1 00:00:15,276 --> 00:00:25,956 Speaker 1: Pushkin, what's your biggest fear. I'd say the biggest fear 2 00:00:26,276 --> 00:00:30,036 Speaker 1: is something a mistake that I would make that would 3 00:00:30,116 --> 00:00:33,236 Speaker 1: damage my credibility to where people would not listen to 4 00:00:33,276 --> 00:00:39,116 Speaker 1: me when there's a tornado down. James Span meteorologist, maybe 5 00:00:39,156 --> 00:00:43,236 Speaker 1: Alabama's best known person aside from some football coaches. He's 6 00:00:43,276 --> 00:00:46,516 Speaker 1: all over TV talking about the weather, especially when the 7 00:00:46,556 --> 00:00:49,476 Speaker 1: weather might kill you. So this is a tornado emergency, 8 00:00:49,636 --> 00:00:52,116 Speaker 1: but the city's at Tuscaloosa and North Fort and the 9 00:00:52,156 --> 00:00:56,516 Speaker 1: campus of the University of Alabama. James is one of 10 00:00:56,556 --> 00:00:59,316 Speaker 1: those people who's never really had a job because he 11 00:00:59,396 --> 00:01:02,236 Speaker 1: found his calling. He once stayed on the air as 12 00:01:02,236 --> 00:01:04,636 Speaker 1: he watched a tornado make straight for his own home, 13 00:01:05,356 --> 00:01:08,396 Speaker 1: pleading with people to see the risk. If you're just 14 00:01:08,516 --> 00:01:11,996 Speaker 1: joining us, This is James Span with Taylor Serrallo mainly 15 00:01:12,076 --> 00:01:16,076 Speaker 1: chicken on my wife's she's okay and she's in the 16 00:01:16,116 --> 00:01:20,076 Speaker 1: tornado shelter. Okay, go ahead, Taylor. I'm sorry. I was 17 00:01:20,116 --> 00:01:22,236 Speaker 1: put on this planet to mitigate loss of life when 18 00:01:22,276 --> 00:01:25,956 Speaker 1: their tornadoes flying around here, and I have to be 19 00:01:26,116 --> 00:01:29,316 Speaker 1: very careful in what I say and what I do, 20 00:01:29,796 --> 00:01:34,196 Speaker 1: not just on the air, but on social media. And 21 00:01:34,436 --> 00:01:39,676 Speaker 1: in real life. To build trust with his audience, James 22 00:01:39,716 --> 00:01:43,556 Speaker 1: goes to incredible links. He's published a children's book called 23 00:01:43,996 --> 00:01:47,836 Speaker 1: Benny and Chipper Prepared Not Scared. He spends time in 24 00:01:47,876 --> 00:01:51,076 Speaker 1: dollar stores talking to people because the people who shop 25 00:01:51,076 --> 00:01:53,156 Speaker 1: in dollar stores are also the people who live in 26 00:01:53,156 --> 00:01:57,156 Speaker 1: trailer homes, the sort of homes that tornadoes obliterate. He 27 00:01:57,196 --> 00:02:01,316 Speaker 1: memorizes the names of Alabamians who've died in storms, people 28 00:02:01,356 --> 00:02:04,636 Speaker 1: he might have saved. There's lots of them. On a 29 00:02:04,676 --> 00:02:07,636 Speaker 1: single day back in April twenty eleven, a line of 30 00:02:07,676 --> 00:02:10,796 Speaker 1: tornadoes in Alabama killed two hundred and fifty three people. 31 00:02:11,676 --> 00:02:15,316 Speaker 1: I know their stories, I know their family members. I've 32 00:02:15,316 --> 00:02:18,036 Speaker 1: talked to many of them, and it's very motivating for me. 33 00:02:18,116 --> 00:02:20,796 Speaker 1: And that's my main job in life. It's to make 34 00:02:20,796 --> 00:02:25,276 Speaker 1: the warning process better with severe weather. He's doing all 35 00:02:25,356 --> 00:02:29,956 Speaker 1: he can to warn people, yet people still don't understand 36 00:02:29,996 --> 00:02:36,676 Speaker 1: what he's saying. I'm Michael Lewis. Welcome back to Against 37 00:02:36,756 --> 00:02:41,476 Speaker 1: the Rules, where we explore unfairness in American life by 38 00:02:41,516 --> 00:02:44,356 Speaker 1: looking at what's happened to various characters in American life. 39 00:02:45,276 --> 00:02:49,956 Speaker 1: This season is all about experts. Today, we're going to 40 00:02:49,996 --> 00:02:53,596 Speaker 1: explore the strange thing that's happened to experts. Not all experts, 41 00:02:53,596 --> 00:02:56,796 Speaker 1: a certain percentage of them, the experts who think and 42 00:02:56,956 --> 00:03:01,516 Speaker 1: speak in probabilities, who use data to forecast the likelihood 43 00:03:01,516 --> 00:03:05,076 Speaker 1: of this or that coming to pass. The experts who 44 00:03:05,116 --> 00:03:07,956 Speaker 1: can never be perfectly certain, and who risk our wrath 45 00:03:08,116 --> 00:03:23,476 Speaker 1: because we love thinking in absolutes. James Span has been 46 00:03:23,476 --> 00:03:26,036 Speaker 1: making and explaining weather forecast for the better part of 47 00:03:26,076 --> 00:03:29,396 Speaker 1: half a century. In that time, it's kind of incredible 48 00:03:29,436 --> 00:03:32,876 Speaker 1: how much has changed. So here's in nineteen seventy eight 49 00:03:32,916 --> 00:03:36,116 Speaker 1: forecast partly sunny tomorrow with a chance of showers in 50 00:03:36,156 --> 00:03:39,836 Speaker 1: the high of eighty. That's it. So today, under the 51 00:03:39,876 --> 00:03:43,396 Speaker 1: same circumstances, I'd say we'll have a pretty good bit 52 00:03:43,396 --> 00:03:46,236 Speaker 1: of sunshine between nine and eleven o'clock. After eleven o'clock 53 00:03:46,996 --> 00:03:49,276 Speaker 1: rain is likely between eleven and one. The chance of 54 00:03:49,316 --> 00:03:51,676 Speaker 1: any one spot getting wet during that two hour window 55 00:03:51,676 --> 00:03:53,996 Speaker 1: it's about seventy five percent. It's going to rain about 56 00:03:53,996 --> 00:03:56,236 Speaker 1: a half inch in most places. There could be some thunder. 57 00:03:56,556 --> 00:03:58,356 Speaker 1: Most of that should be out of here by two thirty. 58 00:03:58,356 --> 00:04:00,356 Speaker 1: After three o'clock, you're good to go. The sun breaks 59 00:04:00,356 --> 00:04:03,036 Speaker 1: back out a temperature should peek around eighty at one o'clock, 60 00:04:03,036 --> 00:04:05,836 Speaker 1: then falling back into the seventies by four o'clock. That's 61 00:04:05,836 --> 00:04:07,676 Speaker 1: the difference in what we can do now compared to 62 00:04:07,756 --> 00:04:10,676 Speaker 1: nineteen seventy eight. It's the prince between daylight and darkness. 63 00:04:10,956 --> 00:04:13,116 Speaker 1: If you go back to the beginning of your career, 64 00:04:13,436 --> 00:04:16,236 Speaker 1: were you encouraged to speak to the audience that way, like, 65 00:04:16,516 --> 00:04:18,876 Speaker 1: we don't know that much about this, this could be wrong. 66 00:04:19,476 --> 00:04:21,436 Speaker 1: Oh no, no, no, they didn't want you to say that. 67 00:04:21,516 --> 00:04:24,236 Speaker 1: I mean, coodn't you know. Back in the seventies, this 68 00:04:24,316 --> 00:04:26,316 Speaker 1: was when TV news was coming of age and I 69 00:04:26,516 --> 00:04:29,836 Speaker 1: witness news, you know, and they wanted to be this 70 00:04:30,076 --> 00:04:33,876 Speaker 1: godlike figure, you know on television. I was scared to 71 00:04:33,876 --> 00:04:37,916 Speaker 1: communicate uncertainty because that wasn't encouraged. We were the news, 72 00:04:38,036 --> 00:04:42,596 Speaker 1: the evening news, the Ron Burgundy newscast. Weather forecasts are 73 00:04:42,596 --> 00:04:47,036 Speaker 1: inherently uncertain, the where, the when, the how much. With 74 00:04:47,116 --> 00:04:49,156 Speaker 1: the current data we have, the best you can do 75 00:04:49,236 --> 00:04:52,596 Speaker 1: is judge the odds. But the odds have gotten much 76 00:04:52,676 --> 00:04:56,076 Speaker 1: more accurate over time. Back when James span was a 77 00:04:56,076 --> 00:04:59,476 Speaker 1: young meteorologist, he knew very little but tried to sound 78 00:04:59,476 --> 00:05:02,316 Speaker 1: like he knew a lot. Now that he knows a lot, 79 00:05:02,676 --> 00:05:06,316 Speaker 1: he works hard to explain what he doesn't know. You're 80 00:05:06,396 --> 00:05:09,796 Speaker 1: giving the audience more information and more new, honest information. 81 00:05:09,876 --> 00:05:13,916 Speaker 1: So it's more demanding on the audience, right it is. 82 00:05:14,236 --> 00:05:17,556 Speaker 1: And you know I hear this all the time. I 83 00:05:17,596 --> 00:05:19,076 Speaker 1: just want to know if it's going to rain tomorrow, 84 00:05:19,716 --> 00:05:23,156 Speaker 1: and they want a yes orno. They want that deterministic forecast, 85 00:05:24,196 --> 00:05:28,916 Speaker 1: deterministic as imperfectly predictable, which is something the weather still isn't. 86 00:05:30,076 --> 00:05:32,716 Speaker 1: When James Span started out, the ten day forecast was 87 00:05:32,796 --> 00:05:35,556 Speaker 1: no better than just guessing. Now it's a lot better. 88 00:05:36,396 --> 00:05:39,516 Speaker 1: But maybe the most obvious improvement, the one people really 89 00:05:39,556 --> 00:05:42,836 Speaker 1: should notice, has been in forecasters understanding of the kind 90 00:05:42,836 --> 00:05:46,076 Speaker 1: of weather that kills people. In nineteen seventy eight, we 91 00:05:46,156 --> 00:05:50,796 Speaker 1: were using nineteen fifty seven era radar and the old 92 00:05:51,156 --> 00:05:53,516 Speaker 1: black and white printouts of radar. It looked like somebody 93 00:05:53,516 --> 00:05:55,716 Speaker 1: barsed on a piece of paper, and so warnings. In 94 00:05:55,756 --> 00:05:58,356 Speaker 1: nineteen seventy eight, let's say we had a tornado down. 95 00:05:58,916 --> 00:06:01,116 Speaker 1: We didn't really know where it was, we had an idea, 96 00:06:01,196 --> 00:06:04,796 Speaker 1: so warnings were issued by an entire county. Tornadoes, even 97 00:06:04,836 --> 00:06:08,196 Speaker 1: the big tornadoes are small and counties are huge. So 98 00:06:08,316 --> 00:06:11,436 Speaker 1: here you are warning an entire county to get into 99 00:06:11,476 --> 00:06:14,716 Speaker 1: your safe place and do something where most people didn't 100 00:06:14,716 --> 00:06:18,276 Speaker 1: need to do anything. We're today we know literally within 101 00:06:18,356 --> 00:06:21,236 Speaker 1: maybe a few city blocks of where the tornado is located. Well, 102 00:06:21,276 --> 00:06:25,836 Speaker 1: so if I'm a consumer of tornado warnings, I get 103 00:06:25,876 --> 00:06:28,716 Speaker 1: a much more precise warning, and I do I get 104 00:06:29,036 --> 00:06:31,276 Speaker 1: a more advanced warning. Am I likely to get it? 105 00:06:31,356 --> 00:06:34,556 Speaker 1: Get more more time to prepare for this thing? Yes? 106 00:06:34,596 --> 00:06:37,316 Speaker 1: They have. Average lead time here is about twelve to 107 00:06:37,316 --> 00:06:39,796 Speaker 1: fifteen minutes, and the average lead time back in the 108 00:06:39,836 --> 00:06:43,676 Speaker 1: seventies was zero to three minutes. So we've come a 109 00:06:43,716 --> 00:06:46,436 Speaker 1: long way, and we don't use counties anymore. We use small, small, 110 00:06:46,476 --> 00:06:50,356 Speaker 1: small segments of counties. Geometric shapes, polygons. Anybody that knows 111 00:06:50,436 --> 00:06:53,516 Speaker 1: James span I've said this over and over. Respect the polygon, 112 00:06:53,556 --> 00:06:56,756 Speaker 1: and if you're in it, you do something. Respect the polygon. 113 00:06:57,156 --> 00:06:59,436 Speaker 1: And if you're in the polygon, you respect the polygon. 114 00:06:59,596 --> 00:07:05,236 Speaker 1: Respect polygon. Every storm today will mean business. Respect A 115 00:07:05,396 --> 00:07:08,396 Speaker 1: James Spans superfan did a remix of his famous frame 116 00:07:09,796 --> 00:07:17,116 Speaker 1: a polygon. I love this, of course, but it also 117 00:07:17,196 --> 00:07:21,756 Speaker 1: raises a question, why respect the Polygon instead of just 118 00:07:22,116 --> 00:07:27,556 Speaker 1: respect what I say. It's weird. If the James Span 119 00:07:27,716 --> 00:07:30,836 Speaker 1: back in nineteen seventy eight had been as accurate as 120 00:07:30,956 --> 00:07:35,676 Speaker 1: James Span is now, he'd have endured hail storms of gratitude, 121 00:07:36,476 --> 00:07:41,836 Speaker 1: hurricanes of appreciation, tornadoes of awe. But that's not the 122 00:07:41,836 --> 00:07:46,836 Speaker 1: wather he now lives with. Hello friends, this is James Span. 123 00:07:46,956 --> 00:07:50,476 Speaker 1: It's time to read some mean tweets. And thanks to 124 00:07:50,516 --> 00:07:52,396 Speaker 1: all of you for sending in the mean tweets. I 125 00:07:52,436 --> 00:07:55,716 Speaker 1: really appreciate from from my heart. You cost the people 126 00:07:55,756 --> 00:07:59,876 Speaker 1: in the state millions of dollars by your boop poor 127 00:08:00,236 --> 00:08:05,996 Speaker 1: boot forecasts. I woke up today expecting snow. I blame you, James. 128 00:08:06,076 --> 00:08:10,596 Speaker 1: I got my dogs all excited for nothing. James, either 129 00:08:10,636 --> 00:08:15,356 Speaker 1: you're the worst meteorologist I've ever layer my eyes on, 130 00:08:16,516 --> 00:08:18,676 Speaker 1: or you have the worst luck at predicting the weather. 131 00:08:18,756 --> 00:08:22,756 Speaker 1: I think it's time to step down. Brother. The only 132 00:08:22,796 --> 00:08:26,636 Speaker 1: difference between James Span and every other meteorologist is that 133 00:08:26,756 --> 00:08:30,036 Speaker 1: James reads his mean tweets on the air. Just to 134 00:08:30,076 --> 00:08:32,876 Speaker 1: show you where we stand, my producer called up some 135 00:08:32,916 --> 00:08:36,116 Speaker 1: weather tweeters. Here's the kinds of things that people have 136 00:08:36,196 --> 00:08:41,316 Speaker 1: to say weather forecasting is the only job you can 137 00:08:41,396 --> 00:08:43,716 Speaker 1: have where you can be wrong fifty percent of the 138 00:08:43,756 --> 00:08:47,276 Speaker 1: time and still make thousands of dollars. If we were 139 00:08:47,276 --> 00:08:51,076 Speaker 1: wrong fifty percent in our jobs, we probably would be fired. 140 00:08:51,556 --> 00:08:55,076 Speaker 1: I know nothing about meteorologists, but I know that you 141 00:08:55,116 --> 00:08:57,636 Speaker 1: know they always wrong. I'm one of those people that 142 00:08:57,716 --> 00:09:01,396 Speaker 1: actually vainly looks at the weather forecast because nine times 143 00:09:01,436 --> 00:09:06,476 Speaker 1: attend it's different from the forecast. As technology improves, they 144 00:09:06,476 --> 00:09:13,116 Speaker 1: don't improve. The continue to be it's smine boggling. You're 145 00:09:13,156 --> 00:09:15,756 Speaker 1: going to get the hate, not necessarily because of your 146 00:09:15,836 --> 00:09:18,476 Speaker 1: missed weather forecast, but just because of who you are. 147 00:09:19,156 --> 00:09:22,156 Speaker 1: You're a you're a weather person, and you know you're 148 00:09:22,196 --> 00:09:25,796 Speaker 1: a stooge. You're a you don't deserve to be on 149 00:09:25,836 --> 00:09:29,316 Speaker 1: the planet. You shouldn't be breathing air. People have that 150 00:09:29,356 --> 00:09:32,676 Speaker 1: attitude towards weather people. Oh listen. So I cut off 151 00:09:32,676 --> 00:09:36,156 Speaker 1: a basketball game on Christmas Day in twenty fifteen, and 152 00:09:36,236 --> 00:09:38,636 Speaker 1: we had a tornado coming up on the southwest part 153 00:09:38,636 --> 00:09:40,196 Speaker 1: of the city here. It could have killed a lot 154 00:09:40,196 --> 00:09:42,956 Speaker 1: of people, So we had to cover up about twenty 155 00:09:42,996 --> 00:09:45,996 Speaker 1: twenty five minutes of that game, and nobody lost their life. 156 00:09:46,036 --> 00:09:49,236 Speaker 1: The warning system worked beautifully but this is Christmas Day. 157 00:09:49,356 --> 00:09:51,996 Speaker 1: Joy to the world, peace on earth, goodwill toward men. 158 00:09:52,436 --> 00:09:54,476 Speaker 1: The first email I got, you know what it said. 159 00:09:54,476 --> 00:09:57,876 Speaker 1: It said you should have been aborted by a coat hanger. 160 00:09:59,156 --> 00:10:01,836 Speaker 1: So this is the stuff I deal with. I mean, 161 00:10:01,876 --> 00:10:05,396 Speaker 1: I'm amazed he still goes on the air. His forecast 162 00:10:05,676 --> 00:10:08,076 Speaker 1: just keep getting better and better, but the job of 163 00:10:08,116 --> 00:10:11,156 Speaker 1: being a meteorology just keeps getting worse and worse. But 164 00:10:11,196 --> 00:10:13,236 Speaker 1: I till these young people, you know, you better have 165 00:10:13,276 --> 00:10:14,996 Speaker 1: a thick skin when you get out of here and 166 00:10:15,036 --> 00:10:16,996 Speaker 1: you get your first job, because they're going to come 167 00:10:17,036 --> 00:10:22,476 Speaker 1: after you when you found that first forecast up. Back 168 00:10:22,516 --> 00:10:24,716 Speaker 1: in an earlier season of this show, I talked about 169 00:10:24,716 --> 00:10:28,756 Speaker 1: the problem of referees and a strange phenomenon. A lot 170 00:10:28,756 --> 00:10:31,316 Speaker 1: of refs are getting better at their jobs. They have 171 00:10:31,396 --> 00:10:34,436 Speaker 1: new tools, they're better train they get better feedbacks, they 172 00:10:34,436 --> 00:10:37,556 Speaker 1: are less likely to repeat mistakes. I mean, there's just 173 00:10:37,756 --> 00:10:40,076 Speaker 1: no way that the refs in pro sports are less 174 00:10:40,116 --> 00:10:42,596 Speaker 1: accurate than they were forty years ago when there was 175 00:10:42,596 --> 00:10:45,436 Speaker 1: no replay, less training and all the refs got hired 176 00:10:45,476 --> 00:10:48,236 Speaker 1: from the same old boys club, But they didn't used 177 00:10:48,236 --> 00:10:51,956 Speaker 1: to need police escorts from the arenas. Now they do. 178 00:10:54,676 --> 00:10:58,796 Speaker 1: In December of twenty twenty one, tornadoes ripped through Kentucky. 179 00:10:59,596 --> 00:11:02,996 Speaker 1: Weather experts gave people lots of warning, So this is 180 00:11:03,036 --> 00:11:07,076 Speaker 1: just an explosive severe weather set up, and that's the 181 00:11:07,116 --> 00:11:10,156 Speaker 1: outlook that we have heading our way, especially after midnight 182 00:11:10,196 --> 00:11:12,876 Speaker 1: through about eight o'clock in the morning. We definitely need 183 00:11:12,876 --> 00:11:16,276 Speaker 1: to stay aware of the weather game. Meteorologists like this 184 00:11:16,316 --> 00:11:20,476 Speaker 1: guy on WHASTV and Louisville were better than they'd ever been. 185 00:11:20,956 --> 00:11:23,196 Speaker 1: Make sure you have a way to wake up if 186 00:11:23,236 --> 00:11:25,796 Speaker 1: a warning is issued like this one that we have. 187 00:11:26,236 --> 00:11:29,596 Speaker 1: That night in Kentucky, at least seventy seven people were killed, 188 00:11:29,996 --> 00:11:32,356 Speaker 1: more people than have ever died from a weather event 189 00:11:32,396 --> 00:11:35,236 Speaker 1: in the state's history. All people had to do to 190 00:11:35,276 --> 00:11:38,956 Speaker 1: survive was listened to the experts, and still a lot 191 00:11:38,996 --> 00:11:50,436 Speaker 1: of them didn't. I think that having data is a 192 00:11:50,516 --> 00:11:56,476 Speaker 1: really recent phenomenon, Rebecca Golden, math professor at George Mason University. 193 00:11:56,636 --> 00:11:59,876 Speaker 1: We didn't have data about how things were, we didn't 194 00:11:59,916 --> 00:12:03,636 Speaker 1: record what happened previously. Then it's only really recently that 195 00:12:03,716 --> 00:12:08,076 Speaker 1: we think maybe our lived experiences could be in part 196 00:12:08,116 --> 00:12:11,636 Speaker 1: based on something probabilistic, Like a lot of people who 197 00:12:11,676 --> 00:12:15,556 Speaker 1: are good at math Rebecca noticed the confusion and wrongheadedness 198 00:12:15,596 --> 00:12:18,716 Speaker 1: of people who weren't. She also noticed that even when 199 00:12:18,716 --> 00:12:23,116 Speaker 1: statistics and these new big piles of data were properly explained, 200 00:12:23,876 --> 00:12:26,716 Speaker 1: people didn't really grasp their meaning. People have a hard 201 00:12:26,716 --> 00:12:29,676 Speaker 1: time being convinced by data. It's just that they don't 202 00:12:29,756 --> 00:12:33,436 Speaker 1: think that their experiences is in line with that data, 203 00:12:33,636 --> 00:12:37,476 Speaker 1: and so they dismiss it, or they have other experiences 204 00:12:37,516 --> 00:12:39,996 Speaker 1: that tell them that there are reasons to be skeptical 205 00:12:40,036 --> 00:12:42,476 Speaker 1: of the source of that data or the source of 206 00:12:42,516 --> 00:12:45,276 Speaker 1: the statements that are relying on the data. The problem 207 00:12:45,396 --> 00:12:47,596 Speaker 1: isn't just in the quality of the information we have 208 00:12:47,676 --> 00:12:50,356 Speaker 1: access to. It's in the way we make sense of 209 00:12:50,356 --> 00:12:54,676 Speaker 1: the world. There's a very large segment of the population 210 00:12:54,996 --> 00:12:59,316 Speaker 1: who are really struggle with basic mathematics. So people are 211 00:12:59,356 --> 00:13:02,836 Speaker 1: making mistakes because they don't think in probabilities. I think 212 00:13:02,836 --> 00:13:07,156 Speaker 1: that's right. Rebecca actually helped to start an organization called 213 00:13:07,276 --> 00:13:12,236 Speaker 1: stats to expose the statistical mistakes made by journalists. She 214 00:13:12,356 --> 00:13:15,356 Speaker 1: thought that if statistics were conveyed more accurately to the public, 215 00:13:15,756 --> 00:13:19,156 Speaker 1: the public would see the world more clearly. Eventually, she 216 00:13:19,236 --> 00:13:22,396 Speaker 1: decided she was wasting her time because there was this 217 00:13:22,596 --> 00:13:27,756 Speaker 1: bigger problem how people comprehend statistics, even when they're accurate. 218 00:13:29,036 --> 00:13:32,196 Speaker 1: Why is it that people don't think in probabilities, like 219 00:13:32,276 --> 00:13:38,236 Speaker 1: the world's probabilistic. Why are our minds so deterministic? It's 220 00:13:38,276 --> 00:13:41,756 Speaker 1: kind of a philosophical question. I think we're hardwired to believe. 221 00:13:41,796 --> 00:13:45,716 Speaker 1: I think it helps us make decisions without being stressed 222 00:13:45,716 --> 00:13:49,956 Speaker 1: about those decisions. It helps us act with certainty and 223 00:13:50,196 --> 00:13:55,556 Speaker 1: make decisions so we don't hesitate too much and think 224 00:13:55,596 --> 00:13:59,236 Speaker 1: too hard. In the savannah, we don't say that's probably 225 00:13:59,276 --> 00:14:05,916 Speaker 1: a lion, right, we just run. But to just run 226 00:14:06,516 --> 00:14:08,796 Speaker 1: is less and less a viable way to move through 227 00:14:08,836 --> 00:14:13,156 Speaker 1: the world world because this relatively new thing called data 228 00:14:13,276 --> 00:14:17,196 Speaker 1: has given us a far shrewder alternative. Everywhere you turn, 229 00:14:17,276 --> 00:14:20,516 Speaker 1: you find someone analyzing data to generate the same sort 230 00:14:20,516 --> 00:14:23,676 Speaker 1: of probabilistic understanding of the world that weather people do. 231 00:14:25,556 --> 00:14:29,356 Speaker 1: I kind of come from this world of like, you know, 232 00:14:29,476 --> 00:14:33,636 Speaker 1: kind of quantz and like baseball geeks and like poker players. 233 00:14:34,396 --> 00:14:37,196 Speaker 1: That's Nate Silver. He got swept up in the nineteen 234 00:14:37,276 --> 00:14:41,076 Speaker 1: nineties by the statistical revolution in baseball. And I think 235 00:14:41,076 --> 00:14:43,716 Speaker 1: I'm kind of like one of the relatively people who's 236 00:14:43,796 --> 00:14:46,116 Speaker 1: kind of escaped, so to speak, from that world in 237 00:14:46,196 --> 00:14:49,596 Speaker 1: the like mainstream society. Back in two thousand and seven, 238 00:14:50,196 --> 00:14:54,076 Speaker 1: Nate quit forecasting the future of young baseball players. He 239 00:14:54,196 --> 00:14:57,596 Speaker 1: began to forecast elections instead. It's sort of what you're 240 00:14:57,596 --> 00:14:59,916 Speaker 1: doing is actually accepting the possibility that maybe you can 241 00:14:59,996 --> 00:15:03,516 Speaker 1: predict something that's right. But yeah, it's like kind of 242 00:15:03,516 --> 00:15:06,476 Speaker 1: like saying, hey, look, we built an audience for this 243 00:15:06,596 --> 00:15:11,836 Speaker 1: in in baseball, and so politics is still in the 244 00:15:11,876 --> 00:15:14,716 Speaker 1: Stone Age, and so there must be kind of an 245 00:15:14,716 --> 00:15:17,876 Speaker 1: audience for some politics too. When you turn your attention 246 00:15:17,916 --> 00:15:22,876 Speaker 1: to politics, at what point are you aware that the 247 00:15:22,956 --> 00:15:28,436 Speaker 1: expertise in political forecasting is sort of limited, that there's 248 00:15:28,476 --> 00:15:32,596 Speaker 1: kind of an opportunity. I mean I had an intuition 249 00:15:33,476 --> 00:15:36,196 Speaker 1: from that from the very beginning in politics, I mean, 250 00:15:36,196 --> 00:15:39,196 Speaker 1: the campaigns have to be fairly smart and data driven 251 00:15:39,236 --> 00:15:41,596 Speaker 1: about they were targeting. But like, but the media was 252 00:15:41,636 --> 00:15:46,596 Speaker 1: all about kind of narratives. It was really quite bad 253 00:15:46,636 --> 00:15:48,636 Speaker 1: in two thousand and eight. Right. It's really like a 254 00:15:48,676 --> 00:15:51,436 Speaker 1: bunch of like, you know, old white men getting together 255 00:15:51,476 --> 00:15:54,836 Speaker 1: and kind of deciding based on, you know, what their 256 00:15:54,876 --> 00:15:59,836 Speaker 1: friends think, kind of what the narratives should be in 257 00:15:59,876 --> 00:16:03,156 Speaker 1: the presidential primaries of two thousand and eight, Nate Silver 258 00:16:03,276 --> 00:16:07,156 Speaker 1: gave an upstart senator named Barack Obama a much better 259 00:16:07,236 --> 00:16:10,316 Speaker 1: chance than most everyone else did. In the general election. 260 00:16:10,356 --> 00:16:13,196 Speaker 1: He nailed not just the outcome, but the result in 261 00:16:13,276 --> 00:16:17,356 Speaker 1: every state, plus the precise number of votes Obama received 262 00:16:17,396 --> 00:16:21,116 Speaker 1: in the Electoral College. People paid more attention to what 263 00:16:21,236 --> 00:16:24,276 Speaker 1: Nate had done than how he had done it. He'd 264 00:16:24,276 --> 00:16:26,956 Speaker 1: simply use polling data rather than his gut or some 265 00:16:27,036 --> 00:16:31,396 Speaker 1: anecdote about some Iowa farmer. The polling data might not 266 00:16:31,476 --> 00:16:34,276 Speaker 1: be perfect, but it was better than every other source 267 00:16:34,276 --> 00:16:38,836 Speaker 1: of information, and they never made outright predictions. He issued 268 00:16:38,876 --> 00:16:44,236 Speaker 1: political forecasts like weather forecasts, with probabilities attached to them. 269 00:16:44,276 --> 00:16:46,756 Speaker 1: Going into election day of two thousand and eight, he'd 270 00:16:46,796 --> 00:16:49,876 Speaker 1: given Obama a ninety point nine percent chance of winning. 271 00:16:50,756 --> 00:16:53,236 Speaker 1: I mean, the irather thing about it is like like 272 00:16:53,276 --> 00:16:55,716 Speaker 1: there was always a chance that we would be wrong, 273 00:16:56,036 --> 00:16:59,036 Speaker 1: you know what I mean, and probably never heard from 274 00:16:59,036 --> 00:17:05,596 Speaker 1: politics again, potentially. Instead, Nate became basically overnight the country's 275 00:17:05,676 --> 00:17:10,476 Speaker 1: leading political forecaster because his expert piece was superior to 276 00:17:10,516 --> 00:17:16,836 Speaker 1: the storytelling it replaced. Nate Silver is his name, fortune 277 00:17:16,836 --> 00:17:23,276 Speaker 1: telling is his game. He's a celebrity statistician. Please welcome 278 00:17:23,356 --> 00:17:28,276 Speaker 1: Nate Silver. That's right, Nate Silver's the good will hunting 279 00:17:28,316 --> 00:17:32,836 Speaker 1: of political prognosticasia. There's a difference between weather forecasting or 280 00:17:32,916 --> 00:17:37,276 Speaker 1: sports statistics and politics, a difference more of degree than kind, 281 00:17:37,636 --> 00:17:40,956 Speaker 1: but still a difference. The people who celebrated Nate Silver 282 00:17:41,516 --> 00:17:45,516 Speaker 1: really really didn't understand how to judge him. His better 283 00:17:45,556 --> 00:17:47,836 Speaker 1: insights into pulling data had allowed him to see that 284 00:17:47,876 --> 00:17:51,316 Speaker 1: Obama was basically always doing better than political pundits thought 285 00:17:51,316 --> 00:17:54,236 Speaker 1: he was doing, but there was still no law that 286 00:17:54,276 --> 00:17:57,596 Speaker 1: said Obama had to win. Polling data is a bit 287 00:17:57,636 --> 00:18:00,876 Speaker 1: like the data that card counters get in blackjack. It's 288 00:18:00,916 --> 00:18:03,836 Speaker 1: a lot better than having no data at all. It 289 00:18:03,876 --> 00:18:07,236 Speaker 1: helps you to predict what comes next, but even card 290 00:18:07,276 --> 00:18:10,956 Speaker 1: counters lose lots of hands. And here we go, ladies 291 00:18:10,996 --> 00:18:14,036 Speaker 1: and gentlemen, welcome to Decision Night in America. Here at 292 00:18:14,156 --> 00:18:17,516 Speaker 1: NBC's Democracy Point, which brings us to two thou sixteen. 293 00:18:20,676 --> 00:18:24,636 Speaker 1: Nate Silver now had an enormous following. Once again, the 294 00:18:24,676 --> 00:18:28,436 Speaker 1: pundits gave Hillary Clinton better odds than the polls. On 295 00:18:28,556 --> 00:18:32,116 Speaker 1: election day, Nate gave Donald Trump a roughly thirty percent 296 00:18:32,196 --> 00:18:35,636 Speaker 1: chance of winning at the time that was a radical call. 297 00:18:35,996 --> 00:18:38,436 Speaker 1: A few traditional pundits thought Trump had that much of 298 00:18:38,436 --> 00:18:41,356 Speaker 1: a shot. Yeah, I guess question, guys, are we post 299 00:18:41,476 --> 00:18:44,836 Speaker 1: Nate Silver, are we pulled out? Well? They've been wrong, 300 00:18:45,116 --> 00:18:48,036 Speaker 1: not only just wrong, they're just they're superfluous. And at 301 00:18:48,076 --> 00:18:49,596 Speaker 1: the point where they just that's when you kind of 302 00:18:49,596 --> 00:18:54,116 Speaker 1: begin to realize that, like, the way you define success 303 00:18:54,156 --> 00:18:56,076 Speaker 1: and the way other people look at your forecast as 304 00:18:56,116 --> 00:18:59,596 Speaker 1: being successful are very different. And also because it wasn't 305 00:18:59,636 --> 00:19:02,636 Speaker 1: just that, like we got criticized after twenty sixteen for 306 00:19:02,756 --> 00:19:05,876 Speaker 1: having quote unquote been wrong, it was also in the 307 00:19:05,956 --> 00:19:07,916 Speaker 1: roup twentyteen people were actually mad at us for not 308 00:19:08,396 --> 00:19:13,516 Speaker 1: being confident enough in Clinton's chances. Right, Nate never claimed 309 00:19:13,516 --> 00:19:16,436 Speaker 1: to have some mystical ability to call a presidential election, 310 00:19:17,276 --> 00:19:20,716 Speaker 1: and assigning probabilities is not the same as taking sides. 311 00:19:21,636 --> 00:19:23,836 Speaker 1: Yelling at him for saying that Donald Trump had a 312 00:19:23,876 --> 00:19:26,636 Speaker 1: thirty percent chance of winning was like being mad at 313 00:19:26,636 --> 00:19:28,796 Speaker 1: the weather man for saying there was a thirty percent 314 00:19:28,876 --> 00:19:32,476 Speaker 1: chance of rain and then getting mad all over again 315 00:19:32,796 --> 00:19:35,396 Speaker 1: after it rains. I'm gonna get myself in a little 316 00:19:35,396 --> 00:19:38,356 Speaker 1: bit of trouble for saying this, right, But like people 317 00:19:38,596 --> 00:19:45,716 Speaker 1: like me really care about being right quote unquote for 318 00:19:45,756 --> 00:19:48,596 Speaker 1: the intrinsic value of like making a good forecast as 319 00:19:48,596 --> 00:19:56,476 Speaker 1: opposed to like influencing the narrative, if you will, Okay, 320 00:19:56,556 --> 00:19:59,996 Speaker 1: so I would love because it would educate me. How 321 00:20:00,036 --> 00:20:05,356 Speaker 1: do you evaluate a probabilistic a forecast? What's the right 322 00:20:05,396 --> 00:20:10,156 Speaker 1: way for people to judge Nate's Silver Expert. The right 323 00:20:10,196 --> 00:20:13,636 Speaker 1: way is if you take a whole bunch of forecasts 324 00:20:13,636 --> 00:20:17,316 Speaker 1: that we've made and look at how they've done collectively. Right, So, 325 00:20:17,556 --> 00:20:20,476 Speaker 1: let's say you made one hundred forecasts where the favorite 326 00:20:20,516 --> 00:20:22,756 Speaker 1: had a seventy percent chance of winning. Look at that 327 00:20:22,796 --> 00:20:26,636 Speaker 1: group of forecasts, and was it true that the favorite 328 00:20:26,716 --> 00:20:29,836 Speaker 1: actually won about seventy percent at a time? Right? The 329 00:20:29,836 --> 00:20:33,316 Speaker 1: slip side of that is that like it does mean that, like, 330 00:20:33,996 --> 00:20:37,636 Speaker 1: you can tell very little from anyone prediction. I mean, 331 00:20:37,676 --> 00:20:41,356 Speaker 1: unless you're like, unless you're very very close to one 332 00:20:41,396 --> 00:20:46,156 Speaker 1: hundred zero percent, right, then one prediction alone won't tell 333 00:20:46,196 --> 00:20:51,076 Speaker 1: you that much. Experts have gotten better, but they've also 334 00:20:51,156 --> 00:20:54,156 Speaker 1: gotten harder to judge, so hard that you need an 335 00:20:54,196 --> 00:20:57,356 Speaker 1: expert to judge them. And that's a problem, right, I Mean, 336 00:20:57,636 --> 00:21:00,116 Speaker 1: who's going to go to the trouble of evaluating hundreds 337 00:21:00,116 --> 00:21:03,076 Speaker 1: of Nate Silver's forecasts. And while it's true that he's 338 00:21:03,076 --> 00:21:06,436 Speaker 1: made thousands of election forecasts, he hasn't made thousands of 339 00:21:06,476 --> 00:21:10,396 Speaker 1: forecasts for presidential elections. Most people don't even think about 340 00:21:10,396 --> 00:21:13,556 Speaker 1: elections or forecasts or anything else the way Nate Silver does. 341 00:21:14,276 --> 00:21:17,716 Speaker 1: Most people don't even speak his language. I actually think 342 00:21:17,756 --> 00:21:21,596 Speaker 1: that the word uncertainty is used in English in a 343 00:21:21,716 --> 00:21:27,276 Speaker 1: very different way than uncertainty is used in statistics. Rebecca 344 00:21:27,316 --> 00:21:30,996 Speaker 1: Golden again, So when we talk about uncertainty and statistics, 345 00:21:31,636 --> 00:21:34,436 Speaker 1: we might say something about a confidence interval, or we 346 00:21:34,516 --> 00:21:37,756 Speaker 1: might use a pee value. I'm not really sure you 347 00:21:37,796 --> 00:21:40,076 Speaker 1: want this on your podcast, Like, maybe that's a little 348 00:21:40,116 --> 00:21:47,236 Speaker 1: bit too technical. It might be better to trying to 349 00:21:47,276 --> 00:21:49,596 Speaker 1: think of how it might be better to talk about 350 00:21:49,676 --> 00:21:53,356 Speaker 1: uncertainty for your Well, this is the root of the matter. So, 351 00:21:53,516 --> 00:21:56,436 Speaker 1: because it's not just my podcast listeners who are cut 352 00:21:56,476 --> 00:22:00,116 Speaker 1: above the average human beings, it's like, how the American 353 00:22:00,236 --> 00:22:05,116 Speaker 1: public understands uncertainty? How do you convey it? I think 354 00:22:05,116 --> 00:22:07,476 Speaker 1: the best way to talk about it is to actually 355 00:22:08,356 --> 00:22:13,236 Speaker 1: put it with specific numbers, Like instead of talking percentages, 356 00:22:13,636 --> 00:22:17,996 Speaker 1: let's talk about numbers instead of ten percent, say one 357 00:22:18,076 --> 00:22:21,236 Speaker 1: in ten, that kind of thing. But there's a much 358 00:22:21,356 --> 00:22:26,796 Speaker 1: bigger problem behind all this, an emotional problem. It comes 359 00:22:26,796 --> 00:22:30,676 Speaker 1: from us wanting certainty in situations where certainty just doesn't exist. 360 00:22:31,636 --> 00:22:34,196 Speaker 1: If the weatherman says is an eighty percent chance of 361 00:22:34,276 --> 00:22:37,996 Speaker 1: rain and it doesn't rain, the people on the receiving 362 00:22:38,076 --> 00:22:40,116 Speaker 1: end of the forecast don't say, oh, that was one 363 00:22:40,116 --> 00:22:41,956 Speaker 1: of the twenty percent of that was one of the 364 00:22:41,996 --> 00:22:43,436 Speaker 1: times when it wasn't going to right. They say the 365 00:22:43,476 --> 00:22:46,756 Speaker 1: expert doesn't know what he's talking about. So the inability 366 00:22:46,796 --> 00:22:51,476 Speaker 1: to think in terms of probabilities also becomes an inability 367 00:22:51,516 --> 00:22:57,596 Speaker 1: to evaluate the experts. There's a huge amount of inability 368 00:22:57,636 --> 00:23:01,996 Speaker 1: to evaluate who is an expert, and yeah, it costs lives, 369 00:23:02,076 --> 00:23:06,236 Speaker 1: it really does. A new kind of expert appears on 370 00:23:06,276 --> 00:23:09,356 Speaker 1: the scene, an expert who works with these new big 371 00:23:09,356 --> 00:23:14,356 Speaker 1: piles of data, an expert who thinks improbabilities, an expert 372 00:23:14,396 --> 00:23:19,036 Speaker 1: who admits to being uncertain. These new experts are clearly 373 00:23:19,076 --> 00:23:22,876 Speaker 1: better than the experts they replaced, and yet people treat 374 00:23:22,916 --> 00:23:26,716 Speaker 1: them as if they're worse and neglect their advice, even 375 00:23:26,796 --> 00:23:30,276 Speaker 1: when their lives depend on it. We who depend on 376 00:23:30,316 --> 00:23:32,996 Speaker 1: the experts still want them to have a definitive answer. 377 00:23:33,716 --> 00:23:37,516 Speaker 1: Either it will reign or it won't. Trump either will 378 00:23:37,596 --> 00:23:40,876 Speaker 1: win or he won't. But that's not the nature of 379 00:23:40,916 --> 00:23:44,116 Speaker 1: the world we live in, and we're having some trouble 380 00:23:44,196 --> 00:23:53,956 Speaker 1: accepting that fact. The more you look for it, the 381 00:23:53,956 --> 00:23:56,876 Speaker 1: more you see this problem. We've been talking about the 382 00:23:56,956 --> 00:23:59,596 Speaker 1: problem of the experts getting better yet being treated as 383 00:23:59,636 --> 00:24:02,476 Speaker 1: if they've gotten worse, a problem that leads to a 384 00:24:02,476 --> 00:24:05,636 Speaker 1: lot of mystifying behavior, like what's gone on in the 385 00:24:05,676 --> 00:24:11,356 Speaker 1: past two years inside the American healthcare system. I definitely 386 00:24:11,476 --> 00:24:14,876 Speaker 1: saw a lot of this coming. Alison Fearing is a 387 00:24:14,956 --> 00:24:19,036 Speaker 1: nurse at Rush Copley Medical Center in Aurora, Illinois. I 388 00:24:19,076 --> 00:24:21,796 Speaker 1: can't tell you how many times I've had somebody coming 389 00:24:21,836 --> 00:24:25,396 Speaker 1: and say I have this because I read X, Y 390 00:24:25,476 --> 00:24:28,236 Speaker 1: and Z on WebMD, so I know that that's what's 391 00:24:28,236 --> 00:24:30,036 Speaker 1: going on, and it's like, well, there's a lot more 392 00:24:30,076 --> 00:24:32,876 Speaker 1: that goes into it that we need to work up further, 393 00:24:33,076 --> 00:24:36,156 Speaker 1: because there are also other things that this could be 394 00:24:36,396 --> 00:24:39,036 Speaker 1: and we won't know this until we diagnose it with 395 00:24:39,836 --> 00:24:42,836 Speaker 1: lab work or a cat scan or whatever. Has this 396 00:24:42,916 --> 00:24:46,916 Speaker 1: been going on your whole career? I would say it's 397 00:24:46,916 --> 00:24:51,276 Speaker 1: definitely gotten worse over the past five years or so. 398 00:24:51,436 --> 00:24:54,676 Speaker 1: I think prior to that there was a bit of it, 399 00:24:54,756 --> 00:24:58,036 Speaker 1: but definitely not to the extent that there is now. 400 00:24:59,276 --> 00:25:02,116 Speaker 1: Modern medicine is one of the great miracles of our age. 401 00:25:02,276 --> 00:25:04,356 Speaker 1: If you went to a doctor in the nineteenth century, 402 00:25:04,356 --> 00:25:06,276 Speaker 1: he was more likely to kill you than cure you. 403 00:25:07,356 --> 00:25:10,436 Speaker 1: Now he's vastly more likely to cure you, and the 404 00:25:10,516 --> 00:25:14,116 Speaker 1: odds of that get better with each passing day. Do 405 00:25:14,156 --> 00:25:16,956 Speaker 1: you think there's anything that, if it happened to me 406 00:25:17,036 --> 00:25:19,636 Speaker 1: that required me to go to the emergency room, that 407 00:25:19,756 --> 00:25:24,076 Speaker 1: I'd be better off forty years ago than now. Honestly, no, 408 00:25:24,196 --> 00:25:26,276 Speaker 1: I really can't think of a single thing, just because 409 00:25:26,356 --> 00:25:30,276 Speaker 1: we have so much technology. At first glance, she's not 410 00:25:30,436 --> 00:25:34,756 Speaker 1: really like James Span or Nate Silver. Doctors and nurses 411 00:25:34,836 --> 00:25:40,796 Speaker 1: don't usually speak in probabilities, but her expertise is essentially probabilistic. 412 00:25:41,556 --> 00:25:44,756 Speaker 1: Behind her is a world of medical science that's calculating 413 00:25:44,796 --> 00:25:48,076 Speaker 1: the odds all the time, the odds that you have 414 00:25:48,156 --> 00:25:51,196 Speaker 1: this disease as opposed to that one, the odds that 415 00:25:51,276 --> 00:25:54,956 Speaker 1: this treatment will work versus that one. Every year, Gallup 416 00:25:54,996 --> 00:25:58,436 Speaker 1: publishes polls that show nursing as America's most trusted profession. 417 00:25:59,156 --> 00:26:01,316 Speaker 1: But every year the number of people who say they 418 00:26:01,316 --> 00:26:06,796 Speaker 1: trust nurses and doctors, that number keeps falling. Alison sees 419 00:26:06,836 --> 00:26:08,676 Speaker 1: it in the number of patients who argue with a 420 00:26:08,756 --> 00:26:13,396 Speaker 1: diagnosis or treatment. I for one, wouldn't like not ever 421 00:26:13,676 --> 00:26:16,596 Speaker 1: like go to my mechanic with my car and be like, oh, 422 00:26:16,676 --> 00:26:19,356 Speaker 1: I know it's you know whatever, because I know nothing 423 00:26:19,396 --> 00:26:22,716 Speaker 1: about cars, Like I know nothing, and so it's just 424 00:26:22,836 --> 00:26:26,796 Speaker 1: really wild for me to see that in healthcare, because 425 00:26:27,476 --> 00:26:31,316 Speaker 1: a human body is so significantly more complicated than a car. 426 00:26:31,756 --> 00:26:33,796 Speaker 1: If I went on Facebook and I said, if you 427 00:26:33,836 --> 00:26:35,836 Speaker 1: go jump off the Bay Bridge, you'll fly and it'll 428 00:26:35,876 --> 00:26:37,956 Speaker 1: be the greatest experience of your life, there are a 429 00:26:37,996 --> 00:26:39,836 Speaker 1: whole lot of people cann go jump off the Bay Bridge. 430 00:26:41,516 --> 00:26:44,716 Speaker 1: What is it about this kind of information that causes 431 00:26:44,756 --> 00:26:47,876 Speaker 1: people to respond to it? The answer popped into my 432 00:26:47,916 --> 00:26:49,996 Speaker 1: head as soon as I'd ask the question, which I 433 00:26:50,076 --> 00:26:53,996 Speaker 1: realize raises a question about the question. There are exactly 434 00:26:54,196 --> 00:26:57,156 Speaker 1: zero examples of people jumping off the Bay Bridge and 435 00:26:57,276 --> 00:27:02,276 Speaker 1: flying to safety because there's no uncertainty involved. However, there 436 00:27:02,276 --> 00:27:04,996 Speaker 1: are plenty of examples of doctors and nurses being wrong 437 00:27:05,876 --> 00:27:09,916 Speaker 1: because medical expertise is a series of probabilistic judgments. The 438 00:27:10,036 --> 00:27:13,076 Speaker 1: experts are using huge piles of data to judge the odds, 439 00:27:13,116 --> 00:27:15,876 Speaker 1: the odds that the vaccine will make you ill or 440 00:27:15,996 --> 00:27:19,596 Speaker 1: keep you safe, which brings us to our most recent 441 00:27:19,676 --> 00:27:25,676 Speaker 1: national crisis. I have been hit while trying to perform 442 00:27:25,716 --> 00:27:28,916 Speaker 1: a COVID swab on somebody who is very clearly dying 443 00:27:28,916 --> 00:27:31,636 Speaker 1: and like crashing fast, and we need to do everything fast, 444 00:27:31,676 --> 00:27:34,516 Speaker 1: and we say what we're doing. Hey, I'm Ali, I'm 445 00:27:34,516 --> 00:27:36,316 Speaker 1: your nurse. Today, I'm going to be swabbing your nose 446 00:27:36,356 --> 00:27:39,596 Speaker 1: real quick for a COVID swab and getting batted at. 447 00:27:39,636 --> 00:27:41,796 Speaker 1: You know, told that this is not COVID, that this 448 00:27:41,876 --> 00:27:45,116 Speaker 1: is just bronchitis, and just give me treatment for bronchitis. 449 00:27:45,196 --> 00:27:49,476 Speaker 1: This isn't what's going on. And it's like watching somebody 450 00:27:49,476 --> 00:27:53,236 Speaker 1: basically breakdown right in front of you and watching them 451 00:27:53,436 --> 00:27:59,556 Speaker 1: choose to basically not help themselves. You've heard some version 452 00:27:59,636 --> 00:28:03,476 Speaker 1: of these stories, and you likely have an opinion about them. 453 00:28:03,516 --> 00:28:07,596 Speaker 1: But what haunts Allison is one particular case. He was 454 00:28:07,636 --> 00:28:10,596 Speaker 1: a member of our local police apartment and you know 455 00:28:10,636 --> 00:28:14,036 Speaker 1: worth as a copy I mean, he was like the 456 00:28:14,076 --> 00:28:17,276 Speaker 1: epitome of health. He had no pre existing issues, nothing 457 00:28:17,276 --> 00:28:22,396 Speaker 1: else going on, and unfortunately he was unvaccinated and came 458 00:28:22,436 --> 00:28:25,916 Speaker 1: in very very ill. I took some time to call 459 00:28:25,996 --> 00:28:29,316 Speaker 1: his wife and explain to her what was going on, 460 00:28:29,996 --> 00:28:32,156 Speaker 1: what the game plan was, what we knew so far, 461 00:28:33,036 --> 00:28:34,956 Speaker 1: and the first thing that she had said to me 462 00:28:35,236 --> 00:28:37,556 Speaker 1: was just so you guys know, he does not want 463 00:28:37,556 --> 00:28:39,636 Speaker 1: to be intubated. He knows what happens when people go 464 00:28:39,676 --> 00:28:42,836 Speaker 1: on the ventilator, and he knows that hospitals are killing 465 00:28:42,836 --> 00:28:45,756 Speaker 1: people with this. So this is a police officer who 466 00:28:45,756 --> 00:28:49,156 Speaker 1: thinks hospitals are killing people. Yes, I just had to 467 00:28:49,316 --> 00:28:51,996 Speaker 1: take a step back and be like, if only you 468 00:28:51,996 --> 00:28:55,636 Speaker 1: could see the tears in your husband's eyes right now 469 00:28:55,716 --> 00:29:01,236 Speaker 1: and see how absolutely terrified he is right now, and 470 00:29:01,396 --> 00:29:06,036 Speaker 1: understand that this is not something that we're wanting to do. 471 00:29:06,876 --> 00:29:09,436 Speaker 1: Alison was faced with a man with a severe case 472 00:29:09,436 --> 00:29:12,796 Speaker 1: of COVID who had refused the vaccine. Now, the man's 473 00:29:12,836 --> 00:29:15,876 Speaker 1: wife wouldn't let the hospital improve his odds of living. 474 00:29:16,356 --> 00:29:18,796 Speaker 1: We had an extra thirty minutes or so before I 475 00:29:18,876 --> 00:29:21,796 Speaker 1: had to take him up to the ICU, and so 476 00:29:21,836 --> 00:29:24,436 Speaker 1: I thought, Okay, you know, I know how this is 477 00:29:24,476 --> 00:29:29,156 Speaker 1: going to go. I've seen how this has gone. Alison's 478 00:29:29,196 --> 00:29:32,116 Speaker 1: patient wasn't insane, not in the way a person would 479 00:29:32,156 --> 00:29:33,996 Speaker 1: be if they jumped off the Bay Bridge thinking they 480 00:29:33,996 --> 00:29:36,476 Speaker 1: were going to fly when there are zero chances of 481 00:29:36,516 --> 00:29:40,316 Speaker 1: that happening. The patient had refused a vaccine. There are 482 00:29:40,356 --> 00:29:43,156 Speaker 1: actual true stories of people getting sick from the vaccine, 483 00:29:43,836 --> 00:29:47,036 Speaker 1: and look at all those unvaccinated people who were totally fine. 484 00:29:47,996 --> 00:29:50,756 Speaker 1: The wife was refusing to allow the treatment most likely 485 00:29:50,796 --> 00:29:54,036 Speaker 1: to save his life. Well, there are actual true cases 486 00:29:54,036 --> 00:29:56,316 Speaker 1: of people being put on ventilators when they'd been better 487 00:29:56,356 --> 00:30:01,356 Speaker 1: off if they hadn't. In a probabilistic world, improbable things 488 00:30:01,396 --> 00:30:05,716 Speaker 1: do happen. We hear stories of the unlikely thing coming 489 00:30:05,756 --> 00:30:08,716 Speaker 1: true or not coming to pass, and they stick in 490 00:30:08,756 --> 00:30:14,756 Speaker 1: our minds. But so does Alison's story. I went into 491 00:30:14,796 --> 00:30:18,236 Speaker 1: his room and you know, gound up and everything, and asked, hey, like, 492 00:30:18,756 --> 00:30:20,196 Speaker 1: we have a few minutes, do you want to try 493 00:30:20,196 --> 00:30:23,276 Speaker 1: facetiming your family? And so we get his phone out, 494 00:30:23,516 --> 00:30:27,476 Speaker 1: we FaceTime his wife, and a couple minutes later, she says, hey, 495 00:30:27,516 --> 00:30:28,756 Speaker 1: do you want to say hi to the boys? The 496 00:30:28,756 --> 00:30:30,836 Speaker 1: boys want to say hi to you, And she brings 497 00:30:30,876 --> 00:30:33,276 Speaker 1: on his young children and I mean they were like 498 00:30:33,836 --> 00:30:35,956 Speaker 1: three and five years old. If I had to guess, 499 00:30:40,716 --> 00:30:43,156 Speaker 1: in my heart, I knew this might be the very 500 00:30:43,236 --> 00:30:45,676 Speaker 1: last time that they ever get to see their dad. 501 00:30:46,356 --> 00:30:49,756 Speaker 1: And they start saying, Daddy, Daddy, we love you, we 502 00:30:49,836 --> 00:30:52,476 Speaker 1: love you. And then one says, why aren't you saying 503 00:30:52,476 --> 00:30:55,396 Speaker 1: it back, dad? And I had to pan the camera 504 00:30:55,476 --> 00:30:58,276 Speaker 1: over to myself and say, oh, no, he's saying it back. 505 00:30:58,316 --> 00:31:00,796 Speaker 1: You just can't hear him. The machines are really loud 506 00:31:00,796 --> 00:31:03,476 Speaker 1: in here, but your daddy loves you, and he's saying 507 00:31:03,476 --> 00:31:06,156 Speaker 1: it back too, I promise. And we got off the 508 00:31:06,156 --> 00:31:08,476 Speaker 1: phone call and I got him up to icy you 509 00:31:08,556 --> 00:31:10,676 Speaker 1: and I had to take a good ten minutes to 510 00:31:10,716 --> 00:31:14,116 Speaker 1: go to the bathroom and just cry what happened to him. 511 00:31:14,436 --> 00:31:21,556 Speaker 1: He unfortunately passed away a week later. We're not wired 512 00:31:21,596 --> 00:31:24,756 Speaker 1: to see the odds. We're not wired to accept the 513 00:31:24,836 --> 00:31:28,636 Speaker 1: expertise that falls out of a giant pile of data, 514 00:31:28,716 --> 00:31:32,396 Speaker 1: but our minds still long for the simple answer rooted 515 00:31:32,396 --> 00:31:37,436 Speaker 1: in our personal experience or some story we've heard, even 516 00:31:37,476 --> 00:31:42,596 Speaker 1: when the simple answer kills us. We don't naturally respect 517 00:31:42,596 --> 00:31:52,076 Speaker 1: the polygon, but really we should, Really we should. Against 518 00:31:52,116 --> 00:31:54,956 Speaker 1: the Rules is written and hosted by me Michael Lewis 519 00:31:55,076 --> 00:31:59,356 Speaker 1: and produced by Catherine Girardo and Lydia Jeancott. Julia Barton 520 00:31:59,556 --> 00:32:03,756 Speaker 1: is our editor, with additional editing by Audrey Dilling. Beth 521 00:32:03,836 --> 00:32:07,676 Speaker 1: Johnson is our fact checker, and Mia Lobell executive produces. 522 00:32:08,196 --> 00:32:12,156 Speaker 1: Our music is by John Evans and Matthias Bossi of 523 00:32:12,236 --> 00:32:17,476 Speaker 1: Stellwagon Symphonette. We record our show at Berkeley Advanced Media Studios, 524 00:32:17,476 --> 00:32:22,556 Speaker 1: expertly helmed by tofur Ruth. Thanks also to Jacob Weisberg, 525 00:32:22,756 --> 00:32:28,436 Speaker 1: Heather Fain, John Snars, Carly Migliori, Christina Sullivan, Nicole Morano, 526 00:32:29,276 --> 00:32:34,956 Speaker 1: Royston Deserve, Daniella Lacan, Mary Beth Smith, and Jason Gambrell. 527 00:32:36,916 --> 00:32:39,996 Speaker 1: And an extra special thanks to Sam Sharpel's for letting 528 00:32:40,076 --> 00:32:44,836 Speaker 1: us use his amazing respect. The Polygon Remix Against the 529 00:32:44,916 --> 00:32:48,316 Speaker 1: Rules is a production of Pushkin Industries. Keep in touch, 530 00:32:48,716 --> 00:32:52,076 Speaker 1: sign up for Pushkin's newsletter at pushkin dot fm, or 531 00:32:52,156 --> 00:32:56,756 Speaker 1: follow at Pushkin Pods. To find more Pushkin podcasts, listen 532 00:32:56,796 --> 00:33:00,996 Speaker 1: on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen 533 00:33:01,036 --> 00:33:09,396 Speaker 1: to podcasts,