1
00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,880
Speaker 1: In the wake of the stabbing deaths of two men

2
00:00:03,040 --> 00:00:06,880
Speaker 1: and the slashing of another who intervened when apparent white

3
00:00:06,880 --> 00:00:10,920
Speaker 1: supremacists allegedly shouted anti Muslim comments at two women in Portland,

4
00:00:11,280 --> 00:00:13,880
Speaker 1: the mayor of Portland, Oregon, is asking the federal government

5
00:00:13,920 --> 00:00:16,639
Speaker 1: to cancel permits for two rallies scheduled to be held

6
00:00:16,640 --> 00:00:18,920
Speaker 1: in the city in the next couple of weeks. One

7
00:00:18,960 --> 00:00:21,120
Speaker 1: of the rallies is being called a Trump free speech

8
00:00:21,160 --> 00:00:24,200
Speaker 1: rally and the other is being called a march against Sharia,

9
00:00:24,800 --> 00:00:27,520
Speaker 1: and the mayor says that these are what he's terming

10
00:00:27,600 --> 00:00:31,800
Speaker 1: alt right rallies, but his request may raise concerns under

11
00:00:31,840 --> 00:00:34,800
Speaker 1: the First Amendment. Our guests to talk about the mayor's

12
00:00:34,840 --> 00:00:37,760
Speaker 1: request of the federal government is Eugene Vallaka, professor at

13
00:00:37,880 --> 00:00:40,400
Speaker 1: u c l A Law school and an expert on

14
00:00:40,440 --> 00:00:43,440
Speaker 1: many things, including the First Amendment. Eugene, always good to

15
00:00:43,440 --> 00:00:46,480
Speaker 1: have you on the program. Um we have you know there.

16
00:00:46,520 --> 00:00:49,680
Speaker 1: You've had these murders in Portland which are pretty horrific. Uh.

17
00:00:50,200 --> 00:00:52,880
Speaker 1: The mayor says that the city is grieving from them,

18
00:00:53,000 --> 00:00:55,240
Speaker 1: and it's a bad time for this kind of rally,

19
00:00:55,320 --> 00:00:58,160
Speaker 1: that it's gonna he he believes apparently is going to

20
00:00:58,240 --> 00:01:01,560
Speaker 1: express views that are consistent with at least some of

21
00:01:01,560 --> 00:01:04,319
Speaker 1: them will be consistent with the views of the person

22
00:01:04,360 --> 00:01:08,399
Speaker 1: who allegedly committed to murders here in another slashing. Is

23
00:01:08,440 --> 00:01:11,880
Speaker 1: there any basis, Eugene for the government to cancel the

24
00:01:11,920 --> 00:01:15,960
Speaker 1: permits for these rallies? No. Uh. Just to give an analogy,

25
00:01:16,080 --> 00:01:20,000
Speaker 1: imagine that there is a shooting of a police officer

26
00:01:20,080 --> 00:01:24,000
Speaker 1: by someone who believes police officers should be killed. Uh.

27
00:01:24,000 --> 00:01:27,960
Speaker 1: And is that a basis for canceling a planned rally

28
00:01:28,000 --> 00:01:32,920
Speaker 1: by people who harshly condemned police officers. Absolutely not. What

29
00:01:33,160 --> 00:01:36,000
Speaker 1: if the rally some of the people in the audience

30
00:01:36,280 --> 00:01:39,680
Speaker 1: will take the view that actually killing police officers are justified,

31
00:01:39,680 --> 00:01:43,080
Speaker 1: of course, a view that I totally disagree with. Is

32
00:01:43,120 --> 00:01:46,400
Speaker 1: that a basis for canceling the rally? Absolutely not. Uh.

33
00:01:46,480 --> 00:01:49,320
Speaker 1: Speech is protected regardless of its viewpoint, even if the

34
00:01:49,400 --> 00:01:54,800
Speaker 1: viewpoint expresses hostility based to Muslims, or hostility to police

35
00:01:54,800 --> 00:01:58,080
Speaker 1: officers and hostility to capitalists or to the one percent,

36
00:01:58,240 --> 00:02:04,000
Speaker 1: or or to strike breakers or whatever else. And Uh,

37
00:02:04,040 --> 00:02:06,600
Speaker 1: a rally can't be canceled just because of a fear

38
00:02:06,680 --> 00:02:09,919
Speaker 1: that some people, some tiny fraction of the audience might

39
00:02:09,960 --> 00:02:14,320
Speaker 1: actually turn that hostility into criminal violence, Eugene. Just for

40
00:02:14,360 --> 00:02:17,520
Speaker 1: the sake of argument, suppose that there was a way

41
00:02:17,520 --> 00:02:20,840
Speaker 1: to prove through memos of this group to emails of

42
00:02:20,880 --> 00:02:24,760
Speaker 1: this group, let's say, or flyers, that they intended to

43
00:02:24,800 --> 00:02:30,200
Speaker 1: incite violence with words and signs. Would that change anything?

44
00:02:30,919 --> 00:02:33,359
Speaker 1: So the Supreme Court has made it quite clear. There's

45
00:02:33,400 --> 00:02:36,480
Speaker 1: a case called Brandenburg View, Ohio from that deals with

46
00:02:36,520 --> 00:02:40,320
Speaker 1: exactly this issue. Supreme Court has said that UH. Speech

47
00:02:40,480 --> 00:02:44,680
Speaker 1: cannot be punished on the grounds that it's intended to

48
00:02:44,720 --> 00:02:48,880
Speaker 1: advocate crime unless it's intended to end likely to promote

49
00:02:49,040 --> 00:02:53,000
Speaker 1: imminent criminal conduct, which is to say, criminal conduct within

50
00:02:53,040 --> 00:02:57,880
Speaker 1: the next few minutes, hours, maybe day or two. Uh So, Yes,

51
00:02:57,960 --> 00:03:01,720
Speaker 1: if somebody is trying to organize a rally outside of

52
00:03:01,800 --> 00:03:07,800
Speaker 1: somebody some building, let's say uh uh, and UH is

53
00:03:08,080 --> 00:03:11,440
Speaker 1: egging on the crowd outside of that building saying let's

54
00:03:11,560 --> 00:03:14,360
Speaker 1: rush the place and burn it down, yes, that is

55
00:03:14,440 --> 00:03:18,480
Speaker 1: punishable incitement. But if older doing is they're trying to

56
00:03:18,520 --> 00:03:21,800
Speaker 1: instill views that they hope eventually will lead to criminal conduct,

57
00:03:21,840 --> 00:03:25,120
Speaker 1: that's constitutionally protected. And that emerged in part from the

58
00:03:25,160 --> 00:03:28,080
Speaker 1: communist air cases because in fact, there was lots of

59
00:03:28,120 --> 00:03:31,400
Speaker 1: evidence that communists who were trying to promote crime in

60
00:03:31,440 --> 00:03:34,200
Speaker 1: the source sense of violent revolution, which of course criminal

61
00:03:34,240 --> 00:03:36,040
Speaker 1: would have involved a great deal of murder, as of

62
00:03:36,040 --> 00:03:41,840
Speaker 1: course communist revolutions always have. But the but the Supreme Court,

63
00:03:42,040 --> 00:03:45,360
Speaker 1: after some fumbling around in the nineteen fifties, ultimately concluded

64
00:03:45,760 --> 00:03:50,080
Speaker 1: that even intentional advocacy of criminal conduct is constitutionally protected

65
00:03:50,240 --> 00:03:54,040
Speaker 1: again unless it's intended to unlikely to cause imminent lawless conduct,

66
00:03:54,320 --> 00:03:57,880
Speaker 1: And that protects people whether they are on the far

67
00:03:57,960 --> 00:04:00,800
Speaker 1: left or far right or far whatever else. You know,

68
00:04:00,840 --> 00:04:04,640
Speaker 1: there are sometimes people who are extremist eco activists or

69
00:04:04,720 --> 00:04:07,720
Speaker 1: animal rights activists who think it's justifiable to go out

70
00:04:07,760 --> 00:04:12,000
Speaker 1: there and say, attack, attack animal researchers. Unfortunately, some people

71
00:04:12,000 --> 00:04:15,760
Speaker 1: in my own university have been have been targeted this way. Uh,

72
00:04:15,840 --> 00:04:19,960
Speaker 1: And I think that that's that any advocacy of this

73
00:04:20,080 --> 00:04:23,040
Speaker 1: kind of of violence like that is is very bad,

74
00:04:23,160 --> 00:04:25,960
Speaker 1: but it's also constitutionally protective, and you can't shut down

75
00:04:26,480 --> 00:04:30,640
Speaker 1: um general animal rights advocacy, even pretty extreme on the

76
00:04:30,640 --> 00:04:32,919
Speaker 1: theory that maybe some of the people there might be

77
00:04:33,000 --> 00:04:35,560
Speaker 1: hoping that that's going to turn into actual violence at

78
00:04:35,600 --> 00:04:37,960
Speaker 1: some point in the future. Well, it's been reported. You

79
00:04:37,960 --> 00:04:39,320
Speaker 1: we only have gout a minute left, but it's been

80
00:04:39,360 --> 00:04:42,440
Speaker 1: a reported Eugene, that there are going to be counter rallies.

81
00:04:42,440 --> 00:04:45,680
Speaker 1: And doesn't the city have some legitimate concern that they've

82
00:04:45,680 --> 00:04:47,200
Speaker 1: got to make sure that, you know, you don't have

83
00:04:47,279 --> 00:04:49,960
Speaker 1: these rallies kind of going at each other and violence results.

84
00:04:50,160 --> 00:04:53,080
Speaker 1: That's why they hire police officers. And they hire the

85
00:04:53,080 --> 00:04:55,960
Speaker 1: police officers to keep the groups apart. Again, imagine there

86
00:04:56,040 --> 00:04:58,920
Speaker 1: was a Black Lives Matter rally or even a more extremist,

87
00:04:59,040 --> 00:05:02,640
Speaker 1: let's say, anti police rally, uh, and there were going

88
00:05:02,680 --> 00:05:05,039
Speaker 1: to be some counter protesters who are pro police. Would

89
00:05:05,080 --> 00:05:07,120
Speaker 1: you say, oh, let's just cancel the rally because it's

90
00:05:07,120 --> 00:05:09,680
Speaker 1: going to bring in counter protesters. No, you're gonna say,

91
00:05:09,839 --> 00:05:12,760
Speaker 1: let's protect the protesters and the counter protesters so they

92
00:05:12,760 --> 00:05:15,320
Speaker 1: can speak, which is their constitutional right, but they can't

93
00:05:15,320 --> 00:05:19,080
Speaker 1: physically attack each other, which of course is illegal, uh

94
00:05:19,120 --> 00:05:21,640
Speaker 1: and not their constitutional right. That's the job of the

95
00:05:21,680 --> 00:05:25,000
Speaker 1: police department. And UH, the government can implement a so

96
00:05:25,080 --> 00:05:28,400
Speaker 1: called Heckler's veto by which this mere fear of violent

97
00:05:28,480 --> 00:05:32,359
Speaker 1: reaction on the part of counter demonstrators is justification to

98
00:05:32,360 --> 00:05:35,680
Speaker 1: suppress the demonstration. That's Eugene fall A, professor at u

99
00:05:35,680 --> 00:05:37,680
Speaker 1: c l A Law School. Eugene, thank you very much

100
00:05:37,680 --> 00:05:39,279
Speaker 1: for being on Bloomberg Law today