Speaker 1: This episode is brought to you by all State. Some
Speaker 1: people just know they could save hundreds on car insurance
Speaker 1: by checking all State first, Like you know, to check
Speaker 1: the date of the Big Game first before you accidentally
Speaker 1: buy tickets on your twentieth wedding anniversary and have to
Speaker 1: spend the next twenty years of your marriage making up
Speaker 1: for it. Yeah, checking first is smart, So check all
Speaker 1: State first for a quote that could save you hundreds.
Speaker 1: You're in good hands with All States savings. Very terms
Speaker 1: apply All State Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates, Northbrook, Illinois.
Speaker 2: Pull up, everybody. So I'm at the Yankee game and
Speaker 2: Kyrie just opted in, which makes most of today's show
Speaker 2: that we recorded a few hours ago absolutely So we're
Speaker 2: still gonna run it because what else are we gonna run?
Speaker 2: And you can hear my thoughts on what could possibly
Speaker 2: happen if Kyrie didn't opt in. Plus we play a
Speaker 2: game that's on. We talked some Draymond. There's some non
Speaker 2: Kyrie stuff, but a lot of what we talked about
Speaker 2: from today's pod is now movement is Kyrie opted in? Okay,
Speaker 2: talk to you guys in a couple of days. Yesterday
Speaker 2: I had lunch with Maverick. You know, Maverick owns part
Speaker 2: of Liverpool, and we had like a fifteen minute discussion
Speaker 2: about European soccer that I was totally locked in on
Speaker 2: thanks to FIFA. I was like, oh no, Liverpool lost
Speaker 2: Mayonnai it's you know, he's a great left wing but
Speaker 2: they've got tads coming up behind him. Talked about composer.
Speaker 2: How am I opposer because of FIFA? I know the
Speaker 2: players and I know the teams. I know who's good.
Speaker 3: No, fair enough, because I'm gonna play a card very
Speaker 3: similar to that at some point.
Speaker 4: What's that career? O my podcast career, what's the card?
Speaker 4: You know it's you don't have to know the card,
Speaker 4: but you.
Speaker 2: Think call of duty is gonna come up. You're gonna
Speaker 2: talk about gun glasses. Welcome in another episode What's Right
Speaker 2: with Nick Right The podcast and YouTube show like rate
Speaker 2: Subscribe Review, We continue on Sundays our countdown of the
Speaker 2: fifty grades players last fifty years. We just came out
Speaker 2: with players nine and eight Shaquille O'Neal and Aqueima LaJuan.
Speaker 2: We actually debated that on the television show Today. You know,
Speaker 2: one of the reasons we debated is because it's a
Speaker 2: great debate. The other reason we debated it is not
Speaker 2: a lot going on in the old sports world right now,
Speaker 2: my friend, which is one of the reasons why Draymond
Speaker 2: Green is already in reruns. But we will discuss him.
Speaker 2: I assume at some point during today's show that is
Speaker 2: my son Demonse, who was also the cost of the show.
Speaker 2: We now have sixteen minutes for the first second, as
Speaker 2: we're doing sixteen minute A block, ten minute B block,
Speaker 2: four minute C block. That's a tight thirty minute show
Speaker 2: in full and I'm going to hit the clocks now
Speaker 2: that I have added it was ten minutes and twelve
Speaker 2: minutes now at sixteen. But before we even start the show,
Speaker 2: let's get to what we are not this discussing on
Speaker 2: today's show. What did not make the cup for today's
Speaker 2: show is Arch Manning going to the Texas Longhorns the
Speaker 2: Thunder drafting two different Jalen Williams is what are the
Speaker 2: odds of that? And Kendall Jenner and Devin Bookers splitting up. Oh,
Speaker 2: that could be big news for you, my friend, if
Speaker 2: she has a type. Now, let's get to the actual.
Speaker 2: Let's get to the actual show them, say what are
Speaker 2: we starting with today?
Speaker 4: All right?
Speaker 3: Man, Kyrie and the Nets are reportedly at a standstill
Speaker 3: as far as negotiations. Kyrie has a list of six
Speaker 3: teams that he would like to go to. Yeah, and
Speaker 3: the Lakers are on that list.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 4: Is there a team that is a Kyrie Irving away
Speaker 4: from a championship? Yeah? The Lakers. Yeah.
Speaker 3: I feel like you are secretly praying that Kyrie goes
Speaker 3: to the Lakers.
Speaker 2: Well, it seems like it mrobab be the best for
Speaker 2: all parties in the wall. I now, did you see this?
Speaker 2: I'm sure I don't. I'm not trying to be rude.
Speaker 2: I'm guessing you didn't. It just came out a few
Speaker 2: hours ago, Okay, from Joe Varden in the Athletic quote
Speaker 2: the Nets should not consider a trade with the Lakers
Speaker 2: unless it is Irving and Ben Simmons for us and
Speaker 2: Anthony Davis, oh, who first proposed that trade a week ago? Here,
Speaker 2: guy nick Wright, that was a real trade I made.
Speaker 2: And Colin Coward laughed at me. All these Chris Mannis said,
Speaker 2: why do all of nick Wright's trades just work out
Speaker 2: for Lebron? All these things now, all of a sudden.
Speaker 2: It's on the athletic Joe Varden is promoting it. Here's
Speaker 2: what I know. The Lakers need spacing, they need shooting,
Speaker 2: and they need somebody who is other than Anthony Davis
Speaker 2: that still theoretically should be in their prime. Kyrie checks
Speaker 2: all those boxes. Now. The only way that they can
Speaker 2: easily get Kyrie is if he walks and plays for
Speaker 2: them for the mid level exception, which is six million dollars.
Speaker 2: That wouldn't sound plausible except for it's Kyrie Irving we're
Speaker 2: talking about. And what do we also know about Kyrie
Speaker 2: Irving When he's with Lebron he can win at the
Speaker 2: highest levels. When he's not, he's never played in a
Speaker 2: game pass Round two. That's just in Boston. The one
Speaker 2: year he was on the team and they made Round three.
Speaker 2: He didn't play in the playoffs in Brooklyn. They haven't
Speaker 2: made a pass Round two with him. And so the
Speaker 2: Nets are in a tricky spot. And we're gonna talk
Speaker 2: more about their future with Durant in just a moment.
Speaker 2: But I understand the Nets not wanting to give Kyrie
Speaker 2: Irving a five year MAX contract guaranteed, given how he's
Speaker 2: conducted himself, given how little he's been available to play
Speaker 2: one hundred and three of the two hundred and twenty
Speaker 2: six games. But they also have Kevin Durant going into
Speaker 2: year sixteen. They have this team where they don't have
Speaker 2: any of their future picks. The idea of oh, we'll
Speaker 2: take a step backwards, that to me is illogical. So
Speaker 2: they're in this tricky place, and anybody else, any other
Speaker 2: player in the league, the threat of going to the
Speaker 2: Lakers for six million dollars would be simply a hollow threat.
Speaker 2: Kyrie Irving, who gave up close to twenty million dollars
Speaker 2: to not get a vaccine that more than one billion
Speaker 2: people have gotten. Kyrie Irving, who gave up his Nike
Speaker 2: contract because he trashed the shoes on Twitter. Kyrie Irving
Speaker 2: has made a lot of decisions that financially don't make
Speaker 2: a ton of sense. And I know he and Lebron
Speaker 2: have reconciled. I know that, I know Lebron would sign
Speaker 2: off on it. And you know, I've been saying for
Speaker 2: a long time Kyrie for Russ. That was back when
Speaker 2: Kyrie wasn't playing for the Nets and they were getting
Speaker 2: nothing out of that roster spot. I don't think the
Speaker 2: Nets would be interested in it. I don't think the
Speaker 2: Nets would be interested in helping facilitate this. But if
Speaker 2: Kyrie goes to them and says, I am leaving, I
Speaker 2: am walking away, I'm going to sign for the six million.
Speaker 2: Do you want to do a sign in trade? Then
Speaker 2: they have real decisions to make. And then it gets
Speaker 2: very common complicated with Durant, which I think we're gonna
Speaker 2: talk about right here.
Speaker 4: Go ahead to see Russ play with Katie again.
Speaker 3: Well, you know, Kyrie and a couple of I mean
Speaker 3: Russ and a couple of picks for Kyrie.
Speaker 2: It would be incredibly fun, man, It would be. It
Speaker 2: would be. And by the way, we have seen Russ
Speaker 2: and Harden together in Houston. We have seen Harden and
Speaker 2: Durant together in Brooklyn. The one we haven't seen is
Speaker 2: Russ and Katie together. Now. I don't think Brooklyn would
Speaker 2: want it. I don't know that k D would want it.
Speaker 2: You know, Russ is not the player he was in
Speaker 2: twenty sixteen, and in twenty sixteen Katie walked away from him.
Speaker 2: But the Kyrie thing, one other thing on the Kyrie thing.
Speaker 2: The Nets turned their entire franchise over to them. To
Speaker 2: him and kat they let them. They said, we want
Speaker 2: DeAndre Jordan. They did it. They were pissed Kenny Atkinson
Speaker 2: wasn't starting DeAndre Jordan. They end up firing Kenny Atkinson.
Speaker 2: They wanted Steve Nash. They hired Steve Nash. They wanted
Speaker 2: them to trade for James hard and they traded for
Speaker 2: James Harden. They said, you're not gonna be able to
Speaker 2: be a part time player. They then flip flopped and
Speaker 2: said you can be a part time player. Now, all
Speaker 2: of a sudden, they want to get strict. That's hard, man.
Speaker 2: It's hard to operate one way, make someone think you're
Speaker 2: going to have carte blanche. Kyrie at the end of
Speaker 2: the season says he's gonna sit down with Joe Sien
Speaker 2: Sean Marks and plot the future of the franchise. And
Speaker 2: now they're like, we're not even gonna give you the
Speaker 2: contract you think you deserve. We're drawing a line. It
Speaker 2: It's easy to do that if that's what you've been
Speaker 2: doing from the beginning. It's much more difficult to change course.
Speaker 2: And I do wonder what it's gonna mean for Durant,
Speaker 2: which I think we're gonna talk about right here.
Speaker 4: Yep.
Speaker 3: Katie is also causing a stir up in Brooklyn. He's
Speaker 3: upset that the front office didn't quote unquote grow to
Speaker 3: understand Kyrie Irving yep, just talk that Durant could walk
Speaker 3: and possibly get the biggest trade package in the NBA
Speaker 3: in NBA history.
Speaker 4: Will the Nets be Ben Simmons team here shortly.
Speaker 2: Well, that's their concern. So this is why they are
Speaker 2: playing a very dangerous game with Kyrie, because listen, if
Speaker 2: Kyrie were to say I'm leaving, I don't think KD
Speaker 2: would demand to trade immediately. I think kat would play
Speaker 2: out this year. But I think if they lose Kyrie
Speaker 2: for nothing or next to nothing, or just a minimal return,
Speaker 2: that doesn't help them win. I think Katy would play
Speaker 2: this year and then next year ask out, and over
Speaker 2: the next five seasons, their draft pick either goes directly
Speaker 2: to the Rockets or the Rockets have the ability to
Speaker 2: swap picks with the Nets. So if the Nets have
Speaker 2: a better pick, the Rockets say we get it and
Speaker 2: you get ours. So if the Nets over the next
Speaker 2: five years bottom out, they get no benefit of it.
Speaker 2: They don't own their own draft rights, which is the
Speaker 2: exact situation they were in after they traded for Pierson
Speaker 2: Garnet and then Piers only played. Piers played two years
Speaker 2: for them, Garnett only played one year for them. They
Speaker 2: never made past Round two with those guys, and all
Speaker 2: of a sudden they're out in the desert for a
Speaker 2: half decade trying to rebuild their team while Jalen Brown
Speaker 2: and Jason Tatum, who were their draft picks but Boston
Speaker 2: ended up getting them because Boston had their draft owned
Speaker 2: all their draft rights. They're now putting themselves to be
Speaker 2: in that exact same position, which is why, as batch
Speaker 2: crazy as it sounds, I might give Kyrie Irving the
Speaker 2: full max because the nuclear winter is if Kevin Durant
Speaker 2: asks out and you don't have your picks? Yeah, now, yes,
Speaker 2: Would you get a good trade package for Kevin Durant,
Speaker 2: Of course you would. Would it be the biggest package ever?
Speaker 2: I don't think so, because if we're talking about Kevin
Speaker 2: Durant asking out when he's in his mid to late thirties,
Speaker 2: I don't think you would get I think you'd get
Speaker 2: unbelievable trade package, but nothing. You don't have any young
Speaker 2: players on your roster as is, other than cam Thomas.
Speaker 2: You don't have any draft picks, you don't have a
Speaker 2: ton of financial flexibility. You've got this Ben Simmons contract.
Speaker 2: And that's the other thing. If I were Kyrie Irving,
Speaker 2: I'd be say, be like, guys, you don't want to
Speaker 2: give me a max. You essentially gave Ben Simmons a
Speaker 2: MAX when you traded for him, and he's on a
Speaker 2: MAX contract. He never played for you. So the Durant
Speaker 2: thing is super fascinating, and that is Kyrie's single best
Speaker 2: piece of leverage, because I don't think Kyrie necessarily wants
Speaker 2: to leave because he likes being at home. He lives
Speaker 2: in New Jersey's from New Jersey. He likes that part
Speaker 2: of it. But the idea that Durant might say, this
Speaker 2: is not what I signed up for, and that there's
Speaker 2: just a lot of things the Nets have done that
Speaker 2: if they had to do over again, obviously they would
Speaker 2: have done the opposite. The Harden trade ends up being
Speaker 2: a total disaster, not only because you only got one
Speaker 2: season out of hard and essentially right, and I understand
Speaker 2: you got Ben Simmons back, and not only because you
Speaker 2: traded Jared Allen, who made an All Star team Krislovert,
Speaker 2: who can score you. You gave away your depth, but
Speaker 2: you also gave away all The reason they don't have
Speaker 2: those draft picks is not because of the Kyrie or
Speaker 2: KD acquisitions. It's because of the Harden trade. If they
Speaker 2: hadn't made the Harden trade and they had their own
Speaker 2: draft picks, the idea of Kyrie walking and trading Durant
Speaker 2: and you know, bottoming out temporarily wouldn't be so terrified.
Speaker 5: You.
Speaker 2: But you don't have those picks anymore. So the Harden
Speaker 2: trade was a massive mistake. I believe hiring Nash was
Speaker 2: a massive mistake. And I believe flip flopping on the
Speaker 2: Kyrie part time player thing is one of the reasons
Speaker 2: Harden asked out, and I think that was a massive mistake.
Speaker 2: So they've made all these massive errors. And if it
Speaker 2: leads to then finally drawing a line in the sand
Speaker 2: on Kyrie, which then leads to Durant saying I don't
Speaker 2: want to be here, talk about fumbling the bag. It'd
Speaker 2: be an all time screw up from a team that
Speaker 2: was the Vegas favorite in back to back years to
Speaker 2: win the whole thing. All right, what's next?
Speaker 5: One?
Speaker 3: Ryan Windhorse says, the Cavs maybe quietly trying to clear
Speaker 3: cap space. Yeah, if they don't re sign and Sexton,
Speaker 3: maybe they're going for Lebron. Yeah, what do you think
Speaker 3: the chances are that Lebron and Bronni end up in Cleveland?
Speaker 2: Well, so listen, this we're talking about not for this
Speaker 2: coming year, but for next year, because right now Lebron's
Speaker 2: contract with the Lakers only goes one more season. And
Speaker 2: when you survey the landscape of teams with young players
Speaker 2: that are you know, on the uptick that could be
Speaker 2: a championship Corps. Darius Garland was an All Star. Evan
Speaker 2: Mobley is going to be awesome.
Speaker 4: Yeah, he was.
Speaker 2: In my opinion, it should have been a Rookie of
Speaker 2: the Year this past year. No disprect to Scottie Barnes.
Speaker 2: Evan Mobley was sensational. And so there's I'll get to
Speaker 2: the Bronni part in a moment. But the questions like
Speaker 2: multi layer, The first question is with what you think
Speaker 2: Mobiley's gonna be in two years, what Garland's going to
Speaker 2: be in two years? Is Lebron going to be good
Speaker 2: enough in two years two? Well no, because they would
Speaker 2: sign him out right, they would keep them those guys.
Speaker 2: Is he gonna be good enough with those two guys
Speaker 2: to win a title? Where if Lebron's your best guy,
Speaker 2: Evan Mobley's your second best guy, and Darius Carlin's your
Speaker 2: third best guy, is with is that team good enough
Speaker 2: to win the title? And the answer to that is yes,
Speaker 2: if Lebron stays close to the level at he was
Speaker 2: this past year, especially who's thirty points, eight rebound, six
Speaker 2: assists on great efficiency. But we're asking Lebron now to
Speaker 2: do that in year twenty one in the league. He
Speaker 2: turns thirty eight this season, So in the year he
Speaker 2: turns thirty nine, that's a big ask, So a really
Speaker 2: big ask. The other thing that I think every team
Speaker 2: needs to understand, and this is the Bronni part of it.
Speaker 2: Bronni theoretically will be draft eligible, not next year's draft,
Speaker 2: but the draft after that. So we're talking about for
Speaker 2: year twenty two, Lebron, So this year coming up to
Speaker 2: your twenty's gonna be with the Lakers. You're twenty one,
Speaker 2: we're talking about maybe gonna be with the Cavs. Your
Speaker 2: twenty two is Bronni's draft eligible year if he's a
Speaker 2: one and done. I believe Lebron, whatever contract he signs
Speaker 2: and with whoever he signs it after this coming season,
Speaker 2: is going to sign a one year deal because he
Speaker 2: wants to be a free agent when Bronni comes into
Speaker 2: the league, if for no other reason then to greatly
Speaker 2: incentivize a team to overdraft Bronni knowing he'll be a
Speaker 2: package deal with it. So there's that element of it.
Speaker 2: The other element, and to me, that's an interesting question,
Speaker 2: is this how much money does Lebron want to get paid?
Speaker 2: So he's been a MAX guy every year of his career.
Speaker 2: Obviously he's still obviously a super MAXI guy.
Speaker 3: Take a lot less money for a chance at the
Speaker 3: championship team and a chance.
Speaker 4: To play with his son.
Speaker 2: I'm sure he would take less for a chance to
Speaker 2: play with Bronni. But I'm talking about this little small window,
Speaker 2: but for not this coming year, but the year after,
Speaker 2: when Bronni's going to be a freshman in college. The
Speaker 2: question is, is Lebron, let's say he this year has
Speaker 2: another amazing season where he's like twenty eight, seven and seven,
Speaker 2: that is a MAX level player. Will he take less though,
Speaker 2: in order to build the best team around him wherever
Speaker 2: he goes. And maybe the most interesting part of the
Speaker 2: will he take less? Is this my whole life. Guys
Speaker 2: who take less gets so much plaudits and applause for it.
Speaker 2: Tim Duncan took less, Team Guy, Dirk took less, Team Guy.
Speaker 2: Tom Brady part of his legend, he takes less. I
Speaker 2: mark this tape. I guarrant damntee it. If Lebron James
Speaker 2: takes less to go somewhere, you know what the commentary
Speaker 2: will be. Oh, stack in the deck, Oh yeah, Oh
Speaker 2: you can't win straight up. Oh you gotta tell you
Speaker 2: make it as easy as possible billionaire. Yeah, absolutely, and
Speaker 2: so all of those. But the fact that Wendy is
Speaker 2: saying they're clearing cap space makes it sound like Lebron's
Speaker 2: plan is not to, you know, go in on the
Speaker 2: veterans minimum somewhere and sign up for a team that's
Speaker 2: already ready to go. All right.
Speaker 3: Last, Draymond, everybody knows about your back and forth with Katie,
Speaker 3: but his former teammate Draymond Green and started calling you
Speaker 3: out too. He did last week, and then he doubled
Speaker 3: down them this weekend.
Speaker 4: What are your thoughts?
Speaker 2: I think we can play it right, let's play it,
Speaker 2: and then I'll respond on.
Speaker 4: The old pod.
Speaker 5: Nicholas, Right, how you doing a lot of hot takes?
Speaker 5: You admitted the other day we make hot takes, analyzed
Speaker 5: the game. My man Lebron could go one for nineteen,
Speaker 5: Nick Wright gonna say he he made one shot and
Speaker 5: he was the best player on the floor. What happened
Speaker 5: to the days of again analyzing the game honest opinions?
Speaker 4: Back to your boy, Nicholas.
Speaker 5: You spoke all of that stuff about Andrew Wickins, You
Speaker 5: spoke all of that stuff about how the Warriors were done,
Speaker 5: and like we never win again and Stephani needs to
Speaker 5: leave Golden Stadium, blah blah blah. And then once you're wrong,
Speaker 5: you then try to go on TV the other day
Speaker 5: or whatever you are on and saying that's what we do.
Speaker 4: We make hot takes. Enough.
Speaker 5: No, no, no, you're wrong, brother. You gotta stand on that.
Speaker 5: Those I takes don't just get the roll off. See
Speaker 5: that's what y'all accustomed to. I'd say, to make these
Speaker 5: asinine statements and then once I'm done, it's just over.
Speaker 5: No no, no, no, no, you got to stand on that.
Speaker 5: Changing your opinion in the middle of this no, no, no, brother,
Speaker 5: stand on that. Stand on your word. It's important to
Speaker 5: stand on that, not just flipping and flopping and all this.
Speaker 2: Okay, now, so here's what what do you stand for? Okay,
Speaker 2: So here's a few things. First of all, Draymond still
Speaker 2: thinks I switched to the.
Speaker 4: Warriors from the Yeah, which is pretty bad.
Speaker 2: Raymond also is very confused on me saying we don't
Speaker 2: analyze the games. I obviously never said that, and I'm
Speaker 2: doing a whole the fifty parts series on NBA history.
Speaker 2: But here's the other thing Draymond is learning.
Speaker 4: I think we'll go ahead.
Speaker 3: I think Draymond's learning that he's not gonna win another finals.
Speaker 3: And then he's got it just sulk in this moment.
Speaker 2: That's not what he's learning. And I lied. I guess
Speaker 2: we're not going to hit the clock today. Next Draymond
Speaker 2: ruined it. It was a longer sound by than I expected.
Speaker 2: Here's what Draymond's learning.
Speaker 4: Okay.
Speaker 2: Oh wow, This content creation business, it keeps going on
Speaker 2: every day even if there's no sports going on, and
Speaker 2: Draymond is now already in reruns the stand on it,
Speaker 2: Nick writes Andrew Wiggins opinion, Oh this this got some
Speaker 2: traction when I did it two weeks ago. Let me
Speaker 2: run it back. Of course, it's because he's got nothing
Speaker 2: to say, because Draymond, Draymond does a little basketball talk.
Speaker 2: But what Draymond really is is not a basketball analyst.
Speaker 2: He's a media critic. And Draymond is running out of
Speaker 2: people and he's running out of content, and so he's like,
Speaker 2: all right, let me rerack this, let me rerack the
Speaker 2: nick right take. And you know what, my new shine
Speaker 2: of paint and my new code of paint. I'm gonna
Speaker 2: call him Nicholas. That'll throw him for a loop. So
Speaker 2: this idea, he keeps saying, stand on it. Here's the deal.
Speaker 2: No one has ever owned an incorrect take more than
Speaker 2: I owned the Andrew Wiggins take. I'm the one that
Speaker 2: tweeted it back out for the world the moment the
Speaker 2: Warriors beat the Maps. I never ran from it. But
Speaker 2: this idea that there is some that there should be
Speaker 2: a and what's the word, an expectation that if we
Speaker 2: ever be wrong, to either never be wrong or to
Speaker 2: never admit you were wrong is the dumbest shit I've
Speaker 2: ever heard. And this other idea, and Draymond doesn't he's
Speaker 2: a sharp guy, but he doesn't understand the hypocrisy of
Speaker 2: this because he clearly believes that folks who didn't play
Speaker 2: that our ability to evaluate or criticize players is minimal. Okay, well, Draymond,
Speaker 2: are you a professor? Were you trained broadcaster? Did you
Speaker 2: go to broadcasting school? Have you been doing this for
Speaker 2: twenty years? Did you go through all the steps of
Speaker 2: local radio and then mid market radio, and then national
Speaker 2: radio and then small television. And by the way, the
Speaker 2: answer is no. Does that mean he shouldn't be able
Speaker 2: to criticize those in the media. Of course it's not.
Speaker 2: But it's the exact same logic. If I were to
Speaker 2: be like Draymond Green, what do you know about my field?
Speaker 2: You figured it out. Now you're having some missteps or
Speaker 2: misquoting me a bit, you're getting your facts wrong. You're already,
Speaker 2: you know, so starved for content that you're just rerunning
Speaker 2: these same takes. But that's fine. It's hard, man, it's
Speaker 2: And by the way, he can do what I I
Speaker 2: do at a closer level to what I do it
Speaker 2: than what I would be able to do what he does.
Speaker 2: I would be a zero out of one hundred on
Speaker 2: the court for the Warriors. Draymond, as far as you know,
Speaker 2: media guy. At times he's good. At times he's a
Speaker 2: little redundant and a little self congratulatory. That's fine, he'll learn.
Speaker 2: The other thing he's going to have to learn is this,
Speaker 2: at some point, the audience is going to expect some
Speaker 2: criticism of guys you don't want to criticize, and that's
Speaker 2: where for a lot of the guys. He's starting these
Speaker 2: fights with Kendrick Perkins. He's mad that as a former player,
Speaker 2: Perk attacked you know, you criticized him. That's always the
Speaker 2: hard part in the transition from player to media member.
Speaker 2: It's why Barkley a lot of people are at him,
Speaker 2: but it's also why Barkley is the best in the
Speaker 2: game at it. So listen, I'm excited for it. Draymond
Speaker 2: and I have a lot of mutual, very close friends,
Speaker 2: so at some point I think we'll sit down together
Speaker 2: and hash this out. But I also think he's realizing,
Speaker 2: oh damn, I got another podcast to do.
Speaker 4: Oh boy, get this podcast?
Speaker 5: Okay?
Speaker 2: Yeah, and I am. I'm gonna be very impressed when
Speaker 2: he has some original content because the latest episode that
Speaker 2: that was lacking sorely. We'll be right back.
Speaker 6: This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the
Speaker 6: inspiring true story about Anthony Roebliss, who defined every expectation
Speaker 6: to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new
Speaker 6: original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,
Speaker 6: Evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and
Speaker 6: thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast
Speaker 6: including Jirell Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Tania, and
Speaker 6: Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.
Speaker 2: Also, that was Draymon's first podcast since the championship. I
Speaker 2: didn't know, so that's They won the championship on the sixteen,
Speaker 2: So that's the seventeenth, so he had ten days to
Speaker 2: come up with some material, do something. You know what
Speaker 2: I would you know what I would be interested in now?
Speaker 2: I like lists, but Draymond called himself the greatest defensive
Speaker 2: player ever. I would like to know who he thinks
Speaker 2: the greatest defensive players in league history for real? Like
Speaker 2: his thoughts on a keem Olajuan on Tim Duncan ron
Speaker 2: Our test Ben Wallace.
Speaker 4: He said that win in the last podcast.
Speaker 2: No, he said that during the regular season this past year.
Speaker 2: Anything's the greatest defense.
Speaker 4: J I just.
Speaker 2: Would There's a lot of things. Listen, Draymond might end
Speaker 2: up being awesome at media. He certainly has the pathway
Speaker 2: to it. But the other question for all these guys
Speaker 2: is always this. When you've made that much money, are
Speaker 2: you is are you going to be motivated and incentivized?
Speaker 2: I do two hundred and forty TV shows a year,
Speaker 2: two hundred and forty shows a year, another one hundred
Speaker 2: podcasts plus the podcast guest stuff I do. These are
Speaker 2: the things like now, Berkley doesn't work that much, and
Speaker 2: I think maybe Draamond, but Barkley still during the NBA
Speaker 2: playoffs is working a lot, right, And Barkley made good
Speaker 2: money but also gambled a ton and didn't make today's
Speaker 2: day money. It's always I mean, one podcast in the
Speaker 2: last two weeks and he's already in repeat. It's not great.
Speaker 2: All right, you ready to go, let's do it all right?
Speaker 2: Time now for hey, well, I hit the clock. Who
Speaker 2: knows at this point I promise things. It doesn't happen
Speaker 2: my apologies, but we're playing you guys. You guys said
Speaker 2: this is a new.
Speaker 4: Game, a new game. It's right or wrong.
Speaker 2: It's a new we haven't got it.
Speaker 4: We have it, but we've got that.
Speaker 3: We've got like two or three games at this point
Speaker 3: with right in the name. Yeah, but yeah, okay, new game,
Speaker 3: all right, right or wrong?
Speaker 2: Let's do it.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Everyone thought Jabari Smith was going number one. A lot
Speaker 3: of people, maybe even you, lost money betting on that. Instead,
Speaker 3: the Magic took bon Caro, who didn't even work out
Speaker 3: with the team, So right or wrong, Bonkiro was right
Speaker 3: at the number one.
Speaker 2: Big, Okay, I you're right. I thought it was going
Speaker 2: to go Smith, Holmgren, Bonkaro Ivy instead that I should
Speaker 2: have known the Kings would screw up the fourth pick
Speaker 2: and they wouldn't even they wouldn't. They would have the
Speaker 2: biggest reach of the first round like they seem to
Speaker 2: always do, and Ivy would fall to five. You gotta
Speaker 2: love what Detroit was able to do staying there, getting
Speaker 2: Ivy Kate Cunningham kind of like what they're building there.
Speaker 2: But that's not the question you asked me. I said
Speaker 2: the day of the draft that I thought Paula was
Speaker 2: the safest, meaning I think he's the least. I think
Speaker 2: he is the surest fire thing to be a good
Speaker 2: NBA player. I think the most upside was Jabbari. Now,
Speaker 2: if you're the Magic, do you want to go safe
Speaker 2: or do you want to go upside? Or maybe they
Speaker 2: thought Paulo was had the most upside as well. I
Speaker 2: know a lot of people think the most upsides chet.
Speaker 2: I just I would have taken Chet fourth or fifth,
Speaker 2: like I would have taken Ivy. Had a Chet, I
Speaker 2: would have considered shade and sharp, just based on his
Speaker 2: high school profile alone, and then I would have been
Speaker 2: comfortable with Chat at five or six. But what I
Speaker 2: find fascinating about the Magic is they never interviewed or
Speaker 2: worked out Paula. And the only explanation of that is, oh,
Speaker 2: it was subterfuge. But you have the number one pick.
Speaker 2: Nobody can jump ahead of you. You have the number
Speaker 2: one pick. So I don't know exactly why they went
Speaker 2: about it the way they did. With that said, I
Speaker 2: love him as a player. I don't think any of
Speaker 2: these guys are superstars. I don't think any of these
Speaker 2: guys are gonna be Anthony Edwards and I didn't think
Speaker 2: anyone in last year's draft, by the way, it was
Speaker 2: gonna be a superstar. Now maybe MOBILEI will turn into one.
Speaker 2: I think Cage's really good. I don't think it'll be
Speaker 2: a superstar. But there's the last draft pick that I
Speaker 2: felt going into the draft is a franchise changing guy
Speaker 2: was Luca. And the next one that I think coming
Speaker 2: into the draft is a franchise changer is the French
Speaker 2: kid Winbinyama, who was seven to with like a seven
Speaker 2: seven wing springs, unbelievable. Uh the last what was the
Speaker 2: last American player that I thought going into a draft
Speaker 2: could absolutely change the trajectory of your franchise.
Speaker 4: Dearon Fox.
Speaker 2: I did love Fox just because I watched it, but
Speaker 2: I was biased. I did think maybe that you might
Speaker 2: be right that I thought that about Fox. I just
Speaker 2: watched Fox score forty and a half in an AAU game.
Speaker 4: Oh my god.
Speaker 2: But yeah, that was the summer I was coaching you
Speaker 2: in AAUFT and I kept watching Dearon Fox. Just cook everybody,
Speaker 2: all right, what's next?
Speaker 4: Uh? So Wolde destroyed gamblers during the draft.
Speaker 3: He reported the incorrect Uh sorry, he reported the incorrect
Speaker 3: draft order. In the morning and then spoiled every pick
Speaker 3: at night. Others do the same in the NFL draft.
Speaker 3: So right or wrong, Twitter has destroyed the draft.
Speaker 2: Wrong. I never have understood this complaint. They're not scrolling
Speaker 2: tweets on the broadcast. If you don't want it's spoiled, don't,
Speaker 2: don't read Twitter. And by the way, you can still
Speaker 2: tweet without reading Twitter.
Speaker 4: It's so crazy.
Speaker 3: We didn't discuss this before, but that was my exact
Speaker 3: take on the situation. I've never I feel like it's
Speaker 3: an obvious one, though, no, but.
Speaker 2: I've never understood. This is one of these things people
Speaker 2: complain about, but it is totally self inflicted.
Speaker 3: It's funny you say something about this because we have
Speaker 3: a conversation about this or anything.
Speaker 4: But I had a very similar take. It's the right take.
Speaker 2: Guess what it's like. Someone's saying, like, I like to
Speaker 2: be surprised by what the weather is going to be
Speaker 2: like when I walk outside, so I'm angry at the
Speaker 2: weather channel. Don't open it, like it's still available to
Speaker 2: you to be surprised. You can just watch the draft
Speaker 2: if you don't want to have the pick spoiled. So
Speaker 2: totally wrong. It's a ludicrous complaint. All right, what's next?
Speaker 3: Benedict Mathurin is not moved by the NBA, says Lebron
Speaker 3: is gonna have to prove that he's better than him.
Speaker 3: He says, oh really, yeah, he says, quote unquote, a
Speaker 3: lot of people say he is great. I want to
Speaker 3: see how great he really is. I don't think anybody
Speaker 3: is better than me. He's gonna have to show me
Speaker 3: that he's better than me, right or wrong. Benedict's Benedict
Speaker 3: calling out Lebron is bad.
Speaker 4: Listen.
Speaker 2: I I appreciate the moxie and the confidence. I don't
Speaker 2: know that I would have gone with the Lebron James
Speaker 2: has to prove he's better than me approached.
Speaker 3: The funniest part to me is a lot of people
Speaker 3: says that he's great, Like, what do you mean?
Speaker 5: All right?
Speaker 2: That's the other thing is the I mean, Lebron's been
Speaker 2: in the league for almost every single moment. This young
Speaker 2: man's in a lot, and so the idea that he's like, hey,
Speaker 2: I've heard good things, but I don't know, but now
Speaker 2: I do respect the I always think I'm the best
Speaker 2: player type of thing. And that is what's hard for
Speaker 2: rookies is that they you know, they come into a
Speaker 2: league and they're not the best player on their own team,
Speaker 2: much less better player in the whole league. But I also,
Speaker 2: let me see, I want to check the schedule here. Oh,
Speaker 2: we don't have the schedule, and I can't check the schedule.
Speaker 2: I'm an idiot. I was going to say when they
Speaker 2: play each other for the first.
Speaker 3: Time, I'll be watching his first game. I don't think
Speaker 3: that big on like, you know, oh, I want to
Speaker 3: see this rookie.
Speaker 4: I like now, what he has done is.
Speaker 3: Created a buzz around himself, I believe because like I
Speaker 3: for one, would not have been like I gotta see
Speaker 3: Benedict Matherin's first game.
Speaker 4: Sorry, no, you're fine. I'm very motivated by the way he.
Speaker 2: Was one of a number of Canadians drafted in the
Speaker 2: first round. Big Canadian contingent that everyone riding that Andrew
Speaker 2: Wiggins way, he's also Canadian. Listen, I watched him in college.
Speaker 2: I think he won Pack twelve Player of the Year,
Speaker 2: so I give him credit, and you know, his top
Speaker 2: ten pick of the draft. But yeah, he's on the
Speaker 2: So he's on the Pacers. So he'll play Lebron twice
Speaker 2: this coming years. This is the other conference. I I'm
Speaker 2: gonna go ahead and guess Lebron will be aware of
Speaker 2: this and will do his best to have a couple
Speaker 2: moments with him, especially because listen that he plays wing
Speaker 2: like Lebron, so they could match up against each other.
Speaker 2: I don't mind him saying, you know, chet was asked
Speaker 2: a few months ago, who's the best player in the
Speaker 2: nbauld have said me in a few months. But the
Speaker 2: whole he's gonna have to show me he's better than
Speaker 2: me is maybe a bridge too far. All right, what's next?
Speaker 4: So all right, sweet?
Speaker 3: The Rockets are practicing with a four point line. Sorry,
Speaker 3: the Rockets are practicing with a four point line in
Speaker 3: their facility.
Speaker 4: Right or wrong? The four point line should exis in
Speaker 4: the NBA.
Speaker 2: Absolutely should not exist. It's wrong. And I want to
Speaker 2: show you a graphic because this, to me, is an
Speaker 2: issue with the NBA. Is Kirk Goldsberry does all these maps?
Speaker 2: He like he's like basically part NBA guy, part cartographer
Speaker 2: where he shows shooting zones. And I'm trying to find
Speaker 2: the one that I saw just the other day that
Speaker 2: where he talked about shot distribution in the NBA. Now
Speaker 2: versus a decade ago, because the I adding a four
Speaker 2: point line would simply further make it to where long
Speaker 2: jump shots are the only shots people take other than threes,
Speaker 2: I'm sorry, other than layups and shots in the paint,
Speaker 2: and I don't think that is good for the health
Speaker 2: of the sport. I think that, if anything, the league
Speaker 2: should go to a true arc, not flattening it out
Speaker 2: in the corners. That way, there is no corner three
Speaker 2: because and that way the mid range starts to have
Speaker 2: a bit of a comeback. Because I understand the math
Speaker 2: of it, I understand why folks don't want the why
Speaker 2: the mid range is a bad shot, but I just
Speaker 2: I think aesthetically speaking, the league was better when there
Speaker 2: was more diversity of offen.
Speaker 3: Say it wouldn't be healthy for the sport. I think
Speaker 3: it'd be a lot healthier for the players. What do
Speaker 3: you mean, Like, as far as I think there would
Speaker 3: be less you know, pounding down in the paint, I
Speaker 3: think that people are going to be taking further shots,
Speaker 3: so there's going to be less contact.
Speaker 4: But you know that's true.
Speaker 2: But the flip side of that is guys have to
Speaker 2: cover so much more ground now defensively, and that would
Speaker 2: be exacerbated even further if they went to a four
Speaker 2: point line. Listen, they're not going to a four point line.
Speaker 2: There's the graphic, thank you here. It is so if
Speaker 2: you look at the most common shot location twenty years ago,
Speaker 2: it was all over the court. Most common shot locations
Speaker 2: this year it is in the restricted area, in the paint,
Speaker 2: in the dead middle, and then just threes, nothing in
Speaker 2: the mid range. And to me, that has made the
Speaker 2: game a little less fun to watch because everyone is
Speaker 2: bombing threes and that seems to be the focal point
Speaker 2: of the offense. A four point line would make it
Speaker 2: even more so that the real way to fix it,
Speaker 2: and I've said this before, is to switch the scoring
Speaker 2: from threes and twos to fours and threes, but that
Speaker 2: will never happen. The reason that would fix it is
Speaker 2: because then the premium on the three point shot, which
Speaker 2: will be a four point shot, will only be a
Speaker 2: thirty three percent premium instead of a fifty percent premium.
Speaker 2: It's the same reason why when you're playing pickup, if
Speaker 2: you play by ones and twos, it just comes down
Speaker 2: to who has the best shooter because it's one hundred
Speaker 2: percent premium. But they'll never change it to fours and
Speaker 2: threes because people don't like math, because it would ruin
Speaker 2: the record books. All right, what's last?
Speaker 3: Okay, well, we've got an unwritten no baseball rule on
Speaker 3: this show.
Speaker 2: Uh huh.
Speaker 4: But this has to be seen. All right, let's see
Speaker 4: right or wrong? You can do this.
Speaker 7: Skeeters the only other team aside from the Patriots and
Speaker 7: the Ducks with double digit wins on the young season.
Speaker 7: The one one Cardula swings and fouls it off towards
Speaker 7: the broadcast booth and I make the catch on the
Speaker 7: foul ball. I am very proud of myself. I hope
Speaker 7: somebody got a video of that. I caught it on
Speaker 7: the fly. Oh and it's a one to two count.
Speaker 7: All right, boy, am I impressive? What a play by me?
Speaker 2: Great job by that guy. So a few things. First
Speaker 2: of all, did you hear the team he mentioned? He
Speaker 2: said the Skeeters are the only other team. That's the
Speaker 2: sugar Lands Snaters. So yeah, so that's the We used
Speaker 2: to live just a few blocks from where they play.
Speaker 2: The Skeeters weren't in that highlight.
Speaker 4: That's where I learned how to drive.
Speaker 2: That is where you learned how to drive. That is
Speaker 2: absolutely right. Could I do that? Unfortunately, I must admit
Speaker 2: I've been in a position to do that when I
Speaker 2: used to cover the Royals where a foul ball came
Speaker 2: into the press box and I did not snag it.
Speaker 4: What I mean, did you touch it?
Speaker 2: I attempted to snag it and it went through my
Speaker 2: hand and.
Speaker 6: Hit the wall.
Speaker 2: Okay, so I know for a fact that I could
Speaker 2: not do that.
Speaker 4: Geez, for a fact. I mean that was one of one.
Speaker 4: You know, know if it if it come on, man,
Speaker 4: you gotta give it a little bit more.
Speaker 2: Not a great baseball player, not a great baseball I
Speaker 2: know I'm.
Speaker 3: A great catcher. I don't even think that's just I'm sorry.
Speaker 3: I'm not trying to grill you right now or anything,
Speaker 3: but you're saying you're not a great baseball player. It's
Speaker 3: not catching an item like it's a it's a baseball.
Speaker 3: I'm not a great baseball player, and I feel like
Speaker 3: I could definitely do that well with the mic on
Speaker 3: and everything.
Speaker 2: I don't know that you could. First of all, maybe
Speaker 2: you could. You have good coordination, You're a good athlete.
Speaker 2: Baseball is different, though, because I have great I'm a
Speaker 2: great catcher.
Speaker 4: Of a basketball.
Speaker 2: No, no, noka when it comes to football. But baseball's tough.
Speaker 2: They're hard, they're coming fast. You gotta track it. There's
Speaker 2: a little fear if you're not used to it. It's
Speaker 2: a little harder. We have during the pod a little
Speaker 2: breaking Kyrie Irving news. We'll do that to wrap up
Speaker 2: the show. Next What's Right? All right, welcome back in
Speaker 2: What's Right with Nick Wright. We have a little bit
Speaker 2: of breaking news. While recording the pod. Christian Winfield Demonse
Speaker 2: of the New York Daily News just wrote an article
Speaker 2: says Kyrie Irving has requested and received permission from the
Speaker 2: NETS to find sign and trade offers from other teams.
Speaker 2: Kevin Durant still hasn't spoken to the NETS front office.
Speaker 2: Russell Westbrook to Brooklyn remains unlikely. So this is where
Speaker 2: I'm really a master, and this is where we break
Speaker 2: out the old trade machine and we see what the
Speaker 2: possible teams are. So we're gonna go NBA trade machine,
Speaker 2: not the one that ESPN uses. There's a better one.
Speaker 2: Fan Spoe has it, and we see which trades can work.
Speaker 2: So let's start with Miami, which was on his list.
Speaker 2: Miami is flatly not trading Bam or Jimmy Butler. I
Speaker 2: guarantee you they're not trading either one of those guys
Speaker 2: for Kyrie. But what they could do is trade Kyle
Speaker 2: Lowry and they could include Tyler Hero. Kyle Lowry for
Speaker 2: Tyler and Tyler Hero for Kyrie Irving. Does that trade
Speaker 2: work against the cap? That trade works against the cap?
Speaker 2: That's a possibility, A nice little Oh yeah, absolutely, And
Speaker 2: we can adjust people's contracts and such. But that trade
Speaker 2: works Kyle Lowry and Tyler Hero, That one works. The
Speaker 2: next one that, to me, there's a real possibility of
Speaker 2: would be the Los Angeles Clippers. So they are not
Speaker 2: trading Kawhi or Paul George, but I'm sure they would
Speaker 2: trade Norman Powell. I'm sure they would trade Marcus Morris,
Speaker 2: and then you could probably get them to include Terrence Man,
Speaker 2: who's a young player and has some value. Those two players,
Speaker 2: they don't have any picks to include, though. Does that
Speaker 2: trade work? That trade works, Marcus Morris, Norman Powell and
Speaker 2: Terrence Man for Kyrie Irving, That trade works. Would the
Speaker 2: Nets do that? Maybe? Would the Clippers do that? I
Speaker 2: would say absolutely the Clippers would do that, and they
Speaker 2: would have a dynamic threesome in Kawhi, Paul George and Katie.
Speaker 2: I mean Kawhi, Paul George and Kyrie. Now the other
Speaker 2: teams that wrero on Kyrie's list, the Knicks could trade
Speaker 2: you picks and bad contracts. I don't know that they
Speaker 2: want that. The MAVs could They could the MAVs make
Speaker 2: it work, assuming let's say Jalen Brunson is gone. Could
Speaker 2: the MAVs, because they're you're not gonna do a Jalen
Speaker 2: Brunson sign in trade. They could send Dinwiddie back and
Speaker 2: din Witty and Burton's are Dinwitty in Hardaway. But I
Speaker 2: don't know that the MAVs want to get in the
Speaker 2: Kyrie business, to be honest, honestly, I know the Lakers
Speaker 2: would want to get involved. But the Lakers can't make
Speaker 2: a trade work unless a it's this massive trade that
Speaker 2: involves Anthony Davis, and then you also have to get
Speaker 2: Ben Simmons back, or if the Nets wanted Russell Westbrook,
Speaker 2: which I don't think they do, and so for the Lakers,
Speaker 2: sign in trade is very unlikely. The other question is,
Speaker 2: and I find this one interesting, is Kyrie willing to
Speaker 2: accept a contract from another team that is the same
Speaker 2: type of contract he turned down from the Nets, And
Speaker 2: I think the answer to that is yes. So by that,
Speaker 2: I mean Kyrie wanted the full max next NETS wouldn't
Speaker 2: give it to him. Say, the Nets offered him two
Speaker 2: years at max money with a team option for year
Speaker 2: three partially guaranteed year three, and Kyrie was offended by that,
Speaker 2: That doesn't necessarily mean he wouldn't accept that from another team,
Speaker 2: so that I'll use again different levels of negotiation, of course.
Speaker 2: But when I was leaving Kansas City radio wise, and
Speaker 2: I wasn't sure if I was gonna leave or not,
Speaker 2: I was wildly insulted by their initial contract offered to me.
Speaker 2: They then made another one. I still thought it was
Speaker 2: way out of whack. I then got the job offer
Speaker 2: in Houston. Houston offered me the exact same amount of
Speaker 2: money that Kansas City offered me at the end, and
Speaker 2: I happily took Houston's because I felt like Kansas City
Speaker 2: had taken me for granted and insulted me, even though
Speaker 2: it was the same amount of money and Houston was
Speaker 2: actually more expensive city. So I don't think every team
Speaker 2: that wants to sign and trade for Kyrie necessarily has
Speaker 2: to give him the same contract the Nets were going
Speaker 2: to give him. But I do think that the Lakers'
Speaker 2: only path is really that six million dollar mid level
Speaker 2: and it's a whole lot of money for Kyrie to
Speaker 2: leave on the table. Yeah, it's Kyrie, so it's possible,
Speaker 2: and I do think that's where he wants to go.
Speaker 2: And so seems like a lot of this is maneuvering
Speaker 2: to get back with Lebron and try to win a title.
Speaker 4: I'd love to see it.
Speaker 2: I think it'd be a great story. I think the
Speaker 2: Lakers would be awesome. I don't know if financially they
Speaker 2: could do it. They could have done it if they
Speaker 2: hadn't traded for us, But such as life. All right,
Speaker 2: there's today's show. We'll be back.
Speaker 4: Breaking news, Yeah, breaking news.
Speaker 3: Colorado Avalanche has won their first Stanley Cup in twenty
Speaker 3: one years. They get their name engraved on the Stanley Cup.
Speaker 3: Nathan had a great game. I don't remember his last name,
Speaker 3: but he scored two points. Okay, I just thought we'd
Speaker 3: bring hockey in here.
Speaker 2: Okay, it's not hockey, it's goals, goals.
Speaker 4: Sorry, is this.
Speaker 2: The thing you were supposed you supposedly knew more about
Speaker 2: than me.
Speaker 4: It's not supposedly I did.
Speaker 2: What did you know more than me?
Speaker 4: That Nathan scored two points?
Speaker 2: You don't even know is Nathan his first or last name?
Speaker 2: And there's no points.
Speaker 4: It's ghosts.
Speaker 2: Okay, don't listen to a new rule on the show. Guys,
Speaker 2: prep to Mom's a better if you're gonna ask him
Speaker 2: to talk hockey, that's first of all. Second of all,
Speaker 2: we're not talking Coloride. Congrats Colorado Avalanche. But until Patrick
Speaker 2: Waugh walks back through that door, it doesn't matter anything
Speaker 2: to me. We'll talk to you guys in a couple
Speaker 2: of days, as