1 00:00:05,800 --> 00:00:08,720 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox. 2 00:00:08,760 --> 00:00:11,520 Speaker 1: Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we 3 00:00:11,640 --> 00:00:15,120 Speaker 1: bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for 4 00:00:15,200 --> 00:00:17,840 Speaker 1: you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store 5 00:00:17,960 --> 00:00:20,720 Speaker 1: or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P M L 6 00:00:20,840 --> 00:00:32,080 Speaker 1: Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. We 7 00:00:32,159 --> 00:00:36,639 Speaker 1: are broadcasting from the Red Hat Summit in Boston and 8 00:00:36,840 --> 00:00:40,040 Speaker 1: joining us now in our New York studio is Peter Anderson. 9 00:00:40,080 --> 00:00:43,760 Speaker 1: He is the chief investment officer of Fiduciary Trust. And Peter, 10 00:00:43,840 --> 00:00:46,800 Speaker 1: thanks for being with us. And I know that it's 11 00:00:46,840 --> 00:00:49,239 Speaker 1: it's what happens. You're based in Boston, you come to 12 00:00:49,280 --> 00:00:51,640 Speaker 1: New York, and you know it's like two ships crossing 13 00:00:51,640 --> 00:00:54,520 Speaker 1: in the night. That's right. So thanks very much for 14 00:00:54,600 --> 00:00:58,440 Speaker 1: being for being with us. Here's here's my question to you. 15 00:00:58,800 --> 00:01:02,160 Speaker 1: Does it make any ends that you can invest in 16 00:01:02,200 --> 00:01:05,520 Speaker 1: a company that's still making money and is one of 17 00:01:05,560 --> 00:01:08,560 Speaker 1: the leaders in its field Ford Motor Company and you're 18 00:01:08,560 --> 00:01:11,600 Speaker 1: gonna get a five and a half percent dividend or 19 00:01:11,840 --> 00:01:13,520 Speaker 1: do you want to lend your money to the US 20 00:01:13,640 --> 00:01:20,760 Speaker 1: government for thirty years? Uh? And get. Well, you're you're 21 00:01:20,800 --> 00:01:26,399 Speaker 1: picking two very different um securities to examine him, right, 22 00:01:26,440 --> 00:01:28,200 Speaker 1: I mean, you've got I'm wondering if you could use 23 00:01:28,240 --> 00:01:30,640 Speaker 1: it as an example for how we've gotten here, Like 24 00:01:30,680 --> 00:01:34,759 Speaker 1: how how is this possible? Well, let's look at the 25 00:01:34,880 --> 00:01:37,480 Speaker 1: U S. Treasury yield, because I think that is more 26 00:01:37,560 --> 00:01:41,920 Speaker 1: telling in its own way than the Ford example you 27 00:01:42,000 --> 00:01:45,000 Speaker 1: gave right now. You know when you look at the 28 00:01:45,200 --> 00:01:48,120 Speaker 1: SMB five hundred also, and that's up about seven percent 29 00:01:48,280 --> 00:01:50,120 Speaker 1: or so a year to date. And then you've got 30 00:01:50,240 --> 00:01:53,920 Speaker 1: the ten uere treasury, which really has stopped tracking the 31 00:01:53,960 --> 00:01:57,639 Speaker 1: anticipated growth that we all thought was going to happen 32 00:01:57,920 --> 00:02:03,120 Speaker 1: post Trump's announcement of his victory. So I think what's 33 00:02:03,120 --> 00:02:08,079 Speaker 1: happening is we're starting to look more carefully at the 34 00:02:08,320 --> 00:02:12,320 Speaker 1: prospect for growth in treasuries, are reflecting that doubt that's 35 00:02:12,440 --> 00:02:16,640 Speaker 1: gradually creeping into our market and forcing us to take 36 00:02:16,639 --> 00:02:19,359 Speaker 1: a second look at the promises of the Trump policies 37 00:02:19,400 --> 00:02:22,120 Speaker 1: and whether or not they will actually come to fruition. Peter, 38 00:02:22,280 --> 00:02:23,800 Speaker 1: is this one of the most boring markets you've ever 39 00:02:23,880 --> 00:02:27,120 Speaker 1: dealt with? Always by far boring, I mean we've got 40 00:02:27,520 --> 00:02:29,320 Speaker 1: if you look at the vix I guess you could 41 00:02:29,360 --> 00:02:32,920 Speaker 1: say that that might be an indication of boredom, but uh, 42 00:02:33,160 --> 00:02:36,000 Speaker 1: in contrary to that, I think that this is one 43 00:02:36,000 --> 00:02:39,079 Speaker 1: of the most unprecedented markets in terms of what's happening. 44 00:02:39,120 --> 00:02:41,720 Speaker 1: If you want to talk on a global perspective, all 45 00:02:41,760 --> 00:02:44,560 Speaker 1: the uncertainty that we're living through right now, and on 46 00:02:44,600 --> 00:02:49,960 Speaker 1: a domestic perspective, so many unanswered questions, totally without a doubt, 47 00:02:50,000 --> 00:02:53,639 Speaker 1: so many unanswered questions and unanswerable questions. Uh. You know, 48 00:02:53,680 --> 00:02:56,720 Speaker 1: we hear a lot about a lack of conviction. We 49 00:02:57,200 --> 00:03:00,519 Speaker 1: heard that Goldman saxes. Uh. David Solomon came out yesterday 50 00:03:00,520 --> 00:03:03,560 Speaker 1: on Bloomberg Television was saying the reason why trading volumes 51 00:03:03,600 --> 00:03:06,240 Speaker 1: and revenues were down so much at Coleman Sects relative 52 00:03:06,280 --> 00:03:08,560 Speaker 1: to the expectations in the first quarter was simply just 53 00:03:08,600 --> 00:03:11,160 Speaker 1: because of a lack of conviction. Do you feel like 54 00:03:11,520 --> 00:03:15,000 Speaker 1: you have conviction? And if so, what is your boldest bet? Okay, 55 00:03:15,040 --> 00:03:17,839 Speaker 1: So here's the way we're thinking of this. Um, if 56 00:03:17,880 --> 00:03:20,360 Speaker 1: you just use what I would call a building block 57 00:03:20,400 --> 00:03:24,680 Speaker 1: approach to US equities, uh, and you assume earnings growth 58 00:03:24,720 --> 00:03:26,600 Speaker 1: is going to be seven percent this year, which is 59 00:03:26,639 --> 00:03:29,560 Speaker 1: fairly typical and then you add on another two percent 60 00:03:29,680 --> 00:03:33,160 Speaker 1: for the dividend. That's nine percent growth for the year 61 00:03:33,480 --> 00:03:36,960 Speaker 1: or nine percent total return. And as you know, so 62 00:03:37,000 --> 00:03:39,120 Speaker 1: we're a third through the year, so we should actually 63 00:03:39,160 --> 00:03:42,360 Speaker 1: be tracking about only three percent up, but instead the 64 00:03:42,480 --> 00:03:45,640 Speaker 1: SMP is tracking north of seven percent. So you've got 65 00:03:45,640 --> 00:03:49,320 Speaker 1: what I would call this four percent UH premium, and 66 00:03:49,520 --> 00:03:52,000 Speaker 1: what is baked into that premium a lot of hope 67 00:03:52,680 --> 00:03:57,720 Speaker 1: that the Trump policies, in our opinion, will be UH materialized. 68 00:03:57,880 --> 00:04:01,720 Speaker 1: And if that doesn't, I think that's a big concern, 69 00:04:01,840 --> 00:04:04,320 Speaker 1: and you could be seeing a sell off of anywhere 70 00:04:04,320 --> 00:04:07,280 Speaker 1: from say four to seven percent this year based on 71 00:04:07,440 --> 00:04:12,520 Speaker 1: how these things play out. Peter Anderson, Um, what kind 72 00:04:12,560 --> 00:04:16,120 Speaker 1: of yield would you have to be offered if the 73 00:04:16,160 --> 00:04:20,640 Speaker 1: Treasury Secretary Stephen Manuchin was selling hundred year bonds? Well, 74 00:04:20,680 --> 00:04:23,480 Speaker 1: you know the other thing, when people are starting it's 75 00:04:23,520 --> 00:04:27,320 Speaker 1: a little bit um challenging to present that to the 76 00:04:27,360 --> 00:04:31,960 Speaker 1: general public pain because you've been involves the daunted bond math, right, 77 00:04:32,120 --> 00:04:35,159 Speaker 1: and people tend to think that, well, a hundred year bond, 78 00:04:35,240 --> 00:04:38,640 Speaker 1: you know, its duration or its interest sensitivity is that, 79 00:04:38,880 --> 00:04:41,520 Speaker 1: you know, uh, four times as great as a twenty 80 00:04:41,560 --> 00:04:44,240 Speaker 1: five year bond and UH for those that have done 81 00:04:44,279 --> 00:04:46,480 Speaker 1: the calculation, it doesn't turn out to be that way. 82 00:04:46,560 --> 00:04:50,839 Speaker 1: So people would expect probably a much higher yield just 83 00:04:51,360 --> 00:04:55,599 Speaker 1: subjectively than the math will probably prove out to be. 84 00:04:55,880 --> 00:04:58,680 Speaker 1: So at the current rates, you would have to have. 85 00:04:59,400 --> 00:05:02,000 Speaker 1: Let me, just in practical terms, I think for people 86 00:05:02,000 --> 00:05:06,479 Speaker 1: to be interested, for the retail or non professional investor 87 00:05:06,560 --> 00:05:09,719 Speaker 1: to be interested, the yield that they have in mind 88 00:05:09,760 --> 00:05:13,800 Speaker 1: would probably be not anywhere near what the yield the 89 00:05:13,880 --> 00:05:16,680 Speaker 1: market yield would present, which I would think is below 90 00:05:17,360 --> 00:05:20,120 Speaker 1: easily below five at this point if they were to 91 00:05:20,200 --> 00:05:24,240 Speaker 1: issue it. Right now, let's talk about credit corporate credit. 92 00:05:24,480 --> 00:05:28,440 Speaker 1: We've heard from scottman Or from Guggenheim Partners yesterday at 93 00:05:28,440 --> 00:05:30,839 Speaker 1: the Milk and conference, and he was saying that he's 94 00:05:30,880 --> 00:05:33,960 Speaker 1: recommending his clients steer away from you as credit markets, 95 00:05:33,960 --> 00:05:37,880 Speaker 1: particularly the riskier segments. What's your view. I have a 96 00:05:38,000 --> 00:05:42,000 Speaker 1: long history and love hate relationship with hil bonds, and 97 00:05:42,160 --> 00:05:46,080 Speaker 1: I am currently very supportive of them. I think, just 98 00:05:46,120 --> 00:05:47,960 Speaker 1: in the same vein as you would think of a 99 00:05:48,160 --> 00:05:51,960 Speaker 1: small cap US equity, they tend to be ring fence 100 00:05:52,000 --> 00:05:54,600 Speaker 1: in terms of their revenues. They're more dependent upon their 101 00:05:54,600 --> 00:05:58,480 Speaker 1: domestic economy, which we haven't talked at all about how 102 00:05:58,480 --> 00:06:00,960 Speaker 1: positive we are on the domestic stick economy. We think 103 00:06:00,960 --> 00:06:05,159 Speaker 1: that that's very consistently strong, and so if you're a 104 00:06:05,240 --> 00:06:10,280 Speaker 1: high yield borrower, you probably will be looking very good, 105 00:06:10,480 --> 00:06:14,480 Speaker 1: unless you're an international high yield borrower, which lends more 106 00:06:14,600 --> 00:06:19,279 Speaker 1: complexities to the calculation. But US domestic small cap companies 107 00:06:19,320 --> 00:06:22,120 Speaker 1: that tend to be high yield issuers would look very 108 00:06:22,120 --> 00:06:25,159 Speaker 1: positive to us. So you're also positive on those same 109 00:06:25,240 --> 00:06:32,000 Speaker 1: equities small small cap domestic companies, depending upon how their 110 00:06:32,160 --> 00:06:36,160 Speaker 1: revenue segments are. Yes, because they tend to be smaller, 111 00:06:36,200 --> 00:06:39,839 Speaker 1: they tend to be what I would call unitary focus 112 00:06:39,960 --> 00:06:44,200 Speaker 1: on one or two product lines, simpler to analyze, would 113 00:06:44,320 --> 00:06:48,719 Speaker 1: be somewhat insulated from the whole Brexit conundrum that we're 114 00:06:48,960 --> 00:06:51,440 Speaker 1: we are looking at for the next two years. Much 115 00:06:51,520 --> 00:06:56,200 Speaker 1: simpler strips away those unanswered questions and are much easier 116 00:06:56,200 --> 00:07:00,720 Speaker 1: to analyze from a fundamental mathemata spreadsheet perspective. What about 117 00:07:00,760 --> 00:07:04,560 Speaker 1: emerging market steps? You know, uh, emerging markets, there is 118 00:07:04,600 --> 00:07:07,000 Speaker 1: a place and everybody's portfolio for it. But let's not 119 00:07:07,080 --> 00:07:11,239 Speaker 1: go overboard. I mean we are going overboard, they really 120 00:07:11,240 --> 00:07:14,040 Speaker 1: are and I think it's because of a relationship between 121 00:07:14,560 --> 00:07:17,880 Speaker 1: you look at US and what's going on here, and 122 00:07:17,960 --> 00:07:21,720 Speaker 1: you look at the developed markets, and for some reason, 123 00:07:21,800 --> 00:07:24,440 Speaker 1: people are using a logic saying, well, there aren't as 124 00:07:24,480 --> 00:07:29,480 Speaker 1: many unanswered questions in emerging markets right now, so therefore 125 00:07:29,560 --> 00:07:33,160 Speaker 1: they look less risky. But as we know, that is 126 00:07:33,240 --> 00:07:36,480 Speaker 1: not the right logic to use. I mean, emerging markets 127 00:07:36,480 --> 00:07:41,200 Speaker 1: are the most risky uh. Second to say, frontier markets. 128 00:07:41,240 --> 00:07:45,920 Speaker 1: So while you want to have exposure, we're advocating UH 129 00:07:45,960 --> 00:07:49,560 Speaker 1: anywhere from save three to five percent in a portfolio, 130 00:07:49,840 --> 00:07:52,480 Speaker 1: not double that, which is what I've been reading recently. 131 00:07:52,800 --> 00:07:55,640 Speaker 1: Well and has that changed to the three to five No, 132 00:07:55,880 --> 00:07:59,000 Speaker 1: we tend to stay fairly constant with these UH with 133 00:07:59,080 --> 00:08:03,160 Speaker 1: these asset locations, because we think moving or trimming or 134 00:08:03,480 --> 00:08:06,600 Speaker 1: rebalancing more frequently than a year as a fool's errand 135 00:08:06,640 --> 00:08:09,520 Speaker 1: because you need at least a years of data, and 136 00:08:09,960 --> 00:08:12,720 Speaker 1: right now there is as you mentioned, you know, is 137 00:08:12,760 --> 00:08:15,040 Speaker 1: this the most boring market. No, I would say it's 138 00:08:15,080 --> 00:08:19,960 Speaker 1: the most unstable market in terms of information. And until 139 00:08:20,000 --> 00:08:23,960 Speaker 1: we get new clarity, fact based clarity, especially in the US, 140 00:08:24,680 --> 00:08:26,280 Speaker 1: we just have to wait and see how these things 141 00:08:26,320 --> 00:08:29,320 Speaker 1: are going to develop fact based clarity. We all are 142 00:08:29,320 --> 00:08:31,960 Speaker 1: praying for that. Peter Anderson, chief investment officer and vice 143 00:08:31,960 --> 00:08:35,000 Speaker 1: president at Fiduciary Trust in Boston, but he's in New York. 144 00:08:35,040 --> 00:08:38,079 Speaker 1: We're in Boston. Makes sense of that. We can't at least. 145 00:08:38,120 --> 00:08:40,920 Speaker 1: Abramy was here with Pim Fox and we're broadcasting live 146 00:08:41,080 --> 00:08:57,600 Speaker 1: from red Hat Summit. We're broadcasting from the Red Hat 147 00:08:57,679 --> 00:09:01,040 Speaker 1: Summit and the Boston I'm Pim Fox Long Lisa brahm Witz. 148 00:09:01,280 --> 00:09:05,040 Speaker 1: And you know, we understand what the word infrastructure means 149 00:09:05,040 --> 00:09:08,920 Speaker 1: when we talk about bridges or roads or even airports. 150 00:09:08,920 --> 00:09:16,120 Speaker 1: But technology infrastructure that exists withincorporations has also various lifespans 151 00:09:16,160 --> 00:09:20,200 Speaker 1: and various histories. And here to understand help us understand 152 00:09:20,240 --> 00:09:23,640 Speaker 1: how to knit these things together in a more efficient way, 153 00:09:23,679 --> 00:09:27,400 Speaker 1: is Joe Fitzgerald. He is the vice president Management Business 154 00:09:27,520 --> 00:09:31,320 Speaker 1: Unit for Red Hat. Joe, thanks for for being here, um, 155 00:09:31,400 --> 00:09:34,600 Speaker 1: and thanks for having us. Is that a reasonable? Uh? 156 00:09:34,720 --> 00:09:38,920 Speaker 1: Analogy that I a picture that I painted? Yes, I 157 00:09:38,920 --> 00:09:41,360 Speaker 1: mean the world started off simple. Things were physical, you 158 00:09:41,360 --> 00:09:43,120 Speaker 1: could touch them, you know, they sort of stayed where 159 00:09:43,160 --> 00:09:45,520 Speaker 1: you left them, and then over time they become virtual 160 00:09:46,000 --> 00:09:48,760 Speaker 1: right where you know, you can have many more virtual 161 00:09:48,760 --> 00:09:51,400 Speaker 1: machines running on physical servers than there really are there. 162 00:09:51,880 --> 00:09:54,280 Speaker 1: And then the world evolved sort of into different cloud 163 00:09:54,360 --> 00:09:57,480 Speaker 1: architectures which are even more abstracted and virtual. So it's 164 00:09:57,480 --> 00:10:01,680 Speaker 1: getting very complicated. Well, Joe, you have a vision for 165 00:10:01,800 --> 00:10:05,400 Speaker 1: automated enterprise and this UH is sort of represented in 166 00:10:05,440 --> 00:10:08,720 Speaker 1: the answable technology by red Hat and I am. We 167 00:10:08,720 --> 00:10:12,480 Speaker 1: were just talking offline about the idea that, for example, 168 00:10:12,559 --> 00:10:17,160 Speaker 1: there are all these small automated parts of everyday items 169 00:10:17,200 --> 00:10:20,280 Speaker 1: that we use and it's up to us to update 170 00:10:20,320 --> 00:10:23,760 Speaker 1: our system or prevent you know, security threats and press 171 00:10:23,840 --> 00:10:25,760 Speaker 1: okay and know what depress and what not to press. 172 00:10:25,840 --> 00:10:29,120 Speaker 1: But this is basically a way to do that for 173 00:10:29,160 --> 00:10:32,000 Speaker 1: you and have some kind of UH intermediary to like 174 00:10:32,160 --> 00:10:34,880 Speaker 1: remove anything that a human actually has to do. Yeah, 175 00:10:34,880 --> 00:10:37,439 Speaker 1: So we have this vision of an automated enterprise, and 176 00:10:37,520 --> 00:10:40,520 Speaker 1: the irony is at enterprises have dozens of automation tools. 177 00:10:41,040 --> 00:10:43,280 Speaker 1: And if you think about automation and other areas, like 178 00:10:43,320 --> 00:10:46,360 Speaker 1: your car, you have automation for cruise control or for 179 00:10:46,800 --> 00:10:49,520 Speaker 1: you know, different things that help the driver. Well, what 180 00:10:49,640 --> 00:10:51,280 Speaker 1: we need to get to is the point where the 181 00:10:51,280 --> 00:10:55,200 Speaker 1: thing can talk across these different silos of automation and 182 00:10:55,240 --> 00:10:58,160 Speaker 1: be able to automate much higher level functions in a car. 183 00:10:58,280 --> 00:11:01,200 Speaker 1: We've we've hit that with the cell driving car, which 184 00:11:01,240 --> 00:11:03,920 Speaker 1: takes all these inputs, for example, and and coordinates them 185 00:11:03,920 --> 00:11:06,600 Speaker 1: in a very sophisticated way. Enterprises don't have that yet. 186 00:11:06,640 --> 00:11:09,560 Speaker 1: So what has been the main blockade? Why hasn't this 187 00:11:09,640 --> 00:11:11,959 Speaker 1: already been created? What's been the obstacle? So it's a 188 00:11:11,960 --> 00:11:14,240 Speaker 1: couple of things. First of all, it's complexity. A lot 189 00:11:14,280 --> 00:11:18,160 Speaker 1: of the automation tools are really programming languages or scripting languages, 190 00:11:18,480 --> 00:11:20,720 Speaker 1: which means that you have to find really smart people 191 00:11:20,720 --> 00:11:24,240 Speaker 1: who are effectively developers to go write automation. And I 192 00:11:24,280 --> 00:11:26,520 Speaker 1: think one of the things we see an answerable finally 193 00:11:26,559 --> 00:11:29,959 Speaker 1: there's a human readable automation language which sort of democratize 194 00:11:30,000 --> 00:11:32,480 Speaker 1: his automation. More people can do it, they can understand it, 195 00:11:32,520 --> 00:11:35,400 Speaker 1: they can participate, So it really changes the whole dynamic. 196 00:11:36,040 --> 00:11:38,480 Speaker 1: Can you give us an example of an industry that 197 00:11:38,600 --> 00:11:42,199 Speaker 1: you see in the future that doesn't use this approach 198 00:11:42,360 --> 00:11:45,760 Speaker 1: but will and will adopt it. Well, So it's interesting. 199 00:11:45,800 --> 00:11:48,160 Speaker 1: So you know, we acquired Ansball about a year and 200 00:11:48,200 --> 00:11:50,920 Speaker 1: a half ago, and so you know, red hats Global company. 201 00:11:51,160 --> 00:11:54,080 Speaker 1: So I've traveled the world talking to customers UM in 202 00:11:54,120 --> 00:11:57,760 Speaker 1: many countries and in many different industries. The answerable sort 203 00:11:57,760 --> 00:12:01,960 Speaker 1: of technology uptake is viral. It's across almost every industry now, 204 00:12:02,080 --> 00:12:06,800 Speaker 1: from government agencies to financial services, healthcare, manufacturing. It's stunning 205 00:12:06,800 --> 00:12:09,840 Speaker 1: how many industries have self selected that technology. And then 206 00:12:09,840 --> 00:12:12,880 Speaker 1: the use cases range from traditional I've got to rule 207 00:12:12,920 --> 00:12:15,480 Speaker 1: out some physical servers to I've got to put my 208 00:12:15,520 --> 00:12:18,680 Speaker 1: Alexa application out so that I can you know, deploy 209 00:12:18,760 --> 00:12:22,959 Speaker 1: my new services for financial services. So if I said 210 00:12:23,800 --> 00:12:27,080 Speaker 1: within the airlines, how would answer will be used? What 211 00:12:27,080 --> 00:12:29,079 Speaker 1: would they be bringing together? So what they would be 212 00:12:29,160 --> 00:12:32,600 Speaker 1: using answall for is things like devloped practices where they 213 00:12:32,600 --> 00:12:35,640 Speaker 1: can move their applications much faster from development to production 214 00:12:36,240 --> 00:12:38,360 Speaker 1: to get them online, to be able to deploy new 215 00:12:38,400 --> 00:12:41,520 Speaker 1: environments so their developers can be instantly productive. UM to 216 00:12:41,679 --> 00:12:45,960 Speaker 1: track and manage the process of getting effectively new business 217 00:12:46,000 --> 00:12:48,600 Speaker 1: services out. There is there a risk when we start 218 00:12:48,640 --> 00:12:52,040 Speaker 1: automating the automation, when we start creating, you know, systems 219 00:12:52,080 --> 00:12:54,760 Speaker 1: to sort of oversee the systems. I mean this is 220 00:12:54,800 --> 00:12:58,079 Speaker 1: like the tech version of c d O squared. I mean, 221 00:12:58,080 --> 00:13:00,240 Speaker 1: at what point if there's a if there's some kind 222 00:13:00,240 --> 00:13:03,440 Speaker 1: of hits or some kind of problem glitch in in 223 00:13:03,800 --> 00:13:08,280 Speaker 1: one of these areas will have become a catastrophe. Yeah, 224 00:13:08,320 --> 00:13:11,360 Speaker 1: automation gone wrong can can do some very you know, 225 00:13:11,440 --> 00:13:14,360 Speaker 1: damaging things. But I think back to my science fiction roots. Yes, 226 00:13:14,880 --> 00:13:16,720 Speaker 1: but one of the things I think that you know, 227 00:13:16,960 --> 00:13:20,760 Speaker 1: helps eliminate that is simplicity. If you've got very complex 228 00:13:20,800 --> 00:13:23,520 Speaker 1: programming that has you know, one line of programming that's 229 00:13:23,559 --> 00:13:27,160 Speaker 1: wrong right, or something that wasn't considered, then that the 230 00:13:27,160 --> 00:13:30,800 Speaker 1: automation can go crazy. When you have a simpler um 231 00:13:30,880 --> 00:13:34,559 Speaker 1: automation language where people can read it. Okay, well, so 232 00:13:34,559 --> 00:13:40,040 Speaker 1: so is this simple language something like, uh, please take 233 00:13:40,520 --> 00:13:43,439 Speaker 1: this system, put it with this system, make sure it's 234 00:13:43,520 --> 00:13:48,840 Speaker 1: updated and safe. Thanks, I mean with yeah, yeah, So effectively, 235 00:13:48,880 --> 00:13:52,600 Speaker 1: you can put a recipe or or um a simple 236 00:13:52,679 --> 00:13:55,160 Speaker 1: way of defining a system, and if you run that 237 00:13:55,320 --> 00:13:58,400 Speaker 1: same recipe or that same you know, automation a thousand times, 238 00:13:58,440 --> 00:14:01,120 Speaker 1: you're gonna get exactly the same result a thousand times. 239 00:14:01,440 --> 00:14:03,360 Speaker 1: So it makes it very predictable and reliable to be 240 00:14:03,400 --> 00:14:05,760 Speaker 1: able to generate those things. So if you're depointing new 241 00:14:05,800 --> 00:14:08,000 Speaker 1: systems in the cloud or you're deploying a new you 242 00:14:08,040 --> 00:14:11,720 Speaker 1: know again, bank or airline application or healthcare application. That 243 00:14:11,720 --> 00:14:13,319 Speaker 1: thing is going to be the same every time. It's 244 00:14:13,320 --> 00:14:15,360 Speaker 1: gonna be reliable, so you don't get those errors that 245 00:14:15,440 --> 00:14:20,120 Speaker 1: people make or complexity you know causes. No. It's an 246 00:14:20,120 --> 00:14:24,760 Speaker 1: interesting topic because it really does pull together the legacy systems, 247 00:14:24,800 --> 00:14:28,240 Speaker 1: the older systems that many companies still use. Can you 248 00:14:28,760 --> 00:14:31,960 Speaker 1: in your travels, what was the oldest system you came into. 249 00:14:32,400 --> 00:14:34,680 Speaker 1: Did you ever go to go to a company and think, wow, 250 00:14:34,720 --> 00:14:37,240 Speaker 1: I can't believe they're even running this. There are people 251 00:14:37,320 --> 00:14:41,680 Speaker 1: using automation tools that are fifteen plus years old, okay, 252 00:14:41,680 --> 00:14:44,160 Speaker 1: that you know deploy some of their their systems. They're 253 00:14:44,160 --> 00:14:47,320 Speaker 1: afraid to touch it, right, And the companies that originally 254 00:14:47,360 --> 00:14:49,960 Speaker 1: sold it to them have been acquired three times right, 255 00:14:50,040 --> 00:14:52,560 Speaker 1: and you know, the original people aren't there um, but 256 00:14:52,600 --> 00:14:54,600 Speaker 1: they don't want to change it because it's so fragile. 257 00:14:55,240 --> 00:14:57,400 Speaker 1: So one of the challenges here is really getting to 258 00:14:57,440 --> 00:15:00,600 Speaker 1: this newer age of automation. Any company that us an automate, 259 00:15:00,640 --> 00:15:02,400 Speaker 1: it's not gonna be able to keep up with all 260 00:15:02,400 --> 00:15:04,560 Speaker 1: the digital transformation that they have to do. It's just 261 00:15:04,600 --> 00:15:08,120 Speaker 1: not going to be possible. I unfortunately can relate having 262 00:15:08,160 --> 00:15:10,040 Speaker 1: a really old thing being like, just don't touch it 263 00:15:10,080 --> 00:15:12,280 Speaker 1: and it'll be okay. Joe Fitzgerald, thank you so much 264 00:15:12,280 --> 00:15:14,920 Speaker 1: for joining us. Joe FitzGeralds as vice president of the 265 00:15:14,960 --> 00:15:18,080 Speaker 1: Management Business Unit at red Hat, and we are here 266 00:15:19,160 --> 00:15:23,760 Speaker 1: red Hat Summit in Boston talking about all things cloud 267 00:15:24,000 --> 00:15:27,720 Speaker 1: and open source and the future of our world. Frankly, 268 00:15:36,360 --> 00:15:37,880 Speaker 1: we want to take a moment to let you know 269 00:15:37,920 --> 00:15:40,840 Speaker 1: about something new from Bloomberg. Starting right now, you can 270 00:15:40,920 --> 00:15:43,800 Speaker 1: use our io s app or our new Google Chrome 271 00:15:43,840 --> 00:15:47,480 Speaker 1: extension to scan any news story on any website, instantly 272 00:15:47,480 --> 00:15:50,320 Speaker 1: revealing relevant news and market data from Bloomberg and other 273 00:15:50,360 --> 00:15:52,960 Speaker 1: sources related to the companies and people you're reading about. 274 00:15:53,240 --> 00:15:55,160 Speaker 1: So no matter where you're reading the news, you can 275 00:15:55,200 --> 00:15:57,760 Speaker 1: bring the power of Bloomberg's news and data with you. 276 00:15:57,960 --> 00:16:01,000 Speaker 1: It's pretty amazing. Download our I s app or search 277 00:16:01,080 --> 00:16:03,240 Speaker 1: for the Bloomberg extension on the Chrome Store to try 278 00:16:03,280 --> 00:16:06,360 Speaker 1: it out. Learn more at bloomberg dot com slash lens. 279 00:16:15,000 --> 00:16:18,960 Speaker 1: We're broadcasting from the seventeen red Hat Summit in Boston, 280 00:16:19,440 --> 00:16:21,840 Speaker 1: and UH I want to cast our attention now to 281 00:16:22,040 --> 00:16:26,400 Speaker 1: Puerto Rico. UH, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico is now 282 00:16:26,440 --> 00:16:31,200 Speaker 1: going to face a series of bondholder lawsuits. In addition, 283 00:16:31,880 --> 00:16:37,200 Speaker 1: Puerto Rico is also experiencing an outflow of people as 284 00:16:37,240 --> 00:16:41,600 Speaker 1: well as a real missed opportunity when it comes to 285 00:16:41,640 --> 00:16:45,520 Speaker 1: a refinancing its debt. Here to tell us More's Michelle 286 00:16:45,560 --> 00:16:49,240 Speaker 1: Caski of Bloomberg News. Michelle, thanks for being with us, 287 00:16:49,680 --> 00:16:54,000 Speaker 1: give us an update on what has happened and maybe 288 00:16:54,040 --> 00:16:56,040 Speaker 1: put it into the context of what it's like to 289 00:16:56,120 --> 00:17:01,280 Speaker 1: be in Puerto Rico now well in in in response 290 00:17:01,280 --> 00:17:03,200 Speaker 1: to your question what it's like to be in Puerto Rico, 291 00:17:03,240 --> 00:17:06,080 Speaker 1: there's a lot of protests going on UM regarding some 292 00:17:06,119 --> 00:17:10,320 Speaker 1: of the changes of spending cuts that the governors is proposing. 293 00:17:10,640 --> 00:17:13,800 Speaker 1: But what has happened with their lawsuits recently is a 294 00:17:14,359 --> 00:17:17,919 Speaker 1: legal stay expired Monday night and last night, and that 295 00:17:18,400 --> 00:17:23,120 Speaker 1: had safeguarded Puerto Rico from creditor lawsuits. That has lifted, 296 00:17:23,240 --> 00:17:27,320 Speaker 1: so now UM investors are free to UM to sue 297 00:17:27,600 --> 00:17:30,240 Speaker 1: the commonwealth. And what has happened is we have a 298 00:17:30,320 --> 00:17:33,880 Speaker 1: suit from both UM and Back Financial Group, which ensures 299 00:17:34,080 --> 00:17:36,840 Speaker 1: UM some of Puerto Rico's debt, and also a group 300 00:17:36,920 --> 00:17:41,240 Speaker 1: of hedge funds holding senior sales tax bombs. Well, Michelle, 301 00:17:41,320 --> 00:17:43,159 Speaker 1: and this is just the opening salvo I mean, right, 302 00:17:43,160 --> 00:17:46,080 Speaker 1: I mean the deadline for when puert Rico is somewhat 303 00:17:46,119 --> 00:17:50,560 Speaker 1: immune from litigation expired at midnight. These lawsuits come today, 304 00:17:50,840 --> 00:17:53,760 Speaker 1: we can only begin to imagine that this is really 305 00:17:54,440 --> 00:17:56,920 Speaker 1: just the tip of the iceberg. Now, I would think 306 00:17:56,920 --> 00:17:59,560 Speaker 1: that there would be more suits coming. And also remember 307 00:17:59,560 --> 00:18:02,760 Speaker 1: there there are already existing lawsuits that had have been filed, 308 00:18:02,760 --> 00:18:05,840 Speaker 1: and so again with the STA being lifted, those lawsuits 309 00:18:05,840 --> 00:18:08,679 Speaker 1: can move forward. Maybe we might see some rulings in 310 00:18:08,680 --> 00:18:11,840 Speaker 1: the next few weeks or so on those suits and 311 00:18:12,200 --> 00:18:16,320 Speaker 1: um and of course UM one way that can one 312 00:18:16,320 --> 00:18:18,920 Speaker 1: thing that Puerto rican can do to stop this is 313 00:18:19,359 --> 00:18:23,320 Speaker 1: the Federal Control Board could pursue Title three, which is 314 00:18:23,359 --> 00:18:29,240 Speaker 1: this provision in the Federal Promisa law, UM, that rescue 315 00:18:29,320 --> 00:18:32,840 Speaker 1: law for Puerto Rico, that that that allows Puerto Rico 316 00:18:32,920 --> 00:18:36,520 Speaker 1: to use a bankruptcy like process to force creditors to 317 00:18:36,520 --> 00:18:41,080 Speaker 1: to take losses. Well, so why wouldn't they invoke Title three? 318 00:18:41,200 --> 00:18:44,480 Speaker 1: Why would they allow these lawsuits to continue in a 319 00:18:44,560 --> 00:18:47,040 Speaker 1: variety of jurisdictions, right, I mean, this won't necessarily be 320 00:18:47,080 --> 00:18:51,600 Speaker 1: a controlled kind of uh process of litigation without Title three. Correct, 321 00:18:52,359 --> 00:18:55,120 Speaker 1: well it yes, and no, I mean why why they're 322 00:18:55,160 --> 00:18:57,560 Speaker 1: not filing Title three so far is because, I mean 323 00:18:57,600 --> 00:19:00,360 Speaker 1: it's a very serious step. There's no going back. It's 324 00:19:00,400 --> 00:19:03,720 Speaker 1: the equivalent of filing bankruptcy. And and so Puerto Rico 325 00:19:03,840 --> 00:19:08,320 Speaker 1: really wants to UM consider that heavily before they do it. UM. 326 00:19:08,440 --> 00:19:10,719 Speaker 1: It would also turn over more control, a bit more 327 00:19:10,720 --> 00:19:14,119 Speaker 1: control over to the Federal Oversight Board. UM. So of 328 00:19:14,160 --> 00:19:19,359 Speaker 1: course politicians on island UM would prefer that UM that 329 00:19:19,680 --> 00:19:23,639 Speaker 1: they don't pursue Title three, although they may not, it 330 00:19:23,720 --> 00:19:25,399 Speaker 1: may have to be the path that they need to 331 00:19:25,440 --> 00:19:29,080 Speaker 1: go down to resolve this UM. But also in terms 332 00:19:29,080 --> 00:19:31,480 Speaker 1: of you know, one one thing that helps out with 333 00:19:31,520 --> 00:19:35,080 Speaker 1: these lawsuits is there's one judge, federal judge on the island. 334 00:19:35,119 --> 00:19:37,679 Speaker 1: His last name is Judge Bestosa, and he had so 335 00:19:37,760 --> 00:19:40,800 Speaker 1: far as been overseeing many of these cases. So in 336 00:19:40,840 --> 00:19:45,040 Speaker 1: some ways that helps corral all these different suits. Michelle, 337 00:19:45,880 --> 00:19:52,160 Speaker 1: I understand that the recent demonstrations and strikes UH took 338 00:19:52,160 --> 00:19:55,480 Speaker 1: place in front of what's the Sea Borne Airlines World 339 00:19:55,520 --> 00:19:58,760 Speaker 1: Plaza building. This is where the Fiscal Control Board is 340 00:19:58,800 --> 00:20:03,919 Speaker 1: located us UH. There are also the Golden Mile area 341 00:20:04,560 --> 00:20:07,959 Speaker 1: how bad does the violence have to get or the 342 00:20:07,960 --> 00:20:12,000 Speaker 1: protests have to get before this becomes a real political 343 00:20:12,040 --> 00:20:14,960 Speaker 1: issue as much as it is an economic and financial 344 00:20:14,960 --> 00:20:18,040 Speaker 1: issue right now. Sure it's such a political issue. I 345 00:20:18,080 --> 00:20:23,359 Speaker 1: mean it's UM this this has happened before on Puerto Rico. UM, 346 00:20:24,280 --> 00:20:26,800 Speaker 1: the the residents really do take to the streets when 347 00:20:27,080 --> 00:20:30,640 Speaker 1: UM the politicians announced that they're going to cut back 348 00:20:30,680 --> 00:20:33,760 Speaker 1: on spending and cut back on programs that help people. 349 00:20:34,240 --> 00:20:38,720 Speaker 1: And we see it on the campuses down there as well. UM, 350 00:20:38,840 --> 00:20:42,359 Speaker 1: some of the campuses get shut down and UM, but 351 00:20:42,480 --> 00:20:46,680 Speaker 1: it has turned more violent and the governor has UM 352 00:20:46,680 --> 00:20:50,280 Speaker 1: spoken out about this and and has urged people UM 353 00:20:50,320 --> 00:20:54,520 Speaker 1: to protest responsibly. You know, what are some deadlines that 354 00:20:54,560 --> 00:20:56,680 Speaker 1: we really should be focusing on because this has obviously 355 00:20:56,720 --> 00:20:59,879 Speaker 1: been ongoing for a long time. The pressure is getting 356 00:21:00,000 --> 00:21:03,399 Speaker 1: matched it up with this stay being lifted. We know 357 00:21:03,480 --> 00:21:06,879 Speaker 1: that Puerto Rico did try to offer a deal to 358 00:21:07,119 --> 00:21:10,560 Speaker 1: bondholders and bondholders rejected it. Both parties seem to think 359 00:21:10,920 --> 00:21:14,560 Speaker 1: that they're going to fare better in court. What deadlines 360 00:21:14,560 --> 00:21:17,280 Speaker 1: coming up could force Puerto Rico's hand and force them 361 00:21:17,320 --> 00:21:21,800 Speaker 1: to UH invoke Title three M. I would think UM 362 00:21:22,000 --> 00:21:24,000 Speaker 1: as we see over the next few weeks, if we 363 00:21:24,080 --> 00:21:27,560 Speaker 1: see UM a lot more lawsuits come in, a lot 364 00:21:27,600 --> 00:21:31,080 Speaker 1: more lawsuits filed, that might really push the Federal Control 365 00:21:31,080 --> 00:21:35,000 Speaker 1: Board's hand. Also, if there's any adverse rulings UM where 366 00:21:35,040 --> 00:21:39,760 Speaker 1: Puerto Rico is unable to UM skip bond payments or 367 00:21:39,880 --> 00:21:43,199 Speaker 1: is unable to shuffle around money in different revenue streams, 368 00:21:43,240 --> 00:21:45,720 Speaker 1: than that might force the Control Board to have to 369 00:21:45,960 --> 00:21:48,760 Speaker 1: pursue Title three. Yeah, and it's also become a political 370 00:21:48,760 --> 00:21:51,440 Speaker 1: issue here in the US. We know that that was 371 00:21:51,480 --> 00:21:54,359 Speaker 1: one of the issues with getting a budget crafted in 372 00:21:54,480 --> 00:21:57,719 Speaker 1: Congress in the US, where people were some Republicans were 373 00:21:57,720 --> 00:22:01,160 Speaker 1: saying that Democrats wanted to put in a Medicaid allocation 374 00:22:01,280 --> 00:22:03,600 Speaker 1: for Puerto Rico, which ended up did getting included in 375 00:22:03,640 --> 00:22:08,480 Speaker 1: the bill. Uh and and uh Republicans, some Republicans, including 376 00:22:08,600 --> 00:22:11,280 Speaker 1: President Trump, didn't want that. So I'm sure this will 377 00:22:11,320 --> 00:22:13,879 Speaker 1: be in the news going forward. And there is seventy 378 00:22:13,920 --> 00:22:16,159 Speaker 1: billion dollars of debt at stake. A lot of it 379 00:22:16,200 --> 00:22:17,959 Speaker 1: is held on the island, but a lot of it 380 00:22:18,000 --> 00:22:20,600 Speaker 1: is also held not only by Hedgeman's but also by 381 00:22:21,160 --> 00:22:23,960 Speaker 1: mutual funds in the US that HOLDMUNI bond. So there 382 00:22:24,040 --> 00:22:26,800 Speaker 1: is a great deal of import on a much broader 383 00:22:26,840 --> 00:22:30,040 Speaker 1: scale than just this Commonwealth, but in and of itself, 384 00:22:30,119 --> 00:22:36,320 Speaker 1: is is becoming human humanitarian issue as well. Thanks for 385 00:22:36,359 --> 00:22:39,000 Speaker 1: listening to the Bloomberg p m L podcast. You can 386 00:22:39,040 --> 00:22:42,879 Speaker 1: subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or 387 00:22:42,920 --> 00:22:46,399 Speaker 1: whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm on 388 00:22:46,440 --> 00:22:50,280 Speaker 1: Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo 389 00:22:50,280 --> 00:22:53,000 Speaker 1: wits one. Before the podcast, you can always catch us 390 00:22:53,040 --> 00:23:01,080 Speaker 1: worldwide on Bloomberg Radio k