WEBVTT - Geoff Ogilvy - Tiger’s Masters Win, Putting, and Trinity Forest

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to another edition of the fried Egg Podcast.

0:00:03.320 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by our friends over

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>at Greater Than. Greater Than is a coconut water based

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>sports drink made by golfers for golfers. Just recently they

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>added a new flavor in new packaging with an actual

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>golfer on it.

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:21.080
<v Speaker 2>These guys run a small business.

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>It's great stuff, really quality product that hydrates you and

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>has half the sugars of Gatorade. Great taste thing and

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>really keeps you fresh and ready to go on the

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>golf course. So give Greater Than a try. It's available

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>for purchase at drinkgt dot com and if you use

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the code fried Egg twenty you'll get twenty percent off

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>your first order, So try it out. Great flavors, The

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>newest one is Watermelon, which features the golfer on the packaging.

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Port their small business. To order Greater then visit drinkgt

0:00:57.280 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>dot com and use the code fried egg to no

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:04.479
<v Speaker 1>spaces in that. It's Frida Egg twenty at drinkgt dot

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>com and uh, if you.

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Really enjoy it, tell your course or a club to

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 2>stock it.

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>This episode is with Jeff Ogilvie, Jeff and I caught

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:15.759
<v Speaker 1>up for a little while, and we've started off by

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 1>talking a little bit about the Masters and Tigers wins,

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:22.040
<v Speaker 1>since we hadn't talked since before Tiger sealed the deal.

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Part two we'll focus on the PGA Championship this week

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>as well as Bethpage Black, So look for that to

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 1>be in your feeds probably on Tuesday night. And this

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>one's up here and we'll get you ready to go

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>for your second major championship, the PGA Championship at Bethpage. So,

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>without further ado, here is Jeff Ogilvie. I miss a green,

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>for example, I'm already upset.

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 3>When I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 3>And when I find my ball in a frid Egg

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 3>Friday egg, the dreaded Frida egg Friday egg Frida egg

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 3>Frida egg bride egg Lie, I'm about ready to run

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 3>off the course.

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you think there's something with short putts? With like

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I think there's like an expectation thing. You know, nobody

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>ever struggles with an eight foot part, but people struggle

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>with a three foot pipe.

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 3>Why you give yourself less chance to miss it? Right?

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if you miss an eight foot you don't

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 3>you don't take it too harsh. I think you kind

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 3>of start you don't let yourself miss short puts, and

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 3>that's why you do well, that's why the stress. At least,

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 3>I should say, you let yourself miss an eight foot

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 3>It's like that's start with the ah pow put the

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 3>dirty part. I mean, every pro in the world more

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:03.079
<v Speaker 3>part parts from eight feet than dirty parts. Why that?

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:10.640
<v Speaker 3>But it's yeah, it's yeah, whatever you want the scientific

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 3>term for it, but it's true. And I think the

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 3>closure you get to the whole, the less you're willing

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 3>to accept you might miss it, so you get tenser

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 3>about it or something. I don't know.

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's it's like almost like the expectations the wrong thing.

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Like if if you walked up and you expect to

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 1>make it without thinking about being mad about missing it,

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>you'd probably make more of them. But the fact that

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you think about missing it.

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, I don't know, you think about missing it

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 3>before you hit it, and once you missed you don't

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 3>think about missing it. When you're young, you just think

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 3>about missing it. Once you missed a few, Once you

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 3>missed a few, then it's always in your head, right,

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 3>That's why it's more it's just a pressure, self inflicted pressure.

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>That's why some courses I think are easier the first

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>time you play them because you don't know where all

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the bad stuff is.

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 3>But that's true on some courses. Some courses it's definitely

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 3>better than not know to just tell me where to

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 3>hit it. I don't want to know where the bad

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 3>stuff is. Yeah, I don't know. If put putting, I

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 3>think there's also there's a massive psychological The guys who

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 3>get like that with their putting are the ones who

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.599
<v Speaker 3>have always hit the ball great, and they just have

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 3>more opportunities to miss. I mean, there's almost no guy

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 3>who's historically not hit it that close to the whole

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 3>or missed a lot of greens. Those guys always put decently,

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 3>they never have problems. It's the guys who have close

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 3>their whole career they're the ones who have problems. Well,

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 3>that has to be psychological.

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>If they didn't hit it close, though, they wouldn't be

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>playing on tour.

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:44.799
<v Speaker 3>You could make that argument, but you could also argue

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 3>that they've seen the ball miss more, you know, because

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 3>they've had more eight to twenty footers, whereas the guys

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:53.359
<v Speaker 3>who don't hit it very well, they chip it up

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 3>to inside five feet every time, So they're more puts

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 3>that they've hit in their life have gone in because

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 3>they've had less parts from outside that I mean, this

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 3>is an accumulation of a career. But I mean Monty

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 3>Adam Scott, like Lucas Glover, these guys who are like

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:12.720
<v Speaker 3>just stripe shows close their whole life eventually by the

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 3>end struggle with they're putting VJ. You know, Nicholas and

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Tiger are like the exceptions.

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I wonder you just said something that made me think

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>of Sergio because Sergio is so he's another guy that's

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, struggled with the putter.

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 3>But but then I think, I think exactly the same.

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Is his pitching the most like his short game, the

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>most underappreciated great skill of any player, because everybody talks

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 1>about how he hits it.

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's very artistic around the greens too, like he's

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he's not seavy, he doesn't play the outrageous shots,

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 3>but he's he always plays the right shot. He's Yeah,

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 3>he's brilliant around the greens, really good, and he looks engaged,

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, like he loves loves sitting. Great pitch shots,

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 3>hip shots. Yeah, he's really good around the greens, but

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 3>he hits it, so he hits it so good that

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 3>everybody just notices his ball striking. But he's incredible for

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 3>everywhere except inside about ten feet probably, you know. And

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 3>when he works out out he wins. When he pats

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 3>well inside ten feet he wins.

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 2>It seems like, yeah, yeah, that's exactly.

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, you look at like Westwood would be

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>another guy inside ten feet just I mean, he'd have

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 1>he'd have a couple of majors.

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:31.919
<v Speaker 3>But again, he's had a career of being ten to

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:34.160
<v Speaker 3>twelve fifth, ten to twenty feet for Bertie on almost

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:36.840
<v Speaker 3>every hole. I mean, these guys who stripe it have

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:38.839
<v Speaker 3>just got more opportunity to miss. I mean, part of

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 3>me is with Speeth with his putting, is that he

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 3>just hits too many puts. And at some point Jackie

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 3>Burke used to say his fix for putting was just

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 3>go hit a one hundred three footers in a row,

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, And if you can hold one hundred three

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 3>footers in a row, then you can put because you're

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 3>just seeing the ball go in all the time. And

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 3>when you pack just eight, ten, twelve, fifteen foot of

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:04.280
<v Speaker 3>is that booty race party as good as you can part,

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 3>you're still seeing the ball miss a lot and that

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 3>just builds up in your head over a long period time.

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Maybe I don't know. That's my theory at least, Like

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 3>the best putters I've ever known haven't practiced they're putting

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 3>that much. I mean they're consistent, but they're five ten

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 3>minutes and then they go on. You know, they don't

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 3>stand there for three hours every Thursday and Friday and

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 3>Wednesday afternoons and just grinding in grooves into the green.

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 3>The great putters don't do that. They come they well

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 3>mean sned okay if you had some patches of practicing

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 3>a little bit. But they're consistently practicing it. But they're

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 3>not like that guy who digs holes in the putt

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 3>and green grooves, because I think they just they get

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 3>the feel, they see the ball go in the hole,

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 3>and then they're happy, you know, then they go out

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 3>in the course. There's something to that. I don't know

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 3>what it is.

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I agree, I think like the short putts, there's something

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to that, like practicing long putts and short putts, but

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>nothing in between.

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because there's.

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 3>Definitely merit to that. I mean, yeah, Tiger, Tiger always

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 3>when he got on the green, it would hit just

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 3>one hundred foot is the longest puts he could hit

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 3>for like the first five minutes he walked on the green,

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 3>and then at the end he would hit two two

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 3>three footers. That was it. He didn't hit many in between.

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 3>And you never saw Tiger practice his putting onto it.

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 3>You just saw him warm it up. He wasn't chalk

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 3>lining or getting the stringline or doing circles or anything that.

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Really.

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 3>He was generally just being loose, putting around the groom

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 3>with one hand sometimes like it was had a sense

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 3>not so serious.

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Does that make sense, Yeah, no, it does.

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 3>Lighter about it. He was on the green and he

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 3>was kind of bantering with guys and banging puts all

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 3>the way across the green. But it wasn't so his

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 3>putting preparation wasn't so stressful and serious like you see

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 3>some guys. I mean, I don't know. I mean, this

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 3>is just years of watching people, watching what works and

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 3>what doesn't work.

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>And this is what I make scuff great because there's

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>no no true answer.

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Nobody's guarded.

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 3>That's why putting so nobody's got it.

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>It's the most frustrating, putting, the most frustrating aspect of golf.

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 2>I find bugs me so much.

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 3>But it's the most, it's the most. It's the most

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 3>black and white. Right, it's in or it's out. It's

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 3>success or its failure. Whereas with a golf and like

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:17.439
<v Speaker 3>a full shot, it feels like there's a bit more

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 3>area of gray. That was okay, that was gray. That

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 3>was average, But I can get away with it, and

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 3>you've got more shot. With a bad drive, you've got

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 3>three more shots to make paw. You miss your paw part,

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:31.199
<v Speaker 3>it's over. You've made bogey. Like there's no coming back

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 3>from that.

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>That's so true because like if you hit an average drive,

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 1>it's whatever. But like when you have an eight foot

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>slider from left to right, and as soon as you

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 1>hit it, you know it's just gonna miss, like a

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 1>cup rate, you're just like god, that was just terrible.

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, you just feel awful.

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 3>And success is only success if the ball goes in.

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 3>Whereas a drive, you've got thirty yards a fair way

0:09:57.320 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 3>and even in the rough you can kind of you

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 3>can maybe make power or it up to the green.

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 3>But like a putt, it's in or it's out, like

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 3>it's success or its failure. And I think that's the

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 3>only part in golf it's like that, So I think

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 3>that's why it leaves all the scars that it does. Hey,

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 3>I can.

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:15.439
<v Speaker 1>What'd you think of what do you think of takers?

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:22.319
<v Speaker 3>When holy wow? Yeah, outrageous. I mean it kind of

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 3>looked it on Saturday a little bit, didn't it. I felt.

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, everybody's written it, and I mean there's been

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 3>as much written about this as anything, but the he

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:36.319
<v Speaker 3>just carried that air of kind of joy or happiness

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 3>and lightness on the course that he hadn't had since

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 3>he was a kid. It didn't appear to me, and

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 3>he just looked like he was in the right mood.

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 3>And as soon as that back nine came along, it

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 3>was like two thousand and two again, wasn't it. It

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 3>was incredible. He just looked he just looked so comfortable

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 3>down the stretch when nobody else looked completely comfortable, you know.

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think they Brooks looked great, and a

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 3>few of the others looked great, but he just looked like,

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 3>heyday Tiger all of a sudden, like, oh now, I

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:05.679
<v Speaker 3>remember what I'm doing everyone, get out of the way.

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna win, you know. And that shot on six

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:11.319
<v Speaker 3>that shot on sixteen, it was just like was it

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 3>ever going to go anywhere else? You know? It was

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:15.319
<v Speaker 3>just incredible.

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Shot on fifteen was awesome too, and then and then yeah, yeah,

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>that fifteen shot on fifteen was like perfect. It seemed

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>like he was never he's never taking on like the

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>really risky line, but he was taking the right line

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>every time.

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 3>It's funny. I mean, he had this reputation in his

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 3>heyday of being ultra aggressive, but he actually wasn't. When

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 3>he got in Majors in the last nine holes especially,

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 3>he was ultra conservative. Really never really gave himself a

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 3>chance to relative to a guy like Phil for example,

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 3>who clearly takes the most cavalier approach that he can

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 3>because that's how he likes to play. Tiger was always

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 3>like backfooting two irons and hitting him low and hitting

0:11:57.320 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 3>it to the fat side of the green and kind

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:06.079
<v Speaker 3>of that Nicholas make people beat me thing. Regular tournaments,

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 3>he was pretty aggressive, but Majors he was always. He

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 3>was incredibly smart golfer probably underestimated, under talked about how

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 3>smart he was, and how a little danger he would

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 3>put his ball in. Yeah, I mean it was great

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 3>to watch. I mean, what a comeback from what a

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 3>couple of years ago he was not playing golf again

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 3>and get pulled up on the side of the road

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 3>by the police in all sorts of I mean, it

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 3>was like, wow, coming back from that just to come

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:37.559
<v Speaker 3>on tours impressive, but to realistically be what one of

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 3>the top two or three golfers in the world right now,

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 3>that's pretty outrageous. Yeah.

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean you look at act and now he's finished

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>top six and with a win in the last three majors, Like,

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>who would have thought that two years ago?

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 2>It's absolutely nuts?

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 3>And no, it's nuts, Yeah, it's nuts.

0:12:57.040 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>What was it like when Taker was in the hunt

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 1>in a major? When you're playing Do you think that

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>it had an effect people have talked about Do you

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>think there was any Tiger effect and the Master, as

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>you said, everybody was a little uncomfortable. Do you think

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that had anything to do with him?

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 3>I think a little bit. I mean, it's not what

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 3>he does. It was the reputation hit for us. Wow.

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 3>If you go back, he never lost a tournament when

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 3>he played in the last group basically, ever, like his

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 3>record of leading on Sunday and closing out the deal

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 3>was what sixty and one or something like. It was

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 3>just it was so it just gave you this. It

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 3>was just this feeling of inevitability. It didn't matter what

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:43.079
<v Speaker 3>you did, he was going to win. It just felt

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 3>that way because he always did. And even though this

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 3>was false, it made you feel like you had to

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 3>play perfect. Even though he didn't play perfect to beat you.

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 3>He did plenty of bad shots, but or not perfect shots,

0:13:56.679 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 3>I should say, but you felt like you had to

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 3>play perfect because no one's ever beaten this guy. So wow,

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to have to play good to beat him.

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 3>And whenever you try to play perfect, you don't play

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 3>very well, right, or it's very difficult to play well

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 3>when you try to play that well. And I think

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 3>that was the intimidation, knowing he was going to be

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.559
<v Speaker 3>hard to beat, knowing you had to play really, really well,

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 3>and whenever you try to play really well, you just

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 3>generally don't. It's I never felt the physical intimidation or

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 3>the oh, this is Tiger. It's like he's just an

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 3>intimidating guy like you probably would standing up next to

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 3>Lebron James or on the blocks with Michael Phelps or something.

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 3>I think that'd be a little different, Like that's a

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 3>physical intimidation with guys like that. Tiger was, and he's

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 3>physically intimidating because he just looked so good and he

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 3>carried himself so well and carries But it was that

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, he was going to be there at the end,

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 3>and you had to play one of the best rounds

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 3>you've ever played, and generally, when you try to do that,

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 3>you don't, So to me, that was the intimidation. And

0:14:56.920 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 3>it's just that feeling of inevitability. It's just he's gonna win,

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 3>like in the crowd knew it, and that everybody knew it.

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 3>It was incredible.

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Watching Moulinari because you know, Molinari played with him at

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the Open, and Tiger had that early flurry there and

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>then Tiger kind of self sabotaged with the bogies he

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>made and so it was so untiger like. But then

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and Molinari just was kind of going about his business

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and nobody was paying attention to him. And then when

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Tiger faltered, he he you know, played really well down

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the stretch. But but this it seemed like the Masters.

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>It was so much different because he was he was leading,

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>he was in the last group and all day, you know,

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 1>he made some unbelievable up and downs just to you know,

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to hang on to the lead on the back. But

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>he definitely looked different from the way he played within

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the Open. But you know, it could have been just

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, bad round or whatever, but it just seemed

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>like there was a little bit different feeling and maybe

0:15:56.640 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>that was just more pressure with the Masters and eating.

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 3>I think there's a history thing that the Master's term.

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 3>He's won there, what's he won there? Five times?

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Now?

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 3>Was that fine? He was so wed one? Yeah, so

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 3>he's won four times before. He's clearly barely played the

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 3>Masters where he didn't have a chance with nine holes

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 3>to play. I mean, so for twenty twenty times in

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 3>his career, he's probably come down the stretch on the

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 3>last nine holes with some chance to win the Masters. Malinurry,

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 3>that was his first then, if or basically I'm not

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 3>sure if he'd been fringes of contention before, but let's

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 3>say it was his first or second at the most.

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 3>That's Augusta. You're fighting history always. It's why Freddie always

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 3>plays well, and Phil usually is around, and the usual

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 3>suspects are always around because it's there's just there's ghosts

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 3>at that place, and Tiger's ghosts to the friendliest ones, right,

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, as he can win there, the crowd, the crowd,

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 3>all they want to do is they just they want

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 3>him to win. I mean, it's just I don't know,

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:06.919
<v Speaker 3>it's this again, there's that's feeling of inevitability that it

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 3>was just gonna happen. I don't know, it's just history

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 3>there is amazing, Like it's he's just been in those

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 3>holes in that position more often than anyone else, and

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 3>he's naturally better at that than most people in history

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 3>as well. So I mean it's a double thing. It's

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 3>a double difficult to beat there. And I think at

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:28.879
<v Speaker 3>a new course where he hadn't won before, or where no

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 3>one had ever played, a completely fresh place, it might

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 3>be a different story, a bit more of a level

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 3>playing field. But that's the That's the great thing about

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 3>the Masters is once you win, you're kind of you're

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:43.640
<v Speaker 3>it's not a level playing field anymore, you know. There's

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 3>just that's such an advantage to one it before, especially

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 3>four times.

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and for the guys that have been in it

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 1>and failed like that's kind of what Ernie was talking

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:55.439
<v Speaker 1>about when he when he talked about it like he

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>was he got in there so many times and every

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>time it went the wrong way, You've start to like

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you're almost cursed.

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And look, it's such a cool tournament to win

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 3>because of the lifetime exemption and the Champions dinner and

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 3>all that little that the coolest little club in golf

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:16.439
<v Speaker 3>professional golf is that Champions, right. I mean, there's so

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 3>few of them that once you're in it, you haven't

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 3>got anything to lose down the last nine holes. Really,

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 3>it's just I can just add to my legacy here.

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 3>You're still part of the club. Whereas people who are

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:29.199
<v Speaker 3>trying to get in the club. That's there's more pressure

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:33.479
<v Speaker 3>involved there, more more more things that construct you, bro,

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:36.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, more things that can distract you and start

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 3>thinking about Champions dinners and what's the locker room look

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 3>like up there? And I don't know, I mean what

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 3>goes through everybody else's head, But it's it's certainly easier

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 3>to win a tournament that you've won before, and that

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 3>tournament I would have said that would be amplified.

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>That's that's why I struggle with when I play tournament golf,

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>is when I'm playing well and I start thinking I

0:18:56.119 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 1>had like when whether it's like a USGA qualifier and

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I start to think about playing in the tournament, or

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, whether it's a you know, a tournament where

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:08.440
<v Speaker 1>you qualify for match play, you start thinking about match

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:10.399
<v Speaker 1>play and you're not done with your struck play. Is

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>that same kind of stuff that yeah, I mean that

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 1>you and a lot of other tour pros struggle with.

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 3>I think that's natural. I mean I think whenever I

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:24.120
<v Speaker 3>was playing really, really well in the tournament so I won,

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't think I thought about winning it until after

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 3>it was over, or at least till right at the end,

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 3>and I'd never it wasn't about I was thinking about

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:33.360
<v Speaker 3>winning it, but I wasn't thinking about what would come

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 3>with the win. I think when you start thinking about

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 3>what comes with the win or anything other than just

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 3>hitting good shots and finishing one in front of the

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 3>guy next year, then you can go wrong. That's when

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 3>I went wrong. The ones that didn't work out were like, yeah,

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 3>you start thinking about oh well, well, yeah, if it

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 3>was qualifying for a matchplay thing, or it was well,

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 3>i might win a million dollars today, and I'm going

0:19:57.400 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 3>to have a two year exemption, and I'm going to

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:00.640
<v Speaker 3>get to go to Kappallura and the two championship. Maybe

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 3>I'll get in that. It's like, you can't hit good

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 3>shots when you think about all that stuff, you know,

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 3>and then you've got more to lose. You're standing on

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 3>that last team and you want to hit the last

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 3>fair way. If you're thinking about stuff like that, you've

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:11.919
<v Speaker 3>given yourself a whole lot of stuff to lose, Whereas

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 3>if you just completely hell bent on beating the guy

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 3>next to you, it's a little bit different. I think

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:19.360
<v Speaker 3>you're just a bit more focused on beating the guy

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 3>next to you rather than all the stuff that comes

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:24.479
<v Speaker 3>with it. I mean, everybody knows you go play your

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 3>friend for match play, for no money, just for pride,

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 3>and it's a little bit easier to close out than

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 3>if you're playing for a thousand dollars. Like everybody's feeling

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 3>a little different on the last hole for one thousand dollars,

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 3>you know. And I think the more kind of candy

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:41.120
<v Speaker 3>you put on the the end of it, the result

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 3>the harder it is to kind of stay clear about it.

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:48.439
<v Speaker 3>I guess, yeah, focused about it, not get distracted. And

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:50.679
<v Speaker 3>I think the Masters does that more than any place.

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:53.160
<v Speaker 3>It gives you distractions.

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that makes sense.

0:20:55.680 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 1>There's more more things to look ahead to. What you

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 1>said about losing, you know, then you have more to

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 1>lose if you're thick and hat which makes a lot

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of sense.

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:09.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Tiger probably felt like he had something to lose.

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 3>I mean, everyone in the last few groups thinks that

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 3>they're the one who's going to win that week, or

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:17.160
<v Speaker 3>they hoping they are, and so there's they're all kind

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 3>of carrying a little bit of that. But Tiger would

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 3>carry the lead. I mean, he he had nothing to

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:23.359
<v Speaker 3>prove at this point. And that's the thing. He's actually

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 3>been playing looking like he hasn't trying to prove anything anymore.

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:28.399
<v Speaker 3>His whole career he looked like, especially when he was

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:31.640
<v Speaker 3>struggling a bit, that sort of kind of at least

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 3>in the Mages between eight and now, he always looked

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 3>like he was trying to prove something, you know, this

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:40.639
<v Speaker 3>time it didn't look didn't look that way. It was

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 3>just I'm just great. Look how good I'm playing. How

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:44.719
<v Speaker 3>fun is it to play well again and getting contention.

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:47.159
<v Speaker 3>It was kind of a different air he carried to me.

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 3>And trying to prove something I think sometimes can overwhelm

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 3>you mentally, at least it did to me.

0:21:56.960 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, you're trying harder, you know, mm hmm. A lot

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of things you try hard, you have less success than

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:06.680
<v Speaker 1>if you just let it happen. It's like when you're

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to write. You know, if I sit down and

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 1>try and write, it's probably not going to happen. But

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:14.919
<v Speaker 1>I wrote something today because I was sitting doing something

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>else and it popped in my head and I just

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 1>wrote it in an hour.

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 2>And it was like, why isn't it always that easy?

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, White, for it to happen as opposed to might

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 3>can happen. Yeah, it's a human knightschat. That's hard. That's

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 3>the challenge.

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Now for a quick word from our sponsors. Today's episode

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 1>is powered by tdum Error Trade. Whether on the course

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>or in the market, it helps to have a second

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>set of eyes to keep you on your game. That's

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:41.680
<v Speaker 1>why tedom or Trades Trade Desk is here to help

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>gut check your strategies so you always feel confident. Teeing

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:49.120
<v Speaker 1>up a trade visit tedomortrade dot com slash fried egg

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>to learn more about what their trade desk can do

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 1>for you member SIPC. Now back to Jeff Ogilvie. So

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:00.640
<v Speaker 1>we're they're at trendy four US this week. This will

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 1>this will air the Monday after tourney for US. What

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 1>do you everybody focuses in on the low scores that

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>people shoot out there for as as a player, do

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you do you look at, you know, twenty three under

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>what wives won last year and think, God, that's crazy.

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 3>Well I played last year. It was doable last year,

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 3>But I don't think we should measure that winning score

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:35.360
<v Speaker 3>on just one year. It wasn't probably a typical Dallas

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 3>week in May, Like it wasn't as windy as it

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:41.439
<v Speaker 3>could be. Of course, I feel like we it was.

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 3>The fairways were firm, but the greens weren't crazy firm.

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:48.399
<v Speaker 3>So it was kind of a combination of it played

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 3>short but you could hit it close to the hole

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:55.880
<v Speaker 3>and it's I don't know, it's kind of a course

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:57.919
<v Speaker 3>that I think will actually get people to develop a

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:00.160
<v Speaker 3>bit more respect for it over the time over the years.

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:04.439
<v Speaker 3>Like I think people Aaron played amazingly well ask you

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 3>to shoot that. I don't know, I mean, and I

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 3>don't think there's anything wrong with last scores. I don't

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 3>It is kind of intimidating. Some tournaments, like Kapalou was

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 3>always like this. You'd start the tournament knowing you had

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 3>to be mid twenties to win the tournament, and even

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 3>part after nine holes, it starts seeming almost ridiculous that

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:21.159
<v Speaker 3>you could think of getting to that score. But I

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 3>don't know. I don't think guys really think about that

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 3>too much, to be honest. I think guys play the

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 3>first round as well as they can, and halfway through

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:29.360
<v Speaker 3>the first round they look at the board and see

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:33.360
<v Speaker 3>see what the scores look like and kind of kind

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 3>of get a feel from that. Really, that's what I did.

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:38.360
<v Speaker 3>That's what I did. Anyway, I get a feel after

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:40.160
<v Speaker 3>nine or twelve holes. If you especially if you play

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 3>all you're playing in the afternoon, you look at the

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:43.199
<v Speaker 3>scores in the morning on Thursday, and you get a

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 3>pretty good sense of what the week's going to be

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 3>like just after the half the field's played nine holes. Really,

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 3>you just get a feel for it.

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a shame, it's gonna it's it rained a

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:55.880
<v Speaker 1>ton yesterday. It's rain It's going to rain more this weekend.

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>They say, so soft again, and I think, I mean,

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously they're going to have a low score.

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 2>But to me it seemed like the course in this it.

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Allows every type of player to have a chance out there.

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Did you feel that way?

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 3>I think every player's got a chance because it's not

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:17.159
<v Speaker 3>outrageously long, although there is certainly a big advantage to

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 3>hitting it long in places. It's quite strategic, as people

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:23.159
<v Speaker 3>have talked about, you've got to there's more than one

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 3>way to play it. There's quite a few kind of

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 3>central central line hazards, you know, bunkers in the middle

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 3>of the fairways that you can go short of, over

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:34.160
<v Speaker 3>right or left of, and that kind of There's quite

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 3>a few of these on that course, and it's quite

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:40.639
<v Speaker 3>a different test than a regular tour event, which is

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 3>I think interesting and got guys it it looks like

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:45.120
<v Speaker 3>a better field this year, and I think the field

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 3>will get better every year, to be honest, because I

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:50.200
<v Speaker 3>think it's a good player's golf course. I think when

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 3>you're playing well and you're a good player, I think

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 3>you feel like you could separate there a little bit.

0:25:55.040 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't think the score relative to par Is really matters,

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:04.640
<v Speaker 3>to be honest with you, but it would be certainly

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:06.920
<v Speaker 3>more fun. It's certainly more fun to play on its

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 3>firm because it's and then it brings in the guy

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 3>who wants to just hit low two ones off the

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 3>tee all week and really run it up and play

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 3>really smart, you know, like say Tiger would have done

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:20.679
<v Speaker 3>in his heyday, or isn't it softer? There'll be just

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:24.640
<v Speaker 3>kind of more sort of drivers and yeah, less less

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:29.159
<v Speaker 3>kind of need for like great angles and stuff, although

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 3>the way the greens are there angle is is still

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:36.120
<v Speaker 3>very important. There's still there's some spots on the fairway

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 3>there that are awful for some pins and you have

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:40.680
<v Speaker 3>to be fifty yards on the other side of the

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 3>fairway the next day, like it varies. There's a few really,

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 3>there's some interesting stuff there. So good good week for

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 3>a good caddy and a guy who is happy to

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 3>kind of change your strategy day to day depending on

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:56.479
<v Speaker 3>the tea, positions and the pins. So I think you'll

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 3>see good play regards to the scores and the conditions.

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 3>I think you'll see like the better players on tour,

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 3>and I mean everyone on plays a good tour, but

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 3>a good player, but the better player, like the quality

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 3>class players will generally get up a top there. I

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 3>would think because it's it's it's it takes more than

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:17.120
<v Speaker 3>just the normal tournament. So I think shoot twenty three under.

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:18.640
<v Speaker 3>I think you've got to do everything really well.

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 2>I was.

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I was talking to David Normoyle, who was like, the uh,

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:31.439
<v Speaker 1>he's a he's a great historian. And David, yeah, so

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>you had this great thing. I was telling him about

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 1>an article I'm going to write and I'm kind of

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:37.440
<v Speaker 1>spilling the beans on this art, but like.

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 2>About score to part.

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 1>So last year US Senior Women's Open, Laura Dv's wins

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 1>at at fourteen under or sixteen under, sixteen under all right,

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 1>at the Senior Open Championship at Saint Andrews. So that

0:27:54.600 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 1>was at Chicago Golf Senior Open at Saint Andrews twelve underwins.

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 1>And then at Shinnecock US Open Brooks wins at minus four.

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 1>What course was the easiest by what measure? Well, naturally, everybody,

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:17.879
<v Speaker 1>you didn't take the vape of most people of the

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Chicago Golf easiest by far, but they played Chicago Golf

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 1>par seventy three. They played Saint Andrews par seventy two,

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and they played Shinnacock par seventy so they all shot

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to seventy six.

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:35.200
<v Speaker 3>In their game. So that's always been my thing about par,

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 3>like it's you've got to take the relative to par

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 3>with a grain of salt. I mean, it's obviously somewhat

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 3>of a measure, but I mean if you made Oakmond

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 3>a par eighty, is it then an easy course? No?

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, we're still shooting two ninety for the week

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 3>or two ninety four or whatever we're shooting, and like

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 3>it's tear away, tearing hair out the whole way around,

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 3>just because we're we end up twenty five hunder part

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 3>you're not like, it's not you know, And that.

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Goes to like, you know, when you play a tournament

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and you shoot six, all sixty eighth aren't equal. If

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you shoot a sixty eight and it's blown twenty five

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 1>in its firm and as fast, that's a lot different

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 1>than a sixty eight on a soft course with no.

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 3>Wind completely one hundred percent like you should sixty eight

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 3>in Palm Springs and you're walking off gun of the

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 3>range wondering what's wrong with your goal? What's wrong with

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 3>your goal? You know, you shoot sixty out at Oakmont.

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean you're framing that card and putting it on

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 3>the wall, so it I mean it. Yeah, it does vary.

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 3>It's score relative parties, I guess important. And it's a

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:38.479
<v Speaker 3>good measure during that week, measuring how everyone played relative

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 3>to the other one hundred and fifty five players. But

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 3>it's not really a good measure of difficulty, I don't think,

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 3>because the thirteenth of the Masters, for example, is a

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 3>really easy five, but a difficult three. You know, just

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 3>if it was a Part four, it would be considered

0:29:56.440 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 3>a really really hard hole. As a Part five, it's

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 3>considered a really really easy hole. But it's the same. Like,

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you still have to shoot to seventy two

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 3>or something to win the Masters or whatever it is,

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 3>and you have to play that hole in sixteen shots

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 3>or whatever it is. I mean, that's difficult. Whatever the

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 3>number is on the tea, it doesn't change the whole

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 3>the part, but it is a good way to measure

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 3>people in a week.

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I hope they That's the premise of the whole thing,

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 1>is like they got to break the par barrier go

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 1>under seventy and you know all the problems will be solved.

0:30:27.440 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Why not just have par sixty seven?

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, certainly the USGA if they do, if some consider

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 3>them getting the set up a little bit wrong in

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 3>the US Open, and a lot do and they say

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:46.479
<v Speaker 3>they don't, but they seem to have an obsession with

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 3>us shooting somewhere near two hundred and eighty shots, you

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 3>know what I mean, they're like four seventies to be like,

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 3>that's the benchmark, that's the lowest we want anyone to

0:30:55.960 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 3>go for the week. If they got that out of

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 3>their head, they'd have more chance to set it up well,

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, shinnecoques are past seventy two? Really seventy one?

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 3>Seventy two properly seventy one? I think maybe naturally. Yeah,

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 3>but anyway, just set it up as well as you can.

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 3>And if it's some weeks it's not windy, and at

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 3>sixteen under, well the guy who wins is still the

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 3>best player because he's still navigated seventy two holes at

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 3>a great course better than anybody else. The score. Nobody

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:30.480
<v Speaker 3>remembers what the score under par was two years later,

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 3>five years later, unless it's historically crazy to me if

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 3>they took away if they didn't care what people shot,

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 3>or if you don't care, it's purely like outside of

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 3>the USJ just everybody. If you don't care what people shoot,

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 3>you've got much. You can just set the course up

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 3>as well as you can, you know, which means some

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 3>stuff can be really hard. Some stuff's going to seem

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 3>really easy. But I know Augusta seems to care what

0:31:57.000 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 3>They always end up with the same sort of winning score.

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 3>But it doesn't seem like they care what people shoot,

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, they just try to have their course so

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 3>that the guy who plays the best that week wins.

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 3>And I don't think you always get that when you

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 3>focus on score relative to part, but I could be

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 3>completely wrong.

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is I was wondering.

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 1>As a player, Like something I think about is you

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>got all these tea boxes on these horse Why does

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 1>every day of the week they always put the tea

0:32:28.800 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 1>backs in relatively the same position for the most part.

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Why isn't like the lower tee ever used for a tournament?

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Like why aren't they ever putting it up there? Is

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 1>it because of like the infrastructure?

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 3>I guess it's Wow, there's some somewhat. I would say

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 3>the PGA Tour as good as they are at setting

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 3>up golf tournaments for zero controversy. You know, their genius

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 3>is never having a bad I've never seen a bad

0:32:57.280 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 3>pin in twenty years and a PGA Tour event, Wow,

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 3>I have some average ones, but not outrageous ones. US

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 3>Opens I've seen twenty, right, and I've played far more,

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 3>far more PGA Tour events. The US Opens Australian opens

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 3>have had historically had some crazy setups and like and

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 3>walk offs with the greens get too fast and stuff

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 3>way way back. But like, generally the PGA Tour masters

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 3>are having like a controversy free setup. But because of that,

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 3>I think there's a lack of imagination sometimes in setup

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 3>because they're so good at avoiding the crazy stuff that

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 3>sometimes you have to kind of risk a bit of

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 3>crazy stuff to get more interesting. You know. It's their

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 3>business model to not have controversy. They want the golfer

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 3>to be the star on Sunday afternoon, not the golf course.

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 3>That's the mile. These guys are good, or they used

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 3>to be good. Now they're living under path. But it's

0:33:51.440 --> 0:33:53.719
<v Speaker 3>the nature of trying to avoid controversy is you're going

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 3>to probably lose a little bit of interest. I still

0:33:56.840 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 3>think they should path three. Certainly we play a lot

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 3>on tour that seemed to be one eight seven, one

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 3>ninety one, eighty eight and one eighty six for the week.

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:09.719
<v Speaker 3>You know where there's certainly scope on every course in

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:12.359
<v Speaker 3>America that's got multiple teas to have it at one

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 3>twenty with that crazy little front pin and then two

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 3>fifteen the next day and funnily loove Mike Davis who

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 3>started doing that. Remember in the US Open Tory Pines,

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 3>Tory Pines, he put fourteen way up, way up that day,

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 3>drivable and a few different things, which I think is great.

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 3>I think you should have more often August to do

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:31.360
<v Speaker 3>a little bit or gust to play that fourth t

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:35.879
<v Speaker 3>off the members team once usually that's really the only

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:39.279
<v Speaker 3>tea they do it. But that's sixteen. They move right

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:41.800
<v Speaker 3>up sixteen, they move right up that one day usually

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 3>sort of twenty thirty yards up from the back to

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:48.120
<v Speaker 3>that right pin. Especially it's done a little bit. It's

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:48.840
<v Speaker 3>not done enough.

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Though, yeah, especially with courses that are like seventy five

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:54.759
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards like where they might not use every back tea.

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Just change it up a bunch every day. I think

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that you'd get a better player. It's not like the

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:03.439
<v Speaker 1>same thing. It's like you're asking the same question every

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:06.560
<v Speaker 1>single day, or you could ask a bunch of different questions.

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 3>It's certainly when Mike started doing that in the US Open,

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:13.800
<v Speaker 3>that was certainly in the practice rounds. Very interesting to see.

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 3>Everyone has had theories about which Holey was going to do,

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 3>which path four was he going to do it too?

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 3>And which hole shall be practice teeing off and all

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:22.240
<v Speaker 3>they're cutting this front tee on twelve, we should actually

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:24.759
<v Speaker 3>hit a shot off this just in case. And it

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 3>created such kind of confusion or anticipation, or it made

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:31.960
<v Speaker 3>your preparation a little bit more difficult. And I think

0:35:32.000 --> 0:35:33.680
<v Speaker 3>preparation is a big part of it too, right, So

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:37.320
<v Speaker 3>if there's always the threat, if they'd do it enough

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 3>that it's always a chance to make a five hundred

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 3>yard path or three eighty, or to make a two

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 3>hundred and fifty yard part three one seventeen or something.

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think it's if they'd do it a

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 3>little bit, it throws. You can't just walk from the

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:56.959
<v Speaker 3>fourth green with a six on in your hand because

0:35:56.960 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 3>that path three is always a six on you know,

0:35:58.440 --> 0:35:59.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, which happens a little bit onto it you

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of you know what club you hitting off the

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:03.960
<v Speaker 3>next tea before you even get to it a little bit.

0:36:07.640 --> 0:36:11.319
<v Speaker 3>It's some of the most interesting times, or at least

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:13.799
<v Speaker 3>for me, my most uncomfortable times on tour, or when

0:36:14.120 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what club to hit off a tea

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:18.719
<v Speaker 3>or what strategy to play because it's we've been thrown

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 3>a curveball, you know.

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 1>You know. The thing too, is that especially with classic courses,

0:36:24.040 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 1>with all the new back teas, sometimes the angle when

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:31.280
<v Speaker 1>they had to get the distance, you know, it almost

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>like makes the T shot easier because it it gives

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:37.319
<v Speaker 1>you like more, you know how when you move it

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:40.319
<v Speaker 1>onto an angle, it might open it up a little

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:42.439
<v Speaker 1>bit more, make the T shot, and then you put

0:36:42.440 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 1>it up on the original tea and all of a

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:46.680
<v Speaker 1>sudden you're standing on that tee and that the look

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:50.120
<v Speaker 1>of the hole just doesn't it doesn't feel as comfortable,

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:53.359
<v Speaker 1>and that it's what you're saying, is the comfortability. Like

0:36:53.760 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I know, when I move up and play up sometimes

0:36:56.600 --> 0:36:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, I don't know where to hit the ball.

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:02.799
<v Speaker 3>Well, I always like we go play. I mean I've

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:05.719
<v Speaker 3>played Whisper Rocketnet. I mean a thousand times, I don't know.

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:09.840
<v Speaker 3>And sometimes when if you go out with say the

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:11.600
<v Speaker 3>older members or the members who don't want to play

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:13.560
<v Speaker 3>off the very back teas like we do, we'll go

0:37:13.719 --> 0:37:15.279
<v Speaker 3>up to like the one tea up or even two

0:37:15.320 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 3>teas up. That's harder for me because I don't know

0:37:17.680 --> 0:37:19.360
<v Speaker 3>how club you hit off any tea because it's just

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:21.439
<v Speaker 3>a routine off the back teas. I just pull drive

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:22.920
<v Speaker 3>out there and three with there and this is a

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:24.799
<v Speaker 3>four iron t shot or whatever it is. But it's

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:27.759
<v Speaker 3>always I don't have to make a decision. Whereas I

0:37:27.840 --> 0:37:29.440
<v Speaker 3>go up to front tees, it's like, oh, what can

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:30.840
<v Speaker 3>I hit here? How do I run it? Can I

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:32.480
<v Speaker 3>run it out there? The angles are all wrong, the

0:37:32.560 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 3>distances are all wrong. And you could do that four

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:39.320
<v Speaker 3>days in a row around a same golf course to

0:37:39.400 --> 0:37:43.719
<v Speaker 3>pros every year, really on courses that it works, and

0:37:43.800 --> 0:37:45.719
<v Speaker 3>all of a sudden, that runout that's never been in

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:48.080
<v Speaker 3>play is in play. You know that bunker that you

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 3>always carry all now you can't. And it just that

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 3>seems like quite an interesting way, And another's just another

0:37:58.760 --> 0:38:00.719
<v Speaker 3>layer to it right, another layer of complexity.

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:03.759
<v Speaker 2>You've been listening to the fried Egg podcast.

0:38:04.280 --> 0:38:05.800
<v Speaker 3>We do the digging for you.