WEBVTT - The Drop | Top 3 Candidates For Every NBA Award

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:07.600
<v Speaker 1>New pr on the leg press. Oh I leg press

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>sixteen hundred pounds. Yeah, but you can't squat three hundred.

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>What good is a sixteen hundred pound leg press when

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:17.919
<v Speaker 1>you're out on the football field. Do you have a

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>leg press when you're throwing the shot put? Do you

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:23.159
<v Speaker 1>have a leg press when you're knee deep in the

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:24.160
<v Speaker 1>muck in Vietnam?

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 2>Do you have a leg press? Good morning, sweet world,

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 2>and welcome to the No Dunks podcast on the Athletic Network.

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 2>It's Friday, January twenty second. This is the drop hashtag

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 2>full squad on Jay Skeets and alongside me, mister what

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 2>you need to.

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 3>Know Test mellis Good day, everybody, Good day tasks.

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 2>We got the bass Master ripping them lips. Nice shirt there,

0:00:54.400 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Trey Kirby, Hey hey, oh yes, the great Dead Lithuania shirt.

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 2>That is amazing there TK. We also have the international

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Man of Mystery taking it to the max in an

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 2>NBL jersey.

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 3>Lee Ellis pre.

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Lee last but not least making the magic happen. It's

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 2>JD Hello, there is and here we are. Shout out

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 2>to the stream team joining us live right now on YouTube.

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Yesterday we reached twenty seven thousand subs. All right, that's

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.960
<v Speaker 2>a lot of subs. Let's intro our way to thirty thousand,

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 2>then to forty thousand, then to fifty k and then

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 2>we get that slim Lee Ellis country song dropped on

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 2>your head. But big news with our YouTube channel yesterday,

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 2>Trey take it away. You do it. You let the

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 2>people know. Whoopsies are back there. It is, Yes, NBA

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Whosi blooper series is back. Forget weekend whoopsies. It's weekly

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 2>whoopsies now from the entire week. So if you haven't

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 2>go check that out again on the No Dunks YouTube channel.

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Fantastic work that music. JD Man, it took me back.

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh my goodness, just to too. Yeah, a lot of fun.

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 3>Great. First, I'm feeling a lot of pressure right now because,

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 3>as you said, we used to do weekend whopsies now

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 3>it's weekly whipsies. Feeling pressure to not miss a whoopsie

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 3>missing it's gonna be a lot of work.

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah, help us out, Help us out. Actually,

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 2>that's a great point there. Tasks for everyone listening and

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 2>joining us of course live watching us here. If you

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 2>see a whoopsie in the NBA, let us know about it.

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Best way is probably on Twitter at No Dunksinc. But

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 2>you can email them in or you can let us

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 2>know in the YouTube comments as well. We've got our

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 2>eye on that. So yeah, if you see something that

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 2>you think could make the whoopsies, tag it and let

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 2>us know what game, where it happened, what it is.

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 2>That really really helps us. All right, keep your questions

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 2>in your comments coming for next week's Beach step in podcast.

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Email them in No dunks at the Athletic dot com.

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Immaculate items always available at no dunks dot com. You know, Task,

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:57.920
<v Speaker 2>I almost feel bad now I said, nice shirt, Tray,

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 2>nice jersey. Lee. Task has the shirt on. Let's be honest.

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.079
<v Speaker 2>He's got the No Dunk basketball shirt there. It's a

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 2>nice shirt rock in the purple. You can go get

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 2>that at No dunks dot com. T shirts, hoodies, shorts,

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 2>and a mug even. All right, we got a lot

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 2>to talk about, as we always do on the drop.

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna touch on last night's light NBA schedule, only

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 2>three games. We'll get to those. We got worse of

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 2>the week, we got tweeted the night we got rapid firefun.

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 2>But I teased this earlier in the week the twenty

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty one NBA regular season already a month in, guys,

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 2>and we're actually nearing the quarter pole really of the season,

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 2>with only seventy two games. We're getting close there. Lately.

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 2>On Wednesday's podcast, we discussed our early season surprises and

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 2>disappointments and some prediction mulligans and our best plays. And

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 2>I teased on that one that on this drop we

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 2>would share in debate our NBA award front runner. So

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 2>let's do it. We'll take turns going through, you know,

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 2>each of the six major NBA awards. Now, I'd like

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 2>to point out I don't think and correct me if

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm wrong, Guys, I looked at it like this, This

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 2>is not who I think's going to win it, you know, necessarily,

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 2>but who right now, you know, fifteen sixteen games in

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 2>would be at the at the top of the leaderboard

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 2>or top three even because I want you, guys to

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 2>give me your top three candidates in each one. So Lee,

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 2>let's start with MVP. Work it backwards. Lee, Okay, goes

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 2>three to two to one for us, And who do

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 2>you have right now as your MVP? A month?

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Then?

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:26.599
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so this is a good award because we all

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:30.280
<v Speaker 4>have different ways of evaluating the MVP. No we I

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 4>mean some go on numbers and stats, some give weight

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:33.840
<v Speaker 4>to team success, and some of it is just part

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 4>of the itest two way effectiveness narrative plays a part.

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 4>So based on all those categories, at number three on

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 4>my MVP leaderboard, I have.

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 5>Joel emb Okay.

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 4>There are a few guys in contention here, but I've

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 4>been really impressed with the early returns of Joel Embi

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:53.280
<v Speaker 4>playing under Doc Rivers. I think Doc has gotten through

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 4>to Joel to make him understand that he needs to

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 4>be a more dominant player closer to the basket. The

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 4>numbers are great, the raw numbers twenty six and twelve

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 4>one and a half blocks and steels per game, so

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 4>he's doing it at both ends there. But he's shooting

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 4>career highs across the board fifty five percent from the field.

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:09.359
<v Speaker 4>He's taking less threes than he's taken in the past,

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 4>but he's shooting them at a better percentage, and he's

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 4>getting to the free thrown free throw line more and

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 4>making those at a career best clip. The Sixers best

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 4>record in the East, but they have had the easiest

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 4>or an an easy schedule, I will say, but I

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 4>think Joel Embiid so far has has has shown this

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 4>is probably his best career season. For me in the

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 4>early games, okay, at number two on my MVP leader board,

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 4>I have Kevin Durant Now. The Nets numbers in terms

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 4>of win losses only nine and seven and seven and

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 4>five when Durant plays, but he has been simply amazing

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 4>on the court when he's been playing, and I think

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 4>they are the best team in the East right now,

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 4>even though their record doesn't say it. Durant's numbers thirty

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 4>one points, eight rebound, six assists on incredible shooting fifty

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 4>four percent from the field forty six from three, only

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 4>eighty six percent from the line for Kevin Durant a

0:05:56.760 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 4>little bit lower than normal. But to me down to

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 4>while the Nets had some defensive issues, every single team

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 4>who plays the Nets has defensive issues. When Kevin Durant's

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 4>out on the floor, that's just how good he is.

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 4>He's had a couple of chances to win games and

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 4>he hasn't been able to do it. But right now

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 4>in the Eastern Conference, if I was to pick who's

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 4>going to make it to the NBA Finals. Kevin Durant's

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 4>team is going to make it to the NBA Finals.

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 4>He has been incredible, hasn't looked like a guy who's

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:24.839
<v Speaker 4>missed eighteen months and is also recovering from an Achilles' injury,

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 4>which is sometimes devastating to a player. He's been unbelievable.

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 4>And I've seen so many games of Kevin Durant that

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 4>I sort of feel I feel like he has just

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 4>impressed me so much because I was wondering if he

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 4>would be able to be back so quickly to the

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 4>player that we saw before he got injured. And I think,

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 4>unquestionably he has number one on my leaderboard. I'm going

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 4>with Lebron James for a lot of reasons. Well, look,

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 4>the Lakers the best team and the clear favorite to

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 4>win the title right now, the best record in the

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 4>league at twelve or four eight zero on the road

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 4>or I mean, it doesn't mean quite the same these

0:06:57.640 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 4>days because we don't have that sort.

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 5>Of home road impact.

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 4>But Lebron last night, I think we saw a classic. Hey, guys,

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 4>you know how awesome I am. Watch me just dismantle

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 4>the Milwaukee Bucks out here. Now, Lebron's numbers aren't huge

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 4>by his standards, twenty four to eight to eight on

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 4>forty eight percent shooting. But it's just so impressive to

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 4>me that he's doing it in basically playing a career

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 4>Lozer in minutes, I think, apart from his rookie season,

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 4>and it's just so easy for him and the Lakers

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 4>right now. You know, coming off winning the championship last season,

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 4>we wondered, I wondered if maybe Anthony Davis would be

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 4>the guy this year who's like, right, I'm going to

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 4>be the best player on the Lakers. I don't think

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 4>that's happened. I think Anthony Davis has kind of not

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 4>quite really found his form yet this season, although he's

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 4>been good, but not certainly the player that I thought

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 4>he was. Whereas I look at Lebron, I look around

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 4>the league and I'm like, man, he is just cruising

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 4>right now. This is the time of year where Lebron

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, I know, this season started later, but he

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 4>often takes a couple of games off and he just

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 4>chills out a little bit.

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 5>Well, he is chilling out a bit.

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 4>But his team is incredible and he's putting up uh,

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, again, not huge numbers by his standards, but

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 4>just doing it so easily, shooting the ball well, and

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 4>his team looks so good. So Lebron James as of

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 4>today is my MVP, which would be his fifth officially,

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 4>I think it would be my twelfth if I.

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Was right, right right, Yes, it should be the biggest

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 2>surprise that you.

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 4>Have just before, just before you guys jump in, I'll

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 4>just say Nikola Jokic was in there because he's obviously

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:28.679
<v Speaker 4>averaging a triple double. But the Nuggets seven to seven,

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 4>not even in the playoffs in the West right now,

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 4>and Steph Curry is also having a great season. The

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 4>Warrior is also not in the playoffs. So those why

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 4>That's the reason why I took those two guys out

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 4>of contention and went with the three that I chose.

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, Trey, let's uh, let's go to you. What

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 2>do you think of Lee's list here, especially with Lebron

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 2>at number one? Do you agree or disagree?

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 6>Well, I've got the same three on my ballot as Lee,

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 6>but I'm gonna be buster rhymes here and flip it

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 6>on him. I've got Lebron at number three on my

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:57.440
<v Speaker 6>MVP ballot because it kind of feels like We've been

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:00.560
<v Speaker 6>watching preseason Lebron for the entirety of this year up

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 6>until last night against the Bucks. Fourth quarter. Lebron is

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 6>the MVP. When he turns it on in the fourth quarter,

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 6>as he's been doing throughout this season, he's clearly the

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 6>best player in the league. But it's hilarious to look

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 6>at his stats comically low, like lia Is saying, twenty

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 6>four to eight to eight incredible for anybody. That's sophomore

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 6>season for Lebron, James like he's not given the full

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 6>effort out there. We all know it. He knows it,

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:23.559
<v Speaker 6>but when he needs to, he can reach into the

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 6>bag and still be the best player in the league.

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:27.680
<v Speaker 6>I got Kevin Durant at number two. I think he

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 6>likely will and will win MVP at the end of

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 6>the season. Like Li says, he has been phenomenal. He's

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 6>instantly back in the best player in the game conversation.

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 6>But I'm given the MVP right now to Juwel Embiid.

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:41.200
<v Speaker 6>He's been dominant, he's been engaged. He looks like an

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 6>MVP game the game throughout his career, but he's constantly

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 6>putting the team on his back right now, doing it

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 6>on both ends, and I'm giving him the MVP for

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 6>now because it probably won't be the case in a

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 6>couple of months. And this is just how it goes

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 6>with Jewel Embiid. We've seen him really put the team

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:57.679
<v Speaker 6>on his back in the past before. I remember. I

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 6>think it was the Christmas game last sear and he

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 6>was going against the Bucks, had like a thirty five

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 6>to fifteen, looked like the best player in the world,

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 6>but it didn't totally translate for the rest of the season.

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 6>He's been awesome this year. He's my MVP right now

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 6>because I want to give him a little shine while

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 6>he's on top.

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 2>I agree with you, Trey, I got Embiid right now

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 2>as the MVP front runner. You know, one month in here,

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty five points per game. He's shooting, you know, fifty

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 2>seven percent on twos, thirty nine point four percent from

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:26.439
<v Speaker 2>from deeply. But he hasn't fallen in love with a

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 2>three point shot like you said. He's going down into

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 2>the block and making it work down there. Both career

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 2>highs though, and I'll add to this. You know a

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 2>reason why I think he is the MVP right now.

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 2>The Sixers' performance without him helps his MVP case. I

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 2>believe they're oh to three when Embid's not playing compared

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 2>to like a nine to two record when he's in there. Now, yes,

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 2>they haven't played the greatest teams yet, but still he

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 2>can only play who's in front of you there, so

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 2>that I think does help him. I got KD I

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 2>actually have him second as well, but then I had

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Jokich just third. But Kad, I have a question for you,

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 2>I'll go to Yulie. Moving forward. I know we're talking

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 2>about one month in here, but moving forward, does trading

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 2>for Harden hurt Katy's MVP chances? Like is it almost

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 2>going to be impossible now for him to win it?

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, as the season goes on, Like, what's your

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:12.719
<v Speaker 2>take on that?

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 5>I don't think so.

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 4>I think Kevin Durant has clearly established himself as the

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 4>best player in the Eastern Conference so far in this

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:20.199
<v Speaker 4>one month into the sea.

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 2>But if Lebron and Ed at times cancel each other out,

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 2>then why it couldn't. Yeah the same about Katie who

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:26.439
<v Speaker 2>also had that happen with Steph curry back.

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 4>I think for that to happen, James Harden would almost

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 4>have to just have like just an an astronomical season,

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 4>which I just don't think he's going to do. I

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 4>think again, it's the eye test for me with the

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 4>Brooklyn Nets, like they're nine and seven and seven and

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 4>five when Kevin Durant plays, which is like, oh, they

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 4>should be better than that. But it just feels to me,

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:46.080
<v Speaker 4>again in the Eastern Conference, I wouldn't pick anyone to

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 4>beat the Nets in a seven game series right now.

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 4>While Kevin Durant's playing the way he is, I just

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 4>feel is that dominant and that impactful if you take

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:54.959
<v Speaker 4>James Harden off that team. Even prior to that, I thought,

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 4>I still think while Kevin Durant's there, the Nets are

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 4>the best team. Harden improves them. Butt for me is

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 4>back to already his best, the best player he was

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:08.199
<v Speaker 4>before he had the injury. So look, I'm maybe a

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 4>little bias too because I have fallen back in love

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 4>with KD. You know, it's like, you know, he because

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:15.319
<v Speaker 4>he was kind of like he was on the out

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 4>of there for a while when he went to the Worriores.

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 4>You know, people kind of like that's a bit of

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:21.079
<v Speaker 4>a dick move. But he's now gone to another team

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:25.679
<v Speaker 4>with star players. But it's like, Okay, let's just let's

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 4>just not forget that this guy is an incredible talent

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:30.560
<v Speaker 4>in the league. And like I say, when he's on

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 4>the court, which other team goes, well, we can defend

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 4>Kevin Durant. You know, That's part of the reason why

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 4>I say they like the Nets have got a terrible

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 4>defense and they allow teams to score, but they have

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 4>Kevin Durant, so they know that if the game comes closed,

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 4>you want the ball in Kd's hands, as we saw

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 4>the other night against the Milwaukee Bucks.

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so tas Leely's got Lebron right now as his

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 2>MVP front unner. Tray and I have Joel Embiid at

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 2>the top of our list, and then we're obviously talking

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 2>about all these other guys. Who do you have?

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I would go with Joel Embiid as well. I

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 3>think one guy who's not part of the conversation right

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 3>now because he contracted the coronaviruses, Jason Tatum. Who would

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 3>be I think either one or two if he was

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 3>entirely healthy the entire season. It's usually a factor is injuries,

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 3>no doubt, but this year a factor is the virus

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 3>contracting the virus and missing a couple of weeks is huge.

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 3>But there's just so many guys that are like middling

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 3>right there at the top. There's like, I think you

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 3>could make an argument for I don't know, I didn't count,

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 3>but like ten guys. All the guys you've mentioned are

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:34.599
<v Speaker 3>all right there. And Lebron. I think Lee kind of

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 3>went with him, and a lot people do because it's

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 3>sort of a default pick. Yeah, he is the best

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:42.319
<v Speaker 3>player on the best team. But this is the one

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 3>year Lebron's not even going for it. I mean, he's

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 3>playing the fewest minutes he's ever played. This is his

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 3>second lowest point total since his rookie season. He needs

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:54.719
<v Speaker 3>things to motivate him. I think there's a reason why

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 3>they're eight to NOO on the road, because he's got

0:13:57.400 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 3>to get up for games and that he's always loved

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 3>playing on the road. This is a season where he's

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 3>chilling a little bit, you know, only playing thirty two

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 3>minutes a game, and Anthony Davis isn't playing to his

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 3>capabilities whatsoever. It's amazing that the Lakers are what they are,

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 3>but yeah, I guess I'm sort of picking embiid because

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, Tray and I picked him last year thinking

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 3>that the jump that came this season would have come

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 3>last season, and it's it's it's there, it's apparent. I

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 3>don't know how long it's gonna last, because it's it's

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 3>hard to be an MVP. It's hard to be jannistet

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 3>Kompo and go seventy two games the full frick and throttle.

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 3>So Embiid and Jokic I would pick because I'm pumped

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 3>to see them right up there at the top of

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 3>the leader board. It's just it's it's an anomaly. I

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 3>just don't know how long those guys last at the top.

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 3>So I would pick it while it's there.

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 2>I think them beads MVP cases helped too that he

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 2>has a you know, he's a factor on the defensive

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 2>end as well. I mean that's why we were always

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 2>bumping Giannis up over the last couple of years, because

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 2>you're like, oh, yeah, he's also a great defender. He's

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 2>in the running for Defensive Player the Year, which I

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, Embiid is always in the mix too. I

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 2>think that's helps him right now and beat can win

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 2>this thing if obviously the Sixers win enough games and

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 2>he plays enough games like he's going to have the

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 2>counting stats. It's just whether he actually has the games played.

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I guess he'll have the average, is what

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, but whether he'll have the games played, It's

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 2>it's fascinating. I am a little intriguedly that you sort

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 2>of have Durant so high, and I get it, you've

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 2>fallen in love with him coming back. The league's better

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 2>watching him. You're watching a ton of Nets games, but

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 2>like you said, the Nets are what nine and seven?

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 2>And you know the Nuggets are disappointing? What seven and seven?

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 2>But you know, like it's so it's not that much different,

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 2>is what I'm getting out here. And we got Yollkich

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 2>averaging a triple double, you know, twenty five, eleven and ten.

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 2>I think he's still at but you still have them

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 2>sort of just outside your top three. But I am

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 2>with you there a task like it's it's very very

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 2>close between a lot of these guys. I mean, Luca

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 2>in the mix, yeah exactly. Of course, Gianness is sort

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 2>of still in the mix there, just with his cheer numbers.

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, Lillard obviously a little bit still in play

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 2>though they're eight and six, Paul George and Cole Leonard

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 2>on the Clippers. I think I have to be considered too.

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 2>So there's a ton of guys, but you know, a

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 2>lot of us are going with embid right now. At

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 2>the top, Lee says Lebron James. He loves a good narrative.

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 5>I love it all. He's got it all.

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 4>But but also again, the Lake is their their their

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 4>point differential, best in the league. I mean, yeah, I'm

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 4>just giving white to the fact that Lebron these numbers

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 4>are a little bit lower by his standards, But he

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 4>looks to me like he's in complete control of the league.

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 4>And right now there's no one I would pick to

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 4>beat the Lakers in the finals as we are today.

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 3>So that's the other thing.

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's hear from you guys out there with all

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 2>of these awards. Let us know in the YouTube comments,

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 2>shout out to the stream team again and you can

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 2>tweet at us that as well. At no Dunk's inc.

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Anything else to add to the MVP conversation or just

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 2>the table is full. I think we got like ten guys.

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, you named everybody that's in the league.

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 4>YEA, yeah, I did say. I did say the Warriors

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 4>winning the playoffs. They are actually in the playoffs at

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 4>eight and seven. I did get that wrong, the seventh

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 4>in the Western Conference.

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's get to our next award. It's most improved

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 2>players so far. Actually, before you give us three, tray,

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 2>is Lebron in the mix? Because I'm getting ready for

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 2>people to start up Lebron for most improved because he's

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 2>added the three point shot, like he's like suddenly back

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:10.120
<v Speaker 2>to being like a I guess he did it once before,

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 2>like a forty percent three point shooter. I'm just waiting

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 2>for somebody to fire up that take. But who do

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:17.640
<v Speaker 2>you have as your top three mips right now? While

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 2>at number three I got Lebron James.

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:21.879
<v Speaker 6>He missed that huge three against the Warriors, made a

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 6>big one last night, so I'm putting him in the mix.

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 6>It happened last night, so it matters the most. I'm kidding, Skeets,

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 6>you hate this award. Guess what I love it?

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 6>Little known fact about me, I was Plano High School's

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:36.159
<v Speaker 6>most improved player in two thousand and one. I just

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 6>sucked when I was a junior, honestly, Yeah, But once

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:44.440
<v Speaker 6>I got a big role was ball and mip Trey Kirby. Anyways,

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 6>here's my top three at number three on my ballot,

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 6>Jeremy Grant twenty five points per game this year. That's

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:54.159
<v Speaker 6>a thirteen point in crazy's career highs across the board.

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 6>The percentages are steady. To me, this is kind of

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 6>the Paul Millsap corollary. Shout out to Tom Zill back

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 6>in the day. Jeremy Grant has an increased role with

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 6>the Pistons, but he's maintained his efficiency. He's seizing an opportunity,

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:07.400
<v Speaker 6>He's doing it every night.

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:08.439
<v Speaker 3>There was a lot of.

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 6>Questions about this signing in the offseason, but the Pistons

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 6>got this one right. I don't know about the rest

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 6>of the moves they made, but the Jeremy Grant won

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 6>it looks good. Number two on my ballot Christian Wood

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 6>twenty three points per game. That's a ten point increase

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 6>career highs across the board. Again, percentages are steady. He's

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:28.640
<v Speaker 6>gone from a curiosity to an established player with star potential,

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 6>maybe a building block for the Houston Rockets. I really

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 6>think that that is Christian Woods team, like they did

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 6>acquire Victor Oladipo. John wall Is there, but that's the

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 6>future for the Rockets. Christian Would, and you know, I

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:43.719
<v Speaker 6>think that people are loving to dunk on you if

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 6>you didn't watch the Pistons a lot last year. But

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:48.360
<v Speaker 6>Christian Would also started like twelve games for the Pistons.

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 6>It wasn't a long stretch where he was out there

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:52.440
<v Speaker 6>putting up twenty five and ten. Now he's doing it

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 6>pretty consistently. Also a good rim protector, so he's in

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 6>the mix for me as well. But my most improved

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 6>player so far is Jalen Brown. I've been sleeping on

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 6>Jalen Brown. He's one of my favorites. Did you realize

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 6>Jalen Brown is now up to twenty five a game,

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 6>six rebounds, four assists, steal in a half, career highs

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:14.680
<v Speaker 6>from the field, career high from three. He's got better playmaking,

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 6>his handle has improved, his usage rate is now up

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:20.440
<v Speaker 6>to thirty. That's superstar level. Celtics have been bawling because

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 6>he's really knocking on superstar status. Jason Tatum, like tast Set,

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 6>has missed some games, Kemba Walker missed some games, but

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 6>Jalen Brown has been there doing it every single night

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 6>for the Celtics. Really impressive stuff.

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, I didn't see that coming. I like that

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 2>pick though, task What do you think about that? Jalen

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 2>at number one on your leader board?

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 3>That was a great one. No, he threw me for

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 3>a curveball. I've kind of forgotten about the Jalen banwig.

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 3>I guess I've just come to accept that Jalen Brown

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 3>is awesome and I don't think of him as an

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 3>improved player because I've been you know, I followed the

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 3>lead every tray is. You know, jumped on that bad

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 3>and Wigan last year and I'm on there. I wonder

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:58.440
<v Speaker 3>what happens to his shots when when Jason Tatum comes back.

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:01.439
<v Speaker 3>He definitely was kicking ass when Tatum was in the

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 3>lineup earlier this season. He's come back a little bit

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 3>to earth. Jayalen Brown was shooting like sixty percent from

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 3>the field. But yeah, he's phenomenal. I don't know. The

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 3>jump isn't as big than it is for Jeremy Grant.

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:18.919
<v Speaker 3>As Trey said that, that and Christian Wood are just

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 3>those two stand out to me as big jumps when

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:24.200
<v Speaker 3>I look at it the Most Improved Player award. It's

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 3>harder to go from good to great like traded in

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 3>his senior year at a Plano or you know these

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 3>numbers where you just get playing time, you get a role.

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:38.159
<v Speaker 3>Christian Wood is that guy, and Jeremy Grant is just

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 3>he's just phenomenal. It's not like he's gotten you know,

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 3>more minutes. The numbers are wild. He's taking ten more

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 3>shots a game, but the percentages are exactly the same.

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 3>It's crazy. I didn't think that that was going to happen.

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 3>He has scored twenty or more in thirteen consecutive games.

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 3>That just doesn't happen on good percentages. And you know,

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:03.440
<v Speaker 3>some say that anybody somebody has to score. I should

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 3>say on the Detroit Pistons, somebody has to score. But

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 3>he's doing it efficiently, so he's he's great. I think

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 3>he's probably the front runner along with Christian Wood. Depending

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 3>the last sixty games of the season, their number increases

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 3>just too damn high to deny them.

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:21.199
<v Speaker 2>Lely and who you got, yeah the end.

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 4>The other name I would throw in there, I like

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 4>the Jalen Brown pick is Chris Bouchet from the Raptors.

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 4>I think he's been incredible, shooting sixty percent on from

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.120
<v Speaker 4>the field, averaging fifteen and a half points a game,

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 4>forty eight percent from downtown, and six rebounds. So he's

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 4>clearly having his best season for the Raptors. The Raptors record, obviously,

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 4>they've they've started off badly. They lost a lot of

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 4>games at the start.

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 2>But he doesn't play a ton of minutes either.

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 4>Well but yeah, but still that's that's good though for

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 4>his Well, that that's good.

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 2>But I got a little trivia question off of that

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:53.400
<v Speaker 2>for you, Lee Okay, can you name Okay? I saw

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:56.120
<v Speaker 2>this from bleacher Report. The NBA hasn't had a most

0:21:56.119 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 2>improved player who averaged under thirty minutes since this in

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 2>ninety seven ninety eight. A tough one. This is a

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:06.920
<v Speaker 2>tough mip. We don't talk about this guy a lot.

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 2>He played for the Hawks.

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 3>For sure.

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 2>I think he played for the Nets. The well fact

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 2>check that while you guys maybe try and pick it. Yeah,

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 2>he's got a very oh, he's got a very common

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 2>sort of last name a lot Jo Henderson. Yeah, man

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 2>TK coming through with Alan Henderson. Did he play for

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 2>one that didner? I'm sorry. He played for the MAVs,

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 2>the Cavs and the Sixers at the end of his career.

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:30.199
<v Speaker 2>That's what I was thinking of. So anyway, it's very,

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 2>very tough to do. I guess was my point. Dell

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 2>Bouche at twenty four minutes per game right now, that

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:37.120
<v Speaker 2>could go up if he gets the starting nod eventually

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 2>in Toronto.

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 4>The other hey, what about this guy, Colin Sixton is

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 4>averaging twenty seven points a game for the Caves.

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:43.959
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 4>He's only played nine games. He's missed the couple, but

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 4>he's shooting fifty three percent from the field and fifty

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:50.880
<v Speaker 4>percent from downtown. Only three and a half sitts the game,

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 4>but a steal and a half as well, And obviously

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 4>the Calves have been a much better team, and you

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 4>know this season, last season, but twenty seven a game

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:01.439
<v Speaker 4>over nine games, that's that's not just the tiny sample size,

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:01.639
<v Speaker 4>you know.

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I had him in the mix as well, but

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 6>I kind of think he's just on fire right now.

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 6>The guy cannot miss from outside, so ergo, his scoring

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 6>stats are going to be the same because when you

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 6>look deep into it, he's taking the same kind of shots.

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:16.119
<v Speaker 6>He's doing the same stuff assist wise. Like you're saying, like,

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:18.959
<v Speaker 6>but he is on fire and we just saw him

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 6>score twenty straight for the Cavaliers, So how can you

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 6>not put him in the mix.

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 2>I love the Jaalen Brown pick. I gotta say I

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 2>sort of had forgotten about him. I think I was

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 2>like task, Like I just you know, we were debating

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 2>Jaalen Brown's All Star capabilities last year, so he's obviously

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 2>we thought he was a good player, but he's taken

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 2>it to the next level. I'm not going to disagree

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 2>with that. Another hate what about this guy? Maybe Julius Randall. Yeah,

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:38.479
<v Speaker 2>I mean what he's doing. I mean, like, I know,

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 2>he's sort of always had good numbers, but they're up

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 2>this year and obviously it's impacting the knicks in the

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 2>wind calumn as well, so I think he's added some

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 2>things to his game as well.

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he has to do a ton So this missed

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 4>out on his triple double again last week.

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 2>So there's a lot of guys. It sounds like most

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:58.120
<v Speaker 2>people probably Jeremy Grant, Christian Wood, and then Jillen Brown

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 2>is an interesting pick. So let's hear from you.

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.920
<v Speaker 6>And for me of Brown is because like Task to say,

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 6>and it is harder to go to good from good

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:08.160
<v Speaker 6>to great, and we've already We've known that Jalen Brown

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:10.119
<v Speaker 6>is a good player basically since his rookie year. But

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 6>you look at the list of guys who have won

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 6>Most Improved in the past couple of seasons, it's Brandon Ingram,

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.880
<v Speaker 6>Pascal Siakam, Victor Oladipo Jannis back in the day. They're

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 6>going from established good player too, you're making All Star teams,

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 6>and I think Jalen Brown is going to be an

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 6>All Star.

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 2>That's a good point, Paul George. I think comes to

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 2>mind too, right, he sort of did that leap and

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 2>that's sort where my mind goes to when I think

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 2>Jaylen Brown. So yeah, no, for sure, if that trend continues,

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 2>then he could win this link all right, sixth man

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 2>of the Year so far tasks who you got top three.

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:40.360
<v Speaker 3>And number three? I'm going with the Philadelphia seventy six ers.

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Shake Milton, what a name. Shake. He has been everything

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 3>the seventy six Ers have hoped for. Seventeen points off

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 3>the bench. He's in the mix for most improved player

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:54.640
<v Speaker 3>as well, going from nine points a game last year

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 3>to seventeen this year. Nearly fifty percent for a guard.

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 3>That's a lovely Doc Rivers and Darryl Morey talked him

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 3>up in the preseason. This guy's amazing. This guy's amazing.

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:07.640
<v Speaker 3>Usually when front office people talk about a player like that,

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:09.879
<v Speaker 3>they're just kind of bigging him up. And then in

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 3>the regular season he drops off. This guy skyrocket, he's

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 3>doing great. Number two. You guys mentioned him, Chris Bouche.

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:18.199
<v Speaker 3>He's not your typical six man for the Toronto Rappers.

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:19.199
<v Speaker 3>He's a backup center.

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:21.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, he's a backup center.

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:23.120
<v Speaker 3>He's a backup big. He's an anomaly. He is one

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:25.359
<v Speaker 3>of a kind. You watch him out there. He's got

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 3>a unique shot. But he you know, when you think

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:31.640
<v Speaker 3>about a six man, you don't think about blocking shots,

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 3>but he does a lot of it. He just does

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 3>a lot. So from this list, I think Chris Bouche

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 3>probably does the most because he blocks two and a

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 3>half shots a game, fifteen and a half points, sixty

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 3>percent from the floor, forty eight percent from three. Yeah,

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:48.399
<v Speaker 3>that's wild. Is that going to come down? Yes, but

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:52.640
<v Speaker 3>still hitting a couple of game. That's that is instrumental

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 3>for the Reps right now because they're not getting anything

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:57.880
<v Speaker 3>from their center play. And yes, it's most likely Chris

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:00.200
<v Speaker 3>Bouche will become a center. I don't know who. That's

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 3>what Nick Nurse does. He's a mastermind. Maybe he's gonna

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 3>keep starting. Aaron Bain's playing for twelve minutes and Bouchet

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 3>the better player coming off the bench, but at number

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 3>one with a bullet. The sixth man of the year

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:13.640
<v Speaker 3>right now, it's Jordan Clarkson. This guy's found his spot

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 3>in the league. You think back to his Laker days.

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:17.480
<v Speaker 3>He's playing behind Kobe Bryant and he's starting. Then he

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:20.640
<v Speaker 3>went to the bench and he wasn't great off the bench.

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Then he just wasn't in his lane. He just didn't

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 3>know that I'm a score that's what I do. And

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 3>then he went to Cleveland and he played behind Lebron

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 3>and he still couldn't find his role. So that's that's

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 3>the point. When you had two tries and you haven't

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 3>found your role, maybe you're not gonna find in this league.

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:40.880
<v Speaker 3>But then he got traded to Utah, had a really

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 3>good season last year, you know, only had half a

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 3>season there, and the Jazz are kicking ass this year

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 3>and Jordan Clarkson's going along for the ride. Top bench

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 3>player with seventeen and a half points per game, forty

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:55.400
<v Speaker 3>nine from the floor, forty three from three. Those are

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:58.640
<v Speaker 3>great Jordan Clarkson numbers from blowing kisses to the jenners

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:02.440
<v Speaker 3>to ballin' he is. He is the best Jordan Clarkson

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 3>I've ever seen. You know, he was just he looked

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 3>like a guy who is just going to sort of

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 3>float around the league for a long time. But he's

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 3>found a spot. He should never leave the bench ever. Ever. Ever,

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 3>He's in a perfect spot.

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 2>He's a contract deal, too, isn't he. He's not paid

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:21.720
<v Speaker 2>a ton if I remember correctly, fifty. Yeah, so he's

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:24.120
<v Speaker 2>making like eleven and a half. That means or something

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:26.439
<v Speaker 2>like that, twelve maybe this year. That's a hell of

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 2>a bargain deal for Jordan Clarkson coming off through bench.

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:31.360
<v Speaker 2>So you're right, he's just having a super efficient year

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 2>off the pine. And he is sort of like the

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:36.640
<v Speaker 2>prototypical six man you think of, a guy comes in

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 2>and just shoots and scores and gets you back in

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:41.880
<v Speaker 2>games or builds leads and stuff like that, and can

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 2>be out there in closing games too. Okay, Clarkson is

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 2>a task his pick. You agree with that one trade

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 2>you have somebody else.

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 6>I've got almost the same ballot as Task Clarkson is

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:52.159
<v Speaker 6>my guy for the number one slot because he's the

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:52.679
<v Speaker 6>new j R.

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 5>Smith.

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 6>He even dresses awesome to come into games, and then

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 6>he goes out there and shoots every time. He's taking

0:27:56.880 --> 0:27:59.200
<v Speaker 6>a lot more threes this year, just like the rest

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:02.199
<v Speaker 6>of the Jazz are really helping him score efficiently. Bouche

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 6>number two. But my number three I got Patty Mills. Yeah, Yeah,

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 6>Patty Mills. He's kind of emblematic of a fun Spurs bench.

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 6>He picks up the pace when he comes in there.

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:14.680
<v Speaker 6>The Spurs second unit, I think is a lot more

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:16.679
<v Speaker 6>fun to watch than their first unit and part of

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:18.920
<v Speaker 6>the reason they've been so successful this year. But you

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:21.120
<v Speaker 6>could easily go Shake Milton. The only reason I'm really

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 6>picking Patty over Shake Patty over shit.

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Crazy.

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:29.439
<v Speaker 6>But the only reason I'm going with Patty Mills over

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 6>Shake Milton is because I got some more sixers coming

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 6>up in some awards here, so I wanted to sprinkle

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:36.360
<v Speaker 6>sprinkle some other stuff here for the Spurs.

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Well, Leah, sounded like you're very happy with Patty

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 2>Mills making Tray's top three at least.

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he's having a career best year coming off the bench,

0:28:43.600 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 4>shooting the ball, scoring points, and I think he's been

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 4>instrumental to the Spurs in their wins. So I'm glad

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 4>that Patty is getting that recognition because the Spurs, you know,

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 4>they're up and down. Watch Sometimes you want to watch them,

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 4>sometimes you don't. But Patty, he's really grown in that

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 4>role there in San Antonio. And always say this about

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 4>Patty that I don't think he shot selection has changed

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 4>all that much in his entire career. I just think

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 4>he knocks him in now. At the start, he used

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 4>to just fire away and a bit like Jordan Clarkson,

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, the first couple of season was like he

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 4>just fires away. But now they go in and that

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 4>makes a huge difference. So but absolutely I agreed that

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 4>Jordan Clarkson would be the clear favorite to win this

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 4>award right now.

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 2>You had some fun talking to Shane Hill the hammer

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 2>about Patty Mills. Really got around to listening to it.

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 2>That came up. For sure, it was great. He's sounded

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 2>like a big Paddy Mills fan himself.

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, he was.

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean Shane Hill was a bit of a smaller

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 4>player too in terms of his stature, and he used

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 4>to go out there and fire, and so I think

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 4>he sees a little bit of Paddy Mills and himself

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 4>there and also played in San Antonio under Greg Popovich

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 4>too there the hammert So yeah, great.

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 2>Awesome, all right, Clarkson all of us taking him for

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 2>the leader right now as six man of the Year

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 2>because I agree with you, guys. No to add on

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 2>to Bouche and what he's doing off the bench for

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 2>the Raptors. He leads the league in true shooting percentage

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 2>and offensive reading. Right, Chris Bouche, wild wild times we're

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 2>living in here in twenty twenty one. All right, Rookie

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 2>of the Year. I'll get a started with this. I

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 2>think it's pretty cool. First off, how many rookies are

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 2>making like an impact right now. And now I don't

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 2>know if that's maybe a little bit because of COVID

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 2>and all like these like guys missing time and with

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 2>the health and safety protocols, and maybe there's more minutes,

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 2>more opportunities for some of these rooks to get in there.

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 2>But a lot of guys are like contributing. And we

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 2>have never here on no dunks pretended to be draft experts,

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 2>but it does seem and correct me if I'm wrong.

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 2>Guys like this rookie class is already a little bit

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 2>better than most expected. We have fourteen rookies I think

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 2>it is that are slash were because Killy and Hayes

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 2>is now out with an injury. Averaging over twenty minutes

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 2>per game. That's pretty significant. So a lot of guys contributing.

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 2>But my top three Warriors rookie James Wiseman at number three.

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, the numbers will not wow you. Actually, with

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 2>all of these guys, the number aren't going to be like, whoa,

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 2>that guy's like a twenty ten already. It's not like

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 2>that this year with these rookies, but they're impactful. Wiseman

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 2>has impressed obviously being the starter there for the Golden

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 2>State Warriors and helping he's out. He has some duds,

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 2>but then he has some great games where he's like,

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 2>oh yeah, you could see why this guy was such

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:11.959
<v Speaker 2>a high pick. He could be a you know, a

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:14.720
<v Speaker 2>building block. And number two because of his impact. Probably

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 2>the most impactful rookie, Tyrese Haliburton with the Kings, fortunately

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 2>hasn't translated into a ton of win for the Kings,

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 2>but he helps them. He definitely helps watch the watch

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 2>sacrament of Kings basketball when he's out there averaging eleven

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 2>three and five. But number one, I'm going with the

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Hornets rookie LaMelo Ball. He's averaging twelve seven and six.

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:35.719
<v Speaker 2>He leads the rookies in win shares, so he's actually

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 2>having an impact on the w's Now he's only shooting

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 2>forty percent from the field and still like pretty abysmal

0:31:43.080 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 2>for a guard, sixty eight percent from the line, but

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 2>he's hitting over a three and a half per game

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 2>and it's thirty three percent. You know that you want

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 2>to get that a little bit higher, but he could.

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 2>And he's just getting more minutes here in the new year,

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 2>he's getting twenty seven minutes per game. Brego is trusting

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 2>him more and more, and he's a human highlight film.

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Money's out there. He must watch televis. So it's close.

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you guys agreed disagree who you

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 2>have number one? But I got Ball, then Haliburton and

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 2>then Wiseman, and you could obviously play what about this guy?

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 2>I think with this rookie class, but tasts, what do

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 2>you think do you have ball number one.

0:32:14.040 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 3>MM, you're a wise man, but I think you should

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 3>put James first. James Wiseman. Yeah, I think it's tough

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 3>to be a center in this league right out the gate.

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 3>The Mell's got the ball.

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, no, it's more difficult to be a point guard

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 2>in this league, right, Yeah, he's playing a point guard.

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 6>Would say the big man defense is the hardest thing

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 6>to learn in the NBA.

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 5>But I'm sure you're right.

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he doesn't play much anyway, It is a toss up.

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 3>This draft class is phenomenal so far. There's no there

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 3>isn't one standout. It's sort of like the MVP minus

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 3>fifteen points per game, but there's like a billion that

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 3>you can you can talk about Haliburton. He was injured.

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 3>I guess that plays a role. But anyway, those guys, yeah,

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 3>they have impressed coming out the gate. We talked about

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 3>this whole this draft class for one three thirty. Well,

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 3>is there is there a Camp miss prospect. No, there

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 3>wasn't a campus prospect. But they're all, you know, playing

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 3>fairly well here to start this season. So it's been

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 3>a pleasant.

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Surprise, including the number one pick Anthony Edwards. So I

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 2>think who has impressed some people, at least Patrick Williams

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 2>obviously the Florists, and Chicago's played well, there's a ton

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 2>like obviously some knicks as well. Yeah, who do you have? Leley?

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 3>Though?

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:23.240
<v Speaker 2>At number one? Do you go Wiseman, do you go Bald?

0:33:23.320 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 2>You got somebody else?

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 4>No, I'm going LaMelo ball to I can excuse the

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 4>shooting for rookies because hardly any rookies come out there

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 4>and start shooting high percentages or decent percentages straight away.

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:33.960
<v Speaker 4>It takes a few years to work on that. But

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 4>Mello's doing the rebounds seven a game, six assists the game,

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:39.239
<v Speaker 4>and he's lived up to the hype. And I think

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 4>that's the hardest thing to do for a rookie, because

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 4>all rookies a hype to some degree. But LaMelo not

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 4>coming from college, you know, playing down in Australia. It

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 4>was like, well, he's playing in a lesser league, but

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 4>he's playing against men, so will that help him?

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 5>Will that hurt him?

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 4>I think he's gone out there, he's come off the bench,

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 4>he's accepted that role and he's not afraid to take

0:33:56.280 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 4>those shots either. He again, he's not shooting it great,

0:33:58.640 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 4>but he's like, listen, if I'm open, I'm gonna take it.

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 4>So I like that about him. I think he's been very,

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 4>very important for the Hornets so far. Wiseman has been good.

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:10.840
<v Speaker 4>Wiseman probably started off a little bit better than Mellow,

0:34:10.880 --> 0:34:12.239
<v Speaker 4>but I think Mellow has just gotten a little bit

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:14.640
<v Speaker 4>more comfortable the last couple of games. So I would

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:19.839
<v Speaker 4>have Mellow, Wiseman, and either Redwoods or Halliburton, probably Edwards.

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 4>I suppose number three, but hey, yeah, you know you're

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:25.719
<v Speaker 4>you're fanangling the numbers a little bit there anyway, So

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:27.279
<v Speaker 4>it's really down to one and two, and I think

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 4>it's lamellow ball right now.

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:31.359
<v Speaker 6>TK talk rook, so you got I got the same

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 6>exact ballad as you, Skeets wise minute three. I do

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:37.359
<v Speaker 6>think he's probably playing the most important minutes playing as

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 6>a center of the most important defensive spot on the

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 6>basketball courters. You guys know I love defense.

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I was like, well you're switching it up now.

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:44.800
<v Speaker 2>I thought you didn't care about.

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 6>Defense, Skeets. I'm giving you the backstory here. I did

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:52.760
<v Speaker 6>win MIP in high school senior year as I played defense.

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:57.360
<v Speaker 6>I hate to say I played defense. I was rebounded,

0:34:57.400 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 6>I was taking jog as I was setting screened. When

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:05.239
<v Speaker 6>you're the tallest guy in the school, Why do you

0:35:05.239 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 6>think I hate defense? I hate him doing my whole life.

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 3>Let me shoot pat.

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 6>Anyways, so I got him at number three, But him

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:14.799
<v Speaker 6>playing these important minutes is huge, right, Like he's playing

0:35:14.840 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 6>on a team that has championship aspirations. They're probably not

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:19.799
<v Speaker 6>getting to the finals this year, but this is a

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 6>team that is a championship organization. They've got Steph Curry,

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 6>They've got Draymond Green. What he's doing is impressive for

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 6>a guy who is super young to have to actually

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 6>step into a playoff situation. Palli Burton is the guy

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:33.640
<v Speaker 6>that every team wants. He's the next andre Iguidala to me,

0:35:33.680 --> 0:35:36.400
<v Speaker 6>from a connectivity standpoint, they don't play the same, but

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:38.879
<v Speaker 6>just the extra juice he gives you on the court,

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:41.400
<v Speaker 6>the ability to do anything you need and the ability

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:43.240
<v Speaker 6>to keep the ball moving and make the right decision.

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:45.920
<v Speaker 6>Incredible from a rookie. But LaMelo is the guy. He

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 6>is a star. He's a building block. He's leading rookies

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 6>in points, rebounds, assists, and steals and he needs to

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 6>play more. Start him already. What are you waiting for.

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think we could get an awful close to

0:35:55.480 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 2>that trivia question with the rookie class, can you name

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 2>the guy of all the rookies who play is the

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 2>most minutes per game? It's not anyone we've said, Sorry,

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:12.440
<v Speaker 2>who'd you say, Trey, No, it's nobody we've mentioned. No, no, no,

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 2>the guy that went top five. I'll give you that.

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:16.880
<v Speaker 2>So there's a hell of a giveaway.

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:20.400
<v Speaker 6>Okay, who is the fifth draft remember any more?

0:36:21.000 --> 0:36:21.399
<v Speaker 3>A Coro?

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:25.240
<v Speaker 2>I think that's right, Isaac A Coral thirty seven point

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:29.280
<v Speaker 2>four minutes per game, which seems like what it seems

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:31.919
<v Speaker 2>almost like an error run basketball reference. But yeah, gets

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot of burn from them out there. They're like,

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:34.880
<v Speaker 2>what you can do? Contribute on both ends? He's been

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:36.040
<v Speaker 2>all right too, he'd be in the mix, is well,

0:36:36.080 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 2>I guess I'm getting out here. But again, like definitely

0:36:38.800 --> 0:36:42.920
<v Speaker 2>uh quickly for the Knicks. Is impressed, Peyton Pritchard for

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 2>the Celtics, and we're gonna do that. Cole Anthony We've

0:36:45.160 --> 0:36:47.439
<v Speaker 2>talked about a little bit, so there's been a lot,

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:50.239
<v Speaker 2>so it's been pretty impressive. But yeah, who's the star

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:52.239
<v Speaker 2>who will be? Like that's a fun question. Who will

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 2>be the guy from this rookie class in five years, Like,

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:57.920
<v Speaker 2>is it is Lamello? Is it Wiseman, is it Edwards?

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Is it Patrick Williams? I mean, I can talk myself

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 2>into any of those guys being them, to be honest,

0:37:03.040 --> 0:37:05.359
<v Speaker 2>So let's just from hear it. Yeah, he's played well.

0:37:05.440 --> 0:37:06.839
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to get Williams in there. He has played

0:37:06.840 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 2>really well for them. I think, all right, defensive player

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 2>of the year Lee talk defense. We almost gave this

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 2>one to Trey just to anger it.

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:17.440
<v Speaker 4>I sort of wish you did give it to train

0:37:17.440 --> 0:37:19.200
<v Speaker 4>in the end, because when I dug into this one

0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:22.399
<v Speaker 4>last night, I went down a rabbit hole and I

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:24.719
<v Speaker 4>was like, I shouldn't have volunteered to do this one

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:28.160
<v Speaker 4>because because the Lakers have the best defensive rating in

0:37:28.200 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 4>the league right now, then it's the Cavs and the Knicks,

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 4>and I'm like, okay, come on, that can't be right.

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:37.360
<v Speaker 4>Then you got the Grizzlies, Okay, the seventy six is fine. Okay,

0:37:37.400 --> 0:37:39.320
<v Speaker 4>that's a good defensive team. Then you still got the Mavericks.

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 4>Remember they started off the season pretty hot, So I'm like, okay.

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 2>This must be the jazz around there.

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 5>Then around the Jazz and next in seventh.

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 4>But okay, I'll start at number three on my Defensive

0:37:49.520 --> 0:37:52.240
<v Speaker 4>Player of the Year leader board. I'm going with Miles Turner.

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 4>He's largely here because he's averaging a massive four point

0:37:56.200 --> 0:37:58.959
<v Speaker 4>two blocks per game. Now, he probably would be higher

0:37:58.960 --> 0:38:00.840
<v Speaker 4>on other leaderboards because people will sort of look at

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:03.799
<v Speaker 4>those defensive stats and say, wow, well he must be

0:38:03.880 --> 0:38:06.160
<v Speaker 4>doing well, he must be great defensive player. The paces

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 4>are only thirteenth in defensive rating, though, and the more

0:38:09.160 --> 0:38:11.080
<v Speaker 4>I looked into I thought, I don't even know if

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:13.440
<v Speaker 4>he's their best defensive player. I think at Sibonus, the

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:16.120
<v Speaker 4>numbers say Sibonis they're better when he's on the bench,

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:20.120
<v Speaker 4>and I'm like, that doesn't jive with what I'm seeing

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:25.879
<v Speaker 4>out Come on, come on. And also Myles Turner. I'm

0:38:25.880 --> 0:38:27.759
<v Speaker 4>reluctant also to put him higher because his pick and

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:31.839
<v Speaker 4>roll defense has improved, but it still needs needs work.

0:38:31.880 --> 0:38:33.879
<v Speaker 4>So he's getting the stats. So he gets in there

0:38:33.920 --> 0:38:34.840
<v Speaker 4>at number three.

0:38:34.840 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, and he's out right now with an injury. Of

0:38:36.480 --> 0:38:37.720
<v Speaker 2>course he needed there with an injury.

0:38:37.760 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 5>With the hand injury.

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, at number two of my Defensive Player of the

0:38:41.680 --> 0:38:42.239
<v Speaker 4>Year leader board.

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 5>I'm going with Kawhi.

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:47.040
<v Speaker 4>Leonard, now fourth in Steel's third in total plus minus

0:38:47.040 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 4>in the league. When he's on the court, no surprise,

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:51.319
<v Speaker 4>the Clippers are much better at both ends of the floor,

0:38:51.480 --> 0:38:53.960
<v Speaker 4>but they have the equivalent equivalent of about the third

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:57.160
<v Speaker 4>best D in the league. And when he sits, it's

0:38:57.239 --> 0:39:02.200
<v Speaker 4>pretty much as bad as the Kings, the Wizards, Bulls, Wolves, Blazers.

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:06.240
<v Speaker 4>So clearly Kawi Leonard. He's won this award before twice.

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:08.120
<v Speaker 4>I think he's a two time defensive Player of the Year.

0:39:09.000 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 4>But the Clippers D in total is only fifteenth in

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:14.000
<v Speaker 4>the league. But when he's out there, they are a

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:17.239
<v Speaker 4>much better team, and the Clippers have quietly improved after

0:39:17.280 --> 0:39:19.319
<v Speaker 4>a bit of a sluggish start. His team lost by

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:22.439
<v Speaker 4>fifty points though as well. So I can't give a guy,

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:24.800
<v Speaker 4>you know, to defensive player of the Year when you

0:39:24.840 --> 0:39:28.440
<v Speaker 4>lose that by that much at home. But at number one, Sketsy,

0:39:28.480 --> 0:39:30.359
<v Speaker 4>you might get angry here, but anyway, I've got I've

0:39:30.360 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 4>got to go with it defensive number one.

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:33.440
<v Speaker 5>On my Defensive Player of.

0:39:33.400 --> 0:39:35.520
<v Speaker 4>The Year leader bought, I'm going with Rudy Gobert, but

0:39:35.520 --> 0:39:38.880
<v Speaker 4>it probably should actually be Mike Conley because when Mike.

0:39:38.760 --> 0:39:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Cutts Rudy Gobert.

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:42.080
<v Speaker 5>Mate, you got to listen.

0:39:42.120 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 4>When Mike Conley's on the court, the Jazz have the

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:47.239
<v Speaker 4>best d in the league by a mile, and when

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 4>he sits second worst. But I'm going with Rudy Gobert

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:52.160
<v Speaker 4>because you know the numbers.

0:39:51.840 --> 0:39:55.760
<v Speaker 3>Because it's a good listen.

0:39:56.000 --> 0:39:58.360
<v Speaker 4>He has more work to do short than Mike Conley.

0:39:58.400 --> 0:40:01.360
<v Speaker 4>But I think the Jazz seventh best defensive team in

0:40:01.400 --> 0:40:04.360
<v Speaker 4>the league, and Rudy Gobert does lead the league in

0:40:04.360 --> 0:40:07.319
<v Speaker 4>defensive field goal percentagele that's how geeky do you want

0:40:07.320 --> 0:40:08.040
<v Speaker 4>to get with these stuff?

0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 2>He's like, Rudy Golbert is the king of the advanced

0:40:11.840 --> 0:40:13.920
<v Speaker 2>defensiveness exactly exactly.

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:17.120
<v Speaker 4>But again that the numbers will tell you. For the Jazz,

0:40:18.480 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 4>Mike Conley is their most impactful defensive player. I know

0:40:21.239 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 4>the eye test, Man, It's different, isn't it. You know,

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 4>You're like, Wow, who would you rather have out there

0:40:25.120 --> 0:40:30.400
<v Speaker 4>protecting the paint? Mike Mike Conley on the on the perimeter.

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:33.400
<v Speaker 6>But Mike Conley has played all but fifty minutes this

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:36.799
<v Speaker 6>season alongside Rudy go The reason his defensive reading is

0:40:36.840 --> 0:40:38.920
<v Speaker 6>so good is because he's on the court with Rudy Gobert.

0:40:38.960 --> 0:40:40.600
<v Speaker 4>I know, I know, but I don't think we we

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:43.000
<v Speaker 4>we give him the credit that he deserves. He's a

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:44.680
<v Speaker 4>very good defensive player, Mike Conley.

0:40:44.719 --> 0:40:47.239
<v Speaker 2>But Okay, I'm fine, I can agree with that, but

0:40:47.239 --> 0:40:48.439
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't say he's the better.

0:40:48.640 --> 0:40:51.000
<v Speaker 4>I know, I know, I'm going with Rudy Gobert, but

0:40:51.000 --> 0:40:53.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm just saying again, when you when you dig into

0:40:53.000 --> 0:40:55.000
<v Speaker 4>these numbers and you just go, oh my god, like

0:40:55.120 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 4>like Conley's like the best defense in the league by

0:40:58.560 --> 0:41:00.680
<v Speaker 4>a mile when he's out on court, not with Rudy.

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:02.880
<v Speaker 4>It's not the same case with Ruby. So the Jazz

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:04.880
<v Speaker 4>seventh in the league and defense, you know, you always

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:07.439
<v Speaker 4>expect them to be somewhere in that top five mix.

0:41:07.480 --> 0:41:10.239
<v Speaker 4>So I think that will improve because again I don't

0:41:10.200 --> 0:41:13.720
<v Speaker 4>see the cads in the Knicks staying there all season long. Right, Okay,

0:41:14.560 --> 0:41:17.800
<v Speaker 4>does have an impact, But yeah, I'm going with Rudy Gobert.

0:41:17.880 --> 0:41:19.640
<v Speaker 4>But I'm like, Mike Conley sort of is going to

0:41:19.640 --> 0:41:20.680
<v Speaker 4>be the one presenting him.

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:23.360
<v Speaker 2>With that award.

0:41:23.560 --> 0:41:25.719
<v Speaker 6>Rudy, at least if he wins it, he should let

0:41:25.760 --> 0:41:28.640
<v Speaker 6>Mike Conley carry the war around it'll be his third one.

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:30.560
<v Speaker 6>It's like, all right, man, just carried around, you've never

0:41:30.600 --> 0:41:32.880
<v Speaker 6>made an All Star team. You can hang onto my trophy.

0:41:33.040 --> 0:41:33.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:41:33.400 --> 0:41:35.799
<v Speaker 2>The shocking part herely to me is not that you

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 2>have Rudy Gobert number one. It's maybe who you have

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:39.160
<v Speaker 2>to at two and three or who you didn't have

0:41:39.239 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 2>at two and three. I think Anthony Davis would still

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:44.279
<v Speaker 2>warrant a lot of defensive player of the reports and

0:41:44.320 --> 0:41:46.920
<v Speaker 2>a Joelle embiid as we talked about. So, okay, Tash,

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:48.680
<v Speaker 2>what do you think of Lee's list there? And you

0:41:48.680 --> 0:41:49.839
<v Speaker 2>can touch on coldly if.

0:41:49.760 --> 0:41:50.080
<v Speaker 6>You want to.

0:41:51.120 --> 0:41:52.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, let's just throw it at LEAs. You got

0:41:52.920 --> 0:41:55.399
<v Speaker 3>to stop looking at defensive stats. You got you went

0:41:55.440 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 3>into the trade machine this year. Just just start with that. Man,

0:41:58.200 --> 0:42:00.759
<v Speaker 3>This is a this is a lot too for you.

0:42:01.320 --> 0:42:05.120
<v Speaker 3>Miles Cerner is a great defender. I think he could

0:42:05.120 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 3>he could be at the top. But Anthony Davis is

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:09.920
<v Speaker 3>leading a Lakers defense that is number one in the

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:13.800
<v Speaker 3>league by a pretty good amount, which is shocking to me.

0:42:14.600 --> 0:42:16.839
<v Speaker 3>Anthony Davis is not having a great offensive year by

0:42:16.880 --> 0:42:21.439
<v Speaker 3>his standards whatsoever, But him and Lebron have somehow got

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 3>everybody on that team to play defense, even though they

0:42:23.640 --> 0:42:25.560
<v Speaker 3>lost Avery Bradley, who was the starter for much of

0:42:25.600 --> 0:42:28.680
<v Speaker 3>the year, they lost Danny Green, they lost Dwight Howard,

0:42:28.680 --> 0:42:30.400
<v Speaker 3>and then they stopped in some some good defenders, some

0:42:30.440 --> 0:42:32.400
<v Speaker 3>not so good defenders, and they've got the number one defense.

0:42:32.440 --> 0:42:35.400
<v Speaker 3>I think a d would probably get it. If you

0:42:35.440 --> 0:42:38.319
<v Speaker 3>look back and see that Giannis won it last year

0:42:38.360 --> 0:42:41.680
<v Speaker 3>with the number one defense, you know it sure seems

0:42:41.680 --> 0:42:43.919
<v Speaker 3>like Anthony Davis would be given that nod this year,

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:47.160
<v Speaker 3>and he was pretty close last year as well. So yeah,

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:51.880
<v Speaker 3>I did not volunteer for this award because I don't

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:54.160
<v Speaker 3>like looking at defensive numbers. I don't think they mean

0:42:54.200 --> 0:42:58.520
<v Speaker 3>all that much. It's it's really just about impacting the game.

0:42:58.760 --> 0:43:01.680
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, is really really good, but they should be

0:43:01.719 --> 0:43:04.880
<v Speaker 3>even better. And Miles Turner is really really good. I

0:43:04.880 --> 0:43:07.479
<v Speaker 3>think they should be even better. So yeah, I think

0:43:07.719 --> 0:43:11.720
<v Speaker 3>just even looking at the best defensive teams is probably

0:43:11.719 --> 0:43:13.759
<v Speaker 3>the most important metric to look at.

0:43:14.200 --> 0:43:17.000
<v Speaker 6>What do you got TK, Well, I actually got Myles

0:43:17.040 --> 0:43:19.640
<v Speaker 6>Turner as my number one because I love looking at

0:43:19.640 --> 0:43:21.600
<v Speaker 6>the stats. This is actually the worst award because you

0:43:21.680 --> 0:43:23.440
<v Speaker 6>got to look at the stats. He is by far

0:43:23.520 --> 0:43:25.880
<v Speaker 6>the best rim protector in the league. Right now, the

0:43:25.920 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 6>Pacers have the league best defense when he's on the court.

0:43:28.719 --> 0:43:31.440
<v Speaker 6>He's also averaging a steal and a half as a

0:43:31.440 --> 0:43:33.880
<v Speaker 6>big guy, four point two blocks, leading the league, and

0:43:33.920 --> 0:43:36.640
<v Speaker 6>the lowest defensive field goal percentage at the rim while

0:43:36.719 --> 0:43:39.560
<v Speaker 6>challenging the most shots at the rim. Rim defense is

0:43:39.600 --> 0:43:42.200
<v Speaker 6>the biggest part of defense in the NBA because a

0:43:42.280 --> 0:43:44.160
<v Speaker 6>dunk is still the best shot in basketball, so if

0:43:44.160 --> 0:43:46.560
<v Speaker 6>you're able to deter them, then that's good. The only

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 6>knock on Turner is that he doesn't rebound, but Demanta

0:43:49.000 --> 0:43:51.359
<v Speaker 6>Sabonis does rebound. Lee like you're saying, you would maybe

0:43:51.440 --> 0:43:54.520
<v Speaker 6>think that Demonta Sabonis is the best defender on the Pacers,

0:43:54.520 --> 0:43:55.960
<v Speaker 6>but he's not very good at the rim. To be

0:43:56.080 --> 0:43:57.840
<v Speaker 6>quite honest, the other guys I would have in the

0:43:57.840 --> 0:44:00.600
<v Speaker 6>mix jowel Embiid. He gives you the rebounding that Turner doesn't,

0:44:00.640 --> 0:44:02.719
<v Speaker 6>and the pace are The Sixers have been good, and

0:44:02.800 --> 0:44:05.799
<v Speaker 6>Rudy Gobert obviously still elite, but I've got Embiid at

0:44:05.880 --> 0:44:09.200
<v Speaker 6>number two over Rudy o'bert because Embiid doesn't have a

0:44:09.239 --> 0:44:11.440
<v Speaker 6>lockdown guy like Mike Conley out there helping him.

0:44:13.120 --> 0:44:15.359
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, I like everybody getting all these guys in here,

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:17.360
<v Speaker 2>I go Rudy Gobert. I actually think he's sort of

0:44:17.440 --> 0:44:19.839
<v Speaker 2>running away with it at the one month in mark.

0:44:19.920 --> 0:44:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Although all these other guys are phenomenal defenders Turner Davis, Embiid, yes,

0:44:23.560 --> 0:44:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Mike Conley as well, but you know, Rudy second best

0:44:26.520 --> 0:44:29.880
<v Speaker 2>defensive rating, second most defensive win share, second most blocks,

0:44:29.960 --> 0:44:32.960
<v Speaker 2>third most rebounds, and like that's his role, his goal.

0:44:33.080 --> 0:44:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Like what I love about these Rudy Gobert lines you're

0:44:35.200 --> 0:44:37.680
<v Speaker 2>seeing from all these Jazz wins is like, not Rudy

0:44:37.719 --> 0:44:40.640
<v Speaker 2>eighteen twenty twenty two points, It's like thirteen points, and

0:44:40.680 --> 0:44:43.160
<v Speaker 2>then there's twelve thirteen rebounds, and then it's like three blocks,

0:44:43.160 --> 0:44:45.000
<v Speaker 2>and then we know how much he just deters as well.

0:44:45.239 --> 0:44:48.279
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, you're right, the Jazz team defense feels like

0:44:48.320 --> 0:44:50.959
<v Speaker 2>it should be higher, like, but seventh is still good.

0:44:50.960 --> 0:44:53.160
<v Speaker 2>And I'm sure if we really, you know, dig into it,

0:44:53.200 --> 0:44:55.200
<v Speaker 2>like I don't have it in front of you, what's

0:44:55.280 --> 0:44:58.000
<v Speaker 2>the gap between the second best defense in the league

0:44:58.000 --> 0:44:59.959
<v Speaker 2>and the seventh best defense in the league this early

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:03.200
<v Speaker 2>the season. I'm sure it's pretty close, though, I do

0:45:03.280 --> 0:45:05.319
<v Speaker 2>agree with I think Task said at the Lakers are

0:45:05.400 --> 0:45:08.520
<v Speaker 2>sort of a you know, a marginal or not marginally

0:45:08.719 --> 0:45:11.080
<v Speaker 2>quite impressively a little bit better than whoever's in second.

0:45:11.120 --> 0:45:13.279
<v Speaker 2>But I go, Rudy Gobert, let's hear from you. Guys.

0:45:13.280 --> 0:45:15.399
<v Speaker 2>No one wanted that award. That was the last one

0:45:15.440 --> 0:45:16.640
<v Speaker 2>filled in in our document.

0:45:17.040 --> 0:45:17.239
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:45:17.320 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 2>I asked Tasser Lee, who wants it? And Lee put

0:45:20.160 --> 0:45:22.360
<v Speaker 2>up his little emoticon hand. So I was like, Okay,

0:45:22.360 --> 0:45:24.600
<v Speaker 2>I guess Lee's into it. I knew Task was avoiding it.

0:45:24.640 --> 0:45:25.920
<v Speaker 2>He was like, I don't want to do this. I

0:45:25.960 --> 0:45:28.520
<v Speaker 2>didn't want to do it, obviously, but I signed up.

0:45:28.400 --> 0:45:32.240
<v Speaker 6>For Coach of the Year rather than talk about.

0:45:31.640 --> 0:45:33.560
<v Speaker 4>Well that's the thing though, with defense, I think it

0:45:33.640 --> 0:45:35.960
<v Speaker 4>is more about sort of eye test and feel. It's

0:45:36.000 --> 0:45:38.560
<v Speaker 4>like they are just a better defense than this. That's

0:45:38.600 --> 0:45:40.200
<v Speaker 4>necessarily right.

0:45:40.080 --> 0:45:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Because like look at Andre Drummond. Look at Andre Drummond's

0:45:42.520 --> 0:45:45.440
<v Speaker 2>defensive numbers. Yeah, okay, and you just got Downe talking

0:45:45.440 --> 0:45:47.120
<v Speaker 2>about the Casby and one of the best defensive teams.

0:45:47.440 --> 0:45:49.480
<v Speaker 2>He leaves like rebounding by a mile. Yeah, he's got

0:45:49.520 --> 0:45:52.120
<v Speaker 2>tons of blocks and steels. I mean, he's a decent defender.

0:45:52.440 --> 0:45:54.279
<v Speaker 2>But we don't even We hadn't even included him in

0:45:54.280 --> 0:45:55.680
<v Speaker 2>the conversation here, so what up with that?

0:45:55.880 --> 0:45:58.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and Larry Nance Junior, I believe leads the league

0:45:58.239 --> 0:46:01.359
<v Speaker 4>in total steals and deflections. Right, you wouldn't know one's

0:46:01.360 --> 0:46:03.839
<v Speaker 4>saying Larry Nance Junior is in contentent of defense.

0:46:03.880 --> 0:46:04.480
<v Speaker 5>We play of the year.

0:46:04.480 --> 0:46:06.839
<v Speaker 4>But he's doing this counting numbers and it's having an

0:46:06.840 --> 0:46:07.880
<v Speaker 4>impact on his team.

0:46:07.920 --> 0:46:10.440
<v Speaker 3>And Isaac accorro leads the league in minutes played per

0:46:10.520 --> 0:46:12.879
<v Speaker 3>game for rookies. Nobody's talking about.

0:46:12.920 --> 0:46:14.399
<v Speaker 5>And the six man's up to twenty seven.

0:46:14.400 --> 0:46:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Again, we're gonna win the championship. Yes, we have determined that. Okay, well,

0:46:18.440 --> 0:46:20.239
<v Speaker 2>maybe the camps are in running for Coach of the Year.

0:46:20.239 --> 0:46:23.120
<v Speaker 2>That's our final award, Trey, you wanted this over defensive

0:46:23.120 --> 0:46:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Player of the Year.

0:46:23.719 --> 0:46:23.839
<v Speaker 6>Man.

0:46:23.920 --> 0:46:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about guys in well, I was gonna say suits,

0:46:26.880 --> 0:46:29.080
<v Speaker 2>but they're not in suits, wear polos.

0:46:29.080 --> 0:46:31.960
<v Speaker 6>So yeah, let's talk about guys in quarter zips. Let's

0:46:31.960 --> 0:46:35.520
<v Speaker 6>talk about guys named Steve who often wear corner zips.

0:46:35.640 --> 0:46:37.759
<v Speaker 6>Let me tell you, for personal experience, Coach of the

0:46:37.840 --> 0:46:42.520
<v Speaker 6>Year candidates number three for me? You know it, Billy Donovan.

0:46:43.480 --> 0:46:46.960
<v Speaker 6>The holes made one change in the offseason. They brought

0:46:47.000 --> 0:46:49.120
<v Speaker 6>in a new coach. They said it's time for Billy ball,

0:46:49.160 --> 0:46:52.359
<v Speaker 6>and now we all recognize that the balls are one

0:46:52.480 --> 0:46:56.480
<v Speaker 6>hundred totally and fully back. Their record could be even

0:46:56.520 --> 0:46:58.560
<v Speaker 6>better than it is. But there are so many guys

0:46:58.560 --> 0:47:00.719
<v Speaker 6>that you could put into this number three spot for

0:47:01.120 --> 0:47:04.160
<v Speaker 6>teams that have kind of exceeded expectations. My number two

0:47:04.280 --> 0:47:07.239
<v Speaker 6>on the ballot, Taylor Jenkins of the Memphis Grizzlies, talked

0:47:07.239 --> 0:47:10.880
<v Speaker 6>about it on Wednesday's show, My biggest surprise of the season.

0:47:10.920 --> 0:47:13.320
<v Speaker 6>So far, they've gotten five games from Jaw and Jaron.

0:47:13.360 --> 0:47:16.040
<v Speaker 6>They're seven and six, playing as a top five defense,

0:47:16.080 --> 0:47:18.520
<v Speaker 6>and I think defensive coaches get a lot of cred

0:47:18.640 --> 0:47:20.359
<v Speaker 6>in the Coach of the Year voting because it's all

0:47:20.400 --> 0:47:22.880
<v Speaker 6>about scheme and it's all about buy in. Both of

0:47:22.880 --> 0:47:25.560
<v Speaker 6>those things are a factor for Taylor Jenkins. Here. Everybody's

0:47:25.600 --> 0:47:28.120
<v Speaker 6>playing hard and they're forcing a whole bunch of turnovers.

0:47:28.120 --> 0:47:31.279
<v Speaker 6>It's working in Memphis or as that song goes, well,

0:47:31.280 --> 0:47:34.560
<v Speaker 6>Gonay mayl fizz. But my number one by a mile,

0:47:34.880 --> 0:47:37.440
<v Speaker 6>Doc Rivers is coach of the Year for me right now.

0:47:37.520 --> 0:47:40.319
<v Speaker 6>The best record in the Eastern Conference. More importantly, it

0:47:40.360 --> 0:47:42.720
<v Speaker 6>looks like he made sense of this roster pretty quickly.

0:47:42.760 --> 0:47:45.320
<v Speaker 6>They've been a ragtag bunch. They've had Embiden, Simmons and

0:47:45.360 --> 0:47:48.839
<v Speaker 6>Harris there for the majority of it. Embiiden Harris look

0:47:48.960 --> 0:47:52.040
<v Speaker 6>particularly unlocked. Doc Rivers just seems to know how to

0:47:52.040 --> 0:47:53.879
<v Speaker 6>get the best out at Tobias. Harris has n't making

0:47:53.960 --> 0:47:57.239
<v Speaker 6>quick decisions, has him getting good shots and moving the ball,

0:47:57.239 --> 0:47:59.440
<v Speaker 6>and Embiid, like we talked about, is an MVP candidate.

0:47:59.480 --> 0:48:01.440
<v Speaker 6>The last piece the puzzle will be figuring out how

0:48:01.440 --> 0:48:03.960
<v Speaker 6>to get the best from Ben Simmons. But Doc Revers

0:48:03.960 --> 0:48:06.160
<v Speaker 6>has figured things out so far the first month of

0:48:06.200 --> 0:48:08.160
<v Speaker 6>the season, so I have some confidence you'll get the

0:48:08.200 --> 0:48:10.280
<v Speaker 6>best out of Ben Simmons as the season progresses.

0:48:10.719 --> 0:48:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Lee, what do you think? This one's a tough one?

0:48:12.560 --> 0:48:14.160
<v Speaker 2>I think because there's so many teams that feel like

0:48:14.200 --> 0:48:16.200
<v Speaker 2>they're eight and six or seven and seven that you

0:48:16.239 --> 0:48:17.960
<v Speaker 2>may be heading into the season you're like, ah, they

0:48:18.040 --> 0:48:20.080
<v Speaker 2>might be like at this point in the year, like

0:48:20.320 --> 0:48:23.279
<v Speaker 2>lucky to have four wins, right, So what do you

0:48:23.280 --> 0:48:25.080
<v Speaker 2>think of Trey's less and then who you would have?

0:48:25.360 --> 0:48:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:48:25.600 --> 0:48:26.319
<v Speaker 5>I like that list.

0:48:26.360 --> 0:48:28.480
<v Speaker 4>I like Jenkins because I think they really did so

0:48:28.600 --> 0:48:30.759
<v Speaker 4>well when John Moran was out, and of course they

0:48:30.800 --> 0:48:32.200
<v Speaker 4>haven't had Jaron Jackson junior.

0:48:32.320 --> 0:48:34.000
<v Speaker 5>So I think that's really important.

0:48:34.040 --> 0:48:37.080
<v Speaker 4>I think the Doc Rivers bump is like, Okay, he's

0:48:37.120 --> 0:48:39.839
<v Speaker 4>got the sixers playing to that level. It's like, can

0:48:39.840 --> 0:48:42.040
<v Speaker 4>you unlock this talent? Can you get them to work together?

0:48:42.040 --> 0:48:44.279
<v Speaker 4>The offense has looked so much better than it has

0:48:44.280 --> 0:48:46.360
<v Speaker 4>in years gone by, so I think he deserves credit

0:48:46.400 --> 0:48:50.120
<v Speaker 4>for that. Then it comes down to, like, Frank Vogel

0:48:50.160 --> 0:48:52.279
<v Speaker 4>didn't win it last year for the Lakers, But if

0:48:52.320 --> 0:48:55.399
<v Speaker 4>the Lakers win, let's say they win sixty games this year,

0:48:56.600 --> 0:48:58.279
<v Speaker 4>how can did he not be Coach of the Year,

0:48:58.280 --> 0:48:59.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, because it's not like, well he got it

0:48:59.560 --> 0:49:01.279
<v Speaker 4>last year, like coach Budenholz is not going to get

0:49:01.280 --> 0:49:04.279
<v Speaker 4>it even if the Milwaukee Bucks win from here on out,

0:49:04.280 --> 0:49:06.000
<v Speaker 4>He's just not going to get it. But I think

0:49:06.080 --> 0:49:08.480
<v Speaker 4>someone like Frank vogue could just be like, well, let's

0:49:08.480 --> 0:49:10.359
<v Speaker 4>just give it to him, you know, why not? I mean,

0:49:10.400 --> 0:49:12.520
<v Speaker 4>he's got the Lakers playing really well, ty Lu's got

0:49:12.520 --> 0:49:15.600
<v Speaker 4>the Clippers playing really well as well. And what does

0:49:15.640 --> 0:49:19.000
<v Speaker 4>this award? Is this award about improvement over last season?

0:49:19.000 --> 0:49:20.960
<v Speaker 4>A new coach in a new situation or is it

0:49:21.000 --> 0:49:23.040
<v Speaker 4>just like, let's just give it to this guy like

0:49:23.120 --> 0:49:24.960
<v Speaker 4>Nate Bjorkrin. You know the faces.

0:49:25.040 --> 0:49:26.319
<v Speaker 5>They're surprising as well, and.

0:49:26.280 --> 0:49:28.799
<v Speaker 4>They've lost their last couple. They were eight four, they

0:49:28.800 --> 0:49:31.360
<v Speaker 4>got off to a good start. So so many coaches

0:49:31.400 --> 0:49:35.240
<v Speaker 4>have a different storyline or a narrative that they could choose.

0:49:35.560 --> 0:49:38.319
<v Speaker 4>I think ultimately, though, because Vogel didn't win it last year,

0:49:38.680 --> 0:49:40.560
<v Speaker 4>his record could put him in the box seat to

0:49:40.560 --> 0:49:40.799
<v Speaker 4>win it.

0:49:41.320 --> 0:49:42.839
<v Speaker 2>I can't believe you didn't go with one of your

0:49:42.840 --> 0:49:45.080
<v Speaker 2>two favorite teams in like a bigger staff with the

0:49:45.160 --> 0:49:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Calves or TIBs with the next I mean there's a

0:49:48.120 --> 0:49:49.800
<v Speaker 2>five hundred teams right now that not a lot of

0:49:49.800 --> 0:49:50.480
<v Speaker 2>people expect it.

0:49:50.560 --> 0:49:50.719
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:49:50.719 --> 0:49:52.759
<v Speaker 4>I'll get to the Knicks when we talk about the

0:49:52.800 --> 0:49:55.560
<v Speaker 4>games a little bit there later on. But yeah, look

0:49:55.600 --> 0:49:57.920
<v Speaker 4>they've had an improvement and Bickerstaff has got the Cavs

0:49:57.920 --> 0:50:00.759
<v Speaker 4>playing exciting basketball as well. Will even out his stein

0:50:00.800 --> 0:50:01.920
<v Speaker 4>it though, that's the question.

0:50:02.040 --> 0:50:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Task Coach of the Year take us home? Who do

0:50:03.960 --> 0:50:05.160
<v Speaker 2>you have the top year leader board?

0:50:05.239 --> 0:50:09.439
<v Speaker 3>Mm? You guys named all the coaches. I think if

0:50:09.680 --> 0:50:13.160
<v Speaker 3>Nate Jorkrin didn't lose Miles Turner, his best defender. Last

0:50:13.239 --> 0:50:16.279
<v Speaker 3>couple of games, everybody be singing a little bit of

0:50:16.280 --> 0:50:19.640
<v Speaker 3>a different tune for Nate Jorkrin because he really has

0:50:19.680 --> 0:50:22.800
<v Speaker 3>those guys playing. They they have impressed me a lot.

0:50:22.840 --> 0:50:26.640
<v Speaker 3>And so yeah, you named them all though, and we've

0:50:26.640 --> 0:50:29.880
<v Speaker 3>got a top ten coach of the year ballot. That's uh.

0:50:30.320 --> 0:50:32.399
<v Speaker 3>I don't think we just like, say, Nate Yorkrin's name

0:50:32.480 --> 0:50:32.799
<v Speaker 3>as well.

0:50:32.800 --> 0:50:35.680
<v Speaker 2>It's a good name, great name, because if we're naming

0:50:35.760 --> 0:50:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Doc Rivers in helping the Sixers, oh, you can maybe

0:50:38.840 --> 0:50:41.239
<v Speaker 2>argue they were helped out with the personnel they brought

0:50:41.239 --> 0:50:43.000
<v Speaker 2>in to add a little more shooting around them. So

0:50:43.040 --> 0:50:45.360
<v Speaker 2>maybe Executive of the Year to Mary there. But whatever,

0:50:45.680 --> 0:50:49.719
<v Speaker 2>what about Tyleru with Doc's old team, they're damn good too.

0:50:49.920 --> 0:50:52.200
<v Speaker 2>And he's the new coach. There's the new voice. I

0:50:52.280 --> 0:50:54.400
<v Speaker 2>think they're playing a little more fun. But no one

0:50:54.400 --> 0:50:56.600
<v Speaker 2>wants to talk about the Clippers. Everyone's done talking about

0:50:56.600 --> 0:50:58.560
<v Speaker 2>them more. We're waiting until the playoffs with them.

0:50:58.600 --> 0:51:01.160
<v Speaker 3>But also pretty awesome last year in the regular season.

0:51:01.239 --> 0:51:03.279
<v Speaker 2>I know they were, but you know so, I mean,

0:51:03.320 --> 0:51:05.680
<v Speaker 2>I guess, yeah, the Sixer did disappoint they weren't. It's

0:51:05.680 --> 0:51:07.160
<v Speaker 2>not like they were out of the playoffs, so they

0:51:07.160 --> 0:51:09.600
<v Speaker 2>were still winning games. But I hear you that's fine,

0:51:09.760 --> 0:51:11.440
<v Speaker 2>it's your list, dock at the top. Let's hear from

0:51:11.440 --> 0:51:13.640
<v Speaker 2>you guys out there. That worked really well. I think

0:51:13.920 --> 0:51:15.600
<v Speaker 2>going to our top three candids. So let's hear from

0:51:15.640 --> 0:51:17.640
<v Speaker 2>you guys in the stream team and tweet at us

0:51:18.040 --> 0:51:22.040
<v Speaker 2>at no dunk's inkor Okay, well, let's get through those

0:51:22.080 --> 0:51:25.680
<v Speaker 2>games from last night. Only three on taskt has started.

0:51:25.760 --> 0:51:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Lebron and the Lakers opened a long trip here by

0:51:28.120 --> 0:51:30.279
<v Speaker 2>beating the Bucks one thirteen, one oh six.

0:51:30.320 --> 0:51:33.919
<v Speaker 3>Big takeaway, Well, the Lakers can do whatever they want.

0:51:34.040 --> 0:51:35.759
<v Speaker 3>That's the biggest takeaway. When it came down to the

0:51:35.800 --> 0:51:39.440
<v Speaker 3>last few minutes, Lebron said, all right, I'm taking over now.

0:51:40.160 --> 0:51:43.280
<v Speaker 3>A part of that is the Milwaukee Bucks. And we've

0:51:43.400 --> 0:51:47.239
<v Speaker 3>talked about the Lakers already. Their defense is phenomenal. They

0:51:47.320 --> 0:51:49.160
<v Speaker 3>know who the heck they are when it comes down

0:51:49.200 --> 0:51:53.000
<v Speaker 3>to winning time. Everybody just hang around and watched Lebron

0:51:53.040 --> 0:51:56.680
<v Speaker 3>do his thing. They're great. The Bucks, on the other hand,

0:51:56.760 --> 0:52:03.120
<v Speaker 3>they're not causing fear and another team whatsoever. They keep

0:52:03.480 --> 0:52:05.920
<v Speaker 3>winning games, they definitely do. But when it comes down

0:52:05.960 --> 0:52:08.560
<v Speaker 3>to crunch time, when it comes down to playing really,

0:52:08.600 --> 0:52:11.879
<v Speaker 3>really good teams. The other team on the other side

0:52:11.920 --> 0:52:14.920
<v Speaker 3>thinks that they can win. I think that's that's just

0:52:15.520 --> 0:52:17.480
<v Speaker 3>the way it works. They believe that if they find

0:52:17.520 --> 0:52:20.280
<v Speaker 3>something that works, that Mike Bunenholzer isn't going to change

0:52:21.200 --> 0:52:26.040
<v Speaker 3>enough in his scheme to adapt. And it keeps showing through.

0:52:26.400 --> 0:52:30.680
<v Speaker 3>They just can't find a way to beat these great teams. Now,

0:52:30.760 --> 0:52:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Chris Middleton has the ball more in his hands than

0:52:32.640 --> 0:52:34.759
<v Speaker 3>Yannis does at the end of games, which is kind

0:52:34.760 --> 0:52:36.400
<v Speaker 3>of like the playoff last year, which is probably the

0:52:36.400 --> 0:52:38.920
<v Speaker 3>better recipe. But I think when it comes down to it,

0:52:39.000 --> 0:52:40.759
<v Speaker 3>Drew Holliday needs to get it more. When it comes

0:52:40.760 --> 0:52:42.480
<v Speaker 3>down to it, it's just guys who can make shots.

0:52:42.520 --> 0:52:44.680
<v Speaker 3>And Giannis isn't a creator when it comes down to

0:52:44.719 --> 0:52:47.440
<v Speaker 3>the last few minutes. He's got to play second man's

0:52:47.640 --> 0:52:50.000
<v Speaker 3>or third man. And they've got to figure this out. Now,

0:52:50.480 --> 0:52:52.080
<v Speaker 3>they've got to figure this out before they get to

0:52:52.120 --> 0:52:56.080
<v Speaker 3>the postseason. They just need more bucket makers. And so yeah,

0:52:56.120 --> 0:52:58.879
<v Speaker 3>they can just like in a game, they'll get down

0:52:58.920 --> 0:53:01.360
<v Speaker 3>to the last few minutes, they'll beat the bad teams.

0:53:01.440 --> 0:53:03.279
<v Speaker 3>Just like in the regular season. They're gonna win a

0:53:03.320 --> 0:53:05.200
<v Speaker 3>lot of games, but when it comes down to the postseason,

0:53:05.239 --> 0:53:08.200
<v Speaker 3>this was this was exactly what we saw with the

0:53:08.200 --> 0:53:10.880
<v Speaker 3>Miami Heat last year. The Heat figured it out. Bucks

0:53:10.880 --> 0:53:15.000
<v Speaker 3>couldn't adapt and Lebron just kept getting switches good night.

0:53:15.320 --> 0:53:17.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean even Montrez Harrald in the post kept getting

0:53:17.760 --> 0:53:20.840
<v Speaker 3>switches good night. It's just too easy. And then the

0:53:20.840 --> 0:53:23.080
<v Speaker 3>offensive end doesn't worry too like like I mentioned, so

0:53:24.040 --> 0:53:28.480
<v Speaker 3>just just scared, scared for the Buck's future. But the

0:53:28.560 --> 0:53:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Lakers are obviously, yeah number one with the bullet they're awesome.

0:53:31.200 --> 0:53:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the Lakers offense there for a good stretch down

0:53:34.040 --> 0:53:37.240
<v Speaker 2>in the fourth there was like post up Trez, post

0:53:37.320 --> 0:53:39.960
<v Speaker 2>up ad the double has to come. It's going to

0:53:39.960 --> 0:53:42.319
<v Speaker 2>come because there's a smaller Bucks player on them, and

0:53:42.360 --> 0:53:44.280
<v Speaker 2>then those guys are just gonna kick it to KCP

0:53:44.400 --> 0:53:47.320
<v Speaker 2>in the corner or Caruso wide open in the corner

0:53:47.440 --> 0:53:49.120
<v Speaker 2>right Trey. Like it felt like that happened like four

0:53:49.200 --> 0:53:51.320
<v Speaker 2>or five times. And good on Vogel and Lebron and

0:53:51.320 --> 0:53:52.880
<v Speaker 2>the Lakers for going back to back to back to back.

0:53:52.960 --> 0:53:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Just keep running into the ground because, as Tass said,

0:53:55.719 --> 0:53:58.200
<v Speaker 2>boonholes are slow to adapt or switch up the defense,

0:53:58.239 --> 0:54:01.080
<v Speaker 2>like maybe try something else, you know, Like I think

0:54:01.120 --> 0:54:02.880
<v Speaker 2>in that instance, I always think of someone like Nick

0:54:02.960 --> 0:54:05.480
<v Speaker 2>Nurse might try something else there. Let's go zone or

0:54:05.800 --> 0:54:08.040
<v Speaker 2>let's drop back in coverage and let's not switch so easily.

0:54:08.120 --> 0:54:08.839
<v Speaker 2>But what did you think?

0:54:09.360 --> 0:54:11.480
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think it was that halftime of this game,

0:54:11.560 --> 0:54:14.200
<v Speaker 6>right that Shaq said the big man is back, and

0:54:14.239 --> 0:54:16.040
<v Speaker 6>we were talking about, Wow, this is great, this is

0:54:16.080 --> 0:54:18.799
<v Speaker 6>a I love seeing all these big bodies banging down.

0:54:19.880 --> 0:54:22.279
<v Speaker 6>But yeah, you're right, And honestly, the Bucks should watch

0:54:22.320 --> 0:54:24.080
<v Speaker 6>the tape of the Lakers and see how they're getting

0:54:24.080 --> 0:54:25.920
<v Speaker 6>the ball into the post every time, because Jannis did

0:54:25.960 --> 0:54:28.240
<v Speaker 6>have a nice post bucket there in the fourth quarter,

0:54:28.320 --> 0:54:30.320
<v Speaker 6>hit like a little fade away sort of dink or

0:54:30.360 --> 0:54:33.200
<v Speaker 6>dumper from probably nine or ten feet, And that's how

0:54:33.200 --> 0:54:35.640
<v Speaker 6>he's got to get involved on the offensive end when

0:54:35.680 --> 0:54:39.040
<v Speaker 6>it comes down to clutch time, because he doesn't strike

0:54:39.080 --> 0:54:41.799
<v Speaker 6>fear in people's hearts with regards to having the ball

0:54:41.840 --> 0:54:43.760
<v Speaker 6>on the perimeter when it's the fourth quarter. It seemed

0:54:43.800 --> 0:54:45.719
<v Speaker 6>like the Lakers decided we're gonna try and take a

0:54:45.760 --> 0:54:48.040
<v Speaker 6>charge on Giannis every single time he comes into the

0:54:48.440 --> 0:54:50.600
<v Speaker 6>into the lane, and that seems to be the recipe

0:54:50.640 --> 0:54:53.319
<v Speaker 6>for how you stop him, because if you're if you're

0:54:53.360 --> 0:54:55.560
<v Speaker 6>just waiting for him, if you're building the wall there,

0:54:56.080 --> 0:54:57.879
<v Speaker 6>you're either gonna get sent him to the free throw

0:54:57.880 --> 0:54:59.600
<v Speaker 6>line where he has struggled, or you're gonna get the call,

0:54:59.600 --> 0:55:01.319
<v Speaker 6>you're gonna the charge, and it's going back down the

0:55:01.360 --> 0:55:03.560
<v Speaker 6>other way. There's got to be other ways to get

0:55:03.560 --> 0:55:06.719
<v Speaker 6>Giannis involved. Offensively, he's a pretty solid passer. I don't

0:55:06.800 --> 0:55:08.840
<v Speaker 6>He's not Lebron passing, as we all know that's his

0:55:08.920 --> 0:55:11.000
<v Speaker 6>greatest strength. But you still got to be able to

0:55:11.000 --> 0:55:12.680
<v Speaker 6>get him the ball in the post. Let him go

0:55:12.760 --> 0:55:15.920
<v Speaker 6>to work, let him get some buckets because he's your MVP.

0:55:16.239 --> 0:55:18.799
<v Speaker 6>And yeah, I agree that Middleton has been ball and

0:55:18.840 --> 0:55:21.720
<v Speaker 6>he's been cooking. He's the best option for the Bucks.

0:55:21.800 --> 0:55:24.840
<v Speaker 6>And also it would be nice to get Drew Holliday involved.

0:55:24.840 --> 0:55:26.960
<v Speaker 6>But there's a reason that Yannis is the MVP. The

0:55:26.960 --> 0:55:29.480
<v Speaker 6>guy can be automatic when he's in the post. Maybe

0:55:29.520 --> 0:55:31.200
<v Speaker 6>he needs a little bit more booty to be able

0:55:31.200 --> 0:55:33.279
<v Speaker 6>to displace people because he's still tall, He's got a

0:55:33.320 --> 0:55:36.719
<v Speaker 6>high center of gravity, especially with those giant shoulders. I

0:55:36.760 --> 0:55:40.000
<v Speaker 6>think that there is opportunities for Giannis to be an

0:55:40.040 --> 0:55:43.440
<v Speaker 6>even better post player. But I don't know, it doesn't

0:55:43.440 --> 0:55:45.400
<v Speaker 6>seem like that's going to be happening right now. The

0:55:45.440 --> 0:55:47.800
<v Speaker 6>good thing for the Bucks is that, yeah, it's scary

0:55:47.840 --> 0:55:49.840
<v Speaker 6>for the future with regards to this season. Maybe they

0:55:49.840 --> 0:55:51.759
<v Speaker 6>don't win the title, but at least Yannas signed before

0:55:51.800 --> 0:55:53.480
<v Speaker 6>the season, because if this was the case right now,

0:55:53.480 --> 0:55:54.800
<v Speaker 6>if you just saw him lose to the Nets and

0:55:54.880 --> 0:55:57.880
<v Speaker 6>Lakers and back to back in a back to back scenario,

0:55:58.200 --> 0:55:59.440
<v Speaker 6>that would be really scary.

0:55:59.480 --> 0:55:59.800
<v Speaker 3>Hours.

0:56:00.040 --> 0:56:01.680
<v Speaker 2>That's a good point. Yeah, Lakers did a good job

0:56:01.719 --> 0:56:03.759
<v Speaker 2>of keeping Unis off the free throw line last night,

0:56:03.760 --> 0:56:05.440
<v Speaker 2>even though you want to put them there at times.

0:56:05.480 --> 0:56:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Ley he only had four free throw attempts, hit two

0:56:07.719 --> 0:56:10.520
<v Speaker 2>of them, and he had nine turnovers too, so you know,

0:56:10.640 --> 0:56:12.359
<v Speaker 2>obviously you want to shore up that. But what did

0:56:12.400 --> 0:56:13.120
<v Speaker 2>you think from this game?

0:56:13.480 --> 0:56:16.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I would be very concerned about the Bucks because

0:56:16.239 --> 0:56:18.279
<v Speaker 4>in those two big games, as you mentioned, they're trade

0:56:18.280 --> 0:56:21.520
<v Speaker 4>Nets and Lakers. The Nets they won the game. It

0:56:21.560 --> 0:56:23.200
<v Speaker 4>was a close game, of course, but I didn't feel

0:56:23.239 --> 0:56:25.560
<v Speaker 4>this one last night was actually particularly close. I felt

0:56:25.600 --> 0:56:27.920
<v Speaker 4>the Lakers were in complete control of this game because

0:56:28.000 --> 0:56:29.200
<v Speaker 4>well sort of, it was incredible.

0:56:29.200 --> 0:56:30.399
<v Speaker 2>It got to a two point game.

0:56:30.680 --> 0:56:33.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, like they made They did make a push there.

0:56:33.120 --> 0:56:35.319
<v Speaker 4>But then the Lakers answer. And one guy who I

0:56:35.360 --> 0:56:37.640
<v Speaker 4>have been critical of the past, who's having actually an

0:56:37.680 --> 0:56:41.160
<v Speaker 4>incredible season for the Lakers is KCP. He is very

0:56:41.280 --> 0:56:44.640
<v Speaker 4>very important for them offensively and defensively. The numbers right now,

0:56:45.160 --> 0:56:48.040
<v Speaker 4>you know, eleven points a game, he's shooting fifty five

0:56:48.080 --> 0:56:51.359
<v Speaker 4>percent from the field, fifty seven percent from three. Now,

0:56:51.600 --> 0:56:54.040
<v Speaker 4>he doesn't do a tonails in terms of the actual stats,

0:56:54.040 --> 0:56:56.480
<v Speaker 4>but I think defensively, they know they've got a guys

0:56:56.560 --> 0:56:58.600
<v Speaker 4>like go and defend this guy. Put you on this guy,

0:56:58.719 --> 0:57:01.399
<v Speaker 4>rotate around and if he's he knocks down that shot

0:57:01.480 --> 0:57:04.160
<v Speaker 4>every time. He's really more comfortable in his role. He's grown,

0:57:04.200 --> 0:57:06.879
<v Speaker 4>he's matured as a player and become a very sort

0:57:06.920 --> 0:57:09.160
<v Speaker 4>of quietly important player for what they do. They can

0:57:09.200 --> 0:57:11.080
<v Speaker 4>rely on him now and that's something they couldn't do

0:57:11.120 --> 0:57:13.400
<v Speaker 4>in the past. So I think that's important. But I

0:57:13.480 --> 0:57:15.920
<v Speaker 4>felt particularly in the second half, and again, you know,

0:57:15.920 --> 0:57:18.560
<v Speaker 4>when we're talking about MVPs this morning, watching Lebron last night,

0:57:18.640 --> 0:57:21.439
<v Speaker 4>I'm like that that is kind of how I still

0:57:21.440 --> 0:57:24.480
<v Speaker 4>feel about Lebron. He's not scared at all of the Bucks,

0:57:24.520 --> 0:57:27.480
<v Speaker 4>not at all. I don't think he's concerned that they

0:57:27.480 --> 0:57:30.160
<v Speaker 4>could take him down in a seven game series, because

0:57:30.240 --> 0:57:33.120
<v Speaker 4>as good as Yannis is, he still forces it a

0:57:33.160 --> 0:57:35.680
<v Speaker 4>little bit too much on the offensive end, and teams

0:57:35.720 --> 0:57:37.680
<v Speaker 4>like the Lakers will say, if you go inside, yeah

0:57:37.680 --> 0:57:39.680
<v Speaker 4>that's a handful, You're a handful inside. But we'll live

0:57:39.720 --> 0:57:41.680
<v Speaker 4>with your shooting the ball anytime you want. We'll just

0:57:41.720 --> 0:57:44.360
<v Speaker 4>live with that right now. And the Lakers instead, they

0:57:44.400 --> 0:57:46.600
<v Speaker 4>have guys who can hit those threes, and it just

0:57:47.040 --> 0:57:49.920
<v Speaker 4>feels like the Lakers have that confidence that they're not

0:57:49.960 --> 0:57:52.680
<v Speaker 4>intimidated by the Milwaukee Bucks so early in the season.

0:57:52.760 --> 0:57:56.040
<v Speaker 4>Still time to improve, but a couple of warriorsome side.

0:57:56.080 --> 0:57:57.560
<v Speaker 4>Hasn't been a great week here for the Bucks.

0:57:57.840 --> 0:57:59.960
<v Speaker 2>No lak A shot nineteen to thirty seven from three

0:58:01.000 --> 0:58:05.080
<v Speaker 2>coldwell Pope had seven of them. Lebron had six. Quick trivia,

0:58:05.480 --> 0:58:07.600
<v Speaker 2>what's the career high for Lebron? Most three is made

0:58:07.640 --> 0:58:11.920
<v Speaker 2>in the game? I my man, Leelis did eight a

0:58:11.920 --> 0:58:14.920
<v Speaker 2>couple times in his career. Yeah, six is a lot

0:58:14.960 --> 0:58:18.640
<v Speaker 2>for Lebron, like and it's it's uh, he's added it though.

0:58:18.720 --> 0:58:21.520
<v Speaker 2>He is feeling comfortable with that three point shot right now.

0:58:21.560 --> 0:58:23.800
<v Speaker 2>He is it's money right now. I will say to

0:58:23.840 --> 0:58:25.800
<v Speaker 2>you if you were, if you were holding out hope

0:58:25.960 --> 0:58:28.480
<v Speaker 2>that Giannis could go back to back to back for MVP,

0:58:29.720 --> 0:58:31.840
<v Speaker 2>It's not a chance not held. There was no chance

0:58:31.840 --> 0:58:33.440
<v Speaker 2>at the start of the season. Tried telling you about it.

0:58:33.440 --> 0:58:35.720
<v Speaker 2>But if you were still holding out hope, I think

0:58:35.800 --> 0:58:38.439
<v Speaker 2>last night it's gone. It's it's just this. I don't

0:58:38.440 --> 0:58:39.800
<v Speaker 2>care what he does from here on now. There's no

0:58:39.840 --> 0:58:42.440
<v Speaker 2>way he's doing it. He's still awesome. He's still awesome.

0:58:42.680 --> 0:58:45.280
<v Speaker 4>When Lebron gets that little struck going at that sort

0:58:45.280 --> 0:58:47.480
<v Speaker 4>of top left hand side, that left wing where he

0:58:47.520 --> 0:58:49.400
<v Speaker 4>sort of rubs his shirt, and it's like, oh, yeah,

0:58:49.600 --> 0:58:51.760
<v Speaker 4>I am just gonna I might step back into three,

0:58:51.800 --> 0:58:54.040
<v Speaker 4>I might drive inside, but it doesn't really matter what

0:58:54.040 --> 0:58:57.080
<v Speaker 4>you guys do. I'm just gonna do something here that's disrespectful.

0:58:57.080 --> 0:58:59.120
<v Speaker 4>That's like Lebron, you know, twirling the ball again.

0:58:59.200 --> 0:59:02.000
<v Speaker 2>I was gonna say, as a fans, we're well aware

0:59:02.000 --> 0:59:05.000
<v Speaker 2>of Lebron, Yeah, wiping his body or spinning the ball

0:59:05.160 --> 0:59:08.440
<v Speaker 2>or yeah, looking like this, he's going to be easy. Yeah, okay,

0:59:08.640 --> 0:59:10.680
<v Speaker 2>next game here. Donovan Mitchell helps the Jazz beat the

0:59:10.680 --> 0:59:13.440
<v Speaker 2>Pelicans for a seventh straight win. Trey Big Tickaway.

0:59:14.320 --> 0:59:16.840
<v Speaker 6>Well, as predicted, the Jazz, we're going to go on

0:59:16.880 --> 0:59:18.960
<v Speaker 6>a huge winning streak and we're gonna start talking about him,

0:59:18.960 --> 0:59:21.200
<v Speaker 6>Like you said, Skeet's seven straight right now, thanks the

0:59:21.280 --> 0:59:24.480
<v Speaker 6>huge games from Donovan Mitchell and Mike Conley. Mitchell, that

0:59:24.520 --> 0:59:26.920
<v Speaker 6>guy was magnificent last night. He's got every shot, he's

0:59:26.960 --> 0:59:29.320
<v Speaker 6>got every pass, and at his best, he finds the

0:59:29.360 --> 0:59:31.400
<v Speaker 6>balance between the two of them and he's in control.

0:59:31.640 --> 0:59:33.480
<v Speaker 6>And that's what it's been for a lot of this season.

0:59:33.520 --> 0:59:35.600
<v Speaker 6>He's still an explosive score, but I feel like he's

0:59:35.680 --> 0:59:38.439
<v Speaker 6>just his decision making in his control of the game

0:59:38.440 --> 0:59:40.600
<v Speaker 6>has gotten a lot better. Mike Conley is giving the

0:59:40.640 --> 0:59:44.440
<v Speaker 6>Jazz exactly what people expected last season. He's another playmaker,

0:59:44.440 --> 0:59:47.400
<v Speaker 6>he's another scorer, and the team is taking a ton

0:59:47.400 --> 0:59:50.120
<v Speaker 6>of threes. With Bogdanovian back. Clearly there's an emphasis on

0:59:50.160 --> 0:59:52.280
<v Speaker 6>getting more attempts up there. Taking forty one a game

0:59:52.320 --> 0:59:55.160
<v Speaker 6>this year thirty five a game last year. Maybe you

0:59:55.200 --> 0:59:57.800
<v Speaker 6>put Quinn Snyder in the Coach of the Year. Yeah, conversation,

0:59:58.080 --> 1:00:00.360
<v Speaker 6>just for that little change, they're saying, Hey, we can

1:00:00.400 --> 1:00:02.800
<v Speaker 6>shoot some jumpers. Let's make them three point jumpers. They're

1:00:02.840 --> 1:00:04.640
<v Speaker 6>going in right now. They've been one of the best

1:00:04.640 --> 1:00:07.080
<v Speaker 6>three point shooting teams in the league, and that opened

1:00:07.080 --> 1:00:09.560
<v Speaker 6>things up for Rudy Gobert to just dunk inside whenever

1:00:09.600 --> 1:00:13.680
<v Speaker 6>he needs to. Mitchell was awesome, but afterwards it was

1:00:13.720 --> 1:00:16.760
<v Speaker 6>all about what people were saying about Donovan Mitchell as

1:00:16.800 --> 1:00:19.520
<v Speaker 6>tests went into on what you need to know earlier today,

1:00:19.920 --> 1:00:23.120
<v Speaker 6>just a completely unnecessary conversation. The man had twenty one

1:00:23.200 --> 1:00:25.000
<v Speaker 6>points in the first half and we're trying to decide

1:00:25.040 --> 1:00:26.360
<v Speaker 6>if he's going to be a top five player for

1:00:26.400 --> 1:00:28.880
<v Speaker 6>the rest of his career. Why literally why?

1:00:29.120 --> 1:00:31.240
<v Speaker 2>I think we'll We'll get to that probably and worse

1:00:31.320 --> 1:00:35.280
<v Speaker 2>of the week coming up here, Yah shack, it's the

1:00:35.320 --> 1:00:38.120
<v Speaker 2>post game with Donovan Mitchell. Crazy a good win from

1:00:38.120 --> 1:00:40.120
<v Speaker 2>the Jazz. Mike Conley, you're a defensive Player of the

1:00:40.160 --> 1:00:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Year candidate league after the game said, our ability to

1:00:43.160 --> 1:00:46.320
<v Speaker 2>turn up our energy level a couple of notches, especially defensively,

1:00:46.360 --> 1:00:47.960
<v Speaker 2>is making the difference. Because they did turn it up

1:00:47.960 --> 1:00:49.600
<v Speaker 2>in this game, and they have a couple times here

1:00:49.600 --> 1:00:51.800
<v Speaker 2>where they just like it's like suddenly just like you

1:00:51.800 --> 1:00:54.560
<v Speaker 2>can't score on them, and that helps out those huge runs.

1:00:54.560 --> 1:00:56.960
<v Speaker 4>So you know, the Pelly's putting out forty three in

1:00:56.960 --> 1:01:00.720
<v Speaker 4>that first Yeah, that's I mean, the Jazz almost wouldn't

1:01:00.720 --> 1:01:02.200
<v Speaker 4>give up that many more for the rest of the game,

1:01:02.280 --> 1:01:03.800
<v Speaker 4>you know, I mean when I really locked down. I mean,

1:01:03.800 --> 1:01:07.000
<v Speaker 4>the Repelicans have some offensive weapons, but their defense right

1:01:07.000 --> 1:01:08.360
<v Speaker 4>now is need some.

1:01:08.280 --> 1:01:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Work task, anything to add to this one.

1:01:11.240 --> 1:01:13.160
<v Speaker 3>The Pelicans got a lot of things to work on. Yeah,

1:01:13.160 --> 1:01:16.000
<v Speaker 3>they came back with a forty three point first quarter

1:01:16.040 --> 1:01:19.080
<v Speaker 3>because they played a baseball doubleheader. That happens game two.

1:01:19.840 --> 1:01:22.120
<v Speaker 3>It's just like a series. In a playoff series, Game two,

1:01:22.120 --> 1:01:25.160
<v Speaker 3>a team comes back, but man, Eric Blitzo and Lonzo

1:01:25.200 --> 1:01:27.400
<v Speaker 3>Ball stopped going to the rim after the first quarter,

1:01:27.880 --> 1:01:31.560
<v Speaker 3>and they've got some serious shooting problems. The Jazz know

1:01:31.600 --> 1:01:37.360
<v Speaker 3>who they are. The Pellies are still learning. So it's

1:01:37.760 --> 1:01:41.120
<v Speaker 3>tough in the Western Conference. Man, it's just tough. You

1:01:41.200 --> 1:01:44.880
<v Speaker 3>got a great Zion Williamson, but you need some guard.

1:01:44.880 --> 1:01:47.919
<v Speaker 2>Play final game from last night, RJ. Barrett scores twenty

1:01:47.920 --> 1:01:50.400
<v Speaker 2>eight as the Knicks beat the Warriors for their third

1:01:50.560 --> 1:01:54.200
<v Speaker 2>straight victory. Knicks are five hundred lately, eight and eight

1:01:54.240 --> 1:01:57.440
<v Speaker 2>here sixteen games in Again, RJ. Barrett's been cooking over

1:01:57.480 --> 1:01:59.560
<v Speaker 2>his last five He's averaging like twenty two points per game,

1:01:59.600 --> 1:02:02.120
<v Speaker 2>shooting really really well, what's your big take away from

1:02:02.120 --> 1:02:02.520
<v Speaker 2>this one?

1:02:02.720 --> 1:02:04.800
<v Speaker 4>So the Knicks r eight and eight. They've won three

1:02:04.960 --> 1:02:06.480
<v Speaker 4>in a row, they lost five in a row, and

1:02:06.480 --> 1:02:08.200
<v Speaker 4>now they've won three again. So they're a little bit

1:02:08.280 --> 1:02:11.440
<v Speaker 4>up and down, but their defense has improved clearly. Right now,

1:02:11.800 --> 1:02:14.680
<v Speaker 4>will that be the way the entire season? I'm not

1:02:14.720 --> 1:02:17.760
<v Speaker 4>so sure, but very very good so far. Two big

1:02:17.800 --> 1:02:20.040
<v Speaker 4>talking points though, really for this one. The first one,

1:02:20.440 --> 1:02:23.360
<v Speaker 4>Obi Toppin had two dunks, and the comparisons to how

1:02:23.400 --> 1:02:25.640
<v Speaker 4>he looks to a Muri Startama are just incredible. The

1:02:25.640 --> 1:02:27.400
<v Speaker 4>way that he goes up there dunks and then he

1:02:27.480 --> 1:02:29.320
<v Speaker 4>just the way he runs down he wears that number one.

1:02:29.400 --> 1:02:32.160
<v Speaker 4>It's like he does look like baby Amari out there.

1:02:32.560 --> 1:02:34.960
<v Speaker 4>But of course, the big talking point really is the

1:02:35.000 --> 1:02:38.400
<v Speaker 4>ejection of Draymond Green in the second quarter there for

1:02:38.760 --> 1:02:41.800
<v Speaker 4>yelling at his teammate James Wiseman, and the referee thought

1:02:41.800 --> 1:02:43.800
<v Speaker 4>he was yelling at him, hit him with his second

1:02:43.840 --> 1:02:46.520
<v Speaker 4>tea and he got ejected. Now the Warriors, obviously we're

1:02:46.560 --> 1:02:47.400
<v Speaker 4>not happy with that.

1:02:47.880 --> 1:02:48.880
<v Speaker 5>Steve Kerr tried.

1:02:48.720 --> 1:02:54.200
<v Speaker 4>To challenge the ejection, but then Steve Kerr said after

1:02:54.240 --> 1:02:57.720
<v Speaker 4>the game that the ref said, okay, that was a mistake. Yeah,

1:02:57.800 --> 1:03:00.760
<v Speaker 4>I didn't realize that. This is something I think the

1:03:00.840 --> 1:03:02.880
<v Speaker 4>NBA needs to look at, like when a guy gets

1:03:02.920 --> 1:03:04.680
<v Speaker 4>ejected and he's obviously out for the rest of the game.

1:03:04.680 --> 1:03:06.600
<v Speaker 4>But if then they admit at halftime they made the

1:03:06.640 --> 1:03:09.040
<v Speaker 4>mistake with a minute to go in that second half,

1:03:09.160 --> 1:03:12.120
<v Speaker 4>in the second quarter, why not say, okay, we rescind it,

1:03:12.200 --> 1:03:14.520
<v Speaker 4>we bring it back into the game. I mean, now,

1:03:14.680 --> 1:03:16.800
<v Speaker 4>Steve Kerr didn't use this as an excuse. He said

1:03:16.800 --> 1:03:18.800
<v Speaker 4>we were playing badly anyway. We lost that game. We

1:03:18.840 --> 1:03:21.080
<v Speaker 4>deserve to lose. He didn't say we lost because of

1:03:21.120 --> 1:03:24.240
<v Speaker 4>the ejection or point at the rest. But it's so

1:03:24.520 --> 1:03:26.680
<v Speaker 4>disappointing to me that the rest can make such a

1:03:26.720 --> 1:03:28.959
<v Speaker 4>mistake that can have such an impact on a game

1:03:29.680 --> 1:03:31.280
<v Speaker 4>and not be able to correct it even when they

1:03:31.320 --> 1:03:33.480
<v Speaker 4>acknowledge it, with still time to be able to correct

1:03:33.480 --> 1:03:37.320
<v Speaker 4>that mistake, because we you know, with coaches challenges and

1:03:37.360 --> 1:03:39.680
<v Speaker 4>in the last two minutes, you can challenge things and

1:03:39.720 --> 1:03:41.840
<v Speaker 4>you can get the call right. Well, this would have

1:03:41.840 --> 1:03:44.240
<v Speaker 4>only cost him just over a minute. Why not just

1:03:44.280 --> 1:03:45.920
<v Speaker 4>put your hand up and say okay, yeah, we got

1:03:45.960 --> 1:03:48.240
<v Speaker 4>that wrong. Sorry, it was a young referee too, so

1:03:49.760 --> 1:03:52.320
<v Speaker 4>that's just a bit of a concern. Again, the Warriors

1:03:52.400 --> 1:03:54.280
<v Speaker 4>aren't using this as an excuse for losing the game,

1:03:54.320 --> 1:03:56.560
<v Speaker 4>but I think there's a way to get this call

1:03:56.720 --> 1:03:59.880
<v Speaker 4>right and to sort of acknowledge that the referees made

1:04:00.080 --> 1:04:01.360
<v Speaker 4>a wrong, costly decision.

1:04:02.040 --> 1:04:05.200
<v Speaker 3>But it was fun to watch, especially in an empty

1:04:05.240 --> 1:04:08.240
<v Speaker 3>arena where you can always hear Draymond Green talk, but

1:04:08.320 --> 1:04:11.080
<v Speaker 3>in an empty arena, it was bouncing off the walls

1:04:11.200 --> 1:04:13.920
<v Speaker 3>like many people in their zoom rooms right now. It

1:04:14.000 --> 1:04:16.200
<v Speaker 3>was just it was echoing, like I turned up the

1:04:16.240 --> 1:04:18.080
<v Speaker 3>volume to make sure I heard what I heard, Like

1:04:18.120 --> 1:04:22.280
<v Speaker 3>he's he yelled at James Wiseman is pissed that Wiseman

1:04:22.280 --> 1:04:25.320
<v Speaker 3>didn't seal off his defender and he turned the ball

1:04:25.360 --> 1:04:27.920
<v Speaker 3>over and it looked like, yeah, he was yelling in

1:04:27.960 --> 1:04:30.680
<v Speaker 3>the direction of Wiseman, but the ref was right there.

1:04:30.880 --> 1:04:32.960
<v Speaker 3>That was weird. It was. It was It was so

1:04:32.960 --> 1:04:36.000
<v Speaker 3>so strange, like the referee must have known, like Steph,

1:04:36.640 --> 1:04:37.200
<v Speaker 3>like they.

1:04:37.280 --> 1:04:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, everyone was like, he wasn't yelling at you, like everybody,

1:04:41.920 --> 1:04:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Here's what I think what you're saying is a little

1:04:43.720 --> 1:04:47.040
<v Speaker 2>extremely Like they admitted the mistake at halftime. The better

1:04:47.320 --> 1:04:49.080
<v Speaker 2>like way to handle that, I think would have been

1:04:49.160 --> 1:04:51.960
<v Speaker 2>for the referees just to come together there and sort

1:04:52.000 --> 1:04:54.160
<v Speaker 2>of talk it out and go, Yeah, Draymond Green never

1:04:54.160 --> 1:04:56.760
<v Speaker 2>shuts up. He's always yelling at people. I don't think

1:04:56.760 --> 1:04:58.880
<v Speaker 2>he you know, was he yelling at you?

1:04:58.880 --> 1:04:59.080
<v Speaker 3>You know?

1:04:59.600 --> 1:05:01.040
<v Speaker 2>I think it was John Butler, I think was the

1:05:01.040 --> 1:05:03.320
<v Speaker 2>official that actually tossed him, a second year official like,

1:05:03.560 --> 1:05:05.760
<v Speaker 2>and he maybe would have been like a maybe he wasn't,

1:05:05.800 --> 1:05:08.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, Like, I think they just should have maybe

1:05:08.320 --> 1:05:10.280
<v Speaker 2>talked it over a little bit more and said, Okay,

1:05:10.600 --> 1:05:13.439
<v Speaker 2>that was a mistake, you're good, let's just play ball here.

1:05:13.560 --> 1:05:16.640
<v Speaker 2>In my opinion, But you know, at the same time,

1:05:17.280 --> 1:05:19.640
<v Speaker 2>if Draymond doesn't pick up his first technical for just

1:05:19.960 --> 1:05:22.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, arguing with the officials too long, that was

1:05:22.160 --> 1:05:24.000
<v Speaker 2>what the first one was for, right, It wasn't because

1:05:24.040 --> 1:05:25.760
<v Speaker 2>he was yelling at someone else on the floor, on

1:05:25.760 --> 1:05:28.320
<v Speaker 2>one of his teammates. You know, Well, that's sort of

1:05:28.360 --> 1:05:30.040
<v Speaker 2>the game you're playing here. With the way you go

1:05:30.120 --> 1:05:32.600
<v Speaker 2>about it, you might accidentally get one and then you've

1:05:32.640 --> 1:05:35.240
<v Speaker 2>really hurt your team. So I think they should have

1:05:35.280 --> 1:05:38.520
<v Speaker 2>just got together though, and really with reasoning, said Okay, Yeah,

1:05:38.560 --> 1:05:41.040
<v Speaker 2>he wasn't yelling at me. He's yelling at James Wiseman,

1:05:41.040 --> 1:05:42.160
<v Speaker 2>who he's always yelling at.

1:05:42.480 --> 1:05:42.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:05:42.920 --> 1:05:45.760
<v Speaker 5>I mean we see it though as well. They almost never.

1:05:45.840 --> 1:05:48.960
<v Speaker 4>I don't think rescind a technical fail even when sometimes

1:05:49.000 --> 1:05:51.720
<v Speaker 4>you've seen a bad goal, a player will say, hey,

1:05:51.720 --> 1:05:54.080
<v Speaker 4>that's a bad call, the repay, the replay will clearly

1:05:54.080 --> 1:05:57.080
<v Speaker 4>show a bad coal and the referee will still give

1:05:57.120 --> 1:05:58.800
<v Speaker 4>you a technical foul for that, and it's like, well

1:05:58.920 --> 1:06:00.919
<v Speaker 4>that should be rescinded to in that case as well.

1:06:01.160 --> 1:06:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I can I give you a technical foul though

1:06:03.760 --> 1:06:06.560
<v Speaker 2>if you just like use vulgar language, even if it's

1:06:06.600 --> 1:06:09.160
<v Speaker 2>not directed at me, can that be considered unspontsedly?

1:06:09.800 --> 1:06:12.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you see, Kelly you break getting a technical

1:06:12.000 --> 1:06:13.520
<v Speaker 4>foul for blowing a kiss to his opponent.

1:06:13.880 --> 1:06:16.000
<v Speaker 2>So I would want it, Yeah, I would see Yeah,

1:06:16.080 --> 1:06:18.360
<v Speaker 2>if you really want to. You think that's on sports alike?

1:06:18.440 --> 1:06:20.880
<v Speaker 4>Sure, but it's one thing, you know, Jeff van Gundy

1:06:20.960 --> 1:06:23.000
<v Speaker 4>complains a lot about everything, but that's one thing he's

1:06:23.080 --> 1:06:26.520
<v Speaker 4>right on, is like you you compound the mistake if

1:06:26.520 --> 1:06:28.360
<v Speaker 4>you give a guy a technical foul for when you

1:06:28.440 --> 1:06:30.920
<v Speaker 4>made a bad or wrong call that was clearly wrong.

1:06:31.280 --> 1:06:33.240
<v Speaker 4>I think that's something the NBA should be able to

1:06:33.240 --> 1:06:36.040
<v Speaker 4>at least say, Okay, yeah, we made the mistake. The

1:06:36.040 --> 1:06:38.560
<v Speaker 4>referees made the mistake. It's okay to admit that rather than,

1:06:38.960 --> 1:06:41.000
<v Speaker 4>like I said, in this case last night, the referees

1:06:41.000 --> 1:06:43.400
<v Speaker 4>got it wrong and it cost Draymon half a game.

1:06:44.120 --> 1:06:46.000
<v Speaker 4>So I think you can I think there is middle

1:06:46.000 --> 1:06:47.800
<v Speaker 4>ground here where you can fix a problem like that.

1:06:48.400 --> 1:06:51.920
<v Speaker 3>Also, the next are good. Yeah, just throw that in there.

1:06:52.080 --> 1:06:53.680
<v Speaker 2>I think a Draymond Green plays in this game, the

1:06:53.720 --> 1:06:54.720
<v Speaker 2>next still might win this one.

1:06:54.800 --> 1:06:57.520
<v Speaker 4>We probably do. And again that's Steve Kerr didn't say

1:06:57.560 --> 1:06:59.680
<v Speaker 4>we lost because of that. So with no one's no

1:06:59.720 --> 1:07:02.240
<v Speaker 4>one's giving disrespect to the Knicks. They played a great game,

1:07:02.720 --> 1:07:05.800
<v Speaker 4>but you know a guy got sent out for half

1:07:05.880 --> 1:07:07.680
<v Speaker 4>the game and the second best player on the team

1:07:08.000 --> 1:07:08.880
<v Speaker 4>over the wrong call.

1:07:09.240 --> 1:07:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Mm hmm yeah, anything to add here, uh, Trey, I

1:07:12.520 --> 1:07:16.440
<v Speaker 2>hate referees, Yeah, Raymond, get him out of here.

1:07:16.480 --> 1:07:19.080
<v Speaker 6>But there are guys who get reputation technicals. And that's

1:07:19.120 --> 1:07:21.680
<v Speaker 6>exactly what this was. Was Draymond. He was yelling like

1:07:21.800 --> 1:07:23.440
<v Speaker 6>task was breaking down on what you need to know.

1:07:23.560 --> 1:07:25.400
<v Speaker 6>Was he yelling at Tom Thibodeau? It did look like

1:07:25.440 --> 1:07:28.200
<v Speaker 6>maybe they were gonna throw down. But yeah, I mean

1:07:28.200 --> 1:07:30.960
<v Speaker 6>we've seen it happen with Boogie before. Even when Draymond

1:07:32.040 --> 1:07:35.400
<v Speaker 6>was suspended for a game after the Steven Adams nutkick,

1:07:35.640 --> 1:07:38.080
<v Speaker 6>the only reason he actually was suspended was because he

1:07:38.120 --> 1:07:41.880
<v Speaker 6>picked up that crazy technical or flagrant with Michael Beasley

1:07:41.880 --> 1:07:43.720
<v Speaker 6>in the first round against the Rockets. Remember, like he

1:07:43.720 --> 1:07:45.680
<v Speaker 6>threw him at the end of the game for literally

1:07:45.720 --> 1:07:48.200
<v Speaker 6>no reason. It just comes back to haunt you eventually.

1:07:48.240 --> 1:07:52.880
<v Speaker 6>But relax, James Butler, I don't like knowen referee Jons.

1:07:52.880 --> 1:07:55.960
<v Speaker 6>I didn't even John Butler. Oh James Butler is Jimmy

1:07:55.960 --> 1:08:00.360
<v Speaker 6>Butler's brother. Yeah, but John Butler get out of here, man,

1:08:00.560 --> 1:08:02.840
<v Speaker 6>Just chill out out. You're right, Skeates, have a little conversation.

1:08:02.960 --> 1:08:04.960
<v Speaker 6>Talk to the Hey, were you yelling at me? No,

1:08:05.040 --> 1:08:07.840
<v Speaker 6>I was yelling at James. Fine, carry on, Yeah.

1:08:07.960 --> 1:08:11.560
<v Speaker 2>Because like Tat said, like everybody on the floor, like immediately,

1:08:11.640 --> 1:08:13.520
<v Speaker 2>like he wasn't yelling at you, like Steph Curry, the

1:08:13.600 --> 1:08:15.160
<v Speaker 2>voice of reason. I mean, I know it's his teammate,

1:08:15.200 --> 1:08:16.800
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna want to keephim out there, but even in Steph,

1:08:16.840 --> 1:08:19.040
<v Speaker 2>it's like I feel like he's a trustworthy guy. I

1:08:19.080 --> 1:08:21.599
<v Speaker 2>think if Steph had seen Draymond actually yell. I got

1:08:21.640 --> 1:08:23.960
<v Speaker 2>John Butler, He's like, you idiot, what are you doing? Like,

1:08:24.000 --> 1:08:25.840
<v Speaker 2>just shut up, you already got one tech but he

1:08:25.880 --> 1:08:27.719
<v Speaker 2>was like, no, he wasn't yelling at you. He's yelling

1:08:27.720 --> 1:08:30.400
<v Speaker 2>at the rookie man. This is what he does. I

1:08:30.400 --> 1:08:32.160
<v Speaker 2>do have a trivia question off of this, the real

1:08:32.280 --> 1:08:36.960
<v Speaker 2>quick one. Green's eleventh career ejection. Okay, guys, for the

1:08:37.000 --> 1:08:39.240
<v Speaker 2>third most in the NBA since he made his debut

1:08:39.280 --> 1:08:42.320
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twelve. Can you name the two guys who

1:08:42.400 --> 1:08:46.400
<v Speaker 2>have more ejections since twenty twelve during that span Boogie

1:08:46.880 --> 1:08:49.599
<v Speaker 2>Boogie Cousins. Yeah, Trey already threw him in there before

1:08:49.600 --> 1:08:51.439
<v Speaker 2>I even asked the question. It was fantastic. He's number

1:08:51.439 --> 1:08:53.240
<v Speaker 2>one with thirteen and this guy's got twelve.

1:08:53.320 --> 1:08:55.600
<v Speaker 4>You can get dwy Dwight Howard No, no, no, no,

1:08:55.760 --> 1:08:57.280
<v Speaker 4>Westbrook Nope.

1:08:57.560 --> 1:08:59.080
<v Speaker 6>I know he's always high on technicals.

1:08:59.240 --> 1:09:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, technically is an ejection? Pat Beverly Nope, Nope. He's

1:09:04.720 --> 1:09:06.519
<v Speaker 2>a bigger guy. You know, he's like a power forward guy,

1:09:06.520 --> 1:09:10.799
<v Speaker 2>small forward, power forward, and well there's I mean, maybe

1:09:11.240 --> 1:09:12.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to give it away too much. Well,

1:09:12.720 --> 1:09:14.559
<v Speaker 2>let's just say there's basically two of them.

1:09:14.880 --> 1:09:18.720
<v Speaker 3>Oh Mars Mars Mars, Marris.

1:09:18.479 --> 1:09:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Yea or Kith Morris. So twelve cousins with thirteen and

1:09:21.320 --> 1:09:23.960
<v Speaker 2>that was Green's eleventh career rejection. I'm not sure if

1:09:24.000 --> 1:09:25.960
<v Speaker 2>that counts the playoffs though, so who knows. All right,

1:09:26.040 --> 1:09:28.240
<v Speaker 2>final piece of news here, just quick. Calves have agreed

1:09:28.240 --> 1:09:30.360
<v Speaker 2>to trade Kevin Porter Junior to the Houston Rockets for

1:09:30.400 --> 1:09:34.320
<v Speaker 2>a heavily protected future second round pick. I mean heavily protected.

1:09:34.320 --> 1:09:38.120
<v Speaker 2>It's like top fifty five protected, meaning that it probably

1:09:38.160 --> 1:09:40.759
<v Speaker 2>will never even convey. So it was sort of for nothing,

1:09:40.800 --> 1:09:42.600
<v Speaker 2>but that's fine. We knew the Caves were moving on

1:09:42.600 --> 1:09:44.400
<v Speaker 2>from him, they were gonna wave them or trade them,

1:09:44.400 --> 1:09:47.000
<v Speaker 2>and they got maybe something, you know, a pick in

1:09:47.040 --> 1:09:49.719
<v Speaker 2>the second round at the end, possibly, But this is good.

1:09:50.920 --> 1:09:53.000
<v Speaker 2>I like the team that Kevin Porter Junior is going

1:09:53.000 --> 1:09:55.840
<v Speaker 2>to here. I know others have pointed this out. The

1:09:55.920 --> 1:09:59.439
<v Speaker 2>Rockets intend to have assistant coach John Lucas work closely

1:09:59.479 --> 1:10:02.160
<v Speaker 2>with this kid, and that's good because Lucas has helped

1:10:02.240 --> 1:10:05.960
<v Speaker 2>several NBA some NFL players to overcome personal issues to

1:10:06.000 --> 1:10:10.240
<v Speaker 2>have successful careers. You know, he did so himself, John Lucas,

1:10:10.240 --> 1:10:11.960
<v Speaker 2>so he you know, speaks from my experience here. So

1:10:12.000 --> 1:10:14.759
<v Speaker 2>I like that that makes sense, and like, why wouldn't

1:10:14.760 --> 1:10:16.120
<v Speaker 2>you do this if you're the Rockets. I think this

1:10:16.280 --> 1:10:20.000
<v Speaker 2>is like fantastic for them potentially if Kevin Porter Junior

1:10:20.040 --> 1:10:22.879
<v Speaker 2>can get everything else, not really even the basketball skills

1:10:23.439 --> 1:10:25.080
<v Speaker 2>in check. I don't know if there's anything to add

1:10:25.120 --> 1:10:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Lelee or not in your head. I feel like you

1:10:26.600 --> 1:10:32.519
<v Speaker 2>feel the same way. Yes, okay, let's get to worst

1:10:32.680 --> 1:10:34.240
<v Speaker 2>of the week, ladies.

1:10:33.880 --> 1:10:43.760
<v Speaker 3>And gentlemen, the worst of the week, all right. I

1:10:43.800 --> 1:10:46.880
<v Speaker 3>asked the people out there, what do you got for me?

1:10:47.160 --> 1:10:49.599
<v Speaker 3>Some great answers this week? For worse of the Week.

1:10:49.600 --> 1:10:52.760
<v Speaker 3>I'll fire through some of the answers that people gave

1:10:52.840 --> 1:10:56.240
<v Speaker 3>to me. Nook No further wrote Kyrie's showing up to

1:10:56.240 --> 1:10:58.559
<v Speaker 3>play against the Kas and getting roasted by a gentleman

1:10:58.600 --> 1:11:03.639
<v Speaker 3>with the last name of Sex wearing his old Calves number. Well,

1:11:03.720 --> 1:11:05.559
<v Speaker 3>Kyrie did have a pretty good game himself. He had

1:11:05.600 --> 1:11:08.080
<v Speaker 3>thirty seven in that game. But I take your point.

1:11:08.160 --> 1:11:11.360
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for your contribution. The life of Kate w

1:11:11.360 --> 1:11:15.840
<v Speaker 3>Writ's task for calling the YouTube fans here stream team

1:11:16.120 --> 1:11:19.120
<v Speaker 3>rather than team stream Oh no, I'm sorry. I'm sorry

1:11:19.120 --> 1:11:21.320
<v Speaker 3>I called him team Stream rather see I always mix

1:11:21.400 --> 1:11:24.600
<v Speaker 3>that up. I always mix that. Okay, yeah it's the

1:11:24.640 --> 1:11:27.639
<v Speaker 3>Stream team, but I always I always can. It's just

1:11:27.880 --> 1:11:32.240
<v Speaker 3>that's just how my brain works. Meg Z rights Lee

1:11:32.320 --> 1:11:38.400
<v Speaker 3>Ellis's chest hair. Yeah we showed this photo. Yeah, come on, yeah,

1:11:38.560 --> 1:11:41.160
<v Speaker 3>you know there it is. Wow. What a zoom in, JD.

1:11:41.320 --> 1:11:44.120
<v Speaker 3>What a zoom in to Lee's chester. That's a photo

1:11:44.200 --> 1:11:46.719
<v Speaker 3>of him. Check our social media pages if you haven't

1:11:46.760 --> 1:11:49.360
<v Speaker 3>seen him attending the US Open in two thousand and one.

1:11:49.640 --> 1:11:51.160
<v Speaker 3>And the linen was that Italy two?

1:11:51.400 --> 1:11:52.679
<v Speaker 5>I think it was two thousand and two.

1:11:52.720 --> 1:11:54.920
<v Speaker 3>Wow, you had trim on that linen shirt too. It's

1:11:54.920 --> 1:11:57.720
<v Speaker 3>not just like a flowing shirt. It looks like, yeah,

1:11:57.720 --> 1:11:59.439
<v Speaker 3>there's a detail on that thing.

1:12:00.040 --> 1:12:02.960
<v Speaker 5>Wow, it was a very comfortable.

1:12:03.000 --> 1:12:03.960
<v Speaker 4>Shit, I will say that.

1:12:05.720 --> 1:12:06.639
<v Speaker 2>Barely relaxed.

1:12:08.400 --> 1:12:11.639
<v Speaker 3>John Ford ninety nine chimed in with a basketball one. Again,

1:12:12.280 --> 1:12:17.040
<v Speaker 3>it's the Timberwolves. That's a fair point. Walker Davidson chimed

1:12:17.080 --> 1:12:20.040
<v Speaker 3>in five game losing streak. The Kangs are back, baby,

1:12:21.760 --> 1:12:24.400
<v Speaker 3>This one was a great one. Romantic to the reporter

1:12:24.520 --> 1:12:29.000
<v Speaker 3>who called Steph Wardell, you know there's a reporter who said,

1:12:29.120 --> 1:12:31.640
<v Speaker 3>excuse me, Wardell, what do you think about that? In

1:12:31.680 --> 1:12:33.800
<v Speaker 3>the end, Steph looks up. If you haven't seen the clip,

1:12:33.800 --> 1:12:35.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure we'll get into whoopsies next week. Check out

1:12:35.800 --> 1:12:39.360
<v Speaker 3>our YouTube channel, because you know it's timeless. I don't

1:12:39.360 --> 1:12:41.519
<v Speaker 3>even know when it happened, but YouTube videos you can

1:12:41.640 --> 1:12:45.360
<v Speaker 3>PLoP in a video from whenever who cares. A referee

1:12:45.360 --> 1:12:47.519
<v Speaker 3>called him Mordell. He wasn't angry or anything. He was

1:12:47.640 --> 1:12:53.360
<v Speaker 3>just a little bit shocked. This gentleman here only here

1:12:53.479 --> 1:12:58.160
<v Speaker 3>for move One writes Lee's claim that Facundo Compozo's pass

1:12:58.400 --> 1:13:01.880
<v Speaker 3>the pooper pass, was the best play of the season. Now,

1:13:02.640 --> 1:13:05.080
<v Speaker 3>did I miss it or was this called the pooper pass?

1:13:05.080 --> 1:13:07.760
<v Speaker 3>Because I think he called it. That's a great that's

1:13:07.800 --> 1:13:10.000
<v Speaker 3>a great name. That's why. That's the only reason I

1:13:10.040 --> 1:13:12.120
<v Speaker 3>included it. Because the pooper pass. He dropped it through

1:13:12.160 --> 1:13:14.880
<v Speaker 3>his own legs. It's a very good name for a pass.

1:13:15.479 --> 1:13:18.360
<v Speaker 3>Anybody who drops a pass between his own legs, pooper pass,

1:13:18.360 --> 1:13:22.960
<v Speaker 3>that's great stuff. Mohammed Hassan writes the heat announcer Eric Reed,

1:13:23.240 --> 1:13:27.679
<v Speaker 3>calling Weggie a doink. Yeah. I didn't get to chime

1:13:27.720 --> 1:13:29.559
<v Speaker 3>in with you guys on this one, and this is

1:13:29.640 --> 1:13:32.400
<v Speaker 3>really near and dear to my soul. I'm not so

1:13:32.439 --> 1:13:35.320
<v Speaker 3>mad at Eric Reed like you guys are. He's an

1:13:35.360 --> 1:13:38.760
<v Speaker 3>old head. We've watched basketball for a long time. A

1:13:38.760 --> 1:13:41.080
<v Speaker 3>lot of old heads called some weird names. Eric Reed

1:13:41.160 --> 1:13:44.760
<v Speaker 3>called it a doink. There was a Jim Sparnacle called

1:13:44.760 --> 1:13:46.840
<v Speaker 3>it a Spinarkle called it what do you call it?

1:13:47.000 --> 1:13:51.599
<v Speaker 3>Neck ball? And Ralph Ralph Lawler, Clippers, longtime Clippers man,

1:13:52.160 --> 1:13:54.720
<v Speaker 3>he called it weggie. Now Eric Reed just doesn't know

1:13:54.800 --> 1:13:59.160
<v Speaker 3>that Ralph Lawler's weggie call has been popularized and now

1:13:59.320 --> 1:14:01.440
<v Speaker 3>you don't call it anything but weggie.

1:14:01.520 --> 1:14:02.920
<v Speaker 5>But Eric Read's an old head.

1:14:03.000 --> 1:14:03.200
<v Speaker 6>You know.

1:14:03.360 --> 1:14:06.880
<v Speaker 3>He likes numbers like Lee Ellis. He likes saying Hassan

1:14:06.920 --> 1:14:09.519
<v Speaker 3>Whiteside just came down with his thirteenth rebound that season.

1:14:09.600 --> 1:14:12.880
<v Speaker 3>This gives him forty thousand rebounds. You know he sees

1:14:12.920 --> 1:14:15.080
<v Speaker 3>just an old head. That's okay. I'm okay with it, guys.

1:14:15.080 --> 1:14:17.080
<v Speaker 3>I know you're angry. I'm not okay.

1:14:17.320 --> 1:14:19.760
<v Speaker 2>He should know, first off, is a weggie, and then

1:14:19.960 --> 1:14:22.200
<v Speaker 2>on top of that, the doink makes no sense. As

1:14:22.240 --> 1:14:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Trey pointed out, a doink does not stick anoint. That's

1:14:28.760 --> 1:14:30.000
<v Speaker 2>you're you're spot on with that TK.

1:14:30.080 --> 1:14:30.599
<v Speaker 3>But that's fine.

1:14:30.640 --> 1:14:35.040
<v Speaker 2>That's fine. I believe though the next weggie called by

1:14:35.120 --> 1:14:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Eric Reed will be called a weggie. I have faith,

1:14:38.000 --> 1:14:38.280
<v Speaker 2>I do.

1:14:39.080 --> 1:14:42.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So some some really good nominees. The Timberwolves a

1:14:42.160 --> 1:14:44.679
<v Speaker 3>great one. They're they're falling apart, especially with Karl Anthony

1:14:44.720 --> 1:14:47.760
<v Speaker 3>Towns contracting the virus. I hope he gets well, Eric Reed, sure,

1:14:47.880 --> 1:14:51.920
<v Speaker 3>Leelis's hair. Sure, but we got a late nominee here.

1:14:52.040 --> 1:14:55.519
<v Speaker 3>Thursday night, we briefly mentioned it. Shaquille O'Neill and Donovan

1:14:55.520 --> 1:14:57.920
<v Speaker 3>Mitchell had a conversation, if that's what you want to

1:14:57.960 --> 1:15:01.960
<v Speaker 3>call it, after Donovan Mitchell's great game. Let's have a listen.

1:15:02.680 --> 1:15:06.200
<v Speaker 7>Part of this is shaq I said tonight that you

1:15:06.280 --> 1:15:08.280
<v Speaker 7>are one of my favorite players, but you don't have

1:15:08.360 --> 1:15:09.960
<v Speaker 7>what it takes to get to the next level.

1:15:09.960 --> 1:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I set it on purpose.

1:15:10.920 --> 1:15:11.840
<v Speaker 2>I want you to hear it.

1:15:12.160 --> 1:15:13.360
<v Speaker 3>What do you have to say about that?

1:15:16.439 --> 1:15:19.200
<v Speaker 2>That's it, that's it, that's it.

1:15:19.960 --> 1:15:22.240
<v Speaker 7>Okay, cool, I want you to hear it.

1:15:22.240 --> 1:15:22.640
<v Speaker 3>I've been here.

1:15:23.120 --> 1:15:24.439
<v Speaker 2>I've been hearing that since my rookie year.

1:15:24.439 --> 1:15:26.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, I'm just gonna get better than would I do?

1:15:26.400 --> 1:15:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Good?

1:15:27.479 --> 1:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's what I wanted you to hearing you say

1:15:29.400 --> 1:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>another garing brother, keep.

1:15:30.720 --> 1:15:34.920
<v Speaker 3>It up, appreciated. Now everyone was angry. We'll get your

1:15:34.960 --> 1:15:38.559
<v Speaker 3>opinion in a set. Guys. Everybody on Twitter was extremely angry.

1:15:38.600 --> 1:15:41.320
<v Speaker 3>Shaquille O'Neil should not be saying that to Donovan Mitchell.

1:15:41.680 --> 1:15:44.799
<v Speaker 3>But if you listen, Donvan Mitchell is actually listening intently

1:15:45.040 --> 1:15:48.960
<v Speaker 3>because he respects Shaquille O'Neil. He's saying, Okay, thank you, Yes,

1:15:49.000 --> 1:15:51.400
<v Speaker 3>I appreciate that. I mean, he's he's like, I've heard

1:15:51.439 --> 1:15:53.200
<v Speaker 3>that crap before, I don't need to hear it again.

1:15:53.479 --> 1:15:55.640
<v Speaker 3>I think where this comes from, where the problem comes from,

1:15:55.760 --> 1:16:00.160
<v Speaker 3>is the bigger issue of NBA analysts not supporting and

1:16:00.200 --> 1:16:02.759
<v Speaker 3>loving the game and just sort of being angry about

1:16:02.960 --> 1:16:06.639
<v Speaker 3>having to watch basketball and all that. Because if Shaq

1:16:06.720 --> 1:16:11.360
<v Speaker 3>calls somebody out and you trust his opinion and he

1:16:11.880 --> 1:16:15.519
<v Speaker 3>gives a crap about his job every day, then this

1:16:15.600 --> 1:16:18.559
<v Speaker 3>is just his method of trying to inspire to motivate

1:16:18.600 --> 1:16:21.439
<v Speaker 3>a player. That's he's a tough he's I think this

1:16:21.520 --> 1:16:23.960
<v Speaker 3>is his dad method, this is his come on kid,

1:16:24.120 --> 1:16:26.960
<v Speaker 3>this is his tough love method. But when it's combined

1:16:27.479 --> 1:16:30.080
<v Speaker 3>with the fact that you know he's not into the

1:16:30.479 --> 1:16:33.240
<v Speaker 3>job at all times. He just kind of, you know

1:16:33.240 --> 1:16:35.000
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't watch the game at all times, and it's

1:16:35.000 --> 1:16:39.680
<v Speaker 3>sort of just it's a it's a trait characteristic of

1:16:40.280 --> 1:16:43.960
<v Speaker 3>many NBA broadcasts right now, and and just throughout every

1:16:44.040 --> 1:16:46.280
<v Speaker 3>sort of legend, and not every legend, but a lot

1:16:46.280 --> 1:16:48.400
<v Speaker 3>of the legend. It's just a common thing right now

1:16:48.439 --> 1:16:51.559
<v Speaker 3>that some guys are just angry. It's already come up

1:16:51.600 --> 1:16:53.960
<v Speaker 3>on this broadcast, you know, Jeff Van Gundy, like, people

1:16:54.920 --> 1:16:58.639
<v Speaker 3>just aren't all that, you know, supportive and chummy about

1:16:58.640 --> 1:17:03.920
<v Speaker 3>the game. So those two things combined got people really angry.

1:17:03.960 --> 1:17:06.800
<v Speaker 3>But I think if Shaq was, you know, do that

1:17:06.880 --> 1:17:09.400
<v Speaker 3>other part of his job really well, I think this

1:17:09.439 --> 1:17:12.280
<v Speaker 3>would have been taken a little bit differently. That's all

1:17:12.280 --> 1:17:13.320
<v Speaker 3>I got to say about that.

1:17:13.800 --> 1:17:16.719
<v Speaker 2>It was awkward as hell. Yeah, Wait, what did Shack

1:17:16.840 --> 1:17:19.040
<v Speaker 2>want him to say back? Is what I want to know, Like,

1:17:19.080 --> 1:17:20.719
<v Speaker 2>what would have like been a good response.

1:17:20.800 --> 1:17:23.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, he said that's what I wanted to hear. Yeah,

1:17:23.840 --> 1:17:26.360
<v Speaker 3>he said, go work on your game, kid, and he said,

1:17:26.400 --> 1:17:28.280
<v Speaker 3>I on my game.

1:17:28.400 --> 1:17:31.320
<v Speaker 2>It was ridiculous. I mean, he's Donovan Mitchell. Kudos to

1:17:31.400 --> 1:17:34.840
<v Speaker 2>him for being a professional. He should have said cough, like,

1:17:35.040 --> 1:17:36.599
<v Speaker 2>and I know he doesn't. I'm sure you respect Shack

1:17:36.640 --> 1:17:39.240
<v Speaker 2>because he's an al timer, but like, cough, I what

1:17:39.360 --> 1:17:41.920
<v Speaker 2>a weird thing to say. I trashed you on national

1:17:41.960 --> 1:17:44.160
<v Speaker 2>TV at the half, then I'm going to trash you

1:17:44.240 --> 1:17:46.880
<v Speaker 2>basically to your face just by having a great game

1:17:46.960 --> 1:17:50.000
<v Speaker 2>in a win, because I want to inspire you to

1:17:50.040 --> 1:17:50.479
<v Speaker 2>be better.

1:17:51.080 --> 1:17:53.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he just worded it. He worded it ron He

1:17:53.200 --> 1:17:55.160
<v Speaker 3>was saying, hey, you're a good player. He said, you're

1:17:55.200 --> 1:17:57.400
<v Speaker 3>a really good player. I want you to be better.

1:17:57.840 --> 1:18:00.280
<v Speaker 3>He should have said it that way, right, Yeah, Kenny's.

1:18:00.280 --> 1:18:03.160
<v Speaker 6>It over right after Kenny was explained what Shaq was

1:18:03.200 --> 1:18:04.960
<v Speaker 6>trying to get at it. Kenny explained it in a

1:18:05.000 --> 1:18:08.400
<v Speaker 6>way that was constructive and supportive, rather than Shaq, who,

1:18:08.439 --> 1:18:10.800
<v Speaker 6>as Task called it, was curmudgeoning out there. And that's

1:18:10.840 --> 1:18:14.519
<v Speaker 6>exactly what it is. He at the half. Donovan Mitchell

1:18:14.680 --> 1:18:16.920
<v Speaker 6>is having has a twenty one point game. He has

1:18:16.960 --> 1:18:18.720
<v Speaker 6>a twenty one point game. He's in the midst of

1:18:18.760 --> 1:18:21.599
<v Speaker 6>his best season. The Jazz are on a winning streak.

1:18:21.600 --> 1:18:23.840
<v Speaker 6>It's not dissimilar to when Draymond Green in the midst

1:18:23.880 --> 1:18:26.200
<v Speaker 6>of the best Suns basketball we've seen, and said we

1:18:26.280 --> 1:18:28.200
<v Speaker 6>got to get Devin Booker out of there. We got

1:18:28.200 --> 1:18:31.000
<v Speaker 6>to get him away from Phoenix. It's like, no, there

1:18:31.000 --> 1:18:33.360
<v Speaker 6>are ways that you can be constructive. There are ways

1:18:33.360 --> 1:18:35.840
<v Speaker 6>that you can help people besides just hating on him.

1:18:35.840 --> 1:18:38.840
<v Speaker 6>Get that pure positivity training shack is what I'm saying.

1:18:38.840 --> 1:18:41.439
<v Speaker 6>But honestly, think about the way Kobe Bryant was doing

1:18:41.520 --> 1:18:46.599
<v Speaker 6>things before he passed away about a year ago. He

1:18:46.680 --> 1:18:48.599
<v Speaker 6>was challenging players. He was saying, here's how you can

1:18:48.640 --> 1:18:50.760
<v Speaker 6>become the best version of yourself. Here's how you can

1:18:50.800 --> 1:18:53.200
<v Speaker 6>become an MVP. He's doing it for people outside of

1:18:53.200 --> 1:18:55.559
<v Speaker 6>the basketball world as well. He's building them up and saying,

1:18:55.720 --> 1:18:58.000
<v Speaker 6>here's where you can approve. Not saying you just had

1:18:58.000 --> 1:18:59.719
<v Speaker 6>twenty one points during in the midst of your best season,

1:18:59.720 --> 1:19:00.960
<v Speaker 6>But are you're going to be a top five player

1:19:01.040 --> 1:19:04.160
<v Speaker 6>that wins championships? That doesn't even make sense, Like us

1:19:04.200 --> 1:19:07.200
<v Speaker 6>listening to half of a podcast and being like, this

1:19:07.280 --> 1:19:09.840
<v Speaker 6>podcast isn't as good as our podcast. Sorry, not listen

1:19:09.880 --> 1:19:13.080
<v Speaker 6>to it anymore. Might as well deleted off iTunes. It's ridiculous.

1:19:13.160 --> 1:19:15.840
<v Speaker 2>It's just weird all around. Leally, what did you think

1:19:15.840 --> 1:19:16.720
<v Speaker 2>of this exchange?

1:19:16.840 --> 1:19:17.120
<v Speaker 5>Well?

1:19:17.960 --> 1:19:19.400
<v Speaker 4>I wonder though, if there's a little bit of a

1:19:19.560 --> 1:19:21.840
<v Speaker 4>drama there between Shack and the Utah Jazz because him

1:19:21.840 --> 1:19:23.840
<v Speaker 4>and Rudy Gobert have kind of been getting into it

1:19:23.840 --> 1:19:27.000
<v Speaker 4>a little bit lately. Shack basically trashed Rudy Gobert for

1:19:27.000 --> 1:19:29.479
<v Speaker 4>getting two hundred million for not having an offensive game

1:19:30.000 --> 1:19:31.720
<v Speaker 4>a few weeks ago. So I wonder if there's just

1:19:31.720 --> 1:19:34.320
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of tension there. And Shaq's just basically saying,

1:19:34.400 --> 1:19:36.719
<v Speaker 4>because he had a history as well playing against the Jazz,

1:19:37.160 --> 1:19:39.280
<v Speaker 4>that he's just kind of like, screw you, Jazz. I

1:19:39.320 --> 1:19:40.880
<v Speaker 4>don't care if you're winning. I'm just going to still

1:19:40.920 --> 1:19:44.400
<v Speaker 4>disrespect you. And again, you know, he looks at maybe

1:19:44.439 --> 1:19:46.200
<v Speaker 4>what happened to the playoff last year, and that's why

1:19:46.240 --> 1:19:47.840
<v Speaker 4>he's sort of in that position where he can say,

1:19:47.840 --> 1:19:49.599
<v Speaker 4>I don't think you guys can step up, because they

1:19:49.640 --> 1:19:52.280
<v Speaker 4>did flame out. They lost in seven games there to

1:19:52.280 --> 1:19:55.000
<v Speaker 4>the Nuggets after leading three ones. So I wonder if

1:19:55.040 --> 1:19:58.479
<v Speaker 4>it's just that, you know, just Shack just like I

1:19:58.520 --> 1:20:01.679
<v Speaker 4>don't respect the Jazz and and Rudy Gobert, I don't

1:20:01.720 --> 1:20:03.519
<v Speaker 4>respect him, and so I'm not giving anyone on the

1:20:03.560 --> 1:20:04.120
<v Speaker 4>Jazz credit.

1:20:04.800 --> 1:20:08.000
<v Speaker 2>That Isn't that still a problem like that it's like

1:20:08.360 --> 1:20:10.519
<v Speaker 2>a major analyst, the guy that is supposed to be

1:20:10.600 --> 1:20:12.760
<v Speaker 2>like promote the game and building up is after that

1:20:12.880 --> 1:20:15.000
<v Speaker 2>like didn't know really, you know, we gave him a

1:20:15.040 --> 1:20:17.720
<v Speaker 2>pass with like not really knowing who Christian Wood was,

1:20:17.880 --> 1:20:20.600
<v Speaker 2>and then like you said, like doubling down possibly on

1:20:20.640 --> 1:20:23.680
<v Speaker 2>his heat for the Jazz, Like that's not a good look, right, No,

1:20:23.840 --> 1:20:26.280
<v Speaker 2>I get it. It's Shack. We always go, man, it's Shack.

1:20:26.320 --> 1:20:28.720
<v Speaker 2>He can do whatever he wants. Ha ha. But at

1:20:28.720 --> 1:20:30.439
<v Speaker 2>a certain point it becomes a little tiresome.

1:20:30.680 --> 1:20:32.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean the after the game stuff. After the

1:20:32.720 --> 1:20:34.559
<v Speaker 4>Jazz have an impressive win, when they're having a hot

1:20:34.600 --> 1:20:36.240
<v Speaker 4>streak and a young star of the league, you don't

1:20:36.280 --> 1:20:38.720
<v Speaker 4>want to basically just say you're not that good though,

1:20:38.960 --> 1:20:41.000
<v Speaker 4>and I don't think you guys can win. It took

1:20:41.040 --> 1:20:43.000
<v Speaker 4>Shack a long time to win in this league. Let's

1:20:43.000 --> 1:20:45.200
<v Speaker 4>not forget that as well. Remember he came in as

1:20:45.200 --> 1:20:47.800
<v Speaker 4>the number one pick, he was the star, he was

1:20:47.880 --> 1:20:49.439
<v Speaker 4>hyped up, and it took him until he got to

1:20:49.520 --> 1:20:51.719
<v Speaker 4>Los Angeles in his what eighth season or ninth season

1:20:51.760 --> 1:20:54.320
<v Speaker 4>before he won, and he lost a few times in

1:20:54.360 --> 1:20:56.160
<v Speaker 4>the playoffs as well. I remember the Jazz beat them

1:20:56.160 --> 1:20:59.880
<v Speaker 4>in ninety nine, ninety eight, ninety eight, ninety nine, and

1:21:00.160 --> 1:21:02.519
<v Speaker 4>so Shaq had some questions to answer in his career

1:21:02.520 --> 1:21:04.679
<v Speaker 4>early on. It didn't go as smoothly as he would

1:21:04.720 --> 1:21:05.080
<v Speaker 4>have liked.

1:21:05.080 --> 1:21:09.080
<v Speaker 2>So did Doug Collins inspire him on a broadcast something

1:21:09.600 --> 1:21:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Shack should realize as well that like it takes Michael Jordan,

1:21:13.200 --> 1:21:15.559
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he went through some struggles as well before

1:21:15.560 --> 1:21:15.920
<v Speaker 2>he won.

1:21:16.000 --> 1:21:18.599
<v Speaker 4>So most players, you know, do have to figure it out.

1:21:18.640 --> 1:21:20.400
<v Speaker 4>It takes a long time. And the Jazz and one

1:21:20.400 --> 1:21:22.240
<v Speaker 4>of those teams, they're in the mix. At their best,

1:21:22.280 --> 1:21:24.519
<v Speaker 4>they're a good team, but they do have some issues

1:21:24.520 --> 1:21:26.479
<v Speaker 4>as well, and they have flamed out in the playoffs

1:21:26.520 --> 1:21:27.080
<v Speaker 4>a couple of times.

1:21:27.080 --> 1:21:28.799
<v Speaker 5>But it's not a good look.

1:21:28.600 --> 1:21:31.880
<v Speaker 4>When Shaq just basically on on C and T just

1:21:31.880 --> 1:21:34.640
<v Speaker 4>just kind of dismisses and ships on the team that

1:21:34.720 --> 1:21:35.760
<v Speaker 4>just had an impressive win.

1:21:36.640 --> 1:21:39.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they gotta love basketball a little bit more. I

1:21:39.280 --> 1:21:42.120
<v Speaker 3>think that's what it comes down to to enjoy watching it.

1:21:42.240 --> 1:21:44.439
<v Speaker 3>And I guess I think it's a double edged sword

1:21:44.640 --> 1:21:47.599
<v Speaker 3>because you've got superstars, Hall of famers, legends that are

1:21:47.600 --> 1:21:50.120
<v Speaker 3>on that desk. So Donovan Mitchell was listening intently. He

1:21:50.200 --> 1:21:53.720
<v Speaker 3>wanted to listen to what Shaq said. But being a superstar,

1:21:53.880 --> 1:21:58.040
<v Speaker 3>quite often you didn't have to. You know, it's not

1:21:58.040 --> 1:22:00.439
<v Speaker 3>that you didn't have to work, but you you just

1:22:00.520 --> 1:22:02.360
<v Speaker 3>don't have to grind the same way you're not going

1:22:02.439 --> 1:22:05.040
<v Speaker 3>to grind at your job. You're not gonna watch, you know,

1:22:05.760 --> 1:22:08.559
<v Speaker 3>hours of footage. You're not gonna watch the games. And

1:22:08.680 --> 1:22:10.960
<v Speaker 3>that's just what's the double edged sword. They get the

1:22:11.000 --> 1:22:13.479
<v Speaker 3>great part of it. Like Chris Webber talking to Anthony

1:22:13.520 --> 1:22:15.240
<v Speaker 3>Davis at the end of the Lakers game, asked him

1:22:15.280 --> 1:22:17.760
<v Speaker 3>a question. Anthony Davis talked for five minutes straight because

1:22:17.760 --> 1:22:20.240
<v Speaker 3>it was Chris Weber on the other end, that was

1:22:20.600 --> 1:22:23.760
<v Speaker 3>obviously a huge positive shack if he just showed a

1:22:23.800 --> 1:22:27.040
<v Speaker 3>little bit of Hey man, you know I watched you tonight.

1:22:27.080 --> 1:22:28.920
<v Speaker 3>You were actually on a broadcast. I didn't have to

1:22:29.320 --> 1:22:32.080
<v Speaker 3>do any research. You're right here. You were good. That's

1:22:32.080 --> 1:22:32.639
<v Speaker 3>all I have to say.

1:22:32.760 --> 1:22:34.920
<v Speaker 2>There was no question he didn't ask him a question.

1:22:35.160 --> 1:22:38.120
<v Speaker 2>He literally said, I was talking crap about you at halftime,

1:22:39.080 --> 1:22:41.040
<v Speaker 2>and I'm gonna sort of tilt talk crap to you

1:22:41.080 --> 1:22:42.880
<v Speaker 2>to you to your face because I'm you know, I'm

1:22:42.880 --> 1:22:45.240
<v Speaker 2>not hiding from it by any means, and what do

1:22:45.280 --> 1:22:47.240
<v Speaker 2>you think about that? Like that was the question, like

1:22:47.320 --> 1:22:49.720
<v Speaker 2>what do you think about me crapping on you? Like

1:22:49.720 --> 1:22:52.000
<v Speaker 2>what are you supposed to say on live television after

1:22:52.040 --> 1:22:54.519
<v Speaker 2>again a good performance? It's like to a Hall of famer,

1:22:54.680 --> 1:22:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Like I think he wanted to say something else and

1:22:58.120 --> 1:23:02.240
<v Speaker 2>and maybe caught himself and probably wisely so. But it's

1:23:02.240 --> 1:23:04.880
<v Speaker 2>just strange, man, It's just like what you're I'm with

1:23:05.000 --> 1:23:07.720
<v Speaker 2>you task like a little more joy, a little more positive,

1:23:08.640 --> 1:23:11.519
<v Speaker 2>you know, applauding this effort from him and the team,

1:23:11.600 --> 1:23:14.519
<v Speaker 2>and an entertaining game would go a long way for sure.

1:23:14.560 --> 1:23:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Then this, like the the it was a game's not

1:23:18.240 --> 1:23:20.760
<v Speaker 2>the same. I don't like watching whatever it is.

1:23:21.360 --> 1:23:23.920
<v Speaker 3>And I guess part of the attitude is like Lee

1:23:24.040 --> 1:23:28.160
<v Speaker 3>was saying, everybody in the NBA can't win, and you know,

1:23:28.280 --> 1:23:30.280
<v Speaker 3>Charles's on that desk. He didn't win. It takes a

1:23:30.320 --> 1:23:33.320
<v Speaker 3>long time to win. But Shack has this, you know,

1:23:33.360 --> 1:23:35.800
<v Speaker 3>he's got this personality that he's still competing with you.

1:23:35.840 --> 1:23:37.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm still better than you. He's always going to compete

1:23:38.000 --> 1:23:40.040
<v Speaker 3>with you. I'm always going to kick your ass, even

1:23:40.080 --> 1:23:42.439
<v Speaker 3>though you know this is Donovan Mitchell trying to win

1:23:42.479 --> 1:23:44.559
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty one. Here he's not playing against you,

1:23:45.479 --> 1:23:47.880
<v Speaker 3>so I think that's partly it too. Right, It's like

1:23:48.439 --> 1:23:51.200
<v Speaker 3>the guy's trying to be that champion and he's freaking

1:23:51.520 --> 1:23:54.799
<v Speaker 3>he's freaking playing so good. In year four, he's expanded

1:23:54.800 --> 1:23:56.559
<v Speaker 3>his game. Shooting nine three is a game to try

1:23:56.600 --> 1:23:59.880
<v Speaker 3>and get better. He's not a finished product. He's fun.

1:24:00.479 --> 1:24:01.439
<v Speaker 3>I like watching him.

1:24:01.640 --> 1:24:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Weird, weird moment, but I think that's a good worst

1:24:03.800 --> 1:24:07.839
<v Speaker 2>of the week right there. Okay, let's get to tweet

1:24:07.960 --> 1:24:08.280
<v Speaker 2>of the.

1:24:08.320 --> 1:24:17.840
<v Speaker 3>Night, Tweet out the night. Wow, we are going away

1:24:17.880 --> 1:24:22.640
<v Speaker 3>from basketball for a moment, Yes, and this isn't getting political,

1:24:22.800 --> 1:24:28.840
<v Speaker 3>although the topic is involving politics. Don't leave yet because

1:24:28.920 --> 1:24:32.439
<v Speaker 3>this tweet from Kristen Anderson Lopez. Oh, we got me

1:24:32.640 --> 1:24:38.160
<v Speaker 3>reeling when Kamala Harris, Kamala Harris and Jill Biden were

1:24:38.200 --> 1:24:43.679
<v Speaker 3>photographed together wearing their long purple coats or Kamala Harris

1:24:43.760 --> 1:24:45.559
<v Speaker 3>wearing a long purple coat, Jill Biden wearing a long

1:24:45.600 --> 1:24:48.519
<v Speaker 3>blue coat and somebody's plit screen that Kristin Anderson did

1:24:48.880 --> 1:24:52.679
<v Speaker 3>with Frozens Anna and Elsa also wearing a long purple

1:24:52.680 --> 1:24:56.920
<v Speaker 3>coat and a long blue coat and then photoshopping Frozen

1:24:56.960 --> 1:25:00.120
<v Speaker 3>behind them. I mean, it's it's uncanny.

1:25:00.080 --> 1:25:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Pretty good, similar colors there. It's a good luck though

1:25:02.880 --> 1:25:03.960
<v Speaker 2>it worked for them in the movie.

1:25:04.600 --> 1:25:08.120
<v Speaker 4>It was also a Lisa Simpson Kamala Harris comparison. That

1:25:08.160 --> 1:25:10.160
<v Speaker 4>was my dad there. She was dressed exactly the same

1:25:10.160 --> 1:25:14.920
<v Speaker 4>when Lisa was Lisa became in an advanced episode or

1:25:14.960 --> 1:25:16.280
<v Speaker 4>Ford episode where she was the.

1:25:16.200 --> 1:25:18.560
<v Speaker 5>President of the Yeah.

1:25:18.640 --> 1:25:21.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and she was dressed exactly like Kamala was on

1:25:21.280 --> 1:25:22.360
<v Speaker 4>the inauguration day.

1:25:22.240 --> 1:25:24.120
<v Speaker 5>The right stuff.

1:25:24.600 --> 1:25:27.480
<v Speaker 2>The tweet just made you chuckle, did it?

1:25:27.680 --> 1:25:32.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Yeah. I haven't seen Lee's tweet yet, No, I know,

1:25:32.479 --> 1:25:34.320
<v Speaker 3>but that's going to make me chuckle when I see it.

1:25:34.520 --> 1:25:37.439
<v Speaker 3>Kamma not wearing purple gloves with her purple jacket, although

1:25:37.520 --> 1:25:39.880
<v Speaker 3>Jill is wearing Joe Biden is wearing blue gloves with

1:25:39.880 --> 1:25:42.840
<v Speaker 3>her blue jacket, so I don't know if that's a

1:25:42.840 --> 1:25:43.760
<v Speaker 3>fashion full paw.

1:25:44.160 --> 1:25:47.640
<v Speaker 2>But in Frozen they wear gloves too, right, because that's

1:25:47.640 --> 1:25:48.840
<v Speaker 2>where their power is coming from.

1:25:49.640 --> 1:25:52.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Also, the other one.

1:25:51.960 --> 1:25:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't no, right, Wow, that sucks. It's got no powers.

1:25:57.960 --> 1:26:00.360
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, but she's you can argue she's the te hero

1:26:00.479 --> 1:26:03.320
<v Speaker 6>of the shelf of It at least of the first movie.

1:26:03.520 --> 1:26:05.519
<v Speaker 2>I didn't know she had zero powers though I thought

1:26:05.520 --> 1:26:06.439
<v Speaker 2>it was ran in the family.

1:26:06.560 --> 1:26:07.519
<v Speaker 6>Her power is love.

1:26:08.400 --> 1:26:09.120
<v Speaker 2>That's a good power.

1:26:09.680 --> 1:26:12.360
<v Speaker 3>Great power she is there.

1:26:12.760 --> 1:26:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Is Yeah, it's because the pearls there really take the

1:26:16.120 --> 1:26:18.360
<v Speaker 2>next level excellent. Good.

1:26:18.880 --> 1:26:22.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't think those are pearls on Kablo. Yeah, I

1:26:22.320 --> 1:26:24.800
<v Speaker 3>hear what you're saying. Hey, come on, Skeets, you know

1:26:24.840 --> 1:26:28.400
<v Speaker 3>that Anna doesn't have powers. I saw you saw Frozen Junior.

1:26:28.439 --> 1:26:31.799
<v Speaker 3>You saw a live I played with Frozen Jr.

1:26:32.200 --> 1:26:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah that was Why did I go watch that? Who

1:26:35.120 --> 1:26:36.680
<v Speaker 2>was in that? That must have been JD one of

1:26:36.680 --> 1:26:38.559
<v Speaker 2>your sons. Were they? And Frozens? That's why I was there?

1:26:40.320 --> 1:26:42.160
<v Speaker 2>They were both in Yeah, they were.

1:26:42.040 --> 1:26:46.479
<v Speaker 3>Both yes, yeah, yeah, Lincoln was He was their reindeer, right.

1:26:48.439 --> 1:26:52.720
<v Speaker 7>Spin span he was right yeah, and uh Jackson, I

1:26:52.760 --> 1:26:54.960
<v Speaker 7>can't remember the character's name. Buddy was like the Duke

1:26:55.000 --> 1:26:58.439
<v Speaker 7>of something or other, the guy who does yeah yeah.

1:26:58.280 --> 1:27:01.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, good times.

1:27:01.040 --> 1:27:03.280
<v Speaker 7>Good times, love to love to get back to the

1:27:03.320 --> 1:27:04.360
<v Speaker 7>live theater at some.

1:27:04.400 --> 1:27:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Point, you know, oh yeah, yeah.

1:27:08.360 --> 1:27:10.280
<v Speaker 7>Well Lincoln is in a school of the arts and

1:27:10.320 --> 1:27:15.439
<v Speaker 7>that's that's his thing. And there's been nothing doing doing

1:27:15.520 --> 1:27:18.920
<v Speaker 7>drama classes over zoom is not is not great.

1:27:19.160 --> 1:27:22.120
<v Speaker 2>No, No, imagine are you reading lines with them every

1:27:22.120 --> 1:27:22.759
<v Speaker 2>once in a while.

1:27:23.200 --> 1:27:24.080
<v Speaker 3>No, he doesn't.

1:27:24.160 --> 1:27:25.920
<v Speaker 7>There's no shows, there's nothing nothing.

1:27:26.000 --> 1:27:27.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but he's got to keep working on his craft.

1:27:27.800 --> 1:27:27.960
<v Speaker 3>Man.

1:27:28.000 --> 1:27:30.200
<v Speaker 2>I hate to be a shock about this, Okay.

1:27:29.920 --> 1:27:39.160
<v Speaker 3>But o case, take it easy, kid, big winter bum out?

1:27:39.720 --> 1:27:42.439
<v Speaker 3>That's that was a lie. Well yeah, blowout big No,

1:27:42.520 --> 1:27:44.880
<v Speaker 3>he says, big summer blow up, big summer blow up.

1:27:44.960 --> 1:27:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:27:45.320 --> 1:27:48.080
<v Speaker 3>I tried to adapt it for Lincoln being upset. Bum

1:27:48.080 --> 1:27:51.519
<v Speaker 3>out right, Yeah, that's not a term. Bum out isn't

1:27:51.520 --> 1:27:52.280
<v Speaker 3>a term.

1:27:53.840 --> 1:27:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Pick of results from last night Lakers Bucks game, Lakers

1:27:57.200 --> 1:27:59.559
<v Speaker 2>favored by one and a half. Trey and I had

1:27:59.600 --> 1:28:01.640
<v Speaker 2>the Laker to get it done and they did. So

1:28:01.720 --> 1:28:04.519
<v Speaker 2>that's a good win for us because it's tight for

1:28:04.640 --> 1:28:07.200
<v Speaker 2>the three of you, especially Trey goes to nine and eleven.

1:28:07.880 --> 1:28:10.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm eleven and nine, and then we got tacin Lee

1:28:10.040 --> 1:28:11.840
<v Speaker 2>who had the Bucks last night with the yel you

1:28:11.840 --> 1:28:13.479
<v Speaker 2>guys are eight and twelve, so you guys are tied

1:28:13.479 --> 1:28:15.439
<v Speaker 2>for last. Tray's right there, and I'm a couple of

1:28:15.479 --> 1:28:17.320
<v Speaker 2>games up. What's tonight's game there?

1:28:17.400 --> 1:28:20.280
<v Speaker 3>Tass Well, that's a rematch from a couple of nights ago,

1:28:20.640 --> 1:28:23.879
<v Speaker 3>we had that double ot game between the Calves and Nets.

1:28:24.400 --> 1:28:29.200
<v Speaker 3>They're playing again, but the spread is shocking. Two teams

1:28:29.560 --> 1:28:32.960
<v Speaker 3>go to double overtime. You expect the spread to be

1:28:33.000 --> 1:28:35.120
<v Speaker 3>close here, but the Calves are getting nine and a

1:28:35.200 --> 1:28:37.519
<v Speaker 3>half points at home. They can lose by nine if

1:28:37.560 --> 1:28:40.479
<v Speaker 3>you pick them. Wow, with the Nets visiting at home,

1:28:41.640 --> 1:28:44.519
<v Speaker 3>this is shocking. So start us off here, Skates, what

1:28:44.520 --> 1:28:45.519
<v Speaker 3>do you think? Wow?

1:28:45.920 --> 1:28:48.880
<v Speaker 2>That is a shocking line. And whenever I see a

1:28:48.960 --> 1:28:51.680
<v Speaker 2>line like that, I go, what does Vegas know that?

1:28:51.760 --> 1:28:54.439
<v Speaker 2>We don't know? What are they got going on over there?

1:28:54.920 --> 1:28:57.160
<v Speaker 2>Which is why I'll take the Nets. You know, that's strange,

1:28:57.280 --> 1:28:59.680
<v Speaker 2>very very strange, big line. You're like, exactly right, you

1:28:59.680 --> 1:29:02.000
<v Speaker 2>just want to double overtime. Colin Sexon was on fire.

1:29:02.400 --> 1:29:04.599
<v Speaker 2>You know, why would you pick against them right now?

1:29:04.600 --> 1:29:06.320
<v Speaker 2>They could win the game for crinel out. Nope, give

1:29:06.320 --> 1:29:08.120
<v Speaker 2>me the Nets by ten plus lee?

1:29:08.160 --> 1:29:09.559
<v Speaker 3>What do you think? Yeah?

1:29:10.200 --> 1:29:15.439
<v Speaker 4>Something weird about that? I don't know. I mean, like,

1:29:15.520 --> 1:29:16.360
<v Speaker 4>will the Nets go?

1:29:16.560 --> 1:29:16.800
<v Speaker 5>Wow?

1:29:16.880 --> 1:29:19.000
<v Speaker 4>Okay, let's be locked in tonight, guys and go and

1:29:19.000 --> 1:29:23.960
<v Speaker 4>get it. Probably, But I all right, give me the Caves.

1:29:24.000 --> 1:29:26.280
<v Speaker 4>I think they've got I think they can keep it

1:29:26.320 --> 1:29:28.840
<v Speaker 4>close enough tonight anyway, I think that wasn't just a

1:29:28.880 --> 1:29:31.800
<v Speaker 4>mirage again. The Calves the nets defense gives me a

1:29:31.800 --> 1:29:33.800
<v Speaker 4>little bit of hope that the sex man could go

1:29:33.840 --> 1:29:34.920
<v Speaker 4>for another forty plus.

1:29:34.920 --> 1:29:38.479
<v Speaker 3>So I'll say the cats, Trey, are you buying this

1:29:38.600 --> 1:29:39.439
<v Speaker 3>sex man talk?

1:29:42.800 --> 1:29:47.640
<v Speaker 6>Yes, I have subscribed to sex Land. I've got the

1:29:47.680 --> 1:29:51.880
<v Speaker 6>premium membership. In fact, I don't know what's tough though.

1:29:51.960 --> 1:29:55.360
<v Speaker 6>Kevin Durant's I guess questionable for tonight's which makes me

1:29:55.400 --> 1:29:58.880
<v Speaker 6>a little hesitant. Maybe then the Calves sleep on the Nets.

1:29:58.880 --> 1:30:00.960
<v Speaker 6>I guess they still got James and then Kyrie Irving.

1:30:01.080 --> 1:30:03.360
<v Speaker 6>That's depth for you right there. Give me the nets.

1:30:03.400 --> 1:30:05.160
<v Speaker 6>I think I'm gonna regret it, but give me the nets.

1:30:05.160 --> 1:30:06.559
<v Speaker 2>Whoa, what are you going with?

1:30:06.840 --> 1:30:10.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? I'm going with the nets too. Whoa, I've got

1:30:10.840 --> 1:30:13.719
<v Speaker 3>Lee tied with him at the bottom here, So let's

1:30:13.760 --> 1:30:15.080
<v Speaker 3>break it tide. Don't like ties?

1:30:15.560 --> 1:30:15.920
<v Speaker 6>All right?

1:30:16.320 --> 1:30:20.040
<v Speaker 2>On Monday's podcast, Yeah, somebody will be in dead last,

1:30:20.920 --> 1:30:25.280
<v Speaker 2>all by themselves by their loadsome All right, let's end

1:30:25.280 --> 1:30:27.280
<v Speaker 2>this strop podcast along one here. But we're having a

1:30:27.320 --> 1:30:29.240
<v Speaker 2>lot of fun, a lot of fun conversations with a

1:30:29.240 --> 1:30:32.320
<v Speaker 2>little rapid fire questions. Trey, my man, you got the

1:30:32.360 --> 1:30:34.920
<v Speaker 2>cubes there, that's right, skeet see.

1:30:35.840 --> 1:30:39.320
<v Speaker 6>ESPN's Tim McMahon snapped a picture of Willie Cowley Stein

1:30:39.479 --> 1:30:43.200
<v Speaker 6>rocking a MAVs Defensive Player of the Game Championship belt

1:30:43.439 --> 1:30:47.160
<v Speaker 6>after a game earlier this week. Looks awesome. What's another

1:30:47.200 --> 1:30:50.520
<v Speaker 6>trophy that should be handed out for single game awards?

1:30:50.680 --> 1:30:51.120
<v Speaker 3>Skeets.

1:30:51.439 --> 1:30:53.559
<v Speaker 2>I won't overthink this, Trey. You came up with it.

1:30:53.600 --> 1:30:56.920
<v Speaker 2>When you get twenty plus rebounds, you got a lot

1:30:56.920 --> 1:31:00.280
<v Speaker 2>of roast beef. So when you do that, I think

1:31:00.320 --> 1:31:02.680
<v Speaker 2>you should have to wear an Arby's hat. What's an

1:31:02.800 --> 1:31:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Rby's hat. It's the Farrell hat. That's what you wear

1:31:07.400 --> 1:31:10.120
<v Speaker 2>when you get twenty plus rebounds in a game, the

1:31:10.240 --> 1:31:14.240
<v Speaker 2>Arby's slash Farrell hat, and you wear it proudly a

1:31:14.240 --> 1:31:16.599
<v Speaker 2>little Probably you could stick some roast beef up under that,

1:31:17.080 --> 1:31:19.360
<v Speaker 2>have a little snack later in the day. That's why

1:31:20.160 --> 1:31:21.000
<v Speaker 2>I love it.

1:31:21.200 --> 1:31:22.240
<v Speaker 6>I love it, JD.

1:31:22.320 --> 1:31:26.439
<v Speaker 7>What you got so I was thinking that we could

1:31:26.479 --> 1:31:29.200
<v Speaker 7>get you know, the sashes they have and the boy

1:31:29.240 --> 1:31:31.960
<v Speaker 7>Scouts and the girl Scouts where there's where you can

1:31:32.000 --> 1:31:34.320
<v Speaker 7>put badges on it, and we just give badges for

1:31:34.640 --> 1:31:37.960
<v Speaker 7>literally everything. You know, if you get the defensive Player

1:31:38.040 --> 1:31:40.800
<v Speaker 7>of the of the week or whatever or of the night.

1:31:41.600 --> 1:31:45.200
<v Speaker 7>But you know, add things like composting in first aid

1:31:45.360 --> 1:31:48.000
<v Speaker 7>and that kind of thing. You know, cookie entrepreneur. Maybe

1:31:48.040 --> 1:31:51.240
<v Speaker 7>if somebody's opening a bakery. These are real badges, by

1:31:51.280 --> 1:31:54.960
<v Speaker 7>the way, model design and stamp collecting. That'd be great

1:31:55.000 --> 1:31:58.000
<v Speaker 7>if you just give those out after a game and

1:31:58.479 --> 1:32:00.400
<v Speaker 7>then they they could wear them around and you know

1:32:00.439 --> 1:32:02.559
<v Speaker 7>you can compare. Oh Le Brown's got a lot of them.

1:32:02.600 --> 1:32:05.840
<v Speaker 7>But you know, Anthony Davis, he's got to get it

1:32:05.920 --> 1:32:07.760
<v Speaker 7>up there, man, he's got to get some badges on

1:32:07.840 --> 1:32:08.280
<v Speaker 7>that thing.

1:32:08.320 --> 1:32:08.559
<v Speaker 3>You know.

1:32:08.880 --> 1:32:12.479
<v Speaker 2>That's not that dissimilar to the like All Star jackets

1:32:12.520 --> 1:32:15.040
<v Speaker 2>they used to do, right that had like a certain

1:32:15.120 --> 1:32:17.559
<v Speaker 2>number of like All Star appearances and like Defensive Player

1:32:17.600 --> 1:32:18.840
<v Speaker 2>of the Earth wins and stuff like that. But you're

1:32:18.840 --> 1:32:21.120
<v Speaker 2>taking it next level with some of the skills that

1:32:21.160 --> 1:32:24.240
<v Speaker 2>they made have acquired. Yeah, Sash, I like the sash

1:32:24.280 --> 1:32:25.400
<v Speaker 2>a lot sash.

1:32:25.560 --> 1:32:27.360
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, that's awesome. At the end of the year, you

1:32:27.360 --> 1:32:29.720
<v Speaker 6>can just look back and see everything you've accomplished. Hang

1:32:29.760 --> 1:32:31.479
<v Speaker 6>them all on the wall. That's a great one.

1:32:31.560 --> 1:32:31.800
<v Speaker 2>J D.

1:32:32.040 --> 1:32:34.200
<v Speaker 5>Lee, what you are so you guys.

1:32:34.560 --> 1:32:36.960
<v Speaker 4>You know, we often get emails from Australia when people say,

1:32:37.000 --> 1:32:39.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, why don't you adopt the Australian rules football

1:32:39.360 --> 1:32:42.320
<v Speaker 4>way of doing the MVP. We call it the Brownlow

1:32:42.360 --> 1:32:45.040
<v Speaker 4>Metal by giving votes after every game and then you

1:32:45.080 --> 1:32:46.840
<v Speaker 4>accumulate them at the end of the season, count them

1:32:46.920 --> 1:32:49.160
<v Speaker 4>up and that decides who the MVP is.

1:32:49.400 --> 1:32:50.200
<v Speaker 5>Why don't we do that?

1:32:50.280 --> 1:32:53.160
<v Speaker 4>Finally in the NBA, right, So after each game, the

1:32:53.160 --> 1:32:55.920
<v Speaker 4>referees get together and they give out two votes. They

1:32:55.920 --> 1:32:57.840
<v Speaker 4>give five points to the best player on the court,

1:32:57.880 --> 1:32:59.760
<v Speaker 4>and then one point to the second best player, and

1:32:59.800 --> 1:33:01.280
<v Speaker 4>then at the end of the season we just count

1:33:01.280 --> 1:33:03.720
<v Speaker 4>them up and then we get the MVP based on

1:33:04.080 --> 1:33:06.080
<v Speaker 4>the amount of points they accumulate during the season. And

1:33:06.160 --> 1:33:08.160
<v Speaker 4>in fact, we can have it running so we can

1:33:08.200 --> 1:33:10.400
<v Speaker 4>see throughout the season who is actually winning, so then

1:33:10.439 --> 1:33:12.160
<v Speaker 4>we don't have to debate the award. We can see

1:33:12.160 --> 1:33:14.479
<v Speaker 4>the leaderboard who's winning, and at the end of the

1:33:14.479 --> 1:33:16.559
<v Speaker 4>season it's like, Okay, that guy won it, because.

1:33:16.360 --> 1:33:19.160
<v Speaker 2>After it I can't trust John Butler to make that

1:33:19.320 --> 1:33:21.400
<v Speaker 2>call technical.

1:33:21.680 --> 1:33:23.680
<v Speaker 4>Hey are you saying are you saying the referees of

1:33:23.760 --> 1:33:26.719
<v Speaker 4>more biason? People in the media, you come into this season.

1:33:26.800 --> 1:33:29.000
<v Speaker 5>You say Yannis can't win no matter why.

1:33:29.000 --> 1:33:31.439
<v Speaker 2>True, that's true, and I'm right, I'm right about it.

1:33:31.560 --> 1:33:34.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, I can't trust John Butler. I'm sorry if

1:33:34.200 --> 1:33:34.640
<v Speaker 2>that is it's me.

1:33:34.840 --> 1:33:35.200
<v Speaker 3>I see.

1:33:35.680 --> 1:33:36.120
<v Speaker 5>That's the thing.

1:33:36.160 --> 1:33:39.040
<v Speaker 4>There's no one system that works perfectly for everyone. So

1:33:39.240 --> 1:33:40.439
<v Speaker 4>do it in the heat of the moment.

1:33:41.960 --> 1:33:42.679
<v Speaker 6>Good stuff.

1:33:43.040 --> 1:33:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Second, wrap it by our question.

1:33:44.439 --> 1:33:47.040
<v Speaker 6>Joelle Embiid and Marcus Smart got into a war of

1:33:47.080 --> 1:33:50.280
<v Speaker 6>words about who's the bigger flopper after Embiid shot twenty

1:33:50.320 --> 1:33:52.719
<v Speaker 6>one free throws and went over the Celtics. But here's

1:33:52.760 --> 1:33:56.880
<v Speaker 6>the twist. They both flop all the time. Guys, when's

1:33:56.920 --> 1:33:59.880
<v Speaker 6>the time you faked something for dramatic effect?

1:34:00.160 --> 1:34:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Skates, I apologize if I've told this story before. I

1:34:03.360 --> 1:34:07.560
<v Speaker 2>can't remember if I have on the podcast. But one Christmas.

1:34:08.160 --> 1:34:10.360
<v Speaker 2>Every Christmas we would usually not this year, but we

1:34:10.400 --> 1:34:12.439
<v Speaker 2>would fly home to Canada, of course, be with family.

1:34:12.840 --> 1:34:15.559
<v Speaker 2>And I've been with Nora for a long time, nearly

1:34:15.640 --> 1:34:17.639
<v Speaker 2>twenty years in fact, so this is a while back.

1:34:17.680 --> 1:34:20.719
<v Speaker 2>But I was probably in year three or four, let's say,

1:34:20.760 --> 1:34:24.040
<v Speaker 2>maybe year five of going to her family Christmas, and

1:34:24.080 --> 1:34:26.840
<v Speaker 2>one of their traditions, she has a British aunt that

1:34:26.880 --> 1:34:28.439
<v Speaker 2>married into the family a long long time ago, and

1:34:28.439 --> 1:34:32.320
<v Speaker 2>we would do the British Christmas pudding. Now, Lee, I

1:34:32.360 --> 1:34:33.840
<v Speaker 2>don't know if you've ever done this, but what they

1:34:33.840 --> 1:34:37.479
<v Speaker 2>would do their whole thing is she aunt Jenny would

1:34:37.479 --> 1:34:39.800
<v Speaker 2>put a bunch of dimes in it, and you know,

1:34:39.880 --> 1:34:42.000
<v Speaker 2>then it's cut up, it's put on fire. It's a

1:34:42.000 --> 1:34:44.479
<v Speaker 2>big show, and then it's passed around and you pass

1:34:44.520 --> 1:34:46.840
<v Speaker 2>it around this giant table and it's got to keep

1:34:46.880 --> 1:34:49.320
<v Speaker 2>going until it, you know, obviously gets to the closest

1:34:49.320 --> 1:34:52.040
<v Speaker 2>person back to where the pudding was, and you get

1:34:52.040 --> 1:34:53.679
<v Speaker 2>your piece, and you see if you get a dime,

1:34:53.720 --> 1:34:55.320
<v Speaker 2>if you get a dime, hey, it's good luck.

1:34:55.439 --> 1:34:55.599
<v Speaker 6>Right.

1:34:56.040 --> 1:34:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, I knew this is a thing they did because

1:34:57.960 --> 1:34:59.680
<v Speaker 2>again I'd been there for a couple of years. So

1:34:59.720 --> 1:35:01.680
<v Speaker 2>I just decided, I don't know why. I just thought

1:35:01.680 --> 1:35:04.400
<v Speaker 2>it would be hilarious that I would take a fifty

1:35:04.439 --> 1:35:08.040
<v Speaker 2>dollars bill that I had and I wrapped it up

1:35:08.040 --> 1:35:10.400
<v Speaker 2>in tinfoil and advance had it in my pocket. You know,

1:35:10.479 --> 1:35:12.680
<v Speaker 2>it gets everything gets passed around. There's too much going on.

1:35:12.760 --> 1:35:15.640
<v Speaker 2>It's a huge Armenian family, right, everybody's like yelling and

1:35:15.680 --> 1:35:17.760
<v Speaker 2>talking and stuff, having a laugh, and so I sort

1:35:17.760 --> 1:35:19.599
<v Speaker 2>of just slipped it on my on my plate, and

1:35:19.640 --> 1:35:21.960
<v Speaker 2>everybody always does the thing like, oh found a dime,

1:35:22.080 --> 1:35:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh found a dime. Everybody trying and keep track and

1:35:24.200 --> 1:35:26.479
<v Speaker 2>all that, and so I did, oh, what's this? And

1:35:26.520 --> 1:35:28.760
<v Speaker 2>then I, you know, had sort of everybody's attention and

1:35:28.800 --> 1:35:32.880
<v Speaker 2>open it up and was like, wow, fifty dollars, I'd

1:35:32.880 --> 1:35:36.680
<v Speaker 2>be a huge deal. And you should have seen the

1:35:36.760 --> 1:35:41.040
<v Speaker 2>reactions from everyone at the table, like he will jaw

1:35:41.280 --> 1:35:43.360
<v Speaker 2>like literally hit the floor. They couldn't believe it because

1:35:43.360 --> 1:35:45.760
<v Speaker 2>they thought it was real. Uh, and it was a

1:35:45.800 --> 1:35:49.920
<v Speaker 2>grand old laugh and it was nailed it perfectly. I

1:35:49.960 --> 1:35:52.120
<v Speaker 2>played it off perfectly, like I was excited, like, wow,

1:35:52.200 --> 1:35:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Auntie Jenny's putt in fifties now man dimes and fifties,

1:35:56.040 --> 1:35:58.040
<v Speaker 2>so that's nice. I can't remember if I shared that

1:35:58.080 --> 1:35:59.000
<v Speaker 2>story on this podcast.

1:35:59.040 --> 1:36:00.799
<v Speaker 3>I feel like an outside offline.

1:36:00.840 --> 1:36:04.000
<v Speaker 2>No, okay, So that was you know, look, the family

1:36:04.040 --> 1:36:07.080
<v Speaker 2>already loved old Skeetzy, but that took me. Still talk

1:36:07.160 --> 1:36:07.479
<v Speaker 2>about it.

1:36:07.560 --> 1:36:09.440
<v Speaker 3>Leal still reminius.

1:36:09.040 --> 1:36:13.719
<v Speaker 6>About that time, fifteen years deep in the podcasting game,

1:36:13.840 --> 1:36:16.280
<v Speaker 6>reaching deep in the bag, like the Fries were at

1:36:16.280 --> 1:36:19.360
<v Speaker 6>the bottom pulling on a banger oh skates with a

1:36:19.439 --> 1:36:20.559
<v Speaker 6>fifty dollars dime.

1:36:21.280 --> 1:36:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Love it. Unfortunately, we'd have to use that fifty and

1:36:23.840 --> 1:36:24.920
<v Speaker 2>give half a bit the task.

1:36:25.800 --> 1:36:32.439
<v Speaker 7>That's quick thee I had a little bit of trouble

1:36:32.439 --> 1:36:35.680
<v Speaker 7>coming up with something, so I'm just gonna say I

1:36:36.720 --> 1:36:41.240
<v Speaker 7>faked sweating for a DraftKings ad a couple of months ago,

1:36:41.360 --> 1:36:44.080
<v Speaker 7>and I have Jackson sprang me down with a with

1:36:44.840 --> 1:36:47.120
<v Speaker 7>a little spray bottle and I got water all over

1:36:47.200 --> 1:36:49.880
<v Speaker 7>my system, and but it was totally worth it. It

1:36:49.920 --> 1:36:53.559
<v Speaker 7>was totally worth it the gag. It went off without

1:36:53.600 --> 1:36:55.479
<v Speaker 7>a hitch. So that's my answer.

1:36:56.800 --> 1:36:58.920
<v Speaker 6>I was a banger of an ad Reid too Bley.

1:37:00.160 --> 1:37:02.320
<v Speaker 4>Pretty much every day when I go outside and play

1:37:02.360 --> 1:37:04.720
<v Speaker 4>with my two boys, we play hide and Seek or

1:37:04.800 --> 1:37:07.120
<v Speaker 4>blasters or something like that. And whenever we play Lego

1:37:07.160 --> 1:37:10.840
<v Speaker 4>Blasters or Star Wars blasters, I have to fake going

1:37:10.920 --> 1:37:13.400
<v Speaker 4>down every time. Like my four year old won't let

1:37:13.400 --> 1:37:15.479
<v Speaker 4>me just be like, I can't just let them bounce

1:37:15.520 --> 1:37:17.479
<v Speaker 4>off me. I have to go down. I have to

1:37:17.520 --> 1:37:19.720
<v Speaker 4>be down and out for the count. And it's like,

1:37:20.240 --> 1:37:22.880
<v Speaker 4>after like the tenth time, I'm like I'm not I'm done, man,

1:37:22.880 --> 1:37:24.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm done. I'm not going down again. They're going to

1:37:24.880 --> 1:37:26.479
<v Speaker 4>go back down and then to get back up, and

1:37:26.479 --> 1:37:28.479
<v Speaker 4>then he just blasts me again. And he never goes

1:37:28.520 --> 1:37:30.280
<v Speaker 4>down when I blast him either. He's always got a

1:37:30.320 --> 1:37:30.720
<v Speaker 4>shield up.

1:37:30.760 --> 1:37:31.880
<v Speaker 2>He always protects himself.

1:37:32.560 --> 1:37:34.840
<v Speaker 4>If I use the same tactics, it never works. I'm like,

1:37:34.960 --> 1:37:36.920
<v Speaker 4>I've I've got a should Actually, you don't have a

1:37:36.960 --> 1:37:39.040
<v Speaker 4>shield for this blast. I'm like, woy, how do you

1:37:39.080 --> 1:37:41.040
<v Speaker 4>have a shield all the time? How come you're always

1:37:41.040 --> 1:37:43.160
<v Speaker 4>blocking my blast? But I've always got to go down

1:37:43.240 --> 1:37:44.839
<v Speaker 4>for yours.

1:37:44.840 --> 1:37:49.080
<v Speaker 6>I'm like, they got that advance to technology game up.

1:37:49.640 --> 1:37:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Sounds like you suck it blasters. I do.

1:37:52.200 --> 1:37:55.360
<v Speaker 4>I do, apparently because I can never ever defeat those guys.

1:37:55.400 --> 1:37:57.360
<v Speaker 4>They always beat me, especially the four year old.

1:37:57.400 --> 1:37:58.880
<v Speaker 5>He's very sly, he's very funny.

1:37:58.880 --> 1:38:02.800
<v Speaker 6>He knows how to get me last rapid fire question.

1:38:02.920 --> 1:38:05.240
<v Speaker 6>With the win over Kansas City this week, this weekend,

1:38:05.280 --> 1:38:07.559
<v Speaker 6>Little Bills would go to the Super Bowl for the

1:38:07.600 --> 1:38:12.639
<v Speaker 6>first time since nineteen ninety three. Shout out to Darryl Tally,

1:38:13.080 --> 1:38:15.439
<v Speaker 6>what's something you haven't done since the nineties, But you

1:38:15.560 --> 1:38:17.240
<v Speaker 6>might get back into skips.

1:38:17.640 --> 1:38:21.559
<v Speaker 2>I am just continuing to talk this into existence. NBA

1:38:21.800 --> 1:38:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Jam playing it a lot, and I'm eventually gonna get

1:38:26.080 --> 1:38:29.080
<v Speaker 2>the NBA JAM arcade system, you know, the whole cabinet.

1:38:29.120 --> 1:38:31.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna do it. You know again, I've talked about

1:38:31.920 --> 1:38:34.479
<v Speaker 2>this before in the pot. We're getting closer because I

1:38:34.800 --> 1:38:37.479
<v Speaker 2>think my buddy Chris just saw one the other day

1:38:37.520 --> 1:38:39.080
<v Speaker 2>at the Walmart. He's like, is this what you were

1:38:39.080 --> 1:38:42.200
<v Speaker 2>talking ABOUT'M like, that's it. That's it, so we know

1:38:42.280 --> 1:38:44.439
<v Speaker 2>it's there. I can just go pick it up later

1:38:44.560 --> 1:38:45.640
<v Speaker 2>today if I wanted to.

1:38:46.160 --> 1:38:47.480
<v Speaker 3>And I'm a little.

1:38:47.240 --> 1:38:50.120
<v Speaker 6>Jam on a Friday looking forward to the unboxing.

1:38:50.600 --> 1:38:52.400
<v Speaker 2>Oh yes, I definitely will unbox that.

1:38:52.400 --> 1:38:53.040
<v Speaker 5>Once I get that.

1:38:53.520 --> 1:38:55.840
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, launch a twist channel if you get into gaming.

1:38:56.320 --> 1:38:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Played a ton of it in the nineties, of course,

1:38:58.200 --> 1:39:00.599
<v Speaker 2>but I'm bringing it back, all right.

1:39:00.640 --> 1:39:06.639
<v Speaker 7>Jerdi shaving maybe you know it's been uh it has

1:39:06.960 --> 1:39:09.679
<v Speaker 7>literally been since the nineties since I didn't have a beard.

1:39:09.760 --> 1:39:12.920
<v Speaker 7>So and it's getting a little Yeah, when you can't

1:39:12.920 --> 1:39:16.880
<v Speaker 7>see the logo on your shirt, it's it's getting a

1:39:16.920 --> 1:39:19.080
<v Speaker 7>little zz top. So I don't know. I thought I

1:39:19.120 --> 1:39:21.960
<v Speaker 7>was thinking what would happen if I just shave like

1:39:22.040 --> 1:39:26.040
<v Speaker 7>complete no no facial hair. I don't it's literally been

1:39:26.080 --> 1:39:29.519
<v Speaker 7>thirty years since I've since That's wow. It was just

1:39:29.720 --> 1:39:31.880
<v Speaker 7>show up one day and just be like you would

1:39:31.880 --> 1:39:34.720
<v Speaker 7>be like, who is that guy? Like you would not

1:39:34.840 --> 1:39:35.559
<v Speaker 7>recognize me?

1:39:35.600 --> 1:39:38.559
<v Speaker 2>Probably, Well, we've never known you. We've seen the odd

1:39:38.640 --> 1:39:42.040
<v Speaker 2>photo maybe, but yeah, you've never known you without a beard.

1:39:41.880 --> 1:39:45.160
<v Speaker 7>Right, Yeah, I don't know. I don't know me without

1:39:45.160 --> 1:39:47.920
<v Speaker 7>a beard. Yeah, yeah, I had a beard ins for sure.

1:39:48.040 --> 1:39:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:39:48.600 --> 1:39:50.720
<v Speaker 7>So I'm worried about my jowels.

1:39:52.880 --> 1:39:55.000
<v Speaker 6>Do you know?

1:39:55.439 --> 1:39:55.880
<v Speaker 7>I don't.

1:39:56.360 --> 1:39:56.719
<v Speaker 3>I don't.

1:39:56.760 --> 1:40:00.360
<v Speaker 7>I got no chin. That's my joke. I'm I'm and

1:40:00.520 --> 1:40:03.240
<v Speaker 7>like Roger Ebert after he had his surgery, his lotch

1:40:03.320 --> 1:40:03.960
<v Speaker 7>and removed.

1:40:14.680 --> 1:40:16.960
<v Speaker 4>When I first started traveling in the nineties, I used

1:40:17.000 --> 1:40:18.519
<v Speaker 4>to have a bum bag, a fanny pack as you

1:40:18.600 --> 1:40:20.200
<v Speaker 4>call it over here, and I used to love it.

1:40:20.120 --> 1:40:22.920
<v Speaker 5>Because fanny packs bum bags. They were in. They were

1:40:22.920 --> 1:40:25.400
<v Speaker 5>in in, in, and then they were out out out.

1:40:25.479 --> 1:40:26.920
<v Speaker 5>People like, get that out of here.

1:40:27.000 --> 1:40:28.759
<v Speaker 4>No one wants to see you with a bum bag anymore.

1:40:28.800 --> 1:40:30.519
<v Speaker 5>But I like them, So I did rock.

1:40:30.680 --> 1:40:33.960
<v Speaker 4>I hold onto mine for a while, and now I've

1:40:34.000 --> 1:40:36.160
<v Speaker 4>missed traveling so much. Next time I'm going on the plane,

1:40:36.200 --> 1:40:38.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm getting a brand new bum bag. I'm putting the

1:40:38.080 --> 1:40:40.320
<v Speaker 4>passports in it, I put my wallet in it, I'm

1:40:40.360 --> 1:40:42.560
<v Speaker 4>put my phone in it. I'm bringing back it's a

1:40:42.560 --> 1:40:44.559
<v Speaker 4>bum bag. I think it's time for it to come back.

1:40:44.600 --> 1:40:45.000
<v Speaker 5>I think so.

1:40:45.160 --> 1:40:47.040
<v Speaker 4>It's a cycle and they're cool.

1:40:47.160 --> 1:40:49.000
<v Speaker 2>I like that they are back. I mean, Tree, you

1:40:49.040 --> 1:40:50.800
<v Speaker 2>can probably speak to this better than I can. The

1:40:50.840 --> 1:40:53.679
<v Speaker 2>fanny pack is it's back, isn't it last couple of years?

1:40:53.680 --> 1:40:55.400
<v Speaker 2>I feel like you always see guys coming into the

1:40:55.400 --> 1:40:56.160
<v Speaker 2>arena wearing them.

1:40:56.560 --> 1:40:58.479
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, the fanny pack is back, but I've never heard

1:40:58.520 --> 1:41:02.200
<v Speaker 6>it called a bum bag. Could definitely come back.

1:41:03.120 --> 1:41:05.679
<v Speaker 2>What would you do, Lea? If Lebron tweeted at you,

1:41:05.680 --> 1:41:10.400
<v Speaker 2>you bum bag, I would say, you see it's back

1:41:10.479 --> 1:41:11.880
<v Speaker 2>in the bum bag is back.

1:41:12.520 --> 1:41:13.439
<v Speaker 5>See the fannie pack.

1:41:13.360 --> 1:41:16.160
<v Speaker 4>Means something different in Australia or you. I woke around

1:41:16.160 --> 1:41:18.040
<v Speaker 4>sign up people, I've got my fanny packed out.

1:41:19.960 --> 1:41:21.120
<v Speaker 6>And Jenny would just laugh.

1:41:23.240 --> 1:41:26.880
<v Speaker 2>That's true, that's true. All right, that's a rapid fire.

1:41:27.000 --> 1:41:29.439
<v Speaker 2>Let's call it there. This is a long one, but hey,

1:41:29.479 --> 1:41:31.880
<v Speaker 2>you got all weekend to listen to this classic. If

1:41:31.920 --> 1:41:34.080
<v Speaker 2>you're in the mood, go grab some No Dunks items

1:41:34.120 --> 1:41:36.880
<v Speaker 2>at No dunks dot com. Hoodies, and T shirts and

1:41:36.960 --> 1:41:40.400
<v Speaker 2>shorts and mugs. Go rep the brand, and you know what,

1:41:40.479 --> 1:41:42.719
<v Speaker 2>treat yourself to an athletic subscription. Go to the athletic

1:41:42.760 --> 1:41:44.439
<v Speaker 2>dot com slash no dunks where you can sign up

1:41:44.479 --> 1:41:46.320
<v Speaker 2>for just three ninety nine a months right now for

1:41:46.360 --> 1:41:49.720
<v Speaker 2>the best damn sports writing in the world. Thanks so

1:41:49.880 --> 1:41:52.719
<v Speaker 2>much to the stream team the team stream for joining

1:41:52.760 --> 1:41:55.320
<v Speaker 2>us live here on YouTube. Really appreciate it. If you

1:41:55.360 --> 1:41:58.400
<v Speaker 2>listen on Apple Podcasts, please leave us that five star

1:41:58.520 --> 1:42:01.960
<v Speaker 2>rating and review. We'll get to a five star Friday

1:42:02.200 --> 1:42:04.360
<v Speaker 2>some point in February, so if you got a new review,

1:42:04.400 --> 1:42:07.360
<v Speaker 2>you might get in the show. All right, fun one guys,

1:42:07.360 --> 1:42:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Clipper bros. You heard it here first, have a great time,

1:42:10.240 --> 1:42:10.680
<v Speaker 2>turn up.

1:42:10.880 --> 1:42:12.160
<v Speaker 6>Love you guys awesome.

1:42:13.800 --> 1:42:17.720
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for joining us. And remember one Christmas, I went

1:42:17.760 --> 1:42:22.160
<v Speaker 3>to Christmas Dinner and I wrapped up fifty and food

1:42:22.320 --> 1:42:24.560
<v Speaker 3>Aunt Jenny.

1:42:25.439 --> 1:42:26.719
<v Speaker 2>It brings the weekend. People.

1:42:27.760 --> 1:42:28.760
<v Speaker 4>You could stay.

1:42:30.520 --> 1:42:31.519
<v Speaker 6>Every day.

1:42:33.040 --> 1:42:36.519
<v Speaker 1>And Dannie happy every minute.

1:42:38.439 --> 1:42:41.520
<v Speaker 2>It's been so long of your mona.

1:42:41.520 --> 1:42:45.240
<v Speaker 7>Way, it's happy already.

1:42:46.720 --> 1:42:49.080
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna be grevy