WEBVTT - Week 7 Recap, Winners, Losers, EHHHH

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show and thanks so much for listening and

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>listen to me. This is the Fantasy Football Best Friends

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Forever show. Start listening to us or suffer the consequences. Doit, donnit? Yeah?

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>That's welcome. Happy your host Friday from my god Rob Say,

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Francis Frantice, stand ball ladies and gentlemen yours and with

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 1>that we're walking you inside a studio at thirty four.

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>This is the VF APPS. His Frank Stanfell. I am

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Greg Soman. What's happening, Frankie, Greggy. Happy Monday to you.

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I hope it's a happy Monday for you, because it

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the happiest of Fantasy Football Sundays for me as

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a as a David Johnson owner and as a Chargers

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Better the BFFs. We did it. We did it. We're

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>on the board night. At least things worked out in

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>one league. Greg, how about that? Actually with the two

0:01:57.000 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>leagues that were released that we shared together, we have one.

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>There you go the Yang You know that? So Mitch, Yeah,

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>even with Patrick Mahomes getting hurt and get for not

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>training us Levi on belt. You know that smug guy

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>did to us on Friday, what do he comes out

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>to He was like, oh, man, I think I got

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>a good shot this week. I'm like, dude, I Patrick

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes getting nothing and Travis Kelsey do nothing and you

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 1>think you have a good shot this week? He's like, shrug,

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, when you put it like that, I do

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>have a good shot. Well thanks, Yang, tick a man

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>while he's down. You know what, two men, you know what?

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>You know what, that's fantasy karma. We kicked his gass

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>this week. That's fantasy karma. That's that's a real thing. Though.

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 1>If you start celebrating early, you start trash talking people,

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 1>things are just gonna start going sideways. Man, it is real.

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 1>So fantasy karma is real. It's a fantasy karma. So

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>this week the controversy in my league, and I wasn't

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:48.519
<v Speaker 1>really a part of a part of because you're the

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>commissioner So in my league we do a waiver run

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>every day overnight. It goes every days Yahoo league, right,

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>so as you know who tends to have these loopholes

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>that we did, you exploit, right? So I realized early

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>on in the season because I saw somebody do it

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>that even for a player, that so for whatever reason,

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that our waivers don't run on a Friday. Rue's every

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 1>day but Friday and Monday obviously, and and Tuesday. So

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's it's Wednesday, Thursday, Saturday, Sunday those four days.

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>So I realized after Thursday night football with the Rams

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 1>played that I put in the labor gerald Ever like,

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>all right, tight end, and I got him on my team.

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Then the next day like on Saturday, it's weird. I'm

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>not gonna tell anybody. I'll just take him correct all

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>you did I do anything wrong in that regard? No

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>should I have told. Nobody else noticed it. I'm not

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>going to bring it up to people. So one so

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>jet Van Jeff goes, how did you get Gerald Ever? Was?

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, He's a Yahoo loophole. He's like, oh,

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting. No one says anything, no one does anything,

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 1>all right, cool, So have you ever Lever actually traded

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>him away lost anyway. It was a disaster. OK, sorry, no,

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>we deal. So this past Thursday happens, Hatrick Mahomes gets hurt.

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>He puts an acclaim on Friday for a Super Flex League.

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>From that more it's a dollar gets him on Saturday. Uproar, uproar.

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>But it wasn't you who picked him up. It was

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 1>somebody else. But of course, like, how can he do

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>that in the super Flex League. It's probably people are

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>paying a little bit more attention, So how can he

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>do that? It's so slimy, And of course he's responses

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:40.480
<v Speaker 1>And then they looped you in. They roped you in, Greggy,

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Greg did it first? Greg noticed you tell anybody you

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>guys are some? You don't tell us. That's rude, it's

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>shady as af Like, how can you do that? Not

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>tell the league? And of course Jeff fan Jeff's just

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>like I should have outed Gregg the first time. He

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>should have. Fine, you should have some he should have

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't do anything illegal. I do appreciate that shady as

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>a F two because that's redundant, like r b I

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 1>s are done than also um bed at insight, So

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:20.839
<v Speaker 1>use for this weekend my league. But that's yahoo, man, Frank,

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 1>So now, don't do anything wrong unless they figure it out.

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 1>It's only cheating if you get caught, right. But it

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>wasn't shading. It was a loophole technically, Well what to loophole? Right?

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, bending the rules kind of seeing.

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's Bill Belichick knowing the rules. There you go.

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>The difference is it's whistling from his bench. That's what's right.

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Bill Belichick's undefeated. Me. I can't buy a win because

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I suck. So this is your fantasy karma. So you

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>get I didn't cheat, but I still suck. I'm sorry. Well,

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:57.559
<v Speaker 1>you know what, Greg, as David Johnson owner, I'm probably

0:05:57.560 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna lose as well. What are my chances of the

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Patriots scoring two points or less tonight? The Patriots defense? Yes,

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>very bad. Yeah it's not kids tonight. Yeah, we're gonna

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 1>move to night football. A little bit later on in

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the show Patriots uh and Jets from met Lefty going,

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going. I was offered tickets by two different people.

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>But get home late on Monday night and you know

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>your Tuesday gets start off. You're all sluggish it's gonna

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>take me a while to get home from the stadium.

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>It's fine, I was just watching it from the comfort

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>of my couch. Jests are probably gonna get blown out anyway.

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Probably I'm gonna I might want to try to go

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to Giants Cowboys in two weeks on of the night.

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I'm considering. I'm Daniel Jones keeps playing

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the way he is. Maybe you don't want to do that,

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, Man, I'm gonna say it's definitely. It's like

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>on my right, it's it's my wedding week. It was.

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>It was a cool week to start off the wedding eight, right,

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>like like Giants Cowboys. See, that's basically kicking off November. Huh,

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:52.720
<v Speaker 1>kicking off your birthday week, my birthday week. That's right,

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not your wedding week, it's my birthday. Well, you know,

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying I'm pretty sure my birthday is more

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>important than saying what more wedding. I'm just saying that

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>my birthday week, your birthday week, coincides of my wedding week.

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:07.599
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, will there be a birthday cake for

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>me at your will be cake? Birthday cake cake can

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I just have one candle on my piece of cake.

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Can we make that happen? Absolutely? You if you bring everybody,

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>if you bring a coke, come on you piece of cake.

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna set it up for me. Man, no problem,

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna have You're not gonna have your pants

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and have you birthday to me. That'd be great. I'm

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>sure it wouldn't be you're not noticing. Have you a

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>birthday to you? And that would be equally great. You

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>can do that, you get my camp friends are gonna

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>bother you with advice all night long, and you're like, listen,

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you want advice? Sing for me? Damn it? All right? Good?

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>And I'm hopefully I'm so intoxicated that I give them

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>all the correct answers. Hopefull. You know, when I'm sober,

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I probably won't give them the wrong advice for them. Frank,

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>something's gonna help you and your cheating team. Gregg. Sorry,

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>we're all in touch with the loopholes in that league.

0:07:57.320 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't assume you're losing in every one of your

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>home That things good? Alright, three and four, it's good team,

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>a good luck, Thanks, Funny, we'll take a break into

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson. We're gonna getting to his brother, carry on Johnson,

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna hit HERB Smith Jr. Doesn't not a Johnson.

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll do it anyway. Come up here on the viffs

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>sports grid dot Com Betting insights and entertainment at your

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>fingertips as our team covers the most important topics in

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>sports wagering, real time odds, predictive betting models, expert picks,

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and more. Want the edge than get on the grid

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>sports grid dot Com. Alright, Frankie, Week seven only has

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>one more game left to go. It's tonight between the

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Jets and the Pats. We learned a lot yesterday, so

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:58.679
<v Speaker 1>let's chat about one we lost and sorry, all right,

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the face on anyway, It's okay. The winners and the

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>losers and the You know that we can't exactly figure

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>out coming out all this weekend, so let's begin in Arizona.

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's presents winners, I won, Losers, you suck. You are

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 1>one pathetical loser, and I have no idea what's going.

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's begame and live stadium. Yesterday Arizona took it to

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>New York Giants, in particular Daniel Jones, Kyler Murray kind

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of yesterday for the most part, didn't have to do

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>too much, but it was all about Chase Edmunds. It

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>was the Chase edmund Show for the Arizona Cardinals as

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 1>he dominated David Johnson, played three snaps, came out of

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the game, and Chase Edmunds shows that, Hey, I could

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>be a lead back in these league. We talked about

0:09:57.960 --> 0:09:59.719
<v Speaker 1>the fan duel, hurry up, how much you may want

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to own Chase Edmonds going to phone. He talked about

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 1>it over the last three weeks that this is a

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>handcuff that has to be owned. Now. The question that's

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>on Nannie David Johnson owner's minds is now that is

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 1>this gonna be a split? But Chase Edmonds is going

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to have a role when Johnson is healthy. How substantial

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>can that be? I said this on the fandal hurry

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>up as well, Greg. I think Chase Edmonds has definitely

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>earned a role in this offense even when David Johnson

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>is healthy, if when he is ever healthy, if that's

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>even a thing. But maybe similar to Jamal Williams's role

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:31.439
<v Speaker 1>with the Green Bay Packers, you know, playing thirty five

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>percent of the snaps, getting some work in there. Maybe

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>some work in the past game as well. Here's what

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll say about Chase Edmonds is that he ran really

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>well yesterday. David Johnson hasn't been able to run the

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:43.679
<v Speaker 1>football effectively this year. He hasn't had more than ninety

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards in a single game. Yesterday, Chase Edmonds had

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and twenty seven rushing yards on the season.

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Chase Edmonds is averaging over five yards per carry. David

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Johnson is averaging three point nine yards per carry, and

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>it's behind the same offensive line, so you can't really

0:10:56.800 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>make excuses. I think that there's a chance that once

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>David Johns in his back and he's good to go,

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>he is a really good pass catcher. They run four

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver sets. Is it crazy that we can see

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson line up in the slot or on the

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>outside in those four wide receiver sets, and Chase Edmonds

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>is on the field in the backfield. I don't think

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:16.199
<v Speaker 1>that's crazy. I think that they're going to get creative

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>with this. But I will say this, Greig. So far today,

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals have announced that they're gonna work out j

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Ji and that they're gonna work out Spencer, where they

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>clearly need running back death. But what that tells me

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>is that this David Johnson injury might actually be worse

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>than they're leading on. You know, he's dealt with the

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 1>back injury so far this year, surgically repaired risk. Now

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>he's got the ankle. The guy has beat up, and

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:43.439
<v Speaker 1>they're working out running backs. As for yesterday, and I've

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 1>seen people talking about this on Twitter today. They didn't

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>really have a choice but to have David Johnson active. Now,

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>should they have told us in advance that, well, we're

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:55.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna see a lot of Chase Edmonds in this game.

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>That would have been helpful for fantasy, would have been

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>helpful maybe for you know, betting purposes as all for props.

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>But if you think about it, why would the Cardinals

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>tip their hand? I mean why would they give, you know,

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>why would they reveal any competitive edge that they have?

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Right if the Giants are prepping the entire week and

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 1>expecting David Johnson, why would the Cardinals reveal that they're

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:17.560
<v Speaker 1>not going to use him, that he's only gonna play

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>three snaps, and that Chase Edmonds was gonna play of

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the snaps and get twenty nine touches. It doesn't make sense.

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>The problem, Greg, the biggest problem that I have with

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 1>everything from yesterday is that the Cardinals Twitter account, if

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>you can throw the graphic up downstairs, please, the Twitter

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 1>account had the audacity to tweet out afterwards this image.

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>You should have started Chase Edmonds in fantasy. You don't

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>have to do that, Arizona Cardinals, because that is a

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 1>douche move. You don't have to do this, Greg, There's

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>no reason to do this. I mean, everyone already feels

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 1>terrible that they had David Johnson in their lineup and

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Chase Edmonds on their bench. What's the point of this. Yeah,

0:12:56.480 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure millions of people are competing at you and say, well,

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you could have told us about David Johnson and Chase Edmonds.

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>That's fine. We're all feeling terrible yesterday. As David Johnson owners.

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>That was not necessary and this trolling, No, dude, well

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you know you loved it because you don't own David

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Johnson any leagues, do you. I started him, Greg in

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a league where he gave me zero point to fantasy points.

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Chase Edmonds had thirties seven on my bench. Now my

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 1>only chance of winning is the Patriots defense putting up

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>two or less points. Asked that question, it's not gonna happen. Now,

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not gonna happen. I lost, But the biggest problem

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I had was the fact that they didn't have to

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>tweet that out everything else. I kind of understand why

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:45.680
<v Speaker 1>they did it. Jason Edmondson is a winner. We'll see

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>what happens. Next week. They go and face the New

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Orleans Saints. They are big underdogs in that game. Looks

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:51.199
<v Speaker 1>like Drew Brees is gonna be back for that game.

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:54.079
<v Speaker 1>As of now, they're saying they're they're trying to get you.

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't make sense. They're eight and a half point

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 1>favorites right now. They could be playing from behind. The

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Saints are good against the run. I don't expect David

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Johnson to play in that game personally as of now,

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:08.559
<v Speaker 1>because they're working out other running backs, so we should

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>we shall see. If Chase Edmonds is available, he should

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>be added. He's probably the second priority at the running

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>back position in terms of waiver ONSI in the logic

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>of trying to use it's just that I believe the

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Saints of a buy in Week nine, like why not

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>just give Breeze an extra two weeks here, like, you

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean? Realistically, they probably don't need him

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to beat the Cardinals either. Teddy Bridgewater, Teddy two gloves

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>playing pretty well right now. Bridgewater is gonna give himself

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the starting job because all he does is win and talking.

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't think they give him up. They

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>give up a third round pick to get him. I

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>still think that he's Drew Brees a successor. I don't

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>think so be a fregent again, isn't he How many

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>years does Drew Brees have left? You're telling me if

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the States win the Super Bowl this year, he doesn't

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>just ride off into the sunset. I think that's a

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>realistic possibility. They give up a third round pick. I don't.

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that they're just gonna let him go.

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>They give their choices. Hey, bridge Water free agent. Yeah,

0:14:57.440 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>so he's a free agent. He was a free agent

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>last year. They give their round pick, decided to resign

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>him seven million dollars to be back up, All right, cool,

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I was worth it. I think that I think they

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>pay him again. But here's the thing, He's proven he

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>could win. So now Bridgewater could probably get a lot

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of money from a team that he's desperate. Maybe this

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>is one of the best systems to be in. So

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>he just helped out his cause tremendous offensive and it

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>was Is Teddy bridge Water really this good though? That's

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the question. So I agree with you, but all we

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>can say is he continues to find ways and seven

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>against the spread in his career, GREG five and oh

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>since he's taken over, and yesterday was no different. He

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>went into Chicago and one against his Chicago Bears defense,

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Like that's an impressive Windwater is making himself money man

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 1>looking for him. Impressive, impressive win without Alvin Kamara and

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>without Drew Brees, Bridgewater did his job. Latavius Murray Man.

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Like we were trying to figure out where to rank

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>him last week, I had him as a low and

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 1>RB two not high enough, clearly clearly not. He finishes

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the RB two on the week overall behind Jase Edmonds.

0:15:57.000 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>And I know this defense is is very good or

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>is a puposed to me? But that's not back to

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>back weeks and they have allowed a lot of point

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>fantasy points to their opposing running back and they've they've

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>lost the chem Hicks who was there. He's a big

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>stalwart in the middle of that defensive line who helps

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>against the run tremendously. Now, they still had him a

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago when they faced Josh Jacobs in

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders. But you're right, there's now two games in

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a row where they give up over a hundred rushing

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>yards two rushing touchdowns. Maybe the Bears defense, especially against

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the run, is not as good as it was. Absolutely,

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Who's who do they play this week? To the Chicago

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Bears will be hosting? This is fun? The Los Angeles Chargers,

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Melvin Gordon and Austin I want to get into Austin Ekeler, Melbourn,

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Gordon in a little bit. I do that after the break,

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>But let me just stick with this game for a moment. Uh.

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Did you pay attention to who the tight end was

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>for New Orleans because Jared Cook didn't play a long out,

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>it was Josh Hill once again. Josh Hill scores the

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>touched on against Chicago. If Jared Cook doesn't play again,

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Josh all very much hard streaming tight end this week

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>against the Cardinals. You're gonna have to pay attention to

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Jarry Cook all week long. Josh Hill and potentially a

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>potential streaming option on the other side of the the Chicago Bears.

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Something else that was dead wrong about this year. Alan Robinson,

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 1>like Alan Robinson, has been awesome all year. He is

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the only weapon of this of the receiving corps for Chicago.

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:19.159
<v Speaker 1>Tree Burton does nothing. Ethany Millard does nothing to like

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Gabriel does nothing like. It's all Alan Robinson at all

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 1>times and as bad as unreliable as Mitchell Drabinsky is.

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Alan Robinson had like sixteen targets yesterday. He did. It

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 1>was an unbelievable performance by arab and he is to

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>me a reliable Loewen Rode receiver two at the moment. Yeah.

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>And I said on Friday that I was hesitant in

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>this matchup because he was going on Marshall Mattimore. Now

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>it was garbage time, which is fine. I mean garbage

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 1>garbage time. Fantasy points counts is count as well. Allan

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Robinson is used to this. I mean he's played with

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:51.919
<v Speaker 1>Blake Portles, right, He's played now with Mitchell Robinsky. He's

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:54.680
<v Speaker 1>used to bad quarterback play. Sixteen targets actually a career

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>high for him. Yesterday in that game ten receptions for

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:01.199
<v Speaker 1>eighty seven yards and a touchdown. He's has three touchdowns

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:03.159
<v Speaker 1>over his last two games. He's had at least seventy

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>seven seventy seven receiving yards in three street. He's had

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:08.920
<v Speaker 1>at least seven targets in every game this season. You're right, Greg,

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>he is a mustart wide receiver too every single week,

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 1>or as we would say, Alan Robinson, a winner. He

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>is a winner Bears. The Bears running back David Montgomery

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>specifically huge, huge, loser, unbelievable. Man. I told you about

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 1>a trade I wanted to propose four Dave of Montgomery.

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 1>You didn't do what nighted doing. Feel good with Austin Ekeler.

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about winners and losers with the Chargers. We

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>were sorry. Sports grid dot Com Betting insights and entertainment

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 1>at your fingertips seven as our team covers the most

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>important topics in sports wagering, real time odds, predictive betting models,

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>expert picks, and more. Want the edge than get on

0:18:47.040 --> 0:19:03.439
<v Speaker 1>the grid sports grid dot Com. I want to be

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the next Daily Fantasy millionaire. Then dunk on your NBA

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:09.440
<v Speaker 1>DFS competition. With Daily rodor dot com, you can dominate

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>on vanduel and draft Kings this season. You can compete

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>with the pros Daily Rotor dot com a lot of

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>optimized on the most accurate projections and NBA d f S.

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Plus you get a lot of alert's, breaking news, late

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>swap support, and so much more. You can say temper

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 1>sent on winning NBA DFS advice with a robo code.

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Dun't that's Daily Roder dot com slash dunk to learn

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 1>more Dailor Roder dot com slash dunk Dailey Roder dot

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:33.199
<v Speaker 1>com for millionaires are made. It's meeking of u NBA DFS.

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I heard that vandal got rid of the drop her

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 1>or lowest score. So it's probably a one year trial

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 1>thing and see if it works out. And I liked it,

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>probably got a lot of bad response. Didn't you like it?

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>It was fine, It was fun. I mean it allowed

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:48.239
<v Speaker 1>you to, you know, put that punt player in your

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>You gotta you gotta hit on everyone else. So are

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:52.439
<v Speaker 1>you going to be playing the DFS a little bit

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>more cognizant of tomorrow or when's day? Yeah? For sure, Yeah, Yeah,

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm you know, I'm a big basketball guy, Grady,

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>So I'm excited for the seasons. It would have been

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 1>awesome if Zion was going to play. I mean, that's

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>unfortunate obviously for the NBA and for the Pelicans, but

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I know not. We'll get more brandon Ingram tomorrow. I'm

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 1>not supposed to do this. They have my basketball draft

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>last night. I couldn't figure out what to do about Zion,

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 1>like I did. I got in on the bidding and

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 1>in the auction. How much did he go for? That

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 1>was what I was about to ask you. How much

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of the Zion should have gone? I don't like, how

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 1>how much did Pascal for her? I'm pulling I'm pulling

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 1>up the because I don't do fantasy basketball auctions, so

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:33.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know very similar to the NFL there,

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>or at least my auction was so sam whatever forty three.

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I will say that Zion went for thirty four thirty nine. Okay,

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 1>So in between what I said and so yeah, I

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:49.880
<v Speaker 1>mean that probably still makes some what a late third

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 1>early fourth round pick in terms of his dollar amount.

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of money. Though for someone who might

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>miss you know they're going to be cautious with him,

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:59.479
<v Speaker 1>so over pick. I was in on Zion until pretty late,

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and I was like why don't. I don't do this, Gred,

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 1>don't get in on the injured guys. Don't be stupid.

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>You you know we had injury. Optimis that guy David

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Johnson Green? I didn't, Dude, he might not. I'm telling you,

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna play another game with the Bengals. Why

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>would he play a game with him at this point?

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>It makes no sense. Let's get back to yesterday, Greg,

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's get right back into it. And I mentioned the

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Chargers and um by the way before I continue. Don't

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>get back into this, but sure you follow us here

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube. If you're watching on YouTube, if you're watching

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>on zoom cha. I don't have a nine team wherever

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>you're watching because I don't YouTube. We like to talk

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>on our chat. You can live interaction with us, So

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>get on YouTube and also check us out on Instagram

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 1>at Sportscrid TV. That's where you can find everything that

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 1>we do at Sportscred Team babe, all right, Frankie, yesterday,

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the Los Angeles Chargers, Fellow, the Tennessee Titans, and Ryan Tannehill.

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get into Tannehill and all these Titans weapons

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>in just a moment. But I wanted to start with

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers because a clear loser of yesterday, there's Melvin Gordon.

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Because Melvin about every single way post, every faster of

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the game, right Like, he's a worse at receiving the football.

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>He's never been good at yards per carry. And you

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 1>saw that yesterday. We were just like, looks like he's plotting.

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>He lost the game for his team by fumbling at

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the goal line. Meanwhile, Austin Ekeler had a few receptions

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>in the first half, he had like three, like three

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>for forty or four for four years. Let along those lines.

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>In the second half, he's running more routes. He got

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 1>like a forty yard touchdown on a double move. He

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>almost had a second touchdown down the middle. It would

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 1>have won the game for the Chargers. Ekeler, every time

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 1>he's on the field looks like a winner. He looks

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>better than Melvin Gordon. Yet there's Anthony Lynn constantly giving

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 1>Melvin Gordon an opportunity after opportunity to be successful. Gordon

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>through the game away for the Chargers. You had said

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 1>to me, I believe it's a week ago. Might have

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:42.199
<v Speaker 1>been to where at what point did the Chargers just

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>say screw this. Eckler is a better player. Ecklers are

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>long term. Guy. Let me get him on the field

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and let me use him more. And I said, it's

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:51.640
<v Speaker 1>not gonna happen. They're gonna run Melvin Gordon into the ground. Well,

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I've kind of come around in your way of thinking,

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 1>because I still think like over the last two weeks,

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I've been right there trying to run Melvin Gordon into

0:22:57.840 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the ground and trying to use him and all facts

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>stuff game. But every time we look, Austin Ekeler is

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>simply the better player. Yesterday, they would have left Ekeler

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:09.640
<v Speaker 1>in the game, they probably win that football game. Melon

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Gordon a loser, Austin Ekeler winner. How do you see

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>this shaping up going forward? That's what fantasy owners needs

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to know. Yeah, I do think that we could be

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>getting closer to that Melvin Gordon we know is going

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to be a free agent in the off season. Are

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers going to bring him back? I'm not so sure.

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>And they were performing better without him earlier on in

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:29.959
<v Speaker 1>the season, Gregg the first four games they were two

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and two, averaging two point five points per game, and

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>with Melvin Gordon since he's been back there, oh in

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>three and they're averaging sixteen points seven points per game

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>on offense. I mean, it's just obvious at this point

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that Austin Ekeler makes them a better team. He's more

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:47.200
<v Speaker 1>dynamic as well. I mean, Melvin Gordon looks a lot

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 1>like you know, Peyton Barber right now. He's just running

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>into the back of his offensive line. An offensive line,

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 1>by the way, which is not good. It might not

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:56.919
<v Speaker 1>all be on Melvin Gordon, but there are twenty one

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:59.640
<v Speaker 1>in run blocking right now according to football outsiders. There's

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>just they hn't run between the tackles. There's nowhere from

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 1>Melvin Gordon to run. He's not somebody who can really

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>break it to the outside and break off these long runs.

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 1>He's he's always been the grinder, the guy who wears

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 1>defenses down. And he's good inside the red zone. He's

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:15.399
<v Speaker 1>good at scoring touchdowns. Well, yesterday he wasn't. He had

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>two opportunities inside the one yard line, and I bet

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 1>on the Chargers money line greg And honestly, as soon

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>as they ruled the first one a touchdown and then

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>overruled it, I said, I turned to my friend, I said,

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:31.159
<v Speaker 1>something bad's about to happen. This is Los Angeles Charger football.

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 1>That he's either gonna fumble or Philip Rivers is gonna

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>throw an interception. Mind you, very next play he fumbles

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the ball, it would just seem like a guarantee. I mean,

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:42.120
<v Speaker 1>this is Chargers football for as long as we can remember.

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:46.880
<v Speaker 1>But yesterday Eckler thirty seven snaps, Melvin Gordon thirty three,

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 1>uh nineteen opportunities for Melvin Gordon, there was thirteen yesterday

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>for Austin Ekeler. He had eight targets, he had that

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 1>receiving touchdown. I think that this team, while you don't

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>want to be one dimensional, I think that they should

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:03.680
<v Speaker 1>just use the short passing game to their running backs

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 1>as an extension of the run game. I mean, we

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:08.160
<v Speaker 1>see we saw the Detroit Lions do that for years

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 1>because they couldn't run the football. I think the Chargers

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>should go down a similar route. Their offensive line is

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 1>just not good enough right now, and if that's the

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:16.639
<v Speaker 1>route that they want to go to go down, Austin

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Ekeler fits that better. So as of right now, if

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I were just ranking these guys, who would I'd rather own?

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I think Austin Ekeler is the more dynamic talent. Definitely

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 1>in PPR, he's gonna get more targets, he's gonna have

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:28.440
<v Speaker 1>more receptions. Um, they can't run block right now, Greg,

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 1>And if you're a Melvin Gordon owner, you feel really

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>bad about him. I think he's more of a high

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>end flex, high end RB three right now than the

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 1>low n RB one. The high end RB two that

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:41.439
<v Speaker 1>you were drafting him to be just doesn't look good

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:43.959
<v Speaker 1>right now for Melvin Gordon. So I'm trying to figure

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>out the value of both of those guys. As I

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 1>said going to break, I had offered almost like three

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 1>weeks in a row Austin Ekeler straight up for David Montgomery.

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to do that anymore. I wouldn't do

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:56.719
<v Speaker 1>it now. Yeah, I can't do that anymore. But if

0:25:56.760 --> 0:25:58.679
<v Speaker 1>you're an Austin Ekeler owner of aending in the position

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that you're in I was, he's my own position. I'm

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:03.120
<v Speaker 1>three and four in this league, you just hold onto him.

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 1>What are you trading? Well? What are you gonna get

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:07.479
<v Speaker 1>him for? That's what you have to ask yourself. It's

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 1>crazy because previously offered over Miles Sanders too I don't

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>want to do that. No, I mean that's not gonna

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>help you either, or at least he's getting targets right now,

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:15.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean eight targets history that was tied for a

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>second on the team with Hunter. Henry has seven receptions

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and eighteen yards. It means the way that they utilized

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>him yesterday is how they should utilize him every game.

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he burnt a linebacker. No linebacker is gonna

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>be able to guard Austin Ekeler, especially you know, on

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 1>wheel routes, on you know, quick slants. They're not gonna

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 1>be able to guard him. He's just too quick. So

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:36.159
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's gonna be his role. I think

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 1>in PPR leagues he is a low and RB two

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:40.400
<v Speaker 1>he's he's a high end flex option and that's fine.

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:43.160
<v Speaker 1>You just have to realize what his value is. He's

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>not the running back that he was early on in

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:46.919
<v Speaker 1>the season. He's not going to have that level of value.

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:49.199
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't mean that he doesn't have value. So

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>if you can flip him for a wide receiver three,

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 1>if you need wide receiver helps something like that, that

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:55.679
<v Speaker 1>might make sense. But if you need a flex I

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 1>think he's fine. Trade for Allen Robinson. I do that, sure.

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't you get it though? Yeah? Probably not all right? Um,

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:05.160
<v Speaker 1>would you trade, thinking out loud, would you trade Austin

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Ekeler and MVS for Robinson? Yeah? I do that for sure,

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 1>would do that as well. Let me get to MBS

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 1>here in a moment. Now on the other side, in

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>this game, in the Chargers Titans game, Titans were successful

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:19.679
<v Speaker 1>and as the new quarterback of course, Ryan Tannehill the

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>starter yesterday and the open up the ovens right through

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>for over three hundred yards. A. J. Brown, Cold Beasley, Um,

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Corey Davis all very much involved. Derrick Henry also found

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the end zone. It seems like the ovens came alive

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:33.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit yesterday. But Frank, the question that fantasy

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 1>owners want to know is what is real and what

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>was a mirage? We've seen glimpses A. J. Brown and

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Corey Davis before we know I think called Beasley again,

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:45.919
<v Speaker 1>Jesus Adam Humphreeze was came alive in this game too. Um,

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 1>what was real and what should fantasy owners not believe

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 1>coming out of yesterday? Well, first of all, I think

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 1>that Ryan Tannehill is better for this team right now

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 1>than Marcus Marriott. I think he showed that yesterday thirty

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 1>nine three twelve yards, ten point eight yards per tamp,

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.120
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns, that's a pretty damn good game. He's gonna

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 1>turn the ball over at times. He did have one interception,

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 1>but overall, you know, going up against look, the Chargers

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 1>are not a great defense. They're beat up as well,

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:13.439
<v Speaker 1>but they're supposed to have a good corner in Casey

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Hayward and Corey Davis still had a great game. He

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>had six receptions, eight yards and a touchdown. And I

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 1>feel really good about both Corey Davis and A J.

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:22.919
<v Speaker 1>Brown heading into next week because they faced the Tampa

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Bay Bucks. The Tampa Bay Bucks have allowed five receiving

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns to wide receivers over their last three games. So

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:31.400
<v Speaker 1>even if it's just for the short term, I don't

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 1>see how this can hurt their value. I think that

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 1>this actually helps their value a lot. We'll talk about

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 1>this morning the Waiver Wire show tomorrow, but if Corey

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Davis and A J. Brown are available, I am very

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 1>bullish on these guys that each had seven targets yesterday.

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 1>In fact, A J. Brown had eight targets, and I

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>think that they can make the most of that going

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>up against that Bucks secondary. So I am I'm buying in.

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm buying in on the Titans wide receivers with with

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Tannehill as the quarterback, because at the least he can

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>get the ball in their hands. Marcus Mariotta was not

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 1>able to do that. Greg and dare Rick Henry yesterday

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:03.479
<v Speaker 1>another twenty two carries had at least He's had at

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>least fifteen carries in every game so far this season,

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 1>ninety rushing yards a touchdown as well. How about this, Greg,

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 1>The seven touchdowns that he scored before that one yesterday

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 1>all came from the one yard crazy he this was

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the first touchdown that he's had in his last eight

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that came from one, not from the one. He was

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 1>an eleven yard touchdowns, So, I mean they used him

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 1>in that regard. You know, whenever they get down to

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the goal line, they used Derrick Henry. But that was

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 1>nice to see as well. I mean, he is a

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>legitimate high end r B two regardless of how their

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 1>offensive line is playing, regardless of who the quarterback is,

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 1>because they want to run the football and you know

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the volume is gonna be there with Derrick Henry. Absolutely,

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry is as reliables they come, you kind of

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:44.240
<v Speaker 1>know what they are. We'll see what Ryan Tannehill can do.

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 1>The Chargers have an underwhelming and ever he says of

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the word this season, we'll see how real the Titans are.

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Was was the this chair has hurt in my back.

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 1>It was nothing that you're saying, Greg, Just sit up

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 1>all right. I mentioned MB yes before Green Day was

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 1>led by Aaron rodd Yester. You had six total touchdowns,

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:04.720
<v Speaker 1>five through the air, one on the ground. He was unbelievable.

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>MBS and Toronto Alison both played. MBS has a big

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 1>game right too, long catches including a touchdown reception. Just

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 1>embarrassing defense by the Raiders. You can't even call it

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 1>defense whatever it was. I mean they were on the field,

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 1>but base defense was all that good either. No, they weren't.

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 1>But I mean on that touchdown to MVS, I mean

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 1>he took a short pass and just ran down the

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 1>sideline untouched. Nobody was even near me at seventy four

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 1>yard touchdown. Big plays for for Marquez Valden Scantling, huge

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:36.719
<v Speaker 1>game for Aaron Rodgers, but ultimately only three targets for MVS.

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:38.239
<v Speaker 1>So we'll talk about this a little bit more when

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 1>we come back. Greg, but targets chair. For me, this

0:30:41.000 --> 0:30:43.239
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a great one for MVS. Absolutely right. We take

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 1>a break. More from green Bay. More around the league, winners,

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>losers at sports grid dot Com, Betting insights and entertainment

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 1>at air Fingertips seven as our team covers the most

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 1>important topics in sports wagering, real time odds, predictive betting models,

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:00.680
<v Speaker 1>expert picks, and more. Want the just didn't get on

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the grid sports grid dot Com or a lot of

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 1>games gets you not a lot of time to do it.

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Like I mentioned Green Bay, MBS, let's hard get share

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 1>what Aaron Rodgers did yesterday in decimating the Oakland Raiders

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of pathetic performance by them, by their defense in particular,

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 1>how do you see this green Bay offense shaking out?

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 1>The problem yesterday for MBS was that he had three

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 1>targets and there was two, four or six eight players

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that had between two and five targets yesterday for the

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay Packers. I just think in games that Davanta

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Adams is not around, they're gonna spread the ball around.

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 1>There's not gonna be just one guy that locks in

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>now when there are games in a good matchup where

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers could get going clearly like he did yesterday

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 1>against this Oakland Raiders secondary a terrible one. Fire up

0:31:55.200 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 1>your Houston Texans next week, because that's who's facing this

0:31:57.800 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Oakland Raiders secondary. Kenny still is very good at But

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>when they're in good matchups, I think that you can

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 1>trust these guys, Greg, but on a weekly basis, just

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, in a neutral or tougher matchup, can you

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:10.280
<v Speaker 1>trust m vs getting you know, three to five targets?

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Can you trust Toronomo Allison? The answer for me, more

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 1>often than not is going to be no, because I

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:16.720
<v Speaker 1>think that they're going to spread the ball out again.

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Uh and hopefully Davantae Adams can get healthy. But I

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 1>think after they see a game like this, they're not

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna rush him back because they're performing. They're still winning games.

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 1>There's six and one, so they're gonna get Davanta Adams

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 1>as much time as they possibly can. In good matchups,

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>you can use these guys, Greg, but in neutral or

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 1>tougher ones, I'm probably staying away. I tend to agree

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 1>it's just simply not worth it to get involved. Oakland

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 1>also just spread the ball around quite a bit yesterday,

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Darren Waller except for one guy. Yeah, that's exactly right.

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Eight targets out of thirty one. I mean that's a

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 1>massive target share. Huge game. Didn't have a touchdown. Entering

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 1>that game, we saw Foster Morea score another touchdown, and

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 1>at the time we're saying, really, Darren Waller can't get

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 1>in the end zone. He was tackled at the one

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 1>yard line. Still ends up with two touchdowns. Someone asking

0:32:57.880 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the chat, what do I do if I have Waller

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 1>or Evan Engram moving forward? You gotta ride with Darren

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Waller based on his usage, based on his targets. Daniel

0:33:04.720 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Jones not playing great right now, great matchup for Evan

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Ingram yesterday, didn't take advantage of it either. You gotta

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 1>go with Waller over Evan Ingram right now. It's funny

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:14.480
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna league that we're together. Frank and I own

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 1>both Darren Waller, uh and we own Travis Kelsey. And

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 1>he was trying to trade one. I was like, why

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:21.960
<v Speaker 1>are you training our best players? Yeah? And we we

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 1>start multiple flex options soon. Look, if we're not gonna

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 1>get fair value, just continue to start them. Both. Our

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 1>benched pretty good yesterday. Luckily we ended up winning, because

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 1>if we didn't win and that bench went off, I

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 1>don't think we would have the same exuberance enthusiasm you mengined.

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Stills. He's been on our team a couple of

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 1>times this year, and hopefully he will be again, because

0:33:41.280 --> 0:33:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Kenny still stepped up yesterday as Will Fuller left this

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:45.360
<v Speaker 1>game with a hamstring injury. We say it every year

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 1>at some point Will Filler is gonna get hurt. Well,

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 1>we've reached the part of the season where he does.

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Will Fuller and the years Texans wound up losing in

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Indianapolis yesterday to Zach Pascal and the Indianapolis Colts. Kenny Stills,

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:00.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about him a lot. I'm sure tomorrow one

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that's out wide receiver adds off the waiver wire here.

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 1>But Zach Pascal is also probably one of them. Yeah.

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:08.319
<v Speaker 1>I do prefer Kenny Stills over Zach Pascal personally, and

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you why right now. Will Fuller has

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 1>been ruled out for the next couple of weeks and

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the Houston Texans again going up against the Oakland Raiders

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 1>next week. We know that the DeShawn that de Shaun

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 1>Watson and the Houston Texans they like to take deep shots. Yes,

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 1>they can do that with DeAndre Hopkins, but Kenny Still

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 1>is also a very good deep throat wide receiver. Had

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 1>four for one oh five yesterday on five targets, so

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I gotta like him in that matchup against the Oakland Raiders.

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:33.240
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna be high end wide receiver three for me. Greg,

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:36.359
<v Speaker 1>I like Zack Pascal. It's gonna be a solid spot

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 1>against the Denver Broncos. I know that, you know, you

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 1>look at the fantasy points against for wide receivers. The

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Broncos are actually really good. But the way to attack

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 1>them is to attack their secondary corner. We know that

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Chris Harris is going to be on t Y Hilton

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 1>next week, so Zach Pascal might have some value going

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>up against the Denver Broncos. But again I looked at

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the snatch and looked at the routes. They're still really

0:34:57.120 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 1>spreading it out. You know, Dion Kane basically played the

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 1>same amount out as Zach Pascal yesterday wasn't targeted a

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:06.000
<v Speaker 1>single time. But Zach Pascal, Greg, this is now three

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 1>out of four games He's had at least seventy two

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 1>yards or a touchdown. So he does have a rapport

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:14.239
<v Speaker 1>with Jacoby Brissette. I like him as a waiver wire ad,

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:17.239
<v Speaker 1>but not as much as I like Kenny Stills. Yeah,

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:19.799
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree with that. Pascal is one of many,

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:21.359
<v Speaker 1>and yesterday he had a really good game, no doubt

0:35:21.400 --> 0:35:23.799
<v Speaker 1>about it. But Kenny Stills, I think has his role

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 1>in this offense. We know what John Watson could do

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:29.279
<v Speaker 1>with the deep ball. I trust him for more consistency

0:35:29.320 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 1>going forward. How about Jacoby Brissette too. Yesterday I mean

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:36.399
<v Speaker 1>over three hundred yards four passing touchdowns. You can't say

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:38.759
<v Speaker 1>enough about the job that Jacoby Brissett and Frank Reich

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:42.160
<v Speaker 1>have done this year. I mean, weeks before the season started,

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Look, their franchise quarterback, retires from football and Jacobe

0:35:48.480 --> 0:35:51.760
<v Speaker 1>rist two steps in here, completing nearly sixty seven percent

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 1>of his passes almost fourteen hundred passing are so far,

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 1>fourteen touchdowns and three interceptions. You can't say enough about

0:35:57.680 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the job both he and Frank Reich have done. Greg

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 1>absolutely man they have. They now take over sole possession

0:36:02.560 --> 0:36:04.959
<v Speaker 1>of first place in the a f C South because

0:36:04.960 --> 0:36:07.560
<v Speaker 1>they played one less game, but they are in first place.

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:10.879
<v Speaker 1>It does count. It counts. Okay, Um, we mentioned when

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the top waiver wire ads, I mean that brings me

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 1>into Detroit. Who felt to Minnesota yesterday? I actually really

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 1>like to trade in that games, especially that they lost,

0:36:17.719 --> 0:36:19.360
<v Speaker 1>but it was bigger loss for them because the potentially

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:21.400
<v Speaker 1>lost cary On Johnson. We don't still know the status

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 1>of his injury, right, we haven't heard from that, Patricia.

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I have not seen anything so far on carry On Johnson. Okay,

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:28.319
<v Speaker 1>so we haven't heard anything of carry On Johnson. But

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:30.239
<v Speaker 1>another Johnson stepped up in his place, and that was

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:33.719
<v Speaker 1>former Maryland terrapin Ti Johnson, who people were excited about

0:36:33.760 --> 0:36:35.640
<v Speaker 1>coming into the year and he hasn't done all that

0:36:35.719 --> 0:36:38.279
<v Speaker 1>much yesterday. Well he's gonna do all that much, but

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 1>he got the majority of the carries at the goal

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:42.920
<v Speaker 1>line on the early downs. He was around. He know

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 1>this Detroit team wants to run the football. Was the

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:49.080
<v Speaker 1>only injury yesterday in this game. Adam Feeling also heard

0:36:49.160 --> 0:36:52.760
<v Speaker 1>himself here the Vikings. They wind up playing on thursdaynight

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:54.879
<v Speaker 1>football against the Redskins. Let's talk about who we could

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 1>potentially replace Adam filand with and just how badly you

0:36:57.520 --> 0:37:00.160
<v Speaker 1>may want TI Johnson. Yes, we'll start off with the

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota Vikings side of things. This is huge news for

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Stefen days. I think he's a big winner from yesterday,

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 1>saw eight targets, seven catches for a hundred and forty

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 1>two yards. I'm jumping out of my my seat screaming

0:37:10.640 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and yelling when he catches that deep pass. I wanted

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 1>him to get inside the end zone. Just didn't have

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 1>enough gas and falls at the two or three yard line.

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately without Adam feeling on the short week going

0:37:20.680 --> 0:37:22.920
<v Speaker 1>up against Washington, it's a good match up to Washington

0:37:23.000 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>secondary not a good one. I think Stefon dig should

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:29.600
<v Speaker 1>be able to eat in that matchup. But outside of him,

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:32.560
<v Speaker 1>B C. Johnson, pay attention to the name. If you're desperate,

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you know by weeks we do have two teams on

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 1>by heading into week eight, we have the Cowboys and

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:39.399
<v Speaker 1>we have the Baltimore Ravens. B C. Johnson had eight

0:37:39.400 --> 0:37:42.879
<v Speaker 1>targets yesterday, actually tie Stefan Digs for the team lead.

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:45.280
<v Speaker 1>He had four catches for forty yards and a touchdown.

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:47.359
<v Speaker 1>So he's gonna be on the field a lot he's

0:37:47.360 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be you know, in two wide receiver sets. He's

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be out there with Stefon Diggs. But if you

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 1>need a tight end, I do think that Kyle Rolf

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and Earth Smith are also in play. Both of these

0:37:55.680 --> 0:37:58.879
<v Speaker 1>guys had at least six targets yesterday. If Smith five

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 1>catches for sixty yards, Kyle Rudolf five for fifty eight

0:38:01.640 --> 0:38:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and a touchdown. Neither one of them have really done

0:38:04.280 --> 0:38:07.760
<v Speaker 1>much so far this season because the Vikings pass attack

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:09.480
<v Speaker 1>can only support so many people. They don't throw the

0:38:09.480 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 1>ball much and when they do, it goes to mainly

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Adam Feeling, Stefon Diggs, and Dalvin Cook. So the tight

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:16.879
<v Speaker 1>ends haven't done much. But if Adam DeLand is out,

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that Kyle Rudolph and Irv Smith, more so

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Rudolph because he still does play more snaps and

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:24.760
<v Speaker 1>he runs more routes, could be streaming options heading into

0:38:25.160 --> 0:38:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night football against Washington. On the other side, Greg

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned Ty Johnson yesterday. He played forty nine of

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 1>seventy six snaps sixty four percent. He had fourteen touches.

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:39.360
<v Speaker 1>He had fifty seven total yards. Two of those touches

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:41.839
<v Speaker 1>came inside the ten yard line. J. D. McKissick saw

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 1>seven touches, zero of those came inside of the ten

0:38:44.760 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 1>yard line. I think that they really liked this kid

0:38:46.680 --> 0:38:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Ti Johnson four point four five forty eighty six percentile

0:38:50.120 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 1>in speed score coming out of the University of Maryland,

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 1>greg and they liked him enough to cut C. J. Anderson.

0:38:56.680 --> 0:38:58.719
<v Speaker 1>Carry On Johnson dealt with a knee injury last year

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:02.440
<v Speaker 1>which limited him to games. So going up against the

0:39:02.600 --> 0:39:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Giants in Week eight, a team that just allowed a

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:08.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty total yards and three touchdowns to Chase Edmonds,

0:39:08.640 --> 0:39:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Ty Johnson is going to be the top waiver wire

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:13.839
<v Speaker 1>ad for me personally this week. He's in a really

0:39:13.840 --> 0:39:15.920
<v Speaker 1>good spot going up against his Giants defense. Greig, we

0:39:15.920 --> 0:39:18.840
<v Speaker 1>don't have news on carry On, but my early diagnosis

0:39:18.880 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 1>would be I don't think carry On Johnson plays in

0:39:20.520 --> 0:39:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that game. We haven't really We really have no idea obviously, UM,

0:39:23.719 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 1>but we'll see a boy carry On Johnson. Adam feeling

0:39:25.600 --> 0:39:27.239
<v Speaker 1>it does the report as you said, came out not

0:39:27.280 --> 0:39:30.319
<v Speaker 1>gonna play this Thursday. He'll be find long term. Um.

0:39:30.440 --> 0:39:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Another Chargers injury is just came out. I rapp report

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 1>guard Forrest Lamp broke his ankle. It's none of the year.

0:39:36.600 --> 0:39:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Another bad news from Melvin Gordon, which means Austeckler in space.

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Their offensive line has just been so beat up, Greg,

0:39:41.920 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean every everybody on the Charges, right, They suffered

0:39:44.600 --> 0:39:47.160
<v Speaker 1>so many injuries every year. Russell Lacom was supposed to

0:39:47.239 --> 0:39:50.320
<v Speaker 1>make his debut yesterday, was supposed to return from injury

0:39:50.400 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't happen. And now they lose Lamp too.

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:55.799
<v Speaker 1>It's tough man, tough for the Chargers, very very tough

0:39:55.840 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 1>spot for the Chargers who just consistently wind up being injured.

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Let me continue on, Frank, I want get to the

0:40:01.920 --> 0:40:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Rams who one in Atlanta? But Jared Goff, this wide receiver,

0:40:06.239 --> 0:40:08.160
<v Speaker 1>these wide receivers kind of a head game. Like I know,

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Jared Goff put up the numbers alternately, and the wide

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 1>receivers were okay, But you used say that a monster's

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 1>break out, a monstros win for them against a bad

0:40:16.600 --> 0:40:20.319
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta team. Only winner I took from this game, Gerald Everett. Yeah,

0:40:20.320 --> 0:40:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's fair to say. I think it's all

0:40:22.640 --> 0:40:25.760
<v Speaker 1>around for this Los Angeles Rams offense outside of Gerald Everett,

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Jared Goff twenty two of thirty seven. Really against the

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta Falcons defense without Desmond true Font, It's just crazy.

0:40:32.800 --> 0:40:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Seven point two yards per tempt. He did throw two touchdowns.

0:40:35.640 --> 0:40:37.960
<v Speaker 1>He had a rushing touchdown which really helped his day

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:40.799
<v Speaker 1>as well. But again, this completion percentage for Jared Goff

0:40:40.880 --> 0:40:44.520
<v Speaker 1>yesterday just doesn't impress me. Todd Gurley returns eighteen carries

0:40:44.560 --> 0:40:47.240
<v Speaker 1>for forty one yards two point three yards per carry.

0:40:47.239 --> 0:40:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I understand. The offensive line another one that you know

0:40:50.680 --> 0:40:53.120
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been great so far this year. That seems to

0:40:53.160 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 1>be a theme out there in Los Angeles, San Diego,

0:40:55.120 --> 0:40:58.279
<v Speaker 1>whatever you wanna call it. But Todd Gurley not They're

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 1>They're different cities, No, I understand in but like you,

0:41:02.400 --> 0:41:05.919
<v Speaker 1>basically the San Diego I mean, did they even play

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:07.680
<v Speaker 1>in Los Angeles? And mean, is that is that even

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a thing? I don't know? Playing Carson right, I don't know, whatever,

0:41:11.560 --> 0:41:13.880
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is. The offensive lines on the West Coast

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:17.120
<v Speaker 1>haven't been great, but the wide receivers again, I mean

0:41:17.200 --> 0:41:20.440
<v Speaker 1>these basically all this production happened in the first half yesterday.

0:41:20.640 --> 0:41:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Robert Woods five for eighty That's fine. We were expecting

0:41:23.040 --> 0:41:27.319
<v Speaker 1>a bigger game. Brandon cooks for Cooper cups six for fifty.

0:41:27.480 --> 0:41:28.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean a lot of people have him as a

0:41:28.760 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 1>top five wide receiver, look to be a good DFS

0:41:31.560 --> 0:41:33.680
<v Speaker 1>play as well. I mean, it's just there's still something

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:36.800
<v Speaker 1>wrong with this team. Greg. They scored thirties seven points,

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:40.120
<v Speaker 1>but I don't feel great about it. Like Jared Golf

0:41:40.160 --> 0:41:41.840
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be a stream going up against the Bengals

0:41:41.840 --> 0:41:43.560
<v Speaker 1>this week they travel back home. He's supposed to be

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:46.520
<v Speaker 1>better at home. But ultimately, I'm with you. I think

0:41:46.520 --> 0:41:50.200
<v Speaker 1>this is an situation all around. Gerald Leverett ten targets

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:52.680
<v Speaker 1>very good. You'd like to see that four catches for

0:41:52.680 --> 0:41:55.319
<v Speaker 1>fifty yards in a touchdown. He has really taken over

0:41:55.440 --> 0:41:58.480
<v Speaker 1>that role as he passed catching tight end for this team.

0:41:58.520 --> 0:42:02.359
<v Speaker 1>He was the tight end that Sean McVeigh drafted when

0:42:02.360 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 1>he first came over to the Los Angeles Brands and

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:06.840
<v Speaker 1>took over. And I remember we were all excited about

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Gerald Everett his rookie year, Greig, because Sean McVeigh came

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:12.239
<v Speaker 1>from Washington, where they used the tight end a lot,

0:42:12.280 --> 0:42:14.600
<v Speaker 1>they used Jordan Read a lot, and it's finally coming

0:42:14.600 --> 0:42:17.239
<v Speaker 1>to fruition. I think this is what they envisioned for

0:42:17.320 --> 0:42:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Gerald Everett, but his targets being up this year. The

0:42:20.920 --> 0:42:24.080
<v Speaker 1>way they have Greg It is really eaten into the

0:42:24.080 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 1>production of Robert Woods, Brandon Cooks and to a lesser extent,

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Cooper Cup. But Cooper Cup has been amazing. Robert Woods

0:42:30.719 --> 0:42:32.759
<v Speaker 1>and Brandon Cooks have not. They have not given us

0:42:32.800 --> 0:42:34.600
<v Speaker 1>what we were expecting coming into the season. No, it's

0:42:34.600 --> 0:42:36.920
<v Speaker 1>been disappointing from these Rams wide receivers. We all had

0:42:36.960 --> 0:42:39.520
<v Speaker 1>ranked in a similar spot was Cooper Cup has been reliable,

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Robert Woods, Brandon Cooks simply not so much. On the

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:45.040
<v Speaker 1>other side, Matt Ryan left this game with an ankle injury.

0:42:45.120 --> 0:42:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Duvante Freeman got thrown out of this game. He's been

0:42:47.760 --> 0:42:49.920
<v Speaker 1>a dumpster fire for the Lata. Alcon's just a mess.

0:42:49.960 --> 0:42:53.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand. Maybe it's because they didn't they don't

0:42:53.239 --> 0:42:54.759
<v Speaker 1>have someone that they want to turn it over to

0:42:54.880 --> 0:42:56.399
<v Speaker 1>that they just kind of want to let Dan Quinn

0:42:56.440 --> 0:42:58.319
<v Speaker 1>see out the rest of his days in Atlanta. But

0:42:58.800 --> 0:43:00.279
<v Speaker 1>I thought that he should have been fired. I mean,

0:43:00.280 --> 0:43:03.000
<v Speaker 1>how do you score ten points yesterday? I understand the

0:43:03.120 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Rams got Jalen Ramsey and their defense was amped up

0:43:06.680 --> 0:43:08.920
<v Speaker 1>for this one, but I mean in a game that

0:43:09.000 --> 0:43:11.399
<v Speaker 1>had a fifty five. Totally you only managed to put

0:43:11.480 --> 0:43:13.480
<v Speaker 1>up ten points. I mean, it was just a horrendous

0:43:13.480 --> 0:43:16.080
<v Speaker 1>showing all around for the for the Atlanta Falcons. DeVante

0:43:16.200 --> 0:43:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Freeman ejected as well, we have to make sure Matt

0:43:18.760 --> 0:43:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Ryan is good to go, because if he's not, you're

0:43:21.200 --> 0:43:24.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna have Matt shop throwing passes. Last time, we told

0:43:24.200 --> 0:43:26.440
<v Speaker 1>this guy playing consistently he was a pick six machine

0:43:26.800 --> 0:43:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and that has major implications on fantasy because Julio Jones

0:43:30.760 --> 0:43:33.040
<v Speaker 1>first round pick. I mean it wasn't great yesterday, but

0:43:33.080 --> 0:43:36.400
<v Speaker 1>still six. He'll take that. With Matt schaubin there, who

0:43:36.440 --> 0:43:38.239
<v Speaker 1>knows what you're gonna get. At least you know he

0:43:38.280 --> 0:43:41.160
<v Speaker 1>threw a touchdown to Austin Hooper. That helps, But Calvin

0:43:41.239 --> 0:43:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Ridley a letdown. I mean, just all around. I think

0:43:43.719 --> 0:43:45.600
<v Speaker 1>dan Quinn is as good as gone, Greg. Does he

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:49.560
<v Speaker 1>make it to the end of the season. No, No,

0:43:50.400 --> 0:43:54.040
<v Speaker 1>their cutter, you can't can you can't get it to

0:43:54.120 --> 0:43:55.680
<v Speaker 1>me More as the defensive end, I guess you can

0:43:55.680 --> 0:43:59.200
<v Speaker 1>think Mike Mlarkey, Yeah, I think you're cutter to coach. Yeah,

0:43:59.200 --> 0:44:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I think dan quinns is it his gun. I agree.

0:44:00.920 --> 0:44:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I said that for a while now Bill survive against

0:44:03.400 --> 0:44:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins. Defense wasn't as good as I would hope for.

0:44:05.960 --> 0:44:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen did look good. A lot of him. Um

0:44:08.719 --> 0:44:11.400
<v Speaker 1>on the other side, Mark Walton, Hala Milage, it's a

0:44:11.400 --> 0:44:13.919
<v Speaker 1>lot of them with Kenyan Jake on the j block. Yeah,

0:44:13.920 --> 0:44:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I thought that Mark Walton was a clear winner yesterday

0:44:16.440 --> 0:44:19.560
<v Speaker 1>as well. He had six He had fourteen carries. Kenyan

0:44:19.600 --> 0:44:22.319
<v Speaker 1>Drake only had six. Mark Walton led this team with

0:44:22.360 --> 0:44:25.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight of the snaps. He had one target as well,

0:44:25.440 --> 0:44:28.680
<v Speaker 1>so he had fifteen opportunities total, whereas Kenyan Drake only

0:44:28.719 --> 0:44:30.839
<v Speaker 1>had ten. They're trying to trade away Kenyan Drake. That's

0:44:30.840 --> 0:44:32.880
<v Speaker 1>why I said last week, Greg, I thought Mark Walton

0:44:32.960 --> 0:44:35.359
<v Speaker 1>was a good waiver wire ad. So yeah, I think

0:44:35.360 --> 0:44:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Mark Walton is a clear winner, although he's on a

0:44:37.360 --> 0:44:39.920
<v Speaker 1>bad team. I think the wide receivers as much as

0:44:39.920 --> 0:44:41.719
<v Speaker 1>you want to Scoff edit Greg, they let us down

0:44:41.719 --> 0:44:44.760
<v Speaker 1>two weeks ago with Ryan Fitzpatrick as the quarterback. Preston

0:44:44.800 --> 0:44:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Williams and DeVante Parker are both gonna have value tough

0:44:47.640 --> 0:44:49.839
<v Speaker 1>matchup against the Bills yesterday, and they still showed up

0:44:50.040 --> 0:44:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a games. It's a very, very good point. All right,

0:44:52.160 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 1>we had a lot more to talk about. We'll do

0:44:53.719 --> 0:44:57.799
<v Speaker 1>it tomorrow. Another edition could be Frank, we'll see you then.

0:44:58.680 --> 0:45:04.520
<v Speaker 1>We hope sports grid dot com betting insights and entertainment

0:45:04.600 --> 0:45:08.400
<v Speaker 1>at your fingertips as our team covers the most important

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:11.720
<v Speaker 1>topics in sports wagering, real time odds, predictive betting models,

0:45:11.800 --> 0:45:14.200
<v Speaker 1>expert picks, and more. Want the edge than get on

0:45:14.200 --> 0:45:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the grid. Sports grid dot com. What did happened? What happens?

0:45:25.840 --> 0:45:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Here's what you missed on the BFS. You guys are scum.

0:45:30.080 --> 0:45:33.440
<v Speaker 1>You don't tell us. That's rude, it's shady as a

0:45:33.680 --> 0:45:36.080
<v Speaker 1>f like, how can you do that? Not tell the league?

0:45:36.800 --> 0:45:39.360
<v Speaker 1>And of course Jeff, Jeff's just like I should have

0:45:39.360 --> 0:45:42.040
<v Speaker 1>outed Gregg the first time. He should have. Fine, you

0:45:42.080 --> 0:45:44.640
<v Speaker 1>should have. Nobody should have. Didn't do any of the illegal.

0:45:45.040 --> 0:45:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate shady as a F two because that's redundant. R

0:45:49.440 --> 0:45:55.239
<v Speaker 1>b I s are also um bett insight, so use

0:45:55.480 --> 0:46:02.080
<v Speaker 1>for this weekend, my league. But that's any Frank, do

0:46:02.200 --> 0:46:05.160
<v Speaker 1>let you do anything wrong unless they figure it out.

0:46:05.160 --> 0:46:06.680
<v Speaker 1>It's only cheating if you get caught, right, But it

0:46:06.719 --> 0:46:11.319
<v Speaker 1>wasn't cheating. It was a loophole technically, well what to loophole? Right,

0:46:11.360 --> 0:46:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, bending the rules kind of seeing.

0:46:14.440 --> 0:46:17.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's Bill Belichick knowing the rules. There you go.

0:46:17.320 --> 0:46:20.440
<v Speaker 1>The different is its whistling from his bench. That's what's right,

0:46:20.480 --> 0:46:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Bill Belichick's undefeated. Me. I can't buy a win because

0:46:23.200 --> 0:46:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I suck. So this is your fantasy karma. So get tea.

0:46:27.840 --> 0:46:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I didn't cheat, but I still suck. I'm sorry. Well,

0:46:31.920 --> 0:46:34.200
<v Speaker 1>you know what, Greg as David Johnson owner, I'm probably

0:46:34.200 --> 0:46:35.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna lose as well. What are my chances of the

0:46:35.680 --> 0:46:38.839
<v Speaker 1>Patriots scoring two points or less tonight? The Patriots defense? Yes,

0:46:39.320 --> 0:46:42.880
<v Speaker 1>very bad? Right, Yeah, it's not kids tonight. Yeah, we're

0:46:42.880 --> 0:46:44.400
<v Speaker 1>got a mill night football. A little bit later on

0:46:44.400 --> 0:46:47.560
<v Speaker 1>in the show, Patriots uh and Jets from that lefty going,

0:46:48.080 --> 0:46:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going. I was offered tickets by two different people.

0:46:50.360 --> 0:46:52.200
<v Speaker 1>But get home late on Monday night, and you know

0:46:52.239 --> 0:46:55.319
<v Speaker 1>your Tuesday gets start off. You're all sluggish. Gonna take

0:46:55.320 --> 0:46:57.120
<v Speaker 1>me a while to get home from the stadium. It's fine.

0:46:57.120 --> 0:46:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I was just watching from the comfort of my couch.

0:46:58.960 --> 0:47:01.399
<v Speaker 1>That's that's probably gonna get out anyway. Probably I'm gonna

0:47:01.480 --> 0:47:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to try to go to Giants Cowboys in

0:47:03.120 --> 0:47:07.480
<v Speaker 1>two weeks on in the night. I don't know, considering

0:47:07.920 --> 0:47:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jones keeps playing the way he is, maybe you

0:47:09.600 --> 0:47:11.479
<v Speaker 1>won't want to do that, you know, Man, I'm gonna

0:47:11.520 --> 0:47:13.920
<v Speaker 1>say it's definitely. It's like on my right, it's it's

0:47:13.920 --> 0:47:15.560
<v Speaker 1>my wedding weeks. It's a cool week to start off

0:47:15.560 --> 0:47:19.799
<v Speaker 1>the wedding week, right like Giants Cowboys. That's basically kicking

0:47:19.800 --> 0:47:22.719
<v Speaker 1>off November. Huh, kicking off your birthday week my birthday week.

0:47:22.760 --> 0:47:25.640
<v Speaker 1>That's right, it's not your wedding week, it's my birthday. Well,

0:47:25.880 --> 0:47:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not saying what I'm pretty sure my

0:47:28.239 --> 0:47:30.120
<v Speaker 1>birthday is more important. They not saying what's in your

0:47:30.120 --> 0:47:33.080
<v Speaker 1>wedding I'm just saying that my birthday week, your birthday week,

0:47:33.120 --> 0:47:35.440
<v Speaker 1>coincides of my wedding week. All right? Well, will there

0:47:35.480 --> 0:47:37.359
<v Speaker 1>be a birthday cake for me at your will be cake?

0:47:37.920 --> 0:47:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Birthday cake cake? Can I just have one candle on

0:47:40.560 --> 0:47:43.560
<v Speaker 1>my piece of cake? Can we make that happen? Absolutely?

0:47:43.600 --> 0:47:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Are you if you bring everybody, if you bring a

0:47:45.360 --> 0:47:48.840
<v Speaker 1>cow your piece of cake? You're not gonna set it

0:47:48.880 --> 0:47:51.000
<v Speaker 1>up for me? Man, no problem, You're not gonna have

0:47:51.200 --> 0:47:53.040
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna have your pants and heavy birthday to me. No,

0:47:53.440 --> 0:47:56.040
<v Speaker 1>that'd be great. I'm sure it wouldn't be. You're not

0:47:56.040 --> 0:47:58.200
<v Speaker 1>noticed the happy birthday to you, and that would be

0:47:58.239 --> 0:48:01.080
<v Speaker 1>equally great. You can do that. You get my camp friends,

0:48:01.080 --> 0:48:03.400
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna bother you with advice all night long. You're like, yes,

0:48:03.520 --> 0:48:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you want advice save for me, Dannit all right, good,

0:48:05.640 --> 0:48:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and I'm hopefully I'm so intoxicated that I give them

0:48:08.160 --> 0:48:10.400
<v Speaker 1>all the correct answers. Hopefull. You know, when I'm sober,

0:48:10.440 --> 0:48:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I probably won't give you the wrong advice for them. Frank,

0:48:13.520 --> 0:48:18.960
<v Speaker 1>something's gonna help you and your cheating team. Gregerfer, we're

0:48:18.960 --> 0:48:20.319
<v Speaker 1>all in touch with loopholes in that league.