WEBVTT - Bloomberg Wall Street Week - July 14th, 2023

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:02.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week.

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean may not have an overall recession. We're having

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:06.960
<v Speaker 2>a rolling recession. To Kanye Roll looks pretty strongly when

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 2>it comes to jobs.

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>The financial story is that shape our work.

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Three major regional bank failures send shockwaves through the banking system.

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 2>We're all trying to figure out what to make of

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 2>generative AI through.

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:19.320
<v Speaker 1>The eyes of the most influential voices.

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Welcome down, Doctor Paul Krugman, Ryan moynihan, Bank of America,

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 2>deebro Lair of the Paulson Institute, Len Hubbard of the

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Columbia Business.

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>School, Bloomberg Wall Street Week with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:32.880
<v Speaker 3>The big rally in Wall Street this week? Who gets

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 3>the credit? The Fed, banks or big Tech? This is

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 3>Wall Street Week. I'm Romaine Bossic in for David Weston.

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 3>This week, Catherine Judge of Columbia Law School and what

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 3>steper capital requirements will mean for banks and their willingness

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:46.160
<v Speaker 3>to lend.

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 4>What we really want is more lending during periods of distress,

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 4>and probably a little less lending when everything's going really well.

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 3>Rock Creek CEO Asani Beschloss on why the economies on mainland,

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 3>China and Taiwan are moving in different direction.

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 5>One thing that President v has created which will be

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 5>hard to undo is uncertainty.

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 3>And former CNN president John Klein on the disruptive effect

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 3>of AI on the business of media.

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 6>AI can be a very useful tool. On the other hand,

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 6>it can result in efficiencies for the studios.

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 3>The FED appeared to score one of its first victories

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 3>in the fight against inflation core CPI, posting its smallest

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 3>increase in June since twenty twenty one, but the FED

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 3>may hike again.

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 7>In July, it was very clear that inflation was and

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 7>still is at levels that are too high for their comfort.

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 7>I do think that the narrative both for the FED

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 7>and also for markets will now begin to change towards

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 7>growth towards employment.

0:01:56.920 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, China faces a different problem, delytionary concerns, prompting the

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 3>Central Bank to step in MEANINGSHIDA.

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 8>Going forward, the People's Bank of China will continue to

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 8>provide support for small, medium and private businesses.

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 3>Media executives gathering in Sun Valley, Idaho, and One Big

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Deal was all the buzz a US court rejecting the

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:21.959
<v Speaker 3>US government's challenge of that Microsoft did the buy Activision.

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 3>The company is now moving forward with some additional measures

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 3>to appease UK regulators and finally close out that deal.

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:32.359
<v Speaker 9>On the one hand, everyone was talking about the Microsoft's

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 9>activision deal, the efforts the FTC went to appeal the

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 9>decision by US district courts.

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 3>But strikes did loom over the annual gathering, members of

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 3>the sag AFTRA Actors Union joining writers who have been

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 3>on strike since May, making it the first time that

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 3>actors and writers have together walked out since nineteen sixty.

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 3>Back then, Ronald Reagan was president of the Actors Guild

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:00.359
<v Speaker 3>and Marilyn Monroe was still gracing the screen.

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 10>You cannot change the business model as much as it

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 10>has changed, and not expect the contract to change.

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:11.080
<v Speaker 3>Two and earnings kick off with a bit of a

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:13.639
<v Speaker 3>sigh of relief on Wall Street. JP Worg and Wells

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:16.800
<v Speaker 3>Fargo and City Group leading the big bank Earnings on

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 3>a high note, getting a big boost from the Fed's

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 3>recent rate heights, But we hit.

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:23.639
<v Speaker 2>A hard landing. It's going to be very difficult for

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 2>the banks, including JP Morgan, but that doesn't appear to

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 2>be the case at least today.

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 3>A goldilocks type of week for the economy, a bit

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 3>of an everything rally for equities, the S and P

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 3>five hundred jumping more than two percent on the week,

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 3>the Nasdaq surging more than three and the Russell two

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 3>thousand index of small cap stocks coming close to a

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 3>four percent game. Discretionary stocks helping to lead the advance,

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 3>so too did big tech, and so too did homebuilders

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 3>Pulti Group and Toll Brothers, closing out the week at

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 3>an all time high, Microsoft finishing a fraction of a

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 3>percent away from a fresh record itself. But the biggest

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 3>moves cross asset wise, we're in treasuries, commodities, and dollar,

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 3>the US currency weakening to a fifteen month low versus

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 3>a global basket of its peers, and two year treasury

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 3>yields swinging more than thirty basis points from peak to

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 3>trough this week, a volatility in that space that is

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:17.239
<v Speaker 3>expected to say as long as the Fed remains in play.

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:19.840
<v Speaker 3>The big catalyst for these market moves came in the

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 3>form of two big economic reports this week to show

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 3>US inflation reverting back to its lowest levels in at

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:29.279
<v Speaker 3>least two years. And that is where we start today.

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Mona Maha John joining us right now, senior investment strategists

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 3>at Edward Jones and Dennis de Busher, chief market strategists

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:39.039
<v Speaker 3>over at twenty two V Research and Mona. I'll start

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 3>with you. You look at that inflation report, particularly when

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 3>it comes to consumer prices, airfares down, used car prices down,

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 3>eight prices, which we've all been obsessing over for the

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 3>last couple of years, finally dropping back to sound down

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:52.720
<v Speaker 3>to something that's somewhat more reasonable.

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, remain Look, it was a nice week in markets

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 11>for the bulls and certainly for investors and consumers broadly.

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 11>You know, I'll highlight three quick things, and one, of course,

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 11>is that CPI report that you mentioned, and in fact,

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 11>inflation broadly surprised to the downside in both the CPI

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 11>and PPI prints. But the good news was in CPI

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 11>not only headline inflation, but we did see a bit

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 11>of cooling in core inflation as well, driven by downward

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 11>pressure in the housing market, and even that non housing

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 11>services inflation that the FED is tracking carefully started to

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 11>ease as well. Number two is the Fed itself. You know,

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 11>I think markets are now looking for perhaps one more

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 11>rate height coming out of the FED and maybe they

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 11>can stept to the sidelines after that. That is welcome news.

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 11>After putting upward pressure on interest rates for the past

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 11>sixteen months, raising borrowing costs for consumers and corporations, we

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 11>are seeing a resilient consumer and an economy that's holding in. There,

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 11>so we have a backdrop of lower inflation, perhaps a

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 11>FED moving to the sideline, and an economy that's holding up.

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:55.280
<v Speaker 11>That's good news for markets broadly.

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:57.039
<v Speaker 3>Well, Dennis, I want to get your thoughts here on

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 3>those economic t leads. I mean, because these are kind

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:02.160
<v Speaker 3>of the two big components of this economic narrative, right,

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 3>whether inflation is coming down to a reasonable enough level,

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 3>but also whether the economy is still unstable enough condition

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 3>following five percentage points of rate hikes out of the FED.

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, you bring up a really important point.

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 8>And if we have to go back to why markets

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 8>have done so well, we know that.

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:21.160
<v Speaker 12>Inflation is coming down.

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 13>The inflation appears to be coming down for now at least,

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 13>not the hardware.

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 12>You know, it can come down to the two ways.

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 8>An easy way which would be associated with the soft landing,

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 8>but the hard way, which be assiliunting obviously for the recession,

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 8>and so it is clear that it's coming down the

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 8>East way. For now, it's achieved. And part of the

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 8>reason we saw this big shift in the internals in

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 8>the market, so small capital performing like you know at

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:46.599
<v Speaker 8>the top of the show, retail stocks out warming deeper,

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 8>cipples balancing is because the housing data stable plods and

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 8>the housing data stabilize it. Because that is the tip

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 8>of the sphere when it comes to interest rate policy.

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 3>We heard from three big banks, JP, Morgan, City Group,

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 3>and Wells Fargo officially kicked off the earning season with

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 3>better than expected results all around. Is this a harbinger

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:06.280
<v Speaker 3>of things to come for the rest of the banking

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 3>sector and more importantly for the rest of corporate America overall.

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 3>Mona Mahajan is still with us over at Edward Jones

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 3>and Dennis to Busher over at twenty two V Research

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 3>and Dennis, I'll start with you. I think some of

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 3>the estimates coming into this earning season certainly not bullish,

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 3>but they certainly weren't as bearish as maybe what we

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 3>saw in the previous quarters.

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 12>Definitely not as parish previous quarters.

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 8>Hope you're earnings revisions are still running around the twenty

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 8>fifth percentile.

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 12>So you've seen a little bit of acceleration that earnings

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:35.239
<v Speaker 12>revisions coming into the quarter.

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 8>And typically when that happens, you beat five about two

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 8>bucks relative to estimates, and I analize, right, they will

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 8>get us somewhere in the two sixteen, two seventeen rings

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 8>for the year, So you know, coming in a little

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 8>bit low on the estimate side, that's not too out

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 8>of bounds relative to history, but not as nearly as poor.

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 13>And I was just saying early sentiment wise, not nearly

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 13>as poor as we've seen.

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 12>The last three or four earning season were really bad.

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 12>En upcoming in.

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 3>We got the banker in these earlier this morning, Dennis,

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 3>or at least three of the big banks here. There

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 3>were some upside surprises there. I'm wondering, what are you

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 3>expecting overall to hear out of not just the banks,

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 3>but overall the companies overall, in terms of how their

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 3>businesses are holding up.

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 12>Shopping lead well.

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 13>Relative to what we've heard and the fears over the

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 13>last I guess yeah, basically here and particularly since the

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 13>banking crisis, when people thought following up there was going

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 13>to be a significant type of financial conditions that was

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 13>going to lead to a sharp curation in the economy.

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 13>I think you're going to hear from companies that things

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 13>are holding up pretty well, consistent with slower growth than

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:47.239
<v Speaker 13>what we've seen the last two years, but expansionary like economy.

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 12>And we'll see what happens in the future with Ernie.

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 8>We'll see what happens in the future with the economy,

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 8>but for now, it seem relatively okay.

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:57.079
<v Speaker 12>Earnings consistent with an expansion mona.

0:08:57.120 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 3>We've already started to see a lot of equity strategists

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 3>and analysts are to ratchet up their expectations not only

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 3>for overall aggregate earnings for the S and P five hundred,

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 3>but of course you're twelve month price targets as well.

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, you know, look, I think the earnings recession that

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 11>we went through, and really Q four and Q one

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 11>came in negative year on year earnings growth for the

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:20.079
<v Speaker 11>S and P five hundred. Q Q two earnings, which

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:23.439
<v Speaker 11>we're getting right now, could also be the perhaps last

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 11>quarter that we get a negative year on year number.

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:28.199
<v Speaker 11>And then we start to see improvement in Q three

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 11>and Q four and really into twenty twenty four as well,

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 11>and so as we head towards the next six to

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 11>twelve months, we also know markets are pretty forward looking

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 11>right now, twenty twenty four estimates are calling for double

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 11>digit earnings growth. Now we will have to assess the

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 11>backdrop as we head into twenty twenty four, but if

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 11>we are in an environment where yields are moving lower

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:50.959
<v Speaker 11>and the economy is improving from any sort of softening,

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 11>we could certainly see a rebound in earnings growth. So

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 11>some of the momentum that we've seen in markets recently

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:00.199
<v Speaker 11>could be an expression of the direction of try level

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 11>of earnings over the next six months as well, So

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 11>we certainly see progress there. Of course, we've moved pretty far,

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 11>pretty fast, as we noted, across equities now, and so

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:12.559
<v Speaker 11>we think some bird of consolidation makes sense. Perhaps we'll

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 11>get some earnings figures over the next few weeks that

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 11>give us some reason to pause, but we do think

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 11>broadly the opportunity will come as we head towards the

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 11>back half.

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 4>Of this year.

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and it'll be interesting to see whether some of

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 3>the moves that we see in equity market actually start

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 3>to broaden out just a little bit. Our appreciation to

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 3>both of you monamaje On over at Edward Jones, Dennis

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 3>the Busher over at twenty two V Research.

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Coming up. One China, But Two Economies. We talked with

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 2>us Sonny Bechelist of Rock Creek about the disappointing performance

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 2>of mainland China so far this year and how different

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 2>it is from Taiwan.

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 5>Who knew in the beginning of the year, that's with

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 5>ais becoming so important and the Taiwan news market would

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 5>do so well.

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 2>That's next on Wall Street Week on Bloomberg.

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week with David Weston from

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 2>One China, but Two Economies. The United States continues to

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 2>go out of its way to underscore its One China policy,

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Speaker 2>as Secretary of State Blincoln did during his recent visit

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 2>to Beijing. Our reiterated the long standing US One China policy.

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 2>That policy has not changed. We do not support Taiwan independence.

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 2>We were made opposed to any unilateral changes to the

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 2>statis quo by either side, even as the United States

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 2>seeks to compete with that one China without coming to blows.

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:46.199
<v Speaker 14>I also believe that the United States in China should

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 14>seek a relationship of healthy economic competition that is not

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 14>winner take all, but with a fair set of rules,

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 14>we benefit both our countries over time.

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 2>But recently the economies of mainland China and Taiwan have

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 2>been headed in very different directions. As the mainland finds

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:10.439
<v Speaker 2>it's harder than expected to come back from the COVID lockdown.

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 12>I have been a.

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 4>Little surprised with the degree of how quickly it's moderated.

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 6>China is going to need to do more stimulus.

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Leading Beijing this week to undertake new stimulus measures, particularly

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 2>to help its struggling property market.

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 10>There's a lot of expectation that there will be more

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 10>coming from Beijing to help the property sector, but the

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 10>question is what can the government actually do when there

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 10>is so much debt at the local government level.

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 2>While Taiwan continues to thrive economically with the move to

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 2>AI spurring on chip manufacturer TSMC and lifting the entire market.

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 3>So why is Taiwan and this bull run and can

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 3>it last?

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 5>One things?

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 11>For sure, stocks have been riding on this AI wave,

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:53.199
<v Speaker 11>but the head.

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Of the Taiwan Stock Exchange says it's not just Ai

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 2>that is driving market strength, as.

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 15>The pace of the US is His high stowing and

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 15>also the Girlball economy remain the statues. I think mostly investors,

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 15>we all pay attentions. Again, I'm Peter A. Bresse and

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:17.680
<v Speaker 15>the kesh In Frost. I expect it in the second

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 15>half of this year.

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 2>All of which makes the geopolitics across the Taiwan Strait

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:27.439
<v Speaker 2>just that much more complicated. And to take us through

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:31.559
<v Speaker 2>the geopondse and the economics of mainland China and its environs,

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 2>we welcome to somebody who knows it terribly well. She

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 2>is a Sunny bachelist. She is the CEO of Rock

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Creek of Sanae. You come on regular. We really value

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 2>you on Wall Street. We thank you for being here.

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 2>As I say, you've spent a lot of your career

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 2>dealing with and around China. Start with what I would

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 2>call mainland China right now, I think that if you

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 2>go back to the first of the year, people expect

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:54.199
<v Speaker 2>it to really be a rebound year for China, given

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 2>what had happened with COVID doesn't seem to be playing

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 2>out that way.

0:13:57.480 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 5>You're so right. Stated in the beginning of the year

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 5>markets went up twenty percent. People expected markets to be

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 5>up another ten to twenty percent in mainland China with

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 5>all the geopolitical issues going on. If anyone had guessed,

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:14.560
<v Speaker 5>you would think Taiwan would be down and the rest

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 5>of Asia would be sort of so so, and Asian

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 5>would be doing relatively well. And if you look actually today,

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 5>it's a very very different story. Number one, what you

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 5>saw is as China came out of COVID, it has

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 5>been taking much longer. Chinese consumers were supposed to be

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 5>the big fource carrying us out of COVID and sort

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 5>of creating this huge growth in the economy, and they

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 5>have been really scared because they went through their savings

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 5>during three years and they are trying to save more.

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 5>And the uncertainties that have been created both internally and

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 5>by geopolitics is getting the Chinese consumer to save more

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 5>and spend less now At the same time, I should say,

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 5>what happened also is that in Taiwan, for example, where

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 5>we did not necessarily expect this kind of rise of

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 5>like twenty two percent year to date. Who knew in

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 5>the beginning of the year that with ai becoming so important,

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 5>the micro chip that is made in Taiwan would become

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 5>even more important and the Taiwanese a market would do

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 5>so well. Last but not least. Of course, you've seen

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 5>a lot of outflows from US and European and other

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 5>global investors going out of China. If anything, the flows

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 5>seem to be increasing coming into July than getting reduced,

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 5>and a lot of very interesting phenomena going on on

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 5>that point.

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 2>So, Sonny, as a longtime investor, you're the first one

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 2>to know that markets go up, markets go down. You

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 2>can't overreact to short term developments. When you look at

0:15:57.200 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 2>mainland again, i'll call it mainland China for the moment,

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 2>how much of this is a short term thing, do

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:05.479
<v Speaker 2>you think? And how much are there larger underlying structural

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 2>factors that may hold back mainland China from the remarkable

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 2>growth we've seen or the last generation.

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 5>David, I think the fact that you have twenty percent

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 5>youth unemployment is a very big factor. That's a long

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 5>term issue and that is not going to get affected

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 5>by short term monetary policy changes. So even though at

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 5>the moment the monthly policy is trying to help push

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 5>the economy forward, the job creation is much less, particularly

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 5>because these jobs were in the tech sector, in services

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 5>in areas that have got affected and have not been

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 5>expanding as much as you would expect. The other area

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 5>I think to look at in China that has been

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 5>affected is sort of the old age population and the

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 5>demographics that also, if you look long term, is a

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 5>big issue with the aging of the population in China.

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 5>With Secretary Yellans visit, we saw we went from decoupling

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 5>to the risking and what the term she used last

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 5>week while she was in China was diversifying. I think

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 5>every country, having experienced the issues the supply chain issues

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:20.120
<v Speaker 5>that the experience, including the US during COVID, is diversifying

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 5>its sources of input and trade, and we saw for

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 5>example Mexico overtake China in terms of trade. Those I

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 5>think are longer term issues as countries, including the US,

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 5>diversify trade sources. There is one big positive though, looking

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 5>at China, which is that they have continued to invest

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 5>in their green economy, not as much as they could

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 5>or should. In fact, Secretary in fact mister carry will

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 5>be will be going there shortly and I think that

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 5>meeting will be quite important. But even looking at their

0:17:56.920 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 5>domestic economy, the Chinese are putting in a lot of

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 5>resources and investments into ev into solar. As you know,

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:09.919
<v Speaker 5>they're still the biggest supplier to the world of solar

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 5>facilities as well as now starting to become the largest producer.

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:19.359
<v Speaker 2>Of ev asny. You mentioned the demographics issues in China.

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:23.159
<v Speaker 2>Perhaps a related issue is for some time China was

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:25.679
<v Speaker 2>something of a talent magnet. I remember going over there

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:28.919
<v Speaker 2>a few years ago, and they're attracting Chinese American scientists

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 2>back to mainland China to live with their families. Is

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 2>there a risk of really not altogether turning around, but

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 2>actually reducing the attraction of mainland China for talent from

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 2>around the world because of some of the reforms as

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 2>you would put it from presidency.

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 5>I think we have about three hundred thousand Chinese students

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:52.199
<v Speaker 5>in the US, and a lot of them would go

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:55.359
<v Speaker 5>back to China, and there's a question mark as to

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 5>whether that flow will be back to China or back.

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:01.439
<v Speaker 5>Some stay here, some go in to other countries for

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 5>exactly the reason you said. For example, Ai, which is

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 5>a very exciting area for some of the scientists you

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 5>are talking about, is heavily government controlled, right, So if

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:14.719
<v Speaker 5>you are working for the largest state owned enterprises and

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:19.399
<v Speaker 5>under direct government supervision. You will be you will be

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.439
<v Speaker 5>benefiting from working on AI. But if you're working in

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 5>the private sector, in some of the private sector companies

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 5>or the ones that we're working with the venture industry

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 5>in the US, that is something that is now think

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 5>of the past, we've seen that a kind of cooperation

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:38.679
<v Speaker 5>between venture in the US and venture in China.

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:39.199
<v Speaker 12>Duendo.

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 5>It's not gone, it's still there is still some going on,

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 5>but at a very different level. So that will definitely

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 5>impact the flow of the brain flow as it were

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:52.160
<v Speaker 5>into China. Asta.

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 2>It's always so good to have your walls. Rybick, thank

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 2>you so much. As ny Rshalist, she is the CEO

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 2>of Rock Creek.

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Coming up.

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Media at a crossroads as leaders meet in Sun Valley

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 2>in the middle of a strike with more uncertainty than

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 2>they've seen for a long time. We go through it

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:12.679
<v Speaker 2>with Streaming and Cable executive Jonathan Klein.

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 6>They know something is coming their way, they just don't.

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:19.879
<v Speaker 2>Know what that's next. On Wall Street Week on Bloomberg,

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 2>this is Wall Street Week. I'm David Weston This week,

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 2>media moguls had their annual Allen and Company meeting out

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 2>in Sun Valley with the fundamentals of their business more uncertain,

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:40.440
<v Speaker 2>perhaps than ever before, as people rush to a streaming

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 2>world with uncertain profits, the basic cable model is melting

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 2>out from under them, and strikes are starting to shut

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 2>down their businesses all together. To take us through where

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 2>the business of media is heading, Welcome down, Jonathan Klin.

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 2>He's a former PRESIDENCYNN now a media entrepreneur whose latest

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 2>venture is Hanging Media, a sports streaming platform. John, Thank

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 2>you so much for being with us. Thanks for having

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 2>me so you know this business over a number of

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 2>years from the point of view of cable as well

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 2>as now streaming. You understand it. Give us your sense

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 2>of how fundamental the shift is as we, I guess,

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 2>are moving away from cable pretty quickly into this streaming world.

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 6>It's all exploded right in front of our faces. There's

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 6>more change hitting media today than ever in the course

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 6>of either of our careers. It's all accelerated so much,

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 6>and ultimately it comes down to consumers embracing the idea

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:37.160
<v Speaker 6>that they really do have total control in the media ecosystem.

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 2>One of the things that strikes me is I certainly

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:42.439
<v Speaker 2>watch streaming services, but if you asked me what service

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 2>it was on. I'm sorry to say often I couldn't

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:46.400
<v Speaker 2>tell you I know what the program is, I don't

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 2>necessarily know what the services. What's the role of brands.

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 2>We used to know ESPN, we used to know CNN.

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure if we know the brands and streaming

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 2>as well.

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 6>The strongest brands today are the shows themselves and often

0:21:57.840 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 6>the creators.

0:21:58.920 --> 0:21:59.119
<v Speaker 11>You know.

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 6>I was the media consultant for Succession on HBO.

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:04.439
<v Speaker 2>Congratulations on them.

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 6>They were an incredible group. I mean Jesse Armstrong, who

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 6>was the creator and show runner, a phenomenal guy and

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 6>a wonderful manager for all of the managers who might

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:19.120
<v Speaker 6>be watching this, really understood how to empower a team

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:23.919
<v Speaker 6>to yield amazing results. I mean, no ego there, but

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:28.400
<v Speaker 6>he is sitting pretty Because if you are a streaming

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 6>service witnessing twenty four percent churn year over year, you

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 6>need retention, and shows like Succession or White Lotus or

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:45.199
<v Speaker 6>d and or or pick them, they are retention magnets.

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 6>That's what keeps users there. That said users are completely promiscuous.

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:55.439
<v Speaker 6>I just saw a survey I think it was Publisher's

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 6>Clearinghouse to the survey, and they found that only less

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 6>than seven percent of viewers plan to keep the subscription

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 6>service that they are currently subscribed to. So what that

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 6>means is consumers completely understand their ability to float from

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:16.160
<v Speaker 6>service to service in search of the shows that they want.

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 2>But does that suggest, as we would call in the

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 2>financial world, of maturity mismatch. On the one hand, you

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:25.639
<v Speaker 2>have to make long term commitments to creators, to the actors,

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:29.160
<v Speaker 2>the writers, the producers, tens of millions, hundreds of millions

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:31.199
<v Speaker 2>of dollars on these series. At the same time, on

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:33.919
<v Speaker 2>the revenue side, you don't have the assurance of the

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:35.880
<v Speaker 2>cable dollars coming in. And think about this.

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:41.640
<v Speaker 6>Added to that, the most popular network on television today

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:46.919
<v Speaker 6>is YouTube. Everyone's smart TV. You power it up. You

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 6>can watch not only traditional broadcasts, but you can watch

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:53.879
<v Speaker 6>internet chat. So YouTube has something like one hundred and

0:23:53.920 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 6>sixty million regular viewers. Their viewership dwarfs Netflix, Disney plus

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 6>Max combined.

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 2>Let me add a further complication of this, and that's

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 2>artificial intelligence. Right now, we have the writers on strike,

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:10.120
<v Speaker 2>we've got issues about SAG after whether they go out,

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 2>and as I understand, artificial intelligence and its role in

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 2>the creative process is key to that element. What is

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 2>artificial intelligence likely to do to all of this?

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:22.680
<v Speaker 6>So AI and I ran an AI company that Apple

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 6>acquired a couple of years ago and it's now Apple's

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 6>Media Intelligence division. AI can be a very useful tool

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:40.400
<v Speaker 6>to creators, enabling them to make projects that look every

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 6>bit as good as the most lavish, high end productions

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:48.400
<v Speaker 6>on any of the services, which is going to unleash

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 6>another tide of creativity. On the other hand, it can

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 6>result in efficiencies for the studios and the networks, so

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 6>they can outsource some of the creative process that.

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Jonathan Klein, he's the former head of CNN and now

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 2>a serial media entrepreneur.

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 16>The problem is they have to sell off assets in

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 16>order to keep their capital up. In the bank's shrink

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 16>and is their asset based shrinks. They can't loan out money,

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 16>and that's the real problem because banks are contracting and

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 16>the marginal borrowers shut out, and that kills the economy.

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:24.359
<v Speaker 2>To take us through the issues banks face. In twenty

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 2>twenty three, we welcome now Catherine Judge. She's professor at

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 2>Columbia Law School. So, Kate, thank you so much for

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 2>being back here on Wall Street. We great to have

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:34.119
<v Speaker 2>you before we get to the question that Marty addressed

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 2>about whether it's going to affect lending or not. First

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 2>of all, tell us why did Michael Barr think he

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 2>needed this at all? What's the issue that they're addressing.

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:43.879
<v Speaker 5>So a couple of things.

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 4>One is, we still haven't fully implemented Basil three in

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 4>the United States. So there's been a lot of conversation

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 4>for a long time around Basil three end game and

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:56.479
<v Speaker 4>helping to bring the US into conformity with some of

0:25:56.520 --> 0:26:00.879
<v Speaker 4>the international standards they degree to. But Michael Barr has

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:04.919
<v Speaker 4>gone further. Price sher Bar very shortly after taking office

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:08.479
<v Speaker 4>said he's going to engage in a broad, holistic review

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 4>of capital requirements. There's a whole host of requirement that

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 4>we're put into place in Dodd Frank modified somewhat since then,

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 4>and he wanted to take a more comprehensive look of

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 4>how they work together, how well they were working, and

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 4>the changes that needed to be made. So what the

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 4>speech was the summary of what he sees as the

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 4>problems and how he wants to proceeed. And it is

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 4>going to mean more capital for all the large banks.

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:35.639
<v Speaker 2>Let's go beyond the banks and the effects of this

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 2>potentially and go back again to what Marty's Wige said,

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:40.880
<v Speaker 2>what Randy Quarrels is saying now. I talked to Mike

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:43.439
<v Speaker 2>Brian moynihand at Bank of America two free weeks ago,

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 2>and he said, it's a very simple thing for Bank

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 2>of America. For every one hundred basis points increase in

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 2>the capital requirements, it means one hundred and fifty billion

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 2>dollars less in loans. Does that sound right? And does

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:55.200
<v Speaker 2>that really have an effect on the real economy as

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 2>it were?

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 4>Again, a bank CEO is going to know better than

0:26:57.600 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 4>I'm exactly how those trade offs are happening. Everything with

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of grain of salt. There are meaningful

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 4>trade offs, but two important qualifications. So first, when banks

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:10.159
<v Speaker 4>pull back up, so first it's hard to know how

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:11.679
<v Speaker 4>much acually going to pull back on lending.

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:13.640
<v Speaker 5>When they do pull back on lending.

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 4>Another challenge that arises is not that that lending doesn't happen,

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 4>that lending moves outside of the banking space to less

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 4>regulated domains. So a lot of what we have to

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 4>pay attention to is where these loans are being made.

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 4>But the other core thing to note is not all

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:32.639
<v Speaker 4>lending is of equal social value, right, What we really

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 4>want is more lending during periods of distress, and probably

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 4>a little less lending when everything's going really well and

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 4>assets are potentially inflated. And so one of the things

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 4>we know from history is that better capitalized banks tend

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 4>to be more willing to make loans during periods of distress,

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 4>which is when we most need that lending. So my

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 4>guess is by share Bard's response would be, even if

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:02.360
<v Speaker 4>we have a little less blending during the good times,

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:05.040
<v Speaker 4>we're going to have more lending when we most need

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 4>it during the bad times, in ways that are going

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 4>to make us overall better off.

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:11.679
<v Speaker 2>Kate, I'm not going to ask you to predict the

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 2>future necessarily, but is this possibly a candidate for one

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 2>of those times we're going to need a little more help.

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:20.200
<v Speaker 2>We're just going in a bank earning season now this

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:23.400
<v Speaker 2>week and next week, and there's a lot of anticipation

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 2>about watching exactly default rates, delinquency rates, reserves being taken,

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 2>particularly in the consumer areas. There are a lot of

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 2>concern that we're going into one of those difficult periods.

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 2>What are you expecting? What are you looking for?

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 4>I think I'll be looking really closely at what we

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 4>actually see in terms of the productions, right, So we

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 4>want to know what the default rates are looking like,

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 4>what is the rate at which they are accelerating. But

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 4>a lot of what we want to see is what

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 4>are the projections that the different banks are making regarding

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 4>how much additional pain they see coming down the road.

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 4>I think we're certainly going to see some challenges, and

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 4>the question really is going to be bad magnitude. You know,

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 4>we're helped a little bit by some of the recent

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 4>inflation data and hopefully some stabilization and the economy which

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 4>would mean balancing out and a little more of the

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 4>soft landing, but that can't be guaranteed, so there's still

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 4>going to be a lot of noise in all the figures.

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 4>But part of what we're going to be trying to

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 4>figure out is is there a possibility not just on

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 4>the employment side, but the employment side as it interacts

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 4>with the lending and the credit of the ability of

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 4>getting through all this.

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Kay, thank you so much. Always great to have

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 2>you on Wall Street Week. Really appreciate that's Katherine Judge Supers,

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Professor at Law at Columbia university coming up. Trying so

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 2>hard to get into the club that just doesn't want you.

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 2>That's next on Wall Street Week on Bloomberg.

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Well Street Week with David Weston from

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Finally, one more thought. I refuse to join any club

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 2>that would have me as a member, so joked Groucho Marx.

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 2>But these days some of those clubs are getting pretty picky.

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 2>Take the Club of NATO for example. Sure, they moved

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 2>this week to admit two new members in Sweden and Finland,

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 2>even though if Turkey had some doubts right up to

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 2>the end.

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 15>Under ratification of Sweden's membership does not mean the end.

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 12>Of cooperation with Turkeia, far from it.

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 2>And though they let two more into the club, they

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 2>gave Ukraine something of a cold shoulder, saying they will

0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 2>consider it somewhere down the road without any indication of when,

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 2>which didn't make President Zelenski or his foreign minister any

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 2>too happy.

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 17>These decisions they make our path to NATO shorter, and

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 17>they could have done it faster too if there was

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 17>a clear indication when the invitation to Ukraine would be extended.

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 2>And then there's the Club of the Financial World, which

0:30:57.120 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 2>recently voted long term member Crispin Oday off the island

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 2>for allegations of some pretty odious conduct.

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 5>We're in the process of moving away from that.

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Business and active as short sellers have never truly been

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 2>embraced by the club of financial players, something felt powerfully

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 2>by Andrew Left, who's under investigation by the Department of

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Justice and the SEC. People think there's just like underground

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 2>network of short sellers who try to ruin companies or

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 2>anything like that. It doesn't work like that. But whoever

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 2>thought that the world of affordable housing would itself start

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 2>to act like an exclusive club. We all know we

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 2>don't have enough existing houses for sale.

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 12>The new home.

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Market is benefiting from a very severe shortage of existing

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 2>homes for sale, and that makes it awfully difficult for

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 2>ordinary people to afford a house.

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 12>The post single multi in house prices.

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, I do think we have an affordability issue

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 2>that needs to be resolved one way or the other,

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 2>which could lead some as fire homeowners to take some

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 2>risks they probably shouldn't a magnificent new home that they

0:31:59.160 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 2>bought for a song who says they can't have it all,

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 2>But that assumes they can get someone to sell in

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 2>the house in the first place. This week comes news

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 2>of the Nimbi that is not in my backyard phenomenon

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 2>coming to none other than Levittown out on Long Island.

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Levittown was a series of housing golls built by William

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:23.760
<v Speaker 2>Levitt after World War II for returning vets. The whole

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 2>idea was affordable housing for eighty four thousand people, mass produced,

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 2>government subsidized, and with the price of just seven nine

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 2>hundred dollars a house. But time has moved on, and

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 2>with it the price of houses in Levittown now averaging

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 2>over five hundred and seventy five thousand dollars, helped by

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 2>local restrictions on multi family residences. While New Jersey allows

0:32:45.920 --> 0:32:49.080
<v Speaker 2>about twenty five new apartment buildings per thousand people a year,

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco builds about sixteen. Out of Long Island, the

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 2>number is just two point three multi family units per

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 2>thousand per year. It turns out that all those residents

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 2>have won it's affordable housing are pretty picky about their neighbors.

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Get off my lawn. That does it. For this episode

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 2>of Wall Street Week, I'm David Weston This is Bloomberg.

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 2>See you next week,