WEBVTT - Cool and Fun for Capital Markets Nerds: Tayvis, MSTR, IPO

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. So here we are.

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:12.319
<v Speaker 2>I guess around the clock. It's been approximately six months

0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 2>since we recorded a podcast together.

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Right, It's good to see.

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.760
<v Speaker 2>It's nice to see you. You look crested, you got

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 2>a haircut, you're clean shaven, you have a tan.

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, yeah, it was nice. I missed the podcast,

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>of course.

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:27.319
<v Speaker 2>But it was nice being making you're so full of it.

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, we're both like being incredibly insincere. Yeah, here

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>we are.

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I will say it was nice to you know,

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 2>roll into Thursday the last two weeks and been like

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:40.880
<v Speaker 2>oh my god, and then have been like, oh wait, no,

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 2>everything's fine. I don't have to record anything right now.

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I share that feeling. And also this Thursday was not

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>like that.

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. We should set up a Patreon.

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to the Money Stuff Podcast. You're a

0:00:56.760 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>weekly podcast where we talk about stuff related to money.

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Levine and I write the Moneys Doff com

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Opinion.

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Katie Greifeld, a reporter for Bloomberg News and

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:09.759
<v Speaker 2>an anchor for Bloomberg Television.

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Taylor shows, gotting engaged.

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, biggest financial market news of the week. Pretty surprising,

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 2>but not to at least one person named Romantic Paul.

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, several people sent me this thing, is it right?

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:26.199
<v Speaker 1>So like a guy made a well time you assume

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a man. Yeah, a user with the account named

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Romantic Paul made a well time trade on polymarket on

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Taylors just getting engaged. Basically, like that contract was trading

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it like twenty five percent, and then it spiked up

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>to like like forty percent like the day before she

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>got engaged. Yeah, and several people sent that to me,

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, you know, like people were interested in

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that stuff, but like that was a contract with a

0:01:56.880 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>couple one hundred thousand dollars of that's outstanding. Yeah, And

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Rheumatic Paul seems to admit on the order of three

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars on this wall time trade. So was it

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the biggest financial market use of Oh no.

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm just talking about the magnitude of tailor Swift getting.

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Engaged, right right, scenting.

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 2>Ripples across all financial.

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you're saying, like Treasury is sold off.

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, you didn't need a haven asset in that scenario.

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 2>America's back.

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, you saw your tweet like you're bearish and Taylor

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 1>Swift got engaged in your.

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 2>Bears, You're parish, Taylor Swift gone engaged in your bears.

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Just a risk one moment. Yeah, soa, I'm sorry, I

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>take it back. I was just talking about the narrow No,

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that's so many things. It's like submission markets, like you

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>can specifically bet on or had a specific thing, but

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>then like those things often have brought her financial market

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 1>implications and so like you can you can structure your

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>tailor Swift trade by like, I don't know ing the

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>S and P.

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 2>I have to say, I am surprised that it was

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:55.799
<v Speaker 2>only about twenty five percent odds. I wish I had

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.080
<v Speaker 2>known that it was trading that cheap.

0:02:58.160 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was like it was she gets engaged by

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 1>the end of this year. Yeah, that seems cheap.

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 2>It does, I mean, especially right now when she's engaged

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 2>after this. For sure, I knew you raised the point

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 2>that she got engaged two weeks ago, so theoretically someone

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 2>probably knew. So maybe there was an element of insider

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:18.639
<v Speaker 2>trading here.

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, although again, like you know the amount of money

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>that you could make insider trading on the Taylor sw

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>with engagement news is in the like single digit thousands of.

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:31.799
<v Speaker 2>Dollars single digit thousands. Yeah, what if you uh? Can

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 2>you lover these bets?

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>The problem is finding people to bet against yours a.

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a prediction market, and to bet on yes, you

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>have to find people who are willing to bet on now.

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>And you know the number of people who wanted to

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>put millions of dollars into betting that Taylor's with won't

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>get engaged against the highly motivated buyer.

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 2>That's true. I guess if you knew for sure, you'd

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 2>probably just sell to a tabloid.

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>But right, right, right, or like you can make a

0:03:57.320 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>lot more, just like be friends with Taylor Swift just

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>seems like a lucid.

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's a few things that point to this being

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 2>not insider trading or a person who didn't know for sure.

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 2>We were just joking. In hindsight, of course it seems obvious.

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 2>But also they got engaged theoretically right after they podcasts.

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Actually the Kelsey brother It's funny how that happens. Maybe

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 2>I'll go repropose to my husband after this. But anyway,

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Taylor Swift, sorry, this is for the Swifties out there.

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 2>She hasn't done an interview like that with a previous

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:34.920
<v Speaker 2>romantic partner of that scale. I mean this, you.

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Dated a podcaster before. Maybe I'm wrong, I probably I know.

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 2>But she's dated other famous people where theoretically they could

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 2>have done a joint appearance like that. They didn't, I know,

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 2>but they could have found a podcast to go on,

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 2>is what I'm saying. Like, she hasn't like sat in

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 2>an interview or done anything like that with previous partners.

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 2>So you could watch the New Heights episode, which millions

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:00.599
<v Speaker 2>of people did, be like, oh wow, these two people

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 2>clearly like each other, and that was the.

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:06.479
<v Speaker 1>Really love that. Like you're like, no, you had to

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:09.119
<v Speaker 1>know they're getting engaged because they podcasted together.

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Well no, it was also a video podcast, which video podcast,

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 2>by the way, we should probably do more of anyway,

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 2>you could really read their body language. But probably maybe

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 2>if you want to give romantic Paul the benefit of

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 2>the doubt, he saw that podcast was like, oh shoot,

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 2>these are two people who genuinely like each other, and

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 2>that that was that they'd get engaged sometime this year.

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 2>It's only August. Yeah, yeah, and they're thirty five years old.

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. You make good points thank you. I really I

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:38.239
<v Speaker 1>don't mean to suggest that Romantic Paul was insider trading

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to make three thousand dollars.

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:41.479
<v Speaker 2>On tellers thirty five hundred.

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Prediction markets are so weird and interesting and so like

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>growing in importance and strange ways. And I think, you know,

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:53.839
<v Speaker 1>the contours of insider trading around prediction markets are very strange.

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I think of it mostly in connection with sports betting,

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>right because and this is not a sports bet, it's

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>sports that as a sports figure, but I have written

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot about and we've talked about how prediction markets

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>are an interestingly important way to make sports bets because

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>it seems like right now CFTC regulated commodities futures markets

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>like CALCI are a way to make sports bets that

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 1>are not subject to state regulation, so you can like

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, ignore state gambling laws and get better tax

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 1>treatment than actual gambling because right now, gambling losses are

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>not fully deductible in your taxes, but commodity trading losses

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 1>are probably fully deductible. So the prediction markets, that particularly Calshie,

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:45.720
<v Speaker 1>are having a real moment for like becoming the sports

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>gambling platform. And you know, this week I wrote about

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>robinhood is pursuing Nevada regulators so that they can be

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:56.479
<v Speaker 1>allowed to offer sports gambling. Robinhoo wouldn't say this, but

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:58.479
<v Speaker 1>I would say, so they can be allowed to offer

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>sports gambling on their stock trading app, which is like,

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of amazing, but like just like sort

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of where things are heading. And prediction markets are beloved

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>by like economists and like libertarian weirdos because like in theory,

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>if you had a prediction market and everything, then you

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>could like predict everything and like the world would be

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>better informed because markets would push prices to their correct place.

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>And there's a lot of skepticism about that because like,

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>in fact, people don't want to bet on all sorts

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>of nonsense, and like the big problem with prediction markets

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>has always been like outside of like the US presidential election,

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to find a lot of people who are

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>really into betting on prediction markets because it doesn't sort

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of serve any savings purpose and it's not a natural

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>home for gamblers, and so the volumes on prediction markets

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>are kind of small, and you can have your doubts

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>about how predictive the prices are. You know, again, outside

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of like the US presidential election, and when prediction markets

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>get into the sports gambling game changes that dynamic entirely.

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>It means that like, if you look at Calshi and

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>you think this is the future of sports betting because

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>it has a better regulatory and tax treatment than the

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>sports books that are doing billions of dollars of bets,

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>then you're thinking Calshi is going to offer people campbells

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that they want and that they come back to every day, right,

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>because sports are constantly happening, and so then all of

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the ancillary stuff, all of the stuff like betting on

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Swift's baby is like just more appealing because more

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>people have Calshie accounts and more people are you know,

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>betting there anyway, so they'll bet on when you know,

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>when the when the wedding will happen, and yeah, you.

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 2>Know, the network effects will kick in, Yeah.

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 1>The network, so you know people will betting on everything,

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>and then you know, you'll have a CFTC regulated licensed

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 1>US Commodities Exchange for sports betting. And then then what

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>happens when people start, you know, making insider bets on

0:08:58.280 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 1>sports or on Taylor Swifts And.

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 2>I should know this, but have DraftKings and FANDUL like,

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 2>have they tried to offer stock betting on their platforms?

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a little bit. It's funny Flutter, which is like the.

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Parent company a fandel right, a FANDL.

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they're working on some sort of partnership with CME

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 1>to offer essentially sports book bets on yeah, financial outcome,

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, like, well the s and PB up or

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>down today, Because yeah, for one thing, if you're a

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>gambling platform, offering people more bets is just more appealing, right,

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>just give them you have more touch points. And then

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>for another thing, if you're a gambling platform and you

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>look at what Calshi is doing, you have to think

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe we should be in the futures trading business rather

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>than the sports book business because it's the same business

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and it gets better tax and regulatory treatment.

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Man, that's pretty wild.

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's just like a lot of conversions between gambling

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and financial markets.

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Parallels here to private markets becoming the public market.

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the betting markets are becoming the the financial markets.

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all of the then diagrams are just turning into circles.

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Before we leave this topic talking about whether or not

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:12.199
<v Speaker 2>this is insider trading or if it could be insider trading.

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 2>You wrote that if Romantic Paul is Travis Kelcey, that's fine.

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Is that fine?

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>This is not legal advice go on. This is going

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to depend a little bit on like the specific terms

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>of service of the platform, right, I mean, polymarket has

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of vague terms of service. But if you think

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 1>about and this is not it, you have to see

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>regulated exchange. But if you think about the future that

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>will live in where all betting takes place on commodity,

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>then the way commodities insider trading rules work is if

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:55.839
<v Speaker 1>you misappropriate information from someone else, then that's illegal. That's

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>illegal insider trading. But if you own the information, it's

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>harder to say that you're insider trading. So if you're

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>an oil company and you drill a lot of oil

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and like you know, you're well as a bust, and

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>you think, oh, that's going to push up oil prices,

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you're allowed to buy oil features because the point of

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:16.199
<v Speaker 1>oil futures is to allow actual oil producers and consumers

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to sort of hedge their actual production into bad And

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>so of course you're trading an inside information about your

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>own behavior. Right, if you're like a trader at an

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:28.679
<v Speaker 1>oil company and you're front running your company by buying

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>futures for your own account. That's illegal insider trading. And

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:33.439
<v Speaker 1>there are cases, right, there are cases of people who

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>are front running, who are misappropriating information get in trouble

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>for commodities insider trading, but just the owners of the commodity,

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the commodity producers that are allowed to trade on their

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 1>own information. So I don't know where that leaves you

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>when your commodity is like will Taylor Swift and Travis

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey get well re engage?

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Will I propose to Tailor Swift?

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Right? But I think it kind of leaves you like, yeah,

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and trade on that. Again, there's like no

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>money here, right.

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 2>There also is a risk I was going to say,

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 2>because he didn't know that she was going to say yes,

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:04.679
<v Speaker 2>but whatever, yeah.

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:06.319
<v Speaker 1>Rarely.

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Also she had already said yes by the time. But

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 2>I was thinking more of the example of he's the

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.319
<v Speaker 2>CEO of a company and he knew that earnings were

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 2>going to be good, but they hadn't.

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>That's not the CEO's information, that's the company's information. And

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 1>by the way, companies can't really inside or trade their

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>stock like in stocks, the rules are kind of different.

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Like in stocks, companies have a fiduciarated a shareholders and

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>they can't really inside or trade their stocks. But in

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 1>commodities that's a little bit.

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about commodities, not stocks. Notes like tailors engagement.

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Congratulations Taylor Swift from your friends at the Money Stuff podcast.

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Come on, yeah, come on, it worked out really well

0:12:44.960 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 2>your last podcast appearance. Do you want to talk about

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Michael Saylor? Yeah, this is a guy that we don't

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 2>about sometimes and his company strategy not micro strategy strategy. Yeah,

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 2>it's premium is collapsing before our eyes.

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I know, I feel a little bad about that somehow.

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why I cause that no, but like

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I've like made fun of this premium for years and years,

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and now it's collapsing before our eyes. And I'm like,

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't wish all on anyone. I want

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>them to keep running this ridiculous strategy for as long

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>as they can.

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Strategy strategy, strategy. I mean it's been kind of depressed

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 2>for a while. Yeah, the premium.

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well they love, they love. Like you have to

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:43.079
<v Speaker 1>like sort of put a lot of signs around things

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 1>like this, because like strategy businesses like they buy it a bitcoin.

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>There's stock trades that like twice they're net asset value.

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 1>They sell more stock to buy more bitcoin. Then the

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>net asset value goes up. The stock goes up by

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:55.959
<v Speaker 1>two times as much, and it's a like perpetual flywheel.

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>But now instead of two times, it's like one point five.

0:13:58.360 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Ish times and one point four.

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So it's like this trade is a magical money

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>printing machine. When you can sell stock at a big

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>premium to your net asset value, and it's like a

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 1>terrible disaster. If you can sell stock at a discount

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 1>to your net asset value, as you come down, it's

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>like less and less fun.

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>So they actually, I think they put out guidance that

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>they would not sell stock at less than two point

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>five times in that asset value, and then when the

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 1>premium went below two times, they were like, well, never mind,

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll just keep selling stock at you know, whatever we

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>can get.

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So I have to say, I don't really understand

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 2>why they did that, because.

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>It's at one time it's a good trade, I know,

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>but you can like sell you know, at a premium.

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 2>You should sell at a premium, I know, But Okay,

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 2>they pluged to they.

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Said they wouldn't, but like you know, that was when things.

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Like they were already below and half when they said that.

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, but like the other reason okay, so sorry, and

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>there was a.

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Two week span there, like they said they wouldn't do this,

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 2>two weeks later they did, and they were already below

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 2>two and a half times.

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay. So there's two questions, right, One is why

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>would you sell stock at below two point five times

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>net asset value? And the answer is because if you

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>can sell stock at any view into net asset value,

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a good trade, right, it's a creative to your

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>shareholders to sell stock for more than it's worth. And

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>then the other question is why did they say they.

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Wouldn't sell That's what I don't understand.

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So there's two answers to that. One is the

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>whole game here is like investor confidence. Right, So if

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>you can say, oh, it's always going to be at

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>a premium, then investors will like your stock and the

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>stock will go up and will be at a bigger premium. Right.

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>So one thing is you just have to like tell

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>people what they want to hear, because you're you're in

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the business of selling them stock at a premium. But

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>then the other reason is that they're not exclusively in

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the business of selling stock. They have gotten really into

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>doing weird capital markets trades that I love as a

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>former weird capital markets banker. And so they've found all

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>sorts of like straight preferred stock deals to do, which

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>is like, companies don't do big straight preferred stock deals.

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>That's not the thing. Like straight preferred stock is not

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a real instrument outside of like financials and a few

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>other weird places. And they were like, we're gonna sell

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars of preferred stock because essentially it's like

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:16.479
<v Speaker 1>borrowing money perpetually at call it nine percent ten percent interest,

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>so by bitcoin. And if you think bitcoin will always

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 1>go up by fifty percent a year, then borrowing at

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 1>ten percent to buy bitcoin that yields fifty percent is

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>a great deal. Yeah, And so they've been doing a

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of preferred stock deals. And I think when they

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>said we're not going to sell stock below two point

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>five x, they thought, we'll just to fix income financing

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>to keep buying more bitcoins. And then the market for

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 1>that's softened.

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, just like it's such.

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>A weird market, Like people don't need billions of dollars

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of preferred stock of a tech company that bitcoin, and

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>so when that market collaps, they're like, we still need

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>to buy more bitcoin, so there's longing stock again.

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's funny. Who would be the typical buyer of preferreds?

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I have never really known that. I mean, it's like

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it's like income oriented. You know, if you're retiree and

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>you can get nine percent yield, that's great, you know.

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well apparently there's not enough of those people because

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:10.159
<v Speaker 2>they're recent of dollars with like you know, like that

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 2>credit profile.

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's weird, weird trade.

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 2>Their most recent sale raise just about like forty seven

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 2>million dollars.

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>And the stuff they're doing is I mean, for me,

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I love it, Like the most recent thing is there.

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 2>You're not buying enough of it, have.

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Bought any of it, But like it's a floating rate

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 1>preferred that the rate floats with, just like their feelings.

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 1>The rate floats with. I want to keep it to

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>trading at par, and so the rate will float at

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>whatever makes it trade at par, which is like essentially

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 1>floating with their own credit, which is a truly insane

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>instrument that no one has ever done before. That like

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:43.239
<v Speaker 1>Michael Sayler is like, I'm going to do this, and

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:45.400
<v Speaker 1>so I shouldn't say no one's ever done it before.

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of auction ary preferred. But it's very strange

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and very cool and fun for capital markets nerds, but

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 1>like they're not buy billions of dollars stop.

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:58.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah.

0:17:58.320 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>And also, by the way, when I say something is

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:01.719
<v Speaker 1>and fun, that means I would not buy it.

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:06.400
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Okay, that's a necessary disclosure. There's also the question

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 2>of why the premium is collapsing. I mean, taking a

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:12.919
<v Speaker 2>look at Bloomberg News coverage, it would one of the

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 2>reasons pointed to go Ahead is that there's just so

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:21.880
<v Speaker 2>many cryptotature companies. How much is that truly deluding demand

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:22.719
<v Speaker 2>for strategy?

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>So one thing that's interesting is, like, you know, people

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 1>thought that the premium would collapse when spot bitcoin ets

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>became a big thing, and it didn't really, Yeah, And

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the reason for that is, like they really

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 1>are two different trades, right. The spot bitcoin ETF is

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 1>like you can buy bitcoin and you want exposure to bitcoin,

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 1>so you buy bitcoin. Micro strategy trade is you can

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>buy stock at a premium so that they can sell

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>more stock at a premium so they can accumulate more bitcoin. Like,

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:50.439
<v Speaker 1>you're really just betting on this is a company that

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:52.680
<v Speaker 1>can sell stock at a premium to buy assets. Right,

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 1>that's the bet, And that bet is very circular and strange.

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:01.200
<v Speaker 1>But it was hard to find, right, it's not it's

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>not replicated with a bitcoin etaf right, Like, that's just

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that's just the bet on bitcoin strategies, on selling train exposure.

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 1>But now you can find that bet anywhere. There's like

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of companies they're like, oh, we've got a way

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 1>to sell's talk at a premium. And some of the

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:17.639
<v Speaker 1>people who are gambling on the generic concept of like

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:19.440
<v Speaker 1>ability to sell stalk at a premium to buy a

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:21.879
<v Speaker 1>crypto or you know, doing it with other crypto companies

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>that have higher premiums or lower premiums. Yeah, there are

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>more flavors of that bet, and there are only so

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>many people who want that bet.

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 2>That's true.

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's part of why the premium is

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 1>not doing it as well. But also just like I

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 1>really think that this is the sort of thing where

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:39.199
<v Speaker 1>if you think about it for a minute, you'll be

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 1>like you and so you look at like, you know,

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Jim Chaino is betting against It's just like some of

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the people who look at this who have my or

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 1>Jim Chanos's cast a blind are like this is crazy. Yeah,

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>And you know enough of those people say that, then

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe like people stop buying it at two point five

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:57.120
<v Speaker 1>x it.

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 2>Is fun to think about. Okay, let's say that the

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 2>strategy premium does erode even further. What this means for

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 2>this ocean of crypto treasury companies that now exist or

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 2>you just kind of all.

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:12.679
<v Speaker 1>Like they're all the numbers that people have announced for

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>like their plans, it's tens of billions of dollars of

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:18.719
<v Speaker 1>crypto treasury plans. Like that's not going to happen, Like

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll see, Like it's just like they're not going to

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>raise that kind of money. I think some of it

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:28.120
<v Speaker 1>is like people have converted their statues of crypto into

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>crypto treasury companies because like it's trading at a higher

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 1>value and if that arose and it ends up at

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 1>a zero premium, and well, you know they'll own a

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>stash of crypto and someonet inconvenient forum and it's like

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of fine. But the people who are like we're

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 1>going to go sell twenty billion dollars of stock at

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the market to buy doagecoin.

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah you are, they're not, So what does that mean?

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 2>We're just going to have like a watery graveyard of companies.

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:57.399
<v Speaker 1>That are acount strategy is a different story because the

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:01.400
<v Speaker 1>real company with you know, eccentric management. But a lot

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>of crypto treasury companies are sort of more or less defunct,

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:07.120
<v Speaker 1>like biotech companies that have like a you know, one

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>million dollar market cap and then got acquired so that

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>someone could pump a billion dollars of crypto into them.

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Right before there were biotech companies, there were gold miners. Right,

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a long history of what are your grave yards

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 1>of public company tickers being passed throughund and let let's

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:24.360
<v Speaker 1>go back to that, right, But the fad this year

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:26.640
<v Speaker 1>was crypto treasury companies a fad two years ago. Yeah,

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it's like.

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:29.680
<v Speaker 2>Fine, yeah, okay, I feel better.

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, crypto treasury companies are quite harmless, Like.

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 2>They're not like negatively impacting the economy.

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 1>No, I mean, you know, in some broad sense, yes,

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:44.119
<v Speaker 1>but like it's not like a crisis could occur in

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:47.479
<v Speaker 1>crypto treasure. So like if the strategy trade stops working.

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Like the worst case is kind of it trades to

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>like eighty percent of that asset value. Right, that's still like,

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:55.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, many tens of billions of dollars company, right,

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Like they've really pumped a lot of I don't know

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that I've want to say real value, but you know,

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 1>in quotes, real value into this small software company.

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Got a lot of Bitcoin've got a lot of bitcoin.

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 3>At the end of the day, at where we are

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:11.360
<v Speaker 3>in the day.

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, on the long list of things to worry about,

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:34.439
<v Speaker 2>I will put that at the bottom. IPOs Matt, you

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:38.199
<v Speaker 2>wrote about a paper. It came out of Joseph J.

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Henry of Northeastern University and Terence M. O'Brien from the

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 2>University of Maryland. And I realized that you're biased here

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 2>because they quote you right off the bat.

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:52.880
<v Speaker 1>That's true. I probably should have dissed.

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Calm No. I think that's awesome. It's like an easter egg.

0:22:57.080 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 2>You actually go to look at the paper.

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:02.400
<v Speaker 1>That you're something. Is that Like there are a lot

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 1>of like finance and law papers on SSRN that have

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, twelve downloads.

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 2>And this one has more than that.

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes, right, I don't mean to talk about this one specifically.

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes I come across these papers in various ways, often

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>because the writer's summoned to me, and then I write

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>about them money stuff, and then they have more than

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 1>twelve downloads, And I think, I don't know how directly

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:35.239
<v Speaker 1>useful money stuff mentions are for like academic tenure, but

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 1>like there's some there's going to be a marginals Yeah,

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:42.199
<v Speaker 1>there should be. I want, I really want to see that, Like,

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>am I getting academics tenure? But anyway, if you quote

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>me at the beginning of your paper, it probably does

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>increase your chances.

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, definitely, So sure.

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 1>Something to think about anyway. Yeah, So they are this

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 1>paper at IPO Pops, which we talked about on the

0:23:56.320 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Mailbag episode of our podcast that was aired moster It no.

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 3>The mailbag episode we did, And this paper sort of

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 3>formalizes an intuition that I've long thought about, which is

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 3>that when you do an IPO, you're a company, and

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 3>you sell in the IPO something like ten to twenty

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 3>percent of your stock.

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>The rest of your stock stays locked up. Right, It's

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:23.479
<v Speaker 1>owned by the CEO, it's owned by the early investors,

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>it's owned by the employees and it's locked up in

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the IPO, so they can't sell for like six months

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>after the IPO. Something like ten or twenty percent of

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the shares come loose in the IPO, but most of

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the shares most of the time are being sold to

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:41.439
<v Speaker 1>like long term investors who have had conversations with management

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and who management wants to be the shareholders. And so

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:46.919
<v Speaker 1>there's this sort of deal where the management and the

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 1>bankers and the long term investors are trying to like

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 1>send the stock to people who will hold it for

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:54.479
<v Speaker 1>the long term. And what that means is that when

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the stock opens for trading the day after the IPO,

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot of stock to buy, because you know,

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:03.399
<v Speaker 1>the company is sold tin ish percent of its stock

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:07.159
<v Speaker 1>and then ninety ish percent of that stock goes to

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:09.119
<v Speaker 1>people who don't sell it on the first day. The

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>amount of stock that's available to buy on the first

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 1>day is on the order of one percent of the

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>shares outstanding. And meanwhile, like you know, there's all these

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 1>retail investors want to buy stock, and so when there's

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:22.920
<v Speaker 1>a hot IPO that a lot of retail investors want

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to buy, there's just not a lot of supply for them,

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and so the stock trades to a price that equilior

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>rates to blind demand for like that one percent of

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:33.399
<v Speaker 1>the shares that the retail investors want to buy. But

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't tell you what the company is worth necessarily.

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:38.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And it also.

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't tell you what the right IPO price was, because

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the IPO price is the clearing price for ten, fifteen,

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent of the stock. But then you know, one

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>or two percent of the stock trades on the exchange,

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>So the clearing price on the exchange is going to

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>be a lot higher than the clearing price for the

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:56.919
<v Speaker 1>IPO if like there's a lot of demand on the exchange. Yeah,

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 1>but if like all ten percent of the stock came

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:01.359
<v Speaker 1>loose on the day after the IPO, it would probably

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>trade less of a pop. And so they write about

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:05.879
<v Speaker 1>like there's this question of like how much money are

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 1>companies leaving on the table that we talked about, where

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:12.479
<v Speaker 1>like people get really mad that when a stock doubles

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>on its first day after the IPO. They say, oh,

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the bankers should have set the price higher so that

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't trade up that high, and the company left

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 1>all this money on the table. But that's not necessarily

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 1>true because most of the stock doesn't trade on the

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:27.359
<v Speaker 1>first day. They couldn't necessarily have sold ten or twenty

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>percent of their stock at the price that it rose

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to on the first day.

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this paper, I mean, it's a really good time

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:36.640
<v Speaker 2>for this paper because I feel like this topic has

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 2>taken on new life because we're getting IPOs again and.

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing right, I was going to say, like this

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:43.479
<v Speaker 1>is an evergreen topic. I've been thinking about this for

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>like fifteen years, but you're right, like for a while

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>it went pretty dormant because there are no IPOs.

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely, and then twenty twenty five, I feel like

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:54.120
<v Speaker 2>you've seen really dramatic pops even in the last couple months.

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 2>You think about Figma Core, we've circle we were talking

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:01.640
<v Speaker 2>like triple digit, multiple percent pops, right, And.

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:05.479
<v Speaker 1>You think about like you're an institutional stock investor, like

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 1>you do some valuation work, you meet with this company

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>as you think, this is what i'd pay for this

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 1>company because it's comparable to like other companies in my portfolio.

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:15.919
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you own other private companies, right, because a lot

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>of institutions do. And then like the stock opens for

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:24.160
<v Speaker 1>trading and retail investors haven't had fun new IPOs to

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 1>buy for years, and so a ton of demand for

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:29.360
<v Speaker 1>very limited supply, and so the stocks go up a lot.

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>But that's not necessarily reflective of where institutions would price them.

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I will say, though, we're not talking about like

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 2>one day pops. I mean, in the case of those

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:41.359
<v Speaker 2>three companies fig mccor we even circle, these are like

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:43.719
<v Speaker 2>multi week mostly sustained.

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:46.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I want to be clear, like this explanation is

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:49.919
<v Speaker 1>like an interesting and important technical explanation for some of

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>what happens in ipo pops. On the explanation, yeah, there

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 1>is a desire to underprice IPOs so that people who

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:01.880
<v Speaker 1>invest in the IPO make a profit, because that's good

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:05.439
<v Speaker 1>for them and for the banks, and also arguably for

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:08.879
<v Speaker 1>the company because it like creates investor goodwill goodwill. But

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>this explanation is not the only reason that IPOs pop.

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it is interesting to look that they find that

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 2>the average IPO share price POP is like nineteen percent

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 2>higher than the actual offer price on the first day

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:23.440
<v Speaker 2>of trading. Nineteen percent I mean relative to some of

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 2>the IPOs I just mentioned. Seems tame at this point.

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that would turn heads in quite the

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 2>same way that.

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Whatever happens is a long sample.

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Right and like yeah, thirty years.

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And like I do think that the scarcity of

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 1>supply means there's more kind of dispersion now.

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, when there's.

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Two IPOs a week, they're not all going to pop

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent.

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 2>That's true. It feels like we're always away from that. Like,

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 2>I know that the ipo market is normalizing.

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I said, two IPOs a week, that's that's a low number.

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I feel like there used to be a lot more

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>than two IPOs a week.

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 2>Two IPOs that people are exciting about a week. Though

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 2>we're now we're now like pretty well, yeah, yeah, it's

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 2>been groom for a while.

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:05.239
<v Speaker 1>And now it's great. I think that this dynamic here

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 1>where like very little of the shares are available and

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 1>retail wants them, and so the stock pops is exactly

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the same dynamic that you see in the private company

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff that we talk about all the time, like retail

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and retail issue, Like you know, accredited retail investors really

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>want to own shares Open dentists, I really want to

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 1>own shares of open AI and SpaceX. It is hard

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>for a retail investor to buy open air and SpaceX,

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's not impossible. There's like little bits of open

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 1>air and SpaceX and like little you know, there's like

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 1>secondary funds. There's like little you know, closing funds that

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 1>own a little bit of it. And because there is

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a limited but not zero supply available to retail, retail

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 1>really bids them up. And so the prices of you know,

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 1>open ai shares or proxies or SpaceX shares or proxies

0:29:57.520 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 1>on the retail market the prices higher than what you

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 1>see those companies raising money at. And it's the same story,

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>right like, institutions will buy tens of billions of dollars

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>of open ai stock at some price, and then retail

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 1>investors will buy tens of millions of dollars of that

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 1>stock gets a much higher price. That doesn't mean that

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 1>like open Aiy's valuation is in the trillions of dollars.

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 1>It means that the supply available to retail is really low.

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 1>It's the same thing with IPOs, right like, the supply

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the first day available to retail is much lower than

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 1>what institutions have access to, and so the price is higher.

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 2>I feel like I'm too tired to like neatly make

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 2>this point, but it just seems somewhat parallel to what

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about with micro strategy in the premium, and

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 2>it's just coming down to supply and demand.

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I guess it's true in the sense

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>that micro strategy, unlike open ai or these IPAs or Figma,

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>micro strategy is pretty much willing to supply whatever whatever

0:30:56.520 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>is demanded, and that is bad for the premium exactly.

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 2>And also to tie to the first thing that we

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 2>talked about, those retail investors don't need to try to

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 2>own open ai. They just need to make a prediction

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 2>market around it somehow to reflect the movement of these.

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, right about that all the time? Yeah, well

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 1>there's legal complications, yeah, because that's not a commodity, that's

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a security based swap, completely different problem. Pleave it there

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 1>on that very boring note.

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, that was awesome. I think that was really totillating.

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:32.960
<v Speaker 1>And that was the Money Stuff Podcast.

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm Matt Levian and I'm Katie Greifeld.

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>You can find my work by subscribing to the Money

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Stuff newsletter on Bloomberg dot com.

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 2>And you can find me on Bloomberg TV every day

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 2>on Open Interest between nine to eleven am Eastern.

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to hear from you. You can send an

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 1>email to Moneypod at Bloomberg dot net, ask us a

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 1>question and we might answer it on air.

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 2>You can also subscribe to our show wherever you're listening

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 2>right now and leave us a review. It helps more

0:31:56.680 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 2>people find the show.

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>The Money Stuff Podcast is produced Anna Mazerakus and Moses Onen.

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 2>Our theme music was composed by Blake Maples and Stage

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Bauman is Bloomberg's head of Podcasts.

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to The Money Stuff Podcast. We'll be

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 1>back next week with more stuff.