WEBVTT - Free Agent Possibilities & Greatest Need in the Draft | Bucs Insider 0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:08.560 Good morning everybody. It's time for Buccaneers Insider Live, presented 0:00:08.560 --> 0:00:11.280 by Miller. Like Casey Phillips, here was senior writer and 0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:13.680 editor Scott Smith. And as always, this is where we 0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:16.120 take all of your questions, thoughts, comments, all that, And 0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:17.639 definitely I know this is the time of year we 0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:19.680 enter where we have a lot of those because we 0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:22.360 have everything with free agency and craft and resigning people 0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:24.920 new people and trades and all these things that this 0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:27.440 is when we get to be sort of analytical and 0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.320 hypothetical about everything. So there's a whole bunch of stuff 0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:31.960 you guys can ask us about. If you're not already 0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:33.960 watching on the Facebook page, head on over there and 0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:36.519 you can submit your questions for us there um be 0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:38.839 or we get to all of that. Of course, we 0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:42.239 have incredibly sad news that we need to address and 0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:43.959 just that I wanted us to be able to talk 0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:46.199 about a little bit with the news of the passing 0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:49.479 of Vincent Jackson, former Buccaneers wide receiver and Scott I 0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:51.080 dis forige. You can start with you giving some of 0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:53.040 your thoughts on on that news and what he meant 0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:56.320 to this franchise and city. Well, I think my initial 0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:59.000 thought is the same as everybody else. And that's my reaction, 0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:02.800 I guess you would say, and that's incredible shock. Um. 0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:05.399 You know, this franchise has been around for forty five 0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:08.759 years and so and and has had thousands of players 0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:12.160 and at some times you're gonna lose them. But you 0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:15.080 would not have guessed Vincent Jackson if you were told 0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:18.920 that somebody had passed away, a former player only thirty 0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:25.040 eight years old. Just incredibly highly respected inside the organization, 0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:27.840 outside the organization, throughout the community, for all the work 0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:31.000 that he's done, certainly among all the military families that 0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:36.399 he helped. Um. Just just shocking and obviously very very sad, 0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:40.000 sad for his family. UM. You know, there's not much 0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:42.679 more I could say. I know, the people that really 0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:45.959 really had a connection with him, UM said things on 0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:49.840 Twitter and elsewhere, like Mike Evans and Gerald McCoy and 0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:52.480 people like that, and uh, you know, I think their 0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:55.320 their words say a lot about how much he meant 0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:58.200 to so many people. Yeah, I completely agree, um, And 0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:00.080 I one of the things I love about my all 0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:01.680 with the organization is how much I tend to cover 0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.360 those community events, UM and do sort of the off 0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:07.120 field stories. And one of the very first stories I 0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:09.440 did when I started here was about Vincent opening his 0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.800 cast restaurant, him giving me a tour, and I just 0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:15.760 remember that story realizing he talked about how he had 0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:18.720 personally gone and selected some of the reclaim material that 0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:20.760 they were using in the ceiling of this restaurant. Just 0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:23.840 seeing all these little details that he focused on, and 0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:26.200 it showed why he was so good on the field, 0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:27.959 And then it carried over to off the field, where 0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:29.359 this wasn't something where he just kind of put his 0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:31.799 name on it. He cared about everything that he did. 0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:33.919 It was always something near and dear to his heart. 0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:35.360 And he was so welcoming to me. And I mean, 0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:37.079 he was such a vet by that point, a big 0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.240 name player, super successful. He didn't need to do videos, 0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:42.440 he didn't need to help us with some of that stuff, 0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:45.080 but he was always so willing um to do that 0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:47.240 and made it so fun. And um, I got to 0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:50.000 cover his military events he did and the baby shower 0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:52.079 he and his wife would throw for the military moms, 0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:55.400 and um, you could just tell that the genuineness behind 0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:56.800 it and how much he cared and how much he 0:02:56.800 --> 0:02:58.160 meant to a lot of those players and there's been 0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:00.440 so so much turnover in this organization that I think 0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:02.320 there's only something like eight players that were here when 0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:05.040 he was here. Um But he made a mark for 0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:07.920 a very long time on everybody that came into contact 0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:09.800 with him. So yes, we're praying for his family and 0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:11.560 everybody that was close to him, but we just wanted 0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:13.200 to make sure we started with a bit of a 0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:15.720 tribute to a guy who was a great football player 0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:18.760 and an even better guy off the field and impacted 0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:21.799 Tampa in huge ways. U. You were right to start 0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:24.519 with his community work and stuff he did off the field, 0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:27.080 but it's also worth noting what a great player he 0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:29.679 was and one of the best Breegent signings, the most 0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:33.040 successful freed and signings the Buccaneers have ever made. Um So, 0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:36.520 just a real pro on and off the field. Absolutely. 0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:38.520 Um So, Now as we start moving to some of 0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:40.240 these questions I know everybody has Again, if you're just 0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:42.760 joining us, if you have questions for our show, you 0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:44.360 can go ahead and put them in the comment section 0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:48.200 underneath the Facebook Live video. Of course, I saw that 0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:51.600 I knew would be getting this one pretty quickly. J J. Watt. 0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:54.440 We had a feeling that was going to be a start. 0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:58.240 Bryce started out asking, um, is J J. Watt of possibility? 0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:00.160 He brought out the idea of he thought of as 0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:02.560 will Shock. He added with will Shack be back? And 0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:04.120 then I just figured in general, that would be an 0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:07.240 interesting place to start of where you know, as people 0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:09.000 look at, is J. J. Watt a good fit here? 0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:12.240 How you see what position in this defense and that 0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:15.200 sort of thing. Well, just from a fit, I think J. J. 0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:17.960 Watt would be a great uh ed rusher, sort of 0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:22.839 inside outside guy in Todd Bull's defense. And a year 0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:26.239 ago I would have easily and quickly dismissed this. They're 0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:28.719 just saying it's very unlikely that the Buccaneers will go 0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:31.320 after J. J. Watt. But after what Jason Lett and 0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:34.320 Bruce Arians and their staffs did last year, every time 0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:37.440 the possibility of something came up, like Rob Gronkowski or 0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:41.080 Leonard Fournette or Antonio Brown, uh, it felt easy to 0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:44.279 dismiss it, and then it happened. So I think after 0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:47.080 last year, I'm gonna be a little less quick to 0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:51.000 dismiss concepts like this. I still think it's unlikely, so 0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:53.320 you know, take it with a grain of salt, but 0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:55.760 I think that the question of there had it, had 0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:59.800 it probably framed the right way. If for some reason 0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:04.359 Shaquille Barrett was not resigned, that would make it more likely. 0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:06.040 But I don't know if the timetable is going to 0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:09.039 work there because he's J. J. Watt is already actively 0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:11.320 searching for a new home, and you see plenty of 0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.080 reports with him being linked to various teams that are 0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:18.080 possible signings. So J. J. Watt might sign somewhere before 0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.720 we know what's gonna happen with Shaq Barrett. Yeah, I think. 0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:23.440 I think given the salary cap and the incredible number 0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:27.000 of free agents we have, including some very important ones, 0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:29.039 I think the majority of our work is gonna be 0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:32.240 done trying to keep what we have intact, and so 0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:34.719 it makes it seem less likely to have big signings 0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:37.040 like a J. J. Watt, which is perfect cause. Our 0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:39.520 next question was from Michael, who said, what is the 0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:42.200 realistic expectation of keeping the boys together now that we're 0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:44.240 a couple of days past celebrations and we start looking 0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:47.080 towards next season, so we're the likelihood and then what 0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:49.080 is the salary cap situation when it comes to all 0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:51.839 of that, Well, the salary cap situation isn't completely in 0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:53.719 stone yet. I know there's been a lot of reports 0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:55.680 that will be about a hundred eighty million. But then 0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.760 we also have the recent reports that the NFL and 0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:02.880 their broadcast part are getting close to new tenure deals 0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:07.880 which could include a whole new infusion of of you know, 0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:11.479 dollars that could be possibly spread around in different ways 0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:13.760 to sort of make up for the impact of the 0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:17.280 pandemic and maybe push that salary cap just up just 0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:19.080 a little bit, which would help the Buccaneers and a 0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:22.880 lot of teams. Of course, um, I think it's relatively 0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:25.719 realistic to expect to get most, probably not all, but 0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:29.040 most of the Buck's key free agents back, just because 0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:31.640 there's a lot of motivation on both sides. I mean, 0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:34.039 you heard it at the parade, You've you've heard players 0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:36.640 say it. I think now I've heard in Dominican Sue, 0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:41.200 Chris Godwin, Lavante, David Shack, Barrett. I'm pretty sure I've 0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:42.880 heard all of them say at some point in another 0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:45.440 that they do want to continue here with the Buccaneers. 0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:48.039 Now that doesn't mean they're gonna give some great, big, 0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:50.840 huge hometown discount, but it could be more along the 0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:53.480 lines of how you structure your deals to make all 0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:56.479 of them fit together. So I think the fact that 0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:58.360 there's a lot of belief that this team could chase 0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:01.040 another championship next year and you know, for a few 0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:05.359 years possibly um is a good motivating factor in the 0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:08.400 right direction. Still, some of these guys are definitely gonna 0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:10.920 get paid, though. I mean, I have to also imagine 0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:14.240 that getting to have a boat garade in February doesn't hurt, 0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:15.920 you know, when you look at these different cities you're 0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.600 choosing from, I just feel like, you know, I feel like, 0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:21.520 how do you not want to live in Tampa as Yeah, 0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:25.880 I got relatives shoveling the driveways this week, so we've 0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:28.640 had our air conditioning on, so I think I'd prefer 0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:30.800 to be here. Yeah, I feel like this winter storm 0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:32.720 that has swept most of the country is probably helping 0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:36.680 our free agent con um. All right, So we had 0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:39.240 a question from Justin who said, do you see us 0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:42.680 drafting a running back in the first round? Um, if 0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:45.200 some of the guys or said let's see, or if 0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:47.560 he said E T. N from Clemson, if we're still 0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:48.920 on the board at that point, So it looks like 0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:51.640 maybe just some first round priorities he's wondering about. Yeah, 0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:54.480 e t n And and um Naja Harris of Alabama. 0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:57.280 They both are guys are projected to possibly be around 0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:00.120 in the second half of the draft. Um, you know, 0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:03.120 running back in the first round sometimes feels like a 0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:04.800 bit of a luxury pick. But the Bucks are in 0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:07.280 a position to make a luxury pick now. Again though 0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:09.280 it's it's I think we're gonna be saying this to 0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:11.880 just about all these personnel questions for the next couple 0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:14.440 of months. It largely depends on what happens. Does Leonard 0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:17.200 Fournette come back, because if you have Leonard Fournette back 0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:21.720 and Ronald Jones and Keyshawn Vaughan, I think you probably 0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.720 could use your first round pick on something else. Um. 0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:27.480 You know, we talked about every year how much a 0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:30.400 lot of the front office people wish you could switch 0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:32.440 the draft in free agency order. And I feel like 0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:34.640 this is the first year that's actually kind of nice 0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:37.200 for us to have free agency first, that we do 0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:39.040 have so many guys that we like and want to 0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:40.880 bring back that this is the first time it feels 0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:42.920 more like this is good that we're going to know 0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:46.920 the free agency situation before the draft. Yeah, because I 0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:50.000 think you'd rather have Chris Godwin than any receiver you 0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:53.920 could take at thirty two. Um. But you know if 0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:56.120 you sort for some reason lose Chris god when that 0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.360 does put that on the table, right. Yeah. Samuel asked 0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:01.440 do you think Bucks will do a lot of short 0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:03.760 term deals and wait until next year when the cap 0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:06.839 is more to sign longer deals. That makes some sense, 0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:09.000 and I think that could work with some guys. I mean, 0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:11.760 I believe in domin Con Sue, for instance, has signed 0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:14.600 three straight one year deals counting the RAMS. But there's 0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:16.719 some guys that aren't gonna want one year deals. I 0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:19.320 think Shack Burry is an example, really wants to get 0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:21.360 a long term deal done at this point. I would 0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:24.240 think Chris Godwin, who who has so far only played 0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:27.320 on his UM rookie contract, would want a long term deal. 0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:30.560 Of course, there's the option using the franchise tag on 0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:32.400 one of those guys, which could end up being a 0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:35.360 one year deal. Um. I think the questioner makes a 0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:37.520 good point. It makes a lot of sense. You just 0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:41.120 have to have motivation on both sides. Um. Christopher had asked, 0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:43.760 do you see us trading down or up or staying 0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:46.520 at thirty two. Yeah, I could see us trading down. 0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:48.320 It makes a lot of sense. I mean, you're already 0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:51.040 at thirty two is practically the second round. If you could, like, 0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:53.360 let's see, you could trade down five or tin picks 0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:55.800 and reclaim the fourth rounder that you gave up to 0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:59.960 get Rob Gronkowski. Um, that's probably a good move, particularly 0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:03.719 because it's you know, the Buccaneers aren't going into this 0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.520 draft with a giant glaring need. I think they clearly 0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.920 needed to get a tackle last year. Um. And and 0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:14.640 everybody kind of knew that. Um, I don't see that here, 0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:15.920 So you would think that there are a bunch of 0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:18.000 positions on the board and when that With that being 0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:19.360 the case, it probably doesn't hurt you at all to 0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:21.439 move down five or tin pick. So somebody's really motivated 0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:23.439 to move up and give you a third or fourth 0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:25.720 round pick. I think it makes a lot of sense. Okay, 0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:28.720 And Richard asked, are there any assistant coaches going to 0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:32.800 other teams for promotions? Yeah? I think I think the 0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:36.400 Lions made it official maybe today or yesterday, that Antoine 0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:38.880 Randall els our new wide receivers coach. So good for him. 0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:41.440 We loved having him. It's too bad that he's gone, 0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:43.360 but that's great for him. I have not heard of 0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:46.560 any others. And how much is that going to impact 0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:49.360 this team's ability to have success again next? I think 0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:52.880 we talk a lot about resigning players. UM in your mind, 0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:55.960 how big of a factor is bringing back coaches? You 0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:59.199 always hear every single time how much a team values 0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:01.600 continuity when it's going into a training camp and it 0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:05.400 has the same coordinators in particular UM running the same systems. 0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:07.720 So I think it's a it's a huge benefit to 0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:09.640 the Buccaneers. We I think we saw a little bit 0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:11.320 of that last year. You know, it was a little 0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:15.520 there was the big transition with Tom Brady, your quarterback, UM, 0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:18.680 you know, fitting into the system. But otherwise the defense 0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:20.960 under Todd Bowles. You know, they had most of the 0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:22.920 crew back and the same schemes, and I think you 0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:25.360 saw how that paid off. So it's definitely a plus 0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:28.719 for the Bucks. Don't don't get used to it, though, 0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:31.400 because I'm not sure that's gonna last that long. Uh. 0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.080 We're also asked, who do you think is the successor 0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:40.520 after Brady. I don't think we can answer that question yet, because, 0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:42.400 first of all, how many years are we talking about, 0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:44.800 you know, he seems to be motivated to play beyond 0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:47.680 two years. That would require another contract for that to 0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:50.520 happen in Tampa, UM, but a lot can happen between 0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:52.160 them and now the Bucks could use a draft pick 0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:55.840 on a quarterback certainly. UM coach Arians did talk about 0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:57.920 Blaine Gabbert the other day though, how much he thinks, 0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:00.760 you know, he could, how highly he thinks of him, 0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:03.280 and that's a possibility. I mean, we are talking about 0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:06.199 a former very high first round pick. So we've all 0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:08.559 seen his arm, talent on the field. He played well 0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:10.480 in that stint that he had in Detroit. I don't 0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:12.400 know if that's a big enough sample to really you know, 0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:15.160 know what you got, but I think there's a lot 0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:18.760 of confidence in him. And Jared asked, do you see 0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:21.200 the Rams as being the biggest challenger in the NFC 0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:26.160 next season? I think that would. I think I'd have 0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:27.800 to go with Green Bay to be honest with you. 0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:31.560 I mean, what they were the team standing there at 0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:33.440 the end with the Buccaneers. They had the first they 0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:35.199 had the home field advantage in the first round. By 0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:37.400 I know, the Rams have an excellent defense and now 0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:40.720 they have Matt Stafford. Um that you know, they're definitely 0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:43.040 gonna be a top continder. I would think, um, but 0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:45.880 I think I would go with Green Bay first. Um, 0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:47.719 and then we'll close with this one. Richard asked, if 0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:50.320 we do get a chance to resign most of our guys, 0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:55.160 what would you say is the biggest need on the team. 0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:59.839 I think probably not just next year, but moving forward, 0:12:59.880 --> 0:13:03.040 the Buccaneers could use some help on the edges on defense. 0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:06.520 You know, some edge rushers or a you know, one 0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:08.839 guy that you could develop into a special player. Uh. 0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:10.679 That's not easy to get when you're picking as low 0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:14.640 as thirty two though, so UM. Otherwise, I don't know, 0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:16.920 there's they're just not glaring needs, right I mean the 0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:21.240 offensive Yeah, the offensive line is in great shape. Maybe 0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:25.000 you want another, uh inside linebacker to start preparing for 0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:27.439 the hopefully not too soon days when you don't have 0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:30.439 Lavante David, But I don't know he should be around 0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:33.520 for a while. It's a pretty solid roster up and down, 0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:36.520 so you know, a dynamic kick returner would be nice, 0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:38.640 but that's not something you're gonna go after in the 0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:41.120 first round. I don't think so. I think this feels 0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:43.000 like the same question is what should the Bucks go 0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:45.559 after in the first round? And to me, the probably 0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:49.200 the best way to go is is outside linebacker edge rusher. Right, 0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:50.520 all right, well that's gonna do it it for us. On 0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:52.960 this edition of Buccaneers Inside Er Live presented by Miller Light, 0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:55.160 we are here with you every week all offseason taking 0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:57.160 all these amazing questions. Thanks for being with us. We'll 0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:02.719 see you next time. STO.