1 00:00:08,640 --> 00:00:12,600 Speaker 1: Welcome, Welcome, Welcome back to the Bob Left Set podcasts. 2 00:00:12,840 --> 00:00:16,720 Speaker 1: My guest today is Tyler Grimm, who's chief counsel for 3 00:00:16,920 --> 00:00:21,840 Speaker 1: Policy and Strategy at the Judiciary Committee of the US 4 00:00:21,840 --> 00:00:23,440 Speaker 1: House of Representatives. 5 00:00:23,840 --> 00:00:26,560 Speaker 2: Tyler, you went to see Roger Daltrey last night? How 6 00:00:26,680 --> 00:00:27,760 Speaker 2: was he? 7 00:00:27,840 --> 00:00:31,360 Speaker 3: It was awesome for being eighty years old. He really 8 00:00:31,360 --> 00:00:34,600 Speaker 3: brought it. I gotta say it was kind of f 9 00:00:34,640 --> 00:00:38,280 Speaker 3: I've probably seen The Who a dozen times in my life, 10 00:00:38,760 --> 00:00:43,239 Speaker 3: never saw Adultrey alone. He was great. He could tell 11 00:00:43,320 --> 00:00:46,680 Speaker 3: he really wanted to swing the microphone, but eighty that 12 00:00:46,800 --> 00:00:49,640 Speaker 3: just wasn't happening. He did bring it out for the encore. 13 00:00:49,720 --> 00:00:55,680 Speaker 3: We got a couple couple of Mike throws. He was awesome. 14 00:00:55,720 --> 00:00:58,320 Speaker 3: You know, he's got Pete Townsend's brother Simon up there 15 00:00:58,360 --> 00:01:01,400 Speaker 3: with him. He seems to be really happy doing his 16 00:01:01,440 --> 00:01:07,120 Speaker 3: own thing. He you know, played some covers, played mostly 17 00:01:07,160 --> 00:01:10,840 Speaker 3: Whose songs, played a couple of his original songs. It 18 00:01:10,880 --> 00:01:11,720 Speaker 3: was great. 19 00:01:12,520 --> 00:01:17,000 Speaker 2: Okay, you're a relatively young guy. How do you become 20 00:01:17,040 --> 00:01:18,040 Speaker 2: a fan of the Who? 21 00:01:19,720 --> 00:01:23,920 Speaker 3: I grew up on the Who. My parents were really 22 00:01:23,959 --> 00:01:28,000 Speaker 3: into music. We started going to concerts when I was 23 00:01:28,360 --> 00:01:32,440 Speaker 3: like five years old. That's basically like what we did 24 00:01:32,480 --> 00:01:33,880 Speaker 3: when we grew up. We didn't go to a lot 25 00:01:33,920 --> 00:01:36,399 Speaker 3: of sports games. We went to concerts. I would look 26 00:01:36,480 --> 00:01:39,360 Speaker 3: and see what concerts were coming to town, beg my 27 00:01:39,520 --> 00:01:42,560 Speaker 3: parents to take me. I think my first concert was 28 00:01:42,560 --> 00:01:45,600 Speaker 3: Elton John and Billy Joel and the second one was 29 00:01:45,640 --> 00:01:49,760 Speaker 3: Tom Petty h And I was just addicted to live 30 00:01:49,880 --> 00:01:53,920 Speaker 3: music from a really young age. My household was it 31 00:01:53,960 --> 00:01:56,600 Speaker 3: was the Stones, it was the Who, primarily the Who 32 00:01:57,240 --> 00:02:01,240 Speaker 3: you know later Pearl Jam, but it was a rock 33 00:02:01,280 --> 00:02:01,880 Speaker 3: and roll house. 34 00:02:02,800 --> 00:02:05,080 Speaker 2: How about acts that are of a newer vintage? Are 35 00:02:05,120 --> 00:02:06,080 Speaker 2: you a fan of those? 36 00:02:07,320 --> 00:02:11,160 Speaker 3: Definitely? I do. Like I really love Pearl Jam's new album. 37 00:02:11,520 --> 00:02:14,320 Speaker 3: I think I think, uh it's there, it's their best 38 00:02:14,320 --> 00:02:18,880 Speaker 3: piece of work in years. Really like I like Gaslight 39 00:02:18,919 --> 00:02:22,280 Speaker 3: Ants them a lot. I like Camp a lot. I 40 00:02:22,320 --> 00:02:28,040 Speaker 3: saw Zach Bryan earlier this year. He was awesome newer music, 41 00:02:28,120 --> 00:02:30,640 Speaker 3: sort of of the rock variety. But I listen to anything. 42 00:02:31,480 --> 00:02:37,360 Speaker 2: Okay, So I'm the Judiciary Committee. How much can you 43 00:02:37,480 --> 00:02:41,240 Speaker 2: talk music with? And are the members fans of music? 44 00:02:42,840 --> 00:02:47,680 Speaker 3: Uh, there's a lot of music fans on the Judiciary Committee, Actually, Bob, 45 00:02:49,480 --> 00:02:52,040 Speaker 3: it is you know, to set the stage here like 46 00:02:53,080 --> 00:02:56,760 Speaker 3: music and movies. We are the primary committee for the 47 00:02:56,880 --> 00:03:02,240 Speaker 3: entertainment industry. Anything copyright, any IP, anything anti trust comes 48 00:03:02,240 --> 00:03:07,040 Speaker 3: through the committee. And we have some members that, you know, 49 00:03:07,600 --> 00:03:10,280 Speaker 3: I'm not sure listen to all that much music. Other 50 00:03:10,320 --> 00:03:14,680 Speaker 3: members that play instruments, that are in bands. We've got 51 00:03:14,680 --> 00:03:17,640 Speaker 3: a member, Kelly Armstrong, who will be the next governor 52 00:03:17,680 --> 00:03:22,680 Speaker 3: of North Dakota. I went to the Zach Bryan concert 53 00:03:22,720 --> 00:03:25,640 Speaker 3: with him. Earlier this year. We saw Tyler Childers together. 54 00:03:26,720 --> 00:03:30,080 Speaker 3: He loves Camp. That's another new band I love, sort 55 00:03:30,080 --> 00:03:34,079 Speaker 3: of great musical taste. There's a lot of music talk 56 00:03:34,120 --> 00:03:34,760 Speaker 3: on the committee. 57 00:03:35,160 --> 00:03:36,120 Speaker 2: How old is Keller? 58 00:03:37,600 --> 00:03:41,440 Speaker 3: Oh, I'm reluctant to guess, but I'd say I give 59 00:03:41,480 --> 00:03:43,480 Speaker 3: him the benefit of the doubt and say early forties. 60 00:03:44,480 --> 00:03:50,800 Speaker 2: Okay, So if we start talking about copyright issues the 61 00:03:50,920 --> 00:03:54,720 Speaker 2: Judiciary Committee, are they pretty familiar with these things or 62 00:03:54,760 --> 00:03:56,760 Speaker 2: do you have to brief them and bring them up 63 00:03:56,760 --> 00:03:57,280 Speaker 2: to speed. 64 00:03:59,560 --> 00:04:02,320 Speaker 3: You've got brief them, right, I mean, you've got a 65 00:04:02,400 --> 00:04:05,800 Speaker 3: brief members on any issue, and it varies member to members. 66 00:04:05,800 --> 00:04:08,920 Speaker 3: Some people are super familiar. They've been doing this for 67 00:04:08,960 --> 00:04:11,840 Speaker 3: a quarter century or more. They've seen a number of 68 00:04:11,920 --> 00:04:16,120 Speaker 3: laws passed, very familiar with the issues and the players 69 00:04:16,160 --> 00:04:19,520 Speaker 3: and what's going on. Others are totally new to this 70 00:04:19,720 --> 00:04:23,000 Speaker 3: but want to learn. You've got some that aren't there 71 00:04:23,080 --> 00:04:26,280 Speaker 3: to do copyright, aren't there to do music issues, and 72 00:04:26,920 --> 00:04:29,200 Speaker 3: you know, they want to understand it for that day 73 00:04:29,279 --> 00:04:32,039 Speaker 3: and then you know, maybe move on to the next thing. 74 00:04:32,480 --> 00:04:37,400 Speaker 2: So not everybody's educated, certainly outside America about the ins 75 00:04:37,400 --> 00:04:41,840 Speaker 2: and outs of the government. What exactly is the Judiciary Committee? 76 00:04:43,320 --> 00:04:47,799 Speaker 3: Sure, so we've obviously got the Congress, which is comprised 77 00:04:47,800 --> 00:04:52,640 Speaker 3: of the House and the Senate. In the House, all 78 00:04:52,680 --> 00:04:55,200 Speaker 3: the work that's done to get a bill to the 79 00:04:55,240 --> 00:04:58,160 Speaker 3: floor before it becomes law is really done at committees, 80 00:04:58,760 --> 00:05:02,280 Speaker 3: and the committee's di eied off work by topic area. 81 00:05:03,000 --> 00:05:08,279 Speaker 3: And so we've got all intellectual property at the Judiciary Committee. 82 00:05:08,320 --> 00:05:10,720 Speaker 3: So if you're going to write a bill that has 83 00:05:10,760 --> 00:05:15,080 Speaker 3: to do with patents or trademarks or copyrights, it will 84 00:05:15,120 --> 00:05:18,440 Speaker 3: come before the committee. The committee will have what we 85 00:05:18,560 --> 00:05:24,880 Speaker 3: call a markup where we'll consider bills, try to amend them, 86 00:05:25,200 --> 00:05:28,120 Speaker 3: debate them, and then vote on them. If a bill 87 00:05:28,160 --> 00:05:32,320 Speaker 3: is successfully voted out of the committee, that's sort of 88 00:05:32,400 --> 00:05:35,480 Speaker 3: primed for floor action, and the floor could take up 89 00:05:35,560 --> 00:05:39,000 Speaker 3: the bill, and then you see what the Senate does 90 00:05:39,240 --> 00:05:40,640 Speaker 3: and see if the President will sign it. 91 00:05:40,960 --> 00:05:43,840 Speaker 2: Okay, let's start at the ground floor. There's a Judiciary 92 00:05:43,880 --> 00:05:47,560 Speaker 2: Committee in the House. Is there an equivalent committee in 93 00:05:47,600 --> 00:05:48,160 Speaker 2: the Senate? 94 00:05:49,040 --> 00:05:52,760 Speaker 3: There is Judiciary Committee in the Senate, and they both 95 00:05:52,800 --> 00:05:58,320 Speaker 3: have sort of subcommittees more dedicated to specific issue areas. 96 00:05:59,320 --> 00:06:03,679 Speaker 3: So there's an intellectual property subcommittee in both the House 97 00:06:03,760 --> 00:06:05,479 Speaker 3: and the Senate, and that's where a lot of this 98 00:06:05,560 --> 00:06:06,320 Speaker 3: work will get done. 99 00:06:06,440 --> 00:06:10,240 Speaker 2: Okay. So let's say I'm someone who wants a passage 100 00:06:10,279 --> 00:06:13,719 Speaker 2: of a bill. Where do I start with the House 101 00:06:13,839 --> 00:06:15,520 Speaker 2: or the Senate. Does it make any. 102 00:06:15,360 --> 00:06:20,320 Speaker 3: Difference, doesn't make a lot of doesn't make a lot 103 00:06:20,320 --> 00:06:23,719 Speaker 3: of difference. There are some exceptions, some kinds of bills 104 00:06:23,760 --> 00:06:28,000 Speaker 3: have to originate in the House, but in this case, 105 00:06:28,600 --> 00:06:31,520 Speaker 3: by and large, either chamber a bill could start it. 106 00:06:33,040 --> 00:06:37,880 Speaker 3: So let's say that you're someone who sees some problem 107 00:06:37,960 --> 00:06:42,480 Speaker 3: in the music royalty space and you think there needs 108 00:06:42,520 --> 00:06:46,279 Speaker 3: to be a fixed You probably call your member, ideally 109 00:06:46,320 --> 00:06:49,760 Speaker 3: a member of the Judiciary committee, pitch them on the issue, 110 00:06:49,800 --> 00:06:52,160 Speaker 3: try and get them to write a bill. They'd write 111 00:06:52,200 --> 00:06:55,560 Speaker 3: a bill, it would get introduced into the House, it 112 00:06:55,560 --> 00:06:59,440 Speaker 3: would get referred to the Judiciary Committee, and then the 113 00:06:59,480 --> 00:07:03,760 Speaker 3: Judiciary Committee could take up that bill, and the rest 114 00:07:03,760 --> 00:07:05,039 Speaker 3: of that process would play out. 115 00:07:05,720 --> 00:07:10,880 Speaker 2: Okay, so we hear about the House and the Senate 116 00:07:11,000 --> 00:07:16,360 Speaker 2: having different bills and then needing to come up with one. 117 00:07:16,400 --> 00:07:17,239 Speaker 2: How does that work? 118 00:07:19,880 --> 00:07:26,000 Speaker 3: Yeah, so this happens all the time. Usually, you know, 119 00:07:26,600 --> 00:07:30,160 Speaker 3: let's say bill gets all the way through in the House, 120 00:07:30,720 --> 00:07:35,120 Speaker 3: passes on the floor, everybody's happy. A bill that's slightly 121 00:07:35,280 --> 00:07:39,080 Speaker 3: different makes it all the way through the Senate more 122 00:07:39,120 --> 00:07:41,440 Speaker 3: often than not. As a House guy, I'm sad to 123 00:07:41,480 --> 00:07:44,480 Speaker 3: say the House will take up the Senate bill. Sometimes 124 00:07:44,480 --> 00:07:47,480 Speaker 3: the Senate takes up the House bill, and then whichever 125 00:07:47,520 --> 00:07:50,000 Speaker 3: one passes both chambers will get sent to the President 126 00:07:50,080 --> 00:07:50,960 Speaker 3: to be signed it to law. 127 00:07:51,800 --> 00:07:55,840 Speaker 2: Okay, so let's assume I'm oblivious and I want to 128 00:07:55,920 --> 00:07:59,120 Speaker 2: introduce a bill. I want to get something done. In 129 00:07:59,240 --> 00:08:03,200 Speaker 2: terms of the House, welir Senate, they're essentially equal, and 130 00:08:03,240 --> 00:08:05,920 Speaker 2: it's more of who I know to get started. What 131 00:08:05,960 --> 00:08:08,200 Speaker 2: would motivate me to go to one chamber or the other? 132 00:08:09,440 --> 00:08:12,240 Speaker 3: I'd say, it's really it's who you know, who you 133 00:08:12,240 --> 00:08:14,240 Speaker 3: think is going to champion the issue, who has a 134 00:08:14,320 --> 00:08:17,800 Speaker 3: history of working on these issues. Maybe who has seniority, 135 00:08:18,080 --> 00:08:21,160 Speaker 3: who's got more clout, and one of the chambers, who's 136 00:08:21,760 --> 00:08:24,720 Speaker 3: closer to leadership that would put the bill on the floor. 137 00:08:26,120 --> 00:08:27,920 Speaker 3: All of that, someone's going to be a good advocate 138 00:08:27,960 --> 00:08:28,200 Speaker 3: for you. 139 00:08:28,280 --> 00:08:33,439 Speaker 2: Really. Okay, you talked about copyright. The Judiciary Committee in 140 00:08:33,480 --> 00:08:37,520 Speaker 2: the House, which is where you work. What other issues 141 00:08:37,559 --> 00:08:40,400 Speaker 2: do they address? What other subcommittees? What is the whole 142 00:08:40,480 --> 00:08:41,959 Speaker 2: of the Judiciary Committee. 143 00:08:43,000 --> 00:08:49,160 Speaker 3: That's a great question, Bob. So you've got intellectual property there, 144 00:08:49,280 --> 00:08:52,560 Speaker 3: so all the things I mentioned. You've got the whole 145 00:08:52,800 --> 00:08:58,440 Speaker 3: court system the federal judiciary. You've got antitrust, so anti 146 00:08:58,480 --> 00:09:03,640 Speaker 3: trust at the FTC and and you've got immigration, You've 147 00:09:03,679 --> 00:09:10,840 Speaker 3: got crime, you've got First Amendment issues. It is a 148 00:09:10,920 --> 00:09:13,359 Speaker 3: large array of issues at Judiciary. 149 00:09:13,840 --> 00:09:16,240 Speaker 2: Okay, just you know, to paint the picture. There's the 150 00:09:16,320 --> 00:09:19,400 Speaker 2: Judiciary Committee. What are some of the other committees the 151 00:09:19,440 --> 00:09:20,080 Speaker 2: House has? 152 00:09:21,640 --> 00:09:25,640 Speaker 3: Sure, So there's the Budget Committee. Obviously they're writing the budget. 153 00:09:25,720 --> 00:09:28,480 Speaker 3: You've got the Energy and Commerce Committee. You know, they're 154 00:09:28,520 --> 00:09:33,199 Speaker 3: dealing with healthcare and energy and sort of a lot 155 00:09:33,240 --> 00:09:38,000 Speaker 3: of economy wide issues. You've got the Ways and Means Committee, 156 00:09:38,040 --> 00:09:42,160 Speaker 3: which is dealing with taxes, You've got the Science Committee, 157 00:09:42,160 --> 00:09:44,880 Speaker 3: which is dealing with all sorts of science issues, including 158 00:09:45,040 --> 00:09:48,079 Speaker 3: like NASA. You've got the Veterans Affairs Committee. I think 159 00:09:48,120 --> 00:09:53,400 Speaker 3: there are you know, eighteen ish committees on Capitol Hill. 160 00:09:54,440 --> 00:09:56,520 Speaker 2: And if you're in one committee, are you in that 161 00:09:56,559 --> 00:09:59,440 Speaker 2: committee only? Or could you be in multiple committees? 162 00:10:01,480 --> 00:10:05,479 Speaker 3: So there are some committees which we call a committees, 163 00:10:05,880 --> 00:10:09,520 Speaker 3: and those are sort of exclusive, most notably like A 164 00:10:09,600 --> 00:10:12,560 Speaker 3: Ways and Means and Energy and Commerce, and more often 165 00:10:12,640 --> 00:10:15,200 Speaker 3: than not, if you're on that committee, you're only on 166 00:10:15,320 --> 00:10:18,040 Speaker 3: that committee and you're not serving on other committees. But 167 00:10:18,120 --> 00:10:20,720 Speaker 3: other than that, you could be on two, three, four committees. 168 00:10:22,160 --> 00:10:23,360 Speaker 3: They keep them busy. 169 00:10:24,160 --> 00:10:26,920 Speaker 2: Okay, how many people are on the Judiciary Committee? 170 00:10:27,280 --> 00:10:28,280 Speaker 3: It's about forty two. 171 00:10:29,559 --> 00:10:32,160 Speaker 2: And how do they decide who's on the committee? 172 00:10:33,200 --> 00:10:38,000 Speaker 3: Uh, there's something called the Steering Committee, and the Steering 173 00:10:38,000 --> 00:10:42,000 Speaker 3: Committee basically gets together and they assign members uh, the 174 00:10:42,120 --> 00:10:46,199 Speaker 3: various committees based on member interest in where there are vacancies. 175 00:10:46,760 --> 00:10:50,000 Speaker 3: But typically, once you're on a committee as a member 176 00:10:50,040 --> 00:10:52,920 Speaker 3: of Congress, you stay there. You're not going to kick 177 00:10:52,960 --> 00:10:55,040 Speaker 3: you off unless you move up to an a committee 178 00:10:55,160 --> 00:10:57,200 Speaker 3: or you you know, try to move over to some 179 00:10:57,320 --> 00:11:01,800 Speaker 3: other committee. I think they really value the institutional knowledge 180 00:11:01,840 --> 00:11:04,280 Speaker 3: that builds up. We're talking about copy right. You know, 181 00:11:04,320 --> 00:11:06,880 Speaker 3: if you were there for a bunch of these fights, 182 00:11:06,880 --> 00:11:09,599 Speaker 3: you've sort of seen how it all plays out. You 183 00:11:09,679 --> 00:11:12,800 Speaker 3: can use that knowledge in the future. There's a premium 184 00:11:12,800 --> 00:11:15,760 Speaker 3: people put on that, so you know, we like when 185 00:11:15,800 --> 00:11:16,680 Speaker 3: people stick around. 186 00:11:17,400 --> 00:11:22,600 Speaker 2: Okay, Obviously the constituency of the House changes every two years, 187 00:11:23,480 --> 00:11:26,440 Speaker 2: So how would that affect the makeup of the committee. 188 00:11:27,640 --> 00:11:33,240 Speaker 3: Sure, so, Uh, you know, if a member loses or 189 00:11:33,280 --> 00:11:36,640 Speaker 3: resigns or isn't there anymore, Uh, they won't be on 190 00:11:36,679 --> 00:11:38,960 Speaker 3: the committee. That's lot'll have to be filled. 191 00:11:40,760 --> 00:11:43,560 Speaker 2: Well, let's say, you know, we have an election and 192 00:11:43,800 --> 00:11:46,480 Speaker 2: let's just say they're four hundred and fifty eight members 193 00:11:46,480 --> 00:11:47,040 Speaker 2: of Congress. 194 00:11:47,120 --> 00:11:51,320 Speaker 3: Is that a correct on a good day? A good day, 195 00:11:51,880 --> 00:11:52,440 Speaker 3: We've got. 196 00:11:53,800 --> 00:11:55,319 Speaker 2: Leave about the bulls, like I got to go back 197 00:11:55,360 --> 00:11:57,520 Speaker 2: to school. I don't know what you know, especially with 198 00:11:57,640 --> 00:12:00,800 Speaker 2: Nate Silver with the exact numbers four fifty ye, I 199 00:12:00,800 --> 00:12:04,800 Speaker 2: don't know where I got that from. But let's say hypothetically, 200 00:12:05,240 --> 00:12:09,000 Speaker 2: it's you know, two seventeen to eighteen, and then there's 201 00:12:09,040 --> 00:12:12,400 Speaker 2: an election and one party ends up with one hundred 202 00:12:12,480 --> 00:12:15,000 Speaker 2: and the other one ends up with three hundred plus. 203 00:12:15,360 --> 00:12:17,560 Speaker 2: Can't believe I got the number of representatives wrong? People 204 00:12:17,720 --> 00:12:22,280 Speaker 2: to kill me. Would that effect the percentage of one 205 00:12:22,440 --> 00:12:26,239 Speaker 2: party or the other party and making up the Judiciary Committee? 206 00:12:28,400 --> 00:12:32,120 Speaker 3: Not necessarily, I've I think it's been quite some time 207 00:12:32,200 --> 00:12:36,479 Speaker 3: since we've had a disparity that big. You know, typically 208 00:12:36,760 --> 00:12:41,680 Speaker 3: the ratios remain about the same, you know, no matter 209 00:12:41,720 --> 00:12:45,040 Speaker 3: who's in charge. There's so many Republicans, so many Democrats 210 00:12:45,040 --> 00:12:49,520 Speaker 3: on the committee. In the Senate, it is proportional. The 211 00:12:49,559 --> 00:12:52,400 Speaker 3: Senate's a whole other animal. The Senate's sort of like 212 00:12:52,440 --> 00:12:56,880 Speaker 3: the Committee's laws are allocated proportional to who controls the chamber. 213 00:12:57,480 --> 00:13:01,480 Speaker 2: Okay, So you're saying on the Judicial Eury Committee, essentially 214 00:13:01,520 --> 00:13:03,920 Speaker 2: half are Democrats and half Republicans. 215 00:13:04,320 --> 00:13:07,040 Speaker 3: Well, no, there's a who's ever in the majority has 216 00:13:07,600 --> 00:13:10,439 Speaker 3: a majority of the committee slots also, but the ratio 217 00:13:10,520 --> 00:13:12,280 Speaker 3: between them basically stays the same. 218 00:13:13,040 --> 00:13:14,720 Speaker 2: It defined ratio in this case. 219 00:13:17,200 --> 00:13:22,440 Speaker 3: So if there are you know, twenty five Republicans on 220 00:13:22,600 --> 00:13:29,000 Speaker 3: the committee and seventeen Democrats, it would that that would flip. 221 00:13:31,880 --> 00:13:33,679 Speaker 2: You mean, if the other party took control in the 222 00:13:33,720 --> 00:13:38,200 Speaker 2: same numbers exactly exactly, Okay, So let's say, you know, 223 00:13:38,480 --> 00:13:41,520 Speaker 2: I'm a member of the Juiciary Committee and my party 224 00:13:41,559 --> 00:13:46,920 Speaker 2: does poorly in the next election, will I lose my seat? 225 00:13:49,800 --> 00:13:54,160 Speaker 3: You could? You could if you know you're a newer 226 00:13:54,240 --> 00:13:57,880 Speaker 3: member of the committee and the ratio gets cut to 227 00:13:57,920 --> 00:14:00,320 Speaker 3: the point where like they've got to eliminate. It's some 228 00:14:00,360 --> 00:14:02,719 Speaker 3: slots you could lose your seat on the committee. 229 00:14:02,840 --> 00:14:05,000 Speaker 2: And who is chairperson in the committee? 230 00:14:05,880 --> 00:14:09,840 Speaker 3: The chair right now is Jim Jordan from Ohio, and 231 00:14:09,880 --> 00:14:12,200 Speaker 3: the ranking members Jerry Nadler from New York. 232 00:14:12,880 --> 00:14:15,880 Speaker 2: And how do they pick those That's. 233 00:14:15,640 --> 00:14:19,160 Speaker 3: Picked by the steering committee. Also in the it's a 234 00:14:19,200 --> 00:14:22,760 Speaker 3: little different on the the Democrats have a different process. 235 00:14:22,800 --> 00:14:26,840 Speaker 3: It's sort of the whole caucus desize. The Republican side, 236 00:14:26,880 --> 00:14:30,760 Speaker 3: there is a steering committee process and they sort of 237 00:14:30,840 --> 00:14:34,280 Speaker 3: vote on who's going to be chair. Once you're chair, 238 00:14:34,400 --> 00:14:37,560 Speaker 3: you've got the job for six years. If you're a Republican. 239 00:14:38,040 --> 00:14:40,080 Speaker 3: Democrats do it a little differently. You can kind of 240 00:14:40,080 --> 00:14:44,720 Speaker 3: be chair in perpetuity. 241 00:14:48,840 --> 00:14:53,200 Speaker 2: So the steering committee. Each party has the equivalent thereof 242 00:14:53,360 --> 00:14:58,359 Speaker 2: that's right, that's right, okay, And whoever has the majority 243 00:14:58,880 --> 00:15:00,800 Speaker 2: gets to decide the chairperson. 244 00:15:01,440 --> 00:15:05,120 Speaker 3: Yeah, you get to decide your relative leadership on the committee. 245 00:15:05,280 --> 00:15:07,000 Speaker 3: So if you're in the minority, you would choose the 246 00:15:07,200 --> 00:15:11,400 Speaker 3: ranking member, you know, the top person on the committee 247 00:15:11,440 --> 00:15:13,720 Speaker 3: for the minority, and if you're in the majority, you 248 00:15:13,840 --> 00:15:17,400 Speaker 3: choose the chairperson, top person on there for the majority. 249 00:15:18,600 --> 00:15:23,640 Speaker 2: As a practical matter, what does it mean if you 250 00:15:23,720 --> 00:15:25,920 Speaker 2: were the party that is in control and you're the 251 00:15:26,000 --> 00:15:28,760 Speaker 2: chairperson as opposed to the opposing party. 252 00:15:29,320 --> 00:15:36,120 Speaker 3: Bob, it means everything. Really, the House is a majoritarian institution, 253 00:15:36,640 --> 00:15:40,480 Speaker 3: and so when you're in control, you set the agenda, 254 00:15:40,560 --> 00:15:42,680 Speaker 3: you decide what bills move, what bills don't move. 255 00:15:44,920 --> 00:15:46,840 Speaker 2: Okay, I'm trying to rationalize how they came up with 256 00:15:46,880 --> 00:15:49,600 Speaker 2: four fifty eight maybe five thirty eight and eight silver. 257 00:15:50,240 --> 00:15:52,560 Speaker 2: You know, I made a mistake there, it is I 258 00:15:52,600 --> 00:15:54,600 Speaker 2: have to own it. Not going to cut it. So, 259 00:15:55,800 --> 00:15:59,200 Speaker 2: if you are on the Judiciary Committee, might you be 260 00:15:59,360 --> 00:16:00,880 Speaker 2: on multiple subcommittee? 261 00:16:00,960 --> 00:16:03,440 Speaker 3: Yes, you definitely are. You're probably on at least two, 262 00:16:03,520 --> 00:16:04,200 Speaker 3: maybe three. 263 00:16:06,360 --> 00:16:11,640 Speaker 2: Okay, So there is a specific subcommittee for intellectual there is, 264 00:16:13,440 --> 00:16:16,520 Speaker 2: and what would be the breadth what would be some 265 00:16:16,600 --> 00:16:19,400 Speaker 2: of the issues that would be addressed in that subcommittee? 266 00:16:19,920 --> 00:16:22,680 Speaker 3: So it's it, And to be clear, it's intellectual property 267 00:16:22,800 --> 00:16:26,360 Speaker 3: and the courts and the Internet. Those are the three 268 00:16:26,440 --> 00:16:30,320 Speaker 3: sort of categories of topics under the subcommittee's jurisdiction. So, 269 00:16:31,360 --> 00:16:33,840 Speaker 3: you know, we've had a bunch of hearings this year 270 00:16:33,960 --> 00:16:39,560 Speaker 3: on AI and copyright. We've had hearings on other sort 271 00:16:39,560 --> 00:16:45,680 Speaker 3: of music royalty issues. There is a hearing just yesterday 272 00:16:45,920 --> 00:16:52,720 Speaker 3: on third party litigation funding. We've had hearings on patentability 273 00:16:53,440 --> 00:16:57,440 Speaker 3: and patentability related to AI. It really runs the gamut 274 00:16:57,480 --> 00:16:59,680 Speaker 3: of all the all the AI, all the all the 275 00:16:59,720 --> 00:17:00,440 Speaker 3: IP issues. 276 00:17:00,520 --> 00:17:06,000 Speaker 2: Rather, what's the third pretty litigation funding? What is that? 277 00:17:06,119 --> 00:17:12,280 Speaker 3: So this is the There are a bunch of lawsuits 278 00:17:12,720 --> 00:17:18,359 Speaker 3: where we'll say one company sues another and the accusation 279 00:17:18,640 --> 00:17:24,120 Speaker 3: is that, you know, the company doing the suing has 280 00:17:24,200 --> 00:17:27,919 Speaker 3: a third party backer. We'll say, someone with a you know, 281 00:17:28,160 --> 00:17:32,240 Speaker 3: financial stake and the outcome of the case and that party, 282 00:17:32,320 --> 00:17:35,280 Speaker 3: that sort of third party might not be known to 283 00:17:35,359 --> 00:17:39,040 Speaker 3: the public or to the court. And so there's a 284 00:17:39,440 --> 00:17:44,320 Speaker 3: movement of foot to get transparency so people know who's suing, 285 00:17:44,359 --> 00:17:47,240 Speaker 3: what their motivations are, who's sort of backing the lawsuit. 286 00:17:49,200 --> 00:17:53,520 Speaker 2: Okay, as we speak, there's a big brew haha with Spotify, 287 00:17:53,680 --> 00:17:57,359 Speaker 2: which now has more than music has books and they're 288 00:17:57,440 --> 00:18:01,240 Speaker 2: bundling and they want to reduce rate. Is this something 289 00:18:01,400 --> 00:18:04,960 Speaker 2: a that the Justice Committee might address? B Is it 290 00:18:05,119 --> 00:18:06,600 Speaker 2: something you're already hearing about. 291 00:18:06,760 --> 00:18:11,520 Speaker 3: It's definitely something we're hearing about. You know. 292 00:18:11,760 --> 00:18:12,640 Speaker 2: It is. 293 00:18:12,760 --> 00:18:18,320 Speaker 3: The music publishers very upset about the situation. You know, 294 00:18:18,440 --> 00:18:23,199 Speaker 3: they think that Spotify is is exploiting a loophole an 295 00:18:23,280 --> 00:18:29,280 Speaker 3: agreement that they made in twenty twenty two. Spotify basically 296 00:18:29,520 --> 00:18:33,720 Speaker 3: contends that you know, everybody signed off on this, that 297 00:18:33,840 --> 00:18:36,760 Speaker 3: the publishers are you know, in fact, making more money 298 00:18:36,760 --> 00:18:38,840 Speaker 3: a year over year and they shouldn't have anything to 299 00:18:38,840 --> 00:18:42,280 Speaker 3: complain about that. It was I think totally foreseeable that 300 00:18:42,320 --> 00:18:46,919 Speaker 3: they'd introduced audiobooks onto the platform. 301 00:18:47,080 --> 00:18:51,160 Speaker 2: So okay, that's the issue. To what degree is something 302 00:18:51,359 --> 00:18:54,920 Speaker 2: happening on the issue Justice Committee now? 303 00:18:55,359 --> 00:18:59,359 Speaker 3: So the committee you hear when when these issues happen, 304 00:18:59,400 --> 00:19:02,760 Speaker 3: there are a lot of sort of funny thing about 305 00:19:02,840 --> 00:19:06,640 Speaker 3: the music space. A lot of this happens between those parties. 306 00:19:06,720 --> 00:19:11,040 Speaker 3: You know, they might they're yelling at each other, trying 307 00:19:11,040 --> 00:19:14,240 Speaker 3: to figure out some settlement, they might sue each other, 308 00:19:14,600 --> 00:19:17,040 Speaker 3: but at the same time they're keeping the Committee apprized 309 00:19:17,080 --> 00:19:21,359 Speaker 3: of this. They might get members of Congress to send 310 00:19:21,520 --> 00:19:26,199 Speaker 3: letters complaining in one direction or the other. But for 311 00:19:26,280 --> 00:19:28,840 Speaker 3: right now, the issue is kind of new. I haven't 312 00:19:28,880 --> 00:19:35,960 Speaker 3: heard of anyone, you know, doing anything in particular about 313 00:19:36,080 --> 00:19:38,960 Speaker 3: these complaints. I know that we're monitoring it, though, and 314 00:19:39,560 --> 00:19:41,480 Speaker 3: we'll kind of we'll see what happens. 315 00:19:42,480 --> 00:19:45,879 Speaker 2: Okay. When you say getting someone to write a letter, 316 00:19:46,240 --> 00:19:49,960 Speaker 2: you mean a member writing a letter to the Judiciary Committee. 317 00:19:50,600 --> 00:19:54,080 Speaker 3: No, I mean a member of the Judiciary Committee or 318 00:19:54,119 --> 00:19:55,840 Speaker 3: even a member off of the committee. This is a 319 00:19:55,960 --> 00:20:02,200 Speaker 3: really common practice. You know, one maybe maybe the songwriters, 320 00:20:02,240 --> 00:20:06,240 Speaker 3: maybe the publishers, may be you know, somebody else interested 321 00:20:06,240 --> 00:20:10,720 Speaker 3: in this will say, hey, you know, ex member, I'm 322 00:20:10,720 --> 00:20:13,959 Speaker 3: really upset about this. I think this is a great injustice, 323 00:20:14,080 --> 00:20:17,920 Speaker 3: or I think that, you know, the songwriters are wrong 324 00:20:18,000 --> 00:20:20,600 Speaker 3: to be upset about this. Send a letter to the 325 00:20:20,600 --> 00:20:23,800 Speaker 3: other party asking questions and sort of raise the issue, 326 00:20:24,440 --> 00:20:27,840 Speaker 3: and that kind of telegraph to the parties the Congress 327 00:20:27,920 --> 00:20:30,359 Speaker 3: is paying attention. Maybe there will be a hearing, Maybe 328 00:20:30,400 --> 00:20:33,760 Speaker 3: this will get elevated. It's kind of more often than 329 00:20:33,760 --> 00:20:36,080 Speaker 3: not to put people back on their heels. 330 00:20:37,920 --> 00:20:39,399 Speaker 2: So what does it take to have a hearing? 331 00:20:41,000 --> 00:20:44,360 Speaker 3: Well, so at the IP Subcommittee, which is shaired right 332 00:20:44,400 --> 00:20:48,640 Speaker 3: now by darryl Isa from California and the ranking members 333 00:20:48,680 --> 00:20:52,159 Speaker 3: Hanna Johnson in Georgia, they do most things on a 334 00:20:52,359 --> 00:20:55,600 Speaker 3: bipartisan basis, and they'll sort of agree we're gonna have 335 00:20:55,680 --> 00:20:58,639 Speaker 3: a hearing, but it's really it's up to him. He'll say, 336 00:20:59,280 --> 00:21:01,000 Speaker 3: you know, next week, I'm going to have a hearing 337 00:21:01,080 --> 00:21:07,040 Speaker 3: on you know, patentability of AI generated you know, inventions, 338 00:21:07,320 --> 00:21:12,800 Speaker 3: and it'll basically happen. The staff will identify witnesses that 339 00:21:12,880 --> 00:21:16,320 Speaker 3: can talk about these things, will convene a panel, they'll 340 00:21:16,320 --> 00:21:19,200 Speaker 3: get sworn in, we'll have a hearing. It'll last about 341 00:21:19,200 --> 00:21:22,840 Speaker 3: two hours. Members will ask questions, and that's kind of 342 00:21:22,880 --> 00:21:23,400 Speaker 3: the ballgame. 343 00:21:25,480 --> 00:21:30,360 Speaker 2: Okay, so right now, the Republicans have the majority, so 344 00:21:30,520 --> 00:21:33,919 Speaker 2: ISA can call or not call a hearing. Can a Democrat, 345 00:21:33,960 --> 00:21:36,600 Speaker 2: who is the minority right now, call a hearing? No? 346 00:21:37,040 --> 00:21:43,000 Speaker 3: They can't. Okay, there's like a there's a funky exception 347 00:21:43,200 --> 00:21:48,439 Speaker 3: to that that I won't bore you with, but generally speaking, no, 348 00:21:48,640 --> 00:21:51,880 Speaker 3: they you know, they can't call a hearing. They're sort 349 00:21:51,880 --> 00:21:54,320 Speaker 3: of relying on on the majority to call a hearing. 350 00:21:54,800 --> 00:21:57,639 Speaker 3: But you know, I think the majority of hearings that 351 00:21:57,760 --> 00:22:00,159 Speaker 3: mister reis Is proposed have been by part of and 352 00:22:00,280 --> 00:22:02,840 Speaker 3: just giving the given the nature of the subcommittee. 353 00:22:04,240 --> 00:22:07,640 Speaker 2: Okay, so it's not really usually a combative process. One 354 00:22:07,720 --> 00:22:09,520 Speaker 2: party wants it and one party doesn't. 355 00:22:10,040 --> 00:22:12,480 Speaker 3: No, not in this space. So that's not how these 356 00:22:12,520 --> 00:22:16,159 Speaker 3: issues break down. It's not really like a red versus 357 00:22:16,200 --> 00:22:20,080 Speaker 3: blue thing. There's you know, other things going on that 358 00:22:20,200 --> 00:22:21,280 Speaker 3: sort of divide members. 359 00:22:22,560 --> 00:22:25,439 Speaker 2: Okay, so let's just use, for an example, the music industry. 360 00:22:25,480 --> 00:22:29,080 Speaker 2: I gotta bug up my rear end and for whatever 361 00:22:29,240 --> 00:22:32,560 Speaker 2: channel I reach, ISA, what's it going to take to 362 00:22:32,680 --> 00:22:34,840 Speaker 2: actually have a hearing where you might say, hey, all 363 00:22:34,840 --> 00:22:37,760 Speaker 2: this stuff is in evidence, I don't need a hearing. 364 00:22:38,200 --> 00:22:40,280 Speaker 3: He's got to be convinced that it's it's sort of 365 00:22:40,600 --> 00:22:43,680 Speaker 3: worth gathering the members of the committee and hearing testimony 366 00:22:43,680 --> 00:22:47,000 Speaker 3: on this. Sometimes it's we might consider more often than not, 367 00:22:47,119 --> 00:22:50,000 Speaker 3: it's like we're going to consider legislation on this topic. 368 00:22:50,040 --> 00:22:51,840 Speaker 3: So we need to get a better understanding. We have 369 00:22:51,880 --> 00:22:55,760 Speaker 3: to build a legislative record of testimony in support or 370 00:22:55,760 --> 00:22:59,120 Speaker 3: against a bill. But you know, it's up to him 371 00:22:59,160 --> 00:23:02,200 Speaker 3: if you came in and how persuasive meeting and he 372 00:23:02,400 --> 00:23:03,080 Speaker 3: to call a. 373 00:23:03,040 --> 00:23:07,320 Speaker 2: Hearing, okay, And why the two hour limit. 374 00:23:07,400 --> 00:23:09,880 Speaker 3: There's no two hour limit. I'm just that's an approximate 375 00:23:09,920 --> 00:23:12,000 Speaker 3: time for about the length of the subcommittee hearing. 376 00:23:13,160 --> 00:23:17,280 Speaker 2: So let's assume we schedule a hearing. Does everybody on 377 00:23:17,320 --> 00:23:18,600 Speaker 2: the subcommittee show up? 378 00:23:19,560 --> 00:23:22,359 Speaker 3: They make their best effort to show up. As you noted, 379 00:23:22,640 --> 00:23:27,240 Speaker 3: members are on multiple committees, so they're very busy. Most 380 00:23:27,240 --> 00:23:29,280 Speaker 3: people try and come for at least part of it. 381 00:23:30,359 --> 00:23:32,800 Speaker 3: You know, some hearings you'll have everyone there the whole time. 382 00:23:33,280 --> 00:23:36,440 Speaker 3: Other times, you know, attendance can be lower than that. 383 00:23:38,080 --> 00:23:43,600 Speaker 2: Let's assume we have a hearing. How do we apportion 384 00:23:44,640 --> 00:23:46,959 Speaker 2: time amongst the members who are in attendance. 385 00:23:48,480 --> 00:23:50,800 Speaker 3: You've got five minutes to ask questions? 386 00:23:53,600 --> 00:23:56,800 Speaker 2: And can you ever can da all? Isus in charge? Now? 387 00:23:56,800 --> 00:23:58,199 Speaker 2: Can he ever say? Well, you know, you're on a 388 00:23:58,200 --> 00:24:00,080 Speaker 2: good thread. You got a few more minutes. 389 00:24:00,320 --> 00:24:03,480 Speaker 3: Not really, that's very frowned upon and not allowed for 390 00:24:03,640 --> 00:24:06,040 Speaker 3: in the rules. You can do anything by what's called 391 00:24:06,119 --> 00:24:10,120 Speaker 3: unanimous consent. Really, you could say, you know, like if 392 00:24:10,160 --> 00:24:14,600 Speaker 3: nobody objects, they could give whoever, you know, some extra time, 393 00:24:15,359 --> 00:24:17,840 Speaker 3: allow the witness to answer more questions. They could also 394 00:24:17,920 --> 00:24:19,959 Speaker 3: do a second round where they'll go around and everybody 395 00:24:19,960 --> 00:24:21,160 Speaker 3: gets five minutes again. 396 00:24:22,680 --> 00:24:26,280 Speaker 2: And what if for some reason, because I'm spacing out, 397 00:24:26,359 --> 00:24:29,240 Speaker 2: or is it another sub committee, I get my five 398 00:24:29,280 --> 00:24:33,520 Speaker 2: minutes and I asked questions if somebody already asked, let's. 399 00:24:33,400 --> 00:24:34,960 Speaker 3: See, I think you hope nobody notices. 400 00:24:35,760 --> 00:24:40,720 Speaker 2: Probably, Okay, so let's soon we're going to have a hearing. 401 00:24:42,000 --> 00:24:46,200 Speaker 2: How many people might testify? And how do you decide 402 00:24:46,240 --> 00:24:47,600 Speaker 2: who actually is testified? 403 00:24:47,720 --> 00:24:51,320 Speaker 3: Got four people testify? The staff will reach out to 404 00:24:51,359 --> 00:24:54,359 Speaker 3: a bunch of witnesses, the people they think could be witnesses, 405 00:24:54,440 --> 00:24:57,880 Speaker 3: sort of feel them out, get a sense of their expertise, 406 00:24:59,240 --> 00:25:01,879 Speaker 3: and then you know, if it makes sense to have 407 00:25:01,960 --> 00:25:05,840 Speaker 3: them there and they're available, they'll they'll show up. So 408 00:25:05,880 --> 00:25:08,600 Speaker 3: it's only four, No, No, it could be as many 409 00:25:09,400 --> 00:25:14,359 Speaker 3: as as many as as the chair wants to have. Really, 410 00:25:14,760 --> 00:25:17,320 Speaker 3: sometimes there are multiple panels. You know, you might have 411 00:25:17,359 --> 00:25:20,040 Speaker 3: a panel of government witnesses and then a panel of 412 00:25:20,800 --> 00:25:25,840 Speaker 3: expert witnesses. Sometimes it's one, you know, when we have 413 00:25:26,160 --> 00:25:34,280 Speaker 3: like the copyright register up, it's usually just her testifying. 414 00:25:36,720 --> 00:25:38,000 Speaker 3: So it really depends. 415 00:25:40,080 --> 00:25:44,800 Speaker 2: Okay, Now we see hearings and we see someone make 416 00:25:44,840 --> 00:25:48,960 Speaker 2: a statement before questions do I get the right to 417 00:25:49,000 --> 00:25:50,600 Speaker 2: make a statement. When do I get to make a 418 00:25:50,600 --> 00:25:53,200 Speaker 2: statement as opposed to just answer questions? 419 00:25:56,600 --> 00:25:59,800 Speaker 3: You get to make a statement at the very beginning. 420 00:26:00,119 --> 00:26:01,520 Speaker 3: You have five minutes to make a statement. 421 00:26:03,680 --> 00:26:10,120 Speaker 2: Okay, let's assume I'm testifying. To what degree are these 422 00:26:10,160 --> 00:26:13,320 Speaker 2: people prepared? And to what deg we should they prepare? 423 00:26:15,800 --> 00:26:21,560 Speaker 3: If you're a witness testifying before the committee, I would 424 00:26:21,560 --> 00:26:24,040 Speaker 3: say you spend a ton of time preparing because you 425 00:26:24,119 --> 00:26:29,160 Speaker 3: never know you're under oath. Uh, it's recorded, it's there 426 00:26:29,200 --> 00:26:32,520 Speaker 3: for all time, it's in the congressional record. You know, 427 00:26:32,640 --> 00:26:35,960 Speaker 3: people usually do what's called a murder board will. They'll 428 00:26:36,000 --> 00:26:39,880 Speaker 3: sit down, have lawyers with them, you know, run through 429 00:26:39,960 --> 00:26:42,080 Speaker 3: questions they might be asked and how they're going to 430 00:26:42,160 --> 00:26:47,440 Speaker 3: answer them. That's almost certainly the case for any sort 431 00:26:47,480 --> 00:26:51,919 Speaker 3: of high stakes testimony. You know, if if you're a 432 00:26:52,400 --> 00:26:55,800 Speaker 3: subject matter expert and you know the material cold, you 433 00:26:55,920 --> 00:26:57,680 Speaker 3: might not prepare that much. I mean you might. You 434 00:26:57,760 --> 00:26:59,240 Speaker 3: might do this all the time. There are a lot 435 00:26:59,280 --> 00:27:02,240 Speaker 3: of people that testif fight pretty regularly and just kind 436 00:27:02,240 --> 00:27:03,680 Speaker 3: of ready for the job. 437 00:27:05,480 --> 00:27:09,639 Speaker 2: Okay. From an outside position, it seems that some of 438 00:27:09,640 --> 00:27:14,640 Speaker 2: these hearings are grandstanding there's an issue that's in the 439 00:27:14,680 --> 00:27:18,920 Speaker 2: news and they have a hearing and we see some 440 00:27:19,000 --> 00:27:21,840 Speaker 2: reports and then doesn't seem like anything happened. 441 00:27:24,000 --> 00:27:28,399 Speaker 3: Sure, I think that happens quite a bit. You know, 442 00:27:28,560 --> 00:27:33,119 Speaker 3: when you say nothing happens, there are There are really 443 00:27:33,960 --> 00:27:37,879 Speaker 3: two purposes to a hearing, right You've got a like 444 00:27:38,240 --> 00:27:43,720 Speaker 3: a legislative hearing, or like an issue intensive hearing about 445 00:27:43,760 --> 00:27:46,840 Speaker 3: like AI and copyright for instance, That's not going to 446 00:27:46,880 --> 00:27:49,320 Speaker 3: be on the front page of the paper. Most people 447 00:27:49,359 --> 00:27:51,719 Speaker 3: aren't going to hear about it unless you're you know, 448 00:27:52,359 --> 00:27:57,080 Speaker 3: unless you're really into this stuff. But if the Attorney 449 00:27:57,119 --> 00:28:01,200 Speaker 3: general's testifying or you know, some se EO is testifying 450 00:28:01,320 --> 00:28:06,359 Speaker 3: about some oil spill or something, the purpose of that 451 00:28:06,480 --> 00:28:11,199 Speaker 3: isn't necessarily like, oh, we're always going to we have 452 00:28:11,240 --> 00:28:13,919 Speaker 3: a bill in mind that we're going to move. It 453 00:28:14,040 --> 00:28:19,160 Speaker 3: is you know, Congress has a rule as an oversight function, right, 454 00:28:19,200 --> 00:28:21,280 Speaker 3: and so it's sort of looking out to these issues 455 00:28:21,280 --> 00:28:23,840 Speaker 3: to see if potentially we need to get involved or 456 00:28:23,880 --> 00:28:26,520 Speaker 3: we need to do something, we need to consider legislative action. 457 00:28:26,920 --> 00:28:31,840 Speaker 3: That isn't always the case. Most of the cabinet secretaries 458 00:28:32,720 --> 00:28:35,560 Speaker 3: had it's customary for them to come up you know 459 00:28:35,960 --> 00:28:38,760 Speaker 3: once a year and testify. I think a lot of 460 00:28:38,800 --> 00:28:40,760 Speaker 3: what you're talking about happens at those hearings. 461 00:28:41,120 --> 00:28:44,720 Speaker 2: Okay, so but let's assume you know it's an issue 462 00:28:45,080 --> 00:28:47,240 Speaker 2: that is going to have to be decided or you 463 00:28:47,280 --> 00:28:50,960 Speaker 2: want to have decided. You have the hearing, Then what 464 00:28:51,240 --> 00:28:54,120 Speaker 2: might happen to move forward towards legislation. 465 00:28:57,240 --> 00:28:59,840 Speaker 3: You have the hearing that gives you the ability to 466 00:28:59,880 --> 00:29:03,800 Speaker 3: know where the members are, what they're thinking. You hear 467 00:29:03,880 --> 00:29:08,719 Speaker 3: from the witnesses about potential problems with the bills, different 468 00:29:08,760 --> 00:29:12,200 Speaker 3: ways to write whatever bills you're considering on that topic, 469 00:29:12,840 --> 00:29:16,760 Speaker 3: sort of go back process all that information, and then 470 00:29:17,680 --> 00:29:21,640 Speaker 3: you'd probably consider putting one of those bills on the 471 00:29:21,680 --> 00:29:26,280 Speaker 3: markup agenda and marking it up marketing and by marking 472 00:29:26,280 --> 00:29:29,320 Speaker 3: it up, sorry I mean, I mean you sort of 473 00:29:29,320 --> 00:29:32,640 Speaker 3: bring it before the committee, You debate the bill, you 474 00:29:32,720 --> 00:29:36,440 Speaker 3: amend the bill, and then you sort of vote on 475 00:29:36,480 --> 00:29:38,959 Speaker 3: it and decide whether or not it will leave the 476 00:29:39,000 --> 00:29:40,560 Speaker 3: committee and go to the floor. 477 00:29:40,960 --> 00:29:44,640 Speaker 2: And that could take on one end. It never happens. 478 00:29:45,120 --> 00:29:49,200 Speaker 2: Never introduce how fast or how slow can this process 479 00:29:49,320 --> 00:29:50,520 Speaker 2: be marking up the bill? 480 00:29:53,640 --> 00:29:58,640 Speaker 3: So as fast as we could notice the markup where 481 00:29:58,680 --> 00:30:04,480 Speaker 3: I think it's three business from now, have the mark 482 00:30:04,560 --> 00:30:06,360 Speaker 3: up on the bill and send it to the floor, 483 00:30:06,400 --> 00:30:07,880 Speaker 3: and it could be on the floor the next day, 484 00:30:08,520 --> 00:30:10,440 Speaker 3: or you know, after a bill reports filed, so that 485 00:30:10,640 --> 00:30:14,760 Speaker 3: that could all happen very quickly. Or you could mark 486 00:30:14,840 --> 00:30:18,000 Speaker 3: up a bill that you send to the floor and 487 00:30:18,080 --> 00:30:21,080 Speaker 3: it never sees action on the floor. Or you could 488 00:30:21,080 --> 00:30:23,000 Speaker 3: introduce a bill and it never gets marked up. 489 00:30:30,200 --> 00:30:31,560 Speaker 2: Okay, who writes the bill? 490 00:30:33,600 --> 00:30:37,320 Speaker 3: Well, bills are always authored by members of Congress. You know, 491 00:30:37,400 --> 00:30:41,000 Speaker 3: it's whatever member's name is on the bill. That's that's 492 00:30:41,000 --> 00:30:45,080 Speaker 3: who introduced the bill, So they've written the bill. 493 00:30:45,600 --> 00:30:49,560 Speaker 2: We hear about lobbyists writing the actual language. Is that 494 00:30:49,640 --> 00:30:50,600 Speaker 2: a possibility? 495 00:30:51,800 --> 00:30:57,520 Speaker 3: I don't think is it a possibility. Lobbyists certainly like 496 00:30:58,240 --> 00:31:00,440 Speaker 3: make the case for how some length would you want 497 00:31:00,480 --> 00:31:03,960 Speaker 3: to build might look like At the end of the day, 498 00:31:03,960 --> 00:31:09,000 Speaker 3: these are people who have an interest in the outcome 499 00:31:09,040 --> 00:31:11,040 Speaker 3: of a thing, and they know about their industry and 500 00:31:11,080 --> 00:31:13,520 Speaker 3: they don't want you to overlook something, and so they 501 00:31:13,600 --> 00:31:17,480 Speaker 3: might play some role in, you know, advising on how 502 00:31:17,520 --> 00:31:22,360 Speaker 3: something's written. But members have to consent to you know, 503 00:31:22,560 --> 00:31:25,680 Speaker 3: that language. Usually you take sort of an idea the 504 00:31:25,720 --> 00:31:28,240 Speaker 3: way it works is you would take an idea that 505 00:31:28,360 --> 00:31:31,400 Speaker 3: you have and you would work with a group we 506 00:31:31,480 --> 00:31:35,440 Speaker 3: have called Legislative Council. There's a bunch of experts there 507 00:31:35,880 --> 00:31:38,920 Speaker 3: that will sort of know how to how to draft 508 00:31:38,920 --> 00:31:42,040 Speaker 3: the bills so that it, you know, can change the 509 00:31:42,120 --> 00:31:44,160 Speaker 3: law in a way that the courts will interpret the 510 00:31:44,200 --> 00:31:45,520 Speaker 3: way that you want them to. 511 00:31:45,920 --> 00:31:46,880 Speaker 2: So what's your job? 512 00:31:49,560 --> 00:31:56,680 Speaker 3: So I basically oversee policy for the Judiciary Committee. That 513 00:31:56,800 --> 00:32:01,840 Speaker 3: means advising members on what bills we're going to move, 514 00:32:02,360 --> 00:32:07,040 Speaker 3: helping to play a role and you know, talking to 515 00:32:07,120 --> 00:32:10,600 Speaker 3: people about why bill is good, why it's bad, if 516 00:32:10,600 --> 00:32:14,200 Speaker 3: it achieves what they want to achieve, what the outcome 517 00:32:14,240 --> 00:32:17,760 Speaker 3: will be, the likelihood of success for the bill you know, 518 00:32:17,800 --> 00:32:22,200 Speaker 3: on the floor or going into law. All that it's 519 00:32:22,240 --> 00:32:26,480 Speaker 3: sort of being, you know, is staff at the committee. 520 00:32:26,560 --> 00:32:30,800 Speaker 3: Our Our main role is advising members and helping guide 521 00:32:30,960 --> 00:32:32,280 Speaker 3: guide the legislative agenda. 522 00:32:33,160 --> 00:32:37,880 Speaker 2: So you it's not only IP you advise on everything 523 00:32:37,960 --> 00:32:39,440 Speaker 2: the Judiciary Committee does. 524 00:32:40,400 --> 00:32:44,520 Speaker 3: I advise on Yes, for the most part, We've got 525 00:32:44,880 --> 00:32:47,520 Speaker 3: you know, sort of underneath me at the committee there 526 00:32:47,520 --> 00:32:51,640 Speaker 3: are other subject matter experts on all these things. And 527 00:32:51,680 --> 00:32:54,840 Speaker 3: you know, I would say that I spend a lot 528 00:32:54,880 --> 00:32:58,760 Speaker 3: of my time in the antitrust and IP space. That's 529 00:32:58,800 --> 00:32:59,960 Speaker 3: where I spend most of my time. 530 00:33:00,120 --> 00:33:05,320 Speaker 2: Okay, So in this department, who do you report to? 531 00:33:06,400 --> 00:33:09,240 Speaker 3: Miss it? Everybody that works for the committee reports to 532 00:33:09,280 --> 00:33:11,960 Speaker 3: the chair. Okay, so I worked for all the members 533 00:33:12,000 --> 00:33:14,360 Speaker 3: of the committee, but we report to the chair. 534 00:33:14,440 --> 00:33:17,280 Speaker 2: Okay, So you're the you're the head guy in policy. 535 00:33:17,680 --> 00:33:19,640 Speaker 3: I think that's that's fair. 536 00:33:20,080 --> 00:33:22,920 Speaker 2: And you're an attorney. How many attorneys work for you? 537 00:33:25,840 --> 00:33:32,320 Speaker 3: There are on staff about one hundred attorneys. I'm reluctant 538 00:33:32,360 --> 00:33:35,080 Speaker 3: to say that these people work for me, but work 539 00:33:35,160 --> 00:33:37,880 Speaker 3: with me. You know, eighty ish. 540 00:33:37,760 --> 00:33:40,040 Speaker 2: People, and are they all attorneys? 541 00:33:40,760 --> 00:33:42,240 Speaker 3: The vast majority of them are attorneys? 542 00:33:42,320 --> 00:33:50,320 Speaker 2: Yeah? Okay, So let's go back to something you brought up, Ai. 543 00:33:50,800 --> 00:33:53,200 Speaker 2: So I remember, back when you were a little kid, 544 00:33:53,240 --> 00:33:58,800 Speaker 2: they had hearings on Napster and ultimately the issue was 545 00:33:58,880 --> 00:34:04,600 Speaker 2: decided by courts that Master was copyright infringement based on 546 00:34:04,640 --> 00:34:09,440 Speaker 2: a centralized database. Then we had Khazah, Then we had lockers, 547 00:34:09,880 --> 00:34:12,000 Speaker 2: and then we had Daniel Leck came up with a 548 00:34:12,040 --> 00:34:16,000 Speaker 2: good model for streaming, and the rest is history. If 549 00:34:16,080 --> 00:34:20,640 Speaker 2: I'm in tech, should I be looking for a legislative solution? 550 00:34:21,640 --> 00:34:24,640 Speaker 2: Or do I say, A, these issues are going to 551 00:34:24,719 --> 00:34:27,440 Speaker 2: work out anyway, or I should find a business solution. 552 00:34:30,200 --> 00:34:33,400 Speaker 3: When it comes to AI, it's it's kind of like a. 553 00:34:33,480 --> 00:34:36,240 Speaker 3: I think the issue is multi dimensional and it depends 554 00:34:36,320 --> 00:34:42,200 Speaker 3: what problem you're trying to solve for right, there are 555 00:34:42,280 --> 00:34:45,759 Speaker 3: definitely some people in tech that are saying you need 556 00:34:45,800 --> 00:34:50,040 Speaker 3: to regulate AI. Some of those people are incumbent players 557 00:34:50,800 --> 00:34:53,600 Speaker 3: who sort of are in at the ground floor at AI, 558 00:34:53,960 --> 00:34:59,280 Speaker 3: and there's concern that the regulations that they want might help, 559 00:34:59,480 --> 00:35:04,200 Speaker 3: you know, of protect their incumbency there there. You know, 560 00:35:04,560 --> 00:35:08,120 Speaker 3: if we're talking about music and AI, I think it's 561 00:35:08,160 --> 00:35:13,040 Speaker 3: a it's a different conversation. You know, you've got sort 562 00:35:13,080 --> 00:35:17,400 Speaker 3: of the Copyright Office who's looking at these issues and 563 00:35:17,960 --> 00:35:20,800 Speaker 3: there I think soon going to put out some recommendations 564 00:35:20,800 --> 00:35:24,640 Speaker 3: about how they're thinking about AI. You've got the course 565 00:35:24,760 --> 00:35:27,319 Speaker 3: looking at this in terms of what is fair use, 566 00:35:27,360 --> 00:35:30,920 Speaker 3: what is not fair use, and you know AI training 567 00:35:30,960 --> 00:35:34,359 Speaker 3: models and how that will work, you know. And then 568 00:35:34,800 --> 00:35:39,759 Speaker 3: I think you've got Congress taking up questions related to 569 00:35:40,160 --> 00:35:45,440 Speaker 3: protecting voice and likeness and to some extent like record 570 00:35:45,520 --> 00:35:51,000 Speaker 3: keeping and transparency. You know, these are all issues that 571 00:35:51,040 --> 00:35:54,759 Speaker 3: are that are hot right now. I don't think that 572 00:35:54,840 --> 00:35:59,040 Speaker 3: the situation we're in today is unlike you know what 573 00:35:59,200 --> 00:36:05,839 Speaker 3: happened in nineteen ninety nine with Napster. We I've been 574 00:36:05,840 --> 00:36:11,320 Speaker 3: working on music issues for almost a decade now on 575 00:36:11,680 --> 00:36:16,480 Speaker 3: on Capitol Hill, and uh, it went from a year 576 00:36:16,520 --> 00:36:19,600 Speaker 3: ago I would hear about AI every couple of months 577 00:36:19,719 --> 00:36:22,839 Speaker 3: or someone would want to come talk about it. This year, 578 00:36:22,880 --> 00:36:25,879 Speaker 3: it feels like every day people want to come talk 579 00:36:25,920 --> 00:36:30,880 Speaker 3: about AI. I think people are people are really concerned 580 00:36:31,560 --> 00:36:33,880 Speaker 3: and they want to get in front of this. I 581 00:36:33,880 --> 00:36:37,440 Speaker 3: think that they don't want a second Napster situation to unfold. 582 00:36:38,200 --> 00:36:40,440 Speaker 2: Okay, so you say you've been working on music issues 583 00:36:40,480 --> 00:36:42,360 Speaker 2: for ten years. What are some of the music issues 584 00:36:42,440 --> 00:36:44,279 Speaker 2: or what are the music issues you're working on. 585 00:36:47,160 --> 00:36:50,680 Speaker 3: Well, in the last ten years, the biggest thing was 586 00:36:50,719 --> 00:36:53,520 Speaker 3: definitely the Music Monetization Act that we got signed in 587 00:36:53,600 --> 00:37:00,560 Speaker 3: a lot in twenty eighteen. You know, you get like 588 00:37:00,680 --> 00:37:03,840 Speaker 3: once in a generation, you get a big piece of 589 00:37:04,160 --> 00:37:10,160 Speaker 3: copyright legislation like the Music Monerornization Act, and so that 590 00:37:10,320 --> 00:37:13,000 Speaker 3: was something that was almost you know, a decade and 591 00:37:13,080 --> 00:37:15,879 Speaker 3: a half in the making. Really, the issues that led 592 00:37:15,920 --> 00:37:21,600 Speaker 3: to that came from streaming that that was just a 593 00:37:21,640 --> 00:37:25,240 Speaker 3: massive accomplishment that I think brought everyone together. We passed 594 00:37:25,239 --> 00:37:27,040 Speaker 3: it out of the House unanimously, went out of the 595 00:37:27,080 --> 00:37:32,280 Speaker 3: Senate unanimously. That was a product of years of hard 596 00:37:32,280 --> 00:37:36,640 Speaker 3: work by a lot of people. Today, the issues, it's 597 00:37:36,680 --> 00:37:39,480 Speaker 3: like AI and people just trying to figure out what 598 00:37:39,560 --> 00:37:42,839 Speaker 3: to do. A lot of these questions are novel. People 599 00:37:42,920 --> 00:37:47,000 Speaker 3: are confused, people are scared, they're they're looking for some 600 00:37:47,719 --> 00:37:51,200 Speaker 3: certainty and to see if Congress is going to do something. 601 00:37:51,640 --> 00:37:55,760 Speaker 2: Music Modernization Act, how'd you get that over the finish line. 602 00:37:58,520 --> 00:38:07,480 Speaker 3: Well, these issues we're talking that was the the centerpiece 603 00:38:07,520 --> 00:38:14,360 Speaker 3: of that bill was fixing the mechanical license process, you know, 604 00:38:15,000 --> 00:38:19,439 Speaker 3: and this is this is something that I'm sure most 605 00:38:19,480 --> 00:38:22,600 Speaker 3: of your listeners know, but you know the mechanical license 606 00:38:22,680 --> 00:38:26,160 Speaker 3: goes back to the piano role. Right. We created this 607 00:38:26,320 --> 00:38:30,759 Speaker 3: in nineteen oh nine after you know, sheet music was 608 00:38:30,800 --> 00:38:33,640 Speaker 3: the only way you sold music in America, right, sold 609 00:38:33,680 --> 00:38:38,960 Speaker 3: sheet music. And that's how you know songwriters, publishers paid money. 610 00:38:40,000 --> 00:38:44,799 Speaker 3: Someone who vents the piano roll wax cylinder case goes 611 00:38:44,840 --> 00:38:47,560 Speaker 3: up to the Supreme Court and the chord is basically 612 00:38:47,680 --> 00:38:50,399 Speaker 3: like this is not a musical work, you know, this 613 00:38:50,480 --> 00:38:53,920 Speaker 3: isn't cheap music. We can't, we won't grant protection to this. 614 00:38:55,239 --> 00:38:59,040 Speaker 3: So Congress steps in and they say they create a 615 00:38:59,080 --> 00:39:02,880 Speaker 3: protection for a mechanical work, like a reproduction, you know, 616 00:39:02,920 --> 00:39:09,000 Speaker 3: a mechanical reproduction of the musical work. It works out, 617 00:39:09,040 --> 00:39:10,759 Speaker 3: you know, I think there was like a two cent 618 00:39:10,920 --> 00:39:13,600 Speaker 3: rate in place at the beginning. This stays in place, 619 00:39:14,560 --> 00:39:18,279 Speaker 3: I think until nineteen seventy six. They increased it a 620 00:39:18,280 --> 00:39:23,200 Speaker 3: little bit, but the mechanical royalty wasn't something people talked about. 621 00:39:23,239 --> 00:39:25,680 Speaker 3: There's talk of even getting rid of it at some point, 622 00:39:26,320 --> 00:39:33,279 Speaker 3: and then in the streaming era it becomes a massive problem. 623 00:39:33,680 --> 00:39:36,960 Speaker 3: You know, back in two thousand and four, people were 624 00:39:37,000 --> 00:39:39,520 Speaker 3: talking about all the issues that would they would come 625 00:39:39,600 --> 00:39:43,759 Speaker 3: of the problems with the mechanical because what was what 626 00:39:43,840 --> 00:39:49,080 Speaker 3: happens is or what did happen? Pre mma was if 627 00:39:49,120 --> 00:39:52,600 Speaker 3: you wanted to mechanically and that's sort of an outdated term, 628 00:39:52,640 --> 00:39:55,600 Speaker 3: even though you know it's not piano rules anymore, reproduce 629 00:39:55,640 --> 00:39:58,319 Speaker 3: the work. You basically told the copyright office you were 630 00:39:58,360 --> 00:40:01,040 Speaker 3: going to do this, and you you know, you paid 631 00:40:01,080 --> 00:40:06,320 Speaker 3: for that, the right to reproduce it. Well with streaming, 632 00:40:06,880 --> 00:40:09,160 Speaker 3: all of the streams and all of the songs. It's 633 00:40:09,200 --> 00:40:15,080 Speaker 3: just this massive deluge of streaming led to these notices 634 00:40:15,120 --> 00:40:18,480 Speaker 3: of intent flooding the Copyright Office. They couldn't keep up. 635 00:40:19,520 --> 00:40:21,920 Speaker 3: People weren't getting paid. 636 00:40:23,120 --> 00:40:23,480 Speaker 2: It was. 637 00:40:23,640 --> 00:40:27,279 Speaker 3: It was a real mess, and it stayed that way 638 00:40:27,360 --> 00:40:30,799 Speaker 3: for quite some time until twenty eighteen when we passed 639 00:40:30,840 --> 00:40:34,880 Speaker 3: the Music Monetization Act, which created like a single entity, 640 00:40:35,080 --> 00:40:39,560 Speaker 3: the Music Licensing Collective, which essentially deals with all these 641 00:40:39,680 --> 00:40:40,760 Speaker 3: deals with all these issues. 642 00:40:40,800 --> 00:40:47,080 Speaker 2: Now, okay, we talk about the Copyright Department setting rates 643 00:40:47,080 --> 00:40:48,760 Speaker 2: and increases. How does that work? 644 00:40:51,400 --> 00:40:55,839 Speaker 3: So the Copyright Office has a three judge panel called 645 00:40:55,840 --> 00:41:01,279 Speaker 3: the Copyright Royalty Board or the CRB. They're charged with 646 00:41:01,360 --> 00:41:07,040 Speaker 3: sort of taking into account all evidence, figuring out rates 647 00:41:07,080 --> 00:41:12,080 Speaker 3: for certain proceedings, basically finding agreement among parties after they 648 00:41:12,120 --> 00:41:16,040 Speaker 3: make their case. That is the process we were talking 649 00:41:16,080 --> 00:41:20,239 Speaker 3: about with Spotify. That was a twenty twenty two agreement. 650 00:41:20,719 --> 00:41:23,239 Speaker 3: I think it was Phono Records for I think is 651 00:41:23,280 --> 00:41:27,120 Speaker 3: the name of that proceeding where you know they came 652 00:41:27,160 --> 00:41:33,160 Speaker 3: to this agreement that now is obviously back in the 653 00:41:33,160 --> 00:41:36,520 Speaker 3: news as a problem. 654 00:41:36,840 --> 00:41:41,000 Speaker 2: Okay, let's switch gears. You say you also have oversight 655 00:41:41,160 --> 00:41:46,880 Speaker 2: into antitrust. We have this dog case against Live Nation 656 00:41:47,160 --> 00:41:52,080 Speaker 2: and its Ticketmaster subsidiary. To what degree is Congress involved 657 00:41:52,120 --> 00:41:52,520 Speaker 2: in that? 658 00:41:54,719 --> 00:41:58,319 Speaker 3: It's the situation Congress is monitoring. There's a lot of 659 00:41:58,800 --> 00:42:05,600 Speaker 3: interest in what happened Ticketmaster, what happened with Taylor Swift. 660 00:42:06,800 --> 00:42:12,560 Speaker 3: But DOJ is basically suing Ticketmaster under existing law. So 661 00:42:12,719 --> 00:42:14,879 Speaker 3: that's not something that they'll be able to talk about 662 00:42:14,920 --> 00:42:19,240 Speaker 3: publicly or really come testify about until the case is settled. 663 00:42:19,640 --> 00:42:22,239 Speaker 3: Something people have a lot of interest in. People are 664 00:42:22,640 --> 00:42:25,480 Speaker 3: saying good things, are bad things about it, But we 665 00:42:25,520 --> 00:42:27,960 Speaker 3: don't have a lot of interest in like that suit 666 00:42:28,080 --> 00:42:33,719 Speaker 3: in particular. Congress is legislating, I would say, around other 667 00:42:33,960 --> 00:42:37,600 Speaker 3: issues in that space. It was just a couple of 668 00:42:37,640 --> 00:42:41,120 Speaker 3: weeks ago we passed something called the Ticket Act, which 669 00:42:41,160 --> 00:42:46,080 Speaker 3: basically provides for all in ticket pricing, so you know, 670 00:42:46,160 --> 00:42:48,600 Speaker 3: all the fees and everything is the price you see. 671 00:42:48,640 --> 00:42:50,520 Speaker 3: The price you see is the price you get. That 672 00:42:50,600 --> 00:42:55,520 Speaker 3: passed the House, you know, I think it likely will 673 00:42:55,560 --> 00:42:57,240 Speaker 3: pass the Senate, but it hasn't yet. 674 00:42:57,800 --> 00:42:59,440 Speaker 2: What will it take to pass the Senate. 675 00:43:00,800 --> 00:43:04,759 Speaker 3: I think they're working out some disagreements. There's a there's 676 00:43:04,800 --> 00:43:10,720 Speaker 3: a Ticket Fairness Act, which is different than the Ticket Act. 677 00:43:11,560 --> 00:43:16,960 Speaker 3: You know, there are issues related to like filthy URLs 678 00:43:17,040 --> 00:43:20,280 Speaker 3: and speculative ticketing, and I think people want those added, 679 00:43:20,360 --> 00:43:22,480 Speaker 3: and so that's part of the process, is figuring out 680 00:43:23,000 --> 00:43:24,840 Speaker 3: like what we'll make it into the final bill that 681 00:43:24,920 --> 00:43:28,880 Speaker 3: the Senate passes. I think, like we talked about earlier, 682 00:43:29,600 --> 00:43:31,719 Speaker 3: they'll pass something. It'll probably be a little different than 683 00:43:31,719 --> 00:43:33,480 Speaker 3: what passed the House, and it'll come back to us. 684 00:43:34,040 --> 00:43:36,839 Speaker 3: But that that bill passed that, I don't know if 685 00:43:36,840 --> 00:43:39,560 Speaker 3: there was any opposition to it. It was like four 686 00:43:39,640 --> 00:43:43,319 Speaker 3: hundred and sum, you know, to a very small number 687 00:43:43,320 --> 00:43:43,720 Speaker 3: of people. 688 00:43:44,320 --> 00:43:47,600 Speaker 2: So on many issues, and ticketing being one of them, 689 00:43:47,640 --> 00:43:52,160 Speaker 2: they're opposing views. How does the committee deal with those 690 00:43:52,160 --> 00:43:56,480 Speaker 2: opposing views? And how do I try to get my 691 00:43:56,840 --> 00:44:00,760 Speaker 2: side across as opposed to the other side. 692 00:44:03,360 --> 00:44:06,200 Speaker 3: We deal with them by providing a forum for people 693 00:44:06,239 --> 00:44:10,000 Speaker 3: to argue and debate and try to convince their colleagues 694 00:44:10,080 --> 00:44:12,880 Speaker 3: that they're right and their colleague is wrong, or vice versa. 695 00:44:13,800 --> 00:44:16,360 Speaker 3: I think if you want your side to prevail, you 696 00:44:16,440 --> 00:44:21,480 Speaker 3: probably come with better arguments, So you spend time with 697 00:44:21,680 --> 00:44:26,439 Speaker 3: your colleagues convincing them you know you're wrong to think 698 00:44:26,480 --> 00:44:29,239 Speaker 3: this way, think that way about this issue. I'm just like, 699 00:44:29,600 --> 00:44:30,600 Speaker 3: that's really. 700 00:44:30,360 --> 00:44:33,200 Speaker 2: It okay, But that's all within the committee. 701 00:44:33,520 --> 00:44:34,000 Speaker 3: That's right. 702 00:44:34,120 --> 00:44:37,560 Speaker 2: If I'm a company external to the committee, how do 703 00:44:37,680 --> 00:44:41,520 Speaker 2: I get my position argued by a member of the committee. 704 00:44:42,400 --> 00:44:46,280 Speaker 3: You meet with them and make the case. It helps 705 00:44:46,280 --> 00:44:49,279 Speaker 3: if you're from the district, you have a connection to 706 00:44:49,320 --> 00:44:54,760 Speaker 3: the member, relationship with them, and make the case. Most 707 00:44:54,800 --> 00:44:57,440 Speaker 3: people have a scattershot approach. They'll meet with all the 708 00:44:57,480 --> 00:44:59,880 Speaker 3: members and hope that someone will be their champion. 709 00:45:07,480 --> 00:45:10,000 Speaker 2: You know, there's been a lot of discussion about certainly 710 00:45:10,040 --> 00:45:14,680 Speaker 2: tech companies who didn't have lobbyists and hired lobbyists. The RIUBLEA, 711 00:45:14,800 --> 00:45:20,160 Speaker 2: the Recording Industry Association of America, is essentially a lobbying outfit. 712 00:45:20,640 --> 00:45:25,040 Speaker 2: To what degree are lobbyists important in getting your side 713 00:45:25,080 --> 00:45:26,160 Speaker 2: of the argument heard? 714 00:45:31,000 --> 00:45:32,799 Speaker 3: If you're a member, you mean, and you want to 715 00:45:32,800 --> 00:45:36,320 Speaker 3: make an argument, how important are lobbyists to like advancing 716 00:45:36,320 --> 00:45:37,279 Speaker 3: that argument. 717 00:45:38,000 --> 00:45:41,040 Speaker 2: Yes, or even from externally. I'm a company and I 718 00:45:41,120 --> 00:45:45,120 Speaker 2: want to get my representative to hear my argument, to 719 00:45:45,120 --> 00:45:49,759 Speaker 2: put forth my argument right. 720 00:45:50,880 --> 00:45:54,480 Speaker 3: I think the lobbyists play a sort of function of 721 00:45:55,640 --> 00:45:59,919 Speaker 3: they probably know the issue. They're spending all day thinking 722 00:46:00,160 --> 00:46:06,000 Speaker 3: about this, building arguments, writing memos, they're willing to go 723 00:46:06,080 --> 00:46:09,120 Speaker 3: talk to other people. For you, as a member or 724 00:46:09,160 --> 00:46:11,799 Speaker 3: a staffer, you're probably working on a thousand things that 725 00:46:11,880 --> 00:46:14,360 Speaker 3: can't dedicate all of your time to that. And so 726 00:46:14,480 --> 00:46:18,160 Speaker 3: I think if you're thinking the same way, you know 727 00:46:18,800 --> 00:46:23,160 Speaker 3: someone from a company is thinking that that could be helpful. 728 00:46:23,920 --> 00:46:26,160 Speaker 2: Okay, let me put it in a different way. If I'm 729 00:46:26,200 --> 00:46:31,560 Speaker 2: somebody in Missouri who has a business is successful, and 730 00:46:31,600 --> 00:46:36,680 Speaker 2: I have no presence in Washington, will it behooved me 731 00:46:36,840 --> 00:46:39,680 Speaker 2: to hire a lobbyist or some company washing just to 732 00:46:39,760 --> 00:46:42,840 Speaker 2: make the connection to the people who are addressing or 733 00:46:42,920 --> 00:46:44,320 Speaker 2: could address my issue. 734 00:46:44,960 --> 00:46:47,239 Speaker 3: Sure, I think that's probably the normal thing. 735 00:46:47,320 --> 00:46:47,440 Speaker 2: You know. 736 00:46:47,480 --> 00:46:49,440 Speaker 3: I've never been in that position where I had to, 737 00:46:50,280 --> 00:46:53,399 Speaker 3: you know, come calling on Congress, but I think that's 738 00:46:53,400 --> 00:46:56,640 Speaker 3: probably what most people do. You know, you're living in 739 00:46:56,680 --> 00:47:00,239 Speaker 3: the Midwest, there is some problem with some law law 740 00:47:00,520 --> 00:47:03,040 Speaker 3: that you think is hurting your company. You think that 741 00:47:03,080 --> 00:47:06,239 Speaker 3: Congress should look at changing that. You're probably going to 742 00:47:06,280 --> 00:47:09,200 Speaker 3: look to retain some law firm or lobbyist in DC 743 00:47:09,719 --> 00:47:12,279 Speaker 3: that can help you navigate the process. That's right. 744 00:47:12,680 --> 00:47:18,399 Speaker 2: So in the Judicial Committee, what music entertainment issues are 745 00:47:18,480 --> 00:47:20,560 Speaker 2: presently being debated. 746 00:47:22,120 --> 00:47:27,760 Speaker 3: Well, certainly all of these AI issues are being debated. 747 00:47:27,880 --> 00:47:31,960 Speaker 3: That's that's a really nascent conversation. In some ways, we're 748 00:47:32,000 --> 00:47:34,319 Speaker 3: taking a lot of testimony. We're hearing from a lot 749 00:47:34,360 --> 00:47:38,239 Speaker 3: of folks, what what could happen in the future, what 750 00:47:38,280 --> 00:47:42,759 Speaker 3: people want us to do. That's there. You know, there 751 00:47:42,840 --> 00:47:49,120 Speaker 3: is this issue of the terrestrial performance, right. This is 752 00:47:49,160 --> 00:47:52,440 Speaker 3: something that has been around for you know, fifty one 753 00:47:52,520 --> 00:47:58,239 Speaker 3: hundred years. You know, the sound recording artists basically say 754 00:47:58,280 --> 00:48:02,319 Speaker 3: they should get paid for being played on radio and 755 00:48:02,360 --> 00:48:07,200 Speaker 3: they're not. Radio obviously has a different take on it, 756 00:48:08,239 --> 00:48:10,879 Speaker 3: and people are split. But that that's something that's that's 757 00:48:10,920 --> 00:48:14,479 Speaker 3: always alive. Uh, And I think we're having a hearing 758 00:48:14,520 --> 00:48:16,360 Speaker 3: on that issue in a couple of weeks. 759 00:48:16,600 --> 00:48:20,960 Speaker 2: In any other music, copyright, entertainment issues that are either 760 00:48:21,239 --> 00:48:24,040 Speaker 2: actively or floating around the committee. 761 00:48:26,320 --> 00:48:30,320 Speaker 3: It's really it's all it's been all a I uh, 762 00:48:31,239 --> 00:48:38,839 Speaker 3: you know, almost all the time. This Congress, I mean, 763 00:48:38,880 --> 00:48:43,120 Speaker 3: the ticketmaster thing is a live discussion that that people 764 00:48:43,120 --> 00:48:47,560 Speaker 3: are people are having. But outside of that, relatively you know, 765 00:48:48,040 --> 00:48:49,600 Speaker 3: relatively calm. 766 00:48:49,600 --> 00:48:55,200 Speaker 2: Okay, So you know, Congress does not have a reputation 767 00:48:55,400 --> 00:49:01,320 Speaker 2: for moving quickly, certainly in the technological sphere, will movement 768 00:49:01,480 --> 00:49:05,359 Speaker 2: in the AI regulation area come from Congress or will 769 00:49:05,400 --> 00:49:06,960 Speaker 2: come from an external source? 770 00:49:08,520 --> 00:49:13,200 Speaker 3: Well it Congress has said, uh, this Congress, We've got 771 00:49:13,200 --> 00:49:19,919 Speaker 3: this AI task Force's equal representation of Republicans and Democrats. 772 00:49:20,200 --> 00:49:24,120 Speaker 3: They're holding all these meetings, hearing from you know, the 773 00:49:24,160 --> 00:49:29,560 Speaker 3: defense industry, that you know, tech companies, everybody's coming in 774 00:49:29,600 --> 00:49:32,160 Speaker 3: for these sort of forums. And I think this panel 775 00:49:32,200 --> 00:49:34,400 Speaker 3: at the end of the year will make some recommendations 776 00:49:34,440 --> 00:49:38,400 Speaker 3: about what they think Congress should do on these issues. 777 00:49:39,680 --> 00:49:45,879 Speaker 3: You have the administration of doing things via executive order 778 00:49:46,800 --> 00:49:50,000 Speaker 3: looking at you know, there are things that executive branch 779 00:49:50,040 --> 00:49:54,480 Speaker 3: agencies can be doing with AI. Senator Schumer put out 780 00:49:54,480 --> 00:49:59,799 Speaker 3: a report about AI. There's a lot of happening. How 781 00:50:00,120 --> 00:50:02,880 Speaker 3: asked all of that will come together? Hard to tell. 782 00:50:03,640 --> 00:50:08,680 Speaker 3: I'm not sure. I don't think anything will happen before 783 00:50:08,719 --> 00:50:11,960 Speaker 3: the end of the year. I don't think anyone would 784 00:50:12,000 --> 00:50:12,680 Speaker 3: disagree with that. 785 00:50:13,040 --> 00:50:15,520 Speaker 2: Yeah, it's an issue with even the players can't agree 786 00:50:15,560 --> 00:50:20,480 Speaker 2: on and within the committee. Does this break down by 787 00:50:20,480 --> 00:50:24,319 Speaker 2: political parties or is everybody basically you know, learning and 788 00:50:24,360 --> 00:50:26,160 Speaker 2: thinking what the best thing to do is. 789 00:50:27,440 --> 00:50:31,120 Speaker 3: People are learning and thinking about what the best thing 790 00:50:31,160 --> 00:50:37,680 Speaker 3: to do is on AI hardly any like tech issues, 791 00:50:37,880 --> 00:50:41,480 Speaker 3: IP issues, they don't break down on party lines. They 792 00:50:41,520 --> 00:50:45,360 Speaker 3: really it's there's a whole almost an entirely different paradigm 793 00:50:45,480 --> 00:50:51,400 Speaker 3: for thinking about like copyright protection and what people have. 794 00:50:51,600 --> 00:50:56,600 Speaker 3: You know, some people would say more it should be cheaper, 795 00:50:56,719 --> 00:51:00,680 Speaker 3: the government shouldn't provide as much protection for creative work. 796 00:51:00,719 --> 00:51:03,279 Speaker 3: So other people are like, that's crazy. You know, we 797 00:51:03,360 --> 00:51:08,600 Speaker 3: need we are way under compensating, you know, creative artists. 798 00:51:08,760 --> 00:51:12,719 Speaker 3: We should really increase, increase the rights people have. I 799 00:51:12,719 --> 00:51:15,200 Speaker 3: think it sort of breaks down along along those lines 800 00:51:15,280 --> 00:51:16,720 Speaker 3: more than more than anything else. 801 00:51:17,600 --> 00:51:21,359 Speaker 2: Okay, you're saying these hearings, these are traditional hearings that 802 00:51:21,640 --> 00:51:24,480 Speaker 2: we're talking about with every member gets five minutes or 803 00:51:24,600 --> 00:51:28,120 Speaker 2: might I come in and speak to five representatives? What 804 00:51:28,160 --> 00:51:30,360 Speaker 2: are all these hearings you're referencing on AI? 805 00:51:31,800 --> 00:51:34,960 Speaker 3: These are not hearings. This is a what we'd call 806 00:51:35,040 --> 00:51:40,439 Speaker 3: a task force, and so it is a more informal thing. 807 00:51:40,520 --> 00:51:43,640 Speaker 3: They've got some rules in place where people come in 808 00:51:43,719 --> 00:51:46,399 Speaker 3: and I think they give them five minutes. It might 809 00:51:46,440 --> 00:51:49,880 Speaker 3: be ten, but it's it's a more informal sort of 810 00:51:50,000 --> 00:51:53,160 Speaker 3: tribunal for hearing for hear hearing out the issues, and 811 00:51:53,200 --> 00:51:56,440 Speaker 3: I think a more freewheeling discussion. They try and you know, 812 00:51:56,600 --> 00:51:59,360 Speaker 3: keep some rules in place. People are still asking questions 813 00:51:59,360 --> 00:52:03,319 Speaker 3: of the witness, but it's a little looser and I 814 00:52:03,360 --> 00:52:06,000 Speaker 3: don't think there's a record being built. It's more of 815 00:52:06,040 --> 00:52:08,960 Speaker 3: a you know, a place where people can just talk 816 00:52:09,040 --> 00:52:09,560 Speaker 3: more freely. 817 00:52:10,080 --> 00:52:12,439 Speaker 2: And will this be you talk about a record? Will 818 00:52:12,440 --> 00:52:15,080 Speaker 2: this be on c spin, will there be any report? 819 00:52:15,520 --> 00:52:17,520 Speaker 2: Or this is basically in chambers. 820 00:52:18,280 --> 00:52:22,080 Speaker 3: It's basically in chambers. Basically in chambers for now. But 821 00:52:22,520 --> 00:52:26,520 Speaker 3: while that's happening, all of the various committees are holding 822 00:52:26,560 --> 00:52:31,440 Speaker 3: hearings on these issues and you know, talking through talking 823 00:52:31,440 --> 00:52:33,640 Speaker 3: through them on the record and having legislative hearings and 824 00:52:33,640 --> 00:52:34,520 Speaker 3: putting bills forward. 825 00:52:35,440 --> 00:52:39,520 Speaker 2: Now, the average person can't understand what AI is, even 826 00:52:39,560 --> 00:52:42,960 Speaker 2: though they're using AI every day on their phones, et cetera. 827 00:52:43,560 --> 00:52:47,440 Speaker 2: You know, these committees address a million issues. To what 828 00:52:47,560 --> 00:52:50,200 Speaker 2: degree are the individuals up to speed on some of 829 00:52:50,239 --> 00:52:50,960 Speaker 2: these issues. 830 00:52:54,960 --> 00:53:00,640 Speaker 3: It would surprise you, I think how knowledge jible some 831 00:53:00,840 --> 00:53:06,760 Speaker 3: members can become. Uh And I think it would also 832 00:53:06,880 --> 00:53:11,319 Speaker 3: surprise you at you know, how little knowledge some people have. 833 00:53:13,680 --> 00:53:18,359 Speaker 3: The really great thing about working in Congress is it's 834 00:53:18,400 --> 00:53:22,200 Speaker 3: really easy to get information. There are a lot of 835 00:53:22,200 --> 00:53:24,640 Speaker 3: people that want to help you understand. We've got the 836 00:53:24,640 --> 00:53:29,120 Speaker 3: Congressional Research Service there staff, You've got sort of legislative 837 00:53:29,120 --> 00:53:31,279 Speaker 3: counsel to advise you on how bills are going to 838 00:53:31,320 --> 00:53:34,640 Speaker 3: be written. So anyone that wants to learn can learn 839 00:53:35,400 --> 00:53:37,760 Speaker 3: a lot of really smart people working on these things, 840 00:53:37,800 --> 00:53:40,799 Speaker 3: and that the hearings are really there to, you know, 841 00:53:40,920 --> 00:53:42,799 Speaker 3: to help you learn. And I think, frankly, that's why 842 00:53:43,120 --> 00:53:45,760 Speaker 3: they're doing some of this is, as you said in Chambers, 843 00:53:45,760 --> 00:53:49,759 Speaker 3: because these issues are novel, they're complex. People want the 844 00:53:49,760 --> 00:53:53,640 Speaker 3: opportunity to, you know, like ask what might be perceived 845 00:53:53,640 --> 00:53:54,640 Speaker 3: as a stupid question. 846 00:53:55,520 --> 00:53:57,960 Speaker 2: Let's go back to antitrust for a minute. You have 847 00:53:58,040 --> 00:54:02,879 Speaker 2: the DOJ, and there's doing Live Nation. You have Lena Kahan, 848 00:54:03,800 --> 00:54:07,279 Speaker 2: and you have the Congress. How do those responsibilities to 849 00:54:07,360 --> 00:54:09,440 Speaker 2: divide up into what degree do they overlap? 850 00:54:11,080 --> 00:54:15,680 Speaker 3: So put it simply, Congress writes the laws and then 851 00:54:16,120 --> 00:54:21,880 Speaker 3: Lena and Jonathan enforced the laws. You've got Lena Khanna, 852 00:54:21,920 --> 00:54:23,920 Speaker 3: you noted at the FTC, which is a commission of 853 00:54:24,160 --> 00:54:29,400 Speaker 3: five people currently controlled by by Lena, who used to 854 00:54:29,400 --> 00:54:32,080 Speaker 3: work at Before she was there, she worked at the 855 00:54:32,160 --> 00:54:39,080 Speaker 3: Judiciary Committee, and they've got a big piece of anti 856 00:54:39,080 --> 00:54:42,319 Speaker 3: trust and they've got a lot of other responsibilities at 857 00:54:42,320 --> 00:54:46,799 Speaker 3: the FTC also, and then you have the DOJ, which 858 00:54:46,800 --> 00:54:49,320 Speaker 3: is run by the DOJ Anti Trust Division, which is 859 00:54:49,400 --> 00:54:53,320 Speaker 3: run by Jonathan Canter and just doing anti trust. 860 00:54:54,040 --> 00:54:55,240 Speaker 2: So how'd you get this job? 861 00:54:55,960 --> 00:54:59,560 Speaker 3: How do I get that? You know, Bob? I came 862 00:54:59,680 --> 00:55:07,440 Speaker 3: to Capitol Hill in two thousand and eleven and I thought, 863 00:55:07,640 --> 00:55:12,359 Speaker 3: you know, I like DC, I like policy work. It's 864 00:55:12,400 --> 00:55:16,839 Speaker 3: important to understand Capitol Hill. I'll stay here for one 865 00:55:16,920 --> 00:55:20,400 Speaker 3: year and then go do something else. And you know, 866 00:55:20,480 --> 00:55:25,640 Speaker 3: almost fourteen years later, I'm still here, still kicking around. 867 00:55:25,800 --> 00:55:28,040 Speaker 3: It's been a lot of fun. It's been a lot 868 00:55:28,080 --> 00:55:28,399 Speaker 3: of fun. 869 00:55:28,880 --> 00:55:31,200 Speaker 2: Well, let's go back to the beginning. Where you're from. 870 00:55:31,640 --> 00:55:35,680 Speaker 3: From Pittsburgh, outside of Pittsburgh, Cranberry Township. 871 00:55:35,600 --> 00:55:38,080 Speaker 2: Okay, And what your parents do for a living? 872 00:55:39,120 --> 00:55:43,560 Speaker 3: My parents do. My mother it's like a sales rep. 873 00:55:43,600 --> 00:55:50,440 Speaker 3: And my father was an engineer, got civil engineer, doing 874 00:55:50,560 --> 00:55:51,280 Speaker 3: energy stuff. 875 00:55:52,280 --> 00:55:54,799 Speaker 2: And how many kids in the family, just. 876 00:55:54,800 --> 00:55:55,520 Speaker 3: Me and my brother. 877 00:55:56,040 --> 00:55:57,080 Speaker 2: What's your brother up to? 878 00:55:57,719 --> 00:56:01,839 Speaker 3: My brother lives out there in LA with you. He's 879 00:56:02,040 --> 00:56:05,960 Speaker 3: he's doing like the communications work for a hospital or something. 880 00:56:07,040 --> 00:56:10,200 Speaker 2: Okay, did you say with the yalies? Who'd you say? 881 00:56:10,320 --> 00:56:11,240 Speaker 3: No? With a hospital? 882 00:56:11,320 --> 00:56:12,440 Speaker 2: With a hospital? Okay? 883 00:56:12,440 --> 00:56:14,920 Speaker 3: Communications were with a hospital. Sorry. And you go to 884 00:56:15,000 --> 00:56:18,120 Speaker 3: college where I go to George Mason down here? 885 00:56:18,960 --> 00:56:21,160 Speaker 2: Any particular reason you go to George Mason. 886 00:56:21,840 --> 00:56:26,880 Speaker 3: Yeah. I was on the debate team at George Mason. 887 00:56:26,920 --> 00:56:29,200 Speaker 3: They had a great debate program, and so that was 888 00:56:29,320 --> 00:56:32,040 Speaker 3: kind of what drove me down there. I wanted to 889 00:56:32,040 --> 00:56:35,600 Speaker 3: be in DC, so everything kind of lined up. It 890 00:56:35,640 --> 00:56:36,480 Speaker 3: was a great experience. 891 00:56:36,640 --> 00:56:39,640 Speaker 2: Did you go directly from undergrad to law school? 892 00:56:40,680 --> 00:56:44,759 Speaker 3: No? I, like I said, I got this. 893 00:56:45,239 --> 00:56:45,439 Speaker 2: Yeah. 894 00:56:45,480 --> 00:56:48,120 Speaker 3: I got a job on Capitol Hill, thought it was 895 00:56:49,400 --> 00:56:50,920 Speaker 3: not going to be awesome, and that I'd go to 896 00:56:51,000 --> 00:56:55,279 Speaker 3: law school right afterward. I was on Capitol Hill for 897 00:56:55,280 --> 00:56:59,200 Speaker 3: about four years, realized I wasn't going to leave, and 898 00:57:00,080 --> 00:57:02,239 Speaker 3: made the decision to go to law school at night, 899 00:57:02,840 --> 00:57:07,560 Speaker 3: also at George Mason while working on the hill. 900 00:57:07,800 --> 00:57:10,120 Speaker 2: Okay, So you graduated from college what year. 901 00:57:10,960 --> 00:57:14,280 Speaker 3: Two thousand and four or two thousand and eight? Sorry, 902 00:57:14,480 --> 00:57:16,800 Speaker 3: got there in four graduated in o eight. 903 00:57:16,840 --> 00:57:18,160 Speaker 2: How long did it take you to go to law 904 00:57:18,200 --> 00:57:18,840 Speaker 2: school at night? 905 00:57:19,720 --> 00:57:20,920 Speaker 3: About four years. 906 00:57:21,240 --> 00:57:25,280 Speaker 2: It's a lot of work, okay. So what happens when 907 00:57:25,320 --> 00:57:29,720 Speaker 2: you start working on Capitol Hill and it evolves into 908 00:57:29,760 --> 00:57:32,520 Speaker 2: where you are now, what's your first job? And then 909 00:57:32,520 --> 00:57:34,280 Speaker 2: where do you go from there? Sure? 910 00:57:34,680 --> 00:57:38,920 Speaker 3: So I got there in twenty and eleven and I 911 00:57:39,000 --> 00:57:43,680 Speaker 3: worked for Dary Lisa, who's now the IP Subcommittee chair 912 00:57:44,320 --> 00:57:47,800 Speaker 3: in like a totally different role at the he was 913 00:57:47,840 --> 00:57:50,440 Speaker 3: at the Oversight Committee at the time. I got to 914 00:57:50,520 --> 00:57:58,600 Speaker 3: know him pretty well. In twenty fourteen, he asked me 915 00:57:58,680 --> 00:58:02,800 Speaker 3: to come be his life legislative director, so I sort 916 00:58:02,840 --> 00:58:06,680 Speaker 3: of managed his whole legislative shop while he was the 917 00:58:06,800 --> 00:58:11,560 Speaker 3: chair of the IP Subcommittee and then Judi Charry Committee 918 00:58:12,120 --> 00:58:12,560 Speaker 3: after that. 919 00:58:12,800 --> 00:58:15,240 Speaker 2: Okay, let's be a little more granular. What's your very 920 00:58:15,280 --> 00:58:16,800 Speaker 2: first job and how do you get it? 921 00:58:17,640 --> 00:58:21,360 Speaker 3: Very first job on Capitol Hill was as a professional 922 00:58:21,400 --> 00:58:25,200 Speaker 3: staff member on the Oversight Committee, which at the time 923 00:58:25,400 --> 00:58:28,280 Speaker 3: was chaired by mister Isaa. 924 00:58:29,320 --> 00:58:30,640 Speaker 2: How do you get a job like that? 925 00:58:32,320 --> 00:58:35,720 Speaker 3: You know, it's how you get a job on Capitol 926 00:58:35,760 --> 00:58:37,720 Speaker 3: Hill is a funny thing. You got to be in 927 00:58:37,800 --> 00:58:42,080 Speaker 3: the right place at the right time. Congress had just 928 00:58:42,200 --> 00:58:49,200 Speaker 3: changed and the twenty ten cycle. I knew some people 929 00:58:49,240 --> 00:58:54,280 Speaker 3: from George Mason that were there and sort of expressed 930 00:58:54,280 --> 00:58:57,439 Speaker 3: some interest and potentially going to Capitol Hill, like I said, 931 00:58:57,440 --> 00:59:02,680 Speaker 3: to get the experience, got an interview, and to get 932 00:59:02,720 --> 00:59:04,760 Speaker 3: the job. And the thing about these changes is like 933 00:59:04,840 --> 00:59:08,960 Speaker 3: you could have to hire twenty thirty forty people within 934 00:59:09,120 --> 00:59:13,680 Speaker 3: a couple of months to staff up and so right place, 935 00:59:13,760 --> 00:59:16,000 Speaker 3: right time, that really really makes a difference. 936 00:59:16,280 --> 00:59:20,280 Speaker 2: So what did you actually do when you started? What 937 00:59:20,320 --> 00:59:21,080 Speaker 2: did I do? So? 938 00:59:22,160 --> 00:59:24,720 Speaker 3: This was it was the Oversight Committee. So at that 939 00:59:24,800 --> 00:59:29,000 Speaker 3: time there was a lot of like oversight of the 940 00:59:29,080 --> 00:59:33,160 Speaker 3: GM bailout and of the tart program and of the 941 00:59:33,200 --> 00:59:37,240 Speaker 3: stimulus program and where's the money going, how's it being spent? 942 00:59:37,720 --> 00:59:39,920 Speaker 3: Asking questions of people. It was like a lot of 943 00:59:40,040 --> 00:59:42,760 Speaker 3: a lot of that stuff, less like policy work. 944 00:59:42,920 --> 00:59:44,720 Speaker 2: Okay, what were you doing? 945 00:59:45,400 --> 00:59:47,760 Speaker 3: I was doing that. I was you know, like writing 946 00:59:47,840 --> 00:59:52,880 Speaker 3: letters to the you know, companies that got bailout money. 947 00:59:53,480 --> 00:59:57,520 Speaker 3: I was talking to members about what we found in 948 00:59:57,560 --> 01:00:00,320 Speaker 3: the documents that we got from these company he is 949 01:00:00,360 --> 01:00:06,680 Speaker 3: about the government funds they received it. A lot of 950 01:00:06,720 --> 01:00:12,000 Speaker 3: writing letters and sort of you know, talking talking to 951 01:00:12,040 --> 01:00:14,520 Speaker 3: people about how they were like waste for out and abuse. 952 01:00:14,600 --> 01:00:27,680 Speaker 4: Basically, how do you become so tight with ISA from working? 953 01:00:27,720 --> 01:00:31,520 Speaker 3: I didn't know him at all. When I uh took 954 01:00:31,560 --> 01:00:36,280 Speaker 3: the job at the at the Oversight Committee, didn't didn't 955 01:00:36,280 --> 01:00:38,680 Speaker 3: know him hardly at all. It was probably a year 956 01:00:38,840 --> 01:00:40,440 Speaker 3: or you know, it was probably a year or so 957 01:00:40,560 --> 01:00:45,360 Speaker 3: before he even knew my name. But over the years 958 01:00:45,400 --> 01:00:48,720 Speaker 3: we've become, you know, very close. He gave the blessing 959 01:00:48,720 --> 01:00:53,480 Speaker 3: at my wedding last year. He's I consider him a 960 01:00:53,800 --> 01:00:54,400 Speaker 3: good friend. 961 01:00:55,400 --> 01:00:59,480 Speaker 2: Okay, Isa happens to be a Republican. Does that have 962 01:00:59,560 --> 01:01:02,040 Speaker 2: anything to do with you getting the job or you 963 01:01:02,200 --> 01:01:04,880 Speaker 2: just working in this committee and he gets a takes 964 01:01:04,880 --> 01:01:05,560 Speaker 2: a liking to you. 965 01:01:09,000 --> 01:01:12,080 Speaker 3: I'm working in this committee. He takes a liking to 966 01:01:12,120 --> 01:01:15,160 Speaker 3: me and is working for the majority controlled by Republicans. 967 01:01:15,160 --> 01:01:15,600 Speaker 3: That's right. 968 01:01:16,360 --> 01:01:19,120 Speaker 2: I used to make his money in Carl Alarms. Does 969 01:01:19,160 --> 01:01:20,360 Speaker 2: he ever talk about that? 970 01:01:21,360 --> 01:01:25,760 Speaker 3: He does talk about that Bob He you know, he's 971 01:01:25,840 --> 01:01:29,080 Speaker 3: the voice of the viper Carl Alarm, the like step 972 01:01:29,120 --> 01:01:33,560 Speaker 3: away from the car protected by Viper, that's his voice. 973 01:01:33,960 --> 01:01:38,440 Speaker 3: He had. I think he's got thirty seven patents or something. 974 01:01:40,600 --> 01:01:46,160 Speaker 3: He like, he's a really really smart guy that knows 975 01:01:46,200 --> 01:01:50,520 Speaker 3: intellectual property. He was actually, I think for a while 976 01:01:51,080 --> 01:01:54,840 Speaker 3: involved in a copyright lawsuit against Shack because Shack had 977 01:01:54,920 --> 01:01:59,400 Speaker 3: used part of the protected by viper bit in a song, 978 01:02:00,720 --> 01:02:03,920 Speaker 3: and so yeah, that's that's what story loves itself. 979 01:02:04,000 --> 01:02:08,680 Speaker 2: But yeah, okay, let's go back. You're working, you become 980 01:02:08,720 --> 01:02:11,600 Speaker 2: tight with Isa, and he gives you what job and 981 01:02:11,640 --> 01:02:13,320 Speaker 2: what are the responsibilities there? 982 01:02:15,800 --> 01:02:19,760 Speaker 3: I go to his office to be his legislative director. 983 01:02:19,880 --> 01:02:24,480 Speaker 3: So on Capitol Hill, basically you either worked for a member, 984 01:02:24,760 --> 01:02:27,480 Speaker 3: and a member personal office has got like about twelve 985 01:02:27,560 --> 01:02:29,760 Speaker 3: staffers in it, you know, a chief of staff, a 986 01:02:29,840 --> 01:02:34,160 Speaker 3: legislative director, other people working on specific issues, or or 987 01:02:34,280 --> 01:02:36,840 Speaker 3: you work for a committee where you're sort of more 988 01:02:36,880 --> 01:02:41,480 Speaker 3: of a subject matter expert. So I go to IS's 989 01:02:41,480 --> 01:02:46,280 Speaker 3: personal office to be his legislative director, basically oversee the 990 01:02:46,400 --> 01:02:50,680 Speaker 3: legislative portfolio. It was during this time we worked on 991 01:02:51,480 --> 01:02:55,600 Speaker 3: the Music Modernization Act. He wrote the Classics Act, which 992 01:02:55,680 --> 01:02:58,560 Speaker 3: was a part of the Music Modernization Act, which basically 993 01:02:58,880 --> 01:03:04,280 Speaker 3: worked to present or protect rather pre seventy two sound recordings. 994 01:03:04,280 --> 01:03:06,640 Speaker 3: This was a you know, legacy issue that had been 995 01:03:06,640 --> 01:03:07,320 Speaker 3: around for a while. 996 01:03:08,840 --> 01:03:10,920 Speaker 2: You say he wrote who actually wrote it? 997 01:03:12,480 --> 01:03:17,240 Speaker 3: Well, I guess I wrote it in the sense that, yeah, 998 01:03:17,320 --> 01:03:20,680 Speaker 3: he had long wanted to take care of this issue. 999 01:03:20,680 --> 01:03:22,920 Speaker 3: There's a lot of music from the fifties and sixties. 1000 01:03:22,960 --> 01:03:26,160 Speaker 3: He really likes you'd hear from these people. He wanted 1001 01:03:26,200 --> 01:03:30,280 Speaker 3: to solve this issue for them. Sort of directed me 1002 01:03:30,360 --> 01:03:32,960 Speaker 3: to find a solution. I talked to a bunch of people, 1003 01:03:34,920 --> 01:03:39,920 Speaker 3: you know, and concluding this, you know, people in the 1004 01:03:40,000 --> 01:03:46,480 Speaker 3: music community, music distributors, and try and find a way 1005 01:03:46,520 --> 01:03:50,200 Speaker 3: to write the bill the best way that we can. 1006 01:03:51,160 --> 01:03:55,200 Speaker 3: You talk with led council about you know, what part 1007 01:03:55,200 --> 01:03:57,960 Speaker 3: of chapter seventeen this belongs in, and how you write 1008 01:03:58,000 --> 01:03:59,600 Speaker 3: the thing. So the course are going to interpret it 1009 01:03:59,600 --> 01:04:00,000 Speaker 3: the right way? 1010 01:04:00,600 --> 01:04:04,160 Speaker 2: Okay, Daryl comes to you, says, I want to address 1011 01:04:04,240 --> 01:04:07,160 Speaker 2: this issue. How long do you come back with a 1012 01:04:07,200 --> 01:04:08,000 Speaker 2: piece of writing. 1013 01:04:10,440 --> 01:04:13,240 Speaker 3: He was one of the things the next day. But 1014 01:04:13,280 --> 01:04:18,360 Speaker 3: it probably you know, it depends on the complexity of 1015 01:04:18,400 --> 01:04:22,080 Speaker 3: the issue. In that case, I mean, it took weeks 1016 01:04:22,240 --> 01:04:25,520 Speaker 3: months of talking talking to folks about the right way 1017 01:04:25,520 --> 01:04:25,880 Speaker 3: to do this. 1018 01:04:26,280 --> 01:04:29,080 Speaker 2: Okay, So you gather all your information, you write it. 1019 01:04:30,080 --> 01:04:32,120 Speaker 2: What literally happens next. 1020 01:04:34,360 --> 01:04:37,479 Speaker 3: You write it, give it to him. He signs the bill, 1021 01:04:37,960 --> 01:04:40,000 Speaker 3: He walks it over to what we'd call the hopper, 1022 01:04:41,560 --> 01:04:43,760 Speaker 3: you know, in the house. You put the bill in 1023 01:04:43,840 --> 01:04:46,880 Speaker 3: the hopper, so that it's filed, it'll get an HR 1024 01:04:47,080 --> 01:04:51,880 Speaker 3: number whatever it was, you know, HR thirteen fifty nine, 1025 01:04:51,880 --> 01:04:55,440 Speaker 3: and it's just the you know number of it's the 1026 01:04:55,560 --> 01:04:59,440 Speaker 3: last bill introduced at that point in the Congress is 1027 01:04:59,480 --> 01:05:05,120 Speaker 3: the number on the bill, and then it's sitting there 1028 01:05:05,440 --> 01:05:09,880 Speaker 3: and everyone knows it's been introduced. What you do then, 1029 01:05:10,040 --> 01:05:12,080 Speaker 3: or you might do some of this before you file it, 1030 01:05:12,160 --> 01:05:14,760 Speaker 3: is you basically try and get other members of Congress 1031 01:05:14,760 --> 01:05:19,640 Speaker 3: to co sponsor your bill. So, yeah, go to other 1032 01:05:19,680 --> 01:05:21,600 Speaker 3: people that you think might be into this issue and 1033 01:05:21,640 --> 01:05:24,240 Speaker 3: you kind of pitch them on it to build up 1034 01:05:24,280 --> 01:05:27,160 Speaker 3: co sponsors. And that's a really important part of the 1035 01:05:27,200 --> 01:05:31,080 Speaker 3: process because if you have other members basically saying I'm 1036 01:05:31,120 --> 01:05:34,640 Speaker 3: totally on board with this, it gives you know, the 1037 01:05:34,720 --> 01:05:41,040 Speaker 3: speaker and leadership confidence that this thing has support. You know, generally, 1038 01:05:41,080 --> 01:05:43,960 Speaker 3: the more co sponsors the better. If you want to 1039 01:05:43,960 --> 01:05:47,200 Speaker 3: be an original co sponsor, you would sign on, you know, 1040 01:05:47,520 --> 01:05:51,680 Speaker 3: before before the bill is introduced, which basically signifies you know, 1041 01:05:51,720 --> 01:05:54,040 Speaker 3: you had some role in creating the bill or coming 1042 01:05:54,120 --> 01:05:54,880 Speaker 3: up with the idea. 1043 01:05:56,440 --> 01:05:59,800 Speaker 2: Okay, when you're working with ISA and yours legislative director, 1044 01:06:00,080 --> 01:06:02,880 Speaker 2: how many people in the office are in the legislative area. 1045 01:06:04,120 --> 01:06:11,080 Speaker 3: How many people. There are probably five people under me 1046 01:06:11,440 --> 01:06:16,200 Speaker 3: in that office, and sort of divided up by issue area. 1047 01:06:16,320 --> 01:06:20,440 Speaker 3: You know, someone might have like energy and environment and healthcare, 1048 01:06:20,520 --> 01:06:26,640 Speaker 3: and someone else might have, you know, taxes and veterans affairs, 1049 01:06:27,080 --> 01:06:33,440 Speaker 3: and you know, any manner everything. I mean, all of 1050 01:06:33,480 --> 01:06:35,640 Speaker 3: the business before the House, which is all of the 1051 01:06:35,640 --> 01:06:39,000 Speaker 3: business of the American public, is really that exists in 1052 01:06:39,040 --> 01:06:41,360 Speaker 3: every congressional office because at some point you're gonna have 1053 01:06:41,360 --> 01:06:43,240 Speaker 3: to vote on some bill related to that. 1054 01:06:44,160 --> 01:06:46,200 Speaker 2: Okay, So what was your next job after that? 1055 01:06:48,000 --> 01:06:56,720 Speaker 3: So back to so is a rich hires And then 1056 01:06:56,880 --> 01:07:00,360 Speaker 3: for me, it was where basically where I'm at now. 1057 01:07:01,000 --> 01:07:04,120 Speaker 2: But didn't Isa lose an election and then come back. 1058 01:07:05,000 --> 01:07:10,680 Speaker 3: He he's very very sensitive about this, Bob. He did 1059 01:07:10,760 --> 01:07:15,200 Speaker 3: not lose an election. He retired near the end of 1060 01:07:15,240 --> 01:07:16,000 Speaker 3: twenty eighteen. 1061 01:07:17,960 --> 01:07:21,480 Speaker 2: Okay, then let's just accept the language not important to me. 1062 01:07:22,320 --> 01:07:26,000 Speaker 2: If he is out of Congress, Andy comes back to 1063 01:07:26,120 --> 01:07:33,000 Speaker 2: what degreed does he lose or regain his seniority and positions? 1064 01:07:33,440 --> 01:07:39,360 Speaker 3: That's a great question. You keep your seniority, So even 1065 01:07:39,400 --> 01:07:42,360 Speaker 3: if you left ten years ago, but before then you'd 1066 01:07:42,400 --> 01:07:45,680 Speaker 3: spent ten years on the Judiciary Committee. You've got more 1067 01:07:45,720 --> 01:07:48,880 Speaker 3: seniority than anyone with less than ten years of seniority 1068 01:07:48,920 --> 01:07:52,040 Speaker 3: on Judiciary Committee. He's sort of come back. 1069 01:07:52,520 --> 01:07:55,360 Speaker 2: So let's assume let's say I'm out of office and 1070 01:07:55,400 --> 01:07:58,280 Speaker 2: I have ten years and I come back. Am I 1071 01:07:58,280 --> 01:08:00,720 Speaker 2: immediately able to get on the Judicial your committee? Or 1072 01:08:00,760 --> 01:08:01,400 Speaker 2: might they say no? 1073 01:08:02,600 --> 01:08:05,840 Speaker 3: They could say no, but it's not likely they're almost 1074 01:08:05,880 --> 01:08:07,919 Speaker 3: certainly going to put you back, especially with that level 1075 01:08:07,960 --> 01:08:12,040 Speaker 3: of seniority. There's a deference there. They might even, you know, 1076 01:08:12,040 --> 01:08:15,560 Speaker 3: if they had to, might like kick a freshman off 1077 01:08:15,600 --> 01:08:16,200 Speaker 3: the committee. 1078 01:08:16,800 --> 01:08:19,720 Speaker 2: Okay, so Isa is out of d C. Tell me 1079 01:08:19,760 --> 01:08:21,559 Speaker 2: how you transition into the next job. 1080 01:08:23,200 --> 01:08:27,080 Speaker 3: I say, is out of d C. I was trying 1081 01:08:27,120 --> 01:08:35,800 Speaker 3: to figure out what to do and got a call 1082 01:08:35,960 --> 01:08:41,920 Speaker 3: from now Chairman Jim Jordan who basically said, hey, I, 1083 01:08:42,240 --> 01:08:46,080 Speaker 3: you know, come work for me. Could you could use 1084 01:08:46,120 --> 01:08:49,280 Speaker 3: your help? And ultimately I said yes. 1085 01:08:49,800 --> 01:08:51,879 Speaker 2: How did Jim Jordan know who you were. 1086 01:08:53,000 --> 01:08:56,960 Speaker 3: From being around the committee, being around Capitol Hill? 1087 01:08:57,040 --> 01:08:58,760 Speaker 2: So when he comes to ask you to come work 1088 01:08:58,760 --> 01:09:00,799 Speaker 2: for you, what year and what is that job? 1089 01:09:02,520 --> 01:09:09,400 Speaker 3: That job was? This is the end of twenty eighteen, 1090 01:09:10,880 --> 01:09:15,040 Speaker 3: and I hadn't made a decision I think it was 1091 01:09:15,080 --> 01:09:18,160 Speaker 3: December of twenty eighteen. You know, I said, was leaving 1092 01:09:18,800 --> 01:09:20,240 Speaker 3: at the end of so I would have been out 1093 01:09:20,240 --> 01:09:27,240 Speaker 3: of a job in a matter of weeks and that 1094 01:09:27,240 --> 01:09:29,400 Speaker 3: that's kind of that's when he called, and that's when 1095 01:09:29,400 --> 01:09:32,519 Speaker 3: I said, yes, he basically tells it. There's some of 1096 01:09:32,520 --> 01:09:38,080 Speaker 3: this gets strangely like it gets a little personal, but 1097 01:09:38,640 --> 01:09:42,320 Speaker 3: he basically said, hey. I said, hey, I like music stuff, 1098 01:09:42,360 --> 01:09:45,120 Speaker 3: I like eyepiece stuff, you know, I like a lot 1099 01:09:45,120 --> 01:09:46,840 Speaker 3: of things that are going on. He said, come work 1100 01:09:46,880 --> 01:09:49,160 Speaker 3: for me. You can do that stuff, you know, kind 1101 01:09:49,160 --> 01:09:52,120 Speaker 3: of whatever, you know, whatever you want to do. At 1102 01:09:52,120 --> 01:09:57,840 Speaker 3: that point he was he was cool if I'm yeah. 1103 01:09:58,080 --> 01:10:01,320 Speaker 3: At the time, I had a lot of friends working 1104 01:10:01,360 --> 01:10:08,120 Speaker 3: there for him. My father was really sick and I 1105 01:10:08,760 --> 01:10:14,920 Speaker 3: knew Chairman Jordan pretty well, and he was kind of like, hey, 1106 01:10:15,080 --> 01:10:20,479 Speaker 3: that like, come work here, the accommodating of everything going 1107 01:10:20,520 --> 01:10:24,400 Speaker 3: on in your life. And so that was kind of 1108 01:10:24,400 --> 01:10:25,559 Speaker 3: where the decision came from. 1109 01:10:26,479 --> 01:10:28,920 Speaker 2: What happened with your father's illness. 1110 01:10:28,520 --> 01:10:32,280 Speaker 3: Well, he passed away from cancer that in like the 1111 01:10:32,280 --> 01:10:34,120 Speaker 3: beginning of twenty twenty. 1112 01:10:34,600 --> 01:10:38,559 Speaker 2: During just wow heavy losing a p It. 1113 01:10:38,560 --> 01:10:44,280 Speaker 3: Was, yeah, obviously not ideal, but you know, very sad, 1114 01:10:44,360 --> 01:10:47,800 Speaker 3: but it happened in January of twenty twenty, so I 1115 01:10:47,840 --> 01:10:49,880 Speaker 3: think it was a blessing that it sort of all 1116 01:10:50,720 --> 01:10:53,920 Speaker 3: happened pre COVID so we didn't have to like deal 1117 01:10:54,000 --> 01:10:56,200 Speaker 3: with the like that whole situation. 1118 01:10:57,479 --> 01:11:03,479 Speaker 2: Okay, your father passes. How does your situation evolve at 1119 01:11:03,479 --> 01:11:05,040 Speaker 2: the Judicial Committee? 1120 01:11:07,000 --> 01:11:11,400 Speaker 3: It it, I mean, largely stays the same. I mean 1121 01:11:11,520 --> 01:11:14,439 Speaker 3: I really love these issues at that point, I mean 1122 01:11:14,479 --> 01:11:19,240 Speaker 3: it was it's the job I have. Now I have, 1123 01:11:19,800 --> 01:11:22,360 Speaker 3: you know, no idea how long I'll keep doing this, 1124 01:11:22,520 --> 01:11:25,720 Speaker 3: but for now it's awesome. I mean you're right in 1125 01:11:25,760 --> 01:11:29,920 Speaker 3: the middle of everything. You get to interact with just 1126 01:11:30,000 --> 01:11:34,599 Speaker 3: about everybody and learn cool stuff. I think you really 1127 01:11:34,640 --> 01:11:37,280 Speaker 3: get to have an opportunity to have have an impact 1128 01:11:37,360 --> 01:11:41,200 Speaker 3: on on the legislative process on where things go. 1129 01:11:41,880 --> 01:11:45,880 Speaker 2: Okay, you're the head guy. Now when Jim Jordan hires you, 1130 01:11:45,960 --> 01:11:47,519 Speaker 2: does he hire you as the head guy? 1131 01:11:49,520 --> 01:11:53,800 Speaker 3: Is it like the one of there's like the policy guy. Yeah? 1132 01:11:53,920 --> 01:11:58,719 Speaker 2: Okay, So how long was your predecessor in this role? 1133 01:12:03,680 --> 01:12:08,120 Speaker 3: So before Jordan was chaired the committee? Now there was 1134 01:12:08,200 --> 01:12:13,800 Speaker 3: chair of the committee, and I think for quite some time, 1135 01:12:14,280 --> 01:12:18,280 Speaker 3: like I mean, you know, ten to fifteen years. 1136 01:12:18,680 --> 01:12:22,240 Speaker 2: So let's just assume for the sake of discussion, Jim 1137 01:12:22,360 --> 01:12:26,200 Speaker 2: Jordan continues to chair this committee. At what point would 1138 01:12:26,280 --> 01:12:27,640 Speaker 2: you pull the ripcord? 1139 01:12:29,800 --> 01:12:34,760 Speaker 3: That's a question I get almost every day. I have 1140 01:12:34,800 --> 01:12:38,320 Speaker 3: no idea. I don't really make plans. You know that 1141 01:12:38,360 --> 01:12:41,599 Speaker 3: this isn't forever. I enjoy every day I have this job. 1142 01:12:42,200 --> 01:12:46,320 Speaker 3: I think it's great. Most people don't stay on the 1143 01:12:46,360 --> 01:12:49,200 Speaker 3: hill as long as I have, but the average tenures 1144 01:12:49,240 --> 01:12:54,000 Speaker 3: something like three four years. Most people, believe it or not, 1145 01:12:54,160 --> 01:12:59,880 Speaker 3: are much younger than me. But for now, I'm not 1146 01:13:00,160 --> 01:13:01,840 Speaker 3: to be here. I don't have I don't have plans 1147 01:13:01,840 --> 01:13:02,200 Speaker 3: to leave. 1148 01:13:02,840 --> 01:13:07,880 Speaker 2: Okay, So theoretically, could there be a move, whether it 1149 01:13:07,920 --> 01:13:10,559 Speaker 2: be you or someone in the same role, from the 1150 01:13:10,640 --> 01:13:15,360 Speaker 2: Judiciary Committee policy person to another job in Congress, Senate, 1151 01:13:16,000 --> 01:13:19,280 Speaker 2: the government somewhere. Does it ever work that way? Yeah? 1152 01:13:19,400 --> 01:13:23,600 Speaker 3: Well, like Lena Lena Cone you mentioned he was a 1153 01:13:23,720 --> 01:13:27,960 Speaker 3: Judiciary Committee and now running the Federal Trade Commission. People move, 1154 01:13:28,160 --> 01:13:29,759 Speaker 3: move around all the time. 1155 01:13:30,160 --> 01:13:32,280 Speaker 2: And how come people only tend to last for three 1156 01:13:32,320 --> 01:13:33,000 Speaker 2: or four years. 1157 01:13:35,000 --> 01:13:38,240 Speaker 3: Uh, it's a lot of hours. It's not easy work. 1158 01:13:39,720 --> 01:13:42,880 Speaker 3: I personally, I like the pace. I like being busy, 1159 01:13:43,360 --> 01:13:46,760 Speaker 3: but I mean you have weeks where you're working. You know, 1160 01:13:46,880 --> 01:13:50,000 Speaker 3: it could be eighteen hours a day, and then the 1161 01:13:50,040 --> 01:13:53,439 Speaker 3: next week it's much slower and much calmer because the 1162 01:13:53,479 --> 01:13:57,600 Speaker 3: members of Congress will leave town. I personally really like 1163 01:13:57,720 --> 01:13:59,760 Speaker 3: that pace. The ebb and flow is fun for me. 1164 01:14:00,240 --> 01:14:02,519 Speaker 3: It's not for everyone. I think a lot of people 1165 01:14:02,520 --> 01:14:05,960 Speaker 3: want to leave and make more money the hill notoriously 1166 01:14:06,040 --> 01:14:09,559 Speaker 3: doesn't you know you're not going to get rich doing this. 1167 01:14:10,600 --> 01:14:12,920 Speaker 2: Do you have the kind of job? Or people in 1168 01:14:13,080 --> 01:14:16,840 Speaker 2: Washington but work peripheral to the government are recruiting you 1169 01:14:16,880 --> 01:14:18,760 Speaker 2: and say come work to the other sign. 1170 01:14:20,400 --> 01:14:23,559 Speaker 3: Over the years, sure people have made overtures about like, oh, 1171 01:14:23,680 --> 01:14:26,719 Speaker 3: it'd be great if you came and worked here or there. 1172 01:14:27,960 --> 01:14:30,519 Speaker 3: You know, nothing has struck my fancy, like I said, 1173 01:14:30,560 --> 01:14:33,439 Speaker 3: and I'm really happy where I am. 1174 01:14:33,840 --> 01:14:39,400 Speaker 2: Okay, And how much of your work is supervisory or 1175 01:14:39,439 --> 01:14:41,360 Speaker 2: work you're doing independently. 1176 01:14:44,000 --> 01:14:50,320 Speaker 3: I would say I bet seventy five percent of it 1177 01:14:50,360 --> 01:14:55,320 Speaker 3: is supervisory sort of talking to people about what they're doing, 1178 01:14:55,479 --> 01:15:01,760 Speaker 3: reviewing their work, guiding them, giving advice, giving counseled. It's 1179 01:15:01,800 --> 01:15:02,240 Speaker 3: a lot of that. 1180 01:15:03,360 --> 01:15:08,439 Speaker 2: Okay, everybody on the Judiciary Committee know you yes, if 1181 01:15:08,479 --> 01:15:12,679 Speaker 2: there are four hundred and thirty five members of Congress. 1182 01:15:12,680 --> 01:15:22,960 Speaker 2: How many of them might know you. 1183 01:15:18,479 --> 01:15:20,679 Speaker 3: More than fifty and less than four hundred. 1184 01:15:22,560 --> 01:15:26,240 Speaker 2: Would Joe Biden possibly know who you are or whoever's 1185 01:15:26,320 --> 01:15:28,360 Speaker 2: president at that moment? Uh? 1186 01:15:28,560 --> 01:15:30,600 Speaker 3: Definitely not, definitely not. 1187 01:15:32,920 --> 01:15:35,920 Speaker 2: Is there an equivalent in the Senate? And what do 1188 01:15:36,040 --> 01:15:38,400 Speaker 2: we do interact with that person here? 1189 01:15:38,479 --> 01:15:41,880 Speaker 3: We interact with the Senate quite You kind of have 1190 01:15:41,960 --> 01:15:45,439 Speaker 3: to to make sure you're on the same page. Would 1191 01:15:45,520 --> 01:15:48,360 Speaker 3: Joe Biden know that person? The answers almost definitely know, 1192 01:15:48,680 --> 01:15:50,000 Speaker 3: unless there's something I don't know. 1193 01:15:51,360 --> 01:15:53,759 Speaker 2: Okay, is it the kind of job like with Jeffrey 1194 01:15:53,800 --> 01:15:57,439 Speaker 2: Katzenberg when he was at Disney, If you don't come 1195 01:15:57,479 --> 01:16:00,440 Speaker 2: in on Saturday, don't even think about coming in on. 1196 01:16:03,960 --> 01:16:05,800 Speaker 3: I'm not sure I follow you well, if you don't 1197 01:16:05,800 --> 01:16:07,560 Speaker 3: come in on Saturday, Okay. 1198 01:16:07,360 --> 01:16:09,559 Speaker 2: What it means? Is it a seven day a week job? 1199 01:16:10,120 --> 01:16:14,519 Speaker 3: Yeah, oh, definitely definitely. It could be a three am 1200 01:16:14,560 --> 01:16:18,800 Speaker 3: on Sunday job. Yeah, you are. You're always on call? 1201 01:16:19,920 --> 01:16:22,840 Speaker 2: And how does one maintain a relationship with that kind 1202 01:16:22,840 --> 01:16:23,440 Speaker 2: of schedule. 1203 01:16:25,160 --> 01:16:30,120 Speaker 3: I have a very wonderful and understanding wife who's patient. 1204 01:16:30,240 --> 01:16:32,960 Speaker 3: She likes to say to your point, she says he's 1205 01:16:33,200 --> 01:16:37,559 Speaker 3: always working and never working. I think because I enjoy 1206 01:16:37,640 --> 01:16:40,320 Speaker 3: the work, you know what, I'm always doing it and 1207 01:16:40,479 --> 01:16:43,559 Speaker 3: kind of at this point, I've seen enough of the 1208 01:16:43,600 --> 01:16:47,280 Speaker 3: issues that I could. It's never really that taxing to 1209 01:16:47,360 --> 01:16:49,800 Speaker 3: sort of go to work and take care of something 1210 01:16:49,800 --> 01:16:50,439 Speaker 3: as it comes up. 1211 01:16:51,080 --> 01:16:54,640 Speaker 2: And are your friends civilians are people in the business, 1212 01:16:54,680 --> 01:16:55,720 Speaker 2: so to speak. 1213 01:16:57,080 --> 01:16:59,080 Speaker 3: Mixture of both. I mean, you don't work somewhere for 1214 01:16:59,080 --> 01:17:02,960 Speaker 3: fourteen years and not develop some friendships there. But I've 1215 01:17:02,960 --> 01:17:05,639 Speaker 3: got I've got a good number of civilian friends. 1216 01:17:05,680 --> 01:17:08,880 Speaker 2: Also. Okay, we live in an era where there's never 1217 01:17:09,040 --> 01:17:13,439 Speaker 2: been less respect for institutions. It's not only Congress, it's 1218 01:17:13,479 --> 01:17:16,760 Speaker 2: the government at large, it's attorneys. We could go on. 1219 01:17:17,200 --> 01:17:21,040 Speaker 2: What would you tell in response to people who say, oh, 1220 01:17:21,120 --> 01:17:25,840 Speaker 2: you know, uh, Congress is a body that is locked up, 1221 01:17:25,920 --> 01:17:28,880 Speaker 2: doesn't achieve anything, and roll their eyes. 1222 01:17:30,920 --> 01:17:33,720 Speaker 3: It is pretty locked up, right. I don't want to 1223 01:17:34,280 --> 01:17:37,559 Speaker 3: want to be cynical here. I mean it's locked up. 1224 01:17:37,600 --> 01:17:39,799 Speaker 3: It's hard to get things done. I think the founders 1225 01:17:39,840 --> 01:17:42,280 Speaker 3: wanted it to be hard to get things done right 1226 01:17:42,880 --> 01:17:46,240 Speaker 3: changing make you know, if changing the law were easy, 1227 01:17:46,280 --> 01:17:49,160 Speaker 3: I think that would be a that would be a problem. 1228 01:17:50,320 --> 01:17:53,680 Speaker 3: You know, and there I would say most of what 1229 01:17:53,760 --> 01:17:58,640 Speaker 3: you see is probably the worst of it all, you know, 1230 01:18:00,040 --> 01:18:03,400 Speaker 3: but what cable news shares and what you're seeing on 1231 01:18:03,520 --> 01:18:07,840 Speaker 3: Twitter from clips is like one percent of what's happening 1232 01:18:07,960 --> 01:18:12,960 Speaker 3: on Capitol Hill. The most of what's happening is good 1233 01:18:13,000 --> 01:18:15,880 Speaker 3: people trying to do the right thing for their constituents. 1234 01:18:16,439 --> 01:18:21,479 Speaker 2: Obviously members are elected, but how important are relationships in 1235 01:18:21,600 --> 01:18:24,240 Speaker 2: terms of getting ahead? You know, like in the entertainment business, 1236 01:18:24,240 --> 01:18:26,599 Speaker 2: you don't know anybody, you can't even start. Is it 1237 01:18:26,600 --> 01:18:27,519 Speaker 2: the same in DC? 1238 01:18:28,680 --> 01:18:29,240 Speaker 3: Yeah? 1239 01:18:29,840 --> 01:18:30,360 Speaker 2: I think it is. 1240 01:18:30,560 --> 01:18:33,599 Speaker 3: You know, Reagan famously said DC's Hollywood for ugly people. 1241 01:18:34,800 --> 01:18:37,920 Speaker 3: It's it's the same thing. It's it's I mean, we 1242 01:18:38,040 --> 01:18:41,679 Speaker 3: are nothing except for the decisions that we make. Right. 1243 01:18:42,200 --> 01:18:45,880 Speaker 3: This is just a job where people are everything. You 1244 01:18:45,920 --> 01:18:47,599 Speaker 3: need other people to get anything done. 1245 01:18:48,800 --> 01:18:52,360 Speaker 2: And what issues might you see coming down the pike 1246 01:18:52,439 --> 01:18:54,080 Speaker 2: in the ip Era area. 1247 01:18:55,520 --> 01:18:57,800 Speaker 3: It's really hard to see past ip I mean for 1248 01:18:57,960 --> 01:19:03,599 Speaker 3: past Ai that that is the big thing that's happening 1249 01:19:03,680 --> 01:19:10,920 Speaker 3: right now. I don't know what happens after this. There 1250 01:19:11,080 --> 01:19:15,240 Speaker 3: is the people have talked about some tweaks to the 1251 01:19:15,320 --> 01:19:20,400 Speaker 3: Music Modernization Act, but that's kind of the that's not 1252 01:19:20,439 --> 01:19:22,360 Speaker 3: the kind of thing you're talking about though, in terms 1253 01:19:22,400 --> 01:19:26,479 Speaker 3: of big issues, it's it's really it's it's AI. 1254 01:19:27,080 --> 01:19:30,920 Speaker 2: And what is the breadth of what might be addressed 1255 01:19:31,600 --> 01:19:33,120 Speaker 2: legislatively on AI? 1256 01:19:36,360 --> 01:19:42,000 Speaker 3: So you know, when it comes to like economy wide 1257 01:19:42,120 --> 01:19:48,799 Speaker 3: AI that you're talking about, everything from like a GAO 1258 01:19:48,960 --> 01:19:52,760 Speaker 3: study on understanding AI might get passed by Congress to 1259 01:19:52,920 --> 01:19:59,680 Speaker 3: like full scaled, robust regulatory regime. I think that there 1260 01:19:59,760 --> 01:20:03,920 Speaker 3: is a a growing consensus that like it is premature 1261 01:20:04,120 --> 01:20:08,719 Speaker 3: to sort of regulate AI right now, that just given 1262 01:20:08,760 --> 01:20:10,800 Speaker 3: that this is a worldwide phenomenon, we don't want to 1263 01:20:10,800 --> 01:20:13,240 Speaker 3: do anything to sort of hold back the United States 1264 01:20:13,479 --> 01:20:15,800 Speaker 3: that we don't know enough yet to jump to those 1265 01:20:15,880 --> 01:20:23,120 Speaker 3: kind of conclusions. In the music space, in particular, the 1266 01:20:23,200 --> 01:20:29,040 Speaker 3: conversations revolving around protecting you know, name, image and likeness, 1267 01:20:29,080 --> 01:20:33,520 Speaker 3: which is not really a copyright question. It's a trademark 1268 01:20:33,600 --> 01:20:36,160 Speaker 3: question more than anything else. 1269 01:20:36,200 --> 01:20:37,320 Speaker 2: And sort of. 1270 01:20:39,320 --> 01:20:40,599 Speaker 3: That's generally what's happening. 1271 01:20:41,560 --> 01:20:44,160 Speaker 2: So what would you tell to someone who wanted to 1272 01:20:44,200 --> 01:20:45,840 Speaker 2: work on Capitol Hill? 1273 01:20:47,720 --> 01:20:51,439 Speaker 3: Would they do it? And most people that want to 1274 01:20:51,479 --> 01:20:54,519 Speaker 3: do it this might surprise you and your listeners to hear, 1275 01:20:54,640 --> 01:20:58,200 Speaker 3: but over the years, I've met a lot of people 1276 01:20:58,280 --> 01:21:00,519 Speaker 3: that are like, I'd love to work on cap Hill 1277 01:21:01,439 --> 01:21:04,240 Speaker 3: and most of them do you know, if if it's 1278 01:21:04,280 --> 01:21:06,080 Speaker 3: something you want bad enough and you have coffee with 1279 01:21:06,200 --> 01:21:11,080 Speaker 3: enough people, the churned people leaving people coming is so 1280 01:21:11,160 --> 01:21:13,080 Speaker 3: great that like you'll find something to do. 1281 01:21:14,439 --> 01:21:17,160 Speaker 2: And to what degree does being an attorney help you? 1282 01:21:19,320 --> 01:21:22,240 Speaker 3: It's complicated a lot of people. I would say if 1283 01:21:22,240 --> 01:21:24,240 Speaker 3: you were to ask, like, what's the normal path on 1284 01:21:24,280 --> 01:21:29,040 Speaker 3: Capitol Hill? Uh, people are interns and then they are 1285 01:21:29,200 --> 01:21:33,840 Speaker 3: like staff assistants, and then legislative correspondence that a legislative assistant, 1286 01:21:34,160 --> 01:21:37,840 Speaker 3: then maybe a legislative director. Then maybe they'll go to committee. 1287 01:21:37,960 --> 01:21:41,240 Speaker 3: It's sort of this process of you know, learning learning 1288 01:21:41,280 --> 01:21:43,479 Speaker 3: the rope. There's nowhere to learn it unless you're there. 1289 01:21:44,400 --> 01:21:47,479 Speaker 3: If you're an attorney, it's probably harder to find a 1290 01:21:47,560 --> 01:21:49,800 Speaker 3: job on Capitol Hill because you probably want to go 1291 01:21:49,840 --> 01:21:52,719 Speaker 3: work at a committee. Those jobs are a little harder 1292 01:21:52,760 --> 01:21:57,320 Speaker 3: to get. But certainly it helps if you if you have, 1293 01:21:57,600 --> 01:22:01,400 Speaker 3: if you have your law degree to do the work. 1294 01:22:01,439 --> 01:22:03,320 Speaker 3: But I'm not sure it gives you like an advantage 1295 01:22:03,400 --> 01:22:04,479 Speaker 3: in getting up there. 1296 01:22:05,479 --> 01:22:08,120 Speaker 2: Okay, so what would you tell to someone who has 1297 01:22:08,160 --> 01:22:11,280 Speaker 2: an issue that they would like a legislative solution to. 1298 01:22:12,200 --> 01:22:16,640 Speaker 2: I'm somewhere, I'm in an industry, I see a problem. 1299 01:22:17,080 --> 01:22:20,160 Speaker 2: What would be my best step moving forward to ultimately 1300 01:22:20,160 --> 01:22:24,000 Speaker 2: get my case heard by Congress and hopefully get some 1301 01:22:24,200 --> 01:22:25,000 Speaker 2: action taken. 1302 01:22:27,360 --> 01:22:33,880 Speaker 3: I would tell that person to call me, but I 1303 01:22:33,880 --> 01:22:38,519 Speaker 3: would say, if you contact your representative's office, they're going 1304 01:22:38,600 --> 01:22:45,000 Speaker 3: to take the meeting. You'd be astounded at the number 1305 01:22:45,000 --> 01:22:48,320 Speaker 3: of letters offices reply to and the number of meetings 1306 01:22:48,320 --> 01:22:50,240 Speaker 3: people take. If you ask for a meeting and you 1307 01:22:50,280 --> 01:22:54,720 Speaker 3: don't get a reply, ask again and ask them who 1308 01:22:54,720 --> 01:22:57,920 Speaker 3: else you should talk to. You know, if you are 1309 01:22:58,040 --> 01:23:03,240 Speaker 3: a sophisticated, you know company that's having an issue, you 1310 01:23:03,400 --> 01:23:05,320 Speaker 3: probably are going to want to hire a law firm 1311 01:23:05,360 --> 01:23:09,200 Speaker 3: that just knows how Capitol Hill works. You know, they'll 1312 01:23:09,280 --> 01:23:12,599 Speaker 3: kind of direct you in the right, right right areas like, oh, 1313 01:23:12,640 --> 01:23:15,560 Speaker 3: don't go to that person you know that's a Democrat 1314 01:23:15,600 --> 01:23:17,640 Speaker 3: that will never agree with you, or don't go to 1315 01:23:17,720 --> 01:23:22,519 Speaker 3: that person they're not on any relevant committees, or you know, 1316 01:23:22,720 --> 01:23:25,479 Speaker 3: go to go to this person. Ideally, you probably want 1317 01:23:25,520 --> 01:23:28,320 Speaker 3: to get a meeting with the you know, chair of 1318 01:23:28,360 --> 01:23:33,040 Speaker 3: the relevant subcommittee or committee and see if they'll hear 1319 01:23:33,080 --> 01:23:33,320 Speaker 3: you out. 1320 01:23:34,280 --> 01:23:37,479 Speaker 2: And is being a pest a good thing or a 1321 01:23:37,520 --> 01:23:38,040 Speaker 2: bad thing? 1322 01:23:39,880 --> 01:23:42,240 Speaker 3: It can be both. I think it depends what kind 1323 01:23:42,280 --> 01:23:46,240 Speaker 3: of a pest you are. You know, the people that 1324 01:23:46,320 --> 01:23:50,680 Speaker 3: send like all caps emails every week. Uh, that's not 1325 01:23:50,760 --> 01:23:55,519 Speaker 3: a good strategy. Uh, you know, but people that are like, Hey, 1326 01:23:55,560 --> 01:23:58,000 Speaker 3: I'm a constituent, I've got this issue, can you help 1327 01:23:58,040 --> 01:24:00,479 Speaker 3: me out. If you don't get a reply, like, you're 1328 01:24:00,520 --> 01:24:02,439 Speaker 3: going to make the person who's reading that email feel 1329 01:24:02,640 --> 01:24:04,519 Speaker 3: guilty they didn't reply to you, and they're probably going 1330 01:24:04,560 --> 01:24:05,120 Speaker 3: to get back to you. 1331 01:24:06,320 --> 01:24:10,000 Speaker 2: Okay, Tyler, thanks for taking the time with my audience 1332 01:24:10,040 --> 01:24:14,040 Speaker 2: and illuminating what's going on in DC and inside the 1333 01:24:14,080 --> 01:24:16,040 Speaker 2: Congress and the Judiciary Committee. 1334 01:24:16,080 --> 01:24:18,800 Speaker 3: Hey, Bob, my pleasure. I love the showgir to. 1335 01:24:18,800 --> 01:24:22,559 Speaker 2: Be with you until next time. This is Bob left 1336 01:24:22,600 --> 01:24:22,840 Speaker 2: six