Speaker 1: You are entering the Freedom Hudge, the Great blame Game
Speaker 1: of twenty twenty. DC Mayor Bowser's worried about a race war,
Speaker 1: the red mirage scenario for the election, the six percent
Speaker 1: COVID number, and Joe Biden tries to use his words
Speaker 1: buck Sextons, decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence.
Speaker 1: Make no mistake America great, You're a great American again.
Speaker 1: This is the buck Sexton showmer CIA analysts can speak
Speaker 1: to three hours without a phone call. Try doing that sometimes. No.
Speaker 1: Welcome everybody to the buck Sexton Show. Honor a privilege
Speaker 1: to have you here with me as always. And they're
Speaker 1: doing everything they can. We knew they would. The Democrats
Speaker 1: are throwing everything they've got at the wall, seeing what sticks.
Speaker 1: It's Trump's fault that there's riding. Trump wants the riding.
Speaker 1: Trump didn't do enough to stop the rioting. Trump lies,
Speaker 1: there is no riding. It does. Depending on what the
Speaker 1: day is, what the time of day is, and who
Speaker 1: the Democrat, politician or a member of the media may be,
Speaker 1: you get an entirely different, entirely different story. It's hard
Speaker 1: to think of a greater point of obvious dishonesty. I mean,
Speaker 1: they're lying in a way that I don't believe it's
Speaker 1: possible they're doing it and think they're being clever. They're
Speaker 1: doing it because they're delusional and they have convinced themselves
Speaker 1: to believe whatever they whatever they have to right, meaning
Speaker 1: that they don't actually think this is or rather they
Speaker 1: may think this is true, but there's no connection to reality.
Speaker 1: There's no connection to reality whatsoever. They tell you what
Speaker 1: they have to tell you in the moment to advance
Speaker 1: the political football downfield. They'll believe whatever they have to
Speaker 1: believe in the moment they have to believe it. It's
Speaker 1: almost like a psychological disconnect. It's hard to believe how
Speaker 1: this is really possible. It's hard to see how anyone
Speaker 1: could do this. But no, I don't think they're being clever.
Speaker 1: I think that they actually have convinced themselves of this insanity,
Speaker 1: that that is where we are. And then that brings
Speaker 1: me to there's a series of tweets and responses and
Speaker 1: things that have been said about all of this that
Speaker 1: we should all focus on for a moment, just because
Speaker 1: they have no respect whatsoever for the intelligence of the
Speaker 1: American people. They don't care how absurd it is. They
Speaker 1: don't care how reckless the statements may be. They are
Speaker 1: absolutely devoted to the great blame shift of twenty twenty.
Speaker 1: They set up these riots, they created the atmosphere. They
Speaker 1: supported them, They were in favor of them, they liked them,
Speaker 1: they justified them all about all this stuff. And now
Speaker 1: they're they're acting like none of that happened, Like you
Speaker 1: didn't see all of that. They weren't hiding it, folks. Right,
Speaker 1: BLM was running corporate America for a while. BLM was
Speaker 1: the thing that you had to sign on for or
Speaker 1: else you risked your career, your reputation. They were going
Speaker 1: to tell you that you were a racist, a bad person,
Speaker 1: so you have to accept BLM's mandate or else. That's
Speaker 1: where we were. Now you have the mainstream edia lives
Speaker 1: in a panic with Biden presenting himself as a law
Speaker 1: and order candidate while the media is out there it's
Speaker 1: kind of a good cop bad cop thing, isn't that ironic?
Speaker 1: Where Biden gets to be the bad cop to his
Speaker 1: base and say, well, violence is bad, which for the
Speaker 1: Democrat base is very upsetting to hear. And then you
Speaker 1: have others out there who were telling the base, Oh no,
Speaker 1: don't worry, it's really Donald Trump's fault. It's not your fault,
Speaker 1: my sweet, innocent, innocent little children of the Democrat Party.
Speaker 1: It's not your fault. Don't worry about it. Joy Read,
Speaker 1: perhaps most famous as a host at has her own
Speaker 1: show Folks at MSNBC, most famous for claiming, and I'm
Speaker 1: being serious, for claiming that she had hackers go into
Speaker 1: her ten year old blog posts and change what she
Speaker 1: had blogged about so that it seemed like she said
Speaker 1: things that today would be considered homophobic and actually homophobic.
Speaker 1: So no one really believes that, but she said that
Speaker 1: it was what was necessary for it was necessary for
Speaker 1: her to reach out to the FBI, and that the
Speaker 1: FBI was going to start an investigation of her ten
Speaker 1: year old blog posts that apparently involved hackers with a
Speaker 1: time machine to go back and change them without anybody noticing.
Speaker 1: And that's how much they want to take her down.
Speaker 1: It was so stupid and so it was so petty
Speaker 1: and silly and juvenile. MSNBC, I'm not kidding. After that
Speaker 1: whole thing promoted her and gave her her own show
Speaker 1: during the week, she said last night on her show
Speaker 1: the read out. If Trump wanted to end the violence
Speaker 1: in American cities, he could simply go on his Twitter
Speaker 1: feed and tell his supporters to go home. Trump is
Speaker 1: openly doing the opposite, encouraging more violence. Oh so it's
Speaker 1: Trump who is the problem. He's the reason that there
Speaker 1: is violence in cities that has been going on for
Speaker 1: four months now that Democrats were saying this, these are
Speaker 1: the new freedom writers, this is the new civil rights movement.
Speaker 1: This is the new that's what they were talking about
Speaker 1: when they talked about BLM. This is standing up for
Speaker 1: social justice. No it's not. It's an evil Marxist movement
Speaker 1: that has made everything worse for everyone, as I have
Speaker 1: been saying for quite some time. And I'm happy to
Speaker 1: see the President actually came out and agreed on that point.
Speaker 1: And then there's also oh wait, but back to back
Speaker 1: to joy Reid for a second. I really think that
Speaker 1: her take on this maybe the dumbest one yet on
Speaker 1: the riots, which is almost impressive. I mean, you have
Speaker 1: to really put in the work to sound that stupid.
Speaker 1: But that's what Democrats have been subjected to. Now that's
Speaker 1: what they're left with. What else they going to say?
Speaker 1: How are they going to explain this. Remember the voters
Speaker 1: who were locked in for Democrats and always will be.
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter what happens. It doesn't matter what I mean.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden could and I mean this could walk out
Speaker 1: on straight on stage, you know, buck naked and start
Speaker 1: muttering gibberish, and they would say, there's the next commander
Speaker 1: in chief, much better than Trump. It doesn't matter. That's
Speaker 1: a big part of the Democrat electorate, that's a big
Speaker 1: portion of who's going to be voting this fall. But
Speaker 1: the people that are actually listening and still being convinced
Speaker 1: either to go out and vote one way or the
Speaker 1: other or just to vote at all. Right, So it's
Speaker 1: a turnout issue, it's an independent issue. They see what
Speaker 1: the Democrats are doing and they've got to think these
Speaker 1: people are nuts. And that's what's happening. That's what we see.
Speaker 1: Biden is out there pretending this is so desperate. It's pathetic.
Speaker 1: He's out there pretending that the rioting, the lawlessness is
Speaker 1: Trump's fault and somehow tied to the Trump movement. Play
Speaker 1: ten fires, you're burning. We have a president who fans
Speaker 1: the flames rather than fighting the flames. But we must
Speaker 1: not burn. We have to build. This president long ago
Speaker 1: forfeited any moral leadership in this country. He can't stop
Speaker 1: the violence because for years he's forum entited. You know,
Speaker 1: he may believe mouthing the words law and order makes
Speaker 1: him strong, but is failure to call on his own
Speaker 1: supporters to stop acting as an armed militia in this
Speaker 1: country shows how weak he is. Oh, the real problem
Speaker 1: with the violence is the armed militia. That's the news
Speaker 1: story too, not the destruction of property. The murder of somebody,
Speaker 1: not a self defense claim from what we've seen so far,
Speaker 1: straight up murder of somebody in Portland by Antifa, a
Speaker 1: guy who described himself as one hundred percent Antifa and
Speaker 1: had a b LM tattoo on his neck. And again
Speaker 1: not kidding, that's who's committing murders in Portland. People in
Speaker 1: the name of BLM will kill their fellow human beings.
Speaker 1: They'll have BLM tattooed on their neck. But Biden is
Speaker 1: claiming that Trump is the problem here. The fires are burning,
Speaker 1: that's correct, Joe Biden. Your supporters are setting them, and
Speaker 1: for months you had nothing to say about it because
Speaker 1: you are a coward and a buffoon. Now Democrats want
Speaker 1: to pretend that this is not something we've all seen
Speaker 1: that we don't know. I just want you to want
Speaker 1: you to make note of this for yourselves, because we've
Speaker 1: been if you're a Trump supporter, we've been for years
Speaker 1: browbeaten by people who think that they're so sophisticated and
Speaker 1: so truthful because of their politics. And now you see
Speaker 1: that they are reduced to this pathetic, intellectual groveling in
Speaker 1: order to try to get Biden elected the presidents. They'll
Speaker 1: do and say anything. They will debase their own intellect.
Speaker 1: The Democrats will pretend to be total morons. A lot
Speaker 1: of them are really dumb, but obviously there's a lot
Speaker 1: of smart Democrats too. They will pretend to be morons
Speaker 1: who don't recognize exactly what has happened since May because
Speaker 1: of Biden voters, because of Democrats across the country. That's
Speaker 1: their only option. Otherwise, what are they gonna do? They
Speaker 1: think they're gonna they think they're gonna win a debate
Speaker 1: on who's really responsible for this? Do they think they're
Speaker 1: gonna prove that? All along? The people that have been
Speaker 1: ardent anti Trumpers screaming about how much they hate Trump
Speaker 1: in the streets. It was all a big false flag.
Speaker 1: Is that that may be the next phase. You've already
Speaker 1: seen some efforts at that that it's really white nationalists
Speaker 1: burning down Minneapolis for example. I mean, there are some
Speaker 1: white people who are riding in Minneapolis, for sure, but
Speaker 1: there are also a lot of not white people who
Speaker 1: are riding in Minneapolis. So I don't think calling them
Speaker 1: white nationalists when people are walking around saying that their
Speaker 1: anti fun BLM makes any sense at all, does it.
Speaker 1: We'll say whatever they have to say. They'll take whatever
Speaker 1: pathetic position is most advantageous. Even Joe Biden now will pretend,
Speaker 1: oh that he's the law and order guy, He's the honest,
Speaker 1: the honest broker and all this he's going to make
Speaker 1: you safe at night. Play eleven. Job of a president
Speaker 1: is to tell straight from the shoulder, tell the truth,
Speaker 1: to be candid, to face facts, to lead, not to incite.
Speaker 1: That's why I'm speaking to you today. Incumbent president is
Speaker 1: incapable of telling us the truth. The senseless violence of
Speaker 1: looting and burning and destruction of property. I want to
Speaker 1: make it absolutely clear, so I mean very clear about
Speaker 1: all of this rioting is not protesting looting, is not protesting.
Speaker 1: Setting fires is not protesting. None of this is protesting.
Speaker 1: It's lawlessness, plain and simple, and those who do it
Speaker 1: should be prosecuted. Oh now he believes the laws should count.
Speaker 1: Now Joe Biden thinks that there should be prosecutions of protesters.
Speaker 1: Democrat attorneys general for states and Democrat district attorneys. They
Speaker 1: were unwilling to prosecute protesters and looters. The federal government
Speaker 1: had a step in. Who was it that was tearing
Speaker 1: down all the monuments? Who was it that was destroying
Speaker 1: so much public federal property? You know, writing f the
Speaker 1: cops and all cops must die? Were those Trump supporters. No,
Speaker 1: not a single person with a three brainsale count would
Speaker 1: ever believe that. Not a single person who has the
Speaker 1: IQ above a rusty nail would think that that is accurate.
Speaker 1: But that's what they're saying, that's what the claim is. Unbelievable, unbelievable,
Speaker 1: and yet here we are continuing, continuing to have to
Speaker 1: deal with the lies and the stupidity, and they don't
Speaker 1: they don't have an alternative. They don't have an alternative.
Speaker 1: The only other option is to accept that they've made
Speaker 1: an enormous blunder. To be honest would be to tell
Speaker 1: the American people that when it was in our favor
Speaker 1: as Democrats, we were willing to excuse the destruction of
Speaker 1: businesses in your neighborhood, the looting, and also the vicious
Speaker 1: anti cop rhetoric and on all that stuff about white
Speaker 1: privilege and white supremacy and all this really damaging and
Speaker 1: divisive talking points from Democrats that it really seemed like
Speaker 1: they weren't just trying to set businesses on fire. It
Speaker 1: fell to a lot of us like they were just
Speaker 1: trying to set America on fire because Trump was president
Speaker 1: and they thought they could get away with it, and
Speaker 1: they were angry that really all this was. But it's
Speaker 1: not working now it's turned against them, so they're scrambling
Speaker 1: and they'll say anything, and they're pathetic and immoral and
Speaker 1: destructive and insane. Just remember that as we get into
Speaker 1: the final stretch here, because all they really want, even
Speaker 1: though it's not going to make their lives better, even
Speaker 1: though it's not going to deal with all the societal
Speaker 1: illis river the BLM protests started under Obama. It's not
Speaker 1: all going to go away. But the only thing that
Speaker 1: Democrats can fixate on at this point is having power.
Speaker 1: They feel so much better if only they have power
Speaker 1: nuts it. So let's deprive them of that. Shall we
Speaker 1: do everything we can. It's in their best interests. We're
Speaker 1: teaching them a very important lesson. You try to burn
Speaker 1: down the country, democrats, we don't let you run the country.
Speaker 1: You're in the freedom Heney. This is the Buck Sex
Speaker 1: and Show podcast. So what kind of things do the protesters,
Speaker 1: the leaders of the protest movement in places like Kenosha, Wisconsin? Say?
Speaker 1: What are they say in public? They know the cameras
Speaker 1: are on them, They know that people are going to
Speaker 1: hear this stuff. What is their ethos? What rules are
Speaker 1: they operating under? Play clip three? Asius as our children,
Speaker 1: women and our family? Did I get to say, God,
Speaker 1: damn it, if you kill one of us, it's half
Speaker 1: of us to kill one of yours. I don't know
Speaker 1: anybody don't want to hear that. But damn where we
Speaker 1: once got to keep marrying us? If you kill one
Speaker 1: of ours, we're gonna kill one of yours. He screams
Speaker 1: over a loud speaker. M what you're talking about exactly?
Speaker 1: Who is he referring to? Well? At a minimum. He's
Speaker 1: talking about police and killing cops now that the Democrats
Speaker 1: would have you believe it. That's just rhetoric, It doesn't
Speaker 1: mean anything. They'll hope you don't remember the five police
Speaker 1: officers murdered by a BLM supporter in Dallas, Texas. They'll
Speaker 1: hope you don't remember the two NYPD officers executed while
Speaker 1: sitting quietly in their squad car here in New York City,
Speaker 1: Ramos and lou Hope you don't remember any of that.
Speaker 1: They also have a problem with the news today because
Speaker 1: Chicago area police, according to Fox are being warned by
Speaker 1: the FBI of a gang pact to shoot on site
Speaker 1: any cop. Quote. We've been made aware of this threat
Speaker 1: by a law enforcement partner, or Chicago Police spokesperson told
Speaker 1: Fox News on Tuesday. Chicago Police Department takes all threats
Speaker 1: against any officers safety seriously. The alert mentions around thirty
Speaker 1: six gangs, including the Latin Kings and Vice Lords, and
Speaker 1: says members of these gang factions have been actively searching
Speaker 1: for and filming police officers in performance of their official duties,
Speaker 1: the purpose of which is to catch on film any
Speaker 1: officer drawing his or her weapon on any subject. And
Speaker 1: the subsequent shoot on site of set officer in order
Speaker 1: to garner national media attention. It's the main story on
Speaker 1: Fox News right now. So at a minimum, gangs or
Speaker 1: at least look this maybe bluster when you're doing terrorism
Speaker 1: or gang analysis. There's a lot of threats that don't
Speaker 1: turn into anything. But there are clearly gangs who are
Speaker 1: walking around saying they want to kill cops right now,
Speaker 1: particularly at this point in time. Why is that. Maybe
Speaker 1: it's because one of the two major political parties in
Speaker 1: this country has been on a jihad to convince people
Speaker 1: that police are murdering unarmed black men at a breathtaking pace,
Speaker 1: and we're supposed to think that that's just happening out
Speaker 1: of racism. This is what they tell people, This is
Speaker 1: what the narrative is. That narrative isn't just a lie.
Speaker 1: It is leading to people getting killed now, and it's
Speaker 1: going to lead to more people getting killed. Democrats have
Speaker 1: created a monster with this movement and they cannot control it.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever
Speaker 1: you get your podcasts. Members where one company is giving
Speaker 1: hundreds of millions of dollars. When you say they're weak,
Speaker 1: what do you mean? Because they just do what's the
Speaker 1: easiest path. That's not the easy path, that's a very
Speaker 1: dangerous path. Black Lives Matter is a Marxist organization. You
Speaker 1: remember pigs in a blanket, frime like bacon. That was
Speaker 1: the first time I ever heard of Black Lives Matter.
Speaker 1: I said, that's a terrible name. It's so discriminatory. It's
Speaker 1: bad for black people, it's bad for everybody. And all
Speaker 1: of a sudden it becomes like sort of although now
Speaker 1: if you look, it's going way down because people are
Speaker 1: tired of this stuff. What's going on the Black Lives Matter?
Speaker 1: If you look at what's going on with the bats
Speaker 1: and a lot of thugs DC last night, Oh, it's terrible.
Speaker 1: What's going on. Black Lives Matter is a Marxist organization.
Speaker 1: The President says it's bad for black people, it's bad
Speaker 1: for everybody. Sounds like somebody you all know, or at
Speaker 1: least listen to on the radio. How long have I've
Speaker 1: been saying Black Lives Matter has made everything worse for everyone?
Speaker 1: This movement has been only in terms of its effects
Speaker 1: of what it does, not what it purports not what
Speaker 1: it pretends to do. The the actual direct results of
Speaker 1: Black Lives Matter are terrible for everyone. Everyone is left safe,
Speaker 1: less safe, everyone is more anxious, everyone is more poor.
Speaker 1: That's the truth of the movement. That's the situation. So
Speaker 1: now we have to look and what they're going to
Speaker 1: say about it. Right, what is going to be the
Speaker 1: Democrat counterclaim in all of this. Well, for one thing,
Speaker 1: the Democrats are going to start saying that it's, of
Speaker 1: course all Trump's fault, But what is Trump's fault? Because
Speaker 1: it's very it's tough to make it sound like the
Speaker 1: that this president in particular is anti law enforcement. What
Speaker 1: is Trump's fault? Oh, now they're talking about this. You're
Speaker 1: hearing pundits and politicians and people in the public eye.
Speaker 1: They're talking about this as a race war issue. That's
Speaker 1: what they're saying that those are the words that are
Speaker 1: being used. Here is April Ryan on CNN play four.
Speaker 1: Let's call a thing a thing. This president, Donald John
Speaker 1: Trump has instigated a race war in America. Borland, Oregon
Speaker 1: is ground zero. This president Donald John Trump has basically
Speaker 1: stoked the flames for racist extremists, neo Nazis, and the right,
Speaker 1: and they're even defending this president, is even defending cal Wriittenhouse,
Speaker 1: the seventeen year old who witten was Hanson and killed
Speaker 1: to protesters. So at the end of the day, the
Speaker 1: Mayor of Portland is absolutely right, and there are those
Speaker 1: who are calling for help from this president and the
Speaker 1: stoking of a race ward. There is a race war
Speaker 1: in America right now because of this president. This is
Speaker 1: someone on CNN White House correspondent I think for NPR,
Speaker 1: PBS or some other thing that no one really watches,
Speaker 1: who is telling you there's a race war underway right
Speaker 1: now in the country and it's Trump's fault. This is
Speaker 1: delusional and this is projection because the only people that
Speaker 1: are causing division between the races, the only people of
Speaker 1: any prominence or power who are pushing narratives that pull
Speaker 1: us apart and increase violence are Democrats. Trump's saying, let's
Speaker 1: enforce the law. He's the good guy here. This is
Speaker 1: what Democrats can't accept. It melts them at their core.
Speaker 1: They can't they can't even begin to accept the truth here,
Speaker 1: which is that Trump in this situation is, for anyone
Speaker 1: who is not completely insane, the good guy. They've now
Speaker 1: put themselves in a position where they've been backing and
Speaker 1: therefore really a part of the bad guy team. It's
Speaker 1: that straightforward, that's really what's happening. There's no justification for
Speaker 1: looting and rioting and destruction of public property. You know,
Speaker 1: I didn't even mention over the weekend there was a
Speaker 1: piece in some liberal, major liberal publication, I forget even
Speaker 1: which one, justifying looting, and there's apparently a whole book
Speaker 1: on it by some you know, a scholar who's not
Speaker 1: very bright. But you know, being a scholar doesn't really
Speaker 1: mean anything anymore. You don't have to know anything to
Speaker 1: be a scholar. You just have to be a left
Speaker 1: wing activist and then you can tax some junk PhD
Speaker 1: on your name and everyone has to pretend like you
Speaker 1: know something. But justifying, openly justifying looting as necessary throughout
Speaker 1: history to advance social progress, you know, this is these
Speaker 1: attacks on property get it done, they get a lot accomplished.
Speaker 1: This again, is insane, This is madness. This does not
Speaker 1: make any sense. So as I continue to see the
Speaker 1: narrative get rolled out here, as I see what they're
Speaker 1: trying to do, it's just it's predictable and yet it
Speaker 1: still makes you just want to throw something through a wall.
Speaker 1: No honesty at all. Let me understand this. If Democrats
Speaker 1: were worried about and I want to hat tip Lisa
Speaker 1: Booth who had a great tweet on this one, If
Speaker 1: Democrats were so concerned about violence, if they were so
Speaker 1: concerned about what's really going on in this country and
Speaker 1: have been all summer, why is it that they didn't
Speaker 1: say anything until now about this. They weren't talking about violence.
Speaker 1: How many mentions of riots were there during the DNC,
Speaker 1: Remember riots that they're now saying Trump is responsible for?
Speaker 1: How many mentions of them were there? Why is it
Speaker 1: that over a month ago the Attorney General Bill Barr
Speaker 1: at Congressional at a congressional hearing, had to say this
Speaker 1: playclip two. What makes me concern for the country is
Speaker 1: this is the first time in my memory that the
Speaker 1: leaders of one of our great two political parties, the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party, are not coming out and condemning mop violence
Speaker 1: in the attack on federal courts. Why can't we just say,
Speaker 1: you know, the violence against federal courts has to stop.
Speaker 1: Could we hear something like that? He was saying that
Speaker 1: this was over a month ago. The Attorney General was
Speaker 1: saying that they won't denounce violence, and no one was
Speaker 1: claiming that they were denouncing violence. They were saying, oh,
Speaker 1: there's not really much violence. There's no violence, just protests,
Speaker 1: mostly peaceful, mostly peaceful. You heard that all summer, mostly peaceful.
Speaker 1: The journals are emotionally invested in the perceived morality of
Speaker 1: these protests. You think that they're going to accept now
Speaker 1: that this was a con all along, that they were
Speaker 1: wrong to buy into this and they were actually hurting people,
Speaker 1: in fact, hurting the very people predominantly black and Hispanic Americans,
Speaker 1: that they claim to be helping. They're they're never going
Speaker 1: to accept that. They're never going to step back and say, yeah,
Speaker 1: you know what we made, We made quite a mistake here.
Speaker 1: This movement, this movement is terrible. No, now, it's we're
Speaker 1: going to stop the violence from the white nationalists. M
Speaker 1: from the white nationalists. They're the ones doing all this.
Speaker 1: You can't you can't help, but notice that Trump supporters
Speaker 1: just don't do the irresponsible, childish crap that these democrats
Speaker 1: are doing repeatedly, and I mean thousands and thousands of Look,
Speaker 1: any one person of any belief system can act out
Speaker 1: and be crazy. Any one person can do that. But
Speaker 1: when you're talking about mass movements, doesn't that indicate something
Speaker 1: about the ideology. This is a mass movement. BLM is
Speaker 1: a Democrat mass movement of destruction, coercion, violence, intimidation. That's
Speaker 1: what it is. And it's the single biggest political event
Speaker 1: for Democrats of this whole year. But we're supposed to
Speaker 1: ignore it, act like we don't know what this is.
Speaker 1: It's it's just appalling. It's just appalling. Oh I love
Speaker 1: how April Ryan. Going back to April Ryan there on CNN,
Speaker 1: she's with Mayor Ted Wheeler. That's right, April Ryan. Not
Speaker 1: very smart. Ted Wheeler a total moron there. I'm sure
Speaker 1: they see eye to eye and all this. He's a
Speaker 1: mayor whose city is turning into a national laughing stock
Speaker 1: in a cautionary tale. But April Ryan, who I'm sure
Speaker 1: is paid a million dollars a year to be a
Speaker 1: mediocre at best journalist, April Ryan sits around and is
Speaker 1: with him. Think of, we're now going to pretend this
Speaker 1: is what they do. We're gonna pretend Ted Wheelers doing
Speaker 1: a good job. You know that the presidents at least
Speaker 1: willing to offer assistance to more on Ted Wheeler Play six.
Speaker 1: I also want to provide an update on left wing
Speaker 1: political violence that we're seeing in Democrat run cities. Under
Speaker 1: my administration, federal law enforcement is working with state and
Speaker 1: local authorities all over the country to comb through hours
Speaker 1: of video, trackdown riders, looters, and arsonists and bring them
Speaker 1: to justice. We've just come up with a report that
Speaker 1: we've arrested a large number of people. It's over two hundred,
Speaker 1: and you'll be hearing about that. But they've been arrested
Speaker 1: in various cities throughout the United States. We're doing it
Speaker 1: very low key, but we're trying to help cities. They are,
Speaker 1: in all cases Democrat run, but we're doing the best
Speaker 1: we can to help them without really much of a consent.
Speaker 1: We'd like to have the consent. As an example, in Portland,
Speaker 1: we could solve that problem and approximately one hour, but
Speaker 1: the mayor refuses, perhaps for political reasons. I don't know.
Speaker 1: Way it's good for him to have a city that's
Speaker 1: falling apart and that's under siege now for ninety four days,
Speaker 1: but really it's been under siege for years, if you
Speaker 1: know Portland. So to the mayor, I say whenever you're ready,
Speaker 1: let us know. We'll solve you a problem of violence.
Speaker 1: We'll solve your problem of crime, will arrest those criminals
Speaker 1: very rapidly, and you'll be able to have some nice evenings.
Speaker 1: In Portland, one hundred and two of one hundred and
Speaker 1: seventy five people arrested during the protests in Kenosha. We're
Speaker 1: from out of town people showing up to Kenosha to
Speaker 1: burn stuff down and to throw rocks at cops. Democrats
Speaker 1: doing all of that. Who's supporting them, who's coordinating them,
Speaker 1: who's funding them? Oh, the media, the Democrat Party really
Speaker 1: don't want to get into that, do they. You're in
Speaker 1: the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: If you give violent extremists what they want, the violence
Speaker 1: doesn't go away. They gain new power to spread the
Speaker 1: terror nationwide. Most of our nation is extremely safe, by
Speaker 1: the way. You know, you only see the bad. You
Speaker 1: see Portland and Chicago, and you see what's happened in
Speaker 1: New York just in a very short period of time.
Speaker 1: It's horrible, what's happened in New York. I love New York.
Speaker 1: I come from New York. And when I see four
Speaker 1: years ago, I left and I could see that it
Speaker 1: was problems under this mayor. He's a terrible mayor, one
Speaker 1: of the worst. I can't say the worst. I mean,
Speaker 1: I've witnessed Portland hard to top him, but he's certainly
Speaker 1: one of the worst. And when I look at what's
Speaker 1: happening in New York, and I look at what's happening
Speaker 1: in the city, and so quickly it happened so quickly,
Speaker 1: it's a shame. It's true. Ted Wheeler may be the
Speaker 1: worst mayor in the country. I think we might have
Speaker 1: to give up the number one spot for Bill the
Speaker 1: Blasio in New York City, although it's closed. Someone explain
Speaker 1: to me, why do Blasio, the mayor of New York
Speaker 1: is okay with indoor dining in New Jersey, which, for
Speaker 1: those who don't know New York City that well, is
Speaker 1: just across the river. You take it's a subway stop. Basically,
Speaker 1: you take the Path train. It's kind of like a subway.
Speaker 1: It's a one train stop away. You can be there
Speaker 1: in five minutes and you can eat indoors in New Jersey,
Speaker 1: but you can't eat indoors in New York City. You
Speaker 1: can even in order to all of New York State,
Speaker 1: but not New York City. That's how stupid we are
Speaker 1: here in New York. And I know a lot of
Speaker 1: you are saying, well, buck, time to go to other places. Yeah,
Speaker 1: guess what. Democrats who have ruined, absolutely ruined these cities,
Speaker 1: these blue states with their dumbass liberal policies, are going
Speaker 1: to just keep piling into states like Texas and Florida
Speaker 1: where they have lower taxes, better better run bureaucracies, more
Speaker 1: you know, pro bisy, business, pro growth strategies. New York
Speaker 1: City is just is in the extraction phase. That's all.
Speaker 1: It's been coasting and now it can't turn around the spiral.
Speaker 1: And this is true of a lot of I think
Speaker 1: this is true of San Francisco, now it's true of Chicago.
Speaker 1: I mean, people that can leave are going to leave.
Speaker 1: But for those of you who that keep on advocating
Speaker 1: for this, just remember, they're coming to Texas, folks. They're
Speaker 1: showing up into your neck of the woods. Now, They're
Speaker 1: coming to Austin they already have been for years. They're
Speaker 1: coming down to Nashville, they're coming down to anywhere in
Speaker 1: Florida pretty much, so getting ready for it. Do you
Speaker 1: think they're going to show up and say, wow, maybe
Speaker 1: high taxes and a giant welfare state and social justice
Speaker 1: obsessed Marxism is a bad idea as a governing philosophy.
Speaker 1: That's why I'm here now. So maybe I'll no, of
Speaker 1: course not, They'll just say, oh, well, we just wanted
Speaker 1: something different now, So that's why we've moved to Tampa,
Speaker 1: you know, That's why we're here. Yeah. That and you
Speaker 1: realize your wife and kids couldn't walk around on the
Speaker 1: street and be safe anymore. Trump knows this. Look, they've
Speaker 1: Democrats are in a panic because look, if Americans are
Speaker 1: so stupid at this point, meaning enough of us, right,
Speaker 1: if fifty one percent of American voters roughly are going
Speaker 1: to see what the Democrat Party has done to the
Speaker 1: country just this year and want to put Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: who is a confused buffoon, in charge, you know, we're
Speaker 1: gonna get what we deserve and get it long and hard.
Speaker 1: Unfortunately as a country, I mean, that's what we're that's
Speaker 1: what we're facing. That's what's gonna end up happening. Speaking
Speaker 1: of Joe Biden and how he's supposed to be this
Speaker 1: great leader that will unite us and do all these
Speaker 1: amazing things. This was Joe Biden speaking during a prepared event,
Speaker 1: not not questions for reporters, not people trying to trip
Speaker 1: him up. This is just Joe Biden speaking at an
Speaker 1: event yesterday in Pennsylvania. Play one COVID has taken this year,
Speaker 1: just since the outbreak, has taken more than one hundred year. Look,
Speaker 1: here's the lives. It's just it's I mean, you think
Speaker 1: about it, more lives this year than any other year
Speaker 1: for the past hundred years. What what does he think?
Speaker 1: He's saying? Well, what is that rare? COVID is the
Speaker 1: other thing and the voice and the thing in the
Speaker 1: hundred years, And you know, you really just want to
Speaker 1: get this guy a nice blanket for his shoulders and
Speaker 1: a sippy cup and tell him that it's time to
Speaker 1: feed the squirrels. I mean, it's like you need to
Speaker 1: get him to calm down. Folks, Well, what is this
Speaker 1: that's you're supposed to be running the country. I swear,
Speaker 1: it's just it's impossible to get these people to stop.
Speaker 1: It's impossible to get them to stop supporting Biden. Doesn't
Speaker 1: matter how crazy he is, doesn't matter how absurd the
Speaker 1: pitch is. It doesn't matter how much he lies. You know,
Speaker 1: right now, Biden is saying that he's not banning fracking.
Speaker 1: He's just gonna limit fracking on public lands. That's what
Speaker 1: That's what the more moderate position is he's peddling today. Well,
Speaker 1: here is Biden just last year playlip eight. But I
Speaker 1: want you to just take a look. Okay, you don't
Speaker 1: have to agree, but I want you to look in
Speaker 1: my eyes. I guarantee, I guarantee we're gonna get a
Speaker 1: fossil fuel and I Am not going to pluck it.
Speaker 1: We're gonna end fossil fuels. Wouldn't that include drilling? Wouldn't
Speaker 1: that include fracking? Of course it would have to. This
Speaker 1: is an objectively maniacal and insane policy idea. Democrats believe
Speaker 1: in it. They think that this makes a lot of sense,
Speaker 1: that this is going to make us a better, safer, free,
Speaker 1: or more prosperous country by getting rid of fossil fuels.
Speaker 1: Fossil fuels are I mean, when you look at this,
Speaker 1: fossil fuels are the lifeblood of our entire economy right now,
Speaker 1: and they want to restrict it, make it more expensive,
Speaker 1: make it harder to get, which is going to make
Speaker 1: your life more annoying. That's really what democrats do. They
Speaker 1: make your life more annoying and think of themselves as
Speaker 1: heroes for doing so. Thanks for listening to The Bus
Speaker 1: Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the
Speaker 1: iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Were ever
Speaker 1: going to get some justice, some accountability against this movement?
Speaker 1: Were ever going to see that happen? There was a
Speaker 1: step today that I thought was at least in the
Speaker 1: right direction. Rand Paul has called to subpoena Antifa plane records,
Speaker 1: hotel records, travel records, and all funding friends. There are
Speaker 1: groups that are being funded, There are individuals and groups
Speaker 1: that are being funded to do this kind of agitation,
Speaker 1: which is a criminal conspiracy. There are conspiracy statutes. You
Speaker 1: know what a conspiracy is under federal law. Two or
Speaker 1: more people who try to put in motion a plan
Speaker 1: to break federal law. It's not hard to be guilty
Speaker 1: of conspiracy. That's why the Feds when they want to
Speaker 1: jam somebody up, love to use that to use that
Speaker 1: charge so much so, this is a good first step.
Speaker 1: It'll be even better when they announce an Antifa Rico prosecution.
Speaker 1: It is after all, and you know Antifa is an
Speaker 1: interstate criminal conspiracy organized and funded as an entity. So
Speaker 1: I say line them up and knock them down. Let's
Speaker 1: do it. Let's use the law as it should be
Speaker 1: to prevent criminality, not to lock up incoming national security advisors.
Speaker 1: Because Democrats are so sad they lost. Hilory lost. I'm
Speaker 1: going to tell you this right now, and it's not
Speaker 1: going to change if Trump wins. Realized, I'm I'm going
Speaker 1: to be a sore winner. I'll I'll be a if
Speaker 1: we lose, I'll be a respectful and a reasonable person.
Speaker 1: But I will tell you if Trump wins, I'll be
Speaker 1: a sore winner. Because they deserve, the Democrats deserve to
Speaker 1: have their faces absolutely rubbed in all of this. It's
Speaker 1: disgusting what they're doing. It's horrific, it's appalling, and I'm
Speaker 1: not going to be able to just let that go,
Speaker 1: not after all the lies told during the lockdowns and
Speaker 1: all the double standards, and now this this pretense that
Speaker 1: the violence is because of Trump. I mean, come on,
Speaker 1: you know what are they going to say next? You
Speaker 1: know that that Trump isn't strong enough on the border,
Speaker 1: that they're really strong on border security. They're they're the
Speaker 1: ones that want to build a wall. How much crazy
Speaker 1: or can it really get from what we were already
Speaker 1: seeing here? I do want the president there to go
Speaker 1: after Antifa and these other groups. I want the Department
Speaker 1: of Justice to use the tools at its disposal because
Speaker 1: we should know one, we should stop this. People don't
Speaker 1: deserve to have their cities destroyed by across state lines.
Speaker 1: Criminal conspiracy using the wires, meaning anything that's uh, you know, telecommunications,
Speaker 1: crossing state boundaries, which is what they're all doing. They're
Speaker 1: coordinating this across state lines, and they're they're going to
Speaker 1: attack law enforcement officers, burned down buildings, that's not protected
Speaker 1: First Amendment speech. In some cases, they're going to kill people,
Speaker 1: which is what they've already done. So why don't we
Speaker 1: start locking them up? Let's go and let's also bring
Speaker 1: them up on federal charges and say, okay, well, we'll
Speaker 1: cut you a deal. Who was paying to send you
Speaker 1: to Kenosha, Who was paying to send you to Portland?
Speaker 1: What were you really planning to do? Who are you
Speaker 1: in communication with during your riots in you know, I
Speaker 1: don't know. LA just had its first series in the
Speaker 1: last couple of days of new anti cop riots. And
Speaker 1: from what I stand, this is where a police officer
Speaker 1: shot somebody who had a gun and was a threat
Speaker 1: to police officer. So now we're going to see riots
Speaker 1: no matter what happens. Right if you shoot someone who
Speaker 1: is black in America and you're a cop, there can
Speaker 1: be an expectation of riots, Your life will be threatened,
Speaker 1: and it'll all fall apart because the BLM movement is
Speaker 1: full of lies and has filled people's heads with the
Speaker 1: nonsense that law enforcement is routinely and systematically murdering black
Speaker 1: men who are unarmed out of racism. That's the actual storyline,
Speaker 1: and it's a falsehood. It's a falseod. We need to
Speaker 1: be able to say that now too. One of the
Speaker 1: big problems I think we've had in all of this
Speaker 1: is you have so few people who are willing to
Speaker 1: in the earlier days speak out against this movement. And
Speaker 1: it was troubling to see how even major corporations. I'm
Speaker 1: going to tell you I tried to write a piece
Speaker 1: on wartime conservatism and it was a very good piece
Speaker 1: and everyone liked it, and some very large, large media
Speaker 1: organizations out there were not up to printing it. You
Speaker 1: know a bunch of different websites. We're oh, no, we
Speaker 1: can't print that. Why there are political campaigns a word
Speaker 1: borrowed from wars. You can't talk about being a wartime conservative. Nope,
Speaker 1: can't say that that was right. You know, in the
Speaker 1: weeks after the George Floyd incident, when I was trying
Speaker 1: to tell everybody be prepared for what we're going to
Speaker 1: be up against. The Left can't help itself. This isn't
Speaker 1: a smart tactic what they've done here with this mobilization.
Speaker 1: They liked it for a while and it did put
Speaker 1: Trump on defense, but now it's become too apparent what
Speaker 1: it really is now that we see the truth. It
Speaker 1: is a liability and they wish they could make the
Speaker 1: whole thing go away. Of course they can't. As I've said,
Speaker 1: I don't believe they really even have full control over
Speaker 1: the movement anymore. I think if Pelosi called for this
Speaker 1: to stop, a lot of people would say no. Look
Speaker 1: at what they do to Ted Wheeler. Ted Wheeler is
Speaker 1: basically walk around offering Antifa a you know, Shiatsu massage, please, Antifa,
Speaker 1: I'll do anything, just like me, and they they actually
Speaker 1: scream curses in his face. And spit at him, and
Speaker 1: he is a lib coward who does everything he can
Speaker 1: to make them happy, and they hate him. You think
Speaker 1: they're going to listen to other Democrats now who realize
Speaker 1: at least what this is going to do to their
Speaker 1: electoral changes. That they don't care. It doesn't it doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: I know what. They really want you to believe. They
Speaker 1: want you to believe. They want you to believe that
Speaker 1: Trump is the one who's not denouncing the violence. Now,
Speaker 1: the violence is a result of Trump Play nineteen. We
Speaker 1: need to hear our leaders denouncing the violence in our streets,
Speaker 1: denouncing it. We need to hear them tell us the
Speaker 1: truth that rioting divides instead of your nights. But this
Speaker 1: president can't say that. He cannot denounce the violence. He
Speaker 1: just cannot. He cannot admit that it divides instead of unites.
Speaker 1: Can't do that. Here's why. Because election day is just
Speaker 1: sixty three days away. He's desperate and he desperately needs
Speaker 1: to change the subject. He can't run on his record,
Speaker 1: really think about it, think about the truth. Trump can't.
Speaker 1: I just want to. I know it's don Lemon, so
Speaker 1: I don't want to get too deep in the weeds.
Speaker 1: You're trying to understand the workings of Don Lemon's brain.
Speaker 1: He's not a very smart man. Trump can't denounce the
Speaker 1: rioting because he can't run on his record. That doesn't
Speaker 1: even make sense. Trump has been denouncing the rioting and
Speaker 1: eluding all along. Now we're gonna again. Nothing matters, no
Speaker 1: reality matters, no history, no truth. We are. We are
Speaker 1: in a cultural, culturally relative, moral relative, moral relativism universe
Speaker 1: with the left, where they'll just make it up as
Speaker 1: they go along. You look at them and say, how
Speaker 1: could you honestly say this at this point? How can
Speaker 1: you really be making such a stupid such a stupid claim.
Speaker 1: And it's because they think people are dumb enough that
Speaker 1: they'll believe it. I don't know, I don't know. Oh,
Speaker 1: and they were very upset at the president because he's
Speaker 1: not he's not going against a written house, right, because
Speaker 1: he's not throwing written house on the bus. First of all,
Speaker 1: presidents should not be commenting on individual criminal cases. Really.
Speaker 1: I mean when I say not commenting, they can speak
Speaker 1: about it, but they should not be influencing people. The
Speaker 1: president is an executive branch employee. There should be a
Speaker 1: presumption of innocence, but also the process of the government's
Speaker 1: prosecution should be allowed to to go forward without undue
Speaker 1: interference from from other officials, which Obama didn't do. By
Speaker 1: the way, Oh, you go back the Obama administration. You know,
Speaker 1: remember if I had a son, he would look like Treyvon.
Speaker 1: Remember he said that. You know, he's trying to create
Speaker 1: greater sympathy for Treyvon Martin embyone. That was the big
Speaker 1: story of racism in America when some Hispanic guy gets
Speaker 1: into a fight with a with a black guy and
Speaker 1: the black guy tries to bash in the Hispanic guy's
Speaker 1: head in the sidewalk, and it was an example. And
Speaker 1: he's a guy. He's not a cop, right, George Zimmerman
Speaker 1: is not a cop. But they created out of out
Speaker 1: of nothing this Oh he's a white Hispanic that's what
Speaker 1: they were saying. He's a white Hispanic because his last name,
Speaker 1: because well, he's half he's half white. He appeared visually,
Speaker 1: George Zimmerman, one would have thought was of Hispanic origin,
Speaker 1: but they negated his Hispanic origin. Can you imagine if
Speaker 1: you were in there, if someone in the press tried
Speaker 1: to negate say, at this point, Kamala a portion of
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris's heritage. There would be an outcry, there'd be outrage.
Speaker 1: But George Zimmerman, No, he's George Zimmerman was white. That
Speaker 1: was the claim. The white Hispanic, whatever that even means.
Speaker 1: But they needed something, they wanted a story to tell,
Speaker 1: and the media in that case even went so far
Speaker 1: as to doctor tapes to make Zimmerman look even more guilty, which,
Speaker 1: if memory serves, he didn't go to prison at all.
Speaker 1: It turns out that you can't expect people to get
Speaker 1: their heads bashed into the sidewalk when they have a
Speaker 1: loaded gun on them. They're going to use the gun.
Speaker 1: That is self defense, and that's a natural law issue.
Speaker 1: That's not even just a question of statute. It doesn't
Speaker 1: matter what any government claims or says about your ability
Speaker 1: to defend yourself. You have a moral right to defend yourself.
Speaker 1: This is and this is really one of the most
Speaker 1: basic rights that you could have. So, you know, Zimmerman,
Speaker 1: it was a weird guy, obviously, and I'm not I'm
Speaker 1: not like a George Zimmerman fan at all, but you know,
Speaker 1: Zimmerman shot Trayvon Martin there in a fight now we've
Speaker 1: got the incident with Rittenhouse. I saw the lawyer last
Speaker 1: night on Tucker's show. I don't look I'm just gonna say,
Speaker 1: I don't think this lawyer. If you're a lawyer and
Speaker 1: you're showing up for a major criminal case like this,
Speaker 1: you got to sound like you're really squared away. I
Speaker 1: was not impressed with this guy. Don't get mad at me.
Speaker 1: I'm just telling you the truth. I do not think
Speaker 1: that Rittenhouse is being well served by this particular attorney.
Speaker 1: I wish we could get this guy. I wish you
Speaker 1: had a better legal counsel. I don't think you show
Speaker 1: up on Tucker Carlson's show as a lawyer with like
Speaker 1: a rumpled dress shirt that looks like you just you know,
Speaker 1: rolled out of you just rolled out of buying a
Speaker 1: you know, a jug of ntella at cost car or
Speaker 1: something like. I did not get a good vibe. I'm
Speaker 1: just telling you, I didn't get a good vibe about
Speaker 1: the whole thing. And he's gonna claim this is a
Speaker 1: well regulated militia defense or the Second Amendment. Ah, buddy,
Speaker 1: you're trying to get your client off of a murder charge.
Speaker 1: You got to work within the system. You have you can't.
Speaker 1: This is not an Errand Sorkin movie. I do think
Speaker 1: that there's a very strong claim for written house on
Speaker 1: self defense. I've said that all along. I also think
Speaker 1: that we shouldn't be encouraging people who are seventeen or eighteen,
Speaker 1: even if they think they're helping you, if you're putting
Speaker 1: yourself in a very dangerous situation when it comes to
Speaker 1: you so force And I get this is not a
Speaker 1: moral issue. This is a wisdom issue. Right you defend
Speaker 1: yourself no matter what right if someone's attacking you, I
Speaker 1: don't care what you've done or what the situation is.
Speaker 1: If they're the ones attacking you, you have a right
Speaker 1: to defend yourself. So that's a different question than say,
Speaker 1: should you put yourself in the middle of an angry mob?
Speaker 1: Choose to be in the middle of an angry mob
Speaker 1: with a loaded weapon when you have very limited training
Speaker 1: and very limited understanding of the law, and also what
Speaker 1: a lethal force situation is going to be. Like this
Speaker 1: guy was not you know former SF. You know who
Speaker 1: was former SF. The guy in Austin who shot a
Speaker 1: one of these BLM lunatics who was waving a gun
Speaker 1: in his face, and threatening him. No charges there, but
Speaker 1: that guy understood, this guy's waving gun in my face.
Speaker 1: This meets all the parameters, and I'm going to defend myself.
Speaker 1: And you know, he's somebody who was trained. And I'm
Speaker 1: not saying you have to be trained, of course, to
Speaker 1: defend yourself, but I'm just saying, and he was put
Speaker 1: in that situation. He didn't go looking for the situation.
Speaker 1: I look, I just I just wish that young, young
Speaker 1: Kyle Rittenhouse wasn't facing the ruination of his life, which
Speaker 1: he now is. What he now is. He seems like
Speaker 1: he's probably a very good guy based on the reporting
Speaker 1: about what he was his intentions were. He was supportive
Speaker 1: even off the bray. Mean, he's look, I think he's
Speaker 1: young and ignorant enough to think the protesters have a point.
Speaker 1: They don't. But he was a well intentioned kid. He
Speaker 1: was trying and I don't know, maybe he shouldn't call
Speaker 1: someone who's seventeen a kid, but we always go back
Speaker 1: and people changed this all the time. You know, when
Speaker 1: are you a kid when you're seventeen, Well you can
Speaker 1: join the Marine Corps when you're seventeen, So certainly not
Speaker 1: going to tell a seventeen year old marine. He's a kid,
Speaker 1: all right. But back to or what Trump said about
Speaker 1: the Rittenhouse situation, because he was asked about out of it,
Speaker 1: and here's what well for first for like, you know what,
Speaker 1: hold on, I'm gonna I'm gonna get into this in
Speaker 1: a bit more detail. So hold one second, you're in
Speaker 1: the Freedom. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast.
Speaker 1: President had a press conference where he was pushed on
Speaker 1: the Written House case. Here's how they try to set up. Remember,
Speaker 1: one guy, one person, defends himself and kills two people
Speaker 1: who are coming after him. We see it on video.
Speaker 1: We're not just taking someone's word for it. It's on
Speaker 1: the video. They were going after him. There's no question
Speaker 1: about that. One guy defends himself and that's supposed to
Speaker 1: be symbolic or that's supposed to be clear evidence that
Speaker 1: the whole of Trump's supporters are violent and they're the problem. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: you got you know, whole blocks of cities burned down,
Speaker 1: people throwing rocks and cops trying to blind them with lasers,
Speaker 1: thousands and thousands, tens of thousands of them for months
Speaker 1: and months and months, all Democrats not indicative of anything.
Speaker 1: They tell you not indicative of any This is out rageous,
Speaker 1: but this is in fact what is happening, all right,
Speaker 1: So here they are trying to push Trump to condemn
Speaker 1: conservative protesters. Now, oh, this is the game they want
Speaker 1: to play. Sixteen said, do you want to also, can't
Speaker 1: see contemd what your supporters did. I understand they had
Speaker 1: large numbers of people that were supporters, But that was
Speaker 1: a peaceful protest. And paint is nut, and paint is
Speaker 1: a defensive mechanism. Paint is nut. Bullets your supporters, your supporters,
Speaker 1: and they are your supporters. Indeed, a shot a young
Speaker 1: gentleman who killed him, not with paint, but with a bullet.
Speaker 1: And I think it's disgraceful. These people they protested peacefully.
Speaker 1: They went in very peacefully. And what they're protesting, they're
Speaker 1: protesting when they turn on television or read whatever they
Speaker 1: may be reading and they see a city like Chicago
Speaker 1: where seventy eight people were shot and thirteen died, or
Speaker 1: a city like New York where a crime rate has
Speaker 1: gone through the roof, or a city like Portland where
Speaker 1: the entire city is ablaze all the time, and a
Speaker 1: mayor says, we don't want to help from the federal government.
Speaker 1: When these people turn that on and they see that,
Speaker 1: they say, this is not our country, This is not
Speaker 1: our country. That was a peaceful protest, totally. I like
Speaker 1: how the President just goes right back at them with
Speaker 1: the nonsense they're trying. Now, Oh, yes, for the problem here, folks,
Speaker 1: are the Trump supporters? Really, no one who's no one
Speaker 1: who's honest and intelligent can believe that. Come on, it's
Speaker 1: the Democrat movement. It couldn't be any more clear. It's
Speaker 1: obvious they've been actually in your faces. Who is who
Speaker 1: is going out toppling monuments? Who wants to destroy Christopher
Speaker 1: Columbus statues, Gandhi statues. Who wants to scream in people's
Speaker 1: face as while they're in outdoor dining because God forbid
Speaker 1: we're allowed to eat indoors? Ever again about you know
Speaker 1: how how they needed they stand in solid area with
Speaker 1: Black Lives matter. It's all we all know. It's all Democrats.
Speaker 1: They want to focus on the Trump supporters. Here's the president.
Speaker 1: One asked specifically about Kyle Rittenhouse seventeen. I see Kyle Rittenhouse.
Speaker 1: We're looking at all of it. That was an interesting situation.
Speaker 1: You saw the same tape as Ia, and he was
Speaker 1: trying to get away from them. I guess it looks
Speaker 1: like and he fell and then they very violently attacked him.
Speaker 1: And it was something that we're looking at right now
Speaker 1: and it's under investigation, but I guess he was in
Speaker 1: very big trouble. He would have been he probably would
Speaker 1: have been killed. But it's under it's under investigate, it's
Speaker 1: under investigation. But from what he saw in the video
Speaker 1: he's telling you, kind of looked like the guy was
Speaker 1: defending himself, which it certainly does. But I think everyone
Speaker 1: needs to remember that as far as the Democrats are concerned,
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter if someone's attacking you. If you're a
Speaker 1: Trump supporter, you deserve to be attacked. It's what they believe.
Speaker 1: You're a Trump supporter, you deserve to be attacked. You
Speaker 1: deserve what you get. And we're not going to allow
Speaker 1: you to even defend your never might have to state
Speaker 1: defend you and protect you. No, no, no, that's not
Speaker 1: how the left plays the game, folks. They're dishonest, but
Speaker 1: they do play for keeps. Thanks for listening to The
Speaker 1: Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts
Speaker 1: at the iHeart Radio app or wherever you get your podcasts. So,
Speaker 1: how are we looking for reelection? And how is it
Speaker 1: looking in our fight against the insane Libs for the
Speaker 1: future of this country. You've got somebody who can weigh
Speaker 1: in on that and more joining us right now to
Speaker 1: also talk about his latest book. Donald Trump Junior is
Speaker 1: with us now. His book is Liberal Privilege, Joe Biden
Speaker 1: and the Democrats Defense of the Indefensable Topic Near and
Speaker 1: dear to our Heart on the show, Don thanks so
Speaker 1: much for calling in. Good to be with you, bug.
Speaker 1: It's great to be here, all right. So, look, you
Speaker 1: wrote a book. We actually had you on the show
Speaker 1: for that one a while back, huge bestseller. What are
Speaker 1: you doing with this one? What are you laying out?
Speaker 1: I mean, obviously we got an election coming up. Every
Speaker 1: issue feels like it's so heightened. What should people know
Speaker 1: about liberal privilege? Well, listen, I wrote in the book
Speaker 1: because when basically because of the lockdown, I was locked
Speaker 1: away up at my cabin. You know, Kimberly is a
Speaker 1: lot of fun, but I had to do a little
Speaker 1: bit of work. I couldn't go to work, It couldn't
Speaker 1: kids couldn't go to school. Couldn't go to church, couldn't
Speaker 1: do anything. I started looking at the person that we're
Speaker 1: running against, and I was amazed when I started digging
Speaker 1: deep into all of these things again, whether it's health,
Speaker 1: whether it's policy, whether it's sort of the family graft,
Speaker 1: whether it's racial issues. I mean, Joe Biden, according to
Speaker 1: Robert Gates, O, a Secretary of Defense, has been on
Speaker 1: the wrong side of every major decision of his entire career.
Speaker 1: And that's fifty years. And I'm watching the media try
Speaker 1: to run him as this sort of you know, undefined,
Speaker 1: non this script democrat. He's just butter and Joe from Scranton.
Speaker 1: And I'm like, oh, oh my god, this is ridiculous.
Speaker 1: And so since the media has sort of abdicated their job,
Speaker 1: they've they've just walked away from giving people both sides
Speaker 1: of the story to simply be a cheerleader for the
Speaker 1: radical left. I said, someone has to actually take this
Speaker 1: down and put it down, because it's literally me versus
Speaker 1: you know, there's guys like you as well, but like
Speaker 1: our universe of people on the right willing to say
Speaker 1: these things to get him out there is you know,
Speaker 1: one percent of the media masses that are literally doing
Speaker 1: whatever they can to cover up the disastrous Joe Biden career.
Speaker 1: I mean they're running this thing like, hey, Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: he's gonna come and save America. I go, he's been
Speaker 1: there for half a century. Like, I can't name a
Speaker 1: single accomplishment, you know, name something that he's done other
Speaker 1: than building up China. It's been a disaster. So I
Speaker 1: literally said, since the media refuses to do their job,
Speaker 1: they won't do it. I have to put out the
Speaker 1: counterpoint for those people. It's not even for the Mondo
Speaker 1: krad It's for the people who are on the fence,
Speaker 1: people who want to know what's really going on, who
Speaker 1: realize they're not being told any part of the story.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's hard to hide a half a century
Speaker 1: of failure, but the media is doing their darkness to
Speaker 1: make sure they do that for Joe. Talking to Donald
Speaker 1: Trump Junior, he's got a new book out, Liberal Privilege,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden, the Democrats, Defense of the Indefensible. Don what
Speaker 1: do you make of the switch that has happened just
Speaker 1: this week, where we've gone from what riots, these are
Speaker 1: mostly peaceful protests to the president and your dad is
Speaker 1: somehow responsible for the riots. How did this happen and
Speaker 1: what do you say in response to it? Well, it
Speaker 1: happened because they saw the polling data and all of
Speaker 1: a sudden, you know, they ignored the riots, the looting,
Speaker 1: the vandalism. They orded for an entire week. That week
Speaker 1: that was the hate filled anti America zoom call, also
Speaker 1: known as the DNC. They adnored it. Not one person
Speaker 1: buck spoke about it, not one person mentioned it. Joe
Speaker 1: Biden didn't even come out against it and say anything.
Speaker 1: There was tacit acceptance from the left. Remember, if you
Speaker 1: opened up your business to feed your family, you'd get
Speaker 1: arrested or lose your license. But if you looted that business,
Speaker 1: that's okay. NPR is writing articles the case for looting,
Speaker 1: meaning it's okay, you can loot a little bit. It's
Speaker 1: not a big deal. I mean, this isn't the Democrat platform.
Speaker 1: So it took Chris Cuomo and Don Lemon to sit
Speaker 1: there on TV and say, hey, you know, man, guys,
Speaker 1: it's it's really hurting us in the polls. The next day,
Speaker 1: all of a sudden, there's a switch. So they went
Speaker 1: from peaceful protest to riots that are now Trump's fault.
Speaker 1: I was like, I don't know how they could be
Speaker 1: riots if they've been peaceful protests for the last six months,
Speaker 1: according to the media, according to every Democrat, according to
Speaker 1: these outlets, those buildings that you see burning in the
Speaker 1: background as they're selling you this bs Obviously it's just
Speaker 1: a sheer coincidence. You saw that Chris says Nolo whatever
Speaker 1: hell his name is, the other day. Well, they're mostly
Speaker 1: peaceful and there hasn't really been any kind of escalation.
Speaker 1: And the picture that he posted is a picture of
Speaker 1: a city in flames. It's ludicrous, but they've been selling
Speaker 1: that to the American people, and that was a big
Speaker 1: part of the book also, you know, highlighting the hypocrisy,
Speaker 1: the double standard by which the media will look at
Speaker 1: Donald Trump and Joe Biden, you know, again, whether that
Speaker 1: be on policy. Notice they've spent more time talking about
Speaker 1: my three year old nephew and if he in fact
Speaker 1: built a lego white house for his grandfather, because my
Speaker 1: sister mentioned that his speech. Then they did talking about
Speaker 1: getting a peace deal done in the Middle East, I mean,
Speaker 1: sort of the holy grail of geopolitical politics at Middle
Speaker 1: East peace deal was accomplished two weeks ago and Goose says,
Speaker 1: crickets nothing. It's like it didn't happen. So, you know,
Speaker 1: the book was really there to make sure that people
Speaker 1: understand the uneven playing field that we're on, to the
Speaker 1: bias that they're getting their news from. You know, that
Speaker 1: guy that's working hard or a lady working hard to
Speaker 1: put food on the table. They're coming home and they're
Speaker 1: consuming five minutes of news and day and it's just
Speaker 1: ninety six percent negative against Donald Trump, irrespective of economic number,
Speaker 1: is irrespective of results, regardless of Middle East peace deals,
Speaker 1: all of the winds that we've seen, trade deals with China, renegotiating,
Speaker 1: failed NAFTA, it's like they never happened. If Obama did
Speaker 1: these things, he'd be emperor for life. But he got
Speaker 1: nothing done and Biden was his VP. All those things
Speaker 1: that Biden says he's going to solve, he had eight
Speaker 1: years as Vice president and forty years in the Senate
Speaker 1: to actually fix. But now he's going to be our savior.
Speaker 1: But now he's going to do it. He's a slow starter.
Speaker 1: It took him half a century to get into his groove.
Speaker 1: Is anyone that's stupid? Unfortunately? I think as we see
Speaker 1: with Joe Biden say, but I hope they see through it.
Speaker 1: I mean the most recent I'm sure you saw that
Speaker 1: most recent SoundBite where he's kind of talking about a
Speaker 1: hundred years of this and the thing and the place,
Speaker 1: and there's a part of me. I mean, this is politics,
Speaker 1: as people say, it ain't being bad right, like, this
Speaker 1: is real, So you can't let this stuff slide. But
Speaker 1: it's a combination of funny and sad, depending on how
Speaker 1: you're really coming out with this guy. It would be
Speaker 1: funny if it would It would be funny if it
Speaker 1: was in a movie. I mean it's I watched the
Speaker 1: Biden campaign. It's like a scene out of Veep. Every day,
Speaker 1: every day this happens. It'd be funny if it wasn't
Speaker 1: so scary. And I don't mean to make light of dementia,
Speaker 1: but Joe Biden. I go into this in great detail
Speaker 1: in the book. I actually interview Ronnie Jackson, who was
Speaker 1: the White House doctor. It observed him for eight years there,
Speaker 1: you know, has seen the steady decline. And then you
Speaker 1: say that, you say, wait a minute, this is a
Speaker 1: guy that has had two brain surgeries because of aneurysms,
Speaker 1: because of explosions in his brain. He's lucky to be alive.
Speaker 1: But no doctor with any credibility would tell you that
Speaker 1: there's there's not a huge chance that even if you
Speaker 1: had one, that there'd be a major issue cognitively with
Speaker 1: you forever. From that point forward. He's had two. And
Speaker 1: then he can't remember where he is most of the time.
Speaker 1: You saw the speech yesterday. I mean he's on the teleprompter,
Speaker 1: and I mean you could see the look of fear
Speaker 1: in his eyes the second he realized he forgot where
Speaker 1: he was the point he was gonna make. You saw
Speaker 1: the same thing Buck in the debates, remember the Democrat debates.
Speaker 1: That was that was three weeks ago. That was before
Speaker 1: they became obsolete. Now the New York Times is telling
Speaker 1: us on the Launchington Post is telling us the debates
Speaker 1: are obsolete because they know they don't want Joe Biden
Speaker 1: on the stage with Donald Trump. I can I ask
Speaker 1: you do you think obsolete? Just forever? For everyone listening,
Speaker 1: we're talking to Donald Trump Junior. Got a new book out.
Speaker 1: You got to check it out, Liberal Privilege. But don
Speaker 1: I just I want to ask, do you think the
Speaker 1: debate's going to happen? I know they've set it on
Speaker 1: the calendar, but do you believe it's gonna happen with
Speaker 1: big shows up. I don't know how he gets out
Speaker 1: of it now. I mean they're trying. You saw you
Speaker 1: know the New York Times again, I should have boast that.
Speaker 1: And the debates are sort of obsolete now they're they're
Speaker 1: absolutely But remember during the debates, Joe Biden would sit there,
Speaker 1: he'd give it forty five second answer, not actually answer
Speaker 1: the question. Then he'd forget where he was going, and
Speaker 1: it was like, oh, just like a deer in the
Speaker 1: headlights panic. And then he would immediately his default answers, well,
Speaker 1: I don't want to take up any more time, so
Speaker 1: I'm gonna let everything. I was like, Joe, I'd actually
Speaker 1: appreciate you finishing your thought rather than pretending you answer
Speaker 1: the question. But again, no one called him out on it,
Speaker 1: no one. And if Donald Trump had a performance like that,
Speaker 1: if Donald Trump once stammered and forgot where he is
Speaker 1: and couldn't read the basics of a teleprompter like Joe
Speaker 1: Biden did yesterday, it read television psychologist in America would
Speaker 1: be on the air saying he's in the later stages
Speaker 1: of dementia and Alzheimer's plus other mental diseases combined. Joe,
Speaker 1: I mean, I've I've also got to ask you, don
Speaker 1: I gotta ask you because because you know, you understand
Speaker 1: what this media, the mainstream media. Obviously they're exceptions like me.
Speaker 1: You know, all the people on the right who make
Speaker 1: who make the contrari in case to sort of left
Speaker 1: wing corporate socialism that is constantly being sputed at seeing
Speaker 1: at an, MSNBC in other places. But you are the
Speaker 1: particular recipient of media attention as a member of the
Speaker 1: first family, as the president's eldest son. There's another would
Speaker 1: be first son in a sense here in Hunter Biden.
Speaker 1: I mean, just a personal level. Do you ever view
Speaker 1: the way the media that shows no interest in the
Speaker 1: child with the stripper drive around and like the new
Speaker 1: Porsche even though he claims he's got no money and
Speaker 1: he's on the board of Brisbie. How much time you
Speaker 1: got Let's just say, there's probably two chapters in the
Speaker 1: book on this, but you know, Hunter Biden is taking
Speaker 1: one point five billion dollars from the Chinese government for
Speaker 1: your listeners who don't know what that means. In a
Speaker 1: typical fun structure. There's a two percent management fee and
Speaker 1: twenty percent of the profits. Two percent annual fee on
Speaker 1: one point five billion dollars is thirty million dollars a year.
Speaker 1: To Hunter Biden. You think Joe item is gonna be
Speaker 1: tough on China. I mean, he spent his entire career
Speaker 1: shipping our jobs to China again, napped up TPP, pushing
Speaker 1: for permanent status in the World Trade Organization. Joe Biden
Speaker 1: has done more damage to the middle class and the
Speaker 1: manufacturing sector of this country than any human being alive.
Speaker 1: He should be running for president of China, not of America.
Speaker 1: But again, no one's gonna hold him accountable for that.
Speaker 1: You think it would be a news story if I
Speaker 1: knocked up a stripper buck and I spent three years
Speaker 1: hiding from child support. Yes, you know, she didn't be
Speaker 1: the number one interview in America, and they're like this
Speaker 1: person who doesn't exist, that never happened. Joe is a
Speaker 1: great family guy. I get to listen to Hunter Biden
Speaker 1: and that like sort of you know, prerecorded, like Vignette
Speaker 1: said that he did talking about you know, his family's character.
Speaker 1: I'm like, this guy's gonna go there. I mean, The
Speaker 1: media's attack on my speech at the DNC was that
Speaker 1: I guess the lighting made my eyes shine, so they
Speaker 1: said I was on cocaine. I go, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: you haven't me confused with the actual crackhead unter Biden.
Speaker 1: It's absolutely disgusting, and I've done it because they say, hey,
Speaker 1: our he has done graft and all other stuff. I go,
Speaker 1: how about this. You put me on a debate stage.
Speaker 1: Jim Van de High of Axios to this, so you
Speaker 1: know no one that anyone's going to confuse as a conservative.
Speaker 1: I said, Jim, you moderate the debate me versus Hunter.
Speaker 1: Full disclosure, tax returns, everything, full disclosure. You do it.
Speaker 1: The media, oh, Hunter Biden would kill Donald Junior. He
Speaker 1: was a Yale lawyer. I'm sure he didn't get it
Speaker 1: to the Yale because his dad was pulling the prestricts
Speaker 1: with the edge. I'm sure I had nothing to do
Speaker 1: with it, right, It's like all of his other jobs.
Speaker 1: But I said, let's do it. They said Hunter would
Speaker 1: kill Don Junior. I go, fine, then make it happen.
Speaker 1: Put the nail in my coffin. Let's end this once
Speaker 1: and for all. All of a sudden, it went to crickets.
Speaker 1: You know, that doesn't even talk about Ukraine the other graphs.
Speaker 1: More importantly, what the book gets into that no one
Speaker 1: knows about it Jim's Joe's brother, Jim getting all these
Speaker 1: housing contracts to build homes in the Middle East in
Speaker 1: these war zones, the billion dollars type contracts, minor details.
Speaker 1: He'd never built a home in his life. But you
Speaker 1: know what he did have. He had access to Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: That's all it is. If these were things that my
Speaker 1: family were doing, we'd be in jail right now. We
Speaker 1: were actually international business people before we got into politics,
Speaker 1: and we stopped doing new deals abroad to avoid the
Speaker 1: notion of impropriety. We actually did. Hunter and Jim magically
Speaker 1: became business people over tonight when you know their dad
Speaker 1: and brother respectively became VP. But again, you can't touch that,
Speaker 1: So I go into all of those details. So anyone
Speaker 1: who thinks that this is moderate Joe from screen and
Speaker 1: not the biggest swamp creature DC has ever produced is
Speaker 1: just flagrantly mistaken. So this book is the counterpoint to
Speaker 1: all of the fluffing that the media is giving Biden,
Speaker 1: his record, his history, his family, because it's all smoke
Speaker 1: and mirrors. It's all alive, but no one's going to
Speaker 1: know that unless you take the effort and put it
Speaker 1: out there. So that's what this is. I mean, you
Speaker 1: have literally five hundred and sixty citations of each of
Speaker 1: these points. Also, so they can't say I'm spreading fake news.
Speaker 1: I mean the thirty five pages of literally citations of
Speaker 1: all of these points. All of it. The voting record,
Speaker 1: racial record, it's a disaster. Any one of these things
Speaker 1: by themselves would be disqualifying if a conservative did it.
Speaker 1: But Joe Biden is the perfect vessel for the left
Speaker 1: because they can tell Middle America that he's a moderate.
Speaker 1: But not talk about Kamala and her record as VP,
Speaker 1: because we all know she's gonna be in charge anyway, right,
Speaker 1: Not talk about the Biden Sanders Bernie Sanders joint Unity platform.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden's platform is not a matter of platform. If
Speaker 1: you're utilizing Bernie Sanders's platform, I think folks are going
Speaker 1: to have to get the rest of it in the book,
Speaker 1: which sounds like it's well worth the read everyone. You
Speaker 1: should check it out. Liberal Privilege. Donald Trump Junior is
Speaker 1: the author Liberal Privilege. Joe Biden and the Democrats defense
Speaker 1: of the indefense. Will Don thanks so much for coming on.
Speaker 1: I know you don't need to hear this for me,
Speaker 1: but please let's make sure your dad wins. Okay, please,
Speaker 1: American I'm working hard. Make sure all your listeners are
Speaker 1: doing the same. Okay, absolutely, man, thanks so much for
Speaker 1: coming on. You're in the freedom hud. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show. Guest. You know there are some governors
Speaker 1: out there who are actually looking at the data and
Speaker 1: the science about COVID nineteen and taking the right conclusions
Speaker 1: from it. You won't hear much about this because we're
Speaker 1: all supposed to accept lockdown until the election, which I've
Speaker 1: been telling you Democrats we're going to do this for months,
Speaker 1: and turns out that is what they're gonna do. Keep
Speaker 1: us lockdown in blue states, in blue cities as much
Speaker 1: as they can get away with until the election actually happens,
Speaker 1: and then we'll see where we are after that. They
Speaker 1: might lock us down even more if Trump wins. Right
Speaker 1: to punish us for our political sins. But here's Florida
Speaker 1: Governor Ron Descantis, who is by the numbers, three times
Speaker 1: better than Governor Cuomo at keeping people alive during a
Speaker 1: pandemic three times better. Really more than that, almost three
Speaker 1: and a half times better. Right, So you got about
Speaker 1: ten thousand deaths in Florida, about thirty three thousand deaths
Speaker 1: in New York work from COVID. Okay, So anyone who
Speaker 1: thinks that Governor DeSantis needs a lecture has to explain
Speaker 1: why they can't do math. But DeSantis also is letting
Speaker 1: everyone know there's not going to be a second lockdown.
Speaker 1: Play twenty two. We gain jobs seventy four thousand, I
Speaker 1: think private sector jobs in July, and just imagine if
Speaker 1: we had shut down the state, we'd have lost another
Speaker 1: three or four hundred thousand jobs. And so I think
Speaker 1: that we understand what we need to do, but we
Speaker 1: will never do any of these lockdowns again. And I
Speaker 1: hear people say they'll shut down the country, and honestly,
Speaker 1: I cringe because we know places that have done that.
Speaker 1: The most draconian lockdown in the world has been Peru
Speaker 1: military and force. Since March. They have the highest per
Speaker 1: capita mortality in the world from COVID. And at best
Speaker 1: what a lockdown will do is delay. It does not
Speaker 1: reduce the ultimate mortality. But I think doctor Alice would agree.
Speaker 1: It creates a lot of other problems with mortality that
Speaker 1: a lot of people don't necessarily focus on. All it
Speaker 1: does is delay. But when the population is so fearful,
Speaker 1: you can control them promise that, oh, if we just
Speaker 1: do this one more month, one more month, you'll be safe.
Speaker 1: The government can't follow through on that promise. Everyone needs
Speaker 1: to understand that the government's not in a position to
Speaker 1: deliver on the promise it makes here. But people don't care.
Speaker 1: They want to blame Trump for all this in this
Speaker 1: country at least, even though it's hit the whole world.
Speaker 1: The whole world hasn't been hit by this. A lot
Speaker 1: of very advanced episcitic countries have had a terrible time
Speaker 1: with COVID. Some other countries have had a much less
Speaker 1: terrible time with COVID. Obesity is an enormous indicator of
Speaker 1: how well a society is going to do with this
Speaker 1: or just note that, so that doesn't get talked about
Speaker 1: very much at all. This not all populations of countries
Speaker 1: are the same, and we are not taking the right
Speaker 1: conclusions from this if we think that continued locked makes
Speaker 1: any sense. Desantists is right. The critics, the haters of
Speaker 1: de santists. I don't know what they're talking about. Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to the Bus Sesson Show podcast. Remember to
Speaker 1: subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. What the heck's really going on with
Speaker 1: the country. There's a guy who can certainly answer that
Speaker 1: question for us. Jesse Kelly is with us now. He
Speaker 1: is the host of the Jesse Kelly Show on KPRC
Speaker 1: down in Houston. You can also watch and listen to
Speaker 1: him on I'm Right with Jesse Kelly on the First,
Speaker 1: which is the best digital channel for conservative talk and
Speaker 1: opinion out there. Mister Kelly, good to see you. It
Speaker 1: is good to be here. I'm glad you get to
Speaker 1: see me today. But I'm a lucky man. What can
Speaker 1: I say? Let's start with this. I was a little
Speaker 1: taken aback today. This was one of those that wasn't
Speaker 1: getting that much attention. But you know, there was a
Speaker 1: story in the New York Times which shouldn't surprise anybody.
Speaker 1: Here's how it goes. Proud and fierce in their identity,
Speaker 1: The Marines have a singular race problem that critics say
Speaker 1: is rooted in decades of resistance to change a handful
Speaker 1: of white men rule over one hundred and eighty five
Speaker 1: thousand white African American, Hispanic and Asian men and women.
Speaker 1: Jesse I had hoped that the Libs weren't planning to
Speaker 1: tear down all of the most hollowed, necessary and unifying
Speaker 1: and elite institutions of this country as racist and sexist.
Speaker 1: But apparently even the Marine Corps they want to dismantle.
Speaker 1: What's going on. Well, one, leftists don't look at anything
Speaker 1: and say to themselves, Ah, we shouldn't go there. Let's
Speaker 1: just leave that alone. It's a religion of domination. It's
Speaker 1: not a political ideology. That's why they're ruining the Church.
Speaker 1: They'll ruin the Marine Corps. They're coming for all of it.
Speaker 1: But the two they're already in the Marine Corps, we're
Speaker 1: trying to make women. We're trying to make them in
Speaker 1: the infantry Marines. A female body does not hold up
Speaker 1: to that. To say nothing in the fact that screws
Speaker 1: up the unicohesion. Women have no place in frontline combat
Speaker 1: units at all. It's completely ridiculous. For a country of
Speaker 1: three hundred and fifty million people, there's no need to
Speaker 1: have women there. But when it comes to the Marine Corps.
Speaker 1: They were, at least when I was in, they were
Speaker 1: the prime example of what race relations should be. It's
Speaker 1: easy for me to say my infantry platoon we said
Speaker 1: the most awful racist things to each other on a
Speaker 1: daily basis, stuff that would make hardened individuals cringe and go,
Speaker 1: that's probably too far. And we all laughed and laughed
Speaker 1: and laughed, and nobody cared. We had black guys, we
Speaker 1: had Cubans, we had Mexicans, we have people from Guatemala,
Speaker 1: and the worst crap you could imagine, we would say
Speaker 1: it because we didn't care. It was a joke. That's
Speaker 1: how dudes relate to each other. It's the people who
Speaker 1: are afraid to talk about it. Those are the real rates.
Speaker 1: Jesse Kelly laying it down for everybody, because these days,
Speaker 1: I feel like there's always there's always some you know,
Speaker 1: they always find some retired three stars our four star
Speaker 1: to go on CNN who will claim with a straight
Speaker 1: face that what you said, for example, about women in
Speaker 1: combat specifically, I don't know what it takes to see this.
Speaker 1: I mean, I know women are biologically different in a
Speaker 1: way that is less effective in a combat situation, but
Speaker 1: we're not allowed to say that, are we? I mean,
Speaker 1: now we have to pretend like the single biggest study
Speaker 1: of the Marine Corps did of women in combat did
Speaker 1: not show catastrophic anatomic failure over time compared to their
Speaker 1: male counterparts. Shocking amounts of failure, setting aside things like
Speaker 1: just basic lung capacity and unicahesion. Physically, it's not there
Speaker 1: their bodies. They don't have the hips, that don't have
Speaker 1: the legs for it, they don't have the shoulders for it.
Speaker 1: Their bodies breakdown over time. It is a relentless four
Speaker 1: year pounding. I haven't been in the Marine Corps in oh,
Speaker 1: fifteen years. My knees still tell me when it's going
Speaker 1: to rain. And I'm six foot eight, two hundred and
Speaker 1: thirty pounds. What do you think that looks like to
Speaker 1: a five two hundred and fifteen pound woman. It destroys
Speaker 1: her body. They're just not made to be there, and
Speaker 1: we don't need them to be there. But be that
Speaker 1: as it may. You brought up generals. Generals are just
Speaker 1: like doctors and teachers and that people. They hear the
Speaker 1: title and they automatically assign some level of respect to it.
Speaker 1: And leftists, of course will use that because tons of generals,
Speaker 1: just like doctors and teachers, don't deserve any respect at all.
Speaker 1: They're useless, idiot losers. Now granted, just like doctors and teachers,
Speaker 1: all it takes is one great general to change your
Speaker 1: life for the better for the rest of your life.
Speaker 1: But automatically assigning respect because of the title is ridiculous.
Speaker 1: Most of the generals I knew were scumbag politicians who
Speaker 1: were only in it for a career. I was happy
Speaker 1: to have one or two who were fantastic, though, Jesse Kelly,
Speaker 1: everybody never, never holding it back. So you're down in Texas,
Speaker 1: I'm up here in New York. How are you guys
Speaker 1: doing with actually getting your lives back? I'm not willing
Speaker 1: to just give up because people are tired of hearing
Speaker 1: about my complaints about imasked and how it doesn't make
Speaker 1: any sense in so many context of my favorite recently
Speaker 1: that I've been subjected to is uber now wants you
Speaker 1: to take a photo or threatens to make people take
Speaker 1: selfies if they're caught not wearing a mask and the
Speaker 1: driver complains about it, and I have to prove you're
Speaker 1: wearing a mask. Every Uber that I have gotten into
Speaker 1: and you can't really find yellow cabs in New York anymore,
Speaker 1: that kind of ubiquitous, iconic yellow cab that usually has
Speaker 1: you know, lots of old gums stuck on the bottom
Speaker 1: of the floor, smells a bit like you know, hobo feces.
Speaker 1: I mean all of that. You can't find that anymore.
Speaker 1: But you do have you do have a requirement to
Speaker 1: wear masks inside these ubers. The guys put the mask
Speaker 1: on when you get in the car, Jesse, So I'm
Speaker 1: basically in like a moving by their own theory, a
Speaker 1: moving viral vesicle until the guy puts his mask on,
Speaker 1: and then I'm supposed to believe it's fine. I don't
Speaker 1: understand what your problem is with taking basic medical precautions.
Speaker 1: But when I walk into a restaurant that's full of
Speaker 1: people and I have to put my mask on for
Speaker 1: the twenty feet between my door and the table and
Speaker 1: then sit down and can immediately take it off, I
Speaker 1: know that I've stopped the spread of coronavirus. You can
Speaker 1: only get it as you're standing walking through a restaurant.
Speaker 1: You can't get it when you're sitting down. And that
Speaker 1: cab driver he can't spread it around until you're in
Speaker 1: the car. It's all. This is all of our coronavirus response.
Speaker 1: You need to just accept this. It was created by
Speaker 1: only the smartest medical experts. They all only have your
Speaker 1: best interests in mind, So please just shut up and
Speaker 1: comply and destroy the economy of the United States of
Speaker 1: America while they try to figure out how to treat something.
Speaker 1: When do people decide that they're just not going to
Speaker 1: do this anymore? I mean, I'm a little bit is
Speaker 1: it because we all have incredible flat screen TVs that
Speaker 1: twenty years ago people would have paid ten thousand dollars for,
Speaker 1: but now we pay two hundred and fifty bucks for
Speaker 1: them like well, and we have endless entertainment options and
Speaker 1: food taste better than it ever has. I mean, are
Speaker 1: we kind of in this brave new world of food
Speaker 1: and entertainment in the home that allows people to not
Speaker 1: completely lose their minds for having a government takeaway the
Speaker 1: actually a lot of the parts of life, time with family,
Speaker 1: pursuing your career, time outdoors. I'm wondering what it takes, Like,
Speaker 1: what do we have to do before people just say no,
Speaker 1: come and arrest me. I think there are three part
Speaker 1: on what you just said's true. I think there are
Speaker 1: three main parts of this. One, we have an American
Speaker 1: society that's been educated in government school systems, and therefore
Speaker 1: they've been taught they're supposed to be good little sheep
Speaker 1: and do as they're told and do as the government says.
Speaker 1: Most people in society have been educated like that for
Speaker 1: eighteen years of their lives or whatever it works out
Speaker 1: to be. That's one. Two. The people being actually attacked
Speaker 1: and affected by coronavirus are for the most part, people
Speaker 1: on the right. That's why it's small business owners and
Speaker 1: people like that, so they're going to be less prone
Speaker 1: to street rioting as we've seen them people on the left.
Speaker 1: And lastly, they slow rolled everybody. Look it was you
Speaker 1: and I very early on saying this. These lockdowns are
Speaker 1: stupid from pretty much day one. But for the most part, remember,
Speaker 1: the American people are compassionate people. I don't have that problems.
Speaker 1: I have no harder soul. But when the American people
Speaker 1: are told go home for a week, they'll do it. Okay,
Speaker 1: go home for two weeks, they'll do it. Fifteen days
Speaker 1: to flatten the spread, they'll do it. And they just
Speaker 1: kept adding, you noticed they were incremental about all of it. Well,
Speaker 1: just a little more of this, a little more of that,
Speaker 1: a little more of this, and sooner or later you
Speaker 1: wake up and you have what we have now, fifty
Speaker 1: million people unemployed in a four trillion dollar deficit, and
Speaker 1: now you slow wrote it so much no one cares.
Speaker 1: It does feel like the frog in the boiling pot.
Speaker 1: I'm I'm furious about it. Every day. I actually have
Speaker 1: people that write into me and say, stop talking about
Speaker 1: the national mask mandate that Biden wants. You know, we
Speaker 1: don't want to hear about this anymore. And I'm like,
Speaker 1: you don't want to hear about this? These people are
Speaker 1: ruining are like, they're ruining people's lives over nonsense. How
Speaker 1: is this not? And these are conservative? Sometimes I get
Speaker 1: very frustrated. I was like, aren't we We had hundreds
Speaker 1: of thousands of people marching about government spending Jesse under
Speaker 1: the aegis of the Tea Party in twenty ten. Well
Speaker 1: they're destroying millions of businesses and telling you you can't
Speaker 1: go visit grandma or have a funeral if she dies.
Speaker 1: And we're like, yeah, whatever, Yeah, those people were marching
Speaker 1: about eight hundred billion dollars spending bills under Barack Obama.
Speaker 1: You see when the Republican government passes a two trillion
Speaker 1: dollars bill and then just flat out prince trillions more.
Speaker 1: Oh that's different. I guess things are changed now. The
Speaker 1: truth is we've lost what it means to be free.
Speaker 1: The American people should never have accepted a governor, or
Speaker 1: mayor or anyone else saying your business has to close
Speaker 1: and yours camp. That immediately should have been no, screw you,
Speaker 1: my business will be open. If you have a problem
Speaker 1: with it, come down and arrest me. And if the
Speaker 1: American people had universally done that, they wouldn't have shut
Speaker 1: down a thing because you can't arrest everybody. But instead
Speaker 1: everybody put their heads down and complied, and now you
Speaker 1: get what you get. Don't go. Yeah, it's like we
Speaker 1: had a massive freedom stress test and we failed it
Speaker 1: as a country. That's really how I don't like saying that.
Speaker 1: I think that's what happened. Oh, you're what, You're right.
Speaker 1: I mean we could acknowledge our failures. We're never going
Speaker 1: to correct them unless we do. We have lost whatever
Speaker 1: that freedom DNA, that gigantic up yours to government thing,
Speaker 1: that was supposed to be an American thing. We've lost that.
Speaker 1: Now we can get it back. We're gonna have to
Speaker 1: fight to get it back one day, but whatever it is,
Speaker 1: it's gone. I watched this country, and like you pointed out,
Speaker 1: most of the right too, wasn't just the left. People
Speaker 1: on the right now love to do that revisionist history
Speaker 1: thing and act like this was all Democrats. That's a
Speaker 1: bunch of crap. Don't let the people on the right
Speaker 1: who screw this whole thing up for you get out
Speaker 1: that with that cop out. People on the right too
Speaker 1: are just shut up. Don't you care about people? And
Speaker 1: now they're weirdly quiet now buff Jesse Kelly speaks the truth,
Speaker 1: my friends. Why you should listen to him, you should
Speaker 1: watch him. I'm right with Jesse Kelly on the first
Speaker 1: which if you have not already download the first TV app,
Speaker 1: which you can get for your smart device. I'm also
Speaker 1: on there, so you've got lots of great stuff. We've
Speaker 1: got fantastic things on the first And also if you're
Speaker 1: listening down in KPRC Houston, the show right before this
Speaker 1: is the Jesse Kelly Show. Jesse, great to have you man,
Speaker 1: Thank you appreciate your boss. You're in the Freedom und
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. The Red
Speaker 1: Mirrage scenario. We're going to be talking more about this.
Speaker 1: This is very important thing. This is something that everybody
Speaker 1: should be aware of right now. The Red Mirrage is
Speaker 1: this concept the Democrats are advancing, and there's one Democrat
Speaker 1: group in particulars that's telling everybody through this this analytics
Speaker 1: firm that there is a very good chance that President
Speaker 1: Trump on election day may look like he is winning substantially,
Speaker 1: like it's a landslide, a huge victory for Trump this election.
Speaker 1: This is not some far off future prediction. And then
Speaker 1: because of mail in voting, he may go from being
Speaker 1: considered the president on election night. People might go to
Speaker 1: bed on November third thinking that Donald Trump is the
Speaker 1: president of the United States for four or more years
Speaker 1: and wake up a day, maybe a week later, only
Speaker 1: to be told, oh, just kidding, we're counting all these
Speaker 1: mail in ballots, and what do you know, it's a
Speaker 1: much closer race than we thought. It's now a contested race.
Speaker 1: It's now a circumstance where we can't tell you that
Speaker 1: the president, the current president, Donald Trump, really even one
Speaker 1: the CEO of this group, hawk Fish, calls the scenario
Speaker 1: the red mirage. Quote. We are sounding an alarm and saying,
Speaker 1: this is a very real possibility that the data is
Speaker 1: going to show on election night an incredible victory for
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. When every legitimate vote is tality we get
Speaker 1: to that final day, which will be someday after election day,
Speaker 1: it will in fact show that what happened on election
Speaker 1: night was exactly that a mirage. It did. It looked
Speaker 1: like Donald Trump was in the lead, and he fundamentally
Speaker 1: was not. When every ballot gets counted, And they even
Speaker 1: have a graphic that they show of how the country
Speaker 1: from November third to say November eighth, ninth, tenth, all
Speaker 1: of a sudden, like the vote count shifts. Here's what
Speaker 1: they're telling you under one of the group's modeling scenarios. Remember,
Speaker 1: modeling with COVID got us into horrible trouble with believing
Speaker 1: believing we're going to run out of ventilators and believing
Speaker 1: we're gonna run out of ppe and all this stuff.
Speaker 1: According to this group's modeling, though, which there's a reason
Speaker 1: why this all matters. Even if they're wrong, this matters
Speaker 1: a lot. Even if this is all a fantasy from
Speaker 1: this analytics firm. Let me just give you their numbers. Though. First,
Speaker 1: Trump could hold a projected lead of four hundred and
Speaker 1: eight to one hundred and thirty electoral votes on election night.
Speaker 1: This is all, according to Axios, if only fifteen percent
Speaker 1: of the vote by mail ballots have been counted. Once
Speaker 1: seventy five percent of mail ballots were counted, perhaps four
Speaker 1: days later, the lead could flip to Biden's favor. This
Speaker 1: particular modeling scenario portrays Biden as ultimately winning a massive
Speaker 1: victory three hundred and thirty four to two hundred and four.
Speaker 1: The ultimate results may well sit somewhere between these low
Speaker 1: end and high end scenarios, but they're telling everybody right
Speaker 1: now that just because you see something on election night
Speaker 1: doesn't mean that that's actually what has happened. This is
Speaker 1: so dangerous. This plays in so clearly to the narrative
Speaker 1: that we've been that's been really been shoved down our
Speaker 1: throats now for months that Trump, if he wins, it's illegitimate.
Speaker 1: Remember Hillary Clinton said, I think it was last week
Speaker 1: or the week before. Hillary Clinton made the claim that
Speaker 1: Biden shouldn't concede under any circumstances that's going to be there.
Speaker 1: That's going to be their position that there should be
Speaker 1: no conceding the election on election night. Hillary didn't even
Speaker 1: want to concede when she lost in twenty sixteen. You'll
Speaker 1: remember that she was thinking about trying to contest it is.
Speaker 1: This is giving you a heads up right now that
Speaker 1: Democrats will absolutely will contest the election results. They're not
Speaker 1: going to give even if it means they're wrong in
Speaker 1: the end. They're not going to give Trump voters the
Speaker 1: peace and the satisfaction of an election night win. They're
Speaker 1: going to say, we can't know because of the outstanding
Speaker 1: melon ballots. Think of the chaos, Think of the way
Speaker 1: that this undermines the sense of stability and fairness in
Speaker 1: the election. Oh so we can't know who the president
Speaker 1: is until all the mail in ballots are counted. And
Speaker 1: how are we counting those mail in ballots? How are
Speaker 1: we to know who's getting them and who's not. How
Speaker 1: are we to know if there's any fraud involved in this?
Speaker 1: You know, Democrats don't like to concede. Don't like to
Speaker 1: concede elections the night of In fact, Sean Davis that
Speaker 1: the Federalists wrote that Democrats haven't conceded our presidential election
Speaker 1: on election night since nineteen eighty eight, and they are
Speaker 1: now laying the groundwork for endless recounts and litigation to
Speaker 1: prevent a potential Trump win from being certified before inauguration day.
Speaker 1: That Sean is completely correct here. That's what's going to happen.
Speaker 1: They're going to fight this thing. They will deny Trump
Speaker 1: victory no matter how much he wins. By that's the plan.
Speaker 1: They will assert that Trump cheated no matter what, and
Speaker 1: they'll say that Trump didn't really win until all these
Speaker 1: votes have been counted. And the reality is that there's
Speaker 1: no way of really knowing in those early hours after
Speaker 1: the polls open up, and I'm sorry, after the polls closed,
Speaker 1: how many mail and ballots are really out there to
Speaker 1: be counted. So now we have the never ending election. Really,
Speaker 1: this is what any you have this with Russia collusion
Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen. The reason that the Democrats feel so
Speaker 1: free to undermine Trump in the extreme ways that they
Speaker 1: do is because they've never really accepted that he's the
Speaker 1: president of the United States. The reason that the Democrat
Speaker 1: Party takes the position they do about this White House,
Speaker 1: about this president is that they've never viewed him as legitimate.
Speaker 1: They've never been willing to accept that the president of
Speaker 1: the United States actually came through in twenty sixteen. And
Speaker 1: one that's very useful for their base, right they get
Speaker 1: to go to sleep at night thinking that it's all
Speaker 1: it's all some bad dream, it didn't really happen. But
Speaker 1: think about what that does to the country, how that
Speaker 1: pulls us apart. Imagine what this feels like after the
Speaker 1: year we've had with COVID and the Democrat riots and
Speaker 1: the Democrat looting, and then we have an election, and
Speaker 1: instead of the peaceful transfer of power, or rather the
Speaker 1: peaceful maintenance of power in this case, when if Trump wins,
Speaker 1: what you'll have is another effort by the media, the
Speaker 1: deep state, the Democrat apparatus to create some grounds for
Speaker 1: what's effectively a soft coup. Soft coup Part two. That's
Speaker 1: what they're going to try to pull off. This is
Speaker 1: the insurance policy, only this time it's not the Russia
Speaker 1: collusion angle, although they'll probably use that too. It's the
Speaker 1: what about all the mail in ballots? They're still coming in,
Speaker 1: They're still being counted. Oh where do they come from?
Speaker 1: When were they postmarked who actually signed them. I'm not
Speaker 1: gonna be able to ask any of those questions. They
Speaker 1: just want to make sure that Trump doesn't get to
Speaker 1: have a win, and they can fight this out of
Speaker 1: the courts endlessly, because even if they don't end up
Speaker 1: being successful in stopping him from being president, they'll pretend
Speaker 1: for the next four years he's not really the president.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the buses and show podcasts. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever
Speaker 1: you get your podcasts. Liberty, Truth and Great Hair. Feel
Speaker 1: those funky beats. It's time for roll call. Roll call everybody.
Speaker 1: Let's do it. Facebook dot com, Slot Buck Sexton Team
Speaker 1: Buck at iHeartMedia dot com. If you would like to
Speaker 1: email me, that is the way to go. Prouser Mark,
Speaker 1: you know, I'm apartment hunting now, you know rental because
Speaker 1: I don't make a lot of money. I'm apartment hunting
Speaker 1: right now. And it turns out they're not yet giving
Speaker 1: away free apartments in New York City. It's pretty said, Wow,
Speaker 1: you actually have to pay for them now, not need
Speaker 1: to pay for them. You're still it's probably still the
Speaker 1: most expensive real estate market in the country. Even with
Speaker 1: the current flight from the city, I think all of
Speaker 1: the landlords, all the property owners are taking the position, Hey,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna wait this out. I'm keeping my price where
Speaker 1: it is. That works for a time, but eventually the
Speaker 1: market forces will if unless there is some big turnaround
Speaker 1: in New York, the market forces are going to hit
Speaker 1: even harder than right, because you're gonna have had vacancies
Speaker 1: and more flight. I think that it's at a time
Speaker 1: when they could be making it more appealing to other
Speaker 1: keep people here or bring people back. There is this
Speaker 1: decision that's being made, and remember sometimes market forces can
Speaker 1: be delayed a decision being aid. No, New York has
Speaker 1: to be the most expensive city in America to live in,
Speaker 1: even if people don't want to live here. We're just
Speaker 1: gonna all try to maintain our prices as high as
Speaker 1: we can instead of ratching them down a little bit.
Speaker 1: I think that's gonna make things even worse here because
Speaker 1: people are looking at what they can get. I just
Speaker 1: sent a friend of mine who's up in Vermont, what
Speaker 1: a one bet the equivalent of what a one betterom
Speaker 1: apartment in New York City proper would get you in Vermont? Right,
Speaker 1: now you'd be like a dreamhouse. Mark Vermont might be
Speaker 1: a little cole if you're you're not a skier. But
Speaker 1: he's up in Vermont, and I sent him something because
Speaker 1: Vermont's were the most out of state moving vans have
Speaker 1: gone to. According to you, I think it's U haul
Speaker 1: or one of those services from New York. They're all
Speaker 1: bouncing on NYC to go to Vermont. Have you ever
Speaker 1: been up there? I have not, but I definitely want to.
Speaker 1: I try to ski. You and the missus would you
Speaker 1: and the missus would would enjoy it. Great food, obviously
Speaker 1: a lot of a big hockey heritage. It's practically Canada,
Speaker 1: so maple syrup in the summers is. I used to
Speaker 1: spend summers there. I went to camp in Vermont. I
Speaker 1: loved that up there. Beautiful and unfortunately the politics are
Speaker 1: not my cup of tea, but their tea is my
Speaker 1: cup of tea because they've got great, great tea houses
Speaker 1: and coffee shops and cheese and ben and Jerry's obviously
Speaker 1: is up there. Although I think there, look, I'm just
Speaker 1: I think there's better ice cream. I'm I'm a Van
Speaker 1: Lewin guy. I'm even more bougie than Ben and Jerry's.
Speaker 1: I'm not ashamed to say it. I mean, I kind
Speaker 1: of get you not liking Ben and Jerry's just because
Speaker 1: they put stuff in it and a lot of it
Speaker 1: has gluten. Correct, that's my If you could eat gluten
Speaker 1: and you said that, I would slap you. Probably that's
Speaker 1: probably fair. That's probably fair, um, you know, because like
Speaker 1: some of the different flavors do have the flower in it.
Speaker 1: But anyway, snow Princess wants me to get her an
Speaker 1: ice cream maker for Christmas this year. She mentioned that,
Speaker 1: and I was like, honey, I'm gonna have to get
Speaker 1: a whole new wardrobe with this. If she starts making
Speaker 1: artis and ice cream at home and the gyms are
Speaker 1: still shut down, you're gonna have to roll me too,
Speaker 1: and from the mic like actual, you know, roll me
Speaker 1: like a beach ball. Imagine she makes you like some
Speaker 1: half baked she makes you some gluten free cookie dough
Speaker 1: and gluten free brownies and puts it in the ice cream.
Speaker 1: Of course, she's already doing all these amazing thing. I'm
Speaker 1: getting hungry just thing. I'm getting hungry just thinking about it.
Speaker 1: I'm also glad that I that there's so many good
Speaker 1: frozen food options, and then I cook pretty well because
Speaker 1: at this rate, there's not gonna be a lot of takeout.
Speaker 1: One of the reasons you live in New York City
Speaker 1: for those who don't, is that it's the only place
Speaker 1: I've ever been in the world where you can decide,
Speaker 1: certainly up to midnight, that you want really any variety
Speaker 1: of food out there, and I mean pretty much anything,
Speaker 1: and you can probably get it sent to you. Not
Speaker 1: even you can go get it, you could probably have
Speaker 1: it sent to you. It's it's the biggest food city
Speaker 1: that in that sense in the world, the greatest concentration
Speaker 1: of restaurants in the world. And because of Deblasio and Quomo,
Speaker 1: they're just killing them all off. They're they're getting rid
Speaker 1: of all these They're all gonna be gone, and they
Speaker 1: think they're just gonna reopen. Who's gonna want to do that? Producer, Mark,
Speaker 1: if I gave you, you know, let's say to open
Speaker 1: a small Actually, what would be what would be the
Speaker 1: Mark restaurant? You know, what would be your cuisine of specialty? Uh,
Speaker 1: maybe a burger place. I don't know, burger joint. Let's
Speaker 1: say that solid burger, look a solid burger joint never
Speaker 1: goes out of style, you know. So I think I
Speaker 1: think you go burger joint and it's like having a
Speaker 1: black leather belt or something. Right, You're always going to
Speaker 1: have a need for this. At some point burger joints
Speaker 1: would be would be really solid. But let's say if
Speaker 1: I gave you, you know, five hundred thousand dollars and
Speaker 1: I said, you can open up a burger joint in
Speaker 1: New York City with much higher rents, much higher costs,
Speaker 1: or you could go open up a burger joint even hey,
Speaker 1: even Jerseys allowing indoor dining starting this week. I think
Speaker 1: it's a you know, I think it's pretty clear where
Speaker 1: where you have higher risk. I'd go open it in
Speaker 1: some smaller town and be like one of the kind
Speaker 1: of places you see on diners, drivings and dives. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I've been really good of having all the Kami towns
Speaker 1: have such good food, you know, all the little amorous
Speaker 1: where I went to college, very good food. Total communist utopia,
Speaker 1: want to be utopia dystopia really Northampton, Massachusetts. Northampton, Massachusetts
Speaker 1: punches about five weight classes above what it should with
Speaker 1: its food scene, and it's it's overrun with complete left
Speaker 1: wing lunatics. It's just true of a lot of places.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna say that. And I look, I gotta get
Speaker 1: back down to North Carolina because I know I've been
Speaker 1: talking some smacking about North Carolina barbecue. But I gotta
Speaker 1: tell you it was not. That was the one part
Speaker 1: of it that I was still not sold on. And
Speaker 1: I expect regional cuisine. I mean, whenever and tells you
Speaker 1: that New Orleans, for example, has great food. No matter
Speaker 1: who you are anywhere in the world. If you know
Speaker 1: anything about food, you go to New Orleans, you say,
Speaker 1: this town's got great food, Like it's not even you've
Speaker 1: been there, right, I have not. Oh I have to
Speaker 1: go that you and missus Mark, that should be. Oh
Speaker 1: she's been, don't worry, Oh she's been. Okay. I mean
Speaker 1: it's a it's just a you gotta go. It's a
Speaker 1: great town. It's a great town. It's all right. I'm
Speaker 1: I'm I'm forgetting that we have we have a huge
Speaker 1: number of people all across the country. Listen. Oh, I
Speaker 1: didn't tell this, producer, Mark. I meant to mention this
Speaker 1: two people. I was walking to Lula and I was
Speaker 1: with the snow princess yesterday on the street and two
Speaker 1: people listen to the show just said you're Buck Sexton, right,
Speaker 1: and and then they said something very nice about the show.
Speaker 1: So that was very nice. Looking at me, You're becoming
Speaker 1: more and more of a celebrity every day, you know.
Speaker 1: It was very nice of them. I was appreciative. But
Speaker 1: there's always a second where I'm like, oh, this is is
Speaker 1: gonna be But I can tell I look at them,
Speaker 1: I'm like, this is a normal nice person. They're they're
Speaker 1: they're on my team. You know, when you're looking for
Speaker 1: your new apartment, maybe you just make sure the doors
Speaker 1: are really big so your head. Oh I thought this
Speaker 1: was an ice creamaker. I mean that's too but I
Speaker 1: was going with the big head thing. Yeah, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: that's a fair that's a fair point. Don't worry. After this,
Speaker 1: I had to scoop up whatever to Lula left on
Speaker 1: the street. So it keeps me humble, keeps me humble. Dave,
Speaker 1: Hey Buck, I'm a semi retired Air National guardsman, an
Speaker 1: it tech with my own business. Love your show listen
Speaker 1: every day. By the way, why does no one mentioned
Speaker 1: that Antifa and Portland has been mostly peaceful protesting nearly
Speaker 1: every weekend since twenty sixteen. These people have been around
Speaker 1: in Portland since the nineteen seventies. They have gained momentum
Speaker 1: and first came to my attention when they when they
Speaker 1: assaulted the Patriot Prayer Rally in twenty seventeen, whom Antifa
Speaker 1: falsely labeled as fascist shield time, Hey day, thank you
Speaker 1: so much for listening, honor to have you as part
Speaker 1: of Team Buck. I would be fascinated to know how
Speaker 1: someone you know, we've learned about how does someone become
Speaker 1: a member of al Qaida? I mean I used to
Speaker 1: study this when I was the CIA. Why does someone
Speaker 1: join al Qaida? And there's a part of it that's
Speaker 1: the they came up with these different progressions. They'd call
Speaker 1: it like the terror recruitment cycle, and they would discuss
Speaker 1: what spiritual sanctioning, jehadization, radicalization, all these different concepts and
Speaker 1: how it happens and within someone's life cycle. Is it
Speaker 1: a traumatic event, is it use as a child? Is
Speaker 1: it just pure brainwashing? Like how does someone decide that
Speaker 1: they want to go be a part of a movement
Speaker 1: that lops people's heads off on video and strap suicide
Speaker 1: bombs to their chests, right, how do you get someone
Speaker 1: to do that? And we've done a lot of study
Speaker 1: of that, and there's a lot of that out there.
Speaker 1: I would be curious to know. And I'm sure there's
Speaker 1: probably a memoir out there I haven't read yet. How
Speaker 1: does a let's call it a you know, run of
Speaker 1: the mill, middle class American decide that they want to
Speaker 1: be a They want to spend a large amount of
Speaker 1: their free time as part of a group that dresses
Speaker 1: all in black, believes they're fighting literal fascism in America
Speaker 1: and wants to duke it out with cops on the streets.
Speaker 1: And you know, overwhelmingly that people in Antifa, you can tell,
Speaker 1: I mean, they're weaklings. A lot of the guys look
Speaker 1: like they're in cells. You know, these are not people,
Speaker 1: These are not winners, right, So that's definitely clear. The
Speaker 1: people of Antifa are overwhelmingly losers in life. And I
Speaker 1: don't say that to me me, and I say that
Speaker 1: to keep it real. I mean, these are not individuals
Speaker 1: that are successful in any field in any way. You know,
Speaker 1: one thing about the conservative mentality, of the conservative approach
Speaker 1: to life is I always I talk about the built
Speaker 1: in humility but there's also I don't believe it's possible
Speaker 1: to be a real conservative and to be a part
Speaker 1: of it ideologically and culturally and not just find respect
Speaker 1: for excellence in any productive thing. So if somebody is
Speaker 1: a great carpenter, someone is a great electrician, and when
Speaker 1: I say great, I don't mean that they're necessarily their
Speaker 1: artistry is worthy of a museum, although there's some of that,
Speaker 1: you know. I have my dad's brother. My uncle makes
Speaker 1: incredible handcrafted He's a locksmith who makes artwork out of
Speaker 1: pieces of wood that he finds in the way. And
Speaker 1: I've got some of his sculptures if I could hang it.
Speaker 1: I've got an incredible eagle that he made from one
Speaker 1: piece of wood, handwhittled the whole thing. I keep it
Speaker 1: in my it's in my bedroom. Uh. You know, conservatives
Speaker 1: have respect for that, a lot of these leftist antifa types, right, So,
Speaker 1: so we respect excellence in anything and in all things
Speaker 1: that's productive, that's worthwhile. I'm not excellence in being a
Speaker 1: lunatic who burns down buildings, but you know, we no
Speaker 1: matter what your job is, if you're if you're a maker,
Speaker 1: if you're a creator, if you're a doer in anything.
Speaker 1: We just inherently respect that. I'm people who take pride
Speaker 1: in whatever their job is. You know, you're going to
Speaker 1: be the most professional, most on time, most reliable long
Speaker 1: haul truck driver in the country. Conservatives respect that, and
Speaker 1: we really do. You know you're gonna be obviously, you know,
Speaker 1: a great doctor who chooses to be a GP instead
Speaker 1: of some hotshot surgeon because you won't. You know, that's
Speaker 1: your chosen field, you go to a rural area, whatever.
Speaker 1: People make these choices all the time, but excellence in
Speaker 1: anything that is worthwhile is to be respected. If you're
Speaker 1: a conservative. With these leftists, these Antifa types, you get
Speaker 1: this sense that they want to eradicate the concept of
Speaker 1: excellence because they've never been able to achieve it in anything.
Speaker 1: They're not productive, they're not creative, they're not reliable, and
Speaker 1: they don't want to confront that. And they're young people.
Speaker 1: They could turn this around. You don't think people in
Speaker 1: Antifa they're losers at twenty five. That doesn't mean you're
Speaker 1: a loser in life. You could turn that around. You know,
Speaker 1: you could become a person who is dependable. You could
Speaker 1: become an alpha male who actually gets stuff done. You
Speaker 1: could abandon all this. You can start to go to church,
Speaker 1: you can get married, you can be a good dad,
Speaker 1: you can be a good employee or start your own business.
Speaker 1: All these options are there, But for Antifa, for this mindset,
Speaker 1: for this left wing insanity that's out there, it's just
Speaker 1: so much more comforting to believe that all the excellence
Speaker 1: that's around them in America is stolen from other people.
Speaker 1: It's all built on oppression, it's all part of a
Speaker 1: racist hierarchy or whatever. I really do believe that Antifa,
Speaker 1: at some level is an ideology that is just at
Speaker 1: war with excellence in anything and in all things. That
Speaker 1: was a little bit of a digression from roll Call.
Speaker 1: We'll come back to more roll call in a second.
Speaker 1: You're in the Freedom, Hud. This is the Buck Sex
Speaker 1: and Show podcast. All right, more roll Call here, Dear Buck.
Speaker 1: The Democrats were always crazy. President Trump just made the
Speaker 1: Left reveal themselves rather than Dems hiding behind their veil
Speaker 1: of normalcy. May I do think that Trump has exposed
Speaker 1: the Left in ways that no other Republican in my
Speaker 1: lifetime has. He's made them show us who they really are,
Speaker 1: and that's a very powerful tool. That's a very powerful
Speaker 1: weapon against them by exposing them for who they are.
Speaker 1: So I would agree with that. I think that's one
Speaker 1: of the president's best qualities. Dave Hey Buck listening to
Speaker 1: the podcast as I do every evening. Thank you so much, Dave.
Speaker 1: It's very comforting to know you have the administration's ear
Speaker 1: at such a pivotal moment in this country's history. Thanks Dave.
Speaker 1: But it's been a while since the Trumpster's given me
Speaker 1: a retweet? What's up with that Trumpster? You know, Commander
Speaker 1: in Chief got no time for the buck tweets lately.
Speaker 1: It makes me makes me sad. I miss my Trumpster retweets.
Speaker 1: It'll happen, Though it'll happen. We're buddies. Dave also writes,
Speaker 1: don't underestimate the influence you have via your voice. As
Speaker 1: long as you maintain your humility and speak the truth
Speaker 1: along with your listeners, you will have a profound effect
Speaker 1: on this country. I don't think that's an overstatement. Keep
Speaker 1: it up, shields high, Dave. That is very kind of you, man.
Speaker 1: I appreciate the encourage. These days. I got very long
Speaker 1: days Boiland for producer Mark, I'd probably sometimes fail to
Speaker 1: even wake up in time to do our show because
Speaker 1: I'm just constantly writing and thinking and reading and it
Speaker 1: never stops. The buck never stops. But thank you so much,
Speaker 1: and I hope that it's Look, if it's worthwhile to you,
Speaker 1: then I'm succeeding. And that's what we try to do
Speaker 1: every day. We really do. You know, we on the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show here in the Freedom Hunt, Mark and
Speaker 1: I and the team and producer Nick and everybody. We
Speaker 1: try to make sure that this thing that we're doing
Speaker 1: is the best usage of your time we can possibly
Speaker 1: make it because we're so honored that you'll even spend
Speaker 1: the time of this. I mean, I honestly, yesterday with
Speaker 1: two people come up me on the street, I'm always
Speaker 1: a little bit. I'm kind of amazed that they like that.
Speaker 1: Strangers just like the show as much as they do,
Speaker 1: and it encourages me. It's really nice. Dave. Oh no,
Speaker 1: we just did it. Dave, Thank you so much for
Speaker 1: running in Wade Buck love your show. Listen to podcast
Speaker 1: every night, all right? Another one? Hunt for Red October
Speaker 1: is not the best marine move me whoa Waite Party?
Speaker 1: Foul das Boot original German with subtitles is the best
Speaker 1: submarine movie. I was in the Navy and served on
Speaker 1: a submarine, and das Boot is the closest thing to
Speaker 1: what it is really like. Well, wait, you know a
Speaker 1: heck of a lot more about submarines than I do,
Speaker 1: so I will check it out. I haven't seen that,
Speaker 1: so I can't I can't weigh in yet, but I'll
Speaker 1: check it out. And I'm producer Mark snow Princess. Last
Speaker 1: night I had to write something. I had to write
Speaker 1: two thousand words for American Consequences magazine, which people should
Speaker 1: check out. But snow Princess wanted to watch Mighty Ducks
Speaker 1: on Producer Mark's recommendations. So we're gonna do it. I'm
Speaker 1: very excited for that. It's about time. Yeah, it needs
Speaker 1: to happen. Anyway, Wait, thank you for the wreck, and
Speaker 1: I'll check out Daspoot, probably without the snow Princess. I
Speaker 1: don't think that sounds like something she would like, Mike,
Speaker 1: why is all of America under siege by Democrat politicians?
Speaker 1: Isn't there any requirement for elected official to protect every
Speaker 1: citizen's life and property under their purview and not to
Speaker 1: bend only to those that elected them. If not, then
Speaker 1: is this not a code. Is this not a cohesive
Speaker 1: society but a set of radically divided interests. I'm sincerely
Speaker 1: interested in how we get this place back was constitutional republic,
Speaker 1: which it was designed to do and treat all citizens equally. Mike,
Speaker 1: you raise a great question, one for which we need
Speaker 1: to continue to ask the answers. But I do not have.
Speaker 1: I can't tell you that I got a clear and
Speaker 1: ready answer on that one. I don't know. Democrat politicians
Speaker 1: have lost their minds, folks. That's it for today. I'm
Speaker 1: in Tomorrow, out Thursday Friday. Please please pass the Buck
Speaker 1: huge favor early birthday and Christmas present for me and
Speaker 1: producer Mark. I don't even know what his birthday is,
Speaker 1: but I'm just gonna say that, So what is your birthday? April?
Speaker 1: Fair enough? So for me and Mark? Early birthday present.
Speaker 1: Get someone to listen to the Buck Sexton Show Spotify, iTunes,
Speaker 1: you name it, Shields High