1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,360 Speaker 1: Ten minutes here before the top of the hour. Our 2 00:00:02,440 --> 00:00:06,119 Speaker 1: guest is Richard McGregor, senior fellow at the Lowe Institute, 3 00:00:06,640 --> 00:00:08,520 Speaker 1: with us to talk a little bit more about the 4 00:00:08,600 --> 00:00:12,479 Speaker 1: latest developments in China and this consolidation of power by 5 00:00:12,680 --> 00:00:15,120 Speaker 1: Shi jun Ping. Richard, always great to have you on 6 00:00:15,160 --> 00:00:18,080 Speaker 1: the program. You know, we have to ask a lot 7 00:00:18,120 --> 00:00:21,840 Speaker 1: of the same questions in seemingly different ways. So let 8 00:00:21,840 --> 00:00:24,520 Speaker 1: me flip this around a little bit. We we knew 9 00:00:24,560 --> 00:00:27,560 Speaker 1: that Hi Jumping had amassed a lot of power in 10 00:00:27,560 --> 00:00:30,720 Speaker 1: in China, and we've known that for the past many years. 11 00:00:31,520 --> 00:00:35,159 Speaker 1: Is this almost more transparent? Now? What you see is 12 00:00:35,159 --> 00:00:38,280 Speaker 1: what you get. All seven members of the Standing Committee 13 00:00:38,280 --> 00:00:43,479 Speaker 1: the polit Bureau are she supporters, she loyalists and at 14 00:00:43,520 --> 00:00:47,440 Speaker 1: least you know that's the case. Yeah, I mean that 15 00:00:47,600 --> 00:00:50,040 Speaker 1: is certainly one way of looking at it. Um. You know, 16 00:00:50,159 --> 00:00:53,680 Speaker 1: there's art of clarity from China in that respect. Art 17 00:00:53,680 --> 00:00:58,280 Speaker 1: of clarity also Procejumping himself. He has a very specific 18 00:00:58,320 --> 00:01:01,720 Speaker 1: and detailed policy program both at home and abroad, which 19 00:01:01,720 --> 00:01:05,240 Speaker 1: he wants to execute in what he thinks are now 20 00:01:05,319 --> 00:01:08,640 Speaker 1: more dangerous times. So he's going to rely on people 21 00:01:08,680 --> 00:01:11,520 Speaker 1: who are utter loyalists to do that, I mean I 22 00:01:11,560 --> 00:01:14,720 Speaker 1: should say that. I mean, in some respects we are 23 00:01:14,720 --> 00:01:17,080 Speaker 1: treating these people who have been appointed to the polit 24 00:01:17,120 --> 00:01:20,680 Speaker 1: Bureau Standing Committee as mere Cipher's for She. But they're 25 00:01:20,680 --> 00:01:23,480 Speaker 1: not greenhorns, you know, they've all had massive jobs in 26 00:01:23,520 --> 00:01:27,039 Speaker 1: the system for many, many years. But but they're all 27 00:01:27,080 --> 00:01:29,680 Speaker 1: on the same page as well, so they're not appointed 28 00:01:29,680 --> 00:01:36,400 Speaker 1: on competence alone. It's also loyalty. Is everyone really all 29 00:01:36,440 --> 00:01:38,720 Speaker 1: on the same page though, I mean, there's definitely this 30 00:01:38,840 --> 00:01:42,120 Speaker 1: facade of unity. But let's just take this, for example, 31 00:01:42,480 --> 00:01:44,880 Speaker 1: that they had to rewrite the constitution to allow she 32 00:01:45,120 --> 00:01:48,480 Speaker 1: to break term limits a unanimous vote in favor, two 33 00:01:48,480 --> 00:01:52,800 Speaker 1: thousand two delegates all think it's a great idea. Really, 34 00:01:53,240 --> 00:01:55,880 Speaker 1: is there really no dissent or is it just really 35 00:01:55,920 --> 00:01:59,400 Speaker 1: well hidden? Well, certainly at the moment, at a moment 36 00:01:59,480 --> 00:02:01,880 Speaker 1: like that and there's voting, that's not the time to 37 00:02:02,000 --> 00:02:06,720 Speaker 1: express any descent at all. Um, the look that the 38 00:02:06,760 --> 00:02:09,560 Speaker 1: system is opaque. Um. You know, one of the funny 39 00:02:09,560 --> 00:02:11,919 Speaker 1: things leading up to this party Congress, when we're all 40 00:02:11,919 --> 00:02:14,720 Speaker 1: trying to discern what might happen, you know, one of 41 00:02:14,720 --> 00:02:18,519 Speaker 1: the prime analytical tools for working, you know, following elite 42 00:02:18,520 --> 00:02:21,440 Speaker 1: politics in China, and of course it's elite politics. Was 43 00:02:21,520 --> 00:02:25,560 Speaker 1: only the elite can practice it, you know, was you know, 44 00:02:25,600 --> 00:02:28,520 Speaker 1: we look at people's birthdays, how old are they and 45 00:02:28,600 --> 00:02:30,799 Speaker 1: the line we used to look at people's factions. Now 46 00:02:30,840 --> 00:02:35,480 Speaker 1: that's gone, age retirement limits has gone, no succession planning 47 00:02:35,520 --> 00:02:39,120 Speaker 1: and the like. So of course there's disagreements are within China, 48 00:02:39,160 --> 00:02:42,720 Speaker 1: and there's disagreements within execution, but we don't have any 49 00:02:42,760 --> 00:02:46,239 Speaker 1: insight into that because at the top it is pretty 50 00:02:46,320 --> 00:02:49,680 Speaker 1: much a black box. Now will it remain like that 51 00:02:49,720 --> 00:02:52,680 Speaker 1: for the next five years? In other words, everybody marching 52 00:02:52,680 --> 00:02:55,840 Speaker 1: in lockstep. I doubt that's true. There's too many pressures 53 00:02:55,840 --> 00:02:59,360 Speaker 1: in the system, but it's not clear easily clear to 54 00:02:59,760 --> 00:03:04,640 Speaker 1: us outside. Thus I think we have to say probably 55 00:03:04,800 --> 00:03:08,240 Speaker 1: that in this next period it may not be as 56 00:03:08,280 --> 00:03:12,800 Speaker 1: friendly to outside investors as what we had been led 57 00:03:12,840 --> 00:03:16,200 Speaker 1: to believe. You know, in terms of pushback, I'm not 58 00:03:16,280 --> 00:03:19,359 Speaker 1: saying that Lee Ka cheongg you know, was was giving 59 00:03:19,440 --> 00:03:24,040 Speaker 1: huge pushback, but both he and Leo Hubb were seemingly 60 00:03:24,160 --> 00:03:29,040 Speaker 1: preaching a slightly more moderate model for investors. You remember, 61 00:03:29,080 --> 00:03:31,960 Speaker 1: back in March, we saw what looked like a promise 62 00:03:32,000 --> 00:03:35,640 Speaker 1: for more transparency, and and that got swept swept to 63 00:03:35,680 --> 00:03:37,920 Speaker 1: the side, and in fact now it looks like it's 64 00:03:37,960 --> 00:03:40,760 Speaker 1: almost a mini purge up there at the top. So 65 00:03:40,920 --> 00:03:43,800 Speaker 1: is it at least safe to say the atmosphere for 66 00:03:43,920 --> 00:03:48,160 Speaker 1: investing is not so safe going forward as it was. Well, 67 00:03:48,160 --> 00:03:51,240 Speaker 1: that's an interesting question because I certainly think at the 68 00:03:51,320 --> 00:03:54,760 Speaker 1: local level of provincial city and even a lower level 69 00:03:54,800 --> 00:03:59,640 Speaker 1: of governments, they're very keen on foreign investment, um, particularly 70 00:03:59,680 --> 00:04:02,360 Speaker 1: as the other drivers of the Chinese economy are not 71 00:04:02,520 --> 00:04:06,800 Speaker 1: working so well. Um. So there's two issues. Are foreign 72 00:04:06,880 --> 00:04:09,960 Speaker 1: investors are less welcome I don't think so. Are there 73 00:04:10,080 --> 00:04:14,640 Speaker 1: investments less safe because of growing gear political issues. That's 74 00:04:14,720 --> 00:04:17,880 Speaker 1: quite possible, I would say, but then they're on the horizon, 75 00:04:17,920 --> 00:04:20,520 Speaker 1: but not right in front of us at the moment. 76 00:04:21,160 --> 00:04:25,520 Speaker 1: I really think the biggest issue for everybody is COVID zero, 77 00:04:25,680 --> 00:04:30,640 Speaker 1: because the policy was reaffirmed quite strongly by C. Jimping. 78 00:04:30,720 --> 00:04:33,920 Speaker 1: You would expect that, but he did it anyway, and 79 00:04:33,960 --> 00:04:36,719 Speaker 1: I think that's really crushing the economy in China and 80 00:04:36,839 --> 00:04:42,479 Speaker 1: making it difficult for Chinese investors as much as foreign investors. 81 00:04:42,600 --> 00:04:44,840 Speaker 1: Until we can see our way clear of that, then 82 00:04:44,880 --> 00:04:48,760 Speaker 1: I don't really see how it's friendly to any sort 83 00:04:48,760 --> 00:04:53,000 Speaker 1: of investment at all. Yeah, and other potential risks around 84 00:04:53,000 --> 00:04:56,039 Speaker 1: that too. In terms of dissent, because you know, we've 85 00:04:56,040 --> 00:04:59,719 Speaker 1: got COVID zero, we saw signs of graffiti emerging and 86 00:04:59,760 --> 00:05:02,520 Speaker 1: power the restrooms. I mean, it sounds trivial, but that's 87 00:05:02,560 --> 00:05:05,680 Speaker 1: really the only place that people can express opinions now 88 00:05:05,720 --> 00:05:10,360 Speaker 1: because there's no surveillance in a public restroom. So some 89 00:05:10,400 --> 00:05:13,520 Speaker 1: of these expressions of frustration with COVID zero. Is there 90 00:05:13,560 --> 00:05:16,320 Speaker 1: any risk that this bubbles up if it continues for 91 00:05:16,440 --> 00:05:20,200 Speaker 1: much longer, Well, that there has to be, but I 92 00:05:20,240 --> 00:05:23,360 Speaker 1: don't want to exaggerate that, because you know, we see 93 00:05:23,400 --> 00:05:25,000 Speaker 1: a lot of stuff on Twitter and the like of 94 00:05:25,080 --> 00:05:28,680 Speaker 1: this sort of descent, people getting angry the latest lockdown. 95 00:05:28,720 --> 00:05:31,800 Speaker 1: Who wouldn't for example. But if you talk to other 96 00:05:31,839 --> 00:05:35,560 Speaker 1: people in China, they say that there's still a lot 97 00:05:35,600 --> 00:05:38,760 Speaker 1: of support for COVID zero because they buy the government 98 00:05:38,839 --> 00:05:43,320 Speaker 1: line that the Chinese government policy has actually protected the 99 00:05:43,360 --> 00:05:47,200 Speaker 1: health of Chinese. So many million plus Americans have died. 100 00:05:47,240 --> 00:05:51,480 Speaker 1: The official figures for deaths in China below six thousand. Now, 101 00:05:51,560 --> 00:05:54,560 Speaker 1: don't no doubt that's an underestimate, but maybe not by 102 00:05:54,720 --> 00:05:58,840 Speaker 1: too much and people seem to have accepted the trade off. 103 00:05:58,920 --> 00:06:03,440 Speaker 1: Now I wonder how much longer that lasts actually, because 104 00:06:03,480 --> 00:06:07,440 Speaker 1: if the economy does continue to perform in a really 105 00:06:07,560 --> 00:06:10,840 Speaker 1: sub half fashion, that will flow onto incomes and create 106 00:06:10,920 --> 00:06:14,320 Speaker 1: other pressures. So we haven't seen that the scent yet. 107 00:06:14,360 --> 00:06:17,080 Speaker 1: Just finally on that point, of course, China has its 108 00:06:17,080 --> 00:06:21,359 Speaker 1: own sort of mini doctor Fauci's medical professionals who have 109 00:06:21,520 --> 00:06:24,440 Speaker 1: the status and standing to speak up a little bit 110 00:06:24,480 --> 00:06:29,440 Speaker 1: independently and periodically. They've been making their voices voice known 111 00:06:29,480 --> 00:06:31,719 Speaker 1: on this issue as well, So I'm watching out for 112 00:06:31,760 --> 00:06:34,600 Speaker 1: that as well. So we've seen a big cell down 113 00:06:34,800 --> 00:06:40,039 Speaker 1: in Chinese equities, and bind flows have have kind of stabilized, 114 00:06:40,320 --> 00:06:43,719 Speaker 1: but but they have been down. Are you are you 115 00:06:43,760 --> 00:06:48,599 Speaker 1: thinking that maybe domestic investors will ultimately be the winners 116 00:06:48,640 --> 00:06:51,839 Speaker 1: here because a lot of foreigners have backed away, but locals, 117 00:06:52,080 --> 00:06:55,400 Speaker 1: you know, may take advantage of these better prices. Well, 118 00:06:55,400 --> 00:06:59,480 Speaker 1: I'm very careful about commenting on markets and stock markets 119 00:06:59,480 --> 00:07:02,880 Speaker 1: in particular, really also in China, but I don't think 120 00:07:02,920 --> 00:07:06,640 Speaker 1: the markets in China are really that reflective of much 121 00:07:06,640 --> 00:07:10,440 Speaker 1: other than confidence in the life um And so whether 122 00:07:10,520 --> 00:07:12,960 Speaker 1: the domestic investors are all going to pile in now 123 00:07:13,040 --> 00:07:14,960 Speaker 1: that the foreigners were out, and they'll win on the 124 00:07:14,960 --> 00:07:19,120 Speaker 1: bounce back. Okay, tough to say. Richard out of time, unfortunately, 125 00:07:19,200 --> 00:07:22,680 Speaker 1: Richard McGregor, senior fellow at the Lower Institute, with his 126 00:07:22,880 --> 00:07:23,360 Speaker 1: live here