1 00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:02,599 Speaker 1: Elsewhere on the Federal Reserve. The former New York Fed 2 00:00:02,600 --> 00:00:06,240 Speaker 1: President Bill Dudley in a new Bloomberg opinion column, writing this, 3 00:00:06,480 --> 00:00:09,160 Speaker 1: I've been too pessimistic about the risks of a so 4 00:00:09,280 --> 00:00:11,840 Speaker 1: called hard landing for the US economy over the past 5 00:00:11,880 --> 00:00:14,440 Speaker 1: few years. Although most of my conclusions that led to 6 00:00:14,480 --> 00:00:17,440 Speaker 1: that view were correct, such an outcome remains very much 7 00:00:17,840 --> 00:00:20,720 Speaker 1: in doubt. Bill joins us now for more. Bill, welcome 8 00:00:20,760 --> 00:00:23,000 Speaker 1: back to the program, sir. It's been quite a journey 9 00:00:23,040 --> 00:00:25,800 Speaker 1: for you, an intellectual journey over the year so far. 10 00:00:25,880 --> 00:00:27,520 Speaker 1: I want to go through a couple of headlines and 11 00:00:27,560 --> 00:00:30,240 Speaker 1: you help me understand why you've changed your thinking. Someone. 12 00:00:30,480 --> 00:00:32,320 Speaker 1: It was only back earlier this summer where you said 13 00:00:32,320 --> 00:00:34,680 Speaker 1: I changed my mind the FED needs to cut rates 14 00:00:34,720 --> 00:00:37,559 Speaker 1: now before the Federal Reserve meeting. Last time around, you 15 00:00:37,600 --> 00:00:39,840 Speaker 1: said they need to go big. Now I think they will. 16 00:00:40,159 --> 00:00:43,959 Speaker 1: They did this morning. My hard landing forecast turned out 17 00:00:44,000 --> 00:00:45,839 Speaker 1: to be wrong. Bill, just walk us through how you're 18 00:00:45,840 --> 00:00:48,320 Speaker 1: thinking about things currently and what kind of policy this 19 00:00:48,360 --> 00:00:49,480 Speaker 1: backdrop needs. 20 00:00:50,600 --> 00:00:53,279 Speaker 2: Well, my original view was that Fed would be late 21 00:00:53,320 --> 00:00:57,360 Speaker 2: to take Madre policy check. As a consequence, inflation want 22 00:00:57,360 --> 00:00:59,720 Speaker 2: to go up, and the labor market would get very tight. 23 00:01:01,280 --> 00:01:03,560 Speaker 2: Then the Federal Reserve would have to tighten mantre policy 24 00:01:03,600 --> 00:01:06,240 Speaker 2: a lot check, and the unployer would have to go up. 25 00:01:06,360 --> 00:01:08,560 Speaker 2: At least they have a percentage point trigger the sam 26 00:01:08,680 --> 00:01:11,880 Speaker 2: rule check, but the shop role trigger. That doesn't seem 27 00:01:11,880 --> 00:01:14,000 Speaker 2: like it's leading to recession. If you look at that 28 00:01:14,080 --> 00:01:17,240 Speaker 2: the GDP numbers, they've have been very firmly lately. 29 00:01:17,920 --> 00:01:20,720 Speaker 3: Second quarter three percent, third quarter is tracking two and 30 00:01:20,760 --> 00:01:21,399 Speaker 3: a half percent. 31 00:01:21,959 --> 00:01:24,320 Speaker 2: So even though I had the story right, it doesn't 32 00:01:24,360 --> 00:01:25,920 Speaker 2: look like the conclusion is going to pan out. 33 00:01:25,920 --> 00:01:28,360 Speaker 3: It was too soon to say for sure. 34 00:01:28,720 --> 00:01:31,680 Speaker 2: That's why the labor market has so much attention focused 35 00:01:31,720 --> 00:01:34,400 Speaker 2: on it, and I thought I was interesting the summary. 36 00:01:34,080 --> 00:01:36,400 Speaker 3: Of economic projections at the last FMC meeting. 37 00:01:37,360 --> 00:01:39,959 Speaker 2: They actually in the in their summary of economic projections, 38 00:01:39,959 --> 00:01:42,440 Speaker 2: they actually think that the downside risks to the labor 39 00:01:42,480 --> 00:01:44,959 Speaker 2: market are actually greater now than the outside risk of 40 00:01:44,959 --> 00:01:47,560 Speaker 2: the inflation. So they're worried about the exact same thing. 41 00:01:47,600 --> 00:01:50,520 Speaker 2: And that's why tomorrow's labor market report is so important. 42 00:01:50,680 --> 00:01:54,480 Speaker 2: If the labor market really starts to deteriorate, then I 43 00:01:54,520 --> 00:01:57,680 Speaker 2: think the soft landing story will start to come into question. 44 00:01:57,720 --> 00:02:00,640 Speaker 2: And that's why the FED cut fifty basis points a 45 00:02:00,680 --> 00:02:01,360 Speaker 2: couple of weeks ago. 46 00:02:01,520 --> 00:02:03,920 Speaker 4: I think a lot of people bill share your journey 47 00:02:04,040 --> 00:02:07,920 Speaker 4: in terms of changing views and not understanding which models 48 00:02:07,920 --> 00:02:12,200 Speaker 4: are actually accurate this time around. What in your analysis 49 00:02:12,600 --> 00:02:14,760 Speaker 4: makes you think that this time is different and that 50 00:02:14,840 --> 00:02:18,320 Speaker 4: some of the classic indicators that traditionally have foretold recession 51 00:02:19,040 --> 00:02:19,840 Speaker 4: no longer work. 52 00:02:20,960 --> 00:02:22,160 Speaker 3: I think two things are different. 53 00:02:22,240 --> 00:02:24,880 Speaker 2: Number One, you had all these fiscal transfers during the 54 00:02:24,919 --> 00:02:28,360 Speaker 2: pandemic to businesses and households, so business and household bounce 55 00:02:28,400 --> 00:02:31,200 Speaker 2: sheets are in better shape than they typically are late 56 00:02:31,240 --> 00:02:33,960 Speaker 2: in the business cycle. You know, for example, look at 57 00:02:33,960 --> 00:02:36,120 Speaker 2: debt service colls for the household sector is still pretty 58 00:02:36,160 --> 00:02:39,240 Speaker 2: low because people locked in very low mortgage rates during 59 00:02:39,280 --> 00:02:42,600 Speaker 2: the servant during the pandemic. Second thing I think is 60 00:02:42,600 --> 00:02:45,200 Speaker 2: different is that financial conditions have eased a lot even 61 00:02:45,240 --> 00:02:48,639 Speaker 2: before the federieser cut rates. So financial conditions are We're 62 00:02:48,680 --> 00:02:51,480 Speaker 2: at the most tightest about about a year ago, and 63 00:02:51,560 --> 00:02:54,440 Speaker 2: since then the beads a lot, stock market up, bondials down, 64 00:02:54,600 --> 00:02:57,919 Speaker 2: credit spreads tighter, and so even though Madre policies tighten, 65 00:02:58,000 --> 00:02:59,799 Speaker 2: when you look at the level of short term rates, 66 00:03:00,120 --> 00:03:03,239 Speaker 2: financial conditions at ease a lot, and that's supporting economic activity. 67 00:03:03,520 --> 00:03:04,880 Speaker 4: What's to say we're landing at all? 68 00:03:04,880 --> 00:03:05,120 Speaker 1: Bill? 69 00:03:06,440 --> 00:03:07,400 Speaker 3: Well, that's a good question. 70 00:03:07,480 --> 00:03:10,040 Speaker 5: I mean, I think you know the fact would like 71 00:03:10,120 --> 00:03:12,120 Speaker 5: the economy to grow, you know too, two and a 72 00:03:12,160 --> 00:03:15,120 Speaker 5: half percent, keep the unemployer rate right where it is, 73 00:03:16,160 --> 00:03:18,600 Speaker 5: and the third quarter looks like it's shaping up that way. 74 00:03:19,040 --> 00:03:21,520 Speaker 5: But keeping on that very you know, that nice edge 75 00:03:21,600 --> 00:03:24,680 Speaker 5: growth not strong enough to cause the researches of inflation, 76 00:03:24,800 --> 00:03:27,359 Speaker 5: not weak enough to lead to the kind of deterioration 77 00:03:27,400 --> 00:03:29,320 Speaker 5: and labor market that would lead to recession. 78 00:03:29,440 --> 00:03:31,560 Speaker 3: That's gonna be tough to keep on that nice edge. 79 00:03:31,800 --> 00:03:33,239 Speaker 4: So what are you expecting for tomorrow? 80 00:03:34,360 --> 00:03:36,880 Speaker 2: I think it'll be a decent payroll employer report. I mean, 81 00:03:36,920 --> 00:03:38,840 Speaker 2: I think the estimates are around one hundred and forty thousand. 82 00:03:39,680 --> 00:03:41,040 Speaker 2: That seems like a regionalle estment. 83 00:03:41,240 --> 00:03:43,720 Speaker 6: We have to remember, though, the payroll employment has a 84 00:03:44,080 --> 00:03:46,760 Speaker 6: big standard are around those estimates, So you could get 85 00:03:46,760 --> 00:03:48,760 Speaker 6: something like eighty thousand, or you get something like two 86 00:03:48,840 --> 00:03:51,600 Speaker 6: hundred thousand, and it really wouldn't to tell you for sure. 87 00:03:51,440 --> 00:03:54,440 Speaker 3: That the economy has actually changed momentum. 88 00:03:54,160 --> 00:03:56,640 Speaker 1: Bill, How difficult is that? In the November seventh meeting 89 00:03:56,720 --> 00:03:59,680 Speaker 1: going to be considering how messy the data might be, 90 00:04:00,240 --> 00:04:02,200 Speaker 1: we might not have an outcome from the election. Can 91 00:04:02,240 --> 00:04:03,880 Speaker 1: you think of a time like this want that they're 92 00:04:03,920 --> 00:04:05,440 Speaker 1: going into in the next month. 93 00:04:06,080 --> 00:04:08,960 Speaker 2: Well, the particular awkwardness is that there will be another 94 00:04:09,000 --> 00:04:12,640 Speaker 2: payilmployment report during the blackout period right before the. 95 00:04:12,560 --> 00:04:13,280 Speaker 3: Fo C meeting. 96 00:04:13,720 --> 00:04:17,760 Speaker 2: Look, I think that most of the momentum is for 97 00:04:17,839 --> 00:04:19,599 Speaker 2: twenty five basis points at this point. 98 00:04:20,120 --> 00:04:22,720 Speaker 3: Powell basically foreshared that in a speech. 99 00:04:22,960 --> 00:04:24,640 Speaker 2: The fact that you had all these people in the 100 00:04:24,920 --> 00:04:27,360 Speaker 2: summery that projections that only had one more rate cut 101 00:04:27,360 --> 00:04:29,880 Speaker 2: in their forecast after the last meeting also tells you 102 00:04:29,960 --> 00:04:31,520 Speaker 2: that it's probably not going to be fifty. So I 103 00:04:32,320 --> 00:04:36,279 Speaker 2: think the basic stories still intact. Risks to the labor 104 00:04:36,360 --> 00:04:39,400 Speaker 2: market are greater than the risk of inflation, Madre policies tight, 105 00:04:39,600 --> 00:04:43,440 Speaker 2: We're still quite ways from neutral, so twenty five basis 106 00:04:43,480 --> 00:04:45,920 Speaker 2: points is the most likely scenario in my view at 107 00:04:45,920 --> 00:04:46,400 Speaker 2: this point. 108 00:04:46,600 --> 00:04:49,480 Speaker 4: Bill we had Adam posted on earlier from the Peterson 109 00:04:49,560 --> 00:04:53,000 Speaker 4: Institute who said that the FED should be vocal about 110 00:04:53,000 --> 00:04:56,400 Speaker 4: the fact that they're considering the deficit and potential tariffs 111 00:04:56,440 --> 00:05:00,400 Speaker 4: as a potential inflationary pressure heading into twenty twenty five 112 00:05:00,560 --> 00:05:03,480 Speaker 4: and a reason to cut less. What do you make 113 00:05:03,520 --> 00:05:05,800 Speaker 4: of that? Not necessarily the FED weighing in on that 114 00:05:05,839 --> 00:05:08,960 Speaker 4: particular issue, but being more cautious ahead of next year 115 00:05:09,040 --> 00:05:09,640 Speaker 4: because of it. 116 00:05:10,880 --> 00:05:14,359 Speaker 2: In my experience, the Fed doesn't make you fit policy 117 00:05:14,360 --> 00:05:16,440 Speaker 2: today on things that might or might not happen in 118 00:05:16,480 --> 00:05:16,880 Speaker 2: the future. 119 00:05:16,960 --> 00:05:19,080 Speaker 3: I think they wait to those things either materialized or not. 120 00:05:20,000 --> 00:05:21,719 Speaker 2: And so I think that the idea that the FED 121 00:05:21,680 --> 00:05:24,680 Speaker 2: wouldn't eased because they're worried that an election could result 122 00:05:24,680 --> 00:05:27,279 Speaker 2: in a certain outcome that would lead to higher terrorists 123 00:05:27,279 --> 00:05:28,000 Speaker 2: and higher inflation. 124 00:05:28,320 --> 00:05:30,440 Speaker 3: I don't think the feder Reserve would hold off because 125 00:05:30,440 --> 00:05:30,760 Speaker 3: of that. 126 00:05:31,360 --> 00:05:33,880 Speaker 1: Bill Dumpley, I appreciate it, sir, as always the former 127 00:05:33,880 --> 00:05:36,240 Speaker 1: New York FED president built dumping down its latest pace. 128 00:05:36,480 --> 00:05:38,800 Speaker 1: How my heart landing forecast turned out to be wrong? 129 00:05:39,000 --> 00:05:40,880 Speaker 1: You can find that on Bloomberg Opinion.