1 00:00:00,400 --> 00:00:04,240 Speaker 1: The Action Network Podcast Action. 2 00:00:04,400 --> 00:00:11,880 Speaker 2: All right, here we go from throwing out so spect 3 00:00:13,039 --> 00:00:15,080 Speaker 2: we're sitting. It's a cash touchdown. 4 00:00:15,920 --> 00:00:18,639 Speaker 1: We see most gamble is when they go to gamble, 5 00:00:18,760 --> 00:00:19,480 Speaker 1: they go to winning. 6 00:00:20,400 --> 00:00:21,720 Speaker 3: That's incredible. 7 00:00:22,760 --> 00:00:24,919 Speaker 4: Being bank small banks, I like to make money. 8 00:00:24,920 --> 00:00:27,480 Speaker 3: All right, this is the ultimate combine. 9 00:00:27,680 --> 00:00:35,320 Speaker 4: If you want to back, and we are underway. Welcome 10 00:00:35,360 --> 00:00:38,720 Speaker 4: to the Action Network Podcast presented by DraftKings. I am 11 00:00:38,760 --> 00:00:41,600 Speaker 4: your host, Evan Abrams, and I am joined as always. 12 00:00:41,640 --> 00:00:43,440 Speaker 4: It would be weird to switch it up all of 13 00:00:43,479 --> 00:00:45,600 Speaker 4: a sudden after like nineteen or twenty weeks, but I 14 00:00:45,600 --> 00:00:48,200 Speaker 4: am joined by Brandon Anderson of course for some best 15 00:00:48,240 --> 00:00:52,240 Speaker 4: bets for the Divisional Divisional round of the NFL Playoffs. 16 00:00:52,280 --> 00:00:54,760 Speaker 4: So let's just dive in right now. I kind of 17 00:00:54,800 --> 00:00:57,160 Speaker 4: wanted to do a bit of a table setter before 18 00:00:57,160 --> 00:00:59,040 Speaker 4: we got into all the games. We will go through 19 00:00:59,240 --> 00:01:02,800 Speaker 4: each of the four games, props in each matchups, all 20 00:01:02,840 --> 00:01:06,119 Speaker 4: sorts of fun stuff. But so at the moment, Buffalo 21 00:01:06,360 --> 00:01:09,039 Speaker 4: is the lone team still in the playoffs who were 22 00:01:09,200 --> 00:01:11,920 Speaker 4: entering the Divisional round who had preseason odds of under 23 00:01:11,959 --> 00:01:18,000 Speaker 4: twenty to one. Philly's gone, Baltimore, KC, Green Bay, Detroit, Washington. 24 00:01:18,040 --> 00:01:19,800 Speaker 4: Those are the other teams under to twenty one. This 25 00:01:19,840 --> 00:01:22,640 Speaker 4: is only the second time in the last fifty years, 26 00:01:22,920 --> 00:01:26,240 Speaker 4: fifty years, we've had one team or less at under 27 00:01:26,240 --> 00:01:28,960 Speaker 4: twenty to one from preseason odds in divisional round. The 28 00:01:29,040 --> 00:01:31,920 Speaker 4: other was twenty nineteen when it was the Chiefs who 29 00:01:32,360 --> 00:01:34,280 Speaker 4: made it all way to the Super Bowl and won it, 30 00:01:34,400 --> 00:01:37,320 Speaker 4: who beat San Francisco. So we will see if the 31 00:01:37,360 --> 00:01:41,480 Speaker 4: Buffalo Bills. Yes, the Buffalo Bills can finally get it done, 32 00:01:41,640 --> 00:01:44,039 Speaker 4: and history in terms of one year says they will. 33 00:01:44,080 --> 00:01:45,760 Speaker 4: But I think that is a good table setter in 34 00:01:45,840 --> 00:01:48,600 Speaker 4: terms of just the teams that have made it here, 35 00:01:48,800 --> 00:01:50,960 Speaker 4: the teams who we thought would probably make it here 36 00:01:51,000 --> 00:01:53,720 Speaker 4: who aren't, and kind of the matchups we have because 37 00:01:54,000 --> 00:01:57,200 Speaker 4: pretty fascinating that you know, Denver the one seed, Seattle 38 00:01:57,280 --> 00:02:00,480 Speaker 4: the one seed, and you know Seattle does get Sam Francisco, 39 00:02:00,520 --> 00:02:03,520 Speaker 4: which they're familiar to. But that Buffalo Denver line kind 40 00:02:03,560 --> 00:02:07,120 Speaker 4: of ping pong back and forth. Interesting stuff. So brandon 41 00:02:07,520 --> 00:02:09,040 Speaker 4: any thoughts there before we dive in. 42 00:02:09,360 --> 00:02:11,080 Speaker 3: Yeah, if there had been a market for you to 43 00:02:11,160 --> 00:02:13,880 Speaker 3: bet who will make the Divisional Round, you would be 44 00:02:13,960 --> 00:02:16,280 Speaker 3: a rich rich man if this was the parlay that 45 00:02:16,360 --> 00:02:17,680 Speaker 3: you put in before the season. 46 00:02:17,720 --> 00:02:18,800 Speaker 4: These are not good point. 47 00:02:18,840 --> 00:02:22,680 Speaker 3: These are not the teams we expected, and frankly especially 48 00:02:22,760 --> 00:02:25,120 Speaker 3: what's interesting this week to me is these are not 49 00:02:25,160 --> 00:02:27,919 Speaker 3: the home teams that we expected, even the Bills, who 50 00:02:27,919 --> 00:02:30,080 Speaker 3: you mentioned on the road this week we got the 51 00:02:30,160 --> 00:02:33,200 Speaker 3: Rams on the road but favored this week. What's weird 52 00:02:33,240 --> 00:02:36,080 Speaker 3: to me is we have the best teams by my 53 00:02:36,200 --> 00:02:39,079 Speaker 3: power ratings. The best teams really are still in the playoffs. 54 00:02:39,400 --> 00:02:42,160 Speaker 3: They're mostly on the road though this round Seattle the 55 00:02:42,200 --> 00:02:46,320 Speaker 3: one exception. But to me, we have this round four 56 00:02:46,360 --> 00:02:49,920 Speaker 3: home games. Obviously, three of the four hosts are not 57 00:02:50,000 --> 00:02:52,280 Speaker 3: in the top eight of my power ratings, they're the 58 00:02:52,320 --> 00:02:55,640 Speaker 3: three right outside that. So it sets up for some 59 00:02:55,760 --> 00:02:59,520 Speaker 3: very interesting matchups where typically this round you get the 60 00:02:59,560 --> 00:03:02,720 Speaker 3: rest of one seed. Usually for most years we'd have 61 00:03:02,760 --> 00:03:07,120 Speaker 3: the rested top two seeds. Usually your home teams are big, 62 00:03:07,200 --> 00:03:10,480 Speaker 3: big favorites, and we're looking at seven point lines, ten 63 00:03:10,520 --> 00:03:13,799 Speaker 3: point lines, really big spreads, trying to talk yourself into 64 00:03:13,840 --> 00:03:16,120 Speaker 3: that long number, and a lot of trends telling you 65 00:03:16,240 --> 00:03:18,880 Speaker 3: really need to do that. Well, a lot different sort 66 00:03:18,880 --> 00:03:21,040 Speaker 3: of games this year, and a lot more toss up 67 00:03:21,040 --> 00:03:23,919 Speaker 3: looking stuff, so we will get into the matchup and 68 00:03:23,960 --> 00:03:26,680 Speaker 3: analysis on each where Normally it's like, oh, you know, 69 00:03:26,760 --> 00:03:29,760 Speaker 3: last year Washington playing Detroit, It's like, well Washington kind 70 00:03:29,760 --> 00:03:33,320 Speaker 3: of stinks, Detroit's been killing everyone. What's the case for Washington? 71 00:03:33,400 --> 00:03:35,600 Speaker 3: All turned out there was a pretty good one. But 72 00:03:35,840 --> 00:03:38,400 Speaker 3: normally those are the sort of games we get these games. 73 00:03:38,680 --> 00:03:40,600 Speaker 3: Other than the Seattle game, we're getting a lot of 74 00:03:40,640 --> 00:03:43,160 Speaker 3: toss up looking games, which is very odd for this year. 75 00:03:43,640 --> 00:03:45,480 Speaker 4: Yeah, you're really only saying how can I make the 76 00:03:45,520 --> 00:03:48,200 Speaker 4: case for San Francisco? Other than that, really take your pick? 77 00:03:48,600 --> 00:03:50,520 Speaker 4: All right, So, if you'd like to tell some of 78 00:03:50,560 --> 00:03:53,000 Speaker 4: the bets we're about to discuss, find the quick sliplink 79 00:03:53,080 --> 00:03:55,680 Speaker 4: in the podcast and video description, or visit actionework dot 80 00:03:55,720 --> 00:03:59,160 Speaker 4: com slash bet. Now even better, sign up for action Pro. 81 00:03:59,320 --> 00:04:01,440 Speaker 4: Action pro us get real time alerts as soon as 82 00:04:01,440 --> 00:04:04,920 Speaker 4: expert's like Stucky Brandon Chris raybund All track their picks 83 00:04:04,960 --> 00:04:07,840 Speaker 4: in the action app. You'll also get real time money 84 00:04:07,840 --> 00:04:10,000 Speaker 4: percentages to see where the smart money is flowing, and 85 00:04:10,080 --> 00:04:13,880 Speaker 4: access to our NFL player prop projections powered by of course, 86 00:04:14,400 --> 00:04:17,240 Speaker 4: Sean Kerner. Just go to actioneeric dot com slash pro 87 00:04:17,440 --> 00:04:20,799 Speaker 4: to get started, use Promo Code Pod twenty Pod twenty 88 00:04:20,839 --> 00:04:23,760 Speaker 4: for twenty dollars off an annual subscription that is Promo 89 00:04:23,800 --> 00:04:28,719 Speaker 4: Code Pod twenty Pod twenty twenty dollars Offactionwork dot Com, 90 00:04:28,760 --> 00:04:34,320 Speaker 4: slash Pro. All right, let's roll Buffalo Denver. So, of course, 91 00:04:34,440 --> 00:04:36,839 Speaker 4: as famously we've been talking about I feel like on 92 00:04:36,880 --> 00:04:39,680 Speaker 4: the internet for a while now, Buffalo opened this game 93 00:04:39,720 --> 00:04:41,520 Speaker 4: as a road favorite of about a point point and 94 00:04:41,520 --> 00:04:44,440 Speaker 4: a half. It is now at as of this recording, 95 00:04:44,560 --> 00:04:48,719 Speaker 4: Denver minus one and a half total about forty six 96 00:04:48,800 --> 00:04:51,159 Speaker 4: still in some of those, which is kind of nice. 97 00:04:51,160 --> 00:04:52,479 Speaker 4: I've seen it coming down a little bit, but I 98 00:04:52,680 --> 00:04:55,680 Speaker 4: still see some forty six's. I'll just toss it to 99 00:04:55,720 --> 00:04:57,080 Speaker 4: you for most of these at the top, and then 100 00:04:57,120 --> 00:04:59,200 Speaker 4: we can kind of get into a conversation what is 101 00:04:59,240 --> 00:05:02,880 Speaker 4: your table set here? Like? What are you looking at 102 00:05:02,920 --> 00:05:04,600 Speaker 4: first when you see Buffalo and Denver? 103 00:05:04,760 --> 00:05:07,279 Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm coming out firing today on the podcast. This 104 00:05:07,360 --> 00:05:09,039 Speaker 3: is the first game, so I didn't put this at 105 00:05:09,080 --> 00:05:11,240 Speaker 3: the top for that reason. But Evan, I'm putting the 106 00:05:11,240 --> 00:05:14,000 Speaker 3: Denver Broncos on fraud Watch, and I guess we've kind 107 00:05:14,000 --> 00:05:16,159 Speaker 3: of put them on fraud Watch all season as we've 108 00:05:16,160 --> 00:05:18,360 Speaker 3: talked about them on Sunday Nights, But I think we 109 00:05:18,440 --> 00:05:21,400 Speaker 3: are thinking about this team all wrong. From week eleven 110 00:05:21,440 --> 00:05:24,599 Speaker 3: and forward, the Broncos are much better offensively than we 111 00:05:24,720 --> 00:05:27,279 Speaker 3: collectively are giving them credit for, but also a lot 112 00:05:27,279 --> 00:05:32,240 Speaker 3: worse defensively. There's a lot of talk right now about Seattle, Houston, Denver, 113 00:05:32,360 --> 00:05:35,520 Speaker 3: these three teams as juggernaut defense and is there just 114 00:05:35,680 --> 00:05:39,200 Speaker 3: enough offense. That's really not what Denver's profile has been. 115 00:05:39,600 --> 00:05:42,120 Speaker 3: And it's both directions. The offense has been a little 116 00:05:42,160 --> 00:05:44,720 Speaker 3: better than both Seattle and Houston, but the defense has 117 00:05:44,760 --> 00:05:47,560 Speaker 3: been worse by a lot. So here are the numbers. 118 00:05:47,600 --> 00:05:51,000 Speaker 3: The pass defense, even once their time came back, has 119 00:05:51,040 --> 00:05:52,760 Speaker 3: been all over the map. They've had a couple of 120 00:05:52,800 --> 00:05:54,880 Speaker 3: good weeks, they've had a couple of really bad weeks. 121 00:05:55,279 --> 00:05:58,800 Speaker 3: They've been down there the eighteenth rank defense by DVA 122 00:05:58,880 --> 00:06:01,600 Speaker 3: since week eleven to four, not coming week eighteen when 123 00:06:01,600 --> 00:06:04,560 Speaker 3: they played against the backup. So that's league averaged and 124 00:06:04,640 --> 00:06:08,400 Speaker 3: if you go first nine games back, nine games, Denver 125 00:06:08,560 --> 00:06:11,279 Speaker 3: was sixth against the pass, third against the run. That's 126 00:06:11,320 --> 00:06:14,320 Speaker 3: their profile we think of with Denver first nine games 127 00:06:14,920 --> 00:06:19,000 Speaker 3: back nine games, thirteenth against the pass, fifteenth against the run. 128 00:06:19,279 --> 00:06:22,200 Speaker 3: That's an average defense, not a bad one, but it's 129 00:06:22,240 --> 00:06:24,560 Speaker 3: not this juggernaut defense that we're giving credit for. And 130 00:06:24,600 --> 00:06:27,200 Speaker 3: if you look back last season, they had the same 131 00:06:27,240 --> 00:06:30,039 Speaker 3: sort of downturn late in the year week eleven forward, 132 00:06:30,200 --> 00:06:32,480 Speaker 3: they dropped a fourteenth in DVAA. This was a big 133 00:06:32,520 --> 00:06:34,960 Speaker 3: point I made in Denver last year in the playoffs, 134 00:06:35,279 --> 00:06:38,040 Speaker 3: and part of that is that this defense fades facing 135 00:06:38,080 --> 00:06:40,680 Speaker 3: top offenses. If you look at the last two years, 136 00:06:40,720 --> 00:06:43,640 Speaker 3: when they face a top twelve offense, Denver allows just 137 00:06:43,720 --> 00:06:47,240 Speaker 3: under twenty eight points a game against those teams. Now, look, 138 00:06:47,560 --> 00:06:51,360 Speaker 3: everyone allows more points to better offenses, but not Houston, 139 00:06:51,560 --> 00:06:57,320 Speaker 3: not Seattle. They're not that sort of defense. By the numbers. Evan. Actually, 140 00:06:57,400 --> 00:07:00,520 Speaker 3: Buffalo has the better defense in this matchup by DA 141 00:07:00,680 --> 00:07:02,560 Speaker 3: since week eleven. Now, I'm not gonna go that far. 142 00:07:02,600 --> 00:07:05,160 Speaker 3: I think that's a little bit crazy, but they're closer 143 00:07:05,160 --> 00:07:07,919 Speaker 3: than you think, and if they are, then that changes 144 00:07:07,960 --> 00:07:09,960 Speaker 3: a lot how you think about this one. We've talked 145 00:07:09,960 --> 00:07:12,520 Speaker 3: about a couple of these other things. Denver has trailed 146 00:07:12,520 --> 00:07:15,160 Speaker 3: in all but two wins this season. They have a 147 00:07:15,200 --> 00:07:17,360 Speaker 3: lot of one score wins. If you flip their one 148 00:07:17,400 --> 00:07:20,000 Speaker 3: score results, which we know historically are pretty coin flippy. 149 00:07:20,400 --> 00:07:22,880 Speaker 3: Denver will be five and twelve this season, not the 150 00:07:22,920 --> 00:07:26,680 Speaker 3: one seed, not a playoff team, last in the AFC. Instead, 151 00:07:27,200 --> 00:07:31,720 Speaker 3: bow and knicks against winning teams that score over seventeen points, 152 00:07:31,760 --> 00:07:34,880 Speaker 3: one in eight straight up in his career, Sean Payton, 153 00:07:35,080 --> 00:07:37,280 Speaker 3: for all the rep he has, He's lost four of 154 00:07:37,320 --> 00:07:40,320 Speaker 3: his last five playoff games. The one win was Matt 155 00:07:40,400 --> 00:07:43,000 Speaker 3: Nagy and Mitch Trubisky eight to eight in the COVID season. 156 00:07:43,400 --> 00:07:46,480 Speaker 3: Three losses as home favorites, and here's the last one 157 00:07:46,520 --> 00:07:50,200 Speaker 3: on fraud Watch. The last two seasons, the Denver Broncos 158 00:07:50,240 --> 00:07:53,640 Speaker 3: have had eight games against a top ten DVOA team. 159 00:07:53,960 --> 00:07:56,320 Speaker 3: The Bills are number eight, by the way. In those 160 00:07:56,320 --> 00:07:59,720 Speaker 3: eight games, Denver is one in seven straight up with 161 00:07:59,760 --> 00:08:03,920 Speaker 3: a minus eighty three point differential. I'm putting the Denver 162 00:08:04,400 --> 00:08:06,760 Speaker 3: on fraud Watch right off the bat. I'm curious what 163 00:08:06,760 --> 00:08:08,160 Speaker 3: you think before I get into the matchups. 164 00:08:08,960 --> 00:08:10,840 Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean, I think some of those numbers, in 165 00:08:10,920 --> 00:08:13,840 Speaker 4: terms of their defense, at least recently, is a little surprising. 166 00:08:14,240 --> 00:08:15,920 Speaker 4: I do think Buffalo is a little bit of a 167 00:08:15,920 --> 00:08:19,080 Speaker 4: difficult matchup for them, just because of you know, certain 168 00:08:19,320 --> 00:08:21,840 Speaker 4: usually trying to cover their number one wide receiver, which 169 00:08:21,880 --> 00:08:24,880 Speaker 4: Buffalo doesn't really have any type of number one wide receiver, 170 00:08:25,000 --> 00:08:28,120 Speaker 4: Like they're like, you could cover Shakir, but other than that, 171 00:08:28,360 --> 00:08:30,960 Speaker 4: it's kind of whoever's out there, Josh does his thing. 172 00:08:31,040 --> 00:08:33,320 Speaker 4: So it's a bit of a different I think defensive 173 00:08:33,360 --> 00:08:35,760 Speaker 4: philosophy they're gonna have to try to have in this game. 174 00:08:35,840 --> 00:08:39,280 Speaker 4: So I think off the bat, it's an intriguing matchup 175 00:08:39,400 --> 00:08:41,880 Speaker 4: just because you can say you like Denver in enough 176 00:08:41,880 --> 00:08:44,560 Speaker 4: for a number of different areas, but really Buffalo is 177 00:08:44,600 --> 00:08:46,840 Speaker 4: just Superman. It's like, does he have enough he did 178 00:08:46,960 --> 00:08:49,800 Speaker 4: last week against Jacksonville this week. You've got a ton 179 00:08:49,840 --> 00:08:52,599 Speaker 4: of people on this team, kind of like the Jaguars 180 00:08:52,760 --> 00:08:56,080 Speaker 4: don't have a ton of playoff experience. Yes the team's good, 181 00:08:56,280 --> 00:08:58,880 Speaker 4: Yes they've performed well, but I think some of that 182 00:08:58,920 --> 00:09:01,400 Speaker 4: comes into it. So we've been talking fraud watch all 183 00:09:01,480 --> 00:09:03,760 Speaker 4: year just because Denver kind of fails to cover a 184 00:09:03,800 --> 00:09:05,720 Speaker 4: lot of their games. I mean, seven and ten against 185 00:09:05,760 --> 00:09:08,360 Speaker 4: the spread this season, which off of a bye with 186 00:09:08,440 --> 00:09:11,080 Speaker 4: a seven and ten ATS record really only done I 187 00:09:11,120 --> 00:09:14,640 Speaker 4: believe the third time since nineteen ninety. So it's just 188 00:09:14,800 --> 00:09:17,840 Speaker 4: this really really doesn't happen often where you have this 189 00:09:17,920 --> 00:09:20,800 Speaker 4: team who has been kind of inflated in some of 190 00:09:20,840 --> 00:09:24,280 Speaker 4: these numbers in this position, and now the number doesn't matter. 191 00:09:24,320 --> 00:09:26,160 Speaker 4: I mean, you're just asking Denver to win the game, 192 00:09:26,160 --> 00:09:28,440 Speaker 4: which it kind of puts that other one into perspective. 193 00:09:28,480 --> 00:09:30,880 Speaker 4: I mean, the last team to walk into the playoffs 194 00:09:31,120 --> 00:09:33,280 Speaker 4: with that, with that bat of an ATS record with 195 00:09:33,320 --> 00:09:35,560 Speaker 4: the buye were the Chiefs and they won the Super Bowl. 196 00:09:35,679 --> 00:09:37,720 Speaker 4: So I think it really just depends on how you 197 00:09:37,760 --> 00:09:39,120 Speaker 4: look at it. It's a little dangerous. 198 00:09:39,559 --> 00:09:42,160 Speaker 3: Yeah, it's definitely dangerous. And look, you and I have 199 00:09:42,200 --> 00:09:45,240 Speaker 3: talked about Denver being about Friday all season. A lot 200 00:09:45,240 --> 00:09:47,600 Speaker 3: of folks have been awaiting all year to fade Denver 201 00:09:47,679 --> 00:09:50,640 Speaker 3: in this spot as the one seed, as the favorite. 202 00:09:50,880 --> 00:09:53,360 Speaker 3: But is this the spot to fade them? Buffalo has 203 00:09:53,400 --> 00:09:56,240 Speaker 3: a ton of injuries. They're down to just whoever they 204 00:09:56,240 --> 00:09:58,960 Speaker 3: can find off the street at receiver. They're missing some 205 00:09:59,000 --> 00:10:02,199 Speaker 3: defensive guys put ten, although at Oliver practicing would be 206 00:10:02,240 --> 00:10:05,559 Speaker 3: a big return for them offset some of those defensive injuries. 207 00:10:06,040 --> 00:10:09,000 Speaker 3: Josh Allen, he's playing hurt. It seems he's gonna play through, 208 00:10:09,320 --> 00:10:11,080 Speaker 3: but we saw him hit the medical tent like three 209 00:10:11,120 --> 00:10:13,520 Speaker 3: times in the first half. Last week, we're talking about 210 00:10:13,520 --> 00:10:16,679 Speaker 3: Buffalo on the Road not being good. My numbers make 211 00:10:16,760 --> 00:10:19,800 Speaker 3: Denver minus one. My numbers basically say this line is 212 00:10:19,840 --> 00:10:22,240 Speaker 3: about what it should be. But then I'm gonna get 213 00:10:22,240 --> 00:10:25,040 Speaker 3: into the matchup stuff. And you mentioned Josh being Superman. 214 00:10:25,559 --> 00:10:27,800 Speaker 3: Part of what's made Buffalo interesting this year is that 215 00:10:27,880 --> 00:10:30,560 Speaker 3: Josh doesn't always have to be Superman. And I think 216 00:10:30,600 --> 00:10:33,439 Speaker 3: this game, this matchup is the exact sort of game 217 00:10:33,480 --> 00:10:36,040 Speaker 3: Buffalo is going to transform itself into. Out of the 218 00:10:36,040 --> 00:10:39,760 Speaker 3: Bills are going to run power run on this Denver defense. 219 00:10:40,120 --> 00:10:43,840 Speaker 3: Denver's run defense funnels the run inside, but they're only 220 00:10:43,880 --> 00:10:48,480 Speaker 3: twenty second and EPA p for play outside twenty second 221 00:10:48,520 --> 00:10:52,640 Speaker 3: inside versus number two outside, so outside runs are more dangerous. 222 00:10:52,679 --> 00:10:55,080 Speaker 3: It's easier to break, contain, break off a big one. 223 00:10:55,400 --> 00:10:58,319 Speaker 3: Denver is shutting that down. They're not letting you get outside. 224 00:10:58,360 --> 00:11:02,280 Speaker 3: But Buffalo not great outside. They're below average EPA for 225 00:11:02,320 --> 00:11:05,839 Speaker 3: a play, but they're number two inside, so Buffalo wants 226 00:11:05,880 --> 00:11:07,520 Speaker 3: to hit you up the middle anyway. They want to 227 00:11:07,600 --> 00:11:10,560 Speaker 3: run up the middle. We know how good Josh Allen is. 228 00:11:10,600 --> 00:11:12,120 Speaker 3: I think we're going to see the tush push a 229 00:11:12,160 --> 00:11:15,360 Speaker 3: lot from the Bills in this game, we eliminated the Eagles, 230 00:11:15,400 --> 00:11:17,720 Speaker 3: but we didn't eliminate the tush push. We just transferred 231 00:11:17,760 --> 00:11:20,120 Speaker 3: it to another conference. I think the Bills are going 232 00:11:20,200 --> 00:11:22,800 Speaker 3: to power run. They're going to control the clock. We 233 00:11:22,880 --> 00:11:25,400 Speaker 3: know Denver wants to bring pressure. Well, the best way 234 00:11:25,440 --> 00:11:28,360 Speaker 3: to get those pressure guys off the edge up against 235 00:11:28,400 --> 00:11:31,680 Speaker 3: you is just run right at them, run up the middle, pressure, 236 00:11:32,240 --> 00:11:35,480 Speaker 3: power run. Denver is only faced all season to one 237 00:11:35,559 --> 00:11:38,680 Speaker 3: team top quarter of the league in run defense. That 238 00:11:38,880 --> 00:11:41,640 Speaker 3: was the Colts. Jonathan Taylor ran twenty five times for 239 00:11:41,679 --> 00:11:44,160 Speaker 3: one hundred and sixty five yards in that game, and 240 00:11:44,240 --> 00:11:47,040 Speaker 3: the Colts won a little bit fluky, but they did win. Nonetheless, 241 00:11:47,040 --> 00:11:49,200 Speaker 3: they were in it all the way. So I think 242 00:11:49,480 --> 00:11:53,040 Speaker 3: Bills can run. And it's not even necessarily Josh Allen 243 00:11:53,160 --> 00:11:55,599 Speaker 3: MVP game, and I think that helps the case a 244 00:11:55,640 --> 00:11:57,760 Speaker 3: little bit because he's banged up. This is maybe a 245 00:11:57,840 --> 00:12:00,200 Speaker 3: James Cook game to have a big one. On the 246 00:12:00,200 --> 00:12:02,679 Speaker 3: flip side, I think the Bills defense can hang a 247 00:12:02,720 --> 00:12:05,400 Speaker 3: little bit as well. They've been way better this season 248 00:12:05,559 --> 00:12:09,680 Speaker 3: against eleven personnel top five there bottom five against other 249 00:12:09,760 --> 00:12:13,160 Speaker 3: personnels two running backs, two tight ends. Well, Denver doesn't 250 00:12:13,160 --> 00:12:15,400 Speaker 3: really have other running backs, other tight ends. They play 251 00:12:15,440 --> 00:12:18,080 Speaker 3: a lot of eleven and also Buffalo, we know how 252 00:12:18,120 --> 00:12:21,079 Speaker 3: bad they are at run defense. Denver has actually been 253 00:12:21,120 --> 00:12:23,560 Speaker 3: one of the pass heavier teams in the league, and 254 00:12:23,600 --> 00:12:26,600 Speaker 3: they prefer lots of short passes. That's the bon Knicks game, 255 00:12:26,920 --> 00:12:30,760 Speaker 3: that's Sean Payton, short passes all underneath. That's what Buffalo 256 00:12:30,800 --> 00:12:33,640 Speaker 3: defense against. They limit everything they put the umbrella on, 257 00:12:34,080 --> 00:12:36,079 Speaker 3: and then their top five VPA per play against the 258 00:12:36,120 --> 00:12:39,520 Speaker 3: short pass. So Denver, I don't think, and hurt Buffalo's 259 00:12:39,559 --> 00:12:42,760 Speaker 3: weaknesses as well their run defense. They're worse against wide 260 00:12:42,800 --> 00:12:45,640 Speaker 3: receiver two on the season, but Buffalo, I think can 261 00:12:45,679 --> 00:12:47,680 Speaker 3: hang at least a little bit. And then, don't forget 262 00:12:48,040 --> 00:12:50,400 Speaker 3: we saw this game last year in the playoffs, and 263 00:12:50,440 --> 00:12:52,719 Speaker 3: of course these teams aren't the same as they were then, 264 00:12:52,800 --> 00:12:55,960 Speaker 3: but it's worth remembering just how badly that went for Denver. 265 00:12:56,240 --> 00:12:59,040 Speaker 3: They had the early bomb touchdown, then they give up 266 00:12:59,080 --> 00:13:02,280 Speaker 3: thirty one straight thirty one to seven. The Bills finished 267 00:13:02,280 --> 00:13:05,920 Speaker 3: better than ninety fifth percentile EPA and success rate. They 268 00:13:05,960 --> 00:13:08,360 Speaker 3: doubled up Denver on first downs, they more than doubled 269 00:13:08,400 --> 00:13:12,120 Speaker 3: in yardage. They had forty two minutes of possession thirty 270 00:13:12,160 --> 00:13:14,839 Speaker 3: one extra plays in that game, and James Cook ran 271 00:13:14,880 --> 00:13:17,720 Speaker 3: one hundred and twenty yards for a score in that game, 272 00:13:18,160 --> 00:13:21,920 Speaker 3: And so I think that's the script here, is Buffalo dominating, 273 00:13:22,080 --> 00:13:25,040 Speaker 3: winning the way they did last year. Probably a better 274 00:13:25,120 --> 00:13:27,920 Speaker 3: Denver team and a worse Buffalo team, But thirty one 275 00:13:27,960 --> 00:13:30,600 Speaker 3: to seven leaves a lot of margin for air there. 276 00:13:30,679 --> 00:13:33,800 Speaker 3: So you can probably tell the direction I'm heading here 277 00:13:34,480 --> 00:13:37,880 Speaker 3: in the division around, you fade the big favorites. That's 278 00:13:37,920 --> 00:13:39,559 Speaker 3: what the trends say. I know you have a lot 279 00:13:39,559 --> 00:13:41,840 Speaker 3: of those trends in your column saying that. Here are 280 00:13:41,840 --> 00:13:44,720 Speaker 3: a couple that I had. The one seed after a 281 00:13:44,760 --> 00:13:48,960 Speaker 3: bye fifteen twenty nine to one ats thirty four percent 282 00:13:49,000 --> 00:13:52,080 Speaker 3: cover rate, including when that one seed is a six 283 00:13:52,120 --> 00:13:54,839 Speaker 3: point favorite or anything worse than that, So a short 284 00:13:54,840 --> 00:13:58,000 Speaker 3: favorite or even underdog, that one seed is only three 285 00:13:58,080 --> 00:14:01,080 Speaker 3: and ten ATS the last couple decades, it's six and 286 00:14:01,120 --> 00:14:03,880 Speaker 3: seven straight up. Not a good spot for Denver here, 287 00:14:03,920 --> 00:14:07,559 Speaker 3: and division around favorites that have won over seventy five 288 00:14:07,600 --> 00:14:10,960 Speaker 3: percent of their games, like Denver thirty four percent ATS 289 00:14:11,200 --> 00:14:12,760 Speaker 3: that one you're gonna hear come up in a few 290 00:14:12,760 --> 00:14:14,920 Speaker 3: of these games here. So at the end of the 291 00:14:15,000 --> 00:14:18,200 Speaker 3: day I said all the power run stuff, but we 292 00:14:18,240 --> 00:14:20,960 Speaker 3: haven't said much about the quarterbacks. This is still the 293 00:14:20,960 --> 00:14:24,560 Speaker 3: best quarterback in the playoffs, and in my opinion, clearly 294 00:14:24,600 --> 00:14:28,080 Speaker 3: the worst. It's still Josh Allen, that's still Bonnicks. Allan 295 00:14:28,160 --> 00:14:30,680 Speaker 3: can handle the pressure if he needs to. I'm talking 296 00:14:30,680 --> 00:14:32,920 Speaker 3: about the pressure from Denver, not the pressure of the 297 00:14:32,920 --> 00:14:35,160 Speaker 3: big game is going to add to the power run game. 298 00:14:35,680 --> 00:14:39,240 Speaker 3: I think two McDermott's defense was really good against Jacksonville 299 00:14:39,280 --> 00:14:42,320 Speaker 3: last week, a tough matchup. I thought he disguised coverage 300 00:14:42,320 --> 00:14:44,880 Speaker 3: as well. And I think Buffalos gonna play a lot 301 00:14:44,880 --> 00:14:47,320 Speaker 3: of zone. Bonux has been way worse against Ozone this 302 00:14:47,400 --> 00:14:50,080 Speaker 3: year and over his career, so that's a big problem too. 303 00:14:50,560 --> 00:14:52,880 Speaker 3: And here are a couple Josh Allen stats that really 304 00:14:52,920 --> 00:14:56,280 Speaker 3: hammer home for me. Josh Allen anything under a field 305 00:14:56,320 --> 00:15:00,360 Speaker 3: goal favorite for his career sixty four percent ats when 306 00:15:00,360 --> 00:15:02,480 Speaker 3: he's not a big favorite. You just trust Josh told 307 00:15:02,480 --> 00:15:04,920 Speaker 3: get it done. And then you have this in your column. 308 00:15:05,160 --> 00:15:07,960 Speaker 3: Josh Allen against an opponent that allows twenty points a 309 00:15:08,000 --> 00:15:11,080 Speaker 3: game or less in his career twenty nine ten and 310 00:15:11,240 --> 00:15:15,000 Speaker 3: one ats seventy four percent cover rate, covering by over 311 00:15:15,040 --> 00:15:18,680 Speaker 3: a touchdown per game, best quarterback in our system, as 312 00:15:18,680 --> 00:15:21,760 Speaker 3: you noted, better even than Tom Brady, who's second best. 313 00:15:21,800 --> 00:15:25,160 Speaker 3: There here's how I translate that. I don't care how 314 00:15:25,200 --> 00:15:28,480 Speaker 3: good your defense is. I'm Josh Allen. We're still gonna 315 00:15:28,480 --> 00:15:31,200 Speaker 3: score some points. You're holding people under twenty not me. 316 00:15:31,440 --> 00:15:33,560 Speaker 3: I'm Josh Allen. We're gonna get a few points. And 317 00:15:33,600 --> 00:15:37,320 Speaker 3: now if you combine those two stats, Josh against the 318 00:15:37,360 --> 00:15:40,120 Speaker 3: defense that allows twenty points a game, or last when 319 00:15:40,160 --> 00:15:43,360 Speaker 3: he is under a field goal favorite, listen to this number, 320 00:15:43,880 --> 00:15:48,280 Speaker 3: nineteen three and one against the spread. He's won fourteen 321 00:15:48,280 --> 00:15:52,480 Speaker 3: of the last sixteen outright close ears Bills fans. Chiefs 322 00:15:52,520 --> 00:15:55,600 Speaker 3: loss twice in the playoffs. That's it. So unless you're 323 00:15:55,640 --> 00:15:59,000 Speaker 3: Mahomes and the Chiefs, that's the only way to beat 324 00:15:59,480 --> 00:16:01,720 Speaker 3: Josh Allen and the Bills in the spot. And by 325 00:16:01,760 --> 00:16:04,680 Speaker 3: the way, that trend I just said, that's gonna apply 326 00:16:04,800 --> 00:16:08,040 Speaker 3: next round against another great defense, and it'll apply against 327 00:16:08,040 --> 00:16:10,320 Speaker 3: Seattle in the Super Bowl too, So we'll hope for 328 00:16:10,440 --> 00:16:13,960 Speaker 3: Bills fans. It's a lot of information. Here's my bet 329 00:16:14,200 --> 00:16:16,840 Speaker 3: Bill's money line minus one, O two or best number 330 00:16:16,840 --> 00:16:21,280 Speaker 3: you can find. Last year, I was all in Bill's Broncos, 331 00:16:21,320 --> 00:16:22,920 Speaker 3: we hit all seven and a half all the way 332 00:16:23,000 --> 00:16:25,080 Speaker 3: up to minus twenty three and a half at five 333 00:16:25,120 --> 00:16:28,000 Speaker 3: to one. Let's run it back. We're on fraud watch. 334 00:16:28,160 --> 00:16:31,720 Speaker 3: Here's how we're doing it. Bill's team total over twenty 335 00:16:31,720 --> 00:16:35,120 Speaker 3: three and a half at DraftKings that has hit nine 336 00:16:35,160 --> 00:16:38,280 Speaker 3: of the last ten Josh Allen playoff games. He's averaging 337 00:16:38,280 --> 00:16:41,240 Speaker 3: almost thirty points a game in those. He's hit twenty 338 00:16:41,280 --> 00:16:43,880 Speaker 3: seven or better in eight of those ten. We'll play 339 00:16:43,920 --> 00:16:46,080 Speaker 3: twenty seven or better as well at two to one. 340 00:16:46,720 --> 00:16:48,840 Speaker 3: If you like the Bills to score a lot here 341 00:16:49,200 --> 00:16:52,840 Speaker 3: and we'll get to Rams Bears later. In between, those 342 00:16:52,880 --> 00:16:56,320 Speaker 3: two games are two unders. I think two low scoring games, 343 00:16:56,640 --> 00:16:58,880 Speaker 3: So I like Bills eight to one to be the 344 00:16:58,960 --> 00:17:02,440 Speaker 3: highest scoring team this weekend. If they go high here 345 00:17:02,880 --> 00:17:06,760 Speaker 3: and if that cold weather compresses Rams bearries a little bit, 346 00:17:06,440 --> 00:17:09,560 Speaker 3: the Bills should be alive. And then last al tier 347 00:17:10,119 --> 00:17:13,120 Speaker 3: got to play the alt lines if Denver can't score either. 348 00:17:13,600 --> 00:17:16,200 Speaker 3: Buffalo eight of their thirteen wins by a touchdown or 349 00:17:16,240 --> 00:17:19,120 Speaker 3: batter over half by double digits. Here are the numbers. 350 00:17:19,160 --> 00:17:21,639 Speaker 3: Bill's minus five and a half plus two twenty five 351 00:17:22,080 --> 00:17:24,919 Speaker 3: Bills by ten or more plus four fifty bills by 352 00:17:25,000 --> 00:17:28,840 Speaker 3: seventeen or more plus nine hundred. I'm out on the broncos. 353 00:17:29,160 --> 00:17:31,240 Speaker 3: I'm in on the bills. And it's not just Josh, 354 00:17:31,280 --> 00:17:34,480 Speaker 3: it's the power run. Denver's on fraud Watch. We're playing 355 00:17:34,480 --> 00:17:35,320 Speaker 3: it every way we can. 356 00:17:35,880 --> 00:17:38,080 Speaker 4: Yeah, I'll give you some updateds percentages right now in 357 00:17:38,119 --> 00:17:39,760 Speaker 4: terms of the markets that we see, because it's kind 358 00:17:39,760 --> 00:17:42,080 Speaker 4: of intriguing. So we talked about the basically three point 359 00:17:42,160 --> 00:17:44,920 Speaker 4: move in Denver's direction, but Buffalo seems to be getting 360 00:17:44,920 --> 00:17:48,440 Speaker 4: all the actions, so it's a bit of a interesting move. Nonetheless, 361 00:17:48,440 --> 00:17:50,440 Speaker 4: in terms of Buffalo getting like sixty three percent of 362 00:17:50,480 --> 00:17:52,359 Speaker 4: the tickets and sixty five percent of the money at 363 00:17:52,400 --> 00:17:54,840 Speaker 4: the moment. I'll say this to kind of back up 364 00:17:54,840 --> 00:17:57,880 Speaker 4: your bets because Buffalo tends to score in the playoffs 365 00:17:57,920 --> 00:17:59,879 Speaker 4: and they do it well. Last five years. There's se 366 00:18:00,200 --> 00:18:03,639 Speaker 4: in three team total over in those ten playoff games. 367 00:18:04,320 --> 00:18:07,720 Speaker 4: And you talked about that stat with Josh Allen versus 368 00:18:07,720 --> 00:18:11,000 Speaker 4: teams allowing under twenty points per game well in that span. 369 00:18:11,280 --> 00:18:14,679 Speaker 4: So basically, when Allen faces a team on the road 370 00:18:15,119 --> 00:18:17,320 Speaker 4: allowing under twenty points per game, he is twelve three 371 00:18:17,359 --> 00:18:19,840 Speaker 4: and one against the spread covering by seven points per game. 372 00:18:19,880 --> 00:18:22,880 Speaker 4: But to your number, he's averaging twenty six points per 373 00:18:22,880 --> 00:18:26,520 Speaker 4: game in those games. So basically great defense, he's still 374 00:18:26,520 --> 00:18:29,320 Speaker 4: putting up points. It doesn't matter. The other one that 375 00:18:29,359 --> 00:18:31,600 Speaker 4: I thought was kind of intriguing Sean Payton in the 376 00:18:31,600 --> 00:18:35,520 Speaker 4: playoffs six and twelve first half ats, so his teams 377 00:18:35,600 --> 00:18:38,880 Speaker 4: have started slow and they just and obviously we've talked 378 00:18:38,880 --> 00:18:41,320 Speaker 4: about the Josh Allen slow thing, and we've talked about 379 00:18:41,359 --> 00:18:44,160 Speaker 4: even last week, like the drives weren't great. He puts 380 00:18:44,240 --> 00:18:46,240 Speaker 4: up I think ten points in the first half. It 381 00:18:46,280 --> 00:18:49,480 Speaker 4: didn't look amazing, But from Denver's standpoint, like if you 382 00:18:49,560 --> 00:18:52,040 Speaker 4: start slow in this one, I would be more worried. 383 00:18:52,080 --> 00:18:54,199 Speaker 4: So that stat was a little alarming to me. But 384 00:18:54,560 --> 00:18:56,480 Speaker 4: that's what I see here in Buffalo Denver. 385 00:18:56,600 --> 00:18:58,560 Speaker 3: Yeah, I agree with the slow start thing. We've talked 386 00:18:58,600 --> 00:19:01,480 Speaker 3: about Buffalo slow starts. We've talked about Denver slow starts 387 00:19:01,480 --> 00:19:03,639 Speaker 3: all year. They've been one of the worst first quarter teams. 388 00:19:03,680 --> 00:19:06,440 Speaker 3: So I'm really curious if you're a Denver fan, or 389 00:19:06,480 --> 00:19:09,040 Speaker 3: if you're a Denver better, you need to see this 390 00:19:09,080 --> 00:19:12,639 Speaker 3: two week rest advantage payoff with something new, something different. 391 00:19:12,680 --> 00:19:15,399 Speaker 3: I'm that first driver too. Those scripted plays have not 392 00:19:15,520 --> 00:19:18,520 Speaker 3: gone well for Denver. If Denver doesn't score and they're 393 00:19:18,520 --> 00:19:20,960 Speaker 3: opening couple drives and the Bills get a score right away, 394 00:19:21,400 --> 00:19:24,080 Speaker 3: I'm gonna feel really really good about my escalators and 395 00:19:24,119 --> 00:19:27,160 Speaker 3: everything from there, because that is the exact opposite setup 396 00:19:27,440 --> 00:19:30,679 Speaker 3: you want for Denver. You need the Patriots matchup that 397 00:19:30,720 --> 00:19:33,600 Speaker 3: we talked about possibly next round. You need a team 398 00:19:33,680 --> 00:19:36,320 Speaker 3: on the front foot. Denver wants to be on the 399 00:19:36,359 --> 00:19:38,720 Speaker 3: front foot the way they have been most of the season. 400 00:19:39,040 --> 00:19:41,320 Speaker 3: We've talked about either of these teams not playing a 401 00:19:41,320 --> 00:19:44,879 Speaker 3: lot of competition. Buffalo hasn't really had a lot of 402 00:19:44,960 --> 00:19:47,280 Speaker 3: chances to be far behind and have to figure some 403 00:19:47,400 --> 00:19:50,040 Speaker 3: things out. They've done it. They did it against Baltimore 404 00:19:50,040 --> 00:19:52,600 Speaker 3: and the opener, they had to come back against Jacksonville 405 00:19:52,640 --> 00:19:55,960 Speaker 3: last week. They've come from behind. That's the script Denver 406 00:19:56,080 --> 00:19:58,520 Speaker 3: needs to ask for here. And I would feel better 407 00:19:58,520 --> 00:20:00,359 Speaker 3: about their chances if I thought they can could come 408 00:20:00,400 --> 00:20:02,960 Speaker 3: out early swing. But you're right, the numbers don't look 409 00:20:02,960 --> 00:20:06,160 Speaker 3: good there, and I don't know, I feel like Buffalo 410 00:20:06,480 --> 00:20:09,040 Speaker 3: could take care of Denver with some ease here if 411 00:20:09,040 --> 00:20:09,959 Speaker 3: things go their direction. 412 00:20:10,720 --> 00:20:12,800 Speaker 4: Yeah, this is a great start. Off to the playoffs 413 00:20:12,800 --> 00:20:15,480 Speaker 4: with this game, because it's going to be fascinating who wins, nonetheless, 414 00:20:15,520 --> 00:20:17,320 Speaker 4: and it'll kind of set the tone for the weekend 415 00:20:17,680 --> 00:20:20,520 Speaker 4: the NFC West Showdown. The thing we just saw San 416 00:20:20,560 --> 00:20:24,800 Speaker 4: Francisco Seattle. You've seen it everywhere. Brock Party never lost 417 00:20:24,840 --> 00:20:27,360 Speaker 4: in Seattle in his career, believe it's four and zero. 418 00:20:27,720 --> 00:20:30,440 Speaker 4: Things have looked good in that sense. So I'll toss 419 00:20:30,440 --> 00:20:33,119 Speaker 4: it to you. What is the first thing you looked 420 00:20:33,119 --> 00:20:35,520 Speaker 4: at when you were trying to because we just handicapped 421 00:20:35,520 --> 00:20:37,280 Speaker 4: this one. We just saw this one a few weeks ago, 422 00:20:37,480 --> 00:20:39,439 Speaker 4: and you're pretty much looking at the exact same stuff. 423 00:20:39,480 --> 00:20:41,199 Speaker 4: Was there anything different that you looked at from San 424 00:20:41,240 --> 00:20:42,160 Speaker 4: Francisco and Seattle? 425 00:20:42,280 --> 00:20:44,920 Speaker 3: Yeah, so I started with the rematch for sure. Obviously 426 00:20:45,240 --> 00:20:48,040 Speaker 3: very unusual, in fact, I think historical that we get 427 00:20:48,119 --> 00:20:51,120 Speaker 3: those team's play week one, then Week eighteen to close, 428 00:20:51,240 --> 00:20:54,119 Speaker 3: and now the rematch. First, it's Seattle's last game. Is 429 00:20:54,119 --> 00:20:57,240 Speaker 3: that game that we saw which was two Saturdays ago 430 00:20:57,600 --> 00:21:00,439 Speaker 3: where the Niners around a short week here instead, So 431 00:21:00,480 --> 00:21:04,000 Speaker 3: it's a really huge rest advantage for Seattle. Early in 432 00:21:04,040 --> 00:21:05,639 Speaker 3: the week, I thought this line would arise. 433 00:21:05,720 --> 00:21:06,120 Speaker 4: It did. 434 00:21:06,280 --> 00:21:08,639 Speaker 3: It was below the seven. Now it's above the seven. 435 00:21:08,840 --> 00:21:11,360 Speaker 3: I think the line makes sense compared to it closed 436 00:21:11,560 --> 00:21:13,760 Speaker 3: two and a half in Seattle, or sorry, two and 437 00:21:13,760 --> 00:21:16,520 Speaker 3: a half in San fran that Week eighteen game. Now 438 00:21:16,520 --> 00:21:18,720 Speaker 3: you add in the rest advantage and flip to Seattle 439 00:21:18,720 --> 00:21:21,119 Speaker 3: home seven and a half, that seems about right. But 440 00:21:21,160 --> 00:21:22,639 Speaker 3: it's a touch high for me. I have it just 441 00:21:22,800 --> 00:21:25,920 Speaker 3: under seven, even though I'm very high in Seattle. That 442 00:21:26,000 --> 00:21:29,640 Speaker 3: game we saw Seattle won thirteen to three. It wasn't 443 00:21:29,640 --> 00:21:32,000 Speaker 3: even that close. Three hundred and sixty one yards to 444 00:21:32,040 --> 00:21:34,639 Speaker 3: one hundred and seventy three, twenty three first downs to 445 00:21:34,880 --> 00:21:38,760 Speaker 3: nine nine first downs for the forty nine ers, thirty 446 00:21:38,800 --> 00:21:42,520 Speaker 3: six percent success rate, lows points and lowest yards for 447 00:21:42,640 --> 00:21:46,439 Speaker 3: Shanahan since his debut game. Twenty seven percent success on 448 00:21:46,520 --> 00:21:50,000 Speaker 3: late downs. That's really shocking for the Niners. There are 449 00:21:50,040 --> 00:21:51,960 Speaker 3: two of nine on third down all of two, and 450 00:21:52,040 --> 00:21:54,360 Speaker 3: fourth down oh of one. In the red zone. This 451 00:21:54,440 --> 00:21:56,840 Speaker 3: is the number one team in the red zone and 452 00:21:56,880 --> 00:22:00,679 Speaker 3: on third down on the season, but Seattle shut it 453 00:22:00,760 --> 00:22:03,160 Speaker 3: down there and they're top two against both of those 454 00:22:03,200 --> 00:22:06,000 Speaker 3: areas on the field, and that has been the trend 455 00:22:06,400 --> 00:22:08,439 Speaker 3: for the Niners. Is kind of what we saw in 456 00:22:08,480 --> 00:22:12,080 Speaker 3: that game. Since Party returned from injury, eight games now 457 00:22:12,080 --> 00:22:14,359 Speaker 3: for the Niners, four of them have been against the 458 00:22:14,359 --> 00:22:18,359 Speaker 3: defense twentieth or worse. Those games average almost seventy points 459 00:22:18,359 --> 00:22:20,520 Speaker 3: a game in them, and the Niners are scoring a 460 00:22:20,560 --> 00:22:23,600 Speaker 3: lot of them. Fifty four percent success rate four other 461 00:22:23,720 --> 00:22:27,480 Speaker 3: games not against top defens is just better than twentieth 462 00:22:27,920 --> 00:22:31,040 Speaker 3: Sam fran drops from fifty four to forty percent success rate, 463 00:22:31,400 --> 00:22:34,560 Speaker 3: and those games are averaging barely thirty points a game, 464 00:22:34,680 --> 00:22:38,040 Speaker 3: way down from seventy. So we took this on the 465 00:22:38,040 --> 00:22:41,520 Speaker 3: hot Red already on Sunday under forty seven and a half. 466 00:22:41,520 --> 00:22:44,320 Speaker 3: There I still see forty five and a half forty five. 467 00:22:44,720 --> 00:22:47,680 Speaker 3: I still like the underbest here. I think McDonald's defense 468 00:22:48,160 --> 00:22:50,320 Speaker 3: is built for a game like this, and I think 469 00:22:50,359 --> 00:22:54,200 Speaker 3: he's built to defend Sam Franz defense well. Seattle is 470 00:22:54,280 --> 00:22:57,119 Speaker 3: elite at a lot of stuff, especially good middle of 471 00:22:57,119 --> 00:23:01,080 Speaker 3: the field defense, especially good against motion and playoff. That's 472 00:23:01,119 --> 00:23:04,680 Speaker 3: the Shanahan scheme. That's what Shanahan does so well. Talked 473 00:23:04,720 --> 00:23:07,720 Speaker 3: about the late downs and red zone coverage. Seattle plays 474 00:23:07,720 --> 00:23:10,240 Speaker 3: the second most light boxes in the league. San Frin 475 00:23:10,320 --> 00:23:12,160 Speaker 3: has not run the ball well this year, and they're 476 00:23:12,160 --> 00:23:15,520 Speaker 3: only thirtieth and EPA per play against light boxes, they 477 00:23:15,520 --> 00:23:18,280 Speaker 3: don't hit a lot of explosives. Seattle defense well against that. 478 00:23:18,800 --> 00:23:22,560 Speaker 3: Seattle is number one against wide receiver one. San Frin 479 00:23:22,640 --> 00:23:25,960 Speaker 3: only really has one wide receiver, it's Jawan Jennings pearsall 480 00:23:26,080 --> 00:23:29,119 Speaker 3: still might be hurt. George Kittle is hurt. I do 481 00:23:29,200 --> 00:23:32,720 Speaker 3: think the Niners can get some success short passes. That's 482 00:23:32,800 --> 00:23:35,040 Speaker 3: one area Seattle does allow a little bit there more 483 00:23:35,119 --> 00:23:38,120 Speaker 3: league averaged, but that's a lot of short passes moving 484 00:23:38,200 --> 00:23:41,080 Speaker 3: down the field against a tough defense and expecting you 485 00:23:41,119 --> 00:23:44,400 Speaker 3: to do that over ten, twelve, fourteen plays and try 486 00:23:44,400 --> 00:23:47,000 Speaker 3: to get some points out of it. On the flip side. 487 00:23:47,400 --> 00:23:49,720 Speaker 3: Forty nine ers defense, we know how they've been bad. 488 00:23:50,200 --> 00:23:51,920 Speaker 3: I think it's a bit overlooked because they have the 489 00:23:51,960 --> 00:23:55,040 Speaker 3: one seed. Again, our perception of the one seeds maybe 490 00:23:55,040 --> 00:23:58,119 Speaker 3: a little bit off here. Seattle's offense has really fallen 491 00:23:58,160 --> 00:24:01,440 Speaker 3: off from the beginning of the season. First ten weeks 492 00:24:01,440 --> 00:24:04,120 Speaker 3: of the season, this was the number one passing team 493 00:24:04,160 --> 00:24:07,320 Speaker 3: by DVOA. Then they played the Rams and the Rams 494 00:24:07,320 --> 00:24:11,280 Speaker 3: said this, hey, you're going heavy because you're trying to 495 00:24:11,320 --> 00:24:13,920 Speaker 3: bait us to go heavy and match you two defensively, 496 00:24:14,320 --> 00:24:17,280 Speaker 3: but you're passing on us anyway. That's the Klint Kobiak scheme. 497 00:24:17,600 --> 00:24:20,080 Speaker 3: The RAM said, Nah, we're not doing that. You're gonna 498 00:24:20,080 --> 00:24:23,240 Speaker 3: pass the ball, you can't run anyways. We're just staying 499 00:24:23,240 --> 00:24:25,280 Speaker 3: in the defense we like to play and we don't 500 00:24:25,280 --> 00:24:27,800 Speaker 3: think you can beat us that way. And since Week 501 00:24:27,840 --> 00:24:31,680 Speaker 3: eleven that game forward, Seattle's dropped a twenty fifth in passing. 502 00:24:31,720 --> 00:24:34,640 Speaker 3: That's bottom quarter of the league, and teams that both 503 00:24:34,720 --> 00:24:38,439 Speaker 3: mostly copycated that. And obviously Robert Salid just saw this 504 00:24:38,560 --> 00:24:42,159 Speaker 3: offense also plays a ton of zone. Sam Darnold has 505 00:24:42,200 --> 00:24:45,960 Speaker 3: been way worse against zone than against man coverage. San 506 00:24:46,080 --> 00:24:49,080 Speaker 3: Fran better against swide receiver, one worse down the line. 507 00:24:49,200 --> 00:24:52,199 Speaker 3: Pretty good matchup for Seattle, who's got JSN and not 508 00:24:52,320 --> 00:24:55,399 Speaker 3: a lot else there. I think Seattle can run on 509 00:24:55,480 --> 00:24:58,080 Speaker 3: San Fran, but I think the forty nine ers will 510 00:24:58,119 --> 00:25:00,800 Speaker 3: live with that. They're gonna put out their light boxes 511 00:25:00,840 --> 00:25:03,879 Speaker 3: as well most in the league, and say, hey, you 512 00:25:03,920 --> 00:25:06,520 Speaker 3: want to run the ball ten, twelve, fourteen times down 513 00:25:06,560 --> 00:25:09,320 Speaker 3: the field, we'll pass the ball like that too, and 514 00:25:09,359 --> 00:25:11,359 Speaker 3: we'll play a thirteen to three. Maybe it will be 515 00:25:11,400 --> 00:25:14,480 Speaker 3: the thirteen this time. I think the underdog on the 516 00:25:14,560 --> 00:25:17,120 Speaker 3: road is gonna be fine with that script. So I 517 00:25:17,280 --> 00:25:19,560 Speaker 3: like under the most. I've got to lean on the 518 00:25:19,600 --> 00:25:21,960 Speaker 3: game and some props. What do you think about this matchup? 519 00:25:22,400 --> 00:25:25,080 Speaker 4: Yeah, I think under is probably the right way you 520 00:25:25,080 --> 00:25:27,640 Speaker 4: would look at it. Just some like off the very 521 00:25:27,680 --> 00:25:30,520 Speaker 4: easy stats in terms of this matchup. Last three Seattle 522 00:25:30,520 --> 00:25:33,400 Speaker 4: San Francisco games all under the total with party. Then 523 00:25:33,440 --> 00:25:35,800 Speaker 4: you look five of the last six with party have 524 00:25:35,880 --> 00:25:38,960 Speaker 4: also gone under forty five. So I just think based 525 00:25:39,000 --> 00:25:42,600 Speaker 4: off this matchup, if you like Seattle, I could see 526 00:25:42,600 --> 00:25:46,000 Speaker 4: the over. If you think San Francisco covers, they're not 527 00:25:46,040 --> 00:25:47,840 Speaker 4: going to be able to put up those type of points. 528 00:25:47,880 --> 00:25:51,080 Speaker 4: It's going to be in that under forty range. It 529 00:25:51,200 --> 00:25:55,639 Speaker 4: just has to be. There. Just isn't enough firepower targets 530 00:25:55,960 --> 00:25:59,399 Speaker 4: people out there explosive wise to get that amount of points. 531 00:25:59,440 --> 00:26:03,479 Speaker 4: So I think a San Francisco and the under type combo, 532 00:26:03,840 --> 00:26:06,080 Speaker 4: even if you talked about a teaser or you're just 533 00:26:06,119 --> 00:26:08,560 Speaker 4: moving a few points in either direction, that's got to 534 00:26:08,600 --> 00:26:10,760 Speaker 4: be the way this goes, or they're gonna have no shot. 535 00:26:10,880 --> 00:26:13,680 Speaker 4: So I think, listen, you're forty seven and a half, 536 00:26:14,280 --> 00:26:17,639 Speaker 4: great job. I mean that's that's over a few key numbers, 537 00:26:17,720 --> 00:26:19,680 Speaker 4: especially when you get to those. Forty six is even 538 00:26:19,760 --> 00:26:22,960 Speaker 4: hit sometimes of course forty seven, so that's fantastic. That 539 00:26:23,080 --> 00:26:25,760 Speaker 4: is no longer the case. But I do think when 540 00:26:25,800 --> 00:26:28,440 Speaker 4: you talk about getting closer to Saturday night, I see 541 00:26:28,440 --> 00:26:30,600 Speaker 4: it coming lower. So I do think that forty five 542 00:26:30,680 --> 00:26:34,280 Speaker 4: right now still does hold some value. Listen, we've also 543 00:26:34,320 --> 00:26:37,520 Speaker 4: talked about like the Denver minus one, minus one and 544 00:26:37,520 --> 00:26:39,560 Speaker 4: a half, whatever you want to call it. The point 545 00:26:39,600 --> 00:26:42,439 Speaker 4: spread doesn't matter, so I kind of ignore history. This 546 00:26:42,600 --> 00:26:44,520 Speaker 4: is to me where the point spread matters. I mean, 547 00:26:44,840 --> 00:26:47,560 Speaker 4: thirty three and forty four against a spread division round 548 00:26:47,560 --> 00:26:50,439 Speaker 4: coming off of bye three and seven since twenty twenty. 549 00:26:50,640 --> 00:26:52,720 Speaker 4: But this is the one that matters to me, favorite 550 00:26:52,720 --> 00:26:55,720 Speaker 4: of seven plus points off the by seventeen and twenty 551 00:26:55,760 --> 00:26:58,359 Speaker 4: six forty percent. So that's the one you're gonna have 552 00:26:58,400 --> 00:27:01,080 Speaker 4: to overcome here. Now, the news came out about Sam 553 00:27:01,160 --> 00:27:04,480 Speaker 4: Donald being questionable, all that stuff. Ignore it. It doesn't matter, 554 00:27:04,560 --> 00:27:07,679 Speaker 4: except don't ignore it in one sense, like there is 555 00:27:07,720 --> 00:27:10,280 Speaker 4: a chance he gets hurt in this game, right, Like 556 00:27:10,320 --> 00:27:13,200 Speaker 4: that is something that actually could happen. And then you 557 00:27:13,240 --> 00:27:16,080 Speaker 4: have there is a percentage chance more than I would 558 00:27:16,080 --> 00:27:19,920 Speaker 4: see Purty exiting this game, seeing Donald exiting this game, 559 00:27:19,920 --> 00:27:23,000 Speaker 4: and seeing Drew Locke. So I do think we even 560 00:27:23,080 --> 00:27:25,719 Speaker 4: just saw the market react to that injury news and 561 00:27:25,760 --> 00:27:27,439 Speaker 4: it came down with some juice, Like I don't know 562 00:27:27,440 --> 00:27:29,359 Speaker 4: if those seven and a halfs are popping up again 563 00:27:30,200 --> 00:27:32,960 Speaker 4: based off of a number of factors. So I do 564 00:27:33,040 --> 00:27:37,720 Speaker 4: feel that this matchup has the ability to be closer, 565 00:27:38,080 --> 00:27:41,480 Speaker 4: just because of the schemes from San Francisco and you're 566 00:27:41,560 --> 00:27:45,480 Speaker 4: stat about them being twenty fifth recently on offense. That's alarming, 567 00:27:45,640 --> 00:27:48,240 Speaker 4: especially to the fact that I feel like they could 568 00:27:48,280 --> 00:27:51,159 Speaker 4: do a pretty good defensive job on JSN here to 569 00:27:51,240 --> 00:27:55,159 Speaker 4: keep him not in check but not go off. And 570 00:27:55,200 --> 00:27:56,920 Speaker 4: I think that's what they're gonna need to probably stay 571 00:27:56,960 --> 00:27:57,560 Speaker 4: in this one. 572 00:27:57,840 --> 00:27:59,840 Speaker 3: Yeah, And I think if it does go under what 573 00:28:00,000 --> 00:28:01,960 Speaker 3: what ever number is San fran is that seven and 574 00:28:02,000 --> 00:28:04,080 Speaker 3: a half better above the key. But I think even 575 00:28:04,119 --> 00:28:06,800 Speaker 3: at seven sevens a lot of points in a game 576 00:28:06,840 --> 00:28:09,080 Speaker 3: that went thirteen to three last time, I think finished 577 00:28:09,080 --> 00:28:11,399 Speaker 3: thirty nine the first time out, sevens out was a 578 00:28:11,440 --> 00:28:13,640 Speaker 3: lot of points, but especially in a low scoring game, 579 00:28:14,000 --> 00:28:16,280 Speaker 3: I think I'm not on the side here as much, 580 00:28:16,320 --> 00:28:18,600 Speaker 3: but I certainly don't have to lean san Fran above 581 00:28:18,600 --> 00:28:20,639 Speaker 3: the key number. Let's see where it lands. Like you 582 00:28:20,680 --> 00:28:22,960 Speaker 3: said with the Darnald News, I had some of those 583 00:28:23,000 --> 00:28:25,400 Speaker 3: same stats. A lot of trends on San Fran here, 584 00:28:25,800 --> 00:28:27,919 Speaker 3: A lot of the trends we just said with Denver 585 00:28:28,080 --> 00:28:30,440 Speaker 3: fading the one seed after the bye week, Division round 586 00:28:30,440 --> 00:28:33,880 Speaker 3: thirty four percent ats Division of round favorites over seventy 587 00:28:33,880 --> 00:28:36,639 Speaker 3: fur percent win rate thirty four percent ATS. A couple 588 00:28:36,680 --> 00:28:39,720 Speaker 3: other new ones here, road team and a division rematch 589 00:28:39,720 --> 00:28:43,000 Speaker 3: in the playoffs. That's the Niners fourteen six and one 590 00:28:43,080 --> 00:28:46,880 Speaker 3: seventy percent ats there division round visitors that missed last 591 00:28:46,920 --> 00:28:49,720 Speaker 3: year's playoffs last round. If you were new to the 592 00:28:49,720 --> 00:28:53,000 Speaker 3: playoffs that didn't make it last year, we fade those teams, 593 00:28:53,040 --> 00:28:54,600 Speaker 3: you might be a bit of a fraud. You kind 594 00:28:54,600 --> 00:28:57,120 Speaker 3: of lucked into it. Now you had to win to 595 00:28:57,200 --> 00:28:59,880 Speaker 3: get to this round. Now you want those teams twenty 596 00:29:00,120 --> 00:29:04,240 Speaker 3: nine to fourteen ATS sixty seven percent. So a lot 597 00:29:04,240 --> 00:29:07,400 Speaker 3: of trends like the Niners here, especially at the seven, 598 00:29:07,640 --> 00:29:09,720 Speaker 3: there are a lot of trends that like Seattle to 599 00:29:09,880 --> 00:29:12,600 Speaker 3: win the game. Seattle's won ten in a row at 600 00:29:12,600 --> 00:29:15,160 Speaker 3: home with fans on the stands you in your column, 601 00:29:15,280 --> 00:29:18,080 Speaker 3: Darnold thirteen to zero as a six point favorite or better. 602 00:29:18,400 --> 00:29:21,600 Speaker 3: There's the huge rest advantage stat We've seen teams that 603 00:29:21,680 --> 00:29:25,360 Speaker 3: win as underdogs in the wildcard round almost never win 604 00:29:25,440 --> 00:29:28,320 Speaker 3: this round. Like it's really rare. Two and twenty two 605 00:29:28,840 --> 00:29:31,440 Speaker 3: since I forget what the date is, but obviously in 606 00:29:31,480 --> 00:29:34,680 Speaker 3: the last twenty four games. So a little bet here, 607 00:29:35,200 --> 00:29:37,760 Speaker 3: Niners to cover hopefully seven and a half. You can 608 00:29:37,760 --> 00:29:39,440 Speaker 3: get it seven if you need it. I would not 609 00:29:39,520 --> 00:29:43,120 Speaker 3: play it underneath the seven Niners to cover plus Seattle 610 00:29:43,160 --> 00:29:46,080 Speaker 3: to win. So some books you can just do Seattle 611 00:29:46,120 --> 00:29:49,160 Speaker 3: to win by one to seven points. I think Seattle 612 00:29:49,520 --> 00:29:52,520 Speaker 3: gets the win, but the Niners keep it close. And look, 613 00:29:52,680 --> 00:29:54,680 Speaker 3: you mentioned this. If you want to throw the under 614 00:29:54,720 --> 00:29:56,560 Speaker 3: in there, that makes a lot of sense as well. 615 00:29:56,840 --> 00:29:58,680 Speaker 3: Mine doesn't have the under in there. It's basically a 616 00:29:58,680 --> 00:30:01,520 Speaker 3: two to one bet. Well, that would be the side here. 617 00:30:01,560 --> 00:30:03,800 Speaker 3: I'm going to be playing props on this one. I 618 00:30:03,800 --> 00:30:07,440 Speaker 3: think a lot of short passes. I wanted Christian McCaffrey props. 619 00:30:07,440 --> 00:30:10,880 Speaker 3: That's what I played Week eighteen the CMC receptions escalator. 620 00:30:11,160 --> 00:30:14,200 Speaker 3: Apparently books were like everybody wants that. You can't play 621 00:30:14,240 --> 00:30:18,080 Speaker 3: it good luck. So Seattle allows the most running back receptions. 622 00:30:18,120 --> 00:30:21,400 Speaker 3: We hit it in week eighteen CMC when Kittle was 623 00:30:21,720 --> 00:30:25,440 Speaker 3: playing fifty percent snaps or less over nine targets a game. 624 00:30:25,760 --> 00:30:28,200 Speaker 3: But the lines aren't new. I can't find any value there. 625 00:30:28,200 --> 00:30:30,520 Speaker 3: You got to play like ten receptions to get anything 626 00:30:30,560 --> 00:30:31,840 Speaker 3: out of it. So I'm gonna go with a couple 627 00:30:31,920 --> 00:30:36,320 Speaker 3: other guys here, two guys less heralded. Jake Tanjas the 628 00:30:36,400 --> 00:30:40,560 Speaker 3: replacement for George Kittle. Seattle also allows top five most 629 00:30:40,600 --> 00:30:43,480 Speaker 3: receptions to tight ends. They've allowed seven or more tight 630 00:30:43,600 --> 00:30:46,120 Speaker 3: end catches in over half of their games, eight or 631 00:30:46,160 --> 00:30:49,720 Speaker 3: more and over third of their games. San Fran thirteen 632 00:30:49,800 --> 00:30:52,520 Speaker 3: tight end catches and the two Seattle games already, so 633 00:30:52,640 --> 00:30:54,720 Speaker 3: Kittle's a big loss here. He would have been a 634 00:30:54,720 --> 00:30:57,320 Speaker 3: big weapon, but the last three games Kittle has missed 635 00:30:57,320 --> 00:31:01,720 Speaker 3: the entire game. Here's Tanja's lines seven for sixty, six 636 00:31:01,800 --> 00:31:04,520 Speaker 3: for forty eight, seven for forty one. He's getting some 637 00:31:04,640 --> 00:31:08,640 Speaker 3: volume here, six seven catches each time, two touchdowns in 638 00:31:08,720 --> 00:31:12,880 Speaker 3: those games too. We'll take the Jake Tonjes unlikely playoff 639 00:31:12,920 --> 00:31:17,959 Speaker 3: receptions escalator five catches plus one thirty five six at 640 00:31:18,000 --> 00:31:20,000 Speaker 3: plus two to fifty seven I'll actually put more of 641 00:31:20,040 --> 00:31:22,880 Speaker 3: my bet on there than on the five that's at DraftKings. 642 00:31:22,920 --> 00:31:25,320 Speaker 3: That's what he's hit in these games. And then seven 643 00:31:25,400 --> 00:31:28,479 Speaker 3: is just over five to one. That's Jake Toanjas. Then 644 00:31:28,560 --> 00:31:32,440 Speaker 3: last one on the other side, Kenneth Walker. The Niners 645 00:31:32,800 --> 00:31:36,080 Speaker 3: allow the second most running back receptions, behind only Seattle. 646 00:31:36,520 --> 00:31:40,120 Speaker 3: They've allowed nineteen running backs this year to have at 647 00:31:40,200 --> 00:31:43,280 Speaker 3: least three catches more than one per game, nine of 648 00:31:43,320 --> 00:31:46,480 Speaker 3: them with four more catches. Kenneth Walker. I don't really 649 00:31:46,480 --> 00:31:49,320 Speaker 3: think is that good of a receiver. But last eight 650 00:31:49,400 --> 00:31:52,080 Speaker 3: games he's averaging two and a half catches for twenty 651 00:31:52,080 --> 00:31:54,680 Speaker 3: five yards. Now, it's not much, but before that he 652 00:31:54,760 --> 00:31:57,840 Speaker 3: was averaging one point two catches for nine yards. It's 653 00:31:57,880 --> 00:32:00,880 Speaker 3: a huge jump. That's twenty catches those eight games. That's 654 00:32:00,880 --> 00:32:04,600 Speaker 3: as many as Sharberney has the entire season. And he's 655 00:32:04,600 --> 00:32:08,560 Speaker 3: had three catches and more six times, including both Niners games. 656 00:32:08,760 --> 00:32:11,120 Speaker 3: So not quite as aggressive here because I don't really 657 00:32:11,120 --> 00:32:13,880 Speaker 3: think this is a huge matchup angle or even a 658 00:32:14,000 --> 00:32:17,440 Speaker 3: Kenneth Walker's strength. But three catches is plus one ninety 659 00:32:17,720 --> 00:32:19,960 Speaker 3: he's hit that both Niners matchups. I have to like 660 00:32:20,000 --> 00:32:22,560 Speaker 3: that one. Just a little nibble on four catches at 661 00:32:22,640 --> 00:32:25,400 Speaker 3: plus five twenty five. And if it is this kind 662 00:32:25,440 --> 00:32:30,520 Speaker 3: of slog under type game, hopefully get lots of short passes, 663 00:32:30,600 --> 00:32:33,680 Speaker 3: lots of dump off type stuff, hopefully goes to Tanjas 664 00:32:33,760 --> 00:32:36,200 Speaker 3: and Kenneth Walker and we kind of scrape across a 665 00:32:36,200 --> 00:32:36,960 Speaker 3: few props here. 666 00:32:37,360 --> 00:32:41,200 Speaker 4: Would you have considered maybe juicing those Kenneth Walker reception 667 00:32:41,320 --> 00:32:44,360 Speaker 4: props with McCaffrey, like you could do five, you could 668 00:32:44,360 --> 00:32:47,000 Speaker 4: do six, like the McCaffrey stuff juiced out of them. 669 00:32:47,560 --> 00:32:49,040 Speaker 4: Out of this world, and you probably don't do it 670 00:32:49,160 --> 00:32:51,280 Speaker 4: so low. But if you think it's gonna hit, it 671 00:32:51,280 --> 00:32:53,960 Speaker 4: could be a nice marriage, assuming both these teams allow 672 00:32:54,000 --> 00:32:56,080 Speaker 4: a ton of to receive. I mean to running backs, 673 00:32:56,120 --> 00:32:58,280 Speaker 4: like it could be something where you just touch both 674 00:32:58,280 --> 00:33:00,640 Speaker 4: of them. But did you was that considered at all? 675 00:33:00,920 --> 00:33:04,160 Speaker 3: I couldn't find a value on a McCaffrey line, So 676 00:33:04,440 --> 00:33:07,080 Speaker 3: I don't mind. I would not juice the Tanjas ones 677 00:33:07,120 --> 00:33:10,120 Speaker 3: because you're hoping the Tanja's short passes probably come at 678 00:33:10,120 --> 00:33:13,320 Speaker 3: the cost of McCaffrey short passes. I don't mind playing 679 00:33:13,360 --> 00:33:15,719 Speaker 3: a little bit with Walker if you're trying to kind 680 00:33:15,760 --> 00:33:17,920 Speaker 3: of put together I don't mind playing that with the 681 00:33:18,040 --> 00:33:20,320 Speaker 3: under because I think that kind of fits the script. 682 00:33:21,320 --> 00:33:23,440 Speaker 3: I don't mind playing San fran covering I think that 683 00:33:23,480 --> 00:33:25,240 Speaker 3: fits the script. So if you want to kind of 684 00:33:25,320 --> 00:33:27,280 Speaker 3: juice the lines a little bit, I don't mind throwing 685 00:33:27,280 --> 00:33:30,360 Speaker 3: some McCaffrey stock in there. He's gonna get his looks. 686 00:33:30,400 --> 00:33:33,080 Speaker 3: It's just I looked at all the numbers. I think 687 00:33:33,080 --> 00:33:36,800 Speaker 3: you almost might be better off playing yardage with McCaffrey than receptions. 688 00:33:37,120 --> 00:33:39,400 Speaker 3: The volume is so high for him that it's just 689 00:33:39,920 --> 00:33:42,600 Speaker 3: not in the market anymore. So the yardage is starting 690 00:33:42,600 --> 00:33:45,160 Speaker 3: to climb as well. I wanted it. I had a 691 00:33:45,200 --> 00:33:47,600 Speaker 3: whole I had my notes all prepped for McCaffrey, and 692 00:33:47,600 --> 00:33:49,480 Speaker 3: I just can't find any lines I like, So don't 693 00:33:49,720 --> 00:33:51,200 Speaker 3: I don't mind the angle. I just don't see a 694 00:33:51,240 --> 00:33:52,000 Speaker 3: ton of value on it. 695 00:33:52,840 --> 00:33:54,560 Speaker 4: What I looked up which I thought was interesting. With 696 00:33:54,640 --> 00:33:57,320 Speaker 4: Kenneth Walker, so in games where he gets a lot 697 00:33:57,400 --> 00:34:00,480 Speaker 4: of targets, obviously the perceptions are there. This one kind 698 00:34:00,480 --> 00:34:02,920 Speaker 4: of is alarming. So when he gets four plus targets 699 00:34:02,960 --> 00:34:06,000 Speaker 4: versus San Francisco, he's had thirty two yards, thirty three yards, 700 00:34:06,040 --> 00:34:08,200 Speaker 4: thirty seven yards, and thirty six yards in his last 701 00:34:08,239 --> 00:34:11,040 Speaker 4: four games, in that spot. Last twenty games he gets 702 00:34:11,080 --> 00:34:14,319 Speaker 4: four plus targets, he's averaging thirty four receiving yards right now. 703 00:34:14,320 --> 00:34:17,040 Speaker 4: I believe that line is somewhere like eleven and a 704 00:34:17,080 --> 00:34:20,839 Speaker 4: half or something like that. So obviously, if there's volume there, 705 00:34:20,880 --> 00:34:22,480 Speaker 4: it's a great bet. And that's kind of the bet 706 00:34:22,520 --> 00:34:25,120 Speaker 4: you're making. So I mean, from a reception standpoint, you 707 00:34:25,160 --> 00:34:27,280 Speaker 4: could try to marry that with some yards as well. 708 00:34:27,480 --> 00:34:31,000 Speaker 4: Fifteen plus twenty plus and hopefully that is just the 709 00:34:31,040 --> 00:34:33,440 Speaker 4: angle they take because the snaps have been there, the 710 00:34:33,520 --> 00:34:35,360 Speaker 4: routes have been there, so it kind of makes sense. 711 00:34:35,960 --> 00:34:39,200 Speaker 3: Yeah, Donald is gonna see some pressure here. San Fran 712 00:34:39,239 --> 00:34:41,560 Speaker 3: does not pressure well. But I think this is a 713 00:34:41,560 --> 00:34:43,879 Speaker 3: little bit of a bet against Donald and him kind 714 00:34:43,880 --> 00:34:46,200 Speaker 3: of panicking and dumping it off a little bit. And 715 00:34:46,239 --> 00:34:48,040 Speaker 3: we all love to bet against Sam Darnald a little 716 00:34:48,040 --> 00:34:49,880 Speaker 3: bit in a playoffs splot, So I think that angle 717 00:34:49,960 --> 00:34:52,480 Speaker 3: kind of hits as well. And you're right if you 718 00:34:52,520 --> 00:34:55,680 Speaker 3: don't want to go too aggressive on the receptions, maybe 719 00:34:55,719 --> 00:34:58,839 Speaker 3: just playing for hoping Walker can even if he gets 720 00:34:58,880 --> 00:35:01,520 Speaker 3: one catch plus a lot, he hits the yardage twenty 721 00:35:01,640 --> 00:35:04,160 Speaker 3: or thirty yards. I think that's interesting as well. 722 00:35:04,920 --> 00:35:08,759 Speaker 4: All right Sunday, here we come. We start off at 723 00:35:08,800 --> 00:35:13,319 Speaker 4: three pm with Houston and New England. Right now, New 724 00:35:13,320 --> 00:35:16,160 Speaker 4: England about a three point favorite. Looks like it's going 725 00:35:16,200 --> 00:35:18,000 Speaker 4: back up to three and a half or so with 726 00:35:18,120 --> 00:35:20,160 Speaker 4: the Nico Collins news, which he looks like he will 727 00:35:20,200 --> 00:35:21,920 Speaker 4: be out, which we can talk about in a second. 728 00:35:22,520 --> 00:35:24,840 Speaker 4: Total about forty and a half, which is the lowest 729 00:35:24,880 --> 00:35:29,279 Speaker 4: of the weekend. What is your handicap initially with this game? 730 00:35:29,320 --> 00:35:32,080 Speaker 4: I mean, from my standpoint, it was the Nico news. 731 00:35:32,440 --> 00:35:34,960 Speaker 4: We talked about this on Favorites earlier today and I 732 00:35:35,000 --> 00:35:37,680 Speaker 4: was surprised that Nico didn't really come up a ton early. 733 00:35:38,120 --> 00:35:40,320 Speaker 4: I feel like, I mean, granted, you look at some 734 00:35:40,400 --> 00:35:41,920 Speaker 4: of the win loss stuff, which I'll talk about in 735 00:35:41,960 --> 00:35:44,200 Speaker 4: a second, I think it's a little skewed because the 736 00:35:44,320 --> 00:35:47,560 Speaker 4: on off numbers are definitely a lot different. But looks 737 00:35:47,560 --> 00:35:50,200 Speaker 4: like no Nico Collins in this game. So, Houston, New England, 738 00:35:50,280 --> 00:35:51,200 Speaker 4: what's your takeaway? 739 00:35:51,360 --> 00:35:53,759 Speaker 3: Yeah, I think that Nico loss is huge here, and 740 00:35:54,280 --> 00:35:58,000 Speaker 3: it's not just like a points yeah spread thing. Christian Gonzalez, 741 00:35:58,080 --> 00:36:00,440 Speaker 3: the lead corner on the Patriots, also so still in 742 00:36:00,520 --> 00:36:03,200 Speaker 3: question though he's practicing now, So it looks like he 743 00:36:03,320 --> 00:36:07,560 Speaker 3: probably will play and Nico Collins out there, that's a swing. 744 00:36:08,040 --> 00:36:10,640 Speaker 3: But it's not just that. It's that the Patriots actually 745 00:36:10,680 --> 00:36:13,120 Speaker 3: are dead last against sweaty zero one by DVA for 746 00:36:13,320 --> 00:36:16,520 Speaker 3: the season. So of all places, of all matchups to 747 00:36:16,600 --> 00:36:19,520 Speaker 3: lose Nico Collins, this is not the spot you wanted 748 00:36:19,560 --> 00:36:22,360 Speaker 3: to do it, and it really I came into the 749 00:36:22,400 --> 00:36:25,120 Speaker 3: week expecting, look, I'm wearing the Texans shirt if you 750 00:36:25,120 --> 00:36:27,480 Speaker 3: need a spoiler, and where this is gonna head. I 751 00:36:27,520 --> 00:36:29,640 Speaker 3: came into the week thinking, Okay, I'm all in on 752 00:36:29,719 --> 00:36:32,120 Speaker 3: Texans here. I have this line close to a pick 753 00:36:32,160 --> 00:36:34,680 Speaker 3: them at full strength. I have the Texans a clearly 754 00:36:34,680 --> 00:36:37,080 Speaker 3: better team than the Patriots. We're at three, three and 755 00:36:37,120 --> 00:36:38,719 Speaker 3: a half. I'm gonna have to bet Houston if it 756 00:36:38,760 --> 00:36:41,719 Speaker 3: gets back there again. But the more I dug into it, 757 00:36:41,920 --> 00:36:44,080 Speaker 3: the more I got a little nervous about the matchup stuff. 758 00:36:44,080 --> 00:36:47,200 Speaker 3: And that happened last week with Chicago Green Bay, and 759 00:36:47,239 --> 00:36:49,759 Speaker 3: it came around that Chicago pulled through in the end, 760 00:36:49,760 --> 00:36:52,600 Speaker 3: but it took three quarters of it not looking good 761 00:36:52,600 --> 00:36:55,200 Speaker 3: and all the matchup stuff hitting. So here's where I 762 00:36:55,239 --> 00:36:58,759 Speaker 3: find a little bit of worries here, Houston's defense, We 763 00:36:58,840 --> 00:37:01,560 Speaker 3: know how good that they are. They just throttle the 764 00:37:01,560 --> 00:37:05,800 Speaker 3: Steelers on Monday Night, just like ended Tomlin ended the era, 765 00:37:06,080 --> 00:37:10,120 Speaker 3: ended Aaron Rodgers. Eli's glorious to watch. Houston this season 766 00:37:10,520 --> 00:37:13,800 Speaker 3: forces a three and out or turnover thirty nine percent 767 00:37:13,880 --> 00:37:17,000 Speaker 3: of their drives. That is outlier number one best in 768 00:37:17,040 --> 00:37:20,720 Speaker 3: the league for reference. That basically turns the opposing offense 769 00:37:20,760 --> 00:37:24,040 Speaker 3: into the Raiders that they're dead last on offense third 770 00:37:24,680 --> 00:37:27,919 Speaker 3: at thirty nine percent themselves. So that's what Houston's doing 771 00:37:27,920 --> 00:37:30,600 Speaker 3: to you. That's how good they've been. We know Will 772 00:37:30,680 --> 00:37:32,960 Speaker 3: Anderson Daniel Hunter are going to bring the elite press 773 00:37:33,120 --> 00:37:36,839 Speaker 3: or pressure rate. But a thing about Houston that they 774 00:37:36,840 --> 00:37:40,279 Speaker 3: get lauded for I think rightfully. So they basically just 775 00:37:40,360 --> 00:37:42,879 Speaker 3: play their eleven dudes and they play one or two 776 00:37:42,960 --> 00:37:46,720 Speaker 3: schemes and they come at you with their guys. Seattle, Denver, 777 00:37:46,800 --> 00:37:49,759 Speaker 3: some of these other elite defenses. They're throwing a mixed 778 00:37:49,840 --> 00:37:53,279 Speaker 3: coverages at you. They're disguising it. They're throwing different packages, 779 00:37:53,640 --> 00:37:57,160 Speaker 3: six defensive backs, five three to one play. Houston's not 780 00:37:57,239 --> 00:37:59,600 Speaker 3: doing that. They're kind of saying, we're just better than 781 00:37:59,640 --> 00:38:01,640 Speaker 3: you are. Guys are better and we're going to beat 782 00:38:01,680 --> 00:38:05,320 Speaker 3: you the way we are and it clearly works usually. However, 783 00:38:05,440 --> 00:38:07,359 Speaker 3: in this matchup, there's a couple of things I think 784 00:38:07,400 --> 00:38:11,360 Speaker 3: could be a little problematic. Number One, Houston's pressure rates 785 00:38:11,400 --> 00:38:14,439 Speaker 3: so good, but the Patriots are thirty EPA per play 786 00:38:14,560 --> 00:38:17,400 Speaker 3: under pressure. That is an area Drake May has crushed 787 00:38:17,400 --> 00:38:22,239 Speaker 3: this season, and the Patriots also have been excellent in 788 00:38:22,320 --> 00:38:26,040 Speaker 3: twenty one personnel with two running backs. The defense for 789 00:38:26,080 --> 00:38:28,680 Speaker 3: Houston drops down to thirteenth in EPA per play against 790 00:38:28,719 --> 00:38:32,880 Speaker 3: twenty one and we know Henderson and Stevenson are going 791 00:38:32,920 --> 00:38:34,560 Speaker 3: to be on the field a lot for New England, 792 00:38:34,880 --> 00:38:38,360 Speaker 3: So that's one problem. Here's the bigger problem Houston's defense, 793 00:38:38,440 --> 00:38:42,480 Speaker 3: because they're so predictable, predictably good, but they can be 794 00:38:42,480 --> 00:38:46,040 Speaker 3: beaten by explosives down the field. Despite all the good 795 00:38:46,120 --> 00:38:50,520 Speaker 3: numbers for Houston, they're only fourteenth defensively against explosives, and 796 00:38:50,600 --> 00:38:53,279 Speaker 3: explosives can cover a lot of sins. You can be 797 00:38:53,320 --> 00:38:56,200 Speaker 3: a great defense for nine plays and give up one 798 00:38:56,239 --> 00:38:58,319 Speaker 3: big play on the tenth one and now he's in 799 00:38:58,360 --> 00:39:00,200 Speaker 3: the end zone and it didn't matter anymore or what 800 00:39:00,280 --> 00:39:03,759 Speaker 3: happened in between. New England leads the league and explosive 801 00:39:03,760 --> 00:39:06,960 Speaker 3: play raid offensively fourteen percent. That's about one of every 802 00:39:07,000 --> 00:39:10,440 Speaker 3: seven plays for them, and it's top five rushing and 803 00:39:10,560 --> 00:39:14,640 Speaker 3: number one passing. Passing, they're hitting explosive play once out 804 00:39:14,640 --> 00:39:19,080 Speaker 3: of every five passes for the entire season. That's Drake May. Look, 805 00:39:19,520 --> 00:39:21,880 Speaker 3: if I had an MVP vote, now that the votes 806 00:39:21,880 --> 00:39:24,879 Speaker 3: are in, we know I love my Stafford ticket. That's 807 00:39:24,920 --> 00:39:28,279 Speaker 3: what made Drake May so valuable these numbers, these explosive 808 00:39:28,320 --> 00:39:31,160 Speaker 3: plays and beating the pressure, and I think he's the 809 00:39:31,239 --> 00:39:34,960 Speaker 3: perfect sort of guy to beat this Houston defense if 810 00:39:34,960 --> 00:39:37,560 Speaker 3: it's going to happen. I think that's why he was 811 00:39:37,640 --> 00:39:41,160 Speaker 3: so valuable this season. So that worries me as a 812 00:39:41,200 --> 00:39:44,680 Speaker 3: Houston possible backer. Here on the other side of things, 813 00:39:45,080 --> 00:39:48,640 Speaker 3: we talked about Jacksonville last week and down the stretches, 814 00:39:48,680 --> 00:39:53,720 Speaker 3: this big breakout team, Houston's breakout mirror Jacksonville down a stretch, 815 00:39:54,040 --> 00:39:56,400 Speaker 3: but the offense didn't really come with the Texans, the 816 00:39:56,400 --> 00:40:00,200 Speaker 3: offense hasn't really gotten a lot better, and Houston is 817 00:40:00,239 --> 00:40:03,400 Speaker 3: second worst in the red zone offensively. Well, the Patriots 818 00:40:03,440 --> 00:40:05,839 Speaker 3: are the worst defense in the red zone. So where 819 00:40:05,840 --> 00:40:09,520 Speaker 3: does that go. Like what we talk about the strength 820 00:40:09,600 --> 00:40:13,279 Speaker 3: on strength, here's weakness on weakness and can Houston get 821 00:40:13,280 --> 00:40:15,399 Speaker 3: to the red zone and score? Can they run? We've 822 00:40:15,400 --> 00:40:17,799 Speaker 3: talked about how weak the Patriots run defense has been 823 00:40:17,960 --> 00:40:22,040 Speaker 3: back half of the season thirtieth by Dvoa. Well, Houston 824 00:40:22,120 --> 00:40:24,000 Speaker 3: has not run the ball well all season. I know 825 00:40:24,040 --> 00:40:26,279 Speaker 3: they did Monday night, but I don't trust them to 826 00:40:26,360 --> 00:40:29,840 Speaker 3: run the ball here where the Patriots are better, especially inside. 827 00:40:30,239 --> 00:40:34,719 Speaker 3: Patriots also are top ten defense against eleven personnel base personnel. 828 00:40:35,120 --> 00:40:38,480 Speaker 3: Houston pretty vanilla on offense as well. So there are 829 00:40:38,480 --> 00:40:40,640 Speaker 3: a lot of just little things where I'm like man 830 00:40:41,440 --> 00:40:45,080 Speaker 3: by roster construction by what I think about these teams. 831 00:40:45,440 --> 00:40:48,800 Speaker 3: I'm Houston, But then you add in all these little matchups. 832 00:40:48,840 --> 00:40:52,560 Speaker 3: You add in Houston a Texas Dome team on the 833 00:40:52,640 --> 00:40:55,960 Speaker 3: road in New England looks like wintry conditions on Sunday. 834 00:40:56,320 --> 00:40:59,120 Speaker 3: I don't feel great about that. I still want to 835 00:40:59,160 --> 00:41:01,680 Speaker 3: fade the home teams in the divisional round. I still 836 00:41:01,680 --> 00:41:04,440 Speaker 3: have some of those same stats, so I'm gonna nibble 837 00:41:04,880 --> 00:41:08,000 Speaker 3: the Houston money line plus one p fifty. It's still 838 00:41:08,040 --> 00:41:10,920 Speaker 3: my better team. I still trust my numbers. I like 839 00:41:11,000 --> 00:41:13,920 Speaker 3: Houston's defense, but it's a nibble. I can't be too 840 00:41:13,920 --> 00:41:16,399 Speaker 3: confident here. Because we don't really know a lot about 841 00:41:16,440 --> 00:41:19,080 Speaker 3: the Patriots right now, and there are some matchup things 842 00:41:19,080 --> 00:41:21,920 Speaker 3: here that gave me some worries. So I'm curious what 843 00:41:21,960 --> 00:41:25,000 Speaker 3: you think. Should I be more confident in Houston or 844 00:41:25,040 --> 00:41:27,480 Speaker 3: am I right to be concerned about some of those matchups. 845 00:41:28,120 --> 00:41:32,080 Speaker 4: I think you're right to be concerned. I like Houston 846 00:41:32,320 --> 00:41:34,520 Speaker 4: in this game in the playoffs, I mean, they were 847 00:41:34,560 --> 00:41:37,280 Speaker 4: one of my picks when we did futures. I think 848 00:41:37,640 --> 00:41:41,600 Speaker 4: the defense will help. Listen, last week, CJ Strod probably 849 00:41:41,600 --> 00:41:44,279 Speaker 4: couldn't have played a worse game, and in the end 850 00:41:44,320 --> 00:41:47,080 Speaker 4: it didn't matter because of how good Houston's defense is. 851 00:41:47,120 --> 00:41:50,440 Speaker 4: Do I expect this game to be exactly like that. 852 00:41:50,560 --> 00:41:53,239 Speaker 4: I don't, But I just feel like it's like a 853 00:41:53,280 --> 00:41:56,440 Speaker 4: card game, Like I think Houston has a lot of outs, Like, 854 00:41:56,520 --> 00:41:58,839 Speaker 4: I just think there's a lot of ways they can 855 00:41:58,880 --> 00:42:00,560 Speaker 4: figure out a way to win. And now I think 856 00:42:00,560 --> 00:42:02,360 Speaker 4: the one thing on Houston that does worry me a 857 00:42:02,400 --> 00:42:05,120 Speaker 4: tiny bit, I do give the coaching edge to Vrabel, 858 00:42:05,200 --> 00:42:07,920 Speaker 4: Like I feel like in a tight situation, which is 859 00:42:08,200 --> 00:42:10,480 Speaker 4: just you know, the smallest over under of the weekend, 860 00:42:10,800 --> 00:42:13,319 Speaker 4: where a lot of these plays, especially late, might matter, 861 00:42:13,920 --> 00:42:17,600 Speaker 4: I don't have the utmost confidence in Dmiko. I kind 862 00:42:17,600 --> 00:42:20,640 Speaker 4: of feel like in those situations he could let us down. 863 00:42:20,760 --> 00:42:25,440 Speaker 4: But overall, I'm betting on what I believe is probably 864 00:42:25,480 --> 00:42:28,560 Speaker 4: the best unit in the playoffs, which is their defense 865 00:42:29,200 --> 00:42:32,279 Speaker 4: figuring out a way to contain Drake May in this game. 866 00:42:32,400 --> 00:42:34,720 Speaker 4: Now you're going to talk about some Drake May stats 867 00:42:34,719 --> 00:42:37,000 Speaker 4: and some props you like on him, But I found 868 00:42:37,040 --> 00:42:39,760 Speaker 4: it interesting that the Texans did face Drake May once. 869 00:42:40,000 --> 00:42:42,440 Speaker 4: They played him last year in Week six, a forty 870 00:42:42,480 --> 00:42:44,200 Speaker 4: one to twenty one win. But what I took out 871 00:42:44,239 --> 00:42:46,799 Speaker 4: of it May through two interceptions, one of his two 872 00:42:46,840 --> 00:42:50,600 Speaker 4: career games with multiple picks. May pass success rate of 873 00:42:50,680 --> 00:42:53,920 Speaker 4: forty five point nine percent, fifth lowest of his career. 874 00:42:54,160 --> 00:42:57,200 Speaker 4: With thirty plus pass attempts, he had a sixty point 875 00:42:57,239 --> 00:43:00,640 Speaker 4: six percent completion percentage, his third lowest for thirty plus 876 00:43:00,680 --> 00:43:04,280 Speaker 4: pass attemp So Houston did a pretty darn good job 877 00:43:04,840 --> 00:43:07,440 Speaker 4: containing him and doing what they needed to do to 878 00:43:07,480 --> 00:43:09,520 Speaker 4: win the game. Now, do I expect them to put 879 00:43:09,600 --> 00:43:13,000 Speaker 4: up forty one. I don't, But at this rate, putting 880 00:43:13,080 --> 00:43:16,239 Speaker 4: up twenty something should be enough for that defense, even 881 00:43:16,280 --> 00:43:19,719 Speaker 4: if they do allow an explosive play, Assuming that that 882 00:43:19,760 --> 00:43:22,120 Speaker 4: even if that explosive play goes for a touchdown, I'm 883 00:43:22,120 --> 00:43:24,120 Speaker 4: not so worried about it. Do I expect if they 884 00:43:24,160 --> 00:43:27,760 Speaker 4: allow multiple explosive plays, then you start to get worried. 885 00:43:27,960 --> 00:43:31,640 Speaker 4: But I feel like a player two is still enough. 886 00:43:31,960 --> 00:43:34,520 Speaker 4: Where you talk about three and outs, you talk about turnovers, 887 00:43:34,520 --> 00:43:39,000 Speaker 4: there's going to be some chaos in this game from 888 00:43:39,120 --> 00:43:41,600 Speaker 4: Houston side, and I think that's what you're banking on. 889 00:43:41,880 --> 00:43:44,239 Speaker 4: And also if you're talking about just to spread here, 890 00:43:44,520 --> 00:43:46,400 Speaker 4: you're getting a field goal or even three and a 891 00:43:46,440 --> 00:43:49,719 Speaker 4: half in this game. So to me that if you're like, 892 00:43:49,760 --> 00:43:52,600 Speaker 4: if you like Houston, that is the difference in this one. 893 00:43:53,160 --> 00:43:54,920 Speaker 4: And then you look at the weather, Well, it was 894 00:43:55,040 --> 00:43:58,160 Speaker 4: damn cold. It wasn't great last week in Pittsburgh. This 895 00:43:58,200 --> 00:44:01,840 Speaker 4: week you're talking about about thirty five degrees. There's about 896 00:44:01,920 --> 00:44:05,160 Speaker 4: five six seven mile an hour wins, which at this rate, 897 00:44:05,239 --> 00:44:07,719 Speaker 4: you know it's not Chicago. But one thing to look at, 898 00:44:07,760 --> 00:44:10,440 Speaker 4: you might get a little rain. There's some precipitation in 899 00:44:10,480 --> 00:44:14,720 Speaker 4: the forecast. That's not amazing for Houston's offense, but also 900 00:44:15,000 --> 00:44:18,120 Speaker 4: it could be bad for Houston for a New England's offense, 901 00:44:18,320 --> 00:44:21,120 Speaker 4: which would help our best unit play so to me, 902 00:44:21,440 --> 00:44:23,560 Speaker 4: I think that's part of the handicap that I would 903 00:44:23,600 --> 00:44:24,760 Speaker 4: like with Houston in this one. 904 00:44:25,000 --> 00:44:26,919 Speaker 3: Yeah, and I will certainly feel better, like you said, 905 00:44:26,920 --> 00:44:28,560 Speaker 3: if it's the three and a half, and that had 906 00:44:28,560 --> 00:44:31,040 Speaker 3: disappeared when I was getting ready for this, but it 907 00:44:31,120 --> 00:44:33,040 Speaker 3: makes sense that it's moving back that way with the 908 00:44:33,120 --> 00:44:35,879 Speaker 3: Nico news likely being out here. I do a couple 909 00:44:35,920 --> 00:44:38,360 Speaker 3: of small props for this one. This is my least 910 00:44:38,360 --> 00:44:40,160 Speaker 3: confident game of the weekend, so I kind of light 911 00:44:40,200 --> 00:44:43,240 Speaker 3: on all of these. But Drake Mays stats against top 912 00:44:43,440 --> 00:44:46,759 Speaker 3: eight quarterback defenses this year four games, two hundred and 913 00:44:46,760 --> 00:44:49,239 Speaker 3: twenty eight yards, one point three touchdowns, so pretty low 914 00:44:49,280 --> 00:44:53,000 Speaker 3: on the touchdowns there, and it's almost identical to Houston's 915 00:44:53,280 --> 00:44:58,080 Speaker 3: six games against a top ten passing DVA offense. They've 916 00:44:58,120 --> 00:45:01,000 Speaker 3: allowed two hundred and twenty nine yards and point three touchdowns 917 00:45:01,040 --> 00:45:03,319 Speaker 3: nearly identical lines. So I think that's kind of what 918 00:45:03,360 --> 00:45:06,560 Speaker 3: you probably should expect from may Low on the passing touchdowns. 919 00:45:06,600 --> 00:45:09,160 Speaker 3: I do think he can run, though we saw that 920 00:45:09,280 --> 00:45:13,320 Speaker 3: on the game against the Chargers. Ten rushes sixty six yards, 921 00:45:13,320 --> 00:45:16,160 Speaker 3: both season highs. In that game, he's had twenty five 922 00:45:16,239 --> 00:45:19,000 Speaker 3: or more yards and half the games this season running 923 00:45:19,239 --> 00:45:21,040 Speaker 3: he's had forty or more and a third of the games. 924 00:45:21,080 --> 00:45:24,720 Speaker 3: And Houston because they bring so much pressure so well, 925 00:45:25,120 --> 00:45:26,960 Speaker 3: it's gonna cause Drake to run a little bit. And 926 00:45:27,000 --> 00:45:29,319 Speaker 3: he's done a really good job this year of even 927 00:45:29,320 --> 00:45:31,560 Speaker 3: when he does take a sack, taking like a two 928 00:45:31,640 --> 00:45:34,000 Speaker 3: or three yard sack like not as quite a damaging 929 00:45:34,040 --> 00:45:37,160 Speaker 3: of one. But when he scrambles he can create. He's 930 00:45:37,200 --> 00:45:41,600 Speaker 3: six in EPA per play on scrambles per dropback. Houston 931 00:45:41,680 --> 00:45:44,600 Speaker 3: is thirty first in that stat. They're getting so well 932 00:45:44,719 --> 00:45:47,880 Speaker 3: up the field pressuring that there's nobody there to contain 933 00:45:47,920 --> 00:45:50,719 Speaker 3: the quarterback, and one or two big plays by May 934 00:45:50,760 --> 00:45:53,000 Speaker 3: with his legs would not surprise me here either. So 935 00:45:53,600 --> 00:45:56,640 Speaker 3: I got creative. Here, here's a couple same game parlays 936 00:45:56,680 --> 00:45:59,239 Speaker 3: for you with Drake May under one and a half 937 00:45:59,320 --> 00:46:02,040 Speaker 3: passing touch downs, so you get one or zero that's it, 938 00:46:02,600 --> 00:46:07,080 Speaker 3: plus twenty five rushing yards plus one eighteen so twenty five. 939 00:46:07,120 --> 00:46:09,759 Speaker 3: It's below the number. His line is at thirty five 940 00:46:09,880 --> 00:46:11,279 Speaker 3: right now. I was all excited to do like a 941 00:46:11,320 --> 00:46:14,120 Speaker 3: twenty five forty to fifty, but books have already kind 942 00:46:14,160 --> 00:46:15,520 Speaker 3: of gone on to that when it baked it in 943 00:46:16,040 --> 00:46:18,600 Speaker 3: so I'll do under one and a half passing touchdowns 944 00:46:18,600 --> 00:46:21,400 Speaker 3: twenty five yards and then keep that but change it 945 00:46:21,440 --> 00:46:23,400 Speaker 3: to sixty rushing yards in case he does what he 946 00:46:23,400 --> 00:46:27,000 Speaker 3: did last week. That's plus five sixty nine with the 947 00:46:27,120 --> 00:46:29,759 Speaker 3: under one and a half touchdowns passing and then one 948 00:46:29,760 --> 00:46:32,560 Speaker 3: other way to attack. I think the Patriots can attack. 949 00:46:33,080 --> 00:46:36,799 Speaker 3: Houston is also second worst EPA against screens in the 950 00:46:37,239 --> 00:46:41,640 Speaker 3: on the season, Patriots are top six on screenplays themselves. Now, 951 00:46:42,000 --> 00:46:44,759 Speaker 3: who's the screen guy for the Patriots. I don't know 952 00:46:44,800 --> 00:46:47,400 Speaker 3: if there's a guy. The numbers suggest it might be 953 00:46:47,480 --> 00:46:49,719 Speaker 3: Rmandra Stevenson, even though it doesn't make a lot of sense. 954 00:46:50,200 --> 00:46:53,200 Speaker 3: Last six games three catches for thirty eight yards a 955 00:46:53,239 --> 00:46:55,600 Speaker 3: game for him, he's had three or more catches and 956 00:46:55,640 --> 00:46:57,640 Speaker 3: four of the six he's at at least twenty two 957 00:46:57,719 --> 00:46:59,880 Speaker 3: yards receiving in all of them, and a lot of 958 00:46:59,920 --> 00:47:02,719 Speaker 3: it's been yack sixty one percent of his season. Yak 959 00:47:02,760 --> 00:47:05,040 Speaker 3: has come just in these six games. And if you're 960 00:47:05,040 --> 00:47:08,600 Speaker 3: wondering about Trevion, he's only down about eight receiving snaps 961 00:47:08,640 --> 00:47:11,480 Speaker 3: a game the last five weeks. Reminder's at twenty two. 962 00:47:11,920 --> 00:47:14,440 Speaker 3: So I think Stevenson has kind of quietly become the 963 00:47:14,440 --> 00:47:17,480 Speaker 3: receiving back here, and the line for him is just 964 00:47:17,600 --> 00:47:19,839 Speaker 3: nineteen and a half receiving yards. Again, he's gone over 965 00:47:19,920 --> 00:47:23,040 Speaker 3: that six straight games, so we'll start with there. And 966 00:47:23,080 --> 00:47:25,200 Speaker 3: in that stretch he's had a forty, he's had a 967 00:47:25,239 --> 00:47:27,799 Speaker 3: fifty five, and he's had a seventy five. Texans have 968 00:47:27,800 --> 00:47:30,160 Speaker 3: allowed thirty six yards or more to a running back 969 00:47:30,320 --> 00:47:33,560 Speaker 3: seven times already. We've seen some long ones. We saw 970 00:47:33,640 --> 00:47:36,000 Speaker 3: Genti hit a long score against them earlier this season. 971 00:47:36,480 --> 00:47:39,160 Speaker 3: I think again that could be a spot where one 972 00:47:39,200 --> 00:47:41,759 Speaker 3: to play a one break contain could get a long 973 00:47:41,800 --> 00:47:45,760 Speaker 3: one for Stevens and so forty fifty and seventy receiving 974 00:47:45,840 --> 00:47:49,440 Speaker 3: yards on the escalator at four to one, six seventy 975 00:47:49,440 --> 00:47:52,040 Speaker 3: five and nineteen to one, just nibbling all the way up. 976 00:47:52,320 --> 00:47:55,480 Speaker 3: And again we're looking for those explosives. We're looking for 977 00:47:56,000 --> 00:47:58,640 Speaker 3: where can you attack this Houston defense. I think it's 978 00:47:58,680 --> 00:48:01,239 Speaker 3: on the ground with Drake's legs and maybe by the 979 00:48:01,280 --> 00:48:04,160 Speaker 3: ear with Ramondre Stevenson. So we'll take a couple of 980 00:48:04,200 --> 00:48:05,760 Speaker 3: shots at some long numbers there. 981 00:48:06,160 --> 00:48:08,560 Speaker 4: Yeah, I'm gonna focus on Stevens and I think he 982 00:48:08,680 --> 00:48:11,200 Speaker 4: is the if New England does their job and wins 983 00:48:11,200 --> 00:48:13,759 Speaker 4: this game. He will be the reason. He will be 984 00:48:13,800 --> 00:48:15,920 Speaker 4: the focal point. And to me, it's not going to 985 00:48:16,000 --> 00:48:19,120 Speaker 4: be at least I don't think a three touchdown game 986 00:48:19,920 --> 00:48:22,480 Speaker 4: through the air for Drake may So. I looked at 987 00:48:22,520 --> 00:48:25,840 Speaker 4: Ramandre in a similar stat to Walker, three plus targets 988 00:48:25,880 --> 00:48:28,160 Speaker 4: for him. He has twenty seven plus receiving yards in 989 00:48:28,239 --> 00:48:30,760 Speaker 4: seven straight games. So just give him a little volume 990 00:48:30,960 --> 00:48:33,920 Speaker 4: and he'll do the job. And you mentioned Ramandre Stevenson 991 00:48:34,000 --> 00:48:37,640 Speaker 4: versus Trevion Henderson, Well, since thereby here are the snaps 992 00:48:37,680 --> 00:48:41,040 Speaker 4: in terms of routes for both these players, twenty three 993 00:48:41,080 --> 00:48:44,680 Speaker 4: to eight, thirteen to zero, nineteen to zero, thirty four 994 00:48:44,680 --> 00:48:47,320 Speaker 4: to five, nineteen to eight, and that's all in favor 995 00:48:47,360 --> 00:48:50,520 Speaker 4: of Vermandre so obviously at this point, and I think 996 00:48:50,520 --> 00:48:53,000 Speaker 4: for most of the season, if you've had Henderson in fantasy, 997 00:48:53,239 --> 00:48:56,520 Speaker 4: he's been in the doghouse. He is not getting anywhere 998 00:48:56,560 --> 00:48:59,000 Speaker 4: near what I think people thought he would this year. 999 00:48:59,160 --> 00:49:01,600 Speaker 4: And Ramandre is still the dark horse and still the man, 1000 00:49:01,640 --> 00:49:03,480 Speaker 4: and still the guy who does all the work for them. 1001 00:49:03,560 --> 00:49:07,880 Speaker 4: So to me, whether it's a touchdown or receiving yards 1002 00:49:08,080 --> 00:49:09,920 Speaker 4: or you know, there's a lot of different ways I 1003 00:49:09,960 --> 00:49:12,400 Speaker 4: would play him, But to me, in this type of 1004 00:49:12,440 --> 00:49:15,000 Speaker 4: weather format, I think he's going to be the man 1005 00:49:15,040 --> 00:49:17,120 Speaker 4: on the ground. And I'll leave you with what I 1006 00:49:17,160 --> 00:49:19,680 Speaker 4: teas at the beginning. It is intriguing with the Nico 1007 00:49:19,800 --> 00:49:23,560 Speaker 4: stat that last three seasons, Nicos missed nine games. Houston 1008 00:49:23,640 --> 00:49:25,879 Speaker 4: is six and three in those games. So, I mean 1009 00:49:26,440 --> 00:49:28,279 Speaker 4: a lot of the numbers don't look as good and 1010 00:49:28,360 --> 00:49:30,680 Speaker 4: a lot of the inside stuff the same. But with 1011 00:49:30,760 --> 00:49:34,080 Speaker 4: this defense, they're able to kind of figure things out 1012 00:49:34,120 --> 00:49:37,040 Speaker 4: on the fly and sometimes the ball just ends up 1013 00:49:37,040 --> 00:49:39,279 Speaker 4: in their hands because of all the pressure. So I 1014 00:49:39,320 --> 00:49:41,960 Speaker 4: think if you're betting on Houston, that's what you're hoping 1015 00:49:42,000 --> 00:49:45,080 Speaker 4: for here, because I think you're, you know, without Nico, 1016 00:49:45,239 --> 00:49:49,000 Speaker 4: you've become a much less explosive team. You know what 1017 00:49:49,120 --> 00:49:51,399 Speaker 4: he marks a little bit, But other than that, you're 1018 00:49:51,719 --> 00:49:54,840 Speaker 4: you're relying on Jaden Higgins, Dalton Schultz. It's going to 1019 00:49:54,920 --> 00:49:57,839 Speaker 4: be a very medium game for them. So I think 1020 00:49:57,880 --> 00:50:00,760 Speaker 4: the under in Houston has some validity to So that's 1021 00:50:00,800 --> 00:50:02,080 Speaker 4: the way I would look at this matchup. 1022 00:50:02,160 --> 00:50:04,319 Speaker 3: Yeah, if you were wanting to bet Houston, you were 1023 00:50:04,360 --> 00:50:06,880 Speaker 3: not betting them for their offense in this game anyway. 1024 00:50:06,880 --> 00:50:09,880 Speaker 3: You're betting them because you expect the defense to contain 1025 00:50:10,400 --> 00:50:12,959 Speaker 3: what is largely a one man team. That's the whole 1026 00:50:12,960 --> 00:50:15,839 Speaker 3: thing with MVP. If you're Drake May, you're the guy 1027 00:50:15,920 --> 00:50:18,279 Speaker 3: doing everything, and those teams usually come up short in 1028 00:50:18,280 --> 00:50:21,360 Speaker 3: the playoffs, especially against such a great defense like this. 1029 00:50:21,520 --> 00:50:24,120 Speaker 3: So I think you shouldn't let the Nico news shake you. 1030 00:50:24,239 --> 00:50:27,120 Speaker 3: So totally there and yeah, what do you marks? He'll 1031 00:50:27,120 --> 00:50:29,840 Speaker 3: be explosive until his weekly injury somewhere on the second 1032 00:50:29,880 --> 00:50:33,520 Speaker 3: or third quarter. That guy cannot stay on the field, But. 1033 00:50:33,480 --> 00:50:35,360 Speaker 4: Don't worry, he will be back. And that's how it 1034 00:50:35,400 --> 00:50:37,840 Speaker 4: works with what he marks. Our last matchup of the 1035 00:50:37,840 --> 00:50:41,000 Speaker 4: weekend and boys at a doozy the Rams on the 1036 00:50:41,120 --> 00:50:44,840 Speaker 4: road in Chicago to face the Bears. Line right now 1037 00:50:44,960 --> 00:50:47,040 Speaker 4: is three and a half for the Rams with a 1038 00:50:47,040 --> 00:50:49,279 Speaker 4: bunch of juice on it, minus one twenty, minus one 1039 00:50:49,360 --> 00:50:52,479 Speaker 4: eighteen total, sitting at forty eight and a half, which 1040 00:50:52,520 --> 00:50:54,520 Speaker 4: is the highest of the weekend, and probably the more 1041 00:50:54,560 --> 00:50:57,160 Speaker 4: interesting note is that it opened around fifty one to 1042 00:50:57,239 --> 00:50:59,279 Speaker 4: fifty one and a half, so it has come down 1043 00:50:59,360 --> 00:51:03,200 Speaker 4: three full points. A lot of wind, a lot of weather, 1044 00:51:03,400 --> 00:51:05,840 Speaker 4: a lot of Stafford cold talk. I mean that's basically 1045 00:51:05,840 --> 00:51:07,839 Speaker 4: what you've had on the internet for the past three 1046 00:51:07,920 --> 00:51:10,480 Speaker 4: or four days. So when you look at this matchup, 1047 00:51:10,760 --> 00:51:13,040 Speaker 4: leaving it for last year, what do you think about 1048 00:51:13,160 --> 00:51:14,160 Speaker 4: the Rams and Bears. 1049 00:51:14,280 --> 00:51:16,239 Speaker 3: Yeah, I was ready to come out firing on the 1050 00:51:16,320 --> 00:51:19,360 Speaker 3: Rams here, but the weather talk and the Stafford finger 1051 00:51:19,440 --> 00:51:22,479 Speaker 3: injury talk do have me a little bit concerned. I'm 1052 00:51:22,480 --> 00:51:25,399 Speaker 3: still Rams here and we'll talk through why, but I'm 1053 00:51:25,400 --> 00:51:27,560 Speaker 3: gonna be a little less aggressive than I would have 1054 00:51:27,600 --> 00:51:30,720 Speaker 3: been without the wedge, the weather and the finger injury. 1055 00:51:30,840 --> 00:51:33,960 Speaker 3: So look, the Bears. We talked about this with the 1056 00:51:34,040 --> 00:51:37,160 Speaker 3: last Packers game. I thought they won their Super Bowl then, 1057 00:51:37,200 --> 00:51:38,960 Speaker 3: well it turns out not because they won a few 1058 00:51:38,960 --> 00:51:41,799 Speaker 3: more games since then. But this time this sort of 1059 00:51:41,840 --> 00:51:45,200 Speaker 3: win in that way, this huge emotional comeback win against 1060 00:51:45,200 --> 00:51:48,759 Speaker 3: your rival in the playoffs. I'm a Vikings fan. I've 1061 00:51:48,800 --> 00:51:51,480 Speaker 3: seen this movie. You get the huge emotional win early 1062 00:51:51,520 --> 00:51:54,560 Speaker 3: in the playoffs. It's really hard to come back the 1063 00:51:54,600 --> 00:51:57,040 Speaker 3: next week and bring that same emotional energy and show 1064 00:51:57,120 --> 00:51:59,600 Speaker 3: up the same way again. So many times you see 1065 00:51:59,600 --> 00:52:02,239 Speaker 3: the huge come back when that's also the end of 1066 00:52:02,239 --> 00:52:05,160 Speaker 3: the DVD. Like the footnote is, you don't come through 1067 00:52:05,200 --> 00:52:07,960 Speaker 3: the next week and it matters not just that they 1068 00:52:08,000 --> 00:52:10,160 Speaker 3: had the comeback, but it matters that, for a second 1069 00:52:10,200 --> 00:52:13,640 Speaker 3: straight time against a terrible Packers defense, they did nothing 1070 00:52:13,840 --> 00:52:16,439 Speaker 3: for three quarters and they couldn't get the ball moving 1071 00:52:16,520 --> 00:52:19,840 Speaker 3: at all until late. They also lose their starting left tackle, 1072 00:52:19,880 --> 00:52:21,840 Speaker 3: which was a big part of their transformation on the 1073 00:52:21,840 --> 00:52:24,920 Speaker 3: offensive line. They'll lost their only good linebacker on a 1074 00:52:24,920 --> 00:52:28,759 Speaker 3: defense that's already really been poor at best, and the 1075 00:52:28,880 --> 00:52:31,040 Speaker 3: Rams are kind of getting healthy at the right time. Finally, 1076 00:52:31,080 --> 00:52:33,600 Speaker 3: it looks like Dotson might be back on their line 1077 00:52:33,600 --> 00:52:36,440 Speaker 3: and get them whole again. And to me, this is 1078 00:52:36,560 --> 00:52:39,680 Speaker 3: just a mismatch on paper. The Bears defense by far 1079 00:52:39,800 --> 00:52:42,160 Speaker 3: the weak length and if the weather is good and 1080 00:52:42,200 --> 00:52:45,160 Speaker 3: Stafford's finger is okay, I think the Rams offense gets 1081 00:52:45,160 --> 00:52:47,480 Speaker 3: anything at once. Here's some of the numbers. Success rate 1082 00:52:47,920 --> 00:52:53,160 Speaker 3: first versus twenty fifth, explosives, third versus twenty two, rushing 1083 00:52:53,239 --> 00:52:56,800 Speaker 3: EPA four versus twenty six. I mentioned that one because 1084 00:52:56,800 --> 00:52:59,239 Speaker 3: that's a pretty good cold weather stat. If you're gonna 1085 00:52:59,280 --> 00:53:02,080 Speaker 3: have to play the cold, how about we run the football, 1086 00:53:02,160 --> 00:53:04,920 Speaker 3: especially with thoughts and back out. The Rams can run 1087 00:53:05,040 --> 00:53:07,399 Speaker 3: much better than they're given credit for. I believe they're 1088 00:53:07,440 --> 00:53:10,120 Speaker 3: top two in the league DA running as well as passing. 1089 00:53:10,560 --> 00:53:14,000 Speaker 3: The Bears defense bottom ten against play action, bottom ten 1090 00:53:14,080 --> 00:53:16,959 Speaker 3: under center. That's the Rams number one most in both 1091 00:53:16,960 --> 00:53:20,359 Speaker 3: of those that they're also third worst at allowing middle 1092 00:53:20,400 --> 00:53:22,360 Speaker 3: of the field, where the Rams have gotten much better 1093 00:53:22,640 --> 00:53:26,879 Speaker 3: attacking this season. They're also terrible at outside runs, where 1094 00:53:26,880 --> 00:53:29,920 Speaker 3: the Rams are number one. Blake Corum especially, I think 1095 00:53:29,960 --> 00:53:32,279 Speaker 3: it could be a good quorum game. He's run really 1096 00:53:32,280 --> 00:53:36,000 Speaker 3: well outside of the tackles, and then down the field. 1097 00:53:36,320 --> 00:53:40,640 Speaker 3: Bears are giving up explosive twenty seventh against passing deep 1098 00:53:40,880 --> 00:53:43,719 Speaker 3: by EPA. The Rams have the most deep passes in 1099 00:53:43,760 --> 00:53:46,120 Speaker 3: the league and are top five there. So I just 1100 00:53:46,160 --> 00:53:49,439 Speaker 3: see all sorts of numbers that tell me the Rams 1101 00:53:49,480 --> 00:53:51,640 Speaker 3: should score some points. And here's where I really thought 1102 00:53:51,680 --> 00:53:55,800 Speaker 3: this was interesting is that McVeigh is playing Dennis Allen's 1103 00:53:55,800 --> 00:53:59,000 Speaker 3: defense here. McVeigh knows how to play Dennis Allen defense. 1104 00:53:59,040 --> 00:54:01,239 Speaker 3: That was a long, long time matchup that he got 1105 00:54:01,320 --> 00:54:04,160 Speaker 3: used to. He's six and two lifetime against the Dennis 1106 00:54:04,200 --> 00:54:08,200 Speaker 3: Allen defense, averaging twenty nine points a game, including in 1107 00:54:08,239 --> 00:54:11,280 Speaker 3: a NAFC Championship game that's pretty infamous with Rams Saints 1108 00:54:11,320 --> 00:54:13,880 Speaker 3: not so long ago. So I think the Rams score 1109 00:54:14,040 --> 00:54:17,319 Speaker 3: a lot. I think they score plenty. The other side 1110 00:54:17,320 --> 00:54:19,920 Speaker 3: of the ball is what complicates things here, because the 1111 00:54:20,000 --> 00:54:23,680 Speaker 3: Rams defense is fading pretty hard, and honestly, I was 1112 00:54:23,719 --> 00:54:27,879 Speaker 3: not impressed against the Panthers thirty one to Carolina. That's 1113 00:54:27,920 --> 00:54:30,879 Speaker 3: not going to go very well. They allowed twenty nine 1114 00:54:30,880 --> 00:54:33,800 Speaker 3: a game week thirteen to seventeen, and they are giving 1115 00:54:33,880 --> 00:54:37,680 Speaker 3: up huge explosive plays nineteen percent the first twelve games, 1116 00:54:37,760 --> 00:54:41,000 Speaker 3: up to forty one percent since then, second worst in 1117 00:54:41,040 --> 00:54:44,480 Speaker 3: the NFL. Caleb and the Bears like to throw deep 1118 00:54:44,880 --> 00:54:47,879 Speaker 3: and the Rams defense everyone's talked about Chris Shula. He's 1119 00:54:47,920 --> 00:54:51,120 Speaker 3: getting some of those coaching interviews. They are top three 1120 00:54:51,200 --> 00:54:54,880 Speaker 3: most zone, top three most light box, bottom three blitz. 1121 00:54:55,280 --> 00:54:57,439 Speaker 3: They are what they are. They are exactly what they're 1122 00:54:57,440 --> 00:55:01,400 Speaker 3: meant to be, and they're a smaller speed defense. But 1123 00:55:01,520 --> 00:55:04,480 Speaker 3: that's the sort of team. We saw that small speedy 1124 00:55:04,520 --> 00:55:07,319 Speaker 3: defense get run hard on by the Eagles last year 1125 00:55:07,320 --> 00:55:09,920 Speaker 3: a couple times. That's the sort of team the Bears 1126 00:55:09,920 --> 00:55:13,320 Speaker 3: are trying to be. And the best defense the Bears 1127 00:55:13,360 --> 00:55:17,480 Speaker 3: can offer this game is a long running drive, chewing 1128 00:55:17,560 --> 00:55:20,040 Speaker 3: up the clock and keeping the Rams on the sideline 1129 00:55:20,040 --> 00:55:23,000 Speaker 3: Over there. The Bears our second most play action. The 1130 00:55:23,080 --> 00:55:25,720 Speaker 3: Rams have not been good play action this season. Rams 1131 00:55:25,719 --> 00:55:27,640 Speaker 3: play heavy light box. Like I just said, the Bears 1132 00:55:27,680 --> 00:55:30,560 Speaker 3: are number one EPA per play against light box, so 1133 00:55:31,160 --> 00:55:34,760 Speaker 3: I think there's a world where Ben Johnson's offense maybe 1134 00:55:34,760 --> 00:55:39,279 Speaker 3: matches score for score. However, they've been better let late 1135 00:55:39,280 --> 00:55:43,239 Speaker 3: in the game second half, so I don't love the 1136 00:55:43,239 --> 00:55:46,040 Speaker 3: comeback possibility if I'm a Rams better We've seen the 1137 00:55:46,040 --> 00:55:48,600 Speaker 3: Bears come through that back door over and over even 1138 00:55:48,640 --> 00:55:51,840 Speaker 3: get the win. Another concerning staff though for the Bears, 1139 00:55:52,280 --> 00:55:55,640 Speaker 3: Caleb Williams has been way way better against man. The 1140 00:55:55,719 --> 00:55:59,560 Speaker 3: Rams play heavy zone. Through October, Williams was thirty p 1141 00:55:59,640 --> 00:56:03,560 Speaker 3: against man coverage twenty first against zone. It's narrowed a 1142 00:56:03,560 --> 00:56:06,920 Speaker 3: little bit over this season. But can he beat that 1143 00:56:07,040 --> 00:56:09,840 Speaker 3: vulnerable Ram secondary will get confused by some of the 1144 00:56:09,880 --> 00:56:13,080 Speaker 3: coverages there. So I don't really know, Evan. If I 1145 00:56:13,120 --> 00:56:16,320 Speaker 3: think what the Bears are going to score, I trust 1146 00:56:16,360 --> 00:56:19,799 Speaker 3: the Rams to score. Except then again, full circle back 1147 00:56:19,840 --> 00:56:22,319 Speaker 3: to the weather, win chill around zero. This is my 1148 00:56:22,440 --> 00:56:24,200 Speaker 3: kind of weather. I'm in North Dakota. This is what 1149 00:56:24,239 --> 00:56:26,600 Speaker 3: we do here every day. But you see all the 1150 00:56:26,640 --> 00:56:29,279 Speaker 3: Stafford stats in the rain and snow. You see the 1151 00:56:29,360 --> 00:56:33,080 Speaker 3: mcveighs stats in Chicago. The injury to the finger, I'm 1152 00:56:33,120 --> 00:56:35,919 Speaker 3: not so worried about it. It's not his like main 1153 00:56:36,000 --> 00:56:39,080 Speaker 3: stabilizing finger throwing. If you listen to the football doctors, 1154 00:56:39,480 --> 00:56:41,520 Speaker 3: it should be okay. But man, it did not look 1155 00:56:41,560 --> 00:56:45,040 Speaker 3: okay last week. So I like the Rams to score. 1156 00:56:45,400 --> 00:56:47,919 Speaker 3: I'll talk about how to bet it. What do you think? 1157 00:56:47,920 --> 00:56:50,320 Speaker 3: Are you concerned about the weather factor. Are you concerned 1158 00:56:50,320 --> 00:56:52,680 Speaker 3: about the Stafford finger injury? How much does that play 1159 00:56:52,719 --> 00:56:53,160 Speaker 3: in for you? 1160 00:56:53,480 --> 00:56:56,040 Speaker 4: Yeah, I don't worry about the weather. I think it's overblown. 1161 00:56:56,160 --> 00:56:58,800 Speaker 4: Stafford's played fine in some of those weather games. I 1162 00:56:58,800 --> 00:57:00,600 Speaker 4: think it just depends on the matt. I think the 1163 00:57:00,600 --> 00:57:04,160 Speaker 4: finger thing is way more impactful than not. I mean, 1164 00:57:04,160 --> 00:57:07,520 Speaker 4: I think what we saw in that Carolina game wasn't pretty, 1165 00:57:08,080 --> 00:57:10,680 Speaker 4: and I'd be worried. And you know about a week's 1166 00:57:10,719 --> 00:57:13,279 Speaker 4: rest in this one, how it looks, and you know what, 1167 00:57:13,440 --> 00:57:16,200 Speaker 4: I've seen some throws during practice. You know, hard to tell, 1168 00:57:16,760 --> 00:57:20,000 Speaker 4: but to me, that would be the one detriment to 1169 00:57:20,400 --> 00:57:23,640 Speaker 4: what's going right for the offense for the Rams, and 1170 00:57:23,640 --> 00:57:25,560 Speaker 4: the one thing that could possibly get in the way. 1171 00:57:25,720 --> 00:57:27,520 Speaker 4: So I mean, to me, if I'm going to weigh 1172 00:57:27,560 --> 00:57:29,720 Speaker 4: things I'm worried about. If I'm a RAMS better, that's 1173 00:57:29,760 --> 00:57:32,320 Speaker 4: probably one of them. I found it kind of intriguing. 1174 00:57:32,360 --> 00:57:35,640 Speaker 4: You know, Rams offense obviously incredible. There's second right now 1175 00:57:35,680 --> 00:57:39,040 Speaker 4: in EPA per play. So I looked at Chicago facing 1176 00:57:39,080 --> 00:57:42,640 Speaker 4: really good offenses, especially recently, is what I wanted to see. 1177 00:57:42,800 --> 00:57:45,600 Speaker 4: So Rams are second, they Green Bay is fourth. They 1178 00:57:45,640 --> 00:57:48,120 Speaker 4: split with them one to one, but Chicago didn't look 1179 00:57:48,160 --> 00:57:52,439 Speaker 4: fantastic for most of those games on the offensive side 1180 00:57:52,440 --> 00:57:54,240 Speaker 4: of the ball, which you know obviously you're going to 1181 00:57:54,280 --> 00:57:57,000 Speaker 4: have to do to keep up here. San Francisco there's 1182 00:57:57,040 --> 00:57:59,680 Speaker 4: sixth in offensive EPA per play. They lost that game, 1183 00:58:00,000 --> 00:58:03,200 Speaker 4: Detroit ninth. They lost that game recently. So to me, 1184 00:58:03,320 --> 00:58:06,840 Speaker 4: I think it's up to Chicago's offense to play with 1185 00:58:07,040 --> 00:58:10,800 Speaker 4: the Rams in this one. And last week a bunch 1186 00:58:10,800 --> 00:58:14,080 Speaker 4: of us, like Devonte under receptions to me, him and 1187 00:58:14,160 --> 00:58:17,240 Speaker 4: Puka got like thirty one targets last week, So I 1188 00:58:17,320 --> 00:58:20,439 Speaker 4: believe that that is a preview of what's to come here. 1189 00:58:20,600 --> 00:58:22,880 Speaker 4: They are both going to be peppered all day long, 1190 00:58:23,080 --> 00:58:26,360 Speaker 4: and I think Higbee Parkinson, I actually don't know if 1191 00:58:26,400 --> 00:58:28,120 Speaker 4: there's news on Fergus and I assume he's not going 1192 00:58:28,200 --> 00:58:31,000 Speaker 4: to play. But at this point, you've got David Allen. 1193 00:58:31,000 --> 00:58:33,240 Speaker 4: You got enough tight ends out there that I think 1194 00:58:33,240 --> 00:58:36,120 Speaker 4: they're going to give Ben Johnson in that defense a 1195 00:58:36,160 --> 00:58:39,440 Speaker 4: little bit of trouble. And to me, that's probably the 1196 00:58:39,480 --> 00:58:42,400 Speaker 4: handicap here is that forget the weather, forget everything else. 1197 00:58:42,480 --> 00:58:45,120 Speaker 4: Obviously it's the injury to the finger that you're worried about. 1198 00:58:45,120 --> 00:58:47,640 Speaker 4: But if the Rams are the Rams, I think they're 1199 00:58:47,640 --> 00:58:49,280 Speaker 4: going to put up enough points. I think my question 1200 00:58:49,360 --> 00:58:52,840 Speaker 4: back to you would be, did you consider Rams first 1201 00:58:52,840 --> 00:58:56,360 Speaker 4: half or Rams first half at least team total over? Like, 1202 00:58:56,400 --> 00:58:59,480 Speaker 4: were those two bets that even crossed your mind? You know, 1203 00:58:59,600 --> 00:58:59,960 Speaker 4: I don't. 1204 00:59:00,000 --> 00:59:02,360 Speaker 3: I think I considered strongly a first half play, But 1205 00:59:02,400 --> 00:59:04,000 Speaker 3: I don't mind it. It makes a lot of sense 1206 00:59:04,040 --> 00:59:07,040 Speaker 3: because we know the Bears have started so slowly offensively 1207 00:59:07,080 --> 00:59:10,600 Speaker 3: all season, like of these Packers games. But the numbers 1208 00:59:10,680 --> 00:59:14,560 Speaker 3: tell you over and over we've played Bears second halves 1209 00:59:14,600 --> 00:59:17,040 Speaker 3: a few times this season and trusted their offense late 1210 00:59:17,080 --> 00:59:19,520 Speaker 3: in the game. So I don't mind that. To me, 1211 00:59:20,400 --> 00:59:22,720 Speaker 3: I kind of just want volume. I think if I'm right, 1212 00:59:23,040 --> 00:59:25,360 Speaker 3: if I'm right that the Rams are gonna score points. 1213 00:59:25,640 --> 00:59:27,560 Speaker 3: Then I think I just want all sixty minutes. I 1214 00:59:27,640 --> 00:59:30,560 Speaker 3: think I just want enough chances to say, Okay, Stafford 1215 00:59:30,560 --> 00:59:32,959 Speaker 3: got a pass tipped and we lost one of the drives. Something. 1216 00:59:33,360 --> 00:59:36,520 Speaker 3: We know Chicago how good they've been at forcing kind 1217 00:59:36,560 --> 00:59:39,920 Speaker 3: of wonky turnovers, So I think I prefer a full game. 1218 00:59:40,280 --> 00:59:42,439 Speaker 3: I'm gonna play the Rams minus three and a half. 1219 00:59:42,520 --> 00:59:44,920 Speaker 3: I don't mind four if you need it. They've covered 1220 00:59:44,920 --> 00:59:47,480 Speaker 3: that line in all but one win until last week, 1221 00:59:47,640 --> 00:59:51,240 Speaker 3: so they're usually not winning super close games. If you 1222 00:59:51,440 --> 00:59:54,200 Speaker 3: like it. I like the team total here, twenty six 1223 00:59:54,240 --> 00:59:56,120 Speaker 3: and a half. I think it kind of works as 1224 00:59:56,160 --> 00:59:58,160 Speaker 3: a proxy for a Rams money line, so it might 1225 00:59:58,200 --> 01:00:00,520 Speaker 3: even be better than the spread. For Get the key 1226 01:00:00,560 --> 01:00:03,080 Speaker 3: number there over twenty six and a half. The Rams 1227 01:00:03,080 --> 01:00:06,160 Speaker 3: have hit that twelve of eighteen games a season, and 1228 01:00:06,200 --> 01:00:08,520 Speaker 3: they had a twenty six in there, so thirteen of 1229 01:00:08,520 --> 01:00:11,240 Speaker 3: eighteen counting that one, and when they scored twenty seven 1230 01:00:11,320 --> 01:00:13,920 Speaker 3: or more, they're ten and two. They're only three and 1231 01:00:13,960 --> 01:00:16,840 Speaker 3: three without that, So I think twenty seven in a 1232 01:00:16,880 --> 01:00:20,080 Speaker 3: game against a good offense, with your defense faltering, you're 1233 01:00:20,120 --> 01:00:22,320 Speaker 3: probably gonna need to get to some total like that. 1234 01:00:22,400 --> 01:00:25,800 Speaker 3: One Chicago's allowed twenty seven or more eight times already. 1235 01:00:26,040 --> 01:00:27,600 Speaker 3: They've allowed that many all but one. 1236 01:00:27,440 --> 01:00:28,240 Speaker 4: Of their loss. 1237 01:00:28,440 --> 01:00:30,840 Speaker 3: So it's like a proxy for a Bears loss and 1238 01:00:30,880 --> 01:00:33,920 Speaker 3: a proxy for a Rams win. But you're getting a 1239 01:00:33,920 --> 01:00:37,240 Speaker 3: money line price at a discount here, effectively. So I 1240 01:00:37,320 --> 01:00:39,880 Speaker 3: like the overteam total twenty six and a half. And 1241 01:00:40,000 --> 01:00:42,000 Speaker 3: I'll do a little escalator on there because I'm gonna 1242 01:00:42,040 --> 01:00:44,120 Speaker 3: avoid the spread. I don't want to mess with the 1243 01:00:44,120 --> 01:00:46,480 Speaker 3: back door. I don't want to get Chicago pushing in late. 1244 01:00:46,520 --> 01:00:49,120 Speaker 3: We've seen that too many times over thirty three and 1245 01:00:49,160 --> 01:00:51,920 Speaker 3: a half plus three thirty. The Rams have scored thirty 1246 01:00:51,920 --> 01:00:55,800 Speaker 3: three or more ten times at nine of their thirteen wins, 1247 01:00:56,080 --> 01:00:58,600 Speaker 3: so I like that number as a possibility. And then 1248 01:00:58,640 --> 01:01:01,360 Speaker 3: the Rams have scored forty one three times the Bearers 1249 01:01:01,400 --> 01:01:04,520 Speaker 3: allowed forty two three times already. Forty or more is 1250 01:01:04,560 --> 01:01:07,600 Speaker 3: plus six twenty five, again a little lighter than I'd 1251 01:01:07,600 --> 01:01:09,200 Speaker 3: love to go here. I'd love to just be like 1252 01:01:09,640 --> 01:01:13,000 Speaker 3: Rams stomp on the Bears. Their defense is terrible. Talked 1253 01:01:13,000 --> 01:01:14,760 Speaker 3: about the tight ends for the Rams. We've done that 1254 01:01:14,800 --> 01:01:19,240 Speaker 3: all season. Bears have no linebackers. There's so many mismatches here. 1255 01:01:19,720 --> 01:01:21,840 Speaker 3: Just the weather and the Finger aren't gonna get me 1256 01:01:21,880 --> 01:01:24,800 Speaker 3: off of the Rams. They're gonna get me to be 1257 01:01:24,880 --> 01:01:27,000 Speaker 3: a little more careful here. And you know, it is 1258 01:01:27,040 --> 01:01:30,040 Speaker 3: a divisional round and we think we know everything and 1259 01:01:30,080 --> 01:01:33,560 Speaker 3: then everything happens and football goes crazy. So I like 1260 01:01:33,600 --> 01:01:36,080 Speaker 3: the Rams, like their team total. And one last one here, 1261 01:01:36,560 --> 01:01:39,040 Speaker 3: I gave out on the hot read Ram Seahawks money 1262 01:01:39,040 --> 01:01:43,320 Speaker 3: line parlay. Well, at some books you can add to 1263 01:01:43,400 --> 01:01:47,880 Speaker 3: that Rams Seahawks money line parlay plus NFC wins the 1264 01:01:47,920 --> 01:01:51,560 Speaker 3: super Bowl. If I get Ram Seahawks money line parlay, 1265 01:01:51,960 --> 01:01:54,240 Speaker 3: I get my two top teams in my power ratings 1266 01:01:54,240 --> 01:01:56,360 Speaker 3: by far more than if you'll go better than anyone 1267 01:01:56,440 --> 01:01:59,760 Speaker 3: else on a neutral, I'm guaranteed a team I like 1268 01:02:00,080 --> 01:02:02,080 Speaker 3: the super Bowl, and I get that at plus two 1269 01:02:02,200 --> 01:02:04,880 Speaker 3: thirteen instead of just plus one hundred on the hot read. 1270 01:02:04,920 --> 01:02:07,120 Speaker 3: I'm gonna like the NFC team the super Bowl. So 1271 01:02:07,160 --> 01:02:08,600 Speaker 3: I'm gonna like to add that one in as well. 1272 01:02:08,720 --> 01:02:10,240 Speaker 3: So a little bonus future there for you. 1273 01:02:10,880 --> 01:02:13,800 Speaker 4: I like that. That is a very brand and angle 1274 01:02:13,840 --> 01:02:16,320 Speaker 4: on that one. Let me put some numbers to that 1275 01:02:16,400 --> 01:02:19,000 Speaker 4: first half second half stuff because I spect for Caleb 1276 01:02:19,000 --> 01:02:22,480 Speaker 4: because it's really jarring. So first half Caleb is thirteen 1277 01:02:22,520 --> 01:02:25,080 Speaker 4: and twenty two first half ats, worst mark of any 1278 01:02:25,120 --> 01:02:28,240 Speaker 4: quarterback over the last two seasons. He's lost four straight 1279 01:02:28,280 --> 01:02:30,880 Speaker 4: first halves against the spread. Entering this week, he is 1280 01:02:30,960 --> 01:02:34,200 Speaker 4: five and eleven first half ats versus teams above five hundred. 1281 01:02:34,320 --> 01:02:37,240 Speaker 4: Second half Caleb is twenty four and eleven second half 1282 01:02:37,320 --> 01:02:40,560 Speaker 4: ats and thirty five career starts, second best quarterback over 1283 01:02:40,560 --> 01:02:43,800 Speaker 4: the last decade behind Josh Allen. Caleb and the Bears 1284 01:02:43,800 --> 01:02:46,600 Speaker 4: have covered eight straight second halves and during the divisional round. 1285 01:02:46,840 --> 01:02:49,240 Speaker 4: I mean, I don't know if we've really seen this 1286 01:02:49,400 --> 01:02:51,400 Speaker 4: much of a difference first half to second half in 1287 01:02:51,480 --> 01:02:53,600 Speaker 4: any team. And I think at any point in this 1288 01:02:53,680 --> 01:02:56,200 Speaker 4: game Bears are trailing, you're gonna start to hear Twitter, 1289 01:02:56,360 --> 01:02:58,600 Speaker 4: You're gonna start to hear everyone start talking about, well, 1290 01:02:58,600 --> 01:03:01,920 Speaker 4: they're not dead yet, but if they start strong, I 1291 01:03:01,920 --> 01:03:04,280 Speaker 4: think it changes the narrative a little bit. But those 1292 01:03:04,320 --> 01:03:07,200 Speaker 4: numbers are really really jarring. I think the other angle 1293 01:03:07,200 --> 01:03:09,960 Speaker 4: for Chicago is also the fact a lot of people 1294 01:03:09,960 --> 01:03:12,840 Speaker 4: have talked about the big comebacks. Usually a big comeback 1295 01:03:12,880 --> 01:03:17,200 Speaker 4: in the playoffs usually goes to a letdown. Since division 1296 01:03:17,480 --> 01:03:20,240 Speaker 4: realignment in two thousand and two, teams after coming back 1297 01:03:20,240 --> 01:03:22,040 Speaker 4: from ten plus points down in the playoffs, are just 1298 01:03:22,080 --> 01:03:25,120 Speaker 4: eight and twenty two in their next playoff game, including 1299 01:03:25,160 --> 01:03:27,720 Speaker 4: five and fifteen in any round before the Super Bowl. 1300 01:03:27,960 --> 01:03:29,840 Speaker 4: This is a tough one on a bit of a 1301 01:03:29,880 --> 01:03:32,120 Speaker 4: short week, on a you know, just a one week er. 1302 01:03:32,680 --> 01:03:34,840 Speaker 4: It's a bit of a tough thing. Now you're at home, 1303 01:03:35,040 --> 01:03:37,600 Speaker 4: you're getting points. It's why I'm talking about just winning 1304 01:03:37,640 --> 01:03:40,080 Speaker 4: the game, and kind of works to what Brandon's talking 1305 01:03:40,080 --> 01:03:42,320 Speaker 4: about with the Rams money line. So that's the way 1306 01:03:42,360 --> 01:03:43,920 Speaker 4: I look at it. It is going to be a 1307 01:03:43,960 --> 01:03:47,320 Speaker 4: fascinating matchup. And to me, this is you know, we 1308 01:03:47,400 --> 01:03:49,720 Speaker 4: don't have all the juggernauts here, but these games are 1309 01:03:49,760 --> 01:03:53,360 Speaker 4: really fantastic. So let's now move to your look ahead. 1310 01:03:55,000 --> 01:03:58,120 Speaker 4: Let's talk ahead, excive it a shot, how about next week? 1311 01:03:58,520 --> 01:04:03,200 Speaker 3: Back out, Mama, say, I got my mindset. 1312 01:04:05,000 --> 01:04:07,480 Speaker 4: So this is something we would be looking at potentially 1313 01:04:07,480 --> 01:04:10,080 Speaker 4: for the conference championship for Super Bowl, and you have 1314 01:04:10,360 --> 01:04:12,200 Speaker 4: a play what do you like? Yeah? 1315 01:04:12,240 --> 01:04:14,960 Speaker 3: So again, DraftKings and others will post these kind of 1316 01:04:15,040 --> 01:04:18,840 Speaker 3: hypothetical lines for games we might get. So I've realized 1317 01:04:18,880 --> 01:04:21,560 Speaker 3: I've actually backed all four road teams this weekend. What 1318 01:04:21,600 --> 01:04:24,520 Speaker 3: could possibly go wrong. But in the offense that I'm 1319 01:04:24,560 --> 01:04:27,640 Speaker 3: wrong and we get both home teams advancing in the NFC. 1320 01:04:28,040 --> 01:04:30,600 Speaker 3: I'm gonna take Seattle minus five and a half home 1321 01:04:30,640 --> 01:04:33,919 Speaker 3: against the Bears, and look, public opinion of the Bears 1322 01:04:33,960 --> 01:04:36,640 Speaker 3: would certainly rise if they beat the Rams. You're gonna 1323 01:04:36,640 --> 01:04:39,200 Speaker 3: start to get some team of destiny conversation I'm assuming 1324 01:04:39,240 --> 01:04:42,600 Speaker 3: after that. But now you hit the road. Chicago winning 1325 01:04:42,640 --> 01:04:45,560 Speaker 3: two home games, totally different animal, going on the road 1326 01:04:45,600 --> 01:04:48,480 Speaker 3: to Seattle where they would have won eleven straight games 1327 01:04:48,480 --> 01:04:51,200 Speaker 3: with fans in the stands in the playoffs, huge home 1328 01:04:51,200 --> 01:04:54,520 Speaker 3: field advantage in Seattle, and you got Caleb Williams road 1329 01:04:54,600 --> 01:04:58,360 Speaker 3: debut in the playoffs. Ben Johnson's offense goes from Packers 1330 01:04:58,360 --> 01:05:01,960 Speaker 3: and Rams to Seahawks. It's like playing Mario level one 1331 01:05:02,000 --> 01:05:04,040 Speaker 3: and suddenly being at the Boss level at the end, 1332 01:05:04,080 --> 01:05:07,120 Speaker 3: which is just a huge jarring swing for them. And 1333 01:05:07,160 --> 01:05:10,200 Speaker 3: then conference championship round. You want to bet the one 1334 01:05:10,280 --> 01:05:13,720 Speaker 3: seed twenty one and five straight up in the last 1335 01:05:13,760 --> 01:05:17,320 Speaker 3: two decades winning by ten points a game, including against 1336 01:05:17,360 --> 01:05:20,240 Speaker 3: the two seed, which Chicago would be twelve and three 1337 01:05:20,320 --> 01:05:22,920 Speaker 3: straight up for the one seed by over ten points 1338 01:05:22,920 --> 01:05:25,280 Speaker 3: a game there as well, and all three losses were 1339 01:05:25,320 --> 01:05:27,800 Speaker 3: close wild finishes there, so the one seed really has 1340 01:05:27,840 --> 01:05:30,600 Speaker 3: been in it all the way. That trend would also 1341 01:05:30,720 --> 01:05:33,880 Speaker 3: look pretty good for Broncos home against Patriots. I don't 1342 01:05:33,880 --> 01:05:36,040 Speaker 3: mind that one as well. I make Denver over the three, 1343 01:05:36,280 --> 01:05:39,600 Speaker 3: but I like Seattle. They've been my top or second 1344 01:05:39,640 --> 01:05:42,560 Speaker 3: in my power rankings all season. It's already six and 1345 01:05:42,560 --> 01:05:45,160 Speaker 3: a half at DraftKings. Six has been a key this 1346 01:05:45,240 --> 01:05:48,400 Speaker 3: year as well. I think this one probably pushes closer 1347 01:05:48,440 --> 01:05:50,720 Speaker 3: to seven. So five and a half I like it. 1348 01:05:50,760 --> 01:05:53,000 Speaker 3: I'll grab it in advance. We've done these the last 1349 01:05:53,000 --> 01:05:55,600 Speaker 3: two weeks, and then the game ends up not happening 1350 01:05:55,640 --> 01:05:57,400 Speaker 3: because one of the teams doesn't come through. But that's 1351 01:05:57,400 --> 01:05:59,080 Speaker 3: all right. You just get your money back after that. 1352 01:05:59,160 --> 01:06:01,280 Speaker 3: Then we can up a different game for next week. 1353 01:06:01,320 --> 01:06:04,560 Speaker 3: So Seahawks minus five and a half home against the 1354 01:06:04,600 --> 01:06:07,600 Speaker 3: Bears and a road debut for Caleb in the boss level. 1355 01:06:07,960 --> 01:06:09,600 Speaker 4: Yeah, I was gonna say boss level. It's more like 1356 01:06:09,640 --> 01:06:11,520 Speaker 4: going from rookie to All Madden. So we're going to 1357 01:06:11,560 --> 01:06:13,959 Speaker 4: see if that matchup comes all together there, all right? 1358 01:06:14,160 --> 01:06:16,080 Speaker 4: That'll do. Here on the Action Ework podcast for our 1359 01:06:16,160 --> 01:06:19,760 Speaker 4: NFL Divisional Round Best Bets episode presented by DraftKings. If 1360 01:06:19,800 --> 01:06:22,640 Speaker 4: you want instant notifications when action experts track their bets, 1361 01:06:22,800 --> 01:06:25,440 Speaker 4: go to actionework dot com slash Pro use a promo 1362 01:06:25,480 --> 01:06:28,360 Speaker 4: code pod twenty Pod twenty for twenty dollars off a 1363 01:06:28,440 --> 01:06:31,080 Speaker 4: year of Action Pro. And more importantly, if you're on 1364 01:06:31,120 --> 01:06:33,200 Speaker 4: Twitter and X if you haven't yet, check out our 1365 01:06:33,240 --> 01:06:37,440 Speaker 4: new AI quick slip bot, just tag playbook at playbook 1366 01:06:37,600 --> 01:06:41,200 Speaker 4: tell to grab whatever bets you're looking for, parlays whatever 1367 01:06:41,320 --> 01:06:43,480 Speaker 4: you want, It'll build it out for you, create a 1368 01:06:43,520 --> 01:06:45,400 Speaker 4: quick slip link for you in a matter of seconds. 1369 01:06:45,400 --> 01:06:46,840 Speaker 4: And again, if you want to tell some of the 1370 01:06:46,880 --> 01:06:48,680 Speaker 4: bets we gave out today, make sure to look for 1371 01:06:48,680 --> 01:06:51,200 Speaker 4: the quick slip link in the podcast and video description. 1372 01:06:51,480 --> 01:06:54,720 Speaker 4: Or my favorite way, go to actionework dot com slash bet. 1373 01:06:54,800 --> 01:06:56,960 Speaker 4: Now all the bets will be listed there. You just 1374 01:06:56,960 --> 01:06:59,120 Speaker 4: click it like a quick slip link, open right in 1375 01:06:59,160 --> 01:07:03,920 Speaker 4: your sportsbook. Absolutely perfect. Thank you for listening, enjoy the slate. 1376 01:07:04,320 --> 01:07:06,560 Speaker 4: Good luck with all your bets this weekend. Only a 1377 01:07:06,600 --> 01:07:08,600 Speaker 4: few weeks to go, so savor ite wall it's here. 1378 01:07:08,680 --> 01:07:24,040 Speaker 1: Thank you, BA have a good one. 1379 01:07:25,320 --> 01:07:28,800 Speaker 3: Action Network reminds you please gamble responsibly. 1380 01:07:29,200 --> 01:07:32,040 Speaker 2: If you or someone you care about has a gambling problem. 1381 01:07:32,320 --> 01:07:34,920 Speaker 3: Help is available twenty four to seven at one eight 1382 01:07:35,000 --> 01:07:35,840 Speaker 3: hundred Gambler