WEBVTT - Week 14 NFL Best Bets (Ep. 68)

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, Welcome back to another episode of the Betting

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Pros NFL podcast. I'm your host Dan Harris. With me,

0:00:20.079 --> 0:00:22.479
<v Speaker 1>of course, is Matt Perrault. You can find us on

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Dan Harris Adi and at Sports Talk Matt

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the hottest NFL better that I've ever seen in my life. Matt,

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>What a week for you? Man?

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, wasn't just the NFL. But yeah, I mean, you know,

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 2>when you get on a roll like this, you just

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of ride it and you just hope that it

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 2>doesn't stop. I mean, at the time of taping, we've

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 2>hit twenty of our last twenty three bets on The

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 2>Daily Juice. If you got a bet late in uh

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:50.239
<v Speaker 2>during the week on Wednesday, you actually won because I

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 2>got a worse number than actually what went off at

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Wisconsin under basketball play that I had at one thirty

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 2>eight and one thirty four thirty three different books and

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 2>people bet it. By the time the more and came around,

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 2>the number had dropped so much that it was a

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 2>beneficiary to the to the Daily Juice audience. So really

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 2>it's twenty one and two for certain players out there.

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:11.759
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I mean when it's like this, I went

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 2>five to oh in the Circa when five to oh

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 2>in the Westgate we went four and one. I mean,

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 2>just as it's been a crazy week.

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, first, sorry for keeping into just the NFL,

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>but you know that's when people are here for the PA,

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 1>So that's why I missed that. But number two, you

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>saw the board so clearly last week because even one

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of the ones that we went to, which was the Colts,

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>like we kind of looked out in that game, you

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:34.680
<v Speaker 1>were on the other side. That was it, right, right,

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>You were on the other side of that one originally.

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I wanted the Texans, and I mean it

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 2>very easily could have been the Texans if it wasn't

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 2>for that fumble body Sean Watson. Yeah, that's the right side.

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>That was the right side. Yeah, but whatever, we'll take it. Obviously,

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>as as you said on the Daily Juice, things even out.

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>This is the whole point of how it works. But

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll break down every game this weekend. Let's recap the

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the DraftKings contest. As Matt said, we went four and one.

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 1>We hit on the saintslaning two and a half to

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons. The Colts lank three and a half to

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the Texans, as I just mentioned the Patriots are getting

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a half a point from the Chargers. That was not close,

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the Washington football team getting eight and a half from

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:11.839
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers, and we missed on the Raiders leank seven

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and a half to the Jets. I said last week

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>on the show that I thought Matt and I needed

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to go fourteen and one over our final three weeks.

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:20.679
<v Speaker 1>Remember we have one bye week still to go. Matt

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>attacked my math as usual Maclos, and he later on

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>realized that he was wrong. So we do need to

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 1>We did need to go fourteen to one to hit

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>sixty percent right now, that is still the cutoff for

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>being in the money. We went four and one, so

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>we've got to sweep. We've got to sleep right now.

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>It may not end up that way, maybe a little lower,

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>but right now, that's where it is. So let's get

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>into this right now. Matt out, what's that? Where are

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>we We're at the low two hundreds out of six

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred and ninety one two top we're two hundred fifteen.

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I think, oh, okay, yeah, we're there. I mean, and

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the top eighty right now are getting paid

0:02:57.320 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>because it's tied and stuff like that. So we're there.

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>We gained I don't know, one hundred spots last week

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>with a four and one. We will move up if

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>we get it, and I remember a lot of people.

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>You know. It depends on the bye weeks that are remaining.

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>We have won, so one of the next three weeks

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 1>could be this week. Don't know for sure. We have

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 1>to take one of our bye weeks. But Matt, let

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:15.519
<v Speaker 1>me ask you. Because we don't talk about this other

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 1>than one pick, which we'll get to, which my guess

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be your top pick. We don't talk about

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>it much. Are you loved last week? I didn't you

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>loved last week?

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Coming in?

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you love this week? Asma?

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't love it. I like it, I don't love it.

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm coming around on it, but I'm in the like

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'm in the beginning part of dating. I'm

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 2>not noting it yet, but I'm close. I'm coming around.

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 2>There are games I like.

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, let's talk about it now. Let's start with you.

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know, there was one game that we talked about,

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and there was a game that we had to talk

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>about because it's a game that if we'd like. By

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the time people are listening, to this, we will have

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>already played and if so, we will play it on Twitter.

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Is that your number one pick of the weekend, Matt.

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 2>It is, and it's it's if you listen to the

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 2>Daily Juice, you already have this. But I'm all over

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 2>the Rams tonight, and I think this is if you

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 2>look at the ultra of point spreads in Vegas, it's

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 2>ten and a half. For a reason, because I think

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 2>this is a ten point victory for the Rams tonight.

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't think the Patriots are gonna score. I think

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 2>the Unders a play as well, but I think the Patriots.

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 2>I have it at twenty seven seventeen somewhere in that range,

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty four to fourteen, somewhere in that range here for

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 2>the Rams. And I don't get the Patriot love. I

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:22.119
<v Speaker 2>don't get the Patriot play. I don't get the money

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 2>coming in on the Patriots. I know all these stats

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 2>are pointing towards the Patriots on a Thursday night victory

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 2>short you know, short week they stayed out there out west.

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 2>If you're beating the Chargers forty five, nothing, blah blah blah,

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 2>all those stats have Tom Brady at the quarterback spot,

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 2>not Cam Newton. Don't think the Patriots can score it

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 2>all here against the Rams. I think it's a complete

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 2>mismatch right now. For what the Patriots are good at doing.

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they're going to be able to move

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 2>the ball. And I think you can play man de

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 2>man defense with Jalen Ramsey in that secondary and put

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 2>eight in the box and say go ahead and try

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 2>to run the football. And the Patriots, I don't think

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 2>they've got an offensive line capable of blowing out holes

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:58.720
<v Speaker 2>like that, So Rams ten points are more tonight.

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 1>I can usually I feel like make a case for

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>myself as to how one team's gonna win a game,

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>especially when it's a single digit spread like this and

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>under a touchdown. It's really hard for me to see away.

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is dumb because people, by the time

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>they're listening to this, this game has been played already,

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>so I don't want to go crazy with it. It

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>really is tough to see the way that the Patriots

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>win and the consensus spread, by the way, it's five

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and a half in our contest, which, by the way,

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>one lesson I've learned is that the Matt peraltisms are

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>full of nonsense. Okay, Matt, but I will make a

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>rule until it's not a role.

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Also, have I bet a five and a half?

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:36.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so, I hold my rules.

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm betting this one because I don't care. You can

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 2>give me up to nine and a half and I'm

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 2>still taking the rams.

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:44.039
<v Speaker 1>All right. The other thing that I've learned is that

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>if I'm on a position, Matt usually won't listen to me.

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>But if he goes and talks to quote unquote smart

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:52.359
<v Speaker 1>people who are also on the same side, He's willing

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>to be convinced.

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 2>But regardless of course, Well, what't I do? I got it?

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I got it. What's weird, man, is the consensus line

0:05:57.560 --> 0:05:59.559
<v Speaker 1>that we're showing like a cross is four and a half,

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>not even five.

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 2>There will be books before this game kicks off that

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 2>will be at four.

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Why, I mean, I legitimately can't figure it out other

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>than you.

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Know, Belichick versus Anthony Lynn has them convinced that it's

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 2>Bill Belichick versus Sean McVay is as big of mismatches

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 2>last week.

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>That's not though Anthony Karen is like in a class

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 1>by himself. I mean, I agreeing them obviously, they they

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the Super Bowl, like they they figured

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>out how to you know, keep the Rams from scoring points,

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 1>but they had different personality. The only way I really

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>see this is if, like the differential and special teams,

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Patriots are really good, you know, sink right, they're third

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>in DVOA and special teams, the Rams are thirty. So

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna take something like that. So I'm gonna put it.

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, think about the logic of that, though. You're

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 2>gonna bet no, you're right that the Patriots are gonna

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 2>score points in special teams where it hadn't happened all year,

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 2>and they blocked a field goal for a touchdown, had

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 2>a punt return for a touchdown. So it's gonna happen

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:58.720
<v Speaker 2>in back to back weeks after not happening all year.

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Come on, that's ridiculous.

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I'm with you. I think it's going to

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>be in the picks. And by the time you're listening

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to this, we're either probably really happy or really we.

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Haven't take any advantage. I mean that there have been

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 2>numerous Thursday games we tape this on Thursday this season

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 2>that we both have liked and said, oh, well, it's Thursday,

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 2>we're taping it. We're not going to take it. And

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 2>we have not taken advantage of the rule that you

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 2>can place one bet Thursday. That's it, the one pick,

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 2>and then the other four later in the weekend. So

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 2>we haven't taken advantage of this. And I just think

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 2>this is a situation will play for me. Patriots back

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 2>to back weeks on the West Coast, and look, take

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 2>all these numbers about like teams that were favored on

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 2>the road that win and come back at home on

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 2>a Thursday at home lose. They're three to nine and

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 2>one against the number. You know, I don't care. I

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 2>don't care what numbers are. It's this Patriots team without

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 2>much talent in the on the wide receiver and corps,

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 2>no tight end to catch the football. I mean, they

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 2>already saw the Damien Harris wildcat against the Chargers, so

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 2>you can't even you know, you can't even shock them

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 2>by going with that because they've already seen it. So

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, look again tomorrow when this drops, I might

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 2>be looking like an idiot, But if the Patriots win

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 2>this game, I'm ecstatic as a Patriot fan. I'm in love.

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't see it.

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, the best thing I could say is

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that I think the public's still because of Belichick and

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>because of the leftovers from Brady looks to get excited

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>about the Patriots. And you know, a game where they

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>win forty five to nothing and they beat Arizona that

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I could see the money coming in necessarily on the Patriots,

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>but the sharp players. This just doesn't seem like the

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>right line to me.

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's what I don't get because I don't

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 2>see everyone I'm talking to. It's Rams, Rams, Rams, right,

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 2>and then people that are on Twitter like, well, the

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 2>experts are picking the Patriots. I'm like, what experts picking

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots? No one I'm talking to, So I mean,

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 2>no one I see, no one. I follow everyone that

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 2>I know is on the Rams big tonight. So I

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 2>don't know. I mean, I feel comfortable with the people

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 2>I trust that they like you, and other people feel like,

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 2>how are the Patriots scoring in? Belichick's a master, But

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is a really tough spot in my mind.

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:01.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah me too. So I'm almost positive we're going to

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>be picking this game. So I'm gonna put in right

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>now with pencil, but we're going to assume that's in,

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and then we'll have a fun night going on here. Okay,

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I have so that that was actually my number one,

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>But that shows you just kind of how I knew

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you were going to go with it. So I figured

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:19.559
<v Speaker 1>that we were going to go with it. I don't

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>have strong feel like I have like five or six

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>games that I'm like, all right, I could do.

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 2>Well. There's one stat to bring up here, So ten

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 2>of the sixteen games this year have road favorites. So

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 2>it's an awkward week for that reason. We got a

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 2>lot of short lines. Yeah, there's not a lot of

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 2>big lines, but a lot of short road favorites, like

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 2>two and a half, one and a half threes all

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:46.199
<v Speaker 2>over the board, which is kind of tough because it's

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 2>really okay on neutral field, it's a six point line

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 2>if your favorite on the road by three. So it's

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of a difficult week for that reason.

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, so here's what I'm gonna throw this one out.

0:09:57.760 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>But don't you know this is not a this is

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:02.839
<v Speaker 1>my number one or my number two. Like it's legitterally

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>as large.

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:06.680
<v Speaker 2>Literally that's a great word. Legitterally. Yeah.

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Wow, Yeah, how about there, I'm gonna go with the

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>bucks laying six and a half to the Vikings in Tampa.

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>So here's my rationale and then we can talk about it. Uh.

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>The Bucks are, of course off of Bye, which I

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>think is pretty important. I don't know if there's ever

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>been one. I should research it, whether there's ever been

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a week thirteen by and for an old you know,

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>quarterback like Brady, but just for the team, I think

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:34.199
<v Speaker 1>they really needed to catch their breath. There are a

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>couple of concerns here. Mike Evans, you know, was downgraded.

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, he was still battling the hamstring. Then I

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:41.719
<v Speaker 1>guess he didn't play today, which never is a good sign.

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>But Chris Godwin sounds like he's going to be fine.

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Ali Marpt is finally going to come back. That's a

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>big sort of thing. And really I think when the

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Bucks struggled, they just struggle against good defenses the Vikings.

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 1>If they could get pressure, fine, but they don't get

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a ton of pressure. They're dealing with injuries themselves. With

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Hendrix who's down on defense, Kyle Rudolph doesn't sound good

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 1>like he's gonna go I think, really, you know, they're

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna be able to stop Dalvin Cook. For the most part,

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Cook is fantastic, but it's a great run defense. And

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>then I think you're gonna put it in Kirk Cousins hands,

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>like good luck. You know. I like to fade Kirk Cousins,

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:18.559
<v Speaker 1>and we talked about how last week. So I think

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>this is a game where the Bucks actually come out

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 1>they need to win. They come out at home and

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 1>put up a big number on the board and under

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown, I feel okay about it. So the Bucks

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>selling six and half is one of my pals.

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 2>I like it. It's on my list. I like it,

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 2>and I like it for a couple of reasons. One

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:35.439
<v Speaker 2>Brady over a. You know, coming out of the by,

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 2>traditionally Tom Brady. You know this is with Belichick obviously,

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:41.479
<v Speaker 2>but coming out of the by, they normally have new wrinkles.

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:44.559
<v Speaker 2>They normally put in either new route trees or they

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 2>put in new type of alignments, and so it changes

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 2>up what they were doing. And I think Bruce arians

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 2>will be smart enough to do this. The only reason

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 2>why I hesitate, the only reason why it's not higher

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 2>on my list is because I am hoping and I

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 2>am borderline praying that Bruce as has changed the offense

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 2>during the bye week to incorporate more short passes to

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:08.960
<v Speaker 2>stop this down the field crap and just I know

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 2>you got Mike Evans and Godwin and whatnot, but let's

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 2>talk about slant routes. Let's talk about you know, guys

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 2>in the slot. Let's let's bring back what was working

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 2>earlier in the year with Scottie Miller. Let's use the

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 2>tight ends as much as they were before, not just

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 2>in the red zone. If they do that, I think

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 2>they'll put up a big number here, and they'll score

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 2>a lot on that secondary for the Vikings, and I

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 2>think they'll cover the line easily. So that's my only

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 2>hesitation that is Bruce arians really that stubborn or does

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 2>he finally wake up and realize what he's got at

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 2>quarterback and put in better pass plays for his quarterback.

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think he's been disappointing already, the fact that

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>he's like, why are you still doing this? Like you

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and I can sit here and watch this and as

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>smart as the two of us are and as much

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>football as we watch, like he's an NFL coach, Like

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>we know that this is not the game plan you

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>should be running right now with Tom Brady, Like it's

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>very clear what you should be doing. So the fact

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that he hasn't done it yet is wrecking. But again

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I agree off of By, they need to win at

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:05.559
<v Speaker 1>this point. This is nothing. And again this is much

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:09.079
<v Speaker 1>a fade of Kirk Cousins, which you know we like,

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're always like, when's the Kirk Cousins fade game?

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 1>It really was last week. I guess.

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes, this is a team.

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>This is a team that could have easily lost to

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the Mike Glennon led Jacksonville Jaguars. They're just not that good.

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the Bucks come out here. I think they

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>make a little bit of a statement. So I do

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:25.959
<v Speaker 1>like the game. Again, not not something far and away,

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>but let's put it on the pencil list and we'll

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about it going in. But we're on the same side,

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>so that's good. Who's your next one?

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So I've got two teams that I'm really concerned

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 2>about in December as to what they've done early versus

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 2>what they've done late. One's the Raiders and one's the Cardinals. First,

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 2>let's start with the Raiders, Indianapolis and our pool laying

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 2>two and a half. There's been money here that's trying

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 2>to push this to three. It probably will be three

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 2>by the time the game kicks off or higher. But

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm really concerned about where the Raiders are, and I

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.080
<v Speaker 2>think there are some legitimate issue with that offensive line.

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 2>With no Regie in cognito, they're not running the ball

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 2>nearly as successfully as they were. Derek Carr, after starting

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 2>out really hot, has now started to turn the football

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 2>over and starting to really regress. Yes, Waller is an

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 2>absolute beast, and I love the guy, but I mean,

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Agalar's come around a little bit. I know you've got

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 2>some third down guys who can move the chains. But

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 2>just the fact that the Jets were in that game,

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 2>and they should have won the game if it wasn't

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 2>for what I call heard it today a suicide play

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 2>call by Greg Williams, which I thought was an awesome

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 2>way of describing.

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the zerog Williams is my hero. Don't worry about it.

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Greg Williams is my hero.

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 2>That he did did to go ahead, hit Ruggs down

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 2>the sidelines, Ruggs fumble in the football and not looking

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 2>good all that, I mean, that game was on him.

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 2>If it wasn't for Yeah, it wasn't for that. I

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 2>just think Indianapolis because there's no pressure coming on Philip Rivers.

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 2>I think Pittman has really stepped up and played nicely.

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, obviously you got t Y. The running games

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 2>come around. I think Indianapoli is just a much better

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 2>overall football team here. I'm laying less than on a

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 2>field goal. I want Indianapolis mist two and a half.

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm good with that. I again, let's right now.

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we're on the you know, we've got three

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>games that I feel pretty decent about. It was on

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 1>my list. I have backed the Colts a lot this year.

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 1>This game against the Texans scared me a little bit

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>because I really thought that this was one that the

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>fact that you probably should have lost to a team

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>without will Fuller, without Roby really nerve wrecking. Rivers is

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>clearly hobbled by the toe. But I agree they found

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 1>a way to get t Y Hilton involved, whether he

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>was fully healthy or not. They still have Michael Pittman Jr.

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 1>They are thankfully turning it over to Jonathan Taylor on

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the ground a little more, and their offensive line, by

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the way, is getting healthy. That is a big deal

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>for them. They were beat up a little bit. I

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to be basically at full strength in

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>this game. So yeah, I'm good with this. It's one

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of the ones that was on my list, so I

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 1>feel pretty good about it. And yeah, and again I

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>like to just see what the general our consensus is,

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and about seventy four percent are on India as well.

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 1>That seems to be the right side underfield goal, Matt, Yeah,

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that seems to be the right side to me. Now,

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 1>what was the other one that you were talking about, Arizona?

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 2>No, well, yeah, so the Giants are catching two and

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 2>a half points against the Cardinals at home. Yeah, I

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 2>just I think the much like the Cardinals, much like

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 2>the Raiders. The Cardinals are flailing and the Giants are

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 2>playing really good smash mouth December football. I like what

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Joe Judge is doing. I don't care who played with,

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 2>whether you Colt McCoy or Danny Dimes, I don't really care.

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 2>I know getting Fitzgerald back is big, but he lost

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 2>nine pounds during his COVID nineteen battle and he definitely

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 2>is not going to be one hundred percent. You just

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 2>don't come back. I've had this starn virus. You don't

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 2>come back that fast and you're you know, look what

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 2>happened to Cam Newton. Look how kind of you you.

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes you're just in a mind fog. I was in

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 2>a brain fog for a good month and a half

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 2>after COVID. It's just it's not something you want to

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 2>play around with. I just think the Cardinals are in trouble.

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 2>I think this is the schedule is going against them.

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't think Kyler mur is healthy. And the Giants,

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I just think they're coming around and they're

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 2>playing really good football in December, catching two and a

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:09.120
<v Speaker 2>half points at home. I like the Giants.

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't hate it. It's not one of my favorite.

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't put it in the same bucket as

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Colts with the Raiders, I would lean

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that way. If I'm if I'm forced to pick a side,

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I would. It's just it's, you know, it's weird, Matt.

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes I find it hard even where IN'SO week fourteen,

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, and you know I look at players really

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:29.400
<v Speaker 1>closely because I protect and everything before the season coming in.

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>It's just hard for they're playing really well, the Giants,

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:36.399
<v Speaker 1>their defense in particular, and if it's legitimate, then yeah,

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>this is the right side for sure. And again Murray,

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of it is on Murray, who doesn't

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 1>look fully healthy. I just don't. I don't. I don't

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 1>feel that comfortable with it.

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Like he just stopped running. Murray stopped running. I mean,

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 2>I know he's their best weapon. He just know it

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 2>has to be because he's not healthy. He's just not

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 2>scattering around like he normally does, picking up first downs

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 2>and burning defenses.

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, all right, let's put it on the maybe list.

0:17:58.000 --> 0:17:58.919
<v Speaker 2>I do.

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I will really want to know your feelings on this one, Matt,

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>because again, you were the Bills fader the whole season,

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>on the list all you were all over.

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 2>Them on the list. They're on the list.

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Wait, they're on the list to take the Bills. Oh no,

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers. Oh yes, good, that's where I'm at, too,

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 1>very good. Okay, I got nervous for a second. They're

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 1>getting two and a half points against the Bills. This

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:26.360
<v Speaker 1>strikes me as massive overreaction to me as to what

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:28.360
<v Speaker 1>we saw. The Bills looked awesome.

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Aline flipped five points.

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Is that what it was?

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 2>It flipped five points? It was two and a half

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 2>for the Steelers. It's not two and a half for

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 2>the Bills. Yeah, five points, get out of.

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Here, and they look great. And you were on that game.

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>You were all over that game. I was on the

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:47.919
<v Speaker 1>other side of that game. Frankly, I thought that the

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 1>forty nine Ers find a way to win. They weren't

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:51.680
<v Speaker 1>even close. Yeah, you were all over that. And it's

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>like the Steelers, I mean, give me a break, Like

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>they can lose a game. Everyone's like, they're not going

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to go undefeated on the season. Big deals. Washington football

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 1>team is underrated. They have a very strong defense. What

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 1>does make me nervous is the fact that they are

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 1>so horribly beat up at linebacker at this point. I mean,

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Robert Splaine is down, Vince Williams just went on the

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 1>COVID list. They're really beat up there. Even Hayden has

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>hurt a little bit. But there are spots. I think

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the one thing that you can think about is Mike

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Tomlin is kind of a really predictable coach when it

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 1>comes to betting, right, you fade him when they're like favorites,

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>right when it's the game that you know they should win,

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:35.399
<v Speaker 1>and when there's a ra ra moment, when there's a

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>people aren't believing in me, you know this is what

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>we need to come up. That's when you jump right

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:43.639
<v Speaker 1>on because he is an incredible motivational coach. Josh Allen

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>looked like the best quarterback in football this past week,

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 1>but we've seen it. We've seen it now for a

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:53.159
<v Speaker 1>couple of seasons. He is super inconsistent. He's gonna come

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:54.400
<v Speaker 1>out one day, he's going to look like the best

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>quarterback in football, and the next day's gonna be like, what

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>is this human being doing at this moment with the ball?

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 1>So sounds like I don't really need to convince you

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the home field advantage by the way. You know that

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>like I fear Buffalo when there are fans there like that,

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 1>that's when it gets nervous. Now, I don't that means

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 1>nothing at this point.

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 2>I also think if you go back and watch the

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 2>game against Washington, how many drops did Ebron have? Nine?

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 1>They always have the many. The unfortunate part is that

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>they are always dropping those balls like Deontay Johnson and

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Eric Gebron their drop machines. But my guess is though

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>that like I wouldn't want to be like playing for

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Tomlin at this point if with all those drops.

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 2>Right, well, in the Ravens game. That didn't look good, right, So,

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean they've played a bunch of games where they've

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 2>had to play a ton of Look, I just think

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 2>this is a primetime game. Everyone's selling on the Steelers.

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, maybe they'll run the ball a bit more.

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the Bills can't stop running anybody running the football,

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:46.120
<v Speaker 2>so I think that maybe they kind of go back

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:47.919
<v Speaker 2>to old school Steeler football and run.

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>With That's a little right, That's that's part of the

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>unfortunate part is that the Steelers really have no run

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>game at this point. They were beat up on the

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>offensive line, but they choose just to throw. That's fine,

0:20:57.200 --> 0:20:59.640
<v Speaker 1>but you're gonna I don't know. Also, this last game,

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and I'm I'm analyzing it more from a fantasy football perspective,

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 1>I do not know why Chase Claypole suddenly was not

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:07.159
<v Speaker 1>on the field nearly as much as he had been

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 1>in the past. He's a great playmaker. My guess is

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>they'll get him out there more. So. Yeah, I just

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 1>think this is a bounce back spot.

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I love it. I mean two and a half

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 2>catching two and a half, I'll bet it. I'm waiting

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 2>to see if I can get three or yeah, right,

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:21.160
<v Speaker 2>So I mean before I bet it, I want three

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 2>or higher. But it's a primetime game for the Pittsburgh

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Steelers here to come back. And I mean, look, anytime

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:28.679
<v Speaker 2>I can fade Josh Allen.

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:30.919
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen, I know. And after a game where you

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>were like, nah, Bill's, Bill's for sure Bill's, I was like, wow, okay,

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where we are, so yeah, okay, good,

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that's another one. Then all right, what do you got?

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>You got any others that you like?

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 2>So there's a couple other that I want to talk about.

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 2>And yes, I wouldn't necessarily that I'm in love with this.

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 2>But how do you feel about the Philadelphia Eagles catching

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 2>seven and a half against New Orleans?

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea how to analyze it with Hurts.

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, talk me through it.

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Because I watching what what when Hurts came in, what

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 2>I saw was a spark.

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:54.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 2>I saw an offense that was working. I sawur receivers

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 2>getting open. I saw Sanders running hard. I saw the

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 2>offensive line, which is a complete mess, but they're blocking

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 2>well enough. And I think because the line's a mess,

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 2>you need a mobile quarterback who can run around and

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Hurts can run over people. He's tough enough to run

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 2>through linebackers if he needs to. So I think I

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 2>saw something there that maybe go okay. And then Taysom

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 2>Hill has been running the ball really effectively, but the

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:20.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, the run defense for the Eagles is not horrible. Yeah,

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:23.439
<v Speaker 2>so I wonder if you got I'm catching more than

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 2>a touchdown here seven and a half. I think everyone's

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 2>gonna gonna go. Oh, Taysom Hill and the Saints here

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 2>we go. But it's their third consecutive road game for

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 2>New Orleans, which is something you almost never see in

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 2>the NFL. Three consecutive games on the road is really

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 2>really rare. And if you want to go old school

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:43.199
<v Speaker 2>gambling adage, you always fade the team that's on the

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:44.880
<v Speaker 2>road for the third consecutive week.

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Right, and now is the road? I mean is it

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean as much with the fact that there are

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:52.880
<v Speaker 1>like few or no fans in most stadiums.

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:55.640
<v Speaker 2>I think it's more travel. It's more that you're constantly

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 2>on the move. You're never situated in your home or

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 2>in your bed. You're always you know, getting up and flying.

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 2>And then all the COVID protocols and everything else that

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 2>goes into it. I just think this Saint I mean

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 2>the Saints. I think they'll win the game. Yeah, but

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:13.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm catching seven and a half points. That hook matters

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:14.160
<v Speaker 2>to be a lot there.

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's funny because I'm looking at the consensus lines

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>available in the market and it's six and a half. Now,

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 1>So that would probably be a different story for you,

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>right if that were the line and the.

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Go yeah, without a doubt. I mean, six and a

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 2>half is dangerous. I still would look at it at

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:25.880
<v Speaker 2>six and a half, but seven and a half. It's

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 2>on the list because it's seven and a half.

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Okay, I mean I think that that one's kind

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:32.159
<v Speaker 1>of if for me, mainly just because I think what

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:34.439
<v Speaker 1>you're saying is right. First of all, the offense is

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>going to look better, just because it can't possibly look worse.

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:40.159
<v Speaker 1>And what's funny is that as bad as that offense

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>has looked, I mean, they should have covered against the

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Packers if not for the Aaron Jones like eighty yard

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 1>run at the end, Right, they were going to cover

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:51.160
<v Speaker 1>that spread despite looking like the worst team in football.

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:53.879
<v Speaker 1>Their defense is legitimate, but it makes me a little

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>nervous for me to not like really know what we're

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna you know, see from Hurtz. Given that now this

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:02.920
<v Speaker 1>is not a random let's put in this guy. Let's

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>see what happens. Oh, everybody doesn't know how to react.

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Is he gonna run?

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 2>Is he not?

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:09.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, suddenly these very very slow wide receivers are

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>getting open. When you give a team with a very

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>strong defense, you know, six days to prepare for the game,

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:17.679
<v Speaker 1>whether or not, it's still going to be quite that easy.

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's more something where if forced to

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>pick a side, I think I would go Eagles, but

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I'm ready to put that one in

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the contest. So that's that's fair one. Let me throw

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 1>out some other ugly games, which I also do not

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>like at all. This is you know, if we talk

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:35.159
<v Speaker 1>about ugly teams, Matt that I'm like, why don't we

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:37.920
<v Speaker 1>bet on this team? It's usually the Falcons. You were

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>surprised that I wasn't on them last WI. They are

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:42.919
<v Speaker 1>laying two and a half points to the Chargers. This

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>is basically as much of a fade of Anthony Lynn

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:49.159
<v Speaker 1>and the Charters as it is to do anything with

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons. But the Falcons are playing better. I mean,

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>let's talk.

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 2>About I'm not I'm blow your mind here.

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>You're on the Chargers. Yeah, Matt, Wow, Okay, that that's

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting to me, Matt. This is what I was looking

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:06.440
<v Speaker 1>this up today. Okay, so wayed DVA is basically takes

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:09.920
<v Speaker 1>new cat your most recent games, the worst, the worst

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>team in the league in total DVOA offenseive defense. Who

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 1>do you think it is? Who's the worst possible team

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:17.920
<v Speaker 1>in football? Right now? Forget about the Chargers. The worst

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:21.160
<v Speaker 1>possible team the Jets, right oh yeah, last their last

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>in DVA. The second worst team in way to DVA

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>is the Charger The best better teams than the Chargers,

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals, the Broncos, the Cowboys, the Jaguars, the Lions,

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles. They are second to last. They are playing terribly.

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 1>They are incredibly terribly coached. And again I think I

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>know Raheem Morris, the Falcons have been better.

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but laye, the Falcons be laying points to anybody.

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:52.679
<v Speaker 1>It's that's that's a very very fair point. That's a

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:55.199
<v Speaker 1>very fair point. And again, look again, I just like

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to see where generally the experts sort of go, just generally,

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 1>how it breaks down and it's fifty eight percent around

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers. So I'm not an overwhelming sort of thing,

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>but that that is probably the feeling about it, and

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>it's on the road. But for me, Man, I don't know.

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:11.440
<v Speaker 1>At this point, I'm probably just gonna fade the Chargers

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:12.439
<v Speaker 1>every single time.

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:15.159
<v Speaker 2>See, I think Herbert's got a chance to put up

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:17.400
<v Speaker 2>a big number here. That's the crap defense.

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so I agree with that. I agree.

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 2>That's why I don't. I'm not so worried about the

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Chargers defense as much as I think that Herbert throws

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 2>for like three point fifty. Yeah, it just has a monster, monster.

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Game because you will talk about that, you know, back to.

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Back, back to back weeks. He hasn't done well. But

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 2>I just think Herbert's going to bounce back. And it

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 2>looked like he did about a month ago when he

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 2>was passing the ball on everybody.

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Now, I mean I think all of that is

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:43.359
<v Speaker 1>fair for me. I couldn't back there, Like, there's under

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:45.640
<v Speaker 1>no circumstances could I back the Chargers in any game

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 1>at this point because I just I just don't feel confident.

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:53.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Matt, they were that game against the Patriots,

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 1>we like the Patriots. We like them to win that game.

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 2>I like it lost. I like the Pats the last

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 2>two weeks. We've been on them the last two weeks.

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 2>That's true, an hour off because it was I mean, look,

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 2>this is sometimes you just see the board really clearly.

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:09.640
<v Speaker 2>This is what I said. I said, went over the Cardinals,

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 2>went over the Chargers, last to the Rams. So that's true.

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's hope you're right. If you're listening right now, you

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>know whether or not that was right right where they were?

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:19.399
<v Speaker 1>All right, So let's let's skip that game. You got

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>a couple other games you thought that, Yes.

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I want to talk through Ravens Browns. Yes, okay.

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 2>So we were talking about fading quarterbacks in fading Josh Allen,

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 2>isn't this the greatest fade spot on Baker Mayfield? Given

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 2>what he just did and all the hype and all

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 2>the running around and all the wave and the arms

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:42.160
<v Speaker 2>and all the nonsense he was doing. Isn't this now

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 2>the time to fade him and to say the Ravens

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 2>are going to get right here and smash the Browns.

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 1>It's on my list, Yeah, it's on my list. This

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:52.400
<v Speaker 1>is Monday night, I believe right, correct, And yeah, and

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens are laying one and a half in our

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:57.360
<v Speaker 1>contest right now, the consensus line is up to two

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:00.679
<v Speaker 1>and a half. So yeah, this has to be. And

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I like the Browns and I've got I've got a

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 1>future that I'm feeling pretty good about. With Stefanski winning

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Coach of the Year, I think he's done a good

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 1>job with this team. But this team, and you were

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 1>on them also, Matt. I mean, I don't know whatever

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you were drinking last week, I want some of it,

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:19.119
<v Speaker 1>because you were all over the Browns too. I wouldn't

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 1>let us take it. You were all over the Browns

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 1>over the Titans in that game. But I'm I'm totally

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 1>ready to fade the Browns in this spot. And I

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:29.160
<v Speaker 1>think the Ravens are going to They know what they

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>need to do at this point. They know they basically

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>got to win out essentially. I saw some stat that

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 1>said there's like a forty chance that a ten win team,

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 1>even with the extra playoffs, is going to miss the

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 1>playoffs in the AFC. They've got to win. They know

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>they've got to win. So yeah, I'm I'm totally good

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 1>with fading the Browns and going with the Ravens in

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the spot for sure.

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 2>I love this. Again, this is a short number to

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 2>one and a half, so it's basically a pick. And

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 2>I just think in terms of coaching, I like Stefanski,

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 2>I do, but I think this is you know, you're

0:28:57.120 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 2>getting into December, must win territory for the Ravens. They

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 2>had their swoon and Lamar's back, Lamar's running, and I

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 2>mean they should have all three of their running backs

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 2>in this game. Coming up a Monday night, Yep, it's

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 2>prime time for Baker Mayfield and oftentimes that means big

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 2>time fade opportunity for Baker Mayfield.

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>And again, I mean Zeke looked better than I expected

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and flooked. But I think if you've got another week

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of health from Brandon Williams and from Kalais Campbell, that

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the line that the run defense is going to be

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>very good if you're going to force Baker Mayfield. And again,

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 1>remember they don't really have any wide receiver that could

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 1>possibly scare you. Jervis Sundry is a fine player at

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 1>this point in his career, but Richard Higgins isn't scaring you.

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Austin Hooper is not. They've got to run

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the ball if the Ravens focus on taking that away.

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I also don't think that the Browns are really going

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to be able to stop you know, Lamar Jackson. They'll

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:50.720
<v Speaker 1>get Mark Andrews back. Hollywood brown is playing better. So yeah,

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I like it. I'm with you on that one. All right,

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 1>let me throw out how do you feel about the

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Titans link seven and a half to the Jaguars in Jacksonville.

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is one of the games I've looked at closely,

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 2>and boy, last week scared me a little bit because

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 2>I was on the Jags last week plus ten against

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 2>the Vikings, yep, and I just I'm wondering, can they

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 2>keep the game close, like, because they're gonna throwing every

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 2>down like they just oh yeah, they don't care. Jaggs

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 2>don't care. Jags are just chucking the football all over

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 2>the place. And I'm a little nervous about that defense

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 2>for the Titans.

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 2>He just got shredded by the Browns.

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree. The biggest thing for me is again,

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't love this game. It's over a

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 1>touchdown and the Jags have an innate ability to hang around.

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Now, and again, remember last week, as much as they

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>almost won that game. I mean that the first touchdown

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of the week was that preposterous catch by Leaviska Chanot,

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 1>which should have been picked. Like they they're getting lucky

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 1>to hang around, and you can see an angry Titans

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 1>team in this one, right, an embarrassed Titans team. Now

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 1>AJ Brown is not practiced this week, and he did

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 1>hurt his ankle in that game. He came back, So

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 1>if AJ Brown didn't play, I really wouldn't like them

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 1>that much. But I don't like the seven and a half.

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 1>That's the side on I'd be on, but I don't

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 1>like it better. We have five games right now, Matt,

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and we'll get to them. But five games, though, like

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm totally fine with at this point. I don't like

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the Titans better than that. But if you were for

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 1>us to choose a side, do you like them at

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half or would you?

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I guess so because Henry just runs the

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 2>football like crazy and just you know, choose up the

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 2>clock and they win like I don't know, like twenty

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 2>eight ten or something like. Yeah, I can see it,

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 2>but I mean I'm nervous about my Titans. Nine and

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 2>a half win bet because much like the I feel

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 2>like there was a couple, they're three teams I'm nervous about.

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 2>In December, we talked about two of them, and the

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Titans are the third one that I was concerned about

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 2>in December because that defensive performance was disgusting against the Browns.

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Now granted credit Stefanski. They practiced all week to stop

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 2>Chubb and to stop Hunt, and all of a sudden,

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 2>Baker came out and threw every down. They weren't ready

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 2>for that. They were like, what are we doing? Are

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 2>we practiced stopping the run and now we're stuck. And

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 2>that showed a little bit of an inflexibility with with

0:31:56.080 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 2>Mike Vrabel, which kind of exposed him a little bit

0:31:58.160 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 2>there that they couldn't get out of their defensive sets.

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 2>But I'm comfortable that they win. I don't know about

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 2>the seven and a half.

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean my guess is that they will say, well,

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 1>well we'll try this again. We'll stop James Robinson. Then

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 1>if if Mike Lennon can beat us with you know,

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 1>DJ Shark and Colin Johnson, will take our chances. But

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 1>over a touchdown, I get nervous regardless I'm on that opportunity.

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm on that side. But yeah, I'm i'd be well

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>in the past. Okay, any other games that you're kind

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of liking at all?

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 2>No, not really, I mean, I mean I I looked

0:32:28.280 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 2>at the I was if the Panthers had Christian McCaffrey,

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:34.200
<v Speaker 2>I would have taken to Panthers. But without Christian McCaffrey,

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:36.640
<v Speaker 2>that's a complete no play. Now I have to stay

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 2>far far away from from that game. And it's really

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 2>kind of frustrating because.

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 1>And again they don't have DJ. I mean, I'm sure

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 1>DJ Moore is not going to play, given that he's

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>on the COVID list, and we don't even know if

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Curtis Sanduel is going to play because he's.

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 2>You know close, and I can't I can't back drew locks.

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 1>So it's like no, no, no, stay away game.

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 2>That was the only side I would have with McCaffrey playing,

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 2>would have I would have said, I would have been

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 2>on the table here about three and a half for

0:32:57.000 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 2>the Panthers, But just too much uncertainty, So that that

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 2>was the old The other game that I was kind

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 2>of looking at and then like gun to my head

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 2>if I had to pick it. I would take the

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Jets plus thirteen and a half against.

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 1>The Seas Also another game where there's no way for

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 1>me to analyze that game and think that the value

0:33:12.000 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 1>isn't on the Jets. Yeah, and there's no way I

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 1>can back the Jets right in the game, like right, Like,

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that's what that game boils down to at this point.

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the pros will take it that the pros

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 2>who bet the board it will take.

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 1>The pros are going to pound that number without it

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that they will love the thirteen and a half. They

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 1>will be more because that is value on the Jets.

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 1>And the Jets, to their quote unquote credit, are playing

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>better offensively. They're down Denzel mims that that's not gonna

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 1>make a huge difference, but it does take away one

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of their weapons. But yeah, the Seahawks probably could win

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 1>this game by twenty five points if they decided to

0:33:42.920 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 1>do it. But you know the Seahawks, they like to

0:33:44.560 --> 0:33:45.360
<v Speaker 1>play c looks games.

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:47.680
<v Speaker 2>It's just something to do up there. Though. Something's going

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 2>on in Seattle. Something's not right right now with them.

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I don't know if it's Pete Carroll or

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Russell Wilson believing his own press clippings too much, or

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, the league figuring out DK or what. But

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 2>it's it's not looking great. The whole MVP Russ campaign

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:05.960
<v Speaker 2>has really stalled.

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:09.719
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, Now, I think that unless he goes nuts

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 1>at the end, I think that that race is pretty

0:34:11.960 --> 0:34:13.800
<v Speaker 1>much over. To the extent he was in it, I

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:17.080
<v Speaker 1>think he was down to Mahomes, maybe Rogers, maybe Allen

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:19.400
<v Speaker 1>if he has a huge finish, who knows. All Right,

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:21.400
<v Speaker 1>let's get to a couple other games here, and I

0:34:21.480 --> 0:34:24.719
<v Speaker 1>have a slight lean on on a couple of them,

0:34:24.719 --> 0:34:27.080
<v Speaker 1>but not strong. How do you feel about the Chiefs

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:29.360
<v Speaker 1>links seven and a half to the Dolphins in Miami?

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 2>See two of playing leads me to bet the Chiefs. Yeah,

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 2>so if it was Fitzpatrick, I would probably bet. I

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:38.840
<v Speaker 2>probably bet the Miami Dolphins if it was Fitzpatrick. But

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:40.880
<v Speaker 2>I just don't think two is the right guy to

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 2>be playing right now. And I just can't believe that

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:46.719
<v Speaker 2>the team consistently wants to force Tua. And he's a

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:49.880
<v Speaker 2>game manager at best. He's accurate with the football, I

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 2>get it, but like you know, you're gonna ride your defense,

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:55.720
<v Speaker 2>and the problem is when you're trying to stop the Chiefs. Yikes.

0:34:55.800 --> 0:34:57.319
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you've got to be able to score with them.

0:34:57.360 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't care how good your defense is, you got

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:00.359
<v Speaker 2>to be able to score with them. I don't think

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Miami could score with them. So my only concern is

0:35:02.880 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 2>just that Dolphins defense has been so good at turning

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 2>the football over. What happens if they get a fubble,

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:10.799
<v Speaker 2>couple of picks or whatever it might be. And you know,

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:13.840
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs haven't really been interested in killing people. They

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:16.239
<v Speaker 2>just want to win the games. True, they want to

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:18.839
<v Speaker 2>They want to go into the playoffs and that's when

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 2>they'll really turn it on. But they're you know, they're

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 2>winning games by four to five points a bit more

0:35:23.600 --> 0:35:25.359
<v Speaker 2>too much for my liking to back them there.

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I agree that that really is the thing. They don't

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:30.320
<v Speaker 1>have the we're gonna win this game by twenty points

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 1>at all. They just don't seem interested, like yeah, because

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you definitely think you see, you know, you get Hi

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes. You have forty five seconds and no timeouts

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 1>to drive the entire field and it's like just a

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:42.560
<v Speaker 1>snap of his fingers and it's done. They could score

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 1>whenever they want to do it, but they just don't

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 1>seem interested in really going. You've got again the Dolphins,

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned it with their defense good at causing turnovers.

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:51.840
<v Speaker 1>But the chief I mean, Mahomes doesn't throw picks really,

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 1>so you'd really need something crazy and that I do

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:56.319
<v Speaker 1>see the snare where the Chiefs get up big and

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:58.120
<v Speaker 1>you're going to force two it to chase points and

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:00.399
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think that's gonna be pretty. But I again,

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't love it at over a touchdown just because again,

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 1>as you said, the Chiefs don't really put people away.

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:05.800
<v Speaker 1>How about the Bucks?

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:08.360
<v Speaker 2>The Bucks game is the clearest. You know, they had

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:10.719
<v Speaker 2>seventeen points in the first quarter, then they can out score

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:13.080
<v Speaker 2>seventeen to seven the rest of the way, right, so

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:15.400
<v Speaker 2>you know that that that's my fear is that like

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 2>they'll get up big and go, okay, we're done. It's like, uh, guys,

0:36:20.640 --> 0:36:24.440
<v Speaker 2>you got three quarters left and yeah, keep going and

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:26.960
<v Speaker 2>then they just don't care. So that that's a problem

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 2>and it could burn them in the playoffs. But but

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:30.880
<v Speaker 2>that's a problem right now in terms of focusing for

0:36:30.920 --> 0:36:31.600
<v Speaker 2>four quarters.

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:33.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm with you, all right. What do you think

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 1>about the Packers link seven and a half to the

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Lions in Detroit.

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:38.879
<v Speaker 2>Hate the number. I would have bet it. I mean,

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 2>I think, like I mentioned last week that you know,

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:43.160
<v Speaker 2>taking the Lions in a spot to go ahead and

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:45.839
<v Speaker 2>win because it's now three and oh for teams that

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:48.800
<v Speaker 2>after they fire their coach, they've won the next game outright.

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:49.920
<v Speaker 2>So we talked about it.

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I said, look, somebody pointed that out on Twitter.

0:36:52.840 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Way take a line. So I said, you know that

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 2>this is just you know, forget about what's going on.

0:36:56.760 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 2>They're gonna beat the Bears just simply because you know,

0:36:59.360 --> 0:37:02.319
<v Speaker 2>they just fire Matt Patricia and Bob Quinn and then

0:37:02.400 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 2>the fumble happens by you know, Mitchell Trubisky, which is

0:37:05.239 --> 0:37:07.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, kind of like a redundant comment, but you know,

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:10.719
<v Speaker 2>go ahead, he just blow blows the game. And then

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 2>so they go ahead and win it. And then there

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:15.160
<v Speaker 2>you go. So this is a classic letdown spot, right,

0:37:15.200 --> 0:37:16.960
<v Speaker 2>you win a game you're not supposed to. Now it's

0:37:17.200 --> 0:37:19.520
<v Speaker 2>introom coach, this interroom coach that they all know they're

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:21.319
<v Speaker 2>out at the end of the year, and you're taking

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:23.480
<v Speaker 2>on Aaron Rodgers who's still very much and not just

0:37:23.520 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 2>the MVP race but also trying to contend for playoff

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:27.879
<v Speaker 2>positioning here. Yep, I just don't like the hook.

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:28.439
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 2>On the road seven and a half just seems to

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 2>be a little bit too That's that's a little bit

0:37:32.040 --> 0:37:32.479
<v Speaker 2>too much.

0:37:32.680 --> 0:37:35.480
<v Speaker 1>That's the exact analysis I have. I I like the

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Packers in this game. I think they're gonna win. The

0:37:37.960 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 1>hook is the hook scares me too much because the.

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:42.919
<v Speaker 2>Teaser game, This is teaser. This is par two team

0:37:42.920 --> 0:37:45.200
<v Speaker 2>teaser written all over all over it.

0:37:45.600 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I love the Teazers. I agree. Yeah, this is just

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:50.839
<v Speaker 1>something where once you're because you know you're gonna have

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Stafford will throw. There's not gonna be meany Kenny Gallay

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:55.440
<v Speaker 1>in this game. But they should have DeAndre Swift back.

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 1>But regardless, they're gonna they're gonna find a way to

0:37:58.760 --> 0:38:02.160
<v Speaker 1>put up points and keep it, you know, potentially from

0:38:02.160 --> 0:38:04.239
<v Speaker 1>becoming a blowout. So I agree, over the heck, I

0:38:04.239 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 1>don't like it. What about the Cowboys laying three and

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:08.879
<v Speaker 1>a half to the Bengals in Cincinnati.

0:38:09.200 --> 0:38:13.400
<v Speaker 2>I can't I can't pick either team. I can't trust

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:18.440
<v Speaker 2>either team. They both stink. Both absolutely atrocious football teams.

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:21.719
<v Speaker 2>And it's just okay, who is gonna be worse? Like

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 2>who's who's gonna be the worst of the two, And

0:38:25.239 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 2>both our teams have backup quarterbacks, both have defenses to

0:38:28.239 --> 0:38:30.880
<v Speaker 2>give up big numbers, both have significant injuries you have

0:38:30.920 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 2>to worry about. I mean, the Cowboys have a better

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:37.719
<v Speaker 2>receiving corps obviously, but I mean, I no, just absolutely,

0:38:37.760 --> 0:38:40.319
<v Speaker 2>this is like my least favorite game of the week.

0:38:40.800 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's gross, it's gross. And again I think we

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 1>can assume that Ryan Finley is going to be the

0:38:46.239 --> 0:38:48.400
<v Speaker 1>quarterback for the Bengals, in which case, you know, I

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 1>feel like, do you know the movie The Princess Bride,

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Matt all right, So I feel like it's that scene

0:38:53.280 --> 0:38:55.839
<v Speaker 1>where Vizzini is trying to figure out the wine, like

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:56.759
<v Speaker 1>which one has?

0:38:56.800 --> 0:38:59.319
<v Speaker 2>The character games? You know, the character names?

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh Mad want to if you ever want to go

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:04.279
<v Speaker 1>on to the culture or movies, we'll talk about all

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:04.520
<v Speaker 1>they life.

0:39:04.520 --> 0:39:06.760
<v Speaker 2>I know the actor's name, I don't know the character's.

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Name, and he can say he's saying, you know, but

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:10.239
<v Speaker 1>you would have known that I know this, So I

0:39:10.320 --> 0:39:12.879
<v Speaker 1>clearly cannot choose the wine in front of me. That's

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:15.440
<v Speaker 1>how I feel when I analyze this game, like this

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 1>is why I cannot choose the beangals. This is why

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I cannot choose the Cowboys, so complete stay away from me.

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:23.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you feel the same, what do you? I'm

0:39:23.520 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 1>actually interesting to see what you think about this next one.

0:39:25.960 --> 0:39:29.320
<v Speaker 1>The Texans are laying one and a half to the

0:39:29.360 --> 0:39:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Bears in Chicago.

0:39:30.800 --> 0:39:33.400
<v Speaker 2>See, there's a couple of things going on. One I

0:39:33.440 --> 0:39:35.960
<v Speaker 2>don't like. If it was a Houston I would say

0:39:36.000 --> 0:39:39.759
<v Speaker 2>a different story. It's outdoors in Chicago, so weather's a

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:42.280
<v Speaker 2>question there for me. Yeah, they don't run the football

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:45.319
<v Speaker 2>Texans do. You're throwing by crazy, So what happens if

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:47.719
<v Speaker 2>it's really cold and nasty? I haven't seen the weather yet,

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:51.080
<v Speaker 2>so but I can't. Again, this is another one of

0:39:51.120 --> 0:39:53.680
<v Speaker 2>these teams with interim coaches. As we head towards the

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:55.680
<v Speaker 2>final four weeks, what are they playing for?

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Right? Like?

0:39:56.560 --> 0:39:59.160
<v Speaker 2>What's the incentive for the Texans team to lay out

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:01.759
<v Speaker 2>for a receip to lay out and get his head

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:05.040
<v Speaker 2>taken off? What's the what's the incentive for a defensive

0:40:05.080 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 2>lineman to go ahead and dive on a football or

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:11.160
<v Speaker 2>dive and make himself vulnerable. I just I don't know

0:40:11.160 --> 0:40:13.359
<v Speaker 2>what these teams are playing for. I mean, maybe Matt

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:15.439
<v Speaker 2>Nagy's gonna be fired, but we know this new coach

0:40:15.480 --> 0:40:18.399
<v Speaker 2>coming in Houston, so that's I just I can't trust

0:40:18.480 --> 0:40:20.239
<v Speaker 2>either one of these teams, although I do think if

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 2>you're picking on quarterbacks, Houston's got the better quarterback clearly coaches,

0:40:24.200 --> 0:40:27.880
<v Speaker 2>though the Bears slightly have the better coach, have the

0:40:27.920 --> 0:40:31.040
<v Speaker 2>better coach. It's it's it's hard. If I had to

0:40:31.040 --> 0:40:32.799
<v Speaker 2>pick a side, I probably would take the home team.

0:40:33.239 --> 0:40:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I have been on both sides of this game

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to the extent I tried to pick a side, which

0:40:37.600 --> 0:40:39.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to do because I just there are

0:40:39.880 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 1>times you don't have to bet on every game. Everyone

0:40:41.840 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 1>like you don't. You can you can take some some

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:46.719
<v Speaker 1>games off. I'm gonna be taking the Cowboys Bengals game off.

0:40:46.840 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably gonna be taking this one because I've talked

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:51.200
<v Speaker 1>myself into both sides of this game, which is really

0:40:51.200 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 1>more that I've talked myself out of the other side

0:40:53.560 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of this game, because it's just something where I don't

0:40:55.680 --> 0:40:59.480
<v Speaker 1>trust either team. I don't trust either quarterback, so I'm

0:40:59.520 --> 0:41:01.319
<v Speaker 1>not going any near it. If you had brought it up,

0:41:01.360 --> 0:41:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I would have just said, Nope, I've got nothing on it.

0:41:03.480 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 1>And if you can convince me, then you are better

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>at this than I have last game, I believe. I

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:11.760
<v Speaker 1>think we've touched everything else. The forty nine Ers laying

0:41:11.880 --> 0:41:14.720
<v Speaker 1>three and a half to the Washington football team.

0:41:15.160 --> 0:41:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Isn't this Yeah? Isn't this the classic letdown spot for Washington?

0:41:19.360 --> 0:41:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Isn't just? Isn't this just the five six, seven point

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:25.400
<v Speaker 2>loss to the forty nine ers. They just run the

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 2>ball down the throat and get out of there with

0:41:27.120 --> 0:41:29.560
<v Speaker 2>a win. I mean, it's just. I mean that was

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:32.720
<v Speaker 2>a super Bowl performance. Alex Smith at three hundred yards passing,

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:35.719
<v Speaker 2>he was on fire. In the second half, Chase Young

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:38.360
<v Speaker 2>came to life that goal line. Stan was gigantic to

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 2>play Chase Young made. They finally made a couple of

0:41:40.680 --> 0:41:43.160
<v Speaker 2>big plays on Big Ben Late to intercept the football

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:46.239
<v Speaker 2>to win the football game. I mean, everything went right

0:41:46.280 --> 0:41:49.399
<v Speaker 2>for them against the Steelers. I think it probably comes back.

0:41:49.560 --> 0:41:51.400
<v Speaker 2>If I had to pick it, I'd say San Francisco.

0:41:51.440 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 2>But I hate backup quarterbacks.

0:41:53.239 --> 0:41:56.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't like the hook three and a half. It's

0:41:56.400 --> 0:41:59.880
<v Speaker 1>three now the consensus line. I'd be much more willing

0:42:00.160 --> 0:42:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to take the forty nine if you give in it

0:42:01.600 --> 0:42:03.399
<v Speaker 1>and it was three and you wanted the forty nine ers,

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I would take them because for all the reason this

0:42:05.719 --> 0:42:08.560
<v Speaker 1>is like the this is like the you know you

0:42:08.600 --> 0:42:11.279
<v Speaker 1>think about classic like you know, by low so high,

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:14.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean there is no what selling high. There is

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:18.160
<v Speaker 1>no selling higher than what Washington just did. The forty

0:42:18.239 --> 0:42:21.920
<v Speaker 1>nine Ers just got obliterated by the Bills on national television.

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:24.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's a spot where you buy them low. So

0:42:24.120 --> 0:42:26.439
<v Speaker 1>I would take them, But over the hook, I don't

0:42:26.480 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 1>like it. So all right, Matt, I think we've got it.

0:42:29.200 --> 0:42:31.319
<v Speaker 1>I think we've got the five and that is the

0:42:31.480 --> 0:42:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Rams laying five and a half points to the Patriots

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:36.600
<v Speaker 1>unless the Patriots cover that spread, in which case we

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:39.440
<v Speaker 1>never picked it and you can't prove it. The Bucks

0:42:39.520 --> 0:42:42.600
<v Speaker 1>laying six and a half to the Vikings, the Colts

0:42:42.680 --> 0:42:44.799
<v Speaker 1>laying two and a half to the Raiders, the Steelers

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:46.840
<v Speaker 1>getting two and a half from the Bills, and the

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Ravens laying one and a half to the Browns.

0:42:50.160 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 2>So say that again, So Bucks minus six and a half.

0:42:52.600 --> 0:42:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Bucks minus six and a half to the Vikes, right,

0:42:54.800 --> 0:42:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the Colts minus two and a half to the Raiders,

0:43:00.200 --> 0:43:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers getting two and a half from the Bills.

0:43:03.520 --> 0:43:05.200
<v Speaker 2>I was nervous that we were going all favorites.

0:43:05.760 --> 0:43:08.600
<v Speaker 1>No, we I know, I we really is. I mean,

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:11.480
<v Speaker 1>it's still too many favorites. But to be fair, like

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:13.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the favorites, the Ravens are laying.

0:43:13.239 --> 0:43:13.920
<v Speaker 2>One and a half.

0:43:13.960 --> 0:43:17.000
<v Speaker 1>That's not yeah, the Colts are laying two and a half, you.

0:43:16.960 --> 0:43:19.919
<v Speaker 2>Know, favorites. Yeah, so so we have we we have

0:43:20.200 --> 0:43:22.959
<v Speaker 2>four dogs, four favorites, one dog, but really two dogs

0:43:22.960 --> 0:43:25.320
<v Speaker 2>skill Ravens. So it's exactly, I'm fine.

0:43:25.200 --> 0:43:27.959
<v Speaker 1>Exactly yeah, works, yeah, and again, well we look where

0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:30.120
<v Speaker 1>we're honest, we'll we'll let you know. If we changed

0:43:30.160 --> 0:43:33.080
<v Speaker 1>one in this last one. I can't what did we

0:43:33.160 --> 0:43:33.600
<v Speaker 1>change it too?

0:43:33.600 --> 0:43:33.759
<v Speaker 2>Man?

0:43:33.840 --> 0:43:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Other cults. We swapped in the Colts in this last one,

0:43:36.760 --> 0:43:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and we took out the Chiefs, which was a good swap,

0:43:39.680 --> 0:43:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a very good swap. And again that was a huge spread,

0:43:41.960 --> 0:43:44.280
<v Speaker 1>which I just think we can't do with the Chiefs

0:43:44.280 --> 0:43:46.600
<v Speaker 1>at this point anymore because they're not interested in all right,

0:43:46.640 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that is great. I will will tweet it out so

0:43:49.200 --> 0:43:51.319
<v Speaker 1>when you'll know when we stopped recording this, because it's

0:43:51.320 --> 0:43:52.759
<v Speaker 1>about to be a tweet that's going to come out

0:43:52.760 --> 0:43:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to take this game but we are

0:43:54.560 --> 0:43:56.960
<v Speaker 1>going to take the rams. I hope it goes well.

0:43:57.280 --> 0:43:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I hope the rest of our pics go well as always.

0:43:59.080 --> 0:44:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget to tune in two Matt's Lives. Matt, what

0:44:01.040 --> 0:44:02.680
<v Speaker 1>have we decided to do now with the props that

0:44:02.680 --> 0:44:03.200
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna do?

0:44:03.280 --> 0:44:05.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh? Great point, Yeah, okay, so here's what we're gonna do.

0:44:05.600 --> 0:44:07.840
<v Speaker 2>So your props are gonna be. We're gonna be my props.

0:44:08.160 --> 0:44:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:44:08.440 --> 0:44:11.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna bet your props every week. Okay, so you're

0:44:11.080 --> 0:44:13.839
<v Speaker 2>gonna give me five, I'm gonna bet it, and I'm

0:44:13.880 --> 0:44:17.280
<v Speaker 2>gonna go ahead, and I'm going to tell everyone your props,

0:44:17.280 --> 0:44:20.600
<v Speaker 2>which are becoming the Daily Juice live stream props every

0:44:20.600 --> 0:44:23.560
<v Speaker 2>single week. So kind of combining our efforts here down

0:44:23.600 --> 0:44:25.560
<v Speaker 2>the stretch, because you're doing all this great work to

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:28.279
<v Speaker 2>break down games and making projections. Normally you were giving

0:44:28.320 --> 0:44:31.000
<v Speaker 2>two to three. But since I think you're on an

0:44:31.000 --> 0:44:32.440
<v Speaker 2>eight and two run.

0:44:32.600 --> 0:44:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I think actually I might be eight and oh. I

0:44:34.560 --> 0:44:36.279
<v Speaker 1>think I lost the two before that. I think the

0:44:36.320 --> 0:44:37.880
<v Speaker 1>last three weeks, I may be wrong. I think it

0:44:37.960 --> 0:44:38.799
<v Speaker 1>might be eight and oh over the.

0:44:38.840 --> 0:44:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Last that's possible. I think I was adding it up

0:44:40.960 --> 0:44:42.759
<v Speaker 2>so very possible to eat in a row, and eight

0:44:42.760 --> 0:44:45.759
<v Speaker 2>out of your last ten you've hit, so I think

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:47.560
<v Speaker 2>it's better. I've been going two and two or one

0:44:47.600 --> 0:44:49.520
<v Speaker 2>and three pretty much every every Sunday, So I think

0:44:49.520 --> 0:44:51.239
<v Speaker 2>it's better and smarter for the audience and better for

0:44:51.239 --> 0:44:53.400
<v Speaker 2>the winning for the listeners to just take your props,

0:44:53.719 --> 0:44:55.600
<v Speaker 2>make up my props, and go ahead and give them

0:44:55.640 --> 0:44:56.520
<v Speaker 2>out on the live stream.

0:44:56.600 --> 0:44:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that's totally fine. And again my process, just

0:44:58.680 --> 0:45:01.840
<v Speaker 1>so everybody knows, I do actually projections because I project

0:45:01.920 --> 0:45:04.879
<v Speaker 1>for my fantasy rankings, and then usually what I will

0:45:04.920 --> 0:45:06.920
<v Speaker 1>do when I have time is I will compare my

0:45:07.000 --> 0:45:09.880
<v Speaker 1>projections to the available props in the market. Part of

0:45:09.920 --> 0:45:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the reason why I haven't been great about it with Matt,

0:45:12.040 --> 0:45:14.200
<v Speaker 1>poor Matt on live room is like, where are the props, dude,

0:45:14.200 --> 0:45:17.640
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, oh, sorry, busy, is because my process

0:45:17.640 --> 0:45:20.479
<v Speaker 1>of refining my projections is like a four or five

0:45:20.520 --> 0:45:23.000
<v Speaker 1>hour process. Matt knows I'm almost always messaging him at

0:45:23.000 --> 0:45:25.440
<v Speaker 1>like one am my time, two am on Saturday mornings,

0:45:25.440 --> 0:45:26.960
<v Speaker 1>because that's what I do, That's how I need to do.

0:45:27.000 --> 0:45:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I need to get all the available information. But we

0:45:29.120 --> 0:45:30.840
<v Speaker 1>have been on a heater, so we will try to

0:45:30.880 --> 0:45:32.920
<v Speaker 1>keep that going. We'll try to keep Matt's NFL betting

0:45:33.000 --> 0:45:35.239
<v Speaker 1>going again. We're gonna take this through to the end

0:45:35.280 --> 0:45:37.080
<v Speaker 1>of the year. Then we're going to figure out, you know,

0:45:37.200 --> 0:45:39.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever we'll be doing with the playoffs. But thanks for

0:45:39.520 --> 0:45:42.600
<v Speaker 1>sticking with us. Hopefully we'll get back and closer to

0:45:42.680 --> 0:45:45.120
<v Speaker 1>finishing into the money again. My name is Dan Harris,

0:45:45.280 --> 0:45:46.920
<v Speaker 1>that's Matt Parole. It can find us on Twitter at

0:45:46.960 --> 0:45:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Dan Harris Ady and that Sports Talk Matt. And for now,

0:45:49.480 --> 0:45:52.040
<v Speaker 1>we will talk to you next week and the same

0:45:52.480 --> 0:45:52.800
<v Speaker 1>time

0:45:54.320 --> 0:45:54.360
<v Speaker 2>He