1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,640 Speaker 1: The President of the United States of America is paying 2 00:00:02,680 --> 00:00:07,800 Speaker 1: off on that campaign promise to discriminate against all Americans 3 00:00:08,320 --> 00:00:11,800 Speaker 1: unless you are a black woman. Because he promised on 4 00:00:11,800 --> 00:00:13,600 Speaker 1: the campaign trail that if he got a chance to 5 00:00:13,640 --> 00:00:17,079 Speaker 1: nominate somebody the Supreme Court, it would be a black 6 00:00:17,239 --> 00:00:20,960 Speaker 1: woman only. Even when he was with Justice Pryor at 7 00:00:20,960 --> 00:00:24,560 Speaker 1: the White House announcing Justice Bror's retirement, he made it 8 00:00:24,680 --> 00:00:29,600 Speaker 1: very clear he was excited to fulfill that quota promise. 9 00:00:30,200 --> 00:00:36,320 Speaker 1: I've made no decision except one except one, only one thing, 10 00:00:36,400 --> 00:00:39,240 Speaker 1: only one decision he had made that day, to discriminate 11 00:00:39,280 --> 00:00:44,199 Speaker 1: against ninety percent of America. The person I will nominate 12 00:00:44,680 --> 00:00:50,720 Speaker 1: will be some of the extraordinary qualifications character, experience, and integrity. 13 00:00:50,760 --> 00:00:53,760 Speaker 1: And that person will be the first black woman ever 14 00:00:53,880 --> 00:00:56,520 Speaker 1: nominated to the United States Supreme Court. All right, So 15 00:00:56,600 --> 00:00:58,639 Speaker 1: there it is. It is a black woman. That's how 16 00:00:58,680 --> 00:01:00,480 Speaker 1: we got to where we are today. Because when he 17 00:01:00,520 --> 00:01:02,200 Speaker 1: was on the campaign trail, when he was worried he 18 00:01:02,240 --> 00:01:04,080 Speaker 1: was going to lose and he didn't have a lot 19 00:01:04,080 --> 00:01:08,520 Speaker 1: of enthusiasm among African American voters, the polls showed he 20 00:01:08,560 --> 00:01:11,160 Speaker 1: needed to do something to get them to like him. 21 00:01:11,200 --> 00:01:13,880 Speaker 1: And what was that. It was all right, we will 22 00:01:14,000 --> 00:01:16,280 Speaker 1: tell you that we're going to discriminate against everybody else, 23 00:01:16,280 --> 00:01:18,080 Speaker 1: and we will tell you that we are only going 24 00:01:18,120 --> 00:01:20,319 Speaker 1: to give a chance at the White House for a 25 00:01:20,360 --> 00:01:23,440 Speaker 1: Supreme Court nominee that fits a quota, not necessarily the 26 00:01:23,480 --> 00:01:30,280 Speaker 1: best person for the job. Say it again, not necessarily 27 00:01:30,319 --> 00:01:34,760 Speaker 1: the best person for the job. Now, a quick reminder, 28 00:01:34,760 --> 00:01:36,920 Speaker 1: if you're listening to this podcast, please make sure you 29 00:01:37,040 --> 00:01:41,199 Speaker 1: hit the subscriber auto download button and tell your friends 30 00:01:41,200 --> 00:01:43,480 Speaker 1: about this podcast, share this on social media, and if 31 00:01:43,520 --> 00:01:46,360 Speaker 1: you would write us a five star review to help us, 32 00:01:46,400 --> 00:01:50,640 Speaker 1: as Democrats have been attacking our podcasts recently with bad reviews. Now, 33 00:01:51,040 --> 00:01:55,080 Speaker 1: we're going to pick an African American woman. So let's 34 00:01:55,080 --> 00:01:58,560 Speaker 1: go to the confirmation of this African American woman. She 35 00:01:58,720 --> 00:02:01,160 Speaker 1: was asked a question, a question that should have been 36 00:02:01,160 --> 00:02:03,559 Speaker 1: an easy one, right, because we know that the only 37 00:02:03,560 --> 00:02:06,920 Speaker 1: reason why she was even eligible for this job is 38 00:02:06,960 --> 00:02:12,040 Speaker 1: because she was number one a woman. Without being a woman, 39 00:02:13,639 --> 00:02:16,680 Speaker 1: she could not be eligible for the job. If she 40 00:02:16,800 --> 00:02:22,799 Speaker 1: was a black man, she was not eligible for the job. 41 00:02:23,360 --> 00:02:27,960 Speaker 1: She had to be a black woman and woman was 42 00:02:28,280 --> 00:02:32,440 Speaker 1: without woman, no shot at this. Now, we've had a 43 00:02:32,440 --> 00:02:34,519 Speaker 1: lot of debate over the last week or so over 44 00:02:34,600 --> 00:02:37,400 Speaker 1: what is a woman? Right? What is the definition of 45 00:02:37,440 --> 00:02:40,880 Speaker 1: a woman? Is a dude saying he's a woman? Actually 46 00:02:40,880 --> 00:02:44,120 Speaker 1: a woman? Of course not, but they're deranged people that 47 00:02:44,200 --> 00:02:47,000 Speaker 1: actually believe now that, oh, yes, that is a woman. 48 00:02:47,919 --> 00:02:51,960 Speaker 1: So Marcia Blackburn decided to ask a question. It's not 49 00:02:52,080 --> 00:02:54,919 Speaker 1: really a trick question. I want to make that very 50 00:02:55,280 --> 00:02:59,640 Speaker 1: very clear. Marcia Blackburn, Senator was getting her time to 51 00:03:00,040 --> 00:03:05,200 Speaker 1: question Judge Jackson, and she said, Hey, I want to 52 00:03:05,200 --> 00:03:09,079 Speaker 1: ask you a question. Can you give me a definition 53 00:03:09,120 --> 00:03:11,200 Speaker 1: of what a woman is? Now? You would think that 54 00:03:11,320 --> 00:03:13,520 Speaker 1: Judge Jackson US Supreme Court. Now I mean to be like, well, 55 00:03:13,560 --> 00:03:17,800 Speaker 1: that that would be me based on even the president's 56 00:03:18,600 --> 00:03:21,400 Speaker 1: definition of a woman. I clearly fit it, because otherwise 57 00:03:21,440 --> 00:03:24,639 Speaker 1: I wouldn't have been nominated. This woman who's going to 58 00:03:24,720 --> 00:03:27,520 Speaker 1: be on the Supreme Court if everything goes well, right, 59 00:03:28,080 --> 00:03:31,399 Speaker 1: looks like they've got enough votes to pull this off. 60 00:03:31,440 --> 00:03:33,799 Speaker 1: She can't even define what an actual woman is when 61 00:03:33,840 --> 00:03:36,040 Speaker 1: the definition of a woman is what actually got her 62 00:03:36,360 --> 00:03:38,400 Speaker 1: to the point where she could be on the Supreme 63 00:03:38,440 --> 00:03:41,160 Speaker 1: Court going through this process right now, take a listen. 64 00:03:41,960 --> 00:03:47,240 Speaker 1: Can you provide a definition for the word woman? Can 65 00:03:47,280 --> 00:03:55,080 Speaker 1: I provide a definition. Yeah, I can't. You can't not 66 00:03:55,480 --> 00:03:58,600 Speaker 1: in case context, I'm not a biology of the word 67 00:03:58,760 --> 00:04:02,040 Speaker 1: woman is so unpleased you're in controversial that you can't 68 00:04:02,080 --> 00:04:07,200 Speaker 1: give me a definition, Senator. In my work as a judge, 69 00:04:07,200 --> 00:04:12,360 Speaker 1: what I do is I address disputes. If there's a 70 00:04:12,440 --> 00:04:16,640 Speaker 1: dispute about a definition, people make arguments, and I look 71 00:04:16,640 --> 00:04:19,920 Speaker 1: at the law and I decide. So I'm not. The 72 00:04:20,080 --> 00:04:24,840 Speaker 1: fact that you can't give me a straight answer about 73 00:04:24,960 --> 00:04:29,839 Speaker 1: something as fundamental as what a woman is underscores the 74 00:04:29,960 --> 00:04:34,720 Speaker 1: dangers of the kind of progressive education that we are 75 00:04:34,839 --> 00:04:40,040 Speaker 1: hearing about. Just last week, an entire generation of young 76 00:04:40,160 --> 00:04:46,839 Speaker 1: girls watched as our taxpayer funded institutions permitted a biological 77 00:04:46,920 --> 00:04:51,159 Speaker 1: man to compete and beat a biological woman in the 78 00:04:51,360 --> 00:04:55,839 Speaker 1: NCAA swimming Championships. Now, you may ask yourself why is 79 00:04:55,839 --> 00:04:58,240 Speaker 1: this important, Because there's a very good chance at some 80 00:04:58,320 --> 00:05:01,640 Speaker 1: point women thists are going to figure out that men 81 00:05:01,680 --> 00:05:04,640 Speaker 1: are taking over their sporting and activities and taking over 82 00:05:04,680 --> 00:05:07,440 Speaker 1: their world and taking away spots from actual women, and 83 00:05:07,440 --> 00:05:09,599 Speaker 1: they're going to have to probably sue. And there's a 84 00:05:09,640 --> 00:05:11,720 Speaker 1: good chance this could go to the court system, if 85 00:05:11,720 --> 00:05:20,800 Speaker 1: not the Supreme Court okay, pretty clear. So answering the 86 00:05:20,880 --> 00:05:24,560 Speaker 1: question of what is the definition of a woman not 87 00:05:24,680 --> 00:05:29,240 Speaker 1: exactly a trick question, especially when that qualification is what 88 00:05:29,360 --> 00:05:31,599 Speaker 1: got you the chance to even sit here and to 89 00:05:31,680 --> 00:05:35,120 Speaker 1: answer these questions, because without it you wouldn't have been 90 00:05:35,160 --> 00:05:39,000 Speaker 1: considered for this job. What message do you think this 91 00:05:39,160 --> 00:05:44,000 Speaker 1: sends to girls who aspire to compete and win in 92 00:05:44,120 --> 00:05:50,320 Speaker 1: sports at the highest levels, Senator, I'm not sure what 93 00:05:50,720 --> 00:05:53,919 Speaker 1: message that sends. If you're asking me about the legal 94 00:05:53,920 --> 00:05:59,360 Speaker 1: issues related to it, those are topics that are being 95 00:05:59,640 --> 00:06:03,000 Speaker 1: hot discussed, as you say, and I could come to 96 00:06:03,040 --> 00:06:06,840 Speaker 1: the court, so and I think it tells our girls, 97 00:06:07,040 --> 00:06:09,719 Speaker 1: by the way she knows it right, could come to 98 00:06:09,720 --> 00:06:12,800 Speaker 1: the court. So I'm not going to talk about it. Now. 99 00:06:12,839 --> 00:06:15,880 Speaker 1: You could easily give a definition of what a woman is, 100 00:06:15,960 --> 00:06:18,080 Speaker 1: but this judge doesn't want too. Now here's the part 101 00:06:18,120 --> 00:06:21,839 Speaker 1: that makes me laugh. If Joe Biden would have nominated 102 00:06:21,960 --> 00:06:25,039 Speaker 1: a dude that says he's a chick, would liberal women 103 00:06:25,160 --> 00:06:28,080 Speaker 1: be okay with it? Of course not. He had to 104 00:06:28,160 --> 00:06:31,279 Speaker 1: actually get a real woman because his promise was to 105 00:06:31,320 --> 00:06:32,800 Speaker 1: put a woman, and you can't put a man with 106 00:06:32,839 --> 00:06:34,640 Speaker 1: tescos and a penis on the Supreme Court. He couldn't 107 00:06:34,680 --> 00:06:37,560 Speaker 1: call Kitlyn Jenner hypothetically she was an attorney or found 108 00:06:37,600 --> 00:06:40,320 Speaker 1: the best transgender attorney out there, and said we're going 109 00:06:40,360 --> 00:06:42,720 Speaker 1: to nominate you to the Supreme Court and justified as 110 00:06:42,720 --> 00:06:44,599 Speaker 1: a woman. Because everybody knows it's not a woman. They 111 00:06:44,640 --> 00:06:46,200 Speaker 1: don't know what to do dressed up like a woman, 112 00:06:46,520 --> 00:06:48,520 Speaker 1: which is not the real definition of a woman. So 113 00:06:48,600 --> 00:06:54,080 Speaker 1: let's just recap the nominee. Biden's nominee Supreme Court can't 114 00:06:54,120 --> 00:06:58,560 Speaker 1: define what a woman actually is. Let's move on from that, 115 00:06:58,640 --> 00:07:04,239 Speaker 1: all right, Let's move on to another issue, which deals 116 00:07:04,240 --> 00:07:06,720 Speaker 1: with gender, because again, without her gender being a woman, 117 00:07:06,760 --> 00:07:09,279 Speaker 1: she wouldn't even be eligible for the job based on 118 00:07:09,320 --> 00:07:11,440 Speaker 1: the litmus test the White House had for their next 119 00:07:11,440 --> 00:07:15,080 Speaker 1: Supreme Court nominee. So let's ask her another question. Should 120 00:07:15,320 --> 00:07:18,560 Speaker 1: should schools teach five year olds that they can pick 121 00:07:18,640 --> 00:07:22,040 Speaker 1: their own gender? Should you be actually teaching a boy 122 00:07:22,120 --> 00:07:25,040 Speaker 1: with testicles and apps are a girl with a vagina? 123 00:07:25,080 --> 00:07:29,080 Speaker 1: And I'm using medical terms here, so if you're offended 124 00:07:29,080 --> 00:07:30,600 Speaker 1: by it, I don't care, because this is how to 125 00:07:30,720 --> 00:07:33,200 Speaker 1: range the world's gotten. We have to now use medical terms. 126 00:07:33,240 --> 00:07:35,320 Speaker 1: I can't just say there's everybody knows there's different gown 127 00:07:35,400 --> 00:07:39,560 Speaker 1: a girl. You've got to now explain it, which is insane. 128 00:07:40,000 --> 00:07:43,040 Speaker 1: But let's just see if the Biden's nominee and Supreme 129 00:07:43,040 --> 00:07:45,280 Speaker 1: Court can at least answer the question if it's schools 130 00:07:45,280 --> 00:07:48,040 Speaker 1: should teach a five year old if they can pick 131 00:07:48,080 --> 00:07:52,520 Speaker 1: their own gender, which you obviously can't be two. With 132 00:07:52,800 --> 00:07:56,320 Speaker 1: Georgetown Day School, I found it astounding. By the way, 133 00:07:56,400 --> 00:07:59,840 Speaker 1: let me give you a little context here. Judge Jackson 134 00:08:00,240 --> 00:08:04,200 Speaker 1: is on the board at this Georgetown Day School, where 135 00:08:04,200 --> 00:08:08,800 Speaker 1: our children, I think go. So this woman is on 136 00:08:08,840 --> 00:08:12,880 Speaker 1: the school board of Georgetown Day School. So at Georgetown 137 00:08:12,920 --> 00:08:15,560 Speaker 1: Day School, what they're teaching kids is something that's obviously 138 00:08:15,680 --> 00:08:19,840 Speaker 1: very relevant. Listen with Georgetown Day School, I found it 139 00:08:19,920 --> 00:08:24,280 Speaker 1: astounding that it teaches kindergarteners, five year old children. And 140 00:08:24,360 --> 00:08:29,560 Speaker 1: I've got grandchildren, and they teach them that they can 141 00:08:29,640 --> 00:08:35,400 Speaker 1: choose their gender. So is this what you were praising 142 00:08:36,080 --> 00:08:40,560 Speaker 1: when you applauded the and I'm quoting you transformative power 143 00:08:40,720 --> 00:08:46,840 Speaker 1: of Georgetown Day School's progressive education. Do you agree that 144 00:08:46,920 --> 00:08:55,600 Speaker 1: our schools should teach children that they can choose their gender? Senator, 145 00:08:56,840 --> 00:09:05,880 Speaker 1: I'm not remembering exactly what quote you're referencing. But Georgetown 146 00:09:06,200 --> 00:09:10,160 Speaker 1: Day School is It was in a book and you 147 00:09:10,200 --> 00:09:14,160 Speaker 1: gave the quote Georgetown Day School is a private school. 148 00:09:14,440 --> 00:09:20,160 Speaker 1: Yes that yeah, I'm asking do you agree that schools 149 00:09:20,200 --> 00:09:24,440 Speaker 1: should teach children that they can choose their gender? Again, 150 00:09:24,520 --> 00:09:27,280 Speaker 1: this is not a little question, right, yes or no. 151 00:09:27,320 --> 00:09:29,840 Speaker 1: You're on the board at the school, Georgetown Day School. 152 00:09:29,880 --> 00:09:31,640 Speaker 1: You know all about this. You give these quotes of 153 00:09:31,640 --> 00:09:34,520 Speaker 1: these books about George Town Day School. You should be 154 00:09:34,559 --> 00:09:40,520 Speaker 1: able to answer this question. Senator, I'm not making comments about, 155 00:09:41,440 --> 00:09:44,640 Speaker 1: all right, what schools can teach me? Let me ask 156 00:09:44,679 --> 00:09:48,760 Speaker 1: you again. All right, So let's recap Joe Biden, Supreme 157 00:09:48,760 --> 00:09:54,440 Speaker 1: Court nominee, not only can't define what a woman is, 158 00:09:55,880 --> 00:09:58,360 Speaker 1: she can't tell you if she thinks that it's wrong 159 00:09:58,880 --> 00:10:00,839 Speaker 1: for school to teach five roles they can pick their 160 00:10:00,840 --> 00:10:03,520 Speaker 1: own gender, when clearly you can't pick your own gender. 161 00:10:04,520 --> 00:10:06,640 Speaker 1: So let's go on to something else. That's maybe, I 162 00:10:06,640 --> 00:10:08,760 Speaker 1: don't know, an easier topic, right, Because there's got to 163 00:10:08,800 --> 00:10:12,120 Speaker 1: be an easier topic than this for her. Why don't 164 00:10:12,160 --> 00:10:16,520 Speaker 1: we deal with the topic of sexual predators. Maybe that's 165 00:10:16,559 --> 00:10:21,319 Speaker 1: a maybe that's a good place to start. Should sexual predators? 166 00:10:21,360 --> 00:10:26,120 Speaker 1: Should the court systems go easy on sexual predators. Not 167 00:10:26,200 --> 00:10:30,160 Speaker 1: a hard question. Listen to what she had to say, 168 00:10:30,440 --> 00:10:35,239 Speaker 1: should the United States strengthen or weaken sentences for child pornographers? 169 00:10:35,480 --> 00:10:36,920 Speaker 1: By the way, I want to be clear about what 170 00:10:37,000 --> 00:10:42,600 Speaker 1: Senator Cotton just asked, Should we strengthen or weaken? Right? Senator? 171 00:10:43,760 --> 00:10:47,640 Speaker 1: Should we asking this question? Should we strengthen or should 172 00:10:47,679 --> 00:10:51,360 Speaker 1: we weaken our laws when it comes to senses for 173 00:10:51,640 --> 00:10:59,760 Speaker 1: child predators? This is Biden Supreme Court nominee. You're ready, Senator. 174 00:10:59,800 --> 00:11:02,520 Speaker 1: That's not a simple question. And the reason it's not 175 00:11:03,040 --> 00:11:06,760 Speaker 1: it's not a simple question. So you can't even simplify 176 00:11:06,920 --> 00:11:10,640 Speaker 1: the question of whether or not sentence for child predators 177 00:11:10,640 --> 00:11:12,920 Speaker 1: should be strengthened or weakened. You can't even that's not 178 00:11:13,280 --> 00:11:15,920 Speaker 1: that's not simple enough for you. So and let's go 179 00:11:15,960 --> 00:11:18,640 Speaker 1: back through the list now a Biden Supreme Court nominee, 180 00:11:18,640 --> 00:11:20,600 Speaker 1: because I think it's really important for us to understand 181 00:11:20,600 --> 00:11:23,640 Speaker 1: the list Biden's nomine and Supreme Court can't define what 182 00:11:23,720 --> 00:11:30,079 Speaker 1: a woman is, can't decide whether sentencing for child predators 183 00:11:30,120 --> 00:11:36,000 Speaker 1: should be strengthened or weakened, and cannot decide or give 184 00:11:36,080 --> 00:11:39,600 Speaker 1: you the definition of insanity when it comes to should 185 00:11:39,600 --> 00:11:41,840 Speaker 1: a child be taught that they can choose their own 186 00:11:41,880 --> 00:11:44,720 Speaker 1: sex when they're five years old in school, because at 187 00:11:44,720 --> 00:11:47,040 Speaker 1: the school where you're on the board, that's what they're teaching. 188 00:11:48,840 --> 00:11:54,439 Speaker 1: Is because what this country does in terms of penalties 189 00:11:54,559 --> 00:11:59,640 Speaker 1: is in Congress's province. You all decide. You all decide 190 00:11:59,679 --> 00:12:03,199 Speaker 1: what the penalties are. You decide what the factors are 191 00:12:03,320 --> 00:12:09,480 Speaker 1: that judges use to sentence. If you determine that any 192 00:12:09,480 --> 00:12:13,640 Speaker 1: set of penalties is insufficient, then it is in your 193 00:12:13,760 --> 00:12:19,120 Speaker 1: purview to make that determination. There are many crimes that 194 00:12:19,240 --> 00:12:26,200 Speaker 1: Congress has determined warrant mandatory minimum penalties, warrant other kinds 195 00:12:26,240 --> 00:12:31,079 Speaker 1: of penalties, and that is in your purview to determine. 196 00:12:31,960 --> 00:12:33,600 Speaker 1: I say, judge, I think whether or not we should 197 00:12:33,600 --> 00:12:36,800 Speaker 1: strengthen or a weekend sentences for chop pornographers is a 198 00:12:36,800 --> 00:12:39,839 Speaker 1: pretty simple question, but I'll move on it. It is 199 00:12:39,880 --> 00:12:41,600 Speaker 1: a simple question, by the way, it's it's a very 200 00:12:41,720 --> 00:12:44,320 Speaker 1: very very very very simple question. But she doesn't want 201 00:12:44,360 --> 00:12:49,839 Speaker 1: to answer, and the reason why is also obvious. She 202 00:12:49,880 --> 00:12:52,240 Speaker 1: doesn't believe that we should strengthen these laws. How do 203 00:12:52,320 --> 00:12:54,960 Speaker 1: we know this? Because there was another line of questioning 204 00:12:55,400 --> 00:12:58,839 Speaker 1: on this issue, another line of question by the way 205 00:12:58,840 --> 00:13:01,120 Speaker 1: which was brought up. People are now trying to get 206 00:13:01,160 --> 00:13:05,040 Speaker 1: Tucker Carlson fired for his commentary that he had on 207 00:13:05,080 --> 00:13:10,640 Speaker 1: this last night. He was talking about how insane this 208 00:13:10,760 --> 00:13:15,480 Speaker 1: actually is. He was describing the insanity that we have 209 00:13:15,559 --> 00:13:18,800 Speaker 1: a Supreme Court nominee that can't answer a very very 210 00:13:18,880 --> 00:13:24,720 Speaker 1: basic question about sexual predators mandatory minimums. Should we strengthen 211 00:13:24,720 --> 00:13:27,560 Speaker 1: the laws when it deals with these issues like this 212 00:13:27,679 --> 00:13:31,920 Speaker 1: is not a very tough question, and I think everybody 213 00:13:32,040 --> 00:13:37,560 Speaker 1: understands that unless you don't believe, as clearly this judge 214 00:13:37,640 --> 00:13:41,680 Speaker 1: doesn't believe, that you should actually strengthen these laws. But 215 00:13:41,760 --> 00:13:44,360 Speaker 1: we're not going to give Judge Jackson the vetting process 216 00:13:44,400 --> 00:13:47,319 Speaker 1: of a typical score of nominee. Why because we're filling 217 00:13:47,320 --> 00:13:52,440 Speaker 1: a quota, right, I mean, that's the truth here. We're 218 00:13:52,480 --> 00:13:56,840 Speaker 1: filling a quota. Everybody knows that's what this is. And 219 00:13:56,920 --> 00:13:58,880 Speaker 1: the president is the one that declared it. If you 220 00:13:58,920 --> 00:14:01,040 Speaker 1: will elect me, I will give you a quota. I 221 00:14:01,080 --> 00:14:04,560 Speaker 1: will give you a black woman, not a transgendered woman, 222 00:14:04,600 --> 00:14:07,040 Speaker 1: because I even know there's a difference, right, A real 223 00:14:07,120 --> 00:14:09,880 Speaker 1: black woman, not a fake black woman, not a fake 224 00:14:09,920 --> 00:14:13,280 Speaker 1: woman who's black, not a white person or an Asian 225 00:14:13,320 --> 00:14:15,520 Speaker 1: person identifies as black. No, no, no, I'm gonna give 226 00:14:15,559 --> 00:14:21,080 Speaker 1: you a genuine African American woman. So why is this 227 00:14:21,240 --> 00:14:29,160 Speaker 1: woman so fixated on defending sexual predators. It's a very 228 00:14:29,160 --> 00:14:32,560 Speaker 1: fair question. It's not a crazy one. It's one that 229 00:14:32,720 --> 00:14:38,480 Speaker 1: actually makes sense. Take a listen to this. Sorry not 230 00:14:38,600 --> 00:14:42,080 Speaker 1: playing along thankfully. In the hearings today, a few centers 231 00:14:42,080 --> 00:14:46,200 Speaker 1: did manage to ask relevant questions. Here's Josh Holley the 232 00:14:46,280 --> 00:14:49,800 Speaker 1: United States versus Hawkins. This was a child pornography case 233 00:14:49,920 --> 00:14:53,520 Speaker 1: where the defendant distributed multiple images of child porn possessed 234 00:14:53,560 --> 00:14:58,160 Speaker 1: dozens more, including videos. The Federal Senses in guidelines recommended 235 00:14:58,200 --> 00:15:00,480 Speaker 1: a sentence of ninety seven to one hundred in twenty 236 00:15:00,480 --> 00:15:04,920 Speaker 1: one months in prison. Prosecutors recommended twenty four months in prison. 237 00:15:05,520 --> 00:15:11,840 Speaker 1: Judge Jackson gave the defendant three months in prison. Well 238 00:15:11,840 --> 00:15:16,320 Speaker 1: that's pretty serious. Why did you do that, Judge Jackson? Well, 239 00:15:16,400 --> 00:15:20,480 Speaker 1: here was the response. The guideline was based originally on 240 00:15:21,640 --> 00:15:26,560 Speaker 1: a statutory scheme and on directives. Specific directives by Congress 241 00:15:26,600 --> 00:15:33,800 Speaker 1: at a time in which more serious child pornography offenders 242 00:15:34,200 --> 00:15:39,280 Speaker 1: were identified based on the volume based on the number 243 00:15:39,360 --> 00:15:42,320 Speaker 1: of photographs that they received In the mail, and that 244 00:15:42,440 --> 00:15:47,040 Speaker 1: made totally total sense before when we didn't have the Internet, 245 00:15:47,080 --> 00:15:49,320 Speaker 1: when we didn't have distribution. But the way that the 246 00:15:49,400 --> 00:15:54,240 Speaker 1: guideline is now structured based on that set of circumstances 247 00:15:55,000 --> 00:16:00,440 Speaker 1: is leading to extreme disparities in the system because it's 248 00:16:00,480 --> 00:16:04,880 Speaker 1: so easy for people to get volumes of this kind 249 00:16:04,920 --> 00:16:08,960 Speaker 1: of material now by computers. Now, I want to be 250 00:16:09,080 --> 00:16:12,840 Speaker 1: very clear, this answer was maybe the most jaw dropping 251 00:16:12,880 --> 00:16:15,680 Speaker 1: answer of all that she has done thus far, and 252 00:16:15,760 --> 00:16:18,840 Speaker 1: she's had some awe moments like are you kidding me? Moments? 253 00:16:19,240 --> 00:16:23,440 Speaker 1: What she has just described, what is she What she's 254 00:16:23,520 --> 00:16:28,040 Speaker 1: saying here is that she believes that you shouldn't go 255 00:16:28,080 --> 00:16:30,240 Speaker 1: to jail for that long of a period of time 256 00:16:30,280 --> 00:16:34,960 Speaker 1: if you're getting child pornography over the internet, because it's 257 00:16:35,000 --> 00:16:39,120 Speaker 1: easier to get large drops of kitty porn over the 258 00:16:39,160 --> 00:16:42,240 Speaker 1: internet compared if you did it through the mail. So 259 00:16:42,360 --> 00:16:51,320 Speaker 1: that's why she went easy on a on a individual 260 00:16:52,520 --> 00:16:58,000 Speaker 1: with kitty porn. She went easy on this person because 261 00:16:58,040 --> 00:17:01,000 Speaker 1: she said, well, they use the Internet and the minimums 262 00:17:01,000 --> 00:17:03,240 Speaker 1: are different because it wasn't through the mail, So get 263 00:17:03,280 --> 00:17:06,600 Speaker 1: more porn through the internet. It's illegal porn. Kitty porn, 264 00:17:06,760 --> 00:17:09,840 Speaker 1: child pornography, and I'll go easy on you because at 265 00:17:09,880 --> 00:17:12,000 Speaker 1: least you didn't send it them out. That's her actual 266 00:17:12,040 --> 00:17:18,000 Speaker 1: defense for going easy on people that possess child pornography. 267 00:17:19,000 --> 00:17:21,439 Speaker 1: Now we'll just concede a front. We are not world 268 00:17:21,480 --> 00:17:25,720 Speaker 1: renowned legal minds, okay, or even technically lawyers on this show, 269 00:17:26,240 --> 00:17:28,840 Speaker 1: but we're going to try to understand what the judge 270 00:17:28,880 --> 00:17:32,000 Speaker 1: just said. So Congress has passed a law saying possessing 271 00:17:32,000 --> 00:17:34,520 Speaker 1: a lot of kitty porn is a very serious crime. 272 00:17:34,520 --> 00:17:36,480 Speaker 1: And then an invention the Internet comes along. It makes 273 00:17:36,480 --> 00:17:39,360 Speaker 1: it easier to collect a lot more kittie porn. So, 274 00:17:39,400 --> 00:17:44,120 Speaker 1: according to noted legal mind Kntaji Brown Jackson, that somehow 275 00:17:44,200 --> 00:17:46,280 Speaker 1: makes the act of possessing a lot of kittie porn 276 00:17:46,520 --> 00:17:49,439 Speaker 1: less back. In other words, since the Internet makes it simple, 277 00:17:49,440 --> 00:17:53,560 Speaker 1: we're not going to punish you as much. Maybe we're 278 00:17:53,560 --> 00:17:55,520 Speaker 1: misinterpreting what she said. That seems to be what she said. 279 00:17:55,520 --> 00:17:59,080 Speaker 1: Does that make sense? If not, it helps to understand 280 00:17:59,119 --> 00:18:01,040 Speaker 1: in the clip you just saw, the judge Brown was 281 00:18:01,040 --> 00:18:04,280 Speaker 1: not articulating some legal principle related to the Constitution that 282 00:18:04,320 --> 00:18:08,080 Speaker 1: we could generalize across our code. She was instead constructing 283 00:18:08,119 --> 00:18:10,879 Speaker 1: a carve out for a narrow and specific group of 284 00:18:10,880 --> 00:18:14,680 Speaker 1: criminals sex offenders, and it's not the first time. It's 285 00:18:14,680 --> 00:18:17,119 Speaker 1: one of many such carve outs she has argued for 286 00:18:17,359 --> 00:18:20,960 Speaker 1: during her career. In nineteen ninety six, for example, Kntaji 287 00:18:21,080 --> 00:18:24,560 Speaker 1: Brown Jackson argued in the Harvard Law Review against sex 288 00:18:24,560 --> 00:18:28,080 Speaker 1: offender registry laws. Here was her reasoning quote, if a 289 00:18:28,160 --> 00:18:31,840 Speaker 1: community notification statute deprives the sex offender of his right 290 00:18:31,880 --> 00:18:34,639 Speaker 1: to mobility or bodily integrity, and if it makes him 291 00:18:34,680 --> 00:18:37,560 Speaker 1: the target of widespread community reaction and tippy and scorn, 292 00:18:38,000 --> 00:18:43,760 Speaker 1: then according to Cantadgie Brown Jackson, that would be unconstitutional. 293 00:18:45,119 --> 00:18:47,920 Speaker 1: Let's go through the list. Now you have a Supreme 294 00:18:47,920 --> 00:18:55,600 Speaker 1: Court nominee, Judge Jackson, who is lenient on child predators, 295 00:18:56,680 --> 00:18:59,959 Speaker 1: doesn't believe that she can define the definition of one. 296 00:19:00,040 --> 00:19:02,000 Speaker 1: And even though the definition woman is what gave her 297 00:19:02,080 --> 00:19:06,399 Speaker 1: the opportunity to have this job, and she's a woman 298 00:19:06,400 --> 00:19:10,760 Speaker 1: that doesn't believe that children should be taught that they 299 00:19:10,760 --> 00:19:12,920 Speaker 1: can choose her in sex stage of five. She thinks 300 00:19:12,960 --> 00:19:15,120 Speaker 1: that's appropriate. It's fine, you should be able to do that. 301 00:19:16,080 --> 00:19:19,760 Speaker 1: And then she also believes it's sexual offenders should have 302 00:19:19,920 --> 00:19:24,880 Speaker 1: rights to mobility to bodily integrity, and that sex registries 303 00:19:24,920 --> 00:19:29,040 Speaker 1: are wrong because it's a target of widespread community rejection. Well, 304 00:19:29,080 --> 00:19:33,000 Speaker 1: if you want to know why they're scorn and widespread 305 00:19:33,040 --> 00:19:36,720 Speaker 1: community rejections, because the person you're describing is a sexual 306 00:19:36,800 --> 00:19:40,000 Speaker 1: predator who is sexually assaulted a child or an adult, 307 00:19:40,640 --> 00:19:44,400 Speaker 1: rape somebody, sexually assault somebody against against their will. Obviously, 308 00:19:45,920 --> 00:19:47,960 Speaker 1: and she says, well, we need to think about the 309 00:19:48,040 --> 00:19:50,320 Speaker 1: feelings of the sexual predators so that they don't feel 310 00:19:50,320 --> 00:19:53,800 Speaker 1: like they're a target for widespread community rejection and or scorn. 311 00:19:53,920 --> 00:19:56,119 Speaker 1: She wrote that in nineteen ninety six. It's not that 312 00:19:56,240 --> 00:19:59,880 Speaker 1: long ago, folks. Okay, she wrote it in ninety six, 313 00:20:01,320 --> 00:20:04,359 Speaker 1: look at the look. In nineteen ninety six she wrote 314 00:20:04,440 --> 00:20:10,680 Speaker 1: this in the Harvard Law Review. Some other random things. 315 00:20:11,000 --> 00:20:13,960 Speaker 1: She can't define what a woman is, you think, that's all. 316 00:20:14,160 --> 00:20:17,440 Speaker 1: She doesn't believe gun ownership is a fundamental right. That's 317 00:20:17,440 --> 00:20:21,800 Speaker 1: the other thing. This is the woman that the Supreme 318 00:20:21,800 --> 00:20:25,959 Speaker 1: Court has decided. All right, let me rephrase that. This 319 00:20:26,000 --> 00:20:28,720 Speaker 1: is the woman that Joe Biden believes the best woman. Well, 320 00:20:28,920 --> 00:20:31,880 Speaker 1: of course within the quota to serve on the Supreme Court. Also, 321 00:20:31,920 --> 00:20:34,879 Speaker 1: the Supreme Court nominee Jackson did not know that the 322 00:20:35,000 --> 00:20:38,440 Speaker 1: former ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, Joe Biden, not once, 323 00:20:38,480 --> 00:20:41,880 Speaker 1: but twice, actually philibustered a black nominee, Janice Rodgers Brown 324 00:20:41,920 --> 00:20:44,800 Speaker 1: for the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. 325 00:20:45,000 --> 00:20:47,199 Speaker 1: Do realize she was philibuster for two years when she 326 00:20:47,200 --> 00:20:50,399 Speaker 1: was appointed to the DC Circuit Judge Senator Lindsay Graham 327 00:20:50,440 --> 00:20:53,159 Speaker 1: ass I didn't know that. Jackson responded, did you know 328 00:20:53,200 --> 00:20:56,600 Speaker 1: that Joe Biden philibuster James Rodgers Brown? Graham ass I 329 00:20:56,680 --> 00:20:59,159 Speaker 1: did not know that. Jackson again said, Now that you 330 00:20:59,240 --> 00:21:00,960 Speaker 1: know that, how do you feel about it? Graham asked, 331 00:21:01,000 --> 00:21:05,240 Speaker 1: to which Jackson had no response. Senator Graham informed Jackson 332 00:21:05,280 --> 00:21:09,480 Speaker 1: Biden filibuster Janie Rodgers Brown, who was raised in Alabama 333 00:21:09,560 --> 00:21:13,000 Speaker 1: under Jim Crowe. Graham explained, despite this adversity, she put 334 00:21:13,040 --> 00:21:15,000 Speaker 1: herself through law school as a single working mother. That's 335 00:21:15,000 --> 00:21:19,320 Speaker 1: pretty impressive, isn't it. Graham asked, yes. Senator Jackson responded, well, 336 00:21:19,440 --> 00:21:21,720 Speaker 1: former Senator Joe Biden. Who's using you now? Is it? 337 00:21:21,840 --> 00:21:24,440 Speaker 1: Quoted by votes in the last selection voted in OH 338 00:21:24,560 --> 00:21:28,160 Speaker 1: three and O five to block Republicans from confirming Brown's 339 00:21:28,200 --> 00:21:34,919 Speaker 1: nomination because she reportedly quoted the Socialist resolution of nineteen thirty. 340 00:21:35,160 --> 00:21:37,840 Speaker 1: President Joe Biden has since, of course, reversed his opinion 341 00:21:37,840 --> 00:21:40,159 Speaker 1: of James Rodgers Brown and has nominated her to be 342 00:21:40,200 --> 00:21:44,200 Speaker 1: a circuit judge because now he has to play the 343 00:21:44,280 --> 00:21:48,399 Speaker 1: politics of African American women. So this is the best 344 00:21:48,480 --> 00:21:50,320 Speaker 1: person we found for the job. Maybe if you didn't 345 00:21:50,320 --> 00:21:51,760 Speaker 1: put a quote out there, we might have gotten a 346 00:21:51,800 --> 00:21:55,679 Speaker 1: better nominee, a nominee that can actually define what a 347 00:21:55,760 --> 00:22:01,800 Speaker 1: woman really is. Senator marsh Blackburn joins me. Now, now, Senator, 348 00:22:01,880 --> 00:22:03,960 Speaker 1: I want to go back in history real quick and 349 00:22:04,800 --> 00:22:08,320 Speaker 1: please correct me if I am wrong. Didn't the President 350 00:22:08,359 --> 00:22:10,160 Speaker 1: of the United States of America, when he was a 351 00:22:10,240 --> 00:22:14,119 Speaker 1: candidate running for office to try to buy the votes 352 00:22:14,160 --> 00:22:18,879 Speaker 1: of liberal women and of minority African American women specifically, 353 00:22:18,960 --> 00:22:22,959 Speaker 1: say that he was going to only nominate and discriminate 354 00:22:23,000 --> 00:22:28,720 Speaker 1: against everyone else that wasn't a woman, and b who 355 00:22:28,800 --> 00:22:32,880 Speaker 1: anybody that wasn't an African American woman was immediately disqualified 356 00:22:32,920 --> 00:22:34,600 Speaker 1: from being on the Supreme Court with his first pick. 357 00:22:34,640 --> 00:22:36,320 Speaker 1: And that true? Is that right? Or did I get 358 00:22:36,320 --> 00:22:40,720 Speaker 1: that wrong? You know, Ben, he was very explicit and 359 00:22:41,040 --> 00:22:46,240 Speaker 1: saying that he was going to bring more diversity and 360 00:22:46,640 --> 00:22:52,200 Speaker 1: that he was going to elevate more women. And of course, 361 00:22:52,680 --> 00:22:58,280 Speaker 1: we want to see women earned their rightful place in society. 362 00:22:58,400 --> 00:23:03,680 Speaker 1: And here we have a federal judge who has been 363 00:23:03,720 --> 00:23:08,600 Speaker 1: on the bench for nearly a decade. She is highly skilled, 364 00:23:08,680 --> 00:23:13,760 Speaker 1: highly educated, has a very impressive resume, resume, has a 365 00:23:13,800 --> 00:23:18,800 Speaker 1: wonderful family, has great parents. They open tremendous stores of 366 00:23:18,880 --> 00:23:23,840 Speaker 1: opportunity to her, and she has taken advantage of all 367 00:23:23,920 --> 00:23:30,120 Speaker 1: this opportunity. It is the embodiment of the American dream. 368 00:23:30,200 --> 00:23:34,600 Speaker 1: With all she has accomplished. And she serves on the 369 00:23:34,680 --> 00:23:40,040 Speaker 1: school board George Town Day School. They are teaching CRT 370 00:23:40,440 --> 00:23:45,440 Speaker 1: to five year olds. They have a curriculum called Woke Kindergarten. 371 00:23:46,800 --> 00:23:50,920 Speaker 1: Parents are very concerned about this. About CRT, they won't 372 00:23:51,800 --> 00:23:54,600 Speaker 1: and they're concerned about the rights for their children. They've 373 00:23:54,640 --> 00:24:01,440 Speaker 1: seen biological men competing against biological women in sports. They 374 00:24:01,600 --> 00:24:06,160 Speaker 1: are concerned about this. They want a Supreme Court justice 375 00:24:06,600 --> 00:24:10,560 Speaker 1: who is going to defend their right as a parent 376 00:24:11,200 --> 00:24:15,960 Speaker 1: to rear their children as they see fit and as 377 00:24:16,119 --> 00:24:21,200 Speaker 1: they know best. And it has been of concern that 378 00:24:21,280 --> 00:24:27,600 Speaker 1: she will not clarify her position on CRT. Like last night, 379 00:24:27,680 --> 00:24:32,560 Speaker 1: I finally said, well, just define woman for me. She 380 00:24:32,600 --> 00:24:35,720 Speaker 1: would not give me that definition. People have been very 381 00:24:35,760 --> 00:24:40,840 Speaker 1: frustrated with her approach on crime and the way she's 382 00:24:40,880 --> 00:24:46,680 Speaker 1: been soft on child abusers, child predators, pedophiles in her 383 00:24:47,000 --> 00:24:52,400 Speaker 1: sentencing during her time on the federal bench. All of 384 00:24:52,440 --> 00:24:57,320 Speaker 1: this has come into play all I don't. I think 385 00:24:57,320 --> 00:24:59,520 Speaker 1: it's shocking though, that you have a president Night Tents 386 00:24:59,520 --> 00:25:03,320 Speaker 1: of America who even understands what the definition of woman is, 387 00:25:03,359 --> 00:25:05,800 Speaker 1: because that's why he picked her, because she is the 388 00:25:05,920 --> 00:25:09,800 Speaker 1: definition of a woman. And so after she has picked 389 00:25:10,320 --> 00:25:13,680 Speaker 1: knowing that she's being picked because she is of two 390 00:25:13,760 --> 00:25:17,199 Speaker 1: qualifications Number one a woman, number two African American, and 391 00:25:17,240 --> 00:25:19,400 Speaker 1: he had to pay off on that promise and discriminate 392 00:25:19,440 --> 00:25:22,240 Speaker 1: against everyone else. She can't even define what a woman 393 00:25:22,359 --> 00:25:24,320 Speaker 1: is when the definition of a woman is what got 394 00:25:24,320 --> 00:25:28,840 Speaker 1: her in front of you yesterday. Anyway, it just shows 395 00:25:29,000 --> 00:25:34,040 Speaker 1: you with the progressive lest how far they're going to 396 00:25:34,080 --> 00:25:36,720 Speaker 1: go to push their agenda. Now, the other thing I 397 00:25:36,800 --> 00:25:43,040 Speaker 1: brought up to her last night after that exchange was 398 00:25:43,520 --> 00:25:48,600 Speaker 1: Demand Justice, a far left progressive group who is seeking 399 00:25:48,640 --> 00:25:51,760 Speaker 1: to pack the court, which, of course going back to 400 00:25:51,880 --> 00:25:54,560 Speaker 1: when Judge Jackson was before us to go on to 401 00:25:54,640 --> 00:25:59,560 Speaker 1: the Appellate Court a year ago, she would not answer 402 00:25:59,640 --> 00:26:03,640 Speaker 1: the question as to where she stood on court packing. 403 00:26:03,800 --> 00:26:08,240 Speaker 1: She has refused to do that during this confirmation hearing. 404 00:26:08,680 --> 00:26:11,840 Speaker 1: And I brought to her attention last night that Demand 405 00:26:12,000 --> 00:26:17,840 Speaker 1: Justice has put out a one million, one million dollar 406 00:26:18,040 --> 00:26:23,679 Speaker 1: ad by to support her confirmation to the US Supreme Court. 407 00:26:24,160 --> 00:26:29,800 Speaker 1: And you gotta believe if court packing comes before the 408 00:26:29,920 --> 00:26:37,280 Speaker 1: US Supreme Court, they're expecting Judge Jackson, as Justice Jackson, 409 00:26:37,680 --> 00:26:41,360 Speaker 1: to support them in court packing. Why else would they 410 00:26:41,560 --> 00:26:45,400 Speaker 1: be doing a one million dollar ad. Bye. They are 411 00:26:45,440 --> 00:26:49,200 Speaker 1: doing rallies in protest all over the country in support 412 00:26:49,240 --> 00:26:55,120 Speaker 1: of her, and they're pushing hard, pushing Democrats senators very 413 00:26:55,160 --> 00:27:00,359 Speaker 1: aggressively to get her confirmed to the court. It is 414 00:27:00,359 --> 00:27:04,359 Speaker 1: shocking to see just how I would say, an activist. 415 00:27:04,440 --> 00:27:06,920 Speaker 1: She is one of the other things that I think 416 00:27:07,000 --> 00:27:09,240 Speaker 1: some people that maybe were at work yesterday, and I 417 00:27:09,280 --> 00:27:12,960 Speaker 1: want you to explain this. She wouldn't say if the 418 00:27:13,080 --> 00:27:16,600 Speaker 1: US should strengthen child pornographer punishments. Now there have been 419 00:27:16,680 --> 00:27:21,560 Speaker 1: accusations that she's been lenient on child predators when she 420 00:27:21,600 --> 00:27:24,840 Speaker 1: has seen cases that involve them explain that a little 421 00:27:24,840 --> 00:27:26,800 Speaker 1: bit more, because this, to me, I think is one 422 00:27:26,840 --> 00:27:30,400 Speaker 1: of the most dangerous parts of what she has done 423 00:27:30,480 --> 00:27:32,919 Speaker 1: as a judge, that we actually have a record of 424 00:27:32,960 --> 00:27:37,520 Speaker 1: her doing this. Yes, exactly right. In as you know, 425 00:27:38,480 --> 00:27:43,960 Speaker 1: strengthening protection of children online is something that I have 426 00:27:44,080 --> 00:27:48,159 Speaker 1: put a tremendous amount of attention on and actually have 427 00:27:48,280 --> 00:27:52,600 Speaker 1: bipartisan legislation ready to go to the Senate floor that 428 00:27:52,680 --> 00:27:56,400 Speaker 1: would strengthen some of these provisions. Well, she sat there 429 00:27:56,520 --> 00:28:00,280 Speaker 1: in these hearings and said, well, you know, Congress hasn't 430 00:28:00,320 --> 00:28:03,800 Speaker 1: given us enough guidance on this, and we pointed out 431 00:28:03,800 --> 00:28:07,320 Speaker 1: to her, well, no, that's not exactly right. Congress has 432 00:28:07,400 --> 00:28:11,600 Speaker 1: given you guidance. But what you did, instead of going 433 00:28:11,760 --> 00:28:18,080 Speaker 1: within the range of sentences recommended the minimum to the maximum. 434 00:28:18,240 --> 00:28:24,680 Speaker 1: Her habit was to repeatedly go about five years below 435 00:28:25,400 --> 00:28:31,040 Speaker 1: the minimum, below the minimum, so she wasn't even meeting 436 00:28:31,200 --> 00:28:36,239 Speaker 1: the minimum. And we brought forward several cases in the 437 00:28:36,320 --> 00:28:39,160 Speaker 1: research that we as a committee did, we found ten 438 00:28:39,280 --> 00:28:44,320 Speaker 1: cases that she had weighed in on and she would 439 00:28:44,360 --> 00:28:50,800 Speaker 1: repeatedly go below the minimum in these cases. And people 440 00:28:50,880 --> 00:28:53,480 Speaker 1: can go back and look through the hearing. Senator Cruz 441 00:28:53,560 --> 00:28:56,080 Speaker 1: did a great job and put them all on a 442 00:28:56,840 --> 00:28:59,680 Speaker 1: poster board so she could see them and so she 443 00:28:59,680 --> 00:29:03,160 Speaker 1: would be able to respond. And she went anywhere from 444 00:29:03,200 --> 00:29:09,200 Speaker 1: fourteen percent to eighty eight percent below the minimum and 445 00:29:09,520 --> 00:29:16,719 Speaker 1: even further below what the government was recommending in these cases. 446 00:29:18,200 --> 00:29:21,200 Speaker 1: It is shocking that this is where we are. Unfortunately, 447 00:29:21,200 --> 00:29:24,080 Speaker 1: and as you just mentioned, Ted Cruz said, if Judge 448 00:29:24,080 --> 00:29:27,760 Speaker 1: Brown gets on the bench, He said, sexual predators would 449 00:29:27,760 --> 00:29:31,160 Speaker 1: be released if your law school views prevailed. And this 450 00:29:31,240 --> 00:29:33,800 Speaker 1: is all the reason why you have these confirmation hearings. 451 00:29:34,320 --> 00:29:36,520 Speaker 1: And that is the point that he kept saying was Look. 452 00:29:36,520 --> 00:29:40,400 Speaker 1: He brought up her nine Harvard Law Review note during 453 00:29:40,440 --> 00:29:43,280 Speaker 1: the second day of her confirmation hearing, talking about this, 454 00:29:43,720 --> 00:29:47,680 Speaker 1: reading aloud excerpts from her major academic work entitled Prevention 455 00:29:47,840 --> 00:29:51,720 Speaker 1: Versus Punishment, Punishment Towards a Principal Distinction and the Restraint 456 00:29:51,760 --> 00:29:55,920 Speaker 1: of Release. Restraint of Release Sex Offenders and Crews argue 457 00:29:55,920 --> 00:29:59,240 Speaker 1: that Jackson was advocating for the idea that the regulator 458 00:29:59,320 --> 00:30:02,000 Speaker 1: release of SEC offenders, which can require them to register 459 00:30:02,160 --> 00:30:05,280 Speaker 1: local law enforcement officials, notify community members of their presence, 460 00:30:05,600 --> 00:30:08,719 Speaker 1: undergo DNA testing, and submit to civil commitment for an 461 00:30:08,720 --> 00:30:13,040 Speaker 1: indefinite term quote could be seen as unconstitutional if the 462 00:30:13,120 --> 00:30:16,600 Speaker 1: regulations are viewed as punishment rather than preventative. This is 463 00:30:16,640 --> 00:30:20,360 Speaker 1: her thought. She's standing up for not the children of 464 00:30:20,400 --> 00:30:24,880 Speaker 1: sexual abuse, She's standing up for the sex offenders themselves. Yes, 465 00:30:25,360 --> 00:30:30,520 Speaker 1: and we pointed this out to her in that writing. 466 00:30:30,640 --> 00:30:33,760 Speaker 1: In that note one of the things that I pointed 467 00:30:33,800 --> 00:30:36,959 Speaker 1: out to her was that she made a point of 468 00:30:37,040 --> 00:30:41,120 Speaker 1: saying she thought that federal judges had personal, hidden agendas. 469 00:30:41,760 --> 00:30:44,960 Speaker 1: So you know, on the first day I asked her 470 00:30:45,000 --> 00:30:47,360 Speaker 1: about this, and of course the left goes while the 471 00:30:47,440 --> 00:30:52,600 Speaker 1: New York Times is beating up on me, Washington Post, MSNBC, CNN, 472 00:30:53,200 --> 00:30:56,400 Speaker 1: saying I was taking things out of context. No, what 473 00:30:56,560 --> 00:31:00,720 Speaker 1: I did was reading back to Judge Jackson her on 474 00:31:01,080 --> 00:31:07,200 Speaker 1: words about releasing hardened criminals, about going soft on child predators, 475 00:31:07,560 --> 00:31:14,840 Speaker 1: about CRT in the schools, about praising progressive education. Well, 476 00:31:14,920 --> 00:31:18,360 Speaker 1: you also mentioned you also mentioned something else, and I 477 00:31:18,400 --> 00:31:20,280 Speaker 1: just want to play this about five year olds. Can 478 00:31:20,320 --> 00:31:22,440 Speaker 1: they pick their own gender? Here is what you said 479 00:31:22,440 --> 00:31:24,520 Speaker 1: in your question, so people don't take it out of context, 480 00:31:24,560 --> 00:31:26,440 Speaker 1: and I want to get your reactions. Tell you too. 481 00:31:27,320 --> 00:31:31,360 Speaker 1: With Georgetown Day School, I found it astounding that it 482 00:31:31,400 --> 00:31:35,680 Speaker 1: teaches kindergarteners five year old children, and I've got grandchildren 483 00:31:36,400 --> 00:31:41,360 Speaker 1: and they teach them that they can choose their gender. 484 00:31:42,040 --> 00:31:47,440 Speaker 1: So is this what you were praising when you applauded 485 00:31:47,560 --> 00:31:51,920 Speaker 1: the and I'm quoting you transformative power of Georgetown Day 486 00:31:51,960 --> 00:31:58,360 Speaker 1: Schools progressive education? Do you agree that our schools should 487 00:31:58,440 --> 00:32:05,360 Speaker 1: teach children that can choose their gender? Senator, I'm not 488 00:32:06,720 --> 00:32:13,240 Speaker 1: remembering exactly what quote you're referencing, but Georgetown Day School 489 00:32:13,920 --> 00:32:17,680 Speaker 1: is it was in a book and you gave the quote. 490 00:32:18,880 --> 00:32:21,160 Speaker 1: I mean, it's it's you can't get more straightforward than this. 491 00:32:21,160 --> 00:32:23,200 Speaker 1: This isn't I got you question, which the media said, 492 00:32:23,200 --> 00:32:26,120 Speaker 1: oh you were This was a grotesque line of questions. 493 00:32:26,120 --> 00:32:28,080 Speaker 1: She's on the school board, she gave the quote, and 494 00:32:28,120 --> 00:32:30,800 Speaker 1: then she acts like she can't remember it. Well, it 495 00:32:30,840 --> 00:32:35,600 Speaker 1: was in their magazine, their annual report magazine, where you 496 00:32:35,680 --> 00:32:38,600 Speaker 1: have board members and parents bragging about the school. So 497 00:32:38,680 --> 00:32:42,320 Speaker 1: this I can get more students. And she knows that, 498 00:32:42,560 --> 00:32:46,600 Speaker 1: she knows she submitted that quote, and she doesn't want 499 00:32:46,600 --> 00:32:49,760 Speaker 1: to own up to it because of the way it 500 00:32:49,840 --> 00:32:54,720 Speaker 1: appears now that parents from It doesn't matter if it's 501 00:32:54,800 --> 00:32:59,840 Speaker 1: Virginia or San Francisco, people are throwing over the school 502 00:33:00,600 --> 00:33:03,479 Speaker 1: and if you're on the school board, then don't you 503 00:33:03,640 --> 00:33:07,000 Speaker 1: think you know a little bit about the curriculum? I 504 00:33:07,040 --> 00:33:10,280 Speaker 1: asked her last night. I said, you know you had senator, 505 00:33:10,320 --> 00:33:14,840 Speaker 1: please show you all these books and I asked you 506 00:33:14,880 --> 00:33:18,360 Speaker 1: about teaching five year olds to choose their gender? Has 507 00:33:18,400 --> 00:33:22,600 Speaker 1: there never been a parent at Georgetown Day that has 508 00:33:22,680 --> 00:33:25,880 Speaker 1: called you as a board member and said I have 509 00:33:26,000 --> 00:33:30,520 Speaker 1: a concern And she said no, unbelievable. There's more question 510 00:33:30,600 --> 00:33:33,520 Speaker 1: coming today. I know you got to go and get 511 00:33:33,520 --> 00:33:36,000 Speaker 1: back to it all right. Lastly, please make sure you 512 00:33:36,080 --> 00:33:40,400 Speaker 1: hit that subscribe button or auto download button wherever you 513 00:33:40,440 --> 00:33:43,200 Speaker 1: were listening to this podcast right now and take a 514 00:33:43,240 --> 00:33:46,280 Speaker 1: moment to write us a five star review. Many on 515 00:33:46,320 --> 00:33:48,800 Speaker 1: the left have been attacking our podcast, writing us bad 516 00:33:48,840 --> 00:33:52,000 Speaker 1: reviews on purpose, So if you would help us fight 517 00:33:52,000 --> 00:33:54,520 Speaker 1: back by writing us a good review, a five star review, 518 00:33:54,880 --> 00:33:57,160 Speaker 1: and share this podcast with your family and friends on 519 00:33:57,200 --> 00:34:00,360 Speaker 1: social media to help us grow. See you back here tomorrow.