>out and said, Why did they throw her out there

0:07:07.910 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 5>on her first day? You got to ease into that job.

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:14.660
<v Speaker 5>That's a hard job. Well, but here's here's my here's

0:07:14.700 --> 0:07:16.140
<v Speaker 5>my go ahead.

0:07:16.380 --> 0:07:19.770
<v Speaker 2>You've got a well. I'm not looking for scandal around this.

0:07:19.970 --> 0:07:21.070
<v Speaker 2>I don't really care.

0:07:21.170 --> 0:07:24.410
<v Speaker 3>But according to the Wall Street Journal, the bigger story is,

0:07:24.690 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 3>did she pass herself off as an attorney in China?

0:07:28.180 --> 0:07:31.300
<v Speaker 3>It would seem that the Chinese thought she was an attorney.

0:07:31.500 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 3>You don't need to have a U.S. pass the bar

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 3>to do this in China or whatever. But she may

0:07:38.140 --> 0:07:42.020
<v Speaker 3>have been portraying herself. So Mark Halpern wrote today, the whole.

0:07:43.670 --> 0:07:46.050
<v Speaker 3>Did she pass the bar at Pepperdine is not a story.

0:07:46.150 --> 0:07:48.230
<v Speaker 3>Some of this other stuff might turn into a story.

0:07:49.090 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 3>So keep your eye on that, I guess, if you

0:07:51.130 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 3>get it at all. I didn't really take that from

0:07:53.300 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 3>the journal article.

0:07:55.340 --> 0:07:58.420
<v Speaker 5>But anyway, what I was going to say is this

0:07:58.540 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 5>just illustrates the the obsession, the self-obsession, Washington, D.C.

0:08:04.140 --> 0:08:05.450
<v Speaker 2>Why are we all talking about this?

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:09.580
<v Speaker 5>The person who walks out says, yeah, the president's new

0:08:09.660 --> 0:08:12.660
<v Speaker 5>agriculture policy is expected to bring more soybeans to.

0:08:12.820 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Blah, blah, blah. What does that have to do?

0:08:15.500 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 5>I mean, you had to be such a politics junkie

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:21.500
<v Speaker 5>not terribly long ago to have any clue who Ari

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:25.230
<v Speaker 5>Fleischer was or any of the many folks whose names

0:08:25.270 --> 0:08:27.630
<v Speaker 5>don't leap to mind for the reasons I'm describing.

0:08:27.730 --> 0:08:30.870
<v Speaker 3>You're 100% right, and I retract everything I said and

0:08:30.890 --> 0:08:33.270
<v Speaker 3>wish I hadn't brought it up because who freaking cares?

0:08:34.050 --> 0:08:36.330
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay. Well, that was a very long segment that

0:08:36.350 --> 0:08:40.220
<v Speaker 2>was intended to be who cares about this story. And

0:08:40.300 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 2>I ruined it. And I take full responsibility. No, no, no.

0:08:43.740 --> 0:08:46.819
<v Speaker 2>I take 85% responsibility. Wow.

0:08:47.380 --> 0:08:50.339
<v Speaker 3>Only 15% of responsibility on the table for anybody who

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:51.020
<v Speaker 3>wants to grab it.

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:54.660
<v Speaker 2>Michael, if you could transcribe that, print that out. Michael

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:56.460
<v Speaker 2>took the 15%. And Mr.

0:08:56.500 --> 0:09:01.449
<v Speaker 5>Armstrong signed that statement at the next break. Talked about

0:09:01.470 --> 0:09:07.599
<v Speaker 5>this briefly last hour. San Francisco Playground. There's probably human

0:09:07.660 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 5>feces all over the place. That's gotten worse in the Tenderloin,

0:09:11.059 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 5>according to a new report. But we're not here to

0:09:13.460 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 5>talk about poop.

0:09:13.780 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 2>It's not possible. It is possible. To get worse? Where

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:18.980
<v Speaker 2>there's a will, there's a way, Jack. You're a quitter.

0:09:19.020 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 2>How could it be worse?

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:25.090
<v Speaker 5>At the Bums and Junkies meeting, they said, look, folks,

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:27.650
<v Speaker 5>we're doing a good job of pooping in the streets.

0:09:28.490 --> 0:09:34.170
<v Speaker 2>But not good enough. Right? So, San Francisco Playground. Stranger...

0:09:34.910 --> 0:09:35.939
<v Speaker 2>wanders up and.

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 5>Chatting with an open AI employee who is there with

0:09:39.300 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 5>their child. Stranger regularly shows up with the child and

0:09:42.900 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 5>makes small talk. And one thing leads to another, starts

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 5>asking the open AI employee about their work.

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:50.710
<v Speaker 2>And turns out Stranger was a spy.

0:09:51.330 --> 0:09:55.309
<v Speaker 5>One of several scenarios, employees of AI companies have been

0:09:55.370 --> 0:09:58.910
<v Speaker 5>presented with in attempts to raise their vigilance against attempts

0:09:58.970 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 5>to steal corporate secrets. In training sessions, OpenAI has warned

0:10:03.380 --> 0:10:06.020
<v Speaker 5>employees that outsiders, including competitors.

0:10:05.540 --> 0:10:07.140
<v Speaker 2>And state-sponsored actors.

0:10:07.550 --> 0:10:10.570
<v Speaker 5>You could try to get access to company information, and

0:10:10.610 --> 0:10:13.310
<v Speaker 5>company leaders are teaching them. It might be people offering money,

0:10:13.770 --> 0:10:17.290
<v Speaker 5>people overhearing you in cafes listening in, or even trying

0:10:17.330 --> 0:10:21.210
<v Speaker 5>to seduce open AI employees, the old fang-fang treatment.

0:10:21.230 --> 0:10:21.850
<v Speaker 2>Computer geeks.

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Some hottie comes on to a computer geek. You

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:28.819
<v Speaker 2>got him right where you want him. Probably not super

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 2>sexually experienced. Anyway.

0:10:32.500 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 5>Anyway.

0:10:33.450 --> 0:10:35.449
<v Speaker 3>Although you can get a fair number of chicks if

0:10:35.490 --> 0:10:39.010
<v Speaker 3>you're worth $ 150 million, like a lot of them are.

0:10:39.910 --> 0:10:40.630
<v Speaker 2>Wow, wow.

0:10:40.670 --> 0:10:43.870
<v Speaker 5>It sounds to me like you're just suggesting that women

0:10:44.809 --> 0:10:49.370
<v Speaker 5>will alter their standards based on a man's finances. That's shocking.

0:10:50.230 --> 0:10:53.610
<v Speaker 5>Here's a financial story worth taking a look at. The

0:10:53.630 --> 0:10:57.820
<v Speaker 5>housing market, the crazy kind of constipated housing market.

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Is about to loosen up. Ew. I so regret that metaphor.

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Why did you need to? I really do. Why did

0:11:05.660 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 2>you need to turn? Yeah, Katie, I agree. Hey, wipe

0:11:08.020 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 2>that look on your face, sister.

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:14.260
<v Speaker 5>I miss who I was before you said that. Why

0:11:14.300 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 5>take an economic story and turn it toilet related? I

0:11:16.860 --> 0:11:18.020
<v Speaker 5>don't understand it.

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:21.230
<v Speaker 2>It was stopped up. The housing market's not moving better.

0:11:21.250 --> 0:11:22.790
<v Speaker 2>It's not going to keep going. Off the top of

0:11:22.830 --> 0:11:28.540
<v Speaker 2>my head, I just big shovel digging hole. But will

0:11:28.580 --> 0:11:35.130
<v Speaker 2>the laxative of lower rates... Stop him! All right, all right.

0:11:35.170 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Here's the actual story. All right. I feel like....

0:11:41.070 --> 0:11:44.180
<v Speaker 5>I feel like perhaps the other side of the break

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 5>is the time to actually talk about this very interesting

0:11:47.420 --> 0:11:48.599
<v Speaker 5>story about the housing markets.

0:11:48.860 --> 0:11:51.380
<v Speaker 2>We are all homed, are we not? The housing market

0:11:51.460 --> 0:11:53.780
<v Speaker 2>matters to all of us. We'll have that for you momentarily.

0:11:55.610 --> 0:11:55.910
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:11:55.970 --> 0:11:57.850
<v Speaker 3>Speaking of finances, we got something to tell you about

0:11:57.870 --> 0:12:01.370
<v Speaker 3>with Blue Collar Dollar. This is for anybody out there

0:12:01.390 --> 0:12:04.490
<v Speaker 3>who's making a living doing regular work, regular guy stuff,

0:12:04.550 --> 0:12:07.130
<v Speaker 3>and doesn't like fancy stuff. And a lot of the

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:10.140
<v Speaker 3>investment stuff you hear about, it just doesn't seem like

0:12:10.179 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 3>they understand your crowd. Well, Blue Collar Dollar does.

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we're talking down-to-earth talk from folks who value your

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 5>time about your retirement and your financial plans. They want

0:12:21.780 --> 0:12:24.380
<v Speaker 5>to do a free consultation with you. It's complimentary if

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 5>you've saved $ 250, 000 or more.

0:12:26.370 --> 0:12:27.790
<v Speaker 2>No obligation at all.

0:12:27.850 --> 0:12:29.210
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it just takes a couple of minutes, and they

0:12:29.250 --> 0:12:31.550
<v Speaker 3>make it super easy. Dial pound 250 on your cell phone,

0:12:31.570 --> 0:12:34.650
<v Speaker 3>and at the prompt, say blue-collar dollar. It's pound 250.

0:12:34.650 --> 0:12:37.290
<v Speaker 3>It didn't say blue-collar dollar. Yeah, take control of your

0:12:37.350 --> 0:12:38.319
<v Speaker 3>financial future.

0:12:38.500 --> 0:12:42.239
<v Speaker 5>Call Blue Collar Dollar, pound 250, and get ready to

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:43.620
<v Speaker 5>say Blue Collar Dollar.

0:12:43.940 --> 0:12:45.740
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty are not clients of Talon. They are

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.439
<v Speaker 1>paid endorsers and receive compensation for this endorsement, which creates

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:52.260
<v Speaker 1>financial incentive to promote Talon. Advisory services are offered through Talon, LLC,

0:12:52.300 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and SEC-registered investment advisor. Learn more at bluecollardollar.com.

0:12:57.580 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 5>Armstrong and Getty.

0:13:01.990 --> 0:13:06.470
<v Speaker 6>President Trump is expressing doubts about live streaming the execution

0:13:06.510 --> 0:13:09.630
<v Speaker 6>of the Fort Hood shooter, who is, after all, in

0:13:09.670 --> 0:13:10.459
<v Speaker 6>a wheelchair.

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:12.550
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the least they can do is give him

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:18.699
<v Speaker 2>a head start. Oh, there you go. We have an

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:19.559
<v Speaker 2>update on that story.

0:13:19.580 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 3>I was listening to a podcast yesterday where they're talking

0:13:21.820 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 3>about this is the televising the execution. The guy is

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 3>in a wheelchair paralyzed because of the did he get shot?

0:13:29.870 --> 0:13:30.070
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:13:30.210 --> 0:13:31.570
<v Speaker 3>Too bad he didn't die at the time would have

0:13:31.590 --> 0:13:34.810
<v Speaker 3>saved us all this trouble. But anyway, how do you

0:13:34.870 --> 0:13:37.530
<v Speaker 3>do that in a way that doesn't look extra gruesome?

0:13:38.050 --> 0:13:40.449
<v Speaker 3>Do you leave him in a wheelchair and execute a

0:13:40.490 --> 0:13:42.770
<v Speaker 3>guy sitting in a wheelchair? Do some people come out

0:13:42.809 --> 0:13:44.690
<v Speaker 3>and lift him out of the wheelchair since he can't

0:13:44.770 --> 0:13:47.449
<v Speaker 3>walk on his own and like set him in a chair?

0:13:47.510 --> 0:13:50.030
<v Speaker 3>That doesn't look good either. Anyway, none of that matters.

0:13:50.410 --> 0:13:52.670
<v Speaker 3>As Donald Trump has just announced, this is breaking news.

0:13:53.010 --> 0:13:56.260
<v Speaker 3>The execution of the Fort Hood terrorist Nadal Hassan will

0:13:56.300 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 3>not be live streamed.

0:13:58.140 --> 0:14:02.110
<v Speaker 2>Will not. Be watchable. Right, right. Well, it was a

0:14:02.450 --> 0:14:04.650
<v Speaker 2>ridiculous idea, and it was never going to happen. So

0:14:04.690 --> 0:14:05.130
<v Speaker 2>now it's official.

0:14:05.150 --> 0:14:08.790
<v Speaker 3>But that is, you've got to admit, that is a

0:14:08.830 --> 0:14:11.710
<v Speaker 3>visual nightmare, kind of thing. No, it could be stage managed.

0:14:11.730 --> 0:14:13.170
<v Speaker 2>You don't think so? How would you do it? FDR

0:14:13.210 --> 0:14:15.770
<v Speaker 2>got away with it for an entire administration or two.

0:14:17.450 --> 0:14:18.150
<v Speaker 2>Stage managed.

0:14:18.170 --> 0:14:19.410
<v Speaker 3>You lift him out of it, put him in the

0:14:19.430 --> 0:14:21.010
<v Speaker 3>chair before you go to the live stream?

0:14:21.710 --> 0:14:25.390
<v Speaker 2>Exactly. Okay. Yeah. Mm-hmm. All right.

0:14:25.950 --> 0:14:30.950
<v Speaker 5>So back to the housing market. It's so interesting right now.

0:14:32.130 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 2>The constipated housing market? That's it.

0:14:34.630 --> 0:14:34.770
<v Speaker 6>Yep.

0:14:34.870 --> 0:14:35.270
<v Speaker 2>That's the one.

0:14:36.430 --> 0:14:38.290
<v Speaker 3>Meaning the interest rates are going to loosen things up

0:14:38.310 --> 0:14:39.390
<v Speaker 3>so much I'm going to need a diaper.

0:14:40.420 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh, okay. Wow. Wow, Katie.

0:14:43.220 --> 0:14:45.380
<v Speaker 5>Now who's the bad guy? I think he's out of

0:14:45.420 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 5>control today.

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:47.780
<v Speaker 2>Are you all right?

0:14:49.420 --> 0:14:49.580
<v Speaker 4>Hmm.

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:51.420
<v Speaker 2>I thought we got past that.

0:14:54.530 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 5>You're a maniac. So the housing market's weird. It's long

0:14:58.660 --> 0:15:00.860
<v Speaker 5>been a hobby of mine to follow real estate. I've

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:02.220
<v Speaker 5>bought and sold a bunch of houses. I'm just really

0:15:02.260 --> 0:15:07.410
<v Speaker 5>interested in it. I've never seen anything like this. There

0:15:07.510 --> 0:15:10.930
<v Speaker 5>is a wide gap between the number of sellers and

0:15:11.030 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 5>buyers in the housing market right now. You got a

0:15:13.740 --> 0:15:15.780
<v Speaker 5>million and a half Americans trying to sell their homes

0:15:16.420 --> 0:15:20.340
<v Speaker 5>and only about 929 who are buying. So that should

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:24.820
<v Speaker 5>mean housing prices would drop, especially because higher interest rates

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 5>put pressure downward.

0:15:26.660 --> 0:15:27.540
<v Speaker 2>On housing prices.

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:29.780
<v Speaker 5>Because look, if all I can afford is $ 3, 000 a month,

0:15:31.350 --> 0:15:33.090
<v Speaker 5>It doesn't really matter to me how much of that

0:15:33.170 --> 0:15:34.830
<v Speaker 5>is the price and how much of that is the

0:15:34.890 --> 0:15:35.430
<v Speaker 5>interest rate.

0:15:35.470 --> 0:15:36.510
<v Speaker 2>That's all the money I.

0:15:36.450 --> 0:15:38.910
<v Speaker 5>Got, for instance. So it puts downward pressure on houses.

0:15:39.690 --> 0:15:44.430
<v Speaker 5>And so housing prices should be tumbling, but they're not.

0:15:45.450 --> 0:15:49.530
<v Speaker 5>They're starting to show weakness as about a third of

0:15:49.690 --> 0:15:55.390
<v Speaker 5>folks who had the old ultra-cheap mortgages don't have the—

0:15:55.500 --> 0:15:57.940
<v Speaker 5>I'm sorry, but today more than a third of outstanding

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:03.020
<v Speaker 5>home loans have a rate above 5%. So at least

0:16:03.100 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 5>a third of them aren't the ultra-cheapos, and those are

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:11.730
<v Speaker 5>more likely to be sold. But here's the really, really

0:16:11.810 --> 0:16:16.270
<v Speaker 5>weird part. The number of people who put their house

0:16:16.350 --> 0:16:19.109
<v Speaker 5>on the market then say, never mind, is at an

0:16:19.350 --> 0:16:22.860
<v Speaker 5>all-time high. If they can't get the price they want,

0:16:22.900 --> 0:16:26.500
<v Speaker 5>they just say, yeah, we'll stay, I guess.

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 2>That's an interesting situation to be in.

0:16:29.460 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, other than divorces and job transfers and death and

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:36.580
<v Speaker 5>that sort of thing, people are just not selling in.

0:16:36.540 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 2>The normal ways and in the normal intervals, at least

0:16:39.250 --> 0:16:39.750
<v Speaker 2>for now.

0:16:39.850 --> 0:16:41.850
<v Speaker 3>Isn't people just wanting to see what they could get

0:16:41.910 --> 0:16:43.550
<v Speaker 3>for it? And if they got enough money, they'd go

0:16:43.570 --> 0:16:46.310
<v Speaker 3>ahead and move? Because I've never moved just for the

0:16:46.330 --> 0:16:49.910
<v Speaker 3>hell of it. So I don't know what that is.

0:16:50.490 --> 0:16:53.730
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think people do have a certain expectation what

0:16:53.750 --> 0:16:56.970
<v Speaker 5>their house is worth, and often it's unrealistic. But especially

0:16:57.070 --> 0:16:59.310
<v Speaker 5>since housing prices have been pretty high for a pretty

0:16:59.350 --> 0:17:04.469
<v Speaker 5>long time, if you bought three, four years ago and

0:17:04.930 --> 0:17:07.830
<v Speaker 5>you realize nobody can give you anything close to what

0:17:07.869 --> 0:17:09.030
<v Speaker 5>you thought you might be able to.

0:17:08.990 --> 0:17:10.300
<v Speaker 2>Get, you just stay put.

0:17:10.580 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 3>Every move I've ever made in my life, though, is job,

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:18.179
<v Speaker 3>school district, something. There was a reason, wasn't there? If

0:17:18.220 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't sell, we'll just stay here.

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:20.300
<v Speaker 2>I guess. Right.

0:17:20.340 --> 0:17:23.659
<v Speaker 5>So you've got this huge oversupply of houses for sale

0:17:23.740 --> 0:17:24.899
<v Speaker 5>and an undersupply of buyers.

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:27.510
<v Speaker 2>I mean, come on, supply and demand, Econ 101, right?

0:17:27.550 --> 0:17:28.469
<v Speaker 2>Except it's not happening.

0:17:29.050 --> 0:17:32.129
<v Speaker 5>In September, 6% of sellers pulled a property off the

0:17:32.170 --> 0:17:34.290
<v Speaker 5>market after failing to get an acceptable offer.

0:17:34.820 --> 0:17:40.129
<v Speaker 2>In Chicago, it was 18% of homes. Every state's different.

0:17:40.150 --> 0:17:40.869
<v Speaker 2>Every town's different.

0:17:40.890 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 3>And then even within a town, you can have different

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:44.940
<v Speaker 3>markets going on within the same town. So it's all

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 3>anecdotal evidence, you know, for individuals. But, man, there's a

0:17:48.060 --> 0:17:50.260
<v Speaker 3>lot of signs in my town. And there weren't any

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:52.740
<v Speaker 3>a couple of years ago when I was looking. It'd

0:17:52.770 --> 0:17:54.750
<v Speaker 3>be like one every couple of weeks, and it would

0:17:54.770 --> 0:17:57.050
<v Speaker 3>last three days. Now they're all– there was one corner

0:17:57.070 --> 0:17:58.409
<v Speaker 3>I drove by the other day. There must have been

0:17:58.590 --> 0:18:00.590
<v Speaker 3>eight signs there competing to try to get you to

0:18:00.630 --> 0:18:02.450
<v Speaker 3>go that way and go look.

0:18:02.350 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 2>At the house.

0:18:02.780 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:18:03.300 --> 0:18:06.820
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so check your local numbers, obviously. In Austin, for instance,

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:10.700
<v Speaker 5>home values are down 27% from their peak in 2022.

0:18:10.700 --> 0:18:14.859
<v Speaker 2>Whoa. Yeah. That's what I've been waiting for. I don't

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:16.780
<v Speaker 2>live in Austin. We've got a lot more on the way.

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:19.700
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty.

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:25.350
<v Speaker 7>He posted AI-generated video that shows him chasing and hugging

0:18:25.380 --> 0:18:28.210
<v Speaker 7>a tiger, a video that appears to be a reference

0:18:28.290 --> 0:18:30.109
<v Speaker 7>to an incident this weekend where a man in the

0:18:30.230 --> 0:18:33.570
<v Speaker 7>UK was killed by a tiger after entering its enclosure

0:18:33.970 --> 0:18:34.770
<v Speaker 7>at a wildlife park.

0:18:35.230 --> 0:18:37.490
<v Speaker 2>Really? It appears to be a reference to that? Hmm,

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:40.199
<v Speaker 2>it does appear that way. Is that a report on

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:43.419
<v Speaker 2>a meme? Yes, that was a news report on a meme.

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:46.020
<v Speaker 3>I would say, you talked the other day that you

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 3>feel like we're in a September 10th moment, people regularly...

0:18:50.869 --> 0:18:53.130
<v Speaker 3>Quote how we were into shark attacks was the big

0:18:53.170 --> 0:18:55.780
<v Speaker 3>story right before September 11th. We weren't paying attention to

0:18:55.800 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 3>the world. Our news, our mainstream news. which few people

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 3>watch anymore, so maybe it's not an indication of anything.

0:19:03.740 --> 0:19:06.730
<v Speaker 3>But our mainstream news, our big evening newscasts, are dumber

0:19:06.770 --> 0:19:09.150
<v Speaker 3>than they've ever been, ever. And I mean, I feel

0:19:09.190 --> 0:19:10.910
<v Speaker 3>like it's gone off a cliff just in the last

0:19:10.970 --> 0:19:15.030
<v Speaker 3>couple of weeks with celebrity stories and YouTube videos of

0:19:15.070 --> 0:19:17.490
<v Speaker 3>the day and all that sort of stuff before they

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:21.100
<v Speaker 3>get to, you know, President Zelensky and the new diesel

0:19:21.140 --> 0:19:26.419
<v Speaker 3>policy will be six celebrity story or memes in.

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 2>Before they get to that. Something's going on there.

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:32.859
<v Speaker 3>So that might just be the state of media and

0:19:32.900 --> 0:19:34.700
<v Speaker 3>have nothing to do with anything else.

0:19:34.790 --> 0:19:37.869
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I don't watch the news. That's a

0:19:37.890 --> 0:19:38.810
<v Speaker 2>wise decision, son.

0:19:38.850 --> 0:19:40.210
<v Speaker 5>It might have more to do with the state of

0:19:40.210 --> 0:19:44.450
<v Speaker 5>the audience, honestly, because I have a feeling the purveyors

0:19:44.450 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 5>of the news, are, they have technology to figure out

0:19:48.660 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 5>what their viewers want and what they don't, what they

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:53.439
<v Speaker 5>stay tuned through and what they tune out of. And

0:19:53.460 --> 0:19:57.300
<v Speaker 5>I think they've realized their audience wants fluff. So they're

0:19:57.320 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 5>giving them fluff.

0:19:58.640 --> 0:19:58.980
<v Speaker 2>Could be.

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:05.629
<v Speaker 3>That's not good. So we've talked about this before. The

0:20:05.670 --> 0:20:10.970
<v Speaker 3>headline is Gen Z is the most depressed generation. we've

0:20:10.990 --> 0:20:14.629
<v Speaker 3>maybe ever had uh we'll get into that in a

0:20:14.650 --> 0:20:17.550
<v Speaker 3>second but it's all about the gallop life evaluation index

0:20:17.570 --> 0:20:19.489
<v Speaker 3>which we've talked about over the years it gives you

0:20:19.570 --> 0:20:27.950
<v Speaker 3>three categories to choose from are you suffering struggling or

0:20:28.060 --> 0:20:31.180
<v Speaker 3>thriving those are your three options you got three options

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:36.270
<v Speaker 3>two of them quite negative suffering and struggling And then

0:20:36.490 --> 0:20:38.810
<v Speaker 3>one of them seems overly positive.

0:20:38.850 --> 0:20:41.909
<v Speaker 5>I feel like there should be something between one and two.

0:20:42.490 --> 0:20:47.050
<v Speaker 5>I think struggling is just one shade too dark. I

0:20:47.170 --> 0:20:51.209
<v Speaker 5>don't find that necessarily negative. But isn't thriving one shade

0:20:51.310 --> 0:20:52.170
<v Speaker 5>too positive?

0:20:52.190 --> 0:20:54.890
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I got to be doing pretty well before

0:20:54.910 --> 0:20:56.459
<v Speaker 3>I'm thriving today.

0:20:56.480 --> 0:21:00.780
<v Speaker 2>Oh, my God. I'm kicking ass. Maybe keeping your head

0:21:00.820 --> 0:21:03.440
<v Speaker 2>above water. Surviving is the middle one. Doing okay.

0:21:03.460 --> 0:21:05.180
<v Speaker 3>I'm all right.

0:21:05.780 --> 0:21:08.940
<v Speaker 2>But anyway, the choices are thriving, struggling, and suffering. Okay.

0:21:10.020 --> 0:21:13.770
<v Speaker 3>Where would you place yourself on the ladder today? Today,

0:21:13.869 --> 0:21:16.390
<v Speaker 3>I'm struggling a little bit. Yesterday, I was thriving.

0:21:16.990 --> 0:21:19.210
<v Speaker 2>That's another problem. Staying up too late watching baseball.

0:21:19.710 --> 0:21:22.409
<v Speaker 3>That's another problem of the if it switches day to

0:21:22.450 --> 0:21:25.250
<v Speaker 3>day or within the day, then what does any polling

0:21:25.290 --> 0:21:25.689
<v Speaker 3>about it.

0:21:26.050 --> 0:21:30.380
<v Speaker 2>Mean at all? In general, though, I'm feeling pretty thrivey.

0:21:30.500 --> 0:21:31.260
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for asking.

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:35.770
<v Speaker 3>But anyway, Gen Z has seen their life satisfaction plummet

0:21:36.230 --> 0:21:40.170
<v Speaker 3>compared to their millennial predecessors a generation ago. This would

0:21:40.190 --> 0:21:43.270
<v Speaker 3>be your 18 to 29 year olds. Remember back in

0:21:43.290 --> 0:21:44.830
<v Speaker 3>the day, we used to talk about millennials and how

0:21:44.850 --> 0:21:49.060
<v Speaker 3>they ruined bedspreads and. mayonnaise and all different things uh

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:51.770
<v Speaker 3>when they were 18 to 29 now they're older and

0:21:52.010 --> 0:21:55.090
<v Speaker 3>uh obviously that's the way life works in time in

0:21:55.109 --> 0:21:57.110
<v Speaker 3>case you weren't aware of that but now we're talking

0:21:57.130 --> 0:22:01.190
<v Speaker 3>about gen z is 18 to 29 uh and a

0:22:01.710 --> 0:22:06.830
<v Speaker 3>over a quarter of them 27 are being treated for

0:22:06.869 --> 0:22:09.170
<v Speaker 3>depression which seems like a very high number but doesn't

0:22:09.190 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 3>have more to do with your parents and i don't

0:22:12.100 --> 0:22:16.350
<v Speaker 3>know anyway Well, and their whole world surrounds them with

0:22:16.510 --> 0:22:20.390
<v Speaker 3>negativity and anger all the time. Less than half now

0:22:20.450 --> 0:22:26.150
<v Speaker 3>describe themselves as thriving, which is down a fair amount

0:22:26.190 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 3>from 2008. Adults describe themselves as drifting away from friends

0:22:31.980 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 3>and partners and experiencing less joy, while less than a

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 3>third said they had reached most of their goals in

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:39.400
<v Speaker 3>the last year. I don't remember when I was 20

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:42.700
<v Speaker 3>in my 20s ever setting goals, really.

0:22:45.350 --> 0:22:49.129
<v Speaker 2>They're, like, incremental on the road to success, I guess.

0:22:49.930 --> 0:22:52.669
<v Speaker 3>I just don't remember having specific goals that I could

0:22:52.690 --> 0:22:53.350
<v Speaker 3>have looked back.

0:22:53.260 --> 0:22:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Over the years. Did you reach your goals this year

0:22:54.780 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 2>as a 22-year-old? I don't know. I guess I kind

0:22:57.480 --> 0:22:59.100
<v Speaker 2>of had a lot of fun, which I was hoping

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:02.700
<v Speaker 2>to do. Kept my job. Yeah.

0:23:04.140 --> 0:23:08.060
<v Speaker 3>The social isolation of COVID-19 during their formative developmental years

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:11.500
<v Speaker 3>has left a lasting impact, according to the researchers. They

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:14.640
<v Speaker 3>think it all turned around COVID and has never gone.

0:23:14.530 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 2>Back, really. which is pretty interesting.

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 5>I think it's been exacerbated by a lot of things

0:23:19.859 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 5>happening in the world right now and the education system

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:24.640
<v Speaker 5>and the fact that people are looking for satisfaction where

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:27.190
<v Speaker 5>they'll never find it, namely online.

0:23:27.710 --> 0:23:32.050
<v Speaker 3>So that age group back in 2010 would have been millennials.

0:23:32.130 --> 0:23:33.990
<v Speaker 3>Now they've gotten older, as I pointed out, the whole

0:23:34.050 --> 0:23:38.230
<v Speaker 3>way time works thing. So back then, 64% of millennials

0:23:38.350 --> 0:23:43.790
<v Speaker 3>when they were 18 to 29 said, described themselves as thriving, 64%.

0:23:43.790 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Gen Z, 44%. 20 points lower. That seems like a lot.

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah.

0:23:52.060 --> 0:23:56.900
<v Speaker 3>And most of that decline since 2020 happened since COVID, whatever.

0:23:56.720 --> 0:24:00.820
<v Speaker 2>COVID did to us. It was big, no doubt. Absolutely huge.

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 5>I didn't mean to suggest that it wasn't, but it's not.

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 2>The only thing.

0:24:06.300 --> 0:24:12.639
<v Speaker 5>Plus, we're celebrating pathologizing every mood and true. I, in

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 5>a way societally, I mean, it's just, it's absolutely rampant

0:24:16.300 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 5>among young people.

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:17.920
<v Speaker 2>I see it all the time.

0:24:17.940 --> 0:24:20.790
<v Speaker 5>In fact, they're like the proverbial fish that doesn't realize

0:24:20.830 --> 0:24:25.330
<v Speaker 5>they're wet. They're all so into their mental struggles.

0:24:26.350 --> 0:24:29.109
<v Speaker 2>Everybody talks about it all the time. Right.

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:31.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:36.139
<v Speaker 3>Uh, gen x is the crowd that has stayed the

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:39.359
<v Speaker 3>steadiest that's what we are gen x oh yes.

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:41.419
<v Speaker 2>Old steady joe they called me back in the day.

0:24:41.340 --> 0:24:44.940
<v Speaker 3>We've hung around in the uh mid to high 40s

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 3>since 2008 gone up a little gone down a little

0:24:47.859 --> 0:24:49.540
<v Speaker 3>just kind of hang around in that area.

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's just say yeah okay not so bad things.

0:24:52.500 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 5>Haven't changed much i would argue and i don't get

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:59.740
<v Speaker 5>credit for this we're all the uh the results of

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:02.100
<v Speaker 5>our upbringing and the world we grew up in, as

0:25:02.300 --> 0:25:04.679
<v Speaker 5>are the Gen Z kids and the millennials and the

0:25:04.700 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 5>rest of them. But correct me if I'm wrong, the

0:25:08.100 --> 0:25:10.659
<v Speaker 5>Gen X official motto is, but what are you going

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:16.430
<v Speaker 5>to do? I mean, that's our zeitgeist, or not zeitgeist.

0:25:16.450 --> 0:25:20.389
<v Speaker 2>But that's our thing. What are you going to do? Ups, downs,

0:25:21.070 --> 0:25:23.149
<v Speaker 2>good times, bad times, et cetera, et cetera. You know what?

0:25:23.190 --> 0:25:25.850
<v Speaker 5>This is a perfect time to read this. Eric crafted

0:25:25.890 --> 0:25:29.540
<v Speaker 5>this email to us. And he's talking about the people

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 5>who are permanently angry about one thing or another, the

0:25:32.859 --> 0:25:40.510
<v Speaker 5>professional scolds that I was describing. He says, I may

0:25:40.550 --> 0:25:42.409
<v Speaker 5>have influenced a woman or two out of it simply

0:25:42.450 --> 0:25:44.679
<v Speaker 5>by laying out what it looks like in her 40s

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:47.379
<v Speaker 5>versus in her 20s. Essentially, I'd ask, do you want

0:25:47.420 --> 0:25:50.220
<v Speaker 5>to burn through your 20s pissed off and angry, then

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 5>end up a lonely cat lady in your 40s? Or

0:25:52.500 --> 0:25:55.380
<v Speaker 5>do you want to embrace your youth joyfully? Because your

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:58.770
<v Speaker 5>youth will never return once it departs. This choice, and

0:25:58.830 --> 0:26:02.790
<v Speaker 5>it is a choice, is critical to at least think about.

0:26:04.070 --> 0:26:05.990
<v Speaker 2>True dad about the youth never returning.

0:26:07.010 --> 0:26:07.210
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:26:07.230 --> 0:26:07.310
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:26:07.970 --> 0:26:09.710
<v Speaker 2>But it is a choice. Do you really want to

0:26:09.730 --> 0:26:11.889
<v Speaker 2>spend your 20 years all angry and pissed off and

0:26:11.950 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 2>screaming in the streets? I didn't. I didn't. So here

0:26:15.820 --> 0:26:16.919
<v Speaker 2>are your questions.

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 5>These kids are the result of the education system, though.

0:26:19.420 --> 0:26:19.620
<v Speaker 4>Yes.

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 3>Here are your questions in case you just want to

0:26:21.740 --> 0:26:23.540
<v Speaker 3>judge for yourself on the whole thriving.

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:26.220
<v Speaker 2>Are you supposed to imagine.

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:30.660
<v Speaker 3>A ladder with 10 steps, 0 to 10, where 0

0:26:30.660 --> 0:26:32.360
<v Speaker 3>represents the worst possible life?

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 2>What, on fire? What is the worst possible life?

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:41.879
<v Speaker 5>On fire as the firing squad gets ready to shoot me.

0:26:42.340 --> 0:26:44.060
<v Speaker 2>Actually, that would put me out of my misery.

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:47.929
<v Speaker 3>On fire in line behind somebody writing a check at

0:26:47.970 --> 0:26:48.750
<v Speaker 3>the grocery store.

0:26:50.190 --> 0:26:52.149
<v Speaker 2>That's a good one. I don't know.

0:26:52.510 --> 0:26:54.670
<v Speaker 3>Imagine the worst possible life, which you got to admit

0:26:54.710 --> 0:26:55.850
<v Speaker 3>is kind of a funny scenario.

0:26:56.369 --> 0:27:01.190
<v Speaker 2>At zero. I'm currently being eaten by a tiger. While

0:27:01.270 --> 0:27:01.570
<v Speaker 2>on fire.

0:27:01.869 --> 0:27:04.469
<v Speaker 3>And 10 represents the best possible life. I've won the

0:27:04.490 --> 0:27:07.010
<v Speaker 3>lottery while I'm having sex, I guess is what today.

0:27:07.630 --> 0:27:10.230
<v Speaker 3>I hear the winning numbers read to me while I'm

0:27:10.250 --> 0:27:12.290
<v Speaker 3>having sex. That's my best possible life.

0:27:12.619 --> 0:27:12.990
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:27:13.859 --> 0:27:17.210
<v Speaker 3>But where are, which step are you standing on today?

0:27:17.300 --> 0:27:18.919
<v Speaker 3>On which step of the ladder would you say you

0:27:18.980 --> 0:27:21.200
<v Speaker 3>personally feel you stand on at this time?

0:27:23.020 --> 0:27:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Like at this very moment. I'm at work. I like work.

0:27:26.180 --> 0:27:27.940
<v Speaker 2>Because I think I'd be on a different step maybe

0:27:27.980 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 2>later today. I don't know. I don't know if I

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 2>would or not.

0:27:30.580 --> 0:27:32.419
<v Speaker 3>I'd have to think about it. Somebody called me and

0:27:32.460 --> 0:27:37.420
<v Speaker 3>asked me at 3 this afternoon. Where would I put myself?

0:27:37.869 --> 0:27:40.050
<v Speaker 3>I'd probably be like a 7 or an 8, actually.

0:27:41.530 --> 0:27:44.570
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would agree. Speaking for myself, yeah, pretty close.

0:27:46.330 --> 0:27:51.700
<v Speaker 5>I'm really not superstitious, but I don't like pronouncing everything's

0:27:51.740 --> 0:27:52.260
<v Speaker 5>going great.

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:58.100
<v Speaker 2>It just doesn't feel like a good idea. I know.

0:27:58.119 --> 0:27:59.160
<v Speaker 2>I have a bit of that, too.

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:01.570
<v Speaker 3>But didn't we learn last week, was that from Tom Brady?

0:28:01.590 --> 0:28:03.750
<v Speaker 3>I think it was Tom Brady that he broke out

0:28:03.770 --> 0:28:05.690
<v Speaker 3>of that trap. He thought it was holding him back.

0:28:07.670 --> 0:28:09.369
<v Speaker 3>The idea that he has to kind of have a

0:28:09.430 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 3>negative attitude to stay on track. And he flipped it

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:17.740
<v Speaker 3>around where he's always picturing everything is going great and

0:28:17.780 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 3>it's going to go great.

0:28:19.270 --> 0:28:21.670
<v Speaker 2>And that was like his key to success in life

0:28:21.730 --> 0:28:22.159
<v Speaker 2>or something.

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:24.980
<v Speaker 3>Which is interesting because I have always said, I used

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:28.060
<v Speaker 3>to believe this a thousand percent when I was in school.

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:30.820
<v Speaker 3>If I don't worry about my test score, I'm going

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:33.160
<v Speaker 3>to get a bad score. So I need to like

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:35.229
<v Speaker 3>be really concerned. I don't think I did very well

0:28:35.250 --> 0:28:36.770
<v Speaker 3>on this test. Then I'd get a B back, which

0:28:36.830 --> 0:28:40.830
<v Speaker 3>is what I was always hoping for. But if I

0:28:40.850 --> 0:28:42.550
<v Speaker 3>thought I did pretty good in that test, that's when

0:28:42.570 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to get the C minus.

0:28:45.300 --> 0:28:47.170
<v Speaker 2>Which is obviously....

0:28:47.940 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, there's no cause and effect there. And the bit

0:28:52.380 --> 0:28:54.260
<v Speaker 3>of a weird self-defeating, I don't know, you.

0:28:54.180 --> 0:28:57.020
<v Speaker 2>Got the whole Ben Franklin pessimist thing, you know. I

0:28:57.040 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 2>don't know what is best. I'm going to listen to

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:03.340
<v Speaker 2>Tom Brady. How many Super Bowl rings did Ben Franklin win? Zero. Over.

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:06.570
<v Speaker 2>Not a one. Anyway, if I were you, where would

0:29:06.610 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 2>you be on the, which step are you on, Michael?

0:29:08.790 --> 0:29:11.330
<v Speaker 3>Zero to ten. Worst life you can possibly imagine on

0:29:11.390 --> 0:29:12.630
<v Speaker 3>fire while being eaten by a tiger.

0:29:13.530 --> 0:29:18.220
<v Speaker 2>Or ten. I'd say seven. You're a seven? How about you, Katie? Yeah,

0:29:18.300 --> 0:29:19.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm between a 7 and an 8. Okay, so we're

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:21.180
<v Speaker 2>all thriving. Every one of us.

0:29:22.580 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 3>And then the other question, by the way, is on

0:29:24.740 --> 0:29:26.870
<v Speaker 3>which step do you think you will stand on five

0:29:26.910 --> 0:29:27.670
<v Speaker 3>years from today?

0:29:30.730 --> 0:29:32.350
<v Speaker 2>That'd also be a 7 or 8, I think.

0:29:32.350 --> 0:29:35.570
<v Speaker 8>I'm just afraid someone's going to push the ladder over.

0:29:35.570 --> 0:29:37.290
<v Speaker 3>Somebody who's got like a two.

0:29:38.510 --> 0:29:40.990
<v Speaker 2>They don't like you being on seven or eight. Exactly.

0:29:41.030 --> 0:29:43.650
<v Speaker 2>That's socialism. They don't want to be at the top

0:29:43.670 --> 0:29:45.370
<v Speaker 2>of the ladder. They just want to chop the ladder

0:29:45.410 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 2>down so nobody gets higher than a four.

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:51.380
<v Speaker 3>That's kind of an interesting one. In five years, what

0:29:51.420 --> 0:29:52.580
<v Speaker 3>step do you think you're going to be on? I

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 3>think that says a lot about your personality, probably more

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:59.460
<v Speaker 3>than reality. That if you have a really bad number

0:29:59.500 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 3>for what you expect in five years, expect things to

0:30:03.580 --> 0:30:04.140
<v Speaker 3>be pretty good.

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:07.230
<v Speaker 2>I hope they will be, I guess. I don't know.

0:30:07.490 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of time between now and then. Wow.

0:30:09.630 --> 0:30:12.250
<v Speaker 2>So what are you going with? Could be feast, could

0:30:12.270 --> 0:30:13.770
<v Speaker 2>be famine.

0:30:13.810 --> 0:30:17.150
<v Speaker 3>You're actually unwilling superstitious-wise to predict you're going to be

0:30:17.930 --> 0:30:18.940
<v Speaker 3>doing well in five years?

0:30:19.580 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh, yeah. Well, no, not superstition. It's a ridiculous question

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 2>to me. That's what you tell Gallup? That's a ridiculous question.

0:30:26.380 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Get out of here. Yeah, yeah.

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:30.060
<v Speaker 5>I'll answer for right now, but no, there's way too

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:31.940
<v Speaker 5>much that's going to happen between now and then. I

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:33.180
<v Speaker 5>can't possibly predict that.

0:30:36.220 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting. Too little data.

0:30:38.060 --> 0:30:41.340
<v Speaker 8>Do you think since they're asking Gen Z, they're talking

0:30:41.380 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 8>more about, like, careers and, well, you have a house

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 8>and all that stuff?

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:47.620
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. You get to make your own criteria.

0:30:47.700 --> 0:30:49.180
<v Speaker 2>That's the thing. I feel like I'm going to be

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:50.310
<v Speaker 2>a seven or eight in five years.

0:30:51.170 --> 0:30:54.090
<v Speaker 5>For a guy of my age, which is your age, too,

0:30:54.550 --> 0:30:57.670
<v Speaker 5>it entirely depends on health. I mean, that's like the

0:30:58.010 --> 0:31:01.940
<v Speaker 5>only question confronting me. My golf game might be slightly

0:31:01.980 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 5>better or slightly worse. I hope my wife will still

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 5>love me. I certainly love her.

0:31:06.020 --> 0:31:08.970
<v Speaker 3>But for whatever reason, your personality is always you hesitate

0:31:09.010 --> 0:31:12.570
<v Speaker 3>to give a prediction on something like you'll be penalized somehow.

0:31:12.370 --> 0:31:13.090
<v Speaker 2>If you do not do it.

0:31:14.770 --> 0:31:16.410
<v Speaker 3>Like somebody's going to come to your house and knock

0:31:16.450 --> 0:31:18.190
<v Speaker 3>on the door five years from now. You said you're

0:31:18.210 --> 0:31:19.930
<v Speaker 3>going to be a seven. Look at you.

0:31:19.970 --> 0:31:25.070
<v Speaker 2>You lost your foot. Look at this idiot. Everybody gather around.

0:31:25.150 --> 0:31:30.790
<v Speaker 2>Look at this. Everybody gather around. No, it's not that.

0:31:30.890 --> 0:31:33.570
<v Speaker 5>It's that I have very, very strong opinions on stuff

0:31:33.590 --> 0:31:36.070
<v Speaker 5>I'm very confident about. But stuff that I don't feel

0:31:36.090 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 5>like I know enough, I don't have an opinion about.

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:41.860
<v Speaker 2>One of those undecideds that gets pulled.

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 3>Which is a reasonable stance, actually. It's not much fun,

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 3>but it's a reasonable stance to say, how would I

0:31:47.220 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 3>possibly know?

0:31:47.900 --> 0:31:52.130
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. Yeah. You can't make me answer a

0:31:52.170 --> 0:31:54.970
<v Speaker 2>question if I don't know the answer. Oh, man.

0:31:55.050 --> 0:31:56.770
<v Speaker 8>You know, I'm with Joe, though, on the whole. I'm

0:31:56.790 --> 0:31:58.930
<v Speaker 8>not going to say everything's great. Like, people ask me

0:31:59.110 --> 0:32:00.930
<v Speaker 8>all the time, so how's Van sleeping?

0:32:02.170 --> 0:32:05.300
<v Speaker 2>Our baby. And I'm like, um... Last night was great.

0:32:05.410 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 8>But I'm not going to say, oh, he's doing great,

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:08.900
<v Speaker 8>because the second I say that, we're going to have

0:32:09.060 --> 0:32:13.540
<v Speaker 8>three middle-of-the-night wake-ups with just screaming. Happens with traffic, happens

0:32:13.580 --> 0:32:14.620
<v Speaker 8>with everything else, too.

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 5>Zach, I was just going to say, and look, I am, like, deliberately,

0:32:17.380 --> 0:32:22.180
<v Speaker 5>studiously not superstitious, but what percentage of human beings, if

0:32:22.220 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 5>their spouse or buddy or whatever says.

0:32:24.180 --> 0:32:28.980
<v Speaker 2>Man, traffic is great today, thinks, oh, no. Yeah, same here.

0:32:29.180 --> 0:32:35.140
<v Speaker 2>It's a truism in golf. Boy, I'm playing well today. Doomed! Doomed!

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 2>You were playing great today. Say goodbye to your golf ball.

0:32:38.660 --> 0:32:41.650
<v Speaker 2>It's about to go into a lake. Yeah, exactly. Yeah,

0:32:41.730 --> 0:32:43.470
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I don't know. Human beings, what are

0:32:43.490 --> 0:32:45.300
<v Speaker 2>you going to do? So a word from our friends.

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:47.820
<v Speaker 3>You weren't thriving until somebody scammed you.

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:49.260
<v Speaker 2>How about that for a transition?

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:52.220
<v Speaker 5>Oh, that's good because you thought it was actually your

0:32:52.260 --> 0:32:54.720
<v Speaker 5>bank on the line. They had your name and address,

0:32:54.780 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 5>the last four digits of your social. You're thinking, all right,

0:32:57.160 --> 0:32:59.900
<v Speaker 5>it's totally my bank. Here's all my private info.

0:33:00.100 --> 0:33:00.830
<v Speaker 2>It's not your bank.

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:02.930
<v Speaker 5>It's a scammer who bought your info from one of

0:33:02.970 --> 0:33:04.290
<v Speaker 5>those damn data brokers.

0:33:04.430 --> 0:33:06.850
<v Speaker 3>Lots of data brokers have all your info, including your

0:33:06.890 --> 0:33:09.550
<v Speaker 3>social security address, all the different things, and they sell

0:33:09.590 --> 0:33:11.130
<v Speaker 3>it to people for practically nothing.

0:33:11.150 --> 0:33:13.150
<v Speaker 2>You got to get it off the websites. Incogni can

0:33:13.170 --> 0:33:13.490
<v Speaker 2>do that.

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:16.580
<v Speaker 3>I like the fact that Incogni is sending removal requests

0:33:16.620 --> 0:33:20.460
<v Speaker 3>to 420 plus data brokers and people search sites for me.

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:23.240
<v Speaker 2>It follows up so my info doesn't sneak back on there.

0:33:23.770 --> 0:33:27.010
<v Speaker 5>You will thrive if you go to incogni.com slash Armstrong

0:33:27.050 --> 0:33:34.440
<v Speaker 5>and get 60% off. It's I-N-C-O-G-N-I like incognito. Incogni.com slash Armstrong.

0:33:34.600 --> 0:33:39.030
<v Speaker 5>Super easy to sign up. Incogni.com. slash Armstrong, do this,

0:33:39.110 --> 0:33:40.930
<v Speaker 5>protect your stuff, they can't scam you if they can't

0:33:40.970 --> 0:33:41.330
<v Speaker 5>find you.

0:33:41.650 --> 0:33:43.530
<v Speaker 2>Bastards again, I say. So J.D.

0:33:43.550 --> 0:33:46.970
<v Speaker 3>Vance made a joke, a gay joke, and I saw

0:33:47.030 --> 0:33:49.510
<v Speaker 3>two different takes on that, one positive, one negative, that

0:33:49.530 --> 0:33:51.050
<v Speaker 3>I thought were really interesting for discussion.

0:33:51.310 --> 0:33:53.890
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we'll get to that in hour three. Among other things,

0:33:53.930 --> 0:33:56.860
<v Speaker 2>stay here. Armstrong and Getty.

0:34:00.060 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 6>Governor Gavin Newsom signed legislation that may require some Californians

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:05.860
<v Speaker 6>to pay slavery reparations.

0:34:06.770 --> 0:34:08.330
<v Speaker 2>To get reparations, you just have.

0:34:08.230 --> 0:34:10.250
<v Speaker 6>To prove you've been married to Kimberly Guilfoyle.

0:34:14.090 --> 0:34:14.370
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:34:16.260 --> 0:34:19.180
<v Speaker 2>Where the hell did that punchline come from? Fox taking

0:34:19.219 --> 0:34:22.900
<v Speaker 2>a shot at Guilfoyle like that. Wow. Okay.

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 5>So next hour, I want to get into the absolutely

0:34:27.900 --> 0:34:32.900
<v Speaker 5>laughable effort at reparations that Gavi continues to embrace.

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:32.990
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:34:34.010 --> 0:34:37.130
<v Speaker 5>I think positioning himself for his run for the presidency

0:34:37.150 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 5>because he's got to do well in South Carolina among

0:34:39.700 --> 0:34:40.360
<v Speaker 5>the black voters.

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:45.759
<v Speaker 2>But it is everything about it just stinks. It's illegal.

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 2>It's illogical. It's unconstitutional.

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:52.549
<v Speaker 3>Well i don't i don't know if you were here

0:34:52.590 --> 0:34:54.710
<v Speaker 3>when we talked about the law he signed what a

0:34:54.750 --> 0:34:56.049
<v Speaker 3>week or two ago i think you were i was

0:34:56.090 --> 0:34:57.430
<v Speaker 3>indeed yeah were you here on the gulf or i

0:34:57.430 --> 0:34:59.430
<v Speaker 3>thought you were on the gulf trip anyway the thing

0:34:59.450 --> 0:35:03.350
<v Speaker 3>he signed where corporations have to disclose any ties they

0:35:03.410 --> 0:35:06.150
<v Speaker 3>or any suppliers to their company may have had to

0:35:06.230 --> 0:35:11.630
<v Speaker 3>slavery back in the day and and the the question

0:35:11.650 --> 0:35:13.750
<v Speaker 3>that isn't answered enough with so many of these things

0:35:13.810 --> 0:35:16.870
<v Speaker 3>is Tell me the one human being that's helped by this.

0:35:17.489 --> 0:35:20.240
<v Speaker 2>One. Give me one and make the argument. One human

0:35:20.300 --> 0:35:21.759
<v Speaker 2>on Earth that's helped by this.

0:35:23.010 --> 0:35:28.009
<v Speaker 5>You know, if like two-thirds of Congress was considering reconstituting slavery,

0:35:28.390 --> 0:35:32.529
<v Speaker 5>and you were trying to gin up, cotton gin up,

0:35:33.250 --> 0:35:37.310
<v Speaker 5>you know, opposition to it, I could see being like, no,

0:35:37.370 --> 0:35:39.089
<v Speaker 5>let's take a look at the history of it and all.

0:35:39.110 --> 0:35:41.730
<v Speaker 2>But no, we're not going to have slaves. We're good.

0:35:42.190 --> 0:35:46.760
<v Speaker 2>No slaves, okay? You have my assurance. So, but yeah,

0:35:46.820 --> 0:35:47.140
<v Speaker 2>it's just.

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:54.510
<v Speaker 5>So, if your parent company in 1906... that doesn't exist anymore,

0:35:54.570 --> 0:35:56.759
<v Speaker 5>but you're, you know, a paint company or a tire

0:35:56.800 --> 0:35:58.720
<v Speaker 5>company or whatever, and you happen to still exist.

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:00.020
<v Speaker 2>You've evolved 18.

0:35:59.660 --> 0:36:04.510
<v Speaker 5>Times, but if in 1906 they did business, we'll stick

0:36:04.550 --> 0:36:07.070
<v Speaker 5>with tires with a rubber company.

0:36:07.860 --> 0:36:10.400
<v Speaker 2>That was the offshoot.

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:14.980
<v Speaker 5>Of a corporation that once bought cotton from Mississippi.

0:36:15.060 --> 0:36:15.299
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:17.520
<v Speaker 5>You've got to disclose that to the state of California

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:21.239
<v Speaker 5>to aid, to your point, Jack, to help with the,

0:36:21.620 --> 0:36:25.910
<v Speaker 5>you know, to make sure the people who are idiotic.

0:36:25.930 --> 0:36:27.850
<v Speaker 3>You got to put a plaque in your lobby or

0:36:27.890 --> 0:36:30.570
<v Speaker 3>something like that. Like the signs that say this building

0:36:30.610 --> 0:36:32.930
<v Speaker 3>contains chemicals that have been known to cause cancer in

0:36:32.950 --> 0:36:33.450
<v Speaker 3>pregnant women.

0:36:33.630 --> 0:36:35.489
<v Speaker 2>You know, that kind of California. Right. Yes.

0:36:35.850 --> 0:36:36.009
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:36:36.860 --> 0:36:37.140
<v Speaker 3>All right.

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:45.580
<v Speaker 5>Compulsory land disclosure plaques, that sort of thing. Virtue signaling nonsense.

0:36:45.780 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 5>As the state is going bankrupt, squandering hundreds of billions

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:54.380
<v Speaker 5>of dollars in taxpayer monies, it's a kleptocracy.

0:36:54.920 --> 0:36:57.360
<v Speaker 2>But, you know, Gavi's like, yes, stupid.

0:36:57.400 --> 0:36:59.880
<v Speaker 5>That's why I do this stuff, to distract you from

0:36:59.900 --> 0:37:00.940
<v Speaker 5>the stuff that matters.

0:37:01.780 --> 0:37:03.299
<v Speaker 3>I look forward to talking about that. Also, you get

0:37:03.340 --> 0:37:10.360
<v Speaker 3>the most expensive... Politics race in the country in Texas

0:37:11.100 --> 0:37:17.190
<v Speaker 3>between the communist wokester and he probably crook Republican.

0:37:17.510 --> 0:37:20.310
<v Speaker 2>Nice choice. But anyway, J.D.

0:37:20.350 --> 0:37:22.900
<v Speaker 3>Vance made a gay joke about the Democrat yesterday that

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:24.799
<v Speaker 3>we should check in on and see what we think

0:37:24.840 --> 0:37:25.040
<v Speaker 3>of that.

0:37:25.580 --> 0:37:26.060
<v Speaker 2>Good Lord.

0:37:27.540 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 5>Armstrong and Getty.