Speaker 1: Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George
Speaker 1: Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.
Speaker 2: Arm Strong and Getty, I know he Armstrong and Yetty.
Speaker 3: Yes, you're going to find some people who were gained
Speaker 3: from individual tariffs. The overall effect could be massive.
Speaker 2: I agree.
Speaker 4: I agree, it's going to have a massive effect, positive effect.
Speaker 2: It's going to be a positive, not a negative.
Speaker 4: But let me just no, no, let me tell you
Speaker 4: committed you unto this, and it must be hard for
Speaker 4: you to spend twenty five years talking about tariffs has
Speaker 4: been negative and then have somebody explained to you that
Speaker 4: you're totally wrong.
Speaker 5: So that's Trump doing the interview with the Bloomberg people
Speaker 5: yesterday explaining why they're wrong about what has been the
Speaker 5: traditional conservative angle on tariffs and how it's going to
Speaker 5: be good for the American conomy and the people. And
Speaker 5: one of your billionaires came out for it yesterday and said,
Speaker 5: Trump's right about this. He's a outlier and outlier, but
Speaker 5: there you are on that. And I don't think there's
Speaker 5: hardly a person in America voting on this issue.
Speaker 2: I would agree.
Speaker 1: Completely, and the most of the commentators on this topic
Speaker 1: have vast amounts of money at stake, and so they
Speaker 1: make arguments that sound like their good faith arguments all
Speaker 1: about the health and well being of the American people,
Speaker 1: but it's difficult to trust their motives.
Speaker 2: Wow sides.
Speaker 5: One more Donald Trump with Bloomberg yesterday. So Trump did
Speaker 5: his Bloomberg interview yesterday, which was, you know, pushed him
Speaker 5: on several issues. And then Kamala Harris is doing her
Speaker 5: Fox Brett Baerry interview, which we got more on in
Speaker 5: a little bit right up to this. But here's some
Speaker 5: more Trump yesterday. I asked he always gets asked about
Speaker 5: January sixth.
Speaker 2: Of course, we're going to bring the companies back.
Speaker 6: We're going to lower taxes still further for companies that
Speaker 6: are going to make their product in the USA. We're
Speaker 6: going to protect those companies with strong tariffs. Because I'm
Speaker 6: a believer in tariff's I'm not sure that you are.
Speaker 6: I don't think you are, but I congratulate you in
Speaker 6: your career. But to me, the most beautiful word in
Speaker 6: the dictionary is tariff, and it's my favorite word. It
Speaker 6: needs public relations firm.
Speaker 2: Okay, you can stop this, that's the wrong clip.
Speaker 5: So do we know which one is fifty three where
Speaker 5: he's asked about this, because I thought it was actually
Speaker 5: pretty good about the whole will there be a peaceful
Speaker 5: transfer firm.
Speaker 2: Before we jump into that.
Speaker 1: I actually wanted to comment on that last clip because
Speaker 1: Trump is able to defend his policies, and for all
Speaker 1: of his bluster and arrogance and name calling in the
Speaker 1: rest of it, that was very gentlemanly, very capable. You know,
Speaker 1: we disagree, blah blah blah. How was adults talking. I
Speaker 1: never get that feeling from Kamala Harris.
Speaker 5: Trump could have said, I come from an upper class family.
Speaker 5: Here's Trump being asked about will there be a peaceful
Speaker 5: transfer of power?
Speaker 3: Will you commit now to respecting and encouraging a peaceful
Speaker 3: transfer of power?
Speaker 6: Well, you had a peaceful transfer of power.
Speaker 2: You had a peaceful transfer power. You had a peaceful
Speaker 2: you always had. You had a.
Speaker 3: Peaceful transfer of power compared with Venezuela. But it was
Speaker 3: by far the most the worst transfer of power for
Speaker 3: a long time.
Speaker 6: The primary scene in Washington was hundreds of thousands, the
Speaker 6: largest group of people I've ever spoken before, and I've
Speaker 6: spoken before, and it was love and peace and some
Speaker 6: people went to the Capitol and a lot of strange
Speaker 6: things happened there, a lot of strange things with people
Speaker 6: being waved into the Capitol by police, with people screaming,
Speaker 6: going with it. That never got into trouble. You know,
Speaker 6: I don't want to mention names, but you know who
Speaker 6: they are, a lot of strange things happened, but you
Speaker 6: had a peaceful, very peaceful I left. I left the
Speaker 6: morning that I was supposed to leave. I went to Florida,
Speaker 6: and you had a very okay.
Speaker 5: So that doesn't include what I was thinking was. He
Speaker 5: goes on about how the Democrats have not agreed with
Speaker 5: the last several elections that Republicans won and challenged them
Speaker 5: and many of them didn't vote for it. Now, that's
Speaker 5: nowhere near storming the Capitol and beating cops with six obviously,
Speaker 5: but that never gets pointed out that the Democrats haven't
Speaker 5: accepted the last close elections the Republicans won either. Yeah,
Speaker 5: and I just I think that's a point that ought
Speaker 5: to be made to the point of shackling the first
Speaker 5: several years of the Trump presidency with the Russia collusion
Speaker 5: hoax and all of the hearings and investigations and constant headlines.
Speaker 1: You know that there's been so much dishonest reporting. And
Speaker 1: it's worth noting that Trump needs to finish his freaking sentences.
Speaker 2: That's half the controversies.
Speaker 1: Start because you won't finish his sentence, and so the
Speaker 1: lefty media can run wild with the interpreting what he says.
Speaker 1: But I was I gonna say, oh, the you know,
Speaker 1: when he was talking about the enemies of the people
Speaker 1: and using the military and the National Guard as usually,
Speaker 1: it was just a bunch of half thoughts strung together,
Speaker 1: and I know what he was trying to say, but
Speaker 1: he would do himself so many favors just finishing sentences.
Speaker 2: Used all the words. It was a peaceful it was
Speaker 2: there was peace. It was piece.
Speaker 1: We had a peaceful Oh you know what, I got
Speaker 1: one more gripe about the media, the Wall Street Joy one.
Speaker 2: I have many.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, no kidding, But right now this article gender
Speaker 1: gap is defining feature of deadlocked race. Okay, you know
Speaker 1: the women are swinging toward Harris by a number of
Speaker 1: points and the men toward Trump.
Speaker 2: I think a lot of people already.
Speaker 1: Know that, but in this Wall Street Journal article, I
Speaker 1: want to quote this exactly as they're explaining why Trump
Speaker 1: can be a turnoff for women. It's because Trump says
Speaker 1: nasty things like promising, Oh here it is Trump, who
Speaker 1: was long prized tough guy talk, has projected a masculine
Speaker 1: persona speaking about fighting enemies and suggesting that a bloodbath.
Speaker 2: Would ensue if he loses the Wall Street Journal.
Speaker 1: That's incredible, enshrining that that utterly dishonest myth.
Speaker 2: That is freaking incredible. God dang it.
Speaker 5: And I'm sure we'll play the clip later. Kamala going
Speaker 5: on about misinformation and disinformation. I agree with you, we
Speaker 5: need to make a national law. Let's just call it
Speaker 5: one thing or the same thing. Yeah, but talking about
Speaker 5: misinformation and how that's her biggest struggle in Charlemagne and
Speaker 5: the God, that is the biggest problem with all fighting
Speaker 5: the misinformation from the other side. When you got NonStop
Speaker 5: Trump promised a bloodbath, which is a one four pinocchio lie.
Speaker 1: Right, God dang it. That makes me mensering to the
Speaker 1: lefty Washington Post for goodness sake.
Speaker 7: And if Trump is such a hitler, dictator, evil, authoritarian
Speaker 7: or whatever, beat him on that issue. But don't make
Speaker 7: up quotes, right, got that's so frustrating, Yeah, Anyway, back
Speaker 7: to Trump and as we transition to Kamala's today interview
Speaker 7: with Brett bhar Trump tweeted out lion Kamala Harris has
Speaker 7: wisely chosen Brett Baar of Fox News to do a
Speaker 7: much needed interview because he is considered to be fair
Speaker 7: and balanced, though often very soft to those on the
Speaker 7: cocktail circuit left.
Speaker 2: I would have.
Speaker 5: Preferred seeing a more hard hitting journalist, but Fox has
Speaker 5: grown so weak and soft on the Democrats, constantly polluting
Speaker 5: the airwaves with one of both Kamala representatives, that it
Speaker 5: all doesn't matter anymore. Hopefully the people will understand on
Speaker 5: November fifth and early voting make America great again. I
Speaker 5: don't think attacking Brett Bear and Fox is your best move,
Speaker 5: mister former mister prosman.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, more on that, you know, moment slip at
Speaker 1: the top, All right, sorry, Brett. Quick word from our
Speaker 1: friends at Prize Picks. Prize Picks is the best place
Speaker 1: to get real money sports action. Over ten million members,
Speaker 1: billions of dollars in awarded winnings, Prize Picks has made
Speaker 1: daily fantasy sports accessible to all.
Speaker 5: Yeah, it's it's pretty cool and it's super duper easy.
Speaker 5: It's the only real money daily fantasy platform with an
Speaker 5: injury insurance policy. Also, so your lineup stay in play
Speaker 5: even if one of your players gets injured, which is
Speaker 5: a complaint.
Speaker 2: I hear a lot with.
Speaker 5: People are doing Fantasy football or whatever. Price Picks puts
Speaker 5: his members first. Withdrawals are fast, safe and secure if
Speaker 5: your pick's hit. You can get your money in as
Speaker 5: quick as fifteen minutes.
Speaker 1: And say you just pick more or less on at
Speaker 1: least two players for a shot to win up to
Speaker 1: one hundred times your cash. Run your game all season
Speaker 1: long on Prize Picks. Just get the Prize Picks app.
Speaker 1: Download it today. Use the code armstrong to get fifty
Speaker 1: dollars instantly after you play your first five dollars lineup.
Speaker 1: You don't have to win, They just give you that
Speaker 1: fifty dollars bonus after you play five dollars. Once again,
Speaker 1: it's the Prize Picks app. Use that code Armstrong. Prize Picks.
Speaker 1: Run your game.
Speaker 5: Why would Trump attack Fox and Brett Baer, I mean why,
Speaker 5: I don't even if he believes that, I mean, how
Speaker 5: do you think that helps you?
Speaker 2: I don't know he's a true believer. I guess he's going.
Speaker 1: Against the world, you gotta have somebody on your side. Yeah,
Speaker 1: to Brett's credit, and I think maybe to Trump's cleverness.
Speaker 1: Trump knows Brett won't let that pervert what he does.
Speaker 1: He knows Brett won't suddenly go harder on Trump. So
Speaker 1: it's a harmless You fire up the real maga folks
Speaker 1: who think Fox News is to liberal or soft or whatever,
Speaker 1: and Fox will still you know, Hannit, He'll still.
Speaker 2: Have you on every single time you want to open
Speaker 2: your mouth, for instance.
Speaker 1: But anyway, Joe in Massachusetts rights Today's interview a Kamala
Speaker 1: by Brett will be a career ender for one of them.
Speaker 1: I realize Brett has a bigger challenge is Kamala is
Speaker 1: so pathetic it will appears though he's punching the handicapped
Speaker 1: if he goes too hard what which would be regular
Speaker 1: good old journalism. If Brett holds back too much, your
Speaker 1: Trump crowd is going to turn on him viciously, as
Speaker 1: we just heard preemptively. They already don't like some of
Speaker 1: the off Fox coverage. One of them is done after today.
Speaker 1: Interesting take Joe, and then this from Charlie some time ago.
Speaker 1: Brett Barry interviewed FBI Director Chris Ray. Pretty long interview,
Speaker 1: one whole segment. As I remember, I quickly realized Ray
Speaker 1: was spewing bs upon horsecrap.
Speaker 2: While it's sort of the mixed grill there, the combo plate.
Speaker 1: And not a little different than the surf and turf,
Speaker 1: but it's a similar idea, Right.
Speaker 2: Can I get to one beef and one chicken taco? Thanks? Great?
Speaker 2: Uh so where was I bs horsecraft there?
Speaker 1: It is not one blessed follow up by good old
Speaker 1: hard hitting Brett. The next night, he had on a
Speaker 1: semi important Republican off soldier or some fame, and almost
Speaker 1: every response brought a comeback comment from our intrepid, hard
Speaker 1: hitting Fox reporter.
Speaker 2: I've never trusted him since it was so black and white.
Speaker 5: Interesting, although, uh, Christopher Ray's ability to handle questions is
Speaker 5: in a completely different league than comes. Yeah, I'll be
Speaker 5: interesting to see how it goes. Uh six eastern three
Speaker 5: o'clock West coast time. He's going to record it right
Speaker 5: before and er it today. I think this is huge.
Speaker 5: This is not a minor thing. This is one of
Speaker 5: the biggest things. This is up there with the debate
Speaker 5: in terms of big things that have happened in the
Speaker 5: last several months.
Speaker 1: Brett's got to say, first of all, thank you for
Speaker 1: being here. Ms Vice President. I just want you to
Speaker 1: know in advance, every time you say let me be clear,
Speaker 1: the audience.
Speaker 2: Is going to think I am an idiot.
Speaker 5: Brett Baar should say I've got a bottle of gold
Speaker 5: schlagger here. And every time you say let me be clear,
Speaker 5: I'm gonna take a shot now. I'd like to be
Speaker 5: able to drive home. I'm gonna end up shirtless. And
Speaker 5: one of the many things that other interviewers haven't asked
Speaker 5: is the when did you recognize that the president was slipping?
Speaker 5: I mean, the the country had picked up on it,
Speaker 5: as close to eighty percent of voters believed he wasn't
Speaker 5: capable of being president again, when did you notice? Let
Speaker 5: her answer that question, yeah, or he never? He never
Speaker 5: displayed any of the things we all saw on the debate.
Speaker 5: I mean, he stepped down from the race. If that
Speaker 5: was a one off, I would think he'd still be.
Speaker 2: In the race. I mean, how is she going to
Speaker 2: answer that?
Speaker 5: Yeah, she's gonna just sit there and claim I bet
Speaker 5: she is, but it won't work for her. Is she
Speaker 5: gonna sit there and claim no behind closed doors. He
Speaker 5: was always sharp every single time I got a bad
Speaker 5: night and just dodge from there. I'm not that incusent.
Speaker 5: Why didn't you encourage him to stay in the office
Speaker 5: and run? Yeah, I would love to hear that.
Speaker 1: I just Joe Biden being senile isn't anywhere on the
Speaker 1: scope of the most important issues either. It takes a
Speaker 1: great question her covering up a scandalot to be though. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: you know, asked the question and let her non answer
Speaker 1: hang out there.
Speaker 5: Probably, But that's as good as you're gonna get. So
Speaker 5: what do you want to go after? What's your main point?
Speaker 1: Just you know, immigration in the economy, because she can't
Speaker 1: give non answers on those. If if I'm struggling to
Speaker 1: pay my grocery bills, I can't I've got to decide
Speaker 1: between utilities and groceries. And she gives some sort of
Speaker 1: non BS answer or non answer BS I, as a voter,
Speaker 1: am am pissed and unsatisfied.
Speaker 5: Well, Charlolemagne the God ask her about you know some
Speaker 5: people are complaining about you give the same answer every
Speaker 5: time to every question.
Speaker 2: Really would she say, we'll have to play that we'll
Speaker 2: have a right stay with us. What do you know.
Speaker 2: I was helping my son with his homework last night.
Speaker 2: Reconstruction Era. Ah.
Speaker 5: Yeah, fascinating period and troubling, it really is, And I
Speaker 5: feel like under studied appreciated.
Speaker 1: I would agree, and I've long thought the assassination of
Speaker 1: Lincoln is underappreciated. It was more than just a guy
Speaker 1: who didn't have it come and getting shot in the
Speaker 1: head by an angry Southerner. Lincoln had a vision for
Speaker 1: reconstruction of the country that was merciful, unifying, and Wyse
Speaker 1: and the guys who followed him did not, and it
Speaker 1: went miserably in a lot of ways.
Speaker 5: Have you watched that mini series with from Stanton's point
Speaker 5: of view about the Chasin Booth after the assassination?
Speaker 2: You know, we watched several God High Love episodes. I
Speaker 2: don't think we finished it.
Speaker 5: I haven't finished it either with the kids, but I
Speaker 5: thought it was as good as anything I've ever seen
Speaker 5: in terms of portraying what it probably looked like.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, we'll have to relook at that. Too much
Speaker 1: good entertainment needs to be cut down. Yeah, I think
Speaker 1: it's interesting.
Speaker 5: I was talking to my son about this because of
Speaker 5: the way it was portraying Grant in this reading from
Speaker 5: where wherever this school material came from, whatever school book
Speaker 5: it came from, printed by whoever, written by whoever, Because
Speaker 5: I grew up with school books that portrayed Grant as
Speaker 5: a corrupt drunk and Lee is a genius, and so
Speaker 5: that was just in my head my whole life until
Speaker 5: I found out we all found out that those books
Speaker 5: were written by Southern companies that hated the fact that
Speaker 5: the North won and tried to destroy Grant's reputation in
Speaker 5: line Lee's, Yeah.
Speaker 7: Isn't that interesting that that was actually when I was thought,
Speaker 7: it's not like.
Speaker 2: Them one hundred and fifty years old either.
Speaker 5: Yeah, And now it's more uh, well, it's more accurate
Speaker 5: that Grant was way too gullible and and had friends
Speaker 5: who betrayed him, but he himself wasn't corrupt and his
Speaker 5: drink act.
Speaker 2: He was one of the most honorable men ever to
Speaker 2: hold the office.
Speaker 5: Yeah, and his drinking had nothing to do with his
Speaker 5: generalship or presidency. Right, And Lee was, you know, fighting
Speaker 5: for the up poll the South.
Speaker 1: This is such an interesting topic for several reasons, including
Speaker 1: my dad spent the bulk of his career in the
Speaker 1: educational publishing industry. And we haven't really talked much about this,
Speaker 1: but I know that certain states, including California at this point,
Speaker 1: drive what's in educational textbooks because your hardest core activisty
Speaker 1: states in the case of this, the example, the South
Speaker 1: cared a lot about that, and most northern schools they
Speaker 1: don't care about defending Grant's reputation. So the textbook manufactures
Speaker 1: so they didn't have to have different editions for every
Speaker 1: region of the country. Just go with whoever's the most
Speaker 1: pissed off, and that's what makes it into the textbooks.
Speaker 2: I was in.
Speaker 5: Wisconsin at the time and actually lived ten miles from
Speaker 5: where Grant was born, and he's a big deal around there,
Speaker 5: and still was reading all this stuff from southern school
Speaker 5: books about what an awful duty was.
Speaker 2: Isn't that crazy?
Speaker 5: So it just shows you the power of what they teach,
Speaker 5: what they decided to teach kids.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, yeah, why are the kids so crazy because
Speaker 1: that's what they've been taught, They've been indoctrinated.
Speaker 2: Yeah, under our watch.
Speaker 5: It's really interesting and it's interesting to see the version
Speaker 5: that my son is getting, which at least in this
Speaker 5: case is more accurate. There's plenty of other things are
Speaker 5: teaching in schools that are nuts.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Oh, speaking of which, we've got a really encouraging gender
Speaker 1: bending madness update coming up in a couple of minutes.
Speaker 2: It's definite sign of progress.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's still utterly crazy and getting worse, but
Speaker 1: people are waking up.
Speaker 5: So we got twenty days still the election and Benjamin
Speaker 5: Nettnyah who has stated that the attack on Iran will
Speaker 5: come before the election. So one of these days there's
Speaker 5: going to be the biggest attack Iran Israel's ever launched,
Speaker 5: maybe on anybody. Uh, And that could be quite the
Speaker 5: October surprise, depending on how it goes.
Speaker 1: And with Israel you never know. Planes and bombs, cyber
Speaker 1: exploding pagers, right, who knows right? And both candidates will
Speaker 1: have to react to it. We'll see how that goes.
Speaker 1: It's gonna be quite the deal though. Explosive charges and
Speaker 1: all the beards of the Mullus you just don't know,
Speaker 1: exploding beards all across them at.
Speaker 2: Least Armstrong and Getty.
Speaker 5: Hey, executive producer hands and I haven't looked at the list.
Speaker 5: Do we have Kamala Harris's answer on reparations that one
Speaker 5: seems to.
Speaker 2: Be getting a lot of attention.
Speaker 5: Oh so if we don't have it, maybe you can
Speaker 5: find that from our interview with Charlemagne the God.
Speaker 2: I find that blasphemous.
Speaker 1: You should go with Charlemagne the chill dude, or Charlemagne
Speaker 1: the fine broadcaster higher power.
Speaker 2: That'd be funny.
Speaker 1: It is gratifying and slightly surprising to me that the
Speaker 1: trans madness issue is playing a much bigger role in
Speaker 1: the election than I expected. I certainly hoped it would,
Speaker 1: but especially on the state level congressional campaigns and and
Speaker 1: the Senate and stuff like that, which we'll get to
Speaker 1: in a moment or two. More and more people are
Speaker 1: recognizing the madness of it, and the poll numbers are
Speaker 1: heading all in one direction back towards sanity, thank goodness.
Speaker 1: One of the drivers, I think is that you can
Speaker 1: cow people into going along to get along on issues
Speaker 1: if they're kind of vague and fuzzy on it. I mean,
Speaker 1: you hear there's some men are born with a woman's body,
Speaker 1: but then they can change it, and you think, really,
Speaker 1: all right, whatever, But then when you see, for instance,
Speaker 1: a dude dominating women's sports and hurting the girls. Suddenly
Speaker 1: that vague, morphous, cloudy issue gets crystallized, and that is
Speaker 1: why so many people are changing their minds, all rolling
Speaker 1: up to the story that we if.
Speaker 2: That's the wrong story. Hello, where's the right story? O
Speaker 2: to me? To me? There it is.
Speaker 1: The fifth University has declared that they will not play
Speaker 1: San Jose State University's women's volleyball.
Speaker 2: They're just afraid of us. We're nine to zero the Spartans.
Speaker 2: You have a dude on the team? Is the thing.
Speaker 1: The Nevada women's volleyball team decided to forfeit an upcoming match.
Speaker 1: There's more to say about that, but first, this is
Speaker 1: one of the players who has joined more than a
Speaker 1: dozen other women athletes ensuing the federal government over Title
Speaker 1: nine violations.
Speaker 8: I fully support every school that is deciding to find
Speaker 8: the courage take the stand to not play against us.
Speaker 8: It's so many people above you as a young woman,
Speaker 8: telling you just do what you're told in sports. Put
Speaker 8: your head down, work hard, that's it. Don't complain. And
Speaker 8: so I think it's just amazing to see that there's
Speaker 8: these young women that are finally deciding to use their
Speaker 8: voice and take a stand.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it is great, even though they have been bullied
Speaker 1: in into silence being told you women shut up. The
Speaker 1: man is a woman now and he wants to play,
Speaker 1: which is incredibly abusive toward women.
Speaker 2: But here's the interesting part.
Speaker 1: The school's athletic department had announced that the wolf Pack
Speaker 1: of Nevada would play the game. Quote, the University of
Speaker 1: Nevada volleyball team remains focused on its upcoming matches with
Speaker 1: you and LV in San Diego State and tends to
Speaker 1: play its remaining Mountain West schedule, including the match with
Speaker 1: San Jose State University on October twenty sixth. The statement read,
Speaker 1: the university will continue to abide by the NCAA Mountain
Speaker 1: West Conference in USA Volleyball rules and regulations, as well
Speaker 1: as the laws and constitution of the State of Nevada.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Well, the players saw that and said they didn't even
Speaker 1: ask us, Oh my god, and they held a vote
Speaker 1: and the vote was overwhelming. No way, they were not playing.
Speaker 5: Freaking university administrators, and they're either delusional beliefs or their cowardice. Yeah,
Speaker 5: to not be willing to either stand up against this
Speaker 5: or some of these schools that have forfeited it haven't
Speaker 5: said out loud why, which bothers me. Also, they forfeit
Speaker 5: and their kind of mealy mouthed about why they forfeited
Speaker 5: instead of just stating they got a dude on their team.
Speaker 5: Yeah yeah, And please don't use the term biological mail
Speaker 5: as if there's another kind of male.
Speaker 2: That's what it is, biology anyway, postal mail. All right.
Speaker 1: I salute these gals for what they've been doing. Obviously,
Speaker 1: this is the fifth women's college team to forfeit to
Speaker 1: San Jose. This is getting a lot of attention on
Speaker 1: the right side of the aisle. None in the mainstream meeting.
Speaker 2: No, I haven't seen a word about it.
Speaker 5: You think this is a Division one school and they
Speaker 5: were nine to oh oh yeah, and.
Speaker 1: This player was dominating. This is a national champion in
Speaker 1: the making.
Speaker 5: Yeah, and now five teams in a row have said
Speaker 5: we ain't playing.
Speaker 2: So I don't know what happens to their playoff chances
Speaker 2: or whatever. I don't know how that works. I have
Speaker 2: no idea.
Speaker 1: The San Jose State gets wins, right, that's right, you
Speaker 1: get do it fourteen and ugh wow. So this could
Speaker 1: turn into a really big story if they if they
Speaker 1: get to go into the playoffs and start marching through
Speaker 1: the bracket.
Speaker 2: That would be something.
Speaker 5: Yeah, network, maybe they're declared national champion without having ever
Speaker 5: played anybody.
Speaker 2: That would really make a point.
Speaker 1: And I believe you know that there are different levels
Speaker 1: of courage. It's a little easier for team number six
Speaker 1: to announce. Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, And I salute whoever
Speaker 1: was first. Was it Utah State? I thought it was
Speaker 1: Boise but I could be wrong, Oh yeah, it could
Speaker 1: be anyway, you know, it's worth saluting the women of
Speaker 1: Southern Utah University, Boise State, the University of Wyoming, and
Speaker 1: Utah State University for sticking their necks out like that.
Speaker 2: Good for you, gals.
Speaker 5: Well, you're not really sticking your neck out in reality,
Speaker 5: you're not. No, it seems like you are, but you're
Speaker 5: not really like ninety perplete capture of the universities in
Speaker 5: the media, right right, But like.
Speaker 1: Ninety percent of the country agrees with you, a huge
Speaker 1: a huge number, which we're gonna get to in a
Speaker 1: second anyway. But I am so I've lost the capacity
Speaker 1: to be surprised by this. But I am so angered
Speaker 1: that the media is so captured again by this radical philosophy.
Speaker 1: They're so flummoxed. They won't even report this story. They
Speaker 1: won't even do a Republican's pounced version of it, where
Speaker 1: they make it seem as all these young women are
Speaker 1: some sort of radical right wing maga lunatics, a bunch
Speaker 1: of college girls, whereas the Evening News would probably be
Speaker 1: perfectly happy with announcing San Jose State women's volleyball won
Speaker 1: a national championship today. It was the first time a
Speaker 1: team had ever won with the transgender woman like. It
Speaker 1: was an accomplishment of something right, a wonderful history making first. Yeah,
Speaker 1: as opposed to reporting this, which is pretty interesting. Five
Speaker 1: forfits in a row, Yeah, and more to come, I
Speaker 1: would guess. I don't know how long a season they play,
Speaker 1: but hey, who's the next team up? I hope you're
Speaker 1: voting right now to stand up for women and women's sports.
Speaker 1: I love this from Rich Lowry in the National Review.
Speaker 1: I think the headline is, did GOP makes Democrats pay
Speaker 1: for the price for trans insanity? The chickens have come
Speaker 1: home to roost, and they are apparently all cis gender.
Speaker 1: There used to be a time when Republicans shied away
Speaker 1: from talking about trans issues. They didn't want to appear
Speaker 1: extreme or intolerant. Why bother waiting into a frack cultural issue,
Speaker 1: and there are so many other things to talk about.
Speaker 1: Deferring to medical professionals or the experts seem the easy
Speaker 1: way out. Correct Now, the Republicans have emphatically found their
Speaker 1: voices and he mentions a bunch of different races and
Speaker 1: candidates and that sort of thing. For the longest time,
Speaker 1: Democrats have gone along with the steadily evolving trans orthodoxy
Speaker 1: as established by the cultural left, existing in a bubble.
Speaker 1: They assume that doubters could be isolated or embarrassed into
Speaker 1: going along and didn't realize just how wildly out of
Speaker 1: touch they'd become.
Speaker 2: I think that's exactly right.
Speaker 1: It's one thing to say people should be tolerant of
Speaker 1: the choices of consenting adults. It's another thing to say
Speaker 1: that miners must have access to life altering so called
Speaker 1: gender affirming treatments.
Speaker 2: Again, that.
Speaker 1: You can dupe people into believing and doing things that
Speaker 1: are stupid is I mean, it's obvious. Look at humankind.
Speaker 1: The fact that you could convince people that confused adolescents
Speaker 1: who are being influenced by activists should be able to
Speaker 1: make life changing permanent decisions is insane. It ignores the
Speaker 1: entire history of what children are.
Speaker 5: Somehow I ended up on a Reddit thread. I guess
Speaker 5: I was on a Twitter thing and I came across
Speaker 5: a post and it linked anyway. It was a Reddit
Speaker 5: thread of people who have been getting their surgeries. It
Speaker 5: looked to be all adults, not anybody under age, but
Speaker 5: there was one very young looking person in a hospital
Speaker 5: bed with their in all caps. I got my vagina today,
Speaker 5: and there was just lots of good for you girl,
Speaker 5: and all that sort of stuff. I thought, Wow, I
Speaker 5: hope it continues to make you happy, and it's not
Speaker 5: like two years from now you're suicidal and depressed and
Speaker 5: realize you shouldn't have done.
Speaker 2: That right, exactly like happens so often.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's a person with serious mental illness problems, and
Speaker 1: I wish them well. Final line from Rich Lowry. It's
Speaker 1: one thing to say everyone should live and let live.
Speaker 1: It's another to say that males must participate in female sports,
Speaker 1: no matter how manifestly unfair it is to the girls
Speaker 1: and women.
Speaker 2: So as we were saying that, they're waking up to it.
Speaker 2: For what it's worth.
Speaker 1: The Washington Post poll last year found that fifty seven
Speaker 1: percent of people say that gender is determined at birth.
Speaker 1: It's only fifty seven and don't use the word gender,
Speaker 1: it's sex anyway. Roughly two thirds of people said males
Speaker 1: should not compete in girls in women's sports, sixty eight
Speaker 1: percent opposed giving children ages ten to fourteen access to
Speaker 1: puberty blocking medication, and oppose teenagers of any age having
Speaker 1: access to hormonal treatments. I'm always frustrated, having been doing
Speaker 1: this for a while, when they give one number and
Speaker 1: not the other, because if you say fifty seven percent
Speaker 1: say sex is determined in Perth, that kind of implies
Speaker 1: that forty three percent think it's never sure, when indeed
Speaker 1: that number might be sixteen percent, and you got twenty
Speaker 1: seven percent who say don't know.
Speaker 5: I like I said yesterday, I believe it's more like
Speaker 5: ninety percent of people think dudes shouldn't participate in women's sports. Yeah,
Speaker 5: and that if you got a whole bunch of those
Speaker 5: people in a room that currently say it's okay, and
Speaker 5: they looked around and realized a whole bunch of people
Speaker 5: actually agree with them that it's not okay, they would
Speaker 5: switch their opinion immediately, and.
Speaker 1: Then you get your hardcore who still won't give it up,
Speaker 1: and I'll show them videos for ten minutes and I'll
Speaker 1: get half of the rest of them. And those that
Speaker 1: are left over after that are just crazy people. They
Speaker 1: can't be reasoned with.
Speaker 2: I'm willing to go along with.
Speaker 5: Like, if you you know you want to switch switches
Speaker 5: and get the operation as an adult, go ahead, fine,
Speaker 5: And I hope you're happy.
Speaker 2: Do what you want to do.
Speaker 5: But the whole dudes in women's sports thing is a
Speaker 5: hard No.
Speaker 2: I mean that is just so crazy.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's that's the keystone, the cornerstone of returning to sanity.
Speaker 2: Oh.
Speaker 1: People see that, and it's just so clear to them. Oh,
Speaker 1: it's also worth mentioning. There's been a couple of high
Speaker 1: profile The number one Trump ad in the Swing States
Speaker 1: right now is the one where Kamala's advocating for taxpayer
Speaker 1: funded transgender surgery, sex changes for inmates and the example
Speaker 1: of that rapist murderer the position to take Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: And there are several cases going on right now that
Speaker 1: a're getting surmounted. Can you imagine taxpayers footing the bill
Speaker 1: sit well into six figures for some crazy, murderous rapey
Speaker 1: inmate who decides they want to be the other sex
Speaker 1: because they're so freaking crazy, and she's a forceful advocate
Speaker 1: for that.
Speaker 9: You know, we have aspirations, we have dreams.
Speaker 2: You know that. I'll grant you that.
Speaker 5: Well, in some cases it's because you're a dude, and
Speaker 5: you know, you get to go to the women's prison if.
Speaker 2: You if you go this route right right.
Speaker 1: And the tagline on the ad is Kamala Harris is
Speaker 1: for they them, She's not for you.
Speaker 2: Well that's pretty good. That is pretty good. Yeah, that's
Speaker 2: a good one.
Speaker 5: So how did Kamala ask answer the question about reparations
Speaker 5: from Charlemagne the Higher Power yesterday? Among other things on
Speaker 5: the way stay with us. So the election is insanely close.
Speaker 5: But like when you said the other day, it's going
Speaker 5: to be decided by eleven people spread across seven states. Yay,
Speaker 5: the margin is going to be eleven people across seven states.
Speaker 2: It actually could be.
Speaker 5: I mean, it's not impossible as close as the polls are.
Speaker 5: And oh, I was just reading about the likelihood of weeks,
Speaker 5: if not months, of litigation in several states at the
Speaker 5: same time.
Speaker 1: I wonder if we read the same thing. The problem
Speaker 1: is mail in ballots that are so common. Now, don't
Speaker 1: get me started on ballot harvesting, but there are so
Speaker 1: many more things that can go wrong with a mail
Speaker 1: in ballot than walking up and saying I'm here to vote.
Speaker 1: I mean, like nothing can go wrong in that situation practically.
Speaker 1: But with a mail in ballots, you got the signatures
Speaker 1: and the dates and the verification of the postmark and
Speaker 1: all sorts of stuff.
Speaker 5: So you could easily have Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Arizona, which
Speaker 5: are needed to put one of them over the top.
Speaker 5: And they're all three locked in endless battles, legal battles
Speaker 5: over which ballots to count and all that sort of
Speaker 5: stuff that goes on for weeks, and we get closer
Speaker 5: closer to January twentieth without really knowing who won. I mean,
Speaker 5: the last time around, we had the legal battles going
Speaker 5: a long time, but most people had come to the
Speaker 5: conclusion Trump lost since they were winning none of their
Speaker 5: legal battles right and coming up with no evidence. But
Speaker 5: this will be an actual nobody knows who's going to
Speaker 5: be president for a long time. Maybe it'll make Bush v.
Speaker 5: Gore look like a bit nothing.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, absolutely and the narratives will be so fiery
Speaker 1: and so entrenched on both sides. When it is quote
Speaker 1: unquote settled or decided, now it'll be completely unsettled. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and whichever side lost is not going to accept it, well,
Speaker 1: including the D's right.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 5: So anyway, Kamala Harris is feeling the pressure because she's
Speaker 5: trying to stop Hitler from becoming president. She was asked
Speaker 5: about this Charlemagne the God yesterday as she's trying to
Speaker 5: I guess win back blackmail.
Speaker 2: Voters through his radio show. But anyway, here's that there
Speaker 2: has to be a high level of anxiety too when
Speaker 2: you have these conversations though, because you are running for president.
Speaker 9: I mean you know what, there is certainly a lot
Speaker 9: of I feel the weight of the moment and my role.
Speaker 9: I feel an extraordinary weight of responsibility right now to
Speaker 9: do everything I can. I'm telling you, Charlamanne. When I
Speaker 9: go to bed at night, I I almost every night,
Speaker 9: in addition to my prayers, will ask have I done
Speaker 9: everything I could do today?
Speaker 2: So two things on that.
Speaker 5: One, the fact that she's laying her head down on
Speaker 5: the pillow feeling the weight of the world because she
Speaker 5: is the only one who stands between the United States
Speaker 5: continuing and not right and the pressure that is now.
Speaker 5: When Trump has said that sort of thing in the past,
Speaker 5: that he was the only one that could save democracy,
Speaker 5: it was mocked as some sort of ridiculous, megalomaniac, fascist
Speaker 5: king person view of the world. She has the same thing,
Speaker 5: the other one being one of the common critiques amongst
Speaker 5: democratic strategists on the left is why are you working harder?
Speaker 2: She's doing like two events a day.
Speaker 5: She doesn't apparently start until two in the afternoon most days.
Speaker 5: The history of campaigning at this point is you're up
Speaker 5: at five in the morning, you've got three events done
Speaker 5: before noon, and then you go to a different time
Speaker 5: zone and then you go to bed at midnight and
Speaker 5: get like four hours sleep the final weeks.
Speaker 2: And she's not doing that at all. Yeah.
Speaker 5: Now, maybe that's David Pluff and other people realize in
Speaker 5: the modern world that's not the way you need a
Speaker 5: campaign anymore.
Speaker 2: It's an anachronism.
Speaker 5: I don't know, but she is not working physically as
Speaker 5: hard near as much as candidates.
Speaker 2: Have in the past.
Speaker 1: Yeah, And you know, I almost you know, drew a
Speaker 1: parallel between after the debate when everybody said of Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: GE's got to get out there and be Joe. He's
Speaker 1: got to do the events and prove that they're wrong.
Speaker 1: Well he couldn't because they weren't wrong. He was senile,
Speaker 1: So you CoML is an idiot. So they're trying to
Speaker 1: keep her hidden. But then but then she can read
Speaker 1: off a teleprompter. Fine, she's just pretty well, she's so.
Speaker 2: Good at that. That is a head scratcher. Nobody's exactly
Speaker 2: sure why why her schedule is so light? Too much good,
Speaker 2: That's what I was thinking.
Speaker 5: Halprin says that every day on his morning podcast, like
Speaker 5: once again a light schedule for Kamala Harris. I don't
Speaker 5: know what their theory is. Wow, But anyway, there's that.
Speaker 5: And then this is short, but it's getting a fair
Speaker 5: amount of attention.
Speaker 2: My question to you is what's your stance on reparations?
Speaker 5: How progressive are you on making it a priority and
Speaker 5: right in America's wrongs?
Speaker 9: So my agenda, well, first of all, on the plane
Speaker 9: of reparations, it has to be studied, there's no question
Speaker 9: about that. And I've been very clear about that position.
Speaker 5: So it's being seen as a roarshock test of Oh yeah,
Speaker 5: you either thought that was a dodge, like I'm going
Speaker 5: to take a look at it, meaning you know, you'll
Speaker 5: never hear it's got to be studied.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I can translate that for you or you're there.
Speaker 1: She's going to be four option, So it's got to
Speaker 1: be studied until the end of time, is the translation
Speaker 1: of that.
Speaker 2: That's what politicians say.
Speaker 5: Because it's undoable and I'm workable and unconstitutional and all
Speaker 5: kinds of different things. Right, if you miss an hour,
Speaker 5: get the podcast Armstrong and Getty on demand
Speaker 2: Armstrong and Getty