WEBVTT - FFW Micro - Jonathan Taylor

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>You found Fantasy Football Weekly Micro a deep dive on

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:11.399
<v Speaker 1>one player in just five to ten minutes. Now, here's

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:19.080
<v Speaker 1>your host, Paul Georgian. Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly Micro Edition.

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I am Paul Chargy in. This is addition number two

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly Micro. My co host remains Tyler Kenneybilely. Hey, Tyler,

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>we're back. We are back. We broke down yesterday, we

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>broke down Kyle Pitts. We saw that one pretty differently.

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna go to another player that's gonna be pretty polarizing,

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Taylor today and again the focus on Fantasy Football

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Weekly Micro Edition. We do a deep dive on one

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:48.520
<v Speaker 1>player lasting five to ten ish minutes or so. Although

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:51.199
<v Speaker 1>I think our last one with eleven don't tell anybody

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>it'll still we need it to feel micro and the ideas.

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>We can give you one of these every day, at

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>least every weekday. Let's talk John and Taylor. Let's begin here.

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Everybody knows that he was the first running back taken

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>in Fantasy football drafts last year, and everybody knows he

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't live up to anywhere near that billing because he

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>was hobbled all seasoned with on and off ankle injuries. Yeah,

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:16.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean right now, he's going where he went RB

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>one last year. As you said, he's going as the

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:21.400
<v Speaker 1>RB three right now, so end of round one and

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>he finished like RB eighteen and points for game in

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, only played eleven games through that injury. And

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 1>I feel like this is definitely going to be one

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>of those situations where the same people who were in

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>drafting McCaffrey and Barkley last off season because they were

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:38.479
<v Speaker 1>injury prone, if you had Jonathan Taylor last season, you're

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be You got burned big time. So you

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 1>better hope the person the one on one last year

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:46.199
<v Speaker 1>is drafting right in front of you in the first

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>round this year, because he is going to be one

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>of those players that some people just never draft again

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>because he burned them so badly. He did. And unfortunately

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Taylor got hurt right out of the game, like I

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>believe it was game one week one, got hurt and

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>then he was just missed games played hurt clearly not himself.

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>And the offensive line for the Colts was dreadful obviously,

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>coaching change, quarterback changes, just everything went wrong. Interesting that

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>he's that Jonathan Taylor is still RB three. Most people

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>feel like the bounce back is still coming. So let's

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>let's let's do Let's dig into the let's dig into

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:26.079
<v Speaker 1>some of the extra stats on him. What did we

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>learn from him last year? Yeah? From last year, well, honestly,

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we would be doing him justice if we

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't at least touch on his twenty twenty one season,

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 1>where he was the RB one. He was awesome. So

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>according to the next Sense stats, he led all running

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 1>backs in the yards overexpected four hundred eighty one, rushes

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:44.639
<v Speaker 1>of twenty plus miles per hour six, and rushing yards

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>after contact fourteen hundred eighteen. That was fourteen hundred and

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>eighteen of his eighteen hundred total rushing yards at which

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:54.799
<v Speaker 1>is after contact. Yes, yeah, he had a if you

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:58.080
<v Speaker 1>have fourteen hundred yards after contact, fourteen hundred yards leads

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the NFL and rushing times. Yes, So this is a

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>guy who can make people miss. And if you've just

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>compared kind of those similar stats to last season, he

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>was fifteenth in expected yards per attempts, where in the

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:12.919
<v Speaker 1>year probably who's obviously number one, but he still finished

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 1>above guys like Kenneth Walker, Austin Eckler and Josh Jacobs

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>all guys who might have won you leagues last year.

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:21.519
<v Speaker 1>So it's not did it on the through the air? Yeah,

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>so you know, he know the running was not magical

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 1>for him. But yes, I just think it's worth noting

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>that these are guys that did when you league last

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 1>year and he still played good last year. I just

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I truly think, I truly think if the situation was

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>even a just average, yeah, we would have gotten a

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>better version of Jonathan Taylor if he was healthy. Of course,

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>now we've got a change at head coach, We've got

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>a looming change a quarterback. Let's talk about looking forward

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>what some of these changes might mean. I think if

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>we just kind of so. Obviously, Shane Stekeen's the new

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>head coach who was the play caller offensive coordinator in

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia and one of the things he did, for sure

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>run the football in Philadelphia, correct, So I know the

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>personnels are different. We'll get into the Jalen Hurts without

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Jone Hurts comparison here in a minute. Good but the

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Eagles finished with the fourth most rushing yards per game

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>last season, the most rushing touchdowns, and the most rushing attempts. Now,

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I know some of you're gonna be like, oh, yeah,

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Hurts. Yeah right, How much of that was driven

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>by Jalen Hurts alone? Because he's special and different? And

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>unless the Colts go Anthony Richardson in the draft, which

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>they might, that's not going to be there. So let's

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about this. How much of that, how much of

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>that Shane steke in offense was rushing offense was driven

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>by Jalen Hurts. So if you'd removed Jalen Hurts his

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 1>rushing totals and replace it with league average stats, yes,

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles would have finished tenth and rushing attempts per game,

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:46.600
<v Speaker 1>still still top ten, ninth and rushing yards, and they

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>would have finished first and rushing touchdowns even if you

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>take away half, if you take away half of Jalen

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:55.599
<v Speaker 1>Hurts rushing tds, they still would have finished first. Okay,

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>And but the league average was three point eight for

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>attempts per game for running But I'm saying, if so,

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>it was kind of a thing when you're looking at

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the stats where Jalen Hurts he had like thirteen rushing touchdowns.

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 1>If you take away obviously thirteen of those, like They're

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be number one anymore, right, But but some

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks usually run in three four exactly. I don't know

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>if he can. So even if it was, even if

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>you take a half away, that's still I did six.

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>They still had the most rushing touchdowns. Okay, And another

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>thing that's really gonna bode well I think for Jonathan

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Taylor is the Miles Sanders factory of this. This is

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the staff that surprised me. Miles Sanders finished tied third

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:31.359
<v Speaker 1>in red zone touches last season with Jalen Hurts on

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:33.679
<v Speaker 1>his team. He had forty four red zone touches. Jalen

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 1>Hurts had forty three red zone touches. Wow. So even

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>if you take away because I'm assuming it depends on

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>what quarterback the Colts are gonna draft, obviously, but if

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a draft someone like Bryce Young, Bright, Song's not gonna

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>have forty three now, He's not, I mean, Andthony Richardson

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>will see Gardner Minshew definitely not. So. I mean, it's

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>just it's just a crazy sets. So even if you

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>take away half of those, he's gonna he would have

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>finished as the you take away half of Jalen Hurts

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 1>is red zone touches and gave him to Miles Sanders,

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 1>which is Denny probably would have been number one. He

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>would have he would have just edged out Austin Eckler. Yeah,

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that makes that makes sense, So I love that part.

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Shane Steken, dude never passed near the goal line. Iyan,

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>it was just all running near the goal line and

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that probably doesn't change and why should it. He just

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 1>went to the Super Bowl on this methodology and he's

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>got Jonathan Taylor. His disposals way better than Miles Sanders.

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I also think he's the person all to do it

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>as well. They had the thirteenth best run blocking old

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 1>line according to PF that was it was ninth in

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one, so pretty much the same kind of group.

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I believe Quinn Elsone was hurt a little bit last few. Yeah,

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>so they're hopefully getting him back. And I just think

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna be a team that wants to run

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the football, especially when you think about the they're gonna

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>have to draft a rookie quarterback. I mean think everyone

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:48.599
<v Speaker 1>expects them the exactly. So I did a little digging

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and this is a list of running backs and they're

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>finishes the year their team drafts a first round rookie quarterback.

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>The thinking behind it, obviously is you're not gonna want

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>your rookie quarterback throwing fifty times a game and just

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of ruining his confidence that you want to play

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of through somebody else, like a Jonathan Taylor or

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>someone like that, to kind of ease him in NFL life.

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>So here's what I found. So in Chicago the draft

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Justin Fields, Dave Montgomery was RB fifteen, Okay, that was

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>two years ago. Two years ago, yep. Cincinnati Joe Burrow,

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Joe Mixon was RB eleven, Charges drafted Justin Herbert aus

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Eckler RB twelve. New York Giants draft Daniel Jones, se

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Quon RB seven, Cardinals Kyler, Murray, Kenny and Drake RB fourteen. Okay,

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>So those were all the players, like those are first

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>round quarterbacks. And how the rookie or sorry, first round

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>rookie quarterbacks, and how the running backs did in that offense. Yeah,

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>these are good running backs Montgomery, Mixon, Eckler, Barkley, well

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>not Kenyan Drake, but those are good running backs. What

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>stands out is RB fifteen, RB eleven, RB twelve, RB

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>seven RB fourteen. Those aren't great numbers. Yeah, Well, the

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>first off, it's it's average points per game, so it's

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>not you not accounting injuries into that. So I'm sure

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>some of these might be a little bit inflated. But

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>that's the kind of thing that scares me a little

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>bit too, is these You're drafting that RB three right now, yeah,

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and these are nobody's getting close to that exactly. I

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>think the one thing we should say is that these

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I think Jonathan Taylor might be better than all of

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 1>these running backs in terms of actually running the football.

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe sa Quan you can at least have an argument,

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>but David Joe, Austin Eckler, Kenny Drake, Jonathan Taylor is

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>better than all these running backs, and he finished as

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 1>an RB one before. Yeah, so I think that's worth mentioning.

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:38.839
<v Speaker 1>And just for the sake of people, I'm guessing you're like,

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>what about Trevor Lawrence, Kenny Pickett. Those were like the

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>good running backs that I had listed, and then then

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the running backs that didn't finish as hot, So Pittsburgh

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Pickett, nag Harris Rby twenty Jackson, So yet Trevor Lawrence,

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>James Robinson Rby twenty three, Zach Wilson gets drafted, Michael Carter,

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll be thirty five, and then so it's funny Dwayne

0:08:56.520 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Haskins and then Adrian Peterson. Wow. Yeah, Adrian Peterson was

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>at the obviously the bitter end of his career. This

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>is RB twenty eight. Okay, the exemptions were obviously Shortan

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Love and Trey lands Day. That's you know, that's not

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 1>that's not very that's not data that suggests that Jonathan

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Taylor is likely to live up to RB three, which

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:18.199
<v Speaker 1>is really interesting when they do bring in the rookie

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>quarterback and obviously, you know the rookies are learning on

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the job, and that doesn't you know a lot of

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 1>defenses are going to be able to have the luxury

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:29.199
<v Speaker 1>to just key in and this case on Jonathan Taylor.

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>A quick question. If let's say the Colts drafts, Yeah,

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>let's go, let's go Will Levis. Okay, say they take

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Will Levis. Yeah, do you think that Will Levis leads

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:43.559
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Taylor to to similar numbers what Carson Wentz did

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 1>when Jonathan Taylor was Darby one. Do you think Will

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Levis can do what Carson Wentz was in Indianapolis. Carson

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 1>Wentz is so polarizing that way. Um, you know, I

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 1>guess if historically no would be the answer, he wouldn't

0:09:57.720 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>quite be at the Carson Wentz level. And I don't

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>have Wentz's number from twenty twenty one in front of me,

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>but I want to say he's through like twenty eight touchdowns,

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:05.959
<v Speaker 1>which is not likely for a rookie to get to

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and so probably not quite no. And so I don't

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that you can say, yeah, well, will

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Levis in his rookie especially him in particular, because he's

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>he's a very polar he is super polarizing quarterback. Yeah,

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that. I don't think he would spur

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 1>that to you. No, I don't, Yeah, I don't think so.

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I think John, I think John had. I feel like

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>when we were just watching that season when you finished

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>RB one, it's a lot of breakaway want runs like

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>something that I don't know well can be replicated. But

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:34.199
<v Speaker 1>then again, John Davis just a beast. When he's healthy,

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you know he's gonna be a top five back in

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:38.079
<v Speaker 1>the league. So I guess I'm I'm I'm a hold

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>on the RB three, right now let's see some more pieces,

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of get at that offense and maybe all a

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:45.559
<v Speaker 1>better decision. I wanted to get better value on Jonathan

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Taylor off the bad season. RB three is not the value. Yeah,

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>i think I'm out at RB three. I think I'm

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna let somebody else take him at pick three or

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>pick four of a draft. I'll take you know, I'll

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>take Travis Kelsey. There you go. I'll play it safe

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and go a different direction. Thank you, Tyler, and thank

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you for listening to Fantasy Football Weekly Micro addition. Back

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:09.679
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow with another player to break down. Do we preview

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the player? Should we do that? Let's do it. Let's

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:15.559
<v Speaker 1>talk about Derek Carr. New landing space for Derek Carr,

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>surrounded by young, talented weapons. It's very exciting. What do

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:24.079
<v Speaker 1>we think about Derek Carr's prospects twenty twenty three? Talk

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 1>to you tomorrow, everybody,