WEBVTT - Part One: Indymedia: How Lefty Techies and Journalists Reinvented the Internet

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Cool Zone Media.

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Hello, and welcome to Cool People Who Did Cool Stuff,

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 2>your weekly podcast that whenever there's bad things happening, there's

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:15.240
<v Speaker 2>people trying to do good things, including not introduced their

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:18.919
<v Speaker 2>podcast badly. I am your host, Margaret Kiljoy, and this

0:00:19.000 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 2>week my guest is Sarah Marshall.

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Hi. How are you? Hi?

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm so happy to be here. I like how you

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 3>started that off big and then he got it nice

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 3>and small. You know this week, Sarah Marshall, that's true.

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 3>It's an intimate salon.

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:38.879
<v Speaker 2>Inviting people to get a little closer to the Yeah.

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, I've been watching a lot of Kathy Griffin's specials

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 3>because I realized how much I missed Kathy Griffin. And

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:48.480
<v Speaker 3>she had like nineteen Bravo specials in the two thousands.

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 2>Do you know who that is? Magbie, Nope, no idea.

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 3>She was on Suddenly Susan in the nineties.

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Magpie also doesn't know what that is.

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 2>I've heard of it. I don't know what it is.

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, I have this thing called suddenly, so you put

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 3>on pasta salad always makes me think of Suddenly Susan.

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 3>But Kathy Griffin is a stand up comedian. Does this

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 3>thing where she like will start kind of like speaking quieter,

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 3>and she's like while doing a giant show on a

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 3>giant theater, and she's like, I'm talking like this because

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 3>this is GISs between you and me before like a

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 3>particularly juicy piece of celebrity gossip. So like, we're talking

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 3>like this because this GISs between us and all the

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 3>people listening as well the guests, between all of us,

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 3>no one else.

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 2>No one else can listen except for the people who

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 2>are currently listening. Don't tell your friends about this podcast

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 2>because they can't hear it.

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 3>We really need to keep this in a tight intimate circle.

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I got to keep them numbers down.

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 3>That's what keeps That's what no one ever says on

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 3>a podcast. I want you to go out and rate

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 3>my podcast. Go ahead and give me a one star rating.

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 3>I hate it when people are like, give us a

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 3>five star rating, because that's presuming that the person listening

0:01:58.600 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 3>liked it.

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 2>What if they didn't, I know, although it is a

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 2>good reason to do it at the end of the episode,

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 2>So at the beginning of the episode, because by the

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 2>end of the episode, if you may get that far,

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 2>you probably don't hate it.

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 3>Like I probably liked it if I listened for this

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 3>whole hour.

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, although I say that is if I don't regularly

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 2>listen to podcasts that I do not like at all,

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 2>because I pick a like new interest like every month.

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:21.639
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you can tell by the theme of this

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 2>podcast that I like new interests. And then I'm like,

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 2>I need to know everything about r ving or sailboats

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 2>or I don't know those are two recently, and then

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 2>I listen to all the podcasts about them, and I

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 2>don't like most of them.

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 3>Yes, because it's hard to find something that's on both

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 3>a topic you like and you like the person doing it.

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 2>I think, I know. Yeah, And if you're listening and

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 2>you're one of those people who kind of hates me

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 2>and just likes my content, I'm not sorry, nice, but

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:53.799
<v Speaker 2>I do have a producer. I'm Sophie.

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Hi, Sophie, Hi, Mike Pie Hi, Sarah, Hi, Sophie.

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 3>Nice to be here with you wearing your hat that

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 3>says potatoes.

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 2>I am. I know, it's so good. Everyone sends me

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 2>potato memes all the time and it's great, But Sophie's

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:09.079
<v Speaker 2>the real.

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>A potato head.

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's the word I was thinking you are, and.

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 3>I am too. It's a very pre potato group today.

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I had potatoes and couscous for lunch. Oh nice.

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 2>It was just sort of random storre fry food and

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:24.079
<v Speaker 2>it was so good.

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 3>I had several mini croissants that I got discounted at

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 3>fred Meyer.

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 2>I like croissants, Sophie, did you have a starch for

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 2>lunch today?

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I had two Italian sausages and an apple sauce.

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Oh. I think you're the healthiest of the three of

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 2>us right now, you're the one.

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 2>Well. We also have an audio engineer named Eva hi

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Eva Hiva hi Eva, and our theme music was written

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 2>forced by unwoman and you have unwittingly come in in

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 2>the middle of me. It's not a series, but it's

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 2>kind of a series. I've been talking a lot about

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 2>the alter globalization movement of the late nineties and early

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 2>oughts for the past couple months because I've been talking

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 2>a lot about the sort of protest infrastructure that people built,

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 2>and so I've been focusing on various groups that came

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 2>together to create the modern protest infrastructure, and specifically this

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 2>grand movement of movements that relied on decentralized organizing I'm

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 2>going to do this long build up before I give

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 2>you the topic. And the movement of movements especially kind

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 2>of came from decentralized organizing techniques developed by the Zapatistas

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 2>in Chiapus, Mexico, as well as anarchist traditions, and they

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 2>challenged neoliberalism and the challenge the way that structural adjustment

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 2>programs are destroying country's economies and basically just destroying the

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 2>global self. We talked about how the Zapatistas in Mexico

0:04:56.760 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 2>broke from traditional leftist organizing by introducing indigenous ae ideas

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 2>around decentralization and bottom up democracy, and we talked about

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 2>how they started to organize various grassroop groups and movements

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 2>from around the world to call for a movement against neoliberalism.

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 2>And what we're going to talk about today is one

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 2>of the mechanisms by which they were able to do

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 2>some of that organizing. But I'm still not going to

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 2>tell you what we're going to talk about yet. I'm

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 2>building it up as if it's like this dramatic reveal,

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:24.119
<v Speaker 2>but I love it. We also talked about the Black

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Bloc protesters that started in Germany and spread across Europe

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 2>to the rest of the world, how they provided an

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 2>alternative to the existing dichotomy with like either regimented nonviolence

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:36.359
<v Speaker 2>on one side or like armed guerrilla movements on the

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 2>other side. We talked about the National Lawyer's Guild, and

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 2>we talked about street medics and maybe I'm just listening

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 2>to all these things because if you like come in

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 2>on just this one, they're like, oh wow, all those

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 2>things sound great too. We also talked about street theater

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 2>and giant puppets. But this week we were going to

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 2>talk about yet another component of the successful protests, independent media.

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 2>This week are going to talk about the decentralized grassroots

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:07.599
<v Speaker 2>collective of independent journalists fundamentally changed our media landscape forever,

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 2>sometimes in ways that made it much worse. This week

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 2>we are talking about indie media I N D Y Media.

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 2>You ever heard of them? Hmmm, excellent? Then this will

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 2>be fun. I'm excited. This is the Independent Media Center

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 2>or the IMC as no one remembers it. If people

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 2>remember it at all, they remember it as indie media,

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 2>spelled with the Y. This is still around, but in

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 2>a much diminished form, but its impacts are outsized. I

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 2>am going to draw a direct link from indie media

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 2>to Twitter and therefore the destruction of all of our brains.

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 2>That's my plan today. Oh well, you ever heard of

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Twitter's sorry, that sounded terrible. Certain you've heard of Twitter.

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:52.919
<v Speaker 3>It is like, don't you feel though that Twitter, like,

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 3>even when it was at its biggest, felt a little

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 3>bit too quaint in a way because it was based

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:03.159
<v Speaker 3>on words, you know, like you could feel it being

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 3>the last big thing based on sentences.

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh interesting, Like it was doomed because it's not going

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 2>to be because the next one was photo and the

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:12.239
<v Speaker 2>next one after that was video.

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 3>Just yeah, this feeling of like this is sort of

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 3>like the last gasp of language based sort of viral

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 3>media online or language based social media as opposed to

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 3>image based, because you could get really big on Twitter

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 3>as an ugly person, is what I'm really saying here.

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 3>That's true, and those doors aren't open anymore.

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 2>I hate every single time I have to do video

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 2>for something. Every single time someone's like, hey, can you

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 2>promote this thing that you're doing? Sent just just really quick,

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 2>just send us a sixty second video of it. And

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, oh, yeah, that's a that's a real quick.

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 3>You're like, are you telling me to act like a

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:55.559
<v Speaker 3>normal person? Who's you know, impression of a normal person.

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 3>People won't pick apart until I want to leave this

0:07:58.000 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 3>industry forever. Like that's going to take me.

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 2>I know, I know, I have to either wear makeup

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 2>or not. I have to think about it. I gotta

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 2>cut my fucking bangs. I gotta like figure out my

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 2>lightning and backdrop. It is.

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 3>It's a whole production to be a person.

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 2>It really is, well, especially to be like a similacro

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 2>of a person on the internet. Being a person's fine.

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 2>I'll go out in public. Public is fine. It's the

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Internet that's a problem.

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, And you know what I think about with that

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 3>is Nicole Kidman and To Die For. Yeah, you know,

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 3>she plays this character who's like a product of like

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:35.959
<v Speaker 3>tabloid media and nineties TV news, and she's got this

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 3>speech about how like if everyone were on TV, then

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 3>everyone would be paved better because we would all be

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 3>being watched all the time. But also if everyone's on TV,

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 3>then who's gonna watch us? And it's like that's what

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 3>we're doing right now.

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's that's the present. Although I feel like instead

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 2>it's just like we've created like weird micro celebrity culture

0:08:55.960 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 2>and I don't know, I mean not that podcasting me

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 2>into it. But at least it's just my voice. That's

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 2>how I feel.

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 3>About it, exactly. At least you're not performing in more

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 3>ways than the way that you consented to. Maybe that's

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 3>appealing to me.

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. All I have to do is get on Mike,

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 2>pretend like my day has been wonderful and have energy

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 2>for a little while.

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 3>That's all I gotta do, or at least pretend like

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 3>my day hasn't been distractingly bad.

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. Yeah, And I actually had a nice day

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 2>to day, although literally all of my day today was

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:38.959
<v Speaker 2>writing this script to finishing this script. But it was

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 2>a nice day.

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 3>But if that's a nice day, Benny, I'm extra excited

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:43.959
<v Speaker 3>for it.

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 2>It was a like moment where I was explaining to

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:47.679
<v Speaker 2>someone the thing that I've researched, and I've been like,

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to explain a really niche topic. I'm glad

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 2>I have a good guest. The short version of indie

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 2>media is that, basically in the late nineties, at the

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Big Seattle protests against the World Trade Organization November nineteen

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 2>ninety nine, people were like, we actually need a media infrastructure,

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 2>We need a structure of independent media. And it actually

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 2>comes out of not just like random people who want

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 2>to post conspiracy theory stuff though we'll get to that later,

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 2>but it comes out of like people who are journalists

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 2>who are like, the existing infrastructure is not going to

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 2>work for what we're going to try and do. They

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 2>got together with a bunch of techies and they created

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 2>what's not the first status update based website, but the

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 2>first big one, the first idea that people can be like, oh,

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:46.680
<v Speaker 2>this is what happened today, and people can all post

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:51.679
<v Speaker 2>that and share that and see that, and that allowed

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 2>the protest movement to accomplish amazing things. It also allowed

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 2>that protest movement to not be disappeared as much by

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:03.960
<v Speaker 2>mainstream media, and it led to a lot of knock

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 2>on effects, and not like an indirect way. I'm going

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 2>to like name specific people who are the through line

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 2>between the modern social media landscape and this thing that

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 2>was put together for some protests. That's the basic idea

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 2>of indie media. I love it. Yeah, Indie media was

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 2>like my political awakening in a lot of ways. When

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 2>I was a teenager. I was an art student, and

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 2>I was brand new to politics, and I was living

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 2>in New York City, and I walked in off the

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 2>street to an Indie Media New York meeting and I

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 2>got to play this like tiny minor part in running

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 2>a newspaper, like a print newspaper that's still around today,

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:47.439
<v Speaker 2>and join a video collective of people putting together video.

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 2>I just spent all of this time talking trash on video,

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 2>but I absolutely well, I didn't worry as much about

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 2>how I looked when I was nineteen years old. A

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 2>year later, I was living in Portland, Oregon, and I

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:05.960
<v Speaker 2>was essentially working full time with the indie media video

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 2>collective there. In exchange for shooting and editing videos and

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 2>helping run events, I was given a room in a

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 2>tiny apartment over an auto shop, and less than a

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 2>year after dropping out of art school, a film I

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 2>edited sold out a movie theater, and I was giving

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 2>talks at universities to students that were older than me. Wow,

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 2>So I'm really fond of indie media, or I'm really

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 2>fond of what it was in two thousand and two. Man,

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 2>But what is it? Where did it come from? I

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:37.839
<v Speaker 2>know that you want context. So one of the things

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 2>that comes up all the time when I'm researching this shit,

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 2>and I suspect we didn't talk about what you do.

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:47.679
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, you run a podcast called You're wrong about

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 2>I Do. You're right about that? Sorry? Oh shit, Oh no,

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 2>you're allowed to make terrible jokes about That's true. That's

0:12:57.160 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 2>how that works.

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 3>If you listen to podcast, people have probably like bothered

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 3>you about it at some point, and if you're like me,

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 3>then you haven't listened to it, because at some point

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty one you were like, stop bringing this

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 3>show up, is what I would assume. And so either

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 3>you have or you haven't listened to it, And if

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 3>you haven't listened to it, then like, look, I'm not

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 3>gonna persuade yet. You get to decide what you do

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 3>with your own time.

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 2>It's fine.

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 3>But it started off as a show about misremembered history

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 3>and sort of classic tabloid narratives like Tiny Harding and

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 3>Lorraina Bobbitt and stories that we.

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Sort of.

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 3>That people sort of like kind of could remember but

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 3>would often sort of remember through USNL parodies, which is

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 3>certainly how I learned history. And now it's kind of

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 3>expanded into like, you know, I like to talk about

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 3>things through that lens of historical misunderstanding and misremembering and

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 3>sort of how the truth gets obscured. But also it's just,

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, a show about stuff I find interesting. And

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 3>so our most recent episode that we just put out

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 3>this week is on the history of the Corn Maze.

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 3>That was so fun for me to do.

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 2>You do love corn? That's cool.

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 3>I love Coorn, and I'm okay with mazes. I mainly

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 3>love corn and I had I'm Chelsea Webber Smith who

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 3>loves mazes, and so that even doubt a good fit.

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that is good. So do you run across this

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 2>thing where people have an idea about how people were

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 2>in the past, and how ideas that we take for

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 2>granted right now people think just like have been around

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 2>forever and are actually reasonably new.

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I think one of the really interesting

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 3>sort of aspects of history and historian ship I guess

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 3>to me is like things that are way newer than

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 3>we would think, and things that are way more timeless

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 3>as human behavior than we would think, you know, because

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 3>I think both of those things occur.

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 2>The example that I'm going to use in this script

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 2>although it's not totally related. Is that the idea of

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 2>being a homosexual or of being a heterosexual about one

0:14:57.360 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 2>hundred to one hundred and fifty years.

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 3>Old, right, I know, And that's the kind of thing

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 3>that like feels shocking, but also when you think about it,

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 3>you're like, hmm, yeah.

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 2>No, totally. The first time someone was like, being straight

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 2>a is about one hundred year old idea, I was like,

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 2>there's no way that's true. And then I read about

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 2>it and I was like, oh, yeah, no, that kind

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 2>of makes sense actually.

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 3>And then you're like, of course straightness is a new

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 3>concept because it's just so weird.

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, If it were innate, it wouldn't be so hard

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 3>to make people, do you know?

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, totally. If the gender binary is so obvious and natural,

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 2>then why do we need laws to enforce it.

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 3>It's a great question. There aren't any laws enforcing gravity, interestingly.

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Enough, Yeah, yeah, totally. All objects must fall down. Yeah no,

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:52.479
<v Speaker 2>one's like damn you birds except hunters maybe, but yeah.

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 2>So another idea that is about as old is the

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 2>idea of being gay or straight is the idea of

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 2>journalistic objectivity.

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 3>Oh boy, yeah, I guess that makes sense.

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 2>The idea that a journalist presents the facts and not

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 2>opinions is brand new in the grand scheme of things.

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah see, and I never thought about that. But then

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 3>you're like, yeah, how long of journalists even existed?

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 2>For not that long? Yeah no, I don't I know

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 2>about the journalistic objectivity. But now I'm like, I wonder

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 2>how long our concept of journalism? I wonder how that is?

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 3>Right, or just like you know, if you look at

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 3>like the Great you know what like all these dead

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 3>guys who like in cells like to have is their

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 3>profile pictures for some reason, right, like all the dead Greeks.

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how that happened. But like herodotus, it's like,

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 3>what's history about? It's like, well, you just make stuff

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 3>up mainly, and then you sort of, yeah, it's fun.

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we start.

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 3>To care about accuracy and academia probably not that long ago.

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, what's interesting is the idea of journalistic objectivity. It's

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 2>not as like a one sided thing as I actually

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of would have expected going into this, because it's

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 2>not like before this everyone just lied for fun, right,

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 2>But if you go back into the New York Times

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 2>archives and read their nineteenth century reporting, which I've had

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:12.400
<v Speaker 2>to do a bunch of times for the show. Nay, yeah,

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:17.479
<v Speaker 2>it is blatantly opinionated. And the thing is is that

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 2>New York Times is one of the main places that

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 2>the concept of objective journalism comes from, just decades elating.

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 3>And now they've come full circle. So that's really good.

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's part of the danger. It's actually part of

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:33.239
<v Speaker 2>why endi media exists, right, is that you have this

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:36.160
<v Speaker 2>thing where like, oh, we're the objective people. So when

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:39.679
<v Speaker 2>they have an obvious bias, it's not presented as an

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 2>obvious bias, right, It's presented as the objective truth unless

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 2>it's on the opinion page, you know, which is why

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 2>the Onion is the only true newspaper. All journalism is

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 2>still biased. Some journalists hide that bias, some journalists try

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 2>to counteract their own biases, and others are a little

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 2>bit more blatant about their bias. But journalistic objectivity didn't

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 2>become the standard because it was like better or more moral.

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 2>It was because it's sold better.

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:13.360
<v Speaker 3>Wow, Okay, that's interesting. I would not have thought that.

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't have thought it either, and it doesn't always

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:18.439
<v Speaker 2>sell better, but it was able to stand out in

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:22.119
<v Speaker 2>the field, because in the eighteen nineties you have a

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 2>lot of like yellow journalism, which is basically tabloid journalism.

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 2>It's the journalism of scandal and half lies and full

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:32.679
<v Speaker 2>lies scandal. That is how if I was a yellow journalist,

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 2>I would tell you that that's how it's pronounced because

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:36.919
<v Speaker 2>it sounds better, it might sell more.

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:38.679
<v Speaker 3>No, you don't have to tell the truth. Yeah, and

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 3>this is like, how important was Hurst in the history

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:45.120
<v Speaker 3>of yellow journalism. He's like, based on my seventh grade education,

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:48.159
<v Speaker 3>I assume, So, okay, it's good to know that the.

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 2>New York Journal I think was his paper. And yeah,

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:56.360
<v Speaker 2>pullets are in Hurst. Wait, pullets are in Hurst. They

0:18:56.400 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 2>think we're not. Oh we not. No, it's crazy. We

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 2>did a whole episode. I'm no, I don't think you

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 2>were the guests. No, but I was cheering from afar.

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 2>We did a whole two parter on the actual newsy strike.

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 2>If anyone wants to go back and hear.

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, everybody should. I mean, it's very inspiring to me.

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 3>How in the actual history you're like, oh, they actually

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:21.679
<v Speaker 3>did like terrify all these industries who were like, oh no,

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:25.640
<v Speaker 3>we can't let children get this many ideas about labor unions.

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 3>This could really screw us.

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and that's actually a lot of I mean when

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 2>I think back of like twentieth century journalism that claims

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 2>to be very objective and then I see its lies,

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 2>it's very rarely that I'm like, ah, they printed things

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:41.640
<v Speaker 2>that were untrue, but instead by like choosing where their

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 2>focus is. I'm like, when labor history is written out

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:46.719
<v Speaker 2>of history, you're like, oh, yeah, there's probably some protests

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 2>here and there, you know, And then you're like, oh,

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 2>protest and disruption is like the engine of progress.

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and that the reaction against it is like the

0:19:57.080 --> 0:19:59.479
<v Speaker 3>driving force shaping the world we now live in.

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, Yeah, and that like the crime of like lying

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:07.159
<v Speaker 3>by omission is actually seems a lot more serious in

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 3>many ways.

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because it's harder to fact check, right, because you're like, well,

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:12.120
<v Speaker 2>I guess everything you wrote is true.

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 3>God, Yeah, because you can't fact check. Leaving stuff out

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 3>of the record, it's just like, well, we had limited space,

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 3>we couldn't fit in another page.

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, not one more page. There's a lot of people

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:25.400
<v Speaker 2>who've been very important in history, and other parts about

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 2>them are left out of it, right, like, it's very

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 2>hard to find when people did sex work. If someone

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 2>did sex work and they did something important, no one

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 2>talks about the sex work. But also if someone was

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 2>a radical leftist and they're not known for being a

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 2>radical leftist, that is left out. Are you thinking about

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 2>Helen Keller, Oh yeah, that's a perfect example. Yeah, it

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 2>is completely left out.

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 3>And then yeah, honorary Wobbly Helen Keller.

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, exactly. So to quote about yellow journalism, I'm

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 2>going to quote Joseph Patrick mccerns from the book History

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:06.400
<v Speaker 2>of American Journalism. The yellow journalism of the eighteen nineties

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 2>and the tabloid journalism of the nineteen twenties and thirties

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 2>stigmatize the press as a profit motivated purveyor of cheap

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:17.679
<v Speaker 2>thrills and vicarious experiments. To its many critics, it seemed

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 2>as though the press was using the freedom from regulation

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:23.639
<v Speaker 2>it enjoyed under the First Amendment to make money instead

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 2>of using it to fulfill its vital role as an

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 2>independent source of information in a democracy. So yellow journalism

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 2>is popular, right, but it is heavily criticized. So it

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 2>creates this niche for someone to be like, yeah, fuck

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:43.159
<v Speaker 2>that stuff. We're going to give you the truth, and

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 2>do you know what the best way to pay for

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 2>the truth is advertising advertising. It's the part where you

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 2>just say this part's a lie and everyone drops pretending

0:21:54.400 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 2>like anything's objective, like what's about to happen, and we're back.

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 2>The biggest like turning point for yellow journalism, or at

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 2>least in history, when people look back and they're like, oh,

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 2>that didn't do us any good, at least in the

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 2>United States context, is when yellow journalism and Hurst sparked

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 2>a whole ass war.

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:21.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that does seem to be taking things too far.

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 3>The Newsy's made out very well though.

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 2>That's true. That's true. Well, no, they actually had to

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 2>fight really hard in order to make out half decent.

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 2>They lived horrible conditions.

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 3>But yes, oh no, but I mean they could sell

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 3>papers about the war.

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, yeah. I used to write.

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 3>About that my fan fiction and have my newsies being

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 3>nostalgic for the Spanish American War. That's amazing. Can folks

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 3>find this fan fiction? I hope they don't, but if

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:52.399
<v Speaker 3>you do, you know, God bless you. It was like

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:57.919
<v Speaker 3>I was his writing the horniest stuff. Okay, maybe I

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 3>don't need to know it if it's yeah, all right, Really,

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 3>I strove her historical accuracy the entire time.

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 2>I suspect that the average like weird erotic thing historical

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 2>fiction is going to be more accurate than like other

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 2>mainstream things, because I think that it takes a certain mindset.

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 3>You have to be kind of detail oriented.

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, probably exactly.

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 3>I just want to solve the prop coffee cup problem.

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 3>It would be so hard to put something a little

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:31.679
<v Speaker 3>bit heavy in those things. You know, when you have

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 3>like actors handling empty coffee cups and they're just like

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 3>flinging them around as if there's nothing inside them, drives

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 3>me insane anyway. Yeah, yeah, when you cause a war

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 3>that does seem rather extreme.

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 2>And what happened was is that the Spanish American War

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 2>was in many ways caused by the USS. Main was

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:58.719
<v Speaker 2>sunk in eighteen ninety eight in Havana, and the New

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 2>York Journal made a huge, huge scandal out of it,

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 2>and it drove popular outcry to go to war. And

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't remember all of the ins and outs of

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 2>it enough to get more into it here, but I've

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 2>known it more before.

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 3>But is it like arguably it just sort of like

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 3>sank for normal reasons.

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's that's what I remember. The last time I

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 2>looked into this.

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Like a boiler exploded or something like that. Yeah, because

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:22.440
<v Speaker 3>ships do sink famously.

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah. So by the end of the nineteenth century,

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 2>people are starting to get extra critical about all the

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:33.200
<v Speaker 2>fake news of yellow journalism, and a local conservative rag

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 2>in New York City with the uninspired name no one's

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 2>ever heard of this paper, The New York Times pivoted

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 2>to being all about being objective.

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 3>That's so interesting that people like, don't you find it

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 3>kind of heartening to think of people being like, hey,

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:53.439
<v Speaker 3>I actually do not like being lied to, you know,

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:56.440
<v Speaker 3>like I guess everyone, you know, a lot of people

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 3>are saying that today. But then there's so many other

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 3>people who seem to be louder who were like I

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 3>love being lied too, and it's hard to think straight.

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I am sure there are people who went

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 2>in that direction because they felt those their moral duty

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 2>to be objective. But as interesting is even at like

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 2>some of the more tabloidy papers at the time, they

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:19.679
<v Speaker 2>would have like signs on the wall that are like truth,

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 2>the truth matters. But it was kind of in this

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:24.400
<v Speaker 2>like tell the truth, but as like wildly and sensationally

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 2>as possible, you know.

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 3>Like tell what's technically the truth, or like you know,

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 3>and beyond belief factor fiction whether like that one's true,

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:36.679
<v Speaker 3>it's based on actual events, based on our research, and

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:37.120
<v Speaker 3>you're like.

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, that doesn't make sense.

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 3>True, it was like a grain of truth maybe in it,

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 3>but that's not you know, it's like the showing me

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:47.119
<v Speaker 3>a pearl and saying this is made out of sand,

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 3>and it's like in a way.

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, totally so, at least according to an article

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 2>in Just or Daily. In the late nineteenth century, being

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 2>really into science was in vogue, and so this idea

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 2>of objectivity was a way to be like the proper

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:10.160
<v Speaker 2>modern scientific person.

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:13.679
<v Speaker 3>Actually, that does sound a little bit too like you know,

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:18.880
<v Speaker 3>male culture today, because like you know, I'm sure all

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 3>these very objective people also didn't realize anger was an emotion.

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, yeah, but good for them. Well, I mean,

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:29.880
<v Speaker 2>they only have one emotion, so they're just real good

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:31.399
<v Speaker 2>at it, and they just not recognize as part of

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 2>the larger palette.

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 3>Just seems like background noise.

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah. The New York Times and other papers were

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 2>really into kind of just cashing in on this trend

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 2>of being the like worthy, objective people. We are the

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 2>good scientific people, we are the modern people.

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 3>This is pretty charming as a trend.

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 2>It's true. I do prefer this. I want to be clear,

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:56.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm being cynical about it, but it's like better than

0:26:56.520 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 2>just everyone lying. Yeah, exactly, I'll take what I can get. Yeah, totally.

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 2>A trade paper at the time called The Journalist wrote, quote,

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:08.639
<v Speaker 2>the most successful journalists are those that are able to

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 2>give the facts, the whole facts, and nothing but the

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 2>facts and brief, pithy sentences, the majority of which contain

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:17.679
<v Speaker 2>not more than a dozen words. And so it was this, like,

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:20.920
<v Speaker 2>that's the new style of news. So they just kind

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 2>of invented the news one day. Yeah, I mean they

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 2>had the news, but the way we understand the news,

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 2>they invented the news. It's news two point oh yeah, totally. Yeah. Oh,

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 2>which is interesting because NDI media is literally going to

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:34.360
<v Speaker 2>invent the web two point zero.

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Well.

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:39.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. The point of view of journalists was slowly stripped

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:42.160
<v Speaker 2>out of the news journalists present to present themselves as

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:45.360
<v Speaker 2>to quote another paper at the time of the writer quote,

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 2>to be the unmoved observer of events, to see things

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:51.400
<v Speaker 2>exactly as they are, without regard to possible motives which

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 2>may have produced them.

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Which is also sexually a Victorian mail view of like

0:27:57.080 --> 0:28:00.439
<v Speaker 3>what's possible, where it's like who could do that?

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 2>Right? And so we start seeing now you can start

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 2>seeing some of the downsides of this turn. Right, You're like, oh, yeah,

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 2>we're not going to talk about why someone was so

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 2>mad that they did this thing. Right, Like a riot

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 2>or broke a window is modern news, right, but not

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:22.400
<v Speaker 2>someone who has been impoverished by capitalism is lashing out

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 2>against what's happening right, right, And so it's another form

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:28.640
<v Speaker 2>of lie by emission sometimes.

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:33.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it also feels like just by stating an utterly

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 3>impossible goal and acting like that's the format. It's like saying,

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 3>here at this hospital, no one literally no one dies,

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 3>We hear everyone of all their diseases, and everyone walks

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 3>out alive and with twenty bucks. And it's like, but

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 3>you're not going to do that. You can't do that.

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 2>No one can, yeah, totally, and no one can be

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 2>truly objective either, Right, Trying for objectivity still feels well,

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 2>trying for objectivity in the action fact finding feels important. Me.

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, yeah, and so I think there's like

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 3>an element of objectivity where it's like, like, if I'm

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 3>going to try and write a story as objectively as possible,

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 3>part of that is me acknowledging my position as a

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 3>person making these observations and acknowledging what my limits are.

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, you know, It's like I think about the shit

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 2>a lot, right, I run a history podcast, and I also, yeah,

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 2>there you go. My terrible joke I wrote into this episode.

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 2>I wear my politics on my sleeve, but to be

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 2>more literal, I cut the sleeves off of all of

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 2>my shirts, which reveals my prominent anarchist tattoo on my

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 2>upper shoulder.

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 1>So fucking real, Magpie.

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's perfect. But I want to tell the

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 2>truth even when it's inconvenient to my political aims. For example,

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 2>all the times on the show where I've had to

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 2>talk about the popularity of eugenics among political people on

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 2>both sides of the spectrum of the early twentieth century,

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 2>including people I would otherwise look up to, And even

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 2>at the time when all this new objectivity is coming in,

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 2>there's criticism of it that actually meant something. It wasn't

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 2>just like Bob but we want to sell more papers

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 2>by start wars. That's the closest I've done to an

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 2>old timey news voice. Thank you, thank you. I'm a

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 2>workshop that one. In eighteen ninety one, a journalist named W. J.

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Stillman wrote about how journalism went from talking about quote

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 2>the questions and answers of contemporary life to quote collecting, condensing,

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 2>and assimilating the trivialities of the entire human experience to

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 2>get insult I know. And that's like I went into

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 2>it being like, I've had my criticisms of ostensibly objective

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 2>media for a long time, but seeing more of them,

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 2>while still also being like, it's still better if we

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 2>don't do yellow journalism, you know. Yeah, and podcasting really

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 2>is the rebirth of yellow journalism.

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, it's interesting, how like, I don't know, I

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 3>like to me, the answer is not format as much

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 3>as just being willing to be boring when the occasion

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:08.480
<v Speaker 3>calls for it, because there are just some things that

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 3>can't be stated excitingly, and if you can't make it exciting,

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:14.479
<v Speaker 3>you shouldn't have to in order for it to be

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 3>able to be circulated to an audience, you know.

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but what if the area of this circle is

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 2>three thousand, nine hundred and twenty four meters radical. Yeah,

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 2>and you know what that means. That means that if

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 2>you divide it, I can't do enough math to do

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 2>this bit any further, Like I know. So, The New

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 2>York Times and other papers invented the myth or the

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 2>ideal of objective journalism at the opening of the twentieth century.

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 2>By nineteen ten, some folks adopted a code of ethics

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 2>for journalism, and by nineteen fifties most publications had code

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 2>of ethics that were like, we don't say things that

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 2>we know are lies.

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 3>I would love to know which papers were like the

0:31:56.160 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 3>last holdouts, you know, before getting on that. We're finally

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 3>they're like, okay, we won't lie on purpose anymore. It's

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 3>nineteen fifty seven.

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I gotta get with the Times. Ah, get with

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 2>the Times, because the New York anyway.

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Right, the best puns happen purely by accident.

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 2>That's true.

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 3>It's like when you drop your toast and it falls

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 3>jam side up and nobody sees.

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 2>If no one's around to see, did it happen? I know.

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it really does make me feel like a liar.

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Yeah, so that's some context around the mainstream news.

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 2>It presents itself as objective, it often tries to be.

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 2>There are upsides and downsides of that. Meanwhile, all along,

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 2>since before the rise of objective journalism, activists and political

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 2>radicals have been presenting counter narratives through their own newspapers

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 2>and radio shows and news outlets, most of the time,

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 2>often to their discredit. Activist papers don't really try for

0:32:55.720 --> 0:33:00.080
<v Speaker 2>the same level of objectivity. Some don't try for that

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 2>because they think objectivity is a myth, and they try

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 2>to be honest about their biases. I will not pretend

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 2>that this is an objective show. I just try to

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 2>be really clear about my biases. It's actually just kind

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 2>of as a side note, It's one of the reasons

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 2>that I like talk about my politics on this show

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 2>is less to convince people of it and more so

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 2>that people can like ignore part of what I say, right.

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 2>They can like be like, well, that BET's just saying

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 2>that because she thinks the following, you know, right, And like,

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean.

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 3>Do you ever have a review where you're like, she

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:34.960
<v Speaker 3>said something that I found stupid or like made a

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 3>dumb mistake, and that makes me not trust what she

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 3>says about other stuff, And I'm like, yeah, you shouldn't

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:43.000
<v Speaker 3>trust me. Why do you trust me?

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I totally earned that totally.

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 3>You don't have to automatically trust everyone who is talking.

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I am not on a pedestal. I'm on a soapbox.

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 2>These are fundamentally different platforms. Yeah, you know, one of

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 2>them smaller, like yeah, and I have to research a

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 2>new subject every week, like.

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's like yeah, like I would love for you

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 3>to listen, but also like assume that I could very

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 3>easily be wrong right about it.

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, wow, Sarah, Thank you, Sophie.

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Like, I try really hard to be right about stuff.

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 2>But one of the things that I do often when

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:24.719
<v Speaker 2>I not every single time, but often when I do

0:34:24.760 --> 0:34:26.880
<v Speaker 2>a topic is I'll listen to other people who've like

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 2>done the sort of more pop culture version of the topic,

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:33.959
<v Speaker 2>and it's always so wrong and it makes me scared

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 2>about my own shit, right, because I'm like, oh, everyone

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 2>just regurgitates the same like ten factoids about a thing,

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 2>and that happens so much.

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:45.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and they get sort of like well worn, like riverstones,

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 3>and you can see a misapprehension getting passed around by sources.

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, totally. Yeah, and it it's hard because then I'm like, well,

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:57.399
<v Speaker 2>I need to try not to do that. And one

0:34:57.400 --> 0:35:00.120
<v Speaker 2>of the main things that messes with my schedule does

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:02.799
<v Speaker 2>that I'll start researching something, you know, because I'll start

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 2>with the big picture thing, I'll read the big picture stuff,

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:07.239
<v Speaker 2>and then I'll dive into the details and learn more

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:11.320
<v Speaker 2>about it. And sometimes I'm like we record on Thursdays.

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes on like Wednesday night at midnight, I'm like, well,

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 2>everything I read was a lie, you know.

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And then you're like, well, now, like our attempt

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:27.160
<v Speaker 3>to like fit research and acquiring information onto a calendar

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 3>is once again imperfect because like, obviously we'd rather find

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:34.960
<v Speaker 3>the actual truth than stick to the calendar. But not

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:37.279
<v Speaker 3>everybody gets to do that, and in fact, it's like

0:35:37.400 --> 0:35:40.920
<v Speaker 3>weird to be able to do that. Yeah, totally, and

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:43.040
<v Speaker 3>that's you know, so it's I feel like one of

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 3>the things I find interesting is like, by making media

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:48.600
<v Speaker 3>about how media gets.

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 2>It wrong, you like.

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Learn a lot and I think develop greater empathy for

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:56.319
<v Speaker 3>the people who get it wrong because that also comes

0:35:56.400 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 3>to include you inevitably.

0:35:57.920 --> 0:36:01.880
<v Speaker 2>Totally. Yeah, then no one is perfect. Oh wait a second,

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:04.279
<v Speaker 2>I'm a person if all people are flogged. Yeah, what

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 2>does that say about me?

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 3>Oh no, Yeah, and especially I think people who want

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 3>to like comment on others, there's like a degree of like, well,

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:16.280
<v Speaker 3>if I'm talking about people, then I'm escaping the problems

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 3>of the human condition. And it's like, no, you brought

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:20.200
<v Speaker 3>them with you as a carry on.

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:23.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I bet you have a similar problem on

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:26.359
<v Speaker 1>your research, Sarah, that Margaret has in her research, which

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:29.080
<v Speaker 1>is she'll researched an entire person and find out that

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:32.960
<v Speaker 1>they were like horrible to their wife. And it happens

0:36:33.000 --> 0:36:33.439
<v Speaker 1>all the time.

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:34.920
<v Speaker 2>You're like, what a really.

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Cool guy slash, I hate him and would hit him

0:36:38.160 --> 0:36:38.760
<v Speaker 1>with my car.

0:36:39.040 --> 0:36:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so many happens all the time.

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 3>Also, because I want to do more kind of little

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 3>bonus like audio book content things, and like it is

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:54.240
<v Speaker 3>so hard to find a book in the public domain

0:36:54.680 --> 0:37:00.399
<v Speaker 3>that's like interesting to read and isn't racist. Oh yeah,

0:37:00.640 --> 0:37:02.920
<v Speaker 3>like The Great Gatsby is in the public domain, but

0:37:03.040 --> 0:37:09.200
<v Speaker 3>that doesn't do me any Nope.

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, it's yeah, I agree, old literature. You're like, well,

0:37:12.160 --> 0:37:13.719
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't work with an audiobook, but when I do,

0:37:13.719 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 2>like Coolsone Media book Club and I read an old thing.

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes I have to be like, hey, let me contextualize

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:19.960
<v Speaker 2>the way that this author wrote about this thing.

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah you know, yeah, but if you're reading the whole

0:37:23.560 --> 0:37:27.200
<v Speaker 3>thing out loud, you're like, okay, yeah, well, oh didn't

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:29.080
<v Speaker 3>remember that part. I want to do the wind in

0:37:29.120 --> 0:37:30.799
<v Speaker 3>the Willows at some point, but I have to like

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:35.400
<v Speaker 3>reread it because like, what if Toad hates Puerto Ricans

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:37.960
<v Speaker 3>or something. I don't know, maybe he does. People just

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 3>did that in books back then, and it was asleep,

0:37:40.440 --> 0:37:42.279
<v Speaker 3>no one even remembered it well.

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:44.920
<v Speaker 2>And actually, to tie this into when people moved into

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 2>this scientific mode in the late nineteenth century, a lot

0:37:48.680 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 2>of really awful stuff comes specifically out of that, Like

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:54.759
<v Speaker 2>the history of anthropology has an awful lot of real

0:37:54.880 --> 0:37:59.839
<v Speaker 2>dark racism that is like specifically around like we're being

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:03.560
<v Speaker 2>so scientific, yeah you know, and so it's like.

0:38:03.800 --> 0:38:06.560
<v Speaker 3>And we are taxonomizing people of color just like we

0:38:06.600 --> 0:38:09.240
<v Speaker 3>would with sharks or something exactly.

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 2>And it's that same the facts don't care about your

0:38:12.120 --> 0:38:14.120
<v Speaker 2>feelings thing where it's like, actually, if you took some

0:38:14.200 --> 0:38:17.440
<v Speaker 2>humanities classes, you'd realize that these are related concepts, you.

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Know, yes, and using like your commitment to objectivity as

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:24.719
<v Speaker 3>a way of defending your own lack of objectivity by

0:38:24.719 --> 0:38:27.399
<v Speaker 3>being like, it's science. I'm just saying facts. And it's

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:30.800
<v Speaker 3>like you're refusing to analyze your emotional response to something

0:38:30.920 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 3>and calling it facts. But yeah, whatever.

0:38:33.560 --> 0:38:36.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So all these activists since me any time will

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 2>write their own papers to try and counter traditional narratives,

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:44.320
<v Speaker 2>and they will do it in all kinds of ways.

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 2>They will sometimes like like sometimes they're like, I don't

0:38:47.239 --> 0:38:50.320
<v Speaker 2>care about the truth because my goal is more important

0:38:50.320 --> 0:38:53.800
<v Speaker 2>than the truth, right, They're like convincing everyone to follow

0:38:53.840 --> 0:38:56.920
<v Speaker 2>this or that ideology is more important. Yeah, and that's

0:38:57.320 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 2>clearly the most dangerous and you should run far away

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:03.360
<v Speaker 2>from any instinct you have towards that and anything that

0:39:03.400 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 2>you're reading that you realize this was happening. And other

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:10.400
<v Speaker 2>people are just like trying to be kind of objective

0:39:10.440 --> 0:39:14.240
<v Speaker 2>but fail and whatever. And some people actually, sometimes activist

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 2>papers are reasonably objective and written the same journalistic standards.

0:39:18.080 --> 0:39:21.759
<v Speaker 2>It's just activist whatever has a bad rap because of

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 2>the number of people who are pushing an agenda. First

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:28.640
<v Speaker 2>and foremost, half of the radicals of the nineteenth century

0:39:28.640 --> 0:39:30.839
<v Speaker 2>that I've talked about on the show run their own newspapers.

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:34.120
<v Speaker 2>There's also this long history of soapboxing a forgotten art.

0:39:34.719 --> 0:39:37.279
<v Speaker 2>I remember reading about this public square in Chicago and

0:39:37.320 --> 0:39:39.920
<v Speaker 2>the nineteen tens that was, like, what you do for

0:39:40.120 --> 0:39:43.560
<v Speaker 2>entertainment on your like night off is head to the

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:45.280
<v Speaker 2>square and listen to speakers.

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 3>Isn't that proof that TikTok is like not as new

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:49.840
<v Speaker 3>as we think it is exactly?

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is the first TikTok, the first tumbler Twitter like,

0:39:53.280 --> 0:39:55.399
<v Speaker 2>and what they show in movies gets it wrong because

0:39:55.440 --> 0:39:56.880
<v Speaker 2>usually in a movie it's like kind of like a

0:39:57.480 --> 0:40:01.319
<v Speaker 2>wild rant or even just an impassion and speech. Right.

0:40:02.200 --> 0:40:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Soapboxers were basically stand up comics with an agenda because

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 2>they are they know how to work crowds. They do

0:40:13.160 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 2>crowd work real well, and they like because they're competing

0:40:17.239 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 2>in this real direct way. You go to a public

0:40:19.080 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 2>square and it's not just like one person on a soapbox.

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:24.279
<v Speaker 2>There's like thirty of them. I'm making that number up.

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:26.439
<v Speaker 2>I have literally no idea how many in any given place,

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:29.360
<v Speaker 2>but like more than one, which is exciting. Yeah. So

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:32.680
<v Speaker 2>activist media various kinds, both the like written down in

0:40:32.719 --> 0:40:37.280
<v Speaker 2>a newspaper and the you know soapbox kind always existed,

0:40:38.320 --> 0:40:41.640
<v Speaker 2>and there's one more piece to put into place to

0:40:41.680 --> 0:40:46.319
<v Speaker 2>get a st indie media. There's something called an info shop.

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:48.240
<v Speaker 2>This is a word that I have taken for granted

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:50.399
<v Speaker 2>that I think most people don't know. This is Yeah.

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:52.359
<v Speaker 3>I love it, and I've never heard that before. I

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 3>don't think.

0:40:53.320 --> 0:40:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a kind of storefront. It is part of

0:40:55.920 --> 0:40:59.800
<v Speaker 2>the activist, especially anarchist media landscape. The name is a

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:02.799
<v Speaker 2>direct translation from German. We talked about a little bit

0:41:02.800 --> 0:41:05.919
<v Speaker 2>in the Black Block episode about the autonomists and their

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:08.280
<v Speaker 2>stuff that they were creating in the seventies and eighties

0:41:08.320 --> 0:41:10.160
<v Speaker 2>and how that started to spread around the world a

0:41:10.160 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 2>little bit where they were like, we want lives outside

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:15.400
<v Speaker 2>of the mainstream culture, and they would build an entire

0:41:16.080 --> 0:41:21.360
<v Speaker 2>subcultural community, and that those communities had infoshops. It's somewhere

0:41:21.360 --> 0:41:24.440
<v Speaker 2>on the continuum between a radical bookstore and a social center.

0:41:24.560 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 2>You can go in and there's going to be like

0:41:26.239 --> 0:41:29.960
<v Speaker 2>zines and books, maybe a lending library, events and speakers.

0:41:30.640 --> 0:41:33.879
<v Speaker 3>Kind of a feminist bookstore. Yes, if there's any kind

0:41:33.880 --> 0:41:35.560
<v Speaker 3>of a moderndy equivalent.

0:41:35.160 --> 0:41:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, totally. The feminist bookstore is a parallel development that Actually,

0:41:40.200 --> 0:41:42.879
<v Speaker 2>I'm kind of curious how much overlap there would be

0:41:42.880 --> 0:41:46.640
<v Speaker 2>between those developments. Infoshops have been around for a while.

0:41:46.760 --> 0:41:49.319
<v Speaker 2>The things have been existing since the earliest one I've

0:41:49.320 --> 0:41:51.239
<v Speaker 2>read about was in Chicago in nineteen ten, but I

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:53.759
<v Speaker 2>think that they go back further than that. That's just

0:41:53.880 --> 0:41:55.240
<v Speaker 2>the oldest one I've read about.

0:41:55.680 --> 0:41:58.640
<v Speaker 3>There need to be more leftist costume dramas. People don't

0:41:58.640 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 3>assume there were leftists in because there aren't costume dramas

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:05.120
<v Speaker 3>about them where they're falling in love or whatever. We

0:42:05.200 --> 0:42:06.799
<v Speaker 3>just need one of those, just one.

0:42:07.840 --> 0:42:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Wait have you seen reds Honey?

0:42:09.480 --> 0:42:09.640
<v Speaker 3>Hi?

0:42:10.480 --> 0:42:11.000
<v Speaker 2>I have not.

0:42:11.239 --> 0:42:14.400
<v Speaker 3>I should because that's like Diane Keaton and Warren Batty.

0:42:14.560 --> 0:42:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Right, Wait, which one did are you talking about? What is?

0:42:16.960 --> 0:42:18.560
<v Speaker 2>What was your pitch, Sophie?

0:42:19.120 --> 0:42:21.200
<v Speaker 1>No, Sarah and I were just going back and forth.

0:42:21.360 --> 0:42:26.720
<v Speaker 3>Oh, okay, what are you doing our Samantha practice? Wait, Sophie,

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 3>should we do? You want to pitch the honey Off?

0:42:29.040 --> 0:42:29.239
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

0:42:29.360 --> 0:42:32.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we have this idea to do a honey off,

0:42:32.840 --> 0:42:35.840
<v Speaker 1>which is Tom Womscans from Succession being afraid of his

0:42:35.880 --> 0:42:39.359
<v Speaker 1>wife and going honey and then Samantha Jones from Sex

0:42:39.400 --> 0:42:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and the City being like honey, and then you go

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:43.560
<v Speaker 1>back and forth.

0:42:44.280 --> 0:42:46.640
<v Speaker 3>We're working on a plane called Sex and the Succession.

0:42:47.760 --> 0:42:49.239
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Sarah, ready, I'm talking.

0:42:49.280 --> 0:42:57.879
<v Speaker 3>Okay, honey, honey, honey, honey. It's perfect, right, mm hmm.

0:42:57.920 --> 0:43:00.200
<v Speaker 2>It's good. You should do an entire show of it.

0:43:00.360 --> 0:43:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I know.

0:43:01.480 --> 0:43:03.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is what we do it every time.

0:43:03.520 --> 0:43:06.480
<v Speaker 3>I think we could do like a two hour like

0:43:06.520 --> 0:43:08.719
<v Speaker 3>a Frankie and Johnny at the Clear to Loon kind

0:43:08.719 --> 0:43:11.440
<v Speaker 3>of play. But it's Tom Wamscans and Samantha Jones.

0:43:11.480 --> 0:43:15.280
<v Speaker 2>It's perfect. But can you turn it into a costume

0:43:15.360 --> 0:43:19.279
<v Speaker 2>drama about feminist bookstores and radical bookstorre? Yes, we can

0:43:19.320 --> 0:43:21.560
<v Speaker 2>forget it. Yeah, like what if the none of the

0:43:21.600 --> 0:43:24.120
<v Speaker 2>dialogue is that, But somehow, through like staging and the

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:27.600
<v Speaker 2>other characters and things happening in the background, you communicate an.

0:43:27.640 --> 0:43:31.080
<v Speaker 3>Entire plot rented a room over a feminist book store.

0:43:31.120 --> 0:43:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:43:32.160 --> 0:43:34.239
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we just gave the audience the real

0:43:34.320 --> 0:43:37.440
<v Speaker 1>insight to our personal lives.

0:43:37.840 --> 0:43:40.040
<v Speaker 3>It's well, you know, you get together and you have

0:43:40.120 --> 0:43:44.279
<v Speaker 3>a Sex and the Succession. Yeah, you watch Sharing just

0:43:44.400 --> 0:43:47.560
<v Speaker 3>like that, and then to recover emotionally, you watch Succession.

0:43:47.640 --> 0:43:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:50.799
<v Speaker 3>And my favorite part is when you do your little

0:43:50.800 --> 0:43:56.040
<v Speaker 3>opening theme to succession dance. Yeah, yeah, it's a slow jam.

0:43:56.200 --> 0:44:00.880
<v Speaker 3>Honey honey, honey, honey, honey, honey.

0:44:01.640 --> 0:44:02.640
<v Speaker 1>We're tak an ad brak.

0:44:02.840 --> 0:44:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah sure, fuck it. Here listen are these ads and

0:44:12.640 --> 0:44:17.120
<v Speaker 2>we're back. So you have these info shops and they've

0:44:17.160 --> 0:44:19.840
<v Speaker 2>been around for a long time. In the early nineties,

0:44:19.920 --> 0:44:23.280
<v Speaker 2>you get this other thing, the Internet. The early nineties

0:44:23.320 --> 0:44:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Internet was custom built for people with niche interests to

0:44:25.880 --> 0:44:28.840
<v Speaker 2>set up websites and find one another. God, ain't it

0:44:28.880 --> 0:44:34.560
<v Speaker 2>the truth? Yeah? I sometimes missed that. Yeah. Add in

0:44:34.600 --> 0:44:36.720
<v Speaker 2>the fact that the Internet was proof of the concept

0:44:36.719 --> 0:44:40.400
<v Speaker 2>of decentralization, Like people were really into the idea of

0:44:40.440 --> 0:44:43.040
<v Speaker 2>decentralization as a source of strength in the nineties and

0:44:43.080 --> 0:44:47.440
<v Speaker 2>early odds, right, And so the early Internet was perfect

0:44:47.520 --> 0:44:51.560
<v Speaker 2>for anarchists. And I've met anarchists who've worked on some

0:44:51.600 --> 0:44:54.640
<v Speaker 2>of the fundamental components of the Internet, like the protocols

0:44:54.640 --> 0:44:57.680
<v Speaker 2>that underline all this stuff and like build encryption and

0:44:57.760 --> 0:44:59.960
<v Speaker 2>all this things. But that's a different story that I'm

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:03.640
<v Speaker 2>we're going to do one day. All of these anarchists

0:45:03.640 --> 0:45:05.720
<v Speaker 2>and catch all radicals are doing shit on the Internet.

0:45:05.760 --> 0:45:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Going back a long way, one of the earliest news sites,

0:45:08.480 --> 0:45:11.680
<v Speaker 2>and literally one of the earliest news sites like that

0:45:11.840 --> 0:45:17.080
<v Speaker 2>isn't part of a print newspaper, is called infoshop dot org,

0:45:17.160 --> 0:45:19.720
<v Speaker 2>which is sadly no longer with us. It was started

0:45:19.719 --> 0:45:23.200
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen ninety five under the name mid Atlantic Infoshop

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:26.480
<v Speaker 2>and it was the online component of the Beehive Infoshop

0:45:26.520 --> 0:45:32.080
<v Speaker 2>in DC. And yeah, soon enough it becomes one of

0:45:32.080 --> 0:45:38.560
<v Speaker 2>the first online only news websites. It's slogan was unthinking

0:45:38.640 --> 0:45:42.440
<v Speaker 2>respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth. And

0:45:42.520 --> 0:45:45.360
<v Speaker 2>I like that. It's still a like, you know, like

0:45:45.440 --> 0:45:49.560
<v Speaker 2>newspapers love using truth in their taglines. You know, I

0:45:49.600 --> 0:45:50.600
<v Speaker 2>love that they played to that.

0:45:51.880 --> 0:45:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's true. I love that too, now that you

0:45:54.200 --> 0:45:54.759
<v Speaker 3>pointed out.

0:45:55.880 --> 0:45:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Then, in nineteen ninety eight, a man named Evan Henshaw Plath,

0:46:00.320 --> 0:46:03.919
<v Speaker 2>better known under the name Rabble, created a website called

0:46:03.960 --> 0:46:08.160
<v Speaker 2>protest dot net that was a calendar for various protesters.

0:46:09.160 --> 0:46:11.360
<v Speaker 2>He's going to be important later in the story because

0:46:11.400 --> 0:46:14.200
<v Speaker 2>he is one of the people who started Twitter. And

0:46:14.239 --> 0:46:16.480
<v Speaker 2>there's others of these sorts of websites too, but these

0:46:16.480 --> 0:46:18.680
<v Speaker 2>are some of the ones that are important our context.

0:46:19.680 --> 0:46:23.800
<v Speaker 2>People obviously were able to organize massive movements before the Internet,

0:46:24.200 --> 0:46:27.040
<v Speaker 2>but there are some serious and specific advantages of using

0:46:27.080 --> 0:46:30.120
<v Speaker 2>the Internet for these protests. Earlier, I was talking about

0:46:30.120 --> 0:46:33.640
<v Speaker 2>how the Zapatista is built. It was called People's Global Action.

0:46:33.719 --> 0:46:37.000
<v Speaker 2>They built a grassroots coalition of people coming together as

0:46:37.040 --> 0:46:39.600
<v Speaker 2>like grassroots groups, which is hard to say.

0:46:39.960 --> 0:46:42.319
<v Speaker 1>You're able to like contact a bunch of people like

0:46:42.360 --> 0:46:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you're supposed to, like you can have a.

0:46:43.680 --> 0:46:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Chain, yeah, and so you can actually get everyone in

0:46:49.000 --> 0:46:51.600
<v Speaker 2>touch with each other all over the world in a

0:46:51.640 --> 0:46:54.360
<v Speaker 2>way that was much harder to do quickly when you

0:46:54.400 --> 0:46:57.520
<v Speaker 2>had to. I guess. Also, probably most activist groups didn't

0:46:57.520 --> 0:46:58.120
<v Speaker 2>have telegraphs.

0:46:58.719 --> 0:47:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was gonna say, like email mailing list versus like,

0:47:01.640 --> 0:47:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, handwritten mailing list.

0:47:03.400 --> 0:47:07.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and so they use an email list and communicated

0:47:07.719 --> 0:47:13.440
<v Speaker 2>quickly to coordinate protests globally. So Web one point zero

0:47:13.680 --> 0:47:16.680
<v Speaker 2>was a collection of information written by and four people

0:47:16.680 --> 0:47:20.000
<v Speaker 2>with niche interests. Right. It was just various documents and

0:47:20.040 --> 0:47:22.640
<v Speaker 2>a kind of closer to them to Wikipedia than the

0:47:22.640 --> 0:47:27.600
<v Speaker 2>modern Web. The main distinguishing feature of what changed that

0:47:27.680 --> 0:47:29.239
<v Speaker 2>with Web two point zero is the idea of the

0:47:29.280 --> 0:47:34.200
<v Speaker 2>status update, the idea that people are posting what's happening,

0:47:34.840 --> 0:47:36.839
<v Speaker 2>and there's a few precursors to what's going to become

0:47:36.840 --> 0:47:40.560
<v Speaker 2>indie media, which kind of propels the status update into

0:47:40.760 --> 0:47:44.320
<v Speaker 2>across the world. One is slash dot, which is still around.

0:47:44.440 --> 0:47:47.840
<v Speaker 2>That's like a tech focused news site. There was open

0:47:47.920 --> 0:47:50.239
<v Speaker 2>Diary in nineteen ninety eight that was a precursor to

0:47:50.280 --> 0:47:53.759
<v Speaker 2>live journal, but nothing really took off on an international

0:47:53.760 --> 0:47:57.719
<v Speaker 2>scaleunti indie media. And there was about to be this

0:47:57.800 --> 0:48:01.640
<v Speaker 2>big world changing protests in Seattle in November nineteen ninety nine.

0:48:01.680 --> 0:48:03.960
<v Speaker 2>People are organizing to get ready for it. They're bringing

0:48:04.000 --> 0:48:07.640
<v Speaker 2>all of their skills, techies and journalists get together and

0:48:07.719 --> 0:48:12.520
<v Speaker 2>talk things through. And to quote an article by Harry

0:48:12.560 --> 0:48:15.320
<v Speaker 2>Halpin and that guy Rabble that I was talking about

0:48:16.040 --> 0:48:19.320
<v Speaker 2>who set uprotests dot net quote. One of the fundamental

0:48:19.320 --> 0:48:22.799
<v Speaker 2>problems facing the anti globalization protests was the lack of

0:48:22.840 --> 0:48:26.640
<v Speaker 2>mainstream media coverage. At the time. In nineteen ninety nine,

0:48:27.000 --> 0:48:29.759
<v Speaker 2>large protests in many countries like the United States were

0:48:29.760 --> 0:48:33.520
<v Speaker 2>relatively unknown, and small scale protests were mostly ignored by

0:48:33.520 --> 0:48:37.600
<v Speaker 2>the radio and television based media of the time. So

0:48:37.680 --> 0:48:40.000
<v Speaker 2>folks tried to do something about that. They're like, how

0:48:40.040 --> 0:48:43.680
<v Speaker 2>do we set up media infrastructure? You had things like

0:48:43.719 --> 0:48:46.360
<v Speaker 2>free Speech TV, which did video journalism. But in the

0:48:46.440 --> 0:48:48.920
<v Speaker 2>nineties and early odds it was pretty hard to distribute

0:48:49.080 --> 0:48:53.800
<v Speaker 2>video journalism. You had the well named group Damn Direct

0:48:53.800 --> 0:48:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Action Media Network. In nineteen ninety six, activists in Chicago

0:48:58.640 --> 0:49:02.080
<v Speaker 2>were getting ready to protest the Democratic National Convention. They

0:49:02.080 --> 0:49:05.480
<v Speaker 2>set up a lot of proto versions of later protest infrastructure.

0:49:05.520 --> 0:49:08.439
<v Speaker 2>They rented a building they called the Convergence Center, which

0:49:08.480 --> 0:49:11.640
<v Speaker 2>was where people could meet and organize, and it's a

0:49:11.719 --> 0:49:15.279
<v Speaker 2>term that got later used. In the basement of this

0:49:15.320 --> 0:49:18.880
<v Speaker 2>convergence Center, they set up a media newsroom, and I

0:49:18.880 --> 0:49:21.080
<v Speaker 2>believe there was a community radio station which was almost

0:49:21.080 --> 0:49:24.040
<v Speaker 2>certainly pirate radio, but it just presented as a community

0:49:24.120 --> 0:49:26.759
<v Speaker 2>radio station. But that wasn't legal at the time, so

0:49:27.480 --> 0:49:31.840
<v Speaker 2>good on them. And I believe this is the first

0:49:31.880 --> 0:49:36.880
<v Speaker 2>independent media center, but not under that name yet. In

0:49:36.920 --> 0:49:39.920
<v Speaker 2>the build up to the Seattle Protest of nineteen ninety nine,

0:49:39.960 --> 0:49:43.239
<v Speaker 2>all these media folks started working together to create a

0:49:43.280 --> 0:49:46.000
<v Speaker 2>single website that would allow the activists to become the

0:49:46.040 --> 0:49:51.000
<v Speaker 2>media themselves, indiemedia dot org. The tagline doesn't have the

0:49:51.000 --> 0:49:53.920
<v Speaker 2>word truth in it, which is a terrible shame. The

0:49:53.960 --> 0:49:57.880
<v Speaker 2>tagline was don't hate the media be the media. I

0:49:57.960 --> 0:50:01.080
<v Speaker 2>love that. Wow. Yeah, I actually too, and because there's

0:50:01.080 --> 0:50:02.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people being like, well I hate the media,

0:50:02.600 --> 0:50:06.799
<v Speaker 2>and you're like, all right, we'll just do it better. Literally. Yeah.

0:50:06.960 --> 0:50:09.520
<v Speaker 2>They use some open publishing software that had been used

0:50:09.520 --> 0:50:12.400
<v Speaker 2>by earlier protesters in England and Australia. I really like

0:50:12.440 --> 0:50:14.799
<v Speaker 2>how it's techies and journalists coming together to create this

0:50:15.520 --> 0:50:18.680
<v Speaker 2>weird thing. And the idea is that you have a

0:50:18.719 --> 0:50:22.120
<v Speaker 2>news wire where anyone can upload photos and text and

0:50:22.160 --> 0:50:24.520
<v Speaker 2>media like MP three's and videos and all this stuff,

0:50:24.520 --> 0:50:27.840
<v Speaker 2>which is seems like a very normal idea, and we

0:50:27.920 --> 0:50:30.240
<v Speaker 2>can actually sort of immediately imagine all of the problems

0:50:30.239 --> 0:50:31.840
<v Speaker 2>with this, like all of the hate speech that's going

0:50:31.920 --> 0:50:34.480
<v Speaker 2>to get posted and all of these things. Right, yes,

0:50:34.680 --> 0:50:40.560
<v Speaker 2>but no one had really done this, and indie media

0:50:40.600 --> 0:50:44.400
<v Speaker 2>solved two problems at once. One was DIY journalism, but

0:50:44.640 --> 0:50:47.360
<v Speaker 2>second it could be used for on the ground updates

0:50:47.400 --> 0:50:49.360
<v Speaker 2>that were of use to people. So it's not just

0:50:49.400 --> 0:50:51.640
<v Speaker 2>a way to hear about a protest after it's happened,

0:50:52.000 --> 0:50:56.240
<v Speaker 2>but you could hear about what's happening during the day. Yeah,

0:50:56.920 --> 0:50:59.120
<v Speaker 2>although fewer people had phones and stuff, so it was

0:50:59.200 --> 0:51:01.520
<v Speaker 2>like a little bit harder to do, but.

0:51:02.320 --> 0:51:04.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it feels like the basic approach is like, well,

0:51:04.280 --> 0:51:06.600
<v Speaker 3>what if you had a newspaper that updated itself in

0:51:06.640 --> 0:51:07.200
<v Speaker 3>real time?

0:51:07.400 --> 0:51:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Totally yeah. And the way to do that is

0:51:10.719 --> 0:51:12.759
<v Speaker 2>to turn all of the people into people who can

0:51:12.800 --> 0:51:15.160
<v Speaker 2>say like, hey, I saw such and such like oh,

0:51:15.200 --> 0:51:17.799
<v Speaker 2>the police are gathering at such and such street, right,

0:51:18.480 --> 0:51:21.280
<v Speaker 2>or I just witnessed three people get arrested or whatever.

0:51:22.040 --> 0:51:26.040
<v Speaker 2>And this is a breath takingly important moment in Internet history.

0:51:26.120 --> 0:51:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Even though it was about protest. It led to Twitter,

0:51:31.000 --> 0:51:35.560
<v Speaker 2>and it also led to podcasts. Yeah, concept of fucking podcasts.

0:51:36.120 --> 0:51:39.359
<v Speaker 2>Well there you go. Yeah, it is indie media's fault

0:51:39.400 --> 0:51:40.719
<v Speaker 2>that you are listening to this right now.

0:51:40.840 --> 0:51:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know what, I'll allow it. Yeah, send them

0:51:44.640 --> 0:51:46.319
<v Speaker 1>your complaints about ads.

0:51:48.719 --> 0:51:50.759
<v Speaker 2>Although they'd probably be like, yeah, no, we agree, fuck

0:51:50.800 --> 0:51:54.600
<v Speaker 2>those ads. Although actually we'll get at the way in

0:51:54.640 --> 0:51:58.000
<v Speaker 2>which it had internal conflict around what exactly its values

0:51:58.040 --> 0:52:03.480
<v Speaker 2>were later cool, but that's where we're at indiemedia dot org.

0:52:03.560 --> 0:52:07.520
<v Speaker 2>I in proper cool people for my one episode context

0:52:07.560 --> 0:52:08.760
<v Speaker 2>one episode stuff.

0:52:09.880 --> 0:52:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, speaking of stuff, Sarah, you got anything about a plug?

0:52:13.360 --> 0:52:17.400
<v Speaker 3>Ooh, you can listen to my podcast you're wrong about

0:52:17.640 --> 0:52:21.319
<v Speaker 3>or you cannot. It's really up to you. I want

0:52:21.320 --> 0:52:24.080
<v Speaker 3>to plug corn, have some sweet corn, add it to

0:52:24.160 --> 0:52:29.000
<v Speaker 3>a salad, put it in your ramen. I'm serious, that's all,

0:52:29.520 --> 0:52:31.040
<v Speaker 3>and go to a corn maze.

0:52:31.440 --> 0:52:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:52:32.840 --> 0:52:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Ever eaten raw sweet corn on the cub? Oh my gosh.

0:52:35.760 --> 0:52:38.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Well, I grew up next to a guy who

0:52:38.120 --> 0:52:41.200
<v Speaker 3>grew corn in the summer, and so we could like

0:52:41.280 --> 0:52:43.120
<v Speaker 3>go and just like pick corn.

0:52:43.760 --> 0:52:44.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, of an evening.

0:52:45.000 --> 0:52:48.600
<v Speaker 3>And I remember like sitting on my dad's shoulders eating

0:52:48.640 --> 0:52:51.160
<v Speaker 3>a raw ear of corn, And like, I think raw

0:52:51.200 --> 0:52:52.359
<v Speaker 3>corn is the way to go.

0:52:53.239 --> 0:52:55.239
<v Speaker 2>I like it slightly less, but it's so much work

0:52:55.280 --> 0:52:58.400
<v Speaker 2>to cook it compared to eating it raw. Yeah. I

0:52:58.480 --> 0:52:59.839
<v Speaker 2>love grilled Yeah, grilled corn.

0:53:00.080 --> 0:53:02.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well that's I mean, all the corn is good.

0:53:03.040 --> 0:53:05.400
<v Speaker 2>I went to school in a cornfield. In my first

0:53:06.000 --> 0:53:10.480
<v Speaker 2>above the table job was selling corn really like on

0:53:10.560 --> 0:53:11.480
<v Speaker 2>a roadside stand.

0:53:11.600 --> 0:53:11.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:53:11.800 --> 0:53:14.319
<v Speaker 2>It was a farm stand on a under a strip

0:53:14.400 --> 0:53:16.680
<v Speaker 2>mall overhang sometimes and in other times it was at

0:53:16.680 --> 0:53:19.319
<v Speaker 2>the farm itself, like roadside stand by the farm as

0:53:19.360 --> 0:53:20.720
<v Speaker 2>soon as I could get my work permit.

0:53:21.440 --> 0:53:24.720
<v Speaker 3>How does that job rank in your life of jobs?

0:53:25.160 --> 0:53:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Is it better or worse than this one? I have

0:53:28.040 --> 0:53:32.839
<v Speaker 2>nostalgia for it. I worked alone, unsupervised at fourteen years old,

0:53:33.320 --> 0:53:35.319
<v Speaker 2>which means I got a lot of free produce, and

0:53:35.360 --> 0:53:38.960
<v Speaker 2>so did a lot of other people. And I once

0:53:39.200 --> 0:53:41.200
<v Speaker 2>was being trolled by the people who worked at Starbucks

0:53:41.200 --> 0:53:43.720
<v Speaker 2>next door, and so I tricked one of them into

0:53:43.840 --> 0:53:45.520
<v Speaker 2>eating a raw HIBERNERO.

0:53:49.160 --> 0:53:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Your boss is better now, right?

0:53:50.520 --> 0:53:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, no, totally?

0:53:51.680 --> 0:53:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Okay, cool, We'll be back for part two.

0:53:55.000 --> 0:54:00.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Part two zero on Wednesday.

0:54:00.200 --> 0:54:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Cool People Who Did Cool Stuff is a production of

0:54:02.719 --> 0:54:05.840
<v Speaker 1>cool Zone Media. For more podcasts on cool Zone Media,

0:54:06.000 --> 0:54:09.200
<v Speaker 1>visit our website goolzonmedia dot com, or check us out

0:54:09.320 --> 0:54:12.719
<v Speaker 1>on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get

0:54:12.760 --> 0:54:13.760
<v Speaker 1>your podcasts.