WEBVTT - Businessweek Extra - Cathie Wood

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:06.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week from Bloomberg Radio. I'm Jason

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Kelly and I'm Carol Master. Welcome to the Bloomberg Business

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Week Extra. It's a weekly podcast bring you an in

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>depth interview you will not hear anywhere else. This week

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>it's Kathy Would, CEO and ce IO of Arc Investments.

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>So from fintech to biotech, to Tesla and more. She

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 1>breaks down by what's going in the markets. Yep, it's

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>a troublesome thing and it's worrisome and it certainly has

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a human toll. But there's also when you see financial disruption,

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>there's innovation and that means opportunities for investors well and

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>her investors have made out very well with her calls

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>over the past year. Is one of the top performing

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>managers out there. Also incredibly thoughtful. She gave us a

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>sense of the secret sauce. Check it out, so we

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>are delighted to have back with us. Kathy Would. She's

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:53.519
<v Speaker 1>CEO at Ark Investment. They've got about eleven billion dollars

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>in assets under manager. She's also Chief Investment Officer. She's

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>back in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio and I have

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to say first of all, welcome back. I know it's

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I know it's a busy time and I was looking

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>at a bunch of your funds and they're still up

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:09.960
<v Speaker 1>this year. And what's been a really tough obviously as

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:11.959
<v Speaker 1>you know already market environment and where we've seen a

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>broad based selling um Before we talk specifics, what do

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>you how do you assess this market environment right now? Well,

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I think there clearly is a lot of fear. The

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>VIX got up to sixty two, that's higher than it

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>has for a number of years, So there is a

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of fear in the market. It has been stirred

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 1>by the coronavirus. UH and UH. I think that a

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:38.399
<v Speaker 1>lot of whether it's hedge funds, are just managers within

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>a negative bias having to do with debt and debt deflation,

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>feel like this is the moment we capitulation or what

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>well they feel like. And you can start with the

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>energy sector. The energy sector, much of it is highly leveraged,

0:01:56.960 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>right and UH, and we're seeing an in plosion of

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>oil prices now shale, the shale gas and oil movement

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to stop. And what are they going to do?

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>How are they going to service their debts? So we're

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 1>getting you know, real to rest in that in that sector.

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>This doesn't surprise us at ARC because we've seen a

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:21.079
<v Speaker 1>lot of companies, not just an energy but in many sectors.

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Even Apple has done this. They've leveraged up to buy

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:29.360
<v Speaker 1>back their shares over many years. Now. Apple is nowhere

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>near any trouble. But the companies that were in cyclical,

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>very cyclical areas of the market, they're going to be

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>in trouble. So from that point of view, we agreed

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>with the bears out there. Uh, but we're not participating

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>in those spaces in the market. That's maybe one reason that.

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 1>And I'll say until today most of our funds were up.

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Today may have taken them below below positive And so Cathy,

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>when when you come into a moment in the market

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>like this, everybody you know likes to say, well, it's

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:05.920
<v Speaker 1>like this, And then there are other people, you know,

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>like this other time, or it's like the financial crisis,

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>or it's like the dot com bust or whatever. There

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>are some people who subscribe to the this time it's

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>different sort of narrative. What narrative do you like? What

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 1>narrative do you bring to this? Yes, well, I wrote

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:24.639
<v Speaker 1>a piece for our website, and I only write usually

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>when the markets down and under duress, so it's on

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 1>our website. And basically, as I said there, you know,

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I have only seen three times during my career where

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>all the policymakers throughout the world, both monetary and fiscal

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>are have been all on the same page. Uh. The

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>first was in the mid eighties. The dollar had gone

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>up fifty and we were in a deflationary at the

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>risk of deflation globally, especially in the emerging markets. The

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the Plaza A Corps is where the finance ministers came

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>together and the monetary authorities cooperated as well. The second

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>was oh eight o nine, and I remember after Lehman

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>went under. I remember saying to my team, look, every

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>policymaker in the world is focused on this problem, and

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>they all want the same thing to happen. It's probably

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. And actually we started out performing in

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>November of that year. And then uh, this is the

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>third time. And of course the coronavirus is what has

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:31.840
<v Speaker 1>united everyone. We we uh, we want to control that

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and uh, and we've got the monetary and fiscal policy

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>makers again all on the same page. So are we

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>going to better get them against them. I'm not. I'm not.

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess what people are saying, Well, they can't control

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the coronavirus. And I do think there's a lot of

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 1>hysteria out there around the coronavir virus. We're in much

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>more of a social media, viral, networking world, and I

0:04:56.640 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>think that's causing a lot of the hysteria. You know,

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>as more and more people are doing their homework, they

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>learn thirty to forty people a year in the United

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>States die of the flu. Thirty to forty million, get it.

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we're going to see anything like those

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>numbers from the coronavirus. So then, how quickly do you

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>think Since there, it does look like we're moving towards

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a much more coordinated move among global policymakers, Cathy, So

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 1>when we get to that point and what we have,

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I keep sit talking about parameters on this virus. When

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 1>we know it's contained and we understand that there will

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 1>be an end to this, how quickly does everything bounce back?

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 1>In your view? Well, the way we're looking at this,

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>this started in China. China is the leading indicator, and

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 1>we know that the number of deaths now is below

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the number of recoveries, so that is that's the early

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>sign of a turn. Now the fatality rate now in

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>China is higher than we think it will be in

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world. And the reason I've been

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>in Wuhan Province. Uh, it's a chimney anyone anyone going there,

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>whether it's smog or smoking both. Uh, it's like a chimney.

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>So because this coronavirus, which by the way, we have

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>two or three other coronavirus is making the rounds annually here.

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Because this coronavirus is focused primarily on those with compromised

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>lungs for whatever reason, whether it's asthma or you know,

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>elderly lung issues, smoking caused by smoking, or i'll say

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:28.359
<v Speaker 1>vaping as well. Uh. You know, those people have to

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>be very careful. What's so interesting is this is not

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 1>hitting the young. Now, maybe they have it and maybe

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 1>they're spreading it, but they're a what doctors would call asymptomatic.

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>So that's very interesting because that's another vulnerable part of

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the population. So at least we can isolate it to

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, those who are compromised when it comes to

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the lungs, right, I mean One of the arguments that's

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:58.840
<v Speaker 1>out there. One of the discussion points is that one

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons that we're seeinging this relatively quick reversal

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>in China is because it's an authoritarian government. You know,

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>they're able to sort of lock it down in a

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>way that other countries, certainly not this country that we're

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>sitting in, can do. How much do you worry about that,

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>understanding the world as you do. Yeah, obviously they they

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>did all they could and and then some in terms

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of because when says stay home, people stay home. Yes, yes,

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, I think that all of us

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>are taking precautions. I think one thing that I think

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>will happen is that the traditional flu is probably not

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be as deadly or contagious because we've suddenly

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>found all of these good hygiene habits. I mean, I'm

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>seeing people talking about scrubbing their hands and doing the

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>alphabet while they do it, you know, So I think

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that is also going viral, which is very good. Yeah.

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 1>My favorite thing, sorry, just asn't aside, since we have

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a little time. My favorite thing that I found today

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>is there's a website. I'll tweet it out and send

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>it to Dave Wilson already that you can put in

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>your favorite song and it will do it. It will

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>put the lyrics against all the different steps of watching

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>your hands. So whether it's Stairway to Heaven or Sweet Nome, Alabama,

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>or whatever it is, you know all the different steps

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that it's useful baby shark for you, very shark for me, Kathy.

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:28.559
<v Speaker 1>What I do wonder and the conversation we keep having

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 1>is what changes long term as a result of this.

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>We've had such a I feel like a conversation of

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>around supply chains coming off the US China trade war.

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, tech is your you know you look at disruption,

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you look at technology. Um you've been to like you

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>understand this global supply chain? Does that change going forward? Well?

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 1>What now you have to consider the source. But what

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm about to say, but what is true that during

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>times of turbulence, innovation actually gains traction and market share.

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:00.839
<v Speaker 1>And I can give you two tangible examples from O

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>eight oh nine, we thought the world was falling apart.

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Tech budgets were cut by right Salesforce. Dot COM's worst

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 1>quarter from a revenue growth point of view, worst was

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>up Amazon. Amazon's worst quarter was up four. So and

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>in this particular crisis, we saw this sequencing of that virus,

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>of the coronavirus COVID nineteen in two days. For Stars

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand three, it took I think it took

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>five months before they could even figure out what it was. Right,

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>we had two days and uh. And now, of course

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>we're accelerating the timeline to trials for vaccines and then

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and then the scaling of vaccines. That's going to take

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 1>time for sure, but I think we'll have a vaccine

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>for the next flu season. How do you invest in

0:09:55.040 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 1>a time like this. We concentrate our portfolios toward our

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:05.319
<v Speaker 1>highest conviction names and so and towards these names generally

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>are going to be a part of the solution. So

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you talk about supply chain. Three D printing has taken

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>a long time to take off. It's been, if you

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:18.959
<v Speaker 1>look at some other stocks, for six years. Okay. Now,

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>remember we've talked about Tesla a lot in the past,

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and I always used to say, uh, you know, I

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>look at a base like that, and that effectively is

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the bulls and their bears fighting each other. There's a

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>big controversy, right, Uh, And bases either break out or

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:35.839
<v Speaker 1>they break down. In the case of Tesla, we're saying,

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>watch out, there's a big base, this is going to

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>be a big breakout. I would maintain the same for

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 1>three D printing stocks. Now it's a little different because

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the industrial sector isn't as uh, it's more methodical. It

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>isn't as quick as break things uh in the tech world. Right.

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, but we do know the aerospace world, which

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>is is going to be in a world of trouble here.

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>They've got to cut their costs. They got to cut

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:07.559
<v Speaker 1>their costs. And with three D printing, not only can

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you cut costs and they're they're printing engine parts now

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>by you can cut cost by plus, but you're also

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 1>shrinking the form factors, are lightening the weight of the

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>planes as well, so bringing many more efficiencies. All right,

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>just want to bring you a headline just crossing the

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Brazil stocks having their worst day in twenty one

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:30.679
<v Speaker 1>years and entering into a bear market. It's something that

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about a lot. We're talking with Dave Wilson.

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Are stocks that are earlier about what a bear market,

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:40.199
<v Speaker 1>what that number is? Uh? Here in the United States,

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>we're not there yet but getting close, and as Day

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:46.319
<v Speaker 1>pointed out, if we have another day like today, we

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:48.319
<v Speaker 1>will get there. Also want to bring you some headlines

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 1>from stitch fix. It's a name well known to our audience.

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:56.719
<v Speaker 1>A lot of stitch fixers out there disappointing with their forecast.

0:11:57.200 --> 0:11:59.599
<v Speaker 1>UH the stock following about the after I was this

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>third quarter revenue, Uh, their view trailing its lowest estimate.

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>The estimate had been for five six point three million.

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 1>They said it will be in the range of four sixty.

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty big mess. So you asked what might turn

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>this and uh, you know, Warren Buffett uh said, just

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks ago, or maybe it was last week,

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>he said, when bond yields were at two percent, He said,

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>do you know that's the that bonds are selling for

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty times earnings and their earnings are not going to increase. Well,

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>think about what fifty basis points is, right, that's two

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred times earnings. Stocks are selling at seventeen times earnings,

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and the end on average, there's there's probably close to

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>a two percent yield in stocks. Now, so you go

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>back to that comparison, right, I mean, from the allocation

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 1>point of view, Uh, stocks are becoming, um, you know,

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>very attractive. You do have to aim away from heavily

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>leveraged companies that have not been investing in their future.

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>They've just been buying back their own stock. You are

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg this week Jason Kelly Carroll Masser streaming

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>live on YouTube as well. Still with us, Kathy would

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>We've captured her for the better part of an hour.

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>CEO and chief investment officer of our invest looking after

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>more than eleven billion dollars. So, Kathy, we just heard

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 1>very much that first part of what would be a

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 1>V or a you the downward part? Are we headed

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:33.199
<v Speaker 1>for a V shaped recovery here? Well, we think that

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>that could be the biggest head fake coming out of this. Uh.

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>And one of the reasons is if you look at

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>consumer sentiment in spending both in the United States and

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:46.199
<v Speaker 1>China until perhaps mid February, we haven't gotten all those

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>numbers yet. Uh. They those numbers were very strong, very firm,

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and consumer confidence was very high. In the United States especially,

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the consumer confidence was very high. Uh. And so consumer

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:05.719
<v Speaker 1>we're spending was was it was carrying on while businesses

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 1>we're cutting back. They were they were worried about the

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 1>China trade conflict, they were worried about the inverted deal curve.

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Last year they were there, they were negative from a

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>sentiment point of view, they were turning quite negative, and

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>so you had to disconnect consumption up and purchasing managers

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>indexes around the world plunging. So we had been saying, well, okay,

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>if the consumer keeps spending, businesses are going to have

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to have to start investing again, both in inventories and

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>capital spending, uh to meet that demand. Right, otherwise they'll

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>just lose business and they'll lose out competitively. Now we've

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>had this crisis, and I believe that the reaction of

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>businesses is even more dire than it is for consumers.

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>If you think about consumers, they're hoarding, right. So so

0:14:56.640 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe consumers spending in some respects has gotten a booster

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>here and we'll give way a little bit. But the

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>inventories have to be depleting rapidly, and we know capital

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 1>spending has gone nowhere in the last years except perhaps down. UH.

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>So you know, you've had the largest part of the

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>US economy moving forward and the business sector not playing ball. Uh.

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>This will cause an interruption but I think if we're

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>right and this is going to pass, We've got spring coming,

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and viruses don't like spring. Uh. If this is going

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to pass, and the and the fatality rate is nowhere

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>near China's. In other words, we do start comparing this

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>more not completely to the traditional flu. Uh, then I

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>think the turn could be a very sharp v as

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>businesses scramble to catch up. Pretty dramatic. Yes, all right,

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>So I am curious then, because I know you know

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 1>you you invest in these various disruptive spaces, and I

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>do wonder, um, one of your funds is the genomic revolution?

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Is is there a healthcare? Is there a genomic play

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>here for you? Because of the virus? Sure sequencing? So illumina? Uh?

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you have owned for a long time? We've owned

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>it for a long time. It's been flagging recently. We

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>understand why it has um there. They've launched a new

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>product cycle and we think that's going to get it

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>going again. But hearing news about the virus being sequenced

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 1>in just two days, uh, and then we have to

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 1>keep sequencing it because we need to know if it's

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 1>mutating our right, So sequencing is critical. There have been

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 1>a number of vaccine we did own, or we do

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>own an Ovo, which has tripled, quadrupled now today it

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 1>had a hit because Citron went after it. But you know,

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the vaccine UH makers are are benefiting nicely.

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Our Tourists is another one that has benefited. That is

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>benefiting for the same reason, and pugen is UH is

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 1>benefiting from for a different reason. It has not sold

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 1>off at all, and that's because it has identified more

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>targets from an immunotherapy point of view cancer immunotherapy than

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>almost any other company. And it's just a very small

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:18.120
<v Speaker 1>company out of Israel. So it's held in very nicely,

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I have to say, and I looked at these numbers.

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:22.159
<v Speaker 1>I think it was either around noon or one that

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:24.360
<v Speaker 1>fund is up twelve point four percent this year, so

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>in a market back gave back a lot today. But

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying, in a market environment where you can't

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>really find any cover, you're still holding out of some game. Again,

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 1>this is innovation gaining traction during difficult times because businesses

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and consumers are willing to think about doing things differently

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>when they're afraid. Cathy Woods, CEO CIO of archivest here

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>with us in our new York studio. So what's the

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 1>mood like in your shop right now? Okay, Well, we

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>have been through these ups and downs, risk on, risk

0:17:56.359 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>off since we started in two thousand and fourteen, more

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>than I ever have experienced in my career. And uh,

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the mantra in our at ARC is innovation gains traction

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 1>during tumultuous times. So let's let's let's pick concentrate our

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>portfolios towards those companies that are going to help solve

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>these problems. And that's what we do. So it's I

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 1>won't say it's exciting because we never like to see

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:27.159
<v Speaker 1>the market going down. But you know, the other thing

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 1>that we do is sometimes we lose confidence in some

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 1>stocks relative to others. This is a nice time to

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>do some house cleaning, and what we do is generate

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>losses that we can take games against in the future.

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 1>So so you are cleaning out some names at this point. Yeah,

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.439
<v Speaker 1>we we have taken down some names. Yes, we have.

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>We've sold names. Like you know, I always forget the

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>ones we're so but out of sight, but by do

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 1>is is one of them, mostly in in our Autonomous

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Technology and Robotics fund. We just don't we see a

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:05.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of disarray in the electric vehicle and autonomous vehicle

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>space in China, and that's why, primarily why we owned

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that one, and so uh yeah, we we bought more

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>more Tesla, of course, uh Tesla. Tesla one might think

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 1>might be hurt by lower oil prices because of course

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>internal commission. But we think that even with oil prices

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:29.360
<v Speaker 1>coming down, that the total cost of ownership of an

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:34.399
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicle today is lower than that of a gas

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 1>powered car, and it's only going to get lower still

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 1>with us Kathy Wood, CEO, and see io at our

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>investment in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio, they have over

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>eleven billion dollars in assets under management. So I'm gonna

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>go through some names with you. We didn't. We did

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>cheat a little bit about Tesla. You and I, Jason,

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:54.679
<v Speaker 1>we've all talked with you a lot about your position

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>in Tesla. You're still very much a ball on it. Yeah,

0:19:57.080 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 1>And we got some new information last week from g M.

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 1>It had its Electric Vehicle Day and we took some

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>of the specs they threw out there. They weren't too generous,

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 1>but what with what we got, we were able to

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:15.880
<v Speaker 1>confirm that Tesla is three years ahead of GM on

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly battery technology. Uh. They also we're talking a lot

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 1>about cobalt reducing that in the battery. Tesla's already there.

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>So you know, it was very interesting illuminating. Yes, it's

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:32.959
<v Speaker 1>a big gap, and Tesla's good. Three years from now

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 1>will be in a completely different place. Did that did

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 1>three years surprise you? Did you think they have been

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>We had no, no, no, no, we we had been

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 1>saying three to four years when it comes to autonomous

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:50.640
<v Speaker 1>vehicles and artificial intelligence chips than most automakers are four

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 1>years behind Tesla. We believe Kathy is GM the one

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>though to fault, Like I wonder is it more like

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Mercedes or one of the years? Like who is the

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>automaker that's maybe potentially closer to nipping at Tesla's heel

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>in interesting uh. Elon Musk has said he he would

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:11.199
<v Speaker 1>not take any manufacturer seriously until they vertically integrated and

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>build out their own battery plant. Volkswagen's doing that, interestingly.

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Now they're having a heap of trouble with their software though,

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:23.119
<v Speaker 1>and so so you know, this is a completely different

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:27.679
<v Speaker 1>dynamic from traditional auto manufacturing. So they have mountains to

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:30.879
<v Speaker 1>climb right, and uh, we think it's going to be

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>a very tough lift for them. Way Mo is the

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 1>one most people would point to. Very interesting Google now

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>is using outside funding for Waymo. They don't want to

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:47.360
<v Speaker 1>put all, you know, their investment dollars into these moon shots,

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and we're wondering if they're getting ready to spin it.

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>We have no idea, but they've certainly distanced themselves to

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>some extent. They don't want to, uh to take all

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the risk, uh when it comes to the autonomous vehicle fronds.

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 1>So talk to us about the last year eighteen months,

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 1>especially when it comes to Tesla. Not always easy to

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 1>be to be a bull, certainly amid all of the

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, we talked a lot about narratives today, amid

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>all the loud narratives, especially from the Bears, that obviously

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>is quite a down a lot over the past six months.

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Because but do you ever have any moments of doubt

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 1>on that one? So I'm probably the most trolled portfolio

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:34.360
<v Speaker 1>manager on Twitter because of Twitter and bitcoin and uh no, actually, um,

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a Wall Street Journal reporter on Twitter, I didn't even

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:41.679
<v Speaker 1>know it was a reporter said, so, Cathy, would how

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>do you feel losing all your your clients all this

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 1>money in Tesla. This was April May of last year

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:50.680
<v Speaker 1>when it was in the one nineties one eighties, and

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know who, And I rarely respond to those things.

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 1>I said, I don't feel any regret or doubt in

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the least. In fact, our conviction has gone up during

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:04.439
<v Speaker 1>down times for stocks. We double down on our soul searching.

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Of course, that's when some of our most interesting insights

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 1>occur again because we're digging deeper and deeper. Uh so

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>we we actually our conviction in Tesla increase during that downturn.

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you sell the like at all? When like it?

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Because I thought I looked at as at the end

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of last year that you guys had paired back a

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Well, if you look at the page on

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg you would see that, but we have it has

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>stayed our top position in the flagship funds. So it

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:38.120
<v Speaker 1>would have been a twenty five percent position. We've kept

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 1>it at ten percent. So we did sell a lot,

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>But that's what a portfolio manager does when a stock quadruples,

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:49.120
<v Speaker 1>quintuples and other stocks are down thirt you know that's

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>what we do. So take us inside the room. What

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>does that soul searching look like at ARC? I mean,

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:55.439
<v Speaker 1>are you sitting around the table like what? What? What

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 1>is it? So we have morning meetings every morning and

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:02.400
<v Speaker 1>so we will be getting news from At that time,

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>it was all the bears and you know, so then

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 1>we kept looking at the bond market, and the bond

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 1>market actually got this right before the stock title did. Uh,

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>so that became, uh, you know, a daily conversation. We

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 1>have brainstorms every Friday from ten thirty to twelve thirty.

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 1>If you'd ever like to join, you'd be more than welcome.

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 1>It's open. People can video in and they do. And uh,

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:29.880
<v Speaker 1>we are as hard on ourselves as you you could

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:33.959
<v Speaker 1>imagine because it's all analysts coming at this from different directions.

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 1>So James Wang is our artificial intelligence analysts who has

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:42.880
<v Speaker 1>been instrumental to our understanding of how far ahead Tesla

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>is with its AI chip. But we've got our genomics team. Uh,

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>they know the brain, that's what neural networks are modeled after,

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and so they will they will join in the conversation

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's no, it's very respectful, it's very methodical.

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 1>It's not in emotional, it's uh, it's we're seeking the truth,

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:06.919
<v Speaker 1>you know. And and the motto I always use is

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:11.919
<v Speaker 1>truth wins out. It always does. So okay, So a

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of minutes left. Is there a new investment idea

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 1>that you guys have been looking at, or new disruptive

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>technology that's not on everybody's radar that you think it

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:22.959
<v Speaker 1>should be. Well, we do think that the digital wallet

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:26.160
<v Speaker 1>space is underappreciated for what it is. We think it's

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:30.439
<v Speaker 1>going to be very disruptive to banks. So Venmore, you know,

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:35.199
<v Speaker 1>Venmo Paypals, Venmo Squares, cash app, which we think is

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:39.120
<v Speaker 1>actually growing much faster than Venmo now because of some

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 1>really brilliant marketing strategies. Uh, they're the number of digital

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>users at each of those companies is higher than at

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan and JP Morgan as a digital strategy and

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 1>they're going and there. And the reason is the cost

0:25:55.880 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 1>of customer acquisition for these viral networking services is about

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:05.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty dollars for a bank to get a new checking

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 1>account or credit card card customer. That's anywhere from dollars

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 1>to two thousand dollars because of all the overhead and safes.

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:20.200
<v Speaker 1>This is bricks and mortar and so forth. So that's

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 1>one thing, and you know the other differences. You know,

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the the the amount of data that Square and Venmo

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 1>have on their user base is unlike anything a bank

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>could hope to have. And it's real time. It's real time.

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 1>They know exactly how much they can loan these merchants,

0:26:41.000 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 1>uh and ultimately consumers. You know how much working capital

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 1>they might need. Oh, maybe you need to payroll service.

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna they're gonna be full service and the banks

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 1>aren't going to know what hit them. They aren't. And

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>that was Kathy Wood, the CEO and ce IO of

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 1>ARC Investment, A great conversation. You've been listening to Bloomberg

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:01.639
<v Speaker 1>Business Week ext be sure to tune into Bloomberg Business

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Week Radio Live Monday through Friday at two pm Wall

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Street Time. I'm Bloomberg Radio. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:27:07.119 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Jason Kelly. This is Bloomberg