WEBVTT - Leaving NAFTA Makes No Sense, Frenkel Says

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane Jaily.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg We

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty get right to this interview. We have two incredibly

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>exceptional guests with us today and it is an honor

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to have them here together, and we're gonna speak on

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>one theme. Lord Tyson needs no introduction to anyone within

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>our economic academics and particularly within public service. She is

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>a former UH Chairman of the President's Council of Economic

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Advisors UH and is also teaching at the University of

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>California at Berkeley School. With this each and every year,

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>it seems at Davos. Maybe I think that's correct. Is

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Kenneth Rogoff His book of last year, The Curse of Cash,

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>was my book of the year. I make a joke

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>that the next effort will be the Curse of Bitcoin.

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>But to have the two of you here with your academics,

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to clear the air on the debate at

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the end of two thousand seventeen, which is do tax

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>cuts drive economic growth? The center points of this was

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Hasset, Professor Tyson, who has your job now at

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the White House, UH chairman of the President's Council of

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Economic Advisors, and the Lori Paul Krugman of Princeton. I'd say,

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>driving the dialogue with many others. Kens, as we saw

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Ken out of Opsfield, Rogoff out of your other work

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>over the years, is there as certitude that tax cuts

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>can drive permanent economic growth? Well, okay, I mean lower

0:01:56.560 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>attacks rights. If you could somehow magically produce the government

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>spending in revenues you need from oil or something else, sure,

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>but you know, in the long run, UH, you have

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to pay for government services. And by the way, in

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>this stage of inequality, it's just really hard to imagine

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>how government services and transfers aren't gonna rise over time.

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>It's I do think, you know, I I certainly see

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the case that tax cuts do benefit, you know, have

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>a benefit compared to UH government, you know, some something

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that raises taxes a little long run. But I have

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:38.639
<v Speaker 1>enormous respect for Kevin Hassett, I think, but the figures

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 1>were very optimistic on what the growth would be Professor Tyson,

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:45.079
<v Speaker 1>you're nodding your head. I think of Rick Michigan and Colombia,

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and you is linking in core economics into Okay, we're

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 1>in the room in Washington, and now we have to

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>affect policy. How do you respond to the certitude that

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Hassett has to deal with from Trump supporters and

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>from frankly direct White House officials representing the president. So

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:05.959
<v Speaker 1>I would say, first of all, it's important to recognize

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the role of the Council of Economic Advisors, which is

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to give objective, unbiased advice. And I think one of

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the criticisms of the of the work that was done

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>by the c e A UH is that really it

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>was a selective choice of evidence. It was the most

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>optimistic evidence. There's plenty of evidence that tax cuts will

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>generate growth. I think what was actually off scale there

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>was the magnitude, and particularly the magnitude for wages, because essentially,

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I would say, look in the past, we already know

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that productivity enhancements have not been turning into wages already. UH,

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>We've now given a major tax cut to businesses. I

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>supported that, I actually supported that, but I think we

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>there were ways to pay for it. We chose not

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to do that. Other countries that have cut tax rates

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>for business to increase investment, have increased taxes on the

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>owners of capital, have increased value added taxes, have found

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>another revenue source, a carbon tax. Why why not say, okay,

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>growth from cutting some business taxes, we gotta pay for it,

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 1>otherwise it's going to defeat itself. One of the great

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>things about Davos is I can see Peter or zegg

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:21.039
<v Speaker 1>in ten minutes later see Douglas Elmendorf, And they're the

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 1>ones that have worked at CBO over the years. Does

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Laura Tyson having her head the percentage deficit to GDP

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that is a trip point for the president or three

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 1>points something? And there's a great certitude at trillion dollars

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:37.599
<v Speaker 1>here on going dirks and and you can a trillion dollars.

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>There is there a point where you worry? Is it five?

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:44.359
<v Speaker 1>Is it six? Is seven? Look? I I don't, I think,

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:46.719
<v Speaker 1>and I think I should get ken here as well.

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the general of you that I've thought about is,

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, a projected deficits in the three to four

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>percent range right now. The global capital markets and the

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:00.600
<v Speaker 1>way they're behaving and US investors and behaving that is

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:03.720
<v Speaker 1>sustainable for the US. We're talking about a long term

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:08.599
<v Speaker 1>we we have fundamentally now reduced the taxation share of

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>GDP to a level which just does not match the

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 1>long runs sustainable. That's classic, That's classic Tyson linkoln and

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 1>policy Ken. How do you respond to it? With all

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of your research with Carmen Reiner? Do you worry that

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>we're going to trip the deficit to GDP? Are we

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna be talking about twin deficits in a few years

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 1>here at Davos? Well? No, but I mean I think

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the reality of the debt rhetoric in Washington is that whoever,

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>whichever party is uh out of power thinks that debt

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and deficits are bad because the party in power spending

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 1>it on their priority, their friends, their base, and so

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>you go back and forth. I mean, maybe the Republicans

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about it a little more, but if you look

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>around the world, a lot of the conversation about debt

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>is really, hey, wait a second, I might be in

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 1>power in four years and you're spending my money. If

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you're doing the spending, I won't be able to do

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>as much. But no, I mean, I said the US

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 1>has enormous borrowing capacity. The dollar has become more powerful

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>than it was under Bretton Woods. But you are spending

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.840
<v Speaker 1>future money. It is so hard. Obviously it's going to

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>be harder to raise spending at taxes. Remember that was

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Reagan's rationalization for why he was doing the tax cuts.

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the rationalization. You know, I was listening

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to this issue of closing down government. One way you

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:34.280
<v Speaker 1>can gradually close down government is just a denuded of revenues.

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 1>And so there was a significant part of this momentum

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 1>for tax cuts coming from the group of people who

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>want to significantly reduce the size of government. And if

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the money is not there, you're gonna have to reduce

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the size. So we've heard from people saying the next

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>step is entitlement reform. That is the next step is

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be work requirements on everything to kind of

0:06:56.360 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>reduce the amount of spending, not to mention things like

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>spending on basic science or infrastructure. I'm waiting with bated

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>breath to see the infrastructure plan here. Absolutely you wonder

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>where it is, And yeah, I guess you could also

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>wonder why it hasn't shown yet. Ken one final question

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 1>if we could, and that is on what kind of

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>economy we should be studying. Paul Krugman has talked about

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a wistfulness back to John Hicks in nine and people say,

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, that was a different world, a different

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>economy back than You can't use those models. Now, what's

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the model that works for America within the unique America

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that the president is going to talk about? Are we

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a big, giant open economy? Are we more closed than

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>we think? We're not more close than we think. We

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>need to look to the future, and I, yes, we

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>have problems that were better in the past, but I

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 1>don't want to look to tired old solutions for dealing

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>with them. For example, I think we need better education,

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 1>But does that mean quadrupling the number of state collegists

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>like Bernie Sanders has or does it in you know,

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>digital education and finding new ways to reach broader audience

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>as adult education. Many examples like this. We can do

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>things differently and better, but that doesn't mean like this

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>is what Bloomberg surveillance is all about. Thank you so much.

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>This was done spur of the moment, folks, with Professor

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Rogoff and with Professor Tyson and just wonderful to both

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of you with your public service and academics with us today.

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 1>She is from the High School, University of California, Berkeley.

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>He is from Harvard University. Mr Frankel's a former governor

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>at the Bank of Israel. He works for a gentleman

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>named Jamie Diamond. Jacob was out on the roof saying,

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>get that helicopter away, Get that helicopter away. He is

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the chairman of JP Morgan International and truly provides economic

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 1>person active to the clients of James Steamond and all

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of JP Morgan. Of course Mr Frankel doing a little

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 1>bit of economic research a few years ago at Chicago.

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>So Dr Frankel, though, you don't put your power point away,

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 1>faying yesterday of China had his power point out and

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>it made worldwide headlines. But John Jacob Frankel is the

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>one guy who he's the one guy who doesn't need

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a power point when he talks to Bloomberg Surveillance. What

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I would suggest, UH, Professor Frankel is, here's the money

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>question of the day, and it comes from one of

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>our sophisticated UH listeners who is a currency manipulator. Now

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a loaded question, isn't it. It is a very

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:48.559
<v Speaker 1>loaded question, And the truth of the matter is, it's

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 1>extremely difficult to answer that question, even in theory. You know,

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>when you have a picture that he's hanged on the

0:09:56.360 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>wall and then it falls, who is the Who is

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the fault, the world's fault, the pictures fault, the nails fault,

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:08.959
<v Speaker 1>the combinations thereof. Now all not, of course, not all

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 1>analogies are good enough to explain the complexity of this question.

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Because the truth of the matter is, when monetary policy

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>is becoming very, very loose, naturally, the value of the

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>currency that is being printed and supplied is diminishing. That's

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the reason why prices go up, and that's the reason

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 1>why the currency depreciates in the foreign exchange market. Now,

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>was this a currency manipulated? The normal answer is we

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>need to know what was the intent. If the intent

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 1>was to boost the economy, then people will say it

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>is not a currency manipulator. If the intent was to

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>depreciate the currency, then it is. It is only an

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>example why it is complex the question. The point of

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the matter is, I really think we should achieve the

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 1>discussion from nominal exchange rate as as is being now

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>discussed into real exchange rate. Namely, what are the factors

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the determined the international competitiveness of a country, not of

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a currency of a country, a country that is highly productive.

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>President Trump taking away our international competitiveness. President Trump has

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>not yet started doing what the what the president is

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 1>put terms and you know little things like that, I

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 1>know you don't. I don't. I can tell you I

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 1>am in general against anything that may look like a trade.

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Mr Diamond said there as well. Yes, but I want

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:46.440
<v Speaker 1>to say that I rather have a discussion rather than

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>shooting the guns. I want to tell you that I think,

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>for example, that the US threats of living after makes

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>no sense to me. I think that that the fact

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that the US did not sign at T T P A,

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:05.479
<v Speaker 1>etcetera is not good. The fact that both candidates for presidency,

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton and Trump were so protectionist in their rectoring

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>is not good because it basically gives a message also

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to the American people that somebody is there to deprive us.

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>We are not. We need to compete and we need

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>to improve. If you're just joining us for FoST Jacob Franco,

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:24.199
<v Speaker 1>whether US from JP, Morgan Chase, we welcome all of

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>you worldwide to our studios in New York with John

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Farrell and Tim Keene of the World Economic Form meetings

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and Daphos. Dr Frankel has been incredibly generous with this time. Today,

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at the Bloomberg terminal and whether it's a

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>fancy guy like me or our most basic listener currencies

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:44.479
<v Speaker 1>around the move, How does a pro like you define

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 1>sean country chees brutal moves? What does that really mean?

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:50.839
<v Speaker 1>And are we in the middle of a brutal move

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 1>right now? If the brutal move means a large move,

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 1>then you it's in the eyes of the bill the

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>what is very large, very large, very very very brutal, etcetera. Again,

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that what we should do is create a situation. Well,

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>sharp moves of the currency do not have sharp effect. Namely,

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>developed the mechanisms to protect investors from shout moves, developed

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the futures markets, developed the forwards market, developed the hedging approaches.

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:28.319
<v Speaker 1>And not everyone needs to be speculated in the phone

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>exchange market. It's too complex. Within that is the corporate response.

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, we all learn the J curve out of

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 1>David Beggs classic textbook or during Bush Fisher Stars and

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:42.679
<v Speaker 1>the other basic textbook. Does the old style currency trade

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>dynamics still work or we do another regime where Maurice

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Hobs fell and Ken Rogo got to go write a

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 1>whole new book. Is it a new world? Well, the

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:55.319
<v Speaker 1>world has evolving, and do you know what, in many

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>many areas, new chapters are being written. My only advice

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>as an old time is to say, don't throw the

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>old textbooks away. They have a lot of wisdom to

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>teach us. Yes, do learn from the most recent experience

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 1>by adding chapters, but not displays the old textbooks. So

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I believe that we have a cumulative experience that comes

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>from many, many years, very few countries who were able

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to gain competitiveness through currency manipulation. And I want to

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>make very clear her folks that that I call him

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Professor Frankel still from his iconic research of years ago.

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>He's in a delicate position. He's with JP Morgan Chase International.

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Obviously he's vising Mr Diamond. He can't talk about that.

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 1>That's what you do at banks. And at the same time,

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 1>as a former governor of a major central bank, he

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>really doesn't want to talk central bankers. So let's do

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that right now, Mr Drug, Mr Corota, the current governor

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of the Bank of Israel. They have to respond to

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that minution headline. I mean, I remember responding seeing people

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>respond to Brazil's currency univentions of years ago. How do

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the players like you respond to a Secretary of Treasury

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>suggesting a weak dollar policy? As I say, I did

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 1>not here, I did not hear what the secretary actually said.

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 1>What I can say is something in principle, you do

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>not gain sustainable long term competitiveness by just weakening your currency.

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>It will be eroding, eroded very quickly. On the contrary,

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>it can be counterproductive because it will deflect the attention

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>from the deeper issues of how to improve long term

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>competitive work. This is what Davos is all about, folks.

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>And Frankly Bloomberg surveillance. The honor of being here with

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Frankel and earlier Ken Rogoff really speaks to my

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>team and what they do to drag these people away.

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>As uh Mr Frankel was with his colleague Mr Diamond,

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>this is a wonderful visit. And and folks, this is

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>about healthcare. It's about the profitability of healthcare, and it's

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 1>such a large part of all of our lives. I

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>just really can't say enough about it. Joining us now

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>is a gentleman of great extinction. He uh says, we

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>may live to a hundred and twenty and he is

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>cutt and chiseled at the august age of sixty nine

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>years old and holding is well, how do you do it?

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>You walk in here, Michael Neidorf, And you know, is

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>that the air in St. Louis is? Is there something

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>about the Midwest and you're working healthcare that makes you

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>look the the the youth that you talk about when

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you're on panels here. I think it's the travel and

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 1>talking to people like you, Okay, you know what I mean,

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>people that are young and aggressive. Yeah, I mean, I

0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>mean we'll talk about St. Louis here in a bit,

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>but I have to talk about a stock that is

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:04.919
<v Speaker 1>and there's the highest accolade, Dana her like. You just

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:07.199
<v Speaker 1>continue to make money in the last ten years. Your

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:11.199
<v Speaker 1>stock is going up per year, and yet you're in

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a business that I'm told doesn't make any money. Healthcare

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 1>is terrible. Nobody makes money. How do you make revenues

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and profits that generates that stock performance in an industry

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>that never makes money. How do you do that? We've

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 1>maintained that the highest quality of care is at least expensive.

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:31.639
<v Speaker 1>We work hard. We have great medical management systems that

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:34.679
<v Speaker 1>help to ensure that the doctors have the information, and

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:39.479
<v Speaker 1>most importantly, we have systems that are becoming predictive and

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>allow you to be interdictive, so that if you if

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you know somebody's potas team is going up, you know

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 1>he's a whisk for a heart attack, you can get

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>ahead of the curve. So it's really all about determining

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:54.199
<v Speaker 1>that somebody has a condition before it becomes a major problem.

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 1>We just had in the president of the leader of

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>New York University's wonderful hospital in New York. I'm gonna

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>ask the same question I asked that physician. How do

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>you do the revolution we're all having in healthcare and

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>keep the doctors and nurses happy. I believe they're the

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>providers of it, aren't they? Yes, well, I am view.

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 1>We have always viewed doctors as our product, not a partner,

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>but our product. And you, if you're smart about it,

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you take very good care of your How do you

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:24.959
<v Speaker 1>do that to incentivise them with salary? Is it tickets

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 1>to the St. Louis Blues. I mean, what do you do?

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 1>You know what we do is we give them information

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that allows them to be more effective and more productive.

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>We pay them fairly, not excessively, not under paying, but

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:39.160
<v Speaker 1>we can try to pay them fairly, and we try

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 1>to provide information that just generally helps him understand what

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:47.399
<v Speaker 1>we're all trying to achieve together. Where do we stand

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 1>in this nation with healthcare? Your knee deep in it?

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>You have decades of experience away from the media hot

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>air of the Affordable Care Act and the eight tangents

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>off of it. Are you happy with where we're going? Well,

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm hopeful. I think the the Affordable Care Active

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Voice we've done very well with with the largest provider,

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:13.879
<v Speaker 1>and we goose significly in January with the And it's

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:16.120
<v Speaker 1>just about putting units through the door. I mean, the

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the Affordable Care Act gives more people more coverage, which

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>puts more units through the door. And we need that.

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>We I mean, it's a it is an entitled when

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:26.400
<v Speaker 1>this country healthcare, So we work on that and that's

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that's very important. But I am I am optimistic that

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 1>systems and the approach over time, ring the cost under control.

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 1>I want to uh completely switched gears on you to

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:41.120
<v Speaker 1>your exceptional leadership to the St. Louis Symphony Orchestra. How

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>do we maintain classical music in this nation? I asked

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Gary Park, with all of his relationship with the New

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 1>York Philharmonic, the same thing. How do we maintain orchestras

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:56.439
<v Speaker 1>for kids on YouTube? How do we let them know

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>who Mendelssohn is, Tchaikovsky is? How do we let them

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>know the more modern classical music? What's the path to

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the future. I think you have to do several things. One,

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:07.640
<v Speaker 1>you have to do things to encourage him to come

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>into the hall and hear music. You started with youth orchestras,

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:13.360
<v Speaker 1>but you also have members of the orchestra go out

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>into the community in small groups. And what the appetite

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:21.639
<v Speaker 1>of youth we uh My wife started a program, she's

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 1>on the executive game now and she started a program

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Experienced the Music and other programs that get children engaged

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>at a very young age with what music is all

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>about and leaves it to life. Do we need a

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Leonard Burnstind that gave us that magic that all I

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 1>do and we we had Leonards acculate in St. Louis.

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>That did a lot of that, and it takes that

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of conduct, takes that kind of says Zaha in

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Boston or whatever. Then David Robertson, who's just stepping down

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the next year, that they have that magic. Very good.

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:57.400
<v Speaker 1>This has been wonderful, my cold, Thank you so much.

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>She's a senting, of course, a science uh in healthcare

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and of course out of St. Louis. I'm Tim Keenan Dabos.

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>And now what does an annual visit? Was? Somebody who

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I think has had three or four occupations or jobs

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 1>in each of his annual visits. Anthony Scaramucci used to

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>play for the New York Mets, and he joins now

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 1>on a most interesting and historic day for the Trump administration.

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Of course, Mr Scaramucci was a former communications director for

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the President. I believe he was in the media last

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 1>year a little bit. But here comes the President, of course,

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Monution today driving dollar weeker with a week dollar policy.

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to all that. Let's clear up things first.

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:58.199
<v Speaker 1>I have heard a little bit of percolation that you

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:01.119
<v Speaker 1>may rejoin the administration. Is there any truth to that?

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:04.439
<v Speaker 1>There's no truth to that that that I'm aware of.

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:06.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, i've I've I've heard that as well. You

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the number of jobs that I had. You should

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 1>also mention the fact that I don't have any w

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:12.640
<v Speaker 1>two so many of those jobs thom because I did

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 1>all those jobs without making any money. That's pretty cool. Okay, amen, right,

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's good news from my my account. Within

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>this is the idea of advising the president. Have you

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 1>spoken to him or his small entourage coming to Davos

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to give them best Davos practices because you and Mr

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:33.679
<v Speaker 1>Kohona I was suggested the two with the most experience. Yeah, listen,

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I I obviously have a very close personal relationship with

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Manuchin. We worked closely together on the campaign, know

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>each other a long time. Gary and I know each

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 1>other from Goldman. But they didn't need any advice or

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:48.880
<v Speaker 1>from me. I mean, obviously they're gonna do great things here.

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I saw Governor Perry or now Secretary Perry this morning.

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I I think the President's message here is going to

0:22:56.400 --> 0:23:00.359
<v Speaker 1>be a very interesting message in this following sense that people,

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 1>uh won't predict what he's gonna say. He is by nature,

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>he actually has a duality to his personality. He wants

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to engage in the global system and he wants to

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:13.879
<v Speaker 1>be part of global growth and prosperity. Uh, that's not

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:16.400
<v Speaker 1>really the media narrative. At the same time he's doing that,

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>he wants to put American workers in middle class and

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>lower middle class families first. And so, how do you

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 1>handle how do you handle the President United States? Or

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:27.919
<v Speaker 1>you or I'd say you're adversary, General Kelly or all

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the good people of the administration get a script written

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and he goes off script. Is that the biggest Trump

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 1>risk of the speech? I actually think that is the

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:43.640
<v Speaker 1>benefit of him being president? And I I would say that, Uh.

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>We we found in the campaign, I found in my

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 1>life experience with him. Letting him be himself, UH is

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:53.199
<v Speaker 1>where you really see the true creative, disruptive nature of

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:57.119
<v Speaker 1>his personality. Reigning in mand trying to box him in

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>UH hasn't worked. Won't war Uh, And we'll probably lead

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to uh people Uh either they'll adapt because he's not

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>going to adapt to them. Either they'll adapt or he'll

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 1>have to help. He'll have to get help from elsewhere.

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I can see you in the room with Mr Khan

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and a few other selected worthy saying, Okay, there's two audiences,

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Mr President, what do we want to say to the

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>global audience, the doubles elite? How does he speak to

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:26.959
<v Speaker 1>the people in a happy valley? Well, listen, I I

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>think it's a I think it's the same message. The

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 1>messages is that helping out? So he has the same

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:35.159
<v Speaker 1>message to the global elite. Did he does to his

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 1>court constituency. I think so, because explain that. Okay, So

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:40.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna explain it, because if you're here with the globally,

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you say, listen, my goal is to help middle class

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 1>and lower middle class families in the United States with

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:50.199
<v Speaker 1>my policies that will lead to more disposable income and

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 1>more opportunity. If Saudia, if IF China, as an example,

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:57.399
<v Speaker 1>is the Saudi Arabia manufacturing in many ways over the

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>last seventy years since the Second World War. The United

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>States is a Saudi Arabia. Consumerism, more aggregate demand for

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 1>people in the United States will lead to more global growth,

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:11.639
<v Speaker 1>more global opportunity, and more global prosperity. And so I

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>actually do think it's an identical message, and I don't

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:19.120
<v Speaker 1>think that's a threatening message. To quote unquote globalists if anything. Um,

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>he's leading the charge here with the largest delegation uh

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that the US government has put together. Well, he's got

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>he's got ten members of the Cabinet and members of

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the White House here in addition to himself, I mean

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 1>meaning ten senior members in addition to all their understaff.

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:40.159
<v Speaker 1>And so I do know it's the largest general delegation

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 1>that we've had in history as it relates to an

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>American delegation here in Davos. So so to me, again,

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that's refreshing, that's unpredictable. Uh. You and I did a

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 1>show here a year ago, A lot of people here

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>would have said, okay, uh, you know, no chance that

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the president will President Trump will be here in Davos

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>anytime soon. His last two preda sessors did not come

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to Davos. Uh. And so I think the first opportunity

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that he had to be here to make a statement,

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:11.159
<v Speaker 1>give a speech, uh, shows you who he really is

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and the character and the quality that he has as

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a person. And Neil Ferguson has the best say FC

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and so far in the Washington Post writing about this,

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and he gives a president great credit, and he gets

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:24.479
<v Speaker 1>it right up top is well where he says the

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:30.160
<v Speaker 1>president exemplifies the ugly American. Davos will accept him anyways,

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Why will they agree with the president's issues. Is it

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>just about less regulation and more growth or is there

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>something more subtle than that. Well, listen, I mean I

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:43.440
<v Speaker 1>probably is a close front of mine. I probably don't

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 1>agree with the whole ugly American comment. I would just say, wait,

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm the ugly American. Be careful what you said. You're

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 1>you're an ugly American. I mean, you're a tall, ugly American. Okay,

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 1>your listeners can't see how all you are. My dad,

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I need four phone books to stay here. Uh here here,

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Here's what I would say. Uh. If there is subtlety,

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the subtlety is that we're going to cooperate in the

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 1>global community. The subtlety is we're going to engage in

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the global system and the world's uh organizations, the broader

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 1>world's organizations like the u N World Economic Form, et cetera,

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 1>to help maintain, stabilize and increased global peace and prosperity.

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 1>But we're not going to leave working class families and

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>other people behind, which, unfortunately, when you analyze globalism that

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:33.159
<v Speaker 1>has happened. I want to ask one last question, and

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:35.639
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna like it, but you've done so much

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:38.440
<v Speaker 1>for charity on Wall Street, I'm gonna bring it up.

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 1>There is a Davos stunned field today about the cover

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:46.119
<v Speaker 1>article in the Financial Times Madison marriage over a charity

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 1>dinner at the Dorchester in London that wasn't very nice.

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:52.959
<v Speaker 1>It was about charity guys and all that with hired

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 1>hostesses and that, you know, the uproar in the United

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 1>States over vice and Emily Changing of Bloomberg has this

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 1>important new book coming out on social You've always been

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 1>known for running class stuff. Is this stuff over? Is

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the is the sleaziness of some of these charity events?

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:16.119
<v Speaker 1>Is it just over? With this FT article today? Well, listen,

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:18.199
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately appreciate you saying that because I really try to,

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 1>I really try to do this stuff straight up and

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and and honest and with high integrity. I think so

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 1>because I think I think it's over. I think I

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>think it's over because I think what's happened now is

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:32.879
<v Speaker 1>the world of social media has put a magnifying glass

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>on everybody, and I think that some of the seediness,

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh it's going to be exposing that magnifying glass and

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and raid out like the way we used to do

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 1>with ants when we were kids. Anthony Skerm, which you,

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much to your update here. He'll be

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a little occupied over the next forty eight hours. Thanks

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>to interviews on Apple, pot Cast, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio.