WEBVTT - Listener Questions #36

0:00:07.840 --> 0:00:11.880
<v Speaker 1>The oderon pops up when protons collide and bounce a

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>three gluon ghost too quick to announce.

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 2>When microbes invade and our skin begins to swell, the

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 2>immune system calls upon the langerhon cell.

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>If our universe sits in a black hole's embrace, do

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>our own black holes? Nest makomatrioshka in space.

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Whatever questions keep you up at night, Daniel and Kelly's

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:35.879
<v Speaker 2>answers will make it right.

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Daniel and Kelly's Extraordinary Universe of Listener Questions,

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>episode number thirty six.

0:00:56.600 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 2>Hello. I'm Kelly Wienersmith. I study parasites and space, and

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:03.639
<v Speaker 2>I think that this was one of our better rhyming

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 2>starts to the show.

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist, and my goal

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 1>is to write a rhyme that Zach Weenersmith doesn't skip.

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, I think you're violating the arrow of

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 2>time with that, because you know, he's just he's not

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 2>going to listen to any of them.

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:27.399
<v Speaker 1>No, he's listening to this part right now, and he's thinking, hmmm,

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:29.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe I should go back and listen to the rhymes. See.

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Well, so here he's gonna have to listen because

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 2>here's here's what I was thinking we could do today.

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 2>So I ask chat gpt to write a two line

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 2>poem about each of the topics that we're talking about today.

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 2>And I thought that after we answered each question, we

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 2>could revisit our poem and then compare the chat gpt

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 2>poem and one see we could have people like way

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 2>in on which one they thought was better. Yes, and

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 2>we could see if chat gpt was like accurate at.

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>All all part of our to force Zach to listen

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to our terrible poetry.

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 2>That's right, that's right. And you know, if we're going

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 2>to force him, it should be on a day when

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 2>we did like pretty okay.

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>So and since you can rewind podcasts, we can break

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the podcast earrow of time.

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 2>We can, right. And for background for anyone who's wondering,

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Zach is my husband who has a degree in literature,

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 2>who cringes whenever Daniel and I make any attempts at poetry.

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 2>So haha, Zach.

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 1>But today we're not just here to needle Kelly's husband.

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>We're here to answer your questions because you're curious about

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the universe, from the stuff inside your body to the

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>vast celestial bodies that make up our universe. You want

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>to understand it, you want to fit it all in

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>your mind and make it make sense. But sometimes it

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't play along. There's something that sticks out and doesn't

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>click together. And we are here to make it all work.

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Yes, we are putting together the puzzles for you, and

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 2>let's start with the puzzle presented to us by Tammy

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 2>from Denver.

0:02:56.320 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 3>Hi, Daniel, and Kelly. This is Tammy from Denver. Heard

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 3>about the Odaron particle on another podcast, basically that it

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 3>exists and would love to learn more about it. I

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 3>have just a few questions. How is the ouduran discovered?

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 3>Does it exist naturally or is it created? And if

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:18.799
<v Speaker 3>it's created, then how is the particle stable or does

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 3>it decay? And if it decays, what is the half life?

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 3>Does the auduron interact with other particles and if so,

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 3>how would it combine with them, repel them or would

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 3>it just ignore them? If combined, would the resulting particle

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 3>be stable? Thank you for answering my questions and I

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 3>really enjoy the show.

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 2>All right, I'll be honest, I have never heard of

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 2>the odoron particle. Oh yeah, there's two d's in it.

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>It's an odd name, but it doesn't smell bad. The

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>odorons sounds like a really stinky particle.

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 2>We'd have to get a smell expert back on the

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 2>show to talk about the odoron particle. But all right,

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 2>I guess this one is in your wheel, So tell

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 2>us about the oduron particle.

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>The auduron particle is not a particle in the sense

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that you are probably thinking. You're imagining. The universe is

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>made up of little bits and bobs and they come

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>together to build apples and dinosaurs and all sorts of stuff,

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and you can think of them as like tiny little

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>marbles or little bits of matter and ask questions like

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>how much mass does it have, how long does it live?

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>How does it interact? But physicists are very generous with

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the term particle. It can mean lots and lots of

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.840
<v Speaker 1>different things. And here the short answer is that the

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>oderon is not a little bit of stuff. It's actually

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>just kind of a pattern seen among gluons when protons

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>or anti protons collide.

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 2>All right, so what does that mean? What does a

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 2>pattern indicate?

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>So to understand what's going on here, we really have

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to understand some crucial details of the strong force, which

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:56.040
<v Speaker 1>is who's in charge when protons collide. So often we

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>smash protons together, right, like at the large hadron collider,

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>we have a beam of proton going one way, or

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>another being of protons going the other way, we smash

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:07.039
<v Speaker 1>them into each other. Sometimes they just bounce off each other,

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 1>like the way two billiard balls would. There's no internal

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>structure at play there. They just bounce off each other,

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and we call this an elastic collision. Sometimes they smash

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and like what's going on inside the protons interacts and

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>we call this an inelastic collision, and then you get

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>like new particles, etc. But if the protons are just

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>bouncing off of each other in an elastic way, right,

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 1>not breaking open, just being treated as if they were

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>their own particles, then how does that interaction happen? Right,

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the protons get close to each other, how do they

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:41.039
<v Speaker 1>bounce off exactly? Well, they do that by exchanging virtual particles,

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 1>like we can talk about how electrons repel each other

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>by exchanging a virtual photon, or if you prefer the

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:50.599
<v Speaker 1>field picture, by having ripples in the electromagnetic field between them.

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:53.840
<v Speaker 1>When protons bounce off each other, it's similar except that

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>they exchange gluons because gluons are the field that mediates

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the strong force. It's the analogy of the photon for electromagnetism.

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Still with me, I'm still with you. In my head,

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 2>I can imagine what a photon is, but I'm having

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 2>trouble remembering what a gluon is.

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so a gluon is just like a photon for

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>a different force. Right, Photons we have for light and electromagnetism.

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Gluons are for the strong force. Remember we have sort

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of four fundamental forces. There's the strong force, the weak force, electromagnetism,

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and gravity. Well, the photon is for electromagnetism, the weak

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>forces the W and Z particles, and the strong force

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 1>has the gluons. Okay, right, Okay, so we have two

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.720
<v Speaker 1>protons coming together and they're exchanging gluons to bounce off

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>of each other. But gluons are really really weird.

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:39.599
<v Speaker 4>Okay.

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:41.599
<v Speaker 2>I'm still feeling like you don't get to judge me

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 2>for using Latin names with all the terms that you're

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 2>throwing around now, But I'm still following you. I'm still

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 2>following you.

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, Unfortunately, a lot of the terms we use are

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>not Latin names. They're just adopted from English, and then

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>we give them totally different meanings to be massively confusing.

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Right, which seems even worse than but.

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Totally agree it's even worse. For example, sample we talk

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>about gluons as having color, even though it's not like

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you can look at them and see colors. But color

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>for gluons is an analogy to charge. For electrons, electrons

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>have a negative charge. Protons have a positive charge. That's

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the electromagnetic charge. The strong force has its own charge,

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>but we call it color because there are three varieties, red, green,

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.679
<v Speaker 1>and blue. But there's a crucial difference between the strong

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>force and electromagnetism. While the photon has no charge, right,

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>it interacts with charge particles, but the photon itself is neutral.

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Gluons do have charge, and that's going to turn out

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to be crucial for forming this interaction among gluons that

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>we call the odoron. So the gluon itself interacts with

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>all particles that have strong charge or color, but it

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>also itself has color. It is a colored particle. It's

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>like if the photon was positive or negative in charge.

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so when we say that a gluon has a charge,

0:07:56.960 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 2>but we call it a color instead. Should I think

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 2>of it as having a charge, but we're just calling

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 2>it a color, But it actually is like has a

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 2>charge that.

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you can think of it.

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Why don't we just call it a charge?

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>We do sometimes call it a charge if you're thinking

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>charge more generally, not just electromagnetic charge. So you can

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>think of strong charge. Every time we say the word color,

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>you can just think strong charge and that totally works. Okay,

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>just realize that it's not electromagnetic charge. You're not talking

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>about positives and negatives here.

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So then, uh, this is going to be a

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 2>real basic Kelly's embarrassed question. So then what does charge

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 2>mean in a much more general sense?

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I think we have a whole episode about that.

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>But charge means that two fields are coupled together. So

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 1>in the electromagnetic charge couples the photon field to any

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>other kind of field. So any field that has a

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 1>charge the photon interacts with, really that's a coupling between

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 1>those two fields. It means energy can slosh back and

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 1>forth from the electron field to the photon field, or

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:57.719
<v Speaker 1>from the gluon field to the quark field. So a

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>charge is just like a coupling between two fields, says

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:02.200
<v Speaker 1>energy can transfer between them.

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, got it.

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, So back to the gluon. Why are we

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about the gluon having color or having strong charge,

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>because it has to in order to form this ouduron.

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>And it's really fascinating. I think this is super cool.

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Why the gluon has colors. One more detail we need

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to understand before we get to the oduron, which is

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 1>why you have to have multiple gluons. When two electrons

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>come together, they can exchange just a single photon and

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 1>they're done. And that's because the photon doesn't carry any charge. Right,

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>So the electron comes in with negative charge, leads with

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:35.319
<v Speaker 1>negative charge. It's all good. But because the gluon is charged,

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>protons cannot just exchange one gluon because protons have to

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>have no color charge. Any object that's out there in

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the universe can't have a color charge all by itself.

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>And so if a proton comes in emits one gluon,

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>because that gluon carries away some color charge, then the

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 1>proton itself would be color charged, and the proton that

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 1>receives the gluon would be color charged, So the protons

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>have to exchange two gluons, one going each direction, so

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that the total color charge is canceled out. But they

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>can still exchange momentum and bounce off of each other.

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>So let's recap. We're talking about what's happening when two

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 1>protons bounce off of each other without destroying each other.

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>They're just exchanging some momentum, and they do that by

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>exchanging gluons. But because gluons are charged and protons are

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>not charged under the strong force, then the gluons have

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to balance in charge, and so you have to have

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>one going one way and one going the other way, Okay,

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's where the auduron comes in. The oduron is

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>like an interaction, a pattern between those two gluons. While

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the gluons are between these two protons, they can also

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:44.679
<v Speaker 1>interact because they both have color charge. And that's what

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>an aduron is. It's like a compound of gluons that

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>are sort of bound together very briefly while two protons

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 1>are interacting.

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so I should think of it as two gluons

0:10:56.760 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 2>that are bound or they just kind of hang out

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 2>near each other like awkward teenagers.

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's very short lived. It's not stable. It's really

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>on the edge of whether you should call this thing

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>a particle. It's more like a mathematical observation. And it

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>turns out that you can exchange more than two gluons.

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>You can exchange three or four or nineteen. And if

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you take all the exchanges which have an odd number

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:25.839
<v Speaker 1>of gluons three, five, seven, nine, eleven, and you add

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 1>them all together mathematically, then the movement of that thing,

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the way the momentum gets exchanged between the protons is

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>exactly as if there was a single particle exchange. So

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 1>take all the odd number of gluon exchanges where these

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 1>gluons are doing weird stuff and interacting along the way,

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>add them all together. You get a big, ugly mess

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 1>of mathematics. But then it collapses. It simplifies into a

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>very simple equation, the same equation you would write if

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you had a single particle of mediating this exchange. And

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:59.199
<v Speaker 1>that's what the odderon is. It's like this abstraction of

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>all of these common, iplicated interactions which happens to come

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>together into a very simple equation. And that's why they

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>call it the odd Oran because it's all the odd

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:11.680
<v Speaker 1>number of gluon exchanges three, five, seven, nine, et cetera.

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 2>I think I don't follow why it has to be

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 2>odd numbers of exchanges.

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:19.439
<v Speaker 1>This mathematical simplification to take a bunch of terms and

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>put it together into one particle works for the odd terms.

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 1>It also works for the even terms. The even term

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 1>has a different name. So we called these the odoran

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>and the other ones I think we call the pomeran.

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:31.959
<v Speaker 2>Oh, come on, they need to be the even rons

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 2>or something. Why are they the potter?

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I was embarrassed to even tell you. I know, it's crazy.

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 1>It's unforgivable the way we've named these things.

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 5>It is.

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm upset. I'm getting worked up over here.

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So this is a really interesting bit of physics, Tammy,

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and I'm glad you asked about it. Apologies that it

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 1>turned out to be so complicated. There's lots of little

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>details that you have to put together here to understand

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>what an oduron is. I'll try to recap it again

0:12:56.280 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 1>one more time, just to make sure it's all coming together.

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>When two protons bound off of each other, they have

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 1>to exchange gluons. It has to be more than one gluon,

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:07.679
<v Speaker 1>because the gluons themselves carry charge, but the protons cannot.

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>And they can also do three, five or seven or nineteen,

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>And if you add up all the odd terms together,

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>it looks mathematically equivalent to exchanging a particle. That doesn't

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 1>mean that particle is there and real and you could

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>like look at it and say, oh, there's an oderon.

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>It means that we see this pattern in the universe

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>and we wonder, h that's cool. Let's treat it as

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>if it was a particle. And this is a really

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>subtle effect. It was predicted in nineteen seventy three, and

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it took fifty years for us to find evidence of it,

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and we had to compare proton proton collisions with proton

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 1>anti proton collisions because those have a small difference in

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>how many odorons would be made. And finally, fifty years

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>after its predicted, they saw evidence for this in those collisions.

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>So you asked, how is it created and the answer

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 1>is in proton proton interactions. You also asked if it decays, Well,

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>it only exists very very briefly. It doesn't exist on

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>its own and then turn into other stuff. So in

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that sense, it always the case. It's more like a

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 1>transient exchange object. It's not like a building block that

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you can use to make other stuff with.

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:12.679
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So that was a great explanation before we hear

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 2>what Tammy thinks, because maybe we can also get Tammy's

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 2>input on the poem. I think we're going to get

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 2>to all right, So here's what chat GPT had to

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 2>say of the oduran. Chat GPT says, in quantum shadows,

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 2>the aduran leaves its subtle trace and a symmetry of

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 2>gluons shaping matters hidden face. So is that is that correct? Daniel?

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not wrong. It's a little heavy, vague symbolism.

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, h And then you said the oduran

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 2>pops up when protons collide and bounce a three gluon

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 2>ghost too quick to announce.

0:14:56.920 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So Tammy, let us know what you think of

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the physics explanation and who's poetry you prefer?

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh, putting Timmy on the spot, all right, that's what

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna do to all the listeners today, all right,

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 2>throwing it to Tammy.

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Hi, Daniel and Kelly, thanks for answering my questions and

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 3>correcting the assumption that the odd around is a particle

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 3>and for explaining how it's created. You do a great

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 3>job of explaining complicated concepts in an accessible way, and

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 3>I learned new and interesting facts and concepts from both

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 3>you and Kelly every episode. Thanks so much.

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>All Right, we're back and we're answering questions from listeners

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>today we are satisfying your curiosity. Up next is a

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>fun question from Jude from Washington State.

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 5>Hi, I just tried to lang her hand cell. The

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 5>explanation described very generally what they do, but it didn't

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 5>describe how they work. Can you explain what Langerhans cells

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 5>are and how they work to help the skin respond

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 5>to new stimuli. Thanks for helping us understand the universe.

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 5>Jude from Washington State.

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 2>All right, So after I reread this question, I thought

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 2>to myself, Oh, this is one of those that kind

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 2>of feels like maybe I'm being asked to do someone's homework.

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 2>And then I thought, well, unfortunately for Jude, if that's

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 2>the case, it takes me about three months to answer

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 2>someone's questions, so it's no longer helpful. And also, I'm

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 2>sure Jude is just genuinely curious about Langerhan cells.

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 1>We always assume good fish, that's right.

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 2>And I'm being totally unfair. So langer Han cells. Actually

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 2>I did not know about langer Han cells, so I

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 2>really enjoyed getting a chance to read about them. They

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 2>were first described by Paul langer Hans in eighteen sixty eight.

0:16:58.320 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Did he name them after himself?

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Oh gosh, I don't know. I know that for a

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 2>while there people were naming things after other people, and

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:09.639
<v Speaker 2>so this could be somebody being nice and naming something

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:11.880
<v Speaker 2>after someone else. I don't know. Maybe he did name

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 2>them after you know, I would name something the Wienersmith

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 2>sell if I could, So I can't judge too harshly, frankly.

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 1>So this guy was just looking through a microscope and

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>saw something new and weird.

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, and so actually, as I understand it, he

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:30.879
<v Speaker 2>thought that it was a projection of a neuron going

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 2>into your skin. So you find these cells in like

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:36.399
<v Speaker 2>your epidermis, which is the outer layer of skin, and

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 2>they looked you know, when you imagine a neuron in

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 2>your head, they sort of end with like sort of

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:44.360
<v Speaker 2>like a circle with that then has all of these

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 2>projections sort of coming out from it. Well, it kind

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 2>of looks like that circle with a bunch of projections,

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 2>and so he thought like, oh, this is kind of

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:55.439
<v Speaker 2>neuron like, and so maybe it's part of the nervous system.

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 2>But then a lot later we realized, no, it's actually

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 2>part of the immune system. And so the Langerhan cells

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 2>are like a line of attack from the immune system

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 2>that is acting in your skin. Okay, And so you

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 2>find them again in your epidermis, and so this is

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 2>the outer layer of skin, and in particular, they're sort

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 2>of like moving around inside of your keratinocytes. Keratinocytes are

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 2>like so if you look at your fingers, you've got

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:28.680
<v Speaker 2>this like thick layer that is impermeable, and those are

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:32.159
<v Speaker 2>your keratinocytes. And so I learned about you know, I'm

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 2>going to try to not throw too many words at you.

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 2>I know, I can see Daniel's face already starting to

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 2>roll his eyes, but I didn't know this, and I'm excited, right, Okay.

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 2>So the deeper you go into the top layer of skin, yeah,

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 2>your keratinocytes are alive and they're fed by your blood vessels.

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 2>But the closer you get to your surface of your skin,

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 2>they essentially start suffocating and dying and then getting like

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 2>cemented and smoothed together to produce the like layer that

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:00.919
<v Speaker 2>protects you. And so I didn't really that like just

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:02.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, the closer you get, the more like dead

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:05.120
<v Speaker 2>they are, and over time they kind of like schluff off.

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 2>And that also helps protect you from stuff, because like

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, if you've got like a bad microbond there,

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 2>eventually they kind of like fall off with your dead

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:14.119
<v Speaker 2>skin cells and they're like, no, I was trying to

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 2>get in there and now they're they're gone.

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 1>This gives me the mental impression that our skin is

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:22.119
<v Speaker 1>like a slow motion waterfall, just sort of like cascading

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 1>off of our pain.

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 2>It was kind of like that, Yeah, I mean, you're

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 2>you're like turning over your skin cells, you know, pretty

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 2>regularly they're getting like sort of sluffed off and waterfalled off.

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 2>Crazy, The waterfalls are more beautiful to think of than

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 2>your skin cells falling off.

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:42.880
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, and so these laying your hand cells are

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>part of these keratinocytes.

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 2>They are living amongst your keratinocytes, and so they're a

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 2>different kind of cell. As I mentioned, they kind of

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.360
<v Speaker 2>look like the end of like neurons. So they've got

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:56.159
<v Speaker 2>all of these like long projections that are sort of

0:19:56.640 --> 0:20:00.400
<v Speaker 2>weaving amongst the keratinocytes, and so that let's them sort

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 2>of like feel around for invaders. And then their unique

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:07.159
<v Speaker 2>immune cells and that they do two pretty different jobs.

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 2>So one thing that they do is that their macrophage

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 2>like and macrophage means big eater, and so when they

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:18.679
<v Speaker 2>encounter an invader, they essentially engulf it and consume it.

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow, so that it, you know, can't do any damage,

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 2>but what if there's more. The other thing that they

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 2>do is they take it to your lymph nodes so

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 2>that they can present it to other parts of your

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 2>immune system, so other parts of your immune system can

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 2>start mounting a defense in case it turns out that

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 2>there's more and you need to mount a bigger defense.

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 1>So they're moving around, right, I'm imagining these caratinocytes is

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:47.439
<v Speaker 1>like squishy squares squeeze together, but these Langerhead cells can

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>like go between them, like in the alley ways.

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so they're again they're not really like squares. They're

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 2>like they're like circles, but out coming out from the

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 2>circles are all of these long filaments. They're think more

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 2>like an octopus, but the arms are sort of like

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:08.119
<v Speaker 2>weaving amongst the cells, the keratinosites, like the cells in

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:11.440
<v Speaker 2>your skin, so that they can like explore all around

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 2>to try to find invaders.

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Wow. And so there are security guards, they like attack

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>them if they can, and if they and it's too

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 1>much to handle, they like bring them back to the

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>lymph node and say book them.

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 2>So they definitely attack them. And then once they've eaten them,

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:28.639
<v Speaker 2>they can like still take a piece of what they've

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:33.399
<v Speaker 2>eaten and bring it to your lymph nodes and be like, Okay, guys,

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 2>look what I found. Keep your eye out for this,

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 2>and like maybe get ready to mount an immune response.

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 2>And so in that sense, they're dendritic cells, which is

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:44.400
<v Speaker 2>another kind of immune cell. So they do two different jobs.

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:46.639
<v Speaker 2>They eat it and then they alert the immune system

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:49.679
<v Speaker 2>to the presence of invaders in case a bigger attack

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 2>needs to be mounted.

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Wow. Fascinating.

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's pretty cool. And so they can come from

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:59.160
<v Speaker 2>bone marrow. So like say you've got a massive infection

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:00.959
<v Speaker 2>in your finger and it's like you've got a lot

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 2>of inflammation, your langer hand cells will start moving towards

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:09.119
<v Speaker 2>that inflammation to like, you know, help deal with the invaders,

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 2>to help eat them and sort of figure out what

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:12.919
<v Speaker 2>needs to go on, and then at that point your

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 2>body might not have a lot of langer hand cells

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 2>to replenish after they've all sort of gone to do

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 2>this job, And so your bone marrow will make more

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 2>langer hand cells and they'll sort of move up into

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:27.679
<v Speaker 2>the skin to replace the ones that have been lost.

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 2>But during normal periods, your langer hand cells will just

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:34.360
<v Speaker 2>sort of like divide and replicate on their own. And

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:37.439
<v Speaker 2>part of how we know that your langer hand cells

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 2>divide and sort of self renew is that when we've

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 2>done human limb transplants, we've looked at langer hand cells

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:47.920
<v Speaker 2>over time, and the donors langer hand cells are still

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 2>there over long periods of time, so they must be

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 2>replicating on their own as opposed to coming from the

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 2>patient's own bone marrow. Yeah, I thought that was kind

0:22:56.800 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 2>of interesting that that's how we sort of figured that out.

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:02.120
<v Speaker 1>So Jude asks how they work to help the skin

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:05.680
<v Speaker 1>respond to new stimuli, But it sounds like they're more

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:07.160
<v Speaker 1>involved in the immune response.

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's right. They're not like helping you feel things

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 2>like the if the stimuli is a bacterial invader. The

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 2>way they help you respond is they eat it and

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 2>then they tell the immune system that this is something

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:22.159
<v Speaker 2>that you need to prepare to attack. Another thing that

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 2>they regularly do, like if you aren't encountering anything bad,

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 2>every once in a while, the langer Hand cells will

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 2>leave and just go to your lymph nodes and be like, hey,

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 2>this is what you look like. And so they've got

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 2>two modes. They've got to, like what's called an activated mode,

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 2>where essentially they're like, I am bringing you something bad,

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 2>I am worked up, I am activated. But they also

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 2>have a mode where they're just like, hey, I'm just

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:48.159
<v Speaker 2>telling you what you look like. This is something you

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:50.119
<v Speaker 2>don't need to attack. And so they're just sort of

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:51.879
<v Speaker 2>like trying to give you a heads up that like,

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 2>here's what you look like. Don't freak out about you.

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 2>And you know, anyone who has an autoimmune disease will

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 2>know it's important not freak out at your own body.

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 2>And so this regular reminder of what you look like

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 2>is important, and so that's another thing that they do. Unfortunately,

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 2>sometimes things go wrong, and when things go wrong with

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 2>these cells, you can get langer hands sell histiocytosis. That

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 2>doesn't sound good, No, it's not good. This is a

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 2>kind of cancer that can be kind of hard to

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 2>diagnose because it can be in your skin, but it

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:29.639
<v Speaker 2>can also end up in places like your bones, or

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 2>your lungs, or your central nervous system or your lymph nodes. Basically,

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 2>they get like lodged somewhere and they start replicating, and

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 2>we don't really understand very well why this happens, and

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:45.639
<v Speaker 2>it can give you lots of very different symptoms, so

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 2>sometimes it can be a little bit hard to diagnose.

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:50.679
<v Speaker 2>And I was listening to a podcast with a pediatric

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 2>oncologist who was saying that this is sort of an

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 2>understudied kind of cancer because we don't understand langer hand

0:24:56.840 --> 0:25:00.639
<v Speaker 2>cells particularly well. And so he was, you know, just

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 2>like every other scientist, arguing that we need more research

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:06.919
<v Speaker 2>and more money. And this is something you hear Daniel

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:09.640
<v Speaker 2>and I say all the time anyway. So, yeah, sometimes

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:12.719
<v Speaker 2>things go wrong with these cells, and this is unfortunately

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:13.919
<v Speaker 2>another cause of cancer.

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:17.200
<v Speaker 1>It's also incredible to me that this ever works. I mean,

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>this whole system seems so baroke, so complicated, it's so

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 1>easy to break down that I'm amazed that people are

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:26.159
<v Speaker 1>just like walking around all day with everything going normally.

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 2>The immune system in particular just seems incredibly complicated, and

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 2>the more we study it, the more complicated it seems

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 2>to get. And so yeah, it is kind of amazing

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 2>that we're not all just sort of shambling and falling

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:43.120
<v Speaker 2>apart every moment of every day.

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 1>So speak for yourselves. I kind of am over here.

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm rounding up to one hundred these days. Don't forget.

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh I'm not. I'm not. I'm happy with my actual

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 2>age of forty forty. I'm running down.

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Actually, it's also incredible to me that so much in

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 1>biology that someone like you who's been doing biology for

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>decades will be like, oh, I don't know anything about this,

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 1>and there's still like so much to learn.

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 2>I know, well, I mean I like, as we've discussed,

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 2>like when I was at UC Davis, they were just

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:18.400
<v Speaker 2>so many biology departments. Yeah, yeah, there's I could spend

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 2>my whole life, literally my whole life reading biology papers

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 2>and somebody could still be like, oh, hey, have you

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 2>heard about this sell in the human body, And I'd

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 2>be like, Nope, nope, that's new.

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 1>But today I'm learning.

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 2>But yes, and thank you to you know the listener questions.

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 2>One of my favorite things is that quite often it's like, oh,

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 2>haven't heard of that, but today today I will be

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:41.919
<v Speaker 2>able to explain it, which is awesome. So should we

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 2>go to the chat GPT poem?

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:46.879
<v Speaker 1>Yes? So what did chat GPT compose about? Langraham cells?

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Sentinels in the skin? They quietly stand guard, laying our hand.

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:59.159
<v Speaker 2>Cells catch whispers of danger before it hits hard.

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's just your delivery, but I

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 1>think chat GBT is like a little over dramatic on

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the poetry.

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, no, I do think they're overdoing it a bit.

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 2>They were super dramatic. I was a bit uh. I mean,

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 2>I guess maybe I was a little over dramatic too,

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:17.719
<v Speaker 2>but in like a superhero funny way, you know. So

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 2>I said, when microbe's invade and our skin begins to swell,

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 2>the immune system calls upon the Langerhans cell. Langer Hans anyway,

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 2>So I think mine was way more fun.

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, Jude, Well, we want you to weigh in.

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Let us know if we answered your question, and also

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:36.919
<v Speaker 1>which poem you prefer.

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:41.880
<v Speaker 5>Hi, Kelly, that was great. I'm a librarian, not in school.

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 5>No homework here genuine curiosity. I'd never heard of Langerhans

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 5>cells until they were mentioned in another podcast. The description

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:55.479
<v Speaker 5>piqued my curiosity. My further reading was either too vague

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 5>or too complicated. Your explanation made sense even to my

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 5>non science spring. As a bonus, I have a better

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 5>understanding for how skin works. I didn't realize that Langerhan

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:13.200
<v Speaker 5>cells were so adaptive, identifying both friend and foe. Amazing biology,

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 5>which gets to the Kelly versus chat GPT poetry slam.

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 5>Kelly's poem was more apt and vivid. You conveyed the

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 5>superhero in the every day that fits the langerhand cell.

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Thanks all right, We are back and we're answering questions

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>from you today. We want to know what you are

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>curious about. What part of the universe doesn't make sense.

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Write to us two questions at Danielankelly dot org and

0:28:56.800 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you'll get an answer. Of Next, we're talking about black

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 1>holes and the universe. Here's a question from Philip.

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 6>Hi Daniel and Kelly. This is Philip from Bucharest with

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 6>the hypothesis of the universe in a black hole doing

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 6>the rounds lately in certain corners of the press, and

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 6>which I might say, you've debanked rather nicely in past episodes.

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 6>I found myself wondering how would such a situation influence

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 6>what we already see around us. For example, it seems

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 6>that we already have black holes in our universe. Is

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 6>physics as we know it. Even allowing for black holes

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 6>inside black holes, would the infinities be compounded or would

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 6>that suggest that a singularities do not actually contain infinities.

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 6>Thank you for the great podcast, and can't wait to

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 6>hear her answer.

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 2>I can't wait to hear chet Chip. It's his poem

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 2>about this. I can imagine black holes within black holes

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 2>is going to give a particularly epic and overblown poem. Also,

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 2>I'll note that I'm you know, I'm always excited when

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 2>we have a listener from another country, Like it still

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 2>kind of amazes me that we have this like technology

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 2>that allows us to reach out to people from all

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 2>over the world. Philip is from Bucharest. That's pretty cool

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 2>to me.

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 1>That is very cool, super fun question. Thank you, Philip.

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Love this first, let's remind people why our universe is

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 1>not a black hole. I mean, you hear this a

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 1>lot in popular science. It's really fun, but it glosses

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>over a lot of really important details. So on the surface,

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:24.959
<v Speaker 1>the universe seems like it has something in common with

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:27.239
<v Speaker 1>a black hole. I mean, a black hole has an

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 1>event horizon beyond which nothing can emerge. Well, our universe

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 1>has a cosmic horizon. There's a place past which we

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 1>cannot see because the universe has a finite age and

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the light has finite speed. So something that's far enough away,

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 1>an event that happened a long long time ago, far

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>far away life from it will not have reached us yet.

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 1>So there's parts of the universe that are just invisible

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 1>to us.

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Teach the controversy.

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 1>So both of those things have the word horizon in them,

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 1>but that's really the end of the similarity. Event horizon

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 1>means nothing will ever escape the cosmic horizon. We will

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 1>eventually see those things if we wait long enough. So

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of a statement of what we can see

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 1>right now, whereas an event horizon says you will never

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 1>see this stuff. In fact, the definition of an event

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 1>horizon requires you to wait till the end of the

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>universe to know for sure that nothing came out. It's

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>defined as the place from which nothing ever emerged, even

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 1>at infinite time, so that's really very superficial. The other

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 1>similarity between black holes and our universe is singularities. General

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 1>relativity predicts that black holes have singularities at their heart,

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 1>these points of infinite density. But we know that's not

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>real anyway, because quantum mechanics says that can't happen, and

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a general relativity only extrapolation, so it's fun to

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 1>think about, but unlikely to be real. In the same way,

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:55.720
<v Speaker 1>if you wind the universe back in time, it gets

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 1>denser and denser as you reverse the expansion by cranking

0:31:59.840 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>that clock backwards. And if you keep going and again

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 1>ignore quantum mechanics and just use general relativity, then you

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 1>get to a moment when the universe had infinite density.

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 1>So that sounds similar to the black hole singularity, but

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:16.720
<v Speaker 1>it's really quite different. A black hole singularity is a

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 1>location in space, a point of infinite density, right, whereas

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the Big Bang singularity is a moment in time that

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 1>occurred everywhere. If the universe is infinite, then it always

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 1>was infinite, and then that singularity was everywhere. So they

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>both contain the word singularity and have infinities, but they're

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 1>very very different. Kind of beasts.

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, But so here's the thing. I kind of zoned out,

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:44.480
<v Speaker 2>and what I heard was that both of them have horizons,

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 2>and both of them have singularities, and so I'm pretty convinced. Well,

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm kidding, I'm kidding.

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 1>So we're the listeners who've been zoning out. Here's one

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 1>more argument, which is, there's a fascinating coincidence in our universe.

0:32:58.560 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 1>We can calculate the radius of a black hole's event

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 1>horizon based only on the mass of the black hole

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and also the speed of light and the gravitational constant.

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>But the thing that changes from black hole to black

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 1>hole is the mass, and that's what controls the radius.

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Very simple calculation, it's called the short styled radius. Now,

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>if you put into that equation the mass of the

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 1>observable universe, you get out a radius. And what does

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that radius mean. It means if you had a black

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 1>hole the mass of the observable universe, what would be

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the radius of the event horizon of that black hole.

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 1>It's fascinating that that turns out to be the same

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 1>size as our cosmic horizon. That means that if you

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 1>had all the mass of the universe in a singularity,

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 1>it would be a black hole who sizes the universe,

0:33:45.560 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 1>And so that's kind of cool. It sounds like it

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 1>means our universe could be a black hole because anyway,

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 1>it has the mass and radius of a black hole. Right,

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 1>But of course here comes Daniel to ruin that fun party.

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 1>That calculation assumes a hole by stuff. It only works

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:04.520
<v Speaker 1>in an empty universe where you only have a black hole,

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and there's no expansion in our universe. We don't think

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:11.360
<v Speaker 1>it is empty past the cosmic horizon, and it is expanding,

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 1>so that calculation does not apply, even though it's a

0:34:14.480 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>fun coincidence, all right, So that's the warm up. As

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:20.839
<v Speaker 1>Philip says, the universe unlikely to be a black hole,

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 1>even though that would be more fun if it were.

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:26.800
<v Speaker 1>His question is could you have black holes within black holes?

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Like if the universe was a black hole? Could you

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 1>have a black hole in our universe? Because we see

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 1>one at the center of the galaxy and we've observed

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 1>them in the universe, is it possible if we're in

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 1>a black hole to have black holes? Or more generally,

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:42.760
<v Speaker 1>can black holes exist within black holes? Super fun question,

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 1>And the first thing you might think about is well,

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:48.480
<v Speaker 1>merging black holes, Like, what happens when two black holes

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:51.480
<v Speaker 1>come together? Is there a moment there when you have

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 1>like two singularities within the event horizon, and could you

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:57.800
<v Speaker 1>call that like a black hole within a black hole?

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Kind of yeah, but it's temporary. What happens here is

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:04.239
<v Speaker 1>that the black holes approach each other and then they

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:07.879
<v Speaker 1>form a common horizon from their common energy. So they

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 1>still have their own horizons, right the original event horizon

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 1>you calculate just for that black hole, but because of

0:35:13.160 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 1>their combined gravitational power, they now have a larger combined horizon.

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:21.240
<v Speaker 1>So in that sense, they're kind of black holes within

0:35:21.400 --> 0:35:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a common black hole. Though it's not going to last

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 1>because eventually they will radiate energy and they will orbit

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:30.800
<v Speaker 1>each other and they'll ring down to form one singularity

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:33.239
<v Speaker 1>within the event horizon, and then you're just going to

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 1>get one bigger black hole. So it eventually becomes one

0:35:36.960 --> 0:35:40.279
<v Speaker 1>event horizon. But temporarily you can have cool stuff like

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:43.880
<v Speaker 1>two singularities orbiting each other within the event horizon.

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Just to try to remember from a previous episode, but

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 2>when we talked about when black holes get together, it

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 2>is more likely that one throws the other one out right,

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:55.400
<v Speaker 2>or is it more likely that they merge.

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:59.280
<v Speaker 1>It depends a lot in the dynamics. If two galaxies merge,

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:01.800
<v Speaker 1>they and you can get their central black holes merging,

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:03.880
<v Speaker 1>or you can get one of them kicked out, And

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that definitely has happened. It's a more complicated situation there

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 1>because you have more than two objects. You have like

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:11.759
<v Speaker 1>the whole galaxy and the black hole, and so three

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 1>body systems are much more chaotic than two body systems,

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 1>got it, And so that seems cool. And then you

0:36:17.719 --> 0:36:20.120
<v Speaker 1>might try to engineer a situation where one black hole

0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:22.880
<v Speaker 1>is much bigger than the other. Like imagine a tiny

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:25.799
<v Speaker 1>baby black hole being shot into a mega black hole,

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and then you can ask, like, how long can it

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:31.480
<v Speaker 1>survive within that mega black hole because it feels like

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a little black hole inside a bigger black hole. Right, Well,

0:36:34.560 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that's basically the same scenario we just talked about. It's

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:39.719
<v Speaker 1>again the merger of two black holes, except one of

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 1>them is really big and one of them is really

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 1>really small. Same thing's going to happen is they're going

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to form a common horizon. They're going to orbit each other,

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and then they're gonna merge. It's going to look a

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:51.920
<v Speaker 1>lot more like one eats the other, just because the

0:36:51.960 --> 0:36:54.400
<v Speaker 1>center of gravity is closer to the bigger one. But

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:57.799
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally it's the same physics, two black holes merging and

0:36:57.840 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 1>one big one eating the other one of a change

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of reference frame. So so far we have a temporary

0:37:03.640 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 1>black hole within the other black hole. But if you've

0:37:06.160 --> 0:37:08.840
<v Speaker 1>been listening to the show, we talked last time about

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Caushi horizons and complicated structure inside black holes. So if

0:37:14.120 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you take your big black hole and you spin it,

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:20.280
<v Speaker 1>then you have an event horizon still, but now within

0:37:20.400 --> 0:37:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the black hole you have another horizon. It's called the

0:37:22.880 --> 0:37:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Caushi horizon. Outside the Caushi horizon, things fall in just

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:29.960
<v Speaker 1>like they do in normal black holes. But inside the

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Caushi horizon, the structure of space time is very different,

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:37.839
<v Speaker 1>and the singularity is no longer inevitable, Like you can

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:41.840
<v Speaker 1>have stable orbits around the singularity, you don't have to

0:37:41.880 --> 0:37:45.759
<v Speaker 1>fall into it. For gr nerds, the singularity becomes timelike.

0:37:45.920 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 1>It's no longer true that every path through space leads

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:52.759
<v Speaker 1>to this singularity, and so it's possible, though it's very,

0:37:52.840 --> 0:37:56.520
<v Speaker 1>very difficult because life inside the Caushi horizon is extraordinarily

0:37:56.640 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 1>unstable and unpredictable. As we talked about last time, it's

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:03.080
<v Speaker 1>not actually deterministic because now you have a singularity that

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:06.400
<v Speaker 1>can appear in your past like cone. But in principle,

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:09.920
<v Speaker 1>for the purposes of sounding like cool pop scientists, you

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 1>can potentially exist within the caushi horizon of a spinning

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:17.880
<v Speaker 1>black hole for quite a long time, saying its stables

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:20.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe a bit much, but in that sense, you can

0:38:20.560 --> 0:38:23.759
<v Speaker 1>have a mini black hole within a bigger spinning black

0:38:23.760 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 1>hole and have it hanging out there for quite a while.

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:29.680
<v Speaker 2>So is that a yes to that? What was the

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:34.319
<v Speaker 2>actual question? Would the infinities be compounded or would that

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:38.440
<v Speaker 2>suggest that the singularities do not actually contain infinities.

0:38:38.840 --> 0:38:42.399
<v Speaker 1>So the infinities here are densities, right, not masses. Each

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 1>black hole has a finite mass, and that mass controls

0:38:46.080 --> 0:38:49.279
<v Speaker 1>its vent horizon. The singularity is the density, saying that

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that mass has been compacted to essentially zero space. So yes,

0:38:53.120 --> 0:38:55.360
<v Speaker 1>you can add two masses together and you're going to

0:38:55.400 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 1>get a bigger mass, a larger but still finite mass,

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's still going to have an infinite density. Of course,

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:04.720
<v Speaker 1>all of this is just ignoring quantum mechanics and quantum

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:08.080
<v Speaker 1>gravity and assuming general relativity is the law of the land,

0:39:08.120 --> 0:39:09.960
<v Speaker 1>which we don't think it is, but you know, for

0:39:10.000 --> 0:39:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the purposes of this question, so yeah, you're going to

0:39:12.719 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 1>get compounded infinities in that sense.

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, are we ready for the poem?

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Bring on Shakespeare GPT.

0:39:20.040 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, here we go, a black hole nested where no

0:39:24.840 --> 0:39:32.600
<v Speaker 2>light can ever flee, an abyss with an abyss folding infinity.

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Now it's a little bit tortured. All right.

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:37.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh, we've got to give him your poem again.

0:39:37.600 --> 0:39:38.480
<v Speaker 1>All right? Do it?

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 2>If our universe sits in a black hole's embrace, do

0:39:45.400 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 2>our own black holes nest like a Matrushka doll in space.

0:39:50.480 --> 0:39:53.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if I said Matrushka correctly, but he knows.

0:39:54.000 --> 0:39:55.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure he knows what we're going for.

0:39:56.080 --> 0:39:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Let's hear from Philip if we answered his question, and

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:03.080
<v Speaker 1>if you like chat GPT's poetry better than mine.

0:40:03.400 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 4>Hello again, Daniel and Kelly. Wow, it's like they say,

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 4>come for the black horse in science, stay for the poetry.

0:40:09.560 --> 0:40:12.759
<v Speaker 4>Slam with ai. Thank you for the fulful answer to

0:40:12.800 --> 0:40:15.600
<v Speaker 4>my question. I guess it sits firmly in the yes

0:40:15.640 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 4>but category, along with many other physics topics. So based

0:40:19.600 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 4>on the fine print of the theory, the singularities could

0:40:22.600 --> 0:40:26.160
<v Speaker 4>technically nest inside one another, but that remains in no

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:29.759
<v Speaker 4>way relevant to those universe we observe. Imagining that is

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 4>a fascinating thought experiment, but still leaves us no way

0:40:33.480 --> 0:40:36.560
<v Speaker 4>to deduce something about what is really happening inside the

0:40:36.560 --> 0:40:39.719
<v Speaker 4>event horizon. Well, I'll try to do better next time,

0:40:39.920 --> 0:40:41.040
<v Speaker 4>and thank you for now.

0:40:41.239 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, Daniel, I feel like what we've learned today is

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:45.720
<v Speaker 2>that what we laughed at the fact that chat GPT's

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:49.360
<v Speaker 2>poems are sort of like a you know, overly emotional

0:40:49.400 --> 0:40:52.080
<v Speaker 2>teenager's poems. To be honest, I'm not sure that that

0:40:52.200 --> 0:40:56.400
<v Speaker 2>much that much worse than ours. And so chat GIPT

0:40:56.600 --> 0:40:59.279
<v Speaker 2>is at like Daniel and Kelly level of poetry right now,

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:02.840
<v Speaker 2>which is, you know, not Emily Dickinson.

0:41:03.200 --> 0:41:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we should feed it all of Zach's books to

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:08.239
<v Speaker 1>ask it to write Zach style poetry.

0:41:08.480 --> 0:41:11.920
<v Speaker 2>I still imagine Zach would do better. But Zach and

0:41:11.960 --> 0:41:16.640
<v Speaker 2>I did have Soonish scraped by AI. Were any of

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:19.000
<v Speaker 2>your books scraped by AI? And were they part of

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:24.040
<v Speaker 2>that absolutely part of that big case settlement thing.

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:26.239
<v Speaker 1>Well, maybe we should get the real Zach to write

0:41:26.239 --> 0:41:27.200
<v Speaker 1>our poetry.

0:41:26.800 --> 0:41:32.759
<v Speaker 2>One week, I asked him, and he politely declines, maybe

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:34.760
<v Speaker 2>it's better we keep some parts of our lives separate.

0:41:34.960 --> 0:41:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's good. All right. Well, thank you very much

0:41:37.000 --> 0:41:41.000
<v Speaker 1>everybody for listening and for sharing your curiosity. It's your

0:41:41.080 --> 0:41:44.239
<v Speaker 1>desire to understand the universe that powers our podcast.

0:41:44.600 --> 0:41:48.399
<v Speaker 2>Please send your questions to questions at Danielankelly dot org.

0:41:48.480 --> 0:41:51.359
<v Speaker 2>We answer every question and some of the questions end

0:41:51.440 --> 0:41:53.520
<v Speaker 2>up on the show, and we look forward to hearing

0:41:53.520 --> 0:41:53.880
<v Speaker 2>from you.

0:41:54.160 --> 0:42:03.719
<v Speaker 1>We really do Thanks everybody for listening. Please go and

0:42:03.760 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 1>do us a favor and rate the show on whatever

0:42:06.160 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 1>podcast app you're using. It really helps people find us.

0:42:09.560 --> 0:42:13.480
<v Speaker 2>Daniel and Kelly's Extraordinary Universe is edited by the amazing

0:42:13.520 --> 0:42:14.240
<v Speaker 2>Matt Kesselman.

0:42:14.480 --> 0:42:17.719
<v Speaker 1>He really is a wizard. You can also find us

0:42:17.800 --> 0:42:22.880
<v Speaker 1>online on Blue Sky, Instagram, and x D and K Universe.

0:42:22.960 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Come engage with us.

0:42:24.440 --> 0:42:27.799
<v Speaker 2>You can email us at questions at Danielankelly dot org.

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:30.040
<v Speaker 2>We really do want to hear from you, and you.

0:42:30.040 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Can find our website www dot danieland Kelly dot org,

0:42:34.320 --> 0:42:37.440
<v Speaker 1>where you'll also find an invitation to join our discord,

0:42:37.520 --> 0:42:40.560
<v Speaker 1>where everybody comes and talks about the amazing.

0:42:40.239 --> 0:42:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Universe, and we also have the most amazing moderators. This

0:42:44.920 --> 0:42:47.560
<v Speaker 2>is an iHeart podcast. Thanks for joining us.