WEBVTT - Daybreak Weekend: US Jobs, Power Conference, China PMIs

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our global look at

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 2>the top stories in the coming week from our Daybreak

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 2>anchors all around the world. Straight ahead on the program,

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 2>what this week's September jobs report could tell the Federal Reserve.

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:23.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Busby in New York.

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:26.279
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caline Hecker here in London, where we're shining a

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 3>spotlight on the women's shaping our global economic future.

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 4>I'm dek Prisner looking at whether China's pro growth pivot

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 4>is succeeding.

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:40.200
<v Speaker 1>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>eleven three h New York, Bloomberg ninety nine to one, Washington, DC,

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg ninety two nine Boston, DAB Digital Radio, London, Syria

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>XM one T one, and around the world on Bloomberg Radio,

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>dot Com and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Good day to you. I'm Tom Busby, and we begin

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:05.680
<v Speaker 2>today's program with the September jobs report out this Friday.

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 2>What might another anemic report mean just weeks ahead of

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 2>another Federal Reserve rate decision? And for more, we welcome

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 2>Stuart paul Us, Economists with Bloomberg Economics. Stuart, thank you

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 2>so much for being here. Now let's start with some

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 2>good news, and there was good news. Q two economic

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 2>growth a lot better than forecasts three point eight percent,

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:29.040
<v Speaker 2>consumer spending strong in August, even if inflation was still

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 2>a little sticky, and Wall Street up until this past week,

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 2>had been hitting one all time high after another. All

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 2>good news. But it's not all good news, is it.

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of worries out there.

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 5>Well.

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:42.680
<v Speaker 6>The thing that everybody seems to be anchoring on with

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:46.759
<v Speaker 6>the Q two GDP data was this major upward revision

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 6>to headline GDP growth and to household spending, and household

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 6>spending ended up growing at an annualized rate of about

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 6>two and a half percent in the second quarter. As

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 6>you mentioned when we finally got the August personal consumption

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 6>expenditures report. It even looks like household spending continued growing

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 6>into the third quarter. So that's all good news there.

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 6>What I'm thinking most about, though, from the last week,

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 6>is that corporate profits for the second quarter were revised

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 6>down pretty significantly. Corporate profits only grew about seven billion

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 6>dollars in the second quarter. That's down from an initial

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 6>estimate of nearly seventy billion dollars, and if that's the case,

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 6>that's a big revision. If that's the case, you would

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 6>have to think that expansion, investment and hiring plans are

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 6>going to start to simmer. And when we look at

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 6>let's say small business surveys, capital expenditure plans have never

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 6>been this low outside of a recession. Capex plans are low,

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:51.640
<v Speaker 6>investment and expansion plans are low. Hiring plans are also low.

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 6>So the thing that I'm thinking most about in the

0:02:55.320 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 6>outlook is the currently tenuous labor market balance between supply

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:03.519
<v Speaker 6>and demand for labor and what that means for the

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 6>pace of hiring going forward. Now, when we think about

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 6>the September jobs report coming out this coming Friday, we

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:13.919
<v Speaker 6>think there is going to be about fifty five thousand

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 6>jobs added during the month. But one thing that we

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 6>need to continue keeping in mind is that a lot

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 6>of workers are going to be rolling off government payrolls.

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 6>These are the folks who took the buy out earlier

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 6>in the year because of DOGE cuts. And when that's

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 6>the case, the pace of hiring could resume slowing to

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 6>the pace that we saw earlier this summer. This is

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 6>a very tenuous balance between labor supply and labor demand,

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 6>which makes us very cautious about the growth and spending

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 6>outlook as we head into year end.

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 2>And just those federal workers, you're talking thousands or tens

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 2>of thousands, not just in Washington and Baltimore, but in

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 2>National Park services across the US, and adjuncts of the

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 2>Social Security Administration all over.

0:03:57.360 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 6>That's right. This is not the sort of thing that's regionally.

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 6>I this is the sort of thing that affects workers

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 6>around the country. And so I think that when we

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 6>think about consumer spending, this is not something that just

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 6>affects businesses locally in Washington. This is something that materially

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 6>affects or outlook for spending growth.

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Now, let's talk more about the jobs, not just those

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 2>federal jobs, because we know about those, but we've seen manufacturing,

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 2>despite the Trump administrations, you know, promoting and touting of

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 2>more manufacturing jobs coming back here, Manufacturing, construction, energy, especially

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 2>in oil, all seeing declines. And that's not good.

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 6>It's not It's basically every month since April, the manufacturing

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:42.919
<v Speaker 6>industry has been shedding jobs. And look, Tom, that's the

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 6>normal state of affairs in an economy that's increasingly services oriented.

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 6>That's not the state of affairs that policymakers want when

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:56.040
<v Speaker 6>they are pursuing industrial policy and protectionism. So there is

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 6>a part of me that thinks, look, the effect of towers,

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 6>the effect of industrial policy. We're just not quite feeling

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 6>it yet. We're not seeing any sort of boost to

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:09.039
<v Speaker 6>manufacturing and construction yet. We should wait to see the

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 6>effects of the policies that the administration is rolling out.

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 6>But right now, yes, the manufacturing industry is shedding jobs.

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 6>Thinking back to the August industrial production report, and this

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 6>is a win for the administration. There is accelerating auto production,

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 6>there's accelerating steel production, there's accelerating pharmaceutical production, and accelerating

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:34.160
<v Speaker 6>textile production. Those are all winds, but those are very recent.

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 6>It's too early to say that there's been material progress

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 6>shown in domestic production as a consequence of tariffs. Instead,

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 6>it looks like the growth negative consequences of uncertainty are

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:54.720
<v Speaker 6>weighing on aggregate economic activity and aggregate hiring. Until we

0:05:54.760 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 6>see those isolated benefits booying domestic production, it's really it's

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 6>really just a growth negative story right now, and.

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 2>We won't know if the latest tariffs that the President

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:08.919
<v Speaker 2>announced on pharmaceutic was one hundred percent, twenty five percent

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 2>on heavy duty trucks, thirty percent on sofas and upholstered furniture.

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 2>It's just too soon to tell. That could be months

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 2>down the road before we see any impact of that domestically, right.

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 6>That's right. So again August, from an industrial production perspective,

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 6>it looks like those favorite industries were doing relatively well.

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 6>But I'm not going to read too much into one

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 6>month's data. It's going to take some time to see

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 6>the full effects of those specific those industry specific tariffs.

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Now, this past week, FED Chairman Jerome Powell, he said

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 2>there are serious risks to the economy involving inflation, which

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 2>we know is well above the target two point nine percent,

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 2>but it hasn't gotten any worse, but also the weakening

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 2>labor market. What does he see? Did he see all

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 2>these things? Is he seeing months out that I'm not seeing?

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 2>Maybe even you're not seeing that. We are going to

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 2>see things continue to digress in the labor market.

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 6>Which is really difficult right now, is that labor supply

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 6>and labor demand have this really treacherous balancing acts right now,

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 6>where growth in labor supply is very slow and labor

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 6>demand is waning. If we rewind the clock, let's say

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 6>a year ago, there were about ten percent more job

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 6>openings than there were unemployed or available workers. Now there

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 6>are just slightly fewer job openings than there are available workers.

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 6>We expect looking ahead to next week when we get

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 6>the job openings and labor turnover survey data, we expect

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 6>the number of job openings to fall further. It's about

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 6>seven point one five million, So again, now we're going

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 6>to have almost five percent fewer job openings.

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 2>The September Jobs report out this Friday, eight thirty am

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street Time. Our thanks to Stuart Paul, us economists

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 2>with Bloomberg Economics. Well, next, we turn to a big

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 2>change coming this week to the US auto industry, the

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 2>end of the seventy five hundred dollars federal tax credit

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 2>for EV buyers. What will for EV makers and for

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 2>EV prices? What about Detroit's Big Three who spent billions

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 2>preparing for an electric engine future? For more, and on

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 2>who wins and who loses? We're joined by Steve Man,

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence, Global Autos and Industrials Research analysts. Well, Steve,

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much for being here. Can you tell us,

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 2>can you just set it up what happens this week

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 2>with that Biden era tax credit and what that program?

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 2>What has it meant to the EV industry.

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, the seventy five hundred dollars Biden tax credit is

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 5>set to expire at the end of September, and the

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 5>tax credit has been very helpful to the industry. It

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 5>helpful to the automakers, helpful to the consumers, and sales

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 5>of EV's have been growing until you know, recent on

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 5>the last couple of years, and you know, when it falls,

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 5>I think EV sales is going to fall off the cliff.

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 5>And a lot of automakers are actually preparing for that

0:08:57.320 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 5>drop off after September thirtieth.

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 2>And how are they preparing for that drop off and

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 2>expected drop off in sales?

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 5>You know a few examples. You know, GM have already

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 5>announced that you know, they're probably gonna stop EV production

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 5>for the month of December. Uh, and then they're also

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 5>rolling out they do have plans to roll out a

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 5>very popular subcompact compact EV called a Bolt, which sold

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:27.319
<v Speaker 5>really well for them in the past. But instead of

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 5>you know, going full on production for for that new EV.

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 5>This is going to start with one shift and then

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 5>maybe ramp it up to two shifts in the new year,

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 5>depending on demand. And then the couple others, the Japanese

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:46.079
<v Speaker 5>automakers are actually discontinuing, Acuras discontinuing their one of their

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 5>evs as well as Nissan in the North American market.

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 2>And how about Ford, I mean, Ford made a big

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 2>splash with the F one fifty lightning the Mustang Mocky,

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 2>but have things uh you know, have things really dialed back?

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 7>Uh?

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean Ford, Ford continues to lose a lot

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 5>of money on their EV business. They do sell the Mocky.

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 5>You know, electric pickup truck is not resonating with the

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 5>US consumer at all. So but you know, they are

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 5>still planning to launch a more affordable pickup truck, but

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 5>that's not until twenty twenty seven. So they've delayed those

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 5>plants a number of times already. So now it's twenty

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 5>twenty seven, we'll have to go. We'll have to see

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 5>what the demand is like in twenty twenty six. You know,

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 5>wouldn't be surprised if they pushed that out even further.

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:41.559
<v Speaker 2>And Stilantis they have, you know, earmarked a jeep that'll

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 2>be all electric. Is that still in the pipeline or

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 2>is that being pushed back?

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 5>It looks like it's going to be pushed back. Also, Ram,

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 5>which is their pickup truck division, they've they've stopped. They

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 5>basically not going to roll out that electric pickup truck

0:10:57.880 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 5>that they was slated for next year.

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:01.839
<v Speaker 2>All right, So that's Detroit's big three. Let's talk about

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 2>the companies that only make EV's. The big one of

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 2>course on everyone's Tesla, but also Rivian, Lucid, we have Faraday,

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 2>There's a whole bunch of smaller ones. What will it

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 2>mean Let's just talk about Tesla, that's the one everybody knows.

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:18.839
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Look, I think I think the the seventy five

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 5>hundred dollars EV credit going away is actually a transition

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:25.439
<v Speaker 5>period for the EV industry in a couple of ways.

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 5>One is definitely consolidation. We've we've talked about some of

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 5>the automaker's discontinuing sale of EV's in the North American market.

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 5>But what it means is, uh, you know, probably more

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 5>business for the likes of Tesla and Rivian. You know,

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 5>their their business is only EV's and uh SO choices

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 5>for consumers are are dwindling and the really the only

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:54.439
<v Speaker 5>ones that consumer can look to to buy EV's or

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 5>or the likes of these peer plays. The other thing

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 5>with this EV credit going on way is a transition

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:08.199
<v Speaker 5>period for the EV industry. Now the consumer cannot rely

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 5>or the automaker. The industry cannot rely on monetary incentives

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 5>to drive demand anymore. It really now needs to go

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 5>back to the basic. The industry needs to address a

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:22.679
<v Speaker 5>lot of the concern that the consumers have with evs,

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 5>which is high costs, high prices, as well as the

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 5>lack of charging infrastructure. We actually put out a deep

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 5>dive report recently looking at the EVE charging industry and

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 5>we actually think there's still continued to be a lot

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 5>of investment in that thirty billion to be exact, between

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 5>now and twenty thirty five.

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, the federal tax credit for buyers of new end

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 2>used evs expiring this Tuesday. Our thanks to Steve Mann,

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence Global Autos and Industrials research analysts and coming

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 2>up on Bloomberg day Break weekend will shine a spotlight

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 2>on the women shaping our global economic future. I'm Tom

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Busby And this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg day Break weekend,

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 2>our global look ahead at the top stories for investors

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 2>in the coming week. I'm Tom Busby in New York.

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Up later in our program, we'll try to gauge the

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:27.079
<v Speaker 2>health of the Chinese economy with the release of official

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 2>PMI data. But first, Bloomberg's Women Money Power Conference returns

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 2>to London this week, bringing together some of the most

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 2>influential names in finance, business, and sport to discuss the

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 2>major issues facing the world, including AI and other new technologies.

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 2>For more, Let's go to London and bring in Bloomberg

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 2>day Break Europe anchor Caroline Hepgar Tom.

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 3>In the midst of a massive reallocation of capital and

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 3>tech driven changes to the global financial system, women are

0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 3>controlling a greater share of wealth and making more of

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 3>the key financial decisions now. In the coming days, Bloomberg's

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 3>Women Money and Power Event will convene the most influential

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 3>voices from across the global finance industry for the second

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 3>year to debate and discuss the critical issues facing the

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 3>future of investing, real estate, consumer banking, and private markets,

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 3>as well as philanthropists, owners and CEOs, it's an issue

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 3>that is fast rising up the global agenda. In the UK,

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 3>this year, Bloomberg analysis found that the average woman working

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 3>in the UK financial sector earns about a fifth less

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 3>than their male colleagues, a reflection of how the gender

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 3>pay gap has stubbornly persisted even during a period when

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 3>businesses have pledged to address workplace inequality through diversity, equity

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 3>and inclusion schemes. At the same time, women a rising

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 3>in terms of the world of wealth. A little more

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 3>than a decade ago, think that they controlled less than

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 3>a third of total US assets. Now by twenty thirty,

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 3>that's expected to jump to thirty eight percent, reaching an

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 3>estimated thirty four trillion dollars. That disparity is likely to

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 3>feature heavily in discussions at the upcoming Bloomberg Women, Money

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 3>and Power Conference. At last year's gathering, participants anticipated a

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 3>bumper m and a year in twenty twenty five, optimistic

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 3>that deal making would pick up due to an anticipated

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 3>loosening of regulations under President Trump's administration. While those hopes

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 3>have only partially materialized, there is perhaps more uncertainty in

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 3>the market now than was expected. Either way, women remain

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 3>at the forefront of change. Just this month, Citygroup CEO

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 3>Jane Fraser told Bloomberg her clients have been much more

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 3>active in cattle markets, investing, and deal making after getting

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 3>greater clarity on taxes, tariffs, and deregulation. Here is Jane

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 3>Fraser speaking to Bloomberg's Jimana Bissetci.

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 7>You've got to look at the collective impact of the

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 7>tax policy, what's been happening with tariffs, and indeed the

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 7>increasing deregulation that we're seeing, and they work together as

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 7>a package, I think the most important piece for a

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 7>corporate clarity. We hate uncertainty, We like clarity. And our

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 7>client base now is really starting to act with more

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 7>confidence now that we've got clarity on those three fronts.

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 7>So active in the capital market, arena in financing, active

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 7>in much more active in investing, less sitting on the sidelines.

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 7>And M and A has been very very active indeed,

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 7>as we talked about, and on the consumer side, pretty

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 7>robust spending through the summer, and we saw that really

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 7>across all categories. Helped a bit by lower gas prices,

0:16:56.040 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 7>but the consumers being fiscally responsible, being more mindful around

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 7>some spend, but still the spending levels were very pleasing.

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 8>So the momentum was pretty strong across all lines of

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 8>your business in the second quarter. And of course, you know,

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:14.159
<v Speaker 8>I don't want to precipitate upcoming earnings, but can that

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 8>momentum continue into the end of the year, just in

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 8>terms of you know what you're seeing an advisory in

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 8>deal making and in trading because there was a very

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 8>strong quarter for trading as well.

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 7>It was exceptional for us on all fronts. I still

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 7>see very strong pipelines, I see high level of engagement

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 7>from clients. I see a sense of urgency as well.

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 7>Given the speed with which industry structures are changing and

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 7>there is still growth opportunity. I think growth will be

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 7>a notch lower. We're keeping an eye on the labor market.

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 7>It's a low churn market, so not everything is rosy,

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:52.400
<v Speaker 7>but we don't see a recession on the horizon.

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 8>The city increasing in a global bank, obviously establishing here,

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 8>your presence over here as well. But at the same time,

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 8>we talk about ultiple geopolitical shocks that we were speaking

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 8>about the latest Russian incursion into Poland's We talk about

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 8>geopolitical of here, we talk about tensions between US and China.

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 8>As a bank, how do you navigate all of those

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 8>potential geopolitical sensitivities and the barriers that are going up

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 8>around the world.

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 7>We were in doing business in about one hundred and

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:25.200
<v Speaker 7>sixty countries around the world. We have local banking license

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 7>people on the ground in almost one hundred and we've

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 7>been in many of these countries for a very very

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 7>long time. So this isn't classic suitcase bankers fly and

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 7>fly out, and there's a really deep knowledge of what's

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:39.879
<v Speaker 7>going on and a lot of the kit services we

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 7>provide are what helped the economies and the companies do

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 7>business every single day. So for us, there is a

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 7>mission to make sure that we are operating with resiliency

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 7>and with rigor to support our clients. And we tend

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:59.360
<v Speaker 7>to move activity around the world as clients ebb and

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 7>flow in fring geographies. So the Middle East is probably

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:06.479
<v Speaker 7>on a rip for the next decade or so in

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:10.160
<v Speaker 7>terms of how much investment and new industries new clients

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:14.680
<v Speaker 7>coming in. Other areas will probably see some more diminishment

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:18.360
<v Speaker 7>in so we just we flex where it is. Our

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 7>people were globally minded. They move around the world as

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:26.160
<v Speaker 7>to where opportunities are and it's a moment where City shines,

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 7>where there is volatility, the clients need us.

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 3>That was City Group's Jane Fraser there. She's one of

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 3>a host of senior women leading teams who are at

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 3>the forefront of the global economy this year, many of

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 3>whom will be in London for Bluemberg's Women Money and

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:46.160
<v Speaker 3>Power Conference. Also taking part is Blueberg's Lizzie Burden. We've

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:49.439
<v Speaker 3>been speaking about the key themes on the agenda, what

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 3>she's most looking forward to at the event, who the

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:55.880
<v Speaker 3>big players are going to be in attendance.

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 5>Sol I.

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 9>We've rustled up some of the most influential voices from

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 9>across global finance. We're going to hear from Julia Hoggett,

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 9>the CEO of the London Stock Exchange. I'll be sitting

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 9>down with her. We've got Emma Walmsley, the CEO of GSK,

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 9>the Bank of England's Catherine Mann, Maggie Murphy, managing director

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 9>of aston Villa Women's Football Club, and Victoria Bateman, who

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:18.360
<v Speaker 9>you might know just wrote this book Economica, a Global

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 9>History of Women, Wealth and Power. It's almost as if

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:23.159
<v Speaker 9>she knew that we were going to have this event again,

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 9>but hosting these conversations, we're also going to have the

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 9>best of our Bloomberg journalists. We've got Stephanie Flanders, head

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 9>of Economics and Government, Michelle Hussein, our new editor at

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 9>large of Bloomberg Weekend, Ruth David Arlunda bureau chief. Danny

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 9>Berger is in from New York. Shamanamaset she's in from Dubai.

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 9>So it's a global affair this one. And then in

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 9>the audience we'll have hundreds of senior finance professionals who've

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 9>taken part in our New Voices program, which, if you

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.959
<v Speaker 9>haven't heard of, it is a Bloomberg initiative that funds

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 9>all this intensive media training around the world to amplify

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:57.719
<v Speaker 9>expert views. I'm really proud of that. And they'll be

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:00.360
<v Speaker 9>in amongst all the C suite executives as well.

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so, then of all of these leading women, what

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 3>do you think the topics for conversation are going to

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 3>be all about?

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 9>Well, let me say this clearly. What this is not

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 9>is a conference about women in leadership or gender focus issues.

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 9>They're really important issues. But what this is is a

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:21.119
<v Speaker 9>global finance conference that just happens to have all female

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 9>panelists and moderators. So we're going to tackle the critical

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 9>issues that are facing the finance industry at the moment,

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:31.400
<v Speaker 9>whether that's real estate, consumer banking, private markets, investing. Are

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 9>also going to be hearing the future for philanthropists, owners

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 9>and CEOs as well.

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 3>And in terms of major developments since last year's conference.

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 9>There's a small matter of the man in the White House.

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:46.239
<v Speaker 9>Of course, he's changed all of everything that I've just

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:48.439
<v Speaker 9>talked about. We are in the middle of a stock

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 9>market rally. Views on whether that can continue, whether this

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 9>is the new normal, whether it's a bubble, and look,

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 9>we have the wars in Gaza and Ukraine rumbling on,

0:21:57.200 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 9>while at the same time private markets are on a

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 9>tare bringing together those themes.

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:05.640
<v Speaker 3>And when it comes to central banking around the world,

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 3>there are more women than ever who are making global

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 3>monetary policy decisions and some under pressure. What's the significance

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 3>of that.

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:15.680
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, well, let me take you through some of those,

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 9>because we've got Christine Lagarde often pointing out the underrepresentation

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:23.439
<v Speaker 9>of women in senior roles in economics, finance and central banks.

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:25.919
<v Speaker 9>In fact, her and Isabelle Schnabel at the ECB, as

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 9>seen as real thought leaders on the Governing Council, and

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:31.959
<v Speaker 9>you especially watch what they say. Even if Schnarbile is

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 9>a known hawk, she's especially respected as an influential voice

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:37.920
<v Speaker 9>on the Governing Council. Here at the Bank of England

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 9>across the road we have Claire Lombardelli, a Deputy governor.

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 9>Remember she dissented in that last but one vote when

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 9>they had to vote again. She's particularly worried about food inflation.

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 9>And we're also, as I say, talking to Catherine Mann

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 9>at this event, she's seen as a bit of a

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 9>maverick on the monetary policy. She went from hawk to

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 9>dove and then kind of back again. So we look

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 9>forward to hearing what she has been thinking about the

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 9>UK economy recently. She's definitely bold in her opinions and

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:10.119
<v Speaker 9>she's kind of at the end of the spectrum a

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 9>thought leader again. Finally at the Fed, of course, we

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 9>lost Adriana Cougler, we don't really know why, and Lisa

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 9>Cook remains under threat from President Trump. So, as you say, Caroline,

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:25.119
<v Speaker 9>women on global monetary policy committees really significant in the

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 9>news right now, So looking forward to hearing particularly from

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 9>Catherine Mann.

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 3>And then you mentioned that you're going to be speaking

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:34.680
<v Speaker 3>to Julia Hoggart at the London Stock Exchange. Of course

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:38.119
<v Speaker 3>at this event now, delistings are surely going to be

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:41.479
<v Speaker 3>something that you'll mention a primary concern for her.

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, just in the past few days we've had Peters

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 9>Hill looking to delist from the London Stock Exchange, so

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 9>bad news there for Julia. Hoggart will be discussing how

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:52.880
<v Speaker 9>to prevent delistings, more of them from happening, but also

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:56.199
<v Speaker 9>how to encourage more companies to list in London. And

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:58.400
<v Speaker 9>I know that's something that she's got lots of views about,

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 9>something that she's already working to wards. We've got the

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 9>UK government forming a Listing's task Force, so I'm really

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 9>interested to hear how the Capital Markets Industry task Force

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 9>that she's on is going to join up with this

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:16.680
<v Speaker 9>new body from Rachel Reeves. And you've got the PISCES,

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:20.399
<v Speaker 9>the Private Intermittent Securities and Capital Exchange System bit of

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 9>a mouthful that came in earlier this year. I'm interested

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 9>to hear what kind of companies want to take part

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 9>in that. Also what she wants to see out of

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 9>Rachel Reeves's budget when it comes at the end of November.

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 9>But there's the question of what pension funds do in

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 9>terms of investing, and then there's the question of retail investing.

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 9>How do you get that going When the latest research

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:44.640
<v Speaker 9>from Hargreave's Landsdowne shows that the number of Brits investing

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 9>in the stock market is twenty three percent. In the

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:50.359
<v Speaker 9>US that's sixty one percent. How do you bridge that gap?

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's really significant, isn't it. How to make investing

0:24:56.280 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 3>just more attractive? My thanks there to Bloomberg TV and

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 3>UK correspondent Lizzie Burden. We will of course have full

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 3>coverage of Bloomberg's second annual Women Money Power Conference. I'll

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 3>be there, hope you'll be there too. I'm Caroline Hepga

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 3>in London. You can catch us every weekday morning for

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Daybreak here at beginning at six am in London.

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 3>That's one am on Wall Street.

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Tom, Thanks Caroline, and coming up on Bloomberg day Break weekend.

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Some key economic data out this week in China. I'm

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 2>Tom Busby and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg day

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Break weekend, our global look ahead at the top stories

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:46.159
<v Speaker 2>for investors in the coming week. I'm Tom Busby in

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 2>New York. We'll be getting a closer look at China's

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 2>economy this week is Beijing releases fresh PMI data. We

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:57.679
<v Speaker 2>get more from Doug Krisner, host of the Daybreak Asia podcast.

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:01.479
<v Speaker 4>Tom, it's been one year since the Chinese government changed

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 4>course on economic policy. A clear pro growth plan was

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 4>unveiled back in September twenty twenty four. This was shock

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 4>and awe a package of monetary, fiscal, stock and housing policies.

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 4>So we're a little curious about whether the plan produced

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 4>the desired results. For a closer look, I'm joined by

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's John lu He is our Greater China correspondent based

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 4>in Beijing. John, thank you so much for making time

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 4>to chat with me about this. So what do you think?

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:32.879
<v Speaker 4>How have things been performing over the last twelve months.

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 10>I would say the results, Doug, have been mixed, and

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:38.680
<v Speaker 10>they've been mixed in the sense that if you look

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 10>at Chinese markets, I think Chinese stocks are up tremendously

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 10>over the last year. We've seen a big pop, especially

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:51.959
<v Speaker 10>for tech names like Ali Baba, like Tencent, But if

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 10>you look at the fundamental economic data, what we see

0:26:56.280 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 10>is continued weakness and in some ways the economy actually

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:05.360
<v Speaker 10>getting even more weak and signs that potentially the government

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 10>is even more alarmed.

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 4>I mentioned the fact that we have the official PMI

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:12.120
<v Speaker 4>figures in the week ahead. How do you think we're

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 4>going to understand sentiment on the part of businesses in

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 4>China as a result of these numbers.

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:19.919
<v Speaker 10>I would expect the data that we will get coming

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 10>up to show a continued weakness. So the PMI has

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 10>been in contraction territory for the last five months in

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 10>a row, and I would expect it will continue to

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 10>be in contraction. That ultimately goes back to a new

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:40.119
<v Speaker 10>campaign that the Chinese government has undertaken. I don't know

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 10>if you've heard about this anti evolution campaign, which it's

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 10>a big word, it's hard to define, but essentially it

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 10>means that Beijing is trying to rein in excessive competition

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:57.120
<v Speaker 10>and by doing that ultimately tackled the question of over

0:27:57.240 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 10>capacity and then in turn the issue of deflation.

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:05.360
<v Speaker 4>So when I hear that, I'm reminded of the electric

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 4>vehicle industry in China, and we know there's been tremendous

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 4>overcapacity in that area. It's something that I think the

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 4>government was concerned about, and many trading partners were very critical.

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 4>But because for a while there it seemed as though

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 4>Beijing was trying to export its way out of that

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 4>overcapacity problem. Has that been addressed well.

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 10>Exports have been growing continuously. China's on pace for a

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:32.159
<v Speaker 10>record trade surplus this year, somewhere in excess of a

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:35.640
<v Speaker 10>trillion US dollars. And so I think that is an

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 10>ongoing issue that's not going to be resolved anytime shortly.

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 10>But the underlying issue, the underlying problem is that the

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 10>production capacity within China far exceeds its domestic consumption needs.

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 10>And so all of this excess stuff, be it electric cars,

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 10>be it solar panels, be it consumer electronics, that all

0:28:57.120 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 10>has to go somewhere, and it is going overseas.

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 4>John, Let's talk a little bit about trade tensions between

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 4>Washington and Beijing. In the last week, President Trump formalized

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 4>and agreement for a group of American investors to take

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 4>control of the US operations of TikTok. I'm curious as

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 4>to how this story fits into the broader narrative in

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 4>terms of trade between these two countries.

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 10>The negotiations between the United States and China have been

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 10>sort of an ongoing, step by step process. I think

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 10>when it comes to TikTok, I do get the sense

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 10>that the US administration puts a lot more value on

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 10>that as an issue than Beijing does. I think for

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 10>Beijing it is the most important things when it comes

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 10>to TikTok are that it shows a domestic audience that

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 10>it is standing up for the rights of Chinese companies,

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 10>that it's protecting Chinese interests, that it's not being cowed

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 10>by threats from Washington DC. Ultimately, whether or not TikTok

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 10>or Byte downs the company has a thriving business in

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 10>the United States, I think is less important to Beijing,

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 10>although I would say within that the ability of Bite

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 10>Dance to hold on to that algorithm I think is

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 10>very important to Beijing, because again it shows that Beijing

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 10>is able to protect these assets of Chinese companies technologies

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 10>owned by Chinese interests, and that I think is ultimately

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 10>what Beijing wants to show coming out of this deal.

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 4>But might not that be required to get some terra

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 4>for relief from the United States.

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:35.240
<v Speaker 10>I'm sure that Beijing would have asked for some concession

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 10>in return for helping close a TikTok deal. We don't

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 10>have a great sense of what exactly that concession might be,

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 10>and indeed, I think it's also possible that you know,

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:53.560
<v Speaker 10>Beijing is often playing the long game, and so maybe

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 10>the concession is not something that's immediate. It might be

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 10>something a bit further off, and we just don't have

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 10>a great view of that at the moment.

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 4>You mentioned domestic demand in China being as weak as

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 4>it is right now, and obviously deflation is a big

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 4>part of that story, whether you're looking at the wholesale

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 4>or retail level. Any signs these days that things are improving.

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 10>Unfortunately, Doug, I think the signs all point to things

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 10>getting more severe, if anything. So we have had negative CPI,

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 10>so deflationary consumer prices for five of the eight months

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 10>that we've had data for in twenty twenty five. That

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 10>is a big increase from last year when we only

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 10>had one month where CPI came in negative. And so

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:41.960
<v Speaker 10>I think as policymakers in Beijing are looking across the economy,

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 10>that is a real concern because everyone knows what happened

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 10>in Japan. Everyone understands that as deflation gets more embedded

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 10>into an economy. As people start to change their behavior

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 10>because they expect prices to go down, it becomes really hard,

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 10>much much harder to undo.

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 4>So what's operating in the psychology here, I'm curious about that.

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 4>We know that the housing market has been a big

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 4>negative overhang. You mentioned the fact that the equity market

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 4>has been performing reasonably well lately, and I'm thinking that

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 4>maybe encouraged some animal spirits. But I'm trying to understand

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:24.239
<v Speaker 4>what's overhanging this negativity, where this is coming from, and

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 4>how people's sentiment toward economic activity is so weak.

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 10>So I would split up the question of deflation into

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 10>a demand side issue and a supply side issue. Right, So,

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 10>I think on the demand side, what you mentioned about

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 10>real estate, that is the fundamental issue because so much

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 10>of the population in China, so much of household wealth

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 10>was saved in property in a family's home, that when

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:54.240
<v Speaker 10>the price of those homes, and I would say broadly

0:32:54.280 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 10>across China, people have seen the price of their homes

0:32:57.280 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 10>fall thirty or more percent from the peak in twenty

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 10>twenty one or so everywhere, and so when people's biggest

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 10>asset becomes worth a lot less money, everybody feels poorer,

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 10>they feel like they need to save more for retirement,

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 10>and so that really hits demand. At the same time,

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 10>we've had a supply issue where we've had this overcapacity

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 10>that we've talked about, and so people are churning out

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 10>lots and lots of product and they're trying to sell

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:25.240
<v Speaker 10>all that product, and the way that they've been competing

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 10>is they've been cutting prices, and so that's also fueled

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 10>this expectation that prices are going to go down, and

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:34.719
<v Speaker 10>so Beijing has actually started this campaign anti involution to

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 10>try and address the supply side in a way that

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 10>they've never done before. They are going out to a

0:33:42.200 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 10>provincial level, local level governments telling them not to provide

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 10>the sort of subsidies that have helped these manufacturers churn

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 10>out their goods. They've gone to companies themselves to say, hey,

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:59.240
<v Speaker 10>let's not do this cutthrough competition, and they've been pushing

0:33:59.240 --> 0:34:02.440
<v Speaker 10>on that. It's partly why we've seen the weakness that

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:05.959
<v Speaker 10>we've seen in both manufacturing when it comes to PMI

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:08.839
<v Speaker 10>and also in fixed asset investment over the last couple

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 10>of months. But the fact that Beijing is willing to

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:14.839
<v Speaker 10>do these things something that they've never done before. That's

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 10>actually giving the stock market and financial markets a sense

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:24.080
<v Speaker 10>of optimism that we might have reached an inflection point,

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 10>and that's why you've seen asset prices being as brilliant

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 10>as they have been.

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:30.400
<v Speaker 4>So I'm curious then if you were to take that

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 4>analysis and kind of related to the way in which

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:36.320
<v Speaker 4>the labor market is holding up right now. Are things

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 4>improving there or is the labor story in China very

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:42.759
<v Speaker 4>much a story of continued weakness.

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:45.759
<v Speaker 10>So unfortunately, again this is a point of weakness. And

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 10>so in August, in the data that we got in

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 10>the month of September for August, it actually showed an

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:56.399
<v Speaker 10>unexpected increase in unemployment in China, so up to five

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 10>point three percent. The economists we're expecting five point two.

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 10>And so it does show that as manufacturing is weakened,

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:07.600
<v Speaker 10>job prospects have also weakened. And so that again is

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 10>another point of I think concern for the government. But

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:13.319
<v Speaker 10>when it comes to the stock market, the stock market

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 10>is always looking forward, and I think they're thinking, hey,

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 10>this bad news is good news because it's going to

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 10>force the government to take action, and so that means

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:26.320
<v Speaker 10>the future prospects for the economy are getting brighter.

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 4>You and I've spoken about the problem with youth unemployment

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:31.759
<v Speaker 4>in the past, and I'm sure that that continues to

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 4>be a major negative. I'm wanting to find some positivity here,

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:39.759
<v Speaker 4>and I'm drawn to the artificial intelligence narrative, where we

0:35:39.880 --> 0:35:43.959
<v Speaker 4>know the Deep Seek moment was enormously positive for tech

0:35:43.960 --> 0:35:47.240
<v Speaker 4>in China, and I'm wondering how that's playing out these days.

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:51.200
<v Speaker 4>Still a lot of positivity as it relates to artificial

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:54.839
<v Speaker 4>intelligence and the industries maybe that could benefit from AI.

0:35:55.239 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 10>There is and the most recent iteration of that positivity

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 10>has been in the form of semiconductors, right, And so

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 10>the big issue in the past was could China create

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:10.360
<v Speaker 10>AI if the US cut off access to Nvidia chips

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 10>to all of these AI processors that would be necessary

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:17.960
<v Speaker 10>to train these large language models. And what we've seen

0:36:18.320 --> 0:36:24.800
<v Speaker 10>are companies like Ali, Baba, Baidu, Huawei, a smaller startup

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:28.799
<v Speaker 10>named Cambra Con that have started to introduce chips that

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 10>they say are able to get to a level that

0:36:32.320 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 10>is getting nearer and nearer what an Nvidia chip can do.

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 10>And so that has actually created a lot of optimism

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:43.800
<v Speaker 10>about the prospects for technology for AI and innovation in

0:36:43.920 --> 0:36:44.960
<v Speaker 10>China going forward.

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 4>When we talk about AI in the States, one of

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:49.319
<v Speaker 4>the things that comes up as a part of the

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:53.360
<v Speaker 4>conversation the demand for power, the demand for electricity to

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:58.720
<v Speaker 4>drive these data centers. How is China tackling that problem?

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:02.759
<v Speaker 4>Are they still using is a primary source for generating

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:06.440
<v Speaker 4>electricity or are they moving in other directions these days?

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:10.719
<v Speaker 10>Two parts to my answer. One is is there enough

0:37:10.760 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 10>electricity for AI in China? And this is actually an

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:17.080
<v Speaker 10>area where China has a huge advantage and so it

0:37:17.160 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 10>is growing very quickly. There is not the same concern

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:26.280
<v Speaker 10>about access to electricity that the hyperscalars in the US

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 10>have at the moment. The other question is how is

0:37:29.760 --> 0:37:34.439
<v Speaker 10>China generating that electricity. It is still dependent by far

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 10>on fossil fuels, so coal and oil. It is using

0:37:39.239 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 10>more natural gas, which is relatively cleaner. But at the

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 10>same time, what China has done that what we've not

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:48.319
<v Speaker 10>seen in the US, especially under the Trump administration, there's

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 10>been a real push for wind, for solar, for alternative energies.

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:58.160
<v Speaker 10>China is also building lots and lots of nuclear power plants,

0:37:58.719 --> 0:38:03.480
<v Speaker 10>and so that of energy is moving very quickly towards

0:38:03.880 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 10>cleaner sources, but still the vast majority today is created

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:11.960
<v Speaker 10>by burning coal and oil and fossil fuels.

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:14.480
<v Speaker 4>John will leave it there. Thank you so much for

0:38:14.520 --> 0:38:17.400
<v Speaker 4>helping us understand what's happening these days in the Chinese

0:38:17.440 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 4>economy as we look ahead to the official PMI figures

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 4>in the week ahead. John lou is our Greater China

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 4>correspondent based in Beijing. I'm Doug Prisner. You can catch

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:30.920
<v Speaker 4>us weekdays for the Daybreak Asia podcast. It's available wherever

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:32.960
<v Speaker 4>you get your podcast. Tom.

0:38:33.320 --> 0:38:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Doug, and that does it for this edition of

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg day Break Weekend. Join us again Monday morning at

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:40.720
<v Speaker 2>five am Wall Street Time for the latest on markets

0:38:40.719 --> 0:38:43.080
<v Speaker 2>overseas and the news you need to start your day.

0:38:43.360 --> 0:38:46.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Buzby. Stay with us. Top stories and global

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:49.760
<v Speaker 2>business headlines are coming up right now.