WEBVTT - Anthology of Horror, Volume 6

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, the production of

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>My Heart Radio. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind.

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:17.799
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:20.760
<v Speaker 1>we're back with another Anthology of Horror episode. I think

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>we're into the Halloween hangover part of the year. Is

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that right? This is actually gonna be airing in November, now,

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>that's right. We're recording this the week of Halloween. We

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>wanted to keep recording Halloween content the week of Halloween,

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 1>which means Halloween last an extra week in our publication schedule.

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>This is indeed going to be Anthology of Horror Volume six,

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>or we might say it's volume six six six, because

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be considering some infernal subject matter in

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>this one. Do you know that due to textual variants

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in the ancient manuscripts of the New Testament, there is

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>some debate about whether the original number was six six

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>six or six one six. They apparently both work as

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:07.959
<v Speaker 1>a cipher for the name of Caesar Nero. Well, it's interesting,

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>but you got it at six one six, not nearly

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:12.960
<v Speaker 1>as a sinister it doesn't have the that doesn't have

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the cinematic qualities you know, it doesn't have all that,

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:20.320
<v Speaker 1>although the it's not backed up by by our b

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:23.120
<v Speaker 1>cinema and our horror fiction. Though it does look a

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit ominous with the two six is kind of

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>closing in on the one. I don't know. Yeah, I

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 1>could see it working, but but I think you're right

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.399
<v Speaker 1>that the three sixes work better. Now, if you're not

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:34.679
<v Speaker 1>familiar with the anthology of horror episodes that we put

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:37.960
<v Speaker 1>out around Halloween, Uh, this is basically what the gimme

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 1>it consists of. We pick we each pick some some

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>particular episodes from either sci fi horror TV anthology shows

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>or anthology films. You know this This is stuff like

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>on TV, Tales from the Crypt, Tales from the Dark Side,

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Black Mirror, et cetera. And then in the cinematic tradition, um,

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>it's stuff like Tales from the Dark Side the movie

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>or Stephen King's Cat's Eye. That sort of thing. Uh,

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:11.239
<v Speaker 1>movies that contain generally like three or more mini segments,

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>each one a self contained story with some sort of

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>narrative structure holding it all together. Did we actually do

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:19.839
<v Speaker 1>Stephen King's Cat's Eye in the previous year. I don't

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>think we did. I was tempted to this year because

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>they have that Quitters Inc. Episode, you know, where James

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Woods learns to quit smoking by having his family tormented

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>by maniacs. It's it's like a smoking cession clinic run

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>by the mob, and yeah, they terrorize you. But like

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>anything that James Woods is in, James Woods is the

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>scariest part. Yeah, it's a um, I'm not sure how

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>that film really holds up. I mainly when I think

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>back on that film, I mainly remember the bit with

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the little girl and the little troll and the and

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the giant bedroom set they had to construct to make

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>it possible. Because one of the cool things is I

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>got to to to meet a guy who worked on

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that production way, Yeah, and he had some some photos

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>from the set of this giant dad because once they

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>built it, they had to build a giant bed so

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>they could have somebody in that troll suit walk around

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>on it, and so there are pictures of the cast

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>members on the bed, you know, posing with it. Uh.

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>So it was it was a lot of fun. I

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>think it is the most the most fun aspect of

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:23.079
<v Speaker 1>that particular film certainly the most memorable. Yeah. Yeah, if

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you haven't seen it. The basic premises that there's like

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a kindall sized troll that comes out of the wall

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>at night and it's attempting to suck a little girl's

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>life spirit out, but her cat must protect her, and

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>so the cat is actually the hero of the story,

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe much like one of the films we're gonna be

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about a little bit later. Yeah, yeah, definitely the

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>cat Cat's Eye does tie into something we're going to

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>discuss here in a little bit. But before we get

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to the infernal world of cats, we're going to have

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to consider the infernal world of a demonic bargains. So Joe,

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>set up your selection for Anthology of Horror volume six. Okay,

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I think I've established a precedent, at least in one

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>of the previous years, maybe in both that I've always

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>got to talk about a Treehouse of Horror because I

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>love the Simpsons the Treehouse of Horror episodes or maybe

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>my favorites of all time, and today I'm gonna be

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about the devil in Homer Simpson. This is one

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>of the all time great Treehouse of Horror segments. It

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:20.479
<v Speaker 1>is I think from season four from tree House of

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Horror three. Uh yeah, that this This always throws me

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>off anytime I'm trying to keep my Treehouse is straight,

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:29.039
<v Speaker 1>because each one has a different number that's one off

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>from the the the season year. So I lose track

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>if i'm if I'm looking for four, Am I talking

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>about season four? Am I talking about Treehouse four? Yeah?

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>It's like centuries, right, how like the first century does

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:43.919
<v Speaker 1>not start with the number one, and the second century

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 1>starts with the number one. Yeah, it's easier to just

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>start watching Treehouse of Horror episodes and just stop when

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you can't really take it anymore. But okay, So the

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>premise of the Devil in Homer Simpson is that Homer

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:01.479
<v Speaker 1>Simpson is trapped at work and his boring job at

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the Nuclear Power Plan. I think he's supposed to be

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the safety inspector, and he is fiercely covetous of a snack.

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>He really wants a donut, but Lenny and Carl ate

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>all the other donuts or somebody ate them, and then

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Homer goes looking for his emergency backup. Donut opens up

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:20.159
<v Speaker 1>like a book that he's cut out the inside inside

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of it. I think it's the the operation manual for

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:27.280
<v Speaker 1>his nuclear safety equipment and uh. He finds that, in fact,

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:29.239
<v Speaker 1>the donut that is supposed to be in there is missing,

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and instead there's a note that says like, dear Homer,

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>iou one donut. Uh. And he's you know, like damn it,

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:39.279
<v Speaker 1>he's always one step ahead of me. Uh. So he

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:42.119
<v Speaker 1>announces to no one in particular that he would sell

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 1>his soul for a donut. And of course when you're

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>talking to nobody in particular, there is somebody listening, and

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>it's the Devil. So Satan appears in the form of

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Ned Flanders with goat legs and a pitchfork in a

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>cool red jacket, and he makes a deal with Homer.

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 1>The Devil will supply Homer with a donut and Homer

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 1>will render his soul. Now, briefly, Homer believes that he's

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 1>outsmart at the devil because he realizes he can eat

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>all but the last bite of the doughnut and still

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>keep his soul. But then, unfortunately, sometime later, Homer is

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:20.479
<v Speaker 1>maybe sort of sleepwalking or at least is hungry for

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a midnight snack, and he disregards the notes all over

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the leftover donut bite in the fridge that say things

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>like Dad's soul donut do not eat, and he eats it,

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and then when he does, Flanders appears to claim his prize.

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:37.160
<v Speaker 1>But then Marge intervenes and she says, you know, Homer

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:40.359
<v Speaker 1>should receive a fair trial. So in the meantime, Homer

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>gets sent to hell for a day where the demons

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>attempt to ironically torture him by force feeding him thousands

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>of donuts, but Homer doesn't really seem to be bothered

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 1>by this, and in the end Homer wins the trial

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Merchant of Venice style on a technicality when Marge cleverly

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 1>proves that he had in fact already handed over possession

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of his soul to somebody else to her, so the

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 1>soul was not really his to sell in the first place,

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:08.039
<v Speaker 1>so it was it was a no go deal to

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>begin with. But then in the end, the devil gets

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>his revenge and he turns Homer's head into a giant donut,

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>which Homer will of course forever be picking at and

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and snacking on. Yeah, you get the idea that that

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 1>he's still pretty doomed because he's it's like the next

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>day or something, you know, and he's already picking at

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>his his donut hit. Yes, it's the same kind of

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>bad thinking that led them to keep the original piece

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of Homer's soul donut in the fridge instead of just

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 1>like throwing it out or destroying it or something. Right. Yeah,

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>this this is a wonderful episode. One one of these

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>episodes I've watched more times than I can remember. I

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>watched it this year, in fact, as we introduced our

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>son to the Simpsons tree House of Horror horror episodes.

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>One of my favorite parts of this that is that

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>when we get to the actual trial, of course, Lionel

0:07:56.960 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Huts briefly serves as the Simpsons defensivetorne any during the proceedings,

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>before I believe he runs away like he he quite

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>The great thing about Lionel Huts is that he always

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>has uh like enormous overconfidence that he can do these things,

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>but like but has so incapable of of performing. But

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>then he he In this episode, he realizes it has

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to go to the bathroom and like escapes through the window.

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 1>He's the quintessential American character, just endless confidence, no competence

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and in the end runs away. Right. There's also a

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>great moment where he's just combing his hair with a

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>fork as he walks into frame. Yeah. So obviously this

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 1>is a great opportunity to talk about deals with the devil,

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>because I think deals with the devil are interesting in

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:45.440
<v Speaker 1>in multiple domains, one from a sort of history of

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:48.680
<v Speaker 1>religions point of view and another from a psychological point

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>of view. And one of the things I'd like to

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 1>start by talking about is that while the contract with

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the devil, the deal with Satan may seem like a

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 1>perversion of the religious impulse, I would argue that actually

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the more personalized and asymmetrical relationship between God and the

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>believer in the modern Abrahamic religions is really the qualitative

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>outlier from a historical perspective, for a huge amount of

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 1>religion throughout all of history, the relationship between the believer

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and the gods has been seen as significantly more practical

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and contractual. You know, from this God, I want this

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>particular blessing or favor, and in return I offer this

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 1>ritual or this sacrifice. Uh So, for example, an ancient

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Roman religion, there is actually a term for this. It's

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 1>dot deaths, meaning I give that you might give back,

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>So I will sacrifice a goat at your shrine or

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I will do whatever ritual. I will burn incense for you,

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and in return you will give me a good harvest,

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>or you will heal my sick child, etcetera. Yeah, and

0:09:56.080 --> 0:10:00.199
<v Speaker 1>and this also, like it's an easy, easy parallel, well

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to say, ap pledging your loyalty to some sort of

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>tribal lord exactly. I mean, this is one of the

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>ways in which the farther you go back in religion,

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:15.079
<v Speaker 1>the more religious relationships seem to mirror political practical types

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 1>of relationships than than a lot of the big religions

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>due today. So in a way, the deal with the devil,

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I would say, is not a myth archetype that needed

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to be invented out of whole cloth by Christian storytellers. Instead,

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>it just took an extremely ancient, extremely common way of

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:39.679
<v Speaker 1>practicing religion and put a nefarious, infernal gloss on it. Like,

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the part that remains unchanged is that there's devotee and

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 1>they ask for some kind of supernatural deliverance or aid.

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:50.680
<v Speaker 1>But now instead of sacrificing a cow to Minerva to

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>get what you want, you have to pay some kind

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>of ultimate price, some unreasonable price, like your eternal soul

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>or your child or something, and you it not to

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>some god of a particular domain, but to the anti God,

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the figure of evil incarnate. So clearly the Simpsons segment

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 1>here is drawing on the Christian tradition of the deal

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>with the Devil. But I would say that that is

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:17.559
<v Speaker 1>not a an archetype that originates with Christianity. It's more

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a sort of reimagining of traditional religion with a very

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>negative spin on it. Yeah, I mean it kind of

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>breaks too, of applying a satanic paint job to to

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>pre Christian religious traditions as well, exactly. But since this

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 1>episode is dealing with the Christian tradition of the deal

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 1>with the Devil, I also want to look at the

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>history of how that idea developed. So in the Christian tradition,

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:44.839
<v Speaker 1>the oldest story of an attempted deal with the devil

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that I'm aware of actually takes place in the Bible.

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 1>It's in the Gospels in the New Testament. So after

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Jesus's baptism, he goes out into the wilderness to fast

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 1>for forty days and forty nights, and during that time,

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:01.439
<v Speaker 1>the devil appears to him and offers him temptations, and

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the temptations culminate in this passage in the Gospel of

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Matthew that goes as fall as This is in chapter four,

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Versus eight to nine. Quote again, the devil took him

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>up on an exceedingly high mountain and showed him all

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the kingdoms of the world and their glory. And he

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>said to him, all these things I will give you

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>if you will fall down and worship me. Now, of course,

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Jesus refuses this temptation. He says, well, I'm only going

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to worship the Lord as commanded in the scripture. But

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the suggestion of the architecture is there, if he had

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 1>taken the devil up on his bargain, he would have

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>surrendered something extremely important. It's not made clear exactly what

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>that is, but he would have sort of sort of

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>like surrendered righteousness or surrendered godhood or something like that,

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and in return he would be granted, you know, this

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>great earthly power. Yeah, I guess the way the way

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I've I've often seen it presented. What it's like, you know,

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Jesus on this mission to save the world, and the

0:12:56.720 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>devil says, hey, but what if you didn't save the world.

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:01.199
<v Speaker 1>What if I set you up all nice and uh,

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>and and fancy here, and then you could just kind

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>of like rule the world. That'd be pretty good too, right,

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Why don't we do that? Then everybody's happy? Yes, And

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>so there might be a question like, wait a minute,

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>why would the devil be offering the world to Jesus,

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Like wouldn't Jesus have more domain over the world anyway

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that he's the ruler of the kingdom of the air though,

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Yes, this gets into some interesting stuff about

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>apocalypticism that I want to talk about in just a minute.

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh So to follow more about the Christian tradition of

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the deal with the Devil, I was looking at an

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>entry in the Dictionary of Biblical Tradition and English Literature

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 1>edited by David Lyle Jeffrey, and there's a good entry

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 1>on the tradition of packs with the Devil by Camille

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:46.839
<v Speaker 1>or Labossi are So. Regarding the temptation of Jesus in

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the Wilderness, Lebassi air points out that the primary appeals

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 1>in this story are to pride, which is kind of interesting,

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Like in one of the temptations, Satan asks Jesus to

0:13:56.800 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 1>bow down and worship him, but in the others he

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>simply Jesus to make a vulgar display of his own power.

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>He says, Okay, you've been fasting for forty days. If

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you're so hungry, why don't you turn these stones into bread.

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 1>And there's a very interesting passage in the Gospel of

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Mark that that ties into the idea of deals with

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the devil as well. Now, the Gospel of Mark is

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the earliest of the four Gospels in the New Testament.

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>It probably represents the earliest stages of a lot of

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>these stories about jesus life. And in this story, Jesus

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>has been performing miracles, he's healing the sick, he's exercising demons.

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 1>He gathers the twelve Disciples to follow him, and then

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>in chapter three, verse twenty two, he gets a challenge

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 1>from the religious scholars. The religious scholars come up to

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>him and it says they came down from Jerusalem and

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 1>they said, quote, he hath beel's abub and by the

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>prince of devils, casteth he out devils. So they're saying, look,

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I know how he's casting out devils. He's made a

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>deal with with like the head demon, the chief devil,

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and he's using that demon power to cast out these

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 1>devils so he can win win over you peasants here. Uh.

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>And this is interesting because so earlier this year I

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>had the biblical historian Bart Erman on the podcast to

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about where the Christian concepts of heaven and Hell

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>came from and how they developed over time. And if

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>you haven't checked that episode out, I recommended. I thought

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Bart was a really fantastic guest. But one of the

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>historical trends that he talks about in a lot of

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>his work, and he discusses in that episode as well,

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>is the development of what's known as apocalyptic theology in

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Judaism in the centuries leading up to the birth of Christianity. Uh.

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>And it's a little bit complicated, but I'll try to

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 1>do the brief simplified version, and it goes like this.

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>For many centuries, the Jewish prophetic tradition had attributed misfortunes

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>of the Jewish people to punishment for their sins. So

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>it would be like, oh, you were conquered by the

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Babylonians and your crops were eaten by the locust. That

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>is because God is punishing you for your wickedness. But eventually,

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>over time, I'm sort of the manifest unfairness of this

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>theology became untenable for many Jews, like, how does it

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>make sense that my three year old child is being

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 1>punished for the sins of our king? And so a

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>new theology arose within the Jewish religion to explain suffering,

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and that was that suffering was not punishment for sins,

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 1>but it was the result of the faithful children of

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Israel being persecuted and victimized by forces of darkness. The

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>idea is that there are evil rulers and evil powers

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>who have made deals with the Devil, who have gone

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>into cooperation with a powerful evil being who is opposed

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>to God, and this is the Devil, and God will

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>eventually destroy the Devil and destroy these evil rulers who

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>are in league with him, and will right all wrongs.

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>But until then we're stuck under the boot of these

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 1>wicked temporal powers who are allied with and empowered by Satan.

0:16:57.080 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>It's essentially kind of a dystopian um attempt for religion, yes,

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 1>very much so, but with the idea that eventually everything

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:07.880
<v Speaker 1>would be fixed, that ultimately God is sovereign, ultimately good

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:10.400
<v Speaker 1>will win over evil. But now we're stuck in this

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>bad middle period where we're suffering under the arrangements made

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>with the evil forces. It's the Matrix kind of, yes,

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 1>though it would develop into even more Matrix e directions

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:26.119
<v Speaker 1>with the advent of Gnosticism, which is one of the

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>most fun things if you actually go back and watch

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 1>the Matrix after learning about Gnostic theology, there are huge

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>overlaps there that are that are very fun to mess

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>around with. Yeah, I'm looking forward. I'm not sure when

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 1>will be the right time, but I'm looking forward to

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 1>rewatching all those films because it's been a long time

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and I know they've got the Matrix four in the works. Really, Yeah,

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel more excited about that than I should be. No,

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think that there's a lot of room

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to explore. I'm I'm interested to see what they put together.

0:17:56.440 --> 0:18:00.440
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, to come back to these ancient theological def elements.

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Another thing that I think is interesting about the development

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of apocalyptic theology is the idea of wicked people being

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>empowered by a pact with Satan or demons. That could

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 1>sort of be viewed as a logical inversion of the

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:19.439
<v Speaker 1>belief that the Jewish people were protected by what they

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>called a covenant with the God of Israel. A covenant

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:25.400
<v Speaker 1>is essentially a contract that they would worship him exclusively,

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>scorning all other gods, and he would protect them as

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a people. But anyway, given the popularity of this type

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:36.199
<v Speaker 1>of apocalyptic thinking around the first century CE, I think

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense that the author of the Gospel might

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:42.640
<v Speaker 1>have a story like this here, where Jesus's enemies who

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>don't understand him would accuse him of somehow being empowered

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:51.679
<v Speaker 1>through a packed with demonic forces, like maybe they, in

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the author's view here, misunderstand Jesus as one of these

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 1>evil princes, one of these evil powers, who has been

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>allied against the good people. It's almost like they're accusing

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>them selling out, Yes, exactly. Uh. And Labassier points out

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 1>that many early Christian Church fathers, such as Justin Martyr

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and Origin, they allege that people who possess powers like divination,

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 1>so the power to acquire otherwise hidden knowledge or to

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:21.920
<v Speaker 1>predict the future, that people who have these powers acquire

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:25.399
<v Speaker 1>them through arrangements with the devil. Especially influential in this

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>respect is the writing of St. Augustine in his theological

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:32.680
<v Speaker 1>work on Christian doctrine. He claimed that people who have

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 1>apparent magical powers, such as divination or prognostication, they gain

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>these powers through consultations, pacts and contracts with demons. And

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 1>there's a passage in St. Augustine that's quoted as an

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:48.479
<v Speaker 1>authority on the subject of all through the Middle Ages

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and is repeated in in canon law and the Catholic Church.

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>But in the Middle Ages it's when the stories about

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 1>these kinds of pacts get get more developed. So the

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Middle Ages saw a proliferate shtion of folk tales about

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 1>pacts with the devil, especially concerning deals between the devil

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 1>and a powerful or learned man. So one example is

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:13.679
<v Speaker 1>the story of Saint Cyprian, who Labossierre says, is a

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>quote megas philosophists, or you know, like a magician philosopher,

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a man of great arcane learning, uh quote, who strikes

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 1>a bargain with the devil to learn the secrets of

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the universe. But he he gets turned around. He responds

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 1>to the appeals of a virtuous woman uh named Justina

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>or Juliana, and he repents of his wicked pact, so

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>he gets out of it. And even more well known

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 1>in the Middle Ages is the story of the Afulus

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 1>of a Donna, and I thought this was a lot

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 1>of fun. So the Awfulis was a cleric who is

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:48.639
<v Speaker 1>said to have lived in the sixth century in Asia Minor.

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 1>This would be in uh Silicia and modern day Turkey,

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>so that's like the southern part of modern day Turkey.

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 1>And the story goes that Theophilist is an archdeacon of

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>a donna. He's like, he's a high up guy in

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the church, but he's a very humble and righteous man,

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:07.679
<v Speaker 1>and he is elected to become a new bishop in

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:11.400
<v Speaker 1>a donna, but out of humility, he turns down the position.

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>He's like, oh no, no, I am not worthy. So

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a different guy gets elected bishop instead. But then, in

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a cruel twist of fate, the new bishop is swayed

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 1>by some false rumors about theophilists character and he kicks

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the Awfulis out of his archdeaconship, and the Afulist is mad.

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>He does not like this, so he's like, I've been wronged.

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I've got to get revenge. And in a quest for revenge,

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>he seeks out the aid of a sorcerer sometimes described

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:44.199
<v Speaker 1>as a necromancer, and this guy helps the Awfulist right

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>out of contract with the devil in his own blood.

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>The devil will give the awfulst the bishopric of a Donna,

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and in return, the Afulist will renounce Christ, renounce the

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Virgin Mary, and hand over his soul to Satan. And

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the deal goes through and he becomes the bishop. The

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 1>devil delivers his half of the bargain, but then Theophilist

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:09.160
<v Speaker 1>gets cold feet. It's like, oh no, I really screwed up.

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>So he gets scared he's going to go to hell

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and he ends up fasting for a couple of periods,

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>like a total of seventy days. He prays to the

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Virgin Mary to get him out of the contract, and

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>at first she appears to him and just really choose

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 1>him out. She's like, you have been an extremely naughty bishop.

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 1>You are that was very bad of you to do.

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 1>But eventually she relents and she grants him absolution. So

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you think everything solved now, but the devil does not

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:39.680
<v Speaker 1>give up. The next morning, Theophilist wakes up with the

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:42.719
<v Speaker 1>contract that he had written in his blood lying on

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:45.159
<v Speaker 1>his chest, and I guess that's a sign that the

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>devil is still trying to hold him to account. So

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 1>next what the apulist does is inspired by the Virgin Mary.

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:55.159
<v Speaker 1>He takes the contract to the bishop who had originally

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:59.199
<v Speaker 1>removed him from the archdeaconship, and he confesses everything, and

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the bishop burns the contract, which frees the awful list

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 1>of soul from this infernal bargain. And the awfullest is

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:08.879
<v Speaker 1>so relieved to have his soul back that he dies

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:12.119
<v Speaker 1>of joy on the spot. And I think this story

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>brings up a couple of features that will appear again

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and again in stories about deals with the devil. I

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:20.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's very interesting that you see these features repeated

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>so often. One is that you can get out of

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:25.719
<v Speaker 1>a deal with the devil. You make the deal, you

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>get what you want, but then upon repenting, you can

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of avoid the contract, so to speak. And then

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the second feature that appears again and again is that,

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>uh is that you can you can get out of

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 1>it with the intercession or intervention of a virtuous woman.

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>What I love about this is that you know, though

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>though fantastic and supernatural and its elements, it's basically a

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>critique of short term versus long term thinking. You know,

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>because it's it's often about like somebody like in this case,

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and I want revenge now, I'm not going to think

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>about what happens later with my eternal soul. But but

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 1>also just like my life past the point of getting

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 1>my vengeance. Uh. And likewise with Homer, like he's not

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:10.879
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the long term, he's thinking about that immediate reward.

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>He's he's failing the ultimate Marshmallow test. You know, yeah, exactly.

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about those exact themes. It's the it's

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the prioritization of the temporal. And in a way, there's

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 1>this idea that people, uh make decisions without thinking them through.

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:31.240
<v Speaker 1>They make the decision on the basis of their appetites

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>or their lusts or their emotions. Uh, and then once

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>they have time to think about it, they repent of

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the decision they have made. And often, weirdly enough, I mean,

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't happen in every case. Like we'll get to

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Dr Faustus in a bit, and then Marlow's Dr Faustus.

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 1>He does not get out of the deal, he just

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>gets claimed by the devil. But in a lot of

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>these deals, eventually, once you think it through and you say,

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:57.399
<v Speaker 1>oh no, I really screwed up. Somebody good. Usually a

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 1>virtuous and clever woman will intervene on your behalf and

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you'll get out of it. I mean to a certain extent.

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>We see that in Dante's Inferno, right, I mean, Beatrice

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>is is kind of this this guiding light that is

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that is there to to sort of pull like a

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 1>tractor beam, to pull Dante up through Inferno and uh

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and Purgatory up towards his paradise. It's very interesting than

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of these stories, the character who makes

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the deal with the devil is tempted by pride. And

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>in the Divine Comedy it's made explicit that Dante's main

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 1>sin is pride. That's the sin that he really has

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 1>to be absolved of when he goes through purgatory, and

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:39.640
<v Speaker 1>it's the main sin that Beatrice is helping purge him of. Yeah,

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:41.679
<v Speaker 1>which is one of my favorite things about the Divine

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Comedy actually is all the passages where he's like, having

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>been cleansed of the sin of pride. I will now

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 1>go back to Earth having written the greatest poem of

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 1>all time, and will copens everybody that they should do

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, that they should follow the path of righteousness,

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>because I've written the best poem ever written, right, I

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 1>mean he did, he did really write his finger there,

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, but but but yes, I don't think. I

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:06.199
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you can make a strong case for

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the pride being completely purge from Dante. But anyway, So

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 1>from here, Labassier goes on to mention a number of

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:15.640
<v Speaker 1>other stories and pacts with the devil that were popular

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>in the Middle Ages and into the Renaissance. For example,

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the Anglo Norman poem, which is apparently satirical, that takes

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:26.479
<v Speaker 1>the form of a full legal document resigning the soul

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>of the signatory to the devil in exchange for the

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:33.119
<v Speaker 1>freedom to live in hedonic pleasure, hoarding wealth and exploiting

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the poor. And I gotta say, is a brief like

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:40.120
<v Speaker 1>moralistic theological note, one thing I can sometimes appre I mean,

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously there are extreme limitations to the insights of medieval

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:47.640
<v Speaker 1>moral philosophy. But one thing I appreciate, going back and

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:50.399
<v Speaker 1>reading a lot of these rebukes of immorality from the

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Middle Ages, is one thing that a thing that gets

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>singled out again and again is abusing the poor. Now

0:26:56.800 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 1>there are more kinds of packs with the devil. In

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>chauce Er in the Friar's Tale, in the canon Yeoman's Tale. Uh,

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>there's this idea that people who seek pacts with the

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>devil are often lusting after wealth or especially secret knowledge.

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>The ultimate secrets of alchemy seem to be a real

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>draw for people to get into these uh, these bad

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>deals like to chase after the philosopher's stone is to

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:24.440
<v Speaker 1>make an enemy of God. And these themes really come

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 1>through in the Renaissance in perhaps the most famous literary

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 1>character who makes a deal with the devil who which

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>is Dr Faustus. We've talked about the faust legend on

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the show before. This is a story with many lives,

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 1>many new sets of clothes over the ages, so we

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 1>won't rehash all of that here, but it is yet

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 1>another tale of a person who seeks great power and

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>knowledge and then uh kind of squanders it and uh

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:49.159
<v Speaker 1>and and of course seeks it through a deal with

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the devil and is ultimately claimed. There is a fair

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 1>amount of lust in there too. Yes. Lobossi Are also

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 1>points out an interesting parallel that I might not have

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 1>thought of otherwise. But it's Shakespeare's The Murder Shin of

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:03.639
<v Speaker 1>Venice between Antonio and Shylock, and because of the anti

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Semitic assumptions of the play, the Jewish money lender Shylock

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 1>has portrayed very much as a devil figure toying with

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Antonio's fate uh and is. As is so often the

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>case in these tales, Antonio is saved by the intercession

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of a virtuous woman, Portia, who wins his case by

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:23.880
<v Speaker 1>finding a technical loophole in the wording of the contract,

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 1>much like Marge does in The Devil and Homer Simpson.

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 1>As for the title of the Simpsons, segment is of

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 1>course adapted from the title of the short story by

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Vincent Benet, The Devil and Daniel Webster, in which

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a New England farmer sells his soul to the Devil,

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 1>then hires the famous lawyer and orator Daniel Webster to

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>represent him in a trial to get it back, and

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Webster's speech to the jury of the damned souls is

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 1>so eloquent that they find for the defendant, even though

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 1>there's no evidence on his behalf, which is pretty good.

0:28:56.640 --> 0:29:00.680
<v Speaker 1>You know. As much as we love courtroom dramas in

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:03.239
<v Speaker 1>and especially in this country, and as much as we

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>love um, you know, the horrifying and the satanic? Why

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 1>have we not? Maybe we have and I'm not aware

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of it. We need a law and Order, um Infernal Unit,

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 1>or you know, we need Daniel Webster lawn Order mash

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>up where not just like one episode, but every episode

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>deals with some sort of satanic bargain. I mean, I'm

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:29.239
<v Speaker 1>half joking, but I also now that I'm thinking about it, like,

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I think this has legs. I think this could be

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>a series. I'd watch it The Perry Mason of the Afterlife. Yeah,

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>what's your favorite courtroom drama? Do you have one? Are you?

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 1>And my cousin Vinny Guy? I mean no, I mean,

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what are some of the great I mean

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>you have to go with like to Kill a Mockingbird?

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Right or something like that. Um. Yeah, I'm trying to

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 1>think of anything. I don't know. I don't know a

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of the stuff in between. Like I feel like

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 1>it for for me to get into a courtroom drama,

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 1>it needs to be it needs to be really good.

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Or yeah, I can't. I can't think of one that's

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>amusingly crappy. Yeah, maybe a Few good Men. Like a

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Few good Men is like entertaining but extremely hokey. Yeah,

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean it does have that classic moment that's been

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a Leaftland lampoon so many times. Um, yeah, I don't

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>know my favorite really, Seriously, my favorite courtroom scenes are

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>all from episodes of The Simpsons or Futurama. Yeah, alright,

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:27.720
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna take a quick break, but we'll be right back.

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Thank thank Alright, we're back. You know, I was thinking

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 1>there's another type of picture of a deal with the devil,

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>which is the idea of deal with the devil as compliment,

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>like the idea that an artist or a musician or

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 1>somebody is so talented, uh, that their their genius or

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>their talent must have come from a deal with the devil,

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Like this was said of the great Delta Blues musician

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Robert Johnson. But of course it was something that actual

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 1>like the Romantic poets often said about themselves. The English

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Romantic poets Blake and Shelley characterized as literary genius and

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 1>poetic energy as a diabolical pact. Yeah. This is interesting too,

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 1>because I think it is reflected in a lot of

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 1>celebrity worship culture today. But it's perhaps a way on

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>one level, like a way of trying to make sense

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of of extreme success, you know, you sort of have

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to tell yourself, well, yeah, they're highly successful at what

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:25.719
<v Speaker 1>they do and or they're highly talented, but at what cost?

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 1>And and you can sort of comfort yourself by saying,

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I didn't pay that cost. I may not have a

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 1>number one album out there, but I also didn't sell

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 1>my soul to the devil. Uh, And you can feel

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a little better about it. And then it's also sort

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of in a way, it's kind of a twisted version

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of instead of saying, well, you know, um, you know

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 1>this this celebrity that deep down there a person too,

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and they're full of insecurities like I am. You know,

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 1>they're they're concerned about the future, etcetera. Instead of humanizing you,

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 1>you kind of go in a different direction and say, well, yes,

0:31:57.160 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 1>but they're going to hell because they made a soul

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 1>a soul ex change with the devil. Like I don't know,

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very weird, very twisted up. No, I

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 1>think that's really good. I think you're exactly right. In

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:08.479
<v Speaker 1>the same way that it feels good to watch a

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 1>really rich person be miserable, uh, at least feels good

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to think about somebody who has talents and successes that

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 1>you're jealous of. You're like, well, they must yeah, they

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 1>must have done something bad to get that. Yeah, they

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 1>lost something in the bargain. I guess it does. It doesn't.

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 1>You can certainly compare it to some of the stats

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 1>about say, lottery winners. Right where a sentence, there's there's

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 1>a strong argument to say that that is a deal

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 1>made with the devil. You get this enormous uh you know, reward,

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 1>this this enormous cash prize, but statistically it brings a

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of chaos into your life. Is that true? Though?

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I've heard people say that, But I think I feel

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 1>like I've looked into that before and it turns out

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that might not be as true as is sometimes alleged.

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>It certainly would make us feel better for it to

0:32:56.160 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 1>be true. Yeah, that's the thing. It needs to be

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 1>true for the ingest this of the universe to make sense. Um.

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 1>But then again with the lottery thing, for example, I mean,

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the great things about that is

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 1>we're always each and every one of us, you know,

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 1>we're the first ones to say to ourselves, well, you know,

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 1>if you win the lottery's gonna bring a lot of

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 1>casts in your life. But I think I can handle it.

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, we always think we're the exception. It's kind

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of like, man, I can't any time I want, Yeah,

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 1>like making a deal with the devil or picking up

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a monkey's paw. That's bad news. But I think I

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 1>might be able to make it work. I think I could.

0:33:30.000 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I could. I could word my demand in just the

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 1>right way that the Devil's going to be totally cool

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 1>with it. I wouldn't eat the hole doughnut. I would

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 1>leave that last bite and not forget about it. Yeah.

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Or I would know how to phrase the monkeys Paul

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 1>questions so that it didn't come back on me. Yeah. Well,

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, going back to the Simpsons episode with the

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 1>monkeys paw, you know, you have that that wonderful segment

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 1>where Maggie gets ahold of it and and I think

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 1>is the only person who uses it, and it's in

0:33:56.560 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a way it's like she's a child. So she makes

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a purer wish, you know, for just a new pacifier,

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 1>which is immediately brought to her, and it doesn't seem

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 1>like there's any kind of come up in so there

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 1>any dark uh, you know, darker ramifications that come from

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:12.800
<v Speaker 1>having made that wish of the poll, unlike all the

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:15.319
<v Speaker 1>other monkey pot wishes. Well, I think it's interesting that

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 1>in the Monkeys Pall it is a technical reading of

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:20.359
<v Speaker 1>the words of the wish that come back to bite you.

0:34:20.760 --> 0:34:22.640
<v Speaker 1>But in many of these stories about the deal with

0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the devil, such as in the Devil in Homer Simpson,

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 1>it is a technical reading of the language of the

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 1>agreement that actually gets you out of trouble, you know,

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 1>trading on a loophole to escape punishment. They seem to

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 1>come from the anxieties of like a literate and legalistic culture. Yeah,

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:42.279
<v Speaker 1>the idea of the law itself as this domain with

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:47.440
<v Speaker 1>enough ambiguity in it that a skilled lawyer or sorcerer,

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're basically the same thing. Depending on how

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you look at it, we'll be able to pry you

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 1>out of it. Arcane books containing formulations of language that

0:34:57.600 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 1>have the power to make things happen in the world

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 1>that you can't understand that the lawyer is very much

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a sorcerer. Now, I wanted to talk about the psychology

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of selling your soul, and I was trying to find

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 1>some good psychology studies about people selling their souls. I

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't really turn up a lot that are directly on target,

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 1>but some that uh, some that are sort of on

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:20.759
<v Speaker 1>point but not as robust as I had hoped, and

0:35:20.800 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 1>then other things that sort of glance off of it

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 1>in interesting ways. So the first thing I found was

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:29.839
<v Speaker 1>an anecdote in a twelve book called The Righteous Mind

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:33.880
<v Speaker 1>by the American social psychologist Jonathan Height. And this book

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:38.399
<v Speaker 1>is about the psychological foundations of moral values and how

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:42.359
<v Speaker 1>these values feed into big systems like social groups and

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 1>politics and stuff. And the story in the book about

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 1>selling souls comes up in the middle of a passage

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:52.279
<v Speaker 1>about a phenomenon that Height calls moral dumbfounding. And this

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:54.839
<v Speaker 1>is something that you've probably encountered before. You've seen other

0:35:54.880 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 1>people do it, you've done it yourself. It's where somebody

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:01.879
<v Speaker 1>makes a very strong moral judgment about something you say

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:05.399
<v Speaker 1>you know that's just wrong, and then if you are

0:36:05.440 --> 0:36:09.000
<v Speaker 1>asked to explain why it's wrong, you get the mental

0:36:09.040 --> 0:36:12.880
<v Speaker 1>blue screen of death. You just search around, frustrated for

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 1>an explanation, a reason behind your moral pronouncement. Maybe you'll

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:19.960
<v Speaker 1>end up saying something but it doesn't make a lot

0:36:20.000 --> 0:36:22.719
<v Speaker 1>of sense, or you just can't think of anything at all,

0:36:22.800 --> 0:36:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and yet you remain convinced of your original opinion. From

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 1>another context, it's phrased as a dogmatic insistence on a

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:34.320
<v Speaker 1>moral judgment for which no good reasons can be given,

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and so example. There are all kinds of examples of

0:36:38.160 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 1>this that are offered, a lot of them are read

0:36:40.719 --> 0:36:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to people as very distasteful for obvious reasons. One is,

0:36:44.800 --> 0:36:48.359
<v Speaker 1>would it be wrong to dip a sterilized cockroach into

0:36:48.400 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 1>somebody's drink? So if I if I just got a cockroach,

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I put it through an autoclave, so I know it's

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 1>absolutely sterile, could not possibly make you sick? Would it

0:36:56.640 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 1>be wrong for me to dip that cock roach in

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:01.200
<v Speaker 1>a glass of water and then give you the glass

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:03.880
<v Speaker 1>of water to drink and not tell you, Yes, that

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 1>would be wrong. I feel like that would be wrong too,

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 1>But it's hard to explain, a like, to come up

0:37:09.520 --> 0:37:11.879
<v Speaker 1>with an explanation for the reason that would be wrong.

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:15.319
<v Speaker 1>It's like, well, it can't possibly hurt them, but it

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 1>just feels really wrong. It feels like a betrayal. Yeah,

0:37:18.600 --> 0:37:20.719
<v Speaker 1>it is, I see what you're you're getting. It is

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:23.000
<v Speaker 1>tricky to try and like make an argument like you

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 1>end up having to sort of go further out on

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a ledge than you think you're going to. You know,

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you have to say things like, well if you would

0:37:29.719 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 1>do that, like what else are you doing to my drink?

0:37:31.520 --> 0:37:33.400
<v Speaker 1>What what you know? What else? Does what else do

0:37:33.520 --> 0:37:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to say about our relationship that you would do this?

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:39.239
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not necessarily saying that you couldn't give a

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:41.600
<v Speaker 1>good reason, but it's like for a lot of people

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 1>would be difficult to express one. And I want to

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:46.560
<v Speaker 1>come back to the difference there in a bit um.

0:37:46.600 --> 0:37:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it would be a health code violation, yes, regardless,

0:37:50.520 --> 0:37:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Well I don't know if it would it be if

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:54.360
<v Speaker 1>it was sterilized. It seems like you need special language

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:57.399
<v Speaker 1>in the health code to address I have. Maybe we'll

0:37:57.400 --> 0:37:59.880
<v Speaker 1>hear from health inspectors out there who listen to the show,

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:03.359
<v Speaker 1>But I'm guessing you can't get by by sterilizing your

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 1>cockroaches before exposing them. I mean, but then again, I

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:10.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know, you know, as we get more into the

0:38:10.520 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the consumption of insects. Are there are there

0:38:13.239 --> 0:38:17.080
<v Speaker 1>food grade cockroaches you could use? I don't know, But

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:19.920
<v Speaker 1>how would that be any different than just being sterilized like.

0:38:20.440 --> 0:38:24.480
<v Speaker 1>It seems like the implication at least is that questions

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:27.400
<v Speaker 1>like this play on just sort of like ick based

0:38:27.719 --> 0:38:31.200
<v Speaker 1>intuitions we have about what's acceptable and what's not that

0:38:31.320 --> 0:38:34.760
<v Speaker 1>we find hard to give justifications for based on things

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:39.040
<v Speaker 1>like utilitarian concerns about harm. Instead, it's just these things

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:43.280
<v Speaker 1>about like that just feels wrong. I guess I'm gonna

0:38:43.280 --> 0:38:45.960
<v Speaker 1>come back and say I would be okay with you

0:38:46.080 --> 0:38:49.200
<v Speaker 1>doing this thing with the cockroach, provided it was it

0:38:49.360 --> 0:38:52.319
<v Speaker 1>was like a food grade cockroach, which I don't think

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 1>actually exists that even if we're another food grade insect

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:57.160
<v Speaker 1>then possibly, But then again, I don't think it's a

0:38:57.200 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 1>vegetarian drink anymore if you've put a dead bugging and

0:39:00.960 --> 0:39:04.440
<v Speaker 1>intentionally all very good concerns. Uh yeah. So so I

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:06.319
<v Speaker 1>want to explain my thinking about this in a bit,

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:09.160
<v Speaker 1>but at first I just want to talk about the experiments.

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:13.839
<v Speaker 1>So Height in this section is discussing evidence that our

0:39:13.920 --> 0:39:17.520
<v Speaker 1>moral decisions are generally not actually rational. So he's sort

0:39:17.560 --> 0:39:20.560
<v Speaker 1>of making the case that when we have when we

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:24.040
<v Speaker 1>make moral judgments, most of the time, we're not reasoning

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to arrive at them. Instead, they're deontological intuitions we just

0:39:28.760 --> 0:39:32.879
<v Speaker 1>feel our moral decisions first, and then afterwards we use

0:39:32.920 --> 0:39:35.400
<v Speaker 1>our rational minds to kind of come up with post

0:39:35.440 --> 0:39:38.839
<v Speaker 1>talk justifications for why we felt the way we did.

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:42.320
<v Speaker 1>And so some evidence of this he discusses would include

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the claim that adding cognitive load does not change people's

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 1>moral judgments. So if you give people mental work to

0:39:48.640 --> 0:39:52.040
<v Speaker 1>do while they're making moral judgments, their moral judgments don't

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:56.120
<v Speaker 1>appear to change. Or giving giving people more time to

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:59.120
<v Speaker 1>think about their answers to moral questions doesn't really seem

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:02.360
<v Speaker 1>to change them. And in the example of selling souls,

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Height is talking about a scenario where a graduate student

0:40:05.719 --> 0:40:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of his was was offering students two dollars if they

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:12.680
<v Speaker 1>would sign a piece of paper that said I hereby

0:40:12.719 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 1>sell my soul after my death for the sum of

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 1>two dollars. And then there was also fine print that

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:20.680
<v Speaker 1>said this form is part of a psychology experiment. It

0:40:20.800 --> 0:40:24.400
<v Speaker 1>is not a legal document and not binding in any way.

0:40:24.480 --> 0:40:26.800
<v Speaker 1>And the students were told that if they signed the document,

0:40:26.840 --> 0:40:28.960
<v Speaker 1>they were free to rip it up and consider it

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:31.000
<v Speaker 1>void the moment after they signed it, and they would

0:40:31.040 --> 0:40:35.040
<v Speaker 1>still get their two dollars, and majorities of students refused,

0:40:35.160 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 1>even many students who explicitly said they were atheists and

0:40:39.040 --> 0:40:42.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't believe in souls, they still didn't want to do it.

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 1>And so the point here is that there's something about

0:40:46.800 --> 0:40:50.919
<v Speaker 1>there's something that we're using to make decisions apart from

0:40:51.000 --> 0:40:54.799
<v Speaker 1>just reasoning about who it would harm. At least that's

0:40:54.840 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the case they're making. Two dollars does seem like low bowing,

0:41:00.640 --> 0:41:03.840
<v Speaker 1>like even in the like, even even into this scenario,

0:41:04.280 --> 0:41:07.319
<v Speaker 1>I think I would I would turn it down. I

0:41:07.360 --> 0:41:09.440
<v Speaker 1>think I would too. You just I mean, part of

0:41:09.440 --> 0:41:13.840
<v Speaker 1>it's probably you know, growing up attending you know, a

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:18.120
<v Speaker 1>church where you're with the reality of of of demons

0:41:18.200 --> 0:41:20.919
<v Speaker 1>is kind of part of the background, and then being

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and then absorbing all of this, uh uh, that this

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:26.479
<v Speaker 1>fantasy as well, probably even seeing tree House of Horror

0:41:26.520 --> 0:41:29.839
<v Speaker 1>as a kid, you know, uh, you end up having

0:41:29.840 --> 0:41:31.760
<v Speaker 1>all this in your background, and it kind of creates

0:41:31.760 --> 0:41:34.200
<v Speaker 1>a sense of wrongness to engage in this, or at

0:41:34.239 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 1>least there's a risk factor there that should not be

0:41:37.719 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 1>trifled with for a mere two dollars. Well that's so

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:43.960
<v Speaker 1>on one hand, yeah, you could argue, well, maybe this

0:41:44.040 --> 0:41:48.840
<v Speaker 1>is just some sort of deontological hangover from from previous

0:41:48.880 --> 0:41:51.240
<v Speaker 1>beliefs you would have. But to come back on things,

0:41:51.800 --> 0:41:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I think there are arguments against the post talk rationalization

0:41:55.640 --> 0:41:59.520
<v Speaker 1>theory of moral dumbfounding, Like the fact that somebody can't

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:03.600
<v Speaker 1>artic kullate good reasons why something should be wrong doesn't

0:42:03.640 --> 0:42:06.640
<v Speaker 1>necessarily mean that there are not in fact good reasons.

0:42:06.680 --> 0:42:08.920
<v Speaker 1>It's possible that a lot of our moral reasoning might

0:42:08.960 --> 0:42:13.399
<v Speaker 1>actually be reasoning and not just deontic dogma, but it's

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:16.120
<v Speaker 1>reasoning on a subconscious level that we find hard to

0:42:16.160 --> 0:42:18.759
<v Speaker 1>put into words. There are all kinds of things that

0:42:18.880 --> 0:42:23.000
<v Speaker 1>people do for good reasons that you could explain in theory,

0:42:23.040 --> 0:42:25.359
<v Speaker 1>but people can't figure out the right way to put

0:42:25.400 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 1>it into words. So one example of this would be

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:32.480
<v Speaker 1>on utilitarian grounds, why can't a hospital just say, like,

0:42:32.680 --> 0:42:36.120
<v Speaker 1>murder one innocent patient who's there for a yearly physical

0:42:36.560 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and then harvest their healthy organs to save the lives of, like,

0:42:40.239 --> 0:42:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, ten other people who urgently need organ transplants.

0:42:44.520 --> 0:42:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I feel like if you think that that kind of

0:42:47.160 --> 0:42:52.040
<v Speaker 1>statement is a defeater for utilitarian reasoning, uh that that

0:42:52.120 --> 0:42:56.640
<v Speaker 1>represents a sort of shallow interpretation of utilitarianism. Like imagine

0:42:56.680 --> 0:42:59.919
<v Speaker 1>if something like that were to actually happen. The con

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:02.600
<v Speaker 1>sequences of it would be that it would totally undermine

0:43:02.640 --> 0:43:05.719
<v Speaker 1>the stability of the society and of medicine in a

0:43:05.760 --> 0:43:08.520
<v Speaker 1>way that would make everyone paranoid and unable to trust

0:43:08.640 --> 0:43:12.480
<v Speaker 1>doctors or feel safe. So it's like, the consequences of

0:43:12.520 --> 0:43:16.120
<v Speaker 1>something like that actually happening in reality would be hugely

0:43:16.360 --> 0:43:20.040
<v Speaker 1>destructive in a utilitarian sense, even though in the moment

0:43:20.120 --> 0:43:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you have saved a number of lives. And so I

0:43:22.719 --> 0:43:24.799
<v Speaker 1>think there could be similar things going on with these

0:43:24.840 --> 0:43:27.520
<v Speaker 1>examples about like say, a contract to get two dollars

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:30.279
<v Speaker 1>for selling your soul. I feel like I have a

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:33.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of idiosyncratic view on this, probably with regards to

0:43:33.120 --> 0:43:35.799
<v Speaker 1>selling souls, because I would say, you know, personally, I'm

0:43:36.200 --> 0:43:39.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of a provisional materialist, like I believe that the

0:43:39.040 --> 0:43:41.920
<v Speaker 1>mind is dependent on the functioning of the physical brain.

0:43:42.440 --> 0:43:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't see any evidence for the existence of an

0:43:44.600 --> 0:43:47.880
<v Speaker 1>immaterial soul or mind that exists without the body. And

0:43:47.960 --> 0:43:50.000
<v Speaker 1>yet at the same time, I think the soul is

0:43:50.080 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of a meaningful and even indispensable concept, and I

0:43:53.680 --> 0:43:56.719
<v Speaker 1>think it really means something to sell your soul, not

0:43:56.800 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 1>in a supernatural sense, but in the sense that there

0:43:59.600 --> 0:44:03.080
<v Speaker 1>are things we can do that represent a surrender of

0:44:03.239 --> 0:44:06.520
<v Speaker 1>rights and claims to the deepest part of our own integrity.

0:44:06.560 --> 0:44:10.120
<v Speaker 1>And in English, the word soul still captures that thing,

0:44:10.400 --> 0:44:13.359
<v Speaker 1>that deep part of our integrity, probably better than any

0:44:13.360 --> 0:44:15.840
<v Speaker 1>other word does, even though it does come with a

0:44:15.840 --> 0:44:19.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of supernatural baggage. And thus I think signing a

0:44:19.160 --> 0:44:22.560
<v Speaker 1>piece of paper in agreement to sell your soul could

0:44:22.600 --> 0:44:24.640
<v Speaker 1>be a thing you would want to resist doing, even

0:44:24.640 --> 0:44:27.719
<v Speaker 1>though you don't believe in a supernatural soul. Like on

0:44:27.880 --> 0:44:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the physicalist or naturalist view of the world, the brain

0:44:31.120 --> 0:44:34.600
<v Speaker 1>operates strongly on the basis of habit, and doing something

0:44:34.680 --> 0:44:37.480
<v Speaker 1>one time always prepares you to do a similar thing

0:44:37.600 --> 0:44:40.120
<v Speaker 1>more easily in the future. And so I think I

0:44:40.160 --> 0:44:43.280
<v Speaker 1>would worry that selling my soul, even in a purely

0:44:43.320 --> 0:44:46.960
<v Speaker 1>symbolic sense, would kind of wound myself image in a

0:44:47.000 --> 0:44:49.719
<v Speaker 1>way that would perhaps make me less protective of my

0:44:49.840 --> 0:44:52.799
<v Speaker 1>integrity in the future. I feel like to come back

0:44:52.840 --> 0:44:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to anchoring. It's also insulting to to offer two dollars

0:44:58.719 --> 0:45:01.120
<v Speaker 1>for someone's soul, because and then you're gonna turn him down,

0:45:01.400 --> 0:45:03.719
<v Speaker 1>like you've already established that that is where you're going

0:45:03.800 --> 0:45:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to begin the bidding. Yes, so even even if I

0:45:06.640 --> 0:45:09.040
<v Speaker 1>come back and and I'm gonna gonna say something like, well,

0:45:09.040 --> 0:45:11.560
<v Speaker 1>at least not for me a hundred dollars, like that

0:45:11.640 --> 0:45:13.279
<v Speaker 1>doesn't say I still probably wouldn't do it for a

0:45:13.360 --> 0:45:16.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars. But but now I'm already thinking about it.

0:45:16.000 --> 0:45:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Because he started at two dollars. I think you were

0:45:18.719 --> 0:45:22.000
<v Speaker 1>actually very much onto something about that number. There. There

0:45:22.040 --> 0:45:24.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a way in which the two dollars makes it

0:45:24.280 --> 0:45:27.560
<v Speaker 1>even worse, because again, even if you don't believe in

0:45:27.600 --> 0:45:32.160
<v Speaker 1>any sort of supernatural immaterial soul, the deal would represent

0:45:32.200 --> 0:45:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a kind of symbolic low ball valuing of yourself. You're

0:45:36.239 --> 0:45:38.719
<v Speaker 1>just saying like, I'm not worth very much, and that

0:45:38.800 --> 0:45:41.520
<v Speaker 1>hurts you to say, even in a symbolic way where

0:45:41.520 --> 0:45:44.920
<v Speaker 1>you can tear up the contract afterwards. Then to come

0:45:44.960 --> 0:45:46.680
<v Speaker 1>back on the other side, though, I did find a

0:45:46.719 --> 0:45:50.400
<v Speaker 1>study that seemed, at least at least on its surface value,

0:45:50.880 --> 0:45:53.359
<v Speaker 1>to sort of line up with the idea of of

0:45:53.480 --> 0:45:56.239
<v Speaker 1>valuing souls and things like that at a at a

0:45:56.280 --> 0:46:00.240
<v Speaker 1>dog matter or deontological level rather than a moral reasoning lele.

0:46:00.640 --> 0:46:03.120
<v Speaker 1>And this was an fMRI I cognition study, which, of

0:46:03.160 --> 0:46:05.520
<v Speaker 1>course we've learned to always be somewhat careful about not

0:46:05.600 --> 0:46:08.160
<v Speaker 1>rely too much on just one or two studies like

0:46:08.200 --> 0:46:12.000
<v Speaker 1>this about a subject, but look for some corroboration. But

0:46:12.120 --> 0:46:15.320
<v Speaker 1>this study was in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society

0:46:15.360 --> 0:46:20.200
<v Speaker 1>b Biological Sciences in twelve by Gregory S. Burns, Emily Bell, C.

0:46:20.400 --> 0:46:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Monica Capra, Michael J. Preetula, Sarah Moore, Brittany Anderson, Jeremy

0:46:24.920 --> 0:46:29.080
<v Speaker 1>gin j Son Scott A trend and the short version

0:46:29.120 --> 0:46:33.000
<v Speaker 1>of this is that the the authors of the study

0:46:33.040 --> 0:46:37.280
<v Speaker 1>put people in f MRI machines and then offered them

0:46:37.440 --> 0:46:40.120
<v Speaker 1>sums of money that would actually be paid out, so

0:46:40.120 --> 0:46:44.040
<v Speaker 1>people would get real money in exchange for symbolically making

0:46:44.200 --> 0:46:48.440
<v Speaker 1>statements that were about sort of sacred type values, deeply

0:46:48.480 --> 0:46:52.719
<v Speaker 1>held personal values, but making statements that disagreed with their

0:46:52.760 --> 0:46:57.080
<v Speaker 1>actual positions. And people were very resistant to doing this

0:46:57.160 --> 0:47:00.400
<v Speaker 1>in some cases for understandable reasons. I think a lot

0:47:00.440 --> 0:47:02.279
<v Speaker 1>of them along the lines of things we've just been

0:47:02.320 --> 0:47:05.359
<v Speaker 1>talking about. And they found that quote. Using fMRI I

0:47:05.440 --> 0:47:08.760
<v Speaker 1>we found that values that people refuse to sell sacred

0:47:08.840 --> 0:47:13.360
<v Speaker 1>values were associated with increased activity in the left tempo

0:47:13.440 --> 0:47:18.759
<v Speaker 1>parietal junction in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex regions previously associated with

0:47:18.920 --> 0:47:24.040
<v Speaker 1>semantic rule retrieval. This suggests that sacred values affect behavior

0:47:24.120 --> 0:47:28.200
<v Speaker 1>through retrieval and processing of deontic rules, and not through

0:47:28.360 --> 0:47:33.480
<v Speaker 1>utilitarian evaluation of costs and benefits. So I think this finding,

0:47:33.840 --> 0:47:35.879
<v Speaker 1>to the extent that is valid, would tend to line

0:47:35.960 --> 0:47:38.960
<v Speaker 1>up more with the idea that when ideas about a

0:47:39.000 --> 0:47:43.040
<v Speaker 1>sacred substance are concerned the idea of like surrendering something

0:47:43.120 --> 0:47:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that is a deeply held value to yourself, you're more

0:47:47.080 --> 0:47:49.120
<v Speaker 1>likely to just use the part of your brain where

0:47:49.160 --> 0:47:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you intuitively automatically check the rules in your knowledge, versus

0:47:53.600 --> 0:47:55.879
<v Speaker 1>the part of your brain that you use to sort

0:47:55.880 --> 0:47:59.640
<v Speaker 1>of think through the pros and cons of things. But anyway,

0:48:00.200 --> 0:48:02.359
<v Speaker 1>I guess to wrap up this section, would you sell

0:48:02.400 --> 0:48:05.279
<v Speaker 1>your soul for a donut? Know? What would you sell

0:48:05.320 --> 0:48:07.239
<v Speaker 1>your soul for? What kind of pastry would it have

0:48:07.320 --> 0:48:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to be? It has to be a pastry? I mean,

0:48:09.600 --> 0:48:13.640
<v Speaker 1>what about a really good queen of mom? I mean,

0:48:14.560 --> 0:48:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if if my my souls being sold either way,

0:48:18.200 --> 0:48:20.719
<v Speaker 1>like it's a must sell situation and I have to

0:48:20.760 --> 0:48:23.439
<v Speaker 1>pick a pastry, I mean I'm gonna go with something big,

0:48:23.520 --> 0:48:26.239
<v Speaker 1>like I'm gonna go with like a big moon cake. Um,

0:48:26.719 --> 0:48:28.720
<v Speaker 1>one that's about the size of a like a dinner

0:48:28.760 --> 0:48:32.320
<v Speaker 1>table or something, you know, some sort of record setting pastry.

0:48:32.360 --> 0:48:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh what about one of those like Guinness book parking

0:48:34.520 --> 0:48:37.480
<v Speaker 1>lot sized pizzas? How about that? Now? Nothing that big

0:48:37.520 --> 0:48:39.960
<v Speaker 1>any anytime there's a food that that looks like you

0:48:40.000 --> 0:48:43.480
<v Speaker 1>had to use like shovels or and or buckets to

0:48:43.600 --> 0:48:45.719
<v Speaker 1>bake it or prepare it, I'm just I'm not really

0:48:45.760 --> 0:48:49.440
<v Speaker 1>fill you with confidence. Yeah, it needs the food needs

0:48:49.480 --> 0:48:53.120
<v Speaker 1>to have been made with actual culinary instruments and tools

0:48:53.400 --> 0:48:55.799
<v Speaker 1>and not things from the hardware store. Now is that

0:48:55.920 --> 0:48:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a conclusion that you reasoned your way to or is

0:48:58.160 --> 0:49:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that a deontological judgment? It's the ladder, but I'd agree

0:49:01.320 --> 0:49:04.120
<v Speaker 1>with you. I think it's based on watching videos of

0:49:04.160 --> 0:49:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the of some of these records setting baking or cooking projects,

0:49:08.680 --> 0:49:12.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, really dirty. Yeah, get being turned off by

0:49:12.280 --> 0:49:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the idea of somebody using something that even if it's

0:49:15.000 --> 0:49:18.120
<v Speaker 1>pristine and it's been sterilized, like you're not supposed to

0:49:18.239 --> 0:49:20.920
<v Speaker 1>use a shovel to stir a chili, you know that

0:49:21.040 --> 0:49:23.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. This is really funny. This comes exactly

0:49:23.719 --> 0:49:25.840
<v Speaker 1>back to the cockroach thing. So would you dip a

0:49:25.880 --> 0:49:28.960
<v Speaker 1>sterilized cockroach in your apple juice and drink it? You know, No,

0:49:29.160 --> 0:49:32.399
<v Speaker 1>you'd feel like that's ikey somehow, even though it's sterilized.

0:49:32.840 --> 0:49:35.319
<v Speaker 1>I've worked in restaurants before, and there are moments in

0:49:35.320 --> 0:49:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a restaurant because you have to create huge portions of

0:49:37.520 --> 0:49:39.239
<v Speaker 1>things that you'll be mixing up a sauce or a

0:49:39.320 --> 0:49:42.239
<v Speaker 1>soup or something in buckets or even in a garbage

0:49:42.280 --> 0:49:45.440
<v Speaker 1>can or something like that, and it's just like, no, no,

0:49:45.640 --> 0:49:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you can't feed that to people. It is clean, they

0:49:48.160 --> 0:49:51.760
<v Speaker 1>clean it, but it just doesn't seem right. I agree,

0:49:51.800 --> 0:49:53.719
<v Speaker 1>I would. I would prefer not to know about that

0:49:53.920 --> 0:49:59.000
<v Speaker 1>with my my my favorite restaurants. Don't go in the kitchen.

0:49:59.040 --> 0:50:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Then all right, we're gonna take a quick break, but

0:50:01.640 --> 0:50:07.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll be right back and we're all right. Well that

0:50:08.120 --> 0:50:12.120
<v Speaker 1>that selection was definitely infernal, but I think in in

0:50:12.160 --> 0:50:14.920
<v Speaker 1>a in a in a way, our next selection is

0:50:14.960 --> 0:50:19.160
<v Speaker 1>also pretty infernal. So uh, you know, generally, speaking with

0:50:19.160 --> 0:50:22.560
<v Speaker 1>with horror anthology films, you have kind of a smartist

0:50:22.680 --> 0:50:26.359
<v Speaker 1>board of horror that's presented. In some cases the filmmakers

0:50:26.400 --> 0:50:29.480
<v Speaker 1>clearly just cobbled together some some short horror films with

0:50:29.520 --> 0:50:33.239
<v Speaker 1>a shaky framing narrative or a creepy host. Otherwise, the

0:50:33.239 --> 0:50:36.840
<v Speaker 1>theme might be the author themselves. Uh, you know, it

0:50:36.920 --> 0:50:39.319
<v Speaker 1>might be okay, these are three stories from Stephen King,

0:50:39.400 --> 0:50:43.080
<v Speaker 1>or these are three stories from Richard Matheson. Other times,

0:50:43.400 --> 0:50:46.000
<v Speaker 1>it's more of a cultural or regional themes, such as

0:50:46.000 --> 0:50:49.640
<v Speaker 1>say the film Three Extremes, which features East Asian horror tales.

0:50:50.920 --> 0:50:55.680
<v Speaker 1>And then there is the Uncanny, from which is I

0:50:56.360 --> 0:50:59.160
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's pretty singular. I think it might be

0:50:59.200 --> 0:51:02.280
<v Speaker 1>one of a kind because it is. It's certainly unlike

0:51:02.320 --> 0:51:05.440
<v Speaker 1>any other horror anthology film that I've watched or I

0:51:05.480 --> 0:51:09.160
<v Speaker 1>am aware of, because the framing narrative and all three

0:51:09.200 --> 0:51:14.400
<v Speaker 1>segments are devoted entirely to murderous house cats. It's true,

0:51:14.880 --> 0:51:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and and I've watched the whole thing. Yeah, it is

0:51:18.520 --> 0:51:22.480
<v Speaker 1>eighty eight minutes of feline cinematic terror. It's wall to

0:51:22.560 --> 0:51:27.280
<v Speaker 1>wall cat sounds, cat based jump scares, creepy music combined

0:51:27.280 --> 0:51:31.080
<v Speaker 1>with cat close ups, and some otherwise very talented actors

0:51:31.160 --> 0:51:34.560
<v Speaker 1>reacting to cat to cats scares, and of course cats

0:51:34.640 --> 0:51:37.000
<v Speaker 1>jumping out and slashing them to Jesus out of people.

0:51:37.520 --> 0:51:39.879
<v Speaker 1>A lot of times with real cats that are clear.

0:51:39.960 --> 0:51:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are a lot of cats in this film,

0:51:42.080 --> 0:51:45.359
<v Speaker 1>probably more cats in scenes in this film than I've

0:51:45.360 --> 0:51:48.839
<v Speaker 1>ever seen, uh in a movie before. Though I would

0:51:48.880 --> 0:51:51.480
<v Speaker 1>say also lots of cats in close up. And I

0:51:51.520 --> 0:51:54.200
<v Speaker 1>think these close ups were filmed separately than the rest

0:51:54.200 --> 0:51:56.200
<v Speaker 1>of the movies, So they just got lots of close

0:51:56.280 --> 0:52:00.480
<v Speaker 1>ups of cats meowing, hissing, swatting at things, and then

0:52:00.520 --> 0:52:02.920
<v Speaker 1>cut those in with the drama that was going on,

0:52:02.960 --> 0:52:05.520
<v Speaker 1>which did still involve some cats, which I'm sure was

0:52:05.560 --> 0:52:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a nightmare. Yeah, this is this production was clearly a nightmare. Um.

0:52:11.120 --> 0:52:13.960
<v Speaker 1>The result is is I will say it's it's very watchable.

0:52:14.000 --> 0:52:16.680
<v Speaker 1>It's a film in the tradition of the the Amicist productions.

0:52:17.120 --> 0:52:19.800
<v Speaker 1>It has Peter Cushing in, it has Donald Pleasant some

0:52:19.840 --> 0:52:25.759
<v Speaker 1>other actors of note. Um, it's it's very well made. UM.

0:52:25.840 --> 0:52:29.880
<v Speaker 1>And I it's it's interesting. I'd forgotten about this film

0:52:29.920 --> 0:52:31.799
<v Speaker 1>and then I when I was researching it and kind

0:52:31.840 --> 0:52:34.360
<v Speaker 1>of rediscovered it, I realized that I had in fact

0:52:34.440 --> 0:52:37.799
<v Speaker 1>seen the first segment, and the first segment is the

0:52:37.800 --> 0:52:40.840
<v Speaker 1>one that I rewatched for this episode. I think I

0:52:40.960 --> 0:52:44.000
<v Speaker 1>caught it on A and E back when I was

0:52:44.040 --> 0:52:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a kid, or when I was in junior high and

0:52:45.520 --> 0:52:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I remember being creeped out at the time, and it

0:52:47.840 --> 0:52:50.239
<v Speaker 1>it is still effectively creepy. It is a it is

0:52:50.360 --> 0:52:53.799
<v Speaker 1>essentially an animals attack film. Yes, but with cats. It's

0:52:53.880 --> 0:52:57.879
<v Speaker 1>Jaws with cats. Yeah, it's the birds but instead cats. Oh,

0:52:57.880 --> 0:52:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the birds is a better comparison because there's not just

0:53:00.040 --> 0:53:03.680
<v Speaker 1>one cat. There are many many cats. By the way,

0:53:03.680 --> 0:53:06.880
<v Speaker 1>this came out in ninety seven. Again, uh, that is

0:53:06.920 --> 0:53:09.399
<v Speaker 1>the same year that Stephen King published a short story

0:53:09.400 --> 0:53:12.600
<v Speaker 1>about a killer cat, The Cat from Hell. Uh, came

0:53:12.640 --> 0:53:15.520
<v Speaker 1>out in the magazine Cavalier, and this would later be

0:53:15.640 --> 0:53:19.000
<v Speaker 1>adapted into the in the excellent horror anthology film Tales

0:53:19.040 --> 0:53:21.799
<v Speaker 1>from the Dark Side the Movie with Buster Point Exter

0:53:22.160 --> 0:53:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and William Hickey. Um, it's it's terrible, but but good.

0:53:26.360 --> 0:53:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I really want to spoil the ending of that segment,

0:53:28.440 --> 0:53:31.319
<v Speaker 1>but I won't. Yeah, it's a it's pretty it's pretty great.

0:53:31.600 --> 0:53:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh you know. Actually, Tales on the Dark Side of

0:53:33.520 --> 0:53:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the Movie is definitely worth checking out. Not so much

0:53:37.040 --> 0:53:39.440
<v Speaker 1>for this for for this one for the Cat from Hell,

0:53:39.880 --> 0:53:42.400
<v Speaker 1>but it has a wonderful gargoyle story that I think

0:53:42.400 --> 0:53:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I've mentioned before that is essentially a retelling of a

0:53:46.040 --> 0:53:49.479
<v Speaker 1>of a Japanese ghost story about the frost made. Yes,

0:53:49.680 --> 0:53:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the first segment I believe is the Mummy one that's

0:53:52.640 --> 0:53:55.080
<v Speaker 1>just star studded. It's got lots of one's well known

0:53:55.120 --> 0:53:57.959
<v Speaker 1>actors and it doesn't have like Christian Slater and Steve

0:53:58.000 --> 0:54:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Bushimmy and people. Christian Slater's definitely in it. Yeah, that

0:54:01.560 --> 0:54:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that Mummy tale, very loosely based on Sir Arthur Conan

0:54:05.400 --> 0:54:09.399
<v Speaker 1>Doyle's work is is pretty terrific in that I find

0:54:09.400 --> 0:54:12.799
<v Speaker 1>that it would be one of the few, certainly, yeah,

0:54:12.920 --> 0:54:14.880
<v Speaker 1>really one of the few Mummy tales where they do

0:54:14.920 --> 0:54:17.759
<v Speaker 1>a good job of making the Mummy scary. Uh As

0:54:17.800 --> 0:54:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I recall, like the Mummy at one point, like Star

0:54:20.480 --> 0:54:23.640
<v Speaker 1>it stalks up on somebody and removes their brain through

0:54:23.680 --> 0:54:27.080
<v Speaker 1>their nostril with like a coat hanger um, which I

0:54:27.080 --> 0:54:29.200
<v Speaker 1>thought was a nice touch, you know, alluding to it

0:54:29.280 --> 0:54:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to the practices of mummification that the ancient Egyptians employed. Yeah,

0:54:33.880 --> 0:54:36.359
<v Speaker 1>one of my other favorite Mummy movies actually is the

0:54:36.360 --> 0:54:38.680
<v Speaker 1>one that I've got the poster of right next to

0:54:38.680 --> 0:54:44.160
<v Speaker 1>me right now. Lamelodicion de feron the nineteen British Mummy

0:54:43.360 --> 0:54:46.240
<v Speaker 1>if it I think it's hammer. If it's not hammer,

0:54:46.280 --> 0:54:49.280
<v Speaker 1>it's very hammer adjacent. Via the cast. It's got Peter Cushing,

0:54:49.640 --> 0:54:52.680
<v Speaker 1>it's got Christopher Lee, it's it's it's fantastic, all right. Well,

0:54:52.719 --> 0:54:54.680
<v Speaker 1>speaking of Peter Cushing, let me let me go and

0:54:54.760 --> 0:54:58.800
<v Speaker 1>roll out there. The framing narrative for the uncanny Peter Cushing,

0:54:59.000 --> 0:55:01.840
<v Speaker 1>who again it always a class act, always elevates anything

0:55:01.840 --> 0:55:05.040
<v Speaker 1>he's part of. In this he plays a nervous author

0:55:05.160 --> 0:55:09.320
<v Speaker 1>named Wilburg Ray who has a new manuscript about cats,

0:55:09.360 --> 0:55:14.240
<v Speaker 1>about how they're actually evil supernatural creatures. They're the devil

0:55:14.280 --> 0:55:17.680
<v Speaker 1>in disguise. They're out to get us and cooshing places

0:55:17.800 --> 0:55:21.520
<v Speaker 1>very well, convincingly, coming off as extremely jumpy and sleep

0:55:21.560 --> 0:55:26.160
<v Speaker 1>deprived due to the lingering threat of feline assassination. It

0:55:26.200 --> 0:55:28.640
<v Speaker 1>has all the he has all the air and seriousness

0:55:28.840 --> 0:55:31.160
<v Speaker 1>of a character in a spy movie, you know who's

0:55:31.160 --> 0:55:34.760
<v Speaker 1>like a defect or pursued by shadowy figures through the streets,

0:55:35.000 --> 0:55:38.080
<v Speaker 1>though in instead of being like weird looking agents and

0:55:38.120 --> 0:55:41.640
<v Speaker 1>trench coats, it's cats. It's stray cats and house cats

0:55:41.680 --> 0:55:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that are that are stalking him at every turn. It's

0:55:44.080 --> 0:55:47.520
<v Speaker 1>what are the thirty nine steps and they're they're all cats. Yeah,

0:55:47.800 --> 0:55:51.359
<v Speaker 1>but uh, I will say this movie makes one grievous

0:55:51.560 --> 0:55:54.040
<v Speaker 1>error with respect to Peter Cushing, which is that he

0:55:54.080 --> 0:55:57.240
<v Speaker 1>has a scraggly beard in it. And Peter Cushing should

0:55:57.239 --> 0:56:00.680
<v Speaker 1>always be clean shaven. He does not need facial Having

0:56:00.719 --> 0:56:04.800
<v Speaker 1>facial hair on Peter Cushing is like having Michael Myer's

0:56:04.800 --> 0:56:07.359
<v Speaker 1>wheeled and knife. But it's in a sheath, is just

0:56:07.640 --> 0:56:10.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, it doesn't really capture what you're using Peter

0:56:10.840 --> 0:56:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Cushing for. Yeah, So those face angles, they should be naked.

0:56:16.120 --> 0:56:19.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's the basic setup. He comes he comes to

0:56:19.200 --> 0:56:23.000
<v Speaker 1>his publisher's house apartment to talk about this this manuscript,

0:56:23.280 --> 0:56:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and of course the publisher has a cat which is

0:56:25.560 --> 0:56:28.719
<v Speaker 1>creeping at him out even more, and he proceeds to

0:56:29.120 --> 0:56:32.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about three different cases that are discussed in his book.

0:56:32.760 --> 0:56:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Each one is a segment about murderous cats. Um. The

0:56:36.760 --> 0:56:39.239
<v Speaker 1>only one that I rewatched for this episode is the

0:56:39.280 --> 0:56:42.800
<v Speaker 1>first one, which is terrific. It takes place in London

0:56:43.080 --> 0:56:45.880
<v Speaker 1>in nineve and in this one, we have a wealthy

0:56:45.920 --> 0:56:48.239
<v Speaker 1>old woman who decides to leave her a state to

0:56:48.320 --> 0:56:51.480
<v Speaker 1>her mini pet cats, who are sadly mistreated by the

0:56:51.520 --> 0:56:54.600
<v Speaker 1>maid turns out the maid is in league with the

0:56:54.680 --> 0:56:58.239
<v Speaker 1>old woman's nephew, who's uh, he's kind of a scoundrel

0:56:58.360 --> 0:57:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and you know, squandering his money. He's he's he's a

0:57:01.400 --> 0:57:05.440
<v Speaker 1>bad dude, and he was set to inherit everything before

0:57:05.440 --> 0:57:08.359
<v Speaker 1>this new will was put in place. Well, the maid

0:57:08.480 --> 0:57:10.919
<v Speaker 1>catches wind of this new plan. She hears the old

0:57:10.960 --> 0:57:14.160
<v Speaker 1>woman talking to her attorney about it, so she tells

0:57:14.160 --> 0:57:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the nephew, and the nephew tasks her then with stealing

0:57:17.960 --> 0:57:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the new will because it's it's assumed that the old

0:57:22.320 --> 0:57:24.200
<v Speaker 1>lady is not going to live that long and we

0:57:24.240 --> 0:57:26.560
<v Speaker 1>can just get this new will out of the picture.

0:57:26.920 --> 0:57:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Then you know, the nephew will get all the money,

0:57:29.240 --> 0:57:31.160
<v Speaker 1>everything will be fine, and they'll like run off into

0:57:31.160 --> 0:57:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the sunset together. Right, So what does she do? She

0:57:34.000 --> 0:57:36.720
<v Speaker 1>decides to steal the will. So what she does is

0:57:36.760 --> 0:57:39.959
<v Speaker 1>she sneaks into the old woman's room at night, goes

0:57:40.000 --> 0:57:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to the safe, opens it up, gets the will out.

0:57:42.680 --> 0:57:45.600
<v Speaker 1>But then the old woman awakens, uh and so, and

0:57:45.640 --> 0:57:48.680
<v Speaker 1>surrounded by her many cats, accuses the maid. Well, the

0:57:48.680 --> 0:57:50.560
<v Speaker 1>maid says, well, I've got to go with plan B now,

0:57:50.800 --> 0:57:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and she smothers the old woman there in front of

0:57:52.960 --> 0:57:57.920
<v Speaker 1>her many cats. And the cats are immediately upset, you know,

0:57:58.160 --> 0:58:01.840
<v Speaker 1>they realize, whoa, we've overstepped your boundaries, you've killed this

0:58:01.880 --> 0:58:04.960
<v Speaker 1>old woman. And when the maid goes to pick up

0:58:05.640 --> 0:58:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the last will and testament on the floor, a cat,

0:58:09.960 --> 0:58:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a cat pop comes out and scratches her hand, and

0:58:12.280 --> 0:58:15.560
<v Speaker 1>she shrieks and draws back and she's bleeding at the hand.

0:58:15.800 --> 0:58:18.640
<v Speaker 1>She reaches out for it again. Cats wipes her hand

0:58:18.680 --> 0:58:22.280
<v Speaker 1>again and and and it's great because it's clearly like

0:58:22.360 --> 0:58:25.680
<v Speaker 1>a like a puppet of a cat's hand scratching her

0:58:26.040 --> 0:58:30.720
<v Speaker 1>um uh cats pomp uh and uh. And from there

0:58:30.760 --> 0:58:33.680
<v Speaker 1>it just becomes a full blown assault. You know, cats

0:58:33.680 --> 0:58:37.080
<v Speaker 1>are leaping out at her, they're they're they're they're assaulting,

0:58:37.160 --> 0:58:39.760
<v Speaker 1>or they're they're chasing her around the house. She ends

0:58:39.800 --> 0:58:42.920
<v Speaker 1>up barricading herself in the larder and for some reason,

0:58:43.480 --> 0:58:45.360
<v Speaker 1>like she's in there long enough that she's forced to

0:58:45.360 --> 0:58:46.800
<v Speaker 1>eat what I what I think is supposed to be

0:58:46.880 --> 0:58:50.160
<v Speaker 1>cat food on bread in order to survive. There just

0:58:50.480 --> 0:58:54.120
<v Speaker 1>jars and jars of these earthenware jars of wet cat

0:58:54.240 --> 0:59:00.080
<v Speaker 1>food covered with like cloth and twine. Yeah. Wait, just

0:59:00.560 --> 0:59:03.640
<v Speaker 1>it's ridiculous. Because like, why are you spreading that on

0:59:03.680 --> 0:59:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the biscuit. Just eat the biscuits if you're starving because

0:59:06.800 --> 0:59:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you're barricaded in her room by cats, Like, just eat

0:59:09.520 --> 0:59:11.880
<v Speaker 1>all the biscuits up first, and then you can think

0:59:11.880 --> 0:59:14.840
<v Speaker 1>of like she's she's playing a weird long game of

0:59:14.920 --> 0:59:18.560
<v Speaker 1>forcing herself to eat cat food. Yeah, there's a bread box.

0:59:18.840 --> 0:59:20.800
<v Speaker 1>She like gets out the bread box, and it's funny

0:59:20.800 --> 0:59:22.480
<v Speaker 1>because when she gets it out, you think she's gonna

0:59:22.520 --> 0:59:25.560
<v Speaker 1>do something with the bread box, like climb up on

0:59:25.600 --> 0:59:27.240
<v Speaker 1>it to get out the window or something. But no,

0:59:27.400 --> 0:59:30.080
<v Speaker 1>she just gets bread out and then and then spreads

0:59:30.080 --> 0:59:32.320
<v Speaker 1>cat food on it. Now, so she hangs out in

0:59:32.360 --> 0:59:36.480
<v Speaker 1>there for a while, presumably like days, I don't know. Finally,

0:59:36.840 --> 0:59:39.280
<v Speaker 1>she's listening at the door. Seems like things have calmed down,

0:59:39.320 --> 0:59:41.760
<v Speaker 1>so she creeps out with a knife, goes back up

0:59:41.800 --> 0:59:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the stairs and tries once more to grab the will,

0:59:44.720 --> 0:59:47.640
<v Speaker 1>but the cats disarmor. She runs away. I think she

0:59:47.720 --> 0:59:51.520
<v Speaker 1>falls down the stairs. Uh, But before she does, she

0:59:51.560 --> 0:59:54.360
<v Speaker 1>sees that the cats have of course begun to eat

0:59:54.480 --> 0:59:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the old woman who is dead in the bed. Finally,

0:59:58.480 --> 1:00:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the police break down the door. The lawyer and the

1:00:01.120 --> 1:00:05.400
<v Speaker 1>nephew show up. Uh. They're you know, horrified when they

1:00:05.560 --> 1:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>find the body of the maid. But the nephew, he's

1:00:07.440 --> 1:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>only got one thing on his mind, so he runs upstairs,

1:00:10.280 --> 1:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>goes into the bedroom where the old woman has been

1:00:13.240 --> 1:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>munched down by the cats. Uh, and he sees the

1:00:15.800 --> 1:00:17.640
<v Speaker 1>will on the floor. He goes to get it, cat

1:00:17.720 --> 1:00:21.600
<v Speaker 1>jumps onto his neck, rips his jugular open, and he dies.

1:00:22.400 --> 1:00:24.640
<v Speaker 1>We also find that once they go up there, they

1:00:24.680 --> 1:00:28.320
<v Speaker 1>discover the cats have also eaten the whole made They've

1:00:28.360 --> 1:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>just stripped her flesh like piranhas, and and it apparently

1:00:33.120 --> 1:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>has happened in a matter of seconds. Yeah, so it's ridiculous,

1:00:38.480 --> 1:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's it's terrific. You know that these cats

1:00:41.000 --> 1:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>are not only are they they they sinister and murderous,

1:00:44.320 --> 1:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>but they also understand that they have a legal claim

1:00:48.280 --> 1:00:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to this house and the woman's estate, and they are

1:00:51.520 --> 1:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>willing to to to murder to protect it. Yeah, that's

1:00:54.400 --> 1:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>something I wasn't sure about. It. It does suggest that

1:00:57.560 --> 1:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the cats understand the legal ramifications of what's going on,

1:01:02.720 --> 1:01:04.960
<v Speaker 1>And I guess this ties in with the framing narrative,

1:01:05.520 --> 1:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>which is Peter Cushing's idea that that cats secretly understand

1:01:09.560 --> 1:01:13.400
<v Speaker 1>everything and run the world, and that they're listening. Now

1:01:13.600 --> 1:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>you you watch the other segments that are they stand

1:01:17.160 --> 1:01:19.480
<v Speaker 1>out at all, like like I felt like I hadn't

1:01:19.520 --> 1:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I've had enough, you know, like my eyes would be

1:01:21.920 --> 1:01:23.680
<v Speaker 1>bigger than my stomach if I if I kept going.

1:01:23.880 --> 1:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's a I'd say the movie is very

1:01:26.440 --> 1:01:29.760
<v Speaker 1>front loaded on the cats, because the first segment is

1:01:29.840 --> 1:01:32.919
<v Speaker 1>just cats, cats, cats, and the next two segments are

1:01:33.000 --> 1:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>about cats, but they're not constantly tons of cats hissing

1:01:37.120 --> 1:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and screeching and me owing. There there's a little bit

1:01:39.920 --> 1:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>more with the human characters. The second segment has Charles

1:01:43.920 --> 1:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Bronson's daughter in it, and she plays like a girl

1:01:47.280 --> 1:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>who uh gets taken into a new home and is

1:01:51.240 --> 1:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>mistreated by the like the daughter who already lives there

1:01:54.440 --> 1:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and is and is she's very mean. She's like the

1:01:56.840 --> 1:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>mean daughter in in Jack Frost, and the mean daughter

1:02:01.040 --> 1:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>eventually gets punished by by Charles Bronson's daughter when she

1:02:05.720 --> 1:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>does a satanic ritual that like shrinks the mean girl

1:02:09.720 --> 1:02:11.800
<v Speaker 1>down to the size of a mouse and then is

1:02:11.840 --> 1:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>tormented by the cat. But ultimately she gets stepped on

1:02:15.200 --> 1:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>by a human, not by by a cat, and then Uh.

1:02:18.920 --> 1:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>That scene at that segment also has a scene where

1:02:21.480 --> 1:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the mean daughter is tormenting the main character with a

1:02:25.320 --> 1:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>remote control airplane. But while she's like supposedly controlling the airplane,

1:02:29.880 --> 1:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>you can actually see part of the airplane just poking

1:02:32.400 --> 1:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>into the frame, so it's just sitting right there in

1:02:34.440 --> 1:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>front of her. The third segment has Donald Pleasants and uh,

1:02:38.360 --> 1:02:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think I was texting you about this in

1:02:40.320 --> 1:02:43.800
<v Speaker 1>my phone auto corrected his name to Donald Pleasure, which

1:02:43.840 --> 1:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>is about right, because he is a pleasure. In this segment,

1:02:47.480 --> 1:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>he's wearing a red wig, so he's ginger Donald Pleasance.

1:02:52.360 --> 1:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>And he plays this vain actor who murders his wife

1:02:56.280 --> 1:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to try to get a beautiful, younger new wife. Uh.

1:02:59.800 --> 1:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>And he tries to. He's like he's hostile towards his

1:03:04.400 --> 1:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>dead wife's cat, but the cat gets revenge on him. Nice.

1:03:08.320 --> 1:03:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I believe there's a there's an iron maiden in this one, right, Yes, yes,

1:03:12.160 --> 1:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>there is an iron maiden, and uh, it's a prop

1:03:15.160 --> 1:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>iron maiden for use on a film set. But it

1:03:17.440 --> 1:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>turns out the spikes are actually metal and sharp, so

1:03:20.320 --> 1:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that when he gets closed inside it, or when somebody

1:03:22.840 --> 1:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>gets closed inside it, it impales them. Well, you know,

1:03:26.120 --> 1:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're a method actor, it's how you have to work. Yeah,

1:03:29.240 --> 1:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a really good scene in the third segment where

1:03:31.440 --> 1:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Donald Pleasants is demonstrating to a to a bad actress

1:03:35.360 --> 1:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>how to scream. People should just clip out that scene. Now.

1:03:39.440 --> 1:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to include a word a word of warning

1:03:41.520 --> 1:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>about this film. So this is very much an animal's

1:03:44.080 --> 1:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>attack film from nine seven. Now, some of you might

1:03:47.320 --> 1:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>have more experience than others with animal attacks films, but

1:03:50.480 --> 1:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>certainly the older animal attacks film you're gonna run into

1:03:53.880 --> 1:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>some some questions about animal handling. Uh, And you certainly

1:03:58.000 --> 1:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>get that vibe with this pretiction with this production, especially

1:04:01.240 --> 1:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>in that first segment, which again just has so many cats. Um,

1:04:05.280 --> 1:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>it must have just been a nightmare to film, because

1:04:08.080 --> 1:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I remember reading about the Cohen Brothers making inside Lewin

1:04:11.480 --> 1:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Davis and about just how much trouble they had shooting

1:04:15.000 --> 1:04:17.160
<v Speaker 1>one cat and getting one cat to do what they

1:04:17.240 --> 1:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>wanted to do. And in this segment of the nine

1:04:20.680 --> 1:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>twelve segment, they're just cats everywhere. It's just it's just

1:04:24.200 --> 1:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>awful to imagine. And I couldn't find anything concrete about

1:04:29.120 --> 1:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>cat mistreatment on the film. But um, imdbek has a

1:04:33.000 --> 1:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>has a bit in the Trivia claiming that cinematographer Harry

1:04:35.760 --> 1:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Waxman threatened to quit when he found that the production

1:04:38.200 --> 1:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>was mistreating the cats. But it's not cited, so I

1:04:40.680 --> 1:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know where he was saying that. I mean, I'm

1:04:43.480 --> 1:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>not particularly doubting it, I just don't have any evidence

1:04:46.760 --> 1:04:48.479
<v Speaker 1>to back that up. Well, I gotta say, I don't

1:04:48.480 --> 1:04:50.160
<v Speaker 1>know if that claim is true, And even if it

1:04:50.280 --> 1:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>is true, I thought it was phrased in an ambiguous way,

1:04:52.920 --> 1:04:54.840
<v Speaker 1>so I didn't know if that meant his objection was

1:04:54.880 --> 1:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to the production actually mistreating cats or to the fact

1:04:58.520 --> 1:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that the movie was about the mistreatment of cats. Right,

1:05:02.840 --> 1:05:06.840
<v Speaker 1>but but certainly just so many cats being used. Uh,

1:05:07.080 --> 1:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>it does raise a red flag because if you know cats,

1:05:09.840 --> 1:05:12.600
<v Speaker 1>cats in general do not want to be a part

1:05:12.600 --> 1:05:15.720
<v Speaker 1>of your stupid movie project. They aren't even interested in

1:05:15.760 --> 1:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>watching your stupid movies unless you have some good high

1:05:18.320 --> 1:05:21.840
<v Speaker 1>deaf bird or road in action. Um, you know, about

1:05:21.840 --> 1:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the most that they'll do is they'll they'll tolerate setting

1:05:24.320 --> 1:05:26.240
<v Speaker 1>on you during a film if you if you don't

1:05:26.320 --> 1:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>laugh too much. So I would say, if you're if

1:05:29.160 --> 1:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you're sensitive to this sort of thing. Just skip this

1:05:31.160 --> 1:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>one all the way. Um. A plus on top of

1:05:34.600 --> 1:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>all this, the fiction of the film involves conflict between

1:05:38.320 --> 1:05:43.040
<v Speaker 1>humans and house cats. Um, so you know it's it's

1:05:43.040 --> 1:05:45.480
<v Speaker 1>going to deal with the idea of like your your

1:05:45.520 --> 1:05:49.160
<v Speaker 1>fur babies as vicious murderers and something that you would

1:05:49.200 --> 1:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>have to combat. Well. On the other side, though, I

1:05:52.000 --> 1:05:55.640
<v Speaker 1>would say that the cats in essentially all three segments

1:05:55.760 --> 1:05:59.160
<v Speaker 1>are to the extent that there is a protagonist, the

1:05:59.200 --> 1:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>cats are the protect agonists and the human character. It's

1:06:01.960 --> 1:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>like Tales from the Crypt The human protagonists are bad

1:06:04.640 --> 1:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>people who are getting punished for their antagonism towards cats,

1:06:09.440 --> 1:06:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and the cats win. Yeah, it's I I feel like

1:06:12.320 --> 1:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of a golden rule of evil cat

1:06:15.160 --> 1:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>um horror fiction, right The cats need to win, like

1:06:18.720 --> 1:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the cats never losen. Yeah, I mean that's the case

1:06:22.600 --> 1:06:25.160
<v Speaker 1>with the cat from hell. Um. I don't know if

1:06:25.240 --> 1:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>to have some listeners chime in on this one. I

1:06:26.880 --> 1:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>think if they can think of any examples where, uh,

1:06:30.440 --> 1:06:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the evil cat doesn't win, I cannot think of one.

1:06:33.080 --> 1:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it seems like a very ancient meme

1:06:35.960 --> 1:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the cat came back. There is always the cats just

1:06:38.360 --> 1:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>always gonna win, all right. So I think we've established

1:06:41.600 --> 1:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>what this film is and what it's all about. It's

1:06:44.240 --> 1:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>time to start thinking deeply about it. So. Um, the

1:06:48.680 --> 1:06:51.040
<v Speaker 1>first question that I think arises from all of this,

1:06:51.200 --> 1:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>especially that first segment when in which again cats clearly

1:06:55.280 --> 1:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>just straight up murder two people. Um, has a house

1:07:00.040 --> 1:07:03.160
<v Speaker 1>at ever killed a human? Uh? And then I think

1:07:03.160 --> 1:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>this is a pretty interesting question to look into. Uh.

1:07:05.520 --> 1:07:07.280
<v Speaker 1>And there have been a couple of articles at least

1:07:07.360 --> 1:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>that have have examined it. Mike Pearl that a solid

1:07:11.280 --> 1:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>article for Vice about five years ago on this topic,

1:07:13.680 --> 1:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>talking to some experts about not just the historical matters here,

1:07:17.960 --> 1:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>but also just the physical attack capabilities of cats and

1:07:21.200 --> 1:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>their jaws and their teeth. The consensus seems to be

1:07:24.400 --> 1:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that that, okay, there are a few situations where cats

1:07:29.440 --> 1:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>have been linked to human deaths. For example, there are

1:07:32.280 --> 1:07:36.480
<v Speaker 1>reports of cats accidentally smothering babies by laying on them,

1:07:36.760 --> 1:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and this seems to have given rise to the you know,

1:07:39.000 --> 1:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the long standing superstition that cats suck out of child's

1:07:42.080 --> 1:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>breath when they sleep. This, of course, was also part

1:07:44.800 --> 1:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of the plot for Stephen King's Cat's Eye. Oh yeah,

1:07:48.200 --> 1:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>but of course The twist there is that the cat,

1:07:50.400 --> 1:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the cat is is said to be the one sucking

1:07:52.720 --> 1:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>out her life essence, but really it's a troll and

1:07:54.920 --> 1:07:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the cat is the bodyguard protecting her from the troll. Right,

1:07:58.600 --> 1:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>So so that's that's one area where you can say, Okay,

1:08:01.320 --> 1:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>this is an example where house cats have been linked

1:08:03.640 --> 1:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to human deaths. Some people have also died from infections

1:08:07.080 --> 1:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>caused by cats, such as rabies, but no human in

1:08:10.760 --> 1:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>all of recorded history has ever been like straight up

1:08:14.360 --> 1:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>attacked and killed by a housecat. Doesn't mean it hasn't happened,

1:08:18.720 --> 1:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't seem to have happened in a way

1:08:21.160 --> 1:08:24.919
<v Speaker 1>that has been recorded and uh and has been made notable. Uh.

1:08:25.040 --> 1:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>And it basically comes back to the fact that cats,

1:08:28.200 --> 1:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>even a large housecat, simply doesn't have the bite strength

1:08:31.320 --> 1:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to pull this off, unlike something like a domestic dog,

1:08:35.080 --> 1:08:38.320
<v Speaker 1>which definitely does. I mean, even in the United States

1:08:39.120 --> 1:08:42.280
<v Speaker 1>dogs kill thirty to fifty people a year now. Brian

1:08:42.280 --> 1:08:45.479
<v Speaker 1>Palmer also wrote an article about this for Slate, and

1:08:45.560 --> 1:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>he he kicked off the article by pointing out that

1:08:47.720 --> 1:08:52.519
<v Speaker 1>in UH, an Illinois man allegedly plotted to murder an

1:08:52.600 --> 1:08:56.320
<v Speaker 1>attorney and frame the victims cat for the murder. So

1:08:56.439 --> 1:08:59.519
<v Speaker 1>not an example of cats actually murdering somebody, but somebody

1:08:59.560 --> 1:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>thinking they could they could use that to cover their

1:09:02.800 --> 1:09:05.240
<v Speaker 1>own track. That sounds very much like a segment that

1:09:05.280 --> 1:09:10.759
<v Speaker 1>would be in the Uncanny. Yeah. Um. Now, Palmer points

1:09:10.760 --> 1:09:13.960
<v Speaker 1>out that there have been cases where a human has

1:09:13.960 --> 1:09:16.599
<v Speaker 1>reportedly had a had a scrape with a cat, gotten

1:09:16.640 --> 1:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>into a fight with a cat essentially and have to

1:09:19.240 --> 1:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>have you know, some degree of of medical intervention. Uh.

1:09:24.120 --> 1:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand ten, a postpartum cat in Idaho bit

1:09:27.240 --> 1:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>her owner thirty five times. Uh. There was a two

1:09:29.840 --> 1:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand eleven case where a Cleveland man had to be

1:09:32.200 --> 1:09:35.960
<v Speaker 1>air left lifted following a housecat attack. Uh. I couldn't

1:09:35.960 --> 1:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>find a lot of details about either of those cases,

1:09:39.439 --> 1:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>by the way, Um, so some questions remain. But you know,

1:09:44.880 --> 1:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>really these two accounts don't give as much to go

1:09:46.880 --> 1:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>on for a variety of reasons. House cats may engage

1:09:50.320 --> 1:09:53.559
<v Speaker 1>in in you know, in in play aggressive behavior or

1:09:53.600 --> 1:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>even more legitimate aggressive behavior. They may act out in defense. Uh.

1:09:58.040 --> 1:10:01.560
<v Speaker 1>There is a threshold to how much of your nonsense

1:10:01.600 --> 1:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>that a cat is going to put up with a

1:10:03.800 --> 1:10:06.559
<v Speaker 1>cat may scratch you, and a cat scratches, nothing to

1:10:06.560 --> 1:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>sneeze at, certainly, but almost certainly not gonna be lethal. Right.

1:10:12.200 --> 1:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>It seems like the main area where you see enhanced

1:10:17.479 --> 1:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>danger from cats from from house cats is is the

1:10:21.200 --> 1:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>area of a cat getting underfoot. So such as when

1:10:24.360 --> 1:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>you're carrying stuff in carrying in groceries, or you're doing

1:10:26.960 --> 1:10:29.559
<v Speaker 1>something in the kitchen. I think about this a lot,

1:10:29.640 --> 1:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>like my cat is going to be the death of

1:10:31.200 --> 1:10:33.960
<v Speaker 1>me because she's under my feet when I'm trying to

1:10:34.000 --> 1:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>move like a um, you know, boiling spaghetti around the

1:10:37.160 --> 1:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>kitchen or something. Yes. Uh, and dogs can do this too.

1:10:40.640 --> 1:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>In fact, sometimes I noticed there's like an ironic attraction.

1:10:43.400 --> 1:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>It seems like dogs and cats often want to get

1:10:45.960 --> 1:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>under your feet right when you're doing something precarious, probably

1:10:49.040 --> 1:10:51.680
<v Speaker 1>because it like looks unusual if you've got like a

1:10:51.680 --> 1:10:54.439
<v Speaker 1>big package in your arms or something. Yeah, or with

1:10:54.479 --> 1:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a cat, it's like it's happening in the kitchen, it

1:10:56.479 --> 1:11:00.599
<v Speaker 1>might be food for me. So uh So I looked

1:11:00.600 --> 1:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>at this up a little bit, and I found a

1:11:02.320 --> 1:11:05.720
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nine report from the CDC that said that

1:11:05.920 --> 1:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>pet related falls involving both dogs and cats injure more

1:11:10.040 --> 1:11:13.519
<v Speaker 1>than eighty six thousand people annually. Now, this entails a

1:11:13.600 --> 1:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>number of pet activities, ranging from taking a dog on

1:11:17.160 --> 1:11:20.559
<v Speaker 1>a walk to stepping over a cat. Uh, and also

1:11:20.840 --> 1:11:23.600
<v Speaker 1>involves like chasing or running from animals. So there's a

1:11:23.600 --> 1:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>lot that that is entailed there um this particular right

1:11:28.040 --> 1:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>up says quote most falls involving cats occurred at home

1:11:31.120 --> 1:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>eighty five point seven percent. Approximately eleven point seven percent

1:11:34.880 --> 1:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of injuries occurred while persons were chasing cats. However, an

1:11:38.160 --> 1:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>activity was not specified. In sixty two point one percent

1:11:41.880 --> 1:11:45.479
<v Speaker 1>of cases, the most frequent circumstances were falling or tripping

1:11:45.560 --> 1:11:49.080
<v Speaker 1>over a cat. Twenty nine point two percent involved other

1:11:49.280 --> 1:11:52.479
<v Speaker 1>or unknown circumstances. Now, how many of those cases where

1:11:52.520 --> 1:11:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the cat caused to fall were due to someone trying

1:11:54.960 --> 1:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to frame a cat for murder? I don't know half um.

1:12:01.320 --> 1:12:03.519
<v Speaker 1>So the next question I have, of course, are our

1:12:03.640 --> 1:12:08.200
<v Speaker 1>cats supernatural? Are they actually the spawn of Satan? Obviously,

1:12:08.320 --> 1:12:10.919
<v Speaker 1>housecats are not the spawn of Satan. They're not magical,

1:12:11.760 --> 1:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>but of course they have. They have been long associated

1:12:13.960 --> 1:12:17.200
<v Speaker 1>with magical and or diabolical ideas, and a lot of

1:12:17.200 --> 1:12:20.640
<v Speaker 1>this seems to come from several different qualities that we

1:12:20.720 --> 1:12:24.960
<v Speaker 1>observe in cats. Um. So for starters, cats haven't been

1:12:24.960 --> 1:12:27.679
<v Speaker 1>domesticated as long as dogs and are by some estimates

1:12:27.680 --> 1:12:30.679
<v Speaker 1>self domesticating. So there's this idea that the the cat

1:12:30.800 --> 1:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>retains a certain amount of power over itself that we

1:12:34.000 --> 1:12:38.919
<v Speaker 1>might find suspicious or intimidating at times. Cats are obviously

1:12:39.040 --> 1:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>stealthy and uh and move around in ways that that

1:12:43.880 --> 1:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>we might have a difficulty, you know, detecting them, and

1:12:47.200 --> 1:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>they may play at hunting you especially, you know, a

1:12:50.280 --> 1:12:52.320
<v Speaker 1>house cat may do this, but I've seen outdoor cats

1:12:52.400 --> 1:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>engage in this kind of behavior as well, which can

1:12:54.320 --> 1:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>be maybe a trifle unnerving. Cats are also frequently active

1:12:58.200 --> 1:13:02.200
<v Speaker 1>at night, and their eyes have a reflective layer called

1:13:02.280 --> 1:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the tapatum lucidum that magnifies incoming light and is the

1:13:06.760 --> 1:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>reason you'll see this reflective, sometimes greenish glint to their

1:13:10.280 --> 1:13:12.639
<v Speaker 1>eyes at night, and it can certainly have a kind

1:13:12.640 --> 1:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of fairy fire look to it. Yeah, they've got the

1:13:15.120 --> 1:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>same thing that like spiders have. Yeah. Uh. And I

1:13:19.840 --> 1:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>think other things just to keep in mind is that,

1:13:22.160 --> 1:13:25.439
<v Speaker 1>of course cats are just really weird. Um. They're they're

1:13:25.520 --> 1:13:28.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of paranoid because they're in this weird space between

1:13:28.840 --> 1:13:32.200
<v Speaker 1>prey and predator. Um. And I feel like they're just

1:13:32.240 --> 1:13:34.200
<v Speaker 1>harder to read. Sometimes. I feel like you can you

1:13:34.200 --> 1:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>can kind of get to know a dog pretty well,

1:13:36.360 --> 1:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>but cats pose more mystery. Yeah, I mean, I think

1:13:39.920 --> 1:13:42.639
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it's just personality differences in the species.

1:13:42.680 --> 1:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Dogs tend to be much more social. They're the kind

1:13:45.040 --> 1:13:47.639
<v Speaker 1>of personality that, if they were a human, you describe

1:13:47.680 --> 1:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>as a person who's an open book. Uh. They're they're

1:13:50.200 --> 1:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>very outward about their emotions and all that. Cats read

1:13:54.920 --> 1:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to humans as a loof reserved kind of playing defense.

1:13:59.640 --> 1:14:01.759
<v Speaker 1>So we've read a lot into that over the years,

1:14:02.000 --> 1:14:04.840
<v Speaker 1>um and and as and it's comes now subroad that

1:14:04.880 --> 1:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you see cats featuring into various uh cultures and religions.

1:14:09.479 --> 1:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>We can identify a you know, wide variety of attitudes

1:14:12.280 --> 1:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and superstitions towards cats, and they range from divine qualities

1:14:16.240 --> 1:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>as identified by the ancient Egyptians, uh, you know, to

1:14:19.360 --> 1:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>just admirable qualities as identified by the prophet Muhammad. Uh.

1:14:23.960 --> 1:14:26.559
<v Speaker 1>He was said to have a loyal cat named Musa,

1:14:27.080 --> 1:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and there were various traditions and legends that were swapped

1:14:29.920 --> 1:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>around associated with Musa. I recommend researching that. It's pretty

1:14:35.640 --> 1:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty interesting in India. UM. As described in uh

1:14:40.320 --> 1:14:43.959
<v Speaker 1>Nanda Christiana's Excellent Sacred Animals of the India, the domestic

1:14:44.000 --> 1:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>cat is the vehicle of of Shash, the fertility goddess

1:14:49.040 --> 1:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>popular in parts of India. UM. So you know, you'll

1:14:51.760 --> 1:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>look at iconography of this particular goddess and you'll see

1:14:54.840 --> 1:14:57.439
<v Speaker 1>that they're clearly writing, you know, kind of standing on

1:14:57.680 --> 1:15:01.639
<v Speaker 1>a house cat. Interesting, however, or Christiana also writes that

1:15:02.360 --> 1:15:05.439
<v Speaker 1>in parts of India, a cat crossing one's path is

1:15:05.439 --> 1:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>still considered inauspicious. Though, so there's still a certain amount

1:15:09.400 --> 1:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of negative superstition wound up in cultural attitudes towards cats

1:15:13.320 --> 1:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>as well. But then, uh, there are a host of

1:15:17.000 --> 1:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>just superstitious cruelties involving cats. Um. In The Golden Bough,

1:15:22.680 --> 1:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>James Fraser wrote of French shepherd traditions that involve burning

1:15:27.360 --> 1:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>or roasting cats alive, and a bonfire is a way

1:15:30.120 --> 1:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to protect the flock against sickness and witchcraft. Yeah, that

1:15:33.320 --> 1:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>just seems to obviously tie into the historical association between

1:15:37.000 --> 1:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>cats and witchcraft. Cats often seen as the familiars of witches,

1:15:40.960 --> 1:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the familiar spirits. Yeah, either either they're working with the

1:15:44.880 --> 1:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>witches or they are themselves transformed witches. And so you

1:15:49.000 --> 1:15:53.920
<v Speaker 1>see this android I customs that survived throughout Europe. Uh.

1:15:54.479 --> 1:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>He points out that other animals, such as snakes and

1:15:56.920 --> 1:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>foxes suffered the same fate due to the same so

1:16:00.080 --> 1:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>siations with alleged witches. The cats are not witches, folks,

1:16:04.400 --> 1:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>They're they're they're keeping your basement rat free. Come on,

1:16:07.600 --> 1:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>what more could you want if you're gonna If you're

1:16:09.960 --> 1:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna air, I would say air on the side of

1:16:12.479 --> 1:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>believing your cat to be a tiny god, because they

1:16:15.360 --> 1:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly believe they're tiny gods. Uh. There's no excuse for

1:16:18.840 --> 1:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>cruelty to cats, be at your cat or somebody else's cat,

1:16:23.320 --> 1:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>be at a domestic purely domestic house cat, or a

1:16:26.400 --> 1:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>feral cat. Now, the next question, I guess kind of

1:16:29.080 --> 1:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the final question that the the uncanny makes me ponder,

1:16:33.520 --> 1:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>is this our cats vengeful? Can you know? Because these

1:16:38.000 --> 1:16:42.479
<v Speaker 1>are all tales of like cats enacting revenge cats leading

1:16:42.560 --> 1:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to the come uppance for villainous humans. Um. And it's

1:16:47.200 --> 1:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>really one that's that's interesting to think about because you

1:16:50.439 --> 1:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>actually hear about this a lot, if you know people

1:16:52.880 --> 1:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>with cats, if you yourself have cats, stories of cats

1:16:56.160 --> 1:17:00.719
<v Speaker 1>allegedly lashing out against their humans or particular human perhaps

1:17:00.800 --> 1:17:04.479
<v Speaker 1>peeing on something that they value or slashing something up

1:17:04.720 --> 1:17:09.120
<v Speaker 1>in retaliation to something they don't like. I've seen behavior

1:17:09.160 --> 1:17:11.680
<v Speaker 1>in cats that I've never seen in dogs, like a

1:17:12.200 --> 1:17:15.160
<v Speaker 1>cat being angry at being bothered or something, and then

1:17:15.200 --> 1:17:18.120
<v Speaker 1>not just reacting with the sort of defensive scratch, but

1:17:18.160 --> 1:17:24.360
<v Speaker 1>like chasing you afterwards to to hiss and scratch. Yeah. Again,

1:17:24.800 --> 1:17:27.240
<v Speaker 1>cats are weird. We have to we have to keep

1:17:27.240 --> 1:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that in mind. I think a lot of a lot

1:17:30.080 --> 1:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>of the A lot of this goes without saying. You

1:17:31.800 --> 1:17:36.479
<v Speaker 1>know that that obviously when humans have pets, we anthropomorphize them.

1:17:36.479 --> 1:17:40.120
<v Speaker 1>We have from anthropomorphies our dogs and our cats and

1:17:40.160 --> 1:17:42.439
<v Speaker 1>any other animals we might have around the house, and

1:17:42.479 --> 1:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>in doing so, it's easy to for forget that they

1:17:46.240 --> 1:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>are different beings. You know, that they live in a

1:17:48.960 --> 1:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>different since world there. You know, they don't just have

1:17:51.800 --> 1:17:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a small human brain inside that skull of theirs. Uh,

1:17:55.080 --> 1:17:59.799
<v Speaker 1>And we've put them in strange conditions that they didn't

1:18:00.000 --> 1:18:03.400
<v Speaker 1>really fully evolved to inhabit. On the other hand, we

1:18:03.439 --> 1:18:07.439
<v Speaker 1>can't think of them as just completely you know, unemotional beings.

1:18:07.479 --> 1:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so so the question becomes one of this. So,

1:18:12.080 --> 1:18:15.360
<v Speaker 1>if a cat is capable of emotional states, is it

1:18:15.479 --> 1:18:18.839
<v Speaker 1>capable of seeking revenge? Is it capable of being vengeful

1:18:19.040 --> 1:18:22.519
<v Speaker 1>or spiteful? I mean, I think of revenge as as

1:18:22.600 --> 1:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>an evolved adaptation that's special in social groups when, like,

1:18:26.880 --> 1:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>you expect to be interacting with the same individuals again

1:18:30.240 --> 1:18:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and again over time, and you need to behave in

1:18:33.200 --> 1:18:37.519
<v Speaker 1>a way that that punishes them for behaviors across time,

1:18:37.640 --> 1:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>not just like discourages something in the moment, but but

1:18:41.439 --> 1:18:45.160
<v Speaker 1>like continues to enforce the kind of behavior you want

1:18:45.200 --> 1:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>from others even after the behavior has stopped. Yeah. So

1:18:49.000 --> 1:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>we're already in a strange position because we, as very

1:18:52.080 --> 1:18:56.960
<v Speaker 1>social mammals are are trying to apply the same like

1:18:57.080 --> 1:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>social structure and uh and and behave realism on creatures

1:19:01.840 --> 1:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>that are far more solitary than we are. So I

1:19:04.760 --> 1:19:07.799
<v Speaker 1>was looking around for for any you know of feedback

1:19:07.840 --> 1:19:10.200
<v Speaker 1>on this, for any inside on this, and I ran

1:19:10.240 --> 1:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>across the cat coach, Maryland Krieger, who is a certified

1:19:14.280 --> 1:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>cat behavior consultant with the International Association of Animal Behavior Consultants.

1:19:19.720 --> 1:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>And uh, they've they've written about this before. UM, And

1:19:24.040 --> 1:19:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at a particular article on catster dot com,

1:19:27.760 --> 1:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and they pointed out, quote cats always have legitimate reasons

1:19:31.320 --> 1:19:35.160
<v Speaker 1>for their behaviors, holding grudges and deliberately being irritating are

1:19:35.240 --> 1:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>not among them. I guess it would depend on your definitions,

1:19:38.160 --> 1:19:40.360
<v Speaker 1>though I would be skeptical of anyone saying that any

1:19:40.479 --> 1:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>organism always has legitimate reasons for its behaviors. I mean,

1:19:44.040 --> 1:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>sometimes behaviors just kind of happen. Well, I mean it

1:19:46.840 --> 1:19:48.640
<v Speaker 1>makes you ask a lot of questions about revenge. Is

1:19:48.640 --> 1:19:51.320
<v Speaker 1>there a legitimate revenge? Like if it happens in a

1:19:51.360 --> 1:19:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Shakespeare play, is that it's like, that's legitimate, Or it

1:19:53.920 --> 1:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>happens in a TV drama, it's legitimate, whereas real life

1:19:57.320 --> 1:20:01.480
<v Speaker 1>revenge is rarely that simple. I mean, you know, it's

1:20:01.560 --> 1:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>it gets gets pretty mudy pretty quickly. I guess maybe

1:20:03.960 --> 1:20:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the point here, which would seem pretty reasonable to me,

1:20:06.280 --> 1:20:10.200
<v Speaker 1>is that, uh that it's it seems like a cat's

1:20:10.280 --> 1:20:13.880
<v Speaker 1>time horizon for reacting to behavior is probably gonna be

1:20:13.920 --> 1:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot shorter and probably going to be a lot

1:20:16.280 --> 1:20:21.559
<v Speaker 1>more just like basically situationally utilitarian. Then uh then would

1:20:21.560 --> 1:20:26.200
<v Speaker 1>be justified justified by a wrath of con style revenge plot. Right, Yeah,

1:20:26.240 --> 1:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's the big question. Our cats capable of

1:20:28.920 --> 1:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>plotting revenge? Um, that seems I think there's a strong

1:20:34.840 --> 1:20:39.280
<v Speaker 1>case to say no. However, will a cat scratch you, uh,

1:20:39.640 --> 1:20:42.240
<v Speaker 1>bite you, or hiss at you because you did something

1:20:42.280 --> 1:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>that they did not like like as an immediate response?

1:20:46.120 --> 1:20:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I think the answer there obviously yes. If you don't

1:20:48.880 --> 1:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>believe me, uh you know, think think about the last

1:20:51.240 --> 1:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>time you try to touch your cat's belly and they

1:20:53.320 --> 1:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>weren't into it. They probably let you know, uh you

1:20:56.040 --> 1:20:59.439
<v Speaker 1>know cats. Cats will generally be very um, if not vocal,

1:20:59.479 --> 1:21:03.599
<v Speaker 1>then at least active about their preferences regarding their their

1:21:03.640 --> 1:21:06.880
<v Speaker 1>belly fur. I remember cats cats I've known being very

1:21:06.880 --> 1:21:09.679
<v Speaker 1>sensitive about their paws, Like you don't want to touch

1:21:09.760 --> 1:21:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the pause, Yeah, those are their murder weapons. Don't disrespect them.

1:21:13.600 --> 1:21:18.120
<v Speaker 1>It's like you cannot touch my sword. Yeah, unlets it

1:21:18.200 --> 1:21:21.120
<v Speaker 1>draws your blood. The warrior's sword is sacred, so for

1:21:21.160 --> 1:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>a cat. Crager points out what frequently happens is that

1:21:24.280 --> 1:21:27.720
<v Speaker 1>a cat does something in response to change in their

1:21:27.760 --> 1:21:32.160
<v Speaker 1>immediate environment, and they're highly susceptible to change in their environment.

1:21:32.479 --> 1:21:35.440
<v Speaker 1>A change in the household can induce stress and anxiety

1:21:35.439 --> 1:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>in the cat, and this can lead to medical problems

1:21:38.040 --> 1:21:41.959
<v Speaker 1>like actual like legitimate medical problems such as urinary tract problems,

1:21:42.080 --> 1:21:45.639
<v Speaker 1>bladder problems, etcetera, that may cause them to do things

1:21:45.640 --> 1:21:49.719
<v Speaker 1>that can then be interpreted as acting out um, even

1:21:49.760 --> 1:21:54.080
<v Speaker 1>things like so called spike ping. Uh you know where

1:21:54.120 --> 1:21:56.400
<v Speaker 1>they're they're paying on, say your favorite pillow or something.

1:21:56.840 --> 1:21:59.120
<v Speaker 1>It might be tied to a medical issue like some

1:21:59.120 --> 1:22:01.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of bladder flare up, or it could be tied

1:22:01.360 --> 1:22:04.519
<v Speaker 1>more to like a separation anxiety, which may cause them

1:22:04.600 --> 1:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>to urinate on their favorite person stuff in order to

1:22:07.920 --> 1:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>mingle their scent with that of the owner. So again,

1:22:11.360 --> 1:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>like that's the kind of thing where that's outside of

1:22:13.360 --> 1:22:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the human um you know, our human emotional states for

1:22:18.120 --> 1:22:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the most part, than the idea of mingling sense to

1:22:20.400 --> 1:22:23.680
<v Speaker 1>feel with someone else's sense to feel better about them

1:22:23.720 --> 1:22:27.679
<v Speaker 1>being away from you. But within a cat sense realm uh,

1:22:27.800 --> 1:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>that may make perfect sense, Like that is the perfect

1:22:30.320 --> 1:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>thing to do. That is the perfect comforting act. Yeah,

1:22:33.120 --> 1:22:35.599
<v Speaker 1>And then on the other side of it, like there

1:22:35.640 --> 1:22:39.000
<v Speaker 1>are some analogies I think people can understand pretty well,

1:22:39.000 --> 1:22:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Like it might be harder to behave correctly and uh,

1:22:43.320 --> 1:22:47.559
<v Speaker 1>maintain mastery over all your bodily functions when you're very stressed. Yeah,

1:22:47.720 --> 1:22:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's it's difficult for us, it's gonna be

1:22:50.120 --> 1:22:53.160
<v Speaker 1>difficult for other organisms as well. So I think it's

1:22:53.200 --> 1:22:55.439
<v Speaker 1>worth keeping in mind that, you know, the cat world

1:22:55.520 --> 1:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>is different from the human world, even if we're sharing

1:22:58.040 --> 1:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the same house. And I mean this applies to any animal.

1:23:00.280 --> 1:23:02.759
<v Speaker 1>The dog world is different from the human world even

1:23:02.800 --> 1:23:06.680
<v Speaker 1>though you you spend your lives together, you share the

1:23:06.720 --> 1:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>same space, but you don't see the world the same.

1:23:09.720 --> 1:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>All right. Uh. On that note, I think we're gonna

1:23:12.080 --> 1:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and close it out here. Um. As of

1:23:16.479 --> 1:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>October twenty twenty, I believe you can watch You can

1:23:20.040 --> 1:23:22.960
<v Speaker 1>generally watch the Treehouse of Horror episodes on Disney Plus.

1:23:23.240 --> 1:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's where they're currently hosted. For streaming, The

1:23:25.880 --> 1:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Uncanny was a little harder for me to get a

1:23:27.800 --> 1:23:30.439
<v Speaker 1>hold of. I had to subscribe to some sort of

1:23:31.080 --> 1:23:33.960
<v Speaker 1>some indie channel on Amazon Prime in order to streaming

1:23:34.160 --> 1:23:35.799
<v Speaker 1>to stream it, but I don't know it's it's probably

1:23:35.840 --> 1:23:38.360
<v Speaker 1>out on the YouTube or something as well. I found

1:23:38.360 --> 1:23:42.240
<v Speaker 1>it on the tube of the Second Person, but you

1:23:42.280 --> 1:23:44.439
<v Speaker 1>know that may change by the time you listen to

1:23:44.479 --> 1:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>this episode. Perhaps it's streaming in a more accessible place.

1:23:48.320 --> 1:23:50.360
<v Speaker 1>All Right, we're gonna go ahead and close the door

1:23:50.840 --> 1:23:55.559
<v Speaker 1>on Anthology of Horror Volume six and hey, if you

1:23:55.680 --> 1:23:59.440
<v Speaker 1>like these, if you want this tradition to continue next October,

1:23:59.680 --> 1:24:01.880
<v Speaker 1>well you have a little less than a year to

1:24:01.960 --> 1:24:07.440
<v Speaker 1>start pelting us with suggestions. What are your favorite episodes

1:24:07.479 --> 1:24:11.519
<v Speaker 1>of various horror and sci fi UH anthology series that

1:24:11.600 --> 1:24:14.120
<v Speaker 1>you would like us to consider, or your favorite segments

1:24:14.160 --> 1:24:17.280
<v Speaker 1>from anthology films UH let us know we would love

1:24:17.320 --> 1:24:19.479
<v Speaker 1>to hear from you. In the meantime, if you want

1:24:19.479 --> 1:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>to listen to other episodes of Stuff to Blow your Mind,

1:24:21.400 --> 1:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you can find us wherever you find your podcasts and

1:24:23.760 --> 1:24:25.840
<v Speaker 1>wherever that happens to be. We just asked that you rate,

1:24:25.880 --> 1:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>review and subscribe. You can always find us by going

1:24:28.840 --> 1:24:30.479
<v Speaker 1>to stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. That will

1:24:30.479 --> 1:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>shoot you over to our high Heart page and if

1:24:32.720 --> 1:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you go there, there's a listing for our store, and

1:24:35.040 --> 1:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>if you go there, if you can buy a shirt

1:24:37.320 --> 1:24:40.400
<v Speaker 1>with our logo or a monster on which thanks as

1:24:40.400 --> 1:24:43.800
<v Speaker 1>always to our excellent audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson. If

1:24:43.800 --> 1:24:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you would like to get in touch with us with

1:24:45.240 --> 1:24:47.519
<v Speaker 1>feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest a

1:24:47.560 --> 1:24:49.479
<v Speaker 1>topic for the future, just to say hello. You can

1:24:49.479 --> 1:24:52.120
<v Speaker 1>email us at contact and Stuff to Blow Your Mind

1:24:52.320 --> 1:25:02.200
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of

1:25:02.240 --> 1:25:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio. For more podcasts for my heart Radio,

1:25:05.080 --> 1:25:07.759
<v Speaker 1>visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

1:25:07.800 --> 1:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you listening to your favorite shows.