WEBVTT - How the Coronavirus Has Broken the Global Economy

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to Stephanomics, the podcast that brings the

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:11.400
<v Speaker 1>global economy to you. When we were last on air

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>two months ago, the coronavirus was a China problem, one

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>story of many that we might have talked about on

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 1>this podcast. Now it's the only story, and most of

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>us are living very differently, thinking very differently than we

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>were even a few weeks ago. Inevitably, Stephanomics is going

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to feel a bit different too, But our basic mission

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>to bring you what's happening in the global economy and

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 1>why it matters hasn't changed. In fact, it seems more

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>important than ever. So later on I'm going to talk

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to the American economist Adam Posen about how governments and

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 1>economists have measured up to the challenge of this pandemic.

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 1>But first, I am very grateful to James Mega, Julian

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and Jeff Black from Bloomberg's economy team in China for

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>managing to produce this piece from the front lines of

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the bat to keep the global supply chain intact. I

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:20.759
<v Speaker 1>think for a minute about how you get your household goods,

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:23.679
<v Speaker 1>or at least how you got them two months ago.

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:26.679
<v Speaker 1>You might have gone to a local store or you

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>ordered them online and waited for delivery. That's all become

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:33.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot more difficult since COVID nineteen spread around the world,

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:36.959
<v Speaker 1>with billions of people now in various forms of lockdown.

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>But what about the people who make these items and

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>how do these things travel across the world. Here in China,

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a thirty million strong army of truckers who linked

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the factories, markets, container terminals and warehouses of this country together.

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Now they're on the front line of that struggled against

0:01:55.440 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the coronavirus and its associated economic impacts. This is the

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Shinfai agricultural wholesale market in Beijing, the size of sixteen

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 1>soccer fields, and there were trucks everywhere early in the

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 1>morning on March nineteen. Every truck acts as a standalone

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>sales booth. Tai Lily is a thirty six year old

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>driver from nearby Herbe Province with a faux hawk haircut.

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>He was playing with his phone in the driver's seat

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and we talked to him. Behind him was half a

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>truck of oranges and boxes waiting to be sold. He

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>told us about what he would be doing normally. No,

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>because of the epidemic, lots of factories haven't returned to work.

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>We have no other choices but to transport fruit. Fruit

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>is all fresh and once picked, it needs to be

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>shipped out right away, while factory goods can wait. Besides,

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>there aren't many factory goods that need to be transported now. Anyway,

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the market was a lot quieter than it would normally be,

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>according to Chai. That's partly because movement in public in

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Beijing is still difficult due to the fear of infection,

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and market demand remains suppressed. But there's an emerging problem

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>now that will further crush demand for China's goods abroad,

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 1>just as restrictions begin to be lifted and drivers returned

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to the roads at home. The spread of the disease

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>around the world and the lockdowns and economies ranging from

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the US to Europe. In a choice, senior vice president

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>at Moody's said, the shock from outside of China is

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>a bigger concern now. We are in a very unprecedented

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 1>situation when global supply chain is being disrupted UM and

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I think UM. So far we have been the supply

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>chain and various in industry in China recovering to a

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>different extent or resuming productivity to a various extent. But

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>going out, it's a little bit difficult to predict. Um

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>as the virus breaks out you know around the world, um,

0:03:56.920 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>what kind of ramifications and um pulling impact that would

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>have to bring back to China. I think now you know,

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>without with very little visibility on how long and how

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>how how fast evolving situation is. I think it's a

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>bit difficult, but I think it's um it's it's It's

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>probably fair to say that some supply chain disruptions it

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>should should be expected. The situation in China's transport industry

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>has come full circle in just a few weeks in February.

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>During the immediate aftermath and the coronavirus shutdowns in Wolhan

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and other cities, even if you had goods to ship,

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>it was next to impossible to find someone to drive them.

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:42.839
<v Speaker 1>Shoot Japan is head of logistics that Longy solar panel

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>factory in Shanxi in northwestern China. Shoes says the industry

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>is experiencing its biggest crisis in history. There were all

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>kinds of unexpected and very serious abnormality. The normal order

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>of transportation was completely the trupted. Mr Shu who we

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:07.600
<v Speaker 1>interviewed on March nine, is talking about the difficulties he

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:11.359
<v Speaker 1>encountered exactly one month before that, when trucks and drivers

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>were in extreme shortage. At the time, he was urgently

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 1>needing to ship raw materials to the company's factory in Vietnam.

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>It relies solely on supplies from China, and it was

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>about to run out of materials from production. If that

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>would happened, more than two thousand workers will be sent

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 1>home and the company would suffer great losses. Shoe managed

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to arrange a dozen trucks to deliver raw materials to

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Apport in chin Jaw, a city in southern China near

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the Vietnamese border, where a ship bound for Vietnam was waiting.

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>There was one hitch. The trucks weren't able to leave

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the highway and chin Jaw because all exits were closed

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>due to virus containment roadblocks. Shoe spent about ten hours

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:55.039
<v Speaker 1>pulling strings with the local commerce department and customs authorities

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 1>before his fleet of trucks were allowed to exit the

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>toll gate and clear customs. China's struggles to get back

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>to work after its own virus shutdowns are likely to

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 1>be repeated in other countries in coming months. The truck

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>as we talked to said, it's been a hard road

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>filled with risk and personal sacrifice. Fung, who's forty three

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:18.239
<v Speaker 1>years old, is a native of Unaway Problems in the East,

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>but he works far from his family in the south

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>in Guandong. We spoke with him on February. He talked

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>about the fear he felt while driving through the peak

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of the epidemic ceremony worried. I wear my mask very

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>tightly every day and replace it daily. For my family's living,

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I have to work. I don't have any other options.

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I have two sons at home. I'm the only breadwinner

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of my family. I have no other choice but to work.

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Frequent temperature checks on highways during the peak of the

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 1>outbreak in China slowed him down and shuttered roadside restaurants

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 1>made it hard to eat while on the move. All

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:58.839
<v Speaker 1>I hope is for the epidemic to be over soon.

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>This way, I feel worried about infections when driving. Whose

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>anxiety is the price for keeping even a fraction of

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>a global economy operating, and it's in stark contrast to

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 1>other professions which can work from the relative comfort of

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>their own homes. Without people like Woo, supply chains would

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>have come to a complete halt. Darante Country Risk analyst

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>at Fitch Solutions in Asia says, the important role the

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>logistics industry plays in the economy goes without saying. You

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>can have your factories, um, you know, produced the goods

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>manufacturer exports Indian and you still require the logistics industry

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to move those goods around the world. Uh So I

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>would say, UM, definitely a very important industry to have

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>us trying to try to recover from the economic disruption.

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>The hardships that Chinese households have suffered seemed to be

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>just the beginning. All indications are that the impact of

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen is far from over. The worst for the

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>global economy is probably yet to come, and for China,

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>if the virus returns, or even if it doesn't, the

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>global downturn or prolong the pain. For Bloomberg News, I'm

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>James Meager in Beijing. So that was the road level

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>view in China. A bit of a gear shift now

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>because in this first episode of the new series, I

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>thought we might step back to think about the economics

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of the coronavirus how economists have responded to this very

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 1>different kind of shock to the global economy, and whether

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 1>the right advice has been getting to governments as they

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>try to cushion the blow. One of the best people

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:45.679
<v Speaker 1>I could think of for talking about all that was

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>my old friend Adam Posen, who has been president of

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the Peterson Institute for International Economics since and also served

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>for a while on the Bank of England's Interest rate

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>setting Committee. Adam, thanks very much for being with us

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:03.319
<v Speaker 1>from your booklined office. Thank you for having me, Stephanie.

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>We're all living in a very different world from a

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>couple of months ago, or even a few weeks ago.

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>How do you think economists have done in first assessing

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>this shock and then thinking about how we respond to it.

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I think economists have displayed both the strengths and the

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 1>weaknesses of the profession, the strength of being relatively empirical,

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:32.599
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps the people's surprise having agreement on some basic principles.

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, policy context is very evident, so on the

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>fiscal side, they it's fascinating to watch not just the

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Larry Summers or Jason Furman or Peter bell Fingers or

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>people on John sunny Ferry on the left calling for

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>massive fiscal stimulus. It's also people on the right like

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Ken Rogoff and Glenn Hubbard and us context you served

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>in Republican administrations, there is agreement that government had to

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 1>be involved and couldn't be just the central banks, and

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>we had to think in terms of essentially said bridge

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:07.839
<v Speaker 1>loans and job preserving programs on an incredible scale. And

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that people should take some part from that.

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>That for all to talk about economists never agreeing on anything,

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>in this case, the response was clear, and that certainly

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>was true with the central banks as well. They're all

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty much on the same page. But of course, as

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 1>you well recognized, and I vi you to my shame cringing,

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 1>if you look back to what economists were talking about,

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>including myself in early February mid February, you know, we

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>were not seeing this coming. Our ability to forecast and

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:38.199
<v Speaker 1>our ability to think about what kinds of shocks are

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 1>happening when remains very limited. That was true before the

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight crisis, although a few people saw

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>things coming, and that's true again here. So it's this

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:51.439
<v Speaker 1>combination of conditional on what happens. I think the economists

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>are behaving well and getting the right advice out. But

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of early warning and foresight and optic well, yeah,

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think it is. And of course we been

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>going through the same exercise at Bloomberg. We had we

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>have a group of economists who were actually very close,

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>We have great expertise in China. They were looking at

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the data. We had a sort of China back to

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the work back to work tracker when we were looking

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>in January and February, and we were able to see

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>quite early that the shot to the Chinese economy was

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:23.679
<v Speaker 1>bigger than people thought. And then we therefore we were

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>then thinking in terms of oh, that's going to mean

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>ex or why for the rest of the world. But

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 1>it took a remarkably long time for us or I

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:33.439
<v Speaker 1>think anyone else to move from that to thinking, hang

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 1>on a minute, it's not just going to be dealing

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>with a shot from China. What if the whole world

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>has to go through what China is going through now?

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>And it does seem to me extraordinary that more people

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't make that leap until really quite quite late, including us.

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is that something about people just not being

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>able to compute a total change of regime or what

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>do you think is driving that I think you thinks

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:58.839
<v Speaker 1>for driving that certainly one is as you say, it

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>just require a willingness to think of things really deviating

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 1>from normal. Economists talk about, you know, small with the

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>technical word perturbations or movements around an equilibrium, and this

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>is moving from one state of the world to another.

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 1>And economists are just as bad on that as everybody else.

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think another piece of it is ultimately fundamental,

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>which is the talk between people who would do public

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>health and do pandemics and not just economists, with foreign

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 1>policy people, market people has been quite limited. I was

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>talking to somebody from one world's largest most successful investment funds,

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and they're one of those funds that sucks up every

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 1>piece of big information that you know, big data that

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you know of. And even they didn't see this coming,

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>They didn't make that mental transition, despite the fact that

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the person who owns this fund contributes to public health research.

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's just a human failing. It's a

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>very sad human failing, but it is one that we've

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>just had a failure of collective imagination. What's interesting is

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>we have got to actually just in the last couple

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>of weeks, some of these conversations that had previously been

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 1>on the sidelines now getting a bit more mainstream. I

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>suspect as people get frustrated were being stuck at home

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>about the trade offs between the public health emergency and

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the economic emergency. And I wonder what you think, because

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 1>there's there was Intuitively people said, well, we're we're sort

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>of putting the public health first in and the result

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>is we're really killing the economy and we know that,

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to try and do all we can,

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>but we're prioritizing the health. But increasingly people have said

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>that actually it's better for the economy as well not

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>to have the pandemic. So do you think we had

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 1>too long where there was a sort of false trade

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>off there between the economy and the public health emergency. Yeah,

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 1>it was a very human thing, was very responsible of

0:13:57.240 --> 0:14:00.719
<v Speaker 1>our political leaders in countries including the US, the UK,

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Brazil and elsewhere can talk that way. The historical evidence

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>has always been pretty dark, clear going back to this

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>flu pandemic nineteen, going back to the nineteen fifties, flu

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>academic going to natural disasters of this sort that you

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:22.119
<v Speaker 1>do better over not even that longer run, a relatively

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>short run, by doing what you need to control the damage.

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>The damage is the real shock, the the loss of

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>human lives, the loss of feman work hours, the capacity

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>constraints on the hospitals and the medical system, the fear

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>of people that is legitimate, and the withdrawal of purchasing

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>in from certain sectors and certain activities. Those are all real.

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Those are gonna happen no matter what. And I think

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>that's what people were reluctant to really recognize and admit.

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Once you admit that, and once you admit that, the

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>real binding constraint for us all in even in the

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>rich world, as we've seen in Italy and Spain now

0:14:56.840 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 1>New York, is hospital capacity medical systems, because you can't

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>It's like for a thousand of your flood, you can't

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 1>always have enough medical capacity for this kind of pandemic.

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>On the hand, once you recognized that is the binding

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>constraint for everything, then it just falls largically. This is

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>no place where I will see you kind of got

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 1>it right. The overwhelming majority immediately said we're better off

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>doing the medically induced called offer these sectors and it

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>will pay off. And it's not because it's gonna be wonderful,

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's because it's better than the t and the

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the big bits of advice, I guess that's

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>particularly you can see it, particularly in the European government's efforts,

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 1>is this effort to if you like, hold the economy

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and suspended animation. You know everything that that the sort

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>of bottom has fallen out of demand um and obviously

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of businesses feeling that they will go under

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>very quickly seeing the kind of fallen been the kind

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of falling revenues that you don't get even in a

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>really deep procession, if you're talking about nine or a

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred said in some cases rather than even the worst

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of recession, which might see twenty or thirty fall

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and in demand. But the economists have basically said, now

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>what you have to do is is do what you

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>can to fill that hole that's been blown into the

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>economy so that the economy is then intact when you

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>come out the other side. We know what we should

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>be trying to do in principle. Do you think in

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>practice we're going to be able to do that or

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>do you think that there will be there will be

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>permanent cost of this even though we know there was

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>nothing fundamentally wrong with the economy and we went into it.

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I think you've hit the profound insights, which is that

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>even more than the usual recession, this is something where

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>there's abroad sudden stop and who falls apart in terms

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 1>of businesses and jobs depends entirely on cash flow at

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>that moment. It's not about sort of merit did you

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>have a good product, did you invest, did you save enough?

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>It's really just the side of economic death is do

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>you have the cash right now or do you happen

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to be in the wrong industry at the wrong place.

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>And so the response that we've put together other and

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I should say, well, I mean the cultum unity is

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:06.919
<v Speaker 1>put together is really one about providing essentially a bridge

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:10.120
<v Speaker 1>loan for everybody. It's the goal to say, don't foreclose

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the mortgages, don't foreclose on loans, don't put people off

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 1>of jobs if you can hold onto them. If we

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:20.399
<v Speaker 1>the government leave the public funds, you to keep those jobs.

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Because there is this reality that once something goes under,

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 1>it's a company, if it's a job place, and people

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>leave that it's very hard to rebuild. I mean, small

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>businesses may be easier to rebuild and back than than

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 1>big businesses because there's less capital involved, there's less reputation,

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:43.400
<v Speaker 1>there's less network, but nonetheless you do have this permanent scarring.

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that we also have to think about in

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>terms of behavioral changes that persists. So we saw that

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 1>after two thousand and eight to two ten or two

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 1>thousand twelve in Europe, where you had extended increases in

0:17:56.520 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 1>female labor force participation, extended rises in households savings. People

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>were being holding off and moving out of the house

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and building family surprising houses. These were all sensible, understandable

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:11.640
<v Speaker 1>precautionary measures. I think we're going to see a lot

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of the same, but it's going to be biased towards

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:18.439
<v Speaker 1>or against, frankly, certain ministries. We can talk about cruise ships,

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 1>we can talk about nails a lots, we can talk

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>about tourism, and that part is going to be a

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 1>permanent scar well, if we're thinking about potential long term changes.

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned at the start that economists on the left

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and right actually had ended up having a similar advice

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:41.239
<v Speaker 1>for governments in response to this crisis, and that was

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:43.639
<v Speaker 1>about spending a lot of money and doing a lot

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 1>of things that they're not used to doing. Um, do

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 1>you think that could also be a change that the

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:51.640
<v Speaker 1>attitude to government could change, and we could see even

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 1>in the US, a desire for government to take a

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 1>bigger role and maybe also have better long term safety

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:02.159
<v Speaker 1>net for gig workers and the like. I think it will.

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I think there will be pressure in that direction, and

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm hopeful, But I also think this is going to

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 1>be much more contentious. I think that there will be.

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:11.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm already talking to people who say, and again not

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>completely and reasonably, well, we don't want to communize the system.

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>We don't want to have permanent ownership of government of

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>all the main industries. But I certainly believe the US

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 1>has a real opportunity and a real reason now to

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:28.640
<v Speaker 1>move towards more safety net, as you say, for its workers,

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>for its people. And I think also what's become very

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 1>clear but it changes in the unemployment regime in the US,

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>is that we do have a lot to learn from

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Europe that you need to make it so the jobs

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 1>are not as fragile as low connection as you mentioned,

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>gig workers informal sector, part time people, but also eating

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>full time people in the US tend to have much

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:54.919
<v Speaker 1>more tenuous support and connection to do their jobs at

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:57.639
<v Speaker 1>the lower end of the income scale. That should change.

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I use the term I think it's not very sexy term,

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess, but I think we need to start taking

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>terms offer stocking, that businesses, people and especial government create

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:15.360
<v Speaker 1>a reserve, and that reserve can be stockpiles of masks

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 1>and medical equipment. That reserve could be money for people

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>who temporarily lose their job in this kind of crisis,

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to quitting or something else. Well, we could

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>definitely see that also in the in the health care sector.

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 1>I guess My final question is, and it is true,

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:35.639
<v Speaker 1>having conversations like this about the proper role of government

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:38.439
<v Speaker 1>and what governments are currently doing in Europe to respond

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to the crisis has led a number of people to

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:44.360
<v Speaker 1>say that Europe might come out rather better from this

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>pandemic than the US. Do you think that's right? Or

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>it feels very odd to be saying that Europe might

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>come out ahead on anything, really, because we're so used

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to saying it's a very sclerosic, inflexible economy with two

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:59.399
<v Speaker 1>larger role for the state and all these things. But

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 1>is it possib well that those things are actually going

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 1>to be a competitive strength at least in responding to

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>this virus. I think it will. I think it should.

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>I think it will. Even before this virus crisis, the

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:15.719
<v Speaker 1>productivity gaps and especially the per capita income growth gaps

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 1>between Europe and US and UK say, we're much smaller

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 1>as productivity is declined throughout the Western world in the

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:28.119
<v Speaker 1>last decade. And so then you have to keep asking yourself, well,

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:30.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're just having a much nastier economy and much

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 1>scarier economy, a much less equal economy, and now economy

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:38.199
<v Speaker 1>much more vulnerable to disaster and illness. And when I

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>say economy, I really mean the people, what are you

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:44.360
<v Speaker 1>getting for it? And it is not clear at all

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that the US is getting awhere near as much for

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 1>that as they would like, as we would like. And

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 1>so I think that discussion has to take place now. Uh.

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>That said, Europe is messing itself up in a different

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>way by its unwillingness to share and neutralized risk cross borders.

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's it's like New York and Louisiana have

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 1>to come together. There is still very strong objection to

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:13.640
<v Speaker 1>sharing of risk within Europe and so yes, European system.

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:17.879
<v Speaker 1>The European values what they get for their greater government

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>intervention versus what they give up looks increasingly attractive. But

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:26.239
<v Speaker 1>Europe and the euro Area in particular is starting to

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>fail on a different basis. Adam posing, thank you very much,

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me, Thanks for listening to Stephanomics. Like everybody,

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>we're working in unusual circumstances right now. The program might

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 1>sound a bit different week to week, but we're certainly

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>going to have plenty to talk about, and Bloomberg reporters

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and economists are still hard at work. You can catch

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:51.439
<v Speaker 1>all the latest news and analysis from Bloomberg Economics on

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg News website or by following at Economics on Twitter.

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:59.360
<v Speaker 1>The story in this episode was written and reported by

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>James May and Julian It was produced by Magmas Hendrickson

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 1>and edited by Jeff Black and Scott Lamman, who is

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 1>also the executive producer of Stephanomics Special Thanks to Adam Posen.

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:14.119
<v Speaker 1>The head of Bloomberg Podcast is Francesca Levie.