WEBVTT - Dollar Strength; Global Pain

0:00:03.880 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg opinion. I'm Vonnie Quinn. This week people

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>say that this is the worst crisis President nature from

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the British Ruth Pollard on tri Lanka's warning to the world,

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and later Stephen mim on the stronger dollar's role in

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>hurting developing nations. First related to the global pain, oil

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.639
<v Speaker 1>paid for, of course in dollars. Let's get to Liam denning. Liam,

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>oil prices have come down over the last few weeks.

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>How has that affected supply and demand? Well, I think

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a reflection of anticipation of supply and demand. So

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the run up we saw in the say,

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:41.240
<v Speaker 1>first and second quarter of the year was really explicitly

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>linked to the disruption of Russia's invasion of Ukraine and

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>fears of what that might mean for supply. As sanctions

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>began to ramp up, as some buyers of Russian crew

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>began to draw back voluntarily for fear of reputational or

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>regulatory clash. There's an old saying in the industry which

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 1>is that the cure for high are prices is higher prices.

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>So quite quickly we saw this alternative narrative begin to

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>come into the market, which is you know, the economy

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:19.119
<v Speaker 1>is just recovering from COVID, the global economy, and it's

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 1>still suffering the effects of that recurrent shutdowns in China

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and that sort of thing. So people began to worry, well,

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing these high prices. Now everyone's panicking, But what

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 1>if this all tips into a recession next year? And

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I think those are the two competing narratives we're seeing.

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 1>I think the reality is that expectations of disruption to

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Russian oil supply were probably a bit overplayed at the beginning.

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>People were talking about, you know, two to three million

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:51.919
<v Speaker 1>barrels of Russian supply immediately getting knocked off the market.

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Some has been, but nowhere near that figure. You know,

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the Russians have found ways to sell the oil at

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a discount. In the meantime, we are definitely seeing pressure

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>on the European economy from all sorts of Ukraine related pressures,

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>notably around what's going to happen with natural gas, and

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>we are starting to see signs of American drivers, still

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the single biggest pool of oil demand on the planet,

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>starting to maybe take notice of those high gasoline prices

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen, even though they have been coming down

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I actually saw a board dollar or something at the

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>MOMP the other day. Yeah, so, so you know, they

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>went above five bucks for the first time ever in June.

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was, and that does appear to have

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>had an effect in the context of broader inflationary pressure exactly. Now.

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Open Plus meets Wednesday, and it of course includes Russia.

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Will Russia counter calls for a more Persian crewed I

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>think they will do so probably in the background Plus

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>in some ways is in a strong position, right. You know,

0:02:55.720 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>all prices are high, everyone's worried about tight supply. We

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen US shale raw back as it might have

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>done a few years ago because of the constraints placed

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>on it by investors. On the other hand, it's also

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in a difficult position. The likes of Saudi Arabia and

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:16.239
<v Speaker 1>the UAE, the big players in Open Plus, certainly don't

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 1>want to tip the global economy into a recession that

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't do them any good. As much as they are

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to deal with what they see as a United

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:30.799
<v Speaker 1>States that is pulling back from the Middle East, they

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>also face a reality that they still depend overwhelmingly on

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the United States for their defense, for weapons, sales, for

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the presence of the fleet, for defending shipping lanes, etcetera, etcetera.

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>So they are playing this balancing act of trying to

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>keep Russia within OPEC and not the place exactly, and

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>they had to at the time because they had kind

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of lost their position of influencing prices. So they're trying

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to keep Russia on board and not be seen to,

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>for example, direct lots of oil towards Europe to help

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>it out. At the same time, they don't want to

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>completely break with the US, you know, and don't forget.

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Will that have made a difference. It didn't seem to

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>at the time. They were keeping their options open and

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>felt like, I actually think it's hard to say, you know.

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that the broad reaction was that it was

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of a mayor tour, like nothing happened. I think, frankly,

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>it's too early to say, you know. I think Biden's

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 1>aim was a couple of things. One was to essentially

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>get over this issue he has had with the Crown

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Prince of Saudi Arabia, his whole call to make him

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:39.039
<v Speaker 1>a prior on the campaign trail without completely being seen

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to get down on his knees and at the same

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>time affirm that the US was still a presence in

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East. We won't really know how much of

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>an effect that's had for a while because it will

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>come through actions. You know, what will Biden do the

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:00.600
<v Speaker 1>next time a missile gets lobbed in from Yemen? What

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>will he do with the next call for for an

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:06.160
<v Speaker 1>arms sale. It's it's hard to say. I want to

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>talk to you a little bit about natural gas in

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Europe as well. There's a relationship there between the two obviously,

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:13.039
<v Speaker 1>but natural gas is trading sort of ten times higher

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 1>than it was ten times. I mean, that's a huge

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>increase and there's almost no supply where capacity now, and

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>there is a fear that Russia will cut it to zero,

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 1>which is very possibly. Could this's what one turbine working

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>or something. Yeah, I mean I think working with quotation marks.

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>We saw them do this actually with the deliveries from

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the Caspian pipeline not too long ago, where you know,

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a documentation issue was was getting in the way. I think. Look,

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the way to think about this is Europe is very

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>dependent on Russian gas, you know, Russian gas imports. I

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>think last year was something like of western Europe's gas consumption.

0:05:55.160 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 1>You can't do without that. The Russians quite coincidentally and

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:03.280
<v Speaker 1>down their gas storage in Europe last four which was

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>actually when we began to see these price increases come in,

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 1>way before the acts of Ukraine. And I think the

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>way President Vladimir Putin of Russia looks at this is

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 1>there was this view at the beginning of the war

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>that well, Russia would be crazy to turn off the

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>gas supply to Europe because you know, it's a big

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:29.159
<v Speaker 1>source of revenue. Putin has invested billions upon billions in

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:34.600
<v Speaker 1>revitalizing the old Soviet legacy gas supply system to Europe,

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>So why would he throw that away? Well, it looks

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>like he has already thrown it away immunition, right, But

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>regardless of what happens with this war and what happens after,

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the energy relationship between Russia and Western Europe is fundamentally broken.

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>At this point. Pewton knows that he's crossed that rubicon already.

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>So now what is he interested in? Well, what he's

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>interested in is winning this war that he expected to

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>last may be two hours, clearly didn't. And now he's

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>locked in this grinding battle against Ukraine. And by extension,

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the West, because it's the West that's supplying the weapons

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that Ukraine is using. And I think from Pewton's point

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>of view, Russia is suffering. Its economy is suffering as

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 1>much as people point to, you know, a strong ruble

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and that sort of thing. Over time, the lack of

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:29.679
<v Speaker 1>access to technology, the brain drain of people leaving, the

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>effective dismantling of parts of the Russian gas system over time,

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that's all going to really hurt the economy. This year,

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the I m F is predicting Russia will have its

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>deepest recession since the early nineties, which is the post

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Soviet chaos. However, will put and be voted out of office?

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Not very likely. He looks at the West. He sees,

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, several governments having already fallen, recently, Italy, the

0:07:55.840 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>UK Prime ministers, parliamentary loss as parliamentary majority, Democrats struggling

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>with high gasoline prices as they head to the mid terms,

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and he thinks to himself, if I can just push

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>on enough pain points economically, I can get these people

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to back off. And he may be right about that.

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, one of the things I've noticed about the

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>European Union's response to this is rhetorically, at least, they're

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 1>not really admitting what the issue is. And the issue

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>is Europe is already in an energy war with Russia.

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>That's how Russia sees it. Europe is still talking of

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>this as essentially an economic problem, you know, it's inflationary,

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:37.320
<v Speaker 1>or it's going to cause cost of living increases and

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 1>hardship and that sort of thing. No, it may have

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a significant chunk of its energy supplies simply cut off,

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>with implications that can range from high prices, through two

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>factories being shut down, people being thrown out of work,

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:54.439
<v Speaker 1>all the way through effects to the labor economy in

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>every and if you have a severe winter, all the

0:08:56.800 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>way through to people being forced to us between paying

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>their gas bill or paying for food, or literally freezing

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>in their homes. This is a more existential threat than

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>just some high gas prices, and what it demands is

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 1>a war economy. And what I found interesting about, you know,

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the agreement that was reached this week for the EU

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to have this mechanism to cut gas in mind by

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, Hungary's Victor Auburn actually denounced it on Facebook

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>as a step towards a war economy, and you know,

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>we can leave all bands politics aside. But what I

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>found amusing is yes, that's exactly what it is, and

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly what Europe needs. It needs to think of

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>this as a war and measures like rationing and planning

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:39.719
<v Speaker 1>and coordinating the gas policy to deal with the war situation.

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:43.199
<v Speaker 1>So what happens next? Then? At what point do leaders

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:46.199
<v Speaker 1>stop denying what's happening and trying to deal with this?

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>And I guess Germany is the obvious example. Do we

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>see mandates bigger mandates? Doesn't seem like asking people to

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>cut their usage by for some time is going to

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 1>do much. I would look at it slightly differently, and

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>that I think agreements like that are a step towards

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:07.959
<v Speaker 1>grappling with the reality of the situation. I think you can,

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:10.560
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I think you've seen signs of it in

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>different places. You know, for example, here in the US,

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>we've seen President Biden invoke the Defense Production Act, not

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>necessarily for oil or gas, but he did it for

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 1>critical minerals for batteries, and that's quite a far reaching

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:34.439
<v Speaker 1>Paris and emergency. We've seen him spr use the SPR

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>exactly to adjust the taxes on gasoline prices. I think

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see this kind of action. Well, I'd

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>say there's two parts. We're going to see this kind

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>of action happen, particularly as we get closer to winter,

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and particularly if Pewton decides, well, if the Europeans want

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>to get off Russian gas, there's no way I'm going

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to wait around and help them do that. I'll just

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>cut it off because as much as he'll take some

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 1>fine actual hit, oil is really the mainstay of Russian revenue.

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 1>The gas is really much more a geopolitical tool. So

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>he will be quite willing to cut it off, I believe.

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 1>And as that reality sinks in, European leaders in particular

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>are going to be faced with a choice. Are they

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>going to back up the rhetoric that they've been talking

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 1>about with regards to Ukraine, of defending values, of defending

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>European security and therefore adopt more kind of coordinated planned

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:33.680
<v Speaker 1>war economy measures whatever you want to call it on

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the energy side, or are they going to back down. Well,

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and they need to be voted into office to right,

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>so they're thinking of their own domestic elections, And I mean,

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:45.079
<v Speaker 1>is it a case of once people are back in

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:48.079
<v Speaker 1>parleman Macon has Obviously he won't have a legislative majority,

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 1>but he's back in power. I mean, has he got

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>more leeway now than say, some of the other economies

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>where there may not even be a government. I think

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>this is part of the problem Europe has that Pewton

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 1>tries to exploit. And we saw it, for example, in

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:08.119
<v Speaker 1>this the wrangling o you saw particularly Southern European countries

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 1>say well, we kept our house in order and Germany didn't,

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>so why should we have and obviously back for the

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>euro exactly now we laugh about this, but that is

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>exactly a sort of division that Peutin seeks to exploit. Clearly,

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>some economies are much more exposed, Germany being the prime example.

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>It's very difficult to say how this will play out,

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>because you can say, under one scenario, we have a

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 1>freezing winter, there's a deep procession in parts of more

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Than and southern Europe, maybe people literally freezing to death

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>in their homes, and a lot of people just say

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>why are we doing this Ukraine. On the other hand,

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>it's possible that Peutin overplays his hand, does something pretty

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>terrible like that, and that actually leads to people saying

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>this is untenable and as bad as this situation is,

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:05.439
<v Speaker 1>we simply can't tie ourselves to a situation where you

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 1>do what Russia says. At the same time, it's much

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:10.319
<v Speaker 1>easier as a citizen of a country to say that

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>when you have your air conditioning or you have your heating,

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>because that's what decisions depend upon, right, the electorate's mood,

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's not going to be very good if they're freezing,

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's absolutely what Putin will count on. I mean,

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the counterpoint I would say is, I think there are

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>two things that are quite obvious to a lot of

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>voters in Europe. One is Putin's invasion of Ukraine is

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>wholly unjustified, awful. We've seen all the images, We're probably

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:38.559
<v Speaker 1>going to see a lot more over time. The second

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>thing is it's quite obvious that the gas isn't flowing

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 1>because Russia has turned it off. So if any sort

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>of political support is to be built for seeing this through,

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 1>it will have to rely on reinforcing those messages over

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and over again. But no question, this is going to

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 1>be an extraordinarily hard winter for Europe. It's simply tied

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to literally via a pipeline. A country that effectively sees

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the worst as its enemy, and it's come to the

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:12.199
<v Speaker 1>fore now, Liam Denning there, do get in touch via

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Twitter a Vanney Quinn or email v Quinn at Bloomberg

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>dot net opinions and comments. Always welcome to Sri Lanka

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>now and Ruth Pollard. So, Ruth, Sri Lanka is in default,

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>inflation is above seventy. We saw protesters sacked the presidential

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>palace the flight of then President got A Biraja Paxa,

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>who later resigned. Now the former Prime Minister of Ranil

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Wickramasinger has the presidency. He was voted into the presidency.

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Why did lawmakers vote him in? In particular, I think

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>when Neil is seen by lawmakers as a known quantity.

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>He's pretty well respected on the global stage, having the

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Prime minister six different times over the past couple of decades,

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and he's seen as I guess, the safe pair of

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>hands to leave the negotiations with the International Monetary Fund

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>for a much needed bail out package for Sri Lanka.

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>He's got a lot of support from got A Buya

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Rudget Parks's ruling party in order to take power. So

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>that's really important to bear in mind, right, and he

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>had promised a type of unity government, and yet of

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the eighteen cabinet ministers that he can appoint, they all

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>seem to be from his party, with the exception of

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>perhaps two from one opposition party. That's not what the

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>protesters were looking for, is it not at all? And

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>indeed Renal is seen as part of the problem by

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the protesters. He has been been from the political elite

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and therefore a really big part of what led Sri

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Lanka to this really really dire situation that it finds

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>itself in now. The protests obviously they were calling for

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the resignation. That's got a buyout past there, and they

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>complained some victory over having forced him from office and

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>indeed forced him to flee the country. But Renal will

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>have to find some layers really differentiating himself from the

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>rudget parks a government. And one way that he could

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>do that is to acceed to the protests of demands

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>she really cut back on the extraordinary powers of the

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>presidency that got to buyer awarded himself during his short

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>term in office. It remains to be seen whether he

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>will do that. I guess for him the priority is

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>talks with the i m F. Sri Lanka does have

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>a big social safety net, but that hasn't helped. People

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>are suffering and they're angry. That's right. I mean he

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>has two priorities. I think one of them is obviously

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>pushing ahead with these talks with the i MS as

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>well as at the same time speaking assistance from Bile.

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Actual vendors like Japan, India and China today have been

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of sitting on the sidelines and waiting to see

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>what happens before they come up with any kind of

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>cold hard cash. India has provided a lot of aid

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of delaying loan payment and sending fuel and

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>wheat and essential medicine to Sri Lanka, but what it

0:16:57.280 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>really means is cold hard cash to keep the economy

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you're going. The other priority for Vicumous is to keep

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 1>the protests at say, while he tries to stabilize the country. Now,

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 1>he did that to some extent by this violence overthrow

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:16.119
<v Speaker 1>the protests as camp out by the presidential residents last week,

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and obviously that move was widely con then but if

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>he does wind back the powers of the presidency and

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>show some good will towards the protests, then that will

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 1>go a long way to maintain his stability in the country.

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 1>China's role, what will it be? President ji Jinping has

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>promised aid, but in fact Belton Road Initiative spending has

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 1>volunto zero. What are China's intentions? It's very difficult to

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:41.959
<v Speaker 1>see what China's plan is. Could Sri Lanka beyond not

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 1>getting caught up in the slow car crash that we've

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 1>seen Sri Lanka going through in terms of its default

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and the political instability that has come after it. China

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>has invested a lot instrumenta over the years as part

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:59.439
<v Speaker 1>of its Belton Road program, but that only makes us

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:02.439
<v Speaker 1>tempt sense of subject that Sri Lanka owns. So we

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 1>have to put China's role in in very clear context. Now,

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:08.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the projects that China has funded as

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:11.120
<v Speaker 1>widely seen as white elements, when many of them are

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>flustered in the Rugi pasta heart Landers hand. Then TOTA

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>investors had been looking to Sri Lanka as an example

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 1>of an emerging market economy that might default and now

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>has defaulted. What kind of an example is this for

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 1>investors in terms of other developing countries? That might default,

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 1>given that all the particulars are so individual. In this case,

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Sri Lanka is very much seen as a warning in

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the South Asia region. Of course, we're all watching Pakistan

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:42.399
<v Speaker 1>and with great interest. It too has uncustainable levels of

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 1>foreign debt that had just managed to negotiate a deal

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>with the IMF that may be stabilized somewhat. Of course,

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:53.399
<v Speaker 1>it is deeply reliant on by election vendors such as

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Staudi Arabia and China to back in that I MS

0:18:56.640 --> 0:19:00.159
<v Speaker 1>loan and create even more stability. But it is in

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 1>a very difficult financial situation and it's certainly not out

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>of the woods yet. Rules you've seen this before. Is

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>this the worst crisis that Sri Lanka has seen? It's

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously been through very many of them. Yeah, I mean

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 1>obviously discivil war which went for decades was a terrible

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.199
<v Speaker 1>crisis that the country faced. But when I was in

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 1>Sri Lanka last week, people from one information to the

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:25.880
<v Speaker 1>other said to me that this is truly the worst crisis.

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:28.159
<v Speaker 1>They have never had a situation where they've had to

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:30.640
<v Speaker 1>queue for fuels, the days and days and days where

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 1>they've had no access to potential medicines and where people

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>have been taking blood pressure medications, for example, every other

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 1>day in order to conserve those pharmaceutical where schools haven't

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>been able to operate. Exams can't be done because there's

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:47.119
<v Speaker 1>no money to print them on paper. And of course

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a food crisis. Farmers have not been able to

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>harvest crops for sometimes two seasons now, and they're not

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>even sure if they can plant next season's crops because

0:19:56.680 --> 0:20:00.040
<v Speaker 1>there's no money to import fertilizns. So people say the

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:05.400
<v Speaker 1>West Class expressage for nightcract beside from the British Ruth

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 1>Pollary with us from New Delhi. By the way, do

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>get in touch. Comments and opinions always welcome at Bonney

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Quinn on Twitter or email v Quinn at Bloomberg dot net.

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Happy to have Stephen mim with US Now columnist and

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 1>University of Georgia history professor. We're going to talk about

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 1>how the strength of the US dollar has been a

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>constant threat to developing nations. Stephen, the Dollar Index d

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:28.879
<v Speaker 1>x Y was below ninety for the first half of

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:31.919
<v Speaker 1>last year for context. Right now we're above one oh seven,

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and we've had a little reprieve this month, but we've

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>been essentially strengthening all that time explained to us why

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>this is so significant for other economies. It's very significant

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:47.199
<v Speaker 1>because every time the dollar strengthened, there's concurrent weakening of

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 1>other currencies, and it's not just the Euro. The currencies

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 1>that are hit the worst and that have the greatest

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 1>impact are the currency issue by so called emerging economies

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 1>in Asia, Latin America, Africa, elsewhere the world, and this

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 1>weakening is something that poses some dangers for these eCos.

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:10.120
<v Speaker 1>We know that already Sri Lanka and Russia are in default,

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>both for idiosyncratic reasons, but also at least in Sri

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Lanka's case, partially because the US dollar is so strong.

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>We're looking at another couple of dozen countries daring default

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>in the face. How much relief would we need to

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 1>see on d X Y in order for these economies

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to actually feel some relief, well, a significant amount, which

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 1>is highly unlikely at this point. I'm afraid because there

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>are all sorts of signals being given by the sort

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of reserve that they will be serious about finding inflation,

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and that the war against inflation, particularly at this moment

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 1>of global chaos, is one that will inevitably lead to

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the strengthening the dollar. And the key here, of course,

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>is that the strengthening of dollar means that the death

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:57.199
<v Speaker 1>of these emerging economies will start to rise the burden

0:21:57.240 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of those debts because they're denominated in dollars more often

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 1>than not. And this is where we get the idea

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>of original sin explained to us. What economists have deemed

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>original sin. Obviously not in the theological sense, right right,

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:14.199
<v Speaker 1>But you know, economists are oftentimes blamed for being not

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 1>very creative. But Barry I. Can Green, who's one of

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 1>the economistic question who coined this phrase, have to be

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:23.120
<v Speaker 1>credited for coming up with a creative way of understanding

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 1>or framing the question of why is it that many

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:29.919
<v Speaker 1>countries around the world are not permitted or unable to

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>borrow in their own domestically issue currencies. Instead, they're forced

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to borrow in other countries currencies, namely, more often than not, dollars.

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>And he called this phenomenon original sin because when you

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>look at a country like Argentina, for example, but it

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 1>is a serial defaulter, we often assume that the problem

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:58.640
<v Speaker 1>here lies with the institutions of Argentina or other other

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:03.159
<v Speaker 1>failings of the tree question the emerging marketing question, and

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 1>what I can green argued instead is that before any

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 1>of this became a problem, these countries began borrowing in

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>other countries current and that created the conditions for default.

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Because when you borrow, especially sovereign debt and in other

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>country's currencies, your hostage effectively to exchange refluctuation, and that

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>also ties your hands in your own fiscal and monetary

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 1>policy that you can leverage in a time of crisis.

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 1>So original Senior is kind of the idea that this

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>act of borrowing in a foreign currency pre dates all

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the other profligacy that we associate with emerging market And

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting because when we think of the major crises

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of our time, we obviously think of big stock market

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>crashes or the Great Financial Crisis, but also the currency crisis.

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>They have been some of the biggest events in my lifetime.

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:57.239
<v Speaker 1>You point out in your column this actually goes back

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:00.680
<v Speaker 1>two years. Of course, that's right, and it's and going on.

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's been a problem, especially in Latin America

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 1>since really the early nineteenth century, where you know, these

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:11.880
<v Speaker 1>these countries borrowed and in not in dollars at that time,

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:16.639
<v Speaker 1>they were borrowing in pounds, sterling or in gold to

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>repay debts in gold, but it was effectively the same

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>thing that put them in the cross areas of an

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:26.679
<v Speaker 1>exchange rate crisis, currency crisis. And and yes, this this

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>recurrent problem very different from the two thousand seven crisis,

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 1>but this recurrent problem is one that dominated the existence

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:39.919
<v Speaker 1>for emerging markets for close to two years. Stephen. Do

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you see conditions in place right now for a significant

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 1>dollar related event or group of events around the world. Yes,

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I do. That's not to say it will be guaranteed

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to happen, but the FED is in this extraordinarily difficult

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>position where it can't really go easy on inflation if

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it to maintain credibility. So if it does continue along

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>those lines, you may see something very similar to what

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>happened back in beginning in early nineteen or mid night

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 1>when Paul Vulker made it very clear to financial markets

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:16.919
<v Speaker 1>that he was he was going to tame inflation. It

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>but the collateral damage of that was, for example, in

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Mexico being plunged into the ABYSS not long afterward, and

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 1>in other countries following. Students of subsequent periods, so we've

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>been down this road before, unfortunately, and while it's great

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:35.119
<v Speaker 1>for the dollar and great for the credibility of the

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 1>United States, not so great for emerging markets. No, and

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>in fact, we haven't seen one for quite some time.

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:44.640
<v Speaker 1>You point out there in Mexico that was four. There

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:49.399
<v Speaker 1>was obviously the Asian currency crisis, Russia, Argentina two two.

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 1>Have we had one since two thousand two? No, but

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly when the dollar began at twenty year decline.

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean not it wasn't a linear decline, but it

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 1>was a secular decline over those twenty years. And so

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:07.159
<v Speaker 1>the dollars suddenly strike thing, you know, reminds us that

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:10.719
<v Speaker 1>eventually things always come full circle. And it looks likely,

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>especially if you consider the geopolitical you know, chaos or

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>disorder between Ukraine and all sorts of things happening, it's

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 1>quite likely that the dollar might strengthen even further. Stephen,

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 1>What institutions have had success in cleaning up the mess

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that a strong dollar has created from time to time?

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 1>Obviously the World Bank and the I m F have

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:35.680
<v Speaker 1>had roles. Have they played their part well? Well? At

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:38.719
<v Speaker 1>what cost? I think is often the question to clean up?

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 1>That is often rhymes imposed on these countries so called

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 1>emerging economies, are oftentimes punitive to an extreme. And while

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 1>that may be justified in terms of rectifying that, the imbalances, again,

0:26:55.880 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the problems predate the act of of of the default

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that they go back to this this larger issue of

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 1>original sin. And sadly, you know, these are reminders constantly

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 1>for folks living in countries like our Continua that they

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>live in a fallen world, that they live in this

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of cycle of what economists are called sin. Well,

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and you see these ridiculous amounts of inflation in these

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:24.440
<v Speaker 1>countries as well. So you have a humanitarian crisis on

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 1>top of a fiscal crisis, and it spreads you know,

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:31.120
<v Speaker 1>social unrest and so on. What's the alternative, I mean,

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 1>is there an alternative for these countries to having so

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>much dollar denominated debt? Yes, well, one is, you know,

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a kind of attempt to market debt in their own currency, which,

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:45.719
<v Speaker 1>believe it or not, has actually happened to some extent

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>in the last ten years. That well, less since two

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>thousand and seven, there's been more debt denominated in local

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>currencies as we call them. The problem, though, is that

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>while that's happened to some extent, it's gone him and

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 1>him with a rather alarming development, which is the rise

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 1>of what's sometimes called domestic original sin, which is a

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:15.959
<v Speaker 1>slightly different flavor of of borrowing and currencies abroad. So

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 1>instead of the sovereign debt being denominated dollars, the corporate

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:24.160
<v Speaker 1>non financial and you know firms in say Argentina are

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 1>borrowing in dollars at law maturities, and so it's the

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>exact same dynamic, it's just different players becoming indebted. So Stephen,

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 1>having looked at the history of this, usually doesn't end

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 1>well at least for somebody, and there's usually a winner

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 1>on the other side as well, typically an individual or

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a hedge fund, right right, that's right, That's that's absolutely right.

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 1>There's the these are these are great opportunities for for

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 1>short to flock in name. I would say, you know,

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 1>as this as a as an aside that not just

0:28:57.160 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>because you borrow in a currency than your own does

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 1>not automatically doom you. There there are clearly many examples

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and and and one of them is in fact the

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>United States. Originally but you know, it's debt was denominated

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 1>in gold clauses in other words, that we had to

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 1>repay our debt in gold, not in dollars, and we

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 1>were able to quote ungle graduate from that state. But

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>it's something that only seems to happen for countries that

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>achieved some kind of hegemonic status within the larger international

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 1>financial system, and we're we're one of those countries. Actors. Yeah,

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 1>John Yellen used to talk about feedback loops. I mean,

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>what will the consequences be for the United States of

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>one or several countries defaulting. Well, I guess I think

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a question here if you look historically

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and what happens when this happens, like Sri Lanka for example,

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:56.720
<v Speaker 1>this kind of canary in the coal mine. The problem

0:29:57.360 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen in the past is that there's then

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:03.960
<v Speaker 1>a flight to safety globally. In other words, countries that

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>are completely beyond reproach but that nonetheless are borrowing in

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars are subjected to the same kind of dynamics. And

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that's where the kind of coordination that we saw in

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the late nineties between central bankers around the world to

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 1>tame the crisis, and that that probably will be necessary

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 1>again things get that beat. Stephen mim there. We're now

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 1>choosing to end all conversations not with you, though as

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>always we love to hear from you. I'm at Vonney

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Quinn on Twitter, or send your thoughts to v Quinn

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 1>at bloomberg dot net, and we're available as a podcast

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 1>on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. Bloomberg

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Opinion is produced by Eric mollow Till next Time a

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 1>money Quinn