WEBVTT - Despondent Dallas! 0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:03.880 Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio. 0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:09.840 Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from my Heart Radio, 0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:14.080 your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and 0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:23.360 advices from Guillotine Leagues dot com. Here's your host. Welcome 0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:26.080 to a week to edition of Fantasy Football Weekly. I 0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:28.560 am Paul Giarchy and my co host today are Scott 0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:32.080 Fish and Brian Johnson. Hey, guys, it seems like I'd 0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:34.919 never leave now. I don't just always love having you here. 0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:39.599 It's fantastic. Brian, Um, not as much you, but you know, 0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:44.040 but you're here. There were that there were ones of 0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:45.720 people asking me if I was gonna be on the 0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:48.919 show today. I was missed by something. One was like 0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:51.920 my mom, Yeah. The other was both of your guys, 0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:55.360 Mom's well and you and your new puppy very concerned. 0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:01.000 Your teams are either one in or oh and one. 0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:03.720 If you're only in one league, and the temptation is 0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:06.400 to feel like if you're want to know you nailed it. 0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:08.560 And if you're temptation is your temptation of your oh 0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:10.920 and one is to go, oh, my team is a disaster. 0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:14.319 Most likely you know you're gonna end up one and 0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:16.360 one at the end of this week, and you're somewhere 0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:18.880 in between those two spots, and it's probably not as 0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:20.560 good or bad as you think, and it'll all even 0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:23.400 out a little bit. Take um, as just one example, 0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:25.720 the Mike Williams game from week one to week two. 0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:27.720 You know, those are the kinds of things that happened 0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:30.039 that tend to level the playing field a little bit 0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:32.840 in fantasy football in week two. The only people who 0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:35.160 should truly be upset about Week one are those who 0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:38.040 were chopped in their Guillotine league. Those those people. But 0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:41.200 everyone else has calmed down. There's a lot of season left, 0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:43.800 you are, okay, plenty of season left at guillotine leagues 0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:45.560 dot com. By the way, we're still forming new leagues, 0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:49.240 seventeen person leagues through this week out at least sixteen 0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:53.760 next week as well, will be the week after. Wait, 0:01:53.640 --> 0:02:00.920 I'm trying to figure out how math works by zero 0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:05.800 carry the one. Yes, that's exactly right. We've got plenty 0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:07.320 to get to. Over the course of this show, we 0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:10.880 will break down all of the games Fantasy Football Weekly style, 0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:13.200 with letter grades on all of the players. We will 0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:15.440 go through our favorite players upon whom you can take 0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:18.840 a chance we will answer three tough questions, and we 0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:21.520 will go into the time machine to give you some 0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:26.480 preman speculation. Near the end of the show, we begin 0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:29.360 with our first matchup of the week, Cardinals taking on 0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:32.840 the Raiders. Cardinals basically couldn't have looked worse in all 0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:36.919 the first game. Boy, they that defense that the Chiefs 0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:39.000 will make a lot of defenses look bad, but I 0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:42.480 think they're legitimately bad by any standard. Yeah, yeah, it 0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:45.839 did not look good last week. Luckily for Murray, things 0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:48.519 should be maybe a little bit better this week. Las 0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:51.000 Vegas was the fifth worst against quarterbacks last week, but 0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:52.880 I mean you got to take into account that they 0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:55.800 played Justin Herbert, so maybe it was just a Justin 0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:58.680 Herbert thing. But Kyler Murray has been a pretty dang 0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:02.080 good fantasy quarterback or last few years. Uh. The offense 0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:05.240 was bad, as we've mentioned, and Murray's day and really 0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:08.560 Hollywood Brown and zach ERT's day were saved by being 0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:12.520 down thirty in the fourth. That's not even hyper hyperbole, 0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.120 Like it was thirty seven to seven and those two 0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:17.839 had forty total yards and no scores. They got two 0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:20.720 touchdowns right at the end to make it the sledding 0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:23.359 is gonna get a little easier here. Murray might need 0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:25.680 to get a couple on his a couple with his 0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:28.000 a couple of points with his legs, but I still 0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:29.640 have a B grade on him. In a matchup that 0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:32.799 has the second highest over under total of the week 0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:36.560 should still be a pretty decent shootout. Um. I have 0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:42.320 Greg Doorche on the bench of snaps, leading targets tied, 0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:44.760 and routes run. I almost want to give him a 0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:47.080 sea here. I just don't know that I can count 0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:50.000 on it yet. I just don't know that maybe a 0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:54.520 J Ground, a J Brown, a JA Green gets more involved. Uh, 0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:57.920 he's got the better matchup. Greg Dortch actually has one 0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:01.040 of the worst matchups in the NFL this week, going 0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:04.120 against one of the league's best up and coming slot corners, 0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:08.800 Nate Hobbs. Yeah, they're nickelback slot corner. He's just he 0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:11.600 might take Greg Dortch out. So you got the plus 0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:13.800 matchups on the sides with Green and Brown. I do 0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:16.320 have a bench grade on Green because he's almost a 0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:20.160 decaying corpse of AJ Green at this point. But I 0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:22.839 do have the C grade on Marquise Brown. I could 0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:25.080 see him being upped from that, but he's gonna get 0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:29.280 bench player now turned into starter. With Anthony Everett out, 0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:32.920 Meek Robinson or Rock you have seen, those guys will 0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:35.520 be on the outside covering Green and Brown in this one. 0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:39.039 Brown played on the outside last week, so that's where 0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:41.400 he'll be. Uh se grade on him. You could talk 0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:43.360 me into a B if you want to, but I 0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:46.920 think a C grade is fair. Zach Ertz, I'm given 0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:49.720 a B grade. Good matchup against the Vegas team who 0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:52.480 was bottom five by almost every metric against ted ends 0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:56.479 last year. They just allowed six six receptions for seventy 0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:58.560 eight yards and the score to tight ends last week 0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:02.680 and that Chargers game. He has been dealing with calf injury, 0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:05.080 but he played through it last week and he ran 0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:07.919 twenty seven routes. No other tight end even ran a 0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:10.680 route for them last week, so he gets everything. He 0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:13.560 gets everything. He he got all the red zone targets 0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.479 for tight ends. He got everything. So be in a 0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:19.720 good matchup for earths and just the scarcity at the position. 0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.360 James Conner also getting a B grade here, played ad 0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:26.800 percent of the Cardinals snaps inside the ten yard line, 0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:29.120 which you love to see with your fantasy running back 0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:31.600 inside the five is even better. I hear charge that's 0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:36.720 that's something like. Uh, he had fit he played fifteen 0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:39.000 of the two. He had fifteen of the twenty two 0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:42.320 running back touches. He's basically getting it all. The nice 0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:44.800 part is he had five catches on six targets. He's 0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:47.039 taking the pass game work, which we thought might go 0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:50.360 to Benjamin a little bit. It really didn't. Benjamin had 0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:52.800 some of it. He only had seven touches. I got 0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:54.600 Benjamin on the bench. I got Connor with a b 0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:57.960 as he seemingly and every down back. We'll see how 0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:00.520 much he gets out of it this but can expect 0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:03.960 fifteen plus touches. Uh. I just can't give him an 0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:05.960 A on this one yet. I need to see I 0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:08.279 need to see a little more um and he also 0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:13.520 he needs touchdowns on the other side. Derek Carr A grade. 0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:16.160 I'm sorry. I love this. I absolutely love this match up. 0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.200 I'm totally with you on this. Yeah, so adding Davantae 0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:23.640 Adams is pretty big. You could argue targets last week. Absolutely, 0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:26.360 you could argue, uh, you know, some of the best 0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:28.760 weapons in the NFL with there are a few better 0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.200 slot guys than than Hunter Renfrow, and he's got Waller 0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:35.039 and Adams Arizona. Let Herbert go. Hey, I'm last week 0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:39.680 the Vegas totals. I've already mentioned. Um, you know, I'm 0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:42.599 also giving Davantae Adams and A grade here, but I 0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:45.640 need a ruling from Brian. Brian, I need a ruling 0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:49.599 from you on this. On Davantae Adams obviously ton of targets, 0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:52.000 he's their number one receiver. It's going to be a shootout. 0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:57.440 It's an obvious A grade. But his grandparents are have 0:06:57.640 --> 0:06:59.960 never seen him play a professional game in the state, Like, 0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:02.800 they've never gone to the stadium for person in person, 0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:05.600 and they're coming this week for the first time. He's 0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:08.880 super excited about that. Is that enough for an ard Vark? 0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:11.920 Just like you've got you know me, I'm more of 0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:13.480 a Fonzie guy, but I will give him the A 0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:16.920 for that. The grandparents game, I love it. I love that. Okay, 0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:21.400 grandparents game. Uh, we're giving the art Vark. What happened? 0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:23.840 We used to have Fonzi A on the on the 0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:28.160 sound bar. I'm gonna have the fons N motorcycle. We 0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:31.000 need our Fonzie A back on the back on the 0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:33.880 sound bar. Speaking of as, it's an a for Darren 0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:36.680 Waller as well. The Cardinals got the fun draw this 0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:40.040 year of Kelsey exploding for ade yards and score last week. 0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:43.160 They weren't great against tight ends last year, and they 0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:45.480 get Darren Waller this week. It reminds me kind of 0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:48.520 the Ravens last year, didn't They started with Kelsey and 0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:51.880 Waller and Hawkinson and like so for the rest of 0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:53.680 the year, we're gonna think that the Cardinals are just 0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:56.560 bad against tight ends, when really they started out on 0:07:56.600 --> 0:08:01.080 this slope. Um Waller was actually really productive with his opportunities. 0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:03.400 He only had four catches, but he had seventy nine yards. 0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.120 He should actually get more work in this one eight 0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:10.320 grade on Waller B grade Josh Jacobs, It's hard not 0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:12.560 to like the usage we saw. Despite the totals. He 0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:15.720 didn't have a lot of yards, was almost six yards 0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.360 of carry, gave him the ball twelve times exactly. It's 0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:20.400 the usage I like, and I think he's going to 0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:23.520 get more volume in this higher scoring game. Here. He 0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:26.920 ran more more routes than all the other Vegas runners combined. 0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:29.320 He had eleven of the sixteen touches or twelve of 0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:33.160 the sixteen touches. Uh backups spelled him, but they didn't 0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:35.040 have an actual role, not a pass catching role, not 0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:37.760 a red zone role, not a two man role. He 0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:40.480 was the lead guy and he got the over seventy 0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.200 of the work. I got a B grade on Jacobs 0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:46.360 in a matchup. I think he surpasses that twelve from 0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:49.000 last week and he goes fifteen plus. All right, let's 0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:51.400 go to the Bucks at Saints and Brian for the Buccaneers. 0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:54.880 It's a disaster scenario for fantasy owners and the Bucks 0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.840 really across their wide receiver position. We gotta give a 0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:00.400 quick shout out to loyal listener Mark McNeil who dubbed 0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:04.760 them the questionnaires this week about that very considering we 0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:07.880 know that I believe they have five wide receivers that 0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:10.640 all have the questionable designation coming into this game, and 0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:13.440 Chris Godwin has been ruled out. Yeah, so we'll start 0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:16.240 with Mike Evans. He has he's dealing with the cap injury. 0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:19.440 He did practice on Friday, so we'll assume he's gonna 0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:21.960 play on Sunday just to see for him though he 0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:24.560 should see extra targets with Godwin out, but Evans will 0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:27.520 see a lot of Marshawn Lattimore in coverage, which is 0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:29.960 which is a tough matchup. Evans managed to score in 0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:32.600 one of two games against the Saints last year, pretty total, 0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:35.720 just three catches for sixty two yards across both contests, 0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:38.920 So not very high expectations for Evans and this one. 0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:43.160 Julio Jones questionable with a knee injury. He also practiced 0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:45.280 on Friday, though, so he should be good to go. 0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:47.640 He did not look washed last Sunday night at all 0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:50.520 and made a couple of highlight catches look great. Only 0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:53.200 saw five targets, but Tampa Bay was running all over 0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:55.160 Dallas in that game. The game script was not in 0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:58.280 his favor. That could change this week. He'll see a 0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:01.840 lot of Bradley Roby, who allowed a catch rate and 0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:04.760 a twenty one passer rating in his coverage last week. 0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.360 So I like Jones more than I do Evans this week, 0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:09.720 assuming both play, which we are going to assume that 0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:13.400 as of right now. Russell Gauge questionable with a hamstring injury. 0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:15.800 Gonna give him a see though I saw just two 0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:18.320 targets in Week one, only ran eighteen pass routes, but 0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:20.000 he should see a bump in those numbers with God 0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:22.040 went out, So I think he is startable in this 0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:25.160 one with the Sea and who is not startable are 0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:27.600 the tight ends. They're all on the bench unless Gronk 0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:31.000 somehow unretires before to kickoff. Think the ends had one 0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:34.800 catch in the in the last in last week's game. Yeah, 0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:37.520 it's not a great matchup regardless, but yeah, you don't 0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:39.280 want to touch the tight ends on Tampa Bay and 0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:42.320 Tom Brady. You barely want to touch him, just to 0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:45.280 see for him. Opposing quarterbacks average just two hundred forty 0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:47.960 three passing yards at one point two touchdowns against New 0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:50.839 Orleans last season, and the Bucks offensive line is a 0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.960 major concern right now. The Saints have allowed a completion 0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:56.319 rate of just thirty four point six percent when the 0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:59.839 opposing quarterback was under pressure since the season. That is 0:10:59.880 --> 0:11:01.640 the best in the NFL. So Brady is gonna be 0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:03.080 under a lot of drest in this game, so just 0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:06.480 to see for him. And lastly for the Bucks, another 0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:09.640 questionable player, Leonard for Nette, dealing with a hamstring injury. 0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:12.600 Assuming he's good to go, you still want to monitor 0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:14.400 his status of course, leave you know, to kick off, 0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:15.960 but if he does play, do not like the matchup 0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:19.079 at all. The Saints defense allowed successful plays on rush 0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:22.440 attempts on just thirty of them last season. That's best 0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:24.360 in the NFL. And if you're wondering what wondering what 0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:27.400 a successful rush play is, it's basically four yards at 0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:30.240 least four yards and situational. If it's fourth and one, 0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:33.360 A successful rush play is one. I could get more 0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:35.679 in the weeds until but no, we won't do that. 0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:39.800 UM Over to the New Orleans side. More questionable tags here, 0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:42.920 starting with Alvin Kamara, who did not practice on Friday 0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.079 with the rib injury. I'm just gonna give him a 0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:47.360 CEE even if he's good to go. Um, this is 0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:50.679 a bad matchup for Kamara the Saints. I'm sorry that 0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:52.319 the Bucks have a lot of troubling issues, but the 0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:55.160 run defense is not one of them. After stuffing Zeke 0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:58.439 last week, Jonathan Taylor is the only opposing running back 0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:00.760 to top eighty rushing yards against the Bucks over their 0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:04.319 last thirteen games, and kamaras struggled mightily in his last 0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:07.360 game against Tampa Bay that was last season, of course, 0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:10.680 totally just thirty one scoreless combo yards and if Kamara 0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:12.559 somehow SAIDs mark Ingram is the next guy up. But 0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:14.320 I don't even know if I started Ingram in this matchup. 0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:16.520 It's just the Bucks. You just don't want to start 0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:20.240 running back to pick the Bucks unless they're an elite talent. Thursday, 0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:26.600 Michael Thomas is practicing and is healthy as of right now. 0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:29.560 I saw healthy eight targets in Week one average the 0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:32.640 third most points per drop back among wide receivers. He's 0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:34.920 in a pretty good spot against the Bucks, who allowed 0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:38.200 the fourth most receptions to opposing wide receivers last season. 0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:40.240 That means I like the other two wide white outs 0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:42.280 for the Saints, starting with the Jarvis Landry and give 0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.560 him a c quite the Saints debut seven catches a 0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:48.280 hundred and fourteen yards, including a forty yard catch that 0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:51.760 was all airy yards. That's more air yards then Jarvis 0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:57.160 Landry is seen a tired that's coming to earth. Exactly 0:12:57.760 --> 0:12:59.920 were you wanting to say something? Your hand is raised? Okay? 0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:03.000 Uh jokes aside, Lander looks like a steal so far 0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:05.600 in reality and fantasy football, but he has a little 0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:08.280 tougher matchup against Tampa Bayed slot quarter in Antoine Winfield, 0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.840 probably the best corner on the team, Chris olav Lastly, 0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:14.160 for the wide Receiver's gonna give him a see led 0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:16.760 all Saints wide receivers and snaps last week, but only 0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:19.400 saw three targets. That said, he made the most of them, 0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:21.480 catching all three for forty one yards in a two 0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:24.400 point conversion. Just like the Bucks. You got all the 0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:26.400 tight ends on the bench for the Saints, but Jawan 0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:27.840 Johnson and guy you want to keep an eye on, 0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:30.240 I think we talk about more. Talk more about him 0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:34.040 later in the show. And lastly, Jamis Winston, he's on 0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:37.000 the bench. I gave all the pass catchers like middling grades. 0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:39.280 Doesn't mean they're all gonna come through. Going back to 0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:41.520 last year, Tampa Bay has held seven of its last 0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:45.240 eleven opposing quarterbacks to zero or one touchdowns. When we 0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:47.520 come back, take a chance on me. Nine players you 0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:50.199 can put in your starting lineup. Find out who they are. 0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:53.959 You may already have injury issues, you might have lineup deficiencies, 0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:57.360 were ready to help you unearthed some gems. Take a 0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:23.160 chance on me when we come back, Take a chance 0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:27.280 on me. Not nine, but ten players upon whom you 0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:29.200 can take a chance. Guys that are not normally in 0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:31.640 your starting lineup may be available on the waiver wire. 0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:35.280 We begin at the quarterback position. Scott, who is your 0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:37.640 take a chance on me quarterback? Sounds like we got 0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:40.720 a surprise coming ten players. I'm gonna I'm gonna add 0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:44.320 players now too. I'm going with Matt Ryan going against 0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:47.320 the Jags. That just allowed Carson Wentz to finish the 0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:51.080 week as a top three quarterback and throw four touchdown passes. 0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:53.680 Who's gonna throw those two? I wonder Ryan went for 0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:57.360 yards in a touch on last week and in a 0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:01.280 much more difficult matchup. Um was a couple of drops away, 0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:04.000 actually two drops away from a four hundred plus multi 0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:07.480 touchdown last week. That would have been nice. Yeah. Uh, 0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:09.640 let's go to Brian your take a chance at me quarterback. 0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:12.080 I have good friend of the show, Davis Mills at 0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:15.080 the Broncos this week. Last week, Geno Smith only threw 0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:18.920 for yards against Denver, but that was only pass attempts, 0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:22.800 twenty three of which went for completions. That's a completion maybe, 0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:26.320 and Gino also threw for two touchdowns no picks. So 0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:28.520 I like Mills this week. Going back to last season, 0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:31.240 the Broncos have allowed at least one touchdown pass in 0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:35.200 fourteen of their last fifteen games, with multiple touchdown passes allowed, 0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:37.400 and more than half of those games. I will continue 0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:39.960 to say Davis Mills. There is no player in fantasy 0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:45.200 football being more overlooked than Davis and fostered in most leagues. 0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:47.120 It will become offensive to use him as a take on. 0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:49.040 We're gonna get to that at some point this season. 0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:53.320 I hope you're right. Trey Lance faces Seattle. I like 0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:55.320 him this week in a bounce back game. Seattle just 0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:58.200 play their super Bowl. That was a nationally televised game 0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:01.080 against the quarterback who spurned them. They got an upset win, 0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:05.080 major letdown coming on the road for them, and all 0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:08.240 you know, Lance obviously had the monsoon. He had one 0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:11.200 bad pick last week, but otherwise I thought he looked fine. 0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:15.040 And the running is is clearly present there. And I 0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:17.120 don't think George Kittle is gonna go, but maybe gets 0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:19.200 George Kittle back, But even it does, it doesn't matter. 0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:22.560 Deevo Samuel Brandon Ike against the secondary of Sydney Jones 0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:25.480 and Justin Coleman and rookie Terreq Willen, and then safety 0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:28.800 Jamal Adams is out and his replacement, a guy named 0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:31.800 Josh Jones a loot four of five passes to be 0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:35.880 completed in his coverage. It's all great for Trey Lance, 0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:38.400 and I think we're gonna get the version of Lance 0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:41.600 that we wanted, the dual threat running and passing coming 0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:45.280 back this week. Let's go to the running back position. Scott, 0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:47.560 who is your take a chance on me runner? Yes? 0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:50.640 So the Indian Polis Colts talked about this all offseason, 0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:54.120 putting heinz he Hines that is in the slot wide 0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:56.960 receiver roll along with his running back role. What happened 0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:00.320 Week one? Hines ran twenty routes last week on twenty 0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:02.640 six steps, most of them out of the slot. The 0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.120 Jags were the third worst team against the slot last week. 0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:08.280 Last year there were ninth worst. Hines caught all six 0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:10.800 of those targets for fifty yards last week, a role 0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:13.680 they had talked about, and uh I projected that this 0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:16.320 week as well. Five plus catch game and some extra 0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:18.879 running work. Running back work, all right, I like it, Brian, 0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:20.960 you take a chance of me runner. We're gonna stick 0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:23.200 with the running back receiving angle and go with Tony 0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:25.640 Pollard at home against the Bengals, who were top five 0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:27.960 in the most catches and yards surrendered to running backs 0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:30.720 last season. Last week, not G Harris caught a touchdown 0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.800 against Since And let's be honest, it's quite plausible that 0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:36.119 Cooper Rush will be under constant pressure and looking to 0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:38.639 dump off to his running backs early and often in 0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:42.680 this game. Khalil Herbert's taking on Green Bay. And even 0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:46.080 though in last week's game David Montgomery had twice as 0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:50.200 many carries for half as much yards as Khalil Herbert, 0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:54.879 and you know, I'm sterned eye test here is starting 0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:57.560 to lean towards Khalil Herbert as the better of the 0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:01.480 running backs. Get this. Montgomery only averaged half a yard 0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:05.800 after contact per carry against San Francisco. That was second 0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:09.080 lowest among all running backs. Last week. The Packers run 0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:12.520 defense earned a PFF ranking of twenty seventh. Last week, 0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:15.480 Dalvin Cook Alexander Madison rolled up hundred twenty eight yards. 0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:18.600 Even though Montgomery will get the probably continue to get 0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.959 more quite a bit more work than than Khalil Herbert, 0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:25.240 there might be enough there where Herbert becomes a plausible starter. 0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:28.520 This week. Let's go to the receivers. Scott, you'll take 0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:30.520 a chance on me wide out. No, it's not gonna 0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:31.919 be a wide out this time. It's gonna be a 0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:34.760 tight end because people need tight end help charge and 0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:38.840 I am here for it. I'm going with Evan Ingram. 0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:42.040 I know, I know it's gonna gross. But Evan Ingram uh. 0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:45.680 He played of snaps and was the only tight end 0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:49.360 in that offense to see any targets last week. His opponent, 0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:51.720 the Colts, were the fourth worst against tight ends last year, 0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:54.679 allowing the third most receptions and third most yards. The 0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:58.080 Colts continued that trend just last week, allowing O. J. 0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:04.159 Howard to somehow scored. He's on just six routes he ran. Uh. 0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:07.679 Shack Leonard is also out. You were, yet again making 0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:09.359 things a little bit easier in the middle of the 0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:12.439 field for having Ingram, Brian, you're take a chance at 0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:15.520 me wide out. I presumed wide out. I'm going wide out, 0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:17.840 and I'm gonna go wide out. That everyone seems to 0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:21.199 have forgotten about. And that's Buffalo. Buffalo's Jamison Crowder at 0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:24.080 home against the Titans. Yes, Isaiah Mackenzie scored the slot 0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:26.280 touchdown for the Bills last week, but Crowder had more 0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:29.600 targets catches and yards than Mackenzie and looking at the matchup, 0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:32.639 Tennessee was the worst team in defending the slot last season. 0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:35.399 And these stats come courtesy of Scott Fish kind enough 0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:37.400 to give them to me. The Titans gave up the 0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:41.199 most PPR points to the slot last year. Sixty of 0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:44.480 the points they surrendered to wide receivers were slot wide receivers, 0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:47.520 and twenty one or thirteen of the twenty one touchdown 0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:50.040 surrender to wide receivers went to slot receivers. Like, can 0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:53.119 I start Mackenzie and Crowder? You can, but I like 0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:55.520 Crowder more as the take on. Everyone's gonna start Mackenzie 0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:58.520 Basically he'll get a sea later on. Spoiler alert, spoiler alert, 0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:00.920 and real quick these teams met last year. Yeah cool, 0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:03.159 Beasley had seven catches for eighty eight yards in a 0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:08.639 touchdown and many Sanders had five catches for but don't 0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:13.000 but don't leave Jamison. Crowder unstarted speaking of slot receivers 0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:16.960 in a plot twist to Bizar for even Hollywood. Paris 0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:22.320 Campbell is the one healthy remaining receiver for Indianapolis. Alec 0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:25.560 Pierce is out. Michael Pittman didn't practice the week. He's 0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:29.879 presumed out and Paris Hilton faces at Jacksonville Secondary that 0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:33.919 just allowed four touchdowns to the modest Commander's passing attack. 0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:37.879 As Scott alluded to earlier, Jaguars slot cornerback is a 0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:43.240