WEBVTT - Time After Time Travel

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Get in touch with technology with tech Stuff from how

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com. Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff.

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works, and iHeart radio and I love all

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:24.119
<v Speaker 1>things tech. And today we're gonna talk about a fun

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>science fiction e kind of topic. We're gonna talk about

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>time travel. But I don't really want to focus too

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 1>much on the various proposed technological approaches to time travel,

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>because those are all either pure science fiction or they're

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:49.880
<v Speaker 1>very much hypothetical and based upon lots of of tenuous guesswork. Instead,

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna do something even more outlandish, like how could

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>we tell if time travelers have walked among us? All Right,

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 1>so we're gonna talk a little bit about that. I

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>will cover a bit of the philosophy behind time travel,

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 1>because there's still a debate about whether or not time

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:12.559
<v Speaker 1>travel is a technological possibility. I mean, we know that

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>time travel works, because we're doing it right now, traveling

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:20.839
<v Speaker 1>forward in time at the rate of sixty minutes per hour.

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>That that's just how time works. However, we also know

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>that if you were able to say, get in a

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>spaceship and push that spaceship too incredible speeds that humans

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>have never been able to get to. But let's say

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that you're getting into a spaceship and you're able to

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 1>accelerate to near the speed of light, like five the

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>speed of light. That is wicked fast. And you know,

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>we know the speed of light is the speed limit

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>for space time in our universe, so you're not gonna

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>go faster than that. And you can't really get mass

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>to the speed of the speed of light as it

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>has mass. That that's one of the limiting factors. But

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>let's say you can get If you were able to

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>do that, then time to you would seem to pass

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>as normal, like a second would be a second, a

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 1>minute would be a minute. It would feel exactly the

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>same as if you were anywhere else. However, time with

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>respect to someone who's back on Earth, it would seem

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 1>to be very different. It would seem as if the

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 1>people back on Earth were living out time at a

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>much accelerated rate, and that to them, you are experiencing

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>time at a much slower rate. So let's say you

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>go off on a five year adventure of exploration around

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the galaxy. So you're zooming around at the speed of light.

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>After five years, you come back home to Earth, it

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 1>would look like everyone had aged decades while you were

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 1>gone for just five years. Like you aged five years,

0:02:56.680 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>everyone else aged fifty years. Everyone else looks much older

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to them. It would seem as if time had barely

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>touched you at all. They had lived out their lives

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>decade after decade, and you are barely any older than

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>when you left. So, in a way, that's kind of

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>like time travel, right it would be like you are

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>traveling to the future, but you're doing so in a

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>way that time is still to you, passing exactly the

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>way it always has. It's only when you take the

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:30.679
<v Speaker 1>reference of someone else. Uh, this is why we call

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>it special relativity. That's part of the theory of special relativity.

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>It's relative to the perspective of someone else who's moving

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>at a different speed throughout space time. So that kind

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>of time travel would be totally possible if you could

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>get a spacecraft up to those speeds, which right now

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>would be impossible for us. But if you could, you

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>would be able to travel to the future. But what

0:03:57.280 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to travel to the asked ah That

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>would be super duper hard traveling to the future is easy,

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>you just wait. Traveling to the past way more tricky. So, scientifically,

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 1>based upon what we understand of our universe and the

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>laws of physics as we understand them right now, we

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>would say that if time travel to the past is

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>possible at all, it's probably only possible up to the

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>point where uh are from the point where the time

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 1>travel machine was first made. So, in other words, let's

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>say it's Tuesday afternoon and you don't have anything going on,

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 1>so you build yourself a time machine. Well, any point

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>after Tuesday afternoon, you could use that time machine to

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>travel back to Tuesday afternoon, but you couldn't go to

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday morning or Monday, or any point before you had

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>created the time machine. The time machine would be your

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>point zero. So, sadly, this would mean there's no way

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>for us to go back to the time of the

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>dinosaurs unless we just happened to come across some t

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:16.359
<v Speaker 1>rex's old time machine sitting around somewhere or something, or

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:20.039
<v Speaker 1>maybe an alien time machine where aliens had visited the

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Earth millions of years ago, and so we find their

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>time machine. It's still miraculously works. We figured out how

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:28.279
<v Speaker 1>to use it, and it doesn't turn us into goo.

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of ifs. Also, it depends upon aliens

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>having visiting us, so a long shot at best, I

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>guess we could say, however, we can look for evidence

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to see if time travelers have visited us. So let's

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>say that someone has infened a time machine at some point.

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Presumably that would mean someone from the future could come

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 1>back to some point in our past up to present day,

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:00.479
<v Speaker 1>any point where the time machine had been made forward,

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and we would potentially be able to figure that out.

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 1>How would we do that? How do we identify the

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>time travelers who secretly walk among us? Well, maybe they

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>would identify themselves. So the first person I want to

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about is someone that I actually did a full

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>episode of tech stuff about years and years ago. This

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:26.039
<v Speaker 1>would be John t toor or tight towards t I

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 1>t O R. This is one of those Internet memes

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 1>from the early early days of the Internet, back in

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the late nineties early two thousands, was actually a radio

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 1>thing before it was an Internet thing. And the story

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>is that, supposedly, according to the narrative, a guy living

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:53.480
<v Speaker 1>in the year twenty six travels back in time, and

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the purpose for traveling back in time. According to the guy,

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>was that he needed to get a specific compute, one

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of the early portable computers. And by portable, I mean

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:06.919
<v Speaker 1>you could in theory lug it around, but it was

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>super heavy, like many many, many pounds. It was a

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>nineteen computer, the IBM fifty. I think it was like

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>fifty pounds if I'm not mistaken in weight, not in

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>not in cost. And that, uh, this computer somehow was

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to fix a problem that existed

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>in his present day of twenty thirty six, that problem

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>being largely this issue of a Y two K like problem.

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>So if you remember the Y two K issue, it

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>was that a lot of computer programming had designated years

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 1>as being two digit numbers. Because this was back in

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen hundreds, the late nineteen hundreds, when no one

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>was really thinking, oh, the system I build now is

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be the same one we're gonna rely on

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty years from now. So pro members were building in

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the shortcut of of you know, abbreviating the year to

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 1>two digits. The game. By the time this is getting

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to the point where we're at nine, surely will have

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>moved on to a different architecture. Software architecture, and they

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>were wrong, because if we can build onto existing structures

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>without having to redo the whole thing, that's usually the

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>choice we make. So the Y two K problem was

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>that no one was really sure what would happen when

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the year rolled over from to two thousand and all

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 1>those two digit numbers would now say zero zero instead

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>of nine nine. Would that mean that the systems would

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>suddenly think that we had rolled over and now the

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 1>year was nineteen hundred and a lot of those systems

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>were important for things like calculating things like interest and uh,

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, financial issues, and other control systems. There's a

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>worry that things were really going to go pear shaped

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>on January one, two thousand, when all these computer systems

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 1>might spontaneously fail, and so there's a huge effort made

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to fix that. Well, there's a similar issue in Unix,

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>except instead of it being the year two thousand, it

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>would be the year twenty thirty eight. And so John Titor,

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 1>as he called himself, said that was why he came

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 1>back in time, was to get hold of this particular

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>computer in order to solve this problem in the future

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and head off a terrible calamity of all the computer

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>systems in in the world failing in various ways. The

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>very first appearance of this personality was in a facts

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>that used to be a thing still is in a

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>few rare cases, but the facts that was sent to

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Art Bell, who was the host of a show called

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Coast to Coast a m which was really a show

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>that focused on all sorts of weird fringe theories and

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>paranormal phenomenon and things like that. This is back in

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>nineteen and in that message, the person claimed that the

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Y two K problem had created a huge catastrophe in

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the future. And so there were a lot of warnings

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that John Titor would give. Over the course of the

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>next several years. He would show up on various message

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>boards giving various details about the future according to his travels.

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:35.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's making all these these claims that were unsubstantiated,

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>although if you wait around long enough you could find

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>out if they were true. But a lot of his

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>predictions failed failed to play out the way he had said.

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Like he said, why two K was gonna lead to

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>massive disaster? It didn't. It did cause problems, but nothing

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>nearly on the level that what of what people were

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>afraid of? He said the two thousand four Olympics would

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:59.839
<v Speaker 1>get canceled. They didn't. He also said that by the

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>United States would split into warring factions and there'd be

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a great civil war, which did not happen. I mean,

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>you could say that people are more polarized than ever before,

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 1>but we haven't turned into tribal groups that are actually

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 1>making war on each other in uh, in the way

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>that he was suggesting. And he did say, however, that

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>he was really from a parallel universe, one that was

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>nearly identical to ours, but that there was probably a

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 1>deviation between one to two per cent, so that things

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>that happened in his universe may not happen exactly the

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:42.559
<v Speaker 1>same way in ours, but largely things would be more

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>or less the same. He also said eventually that the

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:49.599
<v Speaker 1>future wasn't necessarily fixed, which is another get out of

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 1>jail free car card if you're a time traveler. I

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:56.680
<v Speaker 1>guess uh. Eventually, there was some evidence that suggested that

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>this was all the work of a couple of brothers

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 1>in Florida who had sort of orchestrated the whole thing.

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>There was another person who claimed that he was sort

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:08.559
<v Speaker 1>of consulted as part of this and that was kind

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of a collaborative storytelling exercise that sort of snowballed out

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>of control. So chances are not a real time traveler.

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>So then there was also the sad but fascinating tale

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 1>of a man who used the pseudonym Bob White among others.

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 1>This was back in the early two thousand's and this

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>guy sent out emails in huge blasts, like millions of

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>people were getting these emails, and essentially this was a

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>spam email, but instead of trying to sell something, uh,

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:45.679
<v Speaker 1>this spam email was asking for some pretty crazy fictional technology.

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>It was like a three page long manifesto and it

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 1>included things saying that the person needed something like an

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>AcBe five by twenty four series time transducing capacitor was

0:12:56.080 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 1>built in temporal displacement, which is not a thing, but

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>was asked for. So a guy named Dave Hill responded

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to this. He found it fascinating and he went so

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>far as to even send an old hard drive, calling

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 1>it a warp generator. But then he found out that

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the recipient wasn't just someone like making a joke on

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the internet. It was someone who actually seemed to truly

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>believe in what they were saying, and they were showing

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 1>some signs of paranoia and some other concerns. And it

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>turned out that this was Robert Robbie Todino, who had

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:34.959
<v Speaker 1>been sending millions of emails since November two thousand one.

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 1>He was in his twenties. He had founded a company

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 1>called RT Marketing, which sent out spam messages about all

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:43.440
<v Speaker 1>sorts of products on behalf of various clients. But he

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>was eventually hit with a five thousand dollar fine from

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the state of Massachusetts in a cease and desist order

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>for that sort of stuff. That's around the time when

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>he started sending out these anonymous calls for help in

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>obtaining various science e sounding but largely fictional pieces of equipment.

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:01.559
<v Speaker 1>And he said that his life had been quote severely

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 1>tampered with end quote and they needed to find a

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:07.200
<v Speaker 1>way to rewind time to fix it. And he called

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>himself Bob Wyatt or Tim Jones or several other aliases

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 1>as he corresponded with other people. His father said that

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Tudino had mental health problems, including dissociative disorder, and that

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the interactions with people had made it worse. Some people

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>were likely taking advantage of him it's a very sad story.

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>But he was seemingly convinced that time travelers were in

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>fact real and walking among us, but no actual evidence

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>came from that. So that's one way we can look

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>for time travelers, look for people who claimed to be them.

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>But maybe that won't work. Maybe people are maybe they're

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>a little more shy. So what if we were to

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>ask them to show up at a particular place in time.

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>So that was the thought behind the m i T

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Time Traveler Convention. On May seven, two thousand five, students

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>at m i T, who were led by an Electrical

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>engineering and Computer scien it's graduate student named Amal Dora

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I held an official convention for time travelers and according

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to Dora, any real lifetime traveler was welcome to show

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>up with no rs VP. They just had to bring

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>proof that he or she was from the future. And

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and what I think was a pretty clever move. They

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>focused very heavily on getting the word out to the press.

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>And this wasn't just about night marketing a goofy silly event.

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>It was a vital part of this experiment because by

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>publicizing the event, by spreading the word wide, they could

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>better ensure that people time travelers in the future learn

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>about that convention, that party, and that as a result,

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>they could travel back to that moment in time to

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>attend the party. And as they said, this web page

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>is insufficient. In less than a year, it will be

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>taken down when I graduate. Spoiler alert, it wasn't taken down.

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>It's still up. And furthermore, the World Wide Web is

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>unlikely to remain in its present form permanently. Probably true,

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>but it's still pretty much the way it was back then.

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>We need volunteers to publish the details of the convention

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>in enduring forms so that the time travelers of future

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>millennia will be aware of the convention. This convention can

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>never be forgotten. We need publicity in major outlets, not

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>just Internet news. Think New York Times, Washington Post, books,

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing. If you have any strings, please

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>pull them. And you could ask, well, what what can

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I do? And they said that's great. Uh, write it

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 1>down on a piece of acid free paper and slip

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:46.239
<v Speaker 1>those pieces of paper into obscure books in academic libraries,

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>carve them into a clay tablet. If you write for

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>a newspaper, insert a few details about the convention, tell

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>your friends so that the word of the convention will

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>be preserved in our oral history. Time travel is a

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>hard problem and it may not be invented until long

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>after m I t itself has faded into oblivion. Thus

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 1>we ask you to include the latitude longitude information when

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you publicize the convention. You can also make an absolute

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>commitment to publicize the convention afterwards. In that case, bring

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a time counsel or whatever it may be to the party,

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and then bury it afterwards. So I got a lot

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of coverage. They even got our rite up in Nature

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:25.679
<v Speaker 1>News that was called Time Travelers Snub Conference, So I

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 1>guess you can see how that turned out. The website,

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:30.640
<v Speaker 1>which like I said, is still up to this day,

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 1>says update. The convention was a mixed success. Unfortunately we

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 1>had no confirmed time travelers visit us, yet many time

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 1>travelers could have attended incognito to avoid endless questions about

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the future. We had a great series of lectures, awesome bands,

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and even a DeLorean. We regret having had to turn

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>away visitors, but there was were capacity restrictions governing Morse Hall.

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much to the dozens of people who helped,

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 1>I've got a lot more to talk about trying to

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>track down those pesky time travelers, but first let's take

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a little time out to thank our sponsor sticking with

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 1>these events that are being held for time travelers. On

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 1>June two thousand nine, Stephen Hawking held a party in

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Cambridge for time travelers. All time travelers were invited to come,

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>but the catch was he did not issue the invitation

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>to the party until after the party had already taken place.

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>So the invitation flyer read you are cordially invited to

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a reception for time Travelers hosted by Professor Stephen Hawking,

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to be held at the University of Cambridge, Gonville and

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Caius College, Trinity Street, Cambridge. And then it's gave the

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>exact global positioning coordinates for the party and said champagne

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 1>would be served. But I guess it wasn't that rally

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>party because it was it was held at noon, unless

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:07.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, kay, Cambridge, if you're out there, do

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:14.360
<v Speaker 1>you get turned up at noon? If so? Well done? Anyway,

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Later on, after the party had happened, he publicized the

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:21.160
<v Speaker 1>party in the press and on the web, and had

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:24.479
<v Speaker 1>an elegantly designed version of this flyer printed up and

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>placed on sale, and said I'm hoping copies of it,

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>in one form or another, will survive for many thousands

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>of years. Maybe one day someone living in the future

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:36.399
<v Speaker 1>will find this information and use a wormhole time machine

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to come back to my party, proving that time travel

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 1>will one day be possible. But no one showed up.

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Hawking later said during an interview at the two thousand

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:50.120
<v Speaker 1>twelve Seattle Science Festival, I have experimental evidence that time

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>travel is not possible. I gave a party for time travelers,

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>but I didn't send out the invitations until after the party.

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I sat there a long time, but no one came.

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:03.400
<v Speaker 1>So I guess Stephen Hawking just kind of watched champagne

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>slowly go flat. So if they're not showing up to

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 1>our parties, maybe maybe there's some you know, weird laws

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:14.199
<v Speaker 1>in the future about time travel and keeping it secret.

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>What if we were to use big data to mind

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>for the presence of time travelers. There is a paper

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 1>that was written back in or released in It was

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:31.679
<v Speaker 1>written before that, titled searching the Internet for Evidence of

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Time Travelers. It was written by Robert J. Nemerov and

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Theresa Wilson over at the Michigan Technological University's physics department,

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and they looked for evidence of time travelers by sifting

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 1>through enormous amounts of data on the Internet. And the

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>idea was that if travelers from the future were to

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>come to the Internet age, they might not, you know,

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:58.479
<v Speaker 1>come forward and proclaim themselves as time travelers, but they

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>might leave some sort of race of their presence on

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:05.439
<v Speaker 1>the web if you just looked for things that showed

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 1>evidence of what they called prescient knowledge, in other words,

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>looking for any indications that someone knows about something before

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that something actually happens. And they used three main methods

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:21.639
<v Speaker 1>to do this. First, they looked back at the web

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:24.679
<v Speaker 1>for terms that would not have made any sense at

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 1>the time they were published, but which now referred to

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>something meaningful. They gave examples. They said, search terms related

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to comment I sn I S O N, which was

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 1>not discovered until September twenty first, two thousand twelve. Or

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 1>Pope Francis, which was formerly Cardinal Jorge Mario Burgoglio uh.

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>He chose the name Francis in March two thousand thirteen,

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>but before March two thirteen there was no Pope Francis.

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>There never been a Pope Francis, he's the first one.

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 1>So if they said we find evidence of these terms

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 1>existing before those dates, that could indicate a time traveler

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 1>who was googling around or maybe popping on Facebook or

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:12.399
<v Speaker 1>Twitter or something and looking for these terms, but it

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>was before those things had happened. The next method they

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>used was they looked for prescient search terms in search

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:24.359
<v Speaker 1>engine history. So again, if let's say that they're not

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>posting to Facebook or Twitter or whatever. Also, Facebook is

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>problematic because you could back date posts for a really

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>long time, so you could actually cheat. You could post

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:36.119
<v Speaker 1>about you could set the date on a post to

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:39.680
<v Speaker 1>being before the thing actually happened, so that would be

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:41.679
<v Speaker 1>it would look like you were a time traveler, but

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 1>it was just because Facebook allowed you to do it. Anyway,

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>they said, let's see if there's any evidence of search

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>terms being used before these things happened. Google trends didn't

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>really turn up any interesting results. But then they pointed

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 1>out Google aggregates this data and it very well. Maybe

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that if it's a time traveler who's come back to

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>present day, there might not be enough information there for

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>you to draw an in conclusions. Uh, one of the

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 1>studies authors happened to have access to the back end

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:14.639
<v Speaker 1>for NASA's Astronomy Picture of the Day subsite, so he

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>checked to see if anyone had searched for any evidence

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 1>of common ice and before it had been discovered. And Third,

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 1>they invited the future people to travel into the past

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:28.640
<v Speaker 1>before the end of August tweet at them with one

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:31.360
<v Speaker 1>of two hashtags. They said, if you're a time traveler,

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:34.159
<v Speaker 1>go back to the past. Use Twitter and send on

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the message and include one of these two hashtags. Either

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>hashtag I can change the past. Two. That would be

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:45.400
<v Speaker 1>if the time travelers says yes, I can travel through

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>time and history is plastic, which means the past is changeable.

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>You can go back in time and change things, and

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the present and the future are not set in stone.

0:23:56.920 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 1>The second was hashtag I cannot change the past two,

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and that would be if time travel works, but it

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 1>works in a fixed history scenario, which means it's possible.

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:12.959
<v Speaker 1>But the stuff that we experience is already part of

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the whole time travel thing. Like you, you wouldn't be

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:16.959
<v Speaker 1>able to change the future. It would have to be

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff that it's the way it's always happened. It's a

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:24.160
<v Speaker 1>little confusing. It actually goes into a principle called self consistency.

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>They were careful to not use the hashtag in search

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>until after their advertisement asking for past tweets in order

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to prevent time paradoxes, and it didn't turn up any results.

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>So in the end they discovered no prescient knowledge through

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:42.680
<v Speaker 1>any of these inquiries. So that leads to the question

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of if time travel is possible, why haven't we seen

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:50.679
<v Speaker 1>any evidence of it. So, so possibility number one is

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:53.159
<v Speaker 1>time travel to the past is impossible. It's just not

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 1>possible at all, at least not for human beings, or

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 1>we never figure out how to do it. The next

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>is that, yes, time travel is possible, but we have

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that limit of you can only go back as far

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>as a time travel machine has been invented, and so

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>far no one's invented one. That's the next possibility. Then

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>there's the concept of causality branching, or the multiple world's theory,

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the idea that that our timeline is one of many,

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and anytime you travel through back through time, you're actually

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>creating a split from your timeline. So you have your

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>original timeline where everything is the same and nothing in

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the past gets changed. Then you have the new timeline

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that splits off to the moment when you travel back

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to it, and so you can make changes to that,

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and everything in that timeline is affected by your actions.

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 1>But your original timeline, the one you traveled from, continues

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to go without you in it because you've you've moved

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:59.160
<v Speaker 1>away from it, but it doesn't the past events don't

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 1>get changed round, so you're looking at lots of parallel universes.

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>So this would allow you to do stuff like actually

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:09.919
<v Speaker 1>go back in time and to kill yourself or your father,

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:14.199
<v Speaker 1>or your grandfather or or any of your ancestors. And

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't affect you, the person who traveled back, because

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you're from a parallel timeline, But it would mean that

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the alternate version of you would either die or never

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 1>be born because you eliminated them and called blood you,

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:37.400
<v Speaker 1>you crazy person. So the other possibility is that maybe

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>time travelers from the future are just hiding from us

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:43.439
<v Speaker 1>and are just really really good at it. Uh So

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that's also a question of how would that be possible.

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, people make mistakes all the time, so you

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>would think someone somewhere would have slipped up if they

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 1>had traveled back in time. There's gotta be some goofs, right,

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>if time travel is possible, some goofs eventually gets hold

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:03.439
<v Speaker 1>of time travel and makes a complete mess of things.

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>But we haven't really noticed that. I'm gonna put political

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 1>commentary aside. Let me take another quick break, and then

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll conclude our discussion about searching for time travelers. All right,

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 1>So we talked to a little bit about the different

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 1>ways that we might be able to to find time travelers.

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 1>There are a couple of other things I think would

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>be kind of fun to talk about, like, uh, evidence

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>supposedly of time travel. You may have heard about Chaplain's

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 1>film about the Circus, and there's a image of a

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 1>woman in the background. Um, it's this movie was made

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen and there's a woman in the background who

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>looks like she's on a smartphone, Like it looks like

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>she's holding a smartphone to her face, and you're thinking, nine,

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>this is someone from the future, but so far in

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the future that smartphones are no longer a thing. Although

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>it raises interesting questions like what network would that smartphone

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>be on if you had traveled back to nineteen eight.

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 1>There's no infrastructure there to support it. It turns out

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:18.199
<v Speaker 1>it probably was just a very large hearing aid, because

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 1>hearing aids of that sort of size, portable hearing aids

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that you could carry around, but they were quite large,

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 1>had been around for a few years. Uh. Prototypes have

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 1>been around for at least a couple of years. One

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>had been patented as early as nineteen twenty four, so

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>night was still pretty early for that. They might probably

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 1>were pretty rare, but it seems like a more accurate

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 1>guests than a woman had time traveled to be an

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 1>extra and a Charlie Chaplin film. Uh. There's also the

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 1>famous picture of a group of people standing around looking

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 1>at a bridge and one of them looks like a

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 1>hipster from modern day, wearing like a it looks like

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a print T shirt, and them crazy looking sunglasses. And

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the picture was taken in ninety one at South Fork

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Bridge in gold Bridge, British Columbia. However, upon closer examinations,

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 1>people pointed out the glasses the guys wearing were totally contemporary.

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 1>They existed in the forties. They the leather side guards

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>were a little antiquated. It wasn't something that you frequently

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>saw in nineteen forties, but they did exist before then. Uh,

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>And also that the print t shirt he's wearing was

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 1>actually probably more of a sweater and cardigan layer with

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a with a logo knit on the sweaters. In fact,

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>there's some guests that it probably was the logo of

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 1>a local hockey team, So that kind of puts the

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the the lid on that particular one. Um, So there

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 1>are other ones that I've seen h people who supposedly

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 1>are time travelers. In some cases you would argue this

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 1>could easily be photoshop, or it could just be a

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>case of, you know, mistaking one thing that was actually

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 1>quite common during that era as something that came from

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 1>outside of that time. Sadly, no no actual hard evidence

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 1>there either, and I am I am hurt to say that.

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 1>So what else can we do? Maybe we could provide

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 1>an incentive for time travelers to show up and and

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 1>leave evidence of time travel. But to do that, we'd

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:42.000
<v Speaker 1>have to figure out what motivates time travelers, like what

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:46.640
<v Speaker 1>what would be considered valuable. I mean, if grabbing a

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>drink with one of the most famous scientists of the

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 1>modern age isn't enough to convince you to pop on

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 1>over to Cambridge at noon and have some Champagne. I

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 1>don't what is so. I'm not sure that we could

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 1>come up with something even if time travel were possible now. Ultimately,

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think time travel is going to be possible

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 1>any time in our lifetimes. Like if we ever do

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 1>design a time travel device, my guess is it's far

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 1>into the future. And I also think that the scientists

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 1>are right on the money that no one will be

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 1>able to travel back further than the moment when the

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 1>time travel machine was made. I think it far more

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 1>likely that we will develop faster propulsion systems that will

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 1>ultimately bring special relativity into the situation where we will

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 1>have some discrepancies between how much time seems to have

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 1>passed for one person versus another. But that's not quite

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the same thing, and I don't think it's going to

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>be so dramatic as traveling at the speed of light.

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we're gonna get that fast, but we

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>might get fast enough where you know, the clock on

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the ship is not going to match the clocks on Earth.

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 1>We already have to account for this sort of stuff

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 1>due to both special and general relativity with our satellite systems.

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I talked a bit about that in a recent episode

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 1>about how special relativity has to do with the relative

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 1>speed of various bodies traveling through spacetime. General general relativity

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 1>involves time in its relationship with gravity, so both of

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:39.720
<v Speaker 1>those things affect the apparent passage of time for respective bodies.

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 1>And again, it's all relative, right, because your experience of

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:48.320
<v Speaker 1>time is dependent upon those factors, And if those factors change,

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 1>then the way your experience of time happens will like

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 1>to you. It will seem the same until you meet

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>up with somebody else who has been going through a

0:32:56.800 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 1>different experience, and then you'll realize that they don't match up.

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 1>And you might say, I don't understand only five minutes

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 1>have gone by, and the other person says, no, you

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 1>were gone for an hour, and because of the actual

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 1>factors involved, you both could be right. It's the crazy

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:17.120
<v Speaker 1>thing about relativity. Man, it's awesome. I loved thinking about

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. I didn't really touch on things like wormholes

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and other hypothetical kind of possibilities, largely because they might

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 1>end up being a promising way to look at the

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 1>possibility of time travel. I didn't talk about faster than

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 1>light travel either, because as far as we can tell,

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that's not really possible. Uh, but maybe in the future

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>ha ha, I will co into those a little bit more.

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I can get somebody on who's kind of an

0:33:46.600 --> 0:33:51.720
<v Speaker 1>expert in these sort of physical, uh these physics problems,

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and to talk about the possibilities and which ones are

0:33:56.840 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 1>pure science fiction versus well, hypothetically that's possible, and which

0:34:03.080 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 1>ones are no. We might totally do that. I'm very

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 1>curious what about you, guys, And I'm also curious what's

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 1>your favorite time travel movie? I want to I want

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to hear responses because there's so many out there, and

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>my favorites change. I really like them Back to the

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Future series, even though if you look at it from

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a theoretical time travel point of view, it gets super messy.

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 1>But I really like that series. Uh. I also really

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 1>like Bill and Ted, and they're excellent adventure I think

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that one's a lot of fun. I really like time

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 1>travel movies that don't take it too seriously, because time

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:41.360
<v Speaker 1>travel is hard to do well. But there are a

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 1>few out there, a few serious sci fi movies that

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 1>use time travel that do it quite well. Do you

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:48.319
<v Speaker 1>have any favorites I want to hear Also, if you

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 1>have any suggestions for future episodes of tech Stuff. Whether

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a technology, maybe it's a company, maybe it's a

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 1>person in tech. Let me know. Send me an email.

0:34:56.640 --> 0:35:01.360
<v Speaker 1>The address is tech stuff at how stuff works dot com.

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:04.279
<v Speaker 1>You can go to our website that's tech Stuff podcast

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 1>dot com. You'll find links to other ways to contact me,

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:10.719
<v Speaker 1>like on Facebook or Twitter. You'll find more information about

0:35:10.719 --> 0:35:13.359
<v Speaker 1>the show. You'll find all the episodes there. Sorry, does

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a great job on that, so go check that out.

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:17.839
<v Speaker 1>You also can head on over to our store that's

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:21.240
<v Speaker 1>over at t public dot com slash tech stuff. Remember,

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:23.440
<v Speaker 1>every purchase you make goes to the show. We greatly

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:26.319
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it, and we're always having fun coming up with

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:31.040
<v Speaker 1>new and uh goofy designs. I mean it's me. You

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:34.400
<v Speaker 1>know it's gonna be goofy. I I gave up trying

0:35:34.440 --> 0:35:37.799
<v Speaker 1>to be cool years ago after it was abundantly clear

0:35:37.920 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I would never achieve that status. So that's all right.

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:43.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm all right with who I am now, and that's

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 1>it for me. I'll talk to you again really soon

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:54.919
<v Speaker 1>for more on this and bathands of other topics. Because

0:35:54.960 --> 0:36:01.760
<v Speaker 1>it how stuff works dot com. Wh whe