WEBVTT - False Impressions: Frederic Spitzer and His Master Forgers

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:06.559
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Criminalia, a production of shondaland Audio in partnership

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:21.079
<v Speaker 1>with iHeartRadio.

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Gold and jewel encrusted. The Rospigliosi cup had been displayed

0:00:20.079 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 2>as a work of sixteenth century Italian goldsmith ben Venuto

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:26.439
<v Speaker 2>Cellini at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 2>City since nineteen thirteen as part of the Benjamin Altman

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 2>bequest to the museum. But in the early nineteen eighties

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 2>it was discovered that the piece, one of the mets

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 2>most admired and beloved Renaissance treasures, was actually not et

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Cellini original at all. It was really a nineteenth century

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:51.279
<v Speaker 2>Vasters original, and there were others. Welcome to Criminalia, I'm

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Maria Trumurky.

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Holly Frye. Reinhold Vasters was in nineteenth century

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>German goldsmith. His work then zo changed when his wife

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Katerina Hamaker died in eighteen fifty nine, and that left

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>him with two young daughters to raise and a tight

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>budget on which to do so. Today he's famous for

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:18.119
<v Speaker 1>his forgeries of Renaissance objects, including jewelry and vessels in particular,

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>but no one ever knew or guessed about his counterfeits

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>until decades after his death. It all unraveled when the

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Victorian Albert Museum in London began an investigation about works

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>in their archive. Their work led to a revelation beyond

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:39.959
<v Speaker 1>the walls of the Vina. In time, it would be

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 1>discovered that at least forty five objects at the men

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>were actually Vaster's works masquerading as authentic pieces, and they

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>were not the only ones duped.

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Vasters is generally acknowledged as a gifted goldsmith and interpreter

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 2>of period pieces from the time of the European Renaissance.

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 2>Experts have linked some examples of nineteenth century jewelry as

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 2>well as some goldsmithing as his genuine work. He's not

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 2>all fakes. During his legit years. In eighteen fifty three,

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Basters was contracted to be part of the restoration of

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 2>the Ahen Cathedral, specifically to make reproductions of designs for

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Franz Bach, canon of the cathedral and curator at the

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 2>local Diocesan Museum, a museum for the Catholic Church. Bach

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 2>employed highly skilled goldsmiths to not only restore, but also

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 2>to replace liturgical objects that had been damaged through continuous

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 2>usage over time, and here Basters worked with fellow legitimate goldsmiths.

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:44.959
<v Speaker 2>In town records, he is mentioned for having a quote

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 2>workshop for the production of church vessels in the medieval style,

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 2>and he's once named as a jeweler in the town.

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Bach's project put Maasters on the radar of various dealers.

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 2>And this is when a man named Frederick Spitzer are

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 2>an antagonist. If we're going to hand out labels enters

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:06.919
<v Speaker 2>the story Frederick Spitzer.

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Vasters may have been the maker, but Baron Frederick Spitzer

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>was the seller, and it seems the mastermind behind a

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of forged works during the years he was alive.

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Spitzer was a Viennese art collector and dealer of antiquities,

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>specializing in medieval and Renaissance art. He worked with European collectors,

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:32.639
<v Speaker 1>including prominent names like Baron Adolph de Rothschild and Sir

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Richard Wallace, and he boasted that some of his art

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>objects came from the collections of, among others, Louis Fedel

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>de Bruges, Dumenil, Prince Soltikov, Baron Sellier, Alessandro Castellani, and

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Julian Greo. In the years close to Vaster's wife Katerina's death,

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Spitzer commissioned Vasters to be his in house forger. The

0:03:56.400 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>job offer was that Vasters would alter existing objects and

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>or create new forgeries that could be sold on the

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:07.119
<v Speaker 1>market as authentic works of art, all made to meet

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:13.119
<v Speaker 1>market demand. In addition to handling artifacts many of dubious providence,

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Correspondence between Spitzer and his associates suggested he was also

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>very much engaged in some underhanded negotiations and trading with

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>various collectors. For Masters, the partnership was simple, though it

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>kept him flush in work and money.

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 2>While experts consider his connection to Spitzer to be firmly established,

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 2>there is evidence of it in the historical record, the

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 2>record of works misattributed and provenances deliberately concealed. The extent

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 2>of that may never be known. Maasters doesn't get a

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 2>lot of recognition as a talented professional goldsmith during his lifetime,

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 2>though he was, but experts theorize from piecing together the

0:04:56.080 --> 0:05:00.279
<v Speaker 2>financial records of his anonymous works that Spitzer's very very

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 2>generous payments for his forgeries may have compensated for that.

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Maasters wasn't the only forger working for Spitzer. Spitzer had

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 2>a large number of pieces forged by other goldsmiths and artists,

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:14.599
<v Speaker 2>which he sold as authentic.

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>We're going to take a break here for a word

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 1>from our sponsor, and when we come back we will

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>talk about how Spitzer basically lived in a gallery and

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>how it was a stack of drawings that brought down

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 1>the forgery empire.

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Criminalia. Let's get to know more about Spitzer,

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 2>the guy who turned his own home into a museum,

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 2>as well as his unique way of making a sale.

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Spitzer's first big art deal was when he resold an

0:05:56.600 --> 0:06:01.479
<v Speaker 1>Albrecht Durer engraving at a huge profit. He established his

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 1>business in London in the eighteen forties and then moved

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to Paris in eighteen fifty two. By the time he

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:11.239
<v Speaker 1>was in Paris, he had been successful enough to turn

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>his home into a collector's dream. It became known as

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 1>Lemius Spitzer. Located near the Oucta Triomphe. His mansion was

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 1>filled as one would fill a museum gallery and as

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>you'd see at the Louver, for instance, objects were housed

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>in glass cases and everything was cataloged. This home slash

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>gallery was a popular high society hangout. Some came to

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>view the works he kept and some came to buy them.

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>American artist and ex pat John Singer Sargeant was a

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>regular presence there, for instance, and Hungarian composer and pianist

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Franz Liszt was often around the house too, and is

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>said to have been heard playing the piano on occasion.

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Among his regular clients were magnates including the Rothschilds, as

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>well as newspaper baron William Randolph Hurst. Spitzer showed his

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>works for sale in a particular way. He always showed

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a number of works together. No object was ever seen solo,

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and he always chose a mix of authentic pieces with

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>forged pieces.

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 2>He may have courted names like the Rothchilds, but Spitzer

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 2>also focused on the practice of revitalizing broken or damaged

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 2>works of art, particularly those made of metals. That practice

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 2>is not a crime and usually not a forgery. It's

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 2>technically just considered a repair, but it becomes problematic if

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 2>the piece is worked too far. Becoming unrecognizable from its

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 2>original state can turn an authentic work into a counterfeit

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 2>of itself. It's also problematic when deceptive descriptions, provenance, and

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 2>pedigrees get attached to those objects. Spitzer catered to the

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 2>type of person who could and would overlook some squishy

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 2>details to have an object they considered worthy of their

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 2>place in society.

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:12.239
<v Speaker 1>Paula Cordera, a fellow at the Center for the History

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>of Collecting at the Frick, said of Spitzer quote he

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>was really able to capitalize on the growing demand for

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>decorative art among a growing bourgeois class. She continued that

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>much of Spitzer's success came at least in part from

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>his ability to be one step ahead of trends. He

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:33.599
<v Speaker 1>was known to purchase works when they were out of vogue,

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>only to later sell them at a markup when they

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>were in demand. According to Cordera, it wasn't until more

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>than a decade after his death the curators began to

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>really take a look at some of the works from

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Spitzer's collection, and with time and research, they discerned that

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 1>some were heavily restored to a point that threatened their authenticity.

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 2>The controversy, though, really grew legs in nineteen seventy eight,

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 2>when more than one thousand drawings by vasters were rediscovered

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 2>in the archives of the Victoria and Albert Museum. The

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 2>VNA had acquired a library of his drawings, prints and

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 2>lithographs in nineteen nineteen, a decade after the goldsmith's death,

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 2>but they'd been in storage and out of sight. The

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:22.319
<v Speaker 2>drawings appeared to be renderings of known Renaissance objects, including

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 2>many pieces of jewelry. However, upon examination by VNA curator

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:33.439
<v Speaker 2>Charles Truman, notations found on the drawings in Master's handwriting

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 2>include very specific details such as which colors should be

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 2>used when enameling specific objects, and how these were drawings

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:48.559
<v Speaker 2>that actually made one's heart sink because they were production drawings,

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:52.839
<v Speaker 2>and they included precise instructions to other smiths on how

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 2>to craft certain existing Medieval and Renaissance objects, probably all

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 2>for Spitzer, and probably all sold as genuine. Each of

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 2>the thousand plus documents depicted a different piece. Most drawings

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 2>corresponded to known Renaissance objects in a number of well

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 2>known collections, and the revelation suddenly cast doubts on the

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 2>authenticity of many pieces. Equally revealing were associated documents that

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 2>showed other goldsmith's hate executed many pieces to Vaster's designs.

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>With this finding, experts now were suspicious of pretty much

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 1>every single object for which there was a corresponding Master's drawing.

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>In fact, even regarding Renaissance objects for which there were

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>no corresponding drawings, they were still suspicious. After all, what

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>if there were more drawings like this still to be found.

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>The documents confirmed that there was a forger, and also

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:54.959
<v Speaker 1>opened up the idea that there was likely more than

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>one forger, with works hidden in many collections. And that

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>was true true. Spitzer alone had several forgers working for him,

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>including Masters, of course, but also Alfred Andre, a highly

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>regarded nineteenth century Parisian restorer. Andrea was Chevalier of the

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:17.199
<v Speaker 1>Legion of Honor and widely respected for his legitimate metalwork,

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 1>but it also became clear to modern historians that he

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>was one of the goldsmiths who had executed many pieces

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to Vaster's designs.

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Building on the work Truman did at the VNA, scholar

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:33.719
<v Speaker 2>Rudolph Distelberger of the Museum of Art History in Vienna

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 2>began his own detective work in nineteen eighty three. At first,

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:43.079
<v Speaker 2>though in his investigation, it was Alfred Andre's forged Renaissance works,

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 2>not Masters, that came to light. So let's talk about

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 2>him for a moment. We know he was also connected

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:52.439
<v Speaker 2>to Spitzer. His forgeries, it was discovered, had deceived the

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:56.960
<v Speaker 2>National Gallery, the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the British Museum,

0:11:57.160 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 2>the Victoria and Albert, and the Walters Art in Baltimore.

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Through Spitzer. He was another craftsman hired to restore and

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 2>repair or aka make counterfeits. Distelberger concluded that quote in

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 2>order to enlarge his collection, Spitzer apparently commissioned Andre and

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Maasters to produce objects in the style of the Renaissance,

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 2>then presented them in his collection as originals of the

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:28.199
<v Speaker 2>sixteenth century. He played an inglorious role in this deception.

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Like the Masters drawings. Years later, Distelberger found physical evidence

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>of Andre's forgeries. Andre's family had kept many of the

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 1>models and casts that he had created, many of which

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>were used to recreate Renaissance objects and collections around the world.

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 2>We are going to take a break for word from

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 2>our sponsors, and when we're back we'll talk about the

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 2>fallout from the discovery of the forgery ring.

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Criminalia. Let's talk about what happened after

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the discovery of the blueprints and that the Rospiliosi Cup,

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a popular and treasured item, was fake.

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Philippe de Montebello, Museum director at the Metropolitan Museum of

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Art at that time, initially stated that they believe the

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 2>drawings quote might be marvelous chronicles of old pieces, but

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 2>we now know they are not. They contained too many

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:42.200
<v Speaker 2>instructions on how to make them. They were blueprints. We're

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 2>not sure why he kept them, but they're remarkable drawings,

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 2>and even forgers have pride. As an institution, the MET

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 2>was anxious and started to withdraw certain pieces from exhibition,

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 2>announcing that quote, we have been gradually removing things from

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 2>view for examination because we did not want to keep

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:04.079
<v Speaker 2>on view anything that might be doubtful.

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>By nineteen eighty four, the forgeries made worldwide headlines when

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the MET held a news conference to announce that Reinholdmasters,

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a goldsmith and restorer, had been more than a restorer.

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>They stated it had been concluded from his drawings that

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>many of the alleged antique objects in institutions around the world,

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>including the Met, had in fact been made in his

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>shop in Germany in the late eighteen hundreds, and that

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 1>included the Rospiliosi Cup exhibited at the Met. The Respiliosi

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 1>cup was considered a treasure and had long been attributed

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>to the Florentine goldsmith and sculptor benven Nutuccellini. In a

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>brochure in eighteen fifty two, it was described as a

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>salt vessel of gold enameled in different colors from the

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>years fifteen forty to seventy, said to be made by

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>benven Uttuccillini, the property of Prince Ris Bolioso of Rome.

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Art historian Eugene plom named the prince as the owner,

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>but also admitted that there were no documents authenticating the

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>attribution to Cellini. He claimed it had belonged to his ancestor,

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Grand Master of the Court, to the Grand Duke of Tuscany.

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>But then nothing more was heard of that object until

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 1>nineteen oh nine, when it was sold by art dealer

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Charles Wurthheimer to Benjamin Altman, who then bequeathed it to

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the Met.

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Upon close examination an inspection of the Rospiliosi Cup and

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 2>many other works, some objects were clearly made entirely from

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Vastar's Renaissance style blueprints, including a rock crystal vase mounted

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 2>in gold and a rock crystal candlestick mounted in silver guilt.

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Other objects were determined to be partly of authentic Renaissance derivation.

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 2>For instance, fragments of earlier works were remounted and reworked

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 2>by vast To, creating new, similar but forged work. And

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 2>then some works, including a pendant with a figure of

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Neptune enameled in gold and set in jewels and pearls,

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 2>aren't precise copies of Master's designs, but they are so

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 2>similar that scholars believe they can safely attribute them to

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 2>other craftsmen working from his instructions.

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Of the VNA's blueprints. Demonte Bello has also stated, quote,

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>most likely every major repository of Renaissance jewelry, metalwork, and

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>mounted crystals will find that a disturbing proportion of their

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>holdings date from the nineteenth century. This is irrefutable because

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>we have the actual drawings created by the maker. He continued, quote,

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>he captured the style of the Renaissance so well that

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 1>even today, if you were to put side by side

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 1>two pieces, one by Masters and one from the Renaissance,

0:16:56.480 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>very few curators could tell by eye alone. He was

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that good, which is why all the collections were fooled.

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Despite the fact that the works do not actually date

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 2>from the Renaissance. They do still yes, have value among

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:16.160
<v Speaker 2>many circles. De Montebello has stated, quote in their own right,

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 2>while they were made to deceive, these works are of

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:23.679
<v Speaker 2>enormous quality and great beauty, and they are important historically.

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 2>We intend to mount an exhibition in which we will

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 2>carefully explain the master's works, comparing them with authentic pieces

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 2>and showing the difference between the two. And it's true

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.440
<v Speaker 2>the museum doesn't hide them today, though they do now

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 2>attribute these works to masters.

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Of masters well. He purchased a house in Acham in

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>eighteen seventy two, and he lived there until his death

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen oh nine. By his later years, Vasters had

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:54.680
<v Speaker 1>become a man of means, and he became a collector

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>of decorative arts himself. In nineteen oh two, he exhibited

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>almost five hundred objects from his growing collection. His final

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>year as an active goldsmith appears to coincide with the

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>year of Spitzer's death, eighteen ninety and according to city records,

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>he was officially registered as retired in eighteen ninety.

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Five, and Spitzer a short entry in the Collector Journal

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 2>published in eighteen ninety reads quote, the Spitzer collection has

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 2>in the estimation of connoisseurs and amateurs. At least long

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Ben the Eighth Wonder of the World now and then

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 2>its possessor has allowed glimpses of it to be seen

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 2>in exhibitions, but as a rule it has been locked

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 2>and barred against vulgar and elect eyes in his roomy mansion,

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 2>which it stuffs like sausage from cellar to roof. Before

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 2>his death, Spitzer collaborated with art historian Emil Moligner on

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 2>a multi volume illustrated catalog of his private collection. Only

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 2>one volume was published before he died, but he left

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 2>detailed instructions for its completion in his will. The Spitzer collection,

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:09.879
<v Speaker 2>which contained more than four thousand items, was publicly auctioned

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 2>over the span of three months in eighteen ninety three.

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:16.400
<v Speaker 2>Most of the collection was bought by Australian born London

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 2>based private collector George Salting. He bequeathed his collection to

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 2>the British Museum, the National Gallery in London, and the

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Victoria and Albert Museum in nineteen oh nine. Spitzer's collection

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 2>was revered, but what no one knew when it was

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 2>auctioned was that some things were authentic, but some were not.

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Like Vaster's, Spitzer's duplicity wasn't known during his lifetime.

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to Spitzer and his forgers, According to

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 1>online art brokerage Artsy quote, at the very least, Spitzer's

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>story serves as a cautionary tale. When one encounters a

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 1>collection of work so numerous they stuff a house like

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 1>a sausage, one should always inquire a about how they

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:11.120
<v Speaker 1>were made. Indeed, listen, I like sausage. Who doesn't? Would

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you like a bogus bevy? As we consider how many

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>things sitting in collections are probably fake because of this man, Yes, okay,

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:22.360
<v Speaker 1>this one was one of those things. Where as we

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:26.920
<v Speaker 1>were looking at this, I kept thinking not about anything

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:30.679
<v Speaker 1>related to the time that the forgeries were made or

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 1>the period of time that they were forging, but instead

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 1>that magical time when all of this was exposed. The

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>early eighties were a real fun time for cocktails. There's

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of experimentation going on, and it is when

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>most people will say that a very popular cocktail today

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:58.360
<v Speaker 1>was invented, and that is what we are going to make,

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 1>a forgery of espresso martini.

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Do you know my history with the espresso martini? Have

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:07.239
<v Speaker 2>I ever told you, I don't. I really want to

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 2>like the espresso martini, and I also it's a similar

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:13.120
<v Speaker 2>thing for me, like chocolate martini. I very much want

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 2>to like something like that too, and I try. I

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:21.360
<v Speaker 2>at some point in the last let's go with decade

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 2>to fifteen years, decided I will always try it because

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:27.160
<v Speaker 2>there's going to be one out there that I like,

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 2>but I haven't yet.

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the good news is there are now a

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of versions. But the original was really just espresso,

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>coffee liqueur and vodka. It was very simple, and that

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>was created by Dick Bradsell in the UK right around

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty allegedly for a model who said that she

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>wanted to get woken up and messed up at the

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>same time. But that is not what we're making today.

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 1>We're making something that looks like it right, but also

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>has only three ingredients and also will we'll mess you

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 1>up for sure, So let's do it. And it's very yummy.

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:04.400
<v Speaker 1>It's very easy to make. You're going to take an

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>ounce of cognac and an ounce of dark spiced rum

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and put those together in your shaking tin and shake

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 1>them with ice until they are just frosty cold and

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>You're going to strain that into a martini glass with

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a few ice shards are green in there. Get ready

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>because this is going to sound crazy, but I'm telling

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you something great happens here. You're going to top it

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>with an ounce to two ounces, depending on your taste

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:37.120
<v Speaker 1>of root beer. If you really want to sell the illusion,

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you could put a couple of espresso beans on top.

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>But it looks like an espresso martini, but it could

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>not taste more different. But it is very spirit forward

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>because unlike our recent cocktail that included cream soda, where

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the taste of the spirit in it was obscured, this

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:55.879
<v Speaker 1>does not. You can still tell there's a lot of

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:57.959
<v Speaker 1>alcohol in it, like at this point it's two thirds

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>roughly of spirit, so it's very present. It is a

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>weird flavor. I'm not gonna lie. It's unexpected and it's strange.

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 1>But I loved it and found myself like I didn't

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:13.399
<v Speaker 1>even consciously do so. Often when I'm making drinks for

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the show, I'm doing it early in the day because

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:18.959
<v Speaker 1>we record in the afternoon, and I usually don't finish

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the drink. I'll either give it to my beloved or

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I will put it away or I'll just toss it

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>it happens. I realized after a while that I had

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>just been carrying it around sipping it. I was like, oh,

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:32.159
<v Speaker 1>I clearly like this drink, which I am calling the

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 1>slap in the face, because discovering all of these technical

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>drawings that were basically a manual to how to forge

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Renaissance art had to have felt like a slap in

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the face to the entire art community. That's not a

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 1>great feeling to be, like, how many of our things

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 1>are probably fake?

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Sorry? How many documents did you say there were?

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Yes, this one is another one that is a little

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>bit tricky to do. A mocktail. I will tell you

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the mocktail does not look as much like an espresso martini,

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>but it gets closer to the flavor of the original drink.

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:10.879
<v Speaker 1>Instead of that ounce of cogniac, you are going to

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:14.440
<v Speaker 1>take an ounce of white grape juice and doctor it up.

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:16.679
<v Speaker 1>I would let a little bit of clove sit in

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:19.439
<v Speaker 1>there for a little while, and I would throw in

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:21.640
<v Speaker 1>some nutmeg, and you're just gonna let that do its

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>thing for I don't know, ten minutes or so, and

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 1>then give it a little shake and then strain that

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 1>off because you don't want that stuff in there. Dark

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:30.639
<v Speaker 1>spiced drum, we're going to do our trick of a

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>dark tea. I would actually do a red tea here

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and not a black tea. And again, if you really

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>like spice, you can add something like a cardamom and

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:42.639
<v Speaker 1>it's going to do something really good. And then you

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 1>use your root beer and this makes also a very

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>very yummy especially when it's very cold. Something really cool

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 1>happens with these three things, and they're like, hi, we

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>would like to play today. It's sweeter than the alcoholic version.

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 1>So you could put it over ice if you want

0:24:57.600 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to dilute it a little bit down instead of making

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it look like a martini. But you're gonna be happy

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 1>and you won't feel like you got slapped in the face.

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 1>You could just do root beer and rum. If you

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>don't like the kgnac note, I love a little cognac.

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I probably made this because I was thinking of kognak

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:16.880
<v Speaker 1>recently and thinking a konnak in a minute. I really

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:19.479
<v Speaker 1>love a little cognac in that you think, why am

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I not doing that? Now? We are. We hope that

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>if you make this you find it fun and interesting

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and If you don't like it that you tweak it

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to make it super delicious for your palette. We will

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:32.640
<v Speaker 1>be right back here again next week with more stories

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 1>of forgeries and more bogus bevies. Criminalia is a production

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of Shondaland Audio in partnership with iHeartRadio. For more podcasts

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:54.120
<v Speaker 1>from Shondaland Audio, please visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.