WEBVTT - TechStuff Classic: The Worst Hacking Scenes from Hollywood

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio.

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff.

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio and how the tech are you? It is time

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>for a tech Stuff classic episode, and the episode we're

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>about to listen to, the worst hacking scenes from Hollywood,

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>is technically part one of a two parter. Shannon Morse

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>joined me to talk about hacking scenes in Hollywood.

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Shannon is.

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>She's a hacker. She's been doing the hacking routine for

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>several years now. She's been covering hacking for years. She's

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>very knowledgeable on the subject and was a great partner

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to have to talk about how Hollywood doesn't always get

0:00:56.080 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>hacking quite right. Sit back and enjoy this episode originally

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>published September seventh, twenty sixteen. Guys, we've had Shannon on

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the show a few times, and today it's a real treat, really,

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 1>because we're gonna talk about some examples of hacking in

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>pop culture and some of the ones that are incredibly awful,

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>just terrible inaccurate ways of showing how hacking works, as

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>well as talk about something get it more right than

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>not right, which is kind of awesome, and I mean

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 1>the start off, we have to admit the real world

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of hacking. While the results can be quite dramatic and

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>have a huge effect, the process itself is not always cinematic.

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:46.319
<v Speaker 3>Nope, it is not.

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's actually pretty boring. There's just a bunch of

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 4>text on the screen and that's about.

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 2>It, right, I mean it's coding, right.

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly.

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 4>There's a lot of coding involved, a lot of Python

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 4>and BASS scripts and things of that nature, and a

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 4>lot of terminal work. So you don't see very much

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 4>gooey or graphical user interface usage whenever you're running.

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 3>Some kind of hack implementation. A lot of times it's

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 3>just terminal.

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Right, And you know, I understand the need to stretch

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the truth when you're trying to create a really thrilling

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>movie or TV show and you want to have something

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting to look at, having your characters look at lines

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:32.239
<v Speaker 1>of code and going through a process of trying to

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 1>create some sort of exploit for a vulnerability that doesn't

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>really hold a lot of people like on the edge

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>of their seat. So I get it, but it is

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of a problem. And I should also mention we're

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>using the word hacker today a lot. But of course,

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>as I try to mention every time I talk about hacking,

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>hacking is a very broad term, and it doesn't necessarily

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 1>mean that you are doing anything illegal, and it certainly

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't even.

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 2>Mean that you're necessarily working on a computer.

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>You could be doing some hardware hacks that aren't related

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to software.

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 2>That's important to remember.

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>But as far as Hollywood is concerned, there's really only

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>one kind of hacking, and that involves trying to break

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>into a place that you're not supposed to be in.

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 4>Of course, because those are the most interesting people, they're

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 4>the scary ones, and people are afraid of what they

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 4>don't understand.

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Right, And I imagine that a lot of screenwriters are

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>particularly scared of hackers because it's one it's clear that

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>they have no understanding whatsoever about it. And two, I

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>mean we've seen, especially recently, we've seen some very big

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 1>stories about the entertainment industry running away from hackers attacking.

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>And whether it's a hacker who's actually gaining access to

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a system, or it was someone who was on the

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 1>inside who just managed to exploit access in the first place,

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>which I would argue really isn't a hack, it's just

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of industrial sabotage at that point. But the Sony

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>story would be the big example, right.

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the Sony story, I think put a lot of

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 4>fear in the entertainment industry, and I feel like the

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 4>entertainment industry as a whole, with very few exceptions, are

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 4>one of the genres that is the farthest behind when

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 4>it comes to their own security and privacy. They're the

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 4>farthest behind when it comes to a lot of things,

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 4>including how they treat their women. But I think that

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:36.600
<v Speaker 4>it's something that they really need to start focusing on

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 4>and start understanding, not only for their own security, for

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:44.159
<v Speaker 4>their employees, for the actors and actresses that work there

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 4>for these different companies, but also because they need to

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 4>understand how to actually portray it so that more people

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:53.720
<v Speaker 4>understand it as a whole and aren't so afraid.

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Right, And so we're going to dive into a discussion

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of some of the more entertaining and often wildly inaccurate

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>versions of hacking in film and TV.

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 2>I should also give a shout out.

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people on my Twitter feed suggested that

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I check out a subreddit. The subreddit is it's a

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Unix system, which is a reference to Jurassic Park. If

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:23.840
<v Speaker 1>you remember, the young lady runs up to a computer,

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>she takes one look at it, she says.

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 2>It's a Unix system. I know this, And then she's.

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Immediately looking at a graphic user interface and identifying one

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>block out of like fifty blocks that are on the screen,

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 1>and immediately makes the conclusion that all the files for

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the entire island are accessible from that one terminal. I

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know how she knows. That's amazing. It's amazing that

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>you automatically know that everything available on the island is

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:52.719
<v Speaker 1>on that one drive.

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Somehow, I feel like.

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 4>The only way you would know that is if you

0:05:57.160 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 4>were the information security professional that is working for that company.

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, No, she seemed like she was a little

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>too young to be a full time employee at that point.

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Exactly so Jurassic Park. While it lends the.

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:18.599
<v Speaker 1>Quote it's a Unix system to the subreddit, I didn't

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>really include it on this list. There is one other

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>incredibly famous example that I've talked about on a previous

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>episode of Tech.

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Stuff that we will hit. But first I'm going to

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 2>talk about a movie. I haven't actually seen this movie

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 2>but I have seen the sequences that involve hacking. That

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 2>movie is.

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>The Core, And in the first sequence I wanted to

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about, there's a character whose handle is RAT, which

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:45.279
<v Speaker 1>could be you know, like remote access trojan or remote

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>access terminal, depending upon what acronem you want to look at.

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Often one that is associated with hacking, and Rat is

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:58.279
<v Speaker 1>caught by the FBI. The sequence in which he's caught,

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>he's trying desperately to erase all traces of his activities.

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>He's got tons and tons of computers, and he's using

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>massive magnets to try and wipe drives, and he's throwing

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>CD ROM discs into a microwave and turning it on high,

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, the typical stuff.

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 2>We do when the Feds come knocking.

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>But but my favorite bit about this little sequence is

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>he then is taken to an interrogation and as he's

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>being interrogated, he just casually reaches over and grabs a

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>guy's cell phone out of his.

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Little holster or his pocket or whatever. But the guy's

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 2>it's just a cell phone. What can he do with that?

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, Shannon, you know what people can do with so

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you have physical access to a cell phone.

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>It's game over. But oh yeah, but what this guy does.

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't do something to get hold of the guy's contacts.

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't and this is also pre smartphone. It's really

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>a cell phone. He doesn't do anything like that. What

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>he does is he takes a little a little chewing

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>gum rapper. He dials a couple of numbers on the phone,

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and then he uses the chewing gum rapper to make

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a weird little whistling, humming noise and then casually closes

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the phone, tosses it back to the guy and says

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that phone's got free long distance on it forever.

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 2>That's uh.

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 3>I love this one.

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Hundred accurate to real life. That's exactly how it works.

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, totally.

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 4>So I'm pretty sure that this is kind of a

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 4>comparison to what people would actually do, which was called

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 4>phone freaking. And this was like before hacking became a

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 4>really big popular norm that you would see in like

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:45.959
<v Speaker 4>online media that you see.

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 3>In this day.

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so back in the day, this guy named Captain Crunch.

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 4>He got his online screen name from opening up a

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:57.679
<v Speaker 4>Captain Crunch cereal box and getting out a little I

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 4>believe it was a kazoo or something similar to that,

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 4>like a w and if he was able to recreate

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:05.319
<v Speaker 4>or reproduce the kind of tone that you could put

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:07.719
<v Speaker 4>into a payphone to allow you to make free long

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 4>distance calls. So they're using that real life scenario to

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 4>their advantage in this movie The Core and making it

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 4>seem like you can do the same thing with.

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 3>A gum wrapper.

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 4>Now, personally, I don't believe that you can do the

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 4>same thing with a gum wrapper. That seems a little

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 4>bit odd. I know that you can make noises with

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 4>things like that. You can also do the same thing

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 4>with the piece of grass if you want to.

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah you can.

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 1>You can entertain yourself in like a third grade kind

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of way for hours at a time.

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:41.439
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah. Phone freaking really worked on landlines.

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>They worked when the phone system wasn't fully digital yet.

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>It was a much different system, I mean, and there's

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 1>some very famous people who got their start as phone freaks.

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Steve Wozniak was in that world. The Wall

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the Great Wahs was one of the freakers of back

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 1>in the seventies. But it was sort of the same

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 1>thing that you would talk about hackers today. They weren't

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>necessarily trying to gain the system.

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 2>They were trying to figure out how does this work?

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 4>Right, They were just messing with things. They were trying

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:17.839
<v Speaker 4>to reverse engineer them and figure out how they work

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 4>and put them back together and let them let these

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 4>different pieces of technology do things that they weren't necessarily

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 4>supposed to do. Yeah, and that's what I love so

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 4>much about hacking.

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 3>But then you bring it.

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 4>To Hollywood and they're like, oh, these are scary people.

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 4>They're all going to end up in the FBI's hands.

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:35.319
<v Speaker 4>And that's not necessarily true, right.

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 1>And to take something that worked on landlines on a

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 1>payphone basis using a whistle that had I think he

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>even modified it slightly so it would make exactly the

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>tone he needed to replicate the tones that the phone

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:50.319
<v Speaker 1>company was using in order to allow for this kind

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of thing to happen. Yeah, it would never work on

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the cell phone range at all.

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 2>And also just what a weird line.

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Like this phone's got free long distance on it forever,

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and you think there's gotta be multiple ways a phone

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>company would say, Hey, something weird's going on with this

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>one line. But uh, but the core the Corps also

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>has another great scene in it with that same hacker,

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>same guy rat h And when I see him, I

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>always think, uh, he's he's the he's a character who

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 1>also or he's an actor who also play shows up

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>as a character on the show Supernatural as a weird,

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>reedy looking, uh demon killer guy that you would just

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 1>expect to get completely obliterated the first time he shows up,

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>but he turns out to be more capable than you

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>would consider based upon his appearance anyway.

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 2>He walks into a cyber cafe. He's got a.

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>CD rom I think it even says Kung Fu on it,

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:57.679
<v Speaker 1>if I'm not mistaken, and he puts it did puts

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>it into a cyber cafe computer, and after like leaning

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>back and putting his hand up to his face for

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>about five seconds, it ends up completely taking over not

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>just his computer, but the entire local network, and all

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of the screens in the cyber cafe pop up with

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>this image of his rat network.

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Where he has taken over all the computers.

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know exactly why he's trying to take

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 1>over all the computers, apart from just seeing lots and

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 1>lots of what appears to be news footage which spoiler

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>alert there's a thing we can use to get that

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>news footage.

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 2>It's called a TV. You can use that without having

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 2>to hack any systems.

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:47.439
<v Speaker 1>But it's just a weird little moment where he's taken

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:52.320
<v Speaker 1>over all the computers in the cyber cafe. Now, let's

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and make some things clear, Shannon. I know

0:12:54.480 --> 0:13:01.199
<v Speaker 1>that you've addressed this on multiple episodes and ways of

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>reaching out to your audience. There are certain things you

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>should be concerned about when you go and log into

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 1>any kind of local area network, any kind of open

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Wi Fi. If you're going to a coffee shop and

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>you're using that kind of Wi Fi, you need to

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:18.959
<v Speaker 1>be more.

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Aware of potential security problems.

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:28.559
<v Speaker 4>Yes, absolutely, it's very easy if you're on your local

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 4>coffee shops network or your local hotels network for anybody

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 4>to snoop on what you're doing. You may be using HTTPS,

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 4>but that's not going to keep somebody from understanding what

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 4>sites you are visiting. But even though that data may

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 4>be encrypted, however, they're still collecting.

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 3>That encrypted information.

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 4>And it really just depends on how a website that

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 4>you're visiting is encrypting that information, whether or not they

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 4>would be able to decrypt it after a specific amount

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 4>of time.

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 3>So I always tell.

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 4>People if they're going to use a hotel Wi Fi

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 4>or a coffee shop WiFi, to use a VPN, use

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 4>some way to tunnel your traffic from point A to

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:10.559
<v Speaker 4>point B so that nobody else on that network will

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 4>be able to see what you're doing. They may see

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 4>that you're logged on, they may see your IP address,

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:17.719
<v Speaker 4>but they won't know exactly what's going on with your

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 4>traffic while you're connected. So, and I'm pretty sure that

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 4>everybody who generally uses these Wi Fi networks that are

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 4>available for free aren't necessarily using VPNs, But it's a

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 4>huge security risk for pretty much every consumer out there

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 4>that's using these Wi Fi networks.

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Right, And whereas in the core, you know we were talking,

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>it's really hardwired computers that are part of the cyber cafe.

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>You just sit down at a terminal and log in

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 1>so that you have access to everything on that machine.

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 1>That's scary too. I mean, it's kind of like using

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a computer at the library. You want to be very

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>careful about the kinds of activities you do on that

0:14:57.040 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>machine because it's not really you, and you don't really

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, and you don't want to go so far

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to cover your tracks that you're actually causing problems for

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the real purpose of that machine. Still not quite sure

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>what he was trying to do. It was like he

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>was setting up his own little botnet. Also, if you

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 1>are setting up a botnet, probably a bad idea to

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>have a graphic pop up on everyone's screen saying, hey,

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>your computer's mine now.

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so it's In today's age, it is very popular

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 4>for people to use ransomware, which will basically announces its

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 4>availability on your computer. Yeah, it'll announce its presence on

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 4>your machine to let the user know, Hey, I've just

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 4>encrypted all the information, all the photos, all the documents

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 4>that is on your computer. Now you have to pay

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 4>me like one bitcoin to get your data back, and

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 4>then you pay that bitcoin and you may or may

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 4>not get your data back. So, you know, ransomware it's

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 4>a big thing. But in the case of this one,

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 4>in the case of rat yes, you can install like

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 4>malwares something like that on a CD.

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 3>That's entirely possible.

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 4>You can put pretty much anything on a CD, and

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 4>then it looks like he's he's running this CD through

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 4>the entire network, which you can install malware through pivoting

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 4>a network's open ports or open eyps, so that you

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 4>can put the same power on several different computers. But

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 4>it's it's never a good idea to let everybody know

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 4>what the heck you're doing if you're doing something that

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 4>you shouldn't necessarily be doing.

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 3>In the first place.

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I mean again, it's there for dramatic effect.

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>But if you're the one person in the cyber cafe

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>who isn't visibly freaking out when all the computers switch over,

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>here's a here's a little hint, they're going to figure

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>out it was you, right, I mean, that's kind of like,

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're the one guy not surprised that everything's on fire,

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>you probably set the fire.

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm just saying.

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Shannon and I will be back to talk more about

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the worst hacking scenes from Hollywood this quick break. Our

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 1>next example comes from one of my favorite movies of

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>all time.

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 3>Oh my gosh, me too. I love this movie, The Net.

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Oh it's so great. It's so cheesy and wonderful.

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 1>The Net also is a movie in which a character

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:29.639
<v Speaker 1>actually has her identity stolen, and very prescient for its time.

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:31.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not like it got everything wrong. Some of the

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:35.360
<v Speaker 1>stuff it actually predicted quite well. For example, best prediction

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 1>of any movie ever it predicted being able to order

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>pizza online. This was before the dot com bubble even began.

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>This the movie came out in the mid nineties, so

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>this was actually pretty advanced. The people behind the film said,

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to be able to let our character make

0:17:57.280 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>an activity online that would stress how she was distancing

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>herself from other people.

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 2>She was trying her best to.

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Limit the amount of interaction she had with other human beings.

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>It stresses her loneliness, also her paranoia to some extent,

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and it was a neat way of doing it, and

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>it also ended up being accurate. However, that being said,

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a bit in the very beginning. It's right when

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>she's going to order pizza, when she's on the phone

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 1>with a client and she does essentially tech support and

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>really helps people who have been attacked by a virus

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>recover their systems, and it takes her like no time

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 1>at all to identify what the virus is on this

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 1>customer's computer, which she does not have access to.

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 2>She's accessing it remotely.

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 1>She identifies the virus, she sequesters the virus. She removes

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the virus, plus apparently does repairs to the system so

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>it so it starts working again, and that takes her

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>less time than it would take for her to order

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the pizza. That's incredible. I mean, she should Every security

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>firm should hire her.

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 3>She's a genius apparently.

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I like making.

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 4>The comparison between Sandra Bullock's character in the Net to

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:18.640
<v Speaker 4>an actual penetration tester that we have in the two

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 4>thousands or in the twenty tens. In the twenty tens,

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 4>penetration testers go through contracts. They go through a company.

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 4>They're usually hired on by a large firm to go

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 4>through their security and make sure everything's okay. They have

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 4>to write reports, everything has to go through a financial

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 4>financialist before they're actually paid for any of their work.

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 4>They don't actually discuss how much they're getting paid with

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:47.399
<v Speaker 4>the client. They discuss how much they're getting paid with

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 4>the company that they are salaried through. So in the

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 4>case of Sandra Bullock's character here, she's talking about you know,

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 4>oh yeah, I mean he's like, yeah, I'm gonna pay

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 4>X amount of money and he's like, I don't care

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 4>how much it costs, it's worth it, and that's not

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 4>necessarily something that you would talk to the penetration tester about, right,

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 4>because when you do, they're going to make their they're

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 4>going to make their time with you as a client

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 4>much longer to make it seem like a much more

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 4>important case.

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so if you if you do, uh, you know,

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like what Scotty would say is that

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>he'd say he'd figure out how long it was going

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to take him to do a task, and then he

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 1>would then he would give the captain a time that

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>was longer than what it would take him to do.

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 1>In that case, it wasn't so that he could get overtime.

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>It was so that he could impress the captain by

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 1>finishing early.

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:38.120
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:39.679
<v Speaker 1>It's like I told you it was going to take

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 1>me three days, but I really put my nose to

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the grindstone and got it done in a day and

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 1>a half and the Captain's and pressed like, wow, you're amazing.

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:50.919
<v Speaker 2>In this case, it would be yeah, that's probably going

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:51.439
<v Speaker 2>to take me.

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't know a week's worth of work

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and you're done in you know, five hours, then you're

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 1>just billing the time, right.

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:02.199
<v Speaker 4>So so during the conversation that needs two have, it

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 4>sounds like she's a like she's a red teamer, Like

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 4>she's a penetration tester that works for a big security firm,

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 4>and she's she's talking to her client though, but but

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:15.360
<v Speaker 4>her actions make me think that she's a freelancer.

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 3>So I'm not sure what's going on here.

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 4>I think that they that it was produced a little

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 4>bit confusingly, But now that I understand how penetration testing works,

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 4>even though I am not one myself, I was quite

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 4>confused by this scene.

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I I I think it was. Out of all

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 1>the errors that we're talking about today, it's one of

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the less egregious, because, again, unless you were to show

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>like that time had obviously passed a significant amount so

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that she had had time to really identify what was

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>happening and then respond to it, it's not that big

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a deal compared to some of the other versions that

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:57.120
<v Speaker 1>we've got in this episode. So I'm I'm gonna I'm

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna give this one a pass. It's not as bad

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 1>as could have been. It's certainly not as bad as

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the next one.

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:06.399
<v Speaker 3>Oh my gosh, can you just talk about ncis.

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's talk about n CIS for a bit, because

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, in CIS, first of all, it has one

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:19.239
<v Speaker 1>of the most infamous awful hacking scenes in Hollywood, and

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>so much so that there are multiple versions of the

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 1>clip we're going to talk about on YouTube. My favorite

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>title too Idiots One Keyboard. But yeah, let's talk about

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 1>n CIS for a second here. So we've got a

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 1>character in NCIS who is sort of she's the young

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>hip hacker character who is the one responding in this

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>particular scene to an attack that's coming in that attack

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 1>is being represented by lots and lots of pop ups

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of just strings of characters meaninglessly appearing all over her

0:22:56.880 --> 0:23:01.199
<v Speaker 1>her computer monitor, and her response is that each one

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 1>of these is absolutely meaningful, and she knows exactly what's happening,

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>that the hacker is attacking their systems and trying.

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:08.919
<v Speaker 2>To get at very.

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Very secure data and is quickly winnowing through all the

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 1>different security and so she's just furiously typing on her

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 1>keyboard in response, and her coworker, who's standing next to

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:27.119
<v Speaker 1>her and asking her questions and giving her suggestions that

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily mean very much, ends up deciding to help

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 1>her out by simultaneously typing on the same keyboard she's

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 1>typing on, So you have four hands typing on the

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 1>same keyboard at the same time. So bad, dear Hollywood.

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:48.400
<v Speaker 1>That is not how keyboards work. A computer can't tell

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 1>which person is typing which thing. It would just come

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 1>out as a super garbled mess.

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:57.160
<v Speaker 4>Not to mention the frustration, like, have you ever had

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 4>somebody come up and just like start pressing on your keyboard,

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:02.679
<v Speaker 4>because it's very irritating.

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:04.440
<v Speaker 2>Is there's no way.

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 4>That these two characters would be able to type on

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 4>the same keyboard at the same time.

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:08.880
<v Speaker 3>That's ridiculous.

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>It feels like a violation when someone does that to me,

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Like if they're like move, even if it if it's

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>preceded by move, I'll show you. I'm like, no, no,

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you'll tell me and then I'll do it. This is

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>my computer and I don't let you touch it.

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:28.400
<v Speaker 1>This was one of those sequences where really the whole

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:32.439
<v Speaker 1>purpose of this scene was to show how a non

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:36.120
<v Speaker 1>tech savvy, pragmatic guy has a solution to a problem

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that the two tech wizards completely overlook. So in a way,

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:45.199
<v Speaker 1>it's it's about taking down the tech wizard folks. A

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>peg or two because they're not thinking practically, they're too

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 1>filled with panic.

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:50.639
<v Speaker 2>So you've got these.

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:53.399
<v Speaker 1>Two characters who are responding in real time to a

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:58.159
<v Speaker 1>security threat as if they're doing battle with the hacker.

0:24:58.359 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 2>And this is a common.

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 1>Thread in a lot of television and movies. It's not

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 1>terribly accurate in the real world scenarios, but they are

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>acting like the keystrokes they're doing are going to end

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>up either booting the hacker out or securing some of

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the data away from the hacker, and they're just furiously

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 1>typing when the pragmatic guy walks behind the computer system

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and unplugs it, thus saving them from the hack because

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 1>now there's no connection for the hacker to exploit.

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 4>Except what he did was actually make it worse because

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 4>now they don't have a computer that they can work

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 4>through to hopefully find the hack, find the open port

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 4>that this guy is coming through.

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:44.920
<v Speaker 3>This attacker, and close it off.

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:50.199
<v Speaker 4>So he's unplugging a computer as opposed to going to

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:53.639
<v Speaker 4>the server and cutting that off and turning off the server.

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:57.160
<v Speaker 4>He's just unplugging one of the open PCs, right, And

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:00.879
<v Speaker 4>that just drives me nuts. This int okay, I wanted

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 4>to throw things at my TV when I was.

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Watching this scene, because I was like, this is so bad.

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:05.639
<v Speaker 2>It's so bad.

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this one, this one's probably out of all the

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 1>ones that we have, this one's probably maybe not the worst,

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:17.199
<v Speaker 1>but it's way up there, and it's it's clearly played

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 1>for laughs, at least a little bit for laughs. Maybe

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 1>not like outright belly laughs, like you know, anyone who

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>knows what a computer is is probably chuckling, but it's

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously played for this little moment where the pragmatic character

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>can kind of be a smug jerkface and be like,

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>huh see, I thought of it first, and the other

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:40.119
<v Speaker 1>two characters like why didn't we think of that?

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 2>And as as Shannon points out.

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Because it doesn't solve the problem, No, it does not.

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I highly recommend if anyone is unfamiliar with this go

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 1>look for NCIS two it hits one keyboard and watch

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 1>this scene and really appreciate it.

0:26:57.480 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 2>I also liked when I was reading.

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Comments about this one, one of the comments I read

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 1>in that subreddit was the part of the scene that

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>completely pulls me out of it is the fact that

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 1>when the guy takes a bite of his sandwich, it's

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 1>such a tiny little bite. It lost all credibility with me.

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 2>There. No one needs a sandwich like that.

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 3>Oh it's so funny.

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Redditors are great.

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:20.360
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Next on our list is Swordfish, which actually has quite

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a few awful, awful hacking scenes, some of which involve

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 1>material not.

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Appropriate for this podcast, and so I did not include

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 2>those scenes when I wrote.

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>There's one in particular where a guy is being tested

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:41.679
<v Speaker 1>to see if his hacking skills are laite enough to

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 1>join Travolta scene.

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 2>It is awful.

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 1>It is terrible in so many ways, but that one

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:50.919
<v Speaker 1>was so bad that I was like, no, I can't

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that's not going on the list. So instead I looked

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:56.439
<v Speaker 1>at a different one. And Hugh Jackman's playing the hacker

0:27:56.880 --> 0:28:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and he's trying to get access to a system, and

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the way that they decided to depict this was they

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>show a little cube on the screen and he's building

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>onto this cube with other cubes to make what looks

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:15.360
<v Speaker 1>like essentially a Rubik's cube sized digital construct. It's all virtual,

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>there's no actual physical cubes, and this is what represents

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>getting access to a system somehow, building a three dimensional

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 1>virtual object out of smaller three dimensional virtual objects. Now, Shannon,

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 1>is that, in fact, how that looks like when you're

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to access a system you're confronted with a Rubik's

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:39.719
<v Speaker 1>cube that you have to construct virtually.

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so I'm gonna say no shucks. So for me,

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 4>this looks like they are trying to show their viewers

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 4>a graphical compilation of what coding would look like once

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 4>you finally compile your code and you get the aok

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 4>that everything is okay and there are no errors. So

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 4>that's what it looks like to me. If you see

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 4>actual code, if you see somebody building a virus or

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 4>building a worm, or like in this case, Hugh Jackman's

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 4>character is building a worm, you'll see lines and line

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 4>hundreds of lines of code, and then at the end

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 4>they'll probably choose, like going to the guy and choose

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 4>to compile code, and then the interface that they're using

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 4>will give them the okay and tell them that there

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 4>are no errors. But in this case, he's building a

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 4>Rubik's cube on his computer, and it looks nothing like

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 4>what actual compilation looks like.

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, compiling code is so to give you guys a

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit of an insight into how computers quote unquote think.

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:46.320
<v Speaker 1>We use computer languages in order to construct programs, and

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the computer languages are written in such a way that

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 1>a computer understands what operation it needs to perform in

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 1>order to progress through the program. Ultimately, that stuff gets

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 1>compiled and you have like high level computer languages and

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 1>low lane computer languages, and then you eventually get down

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 1>to the point where you get to machine code, and

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that's where you're getting into the binary codes zeros and ones,

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 1>where most humans, the vast majority of humans, nearly all humans,

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 1>are not capable of reading that, at least not with

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot of time on their hands, right. So

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that's why we have these programming languages to kind of

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 1>bridge the gap between the language that computers speak and

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the languages that we speak. So, if you're completely unfamiliar

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 1>with coding languages or programming languages.

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 2>And you take a look at it, it.

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Looks like nonsense, right it For someone who is completely unschooled,

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 1>it looks like you would have to be a genius

0:30:44.640 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>in order to use it. But in fact, it follows

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 1>very specific rules. So once you learn those rules, you

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 1>know it does take there is a learning curve, but

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 1>you do get to a point where you start feeling

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>a little confident with that stuff exactly.

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 4>And there's plenty of programmers that I know who never

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 4>are in every single rule in a specific language that

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 4>they know, but they have books and books, they have,

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, definitions and posters and things of this nature

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 4>so that they always have a reminder, so they're able

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 4>to write different kinds of programs.

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 3>But as long as.

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 4>You know a few general rules for any language that

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 4>you're working with, you can write a programs. It's very hard,

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 4>it is very complicated, but it's possible.

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So it's not going to look like you're building

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 1>a cube, unless, of course, your program, once executed, is

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a cube building program, in which case, if it looks

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 1>like you're building a cube, congratulations you coded it correctly.

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 1>We're going to take another quick break from the episode

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and we'll be right back after these messages from our sponsors.

0:31:56.880 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Our next one is one of my favorite examples of

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that because it takes me back to my childhood. I

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 1>had a discussion with some of my coworkers here about

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>this particular movie, and some of them couldn't remember ever

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:11.720
<v Speaker 1>seeing it. Some of them remembered seeing it as a

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 1>kid on video. I remember seeing.

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 2>This in the theater because I'm old. Superman three. So

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 2>in Superman three.

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 1>You've got a character played by Richard Pryor who is

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 1>a computer programmer, and he goes to work for a

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 1>company and.

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 2>He's a data entry guy.

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 1>For some reason, the data entry folks at this company

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>all have to wear like slippers and stuff. It's almost

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 1>like it's a clean room, like kind of a clean room,

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 1>but not really a clean room. And he finds out

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that everyone in the company is paid. Their payment involves

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 1>fractions of a cent that end up getting rounded down.

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 1>So if this sounds like office space, it's very much

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the same sort of plot. He figures out, Hey, what

0:32:54.400 --> 0:32:56.560
<v Speaker 1>if I took all the fractions of a cent that

0:32:56.760 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 1>otherwise go unaccounted. They're just floating around out there, and

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I pay myself all those fractions of a cent, so

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that I make a real huge amount of money, because

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 1>once you accumulate all of them, it actually amounts to

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 1>something significant. But because each individual little appearance of it,

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>it's tiny, no one takes notice of it. Right Like

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 1>if I took a halfpenny, no one is going to

0:33:22.680 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 1>care if I take a billion half pennies suddenly it matters.

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 2>But he does this by staying late.

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 1>One day and turning on his computer and he does

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 1>type some stuff with one hand on a little bit

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of keyboard that then I'll make texts start to disappear

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and appear like one letter at a time, to a

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>point where it's a very common thing in Hollywood, right

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 1>that the display has some sort of weird effect to

0:33:53.400 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 1>it that indicates that, yes, something is happening, like a

0:33:58.000 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 1>hacker is attacking or the is being compromised. Once he

0:34:03.520 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 1>does that, he types in a command that essentially just says, hey,

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:11.279
<v Speaker 1>pay all the fractions of a cent to me, and

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 1>it's written out in more or less natural language, and

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 1>then he hits enter and it works. A lot of

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:22.759
<v Speaker 1>problems with this, the big one being natural language. Like

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 1>we just said just a second ago, computers do not

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 1>understand the languages that we communicate with to each other,

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:30.520
<v Speaker 1>not on their own.

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 2>They have to be taught how to do that.

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 3>They don't automatically speak English.

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if you ever open up a command line on

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 1>any kind of computer, doesn't matter what operating system pick one,

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Linux or DOS or whatever. You get to

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 1>that command line and you try and type in full

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:51.800
<v Speaker 1>English sentences to see if you can make your computer

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:55.839
<v Speaker 1>to do stuff. You're going to be sorely disappointed. It

0:34:55.880 --> 0:34:59.919
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work that way. It's not like a search bar

0:35:00.560 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 1>with Google. I mean, the Web has really spoiled us,

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:07.759
<v Speaker 1>and that anyone who has not had experience with computers

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:12.239
<v Speaker 1>before the web was a thing doesn't really understand that

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:14.640
<v Speaker 1>when you get to the command line, it's not like

0:35:14.800 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a search field like you're.

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:18.879
<v Speaker 3>Not has spoiled us.

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, I side note again, I'm old enough where

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:29.399
<v Speaker 1>DOS was the way to interface with a computer when

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 1>I was a kid, or Apple Basic, but I was

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 1>mostly using DASS at that point. And then you had

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the Mac come out in nineteen eighty four. They took

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the Guy. They didn't create the guy, the graphic user interface.

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 1>They actually kind of took that from Xerox Park. Xerox

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Park really kind of pioneered that. Then Microsoft came out

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 1>with Windows, and I resisted switching to Windows for a

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 1>very long time and eventually broke down to get Windows

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:02.200
<v Speaker 1>when it became clear that all the software coming out

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:05.720
<v Speaker 1>only would be supported through Windows and not through DOS.

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:11.360
<v Speaker 1>And to this day I'm bitter about that because I

0:36:11.440 --> 0:36:13.240
<v Speaker 1>taught myself all the tree commands.

0:36:13.320 --> 0:36:13.719
<v Speaker 2>Darn it.

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 4>I grew up with Windows since I was a kid,

0:36:17.719 --> 0:36:20.640
<v Speaker 4>so it was always I started in the gooey graphical

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:21.360
<v Speaker 4>user interface.

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 3>I didn't start with commands.

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but this is where Shannon makes me feel old.

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I was born in the eighties, so I think

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 4>that's the difference.

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:31.960
<v Speaker 2>That's that's fair. That's that's fair. Go ahead.

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:33.560
<v Speaker 3>I love you, Jonathan.

0:36:33.880 --> 0:36:37.279
<v Speaker 2>I love you too, Shannon. It's fine. Every every every

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 2>co host I have.

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Makes me feel old because I'm older than everyone but

0:36:41.280 --> 0:36:43.240
<v Speaker 1>one podcaster at this company.

0:36:43.320 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 2>So pray continue.

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:52.719
<v Speaker 4>So I actually liked this Superman three scene because back

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:56.279
<v Speaker 4>in the day before I was born, it was very

0:36:56.320 --> 0:37:01.360
<v Speaker 4>popular among people all over the place, no matter what

0:37:01.520 --> 0:37:04.239
<v Speaker 4>company you were working with, to deal with fractions of

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 4>a penny, because even a penny as a change in

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 4>pricing would be a lot of money. So people would

0:37:12.200 --> 0:37:13.840
<v Speaker 4>be like, Okay, well it's a penny and a half.

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:16.960
<v Speaker 4>And I believe at one point there was even a

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 4>half cent coin that was distributed in the United States.

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:23.399
<v Speaker 3>So this was a thing.

0:37:23.760 --> 0:37:25.439
<v Speaker 4>You can still see it in this day and age

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:28.160
<v Speaker 4>at gas stations. Whenever you go to a gas station,

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 4>you see on the sign it says like gas is

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:34.400
<v Speaker 4>two ninety five and nine tenths of a penny. That's

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:38.520
<v Speaker 4>from back in the day one they would use these exact,

0:37:38.640 --> 0:37:42.960
<v Speaker 4>precise measurements for gasoline distribution at gas stations.

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:49.120
<v Speaker 3>So that really is a thing. But the whole hacking

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 3>scenario of this scene is very false.

0:37:52.840 --> 0:37:58.400
<v Speaker 4>You can't do a specific distribution of money in that nature,

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:00.920
<v Speaker 4>and anybody who has act sus to that kind of

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 4>information who is working for a company should not have

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:07.759
<v Speaker 4>that access in the first pace, especially if they're they're

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:13.160
<v Speaker 4>getting paid and they're not like a chief operating manager

0:38:13.480 --> 0:38:14.280
<v Speaker 4>of that company.

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's the idea that you would have these dumb terminals,

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 1>like i am assuming they were dumb terminals. I'm assuming

0:38:22.640 --> 0:38:27.160
<v Speaker 1>they were all connected to a main system as opposed

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to each being individual computers. But either in either case

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:33.280
<v Speaker 1>you would have limitations on what any of those terminals

0:38:33.320 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 1>could access. But because of his leap programming skills, he's

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:42.719
<v Speaker 1>able to bypass that and get access to the mainframe.

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:45.239
<v Speaker 2>I'm pretty sure they use it as a mainframe.

0:38:45.800 --> 0:38:49.239
<v Speaker 1>Mainframe, by the way, is also a great general term

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:53.319
<v Speaker 1>that Hollywood has misused throughout all the computer films. But

0:38:55.840 --> 0:38:57.839
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the things that's never explained how he

0:38:57.880 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 1>does it. It's just it's just a thing that happens

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:01.279
<v Speaker 1>in the movie.

0:39:01.400 --> 0:39:03.359
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't you know. They're not drawing attention to it.

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:05.400
<v Speaker 1>It's not an important thing other than the fact to

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 1>illustrate that one he is smart. Two he doesn't see

0:39:10.480 --> 0:39:15.240
<v Speaker 1>anything ethically wrong with bending the rules because in his mind,

0:39:15.680 --> 0:39:18.359
<v Speaker 1>these fractions of a cent, they're not doing anything right.

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:21.920
<v Speaker 1>They're not they're not in an account, they're not being

0:39:22.040 --> 0:39:24.440
<v Speaker 1>used by the company. They're just they're just kind of

0:39:24.560 --> 0:39:29.200
<v Speaker 1>loose somehow. They're they're they're in the company's ownership, but

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 1>no one's doing anything with it. So therefore, if no

0:39:31.680 --> 0:39:33.399
<v Speaker 1>one's doing anything with it, no one's going to miss

0:39:33.400 --> 0:39:35.359
<v Speaker 1>them when they're gone. So that's kind of how he

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 1>justifies it, and eventually he becomes one of the he's

0:39:40.120 --> 0:39:42.440
<v Speaker 1>more of a reluctant villain in the movie, but he's

0:39:42.480 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the villains in Superman three. Ah Okay, that's

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a If you have not seen Superman three, good job.

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Continue on that track. Don't feel tempted to change that.

0:39:52.920 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 2>It is not a good movie.

0:39:55.280 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 1>It's better than Superman four. Although my coworker Joe would

0:39:58.640 --> 0:40:03.360
<v Speaker 1>probably trounce me for saying, so, uh, Superman four is awful.

0:40:04.280 --> 0:40:04.960
<v Speaker 2>The next move.

0:40:05.400 --> 0:40:07.719
<v Speaker 1>The next example we have is Numbers, which I love

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:13.160
<v Speaker 1>just because of the way it mischaracterizes IRC, which is,

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:15.239
<v Speaker 1>there's a scene in which people are trying to figure

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 1>out what these what these hackers, these two different hackers

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:20.279
<v Speaker 1>are trying to do, and they don't know, and they

0:40:20.320 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 1>aren't sure how they're going to track down the hackers

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and learn what they're trying to do. But then one

0:40:25.520 --> 0:40:27.840
<v Speaker 1>of the characters says, oh, we got to go on

0:40:27.880 --> 0:40:30.879
<v Speaker 1>I R C because that's where all the hackers go

0:40:31.040 --> 0:40:34.239
<v Speaker 1>to chat. And they use handles, you know, they don't

0:40:34.320 --> 0:40:36.960
<v Speaker 1>use the real name they use. They use handles on

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I RC and that way they can secretly chat to

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 1>each other. And then they use this weird meaningless analogy

0:40:44.160 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about two ships that are sailing across the ocean

0:40:48.360 --> 0:40:50.279
<v Speaker 1>and they meet in the middle of the ocean and

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:53.400
<v Speaker 1>they exchange illegal goods and then they sail away, and

0:40:53.440 --> 0:40:57.239
<v Speaker 1>because the wake of a ship fades so quickly, they

0:40:57.320 --> 0:40:58.600
<v Speaker 1>leave no trace behind.

0:40:58.719 --> 0:41:00.440
<v Speaker 2>That's the same thing as I R C.

0:41:01.360 --> 0:41:01.520
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:04.840
<v Speaker 1>They actually do this whole sequence where that that ship

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:10.520
<v Speaker 1>analogy I just talked about is visualized on screen because folks,

0:41:10.600 --> 0:41:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I r C is boring, Like showing I r C

0:41:13.640 --> 0:41:17.320
<v Speaker 1>on screen is incredibly dull, So it's way more exciting

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to have a visualization of a meaningless ship analogy.

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:22.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:41:22.120 --> 0:41:25.400
<v Speaker 4>I r C is super boring to look at, but

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 4>it's very fun. You can make lots of friends in

0:41:27.680 --> 0:41:30.920
<v Speaker 4>I r C, so it's it is called Internet relay chat,

0:41:31.400 --> 0:41:34.680
<v Speaker 4>so that is a sure thing. People do use lead

0:41:34.760 --> 0:41:37.440
<v Speaker 4>speak in I r C, uh, even though lead speak

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:40.960
<v Speaker 4>is not that hard to read, right, And her definition

0:41:41.480 --> 0:41:44.640
<v Speaker 4>going into the ships made absolutely no sense to me

0:41:44.880 --> 0:41:48.479
<v Speaker 4>as an I r C user, because when I pop

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:51.560
<v Speaker 4>into I r C and then when I leave, my

0:41:51.719 --> 0:41:54.279
<v Speaker 4>chats are still there, and they are still there for

0:41:54.320 --> 0:41:56.480
<v Speaker 4>anybody to see who was also logged in at the

0:41:56.480 --> 0:41:57.040
<v Speaker 4>same time.

0:41:57.360 --> 0:41:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:41:58.000 --> 0:42:01.160
<v Speaker 4>So saying that they disappear after X amount of time

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:04.520
<v Speaker 4>is not necessarily true because anybody with a very very

0:42:04.560 --> 0:42:08.239
<v Speaker 4>simple script can capture everything that was said in an

0:42:08.239 --> 0:42:10.640
<v Speaker 4>IRC for X amount of time, for whatever time that

0:42:10.680 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 4>they want to save a file for, and then they

0:42:13.680 --> 0:42:16.320
<v Speaker 4>can upload that file anywhere that they want to. Yeah,

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:19.360
<v Speaker 4>so that this information disappears is completely false.

0:42:19.600 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I love that there's a I'm pretty sure it's the

0:42:22.200 --> 0:42:24.399
<v Speaker 1>same one. I'm not watching the clips as i'm going

0:42:24.440 --> 0:42:26.120
<v Speaker 1>through them, so I'm not entirely certain.

0:42:26.160 --> 0:42:27.480
<v Speaker 2>But I think there's a moment in this.

0:42:27.520 --> 0:42:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Where they have a desperate like take a screen shot,

0:42:30.920 --> 0:42:33.839
<v Speaker 1>take a screen shot, and she does it like at

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the last second before the connection's broken, and I was

0:42:36.560 --> 0:42:41.239
<v Speaker 1>laughing so hard that the idea of oh, yeah, you

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:45.279
<v Speaker 1>got to take a screenshotter it's gone forever. Yeah, it's

0:42:45.320 --> 0:42:49.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty ridiculous. And there is a funny little exchange where

0:42:49.160 --> 0:42:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the lady says like they'll be speaking in lait, but

0:42:52.000 --> 0:42:58.359
<v Speaker 1>don't worry, I also speak leaked, like, oh, screenwriter, you're

0:42:58.480 --> 0:42:59.640
<v Speaker 1>so adorable.

0:43:00.239 --> 0:43:02.719
<v Speaker 3>Oh so funny. Yeah, Lea, it's easy to speak, so

0:43:02.800 --> 0:43:03.600
<v Speaker 3>anybody can do it.

0:43:03.719 --> 0:43:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, it's really it's really just replacing certain

0:43:07.280 --> 0:43:10.359
<v Speaker 1>characters with other characters that look similar to the ones

0:43:10.400 --> 0:43:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you're replacing, and then sometimes purposefully misspelling words because someone

0:43:15.200 --> 0:43:18.040
<v Speaker 1>some at some point misspelled things people thought was funny

0:43:18.360 --> 0:43:19.439
<v Speaker 1>and they went with it, like.

0:43:19.400 --> 0:43:22.200
<v Speaker 2>Poone pone is a great example. Pwn.

0:43:22.480 --> 0:43:24.920
<v Speaker 1>It's supposed to be owned, but someone just did a

0:43:25.000 --> 0:43:29.400
<v Speaker 1>typo and then that typo became the word yep.

0:43:30.120 --> 0:43:31.399
<v Speaker 2>That's the lovely thing about it.

0:43:31.960 --> 0:43:33.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's it for the first part of the Worst

0:43:33.840 --> 0:43:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Hacking Scenes from Hollywood. Sadly, there's no shortage of subsequent

0:43:40.440 --> 0:43:43.279
<v Speaker 1>terrible hacking scenes out of Hollywood. It's one of those

0:43:43.320 --> 0:43:46.480
<v Speaker 1>things that admittedly can be a little tricky to portray

0:43:46.640 --> 0:43:49.799
<v Speaker 1>in an exciting and dramatic fashion, and so a lot

0:43:49.880 --> 0:43:52.800
<v Speaker 1>of liberties are taken when it comes to showing hacking

0:43:52.840 --> 0:43:57.160
<v Speaker 1>on screen. Next Friday, we will have part two of

0:43:57.200 --> 0:44:00.799
<v Speaker 1>this little two part series. Shannon again will be on

0:44:00.840 --> 0:44:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the show and we'll talk more about the worst scenes

0:44:04.440 --> 0:44:07.560
<v Speaker 1>well hacking scenes from Hollywood. Those the worst scenes from

0:44:07.600 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood would be a much longer show. I hope you

0:44:10.640 --> 0:44:13.200
<v Speaker 1>are all well, and I'll talk to you again really soon.

0:44:18.239 --> 0:44:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Tech Stuff is an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,

0:44:23.200 --> 0:44:26.919
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:44:26.960 --> 0:44:31.839
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows.