WEBVTT - The Threat of Iran’s “No Red Lines” Retaliation

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Iran Supreme Leader Iotola

0:00:09.960 --> 0:00:13.119
<v Speaker 1>Ali Hamanei has been killed in today's joint attack by

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the US and Israel.

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Our objective is to defend the American people by eliminating

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:22.240
<v Speaker 2>eminent threats from the Iranian regime.

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 3>What the United States is doing is an act of aggression.

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 3>What we are doing is the act of self defense.

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:32.200
<v Speaker 4>Targets in Iran, Israel, and elsewhere in the Middle East

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 4>are under attack in an unprecedented escalation in the conflict

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 4>between the US and Iran.

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 2>Would be wonderful if the negotiates really in good conscious,

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 2>good faith, in conscience, but they are not getting there.

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 4>The combat operations come after weeks of negotiations between the

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:52.520
<v Speaker 4>US and Iran over what remains of its nuclear program.

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 4>This was not an imminent nuclear threat.

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 3>This is a military action over regime change, not over

0:00:57.960 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 3>the nuclear program.

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 4>Iranian state TV has reported that at least two hundred

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 4>people were killed in the strikes. The country responded with

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 4>missile attacks on Israel and strikes aimed at US assets

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:10.959
<v Speaker 4>in the region, where at least three US service members

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 4>have been killed. Aron says it sees no red lines

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 4>as it continues to respond with counter strikes. I'm David Gera,

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:23.199
<v Speaker 4>and this is the big take from Bloomberg News Today.

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 4>On the show, Bloomberg'sjeff Mason and Jumani Berseacci joined me

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 4>to discuss what we know about the timing and goals

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 4>of this weekend strikes and the risks of a widening

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:39.319
<v Speaker 4>regional conflict. Bloomberg White House correspondent Jeff Mason and Jumna

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 4>Birssecci in Dubai have been here with me all weekend

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 4>long at Bloomberg, along with correspondents across the globe following

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 4>this story. Jeff, we just now heard the tape from

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 4>President Trump announcing this operation. He did it in a

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 4>post on truth social which is an unprecedented move by

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 4>a sitting US president. What has the President said, Jeff,

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 4>about why they.

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Did this now, why they undertook this at this moment, Well,

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 2>the President is pitching the operation is having been in

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 2>response to an imminent threat, and that is something that

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 2>no doubt people are going to question and look into.

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>But that is the rationale that he used. His people. Also,

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>his top advisors told him that the negotiations that were

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>going on in Geneva with Iran about its nuclear program

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>essentially came to a point where the United States concluded

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>that Iran was not interested in talking about its blistic

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>missile program and was still interested in pursuing a nuclear weapon.

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 4>Jeff, what does the US want? Is that clear? Are

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 4>they using a playbook that they deployed in Venezuela just

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 4>a couple months ago.

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, it seems very clear that regime changes something that

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>they wanted, because the President very directly referred to that

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>in his statement when he encouraged people in Iran essentially

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:53.359
<v Speaker 1>to rise up and take this opportunity to take over

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 1>their government. But they haven't. They been The United States

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 1>in this case have not laid out how they expect

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>that to happen. And of course there's some comparisons to

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the Iraq War and this operation, but where those comparisons

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>don't continue, at least so far as there are not

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>US ground troops in Iran, and so the President may

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>have less ability to influence that despite the fact that

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:17.919
<v Speaker 1>strikes are continuing.

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 4>Jamana, You're witnessing the escalation of this firsthand. You're based

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 4>in Dubai, and I'm curious what things look like there.

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 4>In the wake of these strikes that we've seen, Well, what.

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 3>You need to understand is that a substantial volley of

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 3>missiles and drones have been directed at all of these

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Gulf states. And here I'm talking about the UAE behind

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 3>in Kutar, Kuwait, even Oman who were obviously playing a

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 3>key mediation role in those Geneva discussions. So that was

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 3>also quite a surprising development. And while most of the

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 3>missiles and drones have been intercepted, there are bits of

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 3>debris that actually did cause a significant amount structure of

0:03:56.720 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 3>infrastructure damage. These are financial centers in the Middle East

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 3>that have prided themselves on political stability and geoeconomic stability

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 3>in the context of a broader region that tends to

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 3>be quite hot and cold, i would say. And so

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:19.719
<v Speaker 3>the reaction has been pretty and notable in that it

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 3>seems as though many of these Gulf states are losing

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 3>their patients with Iran. So we just had some comments

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 3>from a key advisor to the UAE President and Viz

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 3>warning Iran to return to their senses and to deal

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 3>with their neighbors in a respectful fashion because otherwise, and

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 3>this is a quote, it confirms the narrative that Iran

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 3>is the biggest source of danger in the region. At

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 3>the same time, you know, Iran has stopped one step

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 3>short of going all the way of directly targeting you know,

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 3>residential buildings or civilian infrastructure or oil infrastructure. But you know,

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 3>who's to say that this isn't going to escalate further.

0:04:58.400 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 4>Jeff, I want to pull back a bit. And there

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 4>was this meeting yesterday of the UN Security Council which

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 4>was called for by the Iranians, and Mike Waltz, the

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 4>US representative at the UN, was there making the case,

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:10.719
<v Speaker 4>the US case for doing this. We've seen responses from

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 4>other world leaders. European allies are holding an emergency meeting tomorrow.

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 4>I was just talking with Senator Mark Warner of Virginia,

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 4>who sits on the Intelligence Committee. He talked about the

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 4>prospects of this being really a US Israeli mission here

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 4>not enjoying wide support of allies. How do you think

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.720
<v Speaker 4>about the way that the international community has responded to

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:30.479
<v Speaker 4>what's happened here?

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think number one, that it's not something that

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>President Trump is going to be too concerned about, and

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 1>that's in large part because he during this second term

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and to some extent during his first term as well,

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 1>has upended the international order with his own will and

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 1>with his actions, be it from on the economy, using tariffs,

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>or these strikes now in Iran and what was done

0:05:56.440 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>in Venezuela. That said, you know, the international community and

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>other countries and allies or enemies for that matter of

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the United States have a right to voice their opinion,

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and the United Nations is a place to do that.

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Whether or not that actually has an impact, though I

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>will see.

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 4>After the break, the risk to the Strait of Hormuz

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 4>and to the oil market, and with the US military

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 4>build up, where this could go from here? She want it.

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 4>In the statements that we got from the US President,

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:33.839
<v Speaker 4>from President Trump, from the Israeli Prime Minister of Benjamin

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 4>at Yahoo, there was this entreaty to Iranians to overthrow

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:40.799
<v Speaker 4>their government, to put down their weapons, and to seek

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:44.720
<v Speaker 4>a change of government in Iran. What risks does that introduce?

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:47.600
<v Speaker 4>The call for that happening in the wake of an

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 4>attack that was undertaken from the air, not on the ground.

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, I have to think also that one of the

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:55.719
<v Speaker 3>reasons that Iran became such a focal point to the

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Trump administration was because of those demonstrations at the beginning

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 3>of the year. That was the as at least in

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty six, obviously with the background of Iran's multi

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 3>decade build up of nuclear capabilities. But if you recall

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 3>back in January, president Trump posted that help is going

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 3>to be on the way for the protesters and the

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 3>demonstrators who were taking to the streets, and of course

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 3>we know that they were brutally put down by the

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 3>Iranian regime, and overtime those demonstrations started to peter out,

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 3>and so here we are. You fast forward about a

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 3>month later, and the US have now got involved militarily

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 3>alongside Israel. And it was pretty clear from that original

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 3>video post that President Trump put up that his expectation

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 3>is that the Iranian people should also use this as

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 3>an opportunity to rise up. But of course that comes

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:48.679
<v Speaker 3>with many challenges. The major risk is that this could

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 3>strengthen the hardliner's hands. They could go down even more

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 3>aggressively on the demonstrators, on the protesters. That could also

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 3>be this push to rally around the flag as well

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 3>and unite their Iranian people about against these external threats

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 3>that are coming through. But then also there's a real

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 3>risk of broader retaliation. And right now, I think the

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 3>Iranian regime sees this as a very fight for their existence,

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 3>and so they're not going to hold back at retaliating,

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 3>either against their own people or against neighboring countries, which

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:26.239
<v Speaker 3>is what we've seen in the last forty eight hours.

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 4>Jeff, what do we know of what the president is

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 4>watching for here? As you said, his rationale here has

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 4>been changing, somewhat ambiguous. What is he looking for in

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 4>the days to come?

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, certainly one of their primary objectives is to prevent

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Iran from being able to develop a nuclear weapon, and

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>that's another thing that he talked about in his video statement.

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:51.079
<v Speaker 1>So the military campaign will no doubt be focused on

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:56.479
<v Speaker 1>that and on the resources and infrastructure that is available

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>in Iran that could potentially be used for that and

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>weapons programs, et cetera. Obviously, we know that they targeted

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Iranian leadership, and no doubt he'll be watching how around response.

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:13.239
<v Speaker 1>We know, as we were just discussing that the retaliation

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>is happening. Does that change any military calculations for President

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Trump the United States? How do they respond to that?

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I imagine they're watching all of those things, Jana.

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 4>Let me ask you about the oil market. What this

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 4>means for that the Strait of Hormu is a key

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 4>part of this conflict, at choke point where nearly twenty

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 4>percent of the world's oil is transported. What is this

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 4>likely to mean for oil prices in the days to come.

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, even at the run up to this, oil prices

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 3>had been lifted by a certain amount of what analysts

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 3>call geopolitical premium because there was an expectation that a

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 3>strike could happen at some point, so we were already

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 3>up almost around twenty percent. We'll see where the market

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 3>opens up. But to your point, the Strait of Hormas

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 3>is a key passageway for seaborne oil and as of now,

0:09:57.160 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 3>if you look at the traffic over the weekends, according

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 3>to Kepler they have their data analytics, it suggests that

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:08.320
<v Speaker 3>the flow of tankers is down around by seventy five

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 3>to eighty percent. So essentially what's happening is tankers and

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 3>vessels are avoiding going through the straits, so a significant

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 3>drop in overall activity. At the same time, you know,

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 3>one thing that you need to think about is the

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 3>oil that passes through that Strait. Most of it ends

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 3>up going to Asia. So this is oil that's coming

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 3>through from the Gulf countries, from Iran, but also other

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 3>countries as well, Saudi Arabia, other GCC nations. The main

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:36.439
<v Speaker 3>buyer there is going to be China, and so if

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 3>that oil isn't able to pass through the Straits, then

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 3>obviously the oil has to come from somewhere else.

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 4>Jaman, I understand that OPEC plus that group of nations

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:48.079
<v Speaker 4>that produce oil weighing an increase in production as a

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 4>result of this.

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's true. So they actually had their regular meeting

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:54.679
<v Speaker 3>today and on the back of that they announced an

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 3>increase of production of more than two hundred thousand barrels

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 3>a day. That was probably not going to happen in

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 3>the absence of the weekend's events, because the last couple

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 3>of months they've just paused with their production output. In

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 3>Q four of last year, they were averaging around one

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty seven thousand extra barrels a day put

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 3>back to the market, But in light of recent events

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 3>and in light of perhaps a tightening of the market,

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 3>they've opted to go with this extra supply increase, which

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 3>also signals that at least a couple of countries within

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 3>OPI plus Saudi Arabia and UAE, who've been pushing anyway

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 3>to increase OPEK share the global share of oil, are

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 3>using this as an opportunity to get more of their

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 3>oil back on the market.

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 4>Jeff, I want to end with what might be an

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 4>off ramp for the president here. In the run up

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:46.440
<v Speaker 4>to this, there was a school of thought that because

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:48.680
<v Speaker 4>this might push up oil prices, maybe the president would

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 4>avoid doing this. That he is under pressure to talk

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 4>more about cost of living in affordability, and if gas

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 4>prices were to rise, that would be a challenge to

0:11:56.679 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 4>him and his party going into the midterm elections. How

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 4>is he thinking about that and how much of a

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:03.959
<v Speaker 4>forcing mechanism do you think that's likely to be here

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:05.559
<v Speaker 4>as he tries to game out a path forward.

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, number one, he can't go back, so he's done

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 1>it now and there's no way of erasing that. And

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the impact that it's going to have on the economy

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and on oil prices is still TBD. I think that'll

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 1>be very interesting to watch. Certainly, you're right to say

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:21.199
<v Speaker 1>that the political risk here for him in terms of

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the midterms is it potentially robs him of one of

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 1>his favorite talking points, which is that he likes to

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 1>take credit for low gasoline prices, and gasoline prices are

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:34.839
<v Speaker 1>absolutely something that voters watch because it's a part of

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 1>their daily lives. And when consumers see their prices going up,

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>be it at the grocery stores or be it at

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the pump, they remember that at the polls. And is

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>that an off ramp? I mean, does it impact whether

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>these strikes continue? I think the answer to that is

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:53.199
<v Speaker 1>no at this point, because the United States is all

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 1>in and.

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 4>Jaman, what are the expectations in the region for where

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:57.080
<v Speaker 4>this goes from here?

0:12:57.280 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 3>I think it's very difficult for anyone to have really

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 3>good foresight on how this is going to play out.

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:07.080
<v Speaker 3>The hope I think from the US side is that

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 3>the ongoing attacks will either lead the Iranian regime to

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 3>fully collapse on itself or eventually for it to capitulate.

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 3>And the capitulation will only come if they have been

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 3>decapitated at a senior level in terms of top echelon

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 3>being taken out and a military level in terms of

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 3>their actual ballistic missile arsenal their launchers being so severely

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 3>damaged that they can't continue lobbying all of these missiles

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 3>and drones into the region, into the GCT countries and

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 3>into Israel. The Prime Minister is really Prime Minister Natanyahu

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 3>was just speaking as well and saying that they also

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 3>expect to continue with these attacks over the next coming days.

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:53.119
<v Speaker 3>And if anything, it will say from the Gulf State's perspective,

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 3>the fact that they've been drawn into this, the fact

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 3>that it has been so destabilizing for their own economies,

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 3>has probably hardened their own resolve, and for a while

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 3>they had been seeking to have not necessarily the strongest

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:11.319
<v Speaker 3>relations with Iran, but at least have operational diplomatic relationships.

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 3>This could be a huge game changer for the region.

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 3>And one just last development that I would bring up

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 3>as well is a phone call took place yesterday on

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Saturday between the Saudi Crown Friends Mohammad bin Seman and

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 3>the UAE President MBZ. The two leaders have not spoken

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 3>in a couple of months over disagreements around the forward

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 3>path of Yemen. What this clearly shows you is that

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 3>the whole region and the Gulf States are uniting at

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 3>this point in time to bring down the temperature to

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 3>de escalate and to ensure that things really don't get

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 3>out of control.

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 4>This is the Big Take from Bloomberg News. I'm David Gurra.

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 4>This is a developing story. We're live blogging at Bloomberg

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 4>dot com with the latest from across the globe. We

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 4>have a special Bloomberg subscription offer for podcast listeners at

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg dot dot com Slash Podcast Offer. Thanks for listening.

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 4>We'll be back tomorrow.