WEBVTT - Supply Chain, Fixed Income, CVS, and Private Credit (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.439
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. So you know, I

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>got lead class cow here in the studio. He covers

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>all the transportation, all the logistics, so he's the blame

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>for all the supply chain stuff. But he does that

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:32.159
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligence. And I was just telling him, I

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:35.840
<v Speaker 1>just read this book book Everything, which is a book

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 1>basically about the global container shipping business. And it was

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a summer beach read on the Jersey Shore because you

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>look at these big ships off the coast of the

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:45.519
<v Speaker 1>Jersey Shore and you think about it, and it got

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>me thinking, that's a tough business. Boy, I mean, that

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>is a tough business. And I saw that Marsk, you know,

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest container shipping companies. They reported some

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>numbers today. Lee, talk to us about Marsk and then

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>help us think about where we are in this global

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>supply chain challenge that really is a global sure shures

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>omarics because like the number one and number two global

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>container liner depending on the day in the month. Um.

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>But you know, they reported great earnings and a lot

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of that had to do with going on their ocean business,

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>which is really cool to what they are, and that's

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>been driven by really really strong contractual rates. Um. You know.

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>What we have seen though, is that you know, we're

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:22.399
<v Speaker 1>probably at peak earnings for these kind of container liner

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>companies and rates are gonna get a lot weaker. And

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the spot market rates are down around seventy eight percent

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 1>year of a year, where at levels that we haven't

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>seen since they move a lot, don't they do. It's

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>it's and its because it's it's a really common I mean,

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the liners won't tell you this, but it's a commoditized business.

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>You know. They they ship a box from point A

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 1>to point b uh, and the lower price, the lowest price,

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that's the new price. And so it's it happens to

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>be a very irrational market because a lot of the

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>players are are subsidized if you will, by uh, you know,

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the country of origin of where they are. Because most

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>of the players are the major players are based out

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of Asia. There's a couple of large European players that

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>are a little more I would call them disciplined and

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>rational when it comes to pricing. So you know, we

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>expect like we're sailing past peak earnings. Uh, and you

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>know next year is going to be a lot more

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>challenging because of that irrational behavior. There's a great chart

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>rolling around in the Bloomber terminal somewhere the shows these

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>container freight rates just completely making a U turn and

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>they're now back to I want to say, pre pandemic

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>levels are almost there. Um what happened to where in

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a supply chain crisis Bush, by the way, has not

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>been fixed yet as far as I as far as

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I understand, So why are these freight rates coming down

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>if there's still this premium in theory to to bring

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>things from abroad? Yeah, I mean it really has. It

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:45.119
<v Speaker 1>stems first and foremost from demand. So demand is off.

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>So typically around now is what we call the peak

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>season for freight as like retailers get ready for Christmas

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:52.679
<v Speaker 1>UH and the holidays, and as you know, a lot

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of like large big box retailers are complaining about their

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>inventory is a little too high. Uh and then you

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>have that you throw on top of that high inflation. Uh.

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>So the you know, the consumer has been relatively uh resilient.

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:07.080
<v Speaker 1>But the reality is is this peak season is going

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to be very muted. There might be a little bit

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of of of a benefit not for the liner industry,

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>but maybe for the trucking industry, um, you know in December.

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>But you know, all expectations are is the peak is

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty much a wash this year. And some of that

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>has to do with, um, you know, the demand trends

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that I talked about, but also a lot of it

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>has to do with last year. The comparables were just

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 1>off the chart. So all right, you covered not only

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>you cover the whole transportation supply chain, if you will,

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the big uh ocean going ships that the railroads, the trucks,

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing. Let's talk about the railroads here. I

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>get my container into a port, Um, are the rails

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>prepared to get it to where it needs to go

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>in a timely fashion and in a way that they

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>can make money. Yeah? So the rails are you know,

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the one of the best businesses in my opinion,

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>with freight transportation. You know, they have really high margin business.

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I've to see the barrier's entry are pretty high. No one,

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>no one laying down track in North America. But what

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the Rails they're the problems that they were facing really

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>has to do with labor. Uh. You know, a they

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>had a tentative agreement that wasn't ratified by two unions

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and there's a true there's a real risk of of

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:22.480
<v Speaker 1>of a of a strike in mid November. We think

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 1>that risk is pretty darn low. Um. And what the

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:28.919
<v Speaker 1>Rails have been doing over the last i'd say, since

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the depth of the pandemic, is trying to resource their

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>networks through hiring and training new employees. And what they

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>found is, you know, in in cycles passed, they would, uh,

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>they would furlough their employees and they call them back

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:44.159
<v Speaker 1>up and the employees whould want to come back. But

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 1>this time around, for some reason, the employers are like, yeah,

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I've had enough of being a railroader. I'm gonna go

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:52.239
<v Speaker 1>work in a warehouse, or I'm gonna go do something else,

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 1>or maybe I'm gonna retire early. Who knows, because you know,

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, it is a hard job. It's outside, so

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you're in the hundred degree heat, the zero a degree cold, UM,

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 1>but you know it is is a very well paid, unionized,

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>unionized job. Thank you, Paul coming to my rescue with

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the mike. UM. Some of these issues that haven't been

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>solved yet from from the rail strike perspective that UM

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that we were just talking about. I believe, correct me

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>if I'm wrong. I think November nine, the next day

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 1>that we're looking for. Um, if the kind of voting

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and negotiations don't fully go through, what are the ripple

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>effects here? How bad could it get? I mean, you

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>know the stats that I've seen, and I'm sure a

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of people have seen that are listening to this,

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:38.599
<v Speaker 1>it's it could cost the economy two billion dollars a day.

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>So no one wants that. I mean, the unions don't

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>want that, the railroads don't want that, our politicians don't

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>want that. I don't want that. UM. You know, so

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>it will really muck up supply Chaine, just at a

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>time when supply chains are trying to normalize, UM, and

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the speed of that normalization is really being driven by

0:05:57.200 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>labor availability. And you know that's why we're you know, uh,

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, Paul, we're talking off the air before like

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 1>why We're not using the R word. It is because

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, the consumer is still pretty resilient. Um. You know,

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>you might get a recession that is shallow uh and short,

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:15.919
<v Speaker 1>but the end of the day, you know, freight demand

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look terrible. Over the next twelve months, it may

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>not be as great as it was last year, which

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 1>again right reopening, it was a real, real tough comp Alright, Lee,

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>great Stuff has always loved getting you here in our

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Interactor broken studio. Even better to get a gold

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:32.160
<v Speaker 1>star for that, Lee Glasgow, sector head senior annalys He

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>comes all the freight transportation logistics, think freight containers, railroads,

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:38.839
<v Speaker 1>trucks and everything uh in between. He does that for

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence to be doing that on Wall Street four decades,

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>so we appreciate getting his insights here. All right, this

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>is what you do or this is what I do?

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 1>What I want to talk fixed income? I go, I end,

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 1>go on the Bloomberg terminal. That gets me the Bloomberg

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Index browser. I scrolled down to the Bloomberg u S

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Aggregate Total return Value unhedged index four bonds. It's a

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:06.840
<v Speaker 1>fifteen point five percent this year and fixed income nerves

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>tell me that has never happened. So of course I

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>feel like I got to jump in the deep end

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>of the pool both feet and start buying. But let

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>me check with the professional before I do that. Natalie

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>treviorth I, head of investment grade credit Strategy of Paident

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and Regal, joins us. So, Natalie, it's got to be

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the mother of all times to buy fixed income today?

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Am my writer wrong on that one? I think you're

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>absolutely right. It's never been more attractive. The only issue

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>is that keeps getting more and more attractive every day,

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>so you continue to see these negative returns roll in.

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>So what's kind of just give us as we now

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>have you know, nine ten months of hindsight here for

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the fixed income market. How did we get to this

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>point here and how did it become like? Again, smart

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>people like you tell me we've never seen this in

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 1>fixed income before. Yeah, so we are priced for the

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 1>perfection and credit at the end of two thousand and

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty one, weet very anemic credit spread, particularly in the

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>front end of the curve. It was hard to even

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>get half a percent and yield, and this forced some

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>investors down the credit spectrum from investment grade down to

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>high yield to clos. But what we see now is

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>really a rate driven move by all of the said

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>hikes so far that has driven these negative returns, and

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gone a lot further than people were

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>anticipating at the beginning of the year. And as we

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>get closer to the end of the hiking cycle, it

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>feels like investors are getting a little bit more confident

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>about wanting to redip their toes into the fixed income market.

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 1>To know, the two year at four and a half

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to send is looking pretty attractive. Natalie, I love that

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you brought up the negative yielding debt because it really

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>wasn't that long ago. Is only a year and year

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and a half ago. Now you can actually make money

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>by having the privilege of lending to a lot of

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 1>these sovereign at governments. But I have to ask, in

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 1>this year and year and a half the amount of

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>bond volatility, is that not discouraging in itself to hop

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>into the bond market. Yeah, that bond volatility that we've

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 1>seen in spreads has been a little bit discouraging, But

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you would think that as the absolute yield rise as

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>an underlying treasury rates that investors should demand a higher

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 1>risk premium for dipping down from treasuries into corporate. So

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I look at the two year here four

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 1>point five. There's no real reason to take any extra

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:24.319
<v Speaker 1>risk by going out on the yield curve? Is there? Well,

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>there is if you think things are going to get

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>better and with the said is able to walk a

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>straight of soft landing because you can get six percent

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>by staying in pretty high quality front and investment, great corporate.

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>So if we were to get a pause soon in

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the SuDS hiking cycle, and if credit spreads were to

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>um tight and next year, you could actually get incremental

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>positive return by taking that extra risk by moving into

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>credit as opposed to treasuries alone. Well, Paul brings up

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the two year, and if actually look at the two

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>year in the ten year and they kind of overlay

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>it would say the terminal rates of what five percent,

0:09:57.240 --> 0:09:59.839
<v Speaker 1>which is now being priced in peak in March three,

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>it kind of seems like there's still a long way

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to go when it comes to the yield. How high

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>can it go? Well, we think the curve can remain

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>inverted for a while, so it wouldn't be too surprising

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>to see the two year move up higher to that

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>five percent, particularly, we think that that's gonna pause at

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>this higher range. But we are seeing some investors who

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>are anticipating cuts eventually, maybe not next year but the

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>following year, and think locking in four percent on the

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 1>ten year plus adding some credit spread on top of

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that is still attractive to locking longer term higher yields

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 1>rather than before the reinvesting in a couple of years. Natalie,

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I started my career and as a credit research guy

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:40.839
<v Speaker 1>at the Chase Manhattan Bank. Do I have to break

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>out some of my old credit models if I'm worried

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>about a recession here and credit quality and all that stuff. Well,

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the good news is credit fundamentals are still actually pretty strong.

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Some of the negative news that we're seen in the

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:56.559
<v Speaker 1>equity market, such as dividend cuts are slowing down a

0:10:56.640 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>share buybacks are actually positive for bondholders. Companies are really

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>focused on managing their balance sheets and want to keep

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 1>leverage and checked, so we don't think there's actually going

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to be a big downgrade wave here um as companies

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 1>really want to make sure that they're maintaining their investment

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>grade ratings. I thought we were done. We're not. Let

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>me ask you about simply the high yield market here,

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 1>there seems to be some divergence in terms of the

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:29.199
<v Speaker 1>commodity moves and commodity forecasts. If you are perhaps forecasting

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a recession, a lot of these oil prices and oil

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>contracts were the first to fall, of the first to collapse.

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:38.199
<v Speaker 1>What does that do to high yield? Yeah, we think

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that could be a little bit challenging for high yield,

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>but we are not forecasting the collapse. And the energy

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>prices we think they stay kind of in this a

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>D range or higher, and at this level of these

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>companies are still are still throwing off quite a bit

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of free cash flow. We do think a lot of

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:56.439
<v Speaker 1>energy bonds of already priced in these um strong markets,

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>So we think there could be some potential downside, but

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't think there's gonna be another wave of down

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>grades like you saw immediately post the pandemic. All right, Natalie,

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 1>great stuff. Really appreciate getting some of your time this morning, Natalie.

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Natalie Trevis, head of investment grade credit strategy at Paid

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and Regals. All right, let's talk technology here. You know,

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>we had tech earnings over the last week. Broadly defined,

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>they were disappointing particularly have any advertising exposure. And it

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of got me thinking, is there's gonna be a

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a reset in this market about how

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the market thinks about technology. So let's bring an Anora Rana.

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 1>He's a senior software I T Services animlysts for Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>joining us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. So

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think really antorwag. Since the Great Financial Crisis,

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>tech broadly defined has led this market higher. It's been

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the leader. It's had the premium valuation, the premium performance.

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Is that narrative? Is that changed in the last week

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to ten days. Yes, I think the biggest thing is

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>way does it welcome from evaluation interview. We have seen

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>massive spending in technology over the last five years. The

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>pandemic spread it up, so companies were spending quite a

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>bit on that. Then now when you see a recession

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:14.199
<v Speaker 1>on the horizon, you do pull back a little bit.

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Now you pull back, you sage, you put back hardware,

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>equipment upgrades, you pull back software. All of those things happened.

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>But you know, one of the things we would say

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>is our biggest thing has been in the last six

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>months we saw no revision estimates. That was our biggest

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:31.559
<v Speaker 1>complaint going in that we have not seen any revision

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 1>of estimates. And one of the numbers I will highlight

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>is in November of last year, when market was really

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>at top, market was expecting let's say, for Microsoft, two

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:44.319
<v Speaker 1>thirty six billion dollars in revenue for calendar of three

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:47.079
<v Speaker 1>Tell about a month ago. Tell about I would say

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:49.959
<v Speaker 1>three weeks ago. They were still expecting that number too

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to be there. And I checked it last night. It's

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>gone down to ten billion dollar reduction about a four.

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>So so we are seeing numbers come down now. I

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>think this is the time when side is going to

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>take the numbers down, and I think that's what will

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>drive the reset. Well, if you what does what does

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:09.079
<v Speaker 1>the reset look like? Then? I mean, are we looking

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>at valuations that are coming back to I wanna perhaps

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:17.559
<v Speaker 1>even then we were thought that tech was borderline in

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>a bubble. What does it look like? I would argue

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that now we are well below our pre pandemic levels

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>at this point for all the technology stocks, including software,

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, Microsoft, Apple, all these companies. The thing that

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I do want to highlight is, let's say, for the

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>sake of argument. For a company like Microsoft that has

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>grown three to five years at about fifteen six in

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>constant currency, they're still going to grow eight to ten

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 1>percent over the next twelve months too, and then the

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>year after that when it rebound comes back, it's going

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to come back actually stronger, because you just cannot live

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>without upgrading some of this stuff. So it's a pause

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see for the next twelve months, but

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'll be a very optimistic about a bounce back.

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>How about you know, I know the backbone of Bloomer

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence research is the data. We have the best data

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street. We spend a lot of money for

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>this data. And for you guys in the tech space,

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>one of your sources, I knows I d C and

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>they've got just kind of industry leading data as it

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>relates to all amounts of spending across the technology stack.

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>What are they saying over the next several years in

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>terms of tech tech span given what we've just experienced

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>over the last few years. So, I mean, I've built

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>my own mental model which I can explain, and I

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>think I DC is, you know, somewhere plus or minus

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>two percent on that. The way I look at it.

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>If the if the global world is going to grow

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>at two to three, technology spending is going to be

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 1>two to three times. So that so let's say four

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to nine pc um in that hardware is going to

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>be low single digits. Software is going to be ten

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 1>percent plus, and service is going to be around five

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to seven percent. So software is the key driver there

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>in double digits. And and in fact, you could look

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>at any company today's salesforce service now you will still

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>see estimates above for this service now above, so we

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>have a long way to go before we reach maturation

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>in the software growth rates. What about kind of great

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>sensitivity here? A lot of these big tech names were

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of the poster child of if the Fed hikes,

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>these are the first names you sell. And and although

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>that made sense when you have these massive balance sheets

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and all this cash and all this liquidity, what happens

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 1>now some of that cash has been deployed and the

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>rates market is kind of peeking and kind of stalling out.

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't that mean that tech should be now? I would

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>say that the day we get this news that the

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>pivot is there, we're gonna have one hell of a

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>tech rally. Now, I don't know when that day. I mean,

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I don't That's the thing I cannot predict.

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 1>But um, that's gonna happen. I mean, it may not

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>happen now, six months, twelve months, even longo, but that's

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the day we're going to have this conversation because all

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>these companies are very resistant to any kind of a

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>downtown and because of the work that they do. But

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>we're already there. If you're looking at the market expectations,

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>they're already stalling out at five in March. And there's

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 1>an argument here that that's going to create some sort

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of floor for the equity market. But does that mean

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that tech leads that, Oh, it has to there is

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>no no other way because that has the highest beta.

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Those are the ones that were killed more. That's where

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:17.879
<v Speaker 1>the discount rate really, you know, completely demolished the valuations

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:20.719
<v Speaker 1>of it. But I think, in in conjunction with what

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I said to Paul earlier, the revenue estimates and and

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and profit estimates needs to come down, and I think

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>they started to come down. I think, you know, it

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>could be another month or so when we see a

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:33.359
<v Speaker 1>bottom for that. I think that couple with the rates

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 1>is what drives the market. Opted all right, let's talk

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>about Microsoft um sat Natla Nadella, I think is one

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 1>of the most under believe it or not, you know,

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the undervalued or under recognized folks out in silicon value

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>what he's done with that company. But I'm looking at

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:50.399
<v Speaker 1>the f A function for Microsoft and a little bit

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>of a slow down and growth in the twenty three

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>consensu assessments eight and a half percent, presumably bacon in

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 1>some type of recession. But then you look at six

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Wall Streets still predicting thirteen percent revenue growth. That's pretty

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 1>darn good, is that. I would argue that it's going

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:08.439
<v Speaker 1>to be better than that, because it's going to be

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 1>close to six. If I do not look at any

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>effects headwinds at that point, we are assuming, you know,

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:17.199
<v Speaker 1>dollar cannot get stronger, you know, forever at that at

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 1>that end. But even if I was to exclude this,

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>because we saw this during the pandemic, if you were

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 1>to go look at the data during the pandemic, and

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:26.880
<v Speaker 1>we published a note on this yesterday, that cloud growth

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>rates dipped quite a bit in the four quarters since

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic started, and the year after that growth rates

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>picked up. In that cloud business, which is very unusual

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 1>because the size of that business is very large. So

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 1>for growth rates to accelerate, and we think that's going

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the same thing is going to happen going into twenty four. Well,

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:47.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about cloud adoption here because I think, um, your

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>colleague Man deep Thing actually talked about the fact that

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:53.199
<v Speaker 1>this is a market. I don't want to mess up

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the numbers here, but this is a market that has

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to like four or five, like a billion

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 1>or trillion or some sort of big, big, big number,

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:04.159
<v Speaker 1>but that only a fraction of it has really been unlocked.

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>But a lot of that is because a lot of

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 1>these companies haven't actually adopted it fully. About thirty seconds here,

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 1>how long is it gonna take to adopt fully? It's

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>it's just going to be taken a lease to decade

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to get dinner. So we are looking at a decade

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of very strong cloud growth. The growth rates will be decelerate,

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>but but it's going to take at least to decade.

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, I don't know great stuff, appreciate it always.

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 1>We let to getting the overview of the text base

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and then digging down into some individual names. I guess

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the key issue for a lot of people, is will

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the tech sector continued to be a leading sector in

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:38.679
<v Speaker 1>this equity market when we get a turn upward or

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:40.879
<v Speaker 1>has that been rerated? On a Rock still feels bullish

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>about the text space on Rock Ron senior Software and

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 1>I T Services analyst for Bloomberg in intelligence. I'm gonna

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>mis some ignorance here. C v S Healthcore, not CBS Television,

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>which is a company I've followed forever, but CBS the

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>healthcare company. I did know how big this company is.

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's a hundred and thirty billion in market capitalization.

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's got like three hundred thousand employees. Uh.

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Just a huge company, and it's just a big, big

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>player in the healthcare space. And I need to do

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:17.679
<v Speaker 1>some more work on this thing. But anyway, they reported

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 1>some numbers today, some good numbers. There's also some news

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>out there about an opioid uh tenant to twelve billion

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 1>dollar opio a pack. So we need to get a

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit smarter on this company. Uh, And so we

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:29.879
<v Speaker 1>asked Jonathan Palmer to come in near. Jonathan Palmer is

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a senior equity research analysts and team leader for the

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 1>healthcare team at Bloomberg Intelligence. He's been covering the stock

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 1>in this sector for decades. Here, Johnathan, give us you

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>know again, I don't know anything about this company. What

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 1>do I like? One or two sentences? What is this company?

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Why do I need to know more about it? Sure, Pauls,

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me on. So CBS has really transformed

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>itself for the last two decades. I mean, traditionally it

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>was a retail pharmacy and that's what I called a

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 1>PBM to help manage drug benefits. And then a couple

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>of years ago they purchased the big insurre at to

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>now become this three legged stool of healthcare retail PBM insurance.

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 1>And really what they're trying to do is become, you know,

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 1>a provider of healthcare services across the spectrum and and

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, come into people's home and provide them services

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 1>at these retail locations. And they have a really big

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:19.439
<v Speaker 1>push lately, although they haven't executed on this plan. They

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>want to move into primary care visa V like Amazon

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and one Medical. Well, what is the difference then, I mean,

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>in our commercial break, you're just talking about how we

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>all kind of think of CVS is still the pharmacy business.

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>It's evolved from from that vision. What could it turn into? Sure?

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:40.640
<v Speaker 1>So I think their their vision is that they want

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to be a provider of healthcare services across the spectrum

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:46.919
<v Speaker 1>and continuum, and you know, they want to have you

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 1>in their network in one form or another, whether that's

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:52.399
<v Speaker 1>in their pharmacy, you know, hopefully down the road in

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 1>one of their doctor's offices and really help, uh, you know,

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>manage that evolution of a patient's care. So they reported

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 1>num Is today stock is trading up, uh IT stocks

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 1>only down like four this year, so out performing the market.

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us about kind of what they reported today

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and kind of what's the call on the stock. Yeah,

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:13.360
<v Speaker 1>so the numbers today were pretty good. There was each

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 1>of the three businesses performed pretty well, a little bit

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>above expectations. Really, the big question coming into today was,

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, what does their outer year growth profile look like.

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>They have had a plan in place where they expected

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 1>to get to double digit EPs growth by two thousand

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty four. They've had a couple of setbacks lately. Uh

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 1>they had some unfavorable rankings in their medicare plans and

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:38.159
<v Speaker 1>um More recently, they lost a big PBM contract u

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:41.719
<v Speaker 1>from one of their peers, UH Sentien, And so there

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:45.120
<v Speaker 1>was a question whether that double digit EPs targets still stood,

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>and they released guidance this morning on a permanent guidance

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:50.680
<v Speaker 1>on on two thousand, twenty three. Um, they're gonna be

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:52.919
<v Speaker 1>high single digit EPs growth, which is in line with

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 1>what they said, and they still planned to reach that

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>double digit target in twenty four and it might come

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>through a couple different flavors. It might be through acquisitions,

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:03.880
<v Speaker 1>or they might be buying back a lot of stock

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to get to that. I'm just looking at the f

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 1>A functional on the Bloomberg terminal kind of gives you

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the consensus of what's out there from all the sales

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 1>side UH and four it's eight point seven EPs scrolls

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 1>in the streets a little bit cautious. They're also a

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>story out today. You want to get your comment on CVS, Walmart,

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Walgreens reach tentative twelve billion dollar opioid pack. Give us

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the background here and and kind of this good news

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 1>for the company. This is great news for the company.

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:33.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, the opioid issue has been overhanging, not so

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>much for the pharmacies but the drug distributors for really

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:38.679
<v Speaker 1>the last almost five to ten years, and they were

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:42.199
<v Speaker 1>really the first targets of these legal actions. And so

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the distributors settled at the beginning of this year for

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>about twenty billion dollars between the big three three like

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>their McKesson, Amerisource, Bergen, and Cardinal Health. And so it's

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>interesting to think about, you know, the the d a

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>s and attorney generals in these various states. You know,

0:23:57.359 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 1>we're going after people who could pay. And my thinking

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 1>always that, well, we have CBS, we have Walgreens, we

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:04.359
<v Speaker 1>have Walmart. These are all pretty big companies in their

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 1>ability to pay is there, And and now we've turned

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:09.679
<v Speaker 1>around and we've got a settlement, and so you know,

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I think what was an overhanging and unknown for a

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:15.640
<v Speaker 1>little while now has some clarity and visibility. And for CBS,

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:18.360
<v Speaker 1>it's five billion dollars over ten years. That's a very

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 1>manageable number. Well, you mentioned Walmart as well. Walmart is

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 1>not the only company to want kind of their their

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:29.120
<v Speaker 1>foot in healthcare. We've got Amazon, We've had Berkshire Hathaway

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>as well, JP Morgan. I think at one point, is

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>it fair to compare CBS is kind of broader vision

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to some of these um MAYA capped companies. It's interesting

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 1>because I think everybody who is looking at the consumer

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:45.640
<v Speaker 1>is thinking that healthcare is there, you know, next obvious extension,

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and that's why you have Walmart and Amazon going there.

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I think CBS sees that that same vision as well,

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the consumer driven healthcare piece. But I think you know

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:56.160
<v Speaker 1>where they're a little bit different. Is there a more

0:24:56.200 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>traditional healthcare provider Visa v their PBM and ensure and

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 1>they look at their peer United Healthcare, which is the

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 1>biggest insurer, and how they've more moved more to become

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 1>more ingrained into the healthcare system, buying practices, buying facilities,

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:15.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, really managing patient end to end. So real

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>quicker thir thirty seconds. If we're going into a recession,

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:20.399
<v Speaker 1>do I want to own healthcare stocks? You're asking a

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 1>healthcare analysts health care of the tagline is healthcare is

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:27.439
<v Speaker 1>extremely defensive, and I mean, I think we've seen that

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 1>play out in a number of recessionary environments. You know,

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 1>people still get sick, they still go to the doctor,

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 1>they still take drugs. You know that these are all

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty defensive sectors of the healthcare space. All right, good, stuff. Yeah,

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, Bloomberg Intelligence folks, B I go

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>on the terminal. If you've got a terminal in front

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:47.360
<v Speaker 1>of you, B I go, and what you're gonna get

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:51.440
<v Speaker 1>there is world class investment research, equity research, credit research,

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and lots lots more. And we've got people like Jonathan Palmer,

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:57.880
<v Speaker 1>each a season Wall Street anald's standing behind this research,

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>writing this research. They have some of that this best

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>data in the business that informs their research. So, uh,

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>if you need to get real smart on a topic

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:09.639
<v Speaker 1>on a stock like I do on CBS, b I

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:12.440
<v Speaker 1>go is your place to go. And we thank Jonathan Palmer.

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>He's a senior equity research channels. He's a team leader

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>leading our healthcare research at Bloomberg Intelligence and ed joined

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:20.639
<v Speaker 1>us here in a Bloomberg Interactive broker studio. So what

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:26.879
<v Speaker 1>does he get a gold star just talking to Shannali

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Bassk Bloomberg News. She covers all things Wall Street. Course

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:31.199
<v Speaker 1>she would talk on and choose down at Miami to

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>private equity sware down there. So we're talking private equity,

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 1>private credit. Uh So our next guest fits right in

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 1>their Randy Swimmer, co head of Senior Lending and senior

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>managing director at Churchill Asset Management. They do that private

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>credit stuff over there. So, Randy, how does your business

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 1>perform in a world of rising interest rates? You're in

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the credit business, So senior dead is floating great instrument.

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>So it improves let's go up, total yields go up.

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:02.400
<v Speaker 1>We've been waiting for this moment for a long long time.

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:06.160
<v Speaker 1>But it's also less volatile because these are smaller companies.

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>They don't trade, so it's obviously an improvement with higher rates,

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 1>but it's also great for the kind of headline volatility

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 1>that we've been subject to for a long time. That's

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>also something that investors appreciate because when you look at

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:22.159
<v Speaker 1>public UH assets such as fixed income in public equities,

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>they have been very correlated, which is not helpful. If

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 1>you're sixty forty allocated portfolio. Everything's going down together. And

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:34.360
<v Speaker 1>you've seen the other asselete classes performance here today, it's

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 1>been in the red. It's it's kind of ugly. Private

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>credit in general has been doing really well UM and

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 1>so that's that's the advantage. Floating rate, less correlated, better structure, security, security,

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. Randy, it is FED day, Happy FAED day.

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:53.919
<v Speaker 1>UH do we see a pivot today? I don't think so.

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>There's been so much invested by the Fed in keeping

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 1>on and and making sure that the market believes that

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>their fight against inflation is real. Um. The data that

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 1>has been coming out has been pretty bullish in terms

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 1>of the economic strength. You're you're talking about GDP for

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the third quarter of two point six percent. That's pretty strong. Yeah,

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 1>there were some export data that helped that. Job openings

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 1>continue to go up. Unemployment, you know, still is low,

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:25.679
<v Speaker 1>the labor market is tight, wages are going up. I

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 1>mean you're talking about you know, I've been calling it

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:31.199
<v Speaker 1>a precession all your Well, you're welcome to you that

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:36.639
<v Speaker 1>term because yeah, thank you. UM. But because in a precession,

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>we think that a recession is coming. Everybody's predicting something

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>next year. But the economics right now are too strong.

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 1>So your business, you tend to finance, you know, private

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 1>equity deals, mid market type of deals. Give us a

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of typical deal for Churchill Asset Management. Sure, so

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>we have private equity sponsor relationships that come to us

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:02.959
<v Speaker 1>for UH to solve multiple of variety of solutions up

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and down the capital structure. So they'll come to say, hey,

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at a very interesting commercial landscaping business. You know,

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty five million, but the revenues um. The great thing

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 1>about commercial landscaping is in real estate, even if there's

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>no one in the building, somebody has always got to

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 1>be cutting the lawn, mowing the grass, hedge hedge clipping,

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>by the way, different kind of hedge fund uh and

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and uh snow plowing. And so that's a kind of

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 1>business that is steady eddy throughout any season and any cycle. Um.

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 1>And with a good sponsor that's going to put in

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 1>fifty equity into the deal below you, it's an attractive

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>investment for our investors because they're protected and then the

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 1>debt itself has covenants, so if the performance deteriorates, we're

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 1>back at the table negotiating. Plus, the private equity sponsors

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 1>that we deal with, they focus and specialized in defensive sectors,

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 1>so healthcare, technology, business services, all of which have been

0:29:56.360 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 1>doing very very well through COVID and we expect would

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>do well during recession. So just ask this Questiontionale, but

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna ask it to you is won't get your take.

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I believe there's a consensus that the private markets operated

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a lag relative to the public markets.

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 1>If there is a reckoning in the public markets, which

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>arguably there already has been for the past ten months

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of equity carnage, does that mean the private markets are

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 1>due for one as well. Yeah. I don't think it's

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 1>so much a lag. It's that it's operating um with

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 1>with different parameters. Because these companies are private, unrated, and

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the debt doesn't trade, you don't see the obvious reaction.

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 1>So if you know the markets public equity markets are down,

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 1>you see an instant reaction in the bond markets, for example,

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 1>you don't see that. It's not that it's lagging, it's

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>just that it responds to different things. Because these companies

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 1>are private, and the advantage of private credit, which is

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 1>what the issuers and investors are seeing right now, is

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 1>headline risk will go up and down, and you'll see

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the public equity markets, for example, go up five hundred

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 1>points one day, down five the next day with no

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>discernible diff for instant data. The private private credit markets

0:31:02.840 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and private equity are much more stable, so they tend

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 1>to respond more to long term changes in the economy

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>in markets um but that makes them in this world

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 1>of high voltility of very favorite asset class. Um. You know,

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 1>we look at our portfolio right now, it's actually doing

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 1>really well. We have we're three hundred companies in the

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 1>portfolio and and the vast majority of them are performing

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>well in terms of revenues and earnings, again because of

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the sectors that they're in, which are defensive. I hear.

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's just me, but it seems like over the

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years, I've heard more and more and

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 1>more about the private credit business and how it's such

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 1>a good business. Um, what's the fundraising environment out that.

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if you guys are in a fundraising

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 1>mode or not, but what's the environment out there for

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>raising private credit capital? So we just publicly issued pressure

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 1>release saying that we had raised twelve billion dollars over

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the last twelve eighteen months. So the fund fundraising environment

0:31:57.160 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 1>for us has been very good. Um. Look right now,

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 1>investors like you all are cautious. They're looking at the signs,

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the kinds of signs that we talked about with the

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>economy potential recession, and so everyone's kind of taking that

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 1>extra layer of due diligence of time and thinking, hey,

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 1>what's the rush to do this? Now? We're not market timers.

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 1>We're basically we've been doing this, you know, close to

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty years at Churchill or the long track records successfully

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>over many cycles are are basically stories. Do this with

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 1>us for the long run because we don't know and

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you don't know when the next recession is going to come.

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 1>So want to you know, hit your wagon to affirm

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and to an asset class that is going to be

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:39.720
<v Speaker 1>here for the long run, that performs well during all

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the downturns. You know, we had positive returns during the

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:46.719
<v Speaker 1>o idline crisis. Why not you know, be in that

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and then benefit right now to what I think is

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the best market and private credit for over a decade.

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing yield to leverage at record highs. We're seeing

0:32:56.640 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 1>um structures tighter, we're seeing leverage or by a turn

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 1>or more of the Badah. I actually think this is

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 1>a great time to be investing, but you have to

0:33:05.440 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>do it with someone who's been through the downturns before successfully. Well,

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 1>speaking of downturns, go about thirty seconds here, when do

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 1>we see the next one? Well, we were not in

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the business of predicting. We have to predicts. Now. We

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 1>we are always saying it's coming next year. In fact,

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 1>we model a recession in every deal we do for

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 1>next year. So in our investment committee, and we've got

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 1>one this afternoon, I'm sure that will show we're going

0:33:29.440 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to be intercession next year. If it doesn't happen. My

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 1>personal belief is that it's going to be a softer

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 1>recession than a harder recession. I think it's gonna be

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 1>more like two thousand, two thousand one than O eight

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 1>oh nine. Because the banks and the finishing systems good shape.

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 1>We'll be in good shape no matter what kind of

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 1>recession it is. All right, Randy, good stuff is always

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate. Making the long commute, oh from your office

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 1>is over here to seven thirty one Lex Randy strmercoh

0:33:53.240 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Had of Senior Lending. He's a senior managing director Churchill

0:33:56.320 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Acts Asset Management. Talking about the private credit business, and

0:33:59.360 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 1>again maybe it's to me, but I've been hearing a

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 1>lot more about the private credit business. It's a good business,

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 1>it's attracting a lot of capital. I'm seeing more and

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>more big names kind of get into that space. Thanks

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:26.279
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller three. On Fall Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 1>pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always catch us

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 1>worldwide at Bloomberg Radio