WEBVTT - Tech News: NASA Plays Galactic Billiards With Asteroid

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tex Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and I love all things tech. And this is the

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>tech news for Tuesday, November twenty three, twenty twenty one.

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>And just as a heads up, we will not have

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a news episode on Thursday because here in America that

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:36.559
<v Speaker 1>is Thanksgiving, So we will be playing our history of

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Cyber Monday episode on Thursday, which I feel is going

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to become my own annual tradition. Anyway, let's get to

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the news. One of the biggest stories of and mental note,

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:52.239
<v Speaker 1>I should probably remember that when I do an end

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>of the year wrap up episode has been about Facebook

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>internal documents that got leaked to regulators and the press,

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>along with whistleblower Francis Hogan's testimony to various governmental bodies

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>around the world regarding Facebook's policies and it's impact on

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the world. Well, now, a collection of organizations are committed

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to releasing those documents so that folks like you or

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I will be able to see them. Note uh, this

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>presumes that you aren't already a member of one of

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>those regulatory bodies or part of the press that received

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the documents. People from the American Civil Liberties Union and

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>several universities, as well as the tech news outlet Gizmoto,

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>are partnering to go through the documents and make them

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:43.639
<v Speaker 1>available to everyone. They plan on reviewing each document first

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>in order to protect the privacy and security of people

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>who might be named in those documents. They don't want

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to docks anyone. And also in the case of documents

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>relating to specific countries like besides the United States, they

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>plan on enlisting the aid of people from those countries

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>before they decide to release the documents. So, in other words,

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like they are working towards establishing a responsible

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:11.919
<v Speaker 1>process when it comes to releasing all those internal documents,

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to just you know, dumping them on a

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>cloud server somewhere. Facebook reps have repeatedly argued that these

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 1>documents that were cited by various media outlets have been

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 1>misleading and that they only play a small part in

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:29.360
<v Speaker 1>a much larger picture. And I'm not saying that the

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>thousands of documents are a definitive repository of all things Facebook,

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>but it might be a harder sell to defend the

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>company should those documents prove to be as damaging as

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>has been indicated over the last couple of months. One

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>document that wasn't in that big leak was one that

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 1>alleges Facebook executives chose to override researchers suggestions to tweak

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the Facebook algorithm in an effort to curb the spread

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of hate speech and racism. Business Insider reports that the

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>document shows researchers had identified issues with this algorithm, pointing

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>out how it would allow for the spread of hateful

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:15.359
<v Speaker 1>and harmful speech that predominantly targeted ethnic minorities. But because

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Facebook has been the target of criticism from white conservatives

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 1>in the past, including powerful media outlets like Fox News,

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the executives that Facebook didn't want to make any changes

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>for fear that it would seem as though the company

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>was actively opposing white conservatives. The name of the research

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>project was Project Wow No. Business Insider also refers to

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>it as quote the worst of the worst end quote

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>meaning the worst content and comments. The document apparently also

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>indicates that Facebook's content moderation algorithms are much better at

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>detecting and suppressing content that targets white people, but not

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>so great when it comes to people of color. So

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>not only did the executives nix the idea of adjusting

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the algorithm to protect vulnerable populations, they were supporting an

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>algorithm that protects a group that you know, arguably really

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't need protection to start with. The document also includes

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a passage that says Facebook execs, We're worried about offending

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>conservatives who think quote hate targeted towards trans people is

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:27.719
<v Speaker 1>an expression of opinion. End quote. Now, y'all, let me

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:33.160
<v Speaker 1>just say that is a wretched, horrible thing to even think,

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>let alone put down in an internal document. A glance

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>at statistics like the suicide rate among trans youth will

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>tell you straight away that targeted hate has a very real,

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>very tragic effect on those who are targeted, and to

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>dismiss it as an expression of opinion is so callous

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>as to be disgusting. Then for Facebook executives to say

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:01.840
<v Speaker 1>they're worried about offending people who think that way is

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>stomach churning. All right, I'm gonna hop off my soapbox.

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I know y'all don't like it, but you know I've

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>got this platform and I feel like i'm going to

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:16.839
<v Speaker 1>use it. Another big tech news last week, Reuters reported

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that Amazon had been behind vigorous lobbying efforts to undermine

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>consumer privacy protection laws in twenty five states. That's that's

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>half of all the states for those of y'all not

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>in the US. Now, several members of Congress are proposing

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:39.239
<v Speaker 1>a federal level of consumer privacy legislation that would apply

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:43.280
<v Speaker 1>across all fifty states. The report showed that Amazon has

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 1>been working hard to whittle away, or sometimes hack away,

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:52.280
<v Speaker 1>protections that would prevent the company from harvesting vast amounts

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>of personal data of customers and others. On top of that,

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Reuters has quoted a few people who say Amazon has

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 1>and pretty hypocritical, paying lips service to the concept and

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the importance of data privacy and security in public, while

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:13.279
<v Speaker 1>simultaneously privately working to remove any barrier that would stand

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:18.679
<v Speaker 1>between the company and that precious, precious information. Amazon reps

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 1>have also essentially said, Hey, we just want a nice

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>unified privacy law so that we can have a set

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:27.840
<v Speaker 1>standard and operate that way across the United States. And

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>on the surface you can sort of understand that, I

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 1>mean each state having a different definition and standard for

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:40.159
<v Speaker 1>privacy makes operating across state borders pretty complicated. However, that

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't explain away all the actual efforts to gut the

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>existing state legislation. Amazon could have instead lobbied for a

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:52.919
<v Speaker 1>nationwide federal standard, so I would say Amazon's explanation is

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>only partly true. Anyway, We'll have to wait and see what,

0:06:56.960 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>if any legislation follows from this and show effort. There's

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>no guarantee that anything will actually come about due to this.

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's shift over to Apple, a company that also has

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>had a rough time PR wise in recent months. I

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 1>should add, by the way, that all of these companies, Facebook, Amazon,

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and Apple have been raking in cash by the truckload.

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>So while it might be rough in the papers when

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the amount of money they're bringing in

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>and the amount of of hikes they're seeing in share price,

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that that doesn't necessarily reflect the you know, the same

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of PR issues in the news. So it's it's

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>like two different worlds. Anyway, Apple recently told the U

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>S Securities and Exchange Commission or SEC that Apple did

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>not use non disclosure agreements or in DA's in order

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to prevent people from revealing you know, acts of quote harassment, discrimination,

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and other unlawful acts in quote. So in other words,

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Apple was saying, we don't make people sign legal agreements

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to prevent the dirty laundry from getting out. But then

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>a former Apple employee named share Scarlett filed a whistleblower

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>complaint with the SEC and then subsequently she came forward.

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 1>She had previously been referred to as an anonymous former employee,

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and in her complaint Scarlett revealed that Apple does indeed

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>issue in DA's at least in some cases. Scarlett worked

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>as an engineered Apple, but she also was you know,

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>working behind the scenes to push for changes in policy,

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>such as a move toward pay equity among Apple employees.

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>And when she left the company, Apple lawyers urged her

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to sign what if was effectively a gag order that

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>would limit her explanation of why she left as quote,

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>after eighteen months at Apple, I've decided it is time

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to move on and pursue other opportunities end quote. She

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 1>shared that in d a with a company called or

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:02.679
<v Speaker 1>an organization and called NIA Impact Capital that is an

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>activist investor organization. It holds share of Apple and it

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:11.319
<v Speaker 1>has currently been trying to force a vote among other

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>shareholders that would make Apple reveal its use of India's

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and be more transparent in the future. Uh, something that

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I suspect the company would not be too keen on,

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>seeing as how they just told the SEC earlier last

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>month that they totally didn't do that. Later today, we

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>expect to hear an announcement that Samsung will establish a

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>new chip making plant in Taylor, Texas. That's about a

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>stone's throw away from Austin if you can throw a stone,

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, thirty miles or so. The facility would likely

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>build chips, not for Samsung products, but more as a

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>business to business that has other corporations as its customers.

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>So you or I wouldn't go out and you know,

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 1>purchase a chip from this company. These chips would be

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 1>going into products that other companies make. The plant is

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>not expected to go into production for a couple of

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>years because it's going to take time to build out

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the facility and attract the talent and all that kind

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. Apparently, the city of Taylor, Texas offered up

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:15.199
<v Speaker 1>some pretty generous tax benefits. According to the Wall Street Journal,

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the plant will have a nine reduction in property taxes

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:22.559
<v Speaker 1>over its first decade. There's been a recent push to

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>bring more chip manufacturing over to the United States in

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the wake of the worldwide shortages and supply chain issues

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>we've seen. Of course, the US also has these you know,

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>pesky laws that protect people and thus make it way

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>more expensive to build stuff over here. That's me being snarky.

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I am fully in favor of protecting workers,

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, I would actually love to see more

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing moved places that aren't as egregious when it comes

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:50.199
<v Speaker 1>to exploiting workers. Not saying that the United States is

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>perfect on that regard, not by a long shot, but

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:57.199
<v Speaker 1>compared to some other countries, it's leagues ahead. Well, there

0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>are other efforts around the world to establish new manufact

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>training facilities in order to kind of smooth things out

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 1>alleviate the supply chain issues, but obviously it's going to

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 1>take a couple of years for them to come online,

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and there's still the question of whether or not it

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>actually ends up solving the problem, or if it just

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>becomes another complicated cog in a very complex machine. In

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the meantime, we should expect more supply chain woes. Speaking

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of Texas, there's a development in that state that concerns me. Actually,

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to be fair, there are a lot of developments in

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Texas that concerned me, but the one I was thinking

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:35.679
<v Speaker 1>about was how the state is courting bitcoin mining operations.

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>And this has to do with power consumption. Okay, so

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:41.679
<v Speaker 1>last year, or actually this past year, in February of

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:48.199
<v Speaker 1>Texas had some pretty massive blackouts during a particularly harsh

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>cold front that brought temperatures way way down. And yeah,

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I know there are parts of the world that are

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>way colder than what Texas got to, but you gotta

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>remember Texas does not have the infrastructure to deal with

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>super low temperatures. It's not common in that state. And

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:09.679
<v Speaker 1>Texas has a power grid authority called ERCOTT e R

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>c OT. Ironically that stands for Electric Reliability Council of Texas,

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's responsible for about nine of the state's electric load.

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>So pretty much everything apart from say like the far

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>west of Texas is under ARCOT. When the cold weather hit,

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>demand for electricity exceeded ercott's capacity and ARCOTT began to

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>implement blackouts. The price for electricity also skyrocketed at that time.

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>It it's hard to even express how high it went.

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>The governor of Texas said that the you know, arcot

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:46.200
<v Speaker 1>reform would be a high priority. There would have to

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>be a full investigation, and the the agency would have

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 1>to put in place preparations for uh, you know, high

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>demand winters in the future. And the reason I bring

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 1>all that up is because bitcoin mining require there's a

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of electricity. And that's because bitcoin works on a

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>proof of work concept, uh that is, one in which

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>computers compete against each other. They are the mining operations,

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and they rush to try and solve what is essentially

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a very hard math problem. I mean, it's kind of

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>similar to guessing a truly huge number. Anyway, bitcoin miners,

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>at least the successful ones, use vast networks of powerful

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 1>machines in order to get to that solution first, and

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>those machines require a lot of electricity in order to operate.

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>So the concern is that Texas has power grid, which

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 1>is already a little bit you know weak, is not

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 1>up to the task of supporting those mining operations, that

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the state is actively trying to attract, and that this

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>could potentially lead to similar situations like what we saw

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>this past February. Now, the expectation is that Urcott will

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>offer up some sort of incentive that would essentially pay

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin miners to not use electricity during times of peak demand.

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>But critics point out that most bitcoin mining operations would

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>likely be more inclined to just keep mining because the

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:13.479
<v Speaker 1>profits for mining would be way more than any incentive

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the state could offer, unless the price of electricity for

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin miners goes way way up. Like if Urcott said,

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>all right, but if you want to use electricity at

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>this peak time, it's going to cost you, you know,

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a thousand times more, that would pretty much drive away

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the very people that the state is trying to attract.

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>So the fear is that the bitcoin miners would just

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>keep gobbling up electricity even in high demand times and

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>thus contribute to a situation that could result in more blackouts.

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>We've got some more news to cover, but before we

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>get to that, let's take a quick break. We're back

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 1>over in the UK. The government has created a mandate

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that will require all new buildings and looting homes to

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 1>include electric vehicle charge points starting next year. The UK

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>is the first country to issue such a mandate, but

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>it really does make a lot of sense. As we

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>see more countries commit to switching to an electric vehicle

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>fleet over the next decade, it becomes imperative that those

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>countries also make sure that there's an infrastructure there to

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>support the move. I mean, after all, like the the

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>gasoline or petrol for those in the UK, UH, that

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure has been around for more than a century and

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>so you know, there's been plenty of time for it

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to be built up. We're now talking about switching over

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to something that has a bit of infrastructure there. You know,

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>some places are have a more dense uh population of

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>of charging stations than others, but this is a real

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 1>move to make sure that it becomes common throughout the

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>entire nation. There's also plans that if you're making any

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>large renovations, if you have parking space is for ten

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>or more vehicles or I guess more than ten vehicles

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>in your you know that building, you are also required

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to install some electric vehicle charging points. The UK currently

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>plans to end the sale of new gas powered or

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>diesel powered vehicles by people will still be allowed to

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>buy and sell used cars that run on petrol or diesel,

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>but all new cars starting that year will be electric vehicles. Okay,

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 1>we all know that Facebook. The company changed its name

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to Meta and that Meta plans to launch a Metaverse

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>product in the not too distant future. But it is

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>not the only company itchen to get meta. Another one

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>is Niantic. That's the company that originally started as a

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 1>project at Google and then spun off to be a

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>very successful game company. It's best known as the company

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>behind the game Pokemon Go, but it also makes or

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>made a few other games that incorporate augmented reality features.

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 1>So at the heart of Niantics games is this kind

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of general philosophy that centers on getting people out into

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the real world to interact with the game in the

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:17.160
<v Speaker 1>virtual space. So they use technology to enhance rather than replace,

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 1>our physical surroundings. So, for example, in Pokemon Go, the

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:26.120
<v Speaker 1>site of various Pokemon gems tends to correspond with interesting

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>real world locations. So the ideas you travel to that

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>location to play the game, and in theory, you also

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:36.679
<v Speaker 1>enjoy the physical space itself, you know, might be of

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>some cultural significance or otherwise interesting. So the ideas you

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>get out and about and you see stuff around that

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 1>you might not otherwise ever look at. That's the idea, well,

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Niantics metaverse plans sound like it's an extension of that

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>philosophy that the company will offer up an expanded a

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:57.920
<v Speaker 1>r d K that stands for Augmented Reality Developer Kit.

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>So this will let other company needs build a R

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>based experiences, including games, using Niantics tools. So the Niantic

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:10.719
<v Speaker 1>metaverse is a very different take than the you know,

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>put on VR goggles and replace the real world with

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>a digital one approach. In pursuit of that goal, Niantic

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 1>has raised three hundred million dollars in funding, and that

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>brings the valuation of the company up to nine billion bucks.

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to existential threats, a collision between the

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Earth and a large asteroid or comet or some other

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:39.359
<v Speaker 1>celestial debris is a big one. I mean, it's happened before,

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and statistically speaking, it will happen again. The question is

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>really just when will it happen? Well, NASA plans to

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>test a system called the Double Asteroid Redirection Test or

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>DART with a launched this scheduled for today. The launch

0:18:56.880 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>vehicle will push a spacecraft called the DART that will

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 1>use what NASA describes as a kinetic impact or technique

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:08.719
<v Speaker 1>to change the path of an asteroid traveling through space. Now, first,

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 1>just to calm some nerves, the target asteroid that NASA

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>has chosen is not one that is on any sort

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of collision course with Earth, so this is literally just

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a test to see if this method is viable. The

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:26.360
<v Speaker 1>particular asteroid Dart will aim for has the name Dimorphous,

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and it circles around another larger asteroid called Didimus. The

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:36.919
<v Speaker 1>Dart spacecraft will essentially slam into Dimorphous in an effort

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 1>to change its path and bring it into a tighter

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:42.439
<v Speaker 1>orbit around Didimus. And you can think of this as

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:45.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a game of galactic billiards. The cub

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:48.920
<v Speaker 1>ball hits the target ball and that moves it out

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:52.399
<v Speaker 1>the way. There are other proposed methods of diverting the

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 1>path of asteroids. Some of them require us to identify

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 1>the threat very early on and then rapidly respond to it. So,

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:03.159
<v Speaker 1>for example, there's a proposal of using a spacecraft to

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>fly by an asteroid and alter its path through gravitational attraction.

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 1>So it would be kind of like towing the asteroid

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>out of its collision course with the Earth. The gravitational

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>attraction would be slight, but it would be enough to

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 1>affect the asteroids pathway, and if you catch the asteroid

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:26.399
<v Speaker 1>far enough out from the Earth, well you only have

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:29.400
<v Speaker 1>to change its path a tiny little bit for it

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:33.400
<v Speaker 1>to completely miss the planet and you remove the threat. However,

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the approach that Dart takes is a more let's say,

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:41.360
<v Speaker 1>direct method to change an asteroid's path. Also, if you're

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:43.920
<v Speaker 1>wondering about the science fiction film Armageddon, in which a

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 1>group of space miners and plant and explosive to destroy

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and incoming threat, that would not work. At best, the

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 1>exploded bits would just reform in space due to that

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:58.440
<v Speaker 1>gravitational attraction I was just talking about, so they would

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 1>effectively be one big thing again. But at worst you

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:05.359
<v Speaker 1>would turn what was originally kind of a bullet into

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 1>a cloud of shotgun pellets. Either way, it is not

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a solution. Motherboard reports that NASA is looking for proposals

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 1>for nuclear power plant designs. This power plant would not

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 1>be located on Earth, however, but on the Moon. I

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 1>find that really interesting because it raises some big questions.

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if we are to establish any sort of

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>lunar base, clearly we're gonna need electrical power. So this

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:33.160
<v Speaker 1>is a problem we have to solve. But nuclear fission

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 1>is a tricky solution. I mean, you do have the

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>issue of nuclear waste and what to do with it.

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:42.159
<v Speaker 1>I assume that the Space Treaty would make it a

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 1>bit tricky to justify storing nuclear waste on the Moon itself.

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:47.719
<v Speaker 1>That seems to kind of fly in the face of

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the spirit, if not the actual word of the treaty.

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 1>But let's say that we somehow solve the waste issue.

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Nuclear power plants don't just magically use atoms to generate electricity.

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:01.199
<v Speaker 1>The way they were work is that you have a

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 1>system of water. Typically you actually have a couple of

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 1>different closed and independent systems of water. And what you

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>do is you use the energy given off by the

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>nuclear fission reactions to heat the water up, which then

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>turns into steam, and that steam turns turbines that generate electricity. So,

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>in other words, nuclear power plants are really steam generators

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:27.199
<v Speaker 1>on steroids. But that would mean that we would have

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to transport not just the nuclear power generator to the Moon,

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>we also have to bring up enough water to make

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:36.119
<v Speaker 1>it work. Now there is ice on the Moon. I

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 1>don't know of any proposal that would involve harvesting the

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>ice from the Moon in order to serve a purpose

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 1>in a nuclear power plant. And the reason why I

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>say this is a big deal is that water is

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>actually pretty darn heavy stuff to send up to space,

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and every pound or kilogram costs a lot of money.

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:57.119
<v Speaker 1>So that's one of the reasons that facilities like the

0:22:57.160 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 1>International Space Station have such extensive risk ecling and reclamation

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>systems in place so that no drop of water is wasted. Anyway,

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 1>we're just at the request for proposal stage right now,

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and since the entire Artemis project has been hit with

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:15.640
<v Speaker 1>some delays due to other issues, I expect it will

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 1>give us some time to debate the merits of a

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>nuclear power plant on the Moon before it becomes a reality.

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Rounding out our NASA news is a somewhat discouraging story.

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:28.440
<v Speaker 1>The James Webb Space Telescope, which has had a long

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:32.159
<v Speaker 1>and arduous journey towards launch, has hit another delay. The

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:34.400
<v Speaker 1>original plan was to launch it as early as two

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:37.639
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven, but for many reasons that never happened. The

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:40.880
<v Speaker 1>plan was to finally launch the telescope on December eighteenth

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:44.160
<v Speaker 1>of this year, but now there's been another setback. While

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>preparing to attach the telescope to the Ariana five launch vehicle,

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a clamp band released unexpectedly and the telescope fortunately did

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:56.439
<v Speaker 1>not tumble to the ground that would have been the

0:23:56.520 --> 0:24:00.880
<v Speaker 1>end of a multidecade, multibillion dollar project, but it did

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>vibrate like there was a shutter that went through the telescope.

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 1>And because this telescope has so many delicate moving parts

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:10.679
<v Speaker 1>and potential points of failure, the fear is that that

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 1>vibration could have moved something out of alignment and put

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:17.359
<v Speaker 1>the mission in jeopardy. So NASA has formed an anomaly

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 1>review Board that will investigate and test the telescope to

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>look for any damage. That should be done by the

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>end of this week, and assuming that the board finds

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>no evidence of damage, the plan is to launch the

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:33.200
<v Speaker 1>telescope no earlier than December twenty two. So hopefully, fingers crossed,

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:36.159
<v Speaker 1>this is not going to turn into another chapter in

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the long story of the telescope's difficult journey from idea

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to reality. Finally, the Rolls Royce Aviation Company unofficially broke

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 1>some speed and altitude records for electric airplanes. Now I

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 1>say unofficially because as of my recording. Those records have

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:58.160
<v Speaker 1>yet to be certified, but the electric airplane prototype named

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the Spirit of Innovation hit a top eat of three

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:04.119
<v Speaker 1>eighty seven point four miles per hour and a sustained

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>speed of five point four miles per hour. That beats

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>out the previous record, which was held by an aircraft

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>called the Extra three three zero l E that had

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a top speed of two miles per hour. And you

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 1>have these planes run on electric engines. They rely upon

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:25.400
<v Speaker 1>arrays of batteries to supply the juice needed to generate

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 1>the force necessary to create lift and flight. But batteries

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>are significantly less energy dense than say, jet fuel, so

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:36.439
<v Speaker 1>don't expect to see the world's airlines switch over to

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 1>e vs right away. It's far more likely that electric

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:42.159
<v Speaker 1>planes might be used for very short jumps, you know,

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:45.199
<v Speaker 1>flights that last like half an hour or so. For

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the longer stuff, we'll have to continue to rely on

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:52.879
<v Speaker 1>fuel powered aircraft. And that is the tech News for Tuesday,

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 1>November twenty one. If you have suggestions for topics I

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>should cover in future episodes of tech Stuff, please reach

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:01.359
<v Speaker 1>out to me. The best way to do that is

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. The handle for the show is Text Stuff

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 1>H s W and I'll talk to you again really soon.

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Y Text Stuff is an I heart Radio production. For

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from I heart Radio, visit the i heart

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.