WEBVTT - Tyler Grimm

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome, Welcome, Welcome back to the Bob Left Set podcasts.

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>My guest today is Tyler Grimm, who's chief counsel for

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Policy and Strategy at the Judiciary Committee of the US

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:23.440
<v Speaker 1>House of Representatives.

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Tyler, you went to see Roger Daltrey last night? How

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 2>was he?

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 3>It was awesome for being eighty years old. He really

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 3>brought it. I gotta say it was kind of f

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 3>I've probably seen The Who a dozen times in my life,

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:43.239
<v Speaker 3>never saw Adultrey alone. He was great. He could tell

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 3>he really wanted to swing the microphone, but eighty that

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 3>just wasn't happening. He did bring it out for the encore.

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 3>We got a couple couple of Mike throws. He was awesome.

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 3>You know, he's got Pete Townsend's brother Simon up there

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 3>with him. He seems to be really happy doing his

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 3>own thing. He you know, played some covers, played mostly

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 3>Whose songs, played a couple of his original songs. It

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 3>was great.

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you're a relatively young guy. How do you become

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 2>a fan of the Who?

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 3>I grew up on the Who. My parents were really

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 3>into music. We started going to concerts when I was

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 3>like five years old. That's basically like what we did

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 3>when we grew up. We didn't go to a lot

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:36.399
<v Speaker 3>of sports games. We went to concerts. I would look

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 3>and see what concerts were coming to town, beg my

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 3>parents to take me. I think my first concert was

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 3>Elton John and Billy Joel and the second one was

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 3>Tom Petty h And I was just addicted to live

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 3>music from a really young age. My household was it

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 3>was the Stones, it was the Who, primarily the Who

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 3>you know later Pearl Jam, but it was a rock

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 3>and roll house.

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 2>How about acts that are of a newer vintage? Are

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 2>you a fan of those?

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 3>Definitely? I do. Like I really love Pearl Jam's new album.

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 3>I think I think, uh it's there, it's their best

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 3>piece of work in years. Really like I like Gaslight

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 3>Ants them a lot. I like Camp a lot. I

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 3>saw Zach Bryan earlier this year. He was awesome newer music,

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 3>sort of of the rock variety. But I listen to anything.

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:37.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So I'm the Judiciary Committee. How much can you

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 2>talk music with? And are the members fans of music?

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Uh, there's a lot of music fans on the Judiciary Committee, Actually, Bob,

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 3>it is you know, to set the stage here like

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 3>music and movies. We are the primary committee for the

0:02:56.880 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 3>entertainment industry. Anything copyright, any IP, anything anti trust comes

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 3>through the committee. And we have some members that, you know,

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure listen to all that much music. Other

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 3>members that play instruments, that are in bands. We've got

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 3>a member, Kelly Armstrong, who will be the next governor

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 3>of North Dakota. I went to the Zach Bryan concert

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:25.640
<v Speaker 3>with him. Earlier this year. We saw Tyler Childers together.

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 3>He loves Camp. That's another new band I love, sort

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:34.079
<v Speaker 3>of great musical taste. There's a lot of music talk

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 3>on the committee.

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 2>How old is Keller?

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I'm reluctant to guess, but I'd say I give

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 3>him the benefit of the doubt and say early forties.

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So if we start talking about copyright issues the

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Judiciary Committee, are they pretty familiar with these things or

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 2>do you have to brief them and bring them up

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 2>to speed.

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 3>You've got brief them, right, I mean, you've got a

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 3>brief members on any issue, and it varies member to members.

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 3>Some people are super familiar. They've been doing this for

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 3>a quarter century or more. They've seen a number of

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 3>laws passed, very familiar with the issues and the players

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 3>and what's going on. Others are totally new to this

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 3>but want to learn. You've got some that aren't there

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 3>to do copyright, aren't there to do music issues, and

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, they want to understand it for that day

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:32.039
<v Speaker 3>and then you know, maybe move on to the next thing.

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 2>So not everybody's educated, certainly outside America about the ins

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:41.840
<v Speaker 2>and outs of the government. What exactly is the Judiciary Committee?

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:47.799
<v Speaker 3>Sure, so we've obviously got the Congress, which is comprised

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 3>of the House and the Senate. In the House, all

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 3>the work that's done to get a bill to the

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 3>floor before it becomes law is really done at committees,

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:02.280
<v Speaker 3>and the committee's di eied off work by topic area.

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:08.279
<v Speaker 3>And so we've got all intellectual property at the Judiciary Committee.

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:10.720
<v Speaker 3>So if you're going to write a bill that has

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 3>to do with patents or trademarks or copyrights, it will

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 3>come before the committee. The committee will have what we

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 3>call a markup where we'll consider bills, try to amend them,

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 3>debate them, and then vote on them. If a bill

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 3>is successfully voted out of the committee, that's sort of

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 3>primed for floor action, and the floor could take up

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 3>the bill, and then you see what the Senate does

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 3>and see if the President will sign it.

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's start at the ground floor. There's a Judiciary

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Committee in the House. Is there an equivalent committee in

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 2>the Senate?

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 3>There is Judiciary Committee in the Senate, and they both

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 3>have sort of subcommittees more dedicated to specific issue areas.

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:03.679
<v Speaker 3>So there's an intellectual property subcommittee in both the House

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:05.479
<v Speaker 3>and the Senate, and that's where a lot of this

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 3>work will get done.

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay. So let's say I'm someone who wants a passage

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 2>of a bill. Where do I start with the House

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 2>or the Senate. Does it make any.

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 3>Difference, doesn't make a lot of doesn't make a lot

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 3>of difference. There are some exceptions, some kinds of bills

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 3>have to originate in the House, but in this case,

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 3>by and large, either chamber a bill could start it.

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 3>So let's say that you're someone who sees some problem

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 3>in the music royalty space and you think there needs

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 3>to be a fixed You probably call your member, ideally

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 3>a member of the Judiciary committee, pitch them on the issue,

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:52.160
<v Speaker 3>try and get them to write a bill. They'd write

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 3>a bill, it would get introduced into the House, it

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 3>would get referred to the Judiciary Committee, and then the

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 3>Judiciary Committee could take up that bill, and the rest

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:05.039
<v Speaker 3>of that process would play out.

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so we hear about the House and the Senate

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 2>having different bills and then needing to come up with one.

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:17.239
<v Speaker 2>How does that work?

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so this happens all the time. Usually, you know,

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 3>let's say bill gets all the way through in the House,

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 3>passes on the floor, everybody's happy. A bill that's slightly

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 3>different makes it all the way through the Senate more

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 3>often than not. As a House guy, I'm sad to

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 3>say the House will take up the Senate bill. Sometimes

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 3>the Senate takes up the House bill, and then whichever

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 3>one passes both chambers will get sent to the President

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 3>to be signed it to law.

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so let's assume I'm oblivious and I want to

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 2>introduce a bill. I want to get something done. In

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 2>terms of the House, welir Senate, they're essentially equal, and

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 2>it's more of who I know to get started. What

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 2>would motivate me to go to one chamber or the other?

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 3>I'd say, it's really it's who you know, who you

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 3>think is going to champion the issue, who has a

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 3>history of working on these issues. Maybe who has seniority,

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 3>who's got more clout, and one of the chambers, who's

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 3>closer to leadership that would put the bill on the floor.

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 3>All of that, someone's going to be a good advocate

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 3>for you.

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:33.439
<v Speaker 2>Really. Okay, you talked about copyright. The Judiciary Committee in

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 2>the House, which is where you work. What other issues

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 2>do they address? What other subcommittees? What is the whole

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:41.959
<v Speaker 2>of the Judiciary Committee.

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 3>That's a great question, Bob. So you've got intellectual property there,

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 3>so all the things I mentioned. You've got the whole

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 3>court system the federal judiciary. You've got antitrust, so anti

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 3>trust at the FTC and and you've got immigration, You've

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 3>got crime, you've got First Amendment issues. It is a

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:13.359
<v Speaker 3>large array of issues at Judiciary.

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, just you know, to paint the picture. There's the

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Judiciary Committee. What are some of the other committees the

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 2>House has?

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 3>Sure, So there's the Budget Committee. Obviously they're writing the budget.

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 3>You've got the Energy and Commerce Committee. You know, they're

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:33.199
<v Speaker 3>dealing with healthcare and energy and sort of a lot

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 3>of economy wide issues. You've got the Ways and Means Committee,

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 3>which is dealing with taxes, You've got the Science Committee,

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 3>which is dealing with all sorts of science issues, including

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:48.079
<v Speaker 3>like NASA. You've got the Veterans Affairs Committee. I think

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 3>there are you know, eighteen ish committees on Capitol Hill.

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 2>And if you're in one committee, are you in that

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 2>committee only? Or could you be in multiple committees?

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:05.479
<v Speaker 3>So there are some committees which we call a committees,

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 3>and those are sort of exclusive, most notably like A

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 3>Ways and Means and Energy and Commerce, and more often

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 3>than not, if you're on that committee, you're only on

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 3>that committee and you're not serving on other committees. But

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 3>other than that, you could be on two, three, four committees.

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 3>They keep them busy.

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, how many people are on the Judiciary Committee?

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 3>It's about forty two.

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 2>And how do they decide who's on the committee?

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Uh, there's something called the Steering Committee, and the Steering

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Committee basically gets together and they assign members uh, the

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:46.199
<v Speaker 3>various committees based on member interest in where there are vacancies.

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 3>But typically, once you're on a committee as a member

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 3>of Congress, you stay there. You're not going to kick

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 3>you off unless you move up to an a committee

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 3>or you you know, try to move over to some

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 3>other committee. I think they really value the institutional knowledge

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 3>that builds up. We're talking about copy right. You know,

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 3>if you were there for a bunch of these fights,

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:09.599
<v Speaker 3>you've sort of seen how it all plays out. You

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 3>can use that knowledge in the future. There's a premium

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 3>people put on that, so you know, we like when

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 3>people stick around.

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Obviously the constituency of the House changes every two years,

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 2>So how would that affect the makeup of the committee.

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 3>Sure, so, Uh, you know, if a member loses or

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 3>resigns or isn't there anymore, Uh, they won't be on

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 3>the committee. That's lot'll have to be filled.

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's say, you know, we have an election and

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 2>let's just say they're four hundred and fifty eight members

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 2>of Congress.

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:51.320
<v Speaker 3>Is that a correct on a good day? A good day,

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 3>We've got.

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:55.319
<v Speaker 2>Leave about the bulls, like I got to go back

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 2>to school. I don't know what you know, especially with

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 2>Nate Silver with the exact numbers four fifty ye, I

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 2>don't know where I got that from. But let's say hypothetically,

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 2>it's you know, two seventeen to eighteen, and then there's

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 2>an election and one party ends up with one hundred

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 2>and the other one ends up with three hundred plus.

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Can't believe I got the number of representatives wrong? People

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 2>to kill me. Would that effect the percentage of one

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:26.239
<v Speaker 2>party or the other party and making up the Judiciary Committee?

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 3>Not necessarily, I've I think it's been quite some time

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:36.479
<v Speaker 3>since we've had a disparity that big. You know, typically

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 3>the ratios remain about the same, you know, no matter

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 3>who's in charge. There's so many Republicans, so many Democrats

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 3>on the committee. In the Senate, it is proportional. The

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 3>Senate's a whole other animal. The Senate's sort of like

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 3>the Committee's laws are allocated proportional to who controls the chamber.

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So you're saying on the Judicial Eury Committee, essentially

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 2>half are Democrats and half Republicans.

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, no, there's a who's ever in the majority has

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:10.439
<v Speaker 3>a majority of the committee slots also, but the ratio

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 3>between them basically stays the same.

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 2>It defined ratio in this case.

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 3>So if there are you know, twenty five Republicans on

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 3>the committee and seventeen Democrats, it would that that would flip.

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:33.679
<v Speaker 2>You mean, if the other party took control in the

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 2>same numbers exactly exactly, Okay, So let's say, you know,

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm a member of the Juiciary Committee and my party

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 2>does poorly in the next election, will I lose my seat?

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 3>You could? You could if you know you're a newer

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 3>member of the committee and the ratio gets cut to

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 3>the point where like they've got to eliminate. It's some

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:02.719
<v Speaker 3>slots you could lose your seat on the committee.

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 2>And who is chairperson in the committee?

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 3>The chair right now is Jim Jordan from Ohio, and

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 3>the ranking members Jerry Nadler from New York.

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 2>And how do they pick those That's.

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 3>Picked by the steering committee. Also in the it's a

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 3>little different on the the Democrats have a different process.

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 3>It's sort of the whole caucus desize. The Republican side,

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 3>there is a steering committee process and they sort of

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 3>vote on who's going to be chair. Once you're chair,

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 3>you've got the job for six years. If you're a Republican.

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 3>Democrats do it a little differently. You can kind of

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 3>be chair in perpetuity.

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 2>So the steering committee. Each party has the equivalent thereof

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:58.359
<v Speaker 2>that's right, that's right, okay, And whoever has the majority

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 2>gets to decide the chairperson.

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you get to decide your relative leadership on the committee.

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 3>So if you're in the minority, you would choose the

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 3>ranking member, you know, the top person on the committee

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 3>for the minority, and if you're in the majority, you

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 3>choose the chairperson, top person on there for the majority.

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 2>As a practical matter, what does it mean if you

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 2>were the party that is in control and you're the

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 2>chairperson as opposed to the opposing party.

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 3>Bob, it means everything. Really, the House is a majoritarian institution,

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 3>and so when you're in control, you set the agenda,

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 3>you decide what bills move, what bills don't move.

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm trying to rationalize how they came up with

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 2>four fifty eight maybe five thirty eight and eight silver.

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, I made a mistake there, it is I

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 2>have to own it. Not going to cut it. So,

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 2>if you are on the Judiciary Committee, might you be

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 2>on multiple subcommittee?

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 3>Yes, you definitely are. You're probably on at least two,

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 3>maybe three.

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So there is a specific subcommittee for intellectual there is,

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 2>and what would be the breadth what would be some

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 2>of the issues that would be addressed in that subcommittee?

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 3>So it's it, And to be clear, it's intellectual property

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 3>and the courts and the Internet. Those are the three

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 3>sort of categories of topics under the subcommittee's jurisdiction. So,

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, we've had a bunch of hearings this year

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 3>on AI and copyright. We've had hearings on other sort

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 3>of music royalty issues. There is a hearing just yesterday

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 3>on third party litigation funding. We've had hearings on patentability

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 3>and patentability related to AI. It really runs the gamut

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 3>of all the all the AI, all the all the

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 3>IP issues.

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Rather, what's the third pretty litigation funding? What is that?

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 3>So this is the There are a bunch of lawsuits

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 3>where we'll say one company sues another and the accusation

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:24.120
<v Speaker 3>is that, you know, the company doing the suing has

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:27.919
<v Speaker 3>a third party backer. We'll say, someone with a you know,

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 3>financial stake and the outcome of the case and that party,

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 3>that sort of third party might not be known to

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 3>the public or to the court. And so there's a

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 3>movement of foot to get transparency so people know who's suing,

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 3>what their motivations are, who's sort of backing the lawsuit.

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, as we speak, there's a big brew haha with Spotify,

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 2>which now has more than music has books and they're

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 2>bundling and they want to reduce rate. Is this something

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 2>a that the Justice Committee might address? B Is it

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 2>something you're already hearing about.

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 3>It's definitely something we're hearing about. You know.

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:12.640
<v Speaker 2>It is.

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 3>The music publishers very upset about the situation. You know,

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:23.199
<v Speaker 3>they think that Spotify is is exploiting a loophole an

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 3>agreement that they made in twenty twenty two. Spotify basically

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 3>contends that you know, everybody signed off on this, that

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 3>the publishers are you know, in fact, making more money

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 3>a year over year and they shouldn't have anything to

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 3>complain about that. It was I think totally foreseeable that

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:46.919
<v Speaker 3>they'd introduced audiobooks onto the platform.

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 2>So okay, that's the issue. To what degree is something

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:54.920
<v Speaker 2>happening on the issue Justice Committee now?

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:59.359
<v Speaker 3>So the committee you hear when when these issues happen,

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 3>there are a lot of sort of funny thing about

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:06.640
<v Speaker 3>the music space. A lot of this happens between those parties.

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 3>You know, they might they're yelling at each other, trying

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 3>to figure out some settlement, they might sue each other,

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 3>but at the same time they're keeping the Committee apprized

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 3>of this. They might get members of Congress to send

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:26.199
<v Speaker 3>letters complaining in one direction or the other. But for

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 3>right now, the issue is kind of new. I haven't

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 3>heard of anyone, you know, doing anything in particular about

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 3>these complaints. I know that we're monitoring it, though, and

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 3>we'll kind of we'll see what happens.

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 2>Okay. When you say getting someone to write a letter,

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 2>you mean a member writing a letter to the Judiciary Committee.

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 3>No, I mean a member of the Judiciary Committee or

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 3>even a member off of the committee. This is a

0:19:55.960 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 3>really common practice. You know, one maybe maybe the songwriters,

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 3>maybe the publishers, may be you know, somebody else interested

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 3>in this will say, hey, you know, ex member, I'm

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:13.959
<v Speaker 3>really upset about this. I think this is a great injustice,

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 3>or I think that, you know, the songwriters are wrong

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 3>to be upset about this. Send a letter to the

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 3>other party asking questions and sort of raise the issue,

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 3>and that kind of telegraph to the parties the Congress

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 3>is paying attention. Maybe there will be a hearing, Maybe

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 3>this will get elevated. It's kind of more often than

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 3>not to put people back on their heels.

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 2>So what does it take to have a hearing?

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:44.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, so at the IP Subcommittee, which is shaired right

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:48.640
<v Speaker 3>now by darryl Isa from California and the ranking members

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 3>Hanna Johnson in Georgia, they do most things on a

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 3>bipartisan basis, and they'll sort of agree we're gonna have

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.639
<v Speaker 3>a hearing, but it's really it's up to him. He'll say,

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, next week, I'm going to have a hearing

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 3>on you know, patentability of AI generated you know, inventions,

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 3>and it'll basically happen. The staff will identify witnesses that

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 3>can talk about these things, will convene a panel, they'll

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:19.200
<v Speaker 3>get sworn in, we'll have a hearing. It'll last about

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 3>two hours. Members will ask questions, and that's kind of

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 3>the ballgame.

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so right now, the Republicans have the majority, so

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:33.919
<v Speaker 2>ISA can call or not call a hearing. Can a Democrat,

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 2>who is the minority right now, call a hearing? No?

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 3>They can't. Okay, there's like a there's a funky exception

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:48.439
<v Speaker 3>to that that I won't bore you with, but generally speaking, no,

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:51.880
<v Speaker 3>they you know, they can't call a hearing. They're sort

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 3>of relying on on the majority to call a hearing.

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 3>But you know, I think the majority of hearings that

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 3>mister reis Is proposed have been by part of and

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 3>just giving the given the nature of the subcommittee.

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so it's not really usually a combative process. One

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 2>party wants it and one party doesn't.

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 3>No, not in this space. So that's not how these

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:16.159
<v Speaker 3>issues break down. It's not really like a red versus

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 3>blue thing. There's you know, other things going on that

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 3>sort of divide members.

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:25.439
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so let's just use, for an example, the music industry.

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 2>I gotta bug up my rear end and for whatever

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 2>channel I reach, ISA, what's it going to take to

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 2>actually have a hearing where you might say, hey, all

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 2>this stuff is in evidence, I don't need a hearing.

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 3>He's got to be convinced that it's it's sort of

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:43.680
<v Speaker 3>worth gathering the members of the committee and hearing testimony

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 3>on this. Sometimes it's we might consider more often than not,

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 3>it's like we're going to consider legislation on this topic.

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 3>So we need to get a better understanding. We have

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 3>to build a legislative record of testimony in support or

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:59.120
<v Speaker 3>against a bill. But you know, it's up to him

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 3>if you came in and how persuasive meeting and he

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 3>to call a.

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Hearing, okay, And why the two hour limit.

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:09.880
<v Speaker 3>There's no two hour limit. I'm just that's an approximate

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 3>time for about the length of the subcommittee hearing.

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 2>So let's assume we schedule a hearing. Does everybody on

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 2>the subcommittee show up?

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 3>They make their best effort to show up. As you noted,

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 3>members are on multiple committees, so they're very busy. Most

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 3>people try and come for at least part of it.

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, some hearings you'll have everyone there the whole time.

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 3>Other times, you know, attendance can be lower than that.

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Let's assume we have a hearing. How do we apportion

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:46.959
<v Speaker 2>time amongst the members who are in attendance.

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 3>You've got five minutes to ask questions?

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 2>And can you ever can da all? Isus in charge? Now?

0:23:56.800 --> 0:23:58.199
<v Speaker 2>Can he ever say? Well, you know, you're on a

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:00.080
<v Speaker 2>good thread. You got a few more minutes.

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 3>Not really, that's very frowned upon and not allowed for

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 3>in the rules. You can do anything by what's called

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:10.120
<v Speaker 3>unanimous consent. Really, you could say, you know, like if

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 3>nobody objects, they could give whoever, you know, some extra time,

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 3>allow the witness to answer more questions. They could also

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:19.959
<v Speaker 3>do a second round where they'll go around and everybody

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 3>gets five minutes again.

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 2>And what if for some reason, because I'm spacing out,

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 2>or is it another sub committee, I get my five

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 2>minutes and I asked questions if somebody already asked, let's.

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 3>See, I think you hope nobody notices.

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 2>Probably, Okay, so let's soon we're going to have a hearing.

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 2>How many people might testify? And how do you decide

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 2>who actually is testified?

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 3>Got four people testify? The staff will reach out to

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of witnesses, the people they think could be witnesses,

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:57.880
<v Speaker 3>sort of feel them out, get a sense of their expertise,

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 3>and then you know, if it makes sense to have

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 3>them there and they're available, they'll they'll show up. So

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 3>it's only four, No, No, it could be as many

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 3>as as many as as the chair wants to have. Really,

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 3>sometimes there are multiple panels. You know, you might have

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 3>a panel of government witnesses and then a panel of

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 3>expert witnesses. Sometimes it's one, you know, when we have

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 3>like the copyright register up, it's usually just her testifying.

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 3>So it really depends.

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Now we see hearings and we see someone make

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:48.960
<v Speaker 2>a statement before questions do I get the right to

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 2>make a statement. When do I get to make a

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 2>statement as opposed to just answer questions?

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 3>You get to make a statement at the very beginning.

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 3>You have five minutes to make a statement.

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's assume I'm testifying. To what degree are these

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 2>people prepared? And to what deg we should they prepare?

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 3>If you're a witness testifying before the committee, I would

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 3>say you spend a ton of time preparing because you

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:29.160
<v Speaker 3>never know you're under oath. Uh, it's recorded, it's there

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 3>for all time, it's in the congressional record. You know,

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 3>people usually do what's called a murder board will. They'll

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:39.880
<v Speaker 3>sit down, have lawyers with them, you know, run through

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 3>questions they might be asked and how they're going to

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:47.440
<v Speaker 3>answer them. That's almost certainly the case for any sort

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:51.919
<v Speaker 3>of high stakes testimony. You know, if if you're a

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 3>subject matter expert and you know the material cold, you

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:57.680
<v Speaker 3>might not prepare that much. I mean you might. You

0:26:57.760 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 3>might do this all the time. There are a lot

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 3>of people that testif fight pretty regularly and just kind

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 3>of ready for the job.

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:09.639
<v Speaker 2>Okay. From an outside position, it seems that some of

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:14.640
<v Speaker 2>these hearings are grandstanding there's an issue that's in the

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:18.920
<v Speaker 2>news and they have a hearing and we see some

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 2>reports and then doesn't seem like anything happened.

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:28.399
<v Speaker 3>Sure, I think that happens quite a bit. You know,

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:33.119
<v Speaker 3>when you say nothing happens, there are There are really

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:37.879
<v Speaker 3>two purposes to a hearing, right You've got a like

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 3>a legislative hearing, or like an issue intensive hearing about

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 3>like AI and copyright for instance, That's not going to

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 3>be on the front page of the paper. Most people

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:51.719
<v Speaker 3>aren't going to hear about it unless you're you know,

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 3>unless you're really into this stuff. But if the Attorney

0:27:57.119 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 3>general's testifying or you know, some se EO is testifying

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 3>about some oil spill or something, the purpose of that

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:11.199
<v Speaker 3>isn't necessarily like, oh, we're always going to we have

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:13.919
<v Speaker 3>a bill in mind that we're going to move. It

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:19.160
<v Speaker 3>is you know, Congress has a rule as an oversight function, right,

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 3>and so it's sort of looking out to these issues

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 3>to see if potentially we need to get involved or

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 3>we need to do something, we need to consider legislative action.

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 3>That isn't always the case. Most of the cabinet secretaries

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 3>had it's customary for them to come up you know

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 3>once a year and testify. I think a lot of

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 3>what you're talking about happens at those hearings.

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so but let's assume you know it's an issue

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 2>that is going to have to be decided or you

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 2>want to have decided. You have the hearing, Then what

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 2>might happen to move forward towards legislation.

0:28:57.240 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 3>You have the hearing that gives you the ability to

0:28:59.880 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 3>know where the members are, what they're thinking. You hear

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:08.719
<v Speaker 3>from the witnesses about potential problems with the bills, different

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 3>ways to write whatever bills you're considering on that topic,

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 3>sort of go back process all that information, and then

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 3>you'd probably consider putting one of those bills on the

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 3>markup agenda and marking it up marketing and by marking

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 3>it up, sorry I mean, I mean you sort of

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 3>bring it before the committee, You debate the bill, you

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 3>amend the bill, and then you sort of vote on

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:38.959
<v Speaker 3>it and decide whether or not it will leave the

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 3>committee and go to the floor.

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 2>And that could take on one end. It never happens.

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Never introduce how fast or how slow can this process

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 2>be marking up the bill?

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 3>So as fast as we could notice the markup where

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 3>I think it's three business from now, have the mark

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 3>up on the bill and send it to the floor,

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 3>and it could be on the floor the next day,

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 3>or you know, after a bill reports filed, so that

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 3>that could all happen very quickly. Or you could mark

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 3>up a bill that you send to the floor and

0:30:18.080 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 3>it never sees action on the floor. Or you could

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 3>introduce a bill and it never gets marked up.

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, who writes the bill?

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, bills are always authored by members of Congress. You know,

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 3>it's whatever member's name is on the bill. That's that's

0:30:41.000 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 3>who introduced the bill, So they've written the bill.

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 2>We hear about lobbyists writing the actual language. Is that

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 2>a possibility?

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't think is it a possibility. Lobbyists certainly like

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 3>make the case for how some length would you want

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 3>to build might look like At the end of the day,

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 3>these are people who have an interest in the outcome

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 3>of a thing, and they know about their industry and

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 3>they don't want you to overlook something, and so they

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 3>might play some role in, you know, advising on how

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 3>something's written. But members have to consent to you know,

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 3>that language. Usually you take sort of an idea the

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 3>way it works is you would take an idea that

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 3>you have and you would work with a group we

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 3>have called Legislative Council. There's a bunch of experts there

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 3>that will sort of know how to how to draft

0:31:38.920 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 3>the bills so that it, you know, can change the

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 3>law in a way that the courts will interpret the

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 3>way that you want them to.

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 2>So what's your job?

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 3>So I basically oversee policy for the Judiciary Committee. That

0:31:56.800 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 3>means advising members on what bills we're going to move,

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 3>helping to play a role and you know, talking to

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 3>people about why bill is good, why it's bad, if

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 3>it achieves what they want to achieve, what the outcome

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 3>will be, the likelihood of success for the bill you know,

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 3>on the floor or going into law. All that it's

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 3>sort of being, you know, is staff at the committee.

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 3>Our Our main role is advising members and helping guide

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 3>guide the legislative agenda.

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 2>So you it's not only IP you advise on everything

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 2>the Judiciary Committee does.

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 3>I advise on Yes, for the most part, We've got

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, sort of underneath me at the committee there

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 3>are other subject matter experts on all these things. And

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, I would say that I spend a lot

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 3>of my time in the antitrust and IP space. That's

0:32:58.800 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 3>where I spend most of my time.

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So in this department, who do you report to?

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 3>Miss it? Everybody that works for the committee reports to

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:11.960
<v Speaker 3>the chair. Okay, so I worked for all the members

0:33:12.000 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 3>of the committee, but we report to the chair.

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So you're the you're the head guy in policy.

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 3>I think that's that's fair.

0:33:20.080 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 2>And you're an attorney. How many attorneys work for you?

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 3>There are on staff about one hundred attorneys. I'm reluctant

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 3>to say that these people work for me, but work

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 3>with me. You know, eighty ish.

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 2>People, and are they all attorneys?

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 3>The vast majority of them are attorneys?

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Okay, So let's go back to something you brought up, Ai.

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 2>So I remember, back when you were a little kid,

0:33:53.240 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 2>they had hearings on Napster and ultimately the issue was

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:04.600
<v Speaker 2>decided by courts that Master was copyright infringement based on

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 2>a centralized database. Then we had Khazah, Then we had lockers,

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 2>and then we had Daniel Leck came up with a

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 2>good model for streaming, and the rest is history. If

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm in tech, should I be looking for a legislative solution?

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Or do I say, A, these issues are going to

0:34:24.719 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 2>work out anyway, or I should find a business solution.

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:33.400
<v Speaker 3>When it comes to AI, it's it's kind of like a.

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:36.240
<v Speaker 3>I think the issue is multi dimensional and it depends

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 3>what problem you're trying to solve for right, there are

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:45.759
<v Speaker 3>definitely some people in tech that are saying you need

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 3>to regulate AI. Some of those people are incumbent players

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 3>who sort of are in at the ground floor at AI,

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:59.280
<v Speaker 3>and there's concern that the regulations that they want might help,

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, of protect their incumbency there there. You know,

0:35:04.560 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 3>if we're talking about music and AI, I think it's

0:35:08.160 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 3>a it's a different conversation. You know, you've got sort

0:35:13.080 --> 0:35:17.400
<v Speaker 3>of the Copyright Office who's looking at these issues and

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:20.800
<v Speaker 3>there I think soon going to put out some recommendations

0:35:20.800 --> 0:35:24.640
<v Speaker 3>about how they're thinking about AI. You've got the course

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:27.319
<v Speaker 3>looking at this in terms of what is fair use,

0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 3>what is not fair use, and you know AI training

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:34.359
<v Speaker 3>models and how that will work, you know. And then

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:39.759
<v Speaker 3>I think you've got Congress taking up questions related to

0:35:40.160 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 3>protecting voice and likeness and to some extent like record

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:51.000
<v Speaker 3>keeping and transparency. You know, these are all issues that

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:54.759
<v Speaker 3>are that are hot right now. I don't think that

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 3>the situation we're in today is unlike you know what

0:35:59.200 --> 0:36:05.839
<v Speaker 3>happened in nineteen ninety nine with Napster. We I've been

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:11.320
<v Speaker 3>working on music issues for almost a decade now on

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:16.480
<v Speaker 3>on Capitol Hill, and uh, it went from a year

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 3>ago I would hear about AI every couple of months

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:22.839
<v Speaker 3>or someone would want to come talk about it. This year,

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:25.879
<v Speaker 3>it feels like every day people want to come talk

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:30.880
<v Speaker 3>about AI. I think people are people are really concerned

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:33.880
<v Speaker 3>and they want to get in front of this. I

0:36:33.880 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 3>think that they don't want a second Napster situation to unfold.

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so you say you've been working on music issues

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:42.360
<v Speaker 2>for ten years. What are some of the music issues

0:36:42.440 --> 0:36:44.279
<v Speaker 2>or what are the music issues you're working on.

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, in the last ten years, the biggest thing was

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 3>definitely the Music Monetization Act that we got signed in

0:36:53.600 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 3>a lot in twenty eighteen. You know, you get like

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:03.840
<v Speaker 3>once in a generation, you get a big piece of

0:37:04.160 --> 0:37:10.160
<v Speaker 3>copyright legislation like the Music Monerornization Act, and so that

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 3>was something that was almost you know, a decade and

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:15.879
<v Speaker 3>a half in the making. Really, the issues that led

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 3>to that came from streaming that that was just a

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:25.240
<v Speaker 3>massive accomplishment that I think brought everyone together. We passed

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 3>it out of the House unanimously, went out of the

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:32.280
<v Speaker 3>Senate unanimously. That was a product of years of hard

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:36.640
<v Speaker 3>work by a lot of people. Today, the issues, it's

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 3>like AI and people just trying to figure out what

0:37:39.560 --> 0:37:42.839
<v Speaker 3>to do. A lot of these questions are novel. People

0:37:42.920 --> 0:37:47.000
<v Speaker 3>are confused, people are scared, they're they're looking for some

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 3>certainty and to see if Congress is going to do something.

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Music Modernization Act, how'd you get that over the finish line.

0:37:58.520 --> 0:38:07.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, these issues we're talking that was the the centerpiece

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:14.360
<v Speaker 3>of that bill was fixing the mechanical license process, you know,

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:19.439
<v Speaker 3>and this is this is something that I'm sure most

0:38:19.480 --> 0:38:22.600
<v Speaker 3>of your listeners know, but you know the mechanical license

0:38:22.680 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 3>goes back to the piano role. Right. We created this

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:30.759
<v Speaker 3>in nineteen oh nine after you know, sheet music was

0:38:30.800 --> 0:38:33.640
<v Speaker 3>the only way you sold music in America, right, sold

0:38:33.680 --> 0:38:38.960
<v Speaker 3>sheet music. And that's how you know songwriters, publishers paid money.

0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:44.799
<v Speaker 3>Someone who vents the piano roll wax cylinder case goes

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 3>up to the Supreme Court and the chord is basically

0:38:47.680 --> 0:38:50.399
<v Speaker 3>like this is not a musical work, you know, this

0:38:50.480 --> 0:38:53.920
<v Speaker 3>isn't cheap music. We can't, we won't grant protection to this.

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 3>So Congress steps in and they say they create a

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:02.880
<v Speaker 3>protection for a mechanical work, like a reproduction, you know,

0:39:02.920 --> 0:39:09.000
<v Speaker 3>a mechanical reproduction of the musical work. It works out,

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:10.759
<v Speaker 3>you know, I think there was like a two cent

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:13.600
<v Speaker 3>rate in place at the beginning. This stays in place,

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:18.279
<v Speaker 3>I think until nineteen seventy six. They increased it a

0:39:18.280 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 3>little bit, but the mechanical royalty wasn't something people talked about.

0:39:23.239 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 3>There's talk of even getting rid of it at some point,

0:39:26.320 --> 0:39:33.279
<v Speaker 3>and then in the streaming era it becomes a massive problem.

0:39:33.680 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, back in two thousand and four, people were

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:39.520
<v Speaker 3>talking about all the issues that would they would come

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:43.759
<v Speaker 3>of the problems with the mechanical because what was what

0:39:43.840 --> 0:39:49.080
<v Speaker 3>happens is or what did happen? Pre mma was if

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:52.600
<v Speaker 3>you wanted to mechanically and that's sort of an outdated term,

0:39:52.640 --> 0:39:55.600
<v Speaker 3>even though you know it's not piano rules anymore, reproduce

0:39:55.640 --> 0:39:58.319
<v Speaker 3>the work. You basically told the copyright office you were

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 3>going to do this, and you you know, you paid

0:40:01.080 --> 0:40:06.320
<v Speaker 3>for that, the right to reproduce it. Well with streaming,

0:40:06.880 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 3>all of the streams and all of the songs. It's

0:40:09.200 --> 0:40:15.080
<v Speaker 3>just this massive deluge of streaming led to these notices

0:40:15.120 --> 0:40:18.480
<v Speaker 3>of intent flooding the Copyright Office. They couldn't keep up.

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:21.920
<v Speaker 3>People weren't getting paid.

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:23.480
<v Speaker 2>It was.

0:40:23.640 --> 0:40:27.279
<v Speaker 3>It was a real mess, and it stayed that way

0:40:27.360 --> 0:40:30.799
<v Speaker 3>for quite some time until twenty eighteen when we passed

0:40:30.840 --> 0:40:34.880
<v Speaker 3>the Music Monetization Act, which created like a single entity,

0:40:35.080 --> 0:40:39.560
<v Speaker 3>the Music Licensing Collective, which essentially deals with all these

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:40.760
<v Speaker 3>deals with all these issues.

0:40:40.800 --> 0:40:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Now, okay, we talk about the Copyright Department setting rates

0:40:47.080 --> 0:40:48.760
<v Speaker 2>and increases. How does that work?

0:40:51.400 --> 0:40:55.839
<v Speaker 3>So the Copyright Office has a three judge panel called

0:40:55.840 --> 0:41:01.279
<v Speaker 3>the Copyright Royalty Board or the CRB. They're charged with

0:41:01.360 --> 0:41:07.040
<v Speaker 3>sort of taking into account all evidence, figuring out rates

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:12.080
<v Speaker 3>for certain proceedings, basically finding agreement among parties after they

0:41:12.120 --> 0:41:16.040
<v Speaker 3>make their case. That is the process we were talking

0:41:16.080 --> 0:41:20.239
<v Speaker 3>about with Spotify. That was a twenty twenty two agreement.

0:41:20.719 --> 0:41:23.239
<v Speaker 3>I think it was Phono Records for I think is

0:41:23.280 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 3>the name of that proceeding where you know they came

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:33.160
<v Speaker 3>to this agreement that now is obviously back in the

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:36.520
<v Speaker 3>news as a problem.

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's switch gears. You say you also have oversight

0:41:41.160 --> 0:41:46.880
<v Speaker 2>into antitrust. We have this dog case against Live Nation

0:41:47.160 --> 0:41:52.080
<v Speaker 2>and its Ticketmaster subsidiary. To what degree is Congress involved

0:41:52.120 --> 0:41:52.520
<v Speaker 2>in that?

0:41:54.719 --> 0:41:58.319
<v Speaker 3>It's the situation Congress is monitoring. There's a lot of

0:41:58.800 --> 0:42:05.600
<v Speaker 3>interest in what happened Ticketmaster, what happened with Taylor Swift.

0:42:06.800 --> 0:42:12.560
<v Speaker 3>But DOJ is basically suing Ticketmaster under existing law. So

0:42:12.719 --> 0:42:14.879
<v Speaker 3>that's not something that they'll be able to talk about

0:42:14.920 --> 0:42:19.240
<v Speaker 3>publicly or really come testify about until the case is settled.

0:42:19.640 --> 0:42:22.239
<v Speaker 3>Something people have a lot of interest in. People are

0:42:22.640 --> 0:42:25.480
<v Speaker 3>saying good things, are bad things about it, But we

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:27.960
<v Speaker 3>don't have a lot of interest in like that suit

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:33.719
<v Speaker 3>in particular. Congress is legislating, I would say, around other

0:42:33.960 --> 0:42:37.600
<v Speaker 3>issues in that space. It was just a couple of

0:42:37.640 --> 0:42:41.120
<v Speaker 3>weeks ago we passed something called the Ticket Act, which

0:42:41.160 --> 0:42:46.080
<v Speaker 3>basically provides for all in ticket pricing, so you know,

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:48.600
<v Speaker 3>all the fees and everything is the price you see.

0:42:48.640 --> 0:42:50.520
<v Speaker 3>The price you see is the price you get. That

0:42:50.600 --> 0:42:55.520
<v Speaker 3>passed the House, you know, I think it likely will

0:42:55.560 --> 0:42:57.240
<v Speaker 3>pass the Senate, but it hasn't yet.

0:42:57.800 --> 0:42:59.440
<v Speaker 2>What will it take to pass the Senate.

0:43:00.800 --> 0:43:04.759
<v Speaker 3>I think they're working out some disagreements. There's a there's

0:43:04.800 --> 0:43:10.720
<v Speaker 3>a Ticket Fairness Act, which is different than the Ticket Act.

0:43:11.560 --> 0:43:16.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, there are issues related to like filthy URLs

0:43:17.040 --> 0:43:20.280
<v Speaker 3>and speculative ticketing, and I think people want those added,

0:43:20.360 --> 0:43:22.480
<v Speaker 3>and so that's part of the process, is figuring out

0:43:23.000 --> 0:43:24.840
<v Speaker 3>like what we'll make it into the final bill that

0:43:24.920 --> 0:43:28.880
<v Speaker 3>the Senate passes. I think, like we talked about earlier,

0:43:29.600 --> 0:43:31.719
<v Speaker 3>they'll pass something. It'll probably be a little different than

0:43:31.719 --> 0:43:33.480
<v Speaker 3>what passed the House, and it'll come back to us.

0:43:34.040 --> 0:43:36.839
<v Speaker 3>But that that bill passed that, I don't know if

0:43:36.840 --> 0:43:39.560
<v Speaker 3>there was any opposition to it. It was like four

0:43:39.640 --> 0:43:43.319
<v Speaker 3>hundred and sum, you know, to a very small number

0:43:43.320 --> 0:43:43.720
<v Speaker 3>of people.

0:43:44.320 --> 0:43:47.600
<v Speaker 2>So on many issues, and ticketing being one of them,

0:43:47.640 --> 0:43:52.160
<v Speaker 2>they're opposing views. How does the committee deal with those

0:43:52.160 --> 0:43:56.480
<v Speaker 2>opposing views? And how do I try to get my

0:43:56.840 --> 0:44:00.760
<v Speaker 2>side across as opposed to the other side.

0:44:03.360 --> 0:44:06.200
<v Speaker 3>We deal with them by providing a forum for people

0:44:06.239 --> 0:44:10.000
<v Speaker 3>to argue and debate and try to convince their colleagues

0:44:10.080 --> 0:44:12.880
<v Speaker 3>that they're right and their colleague is wrong, or vice versa.

0:44:13.800 --> 0:44:16.360
<v Speaker 3>I think if you want your side to prevail, you

0:44:16.440 --> 0:44:21.480
<v Speaker 3>probably come with better arguments, So you spend time with

0:44:21.680 --> 0:44:26.439
<v Speaker 3>your colleagues convincing them you know you're wrong to think

0:44:26.480 --> 0:44:29.239
<v Speaker 3>this way, think that way about this issue. I'm just like,

0:44:29.600 --> 0:44:30.600
<v Speaker 3>that's really.

0:44:30.360 --> 0:44:33.200
<v Speaker 2>It okay, But that's all within the committee.

0:44:33.520 --> 0:44:34.000
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

0:44:34.120 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 2>If I'm a company external to the committee, how do

0:44:37.680 --> 0:44:41.520
<v Speaker 2>I get my position argued by a member of the committee.

0:44:42.400 --> 0:44:46.280
<v Speaker 3>You meet with them and make the case. It helps

0:44:46.280 --> 0:44:49.279
<v Speaker 3>if you're from the district, you have a connection to

0:44:49.320 --> 0:44:54.760
<v Speaker 3>the member, relationship with them, and make the case. Most

0:44:54.800 --> 0:44:57.440
<v Speaker 3>people have a scattershot approach. They'll meet with all the

0:44:57.480 --> 0:44:59.880
<v Speaker 3>members and hope that someone will be their champion.

0:45:07.480 --> 0:45:10.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's been a lot of discussion about certainly

0:45:10.040 --> 0:45:14.680
<v Speaker 2>tech companies who didn't have lobbyists and hired lobbyists. The RIUBLEA,

0:45:14.800 --> 0:45:20.160
<v Speaker 2>the Recording Industry Association of America, is essentially a lobbying outfit.

0:45:20.640 --> 0:45:25.040
<v Speaker 2>To what degree are lobbyists important in getting your side

0:45:25.080 --> 0:45:26.160
<v Speaker 2>of the argument heard?

0:45:31.000 --> 0:45:32.799
<v Speaker 3>If you're a member, you mean, and you want to

0:45:32.800 --> 0:45:36.320
<v Speaker 3>make an argument, how important are lobbyists to like advancing

0:45:36.320 --> 0:45:37.279
<v Speaker 3>that argument.

0:45:38.000 --> 0:45:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Yes, or even from externally. I'm a company and I

0:45:41.120 --> 0:45:45.120
<v Speaker 2>want to get my representative to hear my argument, to

0:45:45.120 --> 0:45:49.759
<v Speaker 2>put forth my argument right.

0:45:50.880 --> 0:45:54.480
<v Speaker 3>I think the lobbyists play a sort of function of

0:45:55.640 --> 0:45:59.919
<v Speaker 3>they probably know the issue. They're spending all day thinking

0:46:00.160 --> 0:46:06.000
<v Speaker 3>about this, building arguments, writing memos, they're willing to go

0:46:06.080 --> 0:46:09.120
<v Speaker 3>talk to other people. For you, as a member or

0:46:09.160 --> 0:46:11.799
<v Speaker 3>a staffer, you're probably working on a thousand things that

0:46:11.880 --> 0:46:14.360
<v Speaker 3>can't dedicate all of your time to that. And so

0:46:14.480 --> 0:46:18.160
<v Speaker 3>I think if you're thinking the same way, you know

0:46:18.800 --> 0:46:23.160
<v Speaker 3>someone from a company is thinking that that could be helpful.

0:46:23.920 --> 0:46:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let me put it in a different way. If I'm

0:46:26.200 --> 0:46:31.560
<v Speaker 2>somebody in Missouri who has a business is successful, and

0:46:31.600 --> 0:46:36.680
<v Speaker 2>I have no presence in Washington, will it behooved me

0:46:36.840 --> 0:46:39.680
<v Speaker 2>to hire a lobbyist or some company washing just to

0:46:39.760 --> 0:46:42.840
<v Speaker 2>make the connection to the people who are addressing or

0:46:42.920 --> 0:46:44.320
<v Speaker 2>could address my issue.

0:46:44.960 --> 0:46:47.239
<v Speaker 3>Sure, I think that's probably the normal thing.

0:46:47.320 --> 0:46:47.440
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:46:47.480 --> 0:46:49.440
<v Speaker 3>I've never been in that position where I had to,

0:46:50.280 --> 0:46:53.399
<v Speaker 3>you know, come calling on Congress, but I think that's

0:46:53.400 --> 0:46:56.640
<v Speaker 3>probably what most people do. You know, you're living in

0:46:56.680 --> 0:47:00.239
<v Speaker 3>the Midwest, there is some problem with some law law

0:47:00.520 --> 0:47:03.040
<v Speaker 3>that you think is hurting your company. You think that

0:47:03.080 --> 0:47:06.239
<v Speaker 3>Congress should look at changing that. You're probably going to

0:47:06.280 --> 0:47:09.200
<v Speaker 3>look to retain some law firm or lobbyist in DC

0:47:09.719 --> 0:47:12.279
<v Speaker 3>that can help you navigate the process. That's right.

0:47:12.680 --> 0:47:18.399
<v Speaker 2>So in the Judicial Committee, what music entertainment issues are

0:47:18.480 --> 0:47:20.560
<v Speaker 2>presently being debated.

0:47:22.120 --> 0:47:27.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, certainly all of these AI issues are being debated.

0:47:27.880 --> 0:47:31.960
<v Speaker 3>That's that's a really nascent conversation. In some ways, we're

0:47:32.000 --> 0:47:34.319
<v Speaker 3>taking a lot of testimony. We're hearing from a lot

0:47:34.360 --> 0:47:38.239
<v Speaker 3>of folks, what what could happen in the future, what

0:47:38.280 --> 0:47:42.759
<v Speaker 3>people want us to do. That's there. You know, there

0:47:42.840 --> 0:47:49.120
<v Speaker 3>is this issue of the terrestrial performance, right. This is

0:47:49.160 --> 0:47:52.440
<v Speaker 3>something that has been around for you know, fifty one

0:47:52.520 --> 0:47:58.239
<v Speaker 3>hundred years. You know, the sound recording artists basically say

0:47:58.280 --> 0:48:02.319
<v Speaker 3>they should get paid for being played on radio and

0:48:02.360 --> 0:48:07.200
<v Speaker 3>they're not. Radio obviously has a different take on it,

0:48:08.239 --> 0:48:10.879
<v Speaker 3>and people are split. But that that's something that's that's

0:48:10.920 --> 0:48:14.479
<v Speaker 3>always alive. Uh, And I think we're having a hearing

0:48:14.520 --> 0:48:16.360
<v Speaker 3>on that issue in a couple of weeks.

0:48:16.600 --> 0:48:20.960
<v Speaker 2>In any other music, copyright, entertainment issues that are either

0:48:21.239 --> 0:48:24.040
<v Speaker 2>actively or floating around the committee.

0:48:26.320 --> 0:48:30.320
<v Speaker 3>It's really it's all it's been all a I uh,

0:48:31.239 --> 0:48:38.839
<v Speaker 3>you know, almost all the time. This Congress, I mean,

0:48:38.880 --> 0:48:43.120
<v Speaker 3>the ticketmaster thing is a live discussion that that people

0:48:43.120 --> 0:48:47.560
<v Speaker 3>are people are having. But outside of that, relatively you know,

0:48:48.040 --> 0:48:49.600
<v Speaker 3>relatively calm.

0:48:49.600 --> 0:48:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So you know, Congress does not have a reputation

0:48:55.400 --> 0:49:01.320
<v Speaker 2>for moving quickly, certainly in the technological sphere, will movement

0:49:01.480 --> 0:49:05.359
<v Speaker 2>in the AI regulation area come from Congress or will

0:49:05.400 --> 0:49:06.960
<v Speaker 2>come from an external source?

0:49:08.520 --> 0:49:13.200
<v Speaker 3>Well it Congress has said, uh, this Congress, We've got

0:49:13.200 --> 0:49:19.919
<v Speaker 3>this AI task Force's equal representation of Republicans and Democrats.

0:49:20.200 --> 0:49:24.120
<v Speaker 3>They're holding all these meetings, hearing from you know, the

0:49:24.160 --> 0:49:29.560
<v Speaker 3>defense industry, that you know, tech companies, everybody's coming in

0:49:29.600 --> 0:49:32.160
<v Speaker 3>for these sort of forums. And I think this panel

0:49:32.200 --> 0:49:34.400
<v Speaker 3>at the end of the year will make some recommendations

0:49:34.440 --> 0:49:38.400
<v Speaker 3>about what they think Congress should do on these issues.

0:49:39.680 --> 0:49:45.879
<v Speaker 3>You have the administration of doing things via executive order

0:49:46.800 --> 0:49:50.000
<v Speaker 3>looking at you know, there are things that executive branch

0:49:50.040 --> 0:49:54.480
<v Speaker 3>agencies can be doing with AI. Senator Schumer put out

0:49:54.480 --> 0:49:59.799
<v Speaker 3>a report about AI. There's a lot of happening. How

0:50:00.120 --> 0:50:02.880
<v Speaker 3>asked all of that will come together? Hard to tell.

0:50:03.640 --> 0:50:08.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure. I don't think anything will happen before

0:50:08.719 --> 0:50:11.960
<v Speaker 3>the end of the year. I don't think anyone would

0:50:12.000 --> 0:50:12.680
<v Speaker 3>disagree with that.

0:50:13.040 --> 0:50:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's an issue with even the players can't agree

0:50:15.560 --> 0:50:20.480
<v Speaker 2>on and within the committee. Does this break down by

0:50:20.480 --> 0:50:24.319
<v Speaker 2>political parties or is everybody basically you know, learning and

0:50:24.360 --> 0:50:26.160
<v Speaker 2>thinking what the best thing to do is.

0:50:27.440 --> 0:50:31.120
<v Speaker 3>People are learning and thinking about what the best thing

0:50:31.160 --> 0:50:37.680
<v Speaker 3>to do is on AI hardly any like tech issues,

0:50:37.880 --> 0:50:41.480
<v Speaker 3>IP issues, they don't break down on party lines. They

0:50:41.520 --> 0:50:45.360
<v Speaker 3>really it's there's a whole almost an entirely different paradigm

0:50:45.480 --> 0:50:51.400
<v Speaker 3>for thinking about like copyright protection and what people have.

0:50:51.600 --> 0:50:56.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, some people would say more it should be cheaper,

0:50:56.719 --> 0:51:00.680
<v Speaker 3>the government shouldn't provide as much protection for creative work.

0:51:00.719 --> 0:51:03.279
<v Speaker 3>So other people are like, that's crazy. You know, we

0:51:03.360 --> 0:51:08.600
<v Speaker 3>need we are way under compensating, you know, creative artists.

0:51:08.760 --> 0:51:12.719
<v Speaker 3>We should really increase, increase the rights people have. I

0:51:12.719 --> 0:51:15.200
<v Speaker 3>think it sort of breaks down along along those lines

0:51:15.280 --> 0:51:16.720
<v Speaker 3>more than more than anything else.

0:51:17.600 --> 0:51:21.359
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you're saying these hearings, these are traditional hearings that

0:51:21.640 --> 0:51:24.480
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about with every member gets five minutes or

0:51:24.600 --> 0:51:28.120
<v Speaker 2>might I come in and speak to five representatives? What

0:51:28.160 --> 0:51:30.360
<v Speaker 2>are all these hearings you're referencing on AI?

0:51:31.800 --> 0:51:34.960
<v Speaker 3>These are not hearings. This is a what we'd call

0:51:35.040 --> 0:51:40.439
<v Speaker 3>a task force, and so it is a more informal thing.

0:51:40.520 --> 0:51:43.640
<v Speaker 3>They've got some rules in place where people come in

0:51:43.719 --> 0:51:46.399
<v Speaker 3>and I think they give them five minutes. It might

0:51:46.440 --> 0:51:49.880
<v Speaker 3>be ten, but it's it's a more informal sort of

0:51:50.000 --> 0:51:53.160
<v Speaker 3>tribunal for hearing for hear hearing out the issues, and

0:51:53.200 --> 0:51:56.440
<v Speaker 3>I think a more freewheeling discussion. They try and you know,

0:51:56.600 --> 0:51:59.360
<v Speaker 3>keep some rules in place. People are still asking questions

0:51:59.360 --> 0:52:03.319
<v Speaker 3>of the witness, but it's a little looser and I

0:52:03.360 --> 0:52:06.000
<v Speaker 3>don't think there's a record being built. It's more of

0:52:06.040 --> 0:52:08.960
<v Speaker 3>a you know, a place where people can just talk

0:52:09.040 --> 0:52:09.560
<v Speaker 3>more freely.

0:52:10.080 --> 0:52:12.439
<v Speaker 2>And will this be you talk about a record? Will

0:52:12.440 --> 0:52:15.080
<v Speaker 2>this be on c spin, will there be any report?

0:52:15.520 --> 0:52:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Or this is basically in chambers.

0:52:18.280 --> 0:52:22.080
<v Speaker 3>It's basically in chambers. Basically in chambers for now. But

0:52:22.520 --> 0:52:26.520
<v Speaker 3>while that's happening, all of the various committees are holding

0:52:26.560 --> 0:52:31.440
<v Speaker 3>hearings on these issues and you know, talking through talking

0:52:31.440 --> 0:52:33.640
<v Speaker 3>through them on the record and having legislative hearings and

0:52:33.640 --> 0:52:34.520
<v Speaker 3>putting bills forward.

0:52:35.440 --> 0:52:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Now, the average person can't understand what AI is, even

0:52:39.560 --> 0:52:42.960
<v Speaker 2>though they're using AI every day on their phones, et cetera.

0:52:43.560 --> 0:52:47.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, these committees address a million issues. To what

0:52:47.560 --> 0:52:50.200
<v Speaker 2>degree are the individuals up to speed on some of

0:52:50.239 --> 0:52:50.960
<v Speaker 2>these issues.

0:52:54.960 --> 0:53:00.640
<v Speaker 3>It would surprise you, I think how knowledge jible some

0:53:00.840 --> 0:53:06.760
<v Speaker 3>members can become. Uh And I think it would also

0:53:06.880 --> 0:53:11.319
<v Speaker 3>surprise you at you know, how little knowledge some people have.

0:53:13.680 --> 0:53:18.359
<v Speaker 3>The really great thing about working in Congress is it's

0:53:18.400 --> 0:53:22.200
<v Speaker 3>really easy to get information. There are a lot of

0:53:22.200 --> 0:53:24.640
<v Speaker 3>people that want to help you understand. We've got the

0:53:24.640 --> 0:53:29.120
<v Speaker 3>Congressional Research Service there staff, You've got sort of legislative

0:53:29.120 --> 0:53:31.279
<v Speaker 3>counsel to advise you on how bills are going to

0:53:31.320 --> 0:53:34.640
<v Speaker 3>be written. So anyone that wants to learn can learn

0:53:35.400 --> 0:53:37.760
<v Speaker 3>a lot of really smart people working on these things,

0:53:37.800 --> 0:53:40.799
<v Speaker 3>and that the hearings are really there to, you know,

0:53:40.920 --> 0:53:42.799
<v Speaker 3>to help you learn. And I think, frankly, that's why

0:53:43.120 --> 0:53:45.760
<v Speaker 3>they're doing some of this is, as you said in Chambers,

0:53:45.760 --> 0:53:49.759
<v Speaker 3>because these issues are novel, they're complex. People want the

0:53:49.760 --> 0:53:53.640
<v Speaker 3>opportunity to, you know, like ask what might be perceived

0:53:53.640 --> 0:53:54.640
<v Speaker 3>as a stupid question.

0:53:55.520 --> 0:53:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's go back to antitrust for a minute. You have

0:53:58.040 --> 0:54:02.879
<v Speaker 2>the DOJ, and there's doing Live Nation. You have Lena Kahan,

0:54:03.800 --> 0:54:07.279
<v Speaker 2>and you have the Congress. How do those responsibilities to

0:54:07.360 --> 0:54:09.440
<v Speaker 2>divide up into what degree do they overlap?

0:54:11.080 --> 0:54:15.680
<v Speaker 3>So put it simply, Congress writes the laws and then

0:54:16.120 --> 0:54:21.880
<v Speaker 3>Lena and Jonathan enforced the laws. You've got Lena Khanna,

0:54:21.920 --> 0:54:23.920
<v Speaker 3>you noted at the FTC, which is a commission of

0:54:24.160 --> 0:54:29.400
<v Speaker 3>five people currently controlled by by Lena, who used to

0:54:29.400 --> 0:54:32.080
<v Speaker 3>work at Before she was there, she worked at the

0:54:32.160 --> 0:54:39.080
<v Speaker 3>Judiciary Committee, and they've got a big piece of anti

0:54:39.080 --> 0:54:42.319
<v Speaker 3>trust and they've got a lot of other responsibilities at

0:54:42.320 --> 0:54:46.799
<v Speaker 3>the FTC also, and then you have the DOJ, which

0:54:46.800 --> 0:54:49.320
<v Speaker 3>is run by the DOJ Anti Trust Division, which is

0:54:49.400 --> 0:54:53.320
<v Speaker 3>run by Jonathan Canter and just doing anti trust.

0:54:54.040 --> 0:54:55.240
<v Speaker 2>So how'd you get this job?

0:54:55.960 --> 0:54:59.560
<v Speaker 3>How do I get that? You know, Bob? I came

0:54:59.680 --> 0:55:07.440
<v Speaker 3>to Capitol Hill in two thousand and eleven and I thought,

0:55:07.640 --> 0:55:12.359
<v Speaker 3>you know, I like DC, I like policy work. It's

0:55:12.400 --> 0:55:16.839
<v Speaker 3>important to understand Capitol Hill. I'll stay here for one

0:55:16.920 --> 0:55:20.400
<v Speaker 3>year and then go do something else. And you know,

0:55:20.480 --> 0:55:25.640
<v Speaker 3>almost fourteen years later, I'm still here, still kicking around.

0:55:25.800 --> 0:55:28.040
<v Speaker 3>It's been a lot of fun. It's been a lot

0:55:28.080 --> 0:55:28.399
<v Speaker 3>of fun.

0:55:28.880 --> 0:55:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's go back to the beginning. Where you're from.

0:55:31.640 --> 0:55:35.680
<v Speaker 3>From Pittsburgh, outside of Pittsburgh, Cranberry Township.

0:55:35.600 --> 0:55:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, And what your parents do for a living?

0:55:39.120 --> 0:55:43.560
<v Speaker 3>My parents do. My mother it's like a sales rep.

0:55:43.600 --> 0:55:50.440
<v Speaker 3>And my father was an engineer, got civil engineer, doing

0:55:50.560 --> 0:55:51.280
<v Speaker 3>energy stuff.

0:55:52.280 --> 0:55:54.799
<v Speaker 2>And how many kids in the family, just.

0:55:54.800 --> 0:55:55.520
<v Speaker 3>Me and my brother.

0:55:56.040 --> 0:55:57.080
<v Speaker 2>What's your brother up to?

0:55:57.719 --> 0:56:01.839
<v Speaker 3>My brother lives out there in LA with you. He's

0:56:02.040 --> 0:56:05.960
<v Speaker 3>he's doing like the communications work for a hospital or something.

0:56:07.040 --> 0:56:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, did you say with the yalies? Who'd you say?

0:56:10.320 --> 0:56:11.240
<v Speaker 3>No? With a hospital?

0:56:11.320 --> 0:56:12.440
<v Speaker 2>With a hospital? Okay?

0:56:12.440 --> 0:56:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Communications were with a hospital. Sorry. And you go to

0:56:15.000 --> 0:56:18.120
<v Speaker 3>college where I go to George Mason down here?

0:56:18.960 --> 0:56:21.160
<v Speaker 2>Any particular reason you go to George Mason.

0:56:21.840 --> 0:56:26.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I was on the debate team at George Mason.

0:56:26.920 --> 0:56:29.200
<v Speaker 3>They had a great debate program, and so that was

0:56:29.320 --> 0:56:32.040
<v Speaker 3>kind of what drove me down there. I wanted to

0:56:32.040 --> 0:56:35.600
<v Speaker 3>be in DC, so everything kind of lined up. It

0:56:35.640 --> 0:56:36.480
<v Speaker 3>was a great experience.

0:56:36.640 --> 0:56:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Did you go directly from undergrad to law school?

0:56:40.680 --> 0:56:44.759
<v Speaker 3>No? I, like I said, I got this.

0:56:45.239 --> 0:56:45.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:56:45.480 --> 0:56:48.120
<v Speaker 3>I got a job on Capitol Hill, thought it was

0:56:49.400 --> 0:56:50.920
<v Speaker 3>not going to be awesome, and that I'd go to

0:56:51.000 --> 0:56:55.279
<v Speaker 3>law school right afterward. I was on Capitol Hill for

0:56:55.280 --> 0:56:59.200
<v Speaker 3>about four years, realized I wasn't going to leave, and

0:57:00.080 --> 0:57:02.239
<v Speaker 3>made the decision to go to law school at night,

0:57:02.840 --> 0:57:07.560
<v Speaker 3>also at George Mason while working on the hill.

0:57:07.800 --> 0:57:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So you graduated from college what year.

0:57:10.960 --> 0:57:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Two thousand and four or two thousand and eight? Sorry,

0:57:14.480 --> 0:57:16.800
<v Speaker 3>got there in four graduated in o eight.

0:57:16.840 --> 0:57:18.160
<v Speaker 2>How long did it take you to go to law

0:57:18.200 --> 0:57:18.840
<v Speaker 2>school at night?

0:57:19.720 --> 0:57:20.920
<v Speaker 3>About four years.

0:57:21.240 --> 0:57:25.280
<v Speaker 2>It's a lot of work, okay. So what happens when

0:57:25.320 --> 0:57:29.720
<v Speaker 2>you start working on Capitol Hill and it evolves into

0:57:29.760 --> 0:57:32.520
<v Speaker 2>where you are now, what's your first job? And then

0:57:32.520 --> 0:57:34.280
<v Speaker 2>where do you go from there? Sure?

0:57:34.680 --> 0:57:38.920
<v Speaker 3>So I got there in twenty and eleven and I

0:57:39.000 --> 0:57:43.680
<v Speaker 3>worked for Dary Lisa, who's now the IP Subcommittee chair

0:57:44.320 --> 0:57:47.800
<v Speaker 3>in like a totally different role at the he was

0:57:47.840 --> 0:57:50.440
<v Speaker 3>at the Oversight Committee at the time. I got to

0:57:50.520 --> 0:57:58.600
<v Speaker 3>know him pretty well. In twenty fourteen, he asked me

0:57:58.680 --> 0:58:02.800
<v Speaker 3>to come be his life legislative director, so I sort

0:58:02.840 --> 0:58:06.680
<v Speaker 3>of managed his whole legislative shop while he was the

0:58:06.800 --> 0:58:11.560
<v Speaker 3>chair of the IP Subcommittee and then Judi Charry Committee

0:58:12.120 --> 0:58:12.560
<v Speaker 3>after that.

0:58:12.800 --> 0:58:15.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's be a little more granular. What's your very

0:58:15.280 --> 0:58:16.800
<v Speaker 2>first job and how do you get it?

0:58:17.640 --> 0:58:21.360
<v Speaker 3>Very first job on Capitol Hill was as a professional

0:58:21.400 --> 0:58:25.200
<v Speaker 3>staff member on the Oversight Committee, which at the time

0:58:25.400 --> 0:58:28.280
<v Speaker 3>was chaired by mister Isaa.

0:58:29.320 --> 0:58:30.640
<v Speaker 2>How do you get a job like that?

0:58:32.320 --> 0:58:35.720
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's how you get a job on Capitol

0:58:35.760 --> 0:58:37.720
<v Speaker 3>Hill is a funny thing. You got to be in

0:58:37.800 --> 0:58:42.080
<v Speaker 3>the right place at the right time. Congress had just

0:58:42.200 --> 0:58:49.200
<v Speaker 3>changed and the twenty ten cycle. I knew some people

0:58:49.240 --> 0:58:54.280
<v Speaker 3>from George Mason that were there and sort of expressed

0:58:54.280 --> 0:58:57.439
<v Speaker 3>some interest and potentially going to Capitol Hill, like I said,

0:58:57.440 --> 0:59:02.680
<v Speaker 3>to get the experience, got an interview, and to get

0:59:02.720 --> 0:59:04.760
<v Speaker 3>the job. And the thing about these changes is like

0:59:04.840 --> 0:59:08.960
<v Speaker 3>you could have to hire twenty thirty forty people within

0:59:09.120 --> 0:59:13.680
<v Speaker 3>a couple of months to staff up and so right place,

0:59:13.760 --> 0:59:16.000
<v Speaker 3>right time, that really really makes a difference.

0:59:16.280 --> 0:59:20.280
<v Speaker 2>So what did you actually do when you started? What

0:59:20.320 --> 0:59:21.080
<v Speaker 2>did I do? So?

0:59:22.160 --> 0:59:24.720
<v Speaker 3>This was it was the Oversight Committee. So at that

0:59:24.800 --> 0:59:29.000
<v Speaker 3>time there was a lot of like oversight of the

0:59:29.080 --> 0:59:33.160
<v Speaker 3>GM bailout and of the tart program and of the

0:59:33.200 --> 0:59:37.240
<v Speaker 3>stimulus program and where's the money going, how's it being spent?

0:59:37.720 --> 0:59:39.920
<v Speaker 3>Asking questions of people. It was like a lot of

0:59:40.040 --> 0:59:42.760
<v Speaker 3>a lot of that stuff, less like policy work.

0:59:42.920 --> 0:59:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, what were you doing?

0:59:45.400 --> 0:59:47.760
<v Speaker 3>I was doing that. I was you know, like writing

0:59:47.840 --> 0:59:52.880
<v Speaker 3>letters to the you know, companies that got bailout money.

0:59:53.480 --> 0:59:57.520
<v Speaker 3>I was talking to members about what we found in

0:59:57.560 --> 1:00:00.320
<v Speaker 3>the documents that we got from these company he is

1:00:00.360 --> 1:00:06.680
<v Speaker 3>about the government funds they received it. A lot of

1:00:06.720 --> 1:00:12.000
<v Speaker 3>writing letters and sort of you know, talking talking to

1:00:12.040 --> 1:00:14.520
<v Speaker 3>people about how they were like waste for out and abuse.

1:00:14.600 --> 1:00:27.680
<v Speaker 4>Basically, how do you become so tight with ISA from working?

1:00:27.720 --> 1:00:31.520
<v Speaker 3>I didn't know him at all. When I uh took

1:00:31.560 --> 1:00:36.280
<v Speaker 3>the job at the at the Oversight Committee, didn't didn't

1:00:36.280 --> 1:00:38.680
<v Speaker 3>know him hardly at all. It was probably a year

1:00:38.840 --> 1:00:40.440
<v Speaker 3>or you know, it was probably a year or so

1:00:40.560 --> 1:00:45.360
<v Speaker 3>before he even knew my name. But over the years

1:00:45.400 --> 1:00:48.720
<v Speaker 3>we've become, you know, very close. He gave the blessing

1:00:48.720 --> 1:00:53.480
<v Speaker 3>at my wedding last year. He's I consider him a

1:00:53.800 --> 1:00:54.400
<v Speaker 3>good friend.

1:00:55.400 --> 1:00:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Isa happens to be a Republican. Does that have

1:00:59.560 --> 1:01:02.040
<v Speaker 2>anything to do with you getting the job or you

1:01:02.200 --> 1:01:04.880
<v Speaker 2>just working in this committee and he gets a takes

1:01:04.880 --> 1:01:05.560
<v Speaker 2>a liking to you.

1:01:09.000 --> 1:01:12.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm working in this committee. He takes a liking to

1:01:12.120 --> 1:01:15.160
<v Speaker 3>me and is working for the majority controlled by Republicans.

1:01:15.160 --> 1:01:15.600
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

1:01:16.360 --> 1:01:19.120
<v Speaker 2>I used to make his money in Carl Alarms. Does

1:01:19.160 --> 1:01:20.360
<v Speaker 2>he ever talk about that?

1:01:21.360 --> 1:01:25.760
<v Speaker 3>He does talk about that Bob He you know, he's

1:01:25.840 --> 1:01:29.080
<v Speaker 3>the voice of the viper Carl Alarm, the like step

1:01:29.120 --> 1:01:33.560
<v Speaker 3>away from the car protected by Viper, that's his voice.

1:01:33.960 --> 1:01:38.440
<v Speaker 3>He had. I think he's got thirty seven patents or something.

1:01:40.600 --> 1:01:46.160
<v Speaker 3>He like, he's a really really smart guy that knows

1:01:46.200 --> 1:01:50.520
<v Speaker 3>intellectual property. He was actually, I think for a while

1:01:51.080 --> 1:01:54.840
<v Speaker 3>involved in a copyright lawsuit against Shack because Shack had

1:01:54.920 --> 1:01:59.400
<v Speaker 3>used part of the protected by viper bit in a song,

1:02:00.720 --> 1:02:03.920
<v Speaker 3>and so yeah, that's that's what story loves itself.

1:02:04.000 --> 1:02:08.680
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, okay, let's go back. You're working, you become

1:02:08.720 --> 1:02:11.600
<v Speaker 2>tight with Isa, and he gives you what job and

1:02:11.640 --> 1:02:13.320
<v Speaker 2>what are the responsibilities there?

1:02:15.800 --> 1:02:19.760
<v Speaker 3>I go to his office to be his legislative director.

1:02:19.880 --> 1:02:24.480
<v Speaker 3>So on Capitol Hill, basically you either worked for a member,

1:02:24.760 --> 1:02:27.480
<v Speaker 3>and a member personal office has got like about twelve

1:02:27.560 --> 1:02:29.760
<v Speaker 3>staffers in it, you know, a chief of staff, a

1:02:29.840 --> 1:02:34.160
<v Speaker 3>legislative director, other people working on specific issues, or or

1:02:34.280 --> 1:02:36.840
<v Speaker 3>you work for a committee where you're sort of more

1:02:36.880 --> 1:02:41.480
<v Speaker 3>of a subject matter expert. So I go to IS's

1:02:41.480 --> 1:02:46.280
<v Speaker 3>personal office to be his legislative director, basically oversee the

1:02:46.400 --> 1:02:50.680
<v Speaker 3>legislative portfolio. It was during this time we worked on

1:02:51.480 --> 1:02:55.600
<v Speaker 3>the Music Modernization Act. He wrote the Classics Act, which

1:02:55.680 --> 1:02:58.560
<v Speaker 3>was a part of the Music Modernization Act, which basically

1:02:58.880 --> 1:03:04.280
<v Speaker 3>worked to present or protect rather pre seventy two sound recordings.

1:03:04.280 --> 1:03:06.640
<v Speaker 3>This was a you know, legacy issue that had been

1:03:06.640 --> 1:03:07.320
<v Speaker 3>around for a while.

1:03:08.840 --> 1:03:10.920
<v Speaker 2>You say he wrote who actually wrote it?

1:03:12.480 --> 1:03:17.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, I guess I wrote it in the sense that, yeah,

1:03:17.320 --> 1:03:20.680
<v Speaker 3>he had long wanted to take care of this issue.

1:03:20.680 --> 1:03:22.920
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of music from the fifties and sixties.

1:03:22.960 --> 1:03:26.160
<v Speaker 3>He really likes you'd hear from these people. He wanted

1:03:26.200 --> 1:03:30.280
<v Speaker 3>to solve this issue for them. Sort of directed me

1:03:30.360 --> 1:03:32.960
<v Speaker 3>to find a solution. I talked to a bunch of people,

1:03:34.920 --> 1:03:39.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, and concluding this, you know, people in the

1:03:40.000 --> 1:03:46.480
<v Speaker 3>music community, music distributors, and try and find a way

1:03:46.520 --> 1:03:50.200
<v Speaker 3>to write the bill the best way that we can.

1:03:51.160 --> 1:03:55.200
<v Speaker 3>You talk with led council about you know, what part

1:03:55.200 --> 1:03:57.960
<v Speaker 3>of chapter seventeen this belongs in, and how you write

1:03:58.000 --> 1:03:59.600
<v Speaker 3>the thing. So the course are going to interpret it

1:03:59.600 --> 1:04:00.000
<v Speaker 3>the right way?

1:04:00.600 --> 1:04:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Daryl comes to you, says, I want to address

1:04:04.240 --> 1:04:07.160
<v Speaker 2>this issue. How long do you come back with a

1:04:07.200 --> 1:04:08.000
<v Speaker 2>piece of writing.

1:04:10.440 --> 1:04:13.240
<v Speaker 3>He was one of the things the next day. But

1:04:13.280 --> 1:04:18.360
<v Speaker 3>it probably you know, it depends on the complexity of

1:04:18.400 --> 1:04:22.080
<v Speaker 3>the issue. In that case, I mean, it took weeks

1:04:22.240 --> 1:04:25.520
<v Speaker 3>months of talking talking to folks about the right way

1:04:25.520 --> 1:04:25.880
<v Speaker 3>to do this.

1:04:26.280 --> 1:04:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So you gather all your information, you write it.

1:04:30.080 --> 1:04:32.120
<v Speaker 2>What literally happens next.

1:04:34.360 --> 1:04:37.479
<v Speaker 3>You write it, give it to him. He signs the bill,

1:04:37.960 --> 1:04:40.000
<v Speaker 3>He walks it over to what we'd call the hopper,

1:04:41.560 --> 1:04:43.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, in the house. You put the bill in

1:04:43.840 --> 1:04:46.880
<v Speaker 3>the hopper, so that it's filed, it'll get an HR

1:04:47.080 --> 1:04:51.880
<v Speaker 3>number whatever it was, you know, HR thirteen fifty nine,

1:04:51.880 --> 1:04:55.440
<v Speaker 3>and it's just the you know number of it's the

1:04:55.560 --> 1:04:59.440
<v Speaker 3>last bill introduced at that point in the Congress is

1:04:59.480 --> 1:05:05.120
<v Speaker 3>the number on the bill, and then it's sitting there

1:05:05.440 --> 1:05:09.880
<v Speaker 3>and everyone knows it's been introduced. What you do then,

1:05:10.040 --> 1:05:12.080
<v Speaker 3>or you might do some of this before you file it,

1:05:12.160 --> 1:05:14.760
<v Speaker 3>is you basically try and get other members of Congress

1:05:14.760 --> 1:05:19.640
<v Speaker 3>to co sponsor your bill. So, yeah, go to other

1:05:19.680 --> 1:05:21.600
<v Speaker 3>people that you think might be into this issue and

1:05:21.640 --> 1:05:24.240
<v Speaker 3>you kind of pitch them on it to build up

1:05:24.280 --> 1:05:27.160
<v Speaker 3>co sponsors. And that's a really important part of the

1:05:27.200 --> 1:05:31.080
<v Speaker 3>process because if you have other members basically saying I'm

1:05:31.120 --> 1:05:34.640
<v Speaker 3>totally on board with this, it gives you know, the

1:05:34.720 --> 1:05:41.040
<v Speaker 3>speaker and leadership confidence that this thing has support. You know, generally,

1:05:41.080 --> 1:05:43.960
<v Speaker 3>the more co sponsors the better. If you want to

1:05:43.960 --> 1:05:47.200
<v Speaker 3>be an original co sponsor, you would sign on, you know,

1:05:47.520 --> 1:05:51.680
<v Speaker 3>before before the bill is introduced, which basically signifies you know,

1:05:51.720 --> 1:05:54.040
<v Speaker 3>you had some role in creating the bill or coming

1:05:54.120 --> 1:05:54.880
<v Speaker 3>up with the idea.

1:05:56.440 --> 1:05:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, when you're working with ISA and yours legislative director,

1:06:00.080 --> 1:06:02.880
<v Speaker 2>how many people in the office are in the legislative area.

1:06:04.120 --> 1:06:11.080
<v Speaker 3>How many people. There are probably five people under me

1:06:11.440 --> 1:06:16.200
<v Speaker 3>in that office, and sort of divided up by issue area.

1:06:16.320 --> 1:06:20.440
<v Speaker 3>You know, someone might have like energy and environment and healthcare,

1:06:20.520 --> 1:06:26.640
<v Speaker 3>and someone else might have, you know, taxes and veterans affairs,

1:06:27.080 --> 1:06:33.440
<v Speaker 3>and you know, any manner everything. I mean, all of

1:06:33.480 --> 1:06:35.640
<v Speaker 3>the business before the House, which is all of the

1:06:35.640 --> 1:06:39.000
<v Speaker 3>business of the American public, is really that exists in

1:06:39.040 --> 1:06:41.360
<v Speaker 3>every congressional office because at some point you're gonna have

1:06:41.360 --> 1:06:43.240
<v Speaker 3>to vote on some bill related to that.

1:06:44.160 --> 1:06:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So what was your next job after that?

1:06:48.000 --> 1:06:56.720
<v Speaker 3>So back to so is a rich hires And then

1:06:56.880 --> 1:07:00.360
<v Speaker 3>for me, it was where basically where I'm at now.

1:07:01.000 --> 1:07:04.120
<v Speaker 2>But didn't Isa lose an election and then come back.

1:07:05.000 --> 1:07:10.680
<v Speaker 3>He he's very very sensitive about this, Bob. He did

1:07:10.760 --> 1:07:15.200
<v Speaker 3>not lose an election. He retired near the end of

1:07:15.240 --> 1:07:16.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty eighteen.

1:07:17.960 --> 1:07:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, then let's just accept the language not important to me.

1:07:22.320 --> 1:07:26.000
<v Speaker 2>If he is out of Congress, Andy comes back to

1:07:26.120 --> 1:07:33.000
<v Speaker 2>what degreed does he lose or regain his seniority and positions?

1:07:33.440 --> 1:07:39.360
<v Speaker 3>That's a great question. You keep your seniority, So even

1:07:39.400 --> 1:07:42.360
<v Speaker 3>if you left ten years ago, but before then you'd

1:07:42.400 --> 1:07:45.680
<v Speaker 3>spent ten years on the Judiciary Committee. You've got more

1:07:45.720 --> 1:07:48.880
<v Speaker 3>seniority than anyone with less than ten years of seniority

1:07:48.920 --> 1:07:52.040
<v Speaker 3>on Judiciary Committee. He's sort of come back.

1:07:52.520 --> 1:07:55.360
<v Speaker 2>So let's assume let's say I'm out of office and

1:07:55.400 --> 1:07:58.280
<v Speaker 2>I have ten years and I come back. Am I

1:07:58.280 --> 1:08:00.720
<v Speaker 2>immediately able to get on the Judicial your committee? Or

1:08:00.760 --> 1:08:01.400
<v Speaker 2>might they say no?

1:08:02.600 --> 1:08:05.840
<v Speaker 3>They could say no, but it's not likely they're almost

1:08:05.880 --> 1:08:07.919
<v Speaker 3>certainly going to put you back, especially with that level

1:08:07.960 --> 1:08:12.040
<v Speaker 3>of seniority. There's a deference there. They might even, you know,

1:08:12.040 --> 1:08:15.560
<v Speaker 3>if they had to, might like kick a freshman off

1:08:15.600 --> 1:08:16.200
<v Speaker 3>the committee.

1:08:16.800 --> 1:08:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so Isa is out of d C. Tell me

1:08:19.760 --> 1:08:21.559
<v Speaker 2>how you transition into the next job.

1:08:23.200 --> 1:08:27.080
<v Speaker 3>I say, is out of d C. I was trying

1:08:27.120 --> 1:08:35.800
<v Speaker 3>to figure out what to do and got a call

1:08:35.960 --> 1:08:41.920
<v Speaker 3>from now Chairman Jim Jordan who basically said, hey, I,

1:08:42.240 --> 1:08:46.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, come work for me. Could you could use

1:08:46.120 --> 1:08:49.280
<v Speaker 3>your help? And ultimately I said yes.

1:08:49.800 --> 1:08:51.879
<v Speaker 2>How did Jim Jordan know who you were.

1:08:53.000 --> 1:08:56.960
<v Speaker 3>From being around the committee, being around Capitol Hill?

1:08:57.040 --> 1:08:58.760
<v Speaker 2>So when he comes to ask you to come work

1:08:58.760 --> 1:09:00.799
<v Speaker 2>for you, what year and what is that job?

1:09:02.520 --> 1:09:09.400
<v Speaker 3>That job was? This is the end of twenty eighteen,

1:09:10.880 --> 1:09:15.040
<v Speaker 3>and I hadn't made a decision I think it was

1:09:15.080 --> 1:09:18.160
<v Speaker 3>December of twenty eighteen. You know, I said, was leaving

1:09:18.800 --> 1:09:20.240
<v Speaker 3>at the end of so I would have been out

1:09:20.240 --> 1:09:27.240
<v Speaker 3>of a job in a matter of weeks and that

1:09:27.240 --> 1:09:29.400
<v Speaker 3>that's kind of that's when he called, and that's when

1:09:29.400 --> 1:09:32.519
<v Speaker 3>I said, yes, he basically tells it. There's some of

1:09:32.520 --> 1:09:38.080
<v Speaker 3>this gets strangely like it gets a little personal, but

1:09:38.640 --> 1:09:42.320
<v Speaker 3>he basically said, hey. I said, hey, I like music stuff,

1:09:42.360 --> 1:09:45.120
<v Speaker 3>I like eyepiece stuff, you know, I like a lot

1:09:45.120 --> 1:09:46.840
<v Speaker 3>of things that are going on. He said, come work

1:09:46.880 --> 1:09:49.160
<v Speaker 3>for me. You can do that stuff, you know, kind

1:09:49.160 --> 1:09:52.120
<v Speaker 3>of whatever, you know, whatever you want to do. At

1:09:52.120 --> 1:09:57.840
<v Speaker 3>that point he was he was cool if I'm yeah.

1:09:58.080 --> 1:10:01.320
<v Speaker 3>At the time, I had a lot of friends working

1:10:01.360 --> 1:10:08.120
<v Speaker 3>there for him. My father was really sick and I

1:10:08.760 --> 1:10:14.920
<v Speaker 3>knew Chairman Jordan pretty well, and he was kind of like, hey,

1:10:15.080 --> 1:10:20.479
<v Speaker 3>that like, come work here, the accommodating of everything going

1:10:20.520 --> 1:10:24.400
<v Speaker 3>on in your life. And so that was kind of

1:10:24.400 --> 1:10:25.559
<v Speaker 3>where the decision came from.

1:10:26.479 --> 1:10:28.920
<v Speaker 2>What happened with your father's illness.

1:10:28.520 --> 1:10:32.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, he passed away from cancer that in like the

1:10:32.280 --> 1:10:34.120
<v Speaker 3>beginning of twenty twenty.

1:10:34.600 --> 1:10:38.559
<v Speaker 2>During just wow heavy losing a p It.

1:10:38.560 --> 1:10:44.280
<v Speaker 3>Was, yeah, obviously not ideal, but you know, very sad,

1:10:44.360 --> 1:10:47.800
<v Speaker 3>but it happened in January of twenty twenty, so I

1:10:47.840 --> 1:10:49.880
<v Speaker 3>think it was a blessing that it sort of all

1:10:50.720 --> 1:10:53.920
<v Speaker 3>happened pre COVID so we didn't have to like deal

1:10:54.000 --> 1:10:56.200
<v Speaker 3>with the like that whole situation.

1:10:57.479 --> 1:11:03.479
<v Speaker 2>Okay, your father passes. How does your situation evolve at

1:11:03.479 --> 1:11:05.040
<v Speaker 2>the Judicial Committee?

1:11:07.000 --> 1:11:11.400
<v Speaker 3>It it, I mean, largely stays the same. I mean

1:11:11.520 --> 1:11:14.439
<v Speaker 3>I really love these issues at that point, I mean

1:11:14.479 --> 1:11:19.240
<v Speaker 3>it was it's the job I have. Now I have,

1:11:19.800 --> 1:11:22.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, no idea how long I'll keep doing this,

1:11:22.520 --> 1:11:25.720
<v Speaker 3>but for now it's awesome. I mean you're right in

1:11:25.760 --> 1:11:29.920
<v Speaker 3>the middle of everything. You get to interact with just

1:11:30.000 --> 1:11:34.599
<v Speaker 3>about everybody and learn cool stuff. I think you really

1:11:34.640 --> 1:11:37.280
<v Speaker 3>get to have an opportunity to have have an impact

1:11:37.360 --> 1:11:41.200
<v Speaker 3>on on the legislative process on where things go.

1:11:41.880 --> 1:11:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you're the head guy. Now when Jim Jordan hires you,

1:11:45.960 --> 1:11:47.519
<v Speaker 2>does he hire you as the head guy?

1:11:49.520 --> 1:11:53.800
<v Speaker 3>Is it like the one of there's like the policy guy. Yeah?

1:11:53.920 --> 1:11:58.719
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So how long was your predecessor in this role?

1:12:03.680 --> 1:12:08.120
<v Speaker 3>So before Jordan was chaired the committee? Now there was

1:12:08.200 --> 1:12:13.800
<v Speaker 3>chair of the committee, and I think for quite some time,

1:12:14.280 --> 1:12:18.280
<v Speaker 3>like I mean, you know, ten to fifteen years.

1:12:18.680 --> 1:12:22.240
<v Speaker 2>So let's just assume for the sake of discussion, Jim

1:12:22.360 --> 1:12:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Jordan continues to chair this committee. At what point would

1:12:26.280 --> 1:12:27.640
<v Speaker 2>you pull the ripcord?

1:12:29.800 --> 1:12:34.760
<v Speaker 3>That's a question I get almost every day. I have

1:12:34.800 --> 1:12:38.320
<v Speaker 3>no idea. I don't really make plans. You know that

1:12:38.360 --> 1:12:41.599
<v Speaker 3>this isn't forever. I enjoy every day I have this job.

1:12:42.200 --> 1:12:46.320
<v Speaker 3>I think it's great. Most people don't stay on the

1:12:46.360 --> 1:12:49.200
<v Speaker 3>hill as long as I have, but the average tenures

1:12:49.240 --> 1:12:54.000
<v Speaker 3>something like three four years. Most people, believe it or not,

1:12:54.160 --> 1:12:59.880
<v Speaker 3>are much younger than me. But for now, I'm not

1:13:00.160 --> 1:13:01.840
<v Speaker 3>to be here. I don't have I don't have plans

1:13:01.840 --> 1:13:02.200
<v Speaker 3>to leave.

1:13:02.840 --> 1:13:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So theoretically, could there be a move, whether it

1:13:07.920 --> 1:13:10.559
<v Speaker 2>be you or someone in the same role, from the

1:13:10.640 --> 1:13:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Judiciary Committee policy person to another job in Congress, Senate,

1:13:16.000 --> 1:13:19.280
<v Speaker 2>the government somewhere. Does it ever work that way? Yeah?

1:13:19.400 --> 1:13:23.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, like Lena Lena Cone you mentioned he was a

1:13:23.720 --> 1:13:27.960
<v Speaker 3>Judiciary Committee and now running the Federal Trade Commission. People move,

1:13:28.160 --> 1:13:29.759
<v Speaker 3>move around all the time.

1:13:30.160 --> 1:13:32.280
<v Speaker 2>And how come people only tend to last for three

1:13:32.320 --> 1:13:33.000
<v Speaker 2>or four years.

1:13:35.000 --> 1:13:38.240
<v Speaker 3>Uh, it's a lot of hours. It's not easy work.

1:13:39.720 --> 1:13:42.880
<v Speaker 3>I personally, I like the pace. I like being busy,

1:13:43.360 --> 1:13:46.760
<v Speaker 3>but I mean you have weeks where you're working. You know,

1:13:46.880 --> 1:13:50.000
<v Speaker 3>it could be eighteen hours a day, and then the

1:13:50.040 --> 1:13:53.439
<v Speaker 3>next week it's much slower and much calmer because the

1:13:53.479 --> 1:13:57.600
<v Speaker 3>members of Congress will leave town. I personally really like

1:13:57.720 --> 1:13:59.760
<v Speaker 3>that pace. The ebb and flow is fun for me.

1:14:00.240 --> 1:14:02.519
<v Speaker 3>It's not for everyone. I think a lot of people

1:14:02.520 --> 1:14:05.960
<v Speaker 3>want to leave and make more money the hill notoriously

1:14:06.040 --> 1:14:09.559
<v Speaker 3>doesn't you know you're not going to get rich doing this.

1:14:10.600 --> 1:14:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Do you have the kind of job? Or people in

1:14:13.080 --> 1:14:16.840
<v Speaker 2>Washington but work peripheral to the government are recruiting you

1:14:16.880 --> 1:14:18.760
<v Speaker 2>and say come work to the other sign.

1:14:20.400 --> 1:14:23.559
<v Speaker 3>Over the years, sure people have made overtures about like, oh,

1:14:23.680 --> 1:14:26.719
<v Speaker 3>it'd be great if you came and worked here or there.

1:14:27.960 --> 1:14:30.519
<v Speaker 3>You know, nothing has struck my fancy, like I said,

1:14:30.560 --> 1:14:33.439
<v Speaker 3>and I'm really happy where I am.

1:14:33.840 --> 1:14:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, And how much of your work is supervisory or

1:14:39.439 --> 1:14:41.360
<v Speaker 2>work you're doing independently.

1:14:44.000 --> 1:14:50.320
<v Speaker 3>I would say I bet seventy five percent of it

1:14:50.360 --> 1:14:55.320
<v Speaker 3>is supervisory sort of talking to people about what they're doing,

1:14:55.479 --> 1:15:01.760
<v Speaker 3>reviewing their work, guiding them, giving advice, giving counseled. It's

1:15:01.800 --> 1:15:02.240
<v Speaker 3>a lot of that.

1:15:03.360 --> 1:15:08.439
<v Speaker 2>Okay, everybody on the Judiciary Committee know you yes, if

1:15:08.479 --> 1:15:12.679
<v Speaker 2>there are four hundred and thirty five members of Congress.

1:15:12.680 --> 1:15:22.960
<v Speaker 2>How many of them might know you.

1:15:18.479 --> 1:15:20.679
<v Speaker 3>More than fifty and less than four hundred.

1:15:22.560 --> 1:15:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Would Joe Biden possibly know who you are or whoever's

1:15:26.320 --> 1:15:28.360
<v Speaker 2>president at that moment? Uh?

1:15:28.560 --> 1:15:30.600
<v Speaker 3>Definitely not, definitely not.

1:15:32.920 --> 1:15:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Is there an equivalent in the Senate? And what do

1:15:36.040 --> 1:15:38.400
<v Speaker 2>we do interact with that person here?

1:15:38.479 --> 1:15:41.880
<v Speaker 3>We interact with the Senate quite You kind of have

1:15:41.960 --> 1:15:45.439
<v Speaker 3>to to make sure you're on the same page. Would

1:15:45.520 --> 1:15:48.360
<v Speaker 3>Joe Biden know that person? The answers almost definitely know,

1:15:48.680 --> 1:15:50.000
<v Speaker 3>unless there's something I don't know.

1:15:51.360 --> 1:15:53.759
<v Speaker 2>Okay, is it the kind of job like with Jeffrey

1:15:53.800 --> 1:15:57.439
<v Speaker 2>Katzenberg when he was at Disney, If you don't come

1:15:57.479 --> 1:16:00.440
<v Speaker 2>in on Saturday, don't even think about coming in on.

1:16:03.960 --> 1:16:05.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure I follow you well, if you don't

1:16:05.800 --> 1:16:07.560
<v Speaker 3>come in on Saturday, Okay.

1:16:07.360 --> 1:16:09.559
<v Speaker 2>What it means? Is it a seven day a week job?

1:16:10.120 --> 1:16:14.519
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, oh, definitely definitely. It could be a three am

1:16:14.560 --> 1:16:18.800
<v Speaker 3>on Sunday job. Yeah, you are. You're always on call?

1:16:19.920 --> 1:16:22.840
<v Speaker 2>And how does one maintain a relationship with that kind

1:16:22.840 --> 1:16:23.440
<v Speaker 2>of schedule.

1:16:25.160 --> 1:16:30.120
<v Speaker 3>I have a very wonderful and understanding wife who's patient.

1:16:30.240 --> 1:16:32.960
<v Speaker 3>She likes to say to your point, she says he's

1:16:33.200 --> 1:16:37.559
<v Speaker 3>always working and never working. I think because I enjoy

1:16:37.640 --> 1:16:40.320
<v Speaker 3>the work, you know what, I'm always doing it and

1:16:40.479 --> 1:16:43.559
<v Speaker 3>kind of at this point, I've seen enough of the

1:16:43.600 --> 1:16:47.280
<v Speaker 3>issues that I could. It's never really that taxing to

1:16:47.360 --> 1:16:49.800
<v Speaker 3>sort of go to work and take care of something

1:16:49.800 --> 1:16:50.439
<v Speaker 3>as it comes up.

1:16:51.080 --> 1:16:54.640
<v Speaker 2>And are your friends civilians are people in the business,

1:16:54.680 --> 1:16:55.720
<v Speaker 2>so to speak.

1:16:57.080 --> 1:16:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Mixture of both. I mean, you don't work somewhere for

1:16:59.080 --> 1:17:02.960
<v Speaker 3>fourteen years and not develop some friendships there. But I've

1:17:02.960 --> 1:17:05.639
<v Speaker 3>got I've got a good number of civilian friends.

1:17:05.680 --> 1:17:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Also. Okay, we live in an era where there's never

1:17:09.040 --> 1:17:13.439
<v Speaker 2>been less respect for institutions. It's not only Congress, it's

1:17:13.479 --> 1:17:16.760
<v Speaker 2>the government at large, it's attorneys. We could go on.

1:17:17.200 --> 1:17:21.040
<v Speaker 2>What would you tell in response to people who say, oh,

1:17:21.120 --> 1:17:25.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, uh, Congress is a body that is locked up,

1:17:25.920 --> 1:17:28.880
<v Speaker 2>doesn't achieve anything, and roll their eyes.

1:17:30.920 --> 1:17:33.720
<v Speaker 3>It is pretty locked up, right. I don't want to

1:17:34.280 --> 1:17:37.559
<v Speaker 3>want to be cynical here. I mean it's locked up.

1:17:37.600 --> 1:17:39.799
<v Speaker 3>It's hard to get things done. I think the founders

1:17:39.840 --> 1:17:42.280
<v Speaker 3>wanted it to be hard to get things done right

1:17:42.880 --> 1:17:46.240
<v Speaker 3>changing make you know, if changing the law were easy,

1:17:46.280 --> 1:17:49.160
<v Speaker 3>I think that would be a that would be a problem.

1:17:50.320 --> 1:17:53.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, and there I would say most of what

1:17:53.760 --> 1:17:58.640
<v Speaker 3>you see is probably the worst of it all, you know,

1:18:00.040 --> 1:18:03.400
<v Speaker 3>but what cable news shares and what you're seeing on

1:18:03.520 --> 1:18:07.840
<v Speaker 3>Twitter from clips is like one percent of what's happening

1:18:07.960 --> 1:18:12.960
<v Speaker 3>on Capitol Hill. The most of what's happening is good

1:18:13.000 --> 1:18:15.880
<v Speaker 3>people trying to do the right thing for their constituents.

1:18:16.439 --> 1:18:21.479
<v Speaker 2>Obviously members are elected, but how important are relationships in

1:18:21.600 --> 1:18:24.240
<v Speaker 2>terms of getting ahead? You know, like in the entertainment business,

1:18:24.240 --> 1:18:26.599
<v Speaker 2>you don't know anybody, you can't even start. Is it

1:18:26.600 --> 1:18:27.519
<v Speaker 2>the same in DC?

1:18:28.680 --> 1:18:29.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

1:18:29.840 --> 1:18:30.360
<v Speaker 2>I think it is.

1:18:30.560 --> 1:18:33.599
<v Speaker 3>You know, Reagan famously said DC's Hollywood for ugly people.

1:18:34.800 --> 1:18:37.920
<v Speaker 3>It's it's the same thing. It's it's I mean, we

1:18:38.040 --> 1:18:41.679
<v Speaker 3>are nothing except for the decisions that we make. Right.

1:18:42.200 --> 1:18:45.880
<v Speaker 3>This is just a job where people are everything. You

1:18:45.920 --> 1:18:47.599
<v Speaker 3>need other people to get anything done.

1:18:48.800 --> 1:18:52.360
<v Speaker 2>And what issues might you see coming down the pike

1:18:52.439 --> 1:18:54.080
<v Speaker 2>in the ip Era area.

1:18:55.520 --> 1:18:57.800
<v Speaker 3>It's really hard to see past ip I mean for

1:18:57.960 --> 1:19:03.599
<v Speaker 3>past Ai that that is the big thing that's happening

1:19:03.680 --> 1:19:10.920
<v Speaker 3>right now. I don't know what happens after this. There

1:19:11.080 --> 1:19:15.240
<v Speaker 3>is the people have talked about some tweaks to the

1:19:15.320 --> 1:19:20.400
<v Speaker 3>Music Modernization Act, but that's kind of the that's not

1:19:20.439 --> 1:19:22.360
<v Speaker 3>the kind of thing you're talking about though, in terms

1:19:22.400 --> 1:19:26.479
<v Speaker 3>of big issues, it's it's really it's it's AI.

1:19:27.080 --> 1:19:30.920
<v Speaker 2>And what is the breadth of what might be addressed

1:19:31.600 --> 1:19:33.120
<v Speaker 2>legislatively on AI?

1:19:36.360 --> 1:19:42.000
<v Speaker 3>So you know, when it comes to like economy wide

1:19:42.120 --> 1:19:48.799
<v Speaker 3>AI that you're talking about, everything from like a GAO

1:19:48.960 --> 1:19:52.760
<v Speaker 3>study on understanding AI might get passed by Congress to

1:19:52.920 --> 1:19:59.680
<v Speaker 3>like full scaled, robust regulatory regime. I think that there

1:19:59.760 --> 1:20:03.920
<v Speaker 3>is a a growing consensus that like it is premature

1:20:04.120 --> 1:20:08.719
<v Speaker 3>to sort of regulate AI right now, that just given

1:20:08.760 --> 1:20:10.800
<v Speaker 3>that this is a worldwide phenomenon, we don't want to

1:20:10.800 --> 1:20:13.240
<v Speaker 3>do anything to sort of hold back the United States

1:20:13.479 --> 1:20:15.800
<v Speaker 3>that we don't know enough yet to jump to those

1:20:15.880 --> 1:20:23.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of conclusions. In the music space, in particular, the

1:20:23.200 --> 1:20:29.040
<v Speaker 3>conversations revolving around protecting you know, name, image and likeness,

1:20:29.080 --> 1:20:33.520
<v Speaker 3>which is not really a copyright question. It's a trademark

1:20:33.600 --> 1:20:36.160
<v Speaker 3>question more than anything else.

1:20:36.200 --> 1:20:37.320
<v Speaker 2>And sort of.

1:20:39.320 --> 1:20:40.599
<v Speaker 3>That's generally what's happening.

1:20:41.560 --> 1:20:44.160
<v Speaker 2>So what would you tell to someone who wanted to

1:20:44.200 --> 1:20:45.840
<v Speaker 2>work on Capitol Hill?

1:20:47.720 --> 1:20:51.439
<v Speaker 3>Would they do it? And most people that want to

1:20:51.479 --> 1:20:54.519
<v Speaker 3>do it this might surprise you and your listeners to hear,

1:20:54.640 --> 1:20:58.200
<v Speaker 3>but over the years, I've met a lot of people

1:20:58.280 --> 1:21:00.519
<v Speaker 3>that are like, I'd love to work on cap Hill

1:21:01.439 --> 1:21:04.240
<v Speaker 3>and most of them do you know, if if it's

1:21:04.280 --> 1:21:06.080
<v Speaker 3>something you want bad enough and you have coffee with

1:21:06.200 --> 1:21:11.080
<v Speaker 3>enough people, the churned people leaving people coming is so

1:21:11.160 --> 1:21:13.080
<v Speaker 3>great that like you'll find something to do.

1:21:14.439 --> 1:21:17.160
<v Speaker 2>And to what degree does being an attorney help you?

1:21:19.320 --> 1:21:22.240
<v Speaker 3>It's complicated a lot of people. I would say if

1:21:22.240 --> 1:21:24.240
<v Speaker 3>you were to ask, like, what's the normal path on

1:21:24.280 --> 1:21:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Capitol Hill? Uh, people are interns and then they are

1:21:29.200 --> 1:21:33.840
<v Speaker 3>like staff assistants, and then legislative correspondence that a legislative assistant,

1:21:34.160 --> 1:21:37.840
<v Speaker 3>then maybe a legislative director. Then maybe they'll go to committee.

1:21:37.960 --> 1:21:41.240
<v Speaker 3>It's sort of this process of you know, learning learning

1:21:41.280 --> 1:21:43.479
<v Speaker 3>the rope. There's nowhere to learn it unless you're there.

1:21:44.400 --> 1:21:47.479
<v Speaker 3>If you're an attorney, it's probably harder to find a

1:21:47.560 --> 1:21:49.800
<v Speaker 3>job on Capitol Hill because you probably want to go

1:21:49.840 --> 1:21:52.719
<v Speaker 3>work at a committee. Those jobs are a little harder

1:21:52.760 --> 1:21:57.320
<v Speaker 3>to get. But certainly it helps if you if you have,

1:21:57.600 --> 1:22:01.400
<v Speaker 3>if you have your law degree to do the work.

1:22:01.439 --> 1:22:03.320
<v Speaker 3>But I'm not sure it gives you like an advantage

1:22:03.400 --> 1:22:04.479
<v Speaker 3>in getting up there.

1:22:05.479 --> 1:22:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so what would you tell to someone who has

1:22:08.160 --> 1:22:11.280
<v Speaker 2>an issue that they would like a legislative solution to.

1:22:12.200 --> 1:22:16.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm somewhere, I'm in an industry, I see a problem.

1:22:17.080 --> 1:22:20.160
<v Speaker 2>What would be my best step moving forward to ultimately

1:22:20.160 --> 1:22:24.000
<v Speaker 2>get my case heard by Congress and hopefully get some

1:22:24.200 --> 1:22:25.000
<v Speaker 2>action taken.

1:22:27.360 --> 1:22:33.880
<v Speaker 3>I would tell that person to call me, but I

1:22:33.880 --> 1:22:38.519
<v Speaker 3>would say, if you contact your representative's office, they're going

1:22:38.600 --> 1:22:45.000
<v Speaker 3>to take the meeting. You'd be astounded at the number

1:22:45.000 --> 1:22:48.320
<v Speaker 3>of letters offices reply to and the number of meetings

1:22:48.320 --> 1:22:50.240
<v Speaker 3>people take. If you ask for a meeting and you

1:22:50.280 --> 1:22:54.720
<v Speaker 3>don't get a reply, ask again and ask them who

1:22:54.720 --> 1:22:57.920
<v Speaker 3>else you should talk to. You know, if you are

1:22:58.040 --> 1:23:03.240
<v Speaker 3>a sophisticated, you know company that's having an issue, you

1:23:03.400 --> 1:23:05.320
<v Speaker 3>probably are going to want to hire a law firm

1:23:05.360 --> 1:23:09.200
<v Speaker 3>that just knows how Capitol Hill works. You know, they'll

1:23:09.280 --> 1:23:12.599
<v Speaker 3>kind of direct you in the right, right right areas like, oh,

1:23:12.640 --> 1:23:15.560
<v Speaker 3>don't go to that person you know that's a Democrat

1:23:15.600 --> 1:23:17.640
<v Speaker 3>that will never agree with you, or don't go to

1:23:17.720 --> 1:23:22.519
<v Speaker 3>that person they're not on any relevant committees, or you know,

1:23:22.720 --> 1:23:25.479
<v Speaker 3>go to go to this person. Ideally, you probably want

1:23:25.520 --> 1:23:28.320
<v Speaker 3>to get a meeting with the you know, chair of

1:23:28.360 --> 1:23:33.040
<v Speaker 3>the relevant subcommittee or committee and see if they'll hear

1:23:33.080 --> 1:23:33.320
<v Speaker 3>you out.

1:23:34.280 --> 1:23:37.479
<v Speaker 2>And is being a pest a good thing or a

1:23:37.520 --> 1:23:38.040
<v Speaker 2>bad thing?

1:23:39.880 --> 1:23:42.240
<v Speaker 3>It can be both. I think it depends what kind

1:23:42.280 --> 1:23:46.240
<v Speaker 3>of a pest you are. You know, the people that

1:23:46.320 --> 1:23:50.680
<v Speaker 3>send like all caps emails every week. Uh, that's not

1:23:50.760 --> 1:23:55.519
<v Speaker 3>a good strategy. Uh, you know, but people that are like, Hey,

1:23:55.560 --> 1:23:58.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm a constituent, I've got this issue, can you help

1:23:58.040 --> 1:24:00.479
<v Speaker 3>me out. If you don't get a reply, like, you're

1:24:00.520 --> 1:24:02.439
<v Speaker 3>going to make the person who's reading that email feel

1:24:02.640 --> 1:24:04.519
<v Speaker 3>guilty they didn't reply to you, and they're probably going

1:24:04.560 --> 1:24:05.120
<v Speaker 3>to get back to you.

1:24:06.320 --> 1:24:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Tyler, thanks for taking the time with my audience

1:24:10.040 --> 1:24:14.040
<v Speaker 2>and illuminating what's going on in DC and inside the

1:24:14.080 --> 1:24:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Congress and the Judiciary Committee.

1:24:16.080 --> 1:24:18.800
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Bob, my pleasure. I love the showgir to.

1:24:18.800 --> 1:24:22.559
<v Speaker 2>Be with you until next time. This is Bob left

1:24:22.600 --> 1:24:22.840
<v Speaker 2>six