WEBVTT - Gold Card Visas & Can AOC Be Prosecuted?

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Law with June Grosso from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.840
<v Speaker 2>It's not a green card, but a gold card that

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 2>gets you a green card, and the price is five

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:21.440
<v Speaker 2>million dollars. We're going to be selling a gold card.

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>You have a green card, this is a gold card.

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 2>We're going to be putting a price on that card

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 2>of about five million dollars and that's going to give

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 2>you Green card privileges.

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 3>Plus it's going to be a rap to citizenship.

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 2>It's a hefty price tag and replaces a current program

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 2>that offers US visas to investors who spend about one

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 2>million dollars on a company that employs at least ten people.

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:48.879
<v Speaker 2>The US wouldn't be the first country to offer so

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 2>called golden visas. Joining me is immigration law expertly on Fresco,

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 2>a partner at Holland and Knight. Leon tell us about

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 2>the program that's in place now.

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>There's a program called the EB five program that allows

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>people to basically use their wealth to obtain lawful permanent residency.

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>And it does it in one of two ways. Either

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you can invest in your own company that creates ten

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 1>American jobs, and you can invest one point eight million

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars into that company, and that will allow you to

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>get a green card, although that process takes about five

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>years to do that. Or you can invest in what's

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:31.320
<v Speaker 1>called a regional center, which is a previously approved project.

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>These projects get permission from the Immigration Service to actually

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>market themselves as pre approved projects, and there are things

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that have been used in the past, like Hudson Yards

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:45.479
<v Speaker 1>in the West End of New York or the Comcast

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Center in Philadelphia. And what happens is if you invest

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>right now used to be five hundred thousand, now it's

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred thousand dollars in those projects, then you get

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a share of the project and a share of the

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>job creation of that which is the ten jobs again

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>that are needed to create it, and you can obtain

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a green card. And so what President Trump is talking

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>about is, although unclear, either some sort of enhancement or

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>improvement or change to the program.

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 2>We don't know much about the specifics, like how he

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 2>intends to do this.

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:24.639
<v Speaker 1>So this is what's a bit unclear, and so there's

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of permutations and possibilities here. The first is

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that the EB five program is always, for whatever reason,

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>a program that expires and continues to need to be reauthorized.

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>So one simple message that President Trump may end up

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>delivering is, look, when this program expires again in twenty

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven, don't expect me to reauthorize it. I want

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to replace it with a new program. And the new

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>program will be rather than having this job creating investment

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 1>which doesn't actually accrue to the federal budget, I want

0:02:57.520 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the money to accrue to the federal budget. So I

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:02.519
<v Speaker 1>want you just to pay need five million dollars and

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't get that money back. It's not an investment,

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:08.679
<v Speaker 1>and we use it to pay down some sort of

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the federal deficit. So that's one option, and it's not

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 1>clear if that would just be a legislative replacement, and

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously if that's attempted, that's going to be something with

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>quite a lot of political pushback because there's a lot

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:26.639
<v Speaker 1>of people who have a lot of money in these

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>projects now. So that's one option. The second option may

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>be that he will decide to use the parole authority

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to say I have the ability to parole anyone I want.

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to parole people into the country who do

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>these five million dollar investments and then allow them to

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>get access to the EB five program. For instance, the

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Obama administration did this and the Biden administration did this

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>for something that was called an International Entrepreneur parole. So

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>they can create a new parole program that allows people

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to come in and who do whatever they want. So

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>in the Bison and in the Obama administration, it was

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>start a new company with a certain amount of venture

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>capital investment. Those people could come in on a parole.

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 1>And so President Trump can say, if you would do

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:16.359
<v Speaker 1>this five million dollar investment, I'm going to bring you

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>in on a parole. And what he can also do

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>conceivably is say, anybody who comes in with this parole

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 1>meets the requirements of the existing ED five statutes such

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that they can then adjust their status to lawful permanent residence.

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Now that will be subject to a law suit, the

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>huge one.

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 3>But he could try that.

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>But what he can't do is create new green cards

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>out of whole cloth. That he cannot do. He would

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>have to try to sneak them in under the existing category.

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 2>How many wealthy individuals are there around the world will

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:55.279
<v Speaker 2>pay five million dollars to get the pathway to citizenship.

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, here's what's very interesting about this. So the five

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.840
<v Speaker 1>million dollar mark is very very high. I don't know

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>how high the demand will be for that at all.

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>The annual cap at the moment is ten thousand green

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>cards per year, and that cap is actually met and

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>is oversubscribed because what happens is it's only one investment

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:17.679
<v Speaker 1>that's needed, so it's one eight hundred thousand dollars investment

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that's needed, and then you can bring your spouse and

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>your children, and each person counts toward the ten thousand cap,

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>so they fill the cap quite quickly. But at five million,

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I actually don't think that this number is realistic from

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the standpoint of how many people you would get to invest.

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it would end up being a very small number.

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>And then here's the second thing, and this is sort

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>of a tough conversation to have on immigration, but I

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 1>think a truthful one, unfortunately, is when the President says, well,

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 1>companies can use this money as an award to give

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 1>people green cards to are employees. That's unfortunately not the

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 1>history of the use of immigration employment visas it We're

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:04.600
<v Speaker 1>being honest. Typically, the companies want the visas in order

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to be able to control the employee and not allow

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 1>them to have free agency. Which is what happens when

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>they get a green card. So the idea that a

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>company will pay five million dollars to allow employees to

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:20.479
<v Speaker 1>have free agency that they can lead whenever they want

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and work for a different company or start their own

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>competitor company, it's not going to be realistic with what

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in the immigration laws. Typically, a lot of companies,

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>even to this day, they say, oh, we need more

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>H to one V visas. They don't say we need

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>more green cards, because green cards means that that helps

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the worker and the worker gets to go wherever they want.

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 1>And what the companies want, to believe it or not,

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>are the visas that actually tether them to the companies.

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>And so if we're being realistic about it, I do

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>not see this five million dollar program ending up being

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a high demand program.

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Congress extended the EB five program until twenty twenty seven.

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 2>So would no wealthy foreigner prefer to invest under that

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 2>program rather than pay under the new golden visa?

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, why would anyone pay five million when they can

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>currently pay eight hundred thousand. And that's where he will

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>have to figure out, Okay, what am I going to

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>do to disincentivize the eight hundred thousand part of this program.

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 3>Am I going to wait till.

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Twenty twenty seven and just when it expires not reauthorize it,

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>meaning you will have to use my five million dollar programs?

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Or is he going to use the Tribal band Statute

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>which allows him to ban any non citizens, so even

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the green card or whatever. He can ban anything from

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>coming into the United States, And so he may say,

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're outside the United States and you're trying to

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>do this application process from abroad, I'm not going to

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>let you do it now. That ban won't work for

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 1>people who are already here, but the ban would work

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>for people waiting for abroad. I mean, there will be

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>litigation over that.

0:07:56.720 --> 0:08:00.080
<v Speaker 3>So he's either going to have to get.

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Congress to change it when the program expires in twenty

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven, or try to force Congress's hand to change

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>it now by using the ban authority in order to

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>do that.

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 2>There are golden visa programs in other countries, and some

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 2>countries have discontinued them, like Spain, because having these programs

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 2>drove up home prices.

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 3>Is that possibility, Well, here's the thing, So the answer

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 3>to that question is yes, Ridge Foreign investors can increase.

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:34.679
<v Speaker 1>The cost of housing. But the truth is that's already

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>happened in the United States, meaning that ship has already sailed.

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:40.559
<v Speaker 1>If you go to Miami, that's happened with a large

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>amount of foreign investors from Latin America. And if you

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:46.079
<v Speaker 1>go on the West Coast, you've seen that with a

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>large number of foreign investors from Asia. And so from

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>that standpoint, that's not something that's not happening. That's already happened,

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and so I don't think this program would be likely

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to increase that any further. If you are a wealthy

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>person from abroad, you already have many options to live

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. You can do the EB five visa.

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>You can do it's called an E too investment visa,

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>which is where you come and you start a company

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and you invest in the United States and a company.

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Now that's not a green card, but it allows you

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to live here in the United States. You can actually

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>transfer yourself from a company you have abroad to a

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>new company you're going to start here in America, or

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a company that's already here. There actually are a lot

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>of options already, and so from that standpoint, any person

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>with money who wants to live in the United States

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:38.319
<v Speaker 1>can do that already, and so I don't think this

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>fills a market need from that standpoint. But more importantly

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to your question, I don't think it adds a single

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>person who's buying a house who wasn't already buying a

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 1>house in the United States.

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 2>As we've discussed many times, Trump promised this historic mass

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 2>deportation of millions of immigrants and we haven't seen that.

0:09:58.760 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I think you have to look at from a global

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>assessment of what was possible, the pipeline of people who

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 1>were eligible to be deported was very low in terms

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>of what the Biden administration had left over by the

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:15.079
<v Speaker 1>time that President Trump was inaugurated.

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 3>So from picking up from that.

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Low pipeline, they are increasing the pipeline of people that

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>are being placed into removal proceedings. Now. In terms of

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>actual removals outside the United States, that's going to be

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>difficult because the only people they can remove right now

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>are people either with final orders of removal who already

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 1>had these final orders pending, or people who are such

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>criminals that you can get them into court quickly, and

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 1>there isn't a way for them to actually be eligible

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to be saved so that you can remove them very quickly.

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:55.319
<v Speaker 1>So what we've seen is a significant number of sort

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of media related viewings of people being picked up and

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 1>moved abroad. But those numbers are not at the moment

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 1>appreciably bigger than anything that was in for sure the

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Obama administration, but even sometimes during the Bide administration. Is

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 1>it a higher focus, yes, higher intensity yes, And will

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>it eventually yield more numbers, yes, But the problem is

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 1>really to yield more numbers, you're going to have to

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>take people through the immigration court system unless some of

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>these other changes we're talking about are allowed to happen.

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>But trying to take them through the immigration court system

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>becomes very, very complicated because you have millions of cases

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:38.199
<v Speaker 1>in the backlog, you have cases being scheduled right now

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>to twenty twenty nine, twenty thirty, and as you remove

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>some of these legal statuses that people have, their next

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>move is going to be to apply for asylum, which

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>is only going to add to the number of cases

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>in that system.

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Coming up next, can AOC be prosecuted for hosting on

0:11:54.880 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Know Your Rights seminar on immigration? This is bloomberg. We

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 2>haven't seen the mass deportations of millions of immigrants that

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 2>President Donald Trump campaigned on. So the Trump administration is

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 2>now going to try fast track deportations of hundreds of

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 2>thousands of migrants. I've been talking to immigration law expertly

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 2>on Fresco, a partner at Holland and Knight, Leon tell

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:21.559
<v Speaker 2>Us about expedited removal.

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 1>So here's what happened. So expedited removal has a bunch

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of different applications in a bunch of different contexts. So

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>what it normally is for is you show up at

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the border with no status of any kind, or you

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>show up at the airport somehow you've manage to sneak

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:40.839
<v Speaker 1>on a plane with no status of any kind. And

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>so what we can do under the Expedited Removal Statute,

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>which was passed in nineteen ninety six, is to say

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>we don't need to take you through a fancy immigration

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>court process. We can literally send you back immediately unless

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you claim that you're eligible for asylum, in which case

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>we have to determine if you have a credible fear

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and if you do that, and we have to put

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>you in that asylum process. So then that clows it down.

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>So here's the thing. That's how we've always applied it.

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>But the statue theoretically allows it to be applied for

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>people who've been here less than two years. Now what

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>gets icy is if you do it for people who

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>snuck across the border, you start getting into this debate

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>about how long they were here, and that becomes messy.

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 1>But it isn't the case for the people that the

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration paroled into the United States. So, if you

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>may recall, the Biden administration did this think called the

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>CCH and Z Parole, the Cuban, Haitian, Nicaragua and Venezuelan Parole,

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>where it was letting in during the last two years

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Biden administration thirty thousand people per month from

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>these countries under the idea that if we let people

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>in legally, then they won't come illegally through the border,

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>they'll just wait and come legally. Well, we know the

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>exact date those people entered the United States, and so.

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:58.079
<v Speaker 3>The idea would be anybody who.

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Entered with one of those paroles will be unparoled, because

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>parole is actually a status that can be revoked at

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>any second and give in an expedited removal order. So

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be the idea that the Trump administration

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 1>says it's going to pursue. So I will try to

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>take all of these people, so the thirty thousand times twelve,

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>which is four hundred and twenty thousand, and then maybe

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe a little more than that, and revoke

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>their paroles and try to get them out. Now, what

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>will actually happen in practice, Well, for the Cubans, it's

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be very difficult to get them out because

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>there's this thing called the Cuban Adjustment Act, which says

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 1>once they've been here for a year, they're eligible for

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>a green card. And so if they've been here longer

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>than a year, you're not going to be able to

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>solve that problem. And even if they've been here less

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>than a year, then you're still going to have to

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 1>try to figure out where you send those people to.

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>And if nobody accepts them and Cuba doesn't accept them,

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and they get to stay here for a year, then

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>once they hit that year number, they're eligible for the

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 1>green card again. So that doesn't solve that problem. For

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the Nicaraguans and the Venezuelans, probably a large number of

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>them will apply for asylum and so then they will

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>be stuck in that large millions of cases backlog that's

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>an immigration cord. And for the Haitians, even though they

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>may not be eligible for asylum in many cases, they

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>still probably apply. And I don't know how many you'll

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>be able to get out in expedited removal. So really

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>what ends up happening is, yes, you'll be able to

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>get some number out who aren't sophisticated enough to then

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>take this next step that I talked to you about.

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 1>But for the people who are sophisticated enough to take

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the next step, what you really end up doing is

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you end up transferring them from a status where they

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>were here on a parole now to a status where

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to seek asylum in the immigration cord. And

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>now they're just adding two hundreds of thousands of more

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>cases to millions of backlog cord. And so that puts

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>strain on any new people you're going to try to

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>put into the removal process.

0:15:57.400 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 2>If Cubans can get a green card if they're here

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 2>for a year, then that Binden program allowing a certain

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 2>number of Cubans in legally basically meant that he was

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 2>giving them a green card.

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Yes, there was this thing called the wet foot dry

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>foot policy in the past that got taken away. But

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the point of that policy was as long as you

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>were parolled or admitted into the United States under the

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Cuban Adjustment active, you then one year from that date

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 1>that you were parolled or admitted you could actually get

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>a green card. So because these Cubans didn't sneak in,

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 1>but were actually parolled into the United States, they were

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>allowed to then start that one year clock. So a

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>large number of these Cubans will have reached the one

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>year clock at some point and that will allow them

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>to apply for a green card. And there's nothing that

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration would be able to do about that because.

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 3>If they try to put them in deportation.

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Proceedings, they would obtain the green card in the deportation

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>proceedings unless they're somehow not eligible, which only happens if

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you are a criminal or if you are known communists.

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 2>So now the Haitians and the Venezuelans just filed a lawsuit.

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 2>They're suing the choice.

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 1>They'll end up just applying for asylum. Correct. They have

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>no other choice because their temporary protective status has been removed,

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and litigation that's just been filed on that front trying

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to challenge the removal of the temporary protected status, saying, look,

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>when under the statue you give it for eighteen months,

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>you can't revoke it at that point. And I think

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be a very powerful argument. I will

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:32.719
<v Speaker 1>have to see what the courts say, but I do

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:35.719
<v Speaker 1>think it's a very powerful argument to say the eighteen

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:38.719
<v Speaker 1>months has to be honored at that point and you

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:41.200
<v Speaker 1>can't remove it. And then they make the same arguments

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that were made during the first Trump administration, which was,

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>in addition, there's an equal protection violation because there was

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>racial animates that played a role in removing the temporary

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 1>protective status, and that one will have to wait and see.

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:56.880
<v Speaker 1>The Ninth Circuit agreed with that argument in the first

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration, so we'll have to see in the second

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration what the courts will say about.

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 2>That work and how many years? Again is the backlog

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 2>for asylum cases?

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Wow, I mean there's cases right now. If you get

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 1>your case right now in a lot of the immigration

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 1>courts in America and you're not in detention, you will

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>have your asylum hearing in twenty thirty, twenty thirty one

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:20.880
<v Speaker 1>right now. And the big problem is, by the way,

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:22.880
<v Speaker 1>on that yeah, I mean, I mean, I have a

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>client that just came to me the other day. They

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 1>filed their asylum case in twenty ten, and now it's

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:31.679
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five. The whole world is completely different.

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:36.880
<v Speaker 2>Now. Another thing that Trump administration is trying is requiring

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:39.680
<v Speaker 2>all immigrants to register. Tell us about that.

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 1>Well, So the registration requirement is as follows. It's the

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:45.880
<v Speaker 1>law that actually was created in the nineteen forties during

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the World War Two, and it said we wanted people

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>to be able to register with the federal government so

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that we know who was who, we were able to

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>keep track of people. But that law has sort of

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>faded into oblivion and hasn't been used because it's been

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:02.639
<v Speaker 1>difficult to administer there. But the idea is, if you

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't originally check in with a visa and fingerprints and

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>everything else, meaning you unlawfully cross the border. Now the

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:11.919
<v Speaker 1>idea is you're going to have to register so that

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:15.919
<v Speaker 1>we can get some understanding of who's here legally or not.

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>And then if you fail to register, you can actually

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>be subject to criminal prosecution for failure to register or

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have your documents with you, you can

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:28.360
<v Speaker 1>be subject to criminal prosecution for failure to have your

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>documents with you. And so the idea of behind that

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>is twofold number one. If you can arrest people for

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:40.440
<v Speaker 1>doing that, that certainly creates a bigger sort of deterrence

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:43.199
<v Speaker 1>factor which tells people, look, you don't want to be

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:46.399
<v Speaker 1>here if you're here unlawfully, because you're subject to arrest

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 1>at any time. So that adds tension. But secondly, and

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 1>more importantly, what it does is it creates a rhetoric

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 1>where you know, many times people are having this debate,

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:02.160
<v Speaker 1>are you here elite? Does that mean you're a criminal

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 1>or not? Well, if you actually create this registration requirement

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and people failed to register, then you can rhetorically call

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>people criminals and you're not in the wrong anymore because

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 1>you're allowed to say every one of these people who

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't register is a criminal.

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about borders. Are Tom Homan and New York

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Democratic Representative Alexandria Ocasio Cortes. So Holman has been making

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:32.640
<v Speaker 2>veiled threats, I'd say because aoc held Unno Your Rights

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 2>seminar for Immigrants is there anything wrong with her doing that.

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 1>So here's the complication. You may recall we spoke a

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>year ago about a Supreme Court case that actually dealt

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 1>with this inducing statue where there was this lawyer who

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 1>had this kakameni scheme to defraud people in order to

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 1>get them to stay into the United States. He said, look,

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>if you painting this money, I can file this crazy

0:20:56.760 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 1>application and you can stay. And he got prosecuted under

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the statue which says it's illegal to induce people who

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 1>are here without status to either remain or to enter

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the United States. And the Ninth Circuit I actually declared

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:14.439
<v Speaker 1>that statute unconstitutional as vague, and the Supreme Court was

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>actually having arguments about this, saying, what if you just

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>ask your grandmother, Hey, grandma, please don't leave the country.

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 3>I love you.

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:24.159
<v Speaker 1>Stay. You know you're a US citizen because you were

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:27.159
<v Speaker 1>born here, but you have this undocumented grandma, and you

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 1>say that, could this be a prosecution? And the DOJ

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:32.919
<v Speaker 1>at that time under the Biden administration said well, we

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 1>would never prosecute anyone under this. Don't invalidate the whole

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 1>statute for that. Because this case of the lawyer who

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>has this Kakamane scheme doesn't fit what you're talking about,

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 1>so we'll wait till that case later. So now this

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Tom Home and AOC situation, we're right back here again,

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 1>which is what does it mean to induce someone without

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>status to remain in the United States? And if you're

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:03.679
<v Speaker 1>doing and know your Rights presentation, knowing that the people

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>are undocumented, are you still inducing them to stay in

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the United States with your advice? And so you would say, well,

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 1>I have First Amendment rights to tell people what their

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 1>rights are, and there's certainly some truth to that, but

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 1>this statute, if somebody actually gets prosecuted under this statute,

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>it's going to need some scrutiny from the courts to

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>decide what is permitted or not because the broad language

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 1>of the statue, as just the sort of Mayor was

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 1>saying during the oral argument, certainly allows this, which is,

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you know you're a US citizen, you have to undocument

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the grandma, you say stay, please stay. That's enough to

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:44.360
<v Speaker 1>apparently induce someone to stay illegally knowing that they're illegal.

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.400
<v Speaker 1>And so if you're giving a know your Rights presentation

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to people who you know are undocumented, you would be

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>doing potentially the same thing. And so that's where this

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>gets dangerous. I'm not saying people shouldn't do this, but

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the statute is so broad, both with regard to inducement

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and also with regard to harboring, which just says any

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 1>act that you take that allows a person to be

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 1>evaded from detection from the immigration authorities knowing that the

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 1>person is undocumented, is considered harboring. And so the question

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 1>is what do you do with these two statutes because

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 1>they're so broad that if they're not actually prosecuted for

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the people that this was meant to prosecute, meeting the

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:32.879
<v Speaker 1>people who do the safe houses, the traffickers, the smugglers,

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing, and you start applying it to

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 1>these broader contexts, that's where the courts are going to

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 1>start getting involved in having to decide if this statute

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 1>is unconstitutionally vague.

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 2>So, I mean, she's speaking as an elected official, so

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 2>it's also within the speech and debate clause, right.

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.679
<v Speaker 1>Correct, There's all of these different defenses that one can

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 1>put speech in debate clause, legislative immunity. In addition to that,

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the statute is vague to First Amendment, so she would

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously be the hardest target to try to prosecute, as

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 1>opposed to someone who is, you know, again a lawyer

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>with a kakamane scheme that's the easiest target, or someone

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>with a safe house or a trafficker. But in terms

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 1>of the broadest language of the statute, one could say

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that the elements of the criminal offense of inducement are harboring,

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 1>could even be violated by someone who's doing to know

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>your Rights presentation to people that they know are undocumented

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and they're telling them how to toward an ICE investigation.

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>And so this is where this gets very challenging for

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>people in the legal community, for people outside the legal community,

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 1>where it's even more challenging because at least as a lawyer,

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to give legal advice, But what if you're

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:50.640
<v Speaker 1>just someone who works at a nonprofit that helps immigrants.

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>And so we'll have to see if the Trump administration

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>tries to use this statute in a broad way moving forward.

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:00.400
<v Speaker 2>So do you think Holman is making these He's made

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:03.399
<v Speaker 2>these remarks several times. You think he's doing it just

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:07.920
<v Speaker 2>to sort of scare people into not taking any action

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 2>to help immigrants.

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the problem is that ICE has very limited

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 1>enforcement authorities that rely predominantly on administrative warrants, not judicial wars,

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:22.400
<v Speaker 1>because judicial wars are very time consuming and very hard

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to get and trying to get them in millions of

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 1>cases is impossible. So they have to use administrative warrants.

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 1>And the problem with administrative warrants is they're rarely enforceable,

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>so they require volunteers to let you into their houses

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>or to let you into their schools or wherever. And

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 1>so if everybody's given to Know your Rights presentation that

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 1>says there's an administrative warrant, don't honor it, then that

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 1>does forward ninety percent of what ICE is trying to accomplish.

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 1>And so this is what gets frustrating to someone in

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Tom Holman's position.

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 2>So many interesting lawsuits on the horizon. Thanks so much,

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 2>leon Asa. That's Leon Fresco of Honda Night. Coming up

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 2>next on The Bloomberg Law Show. The Netflix show Running

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:10.639
<v Speaker 2>Point had to go through some legal hoops before it

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:14.959
<v Speaker 2>started streaming. I'm June Grosso and you're listening to Bloomberg.

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Law with June Grosso from Bloomberg Radio.

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 2>Work in a family business, The greatest basketball franchise in

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 2>the history of the game, The Los Angeles Waves, the

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 2>new Netflix show Running Point, had to go through some

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:39.159
<v Speaker 2>legal hoops before it started streaming. Pepper Down University sued

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 2>to stop the show from airing over trademark infringement claims,

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 2>alleging that the fictional Los Angeles Waves professional basketball team

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 2>in the show uses the university's orange and blue colors

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:55.479
<v Speaker 2>as well as its school's nickname, but a judge denied

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 2>the motion for a temporary restraining order, saying the university's

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 2>request fell short. Joining me is intellectual property attorney Jonathan Hyman,

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 2>a partner Bob Martin's, tell us what Pepperdine was complaining about.

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:12.439
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the case is a pretty interesting one. So it

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:17.160
<v Speaker 4>revolves around Netflix's new show called Running Point, in which

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 4>there's a fictional team name called the Los Angeles Waves

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 4>that's the professional team. The show is actually based loosely

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 4>on one of the producers, Genie Buss's life and her

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:31.400
<v Speaker 4>experience in running to La Lakers, and Pepperdine's main complaint

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:35.400
<v Speaker 4>is that the team name is Waves and that Pepperdine's

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:39.160
<v Speaker 4>thoughts are that everyone would associate the team name Waves

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:42.120
<v Speaker 4>with Pepperdine and that anyone seeing the show would think

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 4>it's about Pepperdine, and the show is an adult show

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:48.920
<v Speaker 4>and it has some content that Pepperdine didn't want to

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 4>be associated with. They kept referencing it as being a

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:56.160
<v Speaker 4>raunchy comedy that's ante ethical to its two Pepperdine Christian values,

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 4>and even in oral argument in the case, Pepperdine had

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 4>raised that it has an anti drug policy and anti

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 4>alcohol policy and they just didn't want to be associated

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 4>with that show. And those are real concerns for brands.

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 4>You know, brands want to be able to control how

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 4>people perceive their brand and not be associated with anything

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 4>that's on savory. But the issue is whether anyone would

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 4>really associate the Waves with Peppernine. And before you could

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:26.920
<v Speaker 4>even get to that issue, the courts in these types

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 4>of issues of using a trademark and expressive work will

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 4>apply to Rogers tests and that's kind of where the

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 4>decision and Pepperdine's arguments kind of got sidetracked.

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 2>It's more than just the name, right, it's also the

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 2>orange and blue collars and other things.

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 4>Correct. Yes, the case Pepperdine complain was not just about

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 4>the name the team named the Waves. They were also

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 4>complaining about the use of the orange and blue uniforms,

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 4>the fact that the logos looked similar, that the mascot

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 4>for Pepperdine is a blue Wave or humanized version of

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 4>a blue Wave. And the other issue was that in

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 4>some of the backgrounds of the scenes, there are jerseys

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 4>in the fictional NBA team's offices, and one of the

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 4>jersey numbers was number thirty seven, and that's the jersey

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 4>that the mascot for Pepperdine wears. So Pepperdine has obviously

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 4>a heightened sensitivity to what is being shown in the show,

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 4>and it seems to be Pepperdine's argument is very nefarious

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 4>and was intentionally done to trade and associate with Pepperdine.

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 4>But Netflix had testimony from its executives and Warner Brothers

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 4>executives that any similarity was unintentional and that the team

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 4>colors orange and blue were chosen because orange is the

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 4>color of basketball and blue is the color of Waves,

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 4>and the team name The Waves was associated with They

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 4>wanted something to associate the fictional NBA team with Los Angeles,

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:56.720
<v Speaker 4>and they were right by the ocean and so it

0:29:56.760 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 4>was natural for what Warner Brothers argued was as natural

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 4>of choose the team name Waves.

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 2>In a trademark infringement case, does it matter what the

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 2>intention of Netflix was. Suppose it was accidental.

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 4>Right under the Rogers test, it has to have some

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 4>artistic relevance to There's two factors in the Rogers test,

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:19.239
<v Speaker 4>and the first factor is that it has to have

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 4>some artistic relevance to the work, And the second factor

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 4>is that the use is not explicitly misleading as the

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 4>source or the content of the work. And normally in

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 4>some of these cases you're dealing with taking the brand

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 4>itself and putting it in or using as a reference

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 4>in the movie itself to the plane of s brand. Here,

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 4>the mark that issue was a fictional team name within

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 4>the show. But Netflix and Warner Brothers argue that that's

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 4>artistically relevant to the show because they were trying to

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 4>make it a NBA team based in Los Angeles that

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 4>had to associate with Team names are always usually associated

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 4>with the locations where they're located, and so like the

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 4>Miami Heat for example. And so the argument again is

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 4>that from Pepperdize perspective, is that it called to mind

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 4>their teammate. But under the Rogers test, if it has

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 4>artistic relevance, well then you get to the whether it's

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 4>explicitly misleading. And basically what Netflix is arguing was that

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 4>it's an arbitrary use of waste and I'm mixing trademark metaphors.

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 4>But it had nothing to do with Pepperdine. And even

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 4>if it did have something to do with Pepperdine, if

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 4>the show was about Pepperdine, well then there'd be no

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 4>issue either. So the first gateway for Netflix was to

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 4>put this case into Rogers And even if the court

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 4>decided that Rogers didn't apply, then you would then go

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 4>into the likely confusion factors, which is under the Ninth

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:49.480
<v Speaker 4>Circuit flee Craft factors, and that would even be tough

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 4>for Pepperdine to show that it prevails under that construct.

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 2>This was for a tro a temporary restraining order, So

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 2>did the judge consider both factors of the Rogers test.

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 4>The judge found that that Pepperdine was unlikely to succeed

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 4>on the merits of its claim under the Rogers test.

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 4>The judge found that the waves mark had artistic relevance

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 4>to the work and it was not explicitly misleading as well.

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 4>The court denied the TRO because of this kind of

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 4>use squarely fits within the Rogers test.

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 2>So this was for a TRO. The standard is high

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 2>for a TRO, and Pepperdine says they're going to continue

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 2>the lawsuit. What are their chances going forward?

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 4>Standard for a TRO. It's an extraordinary remedy, especially in

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 4>this context where the suit was filed days and then

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 4>the judge's decision was within hours of when the show

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:46.600
<v Speaker 4>was supposed to air. And the problem for Pepperdine is

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 4>that the standard for preliminary injunction is the same as

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 4>the TRO in the Ninth Circuit, and even the judge

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 4>noted that, and she ended her order saying Pepperdine may

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 4>file It's a regularly noticed motion for preliminary junction if

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:00.239
<v Speaker 4>it has evidence to do so. And so I think

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 4>Judgment of Venezuela was tipping her hand and saying Pepperdine

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 4>needs to come in with something more than what it

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:09.200
<v Speaker 4>had to TRO, some kind of evidence. But that still

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 4>is also problematic for Pepperdine because the Rogers test would

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 4>still apply. And so even if you get to an

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 4>evidentiary standpoint where Pepperdine is coming in with maybe a survey.

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 4>It still has to show that the Rogers test doesn't apply,

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 4>and then would need to show that under the LIKELHO

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 4>too confusion factors that it can prevail on the trade

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 4>more infringement plane, and there could be some discovery and

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 4>maybe this case would change. It seems unlikely, but maybe

0:33:36.120 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 4>there would be some discovery and there could be documents

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 4>from Netflix that show an intention to trade on Pepperdine.

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm saying it seems unlikely because of the testimony so

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 4>far was that Waves was almost an arbitrary use and

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 4>it was selected because of what the association with Los

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 4>Angeles as opposed to the association with Pepperdine.

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 2>If they don't get the preliminary injunction, what about suing

0:33:56.280 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Netflix for damages.

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:01.479
<v Speaker 4>Right, and that would be that would then still have

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 4>to They would still have to get through the Rogers

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 4>deaths and show that this wasn't an expressive work or

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 4>that they explicitly misled viewers to thinking there was a

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:17.759
<v Speaker 4>connection there and or association. And if they it still

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:20.719
<v Speaker 4>seems that this case won't get out of what we'll

0:34:20.760 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 4>say Rogers lands that they're still squarely within Rogers. But

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:26.799
<v Speaker 4>then even if they can survive that and get to

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 4>a likely confusion analysis, I think they've still got problems

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:33.840
<v Speaker 4>with their case. One of the issues is while Pepperdine

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:36.319
<v Speaker 4>has federal registrations and they're given a presumption that they're

0:34:36.360 --> 0:34:40.719
<v Speaker 4>valid and protectable, the question is how strong is the

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 4>Pepperdine wave mark and whether consumers really associate wave would

0:34:45.480 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 4>just Pepperdine. There are a number of Netflix and Warner Bros.

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:51.279
<v Speaker 4>That show, there's a number of teams in California, and

0:34:51.320 --> 0:34:55.799
<v Speaker 4>there's also teams nationwide like Tulane Green Waves that use

0:34:55.840 --> 0:35:00.040
<v Speaker 4>waves and any third party use or other school A

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 4>team names they use waves couldn't limit the ability for

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 4>Pepperdine to succeed on a likely confusion analysis.

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for being on the show. That's Jonathan Hymen of

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Knob Martin's and that's it for this edition of The

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Law Show. Remember you can always get the latest

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 2>legal news on our Bloomberg Law Podcast. You can find

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 2>them on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and at www dot Bloomberg

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 2>dot com, Slash podcast Slash Law, and remember to tune

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:32.840
<v Speaker 2>into The Bloomberg Law Show every weeknight at ten pm

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street Time. I'm June Grosso and you're listening to

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg