WEBVTT - Surveillance: Data Deluge With Citi's Mann

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene Jay Ley.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course, on the Bloomberg Michael

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Wilson joins us right now. Mike Wilson, us equity strategist

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 1>at Morgan Stanley. Do you share your colleagues discontent this

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:40.599
<v Speaker 1>about the equity markets? Well, good morningtime, morning, all the like.

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:44.919
<v Speaker 1>The discontent in the economy may not necessarily mean discontent

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:46.880
<v Speaker 1>in the markets. I mean, as you know, markets trade

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>differently from the economy, and look, we are looking at

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>a slowdown for sure, as the case counts rise, potential

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>lockdowns and all that good stuff. Look, there's a there's

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>a while. The SMP five hundred is basically flat since

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>early September. There's a raging bowl market going on under

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the surface. This is the point we've been really trying

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to emphasize that as the if we look forward to

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:13.759
<v Speaker 1>next year, there's still a lot of undervalued assets within

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the equity market that hadn't hadn't participated yet, and that's

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>what that's the big story that's really going on in

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the equity market. Is it absolutely relative? Do you unload

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>your tech to go over to material cyclicals, banks and

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the rest or do they participate as well? Well, we

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 1>did that. I mean that that that was the strategy.

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you guys are talking about, you know, stepping

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:37.399
<v Speaker 1>into the fray back in March being difficult. I think

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>it was even more difficult to kind of move away

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>from the former leaders to the laggards, right that. That's

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that's that's real career risk for hunted people. And I

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>think folks have fought that as long as they can,

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and now it's becoming apparent that they need to consider

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that move. And that's what that's what the last three

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>weeks is really all about. The combination of an election

0:01:56.240 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>result plus the vaccine news is now forcing people to

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>consider the possibility that this leadership change is not temporary,

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that it's actually more sustainable, and positions and portfolios are

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:12.399
<v Speaker 1>just not ready for that capitulation. We've got two time

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>frames here, Mike, you and I've talked about him so

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>many times, the net um and the medium term as well.

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>You've had this trading range that you've developed and it's

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:22.679
<v Speaker 1>evolved slightly as the year has progressed. Mike, can you

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>walk us through that range right now? And why you

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>think we might be in protest at the lower rent

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of that range? Yeah, I mean, trying to call you know,

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>corrections in a bull market is sometimes a fools game,

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 1>but sometimes it makes sense. So obviously, as you know,

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>we were extremely bullish from March through basically August, and

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>we we then thought the market would go through some

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>consolidation and we throughout this range of fifty which was

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>technically driven now that worked really really well from you know,

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>basically August through the end of October. We made a

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>trading by call at the low end of that range

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>right before the election that worked out really well. And

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:00.239
<v Speaker 1>now we're up at the upper end of that band again.

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Actually through it, we're at thirty thirty five. So you know,

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>we're just we're gonna be objective about this. We're not

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:08.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna get dogmatic about some training range. But look, at

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, John, five, you've baked in

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty much as much upset as you can legitimately, uh,

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of confirmed with fundamentals. Okay, the technicals

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>are one thing, but but also on a fundamental basis,

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>it's hard for us to stretch it much beyond that

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you have liquidity, you know, maybe surging in the market

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that's taking things higher. But our job is to tell

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 1>our clients when the risk reward is attractive, and right

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>now the risk reward is much less attractive than the

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>west three weeks ago. It doesn't change our view about

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the bowl market extending into next year. And and once

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>again the main message we want to leave with clients

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>is don't focus so much on the index. Let's find

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the opportunities that are clearly in a bowl market. And

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>as you were talking earlier in the show, I mean

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the Russell two thousands of this month and it's just

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>starting to have relative outperformance. That's Those are the types

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>of things that we want to focus on for clients.

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Some notes that I was reading research notes after Jannet

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Yellowin was nominated to be the next Sury secretary said

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>this would turbo charge the euphoria for a longer period

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>of time because the idea of a Treasury working more

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>closely with the Federal Reserve willing to run the economy

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>hot is good for inflation. Isn't only going to fuel

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the trades that you're talking about, Russell two thousand Financials.

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you agree that Janet Yellen at the Treasury is,

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>if not a game changer, at least really adds momentum

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>to what we're seeing in the market. Well. Absolutely. I

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>mean that one of our themes this year has been

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that we're moving out of a what I would call

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy dominant regime to a fiscal policy dominant regime.

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>In fact, Jenny Ellen and Ben Bernanke as well as

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:42.599
<v Speaker 1>been writing op eds for the last six months of

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>imploring Congress to do more fiscal j Paul Is also

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>signaled that in every press conference, and so the Fed

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>is almost been imploring, you know, the government to say, look,

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>we need your help this time. We need to get

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 1>more fiscal cooperation, to use the chief money to finally

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>pull us out of this sort of low gro environment.

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>And putting Jenny Yellen as U S Treasury Secretary can

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>only help uh that effort in my view, because you know,

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>it does come down to a negotiation with Congress. And

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously Jenny Ellen has tremendous street credibility, and you know,

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>we know who she is. She's and she also has

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 1>a pension for some of these programs that are more

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:21.479
<v Speaker 1>favorable to the lower income cohort, which is exactly what

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.279
<v Speaker 1>has been working this year, right getting money to the

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 1>folks who need it and who will spend it. Mike

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Wilson International Investment. Now what your inning are we in?

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Is it just beginning or has it been a nice

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>pop and that's it? Well, this is another one that

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of has been a bit of a

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>widow maker for the last you know, six or seven years,

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that every time it tries to make

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a move, it just gives up. It's like the value

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>versus growth phenomena. It's the same trade Tom, you know.

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think that we are at at an inflection

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>point right now for the more cyclical parts of the

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>market to work better because there's you know, economic growth acceleration,

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>not just here but globally, and some of that inflationary too.

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>So there's no doubt that those markets that we're right

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>about our fundamental economic view, then those markets should have

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>better performance over the course of the next twelve months.

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Best month ever on the stocksic Sundrid for in Europe

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>this month unreal up around about Mike tremendous work with

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:18.919
<v Speaker 1>the team this year. Fantastic to follow some of the research.

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Have a wonderful thanksgiving, Sir Mike Wilson that of more

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Coin Stanley right now and this comes up on the

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 1>economic data that we're gonna see in what John has

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>talked about happening in the House of Commons right now

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>with a Britain in recession that is a compare and

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>contrast to Queen Anne three years ago. Tobias Adrian is

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>one skill to put perspective on this with the International

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Monetary Fund and Director of Monetary and Capital Markets Dr

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Adrian out of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and I

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 1>should say the New York Fellow Reserve, Tobias, I love

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:58.280
<v Speaker 1>your essay which links in the path forward one year,

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>two year, let's say the path four it up to

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twenty three, and you link it directly in

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to the financial stability that the Chancellor of the Exchequer desires.

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Can we have it both? Can we have our Turkey

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and need it too? Well? Good morning, thanks for having me. Yes,

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Center banks, including the Bank of England, but also the

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve and the e c B have deployed extraordinary

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>measures this year in order to fight this terrible pandemic,

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and that has been tremendously helpful in easing financial conditions,

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>getting financial markets to work, allowing firms and governments to

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>borrow from markets. So that's a very very good outcome.

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>But of course, an intended consequence of this monitor policy

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>easing is for risk taking to return in financial markets.

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>And indeed we see that high risk for us can

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:03.119
<v Speaker 1>get loans, but you have to make sure that there's

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>not excessive risk taking, do you This is really important, folks,

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and this goes to the blue book, the Brown Book,

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and in the Green Book of the International Monetary Fund.

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Have you guys calculated the percent of g d P

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to have to spend on this pandemic?

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:22.679
<v Speaker 1>Progressive and liberal economist would say it's a much higher

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>percent of g d P. Do you have a statistic tobias, Well, yes,

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 1>we have looked at the fiscal expenditures this year and

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 1>there were about twelve trillion globally twelve trillion, so that's

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>uh depending on the economies. In advanced economies, it's up

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to fIF of GP that has been spent in two

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand twenty alone on fiscal expenditures in order to cushion

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the economy from this terrible pandemic. And yet still people

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:59.199
<v Speaker 1>say that monetary policy is doing the heavy lifting tobias.

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:02.359
<v Speaker 1>So even though you do that have that incredible fiscal expansion,

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>still it is the idea of incredibly low interest rates

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and bond purchases and beyond by central banks. What are

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the financial stability risks of this disconnect that we keep

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about With markets flying higher records even as we

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 1>look at a pretty bleak winter, So for the moment,

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 1>things am pretty good shape. Banks have entered this crisis

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>with much more capital than they enter the two thousand

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>eight crisis, and um of course markets have come back

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and that has been very helpful in terms of sustaining

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the rescovery and sustaining the economy. We worry about the

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>next three to four years. If monetary accommodation is still needed,

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>financial conditions remain easy, that could fuel risk taking going forward.

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>And so it's really in the medium term that we

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:02.559
<v Speaker 1>worry that there could be some degree of excessive risk

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>taking in some corners of the vices you pointed out.

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Though this was the objective of policy to divorce financial

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>conditions from underlying fundamentals. Use the word excessive. Can you

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 1>define the word excessive and who gets to the side,

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>whether it's successive. Absolutely, it's a balance. It's a balance.

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>So you do want lending, you do want to support

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the economy, but you wanted to be measured and so

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>getting the balance right is really what is on the

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>table here. So in all of your uh, supportive monetary

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 1>policy is going to be appropriate for some time in

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>many countries, for many years, but that has to be

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:45.839
<v Speaker 1>combined with regulatory measures that make sure that there isn't

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>excessive risk taking in terms of risky lending or the

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:54.359
<v Speaker 1>build up of leverage. Are you thinking right the macropodential

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:56.839
<v Speaker 1>tools around the housing markets that we've seen before and

0:10:57.240 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>for instance the UK, those kind of things deparces that

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>way your heads at the moment. Yeah, it would cover

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>of course the banks, the non banks, as well as

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the household sector and the corporate sector. So you really

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>have to look at the economic system as a whole.

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:16.199
<v Speaker 1>To us come back saying I love to continue the

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:19.439
<v Speaker 1>conversation to Adrian that I'm as director of Monetary and

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Capital Markets. Your man joins out from City Group, Doctor

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Man out of Thanksgiving. We're supposed to take a bigger

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>broader view with you. Somebody mentioned there are another major

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>bank looking for zero, looking for slow down, looking for recession.

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Can you be so grim as to tell us we're

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna begin to an approach in nb ER recession. Well,

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of course, the n b E R recession is the

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>two consecutive quarters of negative growth. That's the official word. Um,

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we're going to be looking at that.

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:55.679
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't imply that we aren't going to be looking

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:58.679
<v Speaker 1>at a very difficult situation for a lot of people

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>in the market. I think that you have said that

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you've you have this to to to uh stage recovery.

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>One is manufacturing doing quite well. Um, you know, having

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a trade deficit and endurable and turable aplodes or capital

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 1>goods is actually a good sign for business investment going forward.

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:19.199
<v Speaker 1>But of course, the labor market, the weakness, the continued

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 1>weakness of the labor market is something that is going

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>to drag the whole economy down. So you know, you've

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 1>got two speeds. One is extremely slow actually in reverse,

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's what the initial claims is telling us.

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>That's in reverse, that the capital goods trade deficit is

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>actually positive, um, but that's going to keep us from

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>being in um uh, you know, an official recession, but

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be very grim. I think we can't.

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Can you give us the nits medium term outlook than

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a city for you guys right now, just your base

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>case and terms of the outlook. The contrast between the

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>two well, as I say, i've you know, sort of

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>outlined the fact that the continuing claims UM and the

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>initial claims are pointing to a very difficult period of

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>time over the next you know, a few months, possibly

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>into the second quarter of next year. UM Our official

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>forecast is that the US economy will have returned to

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the pre COVID level of GDP in Q two of

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>next year. But I think that that has to be

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 1>um considered in light of you know, this this burgeon

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>in cases caseload in around around the country that's clearly

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>going to weigh on that on that forecast, Katherine, we

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 1>keep talking about how markets are ignoring the near term

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>looking to a brighter period of time with a vaccine

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>and traveling and more jobs, and the question that we

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 1>keep coming back to on surveillance every morning is what

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>is the damage, the longer term damage being done by

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the virus that is spreading at an exponential rate, and

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing that that's affecting the employment picture dramatically, with

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 1>worse than expected uh jobless claims coming in. What is

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the scarring? How do you measure that? Well, there's you know,

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>there are different ways of measuring it in the in

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the labor market data, but um, you know, the different

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 1>US and so forth. But I really think that it's

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's the labor market. It is um the small

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:11.839
<v Speaker 1>businesses that are disappearing, and it will take time to

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>bring that back. But I also think that there are

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:18.560
<v Speaker 1>some other potential changes in the way the economy works

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>that is a consequence of this divergence between what's happening

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to to companies um, sort of in terms of the

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>real side, and what's happening to companies in terms of

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the financial side. So one of the things that we

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>are seeing is that the companies that are flush have

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>done well are buying their competitors, so that you know,

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>M and A. So we're seeing more M and A.

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>We're kind of we're looking at more of that coming

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>forward over the next six months anyway, and so when

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>we come out the other side, the structure of the

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>economy looks very different, or potentially quite different with more concentration. UM.

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>That of course is not good for labor market people

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>in the labor market being able to get their wages

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and that sort of thing once they get employed. UM.

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>And so consolidation is great for markets, it's great for

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>stock prices, but it is really bad for both UM

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>innovation and for workers. So longer term, the type of

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>m and A concentration that we might end up with

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>six months from now is not something that we're happy

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 1>about in the longer term. Captain Man, a fancy question

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>here on foreign exchange and your excellence at international economics.

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>What happens is you end up having dollar dynamics which

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>harm countries. They complain, and you get an abrupt reversal

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>as well with a week dollar. I guess their currencies

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>get stronger. We had one house today go to a

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>yen nine, which is a shockingly strong yen. Is that

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>what's in store for us next year are strong currencies?

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Where other nations scream at President Biden, you know, I

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>think that, UM, there's a general view in the market

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>that dollar depreciation is UH is sort of in the

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>cards baked in almost UM. But I think we have

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to look at a lot of variation in how economies

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>are going to be performing over the next year. We

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 1>do see a lot of differences in UM potential improvement

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 1>in the economies over the course of the year based

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>on policy differences, based on virus vaccine acceptance differences. So

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's UH. I think it's premature to

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>say that, you know, we're looking at a claus a

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>louver situation where UM, the dollar gets too weak and

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>then everybody has to go in and try to reverse course.

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot more choppy waters, and it

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 1>depends on whether you're looking at Latin America, are looking

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>at Asia in terms of emerging markets UM, and even

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>differences between Europe and Japan against the against the dollar.

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I think we've got a lot of different factors at play.

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Getting somebody action to the data dump of the last

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>eleven minutes. Kathy Jones, a good friend of this program

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>of Charles Swab playing against saying jobless claims up to

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>seven seventy eight not a good sign, but jurable goods,

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>artist rights more than expected. Same old story manufacturing good,

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>but job market not so good. And Katherine, you touched

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:16.719
<v Speaker 1>on this a little bit earlier, your thoughts on how

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>long that kind of dynamic can persist these two different

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 1>economies that seem to be persisting at the moment, at

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>least not just in the United States, but in Europe

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>too well. Manufacturing is really being supported by UM both

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the policies that were put into place to replace worker

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>incomes at a time when they couldn't spend it on

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>anything else. So that's why we're seeing manufacturing goods looking

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 1>so good, retail sales are looking so good, or well,

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>we're good looking so good in terms of in terms

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:48.400
<v Speaker 1>of the bounce off the bottom UM and and then

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the fur allowing schemes in Europe. These are all sort

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:54.639
<v Speaker 1>of designed to replace worker incomes, but of course they

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>have limited things to spend it on, and retail sales

0:17:57.560 --> 0:17:59.399
<v Speaker 1>is one of the ways they're spending it durable goods,

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 1>So there's that UM. Then of course there's the replacing

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 1>the inventories associated with the lockdown periods. Both of those,

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>at least in the United States are coming to an end,

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>especially the support programs designed to support people's income without

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 1>any kind of kind of move towards a either replacement

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of those incomes or move towards another strategy of spending

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>tax changes and regulatory changes that are going to promote

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>business investment to promote employment. Um then then we do

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 1>have this situation where ultimately the lack of consumption, as

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Michael Vickey mentioned earlier, the lack of consumption is going

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 1>to drag down the business side as well. So you

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 1>can't go out too far on the limb with manufacturing

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 1>doing well and employment doing poorly. Ultimately, you know, you

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>fall off cancer and always wonderful to get your perspective

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>cancer man that a city group. Thank you for this

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday before Thanksgiving, a time normally of immense travel. I

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>call it the fourth Wednesday of November. It's just simple.

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:11.400
<v Speaker 1>The college kids come home, there's all the things we've

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>done over the years, and then there's a pandemic. It

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:17.919
<v Speaker 1>has hit no one harder than the hospitality industry and

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>particularly how we transport in our business and hospitality, and

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:24.439
<v Speaker 1>that would be travel. So it would be good not

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to speak to a CEO talking their book and boy

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 1>we've done a great job on that. Thank you, guy

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Johnson for leading that coverage at worldwide. But how about

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 1>talking to somebody who's single handedly changed how we traveled.

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>His name is Brian Kelly. He's never gotten the credit

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>from a straight business community about what the Points guy

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:46.160
<v Speaker 1>has done. It was a website, it was a joke.

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Everybody laughed at him until they realized JP Morgan was

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:54.359
<v Speaker 1>listening and Mr Diamond was taking notes when Brian Kelly

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:57.679
<v Speaker 1>opened his mouth. Brian, you were unprepared for this. What

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>are your thoughts into two thousand tw one? Well, Tom,

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 1>just first off, thanks for giving me that intro instead

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of just saying I'm an influencer. And next I'm kidding. No.

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:14.719
<v Speaker 1>This year has been absolutely wild for for consumers traveling um.

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>But I do see hope on the horizon, you know,

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>just in talking to our millions of readers and looking

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>on social media, I do feel this bubble of revenge

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:26.160
<v Speaker 1>travel that's that's gonna come up, I think. In so,

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I do see good things on the horizon when we

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:32.439
<v Speaker 1>look at things like quantas setting up rules. Do you

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 1>feel your world will be the rule makers that force

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>use of vaccination? You know, I traveled to Ghana quite

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>a bit and I have to show my yellow fever vaccination.

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if countries you know

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>this virus. It's crazy how quickly it can spread once

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 1>you think you get it under control. All it takes

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>is a couple of quick mistakes and it can spread

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>like wildfire. So yeah, I do see more countries putting

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:01.439
<v Speaker 1>in a virus passport, you know, once these billions of

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>doses are out there and we can actually track who

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 1>got it. Bryan, I hope that I can join the

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:08.160
<v Speaker 1>wave of revenge travel. I think a lot of people

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>are looking forward to get back, getting back on planes

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and seeing the world. I am wondering, though, if it's

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be more expensive. The hospitality industry, as Tom

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:19.879
<v Speaker 1>was saying, has gotten hit very hard. How willing do

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you think, based anecdotally on what you've seen so far,

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 1>will they be to continue some of these points and

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>loyalty programs when they need cash they need the money. Well,

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:31.879
<v Speaker 1>it's funny because these points and loyalty programs bring in

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars in upfront cash. You know, we saw

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Hilton and Marryott sell billions this year for future use

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to the credit card companies. So you know, the loyalty

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:45.199
<v Speaker 1>programs need people to use those points. So we've been

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 1>seeing incredible promotions. Even this Black Friday, Virgin Atlantic is

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>selling their miles at a half off. You can fly

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 1>New York or l A to London for basically a thousand,

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>undred dollars when you back during these promotions. So it's

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a great time for con sumers. And I don't foresee

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, prices going up for a long time because simply,

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:07.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, supply and demand, and there's still so many

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>people sitting it out until they can get a vaccine,

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>which may not be till the end of next year.

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 1>So it's a good time for deals, all right. But

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 1>but something's got to give, Brian, right, I mean, we're

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at a market that's been decimated. If you look

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 1>at the losses in the airline industry that's projected that

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:23.640
<v Speaker 1>we're projected in this week billions and billions of dollars.

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:25.400
<v Speaker 1>How are they going to recoup that? And if they don't,

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:28.719
<v Speaker 1>does that mean no soda charging for your luggage? I mean,

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm just talking about the practical implications of the quality

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>of life aspects of these hospitality industries. Well, it's funny

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>because the airlines have actually made it better for consumers

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 1>in waving most change fees. You can now book the

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>cheapest flight and change it for free. They say that's

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be forever, but I agree with you something

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:49.679
<v Speaker 1>a shoe is going to drop at some point. But

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the way they're doing that is by managing capacity, by

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, retiring old and efficient jets. You know, their

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:58.880
<v Speaker 1>real industry has been right size. Um. But I don't

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>first see any punitive changes to consumers anytime soon, even Brian.

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:05.680
<v Speaker 1>We talked to k l M CEO this week and

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>he that k l M and Air France are talking

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>to the Dutch government about a bailout. And there's a

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.199
<v Speaker 1>dance in the United States Southwest Air making headlines in

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty four hours. From where you sit, Brian Kelly,

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:19.400
<v Speaker 1>do you just assume that we're going to see more

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 1>government aid to the industry to get them to the

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>other side of the points, Guy Bridge, I don't see it.

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, we saw Norwegian Air got the big notes

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:34.679
<v Speaker 1>from their government. The US has since you know, not

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>really been willing to extend, although the US CEOs are

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 1>in Washington every other day begging for it. You know,

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, these publicly traded companies. You know,

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:45.919
<v Speaker 1>I learned a lesson that you should probably stuck up

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more on cash. I don't foresee another

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:50.879
<v Speaker 1>big bailout. I think they just have to right size

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:53.719
<v Speaker 1>things and so the demand returns. I mean this this summer,

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>just because of the pandemic. Lisa was going through the Adirondacks.

0:23:57.160 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't Brian, if you know the Adirondacks are mountains

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:03.360
<v Speaker 1>north of New York City, and she was doing, yeah,

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>canoeing and portage and all that. She's trying to use

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>her point miles off a major bank to help her

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:13.439
<v Speaker 1>pay for the portage between the links. What is seriously,

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:17.119
<v Speaker 1>what are the bank's gonna do here? You mean you changes, Brian,

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:19.679
<v Speaker 1>What is the next step for the banks? You get

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 1>two hundred thousand points? You know, it's funny you say

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>that the banks this summer really took a break from

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 1>big promotions, you know, because the credit risk was just

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 1>so unknown. You know, are people gonna be defaulting left

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and right? It appears that's not the case, although we're

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 1>not quite sure how many consumers are defaulting because people

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>have been given so much forgiveness. But the banks came

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 1>back with huge offers. This fall. We saw big sign

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:43.959
<v Speaker 1>up bonuses, and I have seen a shift towards more

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>flexible points instead of credit cards that offer you know,

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 1>airline miles. Now you know, even Chase is offering to

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>use your points on groceries at a really rich rate.

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>So I foresee the credit card companies allowing those points

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 1>to be more flexible for use on things like merchandise.

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you, Brian, through the pandemic, thanks for keeping

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the spirit up. It's really wonderful during a pandemic to

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:07.640
<v Speaker 1>see Mr Kelly in the mall dives and he got

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>there for a hundred and forty two dollars and six

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>jillion points that I'm going to Rwanda this credit course.

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Why did I? Why did I? Why? Am I surprised? Right?

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Kelly go away? The points guy traveling all the places

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 1>Lisa and I Tom, I just want to make a

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg surveillance correction. Okay, you cannot use your points to portage.

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I learned this the hard way. I tried because get

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 1>the truck out and put the canoe drop of the jeep.

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, you need your points to portage. Thanks for

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Subscribe and listen to

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 1>interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer.

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before the podcast. You

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio