WEBVTT - Biden to Release U.S. Oil Reserves

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all partnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.440
<v Speaker 1>analysts in more than twenty countries. You can download Bloomberg

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 1>Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com. You

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>can also listen to our radio show at two pm

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>search Bloomberg Global News. Right now, we're gonna head out

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:36.559
<v Speaker 1>to Davidson, North Carolina covers some of the days COVID headlines,

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>which includes deaths in Europe from COVID nineteen expected to

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:42.880
<v Speaker 1>reach two point two million by March based on current trends.

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 1>That's coming from the World Health Organization putting out a

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>warning as I also pushed for more vaccine nation uh Meantime,

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Germany's top health official reiterated that the country cannot rule

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>out any measures to contain the fourth wave. So let's

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>get to it with Dr Dave Westerner, Professor Biology at

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Davidson College. On the phone from David's in North Carolina.

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Dr Westner and nice to have you here with Ed

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Ludlow and myself. So when you see the days headlines,

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you watch what's going on in Europe, I kind of

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>ask all of our guests, is what's going on in

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Europe going to happen here in the United States? Can

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:20.040
<v Speaker 1>we make that assumption? I think we can, thank you

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:23.040
<v Speaker 1>having back again. But yeah, I think we're already starting

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to see cases go up throughout the United States. We're

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing death scoops at a unlesser rate, but that's going

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>up also. So yeah, I think that what's happening in

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Europe now very well could be what we see over

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:37.479
<v Speaker 1>the next few months here Western. Do you get any

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>sense that American officials are sort of complacent? You know,

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:43.759
<v Speaker 1>you had um Jeff Stains from the White House saying

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>that you know, we have vaccines, we have boosters, we

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>have the therapeutics if we need them, you won't see

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in Europe happen here. Why won't we see

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>it happen here? Well, I think they have the vaccines,

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>they have those those U nctioned belable in Europe as well.

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a UM on my optic way of

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at it. Um, Yes, we have the vaccines, we

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:10.920
<v Speaker 1>had the boot boosters that we're rolling out. Um but

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:13.639
<v Speaker 1>all the all the data suggests that we're going to

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>see the same kind of of an increase here that

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>we're that we're seeing elsewhere. Well, and it's interesting. I

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>guess we all have to figure out as we go

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>make our way through at this point. Um, It's funny.

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I saw something I was reading in this morning, Dr Wester,

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, well, wait a minute, you're six months

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>after your second vaccine. Does that mean you're not vaccinated anymore?

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Are you not protected? Yeah? I think we should be

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>clear about that. These vaccines are are really good vaccines.

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>If you go back to a year ago, a year

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and a half ago, a lot of people were saying

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>if we had a vaccine that was sixty or seventy

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>percent effective, that would be a win. And we've got

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a couple vaccines that are much better than anyone anyone anticipated. Initially,

0:02:56.919 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the waning immunity that we're seine, but the and Maderna

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>vaccines are certainly concerned. But even six months out, we're

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing vaccines that are seven effective. So it's certainly not

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the case that six months after your second shot you're

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>functionally unvaccinated. Um, there's still even even without the booster,

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:21.519
<v Speaker 1>there's still a good deal protection six months out. I

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>wonder if there's a weak spot though, right, is it

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>if you're part of the unvaccinated portion of society that

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:29.919
<v Speaker 1>you're most at risk. Is it that you know, broadly,

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>we should all still be wearing masks. I think that's

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess broadley is a is a if the term um.

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that a certain circumstances, yes, masks should still

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>be worn. If you're in a crowded indoor setting, it's

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>probably a good idea to have a mask on, even

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>if you have both the two jobs. You've gotten that

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that that booster shot recently. Yeah, I think we're at

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a point now where, yes, we have a lot of

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>interventions that are decreased severe disease, decreasing hospitization, decreasing deaths.

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>But we're not out of the woods, and we shouldn't

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>assume that that we are out of the woods just yet.

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>And what about mixing and matching the CDC's recommendations, UM

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>allow I guess right for mixing match dosing for booster shots.

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 1>And certainly I think it's safe to say that many

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>of coming off the J and J one suggests, you know,

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 1>you get fiser and Maderna. Um, what's your guidance on

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>that or your thoughts on that. Yeah, there's there's no

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:33.720
<v Speaker 1>evidence to suggest that mixing and matching is a bad thing. Um,

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>We've seen nothing indicating that if you had two Fiser

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:42.840
<v Speaker 1>shots initially, the Maderna shot is going to be disadvantageous

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:46.279
<v Speaker 1>in any way. It appears that mixing matching is perfectly visible.

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Um in either case if you had the same booster

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>as your original two shots, or if you have one

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>of the others. Um, immunitique goes up dramatically within within

0:04:57.440 --> 0:04:59.359
<v Speaker 1>a week or two of that about booster shots. So

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>there doesn't see to be any any any downside to

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>mixing and matching the vaccine. Dr Wessner, I'm always curious,

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, you teach biology. I love biology. I wasn't

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>doing this. I might be a doctor. That was something

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that was certainly on my radar. UM, but I do

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:22.720
<v Speaker 1>wonder how teaching of biology and against a backdrop of

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:27.479
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic and the creating of a vaccine, Um, how

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:29.719
<v Speaker 1>it's changed or what's the interaction with students, what does

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 1>students want to know and understand. It's been really interesting

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>for me in that role because you know, we can

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>we can talk about biology with a real life example

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 1>that's playing out in real time, which has really been

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>been testing, and I think it makes the the topic

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that much more real in both the lots of biology

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:53.599
<v Speaker 1>we're learning in class and the biology of happening in

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the real world. That makes it more more real, more

0:05:56.360 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 1>more understandable. Um, I guess. So, yeah, that's really good,

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:05.119
<v Speaker 1>an interesting situation to talk about something that's that's happened

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 1>in real time as we discussing it. Well, Carol makes

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>a good point, which is education essentially right. You know,

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>in general population two people understand the science behind the vaccine.

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Have they spent the time researching the reasons for taking

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 1>or whether to wear a mask or not. Are you

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:25.479
<v Speaker 1>just kind of concerned that people don't take COVID seriously enough?

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people don't. Um, yeah, I

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people, you know, will say anecdotally, well,

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I had a friend who was sick for a couple

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>of days. But but that was that was it. So

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I think there there has been this um, this attitude

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>among a segment of the population that it's something that

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 1>we don't have to really take that that seriously. But

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:50.479
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the numbers, UM, you all can

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>can think back to the big surge UM in New York.

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was the health care system was overwhelmed,

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>UM and we could get to that point again. I

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>think it's it's very serious disease. It's much more transmissible

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 1>than the typical insluenda virus is uh. It's a much

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>more serious illness than we see typically within sluenza. UM.

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I think we have to remember that that

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>this is a very serious infectious disease and and we

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>we can't we can't forget that at this point in time. Yeah.

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say, in terms of mask wearing, I feel

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>like I will wear one forever. Uh No, just because

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's interesting in terms of just basic colds

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and things. Um, I've seen more people getting sick as

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>things have ease, and it's it was really nice to

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>go through a full year and not even have a

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>common cold. Yeah, if you look at the deploya season

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>last year, I mean, BLEU was almost non existent throughout

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the High States and a large part of that was

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>because we weren't gathering. There weren't large groups of people indoors,

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>people were wearing masks when they were out. UM, and

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>just generally those precautions are going to prevent the transmission

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>of respiratory diseases. Uh. This year, how do you know that, Carol?

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>You were more more cases of flu certainly, and we

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>had the past couple of couple of years. UM. And

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to a large extent, that's because people are gathering, more

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>people are out, more people aren't wearing masks like they

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>like they Well, so maybe maybe things will change permanently

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>after I mean we've seen that before with infections US,

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that things changed permanently, UM, And maybe some aspect of

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>mask wearing or limited gatherings will be a permanent change. Hey, listen,

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to share with you. A frequent listener and

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>watcher of our show on YouTube, Uh shared with me

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a story, UM, Ryan, thank you, Uh, and just took

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:40.319
<v Speaker 1>a look at what's going on in Michigan right now.

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>The Henry Ford Hill System is seeing COVID nineteen cases

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 1>store by fifty percent in three weeks, putting a major

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 1>strain on staff and patients at the Detroit based network

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of five major hospitals in southeast Michigan. It's uh the

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>latest US hot spots seven day case rate of more

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>than six D per hundred thousand. That's triple the national average,

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, And so we see this, we often talk

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>about this being a disease of the unvaccinated. UM, what

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 1>do we finally do to get the unvaccinated to believe

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the message? In your view, that's a really good question.

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>And there's gonna be some fashion of population that you're

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 1>not going to reach. I think that's that's becoming clear. UM.

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>But I think in back the eggs point earlier, the

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>education is key. We have to get the word out

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that these vaccinities are safe, they've gone through clinical trials,

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 1>they are extremely effective, UM, and not have people get

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>lost in the noise of oh, immunity wanes over time,

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 1>so I shouldn't get a vaccine. UM. I think we

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>have to get that that word out to that fague population.

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:51.599
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio All right, So

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:57.199
<v Speaker 1>let's get to it. Let's see what Dr ellen Wald

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>has to say. She's back with US, President of transfer

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 1>All Consulting Senior Fellow at Atlantic Council's Global Energy Center.

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 1>She wrote the book Saudi Inc. On the history of

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a Ramco and Saudi Arabia UH, and she has also

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>been a Bloomberg opinion contributor. She's back with us from Jacksonville, Florida. Hey, Ellen,

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 1>so nice to have you here. I have to ask

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>you about a couple of things the President said. Um,

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>he said that he's making the largest ever release from

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the spr will provide the supply that we need? Will

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>it and will it make a difference? Well, that's a

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>very interesting question because, Um, part of part of the

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>issue is do we really need more supply? Uh? Is

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the reason why prices are higher really due to a

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:44.079
<v Speaker 1>lack of supply? And it doesn't seem like anyone is

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>having trouble getting gasoline or getting crude oil, So it's

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>not clear that the issue is really one of supply. Um.

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps the release will have an effect on the market

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and will encourage the market to to lower prices, although

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen that happening yet. The biggest drop in

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>oil prices actually happened last week, um, in reaction really

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to the announcement that we were going to see more

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>uh COVID lockdowns in Europe. Today, actually prices rose in

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 1>response to the spr release. So, um, why are prices up?

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Why are prices up when we do this release. It's

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>been a little bit of a conundrum today. I feel like, yeah, well,

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it has to do a lot with market

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>perceptions because this release has been telegraphed and a lot

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:39.719
<v Speaker 1>of people will basically waiting to see, Okay, how much

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 1>is it going to be and what other nations were

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be involved in this coordinated release. And it's

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>possible that what was announced was not nearly as significant

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>as the market was hoping for. And so that's why

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:56.960
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing this price reaction. Yeah, choreographed, as he said,

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>will telegraphed almost because of that curious reaction in the market.

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 1>You remember when something that happens, how deeply political the

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:10.679
<v Speaker 1>oil market is, you know how sensitive it is domestically

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>for voters. But also one thing we haven't talked about

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 1>yet is OPEC plus. You know, they could easily turn

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>around and change their existing plan in terms of their

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>supply into the market, what should be we'll be looking

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:27.679
<v Speaker 1>for with OPEC class Oh, absolutely, and and gasoline prices

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>are always something that's political, especially in the US. Seems

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>always seemed to connect higher gasoline prices with the administration

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>that's in office and tend to blame their administration regardless

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of whether they have any role over it at all.

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's definitely a political political issue in the United

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 1>States when it comes to PA plus. Though, it's very

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:54.839
<v Speaker 1>interesting because UM the amount that is being released for

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the amount that has UM that that we've heard as

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>being we still haven't heard from China and South Korea

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>if they're going to be making any releases, is about

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>as much as three months of UM the supply that

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>OPEC would be increasing. So OPEC has been increasing its

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.439
<v Speaker 1>production by four thousand barrels a day for several months

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 1>now and plans to continue that. The interesting twist though,

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 1>is that OPEC is supposed to meet next week on

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Thursday to decide if they're going to continue their increases

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 1>for for January. So some people think that this could

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>potentially throw OPEC kind of for a loop, and will

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 1>OPEC decide maybe they want to rein it back in.

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that OPEC is really going to be looking

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>at the market overall. They're going to be looking at

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>our oil stock pile starting to build as opposed to

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:53.079
<v Speaker 1>being drawn down, and they will probably look pretty carefully

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:57.199
<v Speaker 1>at what's going on in China and um, what Chinese

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 1>industrial production is like, in Chinese demand and is like

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 1>they don't make their decisions just based off of gasoline prices.

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>But ellen, if it's not a supply issue, then what's

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 1>going on? And the President talked about taking some action

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:14.079
<v Speaker 1>on gas gasoline prices unacceptable for gas firms to pocket

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>gains that gap between wholesale and retail gas prices. Is

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>there something fish going on? Just got about forty five

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 1>seconds or so. Yeah, Yeah, it really doesn't appear to be. Remember,

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>there's more that goes into gasoline than just wholesale gasoline prices.

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>There's the prices ethanol which has gone up. There are

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the price of other adds which has gone up, and

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>there's just general inflation. Plus there's just the price of

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>oil which has gone up. So there's a lot that

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>goes into this and it doesn't necessarily mean that there's

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>some kind of anti competitive collusive behavior going on. And also,

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>as Ed pointed out, therey is in London, right, it's expensive.

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing it as well. This is a just quickly, Ellen,

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a global issue. It's not just a US issue. Yeah,

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely a global issue. And in some areas it's

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>even more pernount out US gas and places in the

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>US are traditionally much lower than elsewhere in the world,

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>so I'm part of It's also taxes, um, A lot

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>of states have increased their gasolene taxes over recent years.

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Some really great perspective. Ellen, we knew when we saw

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the story we wanted to reach out to. So thank

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Have a great and safe Thanksgiving. Dr

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Ellen wal She's president of Transversal Consulting. Check out our

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:28.119
<v Speaker 1>book Saudi Inc. That deals with Saudi Arabia and Oromco.

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. So, climate change,

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>we know what it's done. It's created flooding, droughts, unusual

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>weather patterns and wildfires. It's a story. Uh, And there's

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>actually a story that digs into this. It can be

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>found at business week dot com. It looks at how

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>wildfires are getting worse and then one company that has

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>all the chemicals to combat them. That story written by

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News Technology report to Austin car he's on the

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 1>phone in Boston and also joining us of our business.

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>We get at a Joel Webber. He's in our Interactive

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Brokers studio, a company I hadn't heard about and yet

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>publicly traded and is sort of in a solutions business. Um.

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>And you know, of all the places that we're probably

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>desperate for solutions, it's with wildfires, which seemed to only

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>be getting worse. And here we are in um November

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and California still is that peak peak wildfire fears? And

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 1>so so Austin like, tell us what exactly, uh, this company,

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Perimeter Solutions, is up to. Sure, Yeah, so you've probably

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>seen on the news during big wildfires all these planes

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>that are making humongous drops of all that red stuff

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>that's all retardant made by this one single retardant maker

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>at the biggest one of the US UH called Perimeter Solutions.

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>And just to give it some context, they actually for

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>US agencies alone produced about fifty million gallons of the

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 1>retardants last year. With the fire slaves and booming um,

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the retardants business is booming as well, and that's why

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>just two weeks ago they went public in evaluation of

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>about two billion dollars UM. So for this story for

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Business Week, we spent a lot of time learning about

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:14.399
<v Speaker 1>this sole source contractor for the federal government, how they

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>got so big in the retardants business, and a new

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Stanford engineered chemical that they're putting out that it might

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>end up changing the game for how we address wildfires

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>in the country more so. Um So. Yeah. The the

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 1>product that you see dropped out of planes is called

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>FoST Check, and it basically boxes all the fires in,

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:35.120
<v Speaker 1>but it's not as effective. After it reigns a small

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 1>amount or when there are tons of high winds, it

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 1>usually actually goes away and it's not effective after a

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks, and at that point, like you've seen

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:45.959
<v Speaker 1>in California, another big fire can just happen again. Um.

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, they have this new chemical called Fortify,

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>which again was engineered by Stanford scientists, and it's this

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>white gel that's applied before the wildfire season and sticks

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>on places where they're really high risks of ignitions. UM.

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:02.360
<v Speaker 1>We actually have uns of data about where fires originate

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>because we happen to have a lot of wildfires now

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>in the US and in places like vegetation around utility

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>polls or highways or railroad tracks. Um, we can apply

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the solution now with this chemical jael that will last

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 1>for months and ideally prevent those fires from happening. As

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>one perimeter UM executive told me, uh, he had said

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that we'd rather be fighting wildfires when they're just four

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:27.400
<v Speaker 1>inches tall rather than forty feet tall. And I think

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:29.920
<v Speaker 1>that's the promise that Perimeter is trying to pitch the

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>government on going forward. You're in London right now, but

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>California's your home. You've seen this. Yeah, this story really

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 1>hit home for me. I enjoyed reading it, not just

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:40.679
<v Speaker 1>because of the products. You know, I've I've experienced the

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 1>fires and the side effects of the fires. But the

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 1>great thing about your story is you talk about the

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 1>people that are using the product, the farmers, you know,

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the wine growers in Napa Valley. Um. But it seems

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>like this company is the only product in town. Is

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:56.120
<v Speaker 1>this thing affordable? Is it? You know? Is this something

0:18:56.160 --> 0:19:00.239
<v Speaker 1>that everyday landowners can actually get hold of. It is

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>something that landowners can get ahold of. But I mean

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 1>it's really a product UM that it's going to take

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>some time to get adoption. And I think the larger

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 1>market is actually utility giants like P G and D,

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 1>or insurance companies or railroad companies that you know, they'd

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>rather maybe spend a few million dollars up front on

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>this product rather than billions of dollars and liabilities later on.

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>But in this story, we did interview one local community

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>that had used it uh and for one mile stretch

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:30.120
<v Speaker 1>had cost about thirty thou dollars. Obviously that's an expensive application.

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 1>But when we talked to local fire departments, what they

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>said is we'd love to use more of it. I

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 1>talked to one in near San Diego that had seen

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:39.680
<v Speaker 1>huge ignitions go from a few dozen in the last

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>couple of years down to zero after they applied the product.

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>But what they basically said is we'd love to use

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:46.919
<v Speaker 1>more of it, we just can't afford it. So so

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Austin UM, what other products are they? I mean, this

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 1>company just when public, I mean, do they have two products?

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Do they have more? What's under what's in development like

0:19:57.160 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and and exactly how competitive of the space is this

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:02.399
<v Speaker 1>at this point, since this problem seems to only get

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>worse and worse, So they do this company, Perimeter Solutions,

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 1>does make a ton of different retardants, whether they're gels

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>or phones, or powder or liquid concentrations, and and they

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>all have different uses by the fire department or private

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 1>companies and homeowners. Um. But to be honest, they're really

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the only game in town. I mean, just to give

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you a sense, they about half per cent or so

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 1>of their fire safety products are consumed by the US

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>government in the state of California alone. Um, they're pretty

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 1>much a virtual monopoly. And that's one of the big criticisms. Uh,

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:39.440
<v Speaker 1>they're the only approved, federally approved product that the US

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Force suit uses for aerial drops those big planes. And

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I only talked to one competitor in the issue that

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>they said is it takes so many years to get

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:50.199
<v Speaker 1>on that retardants list to be approved. That it is

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:54.360
<v Speaker 1>very advantageous for Perimeter Solutions and their primary flagship product,

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 1>which is that red stuff that drops out of planes,

0:20:57.160 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and so we haven't seen much competition. It costs about

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:01.400
<v Speaker 1>three dollars a gallon for that stuff they drop out

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:03.919
<v Speaker 1>a plane and so far there they continue to be

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the sole source provider to the US government, have been

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 1>for almost two decades. All Right, I gotta ask you

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 1>if you're if you're going to end up spray in

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>my vegetables and stuff, is it safe? It's a it's

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:16.199
<v Speaker 1>a really good question, Carrol, and and and there is

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>a lot of environmental concerns. I will also say just

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it's kind of very on to watch. I went

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to air bases, I've I've seen this stuff preyed in person.

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>And whether it's the red stuff dropping from planes or

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:28.679
<v Speaker 1>the new white chemical fortify, to just see it doused

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>all over the planet, UM, it's pretty eye opening. And

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>when I talked to the company, they say, look, the

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:36.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff that's in here is ammonium phosphate, which is the

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:39.679
<v Speaker 1>same stuff that's used in fertilizers. UM. So it actually

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>might make your garden grow a little bit faster. But

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:45.159
<v Speaker 1>the downside of it is that it can UH. Studies

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:47.400
<v Speaker 1>have shown that it's it's if it's dropped in water

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:51.160
<v Speaker 1>areas that can kill fish. UM. It can also spurn

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:54.359
<v Speaker 1>algae blooms and invasive plans that can be disruptive to

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:56.679
<v Speaker 1>the natural environment. But the larger truth is there just

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>haven't been enough studies, which is kind of wild. They

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:03.160
<v Speaker 1>said in their s one statement when that moment, Yeah,

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 1>they're just they said in their um uh, there s

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 1>one statement that the current environmental impact is just current

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>is just not known. There's not enough known about it

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 1>because it could have larger toxicity impact on the environment

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>or the animal population. But there have just been a

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:19.919
<v Speaker 1>lack of studies over the years, and they've been limited

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 1>in scope. And so the US government continues to drop

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 1>tens of millions of gallons on the planet just in America,

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's become popular worldwide, and so there's a lot

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 1>of questions about environmental impact that still have to be answered.

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>So the most important question of all um From the

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:39.680
<v Speaker 1>photos in the story, it looks like, uh, there's a vehicle.

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>This is on a trailer. They spray it from the

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:46.120
<v Speaker 1>back of the trailer. Did you get to spray the gel?

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm not approved yet by the California Fire Department,

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:53.199
<v Speaker 1>although I did go through the chemical mixing. I did

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>get my diploma, Jole, So you'll be happy to hear

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 1>we can add that to my uh my Twitter page.

0:22:57.320 --> 0:23:00.080
<v Speaker 1>But maybe our maths out of business did go for

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>after the Daquie specialist dach refecialists comes first. Nice. Nice

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to know if the journalism doesn't work out, you've got

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 1>all these other things that you can fall back on, Austin, Uh. Incredible.

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Read a lot of information in there and check it

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 1>out at Bloomberg dot com. Happy Thanksgiving to you and

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:20.360
<v Speaker 1>to you as well, Joel Joel Weber, editor of Bloomberg

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:23.159
<v Speaker 1>Business weekn of course, of course Austin car technology reporter

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and a man of many talents here at Bloomberg News.

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Radio. This is Bloomberg Business Week

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic from

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:38.159
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. So we just talked about Best Buy shares

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>plummeting uh, and we're gonna get into that a little bit.

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>We also see Dollar Tree selling the majority of its

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:45.160
<v Speaker 1>products for more than a buck. Now there's a lot

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:46.959
<v Speaker 1>going on when it comes to retail. And then, of

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 1>course there are those supply chain rows that we continually

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:52.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about. Lots going on. As I mentioned our Bloomberg

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence Senior Alice Putam Goyle keeping track of it all

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and writing, even with those supply constraints, Americans, they're going

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 1>to be out there shopping this holiday season, she joins,

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:03.640
<v Speaker 1>edding me on the phone in New Jersey. Put them

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 1>good to have you here first and before we get

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>into the holiday season. Any thoughts on best Buy. I

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:10.199
<v Speaker 1>know you cover a lot of different retail and and

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:13.200
<v Speaker 1>this maybe doesn't fall right under some of the companies

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>that you follow, but those criminal groups like I can't

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:20.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's very odd to have a CEO come

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:22.879
<v Speaker 1>out and talk about that, right it is. You know,

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>it must be a really big problem for them to

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:26.920
<v Speaker 1>come out and say that. But it's a scary one

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 1>because not only is it bad for them on the

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 1>margin side, but it prevents people from wanting to go

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:36.159
<v Speaker 1>to the stores, right um, because you're hesitant about what

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you'll have to deal with it should you go into

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the stories, and the employees working there must be scared

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:42.880
<v Speaker 1>to want to work there. So it has a lot

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:46.880
<v Speaker 1>to remember. Don't remember what best Buy does as well

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:49.640
<v Speaker 1>that I wish we discussed the moment, Carol, But they

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 1>sell things that we really needed in the pandemic, and

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>we're not buying as much of right now, you know, screens, electronics,

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 1>all these kinds of stuff. It's kind of like a

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>one to punch. I feel bad for them. I I guess, Punam.

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:05.399
<v Speaker 1>You know, broadly, is demand really good right now? You know,

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>for for Best Buy electronics, for brick and mortar, well,

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>demand is good overall in retail, and we've seen that

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>in the retail sales numbers leading up to UM as

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:17.680
<v Speaker 1>recent as you know, recent earnings results that we've seen

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>from the retailers that's said electronics sales, computers, TVs and

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 1>all of that. You have to remember allapping the pandemic

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>right when they were mostly at home learning for schools.

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Now kids are back to school, so the demand has

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 1>tapered from last year's levels, but it's still higher than

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 1>it was in No, that's a really good point, I

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:38.959
<v Speaker 1>have say, even though on my street I've seen some

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>boxes for people who have obviously just gone out and

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 1>bought a huge green TV at this point. The other

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>thing is Best Buy did talk about spending more on

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>promotional activity and that really hid into gross margin. All right,

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>so let's talk Punam about retail shopping. You know, my

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 1>daughter has already given me her holiday list. It's a

0:25:56.960 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit toned down, which is kind of nice to

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>see that from your kids. UM tell us though, why

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be off the chart. Is it because

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:08.919
<v Speaker 1>of higher prices or we're gonna actually be selling more stuff.

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:11.719
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be a combination of both. So demand

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 1>is higher, especially for categories like Harold and toys, um

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>where kids are going out more and people are going

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>out more, so they want new things. On the sales side,

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:24.359
<v Speaker 1>the reason why we're expecting for high single digit or

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:28.360
<v Speaker 1>even better games is in part through to higher prices. Yes,

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:31.400
<v Speaker 1>prices will be higher because of inflationary pressures, but also

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 1>discounting will be lower. So while there will be discounts

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>over the coming days and even through Christmas, they won't

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>be as pronounced as they were in past years. Should

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:44.199
<v Speaker 1>we should we put everyone in a bad mood and

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about supply chains. I mean, is my favorite sweater

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be on the shelf this holiday season? The

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>things that I want are they actually going to be there?

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:57.439
<v Speaker 1>They will, but how long they'll be there is a

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:02.239
<v Speaker 1>bigger question, and that's how us more everyone? Yeah, so

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 1>get what you want now, well, it's funny that you

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 1>say that to go ahead and please, Well, I was

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>just gonna say that in your rese'm I'm being cheeky,

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 1>But in your research you point out pretty clearly right

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that the holiday season shopping window is long this year.

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, everyone is going to have every opportunity to

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:22.399
<v Speaker 1>go out. You know, why would that give us a boost?

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Because you get an extra shopping day. So if you

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>look at the time frame from when people really, you know,

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>spend the most time buying gifts and thinking about the holidays,

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:34.439
<v Speaker 1>it's between Thanksgiving and Christmas, and this year the calendar

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 1>lenself one extra day. So an extra day is always

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 1>an extra shopping day, means extra dollars for the retailers. Yeah,

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>no doubt about it. It makes a difference. I know

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that there's been a time where I've really kind of

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:46.159
<v Speaker 1>finished my shopping and then all of a sudden, I

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:47.719
<v Speaker 1>go out because of an extra day, and I pick

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 1>up a couple of little things. What's interesting is, so

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:52.879
<v Speaker 1>who's going to benefit the most? You you talk about

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 1>Walmart and Amazon in your recent note. What's interesting is

0:27:57.119 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>we just talked with our Augustus Arriva, who's looking at

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the global supply chain, and she's pointing out how everything

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 1>is going wrong at the same time. And yet you

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:09.679
<v Speaker 1>know there's companies like Amazon that can find alternatives to

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 1>getting their goods here. Walmart can get and can do

0:28:12.400 --> 0:28:14.679
<v Speaker 1>the same thing right, whether they reach out to different

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>suppliers or use their own logistical chains to some extent um,

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:22.440
<v Speaker 1>they've got depockets to be able to do. So you're

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 1>absolutely right on that. You know, the resimplified is the

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 1>bigger the better at this holiday. So the big retailers

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:32.400
<v Speaker 1>really have a competitive because they can afford to pay

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:35.960
<v Speaker 1>more to get the goods here. And that also in

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 1>addition to that, Walmart and Amazon specifically don't have an

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>inventory issue right now. Walmart's inventories were up about at

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the end of the third quarter, so they've been able

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to bring goods in. The other thing is they have

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:50.959
<v Speaker 1>a large third party market place, both of them, and

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that helps flow inventory at least online for both tailors

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and very quickly. Pum I mean, foot traffic seems to

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 1>be pretty good, though, doesn't isn't it strong? The number

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of people actually going into a store they just excited

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to be shopping in person? It is strong when you

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>look at it versus last year, but the numbers that

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at against nineteen it's actually still down. Interesting too.

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 1>But you also pointed out an influx of tourists into

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the US over the coming weeks could drive at least

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 1>a high single digit retail sales gain over the holiday period.

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 1>So it's interesting. A lot of different factors that play

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 1>putam always good to get a gut check on what's

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 1>going on in retail, especially as we head into the

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 1>all important holiday shopping season. She is senior analysts for

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>e commerce at Leisure off price retail. That means TJ Max,

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 1>which I always love, ed love love. Do you go

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to TJ Max? Oh? I do? I'm roam. Yeah, but

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 1>you let me drive? Oh no, no, no no no, this

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 1>is not a please, I'll do. I want to drive.

0:29:57.680 --> 0:30:08.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a good question. Good drive for the Globe Radio.

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, just got about ten minutes left in today's

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 1>trading session. We are driving to the clothes. We're definitely

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 1>off our best levels of the sessional. THEO, I should

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:19.480
<v Speaker 1>say for the Dow Jones Industrial average kind of hovering, uh,

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 1>just off of it, but certainly little bit different when

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the SNP and the NASTAC. Let's talk

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 1>about the market trade today. Megan Horneman is director of

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 1>portfolio Strategy at the Wealth Advisory and Multi Family Office

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 1>from Britain's Capital Advisers. She's back with us on the

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>phone from Hunt Valley, Maryland. So, Megan, nice to have

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you here, just a few days away from Thanksgiving. We're

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 1>talking inflation, we're talking about supply chains, we're talking about

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 1>a release from the spr What is top of mind

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 1>for you and your clients, So I think it's going

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 1>into your end and you know what's going to happen

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 1>with the rally here. That's I think one of the

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 1>biggest concerns for investors, especially since we're starting to see

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 1>this back up an interest rates and we have seen that,

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you know historically, when we see these kinds of movement

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 1>interest rates, it does challenge the equity market. We're seeing

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that today, um with specifically those expensive tech names, as

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>well as seeing the volatility index increased today. Yeah, the

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>big news items of the week, of course, the nomination

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to the Federal Reserve. And I know that you wrote

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 1>going into the week that you felt Biden would keep

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a relatively dubbish f O m C because he wanted

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to help his spending agenda. Right, how do you think

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>about things now? Yeah, I think you know, obviously, yes,

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>he he wanted to have two things that as someone

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:39.120
<v Speaker 1>who's as a relative dub in the market because of

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he does have a very aggressive spending agenda.

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 1>And if you just look at estimates for the net

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:47.479
<v Speaker 1>interest costs for the government or the next decade, they

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>are exposed to skyrocket, So it presents a problem for

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 1>any of his priorities. Um. But Pal has also kind

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 1>of been a little bit more towards the center in

0:31:56.920 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 1>knowing that we do have some inflationary pressures that need

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to be addressed. So you see the market now pricing

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 1>in the potential for two rate hikes in the second

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 1>half of the next year. So I think that the

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 1>other thing that markets like is just a continuity, you know,

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:11.720
<v Speaker 1>having someone new. Markets have never really liked that. So

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:14.720
<v Speaker 1>having Pal pal the helm again, I think is as

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>keeps that you know, nerves from unrattling. Megan, what's the

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:20.239
<v Speaker 1>constructive conversation to have around interest rates right now? I mean,

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 1>we did see you know, another pop up right in

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the tenure today and we are seeing certainly coming off

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of that FED nomination. However, it's still a long time

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:30.480
<v Speaker 1>from here until let's say midyear of next year, when

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll we'll see the FED easing off right in terms

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of those asset purchases. But easing off does not necessarily

0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 1>automatically guarantee an interest rate hike, especially as we watch

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of what's going on around the globe. If China

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 1>slows down, there could be some other issues. If the

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 1>pandemic continues to weigh on the economy. Uh, maybe all

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>bets are off. Yes, there's a lot of moving moving

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 1>parts there that that you've outlined, And I think the

0:32:57.840 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 1>one thing that we believe that interest rates right now

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 1>where they are do not justify not only the economic environment,

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 1>but also the inflation environment. So we do think the

0:33:07.600 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 1>trajectory is higher for interest rates next year. However, all

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 1>those things that you mentioned are something some of the

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 1>reasons why we don't think you're gonna see, you know,

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a massive, massive spike in interest rates over the next

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 1>twelve months. We still do have a lot of uncertainty

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 1>around the supply chain disruption. We have a lot of

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty around the labor market. We also have some uncertainty

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 1>around how sustainable this consumer can be in the face

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 1>of rising prices at the pump, rising prices on everyday necessities.

0:33:36.120 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Can we continue into two thousand to see the sustainability

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 1>of this consumer. So you're gonna have a little give

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and take, I think in the interst rate market. But

0:33:44.800 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, the FED it should

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 1>is very warranted to paper. It was an emergency measure.

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 1>We're no longer in an emergency situation, and I think

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that the next PHASEE to them is to gradually try

0:33:56.320 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and normalize interest rates. So we're still calling for that

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 1>in the second half of next Here I wanted to

0:34:01.640 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 1>ask you about the consumer and not just in the

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 1>context of inflation. How closely are you following the data

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:11.280
<v Speaker 1>around COVID nineteen, particularly in Europe. You have Goldman, sax JP, Morgan,

0:34:11.360 --> 0:34:14.839
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley all saying the kind of spikes were seeing

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:17.799
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, they will be temporary and they don't necessarily

0:34:17.800 --> 0:34:20.279
<v Speaker 1>think that will come over to the United States by

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:24.759
<v Speaker 1>the reopening trade. Is that the way you think about it, Yeah,

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:27.839
<v Speaker 1>because we've seen spikes and you know you have some

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 1>short term kind of reversal in that reopening trade, but

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:34.360
<v Speaker 1>then they do tend to to peak and moderate lower.

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 1>It's just we don't know when. And I have seen

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the data out of Europe, specifically in Germany, it's actually

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:42.480
<v Speaker 1>um I popping if you look at the chart of

0:34:42.560 --> 0:34:45.360
<v Speaker 1>what they're dealing with right now. But keep in mind

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:48.120
<v Speaker 1>that we are moving closer and closer getting more and

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:51.719
<v Speaker 1>more people vaccinated. That's a positive. But the biggest part

0:34:51.719 --> 0:34:54.799
<v Speaker 1>of COVID that we're going to look out into is

0:34:54.840 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 1>the approval of some more therapeutics because those hesitant to

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 1>get a vaccine, which is a buddy's own personal decision.

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:05.399
<v Speaker 1>If there's a therapeutic that's out there that can reproduce

0:35:05.520 --> 0:35:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the risk of serious infection, that's almost as good as

0:35:08.719 --> 0:35:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine when it comes to the risks and stream

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:13.440
<v Speaker 1>we put on the hospitals. And that's what we're concerned

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 1>about right now in Europe. You know, it's interesting too,

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and you you guys deal with highnet wealth individuals, and

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder you know, we talked about the initial

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 1>part of the conversation about some of the things that

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:26.280
<v Speaker 1>everybody's talking about, whether it's inflation or supply chain constraints.

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:28.799
<v Speaker 1>What would you say, is their number one concern right

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:32.359
<v Speaker 1>now because many of these many it is inflation. Okay,

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 1>because many of these individuals have gotten wealthier, right safe

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to say over the last year or two. M. Yeah, absolutely,

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I still think it's inflation. I can give you the

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 1>second biggest concerns for our high network individuals, but inflation

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 1>is the biggest one because it's now visible across so

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:51.440
<v Speaker 1>many aspects of the economy. Before when it was just

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:54.799
<v Speaker 1>lumber prices, or it was just food um or you know,

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 1>some of the COVID related things that that we could

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 1>say may some of that was trans the tree, but

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:04.239
<v Speaker 1>people don't. The one thing people will remember and realize

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 1>right away is at the gas comp and we've seen

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:11.800
<v Speaker 1>more than a dollar increase your date in gasoline prices.

0:36:11.960 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 1>That's a big hit to consumer budgets. So that's going

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to be felt by by all consumers, high networth or not.

0:36:17.560 --> 0:36:20.000
<v Speaker 1>The second biggest thing would be what will happen with taxes,

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 1>And the one thing we do know is that we

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:24.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think taxes are going to go any lower. It's

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 1>just what magnitude will that hit highwork network individuals as

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 1>well as business owners. How worried or not are we

0:36:36.080 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>about Biden's commitment with infrastructure. How worried or not are

0:36:39.719 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 1>we about what the President was saying today about his

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, efforts in the supply chain. We were speaking

0:36:44.680 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to a Bloomberg News colleague a little earlier this hour

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 1>that all of the bottlenecks and global supply chains that

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:54.239
<v Speaker 1>he was saying working to be undone, they're still there.

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:56.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, what is going to be the impact of

0:36:56.560 --> 0:37:02.200
<v Speaker 1>fiscal policy and government stimulus over the next year. Say so,

0:37:02.239 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure is done, is not that we can do

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:06.279
<v Speaker 1>about that, But over the next year, you know, this

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to be more of an impact into g

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:12.400
<v Speaker 1>d p U in the longer run, not necessarily for example,

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 1>for next year. But when you're talking about so much money,

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:18.520
<v Speaker 1>chain thinks, so a few goods because the supply chain

0:37:18.640 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 1>is disrupted right now, then you know, any additional spending

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:24.840
<v Speaker 1>is really not needed and the only thing that is

0:37:24.840 --> 0:37:28.320
<v Speaker 1>going to fix the supply chain disruptions. And some of this,

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 1>some of these kind of interconnected inflation and pressures, is

0:37:32.040 --> 0:37:35.760
<v Speaker 1>either a slowdown in demand or an increase in supply.

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:38.960
<v Speaker 1>And we know that there will be an increase in supply.

0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:42.480
<v Speaker 1>It's just not something that's going to turn turnover overnight.

0:37:42.560 --> 0:37:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we just understand that there's a lot of

0:37:44.880 --> 0:37:48.239
<v Speaker 1>ships sitting out support. UM, there are some disruptions, but

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 1>with so many different staffes of the supply chain that

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:53.280
<v Speaker 1>can't be fixed right away. It's going to take time

0:37:53.320 --> 0:37:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to fix that. So we need to see some moderation

0:37:56.280 --> 0:37:59.160
<v Speaker 1>in the demand side. So any additional spending from the

0:37:59.280 --> 0:38:02.040
<v Speaker 1>government that adds to the pent up demand from the

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 1>American and consumer, it's just that is a concern and

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:07.880
<v Speaker 1>a risk that we see. Hey, Megan, just got about

0:38:08.560 --> 0:38:11.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds here, just quickly, what's one number one investment

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:15.480
<v Speaker 1>that many of your clients tend to ask about. Um,

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, they always want to know about the equity

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:19.520
<v Speaker 1>market and can we continue with this fool market? We

0:38:19.600 --> 0:38:21.960
<v Speaker 1>do think that is the case, But we would allocate

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:25.439
<v Speaker 1>outside of the US as well, because I think next

0:38:25.520 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 1>year two two there could be some rotation there. You know,

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:30.719
<v Speaker 1>I think the US is going to deliver the same

0:38:30.760 --> 0:38:33.840
<v Speaker 1>types of returns and then trying to find some you know,

0:38:33.840 --> 0:38:39.600
<v Speaker 1>attractively valued inflation hedges. We would lean more towards the infrastructure. UM.

0:38:39.680 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's lots of different investments out there in

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:44.239
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure front that we think will kind of their

0:38:44.239 --> 0:38:46.560
<v Speaker 1>structure to help you with that as well. All Right,

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:48.360
<v Speaker 1>great to get that, uh, and thanks so much. Have

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 1>a great Thanksgiving. Megan Horneman, she's Director Portfolio Strategy at

0:38:51.560 --> 0:38:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Verdin's Capital Advisors, joining us on the phone from Hunt Valley, Maryland.

0:38:57.000 --> 0:38:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast

0:38:59.840 --> 0:39:02.840
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com, and you can

0:39:02.880 --> 0:39:05.040
<v Speaker 1>also listen to our radio show at two pm Eastern

0:39:05.080 --> 0:39:08.239
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube search Bloomberg

0:39:08.239 --> 0:39:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Global News