WEBVTT - Tech News: Scams and Lawsuits

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan strickland Um, an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and how the Tech Area. It's time for the tech

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 1>news for Thursday, jan twenty twenty two. Let's get to it.

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Our first story is that we appear to be drawing

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>closer to the conclusion of a very long legal battle

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:41.200
<v Speaker 1>between Apple and some of its employees, more specifically employees

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>who worked at Apple stores in California between July two

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:51.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand nine until August two thousand and fifteen. So what's

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>at the heart of all this. Well, Apple had this

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>policy in place that every single employee was to submit

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>their bags and personal iPhones for a search before they

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:06.040
<v Speaker 1>could leave the store. The company said this was an

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>effort to cut back on employees stealing products from the

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>store or potentially making off with trade secrets. A group

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>of employees sued the company and it became a class

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>action suit with more than fourteen thousand employees involved in it.

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>But the core of the lawsuit wasn't so much about

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the employees had to submit to a search.

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 1>It was more about Apple refusing to count that time

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>as time worked by the employee. In other words, Apple

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>was treating these searches as if they were off the

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>clock in the free time of the employees, which the

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>employees were arguing was a violation of California state law.

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>So the legal representation for the employees were they were

0:01:56.520 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>successful to say that the searches were a ring on

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>company time and that employees therefore should have been compensated

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>for that time. Now, you might wonder how much time

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>did these searches take. Well. Engadget reports that the average

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>weight was between five to twenty minutes. And that doesn't

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>sound like very much time, right, I mean, it's it's

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>just not five to twenty minutes. It's not a whole

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of time. But if you've ever driven in California,

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you know that that state's rush hour ain't no joke.

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>And every minute you're spent being forced to stay at

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 1>work where you're not on the clock not fun. Uh,

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>And I mean that's that's the point, right, It's still

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>your time, and you would not be doing it, you know,

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:43.519
<v Speaker 1>not be spending it sitting at work. You would only

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>do that if you were on the clock. So employees

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>should still have been compensated for their time, even if

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>that time was still a short amount each day plus

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>over you know, a length of your term of employment,

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that five to twenty minutes. That really adds up. So

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Apple has agreed to pay out a settlement to claimants.

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:05.359
<v Speaker 1>The full settlement is a hair under thirty million dollars.

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:08.359
<v Speaker 1>But again, we're talking about more than fourteen thousand, five

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred employees who are covered in this class action suit.

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>So each person should expect to receive a payout of

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>around one thousand, two d eighty six bucks. Uh. That's

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>significantly more than what I typically see when I look

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>at class action suits. Uh. You often see ones that

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>have hundreds of thousands of claimants, and so everyone ends

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>up getting like a fraction of a dollar. Uh. And

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>typically the lawyers make out like bandits. The individual claimants

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>get very little, and the company gets you know, a

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>a fine that they must pay. But anyway, this whole

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>agreement is not quite done and dusted just yet. In fact,

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the final approval for this settlement amount won't happen until

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>this summer. But then, assuming everything goes to you know,

0:03:55.720 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the courts approval, this story will finally have an ending.

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>A federal judge has ruled that the US Federal Trade Commission,

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>or f TC, can move forward with an antitrust case

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>against Facebook slash Meta. Now this comes after lawyers for

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Meta filed a motion to dismiss the case, and it

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>looks like it's going to be able to go on.

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:23.479
<v Speaker 1>This was not always a sure bet. The FTC had

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>previously filed with the federal courts and received a rejection

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:30.840
<v Speaker 1>from the judge. The judge said that the FTC had

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>failed to provide facts to support the case being made

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>against Meta. But second times the charm in this case,

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess, as the judge now says that the revised

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>filing contains sufficient support to merit a case. The argument

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the FTC is making is that Facebook slash Meta had

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>a pretty simple and straightforward strategy when it came to

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:56.359
<v Speaker 1>competitors or even potential competitors, and it boils down to

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>if you can't beat them, by them. So, in other words,

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>when exectit, Facebook would look at services like say Instagram.

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>They saw that the photo sharing platform could potentially rival

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Facebook itself and pull people's time and focus away from Facebook. Now,

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I've talked about how Facebook's business model depends on keeping

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>people tied to the site for as long as possible.

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>That applies to all of Facebook's platforms, whether it's Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp,

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>whatever it may be. So obviously, anything that could threaten that,

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>anything that could pull people's attention away from those properties,

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>is seen as a problem by Facebook. So the FTC

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 1>is arguing that Facebook tries to sidestep this challenge by

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>just buying up companies that could stand in the way

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>whenever the opportunity arises, and uh FTC provided enough information

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to support this argument to convince the judge that a

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit can in fact move forward, an antitrust suit can

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 1>move forward. I would also like to add that Facebook

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>frequently tries to imitate other platforms like U TikTok is

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>a big example right now. Clearly Facebook has not purchased TikTok,

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>but I bet you dollars to donuts they've talked about it,

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>at least at Facebook. But Facebook did introduce reels to Instagram,

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:20.600
<v Speaker 1>which is a product that looks an awful lot like

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the video platform on TikTok and and reels, it just

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>seems to be their approach to trying to keep people

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>on Instagram rather than having them go off the platform

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and and check out videos and doom scroll on TikTok

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>instead of doom scrolling on Instagram. Uh so, I mean,

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>if you can't beat them, you buy them, And if

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you can't buy them, I guess you imitate them. Anyway,

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>we still have to go through the actual antitrust suit,

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Like this was just the preamble to see if if

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:54.039
<v Speaker 1>a suit was you know, merited. So this matter is

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>far from resolved. It could potentially lead to a situation

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:01.039
<v Speaker 1>where the US government forces to spin off some of

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>its properties. Maybe, but a lot of other things have

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>to happen before that comes to pass. An international group

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of fact checkers have sent an open letter to YouTube's

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>CEO saying that the platform is quote one of the

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>major conduits of online disinformation and misinformation worldwide end quote this.

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>According to the Associated Press, The fact checkers assert that

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>bad actors on the platform are utilizing it to spread

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>falsehoods and dangerous information, particularly in non English speaking countries.

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>They say that YouTube appears to be doing very little

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to address this problem, again in non English speaking countries,

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and that the company's efforts have mostly been focused on

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>English speaking regions and the meanwhile, there is real damage

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>being done around the world and it's facilitated by YouTube.

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>That's essentially the argument. They also called for YouTube to

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>superimpose images our messages that debunk misinformation when it's identified. So,

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>in other words, when you find a video that is

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>UH sending out falsehoods that there should be a visual

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>queue that says, hey, this is misinformation. Because the group

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>says that displaying fact checking information is much more effective

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>than just deleting videos. And of course, the big issue

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>with deleting videos is that frequently bad actors can just

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>re upload it on another channel they own. But by

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>creating a process to label videos as containing misinformation, YouTube

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 1>can take away the power of those videos. I think

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a pretty great idea in general, but I do

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>wonder how you would go about implementing it, particularly on

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:48.679
<v Speaker 1>a scale as large as YouTube. We know that hundreds

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>of hours of video get uploaded to YouTube every single minute,

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'm curious as to how you would design a

0:08:55.520 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 1>system to catch stuff quickly and effectively. If you relied

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>solely on human beings to moderate content, you would have

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a situation like that old I Love Lucy episode in

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 1>which Lucy is at the conveyor line as bond bonds

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:12.199
<v Speaker 1>are zooming pastor and she's just shoving them in her

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>shirt and in her mouth and everything because she's overwhelmed. Well,

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 1>imagine that scenario and multiply it by I don't know

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a Brazilian because as you would be reviewing one video,

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>more than a hundred hours of other video would be

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>joining the network every single minute. That's a dawning challenge

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and I don't have an answer for it. I assume

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you would have to go towards some sort of automated solution,

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>but then you have to make sure that whatever automated

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 1>solution you design is effective and it's not prone to

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>bias or false negatives. There are a host of other

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 1>issues that come up, So I definitely feel that this

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>is a real world problem that we need to address.

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I am at a loss as to what that solution

0:09:56.720 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>could be, but then you know there are people far

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>more intelligent than I am who are working on this problem.

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I have an update for the ongoing story about the

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>US Federal Aviation Administration or f a A, and it's

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>uh kind of tense conversation with the telecommunications industry regarding

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 1>five G, namely A T and T and Verizon. Those

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>are the two companies that are specifically kind of at

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>odds with the f a A. So the story so

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:30.959
<v Speaker 1>far has been some tension between them and the f

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 1>a A over the rollout of five G technology, and

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the concern is that five G frequencies, specifically those in

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the C band spectrum of five G, could potentially interfere

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 1>with the operation of sensitive equipment on board airplanes and jets,

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>like radio altimeters. So last year A T and T

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:54.719
<v Speaker 1>and Verizon purchased up pretty much all of the C

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>band spectrum of frequencies in an auction. That's why those

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>two companies have been sing gold out. Now. I point

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>that out because until I read this update in Reuters,

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I actually didn't know why it was just A T

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and T and Verizon that we're getting called out. That's

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>just bad form on my part for not diving in

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 1>deeply enough to find out the reason why. Anyway, we're

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>starting to see some progress being made. For example, A

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>T and T has agreed to create a sort of

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>buffer zone around fifty airports so that jets flying in

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and out of those won't be bombarded with frequencies that

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>could potentially cause interference. Uh. The f a A has

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>issued new sort of directives for aircraft that have untested altimeters,

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:43.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, altimeters where we don't know if five G

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:45.959
<v Speaker 1>would interfere with their operation or not, And the f

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a A says that those aircraft will not be allowed

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:52.599
<v Speaker 1>to land at air strips or airports in low visibility

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>settings if five G happens to be deployed within that region. Uh.

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like there's a big move to replace older

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>radio altimeters with newer technologies that have more effective shielding

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>against these radio frequencies. So there's overall this kind of

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 1>push to adopt technologies that should at least theoretically be

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>resistant to this kind of interference. You might remember that

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>for ages, the rules on airplanes for bade people from

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>even having a cell phone on at all out of

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 1>concern that RF signals from the phones could create interference

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 1>for various airplane systems. Eventually we got away from that obviously.

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Now you can have your phone on, although you're supposed

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:35.679
<v Speaker 1>to have it an airplane mode when you're on an airplane.

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 1>But you know, before you couldn't even do that, Like

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't even have like an e book reader on

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>on an airplane. Uh. And then they said, well, okay,

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:46.599
<v Speaker 1>you can have it on, but not during takeoff and

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>landing and all that kind of stuff. This is similar

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to that, but we are seeing some progress. All right,

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:54.559
<v Speaker 1>We've got some more stories to get to, but before

0:12:54.600 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 1>we get to them, let's take a quick break. We're back.

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Business Insider reports that hackers have launched a malware campaign

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>that is likely using email as the delivery mechanism. This

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>is kind of old school to to blast out emails

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>containing malware. The malwaring question is wrapped up in a

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:24.319
<v Speaker 1>file that has been named a Macron stats dot e

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 1>x c. That's an executable file. So it sounds like

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a campaign that is leveraging the a Macron

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>outbreak in an effort to convince people to click on

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the file. You know, if you scare people and say

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:39.199
<v Speaker 1>you need to know this information, click on this, then

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's effective, and then at that point malware installs

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 1>on the target machine. The actual malware is called redline stealer,

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and it typically steals login information like user names and

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>passwords from the infected computer and then sends them off

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 1>to the hacker, who then sells that information on the

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 1>dark web. The security firm Forte Guard has identified twelve

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>countries where this attack has appeared so far, and it

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 1>sounds like this is not a targeted focused campaign. Rather,

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>this is like a classic malware campaign where hackers are

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>just casting as wide a net as they possibly can

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and hope to get some hits. So this is just

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>yet another reminder that it is a bad idea to

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>click on files that are sent through email, particularly if

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>they're coming from someone you don't know, and if they

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>are coming from someone you know, it's best to touch

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>base with that person make sure that they, you know,

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>legitimately sent you a file before you do anything, because

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>this is just uh an easy vector for hackers to

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to take. It's also an easy one for us to

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>avoid if we're just a little careful. CNBC reports that

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a land rush going on in the virtual space,

0:14:55.840 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>with folks spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to secure

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>your virtual real estate. And yes, this relates back to

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the concept of the metaverse. Uh. This story actually feels

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>like deja vu to me because I remember hearing similar

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>things way back when Second Life was buzzworthy. But yeah,

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>folks are shelling out big bucks to secure specific space

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>on digital you know, various virtual environments, including ones with

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>names like the Central Land and Sandbox. And we're starting

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to hear a lot of people say, pump the brakes

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a bit before you jump on this speculation board. Uh.

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>And I would like to add my voice to the

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>folks who are saying, hey, be careful, um, don't put

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>any money that you aren't willing to just say goodbye

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to into virtual real estate right now, right if you

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>can't afford to lose that money, I mean, just assume

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that money is lost, because that way, if it's not,

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>if things turn around and things are great, that's fantastic.

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>If you're counting on it and it doesn't, that's bad.

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>So just say, all right, well goodbye three hundred thousand dollars.

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who can afford to do that, but

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 1>that that's kind of the scale we're talking about. So yeah,

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 1>be careful and don't do that. Just just invest money

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>where you can afford to lose that money. And I

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 1>want to mention again that you know, we're so far

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>away from a real metaverse, a compelling metaverse, one that

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>can allow more than say, a couple of dozen people

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to gather in the same virtual space at the same time,

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>um and do things that are on a really kind

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of deep level, Like you can have a little virtual

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>environment that people can log into. You know, we've got

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>video games that allow for the simultaneous play of more

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>than a hundred people. But that's a very narrow, narrowly

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>defined environment it right, where you have a limited number

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:04.880
<v Speaker 1>of interactions you can take within that environment. Because it's

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 1>a game. You know, you're not allowed to do everything.

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:10.159
<v Speaker 1>You're allowed to do whatever the game is meant for

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you to do. While the metaverse theoretically is a place

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:17.439
<v Speaker 1>where you would have much fewer constraints on what you

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 1>could do. You would have an enormous variety of things

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you could do, perhaps even things that you could never

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:24.919
<v Speaker 1>do in real the real world. Like I think of

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the matrix where you know you see neo fly at

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the end of it, well spoiler alert from a movie

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that came out in the late nineties. But but but

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think of something like that with the metaverse. Well,

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:39.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's gonna take a while for us to

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 1>have the technology to support that kind of thing. In fact,

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned last year that a VP at Intel said,

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>our technology is is will need to be a thousand

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>times more powerful to support a really meaningful metaverse. Meanwhile,

0:17:56.680 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 1>if you go and buy virtual real estate in one

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>of these virtual environments, who's to say that that virtual

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:08.120
<v Speaker 1>environment is still going to be around whenever the metaverse

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 1>actually does become a legit thing. If it ever does,

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm skeptical that it ever will. But even if it does,

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 1>there's the very real possibility that the place where you

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:25.160
<v Speaker 1>bought your you know, virtual acreage isn't really a thing anymore,

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and is is the digital equivalent of a ghost town,

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and isn't really connected to a larger metaverse that's meaningful.

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>That would just mean that you wasted all that money.

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 1>So that would be a bad investment right now. The

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 1>folks who are running these virtual environments, they're making the killing,

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:48.159
<v Speaker 1>particularly as virtual real estate prices balloon beyond belief. But

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 1>this is probably not sustainable. And I agree with folks

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 1>like Mark Stapp, who is a professor at Arizona State University,

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and he says, quote, if it continues the way it's going,

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>it is most likely going to be a bubble end quote,

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>and like Professor Staff, I would never say definitively that

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 1>this is a bubble, but I'm gonna say that it

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:13.879
<v Speaker 1>sure does walk and quack like a bubble. Besides which,

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>my guess is that again, we're several years away from

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:20.679
<v Speaker 1>having a really compelling metaverse experience. If such a thing

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:24.160
<v Speaker 1>as possible, it probably will be possible. I'm just grouchy.

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm determined to be a techno hermit. I don't think

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you're ever gonna come across me in the metaverse. I'm

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:34.119
<v Speaker 1>more likely to be sitting quietly in a chair, reading

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a book, or perhaps playing Seven Days to Die because

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I've gotten addicted to that game. In the state of

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:45.159
<v Speaker 1>Massachusetts here in the United States, held a referendum on

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a right to repair law for cars, and the voting

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>populace of Massachusetts overwhelmingly supported the law. Voted in favor

0:19:55.760 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of it so voted against. That is an overwhelm homing

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:02.639
<v Speaker 1>win when you're looking at a lot of votes that

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:07.920
<v Speaker 1>come down to like fifty two versus is a huge win. Well,

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:10.199
<v Speaker 1>the car companies were not thrilled with this, and they

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 1>quickly filed lawsuits to reverse the law or the very

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 1>least delay when it would go into effect. See it's

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:19.439
<v Speaker 1>supposed to take effect this year, but the car companies

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:21.880
<v Speaker 1>say that's too soon and it should really be more

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>like or really never. Years ago, Massachusetts actually voted that

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>car companies would have to make wired connection telematic data

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:34.719
<v Speaker 1>accessible in Massachusetts, and that would mean that say, an

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>independent repair shop or potentially even just a private car

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>owner would be able to diagnose problems with their car

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and complete repairs on that car, rather than being forced

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to take the vehicle to, say, an official dealership to

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 1>get the work done. We've been seeing this trend of

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:58.159
<v Speaker 1>turning tech into closed off ecosystems so that one party

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 1>has essentially economic control over the whole thing. In fact,

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:04.239
<v Speaker 1>we talked about this earlier this week with Cannon and

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>its printer and toner cartridges. Uh. But anyway, that earlier

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:13.199
<v Speaker 1>law which did pass, had a technical gap in it

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:17.920
<v Speaker 1>because it did not anticipate wireless systems, and so the

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>law only required automakers to comply with it using wired systems.

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:25.879
<v Speaker 1>So then you saw car companies migrate over to wireless

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>approaches and they didn't have to comply because the wireless

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:33.879
<v Speaker 1>wasn't covered well the law shut that gap down, and

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>according to Motherboard, car companies have brought a lawsuit against

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the state, claiming the law to be unconstitutional. I am

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>not sure on what grounds that claim is based off of.

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 1>Sounds like a Hail Mary play to me, but I

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 1>could very well be missing something obvious. I am not

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a legal expert by any stretch of the imagination, but

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>my guess is that with a seventy support in the state,

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the car industry is going to have a real tough

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 1>time convincing lawmakers in Massachusetts to overturn this law or

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:09.400
<v Speaker 1>to amend it in a way that takes the teeth out.

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 1>I think most politicians in the state are going to

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>feel a lot of pressure to stick to what the

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 1>voters were asking for, because doing otherwise is a great

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 1>way to find your exit out of local politics. Okay,

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:25.639
<v Speaker 1>we've got a couple more stories to cover, but before

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 1>we get to that, let's take another quick break. Okay,

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>if you happen to be a famous person and you

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>are approached by someone who's asking you to endorse a cryptocurrency,

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you might want to do your homework first. Kim Kardashian

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and Floyd Mayweather are learning that firsthand, as they face

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:55.919
<v Speaker 1>a lawsuit from investors who lost money in a cryptocurrency

0:22:55.960 --> 0:23:00.119
<v Speaker 1>called ethere um Max, which I should add is not

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:04.919
<v Speaker 1>actually related to the famous cryptocurrency ether that's on the

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Ethereum blockchain. It has a very similar name, which is

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>a that's a red flag right there, but it's not

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>related to it. Both Kardashian and Mayweather promoted this crypto

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>token over the last year two and now a group

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 1>of investors claim that their promotion was spreading misinformation about

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the tokens, and subsequently it drove up the cost of

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 1>the tokens temporarily before the bottom dropped out and the

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.400
<v Speaker 1>investors then lost a ton of money. So what they're

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:41.120
<v Speaker 1>saying is that ethereum Max was a pump and dump scheme. Now,

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:44.439
<v Speaker 1>in case you're not familiar with that term, the idea

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is that, let's say that you want to run this scheme,

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 1>so you either establish or you buy up a ton

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of something that's super cheap and has low value, right,

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>low market value. Uh, this could be anything. It doesn't

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>have to be cryptocurrency. It can literally be anything, and

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 1>you just buy it up and then you use various

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>means to drive up excitement and speculation about that thing

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>so that more folks jump on board and buy it

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:15.919
<v Speaker 1>all up. So this always makes me think of the

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>film trading places. But you get you get things moving

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 1>so that investors start thinking, oh, this is the next

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, big ticket, this is the next to the

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 1>moon thing. We're gonna I want to get in on

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:32.439
<v Speaker 1>this early on so I can make a mint and

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:35.679
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of people start buying it. Well. Increased demand

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>typically prompts an increase in price. Right, if more people

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>are demanding it, the value goes up. You can demand

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 1>a higher price for the thing. So there you are

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:47.440
<v Speaker 1>sitting on amount of whatever it we're talking about here,

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>whether it's cryptocurrency or something else that you bought at

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 1>pennies on the dollar, and now it's worth a ton

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 1>of money. So you quickly sell it all off and

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you dump it before folks figured out it it's just

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>smoking mirrors, and you make a huge profit. Then you're

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>off to Rio to join the producers. Meanwhile, all the

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>rest of the folks who joined in after you, they're

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>left holding the bag and they're trying to sell off

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>their investment as the prices start to come down. And

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 1>if they're lucky, they might break. Even if they're not lucky,

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>they can lose a ton of money in the process.

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>That's what the lawsuit is alleging happened in this case,

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 1>that Ethereum Max was a pump and dump scheme from

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, and that Kardashian and Mayweather were part of

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the mechanism to drive up the cost of the token

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 1>before the scammers, you know, pull the plug. I think

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the thing to take home here is that crypto remains

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:49.399
<v Speaker 1>a scammers paradise, so don't let yourself get caught up

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>in the excitement without doing your homework. Now. I'm infamously

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>negative about crypto in general for lots of reasons that

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I won't get into here, and I mostly feel like

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 1>crypto in general is kind of a scam in a

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 1>really big picture way. Um, it's sort of the thing

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>where you could actually have a fake it till you

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 1>make it approach, but I'm not convinced that the make

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>it has actually happened. However, you've all heard me go

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:21.400
<v Speaker 1>on enough about that kind of stuff already, so let's

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:25.679
<v Speaker 1>move on. But let's talk about other scams that you

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>should be on the lookout for. We talked about email,

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:31.640
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about crypto. Ours Technica ran a piece recently

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>titled quote scammers put fake QR codes on parking meters

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 1>to intercept parker's payments end quote. I love that headline.

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:42.439
<v Speaker 1>It gives you the gist right away. So kudos to

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 1>John Broadkin and the team at ours Technica for putting

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 1>this together. The article, by the way, also fantastic. So yeah,

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the scam here is that thieves put up QR code

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 1>stickers on parking meters around several cities in the state

0:26:56.280 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of Texas. So if you were to go park somewhere

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 1>in Texas and you see the parking meter, and you

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>walk up and it's got this sticker with a QR

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:07.680
<v Speaker 1>code on it, and you use your smartphone to scan

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the code and then visit the associated website it was

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:13.879
<v Speaker 1>sending you to. You would see what appeared to be

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a pretty simple payment site, presumably for that parking meter,

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>but in fact you would just be sending money straight

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to the thieves because it wasn't connected to the payment

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 1>system at all for the cities. The cities in question

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 1>release statements saying that they don't use QR codes for

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 1>this very reason. That scammers can use fake QR codes

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:38.399
<v Speaker 1>to divert traffic to their own sites. Instead, the cities

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>use cash and cards at the meters themselves, and I

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:44.920
<v Speaker 1>assume all of them. I know Austin for sure has

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 1>an official smartphone app on that side, So as long

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>as scammers can't make a fake parking payment app and

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:56.119
<v Speaker 1>pass it off as real and legit in various cities,

0:27:56.600 --> 0:28:00.080
<v Speaker 1>you can be reasonably sure that if you're using a

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>payment app for the city you are in, that you're

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:05.199
<v Speaker 1>actually paying the meter. That way, you don't have to

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:08.119
<v Speaker 1>worry about thieves taking your money or the city taking

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:11.200
<v Speaker 1>your car. So yeah, just a reminder that QR codes

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>might lead you to places you really don't want to go.

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:18.919
<v Speaker 1>But maybe you do want to go to Disney World.

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I did last year, and it was weird. I was

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 1>being super careful, my whole family was being super careful

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 1>while we were there, but being around that many people,

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of whom we're not being particularly careful, that

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 1>gave me tons of anxiety. I actually kind of regret

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>having gone, but it was a big family trip and

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>a surprise for my nieces, so I waited and decided

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 1>to go, and yeah, still feel weird about that. Luckily,

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>everyone was safe, everyone was healthy both before, during, and after.

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, that's not the point of this segment. No

0:28:56.080 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Disney filed a patent that potentially gives us a glimpse

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 1>what we could encounter on future trips to their theme

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 1>parks and other Disney related places. The patent, which was

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>approved right at the very tail end of last year,

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 1>is for what they're calling a virtual world simulator. Now,

0:29:16.720 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 1>it sounds to me like the patent is describing a

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>three D projection mapping technology paired with cameras and motion

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 1>sensors and facial recognition and an AI system to determine

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>where someone is looking at any given time. So this

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 1>is how I imagine it would play out. Let's say

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that you're on Main Street, USA at Disney World's Magic Kingdom,

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and you've got a ton of cameras trained on you.

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:44.720
<v Speaker 1>They're out of sight, but they're all looking at you,

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and they're paired with tracking software to look at your

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>head position, where your eyes are pointed, how quickly you're moving,

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 1>all that kind of stuff, and then projectors connected to

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 1>this system create an image of I don't know, let's

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 1>say it's Captain Hook because he happens to be your

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>favorite Disney character. Uh, turns out the three D projectors

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 1>are not the only thing projecting in this particular scenario anyway.

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:15.760
<v Speaker 1>The patent seems to describe a tech that would allow

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Disney to kind of create these sorts of projections that

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 1>can move along with you and interact with you in

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 1>some way. The patent specifically dismisses the idea of an

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:30.960
<v Speaker 1>associated headset, so this would not incorporate something like augmented

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>reality glasses. It sounds kind of cool, but it also

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 1>makes me a bit anxious because, I mean the level

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>of tracking a system would need to create this kind

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 1>of interaction on a level that would be really compelling.

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>That also means that Disney would be like seriously watching

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>your every move, and not just your move, but everyone's move.

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not sure how the system would determine which

0:30:55.720 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 1>guests gets to have this kind of experience. Uh, you've

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 1>been to a Disney park, you know how crowded they

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 1>can be. And I imagine you could not have this

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 1>system cater to everyone all the time, because then the

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 1>park would be packed to the girls, both with real

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 1>world guests and all the projected characters interacting with them,

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and if you're not wearing a headset or anything, those

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 1>interactions they could be seen by everybody. Right, It's not

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 1>like just something that you would experience. Everyone would be

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>able to see it. So it's an interesting patent. I

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know if or how it would be implemented. We

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 1>may never actually see this tech materialize. Sometimes that happens

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 1>with patented technology. And in fact, it could just mean

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 1>that Disney sits on this to make sure no one

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 1>else does it, right, not that Disney is working to

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 1>do it themselves, but rather let's make sure that nobody

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>beats us to this, because that would be a real

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 1>competitive edge for for someone else. So let's patent it

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 1>and then they can't do it without our permission. That's

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 1>also a possibility. Uh. I think the idea is kind

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of neat. I I just it's hard for me to

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>imagine how it would actually play out at Disney. For

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>one thing, the projection mapping stuff, I'm curious where you

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 1>would project it onto, um if it just be walls

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 1>or something, or if there would be maybe statues around

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the park where you would do three D projection mapping

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 1>on that. But even then if it's a statue, then

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you're limited in the kind of animations you can do.

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:27.560
<v Speaker 1>You can do a lot of facial animations, but you

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be able to do a lot of body stuff.

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know. Uh. The patent is interesting, the

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>implementation remains a mystery. Okay, that wraps up this news

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:43.719
<v Speaker 1>episode for Thursday, January twenty two. Hope all of you

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:46.600
<v Speaker 1>are well. If you have suggestions for topics I should

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 1>cover in future episodes of tech Stuff, please reach out

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to me. The best way to do so is over

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and the handle for the show is tech Stuff

0:32:56.000 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 1>H s W and I'll talk to you again, really y.

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Text Stuff is an I Heart Radio production. For more

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from I Heart Radio, visit the i Heart Radio app,

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.