WEBVTT - More Data, More Problems

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve Camray.

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:08.880
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you get in touch with technology? With

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:17.439
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff from how stuff works dot com. Hello everyone,

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. My name is Chris Paulette

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:21.959
<v Speaker 1>and I'm an editor at how stuff works dot com.

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:24.639
<v Speaker 1>Sitting across from me, as always, his senior writer, Jonathan

0:00:24.680 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Strickland be there. Yes, today we have sort of a

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:32.239
<v Speaker 1>sobering topic to discuss. Yes, now, when we're recording this,

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>it's in August, early August. It's August t actually, and

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:40.840
<v Speaker 1>earlier this week there was a news story that broke

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>throughout the Twitter sphere really first and then beyond about

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>a tech journalist named Matt Honan who has written for

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>various UH publications, including Wired, and how he had his

0:00:56.000 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>essentially his entire digital life hacked over the course of

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>about thirty minutes and UH and to kind of explain

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>what happened, first, we'll sort of talk about the way

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>he discovered this through his personal experience, and then how

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the hackers did it, and then what needs to happen

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>so that we protect ourselves against such things happening in

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the future. So to start, he was he was playing

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 1>with this kid and he noticed that his iPhone had

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>shut down, so it crashed essentially, and he thought, oh, well,

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>that's annoying. I guess I'll have to go and uh

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 1>connected to my computer, restore from back up, and just

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>get this thing going again. He didn't really think much

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>of it, because you know, technology occasionally fails. Yes, So

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>then he goes and he goes over to his computer

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and tries to start that up, and that also isn't

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>loading up properly. It's asking him for information that he

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have and it won't accept his password, and so

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>he's thinking, well, that's weird, but he doesn't again panic yet. Uh.

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>He then thinks about trying his iPad, which also isn't working,

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and he tries logging into his Google account using a

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:19.239
<v Speaker 1>different computer, and that also gives him a failure. And

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>it's at that point where he's thinking something seriously wrong

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 1>is happening. And eventually he starts noticing that his own

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Twitter handle is posting stuff uh, and he's not the

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.959
<v Speaker 1>one doing it, and so he can't access his Twitter

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:37.639
<v Speaker 1>account anymore either. And there are these horrible Twitter messages

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>with various you know, uh inappropriate tweets going out things

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>that are racist or homophobic, or having lots of foul

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>language in it um and it's just, you know, it's

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>it's just beyond his control. He gets on the phone

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>with Apple trying to find out what's going on, UH

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to explore Lane that his his account has been hacked,

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and it takes him quite some time before they were

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 1>able to sort this out. Part of the reason is

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>that they for a while, we're looking at the wrong account.

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>They had his name wrong, and so they were looking

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>at an account that had none of the issues he

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 1>was explaining. And then when the Apple representative repeated his

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:25.399
<v Speaker 1>name back to him, that's when he said, wait a minute,

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>that's not who I am. I'm Matt Honan. You've got

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 1>the wrong name. And then once they switched their focus,

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>then they started seeing, oh, well, before you called in,

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and actually I think Honan had to ask about this.

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>They didn't, They didn't um volunteer this information. But before

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Honan had called in, someone else had called in to

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>regain access. They said, to regain access. Really it was

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>to gain access for the first time. It was the

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>hackers who had called in too, because they had claimed

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that they no longer had the password or security question answers,

0:03:56.880 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>so they could not get the password normally. They were

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to get into his dot me email and the

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the reason for all of this is probably the craziest

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>part of the story, although the pathway of how the

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>hackers got to the point where they were able to

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>do all these things. You know, once they got access

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>to his iCloud account, they were able to do things

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>like wipe his devices, which is what happened. They wiped

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>his iPhone, his Mac, and his iPad in part to

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>prevent him from being able to head them off. While

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 1>they were going down this trail of hacking his digital life.

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 1>They were also able because of the way he had

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>interconnected various accounts. They were able to do things like

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>reset his Google password, send the message to the dot

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Me address, which they already had access to yes, because

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>they had gained it from Apple. Once they got the

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>password for the Google account, then they were able to

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>get the password for Twitter because that's where he had

0:04:56.240 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>his Twitter account attached to his Google account, So it

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:02.720
<v Speaker 1>was kind of a leap frog thing, right he would

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>they could do a password recovery from one system. It

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>would send the message to one of the email addresses

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>that was already compromised, and then they would get access

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>to the next thing. Turns out what the hackers were

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>interested in from the very beginning was getting hold of

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>his Twitter account and posting these messages. That's really just

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:24.160
<v Speaker 1>for laughs. That's all they really wanted to do. They

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:28.479
<v Speaker 1>weren't really out to make a big show that you know,

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>it should be Matt Honan that should suffer for this. Uh.

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Had nothing to do with Gizmoto, which Honan had written for,

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and his account was linked to Gizmodo's account. It never

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>been unlinked, even though he no longer wrote for Gizmoto,

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:46.720
<v Speaker 1>So they also had access to Gizmoto's Twitter account and

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>hijacked that for a while. Um so, you you know.

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>It turned out the only reason they wanted to get

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>his Twitter account was because he had one of the

0:05:56.480 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>most rare things in Twitter, a three letter Twitter handle,

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, because most people had to go with a

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>longer Twitter handle because of course, once one's taken, it's gone.

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>So people who managed to land one of those three

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 1>letter accounts are rare, and so they thought, oh, this

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>is that's that's why they targeted this particular Twitter account

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:20.039
<v Speaker 1>had nothing to do with him personally, had nothing to

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>do with who he worked for, and had nothing to

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>do with the fact that he was a tech journalist.

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>It was just because his Twitter handle was three letters long.

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's crazy to me. First of all, that you

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>know that that was the that they were They were

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 1>willing to go through the steps that they had to

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:40.160
<v Speaker 1>go through in order to get this one Twitter account. Well,

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that's true, although it only took them a little less

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>than an hour to accomplish. Once they had, once they

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 1>had determined their route of attack, it was all over.

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 1>So the way they did this was not through any

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of crazy sit down at the computer, type in

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the password three times and then you may to get

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:04.919
<v Speaker 1>in type thing. And it certainly wasn't a Hollywood style

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 1>hacker brute force attack where there was uh, you know,

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>some group of of hackers trying everything they could to

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>brute force their way in. Yeah, it wasn't like a

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>computer program that was just running password after password and

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>you see the little like digits flip up each time

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you hit one. That's correct, that wasn't what happened. What

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:29.239
<v Speaker 1>happened was much more simple really in a way, because

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I had nothing to do with using code. It has

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>everything to do with manipulating systems. But from a person perspective,

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>not or or a policy perspective, not from a technological one. Yeah,

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's also clear that although Apple's security procedures

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>are in part to at fault, um, they are not

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the only ones the hackers targeted to get more information

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>on hone and and that Um, it just so happened

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>that uh, the information they needed coincided across multiple companies

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>with his accounts, and once they got some information from

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>a couple of places, they were easily able to go

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>in and fiddle with other stuff. There are really three

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>parties that are I don't want to say at fault

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't blame the victim. There are three party There

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>are three parties that made this possible for the hackers

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to get the access to to the accounts. One of

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>those is Honing himself. Yeah, and he greatly admits that. Yes,

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>if you he has written an incredible uh article that

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that documents this entire process and what he went through.

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>He blogged about it when it happened, but then he

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>wrote up a much more comprehensive account of it. For

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Wired and UH and it's a very interesting read. I

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>highly recommend you read it, especially if you're concerned with

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:57.199
<v Speaker 1>your own potential security computer security. So he was at

0:08:57.200 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>fault and not at fault, he was he some of

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 1>his choices made this possible. Uh, the Amazon Amazon dot

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Com also its policies made this possible. And Apple's policies

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 1>made this possible. So those three parties together made it

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>possible for the hackers to achieve this and UH, and

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of interesting how how they came about it. Yeah,

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and and some of the irony as we get into

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>this is that some of the very things that made

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 1>this possible are in place specifically to make it more

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>difficult for someone to steal identities. So it actually UH

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 1>some of these some of these procedures actually worked in

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>exactly the opposite way in which they weren't intended when

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>they were implemented. So the way this started off was

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 1>it was fairly clever. So they they first they started

0:09:56.800 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 1>to the hackers did a little recon work, and they

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>wanted to find out, um about how they would get

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>uh the access to the Twitter account. And then they

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 1>were able to find out Honan's UH email address because

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:17.679
<v Speaker 1>he has a website. They went to the website, they

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>did a who is look up on Honan, which gave

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>them two things, like two things they needed. They needed

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:27.679
<v Speaker 1>the email address and they needed his physical address. Yeah. Now,

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>if you register a domain name, you are required to

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>have contact information available. Um, and that information is publicly

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>available now um some well we could talk about that too,

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:41.680
<v Speaker 1>but anyway, the the who is record for the domain

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:46.319
<v Speaker 1>had his information in it. Yeah. So once they had

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>that information the Google account and the just the email address,

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have access to the account yet. Um. They

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:57.079
<v Speaker 1>figured out that the Twitter account was linked to the

0:10:57.120 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>personal website. That's what That's where they found the Gmail address.

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>That's where they on the physical address. And then they

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 1>started to look at the account recovery for a Google

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and without actually sending in a recovery request, they saw

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:16.439
<v Speaker 1>that the address, which was only partially obscured per Google's policy,

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 1>wasn't at me dot com email address. That was the

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>recovery address. Well that's an Apple thing, right, So that's

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>where they said, ah, now we know how to get

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>at him because it's because his Google address will go

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>back if we did a password recovery. Because that will

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:41.439
<v Speaker 1>go to an Apple address, and because we know how

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to manipulate the system so that we can get access

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to his Apple account, it's all over. And the way

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>they got access to the Apple account was kind of interesting. Now,

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>they did not have the password, they did not have

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the answer to security questions, So calling up Apple and

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 1>getting access to to this account would require that they

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>have some other information. What Apple requires is that you

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>have to have the building address and the last four

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 1>digits of the credit card you used to establish that account.

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>So what the hackers did was they said, well, there's

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 1>a good chance that the same credit card this guy

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>used to establish his iCloud account is the one that

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>he uses for Amazon. And so instead of calling Apple first,

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>they called Amazon first, and they said that they wanted

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>to add a credit card number to the existing Amazon account,

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>So they weren't trying to get the credit card number.

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:46.320
<v Speaker 1>They wanted to add a credit card number, right, So

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>then they add a credit card number to the Amazon account.

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Then they hang up. Then they call Amazon back and

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 1>they say that they have lost access to their account

0:12:57.280 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and that they will provide the name the billing address,

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>which they already have from the who Is look up

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:07.199
<v Speaker 1>of the website and then the credit card number they

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>gave at the at the call they made earlier. So

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 1>there's now this credit card number that is legit because

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>they provided it. It's not the same one that was

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>used to establish the account in the first place. So

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>then Amazon says, oh, all right, well, we'll send you

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:27.199
<v Speaker 1>the password to the account. Here's which email I addressed

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to go to. So they hackers give their

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 1>email address or an email address that they have created

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 1>for the purposes of this hack. So now Amazon sends

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the log in information to UH to Amazon dot Com,

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to that account, to the email they log into the

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Amazon dot Com account, and then they look for the

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 1>other credit card number, the one that was actually used

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to establish that account. So this is Honan's actual final

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>four digits because those are unmasked in the Amazon dot

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Com system. Yes, they masked the rest of it, right, Yeah,

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the numbers are masked. So it's not

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>that the hackers ever had access to the credit card,

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 1>other than they could have bought a whole bunch of

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>stuff on Amazon and had it sent somewhere. But that's

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>all that's. Yeah, that's what they could have done if

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>they had wanted to, but they could not actually pull

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the credit card number itself other than the last four digits.

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>But those last four digits are what Apple needs for

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>account verification, right, So they take those four digits, they've

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>got the building address, They give a call to Apple.

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>They give that information, and because Honan used the same

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>billing address and the same credit card for both services,

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Apple said, oh, well then you're clearly this guy. We

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>will send you the account retrieval information to your email address.

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>So then they now have the way to log into

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Honan's iCloud account. They do that. That's where they then

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>disable his devices. They wipe them to help slow things

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>down so they can continue to do this stuff. Now

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>they have access to his Apple email, they have access

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>to his Amazon account. That's when they go to the

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Google password recovery asked for the recovery information so that

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>they can access his Google account. Well, that goes to

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>his Apple address, which they already have access to. The

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>information comes to the Apple address, they go into the

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Google account. They immediately delete the password recovery UH email

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>out of his account so that if he has any

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>other devices that would alert him that his password had

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 1>been changed. That he would not be aware of it,

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>so they they hide that, they change the password so

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>that now they've locked him out, they have access to

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>his Google account. They then were able to go and

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>get access to the Twitter account. Um, this is kind

0:15:57.280 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>of scary. And again it has nothing to do with

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>sitting down encoding stuff. It is hacking. You're hacking a system,

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>but you're doing it more through social engineering and manipulating

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>policies and systems. Right, So if you guys remember we

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>had that discussion and I think it was episode three

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>D ninety nine where we interviewed Brian Brushwood and we

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 1>talked about social engineering. Now with Brushwood, his approach to

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>social engineering is more about you know, having fun and uh, like,

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you're in a social situation where you you know, you

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>never have to buy a drink because you're doing these

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 1>cool things and convincing other people to buy drinks for you,

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 1>or you know, you're doing something so that you can

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>get the phone number of someone you're interested in. So

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you're still social engineering people, but it's not necessarily this

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>as nefarious as uh as what these hackers were doing. Yeah,

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's not typically what one thinks of when one

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>thinks of identity theft. I mean again, UM, a lot

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of us would look at the specifically maybe the Amazon

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>portion of this or an online retail portion of this,

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and say, oh, well, they got access to his credit

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 1>card number, they can buy stuff. Well yeah, and in

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of cases that maybe what a hacker might

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>try to do. After all, we have talked about uh

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 1>online systems being hacked for financial information and financial gain,

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>but that's not the point of this. Um, the system

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:25.719
<v Speaker 1>that I was speaking of a few minutes ago, when

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I was saying that ironically, some of these things were

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>turned against him tools that would be used to protect him. Um,

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're not in an Apple customer, you may not

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 1>be aware. There's a there's a uh an I cloud

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 1>system uh called find my and there're a couple of

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>them like find my iPhone. Yeah. Um, so let's say, uh,

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're talking completely behind here. Let's say you

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>have an iPhone and your kid has run off with

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 1>it and stuffed it somewhere in some piece of furniture

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 1>or dropped it and or you left it in a

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:03.159
<v Speaker 1>cab or you left it in a cab. Well, if

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>you're if you're Natalie Dell Conti well yeah, um, well,

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna start with the the easy one. You

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:11.199
<v Speaker 1>can make it. You can make your phone make a

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>noise so you know it's in the house, but you

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 1>can't figure out where it went. I'd like to have

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>one of these for my keys and maybe the remote.

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>But you know you can. You can make it make

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a noise, or if you've left it in a cab,

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:27.239
<v Speaker 1>you can have it tell you roughly where it is. Uh.

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 1>This is especially useful if you can't remember if you

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>left it in a cab, or if you at a

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:34.360
<v Speaker 1>restaurant whatever, or you know, you were at a bar

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and you had a prototype version of the newest iPhone

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 1>and it was sitting on the stool next to you

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>when you were sitting there at the bar, but then

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 1>when you turned around it was gone, and then it

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 1>ends up at some tech blog. Yeah, well that could happen. Yeah,

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 1>they're they're Twitter feed could be hacked to um. But yeah,

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so you can find out where it is.

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 1>You can have it make a noise so that if

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>it is in the same location as you are, Uh,

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>you know you can you can track it down. Um.

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 1>If you don't know where it is, let's say you

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:06.640
<v Speaker 1>did leave it in a in a bar somewhere and uh,

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you say, oh, well, you know it's not I don't

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>know where that is. And you could see a location

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 1>it shows you on the map where where it might be. Oh,

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:16.919
<v Speaker 1>it's no longer in my control. It's somewhere where I

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:19.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know where it is. I'm I have sensitive information

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 1>on there. My my calendars on there, my contacts are

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 1>on there. Um as as Honan himself said, you know

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:30.880
<v Speaker 1>he had um information from many other tech journalists. Um,

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>so he might just let's say he was still in

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>control of his accounts, but no longer in control of

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the device. He could say, wipe this device. I don't

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:43.159
<v Speaker 1>want anything on it anymore. You know, I want to

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>wipe it clean so that nobody else gains information in

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>my personal stuff. It's only a matter of time before

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 1>they figure out my my pass code. Wipe it clean.

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, you can tell it to do that and

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:55.879
<v Speaker 1>it will remotely do that. Apple has added that for

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the Mac to find my mac. So in that case,

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:05.640
<v Speaker 1>let's say he had corporate information. Many companies have have

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:08.920
<v Speaker 1>this policy in place. Yes, you can check your corporate

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 1>email on your personal device, but if you do that. Um,

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:15.919
<v Speaker 1>we retain the right to wipe the information on the

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>device if it should fall into somebody else's hands, or

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>let's say that you were to, uh, you were to

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to either be fired or you you know, you left

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. They might retain that right so that they

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:32.400
<v Speaker 1>can protect themselves as a corporate entity. Yeah, so there

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>there are positive reasons to be able to do this

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>in this case. Once the hackers gained information about his

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:43.159
<v Speaker 1>account and we're able to get access to his account

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and lock him out, Um, they also chose to completely

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>wipe his phone, his iPad, and his Mac laptop. And

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:58.879
<v Speaker 1>in doing so, they not only wiped out any you know,

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>corporate in formation. He's he's a freelance writer, so any

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>articles he might have been working on that were on

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>his hard drive gone. He also lost a year's worth

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:11.440
<v Speaker 1>or more, I guess the photos of personal photos, personal

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff that that he had created. And Yeah, Liz leads

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 1>us to the the thing that we have said a

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:23.479
<v Speaker 1>billion times on this podcast that is an exaggeration, but

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>back up your data. Yeah, and he admits, he admits

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:30.880
<v Speaker 1>he was not regularly backing up his hard drive. This

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>is not to to pick on him or anything else.

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 1>It's something that he wishes in retrospect he had been

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:40.919
<v Speaker 1>doing on a regular basis because, um, oddly enough, this

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>is where this this is where this story takes an

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>unusual turn. He has been in contact with his hackers

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and has agreed not to put in in return. They

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:54.120
<v Speaker 1>were telling him how they did it. Yes, and uh,

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I think first of all, the first thing we can

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:59.880
<v Speaker 1>agree on easily is that Amazon has to change its policy.

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, because because that's the first step that means

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 1>that anyone could access anyone else's Amazon account. Well, um,

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:14.159
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't gonna get there quite yet. I wanted to

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:17.159
<v Speaker 1>make the point that this is where it kind of

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:20.439
<v Speaker 1>gets a little weird, because they they shared all this

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>information with him, and this is how he was able

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 1>to write such a comprehensive, uh post on on Wired

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:29.119
<v Speaker 1>about it was they they told him what they were doing,

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>what the point of it was. Um, they admitted, look,

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, we weren't trying to to steal your your stuff.

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>We weren't really trying to wipe out your your personal life.

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>We have nothing against you personally. We wanted your Twitter account. Um.

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>The guy that that that he talked to primarily um

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 1>was saying, essentially, hey, uh, you know, my partner was

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:55.399
<v Speaker 1>the one who wiped out your computer. And now that

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:57.919
<v Speaker 1>you tell me all your personal files, your your the

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>pictures of your your kid were on here, I'm really sorry. Yeah,

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually really sorry. I didn't mean to to cause

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:08.959
<v Speaker 1>you personal harm as a result of this. And they say, now,

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, you know, I don't know whether their

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 1>motives are are as pure as they say. You know,

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>they say part of it was that they wanted to

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>point out that it really is this easy to hack

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:22.160
<v Speaker 1>into your personal account, and they wanted to draw attention

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to that. Now, I took her say that all the time.

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I suspect, based upon the messages that they posted on Twitter,

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 1>that that's something they they that's covering their tracks. I

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>think they were doing it for the kicks. Yes, well,

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking at again, if you're reading the Twitter,

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the Twitter posts that that we're posted under his name,

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and there were a lot that he left there. He says,

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to keep a record of it. He did

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 1>delete some because they were overly hurtful, patently offensive, and

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>he said, you know, these could actually cause people to

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>feel badly about themselves, and I don't want that. I

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 1>do want there to be a record of what had happened,

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:05.199
<v Speaker 1>but not at that, not that, not at the expense

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>of someone else's feelings, um, other than my own obviously.

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:11.160
<v Speaker 1>So then he went out and he deleted the ones

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 1>they felt were particularly offensive, and then the rest he

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 1>left up. If you read those, I think it's it's

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty hard to defend yourself with I'm just showing how

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the system can be hacked. It's more than that. It's

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>also hey, you know, ha ha, we did it, you know,

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>And and it's so it goes beyond that. And I

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>think it's very telling the the hacker he got in

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 1>touch with, assuming that the what he the information he

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:44.679
<v Speaker 1>gave was accurate about himself, about the hacker himself as

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a young guy nineteen years old, might not quite really

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:52.439
<v Speaker 1>get be mature enough to realize, you know, what the

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 1>consequences are of those actions and what how they could

0:24:57.040 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>affect the target beyond on justus. Oh, you know, they're thinking,

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:04.639
<v Speaker 1>we have a goal, we want to get hold of

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>this Twitter account. They're not thinking of what consequences are

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be felt by the target beyond just the

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>fact that our Twitter handle has been taken over, and

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:15.880
<v Speaker 1>so some of that may just be that they were

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 1>very narrowly focused on what they wanted to do and

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 1>they didn't really consider what could happen or how it

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:23.159
<v Speaker 1>would feel for that sort of stuff to happen to

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>a person. Um. So that's that's something there too, And

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 1>we see that a lot. I mean, there are a

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of hackers out there who because they can do something,

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:35.119
<v Speaker 1>they'll do it and they don't realize or they don't

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:38.159
<v Speaker 1>care what the consequences of that action are going to

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 1>be to the people who are also involved in that

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 1>whatever that situation is. Um. So maybe maybe now this,

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, according to the article, it sounds like this

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:54.480
<v Speaker 1>guy is at least a little remorseful, Yes, that he's

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:57.440
<v Speaker 1>feeling some remorse for this, and you know, we don't

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>know if really like he was at all culpable in

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:07.159
<v Speaker 1>the the actual deletion. He claims that it was the

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 1>other guy who did it, but you know, you never know. So, yeah,

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:14.399
<v Speaker 1>it's it's interesting to look at that. And you know,

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 1>if if you kind of put yourself in the shoes

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>of the the hacker, um, you know, especially if you're

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:24.160
<v Speaker 1>thinking of somebody who is doing it for for fun,

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:27.479
<v Speaker 1>to mess with somebody, and and the person says, hey, look,

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to press charges against you, but I

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:32.120
<v Speaker 1>want to know how how you did it. He started thinking, hey,

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 1>this guy is working with me. You know, the heat

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of the moment's off, the sense of accomplishment you get

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 1>from uh hacking in and and gaining access to all

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 1>this information. You know, after the fact, you've had a

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:45.360
<v Speaker 1>chance to cool down, they've had a chance to cool down.

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 1>You start thinking about it, like, well, you know what,

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 1>this guy is not angry enough with me to to

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>press charges with the cops. You know, we kind of

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:57.239
<v Speaker 1>damaged this guy, and he's willing to talk to us

0:26:57.240 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>about it and share the story online. And you know,

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 1>they kind of got something out of it too. They

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of got a little anonymity anonymous press, so they

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 1>get to point to themselves and say, hey, look he's

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about us. He doesn't seem like such a bad guy.

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess we kind of, you know, burned a lot

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of stuff of his online. That kind of stinks. You know,

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>we were really kind of doing it for the fun

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of it, and now it's not so much fun. You

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:29.159
<v Speaker 1>like a decent guy now you know that there's a

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:31.239
<v Speaker 1>real person on the other end of that account. That's

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the other thing is there's a dehumanizing effect sometimes with

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the whole you know, you don't really identify the fact

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that there's a person on the other end of these accounts.

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes you don't. It doesn't the concept isn't fully formed. Yeah,

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 1>for for a lot of us, we would have gone

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>out and if we had found out who did it,

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>we would have pressed charges. We would have wanted to

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>take them. Now some of us would have re enacted

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the film taken. But well, but yeah, that that's that's

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 1>what makes this story more are interesting than other hacking

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>stories I think, is that that it's got a humanizing

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>character for both parties, the person who or people who

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:15.679
<v Speaker 1>took advantage of of honing and honing himself. And it

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:22.120
<v Speaker 1>does point to security issues. Now these are legitimate for um,

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you think about your Amazon account. For example, Let's say

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 1>you don't have anything else except an email account in

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:31.880
<v Speaker 1>an Amazon account, by and large, you probably wouldn't have

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these security issues. The security issues that

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Amazon would have in place would make it very difficult

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 1>for them for someone else to get that information from them.

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>But then you start sharing. You start using this um

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 1>email address with Amazon and every other company that you

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>do business with online. That makes your email address a

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 1>a key to getting information from other companies. And then

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you start doing business with other pieces. You've got the

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>same credit card number across these different companies, and once

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 1>you have the last four digits of your social Security

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 1>number or a credit card number, that makes it possible

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>to use that information as a key across multiple entities.

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>And all of a sudden, if you do business with

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of places, they get something like your

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 1>physical address, your name, your email address, a credit card number,

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 1>any of that stuff, and they've got the keys to

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 1>open lots and lots of accounts for for them to

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 1>get more information. And once they've hacked one, they can

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 1>get information that will let them into lots and lots

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 1>of other places. Oh, they have an Amazon account, I

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 1>wonder if they have a Barnes and Noble account. We

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>could find out in about ten minutes. So Honan admits

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that his password was not the strongest. It was a

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 1>seven seven digit alpha numeric password, but that it was

0:29:56.440 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 1>one he had used for many years. But they haven't

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 1>They didn't really right right. So that's that's the point

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:05.400
<v Speaker 1>of this thing, is that even if he had had

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the strongest password in the world, it would not have

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 1>mattered because they circumvented that. They didn't they weren't attacking

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>through that direction. And this this demonstrates why security is

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>so tough, because you think about the most obvious point

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of entry, which would be the log in right your

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 1>user name and your password. That's the most obvious point

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 1>because that's the way we access our information. Hackers are

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 1>looking at a system and saying, what's the best vulnerable

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 1>spot to go in at And if the front door

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 1>is heavily locked, you look for a window or a backdoor,

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you look for something else it's gonna let you get

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 1>into there, and not even you just bypass the place

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 1>where you've got all the security and you go in

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>through a different entrance. So when I said that Amazon

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 1>really needs to work on its policy, mainly, the reason

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>for that is that the only thing you need in

0:30:55.120 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 1>order to get that that lug and recovery information was

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the credit card number that's associated with the account, which

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:08.479
<v Speaker 1>they did by adding in one the building address and

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 1>an email address, and that's it. Um uh and in

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>order to add the credit card number, all you need

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>is the building address and the email address that is

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 1>associated with the account. So you know, using some guesswork,

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>thinking that Okay, well he's got an Amazon account, He's

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 1>probably got an Amazon account. He's probably using this address

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>for that Amazon account. We know his address because we

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 1>looked it up from his website. We can fabricate a

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a a credit card using a generator that creates a

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 1>realistic but not actually activated credit card number and assigned

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that to the Amazon account and then use that to

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 1>get the entry point. So obviously Amazon needs to fix that,

0:31:55.320 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 1>because if all you have is a person's address and

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>you have a good guess at what email address they

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>use for that Amazon account, then you could do the

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 1>same thing. And so that's that's a that's number one.

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Number two would be the fact that Apple uses the

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 1>last four digits of the credit card, the building and

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:21.719
<v Speaker 1>the building address as a security recovery method. Clearly that

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 1>needs to to change in some way. Yeah, I think

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a uh, they're there are a

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of things. Now, if you read uh, there's an

0:32:30.640 --> 0:32:33.960
<v Speaker 1>account on Honan's tumbler, and if you want to read

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 1>some truly hurtful comments. I would suggest reading that um,

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>because some people blame him for owning Apple devices, which

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 1>is ridiculous. In fact, of the one that that bugged

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>me probably the most was the one that said, serves

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 1>him right for owning I crap. And I'm going you

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 1>know this, this really could have happened with pretty much

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 1>any manufacturer or Yeah, it's just I mean Apple had

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 1>policies that they were able to leverage. That's not to

0:33:02.360 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 1>say that other companies don't have those same policies, And

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 1>it's just that Apples were well known to them, so

0:33:07.960 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 1>that's how they once they saw the me dot com

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 1>addresses that all right, we know how to do this. Yeah.

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 1>And the thing is, I would say the vast majority

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 1>of online retailers or or companies that have that offer

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>services online um, I mean they knew how to get

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 1>into a Google account too, um. And and a lot

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 1>of them have the same policies. So if you can

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:34.479
<v Speaker 1>get as they did, if you can get one piece,

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 1>then you can apply it to other pieces and get

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 1>information from them and put the whole puzzle together that way.

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's not while while I've seen people singling out

0:33:44.800 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Apple and Amazon and um, and they should to some

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 1>degree be uh considering new stuff. It's not just their fault.

0:33:55.160 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 1>The catch twenty two here is once you make an

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 1>account so locked down that it's extremely hard to get into,

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 1>it's also hard for you to get into when you

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 1>do forget your password, when you do forget what credit

0:34:11.200 --> 0:34:14.760
<v Speaker 1>card you used. Say you've got ten credit cards. Um,

0:34:15.040 --> 0:34:17.440
<v Speaker 1>let's say you h you shredded one of them because

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you don't use that card anymore. But that's the one

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:23.239
<v Speaker 1>that you set up the account with two years ago. Well,

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 1>now you can't get back in. And so if they

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 1>lock it down too hard, then you can't get back

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>in either. So that's why they make it. Yeah, that's

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:35.920
<v Speaker 1>why they make those those pieces available. Well, can you

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:39.239
<v Speaker 1>tell me the last four digits of your Social Security number? Oh? Yeah,

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I know those. Well they got that from somebody else.

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:46.000
<v Speaker 1>So there there's a catch twenty two here. How how

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 1>how secure is secure enough and not too secure to

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:54.360
<v Speaker 1>lock you out forever? So so there there is that

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 1>is a challenge. Um. The part of it is to um,

0:34:58.760 --> 0:35:00.719
<v Speaker 1>when we're talking about the domain name, they were able

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 1>to get information from his domain name. Uh, and you

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:09.759
<v Speaker 1>can there are things you can do there too. UM.

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:11.920
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the services, the places where you can

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 1>register domain names offer a secure UH service where you

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:19.200
<v Speaker 1>pay an additional fee per year or or per however

0:35:19.320 --> 0:35:22.400
<v Speaker 1>often you UH you renew your domain name, that will

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 1>lock it down so that it has a basically the

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the registrar is responsible for it. So if you want

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to contact the owner of the domain name to say

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 1>make them an offer, Hey, we want so and so

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 1>dot com. You've got it, Can we offer you ten

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:39.840
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars and buy the domain name for you? It

0:35:39.880 --> 0:35:42.319
<v Speaker 1>would go through your registrar and you would get contacted

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:45.320
<v Speaker 1>for it. But your information is not the the information

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 1>out there, so there's a proxy between you and them. UM.

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:50.719
<v Speaker 1>That would have helped him too, if he had had

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 1>something like that in place, it would have helped lock

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 1>it down Google. UM the UH. It's it's kind of

0:35:57.560 --> 0:36:01.319
<v Speaker 1>interesting because what Google showed them was uh M star

0:36:01.360 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 1>star star star star star n at, you know, the

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the Gmail name. They were pretty right in guessing that

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 1>it was his first initial last name. He had that

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 1>address at at at several places. He points that out,

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and that was that was easy. Could Google fix that

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and make it more obscure so that it wouldn't be

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:25.440
<v Speaker 1>so easy to guess. Maybe could he have picked a

0:36:25.520 --> 0:36:29.920
<v Speaker 1>more difficult name to use as his backup email address? Probably,

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:33.319
<v Speaker 1>But these are there are lots of little stuff that

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>everyone involved could have done to make it more difficult.

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 1>And there's Google also has a a two step verification process.

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:43.960
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly what I was going to mention nextel two

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 1>part authentication is um is a useful approach. It also

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:52.879
<v Speaker 1>and I've used it, Yeah, I've used it. It's so

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:56.000
<v Speaker 1>two part of authentication is kind of what it sounds like.

0:36:56.360 --> 0:36:58.920
<v Speaker 1>You need you need to have two different things in

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:01.279
<v Speaker 1>order to be able to act as the account. And

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a typical approach is that you register a phone number

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:09.759
<v Speaker 1>with whatever the services of like a cell phone. You

0:37:09.800 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 1>register that cell phone with whatever the services, and then

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 1>when you try to access it, you have to be

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 1>able to provide not only the password, but then an

0:37:18.600 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 1>authentication code is sent to your device that you have

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:27.360
<v Speaker 1>registered and you have to insert whatever that that number is,

0:37:27.840 --> 0:37:30.319
<v Speaker 1>and then then you can and then and only then

0:37:30.480 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you can actually access whatever the account is. And that

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:38.840
<v Speaker 1>helps a lot because as long as that device remains

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:42.000
<v Speaker 1>in your possession and no one has been able to

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:45.320
<v Speaker 1>intercept it in any way, you should be fairly safe.

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:50.319
<v Speaker 1>So even if they try to reset the password, they

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:53.239
<v Speaker 1>can't get access to it because they're trying through a

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:56.160
<v Speaker 1>different device that has not been registered. Uh, and then

0:37:56.200 --> 0:38:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you get that that message. And we've seen very variations

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 1>of this as well, not just two part authentication, but

0:38:02.880 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 1>also registering devices with services like UM. Lots of them

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:10.240
<v Speaker 1>do that so that you can look at the different

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 1>sessions that are logged in through a particular service and

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 1>then if you if you see that there's one there

0:38:15.640 --> 0:38:20.799
<v Speaker 1>that you don't recognize, someone might have access to your account. So,

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:23.799
<v Speaker 1>for example, Facebook does this where if you try and

0:38:23.840 --> 0:38:28.440
<v Speaker 1>access your UM Facebook account through different devices, it may

0:38:28.520 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 1>tell you, hey, I don't recognize this device. This isn't

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:34.640
<v Speaker 1>something that you've used to access this account before UM

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and it'll send an email to you and let you

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:42.759
<v Speaker 1>know if you are that that hey, someone's accessing this.

0:38:42.800 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Is this you? Because if it's you, it's cool. But

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 1>if it's not you, then you need to look into

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:53.280
<v Speaker 1>this now. Again, this is this is a good tool

0:38:53.719 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 1>for people who feel like they may have been hacked. However,

0:38:58.640 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 1>let's say that the person who is trying to access

0:39:01.640 --> 0:39:05.640
<v Speaker 1>your Facebook account. Um, you know where they're trying to

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:09.359
<v Speaker 1>hack into your Facebook account also has control of your

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 1>email address. Then when they say that, hey, is this

0:39:12.320 --> 0:39:14.160
<v Speaker 1>you and they send that to your email address, well

0:39:14.200 --> 0:39:17.319
<v Speaker 1>they've got that email address, yes, yes, if it's gotten

0:39:17.360 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to that point. It's this particular approach doesn't really help you.

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:25.399
<v Speaker 1>But other things that that you can do, because there's

0:39:25.440 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 1>some things that you can't have any control over. It's

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:30.399
<v Speaker 1>it's the pole, it's the companies you work with. Well, one,

0:39:30.480 --> 0:39:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you can choose which companies you you associate yourself with,

0:39:33.920 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 1>but beyond that, you know you have to hope that

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:38.600
<v Speaker 1>they put in the right stuff in place to protect you.

0:39:38.680 --> 0:39:42.239
<v Speaker 1>What you can do one, continue to use strong passwords

0:39:42.400 --> 0:39:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and don't don't use the same ones across multiple platforms

0:39:45.480 --> 0:39:48.560
<v Speaker 1>because it just makes it way easier if one if

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:51.280
<v Speaker 1>one account does get compromised, it makes it way easier

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:54.319
<v Speaker 1>for all the others to get compromised. It's the domino effect. Yeah,

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:56.880
<v Speaker 1>so you we wanna you want to start picking some

0:39:56.920 --> 0:40:01.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty tough passwords and and vary the across and change

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:06.600
<v Speaker 1>them fairly regularly, because the longer they stay, the more

0:40:06.800 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 1>likely you're going to UM encounter a problem, use some

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:14.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of password manager so that you can keep track

0:40:14.280 --> 0:40:16.640
<v Speaker 1>of them all because I know it is. You know,

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:19.959
<v Speaker 1>the flip side of a strong password is it's really

0:40:20.000 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 1>hard to remember. So if you're if you've got lots

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and lots of online accounts, then it's going to be

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:29.439
<v Speaker 1>really challenging to keep all those straight. So some sort

0:40:29.440 --> 0:40:35.279
<v Speaker 1>of password manager is important. UM Also, think about what

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you share before you share it online, because some of

0:40:38.560 --> 0:40:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the details you share may also serve as answers to

0:40:42.719 --> 0:40:47.520
<v Speaker 1>various security questions, or they may give off other information

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 1>that companies use to verify identity. So be careful about that.

0:40:51.680 --> 0:40:56.319
<v Speaker 1>You know, don't don't be too free with personal information

0:40:57.280 --> 0:41:00.759
<v Speaker 1>if that means that information could be used to circumventanced

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:04.879
<v Speaker 1>security systems. One suggestion I've always heard is that when

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you create answers to security questions you create, you're essentially

0:41:09.120 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 1>creating another password. You don't you don't answer the question

0:41:12.840 --> 0:41:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you and you put something else in there, and you

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 1>put something something unrelated but something you will easily remember,

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:21.480
<v Speaker 1>all right, So something that doesn't have to be a

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 1>strong password. In other words, it just needs to be

0:41:24.000 --> 0:41:26.880
<v Speaker 1>a keyword that doesn't have anything to do with a question,

0:41:26.920 --> 0:41:30.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's a keyword you are guaranteed to remember. So, So,

0:41:30.120 --> 0:41:33.000
<v Speaker 1>for example, if you, uh, maybe I've seen something that

0:41:33.000 --> 0:41:35.319
<v Speaker 1>asked for the name of your friend model of your

0:41:35.320 --> 0:41:39.239
<v Speaker 1>first car, you could say something like grapefruit. Yeah, which, well,

0:41:39.239 --> 0:41:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I know if I'm asked about my car, I'm going

0:41:41.000 --> 0:41:44.640
<v Speaker 1>to say grapefruit. Somebody might go, oh, it's a Chevy.

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:46.880
<v Speaker 1>They might have looked on your Facebook page and you

0:41:46.920 --> 0:41:49.400
<v Speaker 1>might have had a thing like this says man, I

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 1>have such great memories of my of my first car,

0:41:52.400 --> 0:41:54.759
<v Speaker 1>and then you have a picture of it on there. Well,

0:41:54.800 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that's all they would need to be able to answer

0:41:56.640 --> 0:41:59.399
<v Speaker 1>that question if you use the right answer, the right

0:41:59.719 --> 0:42:02.759
<v Speaker 1>or a corresponding answer. So if you've done, say a

0:42:02.800 --> 0:42:06.760
<v Speaker 1>thing on on genealogy, and you've uh, you know, talked

0:42:06.760 --> 0:42:09.359
<v Speaker 1>about your parents and say, well, you know my mother

0:42:09.400 --> 0:42:11.160
<v Speaker 1>who was so and so, and it's like, what's your

0:42:11.160 --> 0:42:13.600
<v Speaker 1>mother's maiden name? Oh, well I know it was Steven's

0:42:13.640 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 1>because I saw it on the on their Facebook account.

0:42:16.840 --> 0:42:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Well that's pretty easy to track down. Um. And and

0:42:20.600 --> 0:42:24.480
<v Speaker 1>speaking of Facebook, Uh, it occurs to me that a

0:42:24.520 --> 0:42:28.799
<v Speaker 1>lot of sites these days are using Facebook Connect or

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:31.719
<v Speaker 1>Google or Yahoo and you can say, hey, would you

0:42:31.760 --> 0:42:34.920
<v Speaker 1>like to sign in with your blank account? Some of

0:42:34.960 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 1>them exclusively do that where you cannot access it unless

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:42.319
<v Speaker 1>you happen to have one of those are their accounts. Yes,

0:42:42.480 --> 0:42:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Like I believe Pinterest you had to log in through

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Facebook when it was when it first started. I don't

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:50.480
<v Speaker 1>know if that's still the case. And Spotify, Uh, Spotify,

0:42:51.160 --> 0:42:55.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, had had switched to requiring Facebook. Um, okay.

0:42:55.760 --> 0:42:59.200
<v Speaker 1>So if they gain access to your Facebook account, all

0:42:59.200 --> 0:43:01.720
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, they've got access to every other account

0:43:01.719 --> 0:43:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that you've used that log in with. So when they

0:43:05.320 --> 0:43:08.960
<v Speaker 1>offer you an opportunity to create a separate log in,

0:43:09.120 --> 0:43:11.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe you should take that opportunity. Yeah, it's a pain.

0:43:11.920 --> 0:43:14.239
<v Speaker 1>Is a pain. And the whole point about the whole

0:43:14.239 --> 0:43:16.799
<v Speaker 1>Facebook connect is that it makes it much more convenient,

0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:19.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, you you know, Facebook loves it because it

0:43:19.320 --> 0:43:22.759
<v Speaker 1>becomes the platform for the Internet, and people love it

0:43:22.760 --> 0:43:24.880
<v Speaker 1>because it means that it's one less thing they have

0:43:24.920 --> 0:43:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to worry about when they want to log in. But

0:43:26.960 --> 0:43:30.279
<v Speaker 1>it does mean that there is this point of vulnerability

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that is incredibly attractive to someone who wants to get

0:43:33.120 --> 0:43:36.399
<v Speaker 1>access to your stuff. Because it's going if they get

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:39.399
<v Speaker 1>access to one thing, they get access to a dozen more.

0:43:39.880 --> 0:43:43.120
<v Speaker 1>And it doesn't I say Facebook, but like Chris was saying,

0:43:43.160 --> 0:43:45.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not just Facebook. Google is the same way. There

0:43:45.520 --> 0:43:48.640
<v Speaker 1>are lots of different services that if you have a

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Google account you could potentially access. UM. Another another suggestion

0:43:55.080 --> 0:43:59.719
<v Speaker 1>I've seen is that there are a lot of services

0:43:59.760 --> 0:44:02.120
<v Speaker 1>out there that some of us will sign up for

0:44:02.920 --> 0:44:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and then stop using and then forget about UM. It

0:44:07.920 --> 0:44:10.480
<v Speaker 1>might not be a bad idea to if you never

0:44:10.640 --> 0:44:12.279
<v Speaker 1>use those services, it might not be a bad idea

0:44:12.360 --> 0:44:16.360
<v Speaker 1>to go back and check and delete those accounts, because

0:44:16.560 --> 0:44:19.399
<v Speaker 1>those are other points of vulnerability, especially if it's going

0:44:19.440 --> 0:44:21.440
<v Speaker 1>to you know, if you do tend to use the

0:44:21.480 --> 0:44:25.160
<v Speaker 1>same group of passwords over and over and hackers get

0:44:25.680 --> 0:44:28.800
<v Speaker 1>access to something, particularly if it's something that isn't terribly

0:44:28.840 --> 0:44:32.560
<v Speaker 1>popular anymore, and maybe as a result, the security measures

0:44:32.560 --> 0:44:35.520
<v Speaker 1>aren't as up to date as they could be. It's

0:44:35.520 --> 0:44:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a possibility you might want to get rid of that stuff.

0:44:39.160 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 1>So you know that my Space account that you haven't

0:44:41.760 --> 0:44:44.640
<v Speaker 1>checked in four years, maybe it's time to just go

0:44:44.680 --> 0:44:50.239
<v Speaker 1>ahead and close that out, you know that kind of stuff. Yeah, Uh,

0:44:50.280 --> 0:44:53.400
<v Speaker 1>And we've already mentioned back up your data. It's also

0:44:53.520 --> 0:44:57.400
<v Speaker 1>very important. Uh yeah, so basic basic tips that you

0:44:57.440 --> 0:44:59.880
<v Speaker 1>can follow to try and protect yourself and keeping in

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:02.040
<v Speaker 1>line that you know, a lot of this also depends

0:45:02.120 --> 0:45:06.319
<v Speaker 1>upon the other parties involved. Yeah, and so looking back

0:45:06.360 --> 0:45:10.760
<v Speaker 1>at at at Matt hone and did he do something

0:45:11.040 --> 0:45:15.319
<v Speaker 1>wrong or you know, deserving of being you know, you know,

0:45:15.400 --> 0:45:17.640
<v Speaker 1>really he could have been any of us. And even

0:45:17.680 --> 0:45:21.000
<v Speaker 1>though he's a known tech journalist, he you know, sort

0:45:21.040 --> 0:45:23.719
<v Speaker 1>of succumbed to being human. You know, he had the

0:45:23.719 --> 0:45:25.680
<v Speaker 1>same password, he didn't change it for a long time.

0:45:25.719 --> 0:45:27.960
<v Speaker 1>He's probably told he didn't back up. And I'm sure

0:45:28.000 --> 0:45:30.120
<v Speaker 1>he's probably told people to do that a thousand times,

0:45:30.160 --> 0:45:32.440
<v Speaker 1>just like we have. You know, we're all guilty of

0:45:32.480 --> 0:45:34.960
<v Speaker 1>doing these little things because their pains in the neck.

0:45:35.040 --> 0:45:36.279
<v Speaker 1>We don't want to do it, we don't have time

0:45:36.320 --> 0:45:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to do it. I mean, he's got kids times of

0:45:38.920 --> 0:45:41.359
<v Speaker 1>premium for him, just like it is for so many

0:45:41.400 --> 0:45:44.880
<v Speaker 1>of us. Um, you know, is it is it Apple's

0:45:44.880 --> 0:45:47.880
<v Speaker 1>fault in particular? Is it Amazon's fault in particular? The

0:45:47.920 --> 0:45:50.680
<v Speaker 1>only people who are are really at fault of the hackers. Yeah,

0:45:50.719 --> 0:45:53.279
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's the combination of all of these things

0:45:53.280 --> 0:45:56.399
<v Speaker 1>together that made it possible. It's the hackers that are

0:45:56.440 --> 0:45:59.680
<v Speaker 1>really at fault. Yeah, And the thing is, yeah, we're

0:45:59.719 --> 0:46:02.879
<v Speaker 1>all busy, and none of us really wants to make

0:46:02.960 --> 0:46:07.560
<v Speaker 1>up a new, you know, twenty four digit password for

0:46:07.600 --> 0:46:10.839
<v Speaker 1>each thing and worry about them. No, none of us

0:46:10.880 --> 0:46:13.880
<v Speaker 1>really wants to mess with that. But the truth of

0:46:13.920 --> 0:46:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the matter is that all these systems worked together to

0:46:17.080 --> 0:46:20.560
<v Speaker 1>make this possible. And and it's true for all of us.

0:46:20.600 --> 0:46:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these these vulnerabilities are vulnerable for all of us.

0:46:23.840 --> 0:46:26.239
<v Speaker 1>It's I know that Amazon and Apple both have thought

0:46:26.239 --> 0:46:31.959
<v Speaker 1>about this. It's still kind of fresh um as the recording, Yeah,

0:46:32.200 --> 0:46:35.120
<v Speaker 1>as they're recording this podcast. So you know, neither of them,

0:46:35.160 --> 0:46:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think, have made some public proclamation about how

0:46:39.120 --> 0:46:43.359
<v Speaker 1>they're going to fix this going forward quote unquote fix

0:46:43.400 --> 0:46:47.600
<v Speaker 1>it again. How what do you do? It's not obvious

0:46:47.640 --> 0:46:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to do this, So I think the two part authentication

0:46:50.120 --> 0:46:54.440
<v Speaker 1>is probably one of the the more obvious approaches. And uh,

0:46:54.600 --> 0:46:58.960
<v Speaker 1>well we might see some other elements thrown in there too,

0:46:59.239 --> 0:47:01.480
<v Speaker 1>And and how of her I have seen people say, yeah,

0:47:01.480 --> 0:47:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and I turned this on and it was the point

0:47:04.080 --> 0:47:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I was making earlier. It made it so difficult that

0:47:06.960 --> 0:47:09.279
<v Speaker 1>it took me two weeks to figure out how to

0:47:09.320 --> 0:47:11.680
<v Speaker 1>get back into my account, and it was a real

0:47:11.719 --> 0:47:14.080
<v Speaker 1>pain in the neck. I got in, but it took

0:47:14.080 --> 0:47:17.000
<v Speaker 1>me a while because I kind of, uh laid myself

0:47:17.040 --> 0:47:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a trap. So it's it's one of those things where

0:47:20.719 --> 0:47:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I think you kind of have to work into it

0:47:23.040 --> 0:47:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and think about this stuff when you set it up

0:47:25.120 --> 0:47:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and go back and look at your accounts and see

0:47:28.160 --> 0:47:31.160
<v Speaker 1>how it's laid out to fix this for yourself. Yeah,

0:47:31.160 --> 0:47:33.440
<v Speaker 1>this is this is why it's really important for companies

0:47:33.440 --> 0:47:38.359
<v Speaker 1>to uh to hire white hat hackers who I mean,

0:47:38.400 --> 0:47:40.680
<v Speaker 1>all they do is look at systems and try and

0:47:40.719 --> 0:47:44.640
<v Speaker 1>find ways to to breach systems so that those systems

0:47:44.680 --> 0:47:48.080
<v Speaker 1>can be improved over time. And it's important to get

0:47:48.080 --> 0:47:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a third party to do it because when you design

0:47:50.560 --> 0:47:53.720
<v Speaker 1>a system again, you may be thinking of the obvious

0:47:53.719 --> 0:47:56.920
<v Speaker 1>points of injury, which is where you've really really put

0:47:56.960 --> 0:48:00.160
<v Speaker 1>in great security, right like you know, like there's no

0:48:00.200 --> 0:48:01.960
<v Speaker 1>way anyone's going to get through this, at least not

0:48:02.000 --> 0:48:04.279
<v Speaker 1>in the next five years. We require people to use

0:48:04.680 --> 0:48:07.640
<v Speaker 1>non alpha numeric characters, Well, that's great if they're going

0:48:07.680 --> 0:48:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to use the password in case they used a backdoor. Yeah.

0:48:10.600 --> 0:48:12.919
<v Speaker 1>So again that's why you want to have a third party,

0:48:12.960 --> 0:48:15.840
<v Speaker 1>because they're not thinking the way you think. They're thinking

0:48:15.960 --> 0:48:19.239
<v Speaker 1>how do I get into this system? Not not how

0:48:19.280 --> 0:48:23.080
<v Speaker 1>strong do I make this door? So yeah, there's certain

0:48:23.080 --> 0:48:25.279
<v Speaker 1>things companies can do, um, but there are a lot

0:48:25.280 --> 0:48:28.840
<v Speaker 1>of things we can do as customers, as users to

0:48:28.840 --> 0:48:31.920
<v Speaker 1>try and protect ourselves. And uh. And it's a great

0:48:32.000 --> 0:48:35.560
<v Speaker 1>responsible to you. Don't forget it's a cautionary tale. And uh,

0:48:35.600 --> 0:48:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean in a way it could have turned out

0:48:38.440 --> 0:48:42.919
<v Speaker 1>way worse than it did. Um. So I'm sure, I'm

0:48:42.960 --> 0:48:46.560
<v Speaker 1>sure there's some solace in that for Honan, But I

0:48:46.600 --> 0:48:49.799
<v Speaker 1>mean I can't imagine how and I really don't want

0:48:49.840 --> 0:48:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to imagine how how how he felt when all that happened. Uh. Anyway,

0:48:55.680 --> 0:49:00.719
<v Speaker 1>that wraps up this discussion about the cloud security, maintaining

0:49:00.719 --> 0:49:05.200
<v Speaker 1>your own security there and uh and and the problems

0:49:05.239 --> 0:49:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that exist in our digital age. So you guys, if

0:49:08.520 --> 0:49:10.759
<v Speaker 1>you have any suggestions for topics we should cover in

0:49:10.840 --> 0:49:13.600
<v Speaker 1>future episodes of tech Stuff, you can let us know

0:49:13.680 --> 0:49:16.200
<v Speaker 1>by sending us an email are adjust as tech Stuff

0:49:16.239 --> 0:49:19.319
<v Speaker 1>at Discovery dot com, or send us a message on

0:49:19.320 --> 0:49:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Facebook or Twitter, or handle it both of those is

0:49:21.560 --> 0:49:24.279
<v Speaker 1>text stuff. H. S W and Chris and I will

0:49:24.280 --> 0:49:27.960
<v Speaker 1>talk to you again really soon. For more on this

0:49:28.120 --> 0:49:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and thousands of other topics, visit how stuff works dot com.

0:49:35.320 --> 0:49:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve Camray.

0:49:38.200 --> 0:49:39.399
<v Speaker 1>It's ready, are you