WEBVTT - Zero Tariffs Would Benefit EU Automakers More Than

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm Pim

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Fox along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for you and your money, whether you're at the grocery

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>store or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 1>L Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com.

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Trade talks and updates to NAFTA. President Donald Trump saying

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that there are signs of optimism. He said that we're

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>really doing well. He talked to reporters at the White

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 1>House talking about Canada. He says they want to be

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>part of the deal we've gotten until Friday, and he says,

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the President says, I think we're probably on track. Well,

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>let's find out if we're really on track. We've got

0:00:55.960 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Michael Dean, our senior analyst European Automotive for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Plus we've got Josh wind Grove. He's our Canadian government

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>reporter for Bloomberg and he just happens to be in

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>our nation's capital in Washington, d C. Josh wind Grove.

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>We got just a small comment from Christopher Freeland, the

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Foreign Minister of Canada talking about intense negotiations with Robert Leitheiser.

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Any update on what exactly is going on in those negotiations. Yeah,

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.040
<v Speaker 1>you're getting a good window into the glamour of trade

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>reporting here, and I'm just calling from the streets of

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Washington where we're loitering and hanging on every word that

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Christie Freeland has to throw our way on the way

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>in and out of these meetings, to sort of swinging

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:43.680
<v Speaker 1>in and out as they bringing the political figures and

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 1>bring sort of the technical experts who you might lovingly

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>call the true nerds, the nerds with three cred to

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>commast on these issues. But you know, there isn't a

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>sense of panic in the air. It's hard to finger

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>on the even there were twenty four hours or so

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:04.559
<v Speaker 1>from this sort of quadline self imposed political deadline, which

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:08.919
<v Speaker 1>is frankly all that not that real the deadline. Uh,

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's there's not really uh back against the

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>wall field to it. Also, I think that's reflected in

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 1>the views you're hearing from Trump and Trudeau that maybe

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:20.639
<v Speaker 1>they're untracked to get something. What's interesting is that it

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a day where it does seem like there is progress

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>being made towards some kind of North American free trade agreement,

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>albeit not by that name. There does seem to be

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a softening between the European Union and the US as well,

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>with the European Union proposing reportedly anyway, uh, that they

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>are willing to strip away all tariffs if the US

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:42.920
<v Speaker 1>is willing to do the same. And Michael, I'd love

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:46.079
<v Speaker 1>you to come on in here, how significant, how surious

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>is this, How seriously should we take this? And how

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>significant would it be for the auto industry in particular? Hi? There? Yes, So,

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the German automakers set about one point two million cars

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>in the US. About half of these are imported from

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:01.959
<v Speaker 1>the EU. So this would remove a two and a

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>half percent tariff, which isn't massive in the scheme of things.

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>But what I think the bigger issue here is if

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>it removes the threat that Donald Trump proposed in import tariff.

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the bigger positive here for the European carmakers. Michael,

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>who would benefit more if all tariffs were done away

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>between the EU and the US. Would it be the

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>US automakers or the European automakers? Almost certainly the EU

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>given the numbers. I just talked about over half a

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>million vehicles being exported to the US each year. Michael,

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>does the United States really have an export strategy when

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>it comes to automobiles targeting the European Union? Well, they

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>have brands in Europe. They have fought which which still

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>does very well. UM as you know, GM sold Opal recently,

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>which wasn't such a success. So there hasn't really been

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>a major sort of export mark kids for the US

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>manufacturers into the EU EU, and I don't think that

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>will change all right, So we have that softening of

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the European Union in the US. It seems like there

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>is a good rapport or at least not a bad

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 1>report between Canada and the US and Mexico. So Josh,

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>what are we looking for to determine whether or not

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be a done deal, They're going

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to meet the deadline, and whether or not this is

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>just basically nap to two point over a few tweaks. Yeah.

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the parallel here is that it's less about

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>what can be achieved by deal and the threat that

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 1>comes off the table. It's the same thing with THEU

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>cars less about two and a half percent in the

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 1>shread and the same with NAFTA, because whatever they deal

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>get a deal on this Friday, will be a deal

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>in principle at best, subject a month of for the talks,

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 1>legal haggling, you know, in trade like single words in

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a trade agreement can mean all the difference in the world.

0:04:57.440 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 1>So you know, it's just sort of looking for a

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>political wing to get Trump satisfied, I guess. And it's

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna come down to dairy and dispute Panels. US wants

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to basically do away with media dairy system and the Panels,

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:13.719
<v Speaker 1>and I guess they're looking for a way to save

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of both. Josh, is there any way

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 1>to disentangle US automobile production from what happens in Canada,

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 1>specifically in Ontario? Uh? Not painlessly? Um. You know, Canada

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>is a huge ex border of autos to the US

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to supply chains or deeply integrated some parts across the

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>border six times before they actually end up in a car.

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 1>So if you started tariffing it, it would be US

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>automakers who would have would be certainly among those feeling

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the pain. In US consumers would be among most paying

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the price. Because I feel like this gets lost. It's

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>so timble, but it's like it gets lost in the

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>tariffs are paid by the country that applies book right,

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>So US tarrap is paid by the US people buying

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the goods. John swing Grove, We're gonna let you go.

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:03.279
<v Speaker 1>A lot of trade reporting to be down. Josh wyn

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Grove is Canada government reporter for Bloomberg News. Michael stick

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>with US. I want to talk about the auto industry,

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and I want to talk about the news that we

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>got out earlier today with the European Union. How credible

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:16.839
<v Speaker 1>is what we learned today that the European Union would

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>be European Union will be willing to drop all tariffs

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 1>if the US were to do the same. Is that likely?

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Is that realistic? I think it's possible. Given the magnitude

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>of the exports from the EU and how important the

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>German auto industry is to the EU, I think this

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:36.600
<v Speaker 1>definitely is credible. How big is the auto industry for

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the German economy? Can you give us some perspective? What

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>German auto makers have about a hundred billion dollars of

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>revenues from the US. About of that is directly for

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>exports to the US. So yes, it's it's very significant.

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:57.719
<v Speaker 1>And what about hundred and twenty thousand Americans actually work

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>for European Union car companies in the United States and

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:07.279
<v Speaker 1>states such as South Carolina, Alabama, Mississippi, and Tennessee. Right,

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that's correct. So both BMW and Mercedes have made the

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>US their suv hub production base um globally, and therefore

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>they produce over six hundred thousand vehicles annually in the US.

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Plus Folkswagon produces about two hundred thousand units, so it's

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>very significant. Thank you so much. Michael Dean senior analyst

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>covering the European automative automotive sector for Bloomberg Intelligence, coming

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>to us from London. Michael, thank you. He's an investor

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>who follows Warren Buffett. David Deets is the founder and

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the chief investment strategist for Point View Wealth Management, helping

0:07:56.880 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to manage more than three hundred million dollars of stomer

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>assets based in Summit, New Jersey. David diet is always

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>a pleasure. When did you first invest alongside Warren Buffett

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and Berkshire Hathaway. Well, I've been a long term Berkshire

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 1>halfway holder. Uh, that goes back into the nineties. Part

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of it is just so that I get tickets to

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>go out to Omaha um and see him in person.

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>And I was lucky enough to be in Omaha just

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>this past May. And uh, he's still as witty and

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:36.079
<v Speaker 1>instructive and insightful as he's ever been. And of course

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>his sidekick there um Charles munger Is, is doing the

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:44.319
<v Speaker 1>same thing. And over the years, I'd have to credit

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>him as being so informative to our investing strategy here

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:50.680
<v Speaker 1>at Point View. All right, so let's talk about how

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>he has informed your strategy. In particular recently, he was

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>on earlier a couple of competing networks talking about how

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>he likes airlines, he prefers stocks over bonds. What's been

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:05.080
<v Speaker 1>your biggest takeaway so far today? Well, you know, I

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>think the number one question everyone's mind here we are

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>in the longest bold market ever by some metrics, is

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>does he still like stocks today? And you know, I

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>felt he answered the question with yes for the long term. Um,

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, he always wishes to buy things cheaper, but

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.719
<v Speaker 1>he offered one comparison. He said, look, if you had

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a chance to buy a thirty year treasury bond or

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 1>invest in a well diversified basia stocks. The stock choice

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>is a no brainer. So over the long haul, he

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>likes stocks, particularly relative to where interest rate start today.

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:40.319
<v Speaker 1>Interestingly enough, he also opined in real estate, and he

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>thought stocks are cheaper than real estate. I know we

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>have lots of clients, a lot of people out there

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>are looking as an alternative to the stock market real estate.

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>He would inject a note of caution into that. What

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>about acquisitions. Do you believe that Warren Buffett is searching

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>for large acquisitions or is he going to be spending

0:09:56.559 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>time looking on bolt on acquisition small earth. Well, he's

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>looking at everything. You know. His problem is he's just

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 1>got this huge, massive cash hoard too, as he put it,

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>would put it move the needle. He needs to make

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a big acquisition fifty billion or more, almost an S ANDP.

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Having said that, of course, they're still opportunistic in areas

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:22.959
<v Speaker 1>where they see a lot of growth. So for example,

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:26.199
<v Speaker 1>we just learned that he, along with other tech giants,

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:30.439
<v Speaker 1>have invested in an Indian company which focuses on mobile payments.

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>So I think he's he's open to everything, but he

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>really needs the big one. Okay, But David Diets in

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 1>his annual letter to investors. He talked about paying a

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 1>sensible purchase price for an acquisition, and he said that

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>this has been a barrier to virtually all the deals

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that they reviewed. In he said, prices for decent companies,

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>far from spectacular have hit an all time high. You

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>think that still exists, Well, yeah, I do. I mean,

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>we haven't heard of any big acquisitions from him, and

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that's why, um, you know, I think he made the

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>easy uh comparison in terms of where the stock markets

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>today by just comparing it against you know, these super

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>low interest rate bonds. Um. What has been as biggest

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:18.199
<v Speaker 1>acquisition this year and recently is buying shares of Apple.

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:21.680
<v Speaker 1>But with Apple now the largest company on the planet,

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 1>well over a trillion dollar market cap and hitting all

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>time highs as we speak, it's hard to argue that

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that is a great value today. And even he has

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>said that when he's first started buying very heavily in

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Q one, the stock price got away from him. He

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't admit to buying a few shares this quarter. But certainly,

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>although he loves the business, I don't think that you'd, uh,

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, you'd walk away and say he loves the

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>stock price right now? So over the years that you've

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 1>been following Warren Buffett, what's been the most valuable advice

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>that you've taken from him? You know, I think it's

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>it's two things. Really. One is to think long term.

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, so many people on Wall Street they're they're

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>looking at a chart and looking at it. You know,

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>what can the stock market do for me? And the

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:12.319
<v Speaker 1>next day, the next week, the next month, He argues,

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, think about holding if think about holding companies

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:19.200
<v Speaker 1>for a lifetime. And I think that gives him a

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:23.319
<v Speaker 1>staying power um, which really works to his benefit when

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the rest of us are so short term oriented. I

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>think the second thing, of course, is don't look at

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>stocks this pieces of paper, he says, Look underneath him,

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 1>look under the hood. They are operating businesses. You know,

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>if you wouldn't buy the stock if the stock market

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>was closed for the next six months, don't even consider

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>your purchase. These are operating businesses. Understand what makes them tick,

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>how the cash flows work. Only then can you make

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 1>an intelligent acquisition. David Deets. One of the quotes from

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>his annual letter is that Charlie Munger and warm Buffett

0:12:57.280 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that he says they both sleep well, and they leave.

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>It is insane to risk what you have a need

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>in order to obtain what you don't need. Do you

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 1>believe that those words describe many of the acquisitions that

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>have been reported so far this year? Well, you know

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that that's uh, there's been a lot of acquisitions out there.

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 1>But certainly, just in his comments this morning, you know,

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>he talked about debt and so forth, and and uh,

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>certainly the idea that you should leverage yourself deeply in

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>order to make an acquisition. UM. I think he's very

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 1>negative on if the company won't stand as own merits

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and only makes sense if you leverage it to the hill,

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>he'd be very leery about UM. And so I think

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:50.719
<v Speaker 1>that that's one great takeaway for for Wall Street investors.

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Don't operate on margin. Don't use you know, next month's

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>rent money, only use money that you can afford to

0:13:57.120 --> 0:13:59.559
<v Speaker 1>ride with for a long period of time. David DIDs

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 1>stick with David DIDs is founder and chief investment strategistic

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Point View Wealth Management, based in Summit, New Jersey. We

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>are about to head over and here from the Oracle

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of Omaha himself, I personally am very interested to hear

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>what he might be saying about is more than one

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion dollar cash pile where he is going to

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>put it. Also, he has made news to this year

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about starting his own healthcare initiative with a number

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of other companies. Perhaps he will give some insight into that.

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>He is sitting down with Bloomberg television anchor David Weston

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>at his annual charity lunch at Smith and Malensky in

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>New York City. Berkshire Hathaway chief executive Warren Buffett to

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>be speaking about everything from stocks, two bonds to what

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>he will do with this massive cash pile. Right, and

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>just to put it into context, the shares of Berkshire

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Hathaway they are hired by about six percent so far

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>this year. And uh, Warren Buffett holds a thirty six

0:14:56.720 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent stake in the company. Yeah, so

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>definitely really an interesting time. Also interesting will be whether

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>or not the good times are over, whether the opportunities

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>that Warren Buffett has experienced over his decades of a

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>track record, whether those have passed, Whether this is a

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>different time and that just cannot happen given where valuations are. Yeah,

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and and to wonder whether the valuations are better here

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 1>in the United States or whether they're better overseas. Yeah,

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought that it was really interesting. Without Indian acquisition,

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought that that was compelling, especially at a time

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>when there's a lot of money going to startups in India.

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>But this sort of growing recognition that that is a

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>huge market that will surpass China in population in the

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 1>upcoming decade, not to mention it's sort of technological developments

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and and the other advances in its economy. So it's

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of interesting to see whether there is value to

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>be found there um and if so, where and how

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>as a foreign investor it is to get into that. Yes,

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and also it will be interested to hear if he

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>has anything to say about tariffs and how tariffs supplied

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>by the United States will affect the prices that consumers

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>have to pay based on those pass along costs. David

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>David Deeds come back on in here, David Deed's founder

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>in chief investment strategist at Point View Wealth Management. Do

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you expect, to Pim's point, do you expect Warren Buffett

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to be political in any way? Um? Well, already in

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>some comments earlier today, quite frankly, he was asked the

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>question about the economy, and the issue of tariffs did

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>come up, and of course he's a long term holder

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of Sherwin Williams, the famous paint company, and he did

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>allude to tariffs by talking about hey either having to

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>pay a lot more for their pails and so um uh.

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, having been at the annual meeting in in

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>May and and and knowing how he feels about tariffs,

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>he is very much a free trader, and so that

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>was kind of availed backhand negative comment on the whole

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>concept of tariffs. Um. The other thing that I thought

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>was most interesting that the issue of Jerome Powell came up.

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Of course, he's the chair of the Federal Reserve. Um,

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 1>we're in a period of slightly rising interest rates. But

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:13.679
<v Speaker 1>what I really liked, I think boats well for the

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Marcus as he expressed the most confidence in Mr Powell.

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>He said he's not perfect, but he's going to focus

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:22.920
<v Speaker 1>on the job and he's well equipped to do the job.

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 1>And I thought that was a real plus for investors

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>going forward. Here David Deed's quick question to you, when

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you are in Omaha attending the annual meeting of Berkshire Hathaway,

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:38.679
<v Speaker 1>are you aficionado of dairy Queen. Well, you know, I

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>do smile, and I do like dairy Queen, to be

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 1>honest with you, and I do smile every time I

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>go there, knowing that in a very very small way,

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:48.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of benefiting from my purchase as a very

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:51.920
<v Speaker 1>indirectly as a holder of Berkshire Hathway Stock. Hey, David

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Dean's Point View Wealth Management and stick with us also

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>not only dairy Queen, but also Diet Coke, right, because

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 1>he's a very aficionado at the Oracle of Amaha of

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Diet Coke. We seem to be having some technical difficulties

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 1>with respect to the interview, but a lot of really

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting things. Pim uh that, Warren Buffett said there, and

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 1>just sort of digest some of these things. Let's bring

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>in David Deet's President, chief investment strategist at Point View

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 1>Wealth Management. Um, he sounded really bullish. What was your takeaway? Yeah,

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought there's a couple of great things for investors

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:29.360
<v Speaker 1>that we just heard. One is, don't time that market?

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Is this a perfect time to invest? No, he said,

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's not two thousand eight, nineteen seventy, it's

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:37.879
<v Speaker 1>not nineteen seventy four, when was the cheapest period in

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 1>his lifetime. But still stocks look better than bonds. And

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>if you, you know, invest in a diverse array of stocks,

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you're going to do well over the long haul. I

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:49.919
<v Speaker 1>thought that was a great message. The second one is

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 1>always by quality. He talked about return on equities being

0:18:55.440 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>look for companies which are making good money, um, the Apple,

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>they are deploying to have a sensible business plans and

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>tremendous some defensible brands, and buy them and hold them.

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was just a great message. But David,

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>hang on just a second. I mean, it's hardly likely

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that he would say anything that would be contrary to that, right.

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that would be the news if Warren Buffett

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 1>came out and said I want to spend money on

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>companies that deploy capital needlessly and heedlessly and spend it

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:28.920
<v Speaker 1>on ridiculous things. I mean, that would be the headline.

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's not exactly Warren Buffett's forte to be

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:35.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of tossing money around. I mean he's a kind

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of parsimonious when it comes to his investment philosophy. Well,

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:42.399
<v Speaker 1>I think you're exactly right, And if you read his

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:46.159
<v Speaker 1>annual reports over the years and look at his latest activity. Obviously,

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>as he says, he's not out there with a shovel

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 1>putting money into the market. You know. Having said that,

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of course, when you look at all the great investors

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>around the world and look at their track records, your

0:19:57.280 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 1>heart pressed to identify somemon who has better. So even

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>though you could say he's talking his book a little bit, nevertheless,

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I think you have to give him the benefit of

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>adapt because of how well he has done. Yeah. One

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 1>thing that I thought was really interesting was when David

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:17.640
<v Speaker 1>West of Liver Television asked him about a tool Goande,

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the New Yorker writer and physician who Warren Buffett is

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 1>taped to head his healthcare initiative, and David West asked,

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 1>what's he doing? And Warren Buffett responded, he's thinking, what

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:31.919
<v Speaker 1>did you make of that? Well, I mean, you know,

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the healthcare issues are so far proved almost to be intractable. Um.

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, the share of DDP in America keeps going

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:43.679
<v Speaker 1>up this allocane net direction, and no one seems to

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>have the silver bullet as to how the rain cost

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>he had still provide Americans for the best healthcare possible.

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>That's why Warren and Jamie Diamond Uh and a couple

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:54.679
<v Speaker 1>of others have teamed together to try and come up

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 1>with a solution. But from everything I heard this morning here,

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:01.640
<v Speaker 1>no magic solution has been developed, but at least they're

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>working on it, and and that's where we are now

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 1>with the Warren's project there. Thanks very much for being

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>with us. David Diets is the founder and the chief

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>investment strategist for Point View Wealth Management, helping to manage

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:18.879
<v Speaker 1>more than three million dollars of customer assets based in Summit,

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey. This was the year that oil was going

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to climb, possibly back to its prior highs, and yet

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:46.120
<v Speaker 1>that was not to be. Joining us now to find

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 1>out what to expect in the months ahead for the

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>price of Crewed is Rob Hayworth, senior investment strategist at

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>us Bank Wealth Management, helping to oversee it more than

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and fifty billion dollars of assets. Rob, thank

0:21:57.680 --> 0:21:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you so much for being with us. I'm looking right

0:21:59.880 --> 0:22:03.920
<v Speaker 1>now out crude just under seventy barrel, and I'm wondering,

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>from your perspective, are we going to break out significantly

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to the upside of the downside, because frankly, it's been

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 1>split among the people we've spoken to, with people making

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>arguments on either side. Yeah, our point of view is

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of this year, you're probably actually range

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>bound on oil at this point in time. There is

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:25.199
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous amount of bullish sentiment in the in the

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>futures market, but you're starting to turn the calendar from

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>from peak demand summer season in into the softer demand

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>fall season, so that's going to limit the upside. But

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:38.439
<v Speaker 1>there's a bit of a floor in here when you

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 1>think about the Iran sanctions, the cuts in production that

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 1>are going on in Iran. So we think right now

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>this market is kind of caught between these two factors. Uh,

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and we're probably going to stay in this in this

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>price range for through the rest of the year. Well.

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Obviously worth investing in domestic oil production, either in the

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>midstream or up stream. Yeah. A couple of months ago

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>we actually published a quick paper on an opportunity of

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>midstream energy infrastructure companies, and we think that opportunity still exists.

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 1>You've got oil prices hovering at this reasonable price range

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 1>as we can you know, see even in the Permian

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure is fairly tight, meaning there's not enough storage, there's

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 1>not enough transportation UM and and so demand for these

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:29.400
<v Speaker 1>UH for these services is fairly high. And you're coming

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 1>off a fairly rough patch for these midstream energy companies.

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 1>So valuations are fairly cheap, yields are attractive relative to

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 1>other things like high yield bonds UH and and now

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:45.679
<v Speaker 1>with some of this recapitalization in the in the industry

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and the change in structure from master limited partnership to

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 1>more seed corporations, we think that catalyst is there to

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 1>start to unlock that value. You know, one thing that

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious about. If you think that oil prices are

0:23:57.280 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>going to remain range bound, what's the big risk to

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:05.159
<v Speaker 1>your thesis. Yeah, that's a that's a great question. I

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:09.679
<v Speaker 1>think there'll probably be two. One is US production deteriorates

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a little faster than than we expect UM. That would

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>be a key problem I think for UH for oil prices.

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>And then and then the second is really to the

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 1>extent of this global trade war starts to impair global

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:28.879
<v Speaker 1>economic activity UM. Right now, expectations in the market are

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 1>for demand to continue to grow and absorb this supply

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>coming online, particularly as as OPEC, especially Saudi Arabia and

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and they're non OPEC partner Russia ramp up their production. Um,

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 1>you need that demand to continue to expand. And I

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>think if if we get a a surprise softening from

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>some you know, unforeseen escalation in the trade tip, um,

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that would be that would be kind of problematic for

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the for the global oil markets. Rob. I just want

0:24:57.640 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 1>you to look ahead a little bit, maybe you know,

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>two years, three years or so, because of new rules

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that are going into effect in terms of shipping oil, uh,

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:10.159
<v Speaker 1>you know on the nation on the world's oceans. Do

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:11.920
<v Speaker 1>you believe that it's going to get more expensive to

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>actually transport oil and as a result, that's going to

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 1>filter into the price. Uh? Yeah, in general, we think

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 1>we would see that that is true, right, I mean

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that that's one of the bottlenecks we still really have

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:33.640
<v Speaker 1>in in this industry, is is this infrastructure. So ultimately

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>prices could take higher over time, but it's but we've

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:41.400
<v Speaker 1>still you know that that's Uh, it's tough to price

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:43.399
<v Speaker 1>at this point in time because oil is always priced

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>on what's going on right now, what is going on

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:48.680
<v Speaker 1>with supply demand right now. But there's certainly that opportunity

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:52.439
<v Speaker 1>in the future. Are there any places within the energy

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>complex where you think that there are securities that are

0:25:54.800 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>overvalued right now? Um, we're generally, you know, we we

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 1>have a pretty selective process around around security selection. We're

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>not heavy into the integrated space. We're not heavy um

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:15.679
<v Speaker 1>into into a broad swath of of exploration and production.

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 1>We're probably more interested in domestic at this point than

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>we are everything else. So so we've been pretty selective

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms of this midstream opportunity some exploration and production, uh,

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>but but avoiding many of the other segments for now.

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Rob has investment in goal changed. Yes, I think sentiment

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>has finally rolled over. It's been such a rough road

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>for gold since it you know, touched touched its peak

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a few years ago. And and as you've been breaking down,

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:49.360
<v Speaker 1>we've finally seen futures market sentiment moved from that long

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to net short uh. And I well, I think you've

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 1>seen a bounce in the last uh, the last couple

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of weeks. Um. The struggle is the fundamental headwinds for

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>golden now against you, And I think the sentiment in

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the market has rolled over and it's going to be

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 1>tough for it. To regain that bullish for until until

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you you, you know, until prices are finally washed out.

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>So a higher interest rates from the Fed, a stronger

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:19.119
<v Speaker 1>US dollar due to somewhat better US economic growth than

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 1>rest of world UM is going to keep providing that headwind,

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think a sentiment probably remains negative for tom

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>sometime and keeps pressure on gold prices. Many thanks, Rob Hayworth,

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Senior investment strategist, US Bank Wealth Management based in Seattle,

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:39.119
<v Speaker 1>helping to manage more than a hundred and fifty billion

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:59.479
<v Speaker 1>dollars of customer assets. Well, we marked ten years since

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 1>the financial crisis of two thousand and eight. Many people

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:08.919
<v Speaker 1>remember it as the time when bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers disappeared,

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:13.640
<v Speaker 1>But there were some winners in that two thousand eight crisis.

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Any Massa is here now. She's our investing reporter for

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News to tell us all about how one company

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:25.880
<v Speaker 1>managed to transform itself taking advantage of some problems in

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 1>well other companies. And this has to do with black

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:32.439
<v Speaker 1>Rock and Barkley start off. And he's great to have

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 1>you here. Maybe just talk a little bit about what

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 1>happened at Barkley's that ended up benefiting black Rock. Sure well,

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 1>So Barclay's did not accept UK government bail out money

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and they were looking to shore up their capital reserves,

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 1>so they ended up putting up for sale their I

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 1>shares business and that was their e t F business.

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 1>And what ended up happening is that was a unit

0:28:57.160 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of a bigger business called b g I, and black

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Ock swept in with this thirteen point five billion dollar

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>deal to buy all of b g I and in

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that acquisition it got into the e t F space

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and now we think of it as such a huge player,

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>in fact, the world's largest player in e t F.

0:29:14.080 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 1>And this was the transformative moment. And you know when

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 1>they did this deal back in the throws of the crisis,

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:23.479
<v Speaker 1>when that happened. It's so interesting, Annie, because this clearly

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 1>was a huge boom for black Rock when it comes

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to how many assets they have with more than six

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars under management. What about profitability though, sure so

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>um obviously they are a highly profitable business and they

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 1>have basically paved the way in a couple of different

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 1>ways for that UM through e t S and various

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 1>other products. Et F are about a third of their

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>business now, but it's pretty stark if you consider that

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>they weren't in that space at all. In fact, they

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>had determined that they wouldn't be able to build it

0:29:56.240 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>from scratch in their own internal uh you a review,

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and then once this came up for sale, they said, Hey,

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 1>we have a chance to get into this business that

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that we want to be in, and that's how that

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 1>acquisition happened, and that piece of their business grew and

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 1>grew over the past decade. Financial risk software? What is it?

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 1>And what did black Rock do in order to capitalize

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 1>on everybody's fear. It's like, you know, after a hurricane,

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 1>everyone says, I got to go out and buy hurricane insurance.

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>After two th eight, people were worried about risk to

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 1>their financial assets exactly. So another way that this the

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:41.959
<v Speaker 1>past ten years have been tied to their growth is

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 1>after the crisis and the crash, firms were looking for

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 1>ways to better assess their financial risk and and better

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 1>evaluate uh those types of risks. So black Rock already

0:30:55.960 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 1>had this Aladdin product that they sell which does just that,

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 1>helps helps you analyze all the risks in your portfolio,

0:31:03.600 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and that business has uh really shown some growth over

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the past decade, and they were able in a changing

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 1>regulatory environment to to i think, find some new customers

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>for that software, you know, just sort of taking a

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>step back. Black Rock certainly did benefit a lot in

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the wake of the crisis from these specific businesses, but

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 1>in general, asset managers were big winners. I mean, yes,

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a certainly consolidation now, but if you think about

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 1>it in general, because of some of the stimulus packages,

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 1>people flooded into asset managers and there was more business

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that kind of went to the buy side from the

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 1>cell side as a result of this, right, I mean,

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 1>as black Rock kind of a sort of a lens

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to view this shift through, that's exactly right. And one

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 1>other way that you might look at it is these

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 1>asset managers have not been given the too big to

0:31:57.240 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 1>fail stamp that the big banks have. Oh. I mean

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 1>that includes black Rock, but it also includes peers like Fidelity. Um.

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, the asset management community has been able to

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 1>avoid being labeled too big to fail, even though they

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 1>did for a while they were a little bit in

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 1>limbo over whether that would happen. And ultimately that you know,

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 1>it seems like that scrutiny has tapered fifteen seconds on

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Larry Fink and how important he has been to this success. Sure, well,

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 1>he's obviously the face of the company, and he's only

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 1>become more I think powerful and visible uh in in

0:32:34.640 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 1>these in the past decades. Thanks very much for being

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 1>with us. Annie massa investing reporter for Bloomberg. We encourage

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:45.960
<v Speaker 1>you to read her story about Black Rocks decade, how

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the crash helped forge a six point three trillion dollar giant.

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Much appreciate it. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P

0:32:57.000 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 1>at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa Abramo wits one. Before the podcast,

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.