WEBVTT - Green Bay Struggles, Giants Rolling & This or That

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by all State. Some

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>people just know they could save hundreds on car insurance

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>by checking all State first, Like you know, to check

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the date of the Big game first before you accidentally

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>buy tickets on your twentieth wedding anniversary and have to

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>spend the next twenty years of your marriage making up

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>for it. Yeah, checking first is smart, So check all

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>State first for a quote that could save you hundreds.

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You're in good hands with All States Savings. Very terms

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>apply All State Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates, Northbrook, Illinois.

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in episode eighty six. I'm gonna call it, but

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 2>it might be eighty five of What's Right with Nick Wright,

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 2>the podcast, the YouTube show, all of that going on

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 2>right now. We've got You can watch us live on

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 2>YouTube and add your comments or questions in the chat

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 2>and we will get to you, guys. I think we'll

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 2>do some polls during the show during the first few

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 2>blocks of the show, and then we will get to

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 2>the actual listener comments and questions in the sea block

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 2>of the show. We have a ton to do. This

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 2>was a massive Week seven in the NFL, but as

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 2>we always do, let's start with what we're not starting

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:20.400
<v Speaker 2>with what we're not discussing. Here's what did not make

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:23.559
<v Speaker 2>the Cup for today's show, Zion and Brandon Ingram injured.

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 2>I gotta tell you, I was a little confused. I

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 2>was watching football yesterday, obviously, but then in the late

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 2>window of games, got alerted the Pelicans game went to

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 2>was tight late, and so I turn it on and

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 2>I see Zion's not on the court, but he wasn't

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 2>in foul trouble, So I was a little concerned. He

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 2>has a bit of an injury. You'll probably will know

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 2>more about that as the day goes on. That team

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 2>lost a heartbreaker. The World Series is set Astros against

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 2>the Phillies. I think we might make it through the

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 2>entirety of the Baseball Playoffs without doing a full segment

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 2>on them. And the House of Dragon season finale, I'm

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 2>not even gonna give you my thoughts on it. I

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 2>have seen it, but it just came out hours ago.

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't want people to think we're going to be

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 2>spoiling it. It is not a spoiler to tell you

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 2>we are starting with the Chiefs dominating the San Francisco

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 2>forty nine ers. At least I assume we are is

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:16.799
<v Speaker 2>where I welcome in demanse demanse get us started.

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 4>San Francisco made all the headlines last week, but the

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 4>Chiefs dominated them.

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs are now three to zero games where they were

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 3>down by ten this year. Yep.

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 4>The Chiefs looked like a Super Bowl contender, and the

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 4>forty nine ers obviously think they are too.

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 3>Where they wouldn't have traded all those picks for Christian McCaffrey. Yep.

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 4>What was the story the Chiefs dominance or San Francisco

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:35.360
<v Speaker 4>being a clear tier below them?

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's start with the San Francisco side quickly,

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 2>and then we'll get to the chief side. And also

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 2>shout out to the producers who, after I've been begging

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:46.079
<v Speaker 2>them to put twenty minutes on the clock for our

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 2>eight block on Mondays, they put twenty one minutes on.

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Gave me an extra one minute here. I appreciate that.

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:51.799
<v Speaker 3>All right.

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:59.959
<v Speaker 2>The Niners have two obvious issues. One is their core

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 2>now their quarterback. It was not the reason they lost yesterday. However,

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 2>that pick he threw at the goal line when the

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 2>game was still tight that allowed the Chiefs to take

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 2>firm control of it. That is Jimmy g is going

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 2>to do that once a half. He tried to do

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 2>it again later in the game. Throw another goal line

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 2>pick the Chiefs corner. I think with Sneed just wasn't

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 2>able to get to it. But they know that. That's

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:27.799
<v Speaker 2>why they went and got Christian McCaffrey so they can

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 2>take the ball out of his hands. The bigger concern

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 2>for the Niners is they got healthy for this game.

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 2>They had the number one defense in the league by

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 2>a yardage metric, they had a top three defense by

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 2>points metric, and the Chiefs here's how their drives went.

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 2>Interception by Mahomes on the opening drive, touchdown, touchdown, end

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 2>of half drive sliced them down the field. Mahomes threw

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 2>a touchdown, there was a very questionable low block penalty

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 2>on Jerrick McKinnon wiped the touchdown off the board, so

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs kicked a field goal and missed it. So

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 2>four opening four first half drives. After the opening driver

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 2>where he threw a pick down the field for a touchdown,

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 2>down the field for a touchdown down the field could

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 2>have been for a touchdown, goes off the board. Second

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 2>half touchdown touchdown, touchdown, touchdown, put in Chad Henning. So

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 2>that is eight drives against the Chiefs number one offense,

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 2>six ended in touchdowns, a seventh wood of if not

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 2>for a questionable call, and Mahomes made one mistake that

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs had a clear plan to try to use

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 2>the Niners pass rush against them. They kept running at

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:43.599
<v Speaker 2>Nicky Bosa. It worked beautifully.

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 3>McCall.

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Hardenan had the best game of his life. So for

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:51.840
<v Speaker 2>the Niners, you can't eat your whole idea is we

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 2>are going to get just enough out of Jimmy g

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 2>and the offense and our defense is going to carry us.

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:59.359
<v Speaker 2>Having the Chiefs saying forty four on you will forty

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 2>two Jimmy, he took another safety. Is concerning now to

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 2>the chief side of things, the Mahomes numbers. There's a

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:14.600
<v Speaker 2>whole article on NFL dot com that is just about

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 2>the records Mahomes set yesterday. So a few different things.

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:22.239
<v Speaker 2>So Mahomes is now thirteen and nine in his career

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 2>when he trails by double digits, that is fifty nine

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:29.919
<v Speaker 2>percent of the time when down ten plus he wins.

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 2>The next highest in the league is Tom Brady at

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 2>thirty nine percent. But that actually understates it because while

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:43.119
<v Speaker 2>he's thirteen and nine overall, he started his career one

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 2>and four in games when he trails by double digits,

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 2>So since twenty nineteen, he is twelve and five in

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 2>games where he trails by ten points. For context for

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 2>that highest quarterback winning percentage including the playoffs since twenty nineteen,

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:05.119
<v Speaker 2>so the last twenty nineteen twenty four seasons, Mahomes wins

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 2>seventy nine percent of his games. Aaron Rodgers wins seventy

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 2>three percent of his games. Mahomes wins seventy one percent

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 2>of his games win trailing by double double figures, and

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 2>then number four is Tom Brady at seventy percent. So

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.160
<v Speaker 2>the only quarterback in the last three and a half

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 2>years who wins more games overall than Mahomes wins when

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:31.839
<v Speaker 2>trailing by double pardon me, double figures is Aaron Rodgers. Also,

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Yesterday was Mahomes' seventieth career game. He now is first

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 2>all time through seventy games in wins, yards, and touchdowns.

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Yesterday was Mahomes' eighth career game with four hundred yards

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 2>and three passing touchdowns. Okay, his eighth career game. That

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 2>is the fifth most in league history. Okay, Breeze has twelve,

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Manning and Marino and have eleven and Brady as ten.

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Those four guys, this all from NFL dot Com did

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 2>that in a combined one and twenty games. The fewest

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 2>was Marino, who played two hundred and forty two. Mahomes

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 2>has five. He has played, as I just mentioned, seventy games.

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 2>The Chiefs have the highest scoring offense in the league

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 2>by a mile. And this is all without Tyreek kill.

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 2>And so this is what when people ask me why

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 2>it gets so irritated about the Josh Allen commentary, It

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 2>is not because Josh Allen is not an excellent player.

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 3>He is.

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 2>But Josh Allen is right now Carl Malone in the

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 2>nineties to Michael Jordan. He is a guy who is

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 2>and could potentially be an all time great, but he

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 2>is up against the most talented player in the history

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 2>of the league, who has had the greatest start to

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 2>a career of any player in the history of the league.

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 2>One other fun note about comebacks this year, and this

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 2>is not from NFL dot Com. This is from my

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 2>great statisticians, Dusty and Josh. This year Mahomes win down

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 2>double digits is three to zero. The rest of the

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 2>NFL is seventeen seventy one and one. So Mahomes has

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 2>three double digit comebacks. The rest of the league does

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:42.239
<v Speaker 2>it nineteen percent of the time. It is just another

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 2>level entirely. And this was against a defense that you

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 2>guys heard me last week I thought could give the

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs real problems. And they got everybody back, they got healthy,

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 2>and yesterday was another example that when that Chiefs offensive

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 2>line plays, which it did not against Buffalo, it did

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 2>not in the first half against the Raiders. When the

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs offensive line plays well, the offense is unstoppable. This

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 2>was also the twentieth consecutive game the Chiefs either had

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 2>a lead or at least tied for the lead in

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 2>the fourth quarter. So there has not been a game

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 2>for the last twenty games they have played, there's not

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 2>been one that they were not at least in position

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 2>to win. All right, next, all right.

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 4>For the last decade, we've all asked the same question,

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 4>that's when will Father Time beat Tom Brady.

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, it seems like it's officially happening.

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:37.079
<v Speaker 4>The Firesale Panthers and PJ Walker quarterback and Bears to

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 4>go twenty one to three shird Brady have stayed retired

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 4>and do you think he makes it to the end

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:42.680
<v Speaker 4>of the season.

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 2>All right, So a lot of things here and one

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 2>is Matt maybe you can tell me my ear. I

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:49.839
<v Speaker 2>don't know if Gabe is in studio today, because this

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 2>has to have been Gabe is in studio. So this

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 2>is football nirvana for our fearless leader. Gabe Goodwin the

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 2>owner of an operator of Blue Duck Media who produces

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 2>this podcast. So Gabe is a Jets fan who over

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 2>the last decade has become a part time Jets fan

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:15.439
<v Speaker 2>because they've been so devastating, and a full time Tom

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Brady hater. He dedicates he has in the past dedicated

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 2>more of his football energy to rooting for the demise

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:28.560
<v Speaker 2>of Brady than rooting for the Jets. But right now

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 2>both are on fire. Right now, the Jets have won

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 2>four in a row while Brady has lost what does

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 2>he lost for at least two in a row, maybe

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 2>three in a row, I'm not sure. I know. Rogers

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 2>has lost three in a row. Yeah, the whatever it

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 2>is for Tampa and the last two losses are horrifying.

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 2>So they've lost four out of five. They beat Atlanta

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:53.959
<v Speaker 2>after Brady got that you know, very beneficial rough in

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 2>the passer at all. But they lost to Pittsburgh as

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 2>double digit favorites or point favorites, and they lost to Carolina, Demandsey.

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:05.319
<v Speaker 2>That game went off at thirteen and a half. And

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 2>by the way, now, did I have another two and

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 2>three week against the spread? I did? Did Demand have

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 2>a winning week, which we will discuss later in the show.

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:18.479
<v Speaker 2>He did. Demand made some sharp bets this week, including

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 2>hitting an unlikely first points of the game will be

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:25.679
<v Speaker 2>a field goal in the Niners Bucks game or the

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:29.079
<v Speaker 2>Niners Chiefs game. Pardon me, but what I was gonna

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 2>say is, however, I did put in that teaser I

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 2>told you guys about on the Friday Gambling Show. But

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 2>I the teaser I told you guys about was Las Vegas.

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Las Vegas teased against the Texans, the Raiders. That is

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 2>Las Vegas. He was Las Vegas, New England and Miami.

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 2>I added Cincinnati to it at the last minute for

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 2>a nice little plus two sixty. So I need the

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Patriots tonight badly and that teaser comes in. However, the

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 2>reason I'm bringing that up is I avoided including the

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Bucks in any teaser because they are impossible to trust

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 2>right now now, to answer the questions, Brady's goal always

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 2>was to play until he's at least forty five. And

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 2>I know Gabe's not going to like to hear this,

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 2>but let me give a slight defense of Tom Brady

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 2>off the field for a moment. And this is via

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 2>my friend Laslow, who you know, who does radio in Kinsity,

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 2>does a great job, and he made what I thought

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 2>was a really interesting point, which is the narrative surrounding

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Brady and his pending divorce that Bill Simmons said on

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 2>his podcast this morning that he heard the divorces finalized,

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 2>that that's done with. If not, it's very very close.

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 2>The narrative has been that the last straw in the

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 2>relationship was Brady returning to the NFL. Yeah, I think

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 2>that's what everybody thinks. My buddy Elizlo made a very

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 2>interesting point that I'm just going to put out there

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:08.320
<v Speaker 2>and then we'll talk football. He said, Is it not

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 2>just as likely, maybe even more likely, that the way

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 2>that went down was not that the last straw was

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 2>him returning. It was rather the marriage was hanging by

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:27.079
<v Speaker 2>a thread and he retired as a last ditch effort

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 2>to save it that he said, you know what, I'll

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 2>quit football.

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 3>I'll quit.

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 2>And then after a month of trying to work through

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:39.080
<v Speaker 2>it or whatever it was, he realized and they realized

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 2>there is no saving this, and that that was they

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:45.959
<v Speaker 2>that it was broken, and that's when he was like, well,

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 2>if it's broken, I might as well go back. I

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 2>don't know. Again, I feel a little uncomfortable even talking

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 2>about this. However, the point is I think one. I

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 2>think either of those is just as likely. And it

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 2>feels like everyone just decided the final straw was him returning,

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 2>as opposed to being open to the possibility that the retirement,

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 2>which everyone thought was odd, and the moment and kind

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 2>of rushed that that was his you know that maybe

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:16.079
<v Speaker 2>that was his attempt to save things and then there

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 2>was no saving things. Okay, So that's the defense of Brady.

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 2>What you can't defend is his play so far this year. Yeah,

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 2>he's been awful. And I know people will be like,

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 2>eight touchdowns, one pick, they scored three points against them.

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Much against the Panthers, Well, the offensive line is definitely

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 2>responsible for why they can't run the ball, which has

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 2>had a trickle down effect on everything else. Everyone of

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 2>their teams aren't afraid of them running the ball, so

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Brady has dropped back fifty times all of that. However,

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 2>the idea this is is the same thing we're gonna

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 2>get to the Packers next. The idea of having one

0:14:55.520 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 2>of these guys is even when everything goes awry, they

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 2>are going to fix it. Now, it's not going to

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 2>be enough if all you have is that guy at

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 2>quarterback to beat the best teams. But it should be

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 2>enough to beat the Steelers. It should be enough to

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 2>beat the Panthers. And they have lost these games. They

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 2>have the Chiefs game they lost because the Chiefs scored forty,

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 2>green Bay they lost. Green Bay scored fourteen, Atlanta the

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry Pittsburgh they lost. Pittsburgh scored twenty, and Carolina

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 2>they lost. Carolina scored twenty one. So any of those games,

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 2>if they can get to twenty one points or twenty

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 2>two points, I guess they win them all. And that

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Tampa Bay offense this year take out the Chiefs game

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 2>where the Chiefs started playing prevent that Tampa offense points

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 2>scored nineteen twenty. But that twenty, by the way, wasn't

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 2>really twenty by the offense because they had to pick

0:15:55.600 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 2>six twelve, the thirty one against the Chiefs tentyone eighteen three.

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 2>It's been bad and.

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 3>The last time Tom Brady didn't throw for a touchdown

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 3>in a game?

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 2>That's a good question. But has it happened multiple times

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 2>this year? I'm not sure the I mean, this is

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 2>the worst start to his career in you know, in

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 2>my memory. And as far as let me all go

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 2>to Brady real quick and see, has it happened? No, Well,

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 2>it hadn't happened yet this year, so I don't know

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 2>the last time it happened. But my guess is, honestly,

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 2>it might have happened in a game they won. Well,

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 2>I know they lost like thirty eight to three to

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 2>the Saints at one point last year or something like that,

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 2>so that game would have happened. But the shouldn't answer

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 2>the question, though, which I did not do. Does he

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 2>make it to the end of the season. Yes, In fact,

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm not even certain this will be his last season.

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 2>I think he might go play for someone else next year.

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't think this is a weird thing. I don't

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 2>think he's played well, but I also don't think he's done, like,

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 2>I think he still has something left. I think he's

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 2>in a spot though, where everything needs to be. He

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 2>needs to be on the Bucks team he was on

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 2>two years ago. Awesome weapons, great offensive line because he

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 2>can still make the throws. But he's not in a

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 2>place anymore where he can carry you. But with all

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 2>that said, in the NFC this year, in that division

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 2>in particular, I still think the Bucks are gonna make

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs. Okay, now I do not think that about

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 2>our next topic, next next topic?

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 3>Please?

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh by the way, our poll, will the Bucks turn

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:41.160
<v Speaker 2>it around? Seventy percent say no? Yeah, just rot one

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 2>last thing before we get to the packers. I guess

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:48.120
<v Speaker 2>we have to define turn it around because the fact

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 2>of the matter is right now, in that division, you

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 2>just have to be better than Atlanta. In the NFC,

0:17:56.720 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 2>South Tampa and Atlanta three and four, and Carolina and

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:04.359
<v Speaker 2>New Orleans are two and five. And I know Carolina

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 2>just beat them, but they are both they have both

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 2>been outscored on the year by twenty five points and

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 2>they're both terrible. Yeah, so I just you just got

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 2>to be better than Atlanta, and Atlanta got their teeth

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:18.640
<v Speaker 2>kicked in this week as as predicted on the show.

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Why I didn't include Cincinnati my picks?

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:23.959
<v Speaker 4>All right, Next, speaking of quarterbacks that are holding their

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 4>teams hostages, Yeah, Aaron Rodgers and the Pikers have lost

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 4>their third straight and this time to a backup quarterback.

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:33.920
<v Speaker 4>Rogers demanded fifty million dollars fifty million dollars contract, yet

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:35.679
<v Speaker 4>it's frustrated he has no one to throw the ball to.

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 3>Is the Packers mess on Rogers or is it in

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:40.360
<v Speaker 3>the front office? Uh?

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 2>Well this I'm gonna put the lion's share here on

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Rodgers. The defense hasn't been great and the receivers

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 2>have not uh you know, popped. But you have now

0:18:55.160 --> 0:19:02.199
<v Speaker 2>lost to Daniel Jones, Zach Wilson, and Taylor Heineke in

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:07.479
<v Speaker 2>three straight weeks. Okay, now I understand the argument the

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 2>defense needs to be better. That's fine. You are the

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 2>back to back defending MVP, the highest paid player in

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 2>the sport, and you on the year have been mediocre.

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 2>You throw for two hundred and thirty yards a game,

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 2>six and a half yards per attempt. You do not

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 2>look like the same guy yesterday against Washington. Washington, and

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:38.639
<v Speaker 2>by the way, it's another game where now that it

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 2>was early, but it's another game where you have a

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 2>ten point lead. So they're up fourteen to three on

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Washington and they end up losing twenty three twenty one.

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 2>In fact, I want to look at that. I am

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:55.199
<v Speaker 2>now thinking of a topic that I want to do

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 2>on the TV show. The only reason I'm saying to

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 2>the TV show and not here is because the like,

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:05.439
<v Speaker 2>I don't have it built out yet. But Rogers this

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:10.640
<v Speaker 2>year with a double digit lead versus Mahomes this year

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:14.640
<v Speaker 2>when trailing by double digits. So Rogers this year had

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 2>a double digit lead against the Bears and won it.

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Had did he ever have a double digit lead against

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots, I'm checking real quick. They did not. That

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 2>game was nip and tuck the whole way, by the way,

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 2>that overtime against the Patriots on anything preventing them from

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 2>having a two score, Yeah, exactly. He had a double

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 2>digit lead against Tampa and won barely, and then had

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 2>a double digit lead against the Giants late and lost

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 2>it against the Jets. They never had, They didn't. So

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 2>he's two and two. Rogers is two and two this

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:55.399
<v Speaker 2>year went up by ten plus Mahomes is three and

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 2>Zhero went down by ten plus. You can't be blowing

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 2>these games and Rogers has to at some point. I

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 2>mean again, yesterday, it's like, oh, he was fine, ninety

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 2>nine passer rating, two touchdowns, SnO picks. He threw for

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:14.919
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and ninety yards against Washington, one hundred and

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:20.640
<v Speaker 2>ninety yards on the season. The everything that is Rogers

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 2>is usually amazing at he's nowhere to be found. He's

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 2>tenth in the league in passing.

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:28.679
<v Speaker 3>LEAs as what is?

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:32.120
<v Speaker 2>What was his deep shots used to be the most

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 2>devastating player in the league. They're gone. So he's tenth

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:39.959
<v Speaker 2>in the league in UH passing yards, he's sixth in

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 2>the league in UH passing touchdowns, and he's middle of

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:48.160
<v Speaker 2>the pack in passer rating. So has he been awful?

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Is he the highest paid player in the sport? And

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:56.479
<v Speaker 2>does he need to be better? Yes? More notably, I

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 2>did a little thing. We're gonna do it on Thursday Show.

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 2>By the way, also book club debut on Thursday.

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Show.

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 2>Your book came in the mail, so you got it.

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 2>You got forty pages tree before Thursday. Remember Little History

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 2>of the World by E. H. Gombrech is the book

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:15.959
<v Speaker 2>we've got, we're gonna have until Thanksgiving to read it,

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 2>and then we're going on to the next book that

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:20.719
<v Speaker 2>the guy from Penguin Press suggested. But I did this

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 2>thing today that we're gonna do on today's show, which

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 2>is I took the odds every team's playoff odds in

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 2>each conference and put them in there one through sixteen

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 2>where according to Vegas, most likely and least likely to

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 2>make the playoffs. So I have them each I have locks, possible, unlikely,

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 2>and locked out. So, for instance, just quickly, according to

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 2>the playoff odds, Philly, Minnesota, and Dallas are locks to

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 2>make the playoffs, and Detroit, Carolina and Chicago are essentially

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 2>locked out. They are all of those teams are either

0:22:57.200 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 2>ten to one to make or one to tend to

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 2>make or ten to one to miss. In the AFC,

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 2>the locks are Buffalo, Kansas and Kansay the only real locks,

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:09.199
<v Speaker 2>and the locked out is Cleveland, Pittsburgh, Houston in Denver.

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 2>And then you have the teams in the middle. Here's

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 2>why I bring this up. Green Bay for the first

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:19.680
<v Speaker 2>time all year, is an underdog to make the playoffs.

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 2>They are plus one fifty to make the playoffs. Meanwhile,

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 2>Minnesota is minus nine to fifty to make the playoffs,

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:33.439
<v Speaker 2>which it speaks to what giant divisional favorites they are.

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 2>By the way speaking, I asked for the extra time

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 2>and we're still not even to the final segment. This

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 2>is Monday NFL football shows. We have a lot to

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 2>discuss here. So Green Bay is now three and four.

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 2>You're asking me if I'm done with them. The answer

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 2>is yes, I think they're cooked. Do you know off

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 2>the top of your head. It's fine if you don't

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:54.159
<v Speaker 2>who they play this week. Let me let me Titan. No,

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:55.399
<v Speaker 2>let me put it to you a different way.

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Don't look.

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Hold on, don't look. Chiefs are on a buye and

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 2>then they play the Titans coming Bay next. If you're

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 2>a team that needs to get right, that is lost

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:06.359
<v Speaker 2>three in a row, what is the single worst team

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:11.160
<v Speaker 2>right now you could face next week the Lions? No, no, no, no.

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 2>In the other direction, the team that you are least

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 2>likely to beat.

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh, covey the Chiefs.

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:20.639
<v Speaker 2>No, the Chiefs running buy all right? The Bills is

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 2>the answer. They play the Bills in Buffalo next week.

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 2>So the Green Bay Packers are three and four. They

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 2>have games left against Buffalo, Dallas, Tennessee, Philadelphia, the Rams,

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 2>the Dolphins, and Minnesota. That's seven of their remaining games.

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 2>The only easy games they have left are at Detroit,

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 2>at Chicago home for Detroit. Okay, so give them those

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 2>three wins. That's now six wins. How many do we

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 2>think you need to make the playoffs? My guess is

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 2>get you in nine, mic, right, So of those seven games,

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 2>if they went, if they beat they win in Detroit,

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 2>they win in Chicago, and they win home against Detroit, which,

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 2>by the way, given how they're playing, or not locks.

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Even if you give them those three wins, they have

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 2>to find at least three, probably four wins of at

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Buffalo home for Dallas, home for Tennessee, at Philly home

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 2>for the Rams, at Miami home for Minnesota. I think

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 2>they're done. The Packers are done, and I think everyone's like, oh,

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Rogers might retire. I don't think Rodgers leaving that fifty

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:43.879
<v Speaker 2>million on the table, but I think Rogers is an

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:47.679
<v Speaker 2>elite quarterback is over. I think that is over with

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:49.680
<v Speaker 2>all right, last topic.

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 4>All right, the Giants, the six and one Giants that

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 4>that are the most surprising team of the year so far.

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 3>They have the Seahawks, Texans.

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 4>And the Lions in the next three games, and they

0:25:57.880 --> 0:25:59.640
<v Speaker 4>could easily be nine and one by time we get

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:02.679
<v Speaker 4>to the thing Thanksgiving Days showdown in Dallas. Yeah, Daniel

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 4>Jones is in a contract year, has done enough to

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 4>get the g man here.

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:06.439
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 3>It seems like if you don't.

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:09.639
<v Speaker 4>Have a top five quarterback, it's best that you have

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:13.119
<v Speaker 4>a mobile one that doesn't make mistakes. Is Daniel Jones

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 4>actually good or will this all fall through the cracks

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:15.880
<v Speaker 4>come postseason?

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:20.639
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Daniel Jones is not actually good. He is doing

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:22.440
<v Speaker 2>a good job of not turning the ball over and

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 2>I will give him credit for that. Here's going to

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 2>be my most controversial take. Okay, the Giants are not good.

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 2>The Giants are six and one. Their only loss is

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 2>to a very good team in Dallas, and they are

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 2>not good. The Giants, what they are doing in winning

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 2>all of these one score games is simply not sustainable.

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Chance they're winning margins this year are one, three, eight, five,

0:26:55.800 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 2>four and six. I am here to tell you the

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:06.199
<v Speaker 2>Giants are fool's goal. Now, Giants fans get mad at me.

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 2>Those guys at the bodega, they get upset with me,

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 2>and Brian Dabole is not fools goal. Brian Daboles awesome,

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:19.879
<v Speaker 2>and Sakwan's been great. And Daniel Jones he was the

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 2>most fumbling ist player in NFL history. He has stopped fumbling,

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 2>which has drastically changed his quality of play, and he

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 2>runs the ball a lot more. The the idea that

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 2>the the Giants are too smart and Dable's too smart

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 2>for them to think like, oh, Jones has earned a

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 2>contract extension, that's not the that's not going to happen.

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Do they maybe bring him back on a franchise tag

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 2>or something? Maybe, but I don't even know that. I

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 2>recommend that. I actually think Jimmy g is going to

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:54.920
<v Speaker 2>end up on the Giants next year. But set that aside.

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 2>That's neither here nor there. The Giants absolutely Now, let's

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:04.360
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned the schedule at Seattle, they're underdogs, they then

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 2>have a bye, They're then a home for Houston and Detroit.

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I mean they're gonna be eight and two

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 2>with going into that Dallas game with two games left

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 2>against Washington. So even if they lose to the good teams,

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 2>they have left on their schedule and they have a

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 2>home game against Indy. Could the Giants win twelve games? Yes?

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Is it on the board they win thirteen games?

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 2>And will I rush to the betting counter to bet

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 2>against them on the road in their first playoff game?

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 2>You bet your ass I will, because here's the thing

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 2>that's unfortunate for Giant fans, given what Philly is doing

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 2>unless Philly. Now, I guess they're only one game back

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 2>of Philly the but it is overwhelmingly likely now that

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 2>the Giants. Yes, they make the playoffs, and yes they

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 2>have a gaudy record, but they won't win the division,

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 2>which means they'll be the five seed at best and

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 2>on the road the whole way. So they'll be the

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 2>five seed on the road against the winner of either

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 2>probably against either Tampa or San Francisco. And I am

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 2>here to tell you I will be betting on Tampa

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 2>or San Francisco in a game against the New York

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Giants in the postseason. Flatly I will be. You're not

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 2>gonna be able to talk me out of it. By

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 2>the way, in those playoff odds, the Giants are only

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 2>minus two seventy, so their favorites to make the playoffs.

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 2>But Vegas still thinks there's an outside shot at a collapse,

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 2>just as a for instance, there Tampa, who we just

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 2>talked about how bad they've been, have the same playoff

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 2>odds of minus two seventy. Okay, that was a twenty

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 2>seven minute first segment. That was good. We have a

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 2>lot more NFL to get to. We have a lot

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 2>more of your comments to get to. By the way,

0:29:57.800 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 2>in the poll that we did in the live chat

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 2>on you YouTube, seventy five percent said Aaron Rodgers is

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 2>to blame for the Packers struggles. However, we're gonna take

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 2>about a sixty second break and come back and for

0:30:08.800 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 2>you back to the NFL. We will talk about the

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 2>disaster that was last night in the Lakers game. That

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 2>and what they do with Ross plus rest the NFL

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Week seven? Do that next? What's Right?

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 5>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 5>inspiring true story about Anthony Roblast, who defined every expectation

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 5>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 5>original movie from Amazon, MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 5>evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 5>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 5>including Jerrel Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Panya, and

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 5>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:30:55.120 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 2>All right, welcome back in What's Right? Nick Right? Episode

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 2>eighty six. Hope you're watching us live on YouTube. By

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 2>the way, let me check big. This is episode eighty six.

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 2>I was hoping we could go, you know, episode per

0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 2>episode as far as like YouTube subscribers. So at eighty

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 2>six we'd have eighty six thousand, eighty seven week because

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 2>the goal is to get to one hundred thousand before

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 2>before January, and then Demonta gets a thousand dollars bonus. However,

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 2>oh whoops, Oh my goodness, I just really messed up.

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 2>I was trying to check right now on our YouTube

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 2>page how many subscribers we have, because I think we

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 2>just passed up past the threshold.

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Eighty point eighty and a half eighty point five thousand.

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that's good, that's good. If we add how long

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 2>until New Year's We've got call it ten weeks, so

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 2>we got to add five hundred. No, that would be wrong. Oh,

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 2>that's gonna be hard. It's like ten weeks though, got

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 2>to add two thousand a week.

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Twenty five hundred, two thousand.

0:31:56.400 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 2>A week is gonna be hard. I don't know if

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna get that thousand Bucksubscribe on YouTube America to

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:05.479
<v Speaker 2>his favorite Yeah, that'd be a good idea, wearing one

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 2>of those uh what are you sandwich boards?

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Yeah.

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:11.479
<v Speaker 2>Subscribe with the two paste. Yeah, I like it. I

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 2>like that idea a lot. Bring that sign, just make

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 2>it bigger. Subscribe to the podcast, all right. Also subscribe

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 2>on you you own iTunes and Spotify and everything. All right, demans,

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Before we get to our game, let's talk a little hoops.

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead, all right.

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 4>The Lakers are zero and three after they lost to

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 4>the Blazers on Sunday. Yeah, so bad that we're interrupting

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 4>the show. We're interrupting football to roast it. Yeah, Russ

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 4>has been bad. But Lebron airball to three from the

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 4>logo give me a break? Yeah, I don't give me

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 4>a break.

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 2>By the way, the producer, I want to see who

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 2>in our group chat of the producers sent that video

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 2>and called Lebron a bad teammate. Moe's Moe's is now

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:54.240
<v Speaker 2>the Lebron slander. Lebron James is the third oldest player

0:32:54.280 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 2>in the whole league, and all he's done so far

0:32:57.080 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 2>this year is give you twenty seven a level and seven,

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty seven, eleven and seven. The last night's game, he

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 2>gave you thirty one to eight to eight. Did he

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 2>miss the game winner? He did miss the game winner.

0:33:08.880 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Should he have ever been in the position to where

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 2>they needed the game winner? Of course not. He's also

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 2>leading the Lakers in minutes. How is Lebron averaging more points, rebounds,

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 2>assists and minutes than Anthony Davis? How is that possible

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 2>when Anthony David is supposed to be in his prime?

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 3>But go ahead, Anthony Davis has been good, but.

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 2>He's been fine.

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead.

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 4>Is your take gonna be the Lebron as such a

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:34.960
<v Speaker 4>genius that he's been planning the tank for Wimby.

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 2>No, because they don't have their pick, right, the Pelicans

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 2>get it. The Pelicans get the Lakers pick either this

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 2>year or next year. They get to decide, and they're

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 2>gonna I mean, if the Lakers keep this up.

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 3>But that's not the point.

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:54.479
<v Speaker 2>The point is this, Because I know football was on yesterday,

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 2>so people maybe didn't see the end of the game.

0:33:57.400 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 2>The Lakers were up by eight with four minutes left,

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 2>and then they were up by five, I'm sorry, up

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:11.240
<v Speaker 2>by seven with two minutes left, and then fell apart,

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:16.240
<v Speaker 2>and here were the possessions. After being up by seven,

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:22.759
<v Speaker 2>Blazer's cut it to five. Patrick Beverly, Patrick Beverly, wh

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 2>somehow part of the crunch time offensive lineup misses a

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:35.400
<v Speaker 2>three by four feet. They then the Blazers score. Lebron

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 2>then does a thing Lebron's are doing his whole career.

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:44.239
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's always plus ev, but it's not

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 2>as bad. The numbers make it look worse than it is,

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:52.319
<v Speaker 2>which is he takes an like a tough three that

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 2>would be the win them the game, but he does

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 2>it where the reason that would typically just be terrible.

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:01.359
<v Speaker 2>But the reason it's not terrible is he always does

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 2>it at one second on the shot clock, so it's

0:35:04.680 --> 0:35:08.239
<v Speaker 2>like we're up, We're up a possession or two at

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:11.279
<v Speaker 2>the very least. What's going to happen here is we're

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:12.960
<v Speaker 2>going to use the whole shot clock, and if I

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:15.279
<v Speaker 2>make it, the game's over. The Blazers then go down

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 2>and score and This is when the true travesty happens.

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:22.839
<v Speaker 2>There's thirty five seconds left. When the Blazers score, they

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:29.359
<v Speaker 2>are down one. Russ gets the ball and races up

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 2>the court to take a mid range jump shot, takes

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 2>it with twenty seven.

0:35:34.280 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 3>Seconds loft twenty seven damn.

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:40.440
<v Speaker 2>No, I thought it was like eighteen or No. Took

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 2>it with twenty seven seconds left in that game. By

0:35:43.000 --> 0:35:45.359
<v Speaker 2>the way, in Russ's defense, he was red hot up

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 2>to that point. He was four of fourteen. His justification was,

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 2>I wanted a two for one. It wasn't That's what

0:35:57.160 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 2>he That's what he said. That's what he said. Yeah,

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:03.920
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't a tie game. Now listen, if it's a

0:36:03.960 --> 0:36:08.960
<v Speaker 2>tie game, that is not a terrible play, even for

0:36:09.040 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 2>it being Russ. Because if it's a tie game, it

0:36:13.320 --> 0:36:16.360
<v Speaker 2>is super important to get a two for one because

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:19.399
<v Speaker 2>what you don't want is to use the whole shot

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:21.880
<v Speaker 2>clock miss and then the Blazers controlled the last shot.

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 2>But the Lakers were leading, so you were going to

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:31.120
<v Speaker 2>get a two for one no matter what. Because the

0:36:31.160 --> 0:36:37.399
<v Speaker 2>Blazers trailing by one, we're gonna go fast because they're

0:36:37.400 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 2>not idiots and they know down one, we want to

0:36:41.200 --> 0:36:44.800
<v Speaker 2>go as fast as possible. So if we miss, you

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:48.840
<v Speaker 2>got plenty of time. If we miss, we foul. Worst

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:53.880
<v Speaker 2>case scenario, we're down three. Instead, Russ rushes. The team's

0:36:53.920 --> 0:36:57.440
<v Speaker 2>not even up the court yet. So many problems. One

0:36:57.520 --> 0:37:02.719
<v Speaker 2>is why is Russ on the court? I I I

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:07.360
<v Speaker 2>was talking to Brew this morning and Brew was like, listen,

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:09.960
<v Speaker 2>it's obviously a bad shot by Russ, but the Lakers

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 2>got to know. You can't give him the ball. There

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:12.840
<v Speaker 2>can't give him the ball?

0:37:15.239 --> 0:37:16.799
<v Speaker 3>Is playing shooting guard right now.

0:37:17.080 --> 0:37:19.319
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I don't know what he is, but

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:19.799
<v Speaker 2>I know.

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:21.920
<v Speaker 3>This, Why is he on the court if we can't

0:37:21.960 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 3>give it ball?

0:37:22.760 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 2>Exactly can't. It's not like they gave him the ball

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:29.000
<v Speaker 2>three on the shot clock. They inbounded to him and

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 2>he ran up the court.

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 3>I honestly think.

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 4>Russ, this go ahead, got a little good look charm

0:37:38.719 --> 0:37:39.120
<v Speaker 4>for you?

0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:40.719
<v Speaker 2>What's that hold on?

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 3>You?

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Guys? Have something for me. I don't know what this is,

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 2>but I'm telling you right now, if this is a

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Patrick Beverly Lakers jersey, I don't know what it is.

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:56.160
<v Speaker 2>I'll open it on the air, but they joked about it.

0:37:56.760 --> 0:37:59.000
<v Speaker 2>If this is a Patrick Beverly Lakers Jersey.

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:02.280
<v Speaker 3>Oh look at that.

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:07.799
<v Speaker 2>You've got to be kidding me. They really bought it,

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:16.160
<v Speaker 2>They really bought it. This podcast might be Demonsi's flute game.

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Are you all right, buddy Old? Are you all right?

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:23.399
<v Speaker 2>Maybe lay off the vape pin a little bit, and

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:26.319
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I mean, try to get healthier. This is

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:31.880
<v Speaker 2>such garbage. I cannot believe you guys spent real money

0:38:31.880 --> 0:38:35.400
<v Speaker 2>on this and authentic. They didn't even go cheap. They

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:38.440
<v Speaker 2>got me an authentic. Patrick, I can't even believe they

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:41.960
<v Speaker 2>sell these things. That's okay. But Beverly, amazingly is not

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:45.800
<v Speaker 2>the problem. Patrick Beverly, who this year, don't get me wrong,

0:38:46.160 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 2>has been terrible. Do you know what Beverly has done

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:52.800
<v Speaker 2>this year? Everyone's killing Russ and they should be killing Russ.

0:38:53.200 --> 0:38:58.480
<v Speaker 2>But can I tell you Beverly's this is this accurate?

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:03.520
<v Speaker 2>This is on believable, This is truly unbelievable. I didn't

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:08.080
<v Speaker 2>realize this. Beverly this year has not taken a two pointer,

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 2>not a layup, not a mid range shot, nothing. He

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:17.400
<v Speaker 2>has only taken threes. And he is one for five,

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:22.399
<v Speaker 2>one for six, one for three. So on the year,

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:27.319
<v Speaker 2>Patrick Beverly is three for fifteen from three, which is

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:32.640
<v Speaker 2>actually better than the Lakers team average. Russ, on the

0:39:32.680 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 2>other hand, on the year is seven for twelve, zero

0:39:38.160 --> 0:39:42.919
<v Speaker 2>for eleven, four for fifteen from the field, and overall

0:39:43.600 --> 0:39:47.520
<v Speaker 2>one for twelve from three. So Russ is shooting twenty

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 2>nine percent from the field and eight percent from three.

0:39:53.880 --> 0:39:59.440
<v Speaker 2>The Lakers overall on the season are shooting hold on

0:39:59.520 --> 0:40:03.440
<v Speaker 2>where is it? Uh twenty three? So I guess Patrick

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:08.239
<v Speaker 2>Beverley's not above the team everage. Yeah, I mean it

0:40:08.320 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 2>is gotten to this point with Russ. Yeah, if you

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 2>don't want to trade him yet because you want to

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:23.360
<v Speaker 2>wait and see if there is a better trade available

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:26.759
<v Speaker 2>than the Pacers trade, you have to send him home.

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:33.759
<v Speaker 2>You can't play, You just can't. You tried bringing him

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:37.560
<v Speaker 2>off the bench. He then very conveniently got a hamstring injury,

0:40:37.640 --> 0:40:39.880
<v Speaker 2>and it's like, I don't know about coming off the bench.

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:46.319
<v Speaker 2>By the way, sidebar, a bubbling NBA story is that

0:40:46.440 --> 0:40:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Kawhi Leonard has already sat out a game and is

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:53.640
<v Speaker 2>playing like twenty minutes a night. He got hurt. I

0:40:53.640 --> 0:40:57.840
<v Speaker 2>think when Trump was president, I don't understand how that's happened.

0:40:57.880 --> 0:41:01.399
<v Speaker 2>To set that aside, you got to send Russ home.

0:41:03.200 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 2>You can't play him. You just can't play him. And

0:41:06.719 --> 0:41:08.520
<v Speaker 2>if you're not gonna pull off, if you're not gonna

0:41:08.600 --> 0:41:11.080
<v Speaker 2>do the trade, so be it. If you want to

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:13.520
<v Speaker 2>wait on it. He's unplayable.

0:41:13.640 --> 0:41:16.920
<v Speaker 4>And the hampsteing things honestly kind of annoying, like if

0:41:16.920 --> 0:41:17.800
<v Speaker 4>it's if it's false.

0:41:17.840 --> 0:41:20.400
<v Speaker 3>Obviously him getting hurt isn't annoying, but.

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:23.759
<v Speaker 2>It's not great. If it was like a threat to

0:41:24.040 --> 0:41:25.920
<v Speaker 2>be like, this is what's gonna happen if you.

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:28.960
<v Speaker 3>Here's what you know what I think if you were

0:41:28.960 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 3>playing good, let me let me.

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:34.839
<v Speaker 2>Revise the take. I would make him the sixth man

0:41:36.120 --> 0:41:42.560
<v Speaker 2>and see if the hamstring pops back up. And if

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:44.359
<v Speaker 2>it does, fine, then we don't even have to send

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:49.520
<v Speaker 2>your home. You're just hurt. But this is untenable, and

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:51.879
<v Speaker 2>I don't you know what I'm I'm debating whether i'd

0:41:51.880 --> 0:41:54.360
<v Speaker 2>make him the sixth man or just bench him entirely.

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:59.880
<v Speaker 2>But that that decision last night was such a bleep

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 2>you to his teammates and to his coach and to everyone.

0:42:04.719 --> 0:42:06.640
<v Speaker 2>It was so bad. All right, let's get back to football.

0:42:06.680 --> 0:42:08.879
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, all right, we got a game. It's called

0:42:08.960 --> 0:42:10.640
<v Speaker 3>this or that let's play.

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:13.399
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, first one we got Dak and Tua both got

0:42:13.400 --> 0:42:15.640
<v Speaker 4>wins in their return from the injuries for the Cowboys

0:42:15.680 --> 0:42:18.200
<v Speaker 4>and the Dolphins. The quarterback who will have the better

0:42:18.239 --> 0:42:19.920
<v Speaker 4>season Dak or Tua.

0:42:20.560 --> 0:42:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Listen, Tua tried to throw a hat trick of picks

0:42:23.360 --> 0:42:26.920
<v Speaker 2>last night and they were all dropped. It's unbelievable the

0:42:27.000 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 2>lucky he had last night, but it was his first

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:32.480
<v Speaker 2>game back. Demonse had the Dolphins and the under the Dolphins,

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:34.880
<v Speaker 2>you would have been so mad because it was Dolphins

0:42:34.880 --> 0:42:37.240
<v Speaker 2>minus six and a half and they won by six.

0:42:38.120 --> 0:42:40.520
<v Speaker 2>You just bet the Dolphins money line and the under

0:42:40.880 --> 0:42:43.720
<v Speaker 2>and it ended up working out great. I think Tua

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:46.920
<v Speaker 2>will overall have a better season. I think the Cowboys.

0:42:46.960 --> 0:42:51.160
<v Speaker 2>Are we talking about the Cowboys later in the show. No, okay,

0:42:51.200 --> 0:42:53.600
<v Speaker 2>all right, so then let's just do it right here

0:42:53.680 --> 0:42:57.200
<v Speaker 2>for a second. I got it, listen. I thought the

0:42:57.200 --> 0:42:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Lions could win that game. And by the way, it

0:42:59.200 --> 0:43:01.640
<v Speaker 2>was ten to six. The Lions were at the inch

0:43:01.719 --> 0:43:04.040
<v Speaker 2>line and they fumbled and then Dallas reeled off like

0:43:04.080 --> 0:43:06.400
<v Speaker 2>fourteen straight and it ended up being looked like a

0:43:06.400 --> 0:43:09.000
<v Speaker 2>blowout when the Lions could have taken over. I can't

0:43:09.000 --> 0:43:11.319
<v Speaker 2>believe the Lions didn't cover. I can't believe they didn't

0:43:11.320 --> 0:43:12.960
<v Speaker 2>cover the seven when it looked like they could have won.

0:43:13.200 --> 0:43:15.160
<v Speaker 2>But I gotta give the Dallas defense credit.

0:43:15.239 --> 0:43:15.439
<v Speaker 3>Man.

0:43:16.000 --> 0:43:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Every week they step up and that Lion's offensive line

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:22.160
<v Speaker 2>is awesome, and it didn't matter. They still what did

0:43:22.160 --> 0:43:25.319
<v Speaker 2>they force golf into five turnovers? I think they forced

0:43:25.360 --> 0:43:28.520
<v Speaker 2>golf into five turnovers? I know, or no, Golf maybe

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:32.240
<v Speaker 2>had four turnovers and the Lions had five turnovers. Whatever

0:43:32.280 --> 0:43:35.719
<v Speaker 2>it is, I think I've picked against the Cowboys, and

0:43:35.880 --> 0:43:39.560
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily in our gambling picks, but overall, I think

0:43:39.600 --> 0:43:42.480
<v Speaker 2>I've picked them on television to lose every single week.

0:43:43.120 --> 0:43:47.560
<v Speaker 2>And they're five and two, and so the one game

0:43:47.600 --> 0:43:49.080
<v Speaker 2>I might have picked them to win was the Giants

0:43:49.120 --> 0:43:52.160
<v Speaker 2>game which they lost, which no, they won that game,

0:43:53.200 --> 0:43:57.719
<v Speaker 2>so listen, I give them credit. That defense has been

0:43:58.000 --> 0:44:02.760
<v Speaker 2>even better than advertised. But Dak Dak was not great

0:44:02.760 --> 0:44:05.560
<v Speaker 2>by any stretch yesterday. Now his first game back, we'll see.

0:44:05.840 --> 0:44:09.160
<v Speaker 2>But the weapons the Dolphins have, Tua just has to

0:44:09.160 --> 0:44:12.240
<v Speaker 2>be a one read guy and they can still against

0:44:12.280 --> 0:44:15.920
<v Speaker 2>most teams make things happen. He was really rusty yesterday.

0:44:16.160 --> 0:44:18.600
<v Speaker 2>They escaped with a win, so They're gonna be fine.

0:44:18.640 --> 0:44:20.920
<v Speaker 2>I think the Dolphins are a playoff team. Cowboys are

0:44:20.920 --> 0:44:23.759
<v Speaker 2>a playoff team. But amazingly, I actually think TWOA is

0:44:23.760 --> 0:44:25.400
<v Speaker 2>gonna have the better year. It doesn't mean I trust

0:44:25.400 --> 0:44:26.920
<v Speaker 2>to him more, but I think he's gonna have the

0:44:26.960 --> 0:44:27.359
<v Speaker 2>better year.

0:44:27.360 --> 0:44:30.399
<v Speaker 4>All right, next, all right, Baltimore one Sunday, but once

0:44:30.440 --> 0:44:32.800
<v Speaker 4>again had trouble closing the game out. Lamar went for

0:44:32.840 --> 0:44:35.560
<v Speaker 4>only one hundred and twenty passing yards and sixty rushing yards.

0:44:36.000 --> 0:44:40.240
<v Speaker 4>Lamar has earned an extension or showed limitations.

0:44:39.719 --> 0:44:41.520
<v Speaker 3>Both both of them.

0:44:42.000 --> 0:44:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, listen, the Lamar was playing like an

0:44:46.280 --> 0:44:47.919
<v Speaker 2>MVP the first three weeks of the year.

0:44:48.120 --> 0:44:48.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but.

0:44:51.320 --> 0:44:54.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that anyone could almost mid now.

0:44:55.600 --> 0:44:56.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry.

0:44:57.040 --> 0:45:00.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't love that frazy alo almost mid. Okay, it's

0:45:00.680 --> 0:45:04.200
<v Speaker 2>not the almost part. Well, it's the mid part. Listen,

0:45:04.600 --> 0:45:07.879
<v Speaker 2>Lamar hasn't been good in a month, and now he's

0:45:07.920 --> 0:45:11.320
<v Speaker 2>going to get the extension. And he has earned the extension.

0:45:11.800 --> 0:45:14.879
<v Speaker 2>And I can only say this so many times. The conversation,

0:45:15.719 --> 0:45:17.000
<v Speaker 2>you know what, I'm going to try to lay it

0:45:17.000 --> 0:45:20.680
<v Speaker 2>out the best I possibly can. The Lamar Jackson conversation,

0:45:21.000 --> 0:45:25.440
<v Speaker 2>The Lamar Jackson the football player conversation is a great

0:45:25.680 --> 0:45:31.400
<v Speaker 2>microcosm for how broken we are as a society along

0:45:31.520 --> 0:45:39.359
<v Speaker 2>racial lines. So let me explain that quickly. Lamar got

0:45:39.400 --> 0:45:45.240
<v Speaker 2>attacked and discounted and questioned by a lot of folks

0:45:45.600 --> 0:45:51.480
<v Speaker 2>before the draft, and it was obviously tinged, if not overt,

0:45:51.680 --> 0:45:55.760
<v Speaker 2>racial implications about his intelligence, the position he should be playing,

0:45:55.800 --> 0:46:00.520
<v Speaker 2>all these things. So that was awful and gross. He then,

0:46:00.600 --> 0:46:03.080
<v Speaker 2>by the way, was unbelievable and one of the MVP's

0:46:03.120 --> 0:46:06.279
<v Speaker 2>first year all this stuff. However, when I say how

0:46:06.320 --> 0:46:10.000
<v Speaker 2>broken we are racially, this is not a both sides

0:46:10.120 --> 0:46:14.080
<v Speaker 2>are equally complicit thing, but this is where both sides

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:20.360
<v Speaker 2>have dishonest actors thing. Because of that, some of the

0:46:20.520 --> 0:46:25.200
<v Speaker 2>smartest football commentators who also happen to be pretty typically

0:46:25.320 --> 0:46:31.239
<v Speaker 2>very progressive people, very forward thinking people, and people that

0:46:31.640 --> 0:46:36.040
<v Speaker 2>make it very important to be anti racist. Because of that,

0:46:36.239 --> 0:46:40.720
<v Speaker 2>a lot of those people have just pretended they don't

0:46:40.760 --> 0:46:46.600
<v Speaker 2>see any limitations to him when they're obviously there, and

0:46:46.719 --> 0:46:49.320
<v Speaker 2>because they don't want to be lumped into the category

0:46:49.360 --> 0:46:54.840
<v Speaker 2>of the folks that were attacking this awesome player clearly

0:46:54.840 --> 0:46:57.960
<v Speaker 2>because they think a black quarterback of his style could succeed,

0:46:58.440 --> 0:47:02.520
<v Speaker 2>they now are regarding the fact that, no matter what

0:47:02.600 --> 0:47:07.360
<v Speaker 2>rates Lamar was, the guy has significant limitations as a passer.

0:47:08.520 --> 0:47:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Now does he make up for it as a runner,

0:47:11.520 --> 0:47:15.520
<v Speaker 2>as an athlete all of those things for the most part,

0:47:15.600 --> 0:47:21.759
<v Speaker 2>usually yes this past month, as he barely this past month.

0:47:21.800 --> 0:47:27.279
<v Speaker 2>Had the Ravens been in situations where if Lamar played better,

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:32.360
<v Speaker 2>they would have won, of course the Ravens are. They

0:47:32.480 --> 0:47:35.799
<v Speaker 2>beat New England and Lamar was unbelievable in that game,

0:47:36.000 --> 0:47:39.319
<v Speaker 2>right if we just go back since the Miami game,

0:47:39.640 --> 0:47:41.799
<v Speaker 2>So they beat the Jets Week one, who cares the

0:47:41.800 --> 0:47:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Miami game. They lose, but Lamar was unbelievable. They beat

0:47:45.040 --> 0:47:47.560
<v Speaker 2>New England because Lamar was great. That was Week three.

0:47:48.360 --> 0:47:53.359
<v Speaker 2>Week four against Buffalo, they blow a seventeen point lead,

0:47:53.520 --> 0:47:57.920
<v Speaker 2>in large part because of Lamar's two late turnovers. Week

0:47:58.719 --> 0:48:03.240
<v Speaker 2>five against Since they win in a lot of ways

0:48:03.560 --> 0:48:09.359
<v Speaker 2>despite Lamar's mediocre performance, okay to score nineteen points. They win.

0:48:10.160 --> 0:48:15.879
<v Speaker 2>Week six against the Giants. Lamar has two late turnovers,

0:48:15.920 --> 0:48:20.520
<v Speaker 2>including one horrible one, and they lose because of it.

0:48:21.160 --> 0:48:25.720
<v Speaker 2>And then yesterday against Cleveland, Lamar throws for one twenty

0:48:27.680 --> 0:48:31.160
<v Speaker 2>and he ran the ball for sixty yards. That was fine.

0:48:31.600 --> 0:48:36.840
<v Speaker 2>But we've got to be able to have multiple thoughts

0:48:36.840 --> 0:48:41.240
<v Speaker 2>at once that one of them can be The folks

0:48:41.280 --> 0:48:43.399
<v Speaker 2>that said Lamar would never make it as an NFL

0:48:43.520 --> 0:48:46.840
<v Speaker 2>quarterback were obviously wrong. A lot of them made themselves

0:48:46.880 --> 0:48:53.560
<v Speaker 2>look incredibly foolish. And also say, Lamar now in year four,

0:48:54.719 --> 0:48:58.040
<v Speaker 2>is it year four? Year five? This is you know

0:48:58.040 --> 0:49:01.320
<v Speaker 2>what I'm no, this is year five, Lamar, because Mahomes

0:49:01.360 --> 0:49:04.279
<v Speaker 2>is in year six, Lamar is the fifth year. Yeah,

0:49:04.320 --> 0:49:09.720
<v Speaker 2>this year five, Lamar. Now in year five, we wish

0:49:09.840 --> 0:49:14.320
<v Speaker 2>he would be a little more sophisticated as a passer,

0:49:15.760 --> 0:49:19.480
<v Speaker 2>and that in gotta have it, gotta have passing situations

0:49:19.800 --> 0:49:25.080
<v Speaker 2>that he had evolved more. Those are fair. Lamar's unanimous

0:49:25.160 --> 0:49:28.480
<v Speaker 2>MVP year he had thirty six touchdown six picks in

0:49:28.520 --> 0:49:32.080
<v Speaker 2>a one to thirteen rating, The next year twenty six

0:49:32.200 --> 0:49:36.400
<v Speaker 2>to nine touchdowns, interceptions in ninety nine rating, last year

0:49:36.800 --> 0:49:39.719
<v Speaker 2>sixteen to thirteen and an eighty seven rating. Well, he

0:49:39.800 --> 0:49:43.000
<v Speaker 2>was hurt this year thirteen to six and a ninety

0:49:43.000 --> 0:49:46.520
<v Speaker 2>two rating, better than last year, but still worse than

0:49:47.239 --> 0:49:50.040
<v Speaker 2>his second and third year. Those things can be true,

0:49:50.040 --> 0:49:53.040
<v Speaker 2>and people can't be afraid to say it just because

0:49:54.440 --> 0:49:58.240
<v Speaker 2>you feel like he got unfairly criticized. It's like patronizing

0:49:58.840 --> 0:50:02.160
<v Speaker 2>the way he's talked to sometimes. So with all that said,

0:50:02.719 --> 0:50:05.399
<v Speaker 2>he's still, without a doubt, one of the ten best

0:50:05.480 --> 0:50:09.400
<v Speaker 2>quarterbacks in the league. And those guys get extensions. Damn,

0:50:09.480 --> 0:50:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Kyler Murray got an extension. I'm not sure he's one

0:50:11.560 --> 0:50:13.960
<v Speaker 2>of the fifteen best quarterbacks in the league. So Lamar's

0:50:14.040 --> 0:50:19.120
<v Speaker 2>earned the extension, but he's got to play better, all right, next?

0:50:19.239 --> 0:50:19.600
<v Speaker 3>All Right.

0:50:19.640 --> 0:50:21.839
<v Speaker 4>Two weeks ago, Josh Allen at three hundred and seventy

0:50:21.920 --> 0:50:24.359
<v Speaker 4>yards in the first half. This week, Joe Burrow had

0:50:24.400 --> 0:50:26.960
<v Speaker 4>three forty five. Both had an opportunity to break the

0:50:26.960 --> 0:50:28.719
<v Speaker 4>single game record but cooled off pretty late.

0:50:28.920 --> 0:50:30.400
<v Speaker 3>Who's eventually breaking the record?

0:50:30.520 --> 0:50:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Alan or Burrow? All right? And this record has stood

0:50:33.600 --> 0:50:37.600
<v Speaker 2>since nineteen fifty one. Norm van Brockln said it. I

0:50:37.640 --> 0:50:39.839
<v Speaker 2>thought it was nineteen fifty four, but I might be wrong. No,

0:50:39.880 --> 0:50:41.399
<v Speaker 2>I probably just have that wrong in my head. Because

0:50:41.400 --> 0:50:43.880
<v Speaker 2>the record's five hundred and fifty four yards. It's crazy

0:50:43.920 --> 0:50:47.279
<v Speaker 2>that a passing record has stood for seventy years. The

0:50:47.560 --> 0:50:50.919
<v Speaker 2>odds are neither breaking, But of those two, the more

0:50:51.000 --> 0:50:56.920
<v Speaker 2>likely one is Joe Burrow. And here's why. Because Josh Allen.

0:50:56.960 --> 0:50:59.480
<v Speaker 2>When he did what he did a few weeks ago,

0:50:59.640 --> 0:51:02.160
<v Speaker 2>his defense was shutting down the opponent and they just

0:51:02.160 --> 0:51:04.799
<v Speaker 2>went and cruise control the rest of the way. Yesterday,

0:51:04.840 --> 0:51:07.480
<v Speaker 2>when Burrow did what he did, his team allowed ten

0:51:07.520 --> 0:51:10.160
<v Speaker 2>points at the end of the half and he almost

0:51:10.200 --> 0:51:13.000
<v Speaker 2>had to sling it around some more. I trust the

0:51:13.040 --> 0:51:15.239
<v Speaker 2>Bills depense so much more in the Bengals offense the

0:51:15.280 --> 0:51:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Bengals defense that I think it's way more likely that

0:51:19.480 --> 0:51:24.160
<v Speaker 2>a game that Joe Burrow is on fire that it's

0:51:24.160 --> 0:51:26.799
<v Speaker 2>still a close game late because the reason nobody has

0:51:26.840 --> 0:51:29.560
<v Speaker 2>broken this record, it's not because nobody could. It's because

0:51:29.760 --> 0:51:32.040
<v Speaker 2>there's been a lot of instances like this where a

0:51:32.080 --> 0:51:34.880
<v Speaker 2>guy's in the four hundreds midway through and late in

0:51:34.920 --> 0:51:38.319
<v Speaker 2>the third, but they yeah up thirty and so they

0:51:38.400 --> 0:51:40.080
<v Speaker 2>just put it in cruise control. I thought he was

0:51:40.080 --> 0:51:43.960
<v Speaker 2>going to break it yesterday when Atlanta scored those points

0:51:43.960 --> 0:51:45.160
<v Speaker 2>at the end of the half to make it twenty

0:51:45.160 --> 0:51:46.719
<v Speaker 2>eight to seventeen. I was like, he's gonna break this

0:51:46.800 --> 0:51:49.799
<v Speaker 2>damn record. But he didn't. Obviously, all right, next all right, the.

0:51:49.840 --> 0:51:50.879
<v Speaker 3>Jets are five and two.

0:51:50.880 --> 0:51:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Win.

0:51:51.120 --> 0:51:54.399
<v Speaker 4>Zach Wilson still hasn't lost Meanwhile, Gino Smiths just went

0:51:54.440 --> 0:51:57.120
<v Speaker 4>into LA and took out Justin Herbert and the Chargers,

0:51:57.200 --> 0:51:59.680
<v Speaker 4>who supposedly had the NFL's most talented roster.

0:52:00.480 --> 0:52:03.000
<v Speaker 3>More surprising start Jets of the Seahawks.

0:52:05.080 --> 0:52:08.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna say the Jets, but they're both shocking. And

0:52:08.640 --> 0:52:12.040
<v Speaker 2>if we go back to we want to talk about

0:52:12.040 --> 0:52:14.200
<v Speaker 2>my worst bets ever, let me find it.

0:52:14.200 --> 0:52:16.440
<v Speaker 4>Really, I think the Seahawks probably make you feel better.

0:52:17.200 --> 0:52:19.640
<v Speaker 4>What do you mean as far as like their story

0:52:19.719 --> 0:52:23.440
<v Speaker 4>this season, well with their success makes you feel I'm.

0:52:23.320 --> 0:52:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Just mad at myself though, because if you remember, you

0:52:27.600 --> 0:52:30.640
<v Speaker 2>know I was fading Russ so much, and then I

0:52:30.760 --> 0:52:33.080
<v Speaker 2>just assigned the Seahawks being like the worst team in

0:52:33.120 --> 0:52:35.440
<v Speaker 2>the league. And I should have been like, hold on,

0:52:35.520 --> 0:52:38.600
<v Speaker 2>like those two things from your conflict problem. But when

0:52:38.640 --> 0:52:42.480
<v Speaker 2>I talk about a terrible bet, remember before the year

0:52:42.920 --> 0:52:45.840
<v Speaker 2>when I did that one. So I did one big

0:52:45.920 --> 0:52:50.279
<v Speaker 2>parlay of make playoffs and miss playoffs the make one.

0:52:50.360 --> 0:52:54.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm feeling all right about Ken City, Baltimore, Indian San Francisco. Now,

0:52:54.600 --> 0:52:58.160
<v Speaker 2>INDI's losing to the Titans this week. Indy might screw

0:52:58.239 --> 0:53:00.600
<v Speaker 2>me on that, but I think the Niners gonna be fine.

0:53:00.640 --> 0:53:04.800
<v Speaker 2>Baltimore can't sitting gonna make playoffs? My miss playoffs bet?

0:53:05.120 --> 0:53:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Now I'm looking at these I had Denver missed the

0:53:07.600 --> 0:53:10.960
<v Speaker 2>playoffs of plus money. Those great bet. Cleveland missed the

0:53:10.960 --> 0:53:13.759
<v Speaker 2>playoffs at minus one seventy. That was a great bet.

0:53:13.920 --> 0:53:17.360
<v Speaker 2>But I did that one parlay. And these were the

0:53:17.400 --> 0:53:20.080
<v Speaker 2>four teams I had. And I think right now, if

0:53:20.120 --> 0:53:22.080
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs started today, they might all.

0:53:21.840 --> 0:53:24.520
<v Speaker 3>Be in New England.

0:53:25.120 --> 0:53:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, I remember that in Atlanta. Yeh, who's alive?

0:53:29.120 --> 0:53:33.839
<v Speaker 2>The Jets and the Seahawks. Now they none of those

0:53:33.880 --> 0:53:36.839
<v Speaker 2>teams are locks, but one of them is gonna make it.

0:53:37.040 --> 0:53:40.000
<v Speaker 2>And I'm gonna lose that bet. So that's uh, but

0:53:40.120 --> 0:53:41.040
<v Speaker 2>it go ahead. What were you?

0:53:41.320 --> 0:53:43.160
<v Speaker 4>I was just about to say, like this NFL season

0:53:43.280 --> 0:53:45.920
<v Speaker 4>seems like none of the teams were really what you expected,

0:53:46.080 --> 0:53:48.920
<v Speaker 4>or like anybody expected them to be before the season started.

0:53:48.960 --> 0:53:52.200
<v Speaker 4>Like a lot of bad teams or supposedly bad teams,

0:53:52.200 --> 0:53:53.520
<v Speaker 4>turned out to be good, and a lot of teams

0:53:53.560 --> 0:53:56.040
<v Speaker 4>that you thought were gonna be great a right, are

0:53:56.200 --> 0:53:59.040
<v Speaker 4>very mediocre, I guess with Aaron Rodgers and Tom Brady.

0:53:59.160 --> 0:54:05.239
<v Speaker 2>So I'm I'm looking at my preseason when my preseason totals.

0:54:05.960 --> 0:54:08.239
<v Speaker 2>So I had Baltimore at ten and a half as

0:54:08.280 --> 0:54:11.440
<v Speaker 2>a strong over. That one's gonna come down to the wire.

0:54:12.320 --> 0:54:14.440
<v Speaker 2>I had Indy at nine and a half as an

0:54:14.719 --> 0:54:18.440
<v Speaker 2>over that's gonna lose. I had Jacksonville at six and

0:54:18.480 --> 0:54:21.959
<v Speaker 2>a half as an over. I still think they're gonna

0:54:22.000 --> 0:54:24.319
<v Speaker 2>get there. We'll talk about them in a minute. I

0:54:24.320 --> 0:54:26.120
<v Speaker 2>had KC at ten and a half as an over

0:54:26.360 --> 0:54:29.560
<v Speaker 2>that's gonna win easily. I had New England at eight

0:54:29.560 --> 0:54:31.759
<v Speaker 2>and a half as an under that's gonna come down

0:54:31.760 --> 0:54:35.120
<v Speaker 2>to the wire. I had the Giants at seven and

0:54:35.160 --> 0:54:38.920
<v Speaker 2>a half as an under. That's lost, that's dead, that's gone.

0:54:39.320 --> 0:54:41.520
<v Speaker 2>I had the Niners at nine and a half as

0:54:41.560 --> 0:54:44.200
<v Speaker 2>an over that's gonna come down to the wire. And

0:54:44.280 --> 0:54:47.440
<v Speaker 2>I had Tampa at eleven and a half as my

0:54:47.600 --> 0:54:51.800
<v Speaker 2>strongest under, and that one's almost already won, you know

0:54:51.880 --> 0:54:54.560
<v Speaker 2>what I mean. They're three and four at eleven and

0:54:54.600 --> 0:54:58.200
<v Speaker 2>a half, the six losses and that's in. So I'm

0:54:58.200 --> 0:55:01.160
<v Speaker 2>gonna do okay on a lot of it's gonna come

0:55:01.200 --> 0:55:04.080
<v Speaker 2>down to week seventeen or eighteen. I'm gonna do good

0:55:04.120 --> 0:55:09.240
<v Speaker 2>on my miss playoffs make playoffs bets. The Patriots again,

0:55:09.400 --> 0:55:12.680
<v Speaker 2>I had missing the playoffs, so I need them to

0:55:13.000 --> 0:55:16.120
<v Speaker 2>fall apart. And then, if you remember, I did the

0:55:16.800 --> 0:55:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Division winner parlay of Buffalo, Kansas City, and Indy at

0:55:21.160 --> 0:55:25.000
<v Speaker 2>plus six hundred. Indy losing two to the Titans might

0:55:25.080 --> 0:55:27.680
<v Speaker 2>kill that bet, so that one might be dead. And

0:55:27.719 --> 0:55:30.200
<v Speaker 2>then I had the Kansas City San Francisco super Bowl

0:55:30.239 --> 0:55:32.880
<v Speaker 2>at fifty to one, and they added McCaffrey in the

0:55:33.000 --> 0:55:36.080
<v Speaker 2>NFC like so that one. So I'm gonna do okay

0:55:37.000 --> 0:55:39.640
<v Speaker 2>on those. We'll see how they will update you on

0:55:39.719 --> 0:55:42.239
<v Speaker 2>those later on in the year. But looking at those,

0:55:42.280 --> 0:55:44.680
<v Speaker 2>to answer this question, I didn't see the Jets or

0:55:44.680 --> 0:55:47.320
<v Speaker 2>the Falcons coming. What was the question, Jets are Seahawks.

0:55:47.840 --> 0:55:50.759
<v Speaker 2>I probably should have seen the Seahawks coming more. The Jets, though,

0:55:50.800 --> 0:55:53.080
<v Speaker 2>did just lose bresee Hall, They're awesome. Running back to

0:55:53.120 --> 0:55:57.160
<v Speaker 2>an acl, Zach Wilson still has Zach Wilson thrown for

0:55:57.239 --> 0:56:00.399
<v Speaker 2>two hundred yards in any of these games. I'm gonna

0:56:00.480 --> 0:56:02.600
<v Speaker 2>check real quick, and then I know we're so late today,

0:56:02.920 --> 0:56:06.400
<v Speaker 2>but it's in say it again week five through He

0:56:06.520 --> 0:56:09.040
<v Speaker 2>did I feel like it? You feel like it? Or

0:56:09.080 --> 0:56:10.680
<v Speaker 2>you were just told that you're just saying it off

0:56:10.680 --> 0:56:12.400
<v Speaker 2>the top of your head. All right, you were right.

0:56:12.440 --> 0:56:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Week five he threw for two to ten. Oh yeah,

0:56:14.600 --> 0:56:16.920
<v Speaker 2>and the first one against Pittsford threw for two to fifty.

0:56:17.120 --> 0:56:19.200
<v Speaker 2>It's the last two weeks he's thrown for one te

0:56:20.360 --> 0:56:23.520
<v Speaker 2>uh So the Jets are They're both pretty shocking, but

0:56:23.560 --> 0:56:25.720
<v Speaker 2>the Jets are more shocking. All right, last one?

0:56:26.160 --> 0:56:30.720
<v Speaker 4>All right, sadness, you once again bet on the Jags

0:56:30.719 --> 0:56:32.959
<v Speaker 4>and they once again choked away.

0:56:32.960 --> 0:56:36.200
<v Speaker 2>A little later, another fumble going into the end zone.

0:56:36.280 --> 0:56:40.200
<v Speaker 2>I just can't believe this team. I can't believe this team.

0:56:40.440 --> 0:56:43.400
<v Speaker 4>As your son, it is my responsibility to hold an

0:56:43.480 --> 0:56:46.399
<v Speaker 4>intervention or delete fox bet app off of your phone

0:56:46.440 --> 0:56:47.080
<v Speaker 4>while you're sleep.

0:56:47.239 --> 0:56:49.200
<v Speaker 2>You don't have to do either. I'm done betting on

0:56:49.200 --> 0:56:52.799
<v Speaker 2>the Jets. We go for at least a month. I'm

0:56:52.840 --> 0:56:55.760
<v Speaker 2>not for at least a month. I can't do it anymore.

0:56:56.160 --> 0:56:59.640
<v Speaker 2>I can't. This team's up four, they won't kick a

0:56:59.680 --> 0:57:02.759
<v Speaker 2>field to go up seven. They're fumbling going into the

0:57:02.840 --> 0:57:08.280
<v Speaker 2>end zone. They're just it's just heartbreaking watching this team.

0:57:08.480 --> 0:57:12.520
<v Speaker 2>It is heartbreaking watching this team play the Jags. And

0:57:12.600 --> 0:57:14.799
<v Speaker 2>I know I keep saying, you know, I'll hurry. It

0:57:15.040 --> 0:57:17.680
<v Speaker 2>shows so long today I apologize. I just want to

0:57:17.680 --> 0:57:23.400
<v Speaker 2>tell you. Week one against Washington, the Jacksonville Jaguars have

0:57:23.520 --> 0:57:26.640
<v Speaker 2>the lead. Is that yeah? At the two minute warning.

0:57:27.240 --> 0:57:31.760
<v Speaker 2>They lose. Week four against Philly, they are up fourteen

0:57:31.800 --> 0:57:35.160
<v Speaker 2>to nothing. Before you even get home to watch the game,

0:57:35.640 --> 0:57:38.440
<v Speaker 2>they lose, and I was in on that one. Week

0:57:38.600 --> 0:57:46.480
<v Speaker 2>five against Houston, Houston has six points with four minutes left.

0:57:47.520 --> 0:57:52.960
<v Speaker 2>They have another goal line turnover. They lose. Week six

0:57:53.920 --> 0:57:59.640
<v Speaker 2>against Indy, they have the lead with thirty seconds left.

0:58:00.760 --> 0:58:06.760
<v Speaker 2>They lose. Week seven against the Giants, they have the

0:58:06.880 --> 0:58:12.920
<v Speaker 2>lead with six minutes left. They lose. So this seems

0:58:12.960 --> 0:58:17.800
<v Speaker 2>should be god dog five and two. They're two and five.

0:58:18.400 --> 0:58:21.120
<v Speaker 4>Not to play Devil's advocate, but you don't like them

0:58:21.160 --> 0:58:23.960
<v Speaker 4>against the Broncos this week they're at a fan They're

0:58:23.960 --> 0:58:25.760
<v Speaker 4>favored four in London.

0:58:26.240 --> 0:58:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Are they really favored by four?

0:58:28.160 --> 0:58:29.920
<v Speaker 3>Yep? No, I'm not.

0:58:30.040 --> 0:58:32.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm told you listen it might be Brett Ripping against

0:58:32.600 --> 0:58:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Trevor Lawrence. I no, I'm done. I'm not betting the

0:58:35.840 --> 0:58:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Jags until Thanksgiving. We will keep me to this. I'm

0:58:41.120 --> 0:58:43.640
<v Speaker 2>not betting them. I'm not including them in my picks

0:58:43.920 --> 0:58:48.000
<v Speaker 2>until at least Thanksgiving. We need a hard reset on

0:58:48.040 --> 0:58:51.320
<v Speaker 2>the Jacksonville Jaguars. We answer your guys questions from the chat.

0:58:51.400 --> 0:58:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Next What's Right? All right, welcome back. In What's Right?

0:58:59.120 --> 0:59:01.720
<v Speaker 2>Nick Right? Final segment, We're gonna answer questions here. I'll

0:59:01.720 --> 0:59:04.080
<v Speaker 2>try to do these quickly since this show, this is

0:59:04.080 --> 0:59:05.800
<v Speaker 2>gonna be our first show that's over an hour and

0:59:05.840 --> 0:59:08.800
<v Speaker 2>ten minute runtime. A lot going on. Demanse's had some

0:59:08.960 --> 0:59:12.600
<v Speaker 2>issues in this segment having the right dock open. Do

0:59:12.640 --> 0:59:16.400
<v Speaker 2>you have the one with the live questions on there

0:59:16.800 --> 0:59:19.560
<v Speaker 2>or do we need to switch it? No, I've got it,

0:59:19.640 --> 0:59:20.600
<v Speaker 2>You've got it, all right.

0:59:20.600 --> 0:59:22.920
<v Speaker 3>We're starting off with armand armand.

0:59:22.560 --> 0:59:25.200
<v Speaker 2>All right, what's armand want to know armand says Demonse,

0:59:25.240 --> 0:59:25.800
<v Speaker 2>a big fan.

0:59:26.040 --> 0:59:28.200
<v Speaker 4>What are your thoughts on the Celtics after one week?

0:59:28.680 --> 0:59:31.600
<v Speaker 4>There's a question for Demanse. Yeah, okay, well this is

0:59:31.640 --> 0:59:32.920
<v Speaker 4>your team, your Celtics.

0:59:32.920 --> 0:59:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead, what are your thoughts?

0:59:33.920 --> 0:59:34.760
<v Speaker 3>And I love it? Man?

0:59:34.920 --> 0:59:39.080
<v Speaker 4>I think that uh, I love the Celtics obviously. I

0:59:39.120 --> 0:59:41.400
<v Speaker 4>think that Jason Tatum got that wake up call that

0:59:41.440 --> 0:59:42.800
<v Speaker 4>he needed, and he got a little bit of a

0:59:43.320 --> 0:59:44.520
<v Speaker 4>taste of what it's like.

0:59:44.480 --> 0:59:46.160
<v Speaker 3>To play in the championship last year, and I think

0:59:46.160 --> 0:59:47.320
<v Speaker 3>that he's come with it this year.

0:59:47.600 --> 0:59:50.840
<v Speaker 4>But sadly, I I mean, obviously there hasn't been enough

0:59:50.840 --> 0:59:52.440
<v Speaker 4>of the season. I think that if they don't make

0:59:52.480 --> 0:59:55.760
<v Speaker 4>it this year, that it's like problematic in the following years.

0:59:55.800 --> 0:59:58.919
<v Speaker 3>But always right with him, I hope you're uh.

0:59:58.840 --> 1:00:02.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean Tatum. Listenatum's averaging thirty five a game. Yeah,

1:00:02.040 --> 1:00:05.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's obviously way too early for MVP discussions,

1:00:05.440 --> 1:00:08.000
<v Speaker 2>but Tatum has been as good as anyone in the

1:00:08.040 --> 1:00:10.640
<v Speaker 2>league through three games, right, and they're three and oh.

1:00:10.880 --> 1:00:12.520
<v Speaker 3>And I also bet on him to hit the first

1:00:12.520 --> 1:00:13.000
<v Speaker 3>shot today.

1:00:13.920 --> 1:00:16.400
<v Speaker 2>You're doing first on make sure you're talking to the mic.

1:00:16.480 --> 1:00:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Still you're doing first shot bets?

1:00:19.760 --> 1:00:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I did three of them actually in the same game.

1:00:23.640 --> 1:00:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Well, yeah, it's no A decreases the.

1:00:27.000 --> 1:00:29.960
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't not when you're betting five bucks apiece.

1:00:30.080 --> 1:00:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, know whether you're doing five okay, but just so

1:00:32.480 --> 1:00:37.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, your best case scenario is losing two and

1:00:37.680 --> 1:00:38.200
<v Speaker 2>winning one.

1:00:39.040 --> 1:00:41.520
<v Speaker 4>I understand that what are the odds with the first

1:00:41.520 --> 1:00:43.640
<v Speaker 4>shot bets? If Al Horford hits the shot, I get

1:00:43.720 --> 1:00:46.560
<v Speaker 4>seventy bucks? Let me, can I look at them? I

1:00:46.600 --> 1:00:49.200
<v Speaker 4>profit off of every single one, all right? Maybe fifteen

1:00:49.240 --> 1:00:50.320
<v Speaker 4>bucks on one of them.

1:00:50.400 --> 1:00:52.480
<v Speaker 2>But it's like, okay, but so here's the all right,

1:00:52.600 --> 1:00:55.960
<v Speaker 2>so I get so you have you have Zach Levine

1:00:55.960 --> 1:00:58.320
<v Speaker 2>at plus seven to fifty, Tatum at plus four to ten,

1:00:58.920 --> 1:01:02.360
<v Speaker 2>and al Horford at plus thirteen hundred. So can I

1:01:02.400 --> 1:01:05.160
<v Speaker 2>tell you how how to do this? Not how to

1:01:05.200 --> 1:01:06.600
<v Speaker 2>do this, but how to do the math on it.

1:01:06.640 --> 1:01:12.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying, So you have risked fifteen dollars, right, so,

1:01:12.640 --> 1:01:16.520
<v Speaker 2>but seven fifty and four ten add those things together,

1:01:17.560 --> 1:01:22.160
<v Speaker 2>so we're at twelve or eleven sixty plus thirteen hundred,

1:01:22.640 --> 1:01:26.760
<v Speaker 2>so we're it call it twenty five. So you you're

1:01:26.960 --> 1:01:31.200
<v Speaker 2>twenty five to three over the course of the three bets.

1:01:31.440 --> 1:01:33.720
<v Speaker 2>So you're getting essentially the way to look at it

1:01:33.800 --> 1:01:37.600
<v Speaker 2>is this, You are getting about plus eight hundred on

1:01:37.680 --> 1:01:40.120
<v Speaker 2>the group. You understand what I'm saying, So you're getting

1:01:40.120 --> 1:01:44.840
<v Speaker 2>about eight to one that Lavine, Tatum, or Horford will

1:01:44.880 --> 1:01:47.880
<v Speaker 2>make the first basket. Not terrible. Okay, now look at

1:01:47.920 --> 1:01:50.200
<v Speaker 2>it like that. It's not terrible. Well, you got to

1:01:50.280 --> 1:01:53.040
<v Speaker 2>you gotta make sure because the Tatum thing is plus

1:01:53.080 --> 1:01:56.200
<v Speaker 2>four to ten, so he's only four to one and

1:01:56.280 --> 1:01:59.720
<v Speaker 2>if he makes it, it's really only let's you get

1:01:59.720 --> 1:02:02.560
<v Speaker 2>the lead payout, but also you lose the other ones.

1:02:02.840 --> 1:02:06.520
<v Speaker 2>So it's really the Tatum one is really only like

1:02:06.560 --> 1:02:10.120
<v Speaker 2>plus two to ten for you because you lose the

1:02:10.160 --> 1:02:11.680
<v Speaker 2>other two bets. You understand what I'm saying.

1:02:11.720 --> 1:02:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, I definitely would just I get it.

1:02:13.000 --> 1:02:14.240
<v Speaker 2>But okay, that's not terrible though.

1:02:14.240 --> 1:02:16.960
<v Speaker 3>All right, next, all right, so he got Laane Kerr.

1:02:17.600 --> 1:02:20.120
<v Speaker 4>If Nick, if Nick's lock of the week is wrong

1:02:20.160 --> 1:02:22.480
<v Speaker 4>again this week, he should have to wear the Beverly jersey.

1:02:22.680 --> 1:02:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that's never happened. Never happens made Patrick jersey. Well,

1:02:27.800 --> 1:02:30.240
<v Speaker 2>of course they don't sell those. No one's gonna go

1:02:30.320 --> 1:02:32.360
<v Speaker 2>to the store and give me a Patrick Reverlue jersey.

1:02:32.360 --> 1:02:37.080
<v Speaker 2>It has to be custom made. I can't believe I've

1:02:37.120 --> 1:02:38.360
<v Speaker 2>lost six locks in a row.

1:02:38.840 --> 1:02:41.160
<v Speaker 3>Whoa, I love that. Yeah, that's crazy.

1:02:41.680 --> 1:02:44.040
<v Speaker 2>It's I've lost six locks in a row. So this

1:02:44.200 --> 1:02:46.520
<v Speaker 2>week I think the Miami one I lost by half point.

1:02:46.560 --> 1:02:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead.

1:02:47.000 --> 1:02:49.320
<v Speaker 4>Somebody tweeted me and said that, uh, I think that

1:02:49.400 --> 1:02:51.720
<v Speaker 4>Demonse Bird should take over the Locks of the week.

1:02:52.160 --> 1:02:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well that's great. I'm glad somebody tweeted you and

1:02:55.520 --> 1:02:55.920
<v Speaker 2>said that.

1:02:56.080 --> 1:02:59.640
<v Speaker 4>Next, all right, Jonathan says, if Daniel Jones is still bad,

1:02:59.680 --> 1:03:02.160
<v Speaker 4>then Lawrence shouldn't be on an NFL roster.

1:03:02.600 --> 1:03:04.800
<v Speaker 3>Gap between the two this season has been enormous.

1:03:05.040 --> 1:03:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Test I test, Jonathan.

1:03:07.160 --> 1:03:09.760
<v Speaker 4>Good question, Jonathan, it's not even a question, it's a statement,

1:03:09.880 --> 1:03:10.880
<v Speaker 4>A good statement.

1:03:10.560 --> 1:03:14.640
<v Speaker 2>He Jonathan, save that for your own podcast. I'm out

1:03:14.640 --> 1:03:17.960
<v Speaker 2>here telling you we're not doing quarterback wins. Trevor Lawrence

1:03:18.000 --> 1:03:20.680
<v Speaker 2>is obviously better than Daniel Jones. I'm not gonna debate it.

1:03:21.000 --> 1:03:23.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm not gonna I'm not gonna I'm not gonna engage

1:03:23.440 --> 1:03:26.000
<v Speaker 2>in any of this nonsense. Show sounds dumb.

1:03:25.880 --> 1:03:26.480
<v Speaker 3>When we do that.

1:03:26.560 --> 1:03:30.080
<v Speaker 4>Next, all right, Holden says, Hey, Nick, I'm a freshman

1:03:30.160 --> 1:03:31.960
<v Speaker 4>right now at New House, just like you were. I

1:03:32.080 --> 1:03:34.800
<v Speaker 4>was wondering what advice you could give me, What advice

1:03:34.840 --> 1:03:36.600
<v Speaker 4>you could give to a freshman like me wants to

1:03:36.600 --> 1:03:37.640
<v Speaker 4>be a part of the industry.

1:03:37.880 --> 1:03:39.040
<v Speaker 3>Thanks. I really love your work.

1:03:39.160 --> 1:03:43.880
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, that's a longer talk than we have

1:03:43.920 --> 1:03:45.440
<v Speaker 2>time for right here, because I gotta get to the

1:03:45.480 --> 1:03:47.880
<v Speaker 2>TV show. What I would say is, you're already ahead

1:03:47.920 --> 1:03:51.160
<v Speaker 2>of the game, watching this podcast and going to Syracuse.

1:03:51.200 --> 1:03:53.280
<v Speaker 2>Of course, we're really just watching the podcast. Good for you,

1:03:53.320 --> 1:03:58.480
<v Speaker 2>buddy at Syracuse. Specifically, but this is forever school. Get

1:03:58.520 --> 1:04:01.160
<v Speaker 2>involved in as much as the student as you can.

1:04:01.560 --> 1:04:04.560
<v Speaker 2>But the real piece of advice I would give to

1:04:04.640 --> 1:04:07.120
<v Speaker 2>young people that want to do something like this is

1:04:07.240 --> 1:04:13.120
<v Speaker 2>start doing it and do not concern yourself with following

1:04:13.800 --> 1:04:16.760
<v Speaker 2>or followers or subscribers. And I know that sounds weird

1:04:16.760 --> 1:04:20.480
<v Speaker 2>because I'm always begging for subscribers or whatever different ballgames. Yeah,

1:04:20.520 --> 1:04:25.360
<v Speaker 2>And in fact, I would argue doing it without a

1:04:25.480 --> 1:04:30.840
<v Speaker 2>following is a positive right now because we all are

1:04:31.160 --> 1:04:34.360
<v Speaker 2>terrible at it in the beginning, terrible. So you want

1:04:34.360 --> 1:04:36.280
<v Speaker 2>to be able to find your voice. You want to

1:04:36.320 --> 1:04:39.919
<v Speaker 2>be able to find what your niche is going to be,

1:04:40.200 --> 1:04:44.400
<v Speaker 2>and doing it in anonymity is super useful. So if

1:04:44.440 --> 1:04:47.960
<v Speaker 2>you want, like starting a YouTube page and starting a podcast,

1:04:48.160 --> 1:04:50.680
<v Speaker 2>but do not worry about if the only person listening

1:04:50.720 --> 1:04:53.720
<v Speaker 2>to it is your family, It doesn't matter. You just

1:04:53.760 --> 1:04:57.200
<v Speaker 2>need to get the reps. Like, it takes so long

1:04:57.760 --> 1:05:01.160
<v Speaker 2>to just not suck at this that you want to

1:05:01.200 --> 1:05:04.000
<v Speaker 2>get as many reps as possible while you're in school.

1:05:04.400 --> 1:05:07.200
<v Speaker 2>That way you're closer to not sucking when you get

1:05:07.200 --> 1:05:10.640
<v Speaker 2>out of school. So that it is the It is

1:05:10.680 --> 1:05:13.880
<v Speaker 2>so hard to cut through in this like saturated environment,

1:05:14.120 --> 1:05:16.480
<v Speaker 2>especially if you're doing it totally on your own. So

1:05:16.640 --> 1:05:18.840
<v Speaker 2>still the best way to do it is to get

1:05:18.880 --> 1:05:21.440
<v Speaker 2>good enough to have somebody hire you that already has

1:05:21.760 --> 1:05:24.120
<v Speaker 2>an audience in a platform. The way to do that

1:05:24.240 --> 1:05:26.760
<v Speaker 2>is to get the reps in. And if you're at Syracuse,

1:05:26.760 --> 1:05:29.680
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't recommend War strongly enough. And if you work

1:05:29.720 --> 1:05:32.640
<v Speaker 2>at War or you go there, stop by the talk

1:05:32.680 --> 1:05:34.520
<v Speaker 2>show studio which is named after me and as my

1:05:34.600 --> 1:05:35.280
<v Speaker 2>picture on the wall.

1:05:35.480 --> 1:05:40.000
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, you heard that? Holding all right, Dan asked Demonsey.

1:05:40.040 --> 1:05:43.640
<v Speaker 4>Will you be watching the Celtics Bulls Nets Celtics Bulls

1:05:43.720 --> 1:05:49.080
<v Speaker 4>Nets Grizzlies or Monday Night Football tonight. I'm definitely watching

1:05:49.120 --> 1:05:49.919
<v Speaker 4>the Celtics game.

1:05:50.240 --> 1:05:52.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean I gotta be there for at least the

1:05:52.480 --> 1:05:53.040
<v Speaker 3>first shot.

1:05:53.360 --> 1:05:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Oh oh, right shot, you're locked in. But we got

1:05:57.400 --> 1:06:03.040
<v Speaker 2>the this is actually where our office setup is perfect

1:06:03.680 --> 1:06:07.120
<v Speaker 2>and that we've got We've got three TVs in like

1:06:07.160 --> 1:06:11.080
<v Speaker 2>an upside down triangle, so we'll have Monday Night football

1:06:11.120 --> 1:06:14.600
<v Speaker 2>on the main screen, and then we'll have various NBA

1:06:14.760 --> 1:06:18.440
<v Speaker 2>games that we kind of recycled through the top screen.

1:06:18.880 --> 1:06:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Uh so demands will be able to watch all of them.

1:06:21.320 --> 1:06:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Nets Grizzlies. Hold on a second, Wait a minute, that

1:06:24.440 --> 1:06:27.520
<v Speaker 2>game better, that game's in, the game's got to be

1:06:27.560 --> 1:06:30.920
<v Speaker 2>in Memphis, right if that game's in Okay, yeah, Memphis.

1:06:30.960 --> 1:06:32.880
<v Speaker 2>I was gonna be like, go to the game, Go

1:06:32.920 --> 1:06:35.360
<v Speaker 2>to the game. You know where we are going on Thursday?

1:06:35.840 --> 1:06:43.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh boy, the boy Gaga to the soccer thing, the

1:06:43.920 --> 1:06:44.520
<v Speaker 3>World Cup.

1:06:45.120 --> 1:06:48.360
<v Speaker 2>No, that's in Qatar and it doesn't start for.

1:06:48.520 --> 1:06:54.400
<v Speaker 4>Oh Nets Nets, Mavericks, Nets, MAVs, Luca Nets, MAVs.

1:06:54.440 --> 1:06:57.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna miss the first quarter of Bucks Ravens in

1:06:57.920 --> 1:06:59.960
<v Speaker 2>order to watch watch Luca in person.

1:07:00.440 --> 1:07:03.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm very excited for you and us. Yeah, but uh,

1:07:03.400 --> 1:07:05.160
<v Speaker 4>did you see the past.

1:07:04.880 --> 1:07:05.880
<v Speaker 3>That he threw? Yeah?

1:07:06.000 --> 1:07:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that was a pass or a shot?

1:07:07.480 --> 1:07:09.120
<v Speaker 3>I think it was on pass.

1:07:09.320 --> 1:07:11.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what it was, but it was. If

1:07:11.120 --> 1:07:13.080
<v Speaker 2>it's it's one of the greatest passes ever.

1:07:13.160 --> 1:07:15.000
<v Speaker 4>Lucas said that there's no way that I'm going up

1:07:15.000 --> 1:07:17.800
<v Speaker 4>for a layup and not hitting the back toward not hitting.

1:07:17.240 --> 1:07:19.840
<v Speaker 2>It's a good take. You know, that's a great take.

1:07:19.880 --> 1:07:22.600
<v Speaker 2>All right, there's been an excellent show. Oddly enough, it

1:07:22.720 --> 1:07:25.080
<v Speaker 2>started with Demonse furious with me because I had the

1:07:25.080 --> 1:07:27.720
<v Speaker 2>audacity to be mad at him forgetting for forgetting part

1:07:27.760 --> 1:07:31.080
<v Speaker 2>of the equipment. But we rallied, oh you were mad,

1:07:31.400 --> 1:07:33.320
<v Speaker 2>but you were mad, buddy.

1:07:33.160 --> 1:07:34.880
<v Speaker 3>I've actually got a piece to speak on that.

1:07:35.040 --> 1:07:38.240
<v Speaker 2>We go ahead, No we need go ahead, go ahead,

1:07:38.360 --> 1:07:41.240
<v Speaker 2>go ahead, say whatever you want, air it out here.

1:07:41.640 --> 1:07:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Demonse forgot his AirPods, and I got annoyed.

1:07:43.760 --> 1:07:45.640
<v Speaker 3>Dreams come true here No.

1:07:45.680 --> 1:07:47.680
<v Speaker 2>Demanse forgot his air pods and I and I had

1:07:47.680 --> 1:07:49.760
<v Speaker 2>the audacity he'd be like, well that's a problem. You

1:07:49.840 --> 1:07:52.120
<v Speaker 2>need them, and he all angry stopped.

1:07:51.800 --> 1:07:54.360
<v Speaker 3>Because it comes to the pod.

1:07:54.880 --> 1:07:58.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, you you don't feel like I'm pretty I'm pretty

1:07:58.600 --> 1:07:58.920
<v Speaker 4>on it.

1:07:59.200 --> 1:08:00.760
<v Speaker 3>You are like I'm pretty on.

1:08:00.680 --> 1:08:02.760
<v Speaker 4>It in the one time for me to like, I

1:08:02.840 --> 1:08:05.640
<v Speaker 4>just sound like I forgot my whole case. I brought

1:08:05.640 --> 1:08:07.560
<v Speaker 4>the case and the AirPods aren't in you we're in

1:08:07.560 --> 1:08:09.280
<v Speaker 4>it all the ones o cheese.

1:08:09.440 --> 1:08:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Well all I said, listen, I said, I said, that's

1:08:12.760 --> 1:08:15.440
<v Speaker 2>a big problem. I and you know what, I stand

1:08:15.440 --> 1:08:18.200
<v Speaker 2>by it. Big problem. You got no one.

1:08:18.280 --> 1:08:19.559
<v Speaker 3>Maybe they could have told me that it was the

1:08:19.600 --> 1:08:20.440
<v Speaker 3>bills earlier.

1:08:20.520 --> 1:08:23.479
<v Speaker 2>Were exactly right. They could have been like, hey, dummy,

1:08:23.520 --> 1:08:26.400
<v Speaker 2>you look ridiculous right now. So I was like, do

1:08:26.439 --> 1:08:29.080
<v Speaker 2>you want my AirPod? Like, what do you want? Monzi's all.

1:08:30.000 --> 1:08:32.479
<v Speaker 2>We were like ninety seconds to Air America and de

1:08:32.560 --> 1:08:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Monse was angry. He was like, I don't know, man,

1:08:35.479 --> 1:08:37.560
<v Speaker 2>maybe it's just me. I could tell He's like, you

1:08:37.680 --> 1:08:40.320
<v Speaker 2>always picking on me, finding something I did wrong. I

1:08:40.360 --> 1:08:42.639
<v Speaker 2>forget one thing, make a big deal out of it.

1:08:42.760 --> 1:08:45.800
<v Speaker 2>And Demonse also was sharp because I we were on

1:08:45.840 --> 1:08:47.880
<v Speaker 2>a pre show call and I hung up the call

1:08:48.280 --> 1:08:50.160
<v Speaker 2>and I said to him, was like, Yo, are you upset?

1:08:50.560 --> 1:08:52.559
<v Speaker 2>And de Monse was like, Yo, man, we have hot mics.

1:08:53.400 --> 1:08:56.799
<v Speaker 2>I don't really want to talk about it all that happened,

1:08:56.960 --> 1:09:01.840
<v Speaker 2>but you rally. I love you. Great job, good job,

1:09:01.920 --> 1:09:04.320
<v Speaker 2>all right, we will be back on Thursday. Have a

1:09:04.360 --> 1:09:15.320
<v Speaker 2>great day, everybody,