1
00:00:12,520 --> 00:00:14,200
Speaker 1: Hey guys, how are you happy? Sunday?

2
00:00:14,240 --> 00:00:17,040
Speaker 2: Welcome into another episode of the Daily Juice Podcast with

3
00:00:17,079 --> 00:00:19,480
Speaker 2: me Matt Perrault at Sports Talk Mat on Twitter to

4
00:00:19,520 --> 00:00:22,560
Speaker 2: follow me at Betting Pros. For Betting Pros, we are

5
00:00:22,600 --> 00:00:25,840
Speaker 2: always here thanks to bet MGM. All the bets at

6
00:00:25,840 --> 00:00:28,680
Speaker 2: bet MGM yesterday in cash. So I apologize for that,

7
00:00:28,800 --> 00:00:30,440
Speaker 2: but I guess the book might be happy with that

8
00:00:30,480 --> 00:00:32,200
Speaker 2: if you trailed, because well we lost.

9
00:00:32,280 --> 00:00:32,760
Speaker 1: I lost.

10
00:00:32,920 --> 00:00:35,000
Speaker 2: Not great with that with an zero to three day.

11
00:00:35,040 --> 00:00:36,800
Speaker 2: More on that in one second. But if you did

12
00:00:36,800 --> 00:00:39,199
Speaker 2: bet a ten dollars bet, you won one hundred and

13
00:00:39,200 --> 00:00:41,280
Speaker 2: fifty dollars if you had a new account with the

14
00:00:41,320 --> 00:00:44,120
Speaker 2: promo code juice one fifty. So one way of making money,

15
00:00:44,120 --> 00:00:46,680
Speaker 2: whether I win or lose, is that promo offer from

16
00:00:46,680 --> 00:00:49,400
Speaker 2: bet MGM with a new account not valid in Nevada,

17
00:00:49,440 --> 00:00:52,760
Speaker 2: but every other state that is operating bet MGM juice

18
00:00:52,760 --> 00:00:55,000
Speaker 2: one fifty at sign up ten buck bet you win

19
00:00:55,040 --> 00:00:56,320
Speaker 2: one hundred and fifty dollars.

20
00:00:56,760 --> 00:00:58,760
Speaker 1: All right, I'm not going to suregout this.

21
00:00:58,960 --> 00:01:02,040
Speaker 2: I'm not gonna cut match you and you know, not

22
00:01:02,120 --> 00:01:04,399
Speaker 2: act like I'm pissed off, because I'm pissed off for

23
00:01:04,440 --> 00:01:05,320
Speaker 2: a variety of reasons.

24
00:01:05,319 --> 00:01:07,080
Speaker 1: I'm pissed off, and.

25
00:01:08,440 --> 00:01:12,560
Speaker 2: Well, win lose, win, lose is frustrating, getting a bad

26
00:01:12,760 --> 00:01:16,000
Speaker 2: starting off, really bad start the week after being really

27
00:01:16,040 --> 00:01:18,280
Speaker 2: hot and then sort of going five hundred rust of

28
00:01:18,319 --> 00:01:22,440
Speaker 2: the way again not good. Took a flyer on Justin Thomas.

29
00:01:22,440 --> 00:01:24,360
Speaker 2: He shot four over parr. I thought he might go

30
00:01:24,400 --> 00:01:27,559
Speaker 2: two under par. He shot sixty seven, sixty seven. Thought

31
00:01:27,560 --> 00:01:29,520
Speaker 2: he might be good for a sixty eight. He'd played

32
00:01:29,520 --> 00:01:31,880
Speaker 2: really well in the bad weather. He didn't play well.

33
00:01:31,959 --> 00:01:34,760
Speaker 2: Nobody played well. I mean, Tiger may not be playing here,

34
00:01:34,880 --> 00:01:37,880
Speaker 2: and I thought about fading Tiger on Sunday, so maybe

35
00:01:37,880 --> 00:01:40,360
Speaker 2: I'll add something if Tiger does wind up playing, But

36
00:01:41,040 --> 00:01:42,800
Speaker 2: the books are going to be all over it. So

37
00:01:42,880 --> 00:01:45,640
Speaker 2: really Saturday was the time to fade Tiger. But so

38
00:01:45,720 --> 00:01:48,040
Speaker 2: that was a flyer plus one forty bet. I threw

39
00:01:48,200 --> 00:01:49,360
Speaker 2: kind of a hail Mary.

40
00:01:49,240 --> 00:01:49,840
Speaker 1: Up on that.

41
00:01:50,600 --> 00:01:53,520
Speaker 2: But the reason why I'm mad look Boston losing. I

42
00:01:53,560 --> 00:01:56,840
Speaker 2: mean that was crazy, right, I mean, nineteen steals from Miami.

43
00:01:56,880 --> 00:02:00,680
Speaker 2: Boston was so sloppy. Jason, Tatum and Marcus coming back,

44
00:02:00,720 --> 00:02:03,559
Speaker 2: Tatum getting hurt, Smart getting hurt coming back. But Brown

45
00:02:03,560 --> 00:02:08,239
Speaker 2: and Tatum Brown was great offensively, but so many bad turnovers. Really,

46
00:02:08,600 --> 00:02:10,640
Speaker 2: Boston didn't deserve to win that game. I mean, it

47
00:02:10,680 --> 00:02:12,320
Speaker 2: was a miracle they were even in the game in

48
00:02:12,360 --> 00:02:14,720
Speaker 2: the fourth quarter. It was would have been a complete steal.

49
00:02:14,919 --> 00:02:17,200
Speaker 2: If Boston had won Game three, I think that series

50
00:02:17,240 --> 00:02:19,200
Speaker 2: would have been over. Now it's very much a series.

51
00:02:19,360 --> 00:02:21,760
Speaker 2: We're gonna hammer Boston in Game four, flat out. It

52
00:02:21,800 --> 00:02:24,280
Speaker 2: probably is a one unit bet Boston Game four. Okay,

53
00:02:24,280 --> 00:02:27,560
Speaker 2: probably moneyline one unit Boston Game four. Let's wait and

54
00:02:27,600 --> 00:02:30,160
Speaker 2: see what market smart status is before we do that.

55
00:02:30,200 --> 00:02:32,960
Speaker 2: He's a huge key. Jimmy Butler playing or not doesn't

56
00:02:32,960 --> 00:02:34,960
Speaker 2: really matter to me. But Boston will win Game four.

57
00:02:35,160 --> 00:02:37,560
Speaker 2: It'll be two to two and we'll go and probably

58
00:02:37,560 --> 00:02:39,440
Speaker 2: the winner of Game five wins the series.

59
00:02:39,520 --> 00:02:40,919
Speaker 1: Is probably what's going to happen.

60
00:02:41,000 --> 00:02:43,160
Speaker 2: But long way to go in the series, it's two

61
00:02:43,240 --> 00:02:46,480
Speaker 2: to one, back and forth, seesaw battle. You know, the

62
00:02:46,560 --> 00:02:48,359
Speaker 2: zig zag theory is going to hold here, I think

63
00:02:48,400 --> 00:02:51,160
Speaker 2: in game number four. But you know, a frustrating game

64
00:02:51,160 --> 00:02:53,440
Speaker 2: for me because watching Boston, I just wanted to win.

65
00:02:53,480 --> 00:02:55,120
Speaker 1: I didn't care if they covered or not. I wanted

66
00:02:55,160 --> 00:02:57,120
Speaker 1: Boston to win. Then I win. But the real reason

67
00:02:57,160 --> 00:03:00,200
Speaker 1: why I'm mad is because Holly Holm got robbed. I mean,

68
00:03:00,240 --> 00:03:00,800
Speaker 1: there is.

69
00:03:00,760 --> 00:03:06,480
Speaker 2: Absolutely on no planet did Vieira win that fight. I mean,

70
00:03:06,760 --> 00:03:10,960
Speaker 2: it just didn't happen. Like, I don't know how to

71
00:03:11,120 --> 00:03:14,079
Speaker 2: come across that. I don't know how to deal with

72
00:03:14,200 --> 00:03:17,760
Speaker 2: this that this was. You could make a case it

73
00:03:17,800 --> 00:03:21,119
Speaker 2: was four rounds to one. I mean, seriously, you could

74
00:03:21,160 --> 00:03:24,720
Speaker 2: have made a case that Holly Holm won four rounds

75
00:03:25,760 --> 00:03:29,840
Speaker 2: and Kaitlyn Vieira did not win that fight. I mean,

76
00:03:30,000 --> 00:03:35,200
Speaker 2: I just I don't significant strikes, control time. I mean,

77
00:03:35,320 --> 00:03:40,240
Speaker 2: head kicks, body kicks. It's just judging. I mean, I

78
00:03:40,320 --> 00:03:43,080
Speaker 2: hate doing this. But this is why open scoring needs

79
00:03:43,120 --> 00:03:45,240
Speaker 2: to happen, and this is why personally I think the

80
00:03:45,400 --> 00:03:49,880
Speaker 2: judges just are awful. I mean they're absolutely in particular

81
00:03:49,920 --> 00:03:53,200
Speaker 2: with female fights are so bad. We had it right,

82
00:03:53,640 --> 00:03:56,440
Speaker 2: Holly Holm by decision. Holly Holm won that fight. I

83
00:03:56,440 --> 00:03:59,200
Speaker 2: mean I had four people of my good mma guys

84
00:03:59,320 --> 00:04:01,760
Speaker 2: that I'm going I'm like, what did you score it at?

85
00:04:01,800 --> 00:04:04,200
Speaker 2: One guy had it as three to two, Two guys

86
00:04:04,200 --> 00:04:04,760
Speaker 2: had it at.

87
00:04:04,640 --> 00:04:07,800
Speaker 1: Four to one. With me, I had at four to one.

88
00:04:08,240 --> 00:04:11,360
Speaker 2: I just I don't understand, I, honest to goodness, have

89
00:04:11,440 --> 00:04:13,920
Speaker 2: no idea and it pisses me off because the difference

90
00:04:13,920 --> 00:04:16,200
Speaker 2: between one and two night in an zero and three

91
00:04:16,360 --> 00:04:18,720
Speaker 2: night is significant, It really is.

92
00:04:18,800 --> 00:04:19,760
Speaker 1: It's significant.

93
00:04:19,800 --> 00:04:22,680
Speaker 2: So to me, I mean it's you know, down one

94
00:04:22,680 --> 00:04:25,440
Speaker 2: and a half units or your down point six units.

95
00:04:25,279 --> 00:04:28,159
Speaker 2: It's a gigantic change. So that one bet that should

96
00:04:28,160 --> 00:04:31,760
Speaker 2: have come in at mis one twenty just is extraordinarily

97
00:04:31,760 --> 00:04:33,919
Speaker 2: frustrating for me. And I'm mad, and I'm not gonna

98
00:04:34,240 --> 00:04:36,719
Speaker 2: I know you guys know that I'm honest. I tell

99
00:04:36,720 --> 00:04:38,960
Speaker 2: you when I lose. I've been losing a lot this week.

100
00:04:39,240 --> 00:04:39,960
Speaker 2: I'm frustrated.

101
00:04:40,000 --> 00:04:40,360
Speaker 1: I'm mad.

102
00:04:40,400 --> 00:04:42,359
Speaker 2: I don't like losing money, but I also don't like

103
00:04:42,400 --> 00:04:45,600
Speaker 2: having money taken from me when the wrong outcome comes out.

104
00:04:46,520 --> 00:04:49,560
Speaker 2: Just a bad deal all the way around. Holly Holm

105
00:04:49,560 --> 00:04:51,920
Speaker 2: won that fight. There's no way you'll ever convince me

106
00:04:52,000 --> 00:04:54,360
Speaker 2: that Holly Holme did not win that fight. I watched

107
00:04:54,400 --> 00:04:59,200
Speaker 2: all five rounds very closely, no way, not even close.

108
00:04:59,400 --> 00:05:00,840
Speaker 2: Did Kaitlyn win that fight?

109
00:05:00,920 --> 00:05:04,400
Speaker 1: I don't know. It's it's very, very very fishy that Vieira.

110
00:05:04,760 --> 00:05:07,960
Speaker 2: They need her, they need Brazil, have her go up

111
00:05:08,000 --> 00:05:11,720
Speaker 2: and fight the winner, because if Amanda Neuneeds gets her

112
00:05:11,760 --> 00:05:14,000
Speaker 2: belt back, which could happen. I think it's going to

113
00:05:14,120 --> 00:05:17,240
Speaker 2: happen coming up in July at UFC, and they just

114
00:05:17,279 --> 00:05:20,280
Speaker 2: they made the announcement, by the way, shockingly enough that

115
00:05:20,600 --> 00:05:22,480
Speaker 2: you know, now Neds will fight for her belt back

116
00:05:22,480 --> 00:05:25,479
Speaker 2: against Juliana Payina coming up on July thirtieth at UFC

117
00:05:25,560 --> 00:05:26,480
Speaker 2: two seventy seven.

118
00:05:26,760 --> 00:05:28,560
Speaker 1: Just happened to make that announcement last.

119
00:05:28,440 --> 00:05:31,200
Speaker 2: Night, and the winner of that fight is going to

120
00:05:31,279 --> 00:05:33,440
Speaker 2: fight Kaitlyn Vieira, and then you have a chance to

121
00:05:33,440 --> 00:05:36,719
Speaker 2: have two if Paynya wins, you have two Brazilians fighting

122
00:05:37,279 --> 00:05:40,280
Speaker 2: or three Brazilian fights, right, I mean painous backgrounds. I'm

123
00:05:40,320 --> 00:05:43,200
Speaker 2: forgetting exactly pay hiss background. But you know, new Ned's

124
00:05:43,200 --> 00:05:46,080
Speaker 2: obviously with the international flare that she's got and the

125
00:05:46,120 --> 00:05:48,839
Speaker 2: following that she's got to choose to monster fight.

126
00:05:49,040 --> 00:05:52,240
Speaker 1: It's absolutely monster fight. I hate storylines.

127
00:05:52,320 --> 00:05:55,800
Speaker 2: I hate comparing the UFC to WWE or boxing, but

128
00:05:56,080 --> 00:05:59,039
Speaker 2: boy does that look fishy to me? All Right, we

129
00:05:59,080 --> 00:06:01,880
Speaker 2: already have one bet going here tonight, Tampa and Florida.

130
00:06:01,960 --> 00:06:03,599
Speaker 2: We have the under six and a half. I know

131
00:06:03,720 --> 00:06:06,000
Speaker 2: unders in hockey are really scary. Look at what happened

132
00:06:06,040 --> 00:06:08,240
Speaker 2: with Colorado and Saint Louis but it's why I stayed

133
00:06:08,279 --> 00:06:10,760
Speaker 2: away from that game. That game was crazy, didn't have

134
00:06:10,800 --> 00:06:12,560
Speaker 2: anything on it, just stayed away from it because it

135
00:06:12,560 --> 00:06:16,039
Speaker 2: was wild. I said in the Discord channel to bet

136
00:06:16,080 --> 00:06:17,320
Speaker 2: Colorado down one nothing.

137
00:06:17,360 --> 00:06:18,880
Speaker 1: I would to bet Colorado. You would have got a

138
00:06:18,920 --> 00:06:20,599
Speaker 1: good price in Colorado, but I didn't bet it.

139
00:06:20,680 --> 00:06:24,120
Speaker 2: So okay, So we have one bet going under six

140
00:06:24,160 --> 00:06:25,880
Speaker 2: and a half a minus one twenty for a half

141
00:06:25,920 --> 00:06:28,279
Speaker 2: a unit three more half of unit bets. We have

142
00:06:28,320 --> 00:06:31,560
Speaker 2: three hockey games in one basketball game. I'm staying away

143
00:06:31,560 --> 00:06:34,560
Speaker 2: from baseball. I don't bet baseball on Sundays. Can't stand

144
00:06:34,600 --> 00:06:38,359
Speaker 2: it's it's baseball as wonky as is, but my goodness, gracious,

145
00:06:38,400 --> 00:06:42,680
Speaker 2: Sunday baseball is extremely wonky. I'm going to play the

146
00:06:42,800 --> 00:06:47,960
Speaker 2: over six and a half for Edmonton and Calgary. I

147
00:06:47,960 --> 00:06:51,040
Speaker 2: don't know how you play anything else. You in Vegas,

148
00:06:51,080 --> 00:06:53,760
Speaker 2: it was mine one thirty. I've seen FanDuel mis one

149
00:06:53,800 --> 00:06:57,400
Speaker 2: thirty four. Everyone else is mine one forty. Just go

150
00:06:57,480 --> 00:07:00,679
Speaker 2: to seven, guys, I mean, seriously, just go to seven,

151
00:07:00,800 --> 00:07:03,479
Speaker 2: Like what are you doing? Just go to seven. I

152
00:07:03,520 --> 00:07:05,760
Speaker 2: still would bet over I'll take the six and a half.

153
00:07:06,720 --> 00:07:09,320
Speaker 2: Maybe we get a seven five to two final. Okay,

154
00:07:09,520 --> 00:07:13,480
Speaker 2: we win, it pushes, but these guys don't play defense.

155
00:07:13,560 --> 00:07:15,880
Speaker 2: No one plays defense. Okay, so I think it's gonna

156
00:07:15,880 --> 00:07:18,640
Speaker 2: be high scoring again. Whether it be in Edmonton or Calgary,

157
00:07:18,680 --> 00:07:20,800
Speaker 2: I don't care. It doesn't matter. Over six and a

158
00:07:20,840 --> 00:07:24,000
Speaker 2: half and miss one thirty. Same thing when it comes

159
00:07:24,040 --> 00:07:27,880
Speaker 2: to New York and Carolina shifts to the Rangers. Rangers

160
00:07:27,920 --> 00:07:29,680
Speaker 2: are more I think Rangers are more likely to have

161
00:07:29,720 --> 00:07:32,360
Speaker 2: a lower scoring game in Game three than they would

162
00:07:32,360 --> 00:07:35,600
Speaker 2: in Game two or one. I do think New York

163
00:07:35,640 --> 00:07:38,000
Speaker 2: wins Game three. Not gonna bet it, though, I do

164
00:07:38,120 --> 00:07:41,360
Speaker 2: lean Rangers under five and a half again at miss

165
00:07:41,360 --> 00:07:43,720
Speaker 2: one thirty here in Vegas. Most places are mass one

166
00:07:43,800 --> 00:07:45,840
Speaker 2: thirty five across the country right now at the time

167
00:07:45,880 --> 00:07:49,400
Speaker 2: of taping, under five and a half one thirty for

168
00:07:49,480 --> 00:07:51,360
Speaker 2: Vegas is kind of the highest the juice goes.

169
00:07:51,800 --> 00:07:53,840
Speaker 1: The rest of the country. Is this wacko when it

170
00:07:53,840 --> 00:07:54,600
Speaker 1: comes to this stuff.

171
00:07:54,760 --> 00:07:56,560
Speaker 2: When it gets to one thirty, it means it's gonna

172
00:07:56,600 --> 00:07:58,960
Speaker 2: go to six or five. If it goes to five.

173
00:07:59,000 --> 00:08:00,200
Speaker 2: By the way, if you guys get up up and

174
00:08:00,240 --> 00:08:03,880
Speaker 2: it's five, bet the over. Like in game We'll play

175
00:08:03,960 --> 00:08:06,080
Speaker 2: under five and a half. If in game gets to

176
00:08:06,200 --> 00:08:09,160
Speaker 2: four and a half or four or three and a half.

177
00:08:09,440 --> 00:08:10,920
Speaker 1: I will come back and bet that as well.

178
00:08:10,960 --> 00:08:12,560
Speaker 2: Try to middle this because I do think we'll see

179
00:08:12,600 --> 00:08:15,080
Speaker 2: some more offense in New York than we did in Carolina.

180
00:08:15,320 --> 00:08:17,480
Speaker 2: But it's a great way play under five and a half.

181
00:08:17,520 --> 00:08:19,920
Speaker 2: I mean concept to a slow start, zero zero. After

182
00:08:19,960 --> 00:08:22,080
Speaker 2: one period, you can turn around and bet you know,

183
00:08:22,240 --> 00:08:24,920
Speaker 2: over three and a half over three and have potentially

184
00:08:24,960 --> 00:08:26,960
Speaker 2: a next middle there with a three to two final

185
00:08:27,480 --> 00:08:30,360
Speaker 2: or you know, a three to one final potentially, and

186
00:08:30,400 --> 00:08:32,800
Speaker 2: we get in there. So that's how I'll play this

187
00:08:32,920 --> 00:08:35,200
Speaker 2: under five and a half over six and a half.

188
00:08:35,679 --> 00:08:37,480
Speaker 1: And you know what we're doing with Dallas, right.

189
00:08:37,679 --> 00:08:40,080
Speaker 2: I mean again, this could be wrong, this could blow

190
00:08:40,160 --> 00:08:42,240
Speaker 2: up in my face, but Dallas has been my favorite

191
00:08:42,280 --> 00:08:45,240
Speaker 2: bet the entire year. I'm going down with this ship here.

192
00:08:45,440 --> 00:08:49,479
Speaker 2: I'm not going to fade my favorite bet, Dallas Mavericks

193
00:08:49,559 --> 00:08:53,559
Speaker 2: at home under two eighteen and a half. That number

194
00:08:53,600 --> 00:08:57,160
Speaker 2: is pretty well everywhere across the country. The Dallas Mavericks

195
00:08:57,160 --> 00:09:00,360
Speaker 2: are thirty four to twelve and one to the under

196
00:09:00,920 --> 00:09:05,320
Speaker 2: here in this season at home on the road Golden

197
00:09:05,320 --> 00:09:08,480
Speaker 2: State twenty four and twenty two to the over. This series, though,

198
00:09:08,520 --> 00:09:10,680
Speaker 2: has gone under. The first well, I guess the last

199
00:09:10,679 --> 00:09:12,880
Speaker 2: game went over by twenty seven points. First game went under,

200
00:09:12,920 --> 00:09:15,679
Speaker 2: second game went over by twenty seven points. But I

201
00:09:15,760 --> 00:09:18,000
Speaker 2: just think this is a dead under game under to

202
00:09:18,000 --> 00:09:20,560
Speaker 2: eighteen and a half Dallas hosting Golden State.

203
00:09:20,679 --> 00:09:24,000
Speaker 1: I leaned Dallas to win the game. I think.

204
00:09:24,160 --> 00:09:26,199
Speaker 2: I mean, I like Golden State in the over. In

205
00:09:26,240 --> 00:09:30,400
Speaker 2: the last game, both those things came in. I like Dallas,

206
00:09:30,440 --> 00:09:32,960
Speaker 2: although I bet Dallas plus six to night. Yeah, I

207
00:09:32,960 --> 00:09:34,600
Speaker 2: bet Dallas plus six. I like the Dalla and I

208
00:09:34,679 --> 00:09:36,160
Speaker 2: like Dallas and the over. That's what I liked it.

209
00:09:36,240 --> 00:09:37,800
Speaker 2: I bet like plus six and the over. That's what

210
00:09:37,880 --> 00:09:41,320
Speaker 2: I bet in that game. But tonight I'll take Dallas

211
00:09:41,960 --> 00:09:43,920
Speaker 2: to keep it close. On the under, I would lean

212
00:09:44,000 --> 00:09:45,839
Speaker 2: Dallas mass two and a half down two oho, I

213
00:09:45,840 --> 00:09:47,480
Speaker 2: would lean Dallas, but I'm not going to play the

214
00:09:47,480 --> 00:09:49,640
Speaker 2: side here under to eighteen and a half for a

215
00:09:49,679 --> 00:09:52,600
Speaker 2: half a unit. Okay, So the three bets were adding

216
00:09:52,640 --> 00:09:55,120
Speaker 2: to the card. We already had Tampa Florida under six

217
00:09:55,200 --> 00:09:57,240
Speaker 2: and a half of mist won twenty. We were going

218
00:09:58,240 --> 00:10:02,440
Speaker 2: over six and a half Calgary and Edmonton under five

219
00:10:02,480 --> 00:10:04,920
Speaker 2: and a half for Carolina in New York and under

220
00:10:04,920 --> 00:10:07,360
Speaker 2: to eighteen and a half for Dallas and Golden State.

221
00:10:07,640 --> 00:10:09,720
Speaker 2: Kind of predictable here. You know where I'm gonna go.

222
00:10:09,800 --> 00:10:13,280
Speaker 2: You know where I'm gonna be again. It's a total Sunday,

223
00:10:13,440 --> 00:10:16,360
Speaker 2: But it's just the bets that I've liked. Fatom if

224
00:10:16,360 --> 00:10:18,040
Speaker 2: you want, I mean, it'd be a bad idea given

225
00:10:18,040 --> 00:10:21,640
Speaker 2: the way that I've been this coming week to Sunday, though.

226
00:10:21,760 --> 00:10:23,600
Speaker 1: Let's start a new week. Let's go off to a

227
00:10:23,600 --> 00:10:24,080
Speaker 1: good start.

228
00:10:24,160 --> 00:10:26,520
Speaker 2: Let's hope all the trends hold here on a Sunday

229
00:10:26,720 --> 00:10:29,400
Speaker 2: minus Matt Paroltz. Follow me on Twitter at Sports Talk Matt.

230
00:10:29,559 --> 00:10:32,000
Speaker 2: Each and every morning, It's del J's podcast. I was

231
00:10:32,000 --> 00:10:47,440
Speaker 2: being brought to you by BETHAMGM