WEBVTT - Global Default Rate Hit Could Hit 10% By Year-End: TwentyFour Asset

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penl podcast. I'm Paul swing you,

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>along with my co host Lisa Brahma wits. Each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.959
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Well, we've certainly become accustomed to

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>volatility and the financial markets UH and across the fixed

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>income markets in particular. Here to get a sense of

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of how we should be thinking about investing in

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>fixed income markets over the next several quarters, we welcome

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Mark Holman, CEO of twenty four Asset Management with about

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty three billion dollars under management. We appreciate Mark joining us. Mark,

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:42.879
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. So as we

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>think about these markets here, I want to start with

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:50.519
<v Speaker 1>kind of what your backdrop is, what your construct is

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>for the economy going forward. Is this a a kind

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of a a V shaped recovery here or should we

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>be preparing for lower for longer in terms of economic activity? Yeah,

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I think undoubtedly I'd be going for lower for longer

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of economic activity. I think the the end

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of the last cycle ending with a surprise, as they

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>often do, but this surprise was global. When you've got

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>a global surprise that h's every part of the globe

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, I think it the impact is

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>just that much more significant, and it's going to hit

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 1>the both the supply side and the demand side, and

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it just takes a lot longer to recover.

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>These incredible aid programs that we've got around the world,

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>whilst enormous in spise, logistically just won't reach everybody, but

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>there's there's some long term damage to them on which

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:41.119
<v Speaker 1>in my view means we're going to be spending probably

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the best part of two years to get ourselves back

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>towards a QUE for nineteen type production level. Mark I'm

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>struck it and saw a lot of people about the

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>disconnect in the slow recovery that a lot of economists

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and analysts are seeing and stock markets, which seem relatively

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>unfazed by this whole issue, at least based on the

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>rally that we have seen over the past month. This

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>morning we have Goldman Sachs coming out and saying that

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>at one point these realities are going to converge and

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>that stocks are poised to drop about over the next

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 1>three months. Do you agree. I think when you look

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>at fundamental you have to agree that the market has

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>really really raised ahead and then it's really pricing in.

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>It's actually described a somewhat of a V shaped recovery.

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Um So I think you're fundamentally probably quite hard to

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>justify where we are here. However, technically I don't think

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>we're getting a full picture. The full picture does include

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the incredible amounts of money poured in by the FED

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and other institutions around the world, and we know they

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:48.079
<v Speaker 1>find these volumes of cash find their way into financial markets,

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and that these volumes of cash are going to be

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>there for the foreseeable I think investors are saying, well,

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the FAD behind us, or the ECBs behind us, sort

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>of Bank of Englands behind us, and if it's going

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to be action done in the in the US has

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>been has been very very broad. So I think that

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:06.919
<v Speaker 1>as I've got confidence from that, and I think that

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:09.639
<v Speaker 1>liquidity in the market is making it a very very

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 1>painful rally. Indeed, it's it's a squeeze so market, you know,

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the credit markets. Here, we're starting to

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>see some bankruptcies and defaults kind of start trickling in

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>across the tape here. How do you think this is

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:26.920
<v Speaker 1>going to play out? As you take a look at

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the credit quality out there in the markets that you

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>look at, I mean, credit quality is no doubt going

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to deteriorate pretty much across the board. There'll be very

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>very few businesses that will improve their credit quality. And

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>while this is going on and now over the last

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>decade or so, we've been somewhat immunized from them deteriorating

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>credit quality by the by the actions from UH in

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>cential banks and government. This h it is just too big.

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going to see a material spike in

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the default rate. It's very very hard to predict exactly

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>what it's going to be in the in the in

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the world of rated securities, we well, we know that

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the individual consumers are going to have problems because they

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>won't reach them. Sm evil that problems because they won't

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>reach them. And in the end, this does affect the

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>larger companies too. It's been quite remarkable how quickly some

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of those companies have run out of money. I mean,

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm gonna stick my neck out and say

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be surprised to see at global for thult

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>rate by the end of this year approaching ten totally

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>two and a half of the end of last year.

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's a really quite a big move. Where are

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you hiding mark, where are you investing? Well, it's it's

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>tricky in the corporate world. Really, there's a long list

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 1>of sectors I think you really need to try to avoid,

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and you know, whether it be metals, mining, energy, which

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>are sort of late cycle names that you don't want

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to on late cycle sectors um. And then there's the

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>ones which perhaps more impacted by the current situation, where

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>you travel, leisure, retail, of course, an automotive. I think

0:04:56.560 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>that those are the kind of areas to avoid and

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>where you can, I think you focus on sectors that

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>are more resilient obviously, but you know where the balance

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>sheets to the companies are more resilient or regulated, there's

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>more visible learning. So I would say, contrary perhaps to

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the to the last recession, let's look at banking, Let's

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>look at financial insurance as an incredible way of repricing itself.

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>The banks have got very resilient balance sheets thanks to

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the terrific work work done by the authorities or and

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 1>utility you generally regulated much more solid balance sheet in

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:31.679
<v Speaker 1>each of these industries are all open for business today.

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:35.039
<v Speaker 1>We're all still paying the bank interest, we're all still

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 1>taking our insurances that we're all still using these utilities.

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:40.280
<v Speaker 1>So they've they've got the resilient balance sheets and then

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:42.919
<v Speaker 1>they've got more visible learning. So I think that that

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:46.719
<v Speaker 1>the list of sex is pretty small, but there's they're

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:48.480
<v Speaker 1>quite broad. There's quite a few companies that you can

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>still invest with there with a lot of confidence. Mark Holeman,

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with us. Mark Coleman,

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:57.720
<v Speaker 1>chief executive officer of twenty four Asset Management based in London,

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 1>with twenty three billion dollars of assets under management. And

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm struck by the idea that insurance companies and banks

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>will be behavens this time around. It just sort of

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>highlights how different this particular crisis is than the last one. Paul, Yeah, exactly.

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>When you're thinking about the you know, the big money

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 1>center banks and being bailed out and the A I. G.

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>S of the world, and so as we've heard, you know,

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>time and time again, this is very, very different. This

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>is an external shock of pandemic medical issue, healthcare issue,

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 1>not something endemic to the financial system per se. We've

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>been talking a lot about the pain in the developing

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>world as that area sees a disproportionate hit from the

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>removal of financing from the likes of the United States

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and Europe. Here to speak with us, we are so

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>pleased to say, is the seminal expert on this area.

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Bill Rhodes, President and chief executive officer of the William

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Our Rhodes Global Advisors, former City Bank chairman, also one

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of the key architects of the restructuring efforts in Latin

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>America during the ninth nineties, and the author of the

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>book Banker to the World. Bill, thank you so much

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 1>for being back with us. I know that you see

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>potentially a crisis in emerging markets that exceeds what we

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>have seen in recent history. I want to sort of

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>focus in on some of the hotspots, starting with Argentina.

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Argentina on the brink of defaulting once again. Is there

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>a threshold for how many times a country kind default

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>and what the consequences will be? Anyway, First of all,

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>it's great to be on with you, Lisa. Well, Uh,

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I would say in a case of Argentina, they they've

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>defaulted eight times in their history. I was structured them

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>five times, and they're on the brink of our ninth default.

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>They were going to declare default today and they moved

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>it off to the two for further discussions with the creditors.

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>But they need to make a five million dollar payment

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>on their eight six million billion dollars of debt that

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>they have in addition to the eighties six billion dollars

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of of of of normal debt in the sense of

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>sovereign debt UH two creditors. They also have an outstanding

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>of somewhere depending on how you look at the disbursements

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>between forty seven and fifty billion with the International Monetary Fund.

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>So they are they are basically UH the case that's UH,

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I think right at the lands point of what's going

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>on in the American emerging markets. So, Bill, I know

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>you've you've educated us UH in the past about how

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>this is a little bit different this time in that

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the private sector owns a lot of this debt. Here

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>is there any indication that the private sector that I

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 1>mean the public sector will hold off on debt collection.

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:55.439
<v Speaker 1>Here some of these hedge funds and and and investors,

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the only ones who've agreed to hold off

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>of a sovereign which in the in the Group of

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:06.439
<v Speaker 1>twenties said they would hold off to the poorest countries

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:09.839
<v Speaker 1>until the end of the year, but of course it's

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>not even clear uh what that'll be after the end

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>of the year. They haven't come up with a plan.

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>And on the private sector, there are all sorts of

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>discussions going on how the private sector and the public

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 1>sector can work together, but at the up up to now,

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 1>there's been nothing on the on the private sector. And

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>as you point out, there's a lot of private sector

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 1>debt out there, uh, not only to the sovereign, but

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>two companies uh in uh in these various countries. So

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it's sort of a perfect storm type situation. It's

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the worst, I would say that situation I've ever seen

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>in my lifetime. And everyone's grappling with how to handle

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it because you have this COVID nineteen problem which even

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the experts are not sure how to resolve it other

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:03.439
<v Speaker 1>than getting a vaccine, which it doesn't look like we're

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>going to have until next year. Just to give you

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>some perspective as to how deep the pain is. Just

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to give you a sense of the nations that have

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>dollar bonds UH that are trading at distress levels. It

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>includes Venezuela, Argentina, Lebanon, Ecuador, Zambia, Zambia, Surinam, going all

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the way through it to Nigeria and El Salvador and

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and a host of others. I'm just wondering what you think, bill,

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 1>based on your experience, should be done for this at

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a time when some of these emerging markets are actually

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>trying what developed markets are doing and printing money, they're

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>just doing quewie, risking more inflation and further capital flight. Right,

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and you're talking about just dollar denominated debt, because you

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>have two other phenomena out there. None of these countries,

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>particularly Eastern Europe and elsewhere, and some in Africa have

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>your dead also so um and a lot of people

0:10:56.840 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>tend not to factor that in. And then of course

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 1>you have a one belt, one road UH Chinese lending

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>policies that are outstandings of anywhere, because they're you know,

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>it's very obscure as to how the outstanding, what the

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>outstandings are, and what the collection arrangements are the credit

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>arrangements any the estimate there is anywhere from two hundred

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and forty billion to to five billion. And so I

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:27.559
<v Speaker 1>think what needs to be done here is the I

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>m F and the World Bank have to sit down

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>with a group of twenty and try and work out

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>some sort of a plan UH, starting on the sovereign side,

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:41.679
<v Speaker 1>but also try and see if you can get an

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:45.079
<v Speaker 1>inner link with the private sector, as we did with

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the Brady bonds in the late nineteen eighties in the

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>early nineties UH. And the situation here is much much

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>worse because there it was an economic debt crisis, but

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>you didn't have a health crisis, and so many of

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>these countries in the emerging markets don't have decent health systems.

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>And then in Latin America exacerbated, you have five million

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:13.439
<v Speaker 1>Venezuelan refugees UH in Latin America, and that puts at

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>risk countries like Colombia, Ecuador, through some of the islands

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>in the Caribbean and UH and also northern Brazil UH.

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>And I would just say on Brazil is going through

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:29.679
<v Speaker 1>probably one of the worst periods it's had because they

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:31.959
<v Speaker 1>just got out of recession. And now they're going to

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>go back into recession with five percent negative growth this

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>year with the president who doesn't want to recognize that

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen is a problem. So, Bill, you mentioned that

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>China a little bit. In China, I know that during

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:46.959
<v Speaker 1>the last financial crisis two thousand eight, two thousand nine,

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 1>China was there, uh pumped a bunch of money into

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the world economy. Is that still the case now? Can

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>some of these emerging markets depend upon liquidity coming from China? Well,

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the reason I mentioned China was you have a phenomenon

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>that didn't exist in OH eight and O nine, which

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 1>is one Belt, one road, and all of those outstandings

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:09.439
<v Speaker 1>are already there. So uh, I think China is in

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>a much more difficult position. Plus, their debt has been

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 1>allowed as a starting with their bailout, I would say

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of the world in two thousand and eight two thousand nine,

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:22.679
<v Speaker 1>where they put into infrastructure and brought commodities from a

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of these developing countries to the tune of eight

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion dollars almost a trillion dollars. And they are

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 1>not going to be a factor today because their own

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>as they were then, because of their own Uh. You

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>know debt load that they have, and they're going to

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 1>be fighting just to keep the Chinese economy in a

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>positive growth mode this year. So the answer to your

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 1>question is they will be important, but they are not

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>going to bail us out this time, and they have

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>their own problems with the emerging markets, which raises a

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>question who's going to take leadership in helping the developing

0:13:56.720 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 1>world get out of this mess? Well, suppose of league

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 1>people think that the G twenty will get their act together,

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 1>But as you know, they're very fractured. And one of

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the things I give credit to my old friend Gordon

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Brown was when he put everyone together at the London

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 1>conference at the time in two thousand nine, at the

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>time of the Great Financial Crisis, everyone agreed to work together.

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>We don't even have an arrangement where these G twenty

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>countries have agreed to work together on trying to find

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>anti virals in a vaccine. So, unfortunately, we're going into

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a period with a very fractured leadership situation in the

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>so called developed world and real problems with leadership in

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the developing world. We're speaking with Bill Rhodes, President and

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>CEO of William R. Rhodes Global Advisors, former City Bank

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 1>chairman Bill. You know, as we think about you know

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of how the the arc of how this virus

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>has spread from China to Europe to the US. Um

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's varying levels of healthcare systems there. But

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>me think about in American emerging markets in general, the

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 1>health care systems in most places are just not as

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>robust as we've seen in kind of some of the

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Western economies. How bad do you think it's really going

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>to get in and just just take Latin America for example,

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it could get very bad. I think Brazil

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>is an example because they haven't put the money in

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the health system. Argentina is better off in that sense.

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>In Chile, Prue is all right to a certain point.

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>But what's added to all of this is he's Venezuelan

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>refugees that have been forced out of their country. So

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 1>it's it's really the perfect storm that we're looking at here,

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's going to be very, very difficult.

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>And then when you want to look at the COVID situation,

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>as you already have mentioned, I think on a prior

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>segment here is that you're starting to see new cases

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>again in places like South Korea, which thought they had

0:15:56.280 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 1>gotten rid of it, Singapore. Uh, even some case is

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>now reappearing in China. And this is not even taking

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to account the so called famous second wave, which is

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>supposed to hit us in the fall, because we won't

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>have a vaccine by then, and it will be it's

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>not clear if we'll have an anti viral either by then.

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Uh and so uh. If you want to pattern this

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>somewhat on the Spanish flu, it was the second wave

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>that was the most destructive, more so than the first wave.

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's part of the problem, the fractured leadership,

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>even on an issue like COVID nineteen bill. We've talked

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot about how the amount of emerging market debt

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>has tripled by some counts in the past decade or so,

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just wondering who's going to bear the brunt

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>of the losses if there is a mass for structuring

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>like the one that you're calling for an order to

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>remedy the situation. Well, I think for governments who have lent, uh,

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>it's much easier to a SOB, But for the private sectors,

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>lent is going to be very, very difficult. You're gonna

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of bankruptcies. I think there would be

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>some real hits uh to various institutions that have taken

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>on all this that and you too remember, well, I've

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:16.880
<v Speaker 1>been on your show for years wondering, you know, wondering

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>when this was going to hit because of the reach

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and search for yield that we've seen, and so there's

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 1>so much exposure out there, uh, and a lot of

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>this is going to come home to roots. So I

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's we're in a very difficult period. So my

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:32.679
<v Speaker 1>hope is that the G twenty can get its act together,

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:37.120
<v Speaker 1>both on a financial basis and on a health basis. Uh.

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's what I think we desperately need, or we're

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>going to go through a very very difficult period over

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the next two years. Bill, thanks so much for joining us.

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>We really appreciate your perspective. As always, when we talk

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 1>about the emerging markets and some of the credit challenges arising,

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>there's no one better to speak to than Bill Rhodes,

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 1>President CE of William R. Rhodes Global Advisors, former chairman

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 1>of City Bank, with tons of X variance years of

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:04.679
<v Speaker 1>experience dealing with emerging markets Latin America in particular and

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>some of their fiscal challenges over the years. So at leasta,

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>it just sounds like there's much more pain for the

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets, the company, the countries themselves, the people as

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.679
<v Speaker 1>well as the investors in those markets. Yeah, and just

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to sort of highlight how much debt these companies, companies

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and countries have, you know, hundreds of billions of dollars

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that they have incurred over recent years, and there's a

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>question who's going to bear the losses? And some people saying, well,

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's time to reinvest in some of these

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:37.919
<v Speaker 1>areas because of the yields being offered. Yet you have

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>to wonder what the capital flight will be like as

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the defaults really pick up lesa. You know, I grew

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:49.879
<v Speaker 1>up within a household where my parents were children of

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:52.919
<v Speaker 1>the depression, and it really impacted even you know, all

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 1>through my childhood kind of how they viewed life in

0:18:55.920 --> 0:19:00.119
<v Speaker 1>terms of money and you know, food security and all

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>these things. And I think, you know, it was such

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>a such a significant impact on their lives that really,

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:07.879
<v Speaker 1>I think impact of them their entire lives. And some

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 1>folks are questioning whether this pandemic will have a similar

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>effect on some of the young folks today and what

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:18.400
<v Speaker 1>it means for consumer behavior and will the consumer actually

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>come back and and spend an act uh, coming out

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic as they did going into the pandemic.

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Christopher Condent, he's a Federal Reserve reporter for Bloomberg News

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>joining US Washington, d C. Christopher, thanks so much. I

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>know you kind of had a really interesting story Scarred

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 1>and Scared the reshaping of American consumer begins. This is really, uh,

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I think fascinating story. What did you find out? Thank you, Paul. Yeah,

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, um, I think we're compared to any expectations

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>for a quick return of the American consumer, there's not

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of evidence to support that that would be

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the case, simply because the consumer is getting hit on

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>really multiple levels. This story that I wrote about addresses

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>three levels, where first of all, the most obvious is

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of people are losing their income, so

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not about their willingness to spend, but their ability

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 1>to spend, and that's going to be severely damaged and

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>probably in many cases for quite a while. But then

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 1>moving even beyond that, we know from past experience, and

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>you brought up the great depression, which I also talked

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:30.680
<v Speaker 1>about in that story. Um, there is a knock on effect.

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not just for those people that lose their job

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and lose income, but when you see neighbors and friends

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and family members affected. It also we know from the

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>past experience can affect people's spending habits. They get a

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit more cautious. Uh. And and you know what

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:52.359
<v Speaker 1>I thought was really interesting. The economists that I spoke

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>to brought up again and again that this is the

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>second time in the space of about twelve years where

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>we're hearing this is the worst the session since the

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Great Depression, and that really can begin We don't know.

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:09.959
<v Speaker 1>This is a bit speculative, but that can really affect

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the psyche of people as workers, as consumers for a

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 1>very long time, just as you talked about your parents.

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>And then finally, just the other obvious thing about this,

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:25.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not just about economics for the consumer, it's about

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>their own health. This contagion can affect you. Obviously, it

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 1>can kill people, so that adds another elements of fear. Um,

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>again we're being speculative here. We don't know how long

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna last. But when you talk about risks like this.

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:48.359
<v Speaker 1>It brings in the emotional side of decision making for consumers,

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and economists that have studied that say it's very difficult

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:55.679
<v Speaker 1>to overcome. It doesn't mean everybody's gonna stop shopping, but

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>even at the margin, if many millions of people are

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>affected by the US for a long period of time,

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 1>that will have a great drag on our economy, Chris.

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Some people say that the consumer is in much better

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 1>situation now than it was getting into the two thousand

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and eight crisis, and that the US government has supplied

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a big enough stimulus to offset a good deal of

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 1>the mispay for a larger proportion of the US population.

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 1>They point to that as one of the reasons why

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>consumer spending may be more resilient. On the other side

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>of this, did any of the economists you spoke with

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>address that, Yeah, well, there's a couple of things to

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 1>say there, I think, Lisa Um, it's true that on

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>aggregate the if you look at household debt two income,

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>it's in a much better place. But those numbers are

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>really skewed by the upper end, the top ten percent,

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 1>the top one. If you look at the middle deciles

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:57.879
<v Speaker 1>across the you know, the distribution of this data. People

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 1>in the middle and even the upper to middle range.

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:04.719
<v Speaker 1>We're not in a very good position in terms of

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 1>debt income before this, so those numbers are slightly misleading.

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I think. Second is that it's true there has been

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:16.479
<v Speaker 1>a huge amount of support being brought up by the

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>federal government. Um, now the question is how long does

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that is that a sufficient enough bridge. It may help

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>for a while, but you know, unemployment benefits even with

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the extension in the care Is Act going out to

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>say thirty nine weeks for a lot of state that's

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna help a lot of people, but it won't bridge

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the full gap for many people who will lose their

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 1>jobs for longer than that. And the six hundred supplemental

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>amount per week that the federal government kicked in as well,

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 1>that's super, but it only lasts until July one, So again,

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:52.920
<v Speaker 1>how will it really bridge the gap? And and and

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:56.399
<v Speaker 1>even then, you know, we talk about already the psychological

0:23:56.600 --> 0:24:00.400
<v Speaker 1>scarring effect. If you are able to bridge the gap

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 1>in your income and then you have work again, you know,

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 1>we can still ask are you going to be as

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 1>aggressive in your spending as you wouldn't before? So we

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>don't really know the answers to all these questions, but

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>it is quite worrying. Chris Condon, thank you so much

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 1>for being with us. Chris Condon, us economy reporter for

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News, joining us on the consumer confidence hit from

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 1>the coronavirus. And I will just say, Paul, it's really

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see the response to articles about the spread

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:32.160
<v Speaker 1>of the virus, with some people saying it's fear mongering

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and that the virus has a pretty low fatality rate

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and that the shutdowns also have a high fatality rate,

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:40.639
<v Speaker 1>and other people saying, well, the reason why it's not

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot higher and why we're not seeing many more

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:46.119
<v Speaker 1>deaths is because of the shutdowns and this sort of

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>push pull in public sentiment ongoing as the US and

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world considers how to reopen. Yeah. Absolutely,

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:53.879
<v Speaker 1>and I think it has a little bit to do

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 1>with the kind of where in the country you reside.

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:58.359
<v Speaker 1>If you're kind of in that New York metro area,

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:00.400
<v Speaker 1>you probably have a different view than if in Middle

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 1>America where you really haven't been that impacted by it.

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's gift to another one that's suffering dramatically, and that

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>is the hospitality and lodging sector. We're looking at Marriott International,

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>which saw its REVENU revenue per available room plunge ninety

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>percent in April. The question is how do you batten

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:24.880
<v Speaker 1>down the hatches and gird for the future. There, Brian

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 1>Ecker joining us now senior Gaming and Lodging analyst for

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloombrick Intelligence. Can you give us a sense, Brian, of

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:33.119
<v Speaker 1>just how bad the carnage is and has been this

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 1>earning season versus expectations in this sector, the lodging sector. Sure,

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>so we entered a situation where most of the major

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:45.439
<v Speaker 1>lodging companies are already effectively pre announced results and you

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>know declines are certainly severe. If you look at revenue

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>prevailable room, the key metric that was down about uh

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 1>in the first quarter for both March, for both Mary

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and Hilton, but more notably in April that metric was

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 1>down percent. So you still have a lot of hotels

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:06.199
<v Speaker 1>that are currently closed. There is some pace of reopening,

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's going to be gradual and mixed and phased

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>across the world, depending upon the type of hotel. So, Brian, there,

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess the question for a lot of industries, a

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of companies is kind of consumer behavior. How is

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:21.440
<v Speaker 1>it going to be affected as we come out on

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:24.199
<v Speaker 1>the other side of this, what we see material and

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:27.439
<v Speaker 1>maybe even permanent changes in consumer behavior. I know, you

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 1>do some a lot of work following them, the casinos

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and Macau and as Asia it starts to open up.

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:36.680
<v Speaker 1>What are some of the early feedback from the hotel's

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and the casino and the other consumer facing businesses there

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 1>in Asia? So it's coming back slowly. I mean early

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:46.160
<v Speaker 1>indications are is the most recent monthster and we've had

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 1>eighty nine to clients and at least gaming revenue in Asia.

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:52.479
<v Speaker 1>You know, the hotels also coming back slowly, but because

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 1>they entered this pandemic earlier, arguably they have the potential

0:26:56.800 --> 0:27:00.040
<v Speaker 1>to start to recover um somewhat sooner. I think what

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing within the US is again it's going to

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:06.639
<v Speaker 1>be mixed by region, where drive to limited service hotels

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 1>UH in local locations probably can come back a little

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 1>bit quicker, but group hotels that depend on conventions, large resorts,

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 1>major gateway cities are likely to come back somewhat slower,

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and likewise it will be very you know, across the

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:25.879
<v Speaker 1>world in terms of US versus Europe, etcetera. So we

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 1>were just talking Brian to George about the airline companies

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and saying he was saying that without another government bailout,

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>it's unlikely that all of the companies will survive in

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the way that they are currently. What's the consolidation wave

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>going to look like in the lodging space if things

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 1>continue the way that they're expected to. Sure, so we've

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>already had a tremendous amount of consolidation the lodging sector,

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:52.480
<v Speaker 1>just to point that out. Um, you know, there are

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 1>many small independent hotels, but certainly the large chains like

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Marriott Hilton benefited from ample consolidation. And then you look

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:03.679
<v Speaker 1>at companies like Marriott. They just report today, you know,

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 1>they do have four point three billion dollars in liquidity.

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>So given the amount of the cash burn rate, if

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you will, that they face during this period of downturn,

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:16.959
<v Speaker 1>that provides them with quite a long runway for them

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to be able to sustain even very draconian red partic

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 1>clients as large as doesn't mean there could have made

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>some combination consolidation or even independent hotels that might try

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to convert their brand flag and convert to uh let's

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 1>say a Marryott brand or something else. But you know,

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:36.399
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly in terms of consolidation because we've seen so

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>much of it already. I think in terms of major chains, uh,

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 1>they are at least for their part, fairly well positioned

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to kind of weather this downturn and come back slowly. Brian,

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>where are we in terms of supply of rooms in

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace? It just feels like there's been a lot

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>of hotels, a lot of new construction, a lot of

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>supply added to the market. Is that are we oversupplied here?

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Or you think you know, given the pullbacks and demand,

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 1>that the supply and demand er in decent shape. So

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>we had seen kind of a low, single legit pace

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>of new supply, and there were some concerns that maybe

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 1>supply is growing more quickly and let's say the limited

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 1>or select service segments. The reality is, because of the pandemic,

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 1>you may see some openings delayed. Uh. You know what

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Mary at It said in their calls in terms of

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 1>scheduled or plan hotel openings, they don't know if that

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>will be down by or but it certainly will be affected. Um.

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 1>But but again I think in terms of supply, it

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 1>really um, at least some of the slower level of construction,

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 1>they actually worked at the benefit of hotels, and you've

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 1>got a decent number of hotels of construction. Those that

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>were fair fairly well along and being built continue to

0:29:51.800 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 1>work through that construction process. But UM, I think the biggers,

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 1>who's how how long does it take for demand itself

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to recover? And then there's a question Brian, of additional

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 1>spending to try to ensure that people feel confident that

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>they are going to get sick or that these hotel

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 1>rooms are clean. I mean, we've heard about some types

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of ventilation that are changing and different cleaning standards that

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 1>can be maintained to sort of show potential clients that

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 1>they are safe. What are you hearing in terms of

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 1>spending on that side? So, UM, I don't know if

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a question of spending as much as protocols and practices.

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, the way that companies have approached this as

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 1>they think about the process of reopening, is the likely

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 1>to having um some food and beverage outlets closed or

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>operating a limited service with a lot of pick up

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and take out of having in some cases of hotels

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 1>are running in very lock and see a limited utilization

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of certain floors, having a lot of safety and queaning

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>protocols in place for housekeeping. But the reality is because

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of hotels might find it practical or lose less money

0:30:56.440 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 1>by opening a temperson often see rather than staying closed

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 1>because they're opening with such limited occupancy in some cases

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 1>in order to mitigate losses. The reality is that accommodating

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>UH social distancing might be somewhat easier to execute given

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the level of ocupancy is so slow

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 1>to begin with, at least during the initial stages of recovery.

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Brian Igger, thanks so much for joining us. We appreciate

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that Brian Egger covers all things hospitality, UH, end gaming

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligence. Marriott reporting some numbers today in the

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 1>rev bar and the occupancy levels UH you know, obviously

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 1>down significantly, Lisa, And you know, it just kind of

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 1>comes back to the question we're talking with Brian Egger

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 1>on the hospitality and George Ferguson on the airlines. It's

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of about consumer behavior. How will consumers come out

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of this on the back half of this pandemic in

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of behavior, in terms of going on planes, going

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to hotels, going to conferences and casinos and things like that. Yeah,

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, we're getting to summer, and I

0:31:56.080 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>will say a lot of my friends and I have

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>been talking about the fact that our kids are not

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be going to camp and there is no

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 1>sign of vacation on the forefront. What do you do?

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you just stay in your home indefinitely? Do you

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 1>try to get out? How do you get out? Do

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you stay at hotels? I mean, these are all the

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 1>considerations as people start to face a very bleak number

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of indefinite months ahead, and it just raises a question

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 1>how can hotels entice people back and what sort of

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:27.239
<v Speaker 1>the confidence level they have to get Yeah, I think

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and and there's a sizeable part of the population, and

0:32:29.200 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a growing percentage that says we need

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>to get back out there. We need to get this

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>economy going, we need to get out of the house

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and start moving again. You know, we've we've bent the

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 1>curve and maybe we're at the point where it's able,

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 1>we're able to get out there. So I'll have to

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 1>see how that plays out. Thanks for listening to the

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen

0:32:48.360 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 1>to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Paul Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. I'm Lisa

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 1>abram Woids. I'm on Twitter at Lisa abram Woids. One

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:00.240
<v Speaker 1>before the podcast, you can always catch us World wid

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio m